Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090评论：酷睿i9-13950HX巨兽，全球首款双模迷你LED UHD+显示屏

令人流口水的蛇。 Razer Blade 16 Early 2023是为对旗舰型16:10 16英寸游戏笔记本电脑感兴趣的玩家提供的新产品。刀锋16配备了桌面级的英特尔猛禽湖-HX酷睿i9-13950HX，175瓦的英伟达GeForce RTX 4090笔记本GPU，以及世界上第一个双模式迷你LED显示屏，它试图在今年挑战一些最强大的巨无霸。我们探讨雷蛇对Blade 16的野心，看看它是否值得比Blade 16 RTX 4080多出700美元。

Vaidyanathan Subramaniam, 👁 Vaidyanathan Subramaniam (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 03/23/2023 🇺🇸 🇸🇪 ...

Laptop / Notebook Intel Raptor Lake Gaming Geforce

新的雷蛇刀片16越来越多的猛禽湖-HX和RTX 40系列游戏笔记本电脑加入了这个名单，这些笔记本电脑除了厨房水槽之外，什么都有，而且价格和一辆二手车一样高。

我们的测试样品由Nvidia印度公司提供，采用的是酷睿i9-13950HX, RTX 4090笔记本GPU, 16英寸双模迷你LED UHD显示屏，32GB DDR5-5600内存，2x 1TB NVMe SSD，以及95.2WHr电池。Razer不在印度销售其产品，但这一配置将使你花费4,300美元或5,000欧元。

我们以前曾审查过Razer Blade 16 Early 2023由英特尔酷睿i9-13950HX和NvidiaGeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU和另一款刀片18采用相同的CPU和RTX 4070笔记本GPU.

在这篇评论中，我们测试了RTX 4090笔记本GPU变体的Blade 16 Early 2023，将其与今年的最新设备进行比较，并看看在已经相当大的配置上再花700美元是否有真正的好处。

机箱、输入设备和其他内部设备与RTX 4080版本的Blade 16相同，所以我们在这里只简单地谈一下。

Razer Blade 16 SKU和配置。酷睿i9-13950HX是所有2023年刀锋的共同配置。

Test device courtesy of Razer

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Razer Blade 16 RZ09-0483 (Blade 16 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i9-13950HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.5 GHz, 130 W PL2 / Short Burst, 110 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, 175 W TDP, GDDR6, Game Ready Driver 531.29, Advanced Optimus

Memory

32 GB

, DDR5-5600 Quad-Channel, Timings: 46-45-45-89

Display

16.00 inch 16:10, 3840 x 2400 pixel 283 PPI, No, AUO B160ZAN01.U, mini-LED, Dual Refresh Rate: UHD+ 120 Hz / FHD+ 240 Hz, , glossy: no, HDR, 120 Hz

Mainboard

Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)

Storage

SSSTC CA6-8D1024, 1024 GB

, 2x 1 TB SSD, 865 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Raptor Point-S PCH - HD Audio (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Connections

4 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo audio jack, Card Reader: UHS-II SD Card Reader

Networking

Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 21.99 x 355 x 244

Battery

95.2 Wh, 6182 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: FHD, IR
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 4-speaker array (2x tweeters, 2x woofers). THX Spatial Audio, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Razer Synapse, Razer Cortex, Razer Axon, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

2.45 kg, Power Supply: 959 g

Price

5000 EUR

Links

Razer homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
89.8 %	03/2023	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	2.5 kg	21.99 mm	16.00"	3840x2400
89.9 %	03/2023	Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	2.9 kg	27 mm	17.00"	2560x1600
88 %	04/2023	Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	2.7 kg	29.7 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
89 %	02/2023	MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	3.5 kg	23 mm	17.30"	3840x2160
86.6 %	02/2023	Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	3.1 kg	30.8 mm	18.00"	2560x1600
89.4 %	03/2023	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	22.9 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
88.4 %	03/2023	Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	2.4 kg	30.4 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
91.2 %	02/2023	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	2.4 kg	21.99 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
89.4 %	02/2023	Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	2.7 kg	26 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
91.4 %	02/2023	Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	3 kg	21.9 mm	18.00"	2560x1600

外壳：真正的Razer风格的高级和坚固的外壳

刀片16采用阳极氧化铝处理，让人联想到MacBook Pro，与我们之前测试过的大量Razers类似。优质的机箱感觉非常坚固，弯曲度非常小，也只有在故意施加大量压力的情况下才会如此。

雷蛇Blade 16比华硕ROG Zephyrus更纤细。华硕ROG Zephyrus Duo 16而且绝对比联想Legion Pro 7和 MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI.这款华硕ROG Zephyrus M16在整体尺寸方面几乎与Blade 16 Early 2023相同。

机箱采用了简约的设计，唯一的照明效果是盖子背面特有的雷蛇标志。然而，这个盖子是一块污垢和指纹磁铁，要保持它的清洁是很烦人的。用一根手指打开盖子很容易，没有稳定性问题。

连接性：高通量SD卡和Wi-Fi

刀片16提供了一个足够的端口选择。Razer使用一个专有的充电端口，向后兼容去年的刀片15和刀锋17.连接器没有与机箱平齐，这可能是一些人的不满。

两个USB Type-C端口的功率输出都可以达到100W。说到Type-C，Blade 16只提供一个Thunderbolt 4，另一个是USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-C。

雷蛇本可以为Blade 16配备两个Thunderbolt 4端口的。另外，Type-C端口没有标记，所以你必须注意Thunderbolt 4实际上是在右边的那个，而不是左边的那个。

一个Kensington锁插槽是存在的。然而，没有RJ-45千兆以太网端口是一个遗憾，因为这台笔记本电脑并不完全渴望瘦小。

左侧：专有电源端口，2个USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A，USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-C，3.5毫米组合音频插孔

右边：UHS-II SD读卡器、Thunderbolt 4、USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A、HDMI 2.1输出、Kensington锁

SD卡阅读器

雷蛇继续在游戏笔记本中使用一些最快的SD读卡器，而Blade 16也不例外。尽管Blade 16 Early 2023的读卡器在顺序测试中落后于华硕ROG Zephyrus Duo 16，但在JPG文件复制测试中，它能够寸步不让地超越后者。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)	202 MB/s ∼100% +7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelbird AV PRO 128 GB V60)	188.2 (162.9^min - 196.43^max) MB/s ∼93%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	185.7 (176.29^min - 198.35^max) MB/s ∼92% -1%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	182 MB/s ∼90% -3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	125 MB/s ∼62% -34%
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=97, last 2 years)	99.1 MB/s ∼49% -47%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)	83.5 MB/s ∼41% -56%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)	77.2 MB/s ∼38% -59%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	269 MB/s ∼100% +33%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)	207.8 MB/s ∼77% +2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	207.6 MB/s ∼77% +2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelbird AV PRO 128 GB V60)	203.01 MB/s ∼75%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	191.89 MB/s ∼71% -5%
Average of class Gaming (26 - 269, n=88, last 2 years)	125.2 MB/s ∼47% -38%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)	89.9 MB/s ∼33% -56%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)	86.2 MB/s ∼32% -58%

沟通

刀片16配备了一个英特尔Wi-Fi 6E AX211无线局域网模块。使用我们参考的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000路由器对Wi-Fi性能进行了测试，距离笔记本电脑1米，视线清晰，没有其他连接设备或外部干扰。

网络性能在5GHz和6GHz频段都相当稳定。使用6GHz频段比5GHz频段没有真正的吞吐量优势，因为两者的传输速率基本相同。

也就是说，如果你有一个兼容的路由器，并希望减少来自其他大量5GHz客户端的干扰，6GHz选项仍然是一个不错的选择。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1635 (1528^min - 1715^max) MBit/s ∼100%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1582 (1517^min, 1518.74^P1 - 1636^max) MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1579 (848^min - 1696^max) MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1545 (1189^min - 1625^max) MBit/s ∼94% -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1466 (748^min - 1542^max) MBit/s ∼90% -10%
Average of class Gaming (714 - 1780, n=116, last 2 years)	1329 MBit/s ∼81% -19%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1295 (1034^min - 1383^max) MBit/s ∼79% -21%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (591 - 1861, n=128)	1260 MBit/s ∼77% -23%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1196 (618^min - 1298^max) MBit/s ∼73% -27%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1155 (495^min - 1441^max) MBit/s ∼71% -29%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1890 (1843^min - 1936^max) MBit/s ∼100% +9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1733 (1700^min - 1761^max) MBit/s ∼92%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1619 (1537^min - 1665^max) MBit/s ∼86% -7%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1557 (795^min - 1691^max) MBit/s ∼82% -10%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1545 (1508^min, 1510.9^P1 - 1569^max) MBit/s ∼82% -11%
Average of class Gaming (685 - 1890, n=123, last 2 years)	1428 MBit/s ∼76% -18%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (826 - 1890, n=128)	1387 MBit/s ∼73% -20%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1362 (1249^min - 1437^max) MBit/s ∼72% -21%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1328 (1093^min - 1448^max) MBit/s ∼70% -23%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1225 (1116^min - 1351^max) MBit/s ∼65% -29%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W MediaTek RZ616	1767 (1634^min, 1649.37^P1 - 1855^max) MBit/s ∼100% +8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1632 (1509^min - 1662^max) MBit/s ∼92%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1615 (840^min - 1682^max) MBit/s ∼91% -1%
Average of class Gaming (843 - 1878, n=58, last 2 years)	1512 MBit/s ∼86% -7%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (713 - 1851, n=137)	1384 MBit/s ∼78% -15%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1371 (1036^min - 1505^max) MBit/s ∼78% -16%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1230 (1091^min - 1327^max) MBit/s ∼70% -25%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1751 (1679^min - 1777^max) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W MediaTek RZ616	1738 (1633^min, 1638.51^P1 - 1768^max) MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1645 (1614^min - 1670^max) MBit/s ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming (853 - 1857, n=60, last 2 years)	1531 MBit/s ∼87% -13%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1516 (769^min - 1565^max) MBit/s ∼87% -13%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (883 - 1857, n=136)	1503 MBit/s ∼86% -14%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1494 (1283^min - 1580^max) MBit/s ∼85% -15%

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1632 (1509-1662)

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W MediaTek RZ616; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1767 (1634-1855)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1750 (1679-1777)

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W MediaTek RZ616; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1738 (1633-1768)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1635 (1528-1715)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1733 (1700-1761)

网络摄像头

1080p网络摄像头显示出较高的色彩偏差，特别是在蓝色阴影下。锐度是可以接受的，但有可感知的噪音。总的来说，该输出是体面的，足够用于视频通话和工作。

ColorChecker Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090: 14.25 ∆E min: 2.28 - max: 21.01 ∆E

安全问题

刀片16支持通过红外传感器进行基于Windows Hello的登录。面部识别速度很快，工作起来没有什么问题。与Blade 18不同的是，为网络摄像头提供了一个物理快门。存在一个TPM 2.0模块。

维护

卸下八个T5螺丝，就可以打开底板，露出巨大的蒸汽室冷却系统。如果需要的话，DDR5-5600内存、NVMe固态硬盘和Wi-Fi卡可以被换掉。双电池组也可以被拧开并更换。

这里需要注意的一点是，Razer只在其支持网站上提供BIOS和固件更新。.在大多数情况下，来自英特尔和Nvidia的官方通用驱动用于WLAN和图形，工作起来没有问题。

但是，如果你因为某些原因必须清除或更换整个驱动器，请确保事先有一份工厂恢复镜像的副本。事先准备好。下载恢复镜像需要用Razer账户登录并输入设备的序列号。

配件和保修

我们的Blade 16装置带有一个330W的GaN电源适配器和通常的文书工作作为标准。

Razer为Blade 16提供了一年的标准保修，为电池提供了两年的保修。可以单独购买另外一年的延长保修，但这不适用于电池。

输入设备：与早期的刀片没有太大区别

键盘

Razer在键盘上采用了传统的薄膜按键开关。键是平的，有很好的驱动力和触感，但提供一个短的1毫米行程距离。键盘支持Razer Chroma RGB效果和N键翻转。背光强度可在15个步骤中调节。

居中的定位将吸引那些不介意没有数字键盘的人。然而，习惯于较长的右Shift键和较短的上下方向键会显得很麻烦。

刀片16的键盘不能与微星Titan GT77或Schenker XMG Neo 17M等相提并论。申克XMG Neo 17 M22提供机械开关。虽然Razer的实现在大多数情况下是很好的，但在这个键盘上输入长篇文件确实感觉有点吃力。

触摸板

宽敞的9.5厘米x17厘米的玻璃触摸板是2023年刀片的新产品，有一个大的滑行区域，支持WindowsPrecision 手势。整个表面是可点击的，反应灵敏，但触觉感觉有些模糊。

显示：明亮、接近OLED质量的双模式迷你LED，具有高PWM功能

Blade 16 Early 2023提供了一个首创的双模式迷你LED显示屏。我们的测试装置在测试过程中提出了几个耐人寻味的见解。

我们的设备的AUO面板最初遭受了一个图像保留的错误，它将墙纸的一部分永久地刻在显示屏上（除了关闭时），这是一个令人讨厌的体验。然而，Razer现在已经，发布了一个固件补丁，完全解决了这个问题。

Blade 16 Early 2023是首款提供16:10双模式显示选项的笔记本电脑。用户可以在UHD+（3840 x 2400）120赫兹和FHD+（1920 x 1200）240赫兹原生面板模式之间转换，这是一个完美的整数缩放。更高的分辨率可以帮助创造性的工作流程，而240赫兹的FHD+在竞争性游戏中也很方便。

雷蛇没有说明调光区的确切数量，但我们预计它们将超过1000个，与微星Titan GT77 HX 13VI类似。支持Nvidia G-Sync，但只在dGPU模式下。

显示模式可以通过Razer Synapse（需要重新启动）或从BIOS改变。在这里，我们遇到了几个特殊情况中的第一个。如果你在BIOS中把分辨率改为FHD+，你就不能从UEFI界面改回UHD+。相反，你将不得不依靠Synapse来切换到UHD+。这一点没有详细说明，可能会使第一次使用的人感到困惑。

我们在UHD+ 120 Hz模式下进行了所有测试，因为对于任何在笔记本电脑上花费超过四千美元的人来说，这是合理的选择。

近距离观看时，子像素矩阵看起来有些颗粒感。有趣的是，我们看到UHD+模式下的矩阵看起来相当清晰和明确。人们期望在切换到FHD+模式时有更大的像素尺寸，但我们在这里看到相同大小的像素。

我们还可以看到子像素矩阵的模糊性和混叠伪影--它不像UHD+模式那样锐利，与原生FHD面板相比也绝对不那么锐利。似乎Razer只是简单地缩小了4K分辨率并使用了时间抖动。

在玩快节奏的射击游戏时，这可能不会构成太大的问题，但我们建议在大多数情况下坚持使用原生UHD+分辨率。在高曝光下没有观察到背光渗漏。

2023年Razer Blade 16的面板被官方评为提供1000尼特的峰值亮度。我们观察到94%的优秀亮度分布，在SDR模式下的峰值为752尼特。

由于某些原因，只有在使用默认的Windows色彩配置文件时才能获得这些数值，这也是我们下面测量的基础。刀锋16在出厂时已进行了校准，但使用这种ICC配置文件会使亮度水平下降100尼特。

我们在HDR模式下测量到接近1110尼特，100%的白色图像。这并不完全是 Apple MacBook Pro 16水平，但仍然是一个优秀的亮度，尽管如此。

除了一个工厂校准的ICC文件外，没有预设的颜色配置文件。在UHD+模式下，用户可以直接从Windows显示设置或Razer Synapse选择所需的配置文件。然而，这些选项在FHD+模式下是不可用的。


746 cd/m²	743 cd/m²	705 cd/m²
728 cd/m²	730 cd/m²	709 cd/m²
752 cd/m²	729 cd/m²	717 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

AUO B160ZAN01.U

X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3

Maximum: 752 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 728.8 cd/m² Minimum: 5.17 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 723 cd/m²
Contrast: 162222:1 (Black: 0.0045 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.65 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.1, calibrated: 1.85
ΔE Greyscale 8.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
90.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.98

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3)

	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 AUO B160ZAN01.U, mini-LED, 3840x2400, 16.00	Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W NE160QDM-NM4, MiniLED, 2560x1600, 16.00	MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI B173ZAN06.C, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 17.30	Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ TL160ADMP03-0, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H MNG007DA2-3 (CSO1628), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 AU Optronics B180QAN01.0, IPS, 2560x1600, 18.00
Display		-0%	-1%	-3%	-18%	-3%
Display P3 Coverage	99.9	99.4 -1%	94.9 -5%	97 -3%	69.1 -31%	96.9 -3%
sRGB Coverage	100	100 0%	99.9 0%	99.9 0%	99.7 0%	99.8 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	90.9	90.8 0%	92.4 2%	84.9 -7%	71.2 -22%	85.3 -6%
Response Times		139%	-74%	70%	35%	73%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	10.2 ?(5.8, 4.4)	15.2 ?(11.2, 4) -49%	38.4 ?(13.6, 24.8, n) -276%	5.1 ?(2.3, 2.8) 50%	12.3 ?(5.7, 6.6) -21%	4.2 ?(2.1, 2.1) 59%
Response Time Black / White *	62.04 ?(58.04, 4)	19 ?(10.6, 8.4) 69%	26.6 ?(9.2, 17.4, n) 57%	6.6 ?(2.2, 4.2) 89%	5.9 ?(2.2, 3.7) 90%	8 ?(3.8, 4.2) 87%
PWM Frequency	2420 ?(100)	12000 ?(100) 396%	2380 ?(100) -2%
Screen		-147%	417%	-1018%	-962%	-1303%
Brightness middle	730	712 -2%	606 -17%	470 -36%	511 -30%	549.6 -25%
Brightness	729	703 -4%	602 -17%	459 -37%	469 -36%	524 -28%
Brightness Distribution	94	95 1%	93 -1%	93 -1%	86 -9%	89 -5%
Black Level *	0.0045	0.07 -1456%	0.0001 98%	0.42 -9233%	0.4 -8789%	0.53 -11678%
Contrast	162222	10171 -94%	6060000 3636%	1119 -99%	1278 -99%	1037 -99%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.65	1.7 70%	4.8 15%	1.86 67%	0.95 83%	3.32 41%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.11	4 60%	8.2 19%	3.87 62%	2.07 80%	6.63 34%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.85	1.2 35%	1.8 3%	0.93 50%	0.91 51%	2.7 -46%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	8.1	2.8 65%	6.5 20%	2.7 67%	0.6 93%	2 75%
Gamma	1.98 ^111%	2.21 ^100%	2.63 ^84%	2.246 ^98%	2.176 ^101%	2.29 ^96%
CCT	5874 ^111%	6978 ^93%	6596 ^99%	6711 ^97%	6545 ^99%	6319 ^103%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-3% / -61%	114% / 235%	-317% / -645%	-315% / -617%	-411% / -828%

* ... smaller is better

Razer宣传该面板的DCI-P3覆盖率为100%，而我们的测量结果也证实了这一点。我们还观察到sRGB色域的完整覆盖率和Adobe RGB的91%的出色覆盖率，这意味着Blade 16的显示屏对游戏玩家和内容创作者来说都是适用的。

从主观上讲，迷你LED显示屏是一种视觉享受，具有接近无限的黑色和强烈的色彩。仔细观察会发现有一些花屏现象，但这并不令人分心，不会妨碍观看体验。

这是你能得到的最接近OLED的质量，同时也能获得高亮度水平的好处。

尽管工厂校准似乎降低了SDR的整体亮度，但与Windows默认ICC配置文件的值相比，Delta E值要好得多。也就是说，工厂色彩校准并不完美，有很多改进的余地。

我们使用X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3分光光度计和Portrait Displays的Calman Ultimate色彩校准软件在DCI-P3色彩空间中校准了Blade 16的显示屏。

我们的校准程序使灰度和ColorChecker测量中的平均Delta E值明显改善，分别为1.3和1.85。红色和100%的蓝色显示出最高的偏差，但最大的Delta E值为3.75，对于大多数创造性的工作流程来说仍然是相当适用的。请注意，校准后的亮度水平再次下降。

校准后的ICC文件可以从上面的链接下载。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
62.04 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 58.04 ms rise
62.04 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.8 ms rise
10.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (34.5 ms).

迷你LED阵列使得准确测量响应时间变得有点复杂。高闪烁意味着我们不得不在整个脉冲范围内进行数据采样，并手动确定上升和下降时间。因此，上面提到的数值对于游戏笔记本来说似乎高于正常值，特别是在100%黑色到100%的过渡期。

Razer宣传的响应时间为3毫秒，但不清楚这个数值是在什么条件下获得的。我们使用了100%的SDR亮度设置，但Razer有可能选择了更低的亮度。也就是说，120赫兹的刷新率似乎并没有导致任何可察觉的重影问题。

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

2420 Hz

≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2420 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2420 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18993 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

我们观察到，在所有测试的亮度水平上，PWM为2,420赫兹，这已经足够高了。在0%的亮度下，PWM增加到9.89MHz，这和没有闪烁一样好。

高亮度水平有助于在户外获得良好的观看体验，即使在阳光直射下也是如此。可视角度非常稳定，只有在极端情况下亮度损失很小。

性能：酷睿i9-13950HX和RTX 4090组合落后于竞争对手

我们的Razer Blade 16 Early 2023装置采用了英特尔酷睿i9-13950HX和 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4090 笔记本电脑GPU.买家还可以选择其他几种刀片16的配置，如介绍中所示。

请注意，双模式迷你LED显示屏只适用于采用RTX 4070笔记本GPU和RTX 4090笔记本GPU的配置。

测试条件

Razer Synapse允许根据需要改变各种性能模式。为了让Core i9-13950HX和RTX 4090充分施展它们的力量，我们使用了带有CPU Boost和GPU High选项的自定义模式。这导致了110W的持续PL1和130W的短时爆发式提升。

我们使用dGPU模式来运行图形测试。笔记本电脑支持高级优化，所以你可以很容易地在MSHybrid和dGPU之间直接从Nvidia控制面板切换，而不必重新启动。测试期间，G-Sync被禁用。

性能模式的选择会对散热和噪音排放产生影响。下表说明了PL1和PL2在每种性能设置下的变化。

只有平衡模式是以电池电量提供的。我们在电池测试中使用了这种模式，并启用了自动切换到60 Hz刷新率的选项。

性能模式	PL1（PBP）/ Tau	PL2（MTP）/ Tau
静音	32.5 W / 56 s	37 W / 2.44 ms
平衡模式	54 W / 56 s	55 W / 2.44 ms
定制（CPU Boost / GPU High）	110 W / 56 s	130 W / 2.44 ms

处理器

英特尔酷睿i9-13950HX是猛禽湖-HX部件，有24个核心和32个线程，可以实现5.5GHz的单核提升。

当我们审查配备RTX 4080的Razer Blade 16时，竞争者大多是由英特尔Alder Lake和AMD Ryzen 6000系列芯片驱动的设备。

在过去一个月左右，英特尔13代和AMD Ryzen 7000系列笔记本不断涌现。这使我们能够做一个更现代的比较，不幸的是，2023年的刀片16都在最新的竞争中挣扎。

尽管有一个强大的蒸汽室冷却器，但配备RTX 4090的Blade 16在Cinebench R15多核循环测试中未能保持良好的性能。我们看到在第19次运行时下降了29%，然后在第21次循环中恢复了速度。这与配备RTX 4080的Blade 16不同，后者显示了良好的持续性能。

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø3945 (3056-4339.34)

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø4802 (4757.37-4969.56)

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX: Ø5385 (5255.55-5554.01)

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø4980 (4889.98-5226.71)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX: Ø4735 (4684.94-4780.69)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2914 (2871.5-3068.66)

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX; turbo: Ø4509 (4425.76-4764.17)

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX: Ø4416 (1123.72-4730.93)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø4512 (4463.29-4528.99)

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø4574 (4429.68-4819.28)

累计性能比平均水平提高了17%，是一个不错的成绩。酷睿i9-12950HX.这款酷睿i9-13900HX联想Legion Pro 7中的酷睿i9-13950HX由于其130W/185W的高PL1/PL2值，轻松超过了Blade 16的酷睿i9-13950HX。

同样，微星Titan GT77 HX 13VI的CPU与Blade 16的CPU相同，由于其150 W PL1和220 W PL2，能够在CPU基准测试中获得更高的累积分数。

该 AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX华硕ROG Zephyrus Duo 16中的AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX在整体上比Blade 16中的Core i9-13950HX领先12%。

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.2 - 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Average Intel Core i9-13900K	87.8 pt ∼88%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	79.5 pt ∼80%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	78.9 pt ∼79%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	77.7 pt ∼78%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	77.6 pt ∼78%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	75.7 pt ∼76%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	74.5 pt ∼75%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	73.8 pt ∼74%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	69.2 pt ∼69%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	68 pt ∼68%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	59.2 pt ∼59%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX	58.3 pt ∼58%
Average of class Gaming	49.6 pt ∼50%

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average Intel Core i9-13900K (32592 - 40103, n=4)	37310 Points ∼100% +31%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	34521 (32987.6^min - 34521.3^max) Points ∼93% +21%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	33277 Points ∼89% +17%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	32623 (30004.7^min - 32622.9^max) Points ∼87% +15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	31572 Points ∼85% +11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	30162 Points ∼81% +6%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	30139 Points ∼81% +6%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	28681 (25585.5^min - 28680.9^max) Points ∼77% +1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	28422 Points ∼76%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	26736 (22394.1^min - 26736.1^max) Points ∼72% -6%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (16277 - 23113, n=7)	19930 Points ∼53% -30%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	19469 (17696.3^min - 19468.6^max) Points ∼52% -32%
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34521, n=242, last 2 years)	17161 Points ∼46% -40%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average Intel Core i9-13900K (2203 - 2272, n=4)	2238 Points ∼100% +15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	2140 Points ∼96% +10%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	2126 Points ∼95% +9%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	2100 Points ∼94% +8%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	2092 Points ∼93% +7%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	2076 Points ∼93% +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	2043 Points ∼91% +5%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	2029 Points ∼91% +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	1974 Points ∼88% +1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	1952 Points ∼87%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	1940 Points ∼87% -1%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (1465 - 1922, n=7)	1835 Points ∼82% -6%
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2169, n=240, last 2 years)	1720 Points ∼77% -12%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average Intel Core i9-13900K (13415 - 15181, n=4)	14459 Points ∼100% +35%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	13457 Points ∼93% +25%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	12648 Points ∼87% +18%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	12541 Points ∼87% +17%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	12073 Points ∼83% +12%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	11510 Points ∼80% +7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	11500 Points ∼80% +7%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	10919 Points ∼76% +2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	10738 Points ∼74%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	8697 Points ∼60% -19%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (6625 - 8777, n=7)	7689 Points ∼53% -28%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	7411 Points ∼51% -31%
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=240, last 2 years)	6507 Points ∼45% -39%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average Intel Core i9-13900K (828 - 870, n=4)	849 Points ∼100% +13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	824 Points ∼97% +9%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	818 Points ∼96% +8%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	803 Points ∼95% +6%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	802 Points ∼94% +6%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	797 Points ∼94% +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	788 Points ∼93% +5%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	756 Points ∼89% 0%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	754 Points ∼89%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	751 Points ∼88% 0%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	742 Points ∼87% -2%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (703 - 741, n=7)	727 Points ∼86% -4%
Average of class Gaming (169 - 825, n=240, last 2 years)	664 Points ∼78% -12%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-13900K (5321 - 6191, n=5)	5877 Points ∼100% +35%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	5554 (5255.55^min - 5554.01^max) Points ∼95% +28%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	5227 (4889.98^min - 5226.71^max) Points ∼89% +20%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	4970 (4757.37^min - 4969.56^max) Points ∼85% +15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	4819 (4429.68^min - 4819.28^max) Points ∼82% +11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	4781 (4684.94^min - 4780.69^max) Points ∼81% +10%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	4764 (4425.76^min - 4764.17^max) Points ∼81% +10%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	4731 (1123.72^min - 4730.93^max) Points ∼81% +9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	4529 (4463.29^min - 4528.99^max) Points ∼77% +4%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	4481 Points ∼76% +3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	4339 (3056^min - 4339.34^max) Points ∼74%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (2464 - 3530, n=7)	3090 Points ∼53% -29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	3069 (2871.5^min - 3068.66^max) Points ∼52% -29%
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=246, last 2 years)	2744 Points ∼47% -37%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-13900K (317 - 328, n=5)	323 Points ∼100% +16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	312 Points ∼97% +12%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	307 Points ∼95% +10%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	306 Points ∼95% +10%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	296 Points ∼92% +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	301 Points ∼93% +8%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	300 Points ∼93% +8%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	299 Points ∼93% +8%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	297 Points ∼92% +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	292 Points ∼90% +5%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	278 Points ∼86%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	274 Points ∼85% -1%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (167 - 276, n=7)	257 Points ∼80% -8%
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 312, n=245, last 2 years)	257 Points ∼80% -8%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming (91 - 1259, n=238, last 2 years)	224 Seconds * ∼100% -91%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (138 - 193, n=7)	171.4 Seconds * ∼77% -46%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	166 Seconds * ∼74% -42%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	117 Seconds * ∼52%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	114 Seconds * ∼51% +3%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	111 Seconds * ∼50% +5%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	106 Seconds * ∼47% +9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	105 Seconds * ∼47% +10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	103 Seconds * ∼46% +12%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	101 Seconds * ∼45% +14%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	100 Seconds * ∼45% +15%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	93 Seconds * ∼42% +21%
Average Intel Core i9-13900K (80 - 101, n=5)	86.4 Seconds * ∼39% +26%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average Intel Core i9-13900K (127201 - 148053, n=5)	142777 MIPS ∼100% +31%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	135927 MIPS ∼95% +25%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	127295 MIPS ∼89% +17%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	127283 MIPS ∼89% +17%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	123833 MIPS ∼87% +14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	122254 MIPS ∼86% +12%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	116665 MIPS ∼82% +7%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	114658 MIPS ∼80% +5%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	109330 MIPS ∼77% 0%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	108860 MIPS ∼76%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	79032 MIPS ∼55% -27%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (65637 - 85019, n=7)	77515 MIPS ∼54% -29%
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=237, last 2 years)	69059 MIPS ∼48% -37%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average Intel Core i9-13900K (7176 - 7539, n=5)	7343 MIPS ∼100% +9%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	7319 MIPS ∼100% +9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	7084 MIPS ∼96% +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	7035 MIPS ∼96% +5%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	6999 MIPS ∼95% +4%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	6909 MIPS ∼94% +3%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	6897 MIPS ∼94% +3%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	6880 MIPS ∼94% +2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	6715 MIPS ∼91%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	6445 MIPS ∼88% -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	6245 MIPS ∼85% -7%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (6022 - 6318, n=7)	6174 MIPS ∼84% -8%
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=238, last 2 years)	5906 MIPS ∼80% -12%

Geekbench 5.2 - 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average Intel Core i9-13900K (22448 - 24157, n=5)	23743 Points ∼100% +42%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	21058 Points ∼89% +26%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	20847 Points ∼88% +24%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	20779 Points ∼88% +24%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	20634 Points ∼87% +23%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	20036 Points ∼84% +19%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	19583 Points ∼82% +17%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	19433 Points ∼82% +16%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	18152 Points ∼76% +8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	16776 Points ∼71%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	15410 Points ∼65% -8%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (14028 - 16009, n=7)	15046 Points ∼63% -10%
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=243, last 2 years)	12160 Points ∼51% -28%

Geekbench 5.2 - 5.5 / Single-Core
Average Intel Core i9-13900K (2106 - 2290, n=5)	2237 Points ∼100% +14%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	2132 Points ∼95% +9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	2099 Points ∼94% +7%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	2081 Points ∼93% +6%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	2044 Points ∼91% +4%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	2043 Points ∼91% +4%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	2035 Points ∼91% +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	2025 Points ∼91% +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	1974 Points ∼88% +1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	1959 Points ∼88%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (1847 - 1945, n=7)	1891 Points ∼85% -3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	1805 Points ∼81% -8%
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2139, n=243, last 2 years)	1726 Points ∼77% -12%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average Intel Core i9-13900K (34.5 - 42.6, n=5)	39.9 fps ∼100% +31%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	34.8 fps ∼87% +14%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	34.4 fps ∼86% +13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	33.4 fps ∼84% +10%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	32.7 fps ∼82% +7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	31.9 fps ∼80% +5%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	31 fps ∼78% +2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	30.5 fps ∼76%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	29.7 fps ∼74% -3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	28.7 fps ∼72% -6%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (18.6 - 26.5, n=7)	22.3 fps ∼56% -27%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	21.7 fps ∼54% -29%
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=241, last 2 years)	19.1 fps ∼48% -37%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	60.4 s * ∼100% -16%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	52.1 s * ∼86%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	50.5 s * ∼84% +3%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=236, last 2 years)	49.7 s * ∼82% +5%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	47.7 s * ∼79% +8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	47.5 s * ∼79% +9%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	46.5 s * ∼77% +11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	44 s * ∼73% +16%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	43.4 s * ∼72% +17%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (34.7 - 45.4, n=7)	40.2 s * ∼67% +23%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	36 s * ∼60% +31%
Average Intel Core i9-13900K (30.3 - 41.6, n=5)	35.3 s * ∼58% +32%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	32.8 s * ∼54% +37%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Gaming (0.375 - 4.47, n=238, last 2 years)	0.4902 sec * ∼100% -23%
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (0.4251 - 0.4515, n=7)	0.4374 sec * ∼89% -10%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	0.4121 sec * ∼84% -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	0.412 sec * ∼84% -4%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	0.4033 sec * ∼82% -2%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	0.3982 sec * ∼81% -0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	0.3979 sec * ∼81% -0%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	0.3971 sec * ∼81%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX	0.3955 sec * ∼81% -0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	0.387 sec * ∼79% +3%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	0.3799 sec * ∼77% +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	0.3793 sec * ∼77% +4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900K (0.3468 - 0.3911, n=5)	0.3597 sec * ∼73% +9%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

4339 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

290 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

278 Points

Help

... in comparison

在Cinebench R15循环测试中看到的不寻常的图表也反映在可用的性能模式下评估各种CPU参数。在平衡和静音模式下运行循环测试时，没有看到这种模式。

在自定义设置中，我们看到封装功率达到最大137.6W，导致4.4GHz的最大提升，核心温度高达90℃。可能是Razer在核心温度达到90°C时，实施了苛刻的温度容忍度。这导致封装功率下降到74瓦，然后再恢复到130瓦，循环往复。

在这种情况下，平衡模式似乎有点宽松。我们看到时钟接近4.4GHz，峰值封装功率为59W，最大核心温度为79℃。这种模式对于大多数使用情况来说应该是足够的。

静音模式在时钟方面受到相当大的冲击，但峰值核心温度是可控的69℃，同时最大消耗39.7瓦。

在Cinebench R15循环中的CPU时钟、核心温度和封装功率。(红色：自定义，绿色：静音，蓝色：平衡）。

在电池方面，Blade 16运行在平衡模式下。虽然单核性能只受到5%的打击，但在Cinebench R20中，多核得分下降了57%。也就是说，降低的性能应该仍然足以在移动中完成一些工作。

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023总体上提供了良好的CPU性能，但相对较低的功率限制使其在竞争中处于不利地位。

Performance Rating
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	95.6 pt ∼96%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	93.5 pt ∼94%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	93.2 pt ∼93%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	89.8 pt ∼90%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	88.5 pt ∼89%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	87.8 pt ∼88%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	87.2 pt ∼87%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX	85.5 pt ∼86%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	78.8 pt ∼79%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	66.3 pt ∼66%
Average of class Gaming	57.8 pt ∼58%

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	28957 KRay/s ∼100% +60%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	28701 KRay/s ∼99% +58%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	27594 KRay/s ∼95% +52%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	27227 KRay/s ∼94% +50%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	26741 KRay/s ∼92% +47%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	25949 KRay/s ∼90% +43%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	25857 KRay/s ∼89% +43%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (18131 - 28957, n=6)	24494 KRay/s ∼85% +35%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	18961 KRay/s ∼65% +5%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	18131 KRay/s ∼63%
Average of class Gaming (2585 - 55084, n=231, last 2 years)	15723 KRay/s ∼54% -13%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	144303 Points ∼100% +32%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	138190 Points ∼96% +27%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	133668 Points ∼93% +22%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	131131 Points ∼91% +20%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	130870 Points ∼91% +20%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	129286 Points ∼90% +18%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	125944 Points ∼87% +15%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (102591 - 144303, n=6)	125519 Points ∼87% +15%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	109158 Points ∼76%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	93802 Points ∼65% -14%
Average of class Gaming (12439 - 234848, n=231, last 2 years)	80656 Points ∼56% -26%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	7093 MB/s ∼100% +19%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	7029 MB/s ∼99% +18%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	6949 MB/s ∼98% +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	6750 MB/s ∼95% +14%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	6596 MB/s ∼93% +11%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	6350 MB/s ∼90% +7%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	6338 MB/s ∼89% +7%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (4981 - 7093, n=6)	6267 MB/s ∼88% +6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	5937 MB/s ∼84%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	4207 MB/s ∼59% -29%
Average of class Gaming (629 - 9930, n=231, last 2 years)	3813 MB/s ∼54% -36%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	143409 Points ∼100% +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	141427 Points ∼99% +3%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	141385 Points ∼99% +3%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	139649 Points ∼97% +2%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	137876 Points ∼96% +1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	136898 Points ∼95%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (131931 - 140103, n=6)	136614 Points ∼95% 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	134227 Points ∼94% -2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	133226 Points ∼93% -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	120181 Points ∼84% -12%
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 186519, n=231, last 2 years)	103558 Points ∼72% -24%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	17179 Points ∼100% +39%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	17117 Points ∼100% +38%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	17057 Points ∼99% +38%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	17026 Points ∼99% +38%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	16073 Points ∼94% +30%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	15813 Points ∼92% +28%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	15807 Points ∼92% +28%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (12381 - 17057, n=6)	15241 Points ∼89% +23%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	12381 Points ∼72%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	11631 Points ∼68% -6%
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 30810, n=231, last 2 years)	11342 Points ∼66% -8%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	71038 Points ∼100% +53%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	70739 Points ∼100% +52%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	66924 Points ∼94% +44%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	66753 Points ∼94% +43%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	66336 Points ∼93% +43%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	64736 Points ∼91% +39%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	63308 Points ∼89% +36%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (46539 - 71038, n=6)	61041 Points ∼86% +31%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	46539 Points ∼66%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	46487 Points ∼65% 0%
Average of class Gaming (7135 - 124377, n=231, last 2 years)	42548 Points ∼60% -9%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	236139 MB/s ∼100% +15%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	204491 MB/s ∼87%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (99981 - 204491, n=6)	137276 MB/s ∼58% -33%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	136551 MB/s ∼58% -33%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	134166 MB/s ∼57% -34%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	128070 MB/s ∼54% -37%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	127698 MB/s ∼54% -38%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	125644 MB/s ∼53% -39%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	122159 MB/s ∼52% -40%
Average of class Gaming (18146 - 328679, n=231, last 2 years)	104754 MB/s ∼44% -49%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	85007 MB/s ∼36% -58%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	2059 MB/s ∼100% +19%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	2030 MB/s ∼99% +18%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	1958 MB/s ∼95% +14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	1936 MB/s ∼94% +12%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	1912 MB/s ∼93% +11%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	1850 MB/s ∼90% +7%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (1472 - 2069, n=6)	1834 MB/s ∼89% +6%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1829 MB/s ∼89% +6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	1724 MB/s ∼84%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	1204 MB/s ∼58% -30%
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2231, n=234, last 2 years)	1052 MB/s ∼51% -39%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	15573 KRay/s ∼100% +59%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	15540 KRay/s ∼100% +59%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	14948 KRay/s ∼96% +53%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	14722 KRay/s ∼95% +50%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	14671 KRay/s ∼94% +50%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	14066 KRay/s ∼90% +44%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	13844 KRay/s ∼89% +41%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (9787 - 15573, n=6)	13271 KRay/s ∼85% +36%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	10342 KRay/s ∼66% +6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	9787 KRay/s ∼63%
Average of class Gaming (1437 - 29473, n=231, last 2 years)	8544 KRay/s ∼55% -13%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	50864 MPixel/s ∼100%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	50834 MPixel/s ∼100% 0%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	49634 MPixel/s ∼98% -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	48626 MPixel/s ∼96% -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	48325 MPixel/s ∼95% -5%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (40233 - 50864, n=6)	47131 MPixel/s ∼93% -7%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	44308 MPixel/s ∼87% -13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	44016 MPixel/s ∼87% -13%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	40896 MPixel/s ∼80% -20%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	37069 MPixel/s ∼73% -27%
Average of class Gaming (8341 - 52949, n=232, last 2 years)	33139 MPixel/s ∼65% -35%

查看我们专门的英特尔酷睿i9-13950HX页面了解更多信息和性能比较。

系统性能

PCMark 10总分显示，Razer Blade 16落后于Ryzen 9 7945HX驱动的Zephyrus Duo 16 17%，但这些设备在CrossMark总分中显示出或多或少相同的性能。

在日常使用中，我们没有遇到任何关于系统性能和响应性的问题。

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	9151 Points ∼100% +20%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	9016 Points ∼99% +19%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8884 Points ∼97% +17%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	8764 Points ∼96% +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8277 Points ∼90% +9%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (7597 - 8884, n=2)	8241 Points ∼90% +8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	7888 Points ∼86% +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7830 Points ∼86% +3%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	7609 Points ∼83% 0%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	7597 Points ∼83%
Average of class Gaming (4477 - 9331, n=198, last 2 years)	7384 Points ∼81% -3%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	7223 Points ∼79% -5%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	12176 Points ∼100% +12%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	12031 Points ∼99% +10%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	11983 Points ∼98% +10%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11761 Points ∼97% +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	11703 Points ∼96% +7%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	11683 Points ∼96% +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11659 Points ∼96% +7%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (10903 - 11761, n=2)	11332 Points ∼93% +4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	11078 Points ∼91% +2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	10903 Points ∼90%
Average of class Gaming (7334 - 12176, n=197, last 2 years)	10575 Points ∼87% -3%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	11833 Points ∼100% +42%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11046 Points ∼93% +33%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10788 Points ∼91% +30%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10755 Points ∼91% +29%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9851 Points ∼83% +18%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	9645 Points ∼82% +16%
Average of class Gaming (6161 - 11833, n=197, last 2 years)	9559 Points ∼81% +15%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (8330 - 9851, n=2)	9091 Points ∼77% +9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	8330 Points ∼70%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	8271 Points ∼70% -1%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	7686 Points ∼65% -8%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	16424 Points ∼100% +25%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	15430 Points ∼94% +18%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (13099 - 16424, n=2)	14762 Points ∼90% +13%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	14535 Points ∼88% +11%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	14432 Points ∼88% +10%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	13099 Points ∼80%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11949 Points ∼73% -9%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	11058 Points ∼67% -16%
Average of class Gaming (5288 - 16424, n=197, last 2 years)	10881 Points ∼66% -17%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	10611 Points ∼65% -19%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10319 Points ∼63% -21%

CrossMark / Overall
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2195 Points ∼100% +9%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2182 Points ∼99% +8%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2139 Points ∼97% +6%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2127 Points ∼97% +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	2080 Points ∼95% +3%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2019 - 2139, n=2)	2079 Points ∼95% +3%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	2078 Points ∼95% +3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2019 Points ∼92%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1972 Points ∼90% -2%
Average of class Gaming (974 - 2295, n=149, last 2 years)	1836 Points ∼84% -9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1592 Points ∼73% -21%

CrossMark / Productivity
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2044 Points ∼100% +7%
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2032 Points ∼99% +6%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1977 Points ∼97% +4%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1969 Points ∼96% +3%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	1946 Points ∼95% +2%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1909 - 1977, n=2)	1943 Points ∼95% +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	1909 Points ∼93% 0%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1909 Points ∼93%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1845 Points ∼90% -3%
Average of class Gaming (907 - 2166, n=149, last 2 years)	1756 Points ∼86% -8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1509 Points ∼74% -21%

CrossMark / Creativity
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2514 Points ∼100% +13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	2455 Points ∼98% +10%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2423 Points ∼96% +9%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2400 Points ∼95% +8%
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2390 Points ∼95% +8%