华硕ROG Zephyrus M16笔记本电脑评测。一个全面的游戏包

Name: Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Brand: Asus

当风神玩游戏的时候。 凭借Core i9-12900H、RTX 3070 Ti和DDR5内存，Zephyrus M16包含一些强大的硬件。我们的广泛测试表明，在Alder Lake和RTX 30xx一代的末期，这款游戏笔记本电脑是否仍然能够给人留下深刻印象。

Christian Hintze (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 02/18/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Alder Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook

M16(2022)GU603zw继承了其同名的前辈，用一个强大的i9 Alder Lake CPU和RTX 3070 Ti，升级了包装。 RTX 3070 Ti.所有这些都是在一个相当苗条和紧凑的16英寸外形尺寸，16:10显示屏（2,560 x 1,500像素），只是勉强错过了我们的最佳移动游戏笔记本电脑名单，因为它的重量只有75克（约2.6盎司）太多（>2公斤=4.4磅）。这本来是列表中的第一个16英寸设备。

由于采用16:10显示屏的16英寸游戏笔记本电脑仍然是少数，我们在比较中也包括具有类似硬件的 "传统 "16:9设备。除了前辈外，这些设备特别是申克视界16 Pro和联想Legion 5 Pro，但也有申克XMG Focus 16和 Corsair Voyager a1600.

Test device courtesy of Asus

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z (ROG Zephyrus M16 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i9-12900H 14 x 1.8 - 5 GHz, 90 W PL2 / Short Burst, 90 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-H

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 120 W TDP ( including 20 W Dynamic Boost), Geforce 528.24, MUX Switch + Optimus

Memory

32 GB

, 1x 16 GB Samsung DDR5-4800 plus 1x 16 GB soldered

Display

16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, BOE0A0B (BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY3), IPS, glossy: no, HDR, 165 Hz

Mainboard

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH

Storage

Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, 1024 GB

, 960 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Connections

3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: headset port, Card Reader: MicroSD

Networking

Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 19.9 x 355 x 243

Battery

90 Wh Lithium-Ion, 90WHrs, 4S1P, 4-cell Li-ion

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: 720P HD IR camera for Windows Hello
Primary Camera: 1 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 2x 2W stereo speakers, Keyboard: Backlit chiclet keyboard with single-zone RGB, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.075 kg, Power Supply: 761 g

Price

3000 Euro

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
87.8 %	02/2023	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	19.9 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
85.6 %	06/2021	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	2 kg	20 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
87.8 %	11/2022	SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	1.7 kg	17.1 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
87.7 %	10/2022	Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2.6 kg	26.6 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
87 %	01/2023	SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	2.2 kg	24.3 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
86.6 %	12/2022	Corsair Voyager a1600 R9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	2.4 kg	19.9 mm	16.00"	2560x1600

案例--超薄16英寸游戏笔记本

由于该案几乎没有任何变化，我们向您介绍一下我们在2021年对M16的测试的测试，该测试对外壳、维护选项和输入设备进行了详细描述。

尺寸比较

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Corsair Voyager a1600 Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti DIN A4 ❌

连接设备 - HDMI 2.1和Thunderbolt 4

左边：AC、HDMI 2.1 TMDS、GigabitLAN、USB-A 3.2 Gen2、USB-C/Thunderbolt 4（包括DP和PD）、USB-C 3.2 Gen2（包括DP和PD）、耳机接口

右边。USB-A 3.2 Gen2, microSD读卡器, Kensington锁

SD卡阅读器

SC读卡器仅限于microSD卡，但至少我们的AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60可以紧紧地贴在一起，而不会伸出来。与已经表现良好的前代产品相比，速度又有了小幅提升。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	138.1 (127.28^min - 140.64^max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=100, last 2 years)	98.4 MB/s -29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	96 MB/s -30%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	84.86 MB/s -39%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H (AV Pro V60)	78.2 MB/s -43%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	77 (59.03^min - 141.54^max) MB/s -44%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	261.31 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	187 MB/s -28%
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=94, last 2 years)	121.3 MB/s -54%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	89.78 MB/s -66%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	86.79 MB/s -67%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H (AV Pro V60)	82.5 MB/s -68%

沟通

华硕使用英特尔AX211模块，它也支持6-Ghz网络。与前代的联发科模块相比，传输速率明显增加。性能非常稳定。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Corsair Voyager a1600 Qualcomm WCN685x	1875 (859^min - 1931^max) MBit/s +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1596 (1559^min - 1632^max) MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1569 (594^min - 1673^max) MBit/s -2%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti MediaTek RZ616	1483 (1373^min - 1637^max) MBit/s -7%
Average of class Gaming (648 - 1878, n=77, last 2 years)	1477 MBit/s -7%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (632 - 1851, n=173)	1371 MBit/s -14%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Corsair Voyager a1600 Qualcomm WCN685x	1780 (896^min - 1840^max) MBit/s +32%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1576 (1508^min, 1508^P1 - 1653^max) MBit/s +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1347 (1002^min - 1458^max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1793, n=153, last 2 years)	1272 MBit/s -6%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (464 - 1861, n=186)	1243 MBit/s -8%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1655 (1550^min - 1681^max) MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1637 (829^min - 1653^max) MBit/s -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti MediaTek RZ616	1576 (1546^min - 1644^max) MBit/s -5%
Average of class Gaming (853 - 1857, n=79, last 2 years)	1516 MBit/s -8%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (883 - 1857, n=172)	1489 MBit/s -10%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Qualcomm WCN685x	886 (444^min - 941^max) MBit/s -46%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1694 (1645^min, 1645.58^P1 - 1715^max) MBit/s +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1619 (1564^min - 1655^max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming (685 - 1890, n=159, last 2 years)	1403 MBit/s -13%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (582 - 1890, n=186)	1394 MBit/s -14%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Qualcomm WCN685x	852 (425^min - 931^max) MBit/s -47%

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1596 (1559-1632)

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti MediaTek RZ616; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1483 (1373-1637)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1655 (1550-1681)

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti MediaTek RZ616; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1575 (1546-1644)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø548 (470-602)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø697 (360-761)

网络摄像头

ColorChecker Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z: 19.46 ∆E min: 3.32 - max: 29.53 ∆E

显示屏 - 16英寸，QHD+，165赫兹

尽管它与前代产品的基本规格相同（16英寸，IPS，16:10，2,560 x 1,600，165 Hz），但华硕现在使用了不同的面板。这次没有使用来自友达光电的面板，而是来自京东方。虽然面板甚至略微更亮（481尼特），但亮度分布更不均匀，尤其是左下角的亮度大大降低。由于黑值的明显改善，对比度值有了积极的增加。

响应时间相对较快，尽管前代产品在这里的响应速度更快。PWM不用于亮度控制，一些轻微的屏幕渗漏只在黑暗场景中明显。


498 cd/m²	534 cd/m²	527 cd/m²
464 cd/m²	497 cd/m²	483 cd/m²
436 cd/m²	449 cd/m²	441 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BOE0A0B (BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY3) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 534 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 481 cd/m² Minimum: 28.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 484 cd/m²
Contrast: 2367:1 (Black: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.53 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 3.53
ΔE Greyscale 1.74 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
83.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 3)

	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z BOE0A0B (BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY3), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H AU Optronics AUOC199, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti N160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) BOE NE16oQDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Corsair Voyager a1600 BOE0A3B, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Display			-15%	-15%	-14%	-14%
Display P3 Coverage	92.8		68.7 -26%	67.3 -27%	68.3 -26%	68.7 -26%
sRGB Coverage	98.5		96.7 -2%	96.1 -2%	96.6 -2%	98.2 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	83.1		70 -16%	69.5 -16%	70.6 -15%	70.1 -16%
Response Times		39%	-37%	-51%	-62%	-36%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	7.6 ?(3.4, 4.2)	4.8 ?(2, 2.8) 37%	14.3 ?(6.8, 7.5) -88%	14.4 ?(7.6, 6.8) -89%	16.4 ?(7.4, 9) -116%	13 ?(7, 6) -71%
Response Time Black / White *	10 ?(4.6, 5.4)	6 ?(2, 4) 40%	8.6 ?(3.9, 4.7) 14%	11.2 ?(6, 5.2) -12%	10.8 ?(5, 5.8) -8%	10 ?(5, 5) -0%
PWM Frequency
Screen		-28%	-34%	-11%	-40%	-21%
Brightness middle	497	448 -10%	364 -27%	522.8 5%	460 -7%	355 -29%
Brightness	481	446 -7%	347 -28%	503 5%	442 -8%	340 -29%
Brightness Distribution	82	86 5%	89 9%	84 2%	89 9%	91 11%
Black Level *	0.21	0.48 -129%	0.3 -43%	0.41 -95%	0.32 -52%	0.53 -152%
Contrast	2367	933 -61%	1213 -49%	1275 -46%	1438 -39%	670 -72%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.53	2.76 22%	3.3 7%	2.47 30%	3.65 -3%	2.43 31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.15	7.09 -15%	6.6 -7%	6.56 -7%	7.49 -22%	4.31 30%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	3.53	2.86 19%	2.5 29%	0.61 83%	3.65 -3%	1.14 68%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.74	3.1 -78%	5.2 -199%	3 -72%	5.87 -237%	2.62 -51%
Gamma	2.2 ^100%	2.153 ^102%	2.14 ^103%	2.27 ^97%	2.42 ^91%	2.28 ^96%
CCT	6418 ^101%	6826 ^95%	6331 ^103%	6719 ^97%	6711 ^97%	6909 ^94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		87
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		100
Total Average (Program / Settings)		6% / -16%	-29% / -30%	-26% / -17%	-39% / -38%	-24% / -22%

* ... smaller is better

华硕宣传100%覆盖DCI-P3色彩空间，但我们测得 "只有 "92.8%。AdobeRGB色彩空间的覆盖率仍为83%。至少在我们选定的竞争对手的测试领域中，这仍然导致了顶级的位置。总的来说，这款显示器也适合于图片和视频的专业编辑。

在交付状态下，面板已经被很好地校准了。只有1.74，灰度的DeltaE值特别低。在ColorChecker中，我们的Portrait Display Calman色彩校准工具测得的偏差略高。额外的校准并没有进一步改善这些数值，而是把已经非常好的灰度弄得一团糟。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4.6 ms rise
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
7.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3.4 ms rise
7.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

尽管显示屏的亮度很好，但你仍应避免在户外被阳光直射，并确保你从正面直视屏幕，因为否则能见度会迅速下降。

即使从极端的视角看，也能轻松阅读显示内容。当从侧面看屏幕时，亮度比从顶部或底部观察角度看时要低。

性能 - 120瓦的RTX 3070-Ti略低于平均水平

ROG Zephyrus有各种设备配置。据称，M16也将很快配备英特尔第13代CPU和RTX 40xx，而我们的测试设备仍然使用了一个酷睿i9-12900H和RTX 3070 Ti.

另外，几乎任何东西都有可能从RTX 3050 Ti到 RTX 3080 Ti.在处理器方面，你目前有以下选择 i7-12700H和我们的顶级型号。该设备由32GB内存完成，但这里也有许多选择。

测试条件

华硕Armoury Crate软件允许你调整笔记本电脑的各种设置，所以用户应该熟悉这个。它提供了寻找设备更新的选项，选择多彩和动态的Aura壁纸，或控制性能。

制造商提供了三种性能模式（安静、性能和涡轮），还提供了使用Windows性能模式控制性能的选项，甚至可以在手动模式下自己设置几个功率限制--这些选项是许多其他制造商所缺乏的。

由于在Turbo模式下，笔记本电脑在空闲运行时已经非常响亮，我们在 "性能 "模式下运行所有基准测试。安静 "模式只用于电池测试--没有单独的省电模式。

尽管软件本身组织得很好，但各种翻译错误或不完整的句子（在德语版本中）仍然妨碍了一个良好的整体印象。

处理器

华硕已经宣布M16采用英特尔Gen13。在这之前，我们目前仍在使用Intel Core i9-12900H在我们的测试单元中。该高端CPU提供6个性能核心和8个效率核心。性能核心的时钟速度高达5GHz，而效率核心的基本时钟速度为1.8GHz。由于只有P核心支持超线程，我们总共得到12个线程。

在Cinebench循环中，恒定性能非常稳定，在性能模式下最大TDP达到约84瓦。的性能i7-12700H在非常强大的XMG Focus 16在开始的时候甚至略胜一筹。但在最新的第4次运行后，它的性能下降到我们的M16以下，它也击败了Ryzen 7 6800在Legion 5.

顺便说一下，而不是84瓦，在Turbo模式下有强大的99瓦!在电池运行期间，这只有大约40瓦，性能也相应下降。

在所有的测试中，2022年的M16比前代的i9-11900H快20%左右。i9-11900H.

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2532 (2431.02-2585.82)

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H: Ø2351 (2324.37-2366.02)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2440 (2338.36-2692.88)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming	81.7 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	77.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	74.8 pt
Average Intel Core i9-12900H	72.9 pt
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	67.7 pt
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	67.6 pt
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	64 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H ^-2! Intel Core i9-11900H	61.6 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34613, n=232, last 2 years)	19581 Points +23%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	17378 Points +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	15870 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (7359 - 19648, n=26)	15137 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	14660 (14400.8^min - 14660.4^max) Points -8%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	13445 Points -15%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	12979 Points -18%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	1871 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1634 - 1921, n=26)	1822 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2235, n=230, last 2 years)	1816 Points -3%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	1802 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	1775 Points -5%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	1554 Points -17%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1543 Points -18%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=230, last 2 years)	7442 Points +23%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	6358 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	6053 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (2681 - 7471, n=26)	5705 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	5661 Points -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H	5160 Points -15%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	5152 Points -15%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	4994 Points -17%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	715 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (624 - 738, n=26)	705 Points -1%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	699 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming (169 - 855, n=230, last 2 years)	699 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	689 Points -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H	603 Points -16%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	599 Points -16%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	596 Points -17%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=235, last 2 years)	3101 Points +20%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	2756 (2001.6^min - 2029.74^max) Points +7%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	2030 (2001.6^min - 2029.74^max) Points -22%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	2693 (2338.36^min - 2692.88^max) Points +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	2586 (2431.02^min - 2585.82^max) Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1395 - 3077, n=26)	2468 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	2366 (2324.37^min - 2366.02^max) Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H	2211 (1875.21^min - 2210.56^max) Points -15%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	2161 Points -16%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 318, n=234, last 2 years)	268 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	263 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (235 - 277, n=27)	262 Points 0%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	261 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	256 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	248 Points -6%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	245 Points -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H	236 Points -10%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	261 Seconds * -34%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H	243 Seconds * -25%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (160 - 451, n=26)	232 Seconds * -19%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	227 Seconds * -16%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	213 Seconds * -9%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	211 Seconds * -8%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=228, last 2 years)	198.9 Seconds * -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	195 Seconds *

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=229, last 2 years)	77274 MIPS +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	66057 MIPS
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	64817 MIPS -2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	64403 MIPS -3%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	62024 MIPS -6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (34684 - 76677, n=26)	60982 MIPS -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H	54156 MIPS -18%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	51281 MIPS -22%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	6192 MIPS
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=229, last 2 years)	6133 MIPS -1%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	5858 MIPS -5%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (5302 - 6289, n=26)	5836 MIPS -6%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	5805 MIPS -6%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	5803 MIPS -6%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	5764 MIPS -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H	5582 MIPS -10%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=234, last 2 years)	13627 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	12753 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (8519 - 14376, n=27)	12083 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	12058 Points -5%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	10846 Points -15%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	10355 Points -19%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	10040 Points -21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H	9663 Points -24%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	1841 Points
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	1821 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2210, n=234, last 2 years)	1811 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1631 - 1892, n=27)	1797 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	1737 Points -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H	1624 Points -12%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1566 Points -15%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	1481 Points -20%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=232, last 2 years)	21.3 fps +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	18.9 fps
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	18.5 fps -2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	18 fps -5%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (8.05 - 22.5, n=26)	17.1 fps -10%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	16.8 fps -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H	15 fps -21%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	13.8 fps -27%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	57.2 s * -36%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	52.8 s * -25%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=226, last 2 years)	49.1 s * -16%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	44.1 s * -5%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	43.3 s * -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (36.8 - 59.8, n=26)	42.6 s * -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	42.2 s *
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H	40.5 s * +4%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H	0.544 sec * -25%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	0.4897 sec * -13%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	0.4894 sec * -12%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 4.47, n=229, last 2 years)	0.4687 sec * -8%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4685 sec * -8%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4582 sec * -5%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (0.4218 - 0.506, n=26)	0.4551 sec * -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	0.4352 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2586 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

276 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

263 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming	92.9 pt
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	90.4 pt
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	87.1 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	82.5 pt
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	78 pt
Average Intel Core i9-12900H	67.5 pt
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	67.2 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H ^-9! Intel Core i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	0 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (3069 - 60169, n=225, last 2 years)	18634 KRay/s +21%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	17031 KRay/s +11%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	15798 KRay/s +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	15387 KRay/s
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	15068 KRay/s -2%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	12459 KRay/s -19%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (4074 - 18289, n=26)	11009 KRay/s -28%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	105987 Points +41%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	99931 Points +33%
Average of class Gaming (18567 - 252486, n=225, last 2 years)	93571 Points +25%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	81613 Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	74919 Points
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	62698 Points -16%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (22307 - 93236, n=26)	54468 Points -27%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=225, last 2 years)	4332 MB/s +22%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	3902 MB/s +10%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	3634 MB/s +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	3545 MB/s
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	3410 MB/s -4%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1378 - 4215, n=26)	3042 MB/s -14%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2895 MB/s -18%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=225, last 2 years)	109573 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	106322 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	105420 Points
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	105203 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	102320 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (78172 - 111241, n=26)	100783 Points -4%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	89788 Points -15%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	13039 Points +37%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	12842 Points +35%
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=225, last 2 years)	12203 Points +28%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	9727 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	9538 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (5709 - 10410, n=26)	9023 Points -5%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	8476 Points -11%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	58327 Points +60%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	54778 Points +50%
Average of class Gaming (10291 - 134044, n=225, last 2 years)	47882 Points +31%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	38369 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	36496 Points
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	31038 Points -15%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (11257 - 45581, n=26)	28287 Points -22%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	137383 MB/s +7%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	135448 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	128492 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=225, last 2 years)	107712 MB/s -16%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (31935 - 151546, n=26)	85619 MB/s -33%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	76636 MB/s -40%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	61160 MB/s -52%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2409, n=225, last 2 years)	1213 MB/s +22%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	1116 MB/s +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	993 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (449 - 1193, n=26)	933 MB/s -6%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	901 MB/s -9%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	866 MB/s -13%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	835 MB/s -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	0 MB/s -100%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (1518 - 31796, n=225, last 2 years)	10089 KRay/s +21%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	8856 KRay/s +6%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	8438 KRay/s +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	8316 KRay/s
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	8034 KRay/s -3%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	6644 KRay/s -20%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (2235 - 10511, n=26)	6117 KRay/s -26%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	42660 MPixel/s 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	42574 MPixel/s
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=226, last 2 years)	36818 MPixel/s -14%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (20960 - 48269, n=27)	36335 MPixel/s -15%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	30182 MPixel/s -29%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	30047 MPixel/s -29%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	29687 MPixel/s -30%

系统性能

在PCMark中，i9和RTX 3070 Ti的组合为 RTX 3070 Ti在所有基准测试中都处于领先地位，但这也是预期的性能水平。CrossMark基准测试的情况也是如此。

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	7871 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (7087 - 8072, n=6)	7712 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=200, last 2 years)	7592 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7549 Points -4%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7208 Points -8%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	7134 Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7097 Points -10%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	10936 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (10266 - 11663, n=6)	10807 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming (8300 - 12334, n=199, last 2 years)	10731 Points -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	10544 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10472 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	10150 Points -7%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9970 Points -9%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	10187 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (9402 - 10742, n=6)	10153 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9929 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 11833, n=199, last 2 years)	9725 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	9479 Points -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9113 Points -11%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8983 Points -12%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	11881 Points
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	11759 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=199, last 2 years)	11476 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (10009 - 12541, n=6)	11364 Points -4%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11350 Points -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	10097 Points -15%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9777 Points -18%

CrossMark / Overall
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1884 Points
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2334, n=170, last 2 years)	1881 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1664 - 2044, n=6)	1871 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1657 Points -12%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1648 Points -13%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1643 Points -13%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1415 Points -25%

CrossMark / Productivity
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1797 Points
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=170, last 2 years)	1791 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1591 - 1968, n=6)	1784 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1600 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1592 Points -11%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1582 Points -12%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1379 Points -23%

CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2514, n=170, last 2 years)	2046 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2004 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1797 - 2148, n=6)	2004 Points 0%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1829 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1816 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1746 Points -13%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1599 Points -20%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1803 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1514 - 2069, n=6)	1759 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=170, last 2 years)	1704 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1481 Points -18%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1419 Points -21%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1363 Points -24%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1060 Points -41%

PCMark 10 Score		7871 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	63157 MB/s
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	63102 MB/s 0%
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 92565, n=225, last 2 years)	59453 MB/s -6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (34438 - 74264, n=26)	58643 MB/s -7%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	51182 MB/s -19%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	49972 MB/s -21%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	44959 MB/s -29%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	67051 MB/s
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	66149 MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming (24879 - 90647, n=225, last 2 years)	63375 MB/s -5%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (36365 - 74642, n=26)	61370 MB/s -8%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	51778 MB/s -23%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	51270 MB/s -24%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	46043 MB/s -31%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	66275 MB/s
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	65336 MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming (21619 - 103259, n=225, last 2 years)	61670 MB/s -7%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (32276 - 67858, n=26)	58829 MB/s -11%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	55307 MB/s -17%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	55214 MB/s -17%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	48054 MB/s -27%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	95.2 ns * -8%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	92.5 ns * -5%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	91.2 ns * -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	88 ns *
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 152.5, n=222, last 2 years)	87.3 ns * +1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	87.1 ns * +1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (74.7 - 118.1, n=25)	85.4 ns * +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	0 ns * +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

不幸的是，LatencyMon在启动软件时已经发现了第一个延迟，即使没有额外的操作。当用多个标签打开浏览器时，延迟会进一步增加。

我们的4K/60-fps YouTube视频也不能在没有任何丢帧的情况下再现(6)。然而，延迟值总体上并不是特别高，而且低于在 XMG Focus 16，比如说。另一方面，它们变得很明显。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1994.6 μs * -111%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	960 μs * -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	945.7 μs *
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	776 μs * +18%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	773 μs * +18%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	747.7 μs * +21%

* ... smaller is better

存储解决方案

我们的测试模型使用美光公司的PCIe Gen4固态硬盘，存储量为1TB。在我们的最佳固态硬盘列表中，它排在第74位。基准测试证实了该存储解决方案的体面价值。然而，三星存储的测量值在前辈或 Legion 5，则更快。

这款固态硬盘不太能够长期保持其性能，但性能下降的幅度很小。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6585 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 4887 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 724 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 579 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 60.3 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 247 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 2360 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 2313 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	88 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	87.9 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	80 pt
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	79.6 pt
Average of class Gaming	76.1 pt
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	72.6 pt
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	62.5 pt
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	62.2 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4229 (4208.75^min - 4229.47^max) MB/s +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4101 (4091.33^min - 4100.54^max) MB/s +9%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3788 (3770.05^min - 3788.09^max) MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	3764 (3540.2^min - 3763.76^max) MB/s
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3664 (3617.8^min - 3664.36^max) MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=199, last 2 years)	3539 MB/s -6%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (1306 - 4343, n=23)	3283 MB/s -13%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3207 (3148.45^min - 3206.84^max) MB/s -15%
seq write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4767 (4365.51^min - 4766.62^max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4158 (4130.89^min - 4157.81^max) MB/s -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4030 (4011.22^min - 4030.01^max) MB/s -15%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (2416 - 4954, n=23)	3856 MB/s -19%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=199, last 2 years)	3829 MB/s -20%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3481 (3471.23^min - 3481.48^max) MB/s -27%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3377 (3301.76^min - 3376.79^max) MB/s -29%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	2974 (2933.08^min - 2974.1^max) MB/s -38%
seq q8 t1 read
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7090 (6255.18^min - 7089.92^max) MB/s +8%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	6861 (5902.16^min - 6860.74^max) MB/s +5%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	6789 (5989.89^min - 6788.74^max) MB/s +4%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6593 (6284.75^min - 6592.61^max) MB/s +1%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (6207 - 6734, n=23)	6571 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	6550 (5497.59^min - 6549.73^max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming (2268 - 16089, n=199, last 2 years)	6390 MB/s -2%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	6099 (5570.64^min - 6098.73^max) MB/s -7%
seq q8 t1 write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5216 (5094.91^min - 5216.3^max) MB/s +7%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5048 (5040.92^min - 5048.44^max) MB/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	5033 (5015.97^min - 5032.74^max) MB/s +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4969 (4945.26^min - 4969.12^max) MB/s +2%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4939 (4914.28^min - 4939.19^max) MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4876 (4374.87^min - 4876.3^max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=199, last 2 years)	4818 MB/s -1%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (4259 - 4991, n=23)	4807 MB/s -1%
4k q1 t1 read
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	81.1 (79.64^min - 81.05^max) MB/s +9%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	79.8 (79.31^min - 79.75^max) MB/s +7%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	75 (74.44^min - 75.02^max) MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	74.3 (71.59^min - 74.33^max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=199, last 2 years)	67.9 MB/s -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	59.4 (59.37^min - 59.41^max) MB/s -20%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (39.2 - 74.3, n=23)	59.4 MB/s -20%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	58.6 (57.33^min - 58.61^max) MB/s -21%
4k q1 t1 write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	264 (263.57^min - 264.44^max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 421, n=199, last 2 years)	224 MB/s -15%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	194.2 (193.1^min - 194.16^max) MB/s -26%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	190 (189.88^min - 190.32^max) MB/s -28%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (125.8 - 273, n=23)	189.4 MB/s -28%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	156.4 (153.47^min - 156.39^max) MB/s -41%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	140.8 (138.42^min - 140.84^max) MB/s -47%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	138 (136.39^min - 138^max) MB/s -48%
4k q32 t16 read
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4178 (4170.63^min - 4178.12^max) MB/s +46%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4056 (4048.94^min - 4055.97^max) MB/s +42%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3340 (3040.22^min - 3340.46^max) MB/s +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2855 (2482.75^min - 2854.87^max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=199, last 2 years)	2590 MB/s -9%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (636 - 2868, n=23)	2075 MB/s -27%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1404 (1371.85^min - 1404.22^max) MB/s -51%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	895 (882.72^min - 894.69^max) MB/s -69%
4k q32 t16 write
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3559 (3517.38^min - 3559.2^max) MB/s +32%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3478 (3468.35^min - 3478.1^max) MB/s +29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2694 (2561.51^min - 2693.92^max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	2605 (2378.14^min - 2604.93^max) MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=199, last 2 years)	2152 MB/s -20%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (328 - 2786, n=23)	1765 MB/s -34%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	497 (485.81^min - 496.85^max) MB/s -82%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	346 (331.29^min - 346.04^max) MB/s -87%

AS SSD
Score Total
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8923 Points +30%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8563 Points +25%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	7293 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	6864 Points
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=186, last 2 years)	6843 Points 0%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (3998 - 7575, n=21)	6303 Points -8%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5878 Points -14%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3394 Points -51%
Score Read
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3433 Points +34%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (1123 - 26650, n=21)	3402 Points +33%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3208 Points +25%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	2894 Points +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2562 Points
Average of class Gaming (760 - 4721, n=186, last 2 years)	2508 Points -2%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1824 Points -29%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1525 Points -40%
Score Write
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3809 Points +29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3790 Points +28%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3221 Points +9%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=186, last 2 years)	3120 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3019 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2953 Points
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (2373 - 3304, n=21)	2942 Points 0%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1130 Points -62%
Seq Read
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5615 MB/s +66%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5434.9 MB/s +60%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	5347 MB/s +58%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=186, last 2 years)	4963 MB/s +46%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4821 MB/s +42%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4764.72 MB/s +41%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (2201 - 5348, n=21)	4468 MB/s +32%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	3388 MB/s
Seq Write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4297 MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4240 MB/s
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4136 MB/s -2%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4007.79 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=186, last 2 years)	3673 MB/s -13%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (1876 - 4539, n=21)	3311 MB/s -22%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	2725.01 MB/s -36%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2725 MB/s -36%
4K Read
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	75.03 MB/s +44%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	71.79 MB/s +38%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	70.76 MB/s +36%
Average of class Gaming (30.4 - 112.1, n=186, last 2 years)	66.9 MB/s +28%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (40.6 - 67.7, n=21)	58.6 MB/s +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	55.3 MB/s +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	52.1 MB/s
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	49.75 MB/s -5%
4K Write
Average of class Gaming (96.3 - 512, n=186, last 2 years)	211 MB/s +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	205 MB/s
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (97.9 - 242, n=21)	177.9 MB/s -13%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	171.09 MB/s -17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	170.5 MB/s -17%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	168.84 MB/s -18%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	159.04 MB/s -22%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	141.54 MB/s -31%
4K-64 Read
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2817.67 MB/s +30%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2591 MB/s +19%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	2346.64 MB/s +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2171 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (442 - 3475, n=186, last 2 years)	1939 MB/s -11%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (603 - 2264, n=21)	1754 MB/s -19%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1292.41 MB/s -40%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	915.1 MB/s -58%
4K-64 Write
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3239.16 MB/s +39%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3190 MB/s +37%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2807.18 MB/s +21%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	2575.15 MB/s +11%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=186, last 2 years)	2544 MB/s +9%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (1959 - 2807, n=21)	2433 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2324 MB/s
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	556.92 MB/s -76%
Access Time Read
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.078 ms * -50%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=184, last 2 years)	0.05343 ms * -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	0.052 ms *
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (0.023 - 0.089, n=20)	0.04675 ms * +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.04 ms * +23%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	0.039 ms * +25%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.032 ms * +38%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	0.022 ms * +58%
Access Time Write
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.072 ms * -260%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=186, last 2 years)	0.04639 ms * -132%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (0.019 - 0.092, n=21)	0.0369 ms * -85%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.029 ms * -45%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.025 ms * -25%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	0.025 ms * -25%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	0.022 ms * -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	0.02 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH: Ø4741 (3891.45-4949.7)

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø6607 (6029.31-6634.49)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW: Ø4049 (1282.88-6894.75)

图形卡

我们的测试系统使用了一个RTX 3070 Ti。尽管它确实是最强大的笔记本电脑GPU之一，但它 "只 "被允许在M16中使用100W和20W动态提升。当允许使用150瓦时，同样的GPU在M16系统中更快，这并不令人惊讶。Legion 5 Pro的速度，甚至高达27%!

至少，前辈的 RTX 3070(没有 "Ti")超过了38%。这款XMG Vision 16 Pro只允许最大95W的GPU，所以也仍然大大落后于M16。

总的来说，120-W显卡的速度比我们数据库中的平均RTX 3070 Ti慢了约7至12%。

在Turbo模式下，性能和消耗略有增加，另一个Fire-Strike测试的结果是图形得分高出约13%。

在电池运行期间，3D性能明显下降。与主电源运行时Fire Strike 的24,618个图形点相比，在电池运行时只剩下7,348个3D点，这相当于下降了70%!

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	99.7 pt
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	93.4 pt
Average of class Gaming	92.2 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	83.8 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	78.5 pt
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	77.2 pt
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	70.8 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900H	48.9 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	40796 Points +27%
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72070, n=232, last 2 years)	40487 Points +26%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	39075 Points +21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (13799 - 42569, n=36)	35944 Points +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	32236 Points
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	32207 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	29319 Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900H	20039 Points -38%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	181005 Points +28%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	170020 Points +20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	141689 Points
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=142, last 2 years)	136246 Points -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (33126 - 181005, n=25)	130456 Points -8%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	128056 Points -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900H	78290 Points -45%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	31289 Points +27%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	30507 Points +24%
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=236, last 2 years)	29457 Points +20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (22612 - 32550, n=37)	27554 Points +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	24618 Points
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	24322 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	22035 Points -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900H	16628 Points -32%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22547, n=234, last 2 years)	12066 Points +28%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	11923 Points +27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (8142 - 12324, n=37)	10478 Points +11%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	10439 Points +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	9421 Points
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	9057 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	8466 Points -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900H	6059 Points -36%

3DMark 11 Performance		29169 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		59794 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		21717 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		9841 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender
v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU ()	380 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming (51 - 668, n=15, last 2 years)	275 Seconds *
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	63 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	32 Seconds * -14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	28 Seconds *
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	27 Seconds * +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (22 - 30, n=15)	25.3 Seconds * +10%
Average of class Gaming (9 - 142, n=180, last 2 years)	23.1 Seconds * +17%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	22 Seconds * +21%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	54 Seconds * -20%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	45 Seconds * -0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	45 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (36 - 46, n=16)	41.4 Seconds * +8%
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=187, last 2 years)	39.8 Seconds * +12%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	36 Seconds * +20%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	459 Seconds * -40%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	441 Seconds * -34%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	382 Seconds * -16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (285 - 459, n=16)	376 Seconds * -14%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	355 Seconds * -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	329 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=199, last 2 years)	315 Seconds * +4%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

在游戏时，整体上的差异并不是很大，这也是因为在相应的CPU重度游戏中，强大的CPU能够赶上。在GPU重的游戏中，如《Witcher 3 》或《奇异旅》，5Pro的性能是最强的。Legion 5 Pro与其150-W RTX 3070-Ti明显领先。在DOTA 2 Reborn或X-Plane 11.11中，M16能够名列前茅。

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	94.5 pt
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	91 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	90.1 pt
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	84.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	77.9 pt
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	77.8 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	69.2 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=226, last 2 years)	117.1 fps +18%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	117 (106^min) fps +18%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	108 (38^min, 58.3^P0.1, 88.2^P1) fps +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	99.5 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	89.1 (76^min) fps -10%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	84.9 (80^min, 81^P1) fps -15%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	80 fps -20%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	110.1 (6.31^min, 76.9^P1) fps +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	108.1 (4.18^min, 76.9^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (6.38 - 167.7, n=218, last 2 years)	107.4 fps -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	104 (6.17^min, 71.4^P1) fps -4%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	94.7 (8.91^min, 62.5^P1) fps -12%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	92.8 (6.46^min, 55.6^P1) fps -14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	79.4 (10.2^min, 47.6^P1) fps -27%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	115.6 fps +22%
Average of class Gaming (9.13 - 194.9, n=228, last 2 years)	111.4 fps +18%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	97.5 fps +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	94.8 fps
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	91.4 fps -4%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	84.5 fps -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	65.7 fps -31%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	217 (41.5^min, 154.4^P1) fps +32%
Average of class Gaming (14.6 - 421, n=226, last 2 years)	207 fps +26%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	206 (116.9^min, 151.5^P1) fps +26%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	163.8 (35.9^min, 125.2^P1) fps
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	162.6 (46.7^min, 118.8^P1) fps -1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	150.1 (57.7^min, 109.7^P1) fps -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	105 (66.4^min, 72.1^P1) fps -36%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	160.5 (140.4^min) fps
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	146.7 (125.5^min) fps -9%
Average of class Gaming (26.9 - 220, n=238, last 2 years)	142.8 fps -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	139 (109.6^min) fps -13%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	135.7 (118^min) fps -15%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	126.6 (111.8^min) fps -21%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	114.8 (94.7^min) fps -28%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	115 fps
Average of class Gaming (12.4 - 166.2, n=243, last 2 years)	102 fps -11%
SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	101 fps -12%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	99.5 fps -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	86.4 fps -25%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	83.9 fps -27%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	45.3 fps -61%

这款笔记本电脑不支持高级优化，而是支持普通的优化，它还提供一个MUX开关，允许你在集成（或混合模式）和专用GPU之间主动切换。

我们的Witcher 3 循环导致了相对稳定的帧率。竞争对手之间的性能差异在这里变得很明显：虽然Legion 5 Pro的速度要快得多，而申克视讯16专业版几乎没有被超越。

在涡轮模式下（蓝图，测量时间为6分钟），性能大大增加，在某些部分接近Legion 5 Pro的性能。然后，笔记本产生的噪音也同样响亮，你也可以在下面的排放物部分看到。GPU和存储速度增加，功耗也增加到近120W。

随着时间的推移，GPU的时钟速度仍然略有下降，最后平均为1,288 MHz。显卡的温度上升到72 °C (162°F) 左右，而显卡的平均功耗只有 93 W，这与TGP的目标值还有很大差距。

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø91 (74-97)

SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø84.9 (80-93)

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø110.7 (100-116)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø100.7 (96-107)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
GTA V (2015)		184.6	171.4	108.1
The Witcher 3 (2015)	370.2	273.2	171	99.5
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	195.2	174.7	170.2	160.5
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)		123.8	94.8		72.1	43
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	166.8	145.7	115
Far Cry 5 (2018)	174	128	128	124	90
Strange Brigade (2018)	376	227	187.9	163.8
Dying Light 2 (2022)	98.5	79	66		46.7

排放 - 适度的华硕M16

噪声水平

在空闲运行期间，风扇经常被关闭--但不是持续的。不时地，它们可以很容易地转速到47分贝，例如在重启后，当Windows启动时。

在3DMark 06基准测试的第一个场景中，风扇基本保持安静，只有34分贝，而在结束前风扇噪音才增加到47分贝。Schenker Vision 16 Pro 和Legion 5 Pro 能够保持更长时间的安静。

在游戏时，与竞争对手相比，M16的操作仍然相当安静，其中一些产品的噪音水平明显高于50分贝，而M16的噪音水平仍然低于这一水平。然而，这只适用于性能模式。如果你使用Turbo模式，风扇转速几乎达到55分贝，这与Legion 5 Pro的水平相同，并明显高于Vision 16 Pro的声音。

Noise Level

Idle		23 / 24 / 47 dB(A)
Load		47.91 / 50.25 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A)

	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Noise		-8%	8%	-1%	0%	-9%
off / environment *	23	25 -9%	22.9 -0%	23.5 -2%	23 -0%	29.9 -30%
Idle Minimum *	23	25 -9%	24.3 -6%	23.7 -3%	23 -0%	30.5 -33%
Idle Average *	24	31 -29%	24.3 -1%	31.1 -30%	23 4%	30.6 -28%
Idle Maximum *	47	42 11%	24.3 48%	32.2 31%	32.07 32%	30.7 35%
Load Average *	47.91	48 -0%	38.5 20%	38.4 20%	53.7 -12%	44.5 7%
Witcher 3 ultra *	48.91	52 -6%	51 -4%	54.8 -12%	54.58 -12%
Load Maximum *	50.25	56 -11%	51 -1%	54.8 -9%	54.58 -9%	51.1 -2%

* ... smaller is better

温度

在重载的情况下，机箱的顶部和底部会发热到略高于50°C（122°F）。这仍然在通常的范围内，甚至比前代产品略好。的 Legion 5 Pro 在顶部仍然略微凉爽，而 Vision 16 Pro 在底部略微凉一些。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


46 °C	52 °C	48 °C
40 °C	49 °C	42 °C
30 °C	32 °C	30 °C

Maximum: 52 °C
Average: 41 °C


49 °C	50 °C	49 °C
43 °C	51 °C	48 °C
27 °C	34 °C	36 °C

Maximum: 51 °C
Average: 43 °C

Power Supply (max.) 51 °C | Room Temperature 18 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


29 °C	29 °C	28 °C
28 °C	28 °C	27 °C
24 °C	22 °C	23 °C

Maximum: 29 °C
Average: 26.4 °C


33 °C	33 °C	33 °C
31 °C	32 °C	32 °C
22 °C	22 °C	24 °C

Maximum: 33 °C
Average: 29.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 26 °C | Room Temperature 18 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


46 °C	51 °C	48 °C
37 °C	49 °C	41 °C
29 °C	31 °C	30 °C

Maximum: 51 °C
Average: 40.2 °C


48 °C	49 °C	48 °C
43 °C	52 °C	44 °C
27 °C	33 °C	32 °C

Maximum: 52 °C
Average: 41.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 53 °C | Room Temperature 18 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-3.1 °C / -5.6 F).

	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M
Heat		-15%	9%	3%	4%	-7%
Maximum Upper Side *	52	52 -0%	50.8 2%	43.8 16%	50 4%	50.7 2%
Maximum Bottom *	51	53 -4%	46.3 9%	53 -4%	48 6%	54.2 -6%
Idle Upper Side *	29	38 -31%	27.2 6%	30 -3%	28 3%	35.8 -23%
Idle Bottom *	33	41 -24%	26.6 19%	31.8 4%	32 3%	33 -0%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

CPU核心以3.5GHz的频率开始我们的压力测试。几秒钟后，时钟速度开始下降，在2.4GHz左右趋于平缓。温度有所变化，最高为97℃（207°F），平均为83℃（181 °F）。CPU的TDP平均为44W。

显卡速度在500至1600兆赫之间变化很大，平均为838兆赫。存储速度在1.4GHz左右，GPU加热到约70°C（158°F）。我们测量的功耗约为66瓦。

	CPU时钟(GHz)	GPU时钟(MHz)	CPU平均温度(℃)	GPU平均温度(℃)
Prime95 + FurMark压力	2,4	838	83	70
Witcher 3 压力	1.1	1,288	68	72

发言人

华硕在M16的扬声器方面采取了特殊的做法：制造商没有使用通常的立体声扬声器，而是使用了四个扬声器，每个2W，两个用于高频，两个用于低频。这一点变得相当明显，扬声器不仅相对响亮，而且还提供平衡的中音和高音，甚至低音也不像许多竞争对手那样表现不足。

然而，它们仍然不能取代半途而废的外部扬声器。对于模拟音频设备的连接，你可以使用一个组合音频端口。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.96 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理--游戏时效率高，但空闲时不稳定

消耗功率

不幸的是，尽管任务管理器没有显示任何阻碍性进程，但空闲时的消耗量变化很大，变得相当高。即使在长时间运行后，情况也是如此。我们欢迎华硕在这方面进行一些驱动更新。

在游戏时，M16的消耗量出奇的低（144W）。Vision 16 Pro 的消耗量多出8%，而更强大的Legion 5 Pro 甚至多出45%!考虑到Legion 5 的额外性能，这并不十分令人惊讶，但差异的程度却令人惊讶，因为即使是明显较弱的前辈在游戏时也会消耗更多的电力。

如果我们为M16选择Turbo模式，它在游戏时消耗175瓦（《Witcher 3 》）而不是144瓦（蓝图）。这就比Vision 16 Pro略高，但仍低于Legion 5 Pro的209瓦。

我们测量了240W电源的临时负载峰值高达220W，因此这应该足以满足所有的使用场景。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.151 / 3.6 Watt
Idle	10.8 / 17 / 17.8 Watt
Load	116 / 220 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Corsair Voyager a1600 R9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-14%	14%	-30%	-16%	-32%	-23%	-21%
Idle Minimum *	10.8	11 -2%	9 17%	9.7 10%	14.7 -36%	16.9 -56%	14.2 ?(4 - 34.6, n=27) -31%	13.8 ?(2 - 64, n=179, last 2 years) -28%
Idle Average *	17	20 -18%	13.3 22%	14.8 13%	18.6 -9%	20.3 -19%	19.9 ?(8.9 - 43, n=27) -17%	19.2 ?(8 - 67, n=179, last 2 years) -13%
Idle Maximum *	17.8	30 -69%	14.3 20%	45.8 -157%	21.2 -19%	22.2 -25%	26.2 ?(14.3 - 47.3, n=27) -47%	27 ?(9 - 101.1, n=179, last 2 years) -52%
Load Average *	116	111 4%	107 8%	87.2 25%	121 -4%	133.4 -15%	125.8 ?(87.2 - 202, n=27) -8%	111.3 ?(32.1 - 202, n=178, last 2 years) 4%
Witcher 3 ultra *	144	156 -8%	155.2 -8%	209 -45%	174 -21%	206 -43%
Load Maximum *	220	197 10%	172 22%	275.3 -25%	235 -7%		248 ?(160 - 319, n=27) -13%	251 ?(64.5 - 418, n=177, last 2 years) -14%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø143.7 (127.65-153.76)

SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø155.2 (151.5-160.3)

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø209 (199.1-224)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø175.5 (172.3-181.1)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø160.5 (98.84-220.16)

SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø158.8 (152.1-172.1)

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø246 (205-276)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø21.4 (6.343-56.588)

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø11.1 (1.518-17.6)

Power Consumption with External Monitor

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø127.1 (116.71-135.72)

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø157.2 (152.3-159.9)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø124.9 (117.36-132.82)

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø148.9 (148.1-150.4)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø130.6 (127.18-136.05)

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø192.6 (185-198.4)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø134.4 (129.69-138.76)

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø210 (203-221)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø26.5 (24.583-33.509)

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø10.8 (2.24-28.2)

电池寿命

华硕在性能选项中并没有列出任何真正的省电模式。如果你拔掉插头，M16会自动切换到静音模式。

电池容量为90Wh，相比之下还算不错。Vision 16 Pro和Legion 5只提供80Wh的容量。这导致M16的持续时间相应地更长。

根据显示亮度的不同，运行时间也有很大差异。在我们的WiFi测试中，M16的持续时间在5小时（全亮度）和约7.5小时（150尼特）之间。

在看电影时，你可以期待差不多的时间。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing		7h 25min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		5h 00min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		7h 16min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 26min

	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	SCHENKER Vision 16 Pro RTX 3070 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 80 Wh	Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 80 Wh	SCHENKER XMG Focus 16 (i7-12700H, RTX 3060) i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 54 Wh	Corsair Voyager a1600 R9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M, 99 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		9%	-15%	-41%	-21%	3%	-9%
H.264	436		367 -16%			358 -18%	399 ?(56 - 747, n=92, last 2 years) -8%
WiFi v1.3	445	463 4%	361 -19%	264 -41%	286 -36%	350 -21%	368 ?(57 - 745, n=181, last 2 years) -17%
Load	86	97 13%	77 -10%		81 -6%	126 47%	84.2 ?(36 - 173, n=143, last 2 years) -2%
Reader / Idle		799				418	544 ?(57 - 1290, n=83, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 明亮的16:10显示屏，165赫兹

+ 非常好的CPU性能

+ 良好的扬声器

+ 游戏时效率高

+ 合适的电池寿命

Cons

- RTX 3070 Ti略低于平均水平

- 只有一个microSD读卡器

- 风扇控制不太理想

结论 - 一个全面的游戏笔记本电脑，拥有16:10的显示屏

华硕ROG Zephyrus M16是一款整体优化良好的游戏笔记本电脑，没有任何明显的问题领域。除了非常好的CPU性能和体面的电池寿命外，16:10格式的大型16英寸QHD+显示屏也知道如何以其强大的对比度和相当高的色彩空间覆盖率来取悦。

考虑到许多竞争对手完全没有任何SD卡读卡器的事实，我们可以原谅华硕只使用了一个microSD读卡器，特别是因为这里使用的设备相当快。 RTX 3070 TiRTX 3070 Ti只有120W的TGP，但这也意味着笔记本电脑不会变得太热，噪音水平也保持在限制范围内。另一方面，华硕可以优化风扇控制，因为不时地，即使在空闲运行时，风扇也会突然转速达到47分贝。

M16主要是作为一个全面的游戏包来展示自己。尽管它没有提供最大的性能，但该套装的温度和噪音水平都很适中。

那些需要更高的性能的人可以看一下联想Legion 5 Pro或者你可以直接打开M16中同样响亮的Turbo模式，导致这里的性能也有明显的、可测量的提高。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

亚马逊列出了2022年华硕ROG Zephyrus M16的各种配置，起价2249美元。

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z - 2023-02-14 02/14/2023 v7
Christian Hintze

Chassis

85 / 98 → 87%

Keyboard

79%

Pointing Device

86%

Connectivity

67 / 80 → 84%

Weight

63 / 10-66 → 94%

Battery

74 / 95 → 77%

Display

91%

Games Performance

99%

Application Performance

96%

Temperature

81 / 95 → 85%

Noise

66 / 90 → 73%

Audio

89%

Camera

32 / 85 → 38%

Average

78%

88%

Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 510 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 389263 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华硕ROG Zephyrus M16笔记本电脑评测。一个全面的游戏包

Christian Hintze, 2023-02-18 (Update: 2023-02-18)

华硕ROG Zephyrus M16笔记本电脑评测。一个全面的游戏包

潜在的竞争对手比较

案例--超薄16英寸游戏笔记本

尺寸比较

连接设备 - HDMI 2.1和Thunderbolt 4

SD卡阅读器

沟通

网络摄像头

显示屏 - 16英寸，QHD+，165赫兹

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - 120瓦的RTX 3070-Ti略低于平均水平

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

系统性能

DPC延迟

存储解决方案

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

游戏性能

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

排放 - 适度的华硕M16

噪声水平

温度

压力测试

发言人

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z audio analysis

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti audio analysis

电源管理--游戏时效率高，但空闲时不稳定

消耗功率

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

Power Consumption with External Monitor

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论 - 一个全面的游戏笔记本电脑，拥有16:10的显示屏

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Pricecompare