华硕ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY评测--配备RTX 4090的游戏笔记本
随着ROG Strix Scar 18的推出,华硕也加入了18英寸游戏怪物复兴的潮流。在发布会上,有一个新的情况下,与 RTX 4080和 RTX 4090笔记本GPU由我们的测试装置使用。在CPU方面,华硕使用新的HX系列,这意味着你得到了目前市场上最快的笔记本电脑组件。大机箱不仅被18英寸QHD+显示屏完全使用,而且还容纳了一个带有三个风扇的新冷却系统,这应该是为了控制耗电的组件。在下面的测试中,我们详细了解了目前在英国上市的配备RTX 4090、32GB GDDR5内存和2x 1-TB SSD的G834JY-N6005W。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86.6 % | 02/2023 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 3.1 kg | 30.8 mm | 18.00" | 2560x1600 | |
89 % | 02/2023 | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 3.5 kg | 23 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 | |
89.4 % | 02/2023 | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 26 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
91.2 % | 02/2023 | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 21.99 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
86.9 % | 11/2022 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.9 kg | 28.3 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 | |
88.3 % | 08/2022 | MSI Titan GT77 12UHS i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 3.3 kg | 23 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
85.4 % | 03/2023 | HP Omen 17-ck2097ng i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 27 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例
这款机箱应该是通过大量使用RGB LED和透明的机箱元素来实现的。同时,基本设计相对谨慎,相当有吸引力。只有侧面的透明表面看起来有点廉价。底座单元本身是由塑料制成的,并没有给人以高质量的感觉。当把它抬起来的时候,它也会稍微翘起来。另一方面,铝制显示屏盖子明显更稳定,也给显示屏提供了足够的保护。
箱子的大小是由巨大的18英寸显示屏决定的,大大超过了大多数17英寸笔记本电脑。另一方面,基本单元并不十分巨大,使笔记本电脑看起来比实际情况要小一点。
设备
所有的端口都在机箱的左侧和右侧。不幸的是,这在桌面操作中不太理想,因为你总是可以看到电缆。 此外,两个USB-A接口都放在右侧向中间的位置,使得电缆的位置对右手使用鼠标的人来说不太理想。对于左撇子用户来说,网线会碍手碍脚。
我们对连接设备也有一些抱怨。两个USB-C端口中只有一个支持Thunderbolt,另一个支持Power Delivery,但有一些限制。在我们的测试中,MacBook Air M1充电器能够以30瓦的功率为笔记本电脑充电,但在Windows中没有通知。45瓦的Anker Nano 2根本没有为笔记本电脑充电。在积极的一面,我们也要提到2.5G比特的网络连接。
沟通
在通信选项方面,华硕为无线连接提供了M.2格式的快速英特尔Wi-Fi 6E AX211卡,为有线2.5-Gbit LAN连接提供了Realtek RTL8125芯片。在我们的测试中,两者都没有任何干扰,但AX211卡没有找到我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AX11000路由器的6-GHz网络。不幸的是,Wi-Fi 6E在我们的测试中找到网络时仍然是一击即中。
另一方面,Wi-Fi 6网络中的数据速率非常好,没有任何掉线。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1780, n=154, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (464 - 1861, n=175) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average of class Gaming (685 - 1890, n=160, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (582 - 1890, n=175) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average of class Gaming (648 - 1878, n=75, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (632 - 1851, n=167) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average of class Gaming (853 - 1857, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (883 - 1857, n=166) |
网络摄像头
不幸的是,内置的720p高清网络摄像头只能满足视频电话的最低要求。良好的光线条件在这里很重要,因为我们在背光下或黑暗中得到的结果几乎无法使用。
辅料
盒子里只包括一个额外的 "盔甲帽",它可以在显示屏下方的左侧更换。帽子是用磁力固定的,可能是为了给你一个选择,使设备个性化。
维护
ROG Strix G18系列的内部是比较容易从机箱的底部进入的。你首先要卸下许多飞利浦螺丝,然后用撬具松开边缘的塑料夹子。这在我们的测试设备上相对容易做到(从前面的角落开始),幸运的是,打开机箱时没有一个塑料夹子断裂。
在笔记本内部,我们看到两个用于PCIe固态硬盘的M.2-2280插槽(两个都被占用,用于RAID-0系统),一个用于WLAN卡的M.2插槽,以及两个内存插槽(也都被占用),最多可容纳64GB GDDR5内存。所有的风扇也都可以接触到,并且可以很容易地进行清洁。电池是用螺丝固定在机箱内的,所以它应该也比较容易更换。
担保
华硕只提供一年的常规保修(在德国提供的型号为两年)。没有提到更换零件或任何类似的保修。
输入设备
键盘
除了数字块之外,这里使用的全尺寸键盘还包括双倍使用的F1-F12行上面的五个特殊按键。小鸡键提供了足够的键程和安静的行程。在第一次打字测试中,作者达到了每分钟85字的好成绩,准确率为96%。独立按键的内置RGB背光可以通过许多动画进行个性化设置。在N个键的滚动测试中,我们没有看到任何限制(最大达到24个同时按键)。
触摸板
大型触摸板提供了一个玻璃表面和出色的滑动特性。在我们的测试中,多点触控工作无懈可击,下部4/5的区域也可以舒适地点击。然而,在右下角的点击经常被识别为按下鼠标右键,导致一些错误的输入。
显示
根据规格表,新的18英寸显示屏具有众多功能,如G-Sync、240赫兹、QHD+、3毫秒快速响应时间和DCI-P3色彩空间覆盖。在亮度方面,这个大型18英寸显示屏并没有完全达到承诺的500尼特。然而,亮度在室内肯定总是足够的,而且亮度分布也很好,达到86%。我们的测试装置没有显示任何可见的背光渗漏。
|
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 490 cd/m²
Contrast: 907:1 (Black: 0.54 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.97 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 2.97
ΔE Greyscale 7.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
84.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.161
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NE180QDM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1600, 18.00 | Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 AU Optronics B180QAN01.0, IPS, 2560x1600, 18.00 | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI B173ZAN06.C, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 17.30 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W NE173QHM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | 2% | 0% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 97.2 | 96.9 0% | 94.9 -2% | 97.1 0% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 99.8 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.9 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 84.9 | 85.3 0% | 92.4 9% | 84.8 0% |
Response Times | 15% | -410% | -11% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 5.41 ? | 4.2 ? 22% | 38.4 ? -610% | 5.7 ? -5% |
Response Time Black / White * | 8.62 ? | 8 ? 7% | 26.6 ? -209% | 10.1 ? -17% |
PWM Frequency | 2380 ? | |||
Screen | 22% | 74253% | 29% | |
Brightness middle | 490 | 549.6 12% | 606 24% | 320 -35% |
Brightness | 468 | 524 12% | 602 29% | 303 -35% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 89 3% | 93 8% | 87 1% |
Black Level * | 0.54 | 0.53 2% | 0.0001 100% | 0.3 44% |
Contrast | 907 | 1037 14% | 6060000 668037% | 1067 18% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.97 | 3.32 33% | 4.8 3% | 1.1 78% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.02 | 6.63 40% | 8.2 26% | 2.7 75% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.97 | 2.7 9% | 1.8 39% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.2 | 2 72% | 6.5 10% | 1.1 85% |
Gamma | 2.161 102% | 2.29 96% | 2.63 84% | 2.13 103% |
CCT | 6515 100% | 6319 103% | 6596 99% | 6599 98% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 12% /
16% | 24615% /
47676% | 6% /
16% |
* ... smaller is better
测量的色彩空间涵盖了Display-P3色彩空间的97%,因此也适用于高要求的任务(在校准之后)。在色彩准确性方面,结果取决于所使用的预设。在Armory Crate工具中,华硕在GameVisual下提供了四种不同模式:Native、sRGB、DCI-P3和Display P3。在Native模式下,我们的测试设备的显示器有一个很明显的、可测量的蓝色色调,也表现为ΔE值几乎为5。在用我们的i1Pro 3进行校准后,我们取得了明显改善的结果--尤其是在极端值中。校准后,该显示器也适用于图像处理。
在这里使用的NE180QDM-NZ2面板中,显示亮度不是通过PWM控制的,而且我们的测量设备没有发现任何闪烁(在所有的亮度水平上)。我们能够确认在灰色变化期间承诺的3毫秒响应时间。为了实现这一点,华硕使用了最小的超速,但我们没有注意到任何负面影响。因此,结合240赫兹的刷新率,该显示器是游戏的理想选择。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
8.62 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.68 ms rise | |
↘ 4.94 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
5.41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.57 ms rise | |
↘ 2.84 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
由于磨砂显示表面和良好的最大亮度,ROG Strix Scar 18理论上也可以在户外轻松使用。虽然近500尼特对于夏季的明亮阳光来说是不够的,但在阴凉处或晚间的阳光下,就像我们的图片一样,它们是相当足够的。
由于采用了IPS级面板,可视角度非常好。陡峭的视角带来的亮度损失仍在限制范围内,而且主观上不存在明显的色彩失真。
业绩
我们的测试装置Scar 18能够在性能测量中多次得分。华硕使用了目前最快的移动显卡,GeForce RTX 4090,也使最大功耗达到175瓦。华硕在处理器上也没有偷工减料,使用了英特尔的移动顶级型号。该英特尔酷睿i9-13980HX是基于新的猛禽湖系列,提供24个核心和一个相当大的5.6 GHz的最大提升。存储量也很可观,有32GB的DDR5内存。然而,4800MB/s的存储速度比竞争对手的一些型号略低。最后,在一个RAID-0系统中还有两个1TB的固态硬盘。
测试条件
我们在涡轮模式和终极GPU模式下进行了性能测试。利用这一点,RTX 4090的连接通过MUX固定,并最小化地超频了50MHz。此外,我们还测试了性能模式(交付状态下默认)和标准GPU模式(MSHybrid Optimus切换)。
处理器
芯片英特尔酷睿i9-13980HX是目前英特尔用于笔记本电脑的顶级型号。它基于新的Raptor Lake系列,在技术上可与 酷睿i9-13900K台式机处理器.该CPU包含8个具有超线程的猛禽湖性能核心,时钟速度高达5.6GHz。较小的Gracemont Efficiency核心不提供超线程,其时钟速度高达4GHz。总的来说,该CPU能够使用32MB二级缓存,英特尔指定的TDP为157瓦(PL2)和55瓦(PL1)。华硕规定CPU的运行功率为65瓦(PL1),但HWInfo64中的PL1和PL2值显示为175瓦。在基准测试中,CPU开始时为175瓦,然后在96°C(205°F)时进入热极限,之后TDP被降低到135瓦。在静音模式下,TDP被降低到100W/65W,这也导致了性能的大幅下降。
在我们的处理器基准测试中,ROG Strix 18的i9-13980HX也能够勉强领先竞争对手的13900HX和13950HX CPU。然而,这只是涡轮模式的情况,在性能模式下,Strix Scar 18只在新的13000HX CPU的领域中处于中间位置。但即使如此,采用i9-12950HX处理器的旧设备仍被明显超越。
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (28301 - 33052, n=11) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34613, n=239, last 2 years) | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (1825 - 2169, n=9) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2235, n=237, last 2 years) | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (10353 - 12437, n=10) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=237, last 2 years) | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (717 - 825, n=10) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
Average of class Gaming (169 - 855, n=237, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (4358 - 5172, n=11) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=242, last 2 years) | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (289 - 312, n=11) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 318, n=241, last 2 years) |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=235, last 2 years) | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (97 - 136, n=10) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (104616 - 129804, n=10) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=236, last 2 years) | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (6230 - 7163, n=10) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=236, last 2 years) | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (18475 - 22200, n=10) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=241, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (1796 - 2139, n=10) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2193, n=241, last 2 years) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (27 - 33.4, n=9) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=239, last 2 years) | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=233, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (35 - 51.4, n=10) | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 4.47, n=236, last 2 years) | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (0.3793 - 0.4462, n=10) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (21332 - 29553, n=9) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Average of class Gaming (2585 - 60169, n=232, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (108001 - 148168, n=9) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Average of class Gaming (12439 - 252486, n=232, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (5264 - 7142, n=9) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=232, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (126758 - 143409, n=9) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=232, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (13785 - 17117, n=9) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=232, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (53398 - 73758, n=9) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Average of class Gaming (7135 - 134044, n=232, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (105169 - 136520, n=9) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=232, last 2 years) | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (1513 - 2039, n=9) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2409, n=232, last 2 years) | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (11431 - 16325, n=9) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Average of class Gaming (1437 - 31796, n=232, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (37069 - 52949, n=9) | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average of class Gaming (11451 - 60161, n=233, last 2 years) |
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
系统性能
强大的硬件也能在一般的系统性能上得分。在PCMark 10中,Scar 18达到了一个顶级的位置,目前只有强大的台式机和微星Titan GT77 HX 13VI勉强超过。在CrossMark中,其结果也是处于顶级水平。即使一些笔记本电脑能够排在Strix Scar 18的前面,但距离非常小,最多只有4%(微星Titan GT77 12UHS目前是最快的笔记本电脑,而最快的台式机则取得了24%的高分)。
在存储基准测试中,你可以很容易地看到DDR5-4800存储的影响。采用更快的DDR5-5600主存储器的系统,如Razer Blade 16,仍然能够取得明显的优势。这是华硕没有使用现有最快组件的少数领域之一,但在实践中影响相对较小。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (11215 - 11644, n=3) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average of class Gaming (8300 - 12334, n=202, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (10125 - 11067, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average of class Gaming (7244 - 11833, n=202, last 2 years) | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (15052 - 16012, n=3) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=202, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1935 - 2176, n=4) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Average of class Gaming (974 - 2334, n=173, last 2 years) | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1764 - 2005, n=4) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Average of class Gaming (907 - 2204, n=173, last 2 years) | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2267 - 2469, n=4) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
Average of class Gaming (1027 - 2514, n=173, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 2327, n=173, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1556 - 1904, n=4) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 |
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 Score | 8764 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (62189 - 80776, n=9) | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average of class Gaming (23850 - 92565, n=232, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (62624 - 89096, n=9) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average of class Gaming (24879 - 90647, n=232, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (59912 - 79917, n=9) | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
Average of class Gaming (21619 - 103259, n=232, last 2 years) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (79.4 - 93.2, n=9) | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 152.5, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
在DPC延迟方面,华硕笔记本电脑在所有测试的笔记本电脑中只处于中间位置。根据LatencyMon,Nvidia驱动程序在这里出了问题,这可能会在实时应用程序中产生一些问题。我们在Ultimate GPU(无Optimus)的Turbo模式下进行了测试,理论上这比混合模式或省电模式更适合。 不幸的是,在这个设备级别中,DPC性能较弱并不是一个例外。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H |
* ... smaller is better
存储解决方案
华硕在Scar 18 G834JY-N6005W中使用了两个快速的三星PM9A1固态硬盘,每个都有1TB的存储空间,组成RAID-0系统。尽管这样做速度略有提高,但故障的可能性和耗电量也会增加。然而,在与具有相同RAID系统的Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H的比较中,华硕Scar被超越了--甚至以很大的优势。但这并不是因为散热问题,在恒定的负载下,性能保持不变。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
华硕ROG Strix Scar 18中的展示品显然是 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4090 笔记本GPU.虽然这个名字表明与 RTX 4090桌面GPU但该移动版本与 桌面RTX 4080(相同的芯片),而且性能仍然低于 桌面RTX 4070 Ti.但至少,华硕提供了RTX 4090移动版的最快版本,具有175瓦的TGP(150瓦+25瓦的动态提升),甚至将GPU稍微超频了50MHz。
与RTX 4090相比,在MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI相比,Strix G18仍然勉强排在后面,尽管有超频。RTX 4080笔记本电脑也明显被超越,而采用旧的 RTX 3080 Ti 笔记本GPU的顶级型号仍然远远落后。
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (56764 - 73027, n=34) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72070, n=241, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 67702 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 46985 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 277937 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 70984 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 36408 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 24278 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 20166 points | |
Help |
Blender - v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Average of class Gaming (9 - 142, n=173, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (9 - 19, n=32) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W |
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 - GPU | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (873 - 1334, n=25) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Average of class Gaming (55 - 1334, n=193, last 2 years) | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W |
V-Ray 5 Benchmark | |
GPU RTX | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (3115 - 3824, n=25) | |
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average of class Gaming (171 - 3824, n=129, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
GPU CUDA | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2221 - 2797, n=25) | |
Intel Core i9-13900K @253W | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average of class Gaming (120 - 2797, n=132, last 2 years) | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
游戏基准测试显示了与合成基准测试中已经出现的类似情况。作为一个特殊的功能,RTX 4000系列现在还提供了对DLSS 3的支持与帧生成。在支持的游戏中,RTX 4090能够在这里大幅提升帧率。这也使得4K中的光线追踪效果在流畅的帧率下成为可能。然而,显示器的240赫兹只能在要求不高的游戏中,在2,560 x 1,600像素的原生分辨率中得到充分利用。
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Average of class Gaming (6.38 - 167.7, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Average of class Gaming (9.13 - 194.9, n=237, last 2 years) | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Average of class Gaming (14.6 - 421, n=235, last 2 years) | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
Average of class Gaming (26.9 - 220, n=248, last 2 years) |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
Average of class Gaming (12.4 - 166.2, n=253, last 2 years) |
在我们用TheWitcher 3 进行的负载测试以及3DMarkTime Spy 压力测试中,华硕G834JY保持了稳定的性能,没有任何下降。TheWitcher 3 中可见的波动是由于白天和夜晚之间的变化造成的。
The Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K DLSS | 4K | |
Counter-Strike: GO (2012) | 516 | 314 | |||||
GTA V (2015) | 187.4 | 185.7 | 184.8 | 141.3 | 139.1 | 175.7 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 237 | 207.7 | 201.75 | 190.2 | 178.6 | ||
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) | 169 | ||||||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 224 | 208 | 177.6 | 146.7 | 90.1 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 211 | 186.8 | 142.8 | ||||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 197 | 181 | 172 | 158 | 153 | 107 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 496 | 403 | 386 | 366 | 292 | 154.7 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 143.7 | 121.2 | 87.3 | ||||
Control (2019) | 184.4 | 123.2 | 72.6 | ||||
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | 184 | 154 | 145 | 127 | 92 | ||
Flight Simulator 2020 (2020) | 74 | 74 | 96.8 | 51.2 | |||
Battlefield 2042 (2021) | 172.6 | 138.9 | 85.4 | ||||
Halo Infinite (2021) | 128.9 | 77 | 57.3 | ||||
Elden Ring (2022) | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 119.7 | 94.5 | |||||
Vampire Bloodhunt (2022) | 290 | 242 | 138.3 | ||||
F1 22 (2022) | 319 | 308 | 273 | 124.5 | 75 | 42.4 | |
FIFA 23 (2022) | 183.7 | 182.6 | 162.4 | ||||
A Plague Tale Requiem (2022) | 96.8 | 72 | 82.3 | 41 | |||
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection (2022) | 108.2 | 103.1 | 62.9 | ||||
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022) | 170 | 127 | 112 | 81 | |||
Spider-Man Miles Morales (2022) | 109.1 | 103.8 | 73.2 | ||||
Need for Speed Unbound (2022) | 124.2 | 111.8 | 84.3 | ||||
High On Life (2023) | 180.3 | 120.2 | 52 | ||||
The Witcher 3 v4.00 (2023) | 137.6 | 96.6 | 49 |
排放
噪声水平
在负载情况下,三个内置风扇明显在与强大的组件进行斗争。即使噪音特性仍然非常舒适,但高达55.8分贝(风扇在4900、5500和6400 RPM时)仍然非常响亮。在游戏时,良好的扬声器发出的声音会被淹没一些,建议你在这里使用耳机。 如果你在游戏中使用240赫兹的显示屏,并达到高帧率,我们的测试装置不幸地产生了明显的线圈啸叫。这从100帧开始就可以听到,而且根据游戏的不同,会变得有点烦人。
在空闲运行期间,这三个风扇也可以长时间保持关闭状态,但只有在静音模式和使用集成GPU时才会如此。然而,在大多数情况下,它们在冲浪时不会保持完全关闭,但在2000-3000转/分的最低风扇水平是舒适安静的,低于33分贝(A)。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.9 / 32.6 / 32.6 dB(A) |
Load |
| 35.9 / 55.8 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.9 dB(A) |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) | Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024 | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024 | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 8% | -5% | 11% | -9% | -17% | 13% | |
off / environment * | 23.9 | 23.5 2% | 24 -0% | 23 4% | 24.6 -3% | 26 -9% | 23.9 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.9 | 23.8 -0% | 26 -9% | 23 4% | 29.2 -22% | 26 -9% | 23.9 -0% |
Idle Average * | 32.6 | 23.8 27% | 28 14% | 23 29% | 29.2 10% | 34 -4% | 23.9 27% |
Idle Maximum * | 32.6 | 26.8 18% | 34 -4% | 23.6 28% | 29.2 10% | 46 -41% | 23.9 27% |
Load Average * | 35.9 | 37.3 -4% | 47 -31% | 39 -9% | 50.7 -41% | 50 -39% | 34.3 4% |
Load Maximum * | 55.8 | 53.5 4% | 56 -0% | 51.3 8% | 61 -9% | 57 -2% | 45.9 18% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 48 | 55 | 51.6 | 53.3 | 55 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
温度方面的结果好坏参半。机箱中被触及的相关区域,如掌托和键盘,即使在较长的压力情况下也能保持舒适的温度。但在游戏时,机箱顶部区域的热点会相对变热,最高可达55℃(131°F)。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28 °C / 82.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+0.9 °C / 1.6 F).
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 9% | 13% | -23% | -4% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 54 | 40 26% | 40.6 25% | 53 2% | 48.8 10% |
Maximum Bottom * | 46 | 37.6 18% | 41.1 11% | 58 -26% | 52.4 -14% |
Idle Upper Side * | 30 | 32.4 -8% | 26.2 13% | 38 -27% | 30.4 -1% |
Idle Bottom * | 31 | 31.4 -1% | 30.3 2% | 43 -39% | 34.1 -10% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在压力测试中,CPU的内部温度变化很大。这可以追溯到不断调整的时钟速度,它不断将CPU推向接近100℃(212°F)的大关。在GPU方面,情况就不那么严重了,RTX 4090的最高温度只达到了70°C(158°F)。
在游戏时,CPU的温度仍然略微不那么极端。我们测量了81°C(178°F,《赛博朋克2077》)和90°C(194°F,《Witcher 3 》)之间。另一方面,在72°C(162°F,《赛博朋克2077》)和77°C(171°F,《Witcher 3 》)之间,GPU的温度比压力测试时略高。
E-Cores CPU Clock (GHz) | P-CoresCPU Clock (GHz) | GPU Clock (MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | GPU平均温度(℃) | |
系统空闲(静音) | 1.4 | 1.8 | 0 | 42 | 0 |
系统空闲(涡轮) | 1.6 | 2.1 | 210 | 44 | 39 |
Prime95压力(涡轮) | 3 | 3.5 | 210 | 92 | 56 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力(涡轮) | 1.6 | 2.1 | 2260 | 80 | 73 |
Witcher 3 应力 | 3.7 | 4.6 | 1995 | 90 | 77 |
发言人
内置扬声器的低音相对较重,但提供了主观上有吸引力的性能,适合于笔记本电脑的游戏目的。在日常条件下,最大音量也足够大。
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理
消耗功率
由于强大的硬件,该系统的耗电量非常高。最突出的是待机功耗非常高,总是在5瓦和10瓦之间交替出现。故障可能还在于LED照明,即使在待机时也有动画。
Off / Standby | 0.09 / 7.5 Watt |
Idle | 17.3 / 27 / 46 Watt |
Load |
133 / 329 Watt |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0), IPS, 2560x1600, 18.00 | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 17.30 | MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30 | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 9% | 13% | 15% | 6% | 26% | |
Idle Minimum * | 17.3 | 15.2 12% | 14 19% | 13 25% | 19.3 -12% | 13.8 ? 20% |
Idle Average * | 27 | 22.8 16% | 21.6 20% | 19 30% | 26.5 2% | 19.1 ? 29% |
Idle Maximum * | 46 | 49.8 -8% | 24.8 46% | 29 37% | 27.1 41% | 26.7 ? 42% |
Load Average * | 133 | 121.2 9% | 122.5 8% | 143 -8% | 141 -6% | 111.2 ? 16% |
Load Maximum * | 329 | 273.7 17% | 418 -27% | 352 -7% | 307.9 6% | 250 ? 24% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 242 | 265 | 247 | 225 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test
Power Consumption with External Monitor
电池寿命
由于耗电量大的组件,90瓦时容量的电池无法产生任何记录值。在Optimus模式下(停用GPU),静音模式,并将亮度降低到150cd/m²,你仍然可以脱离电网工作几个小时。我们的WLAN测试在这种模式下运行的时间略多于7小时。然而,如果你想在电池运行中玩游戏,你不仅要忍受明显降低的性能,而且在我们的测试中,电池寿命仍然只持续了约一个小时(没有帧率限制),用TheWitcher 3 。
在系统关闭的情况下,电池在1小时40分钟后完全充电,或在空闲运行的情况下,电池在1小时45分钟后完全充电。当时电源提供的最大功率为117瓦特。
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.99 Wh | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 15% | 5% | 29% | -42% | 21% | |
H.264 | 419 | 358 -15% | 389 -7% | 391 ? -7% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 428 | 365 -15% | 319 -25% | 324 -24% | 250 -42% | 364 ? -15% |
Witcher 3 ultra | 53 | 81.6 ? 54% | ||||
Load | 56 | 81 45% | 86 54% | 122 118% | 85.5 ? 53% | |
Reader / Idle | 533 | 590 | 541 ? |
Pros
Cons
判决书
华硕ROG Strix SCAR 18 (2023) G834JY是一款高端游戏笔记本电脑,华硕配备了目前最强大的移动组件。这个大箱子里有一个非常好的18英寸显示屏,为游戏玩家提供了快速的响应时间,G-SYNC和良好的图像质量。但G834JY的亮点肯定是强大的硬件,配备了Core i9-13980HX,GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU(175 W TGP),以及RAID-0 NVMe SSD。虽然这些组件在负载下会产生大量的热量,但华硕通过三风扇冷却系统、蒸汽室热管和液态金属膏将其控制得很好。
ROG Strix SCAR 18是一个全面的整体包装,以高昂的价格提供令人印象深刻的性能值。
我们唯一的抱怨点是很小的,比如我们的测试设备在高帧率下的线圈啸叫,糟糕的网络摄像头,或者端口的定位,在某些情况下可能不是最佳的。
作为替代品,你可以从Alienware(m18 R1)和Razer(Blade 18)获得配备RTX 4090 GPU的18英寸机型。微星公司提供速度最低的Titan GT77 HX 13VI ,配备17英寸显示屏。那些可以忍受稍低性能的人可以看看基于RTX 4080的型号,它们明显更实惠。G834JZ版本的Scar 18在这里也可能是一个有趣的选择。
价格和可用性
我们测试的G834JY-N6000W目前只在英国有售,3999.99英镑(清单价格)。.一些美国商店提供G834JY-XS97目前售价3899.99美元(华硕缺货),而亚马逊提供的G834JY-XS97售价为5390美元。
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
-
03/07/2023 v7
Klaus Hinum
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.