Notebookcheck Logo

华硕ROG Zephyrus Duo 16回顾。一个不寻常的游戏笔记本,拥有良好的电池寿命

动态的二人组。 Ryzen 9-6900HX APU和GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU将目前所有的游戏顺利带到16:10格式的哑光4k屏幕(IPS,DCI P3,FreeSync)上。它们伴随着4TB的存储空间(RAID 0),64GB的工作内存,以及令人惊讶的良好电池寿命。
AMD Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Ryzen (Zen) Touchscreen Windows

通过Zephyrus Duo 16,华硕为游戏玩家、流媒体和内容创作者推出了一款笔记本电脑,其最引人注目的特点立即变得明显。放在键盘上方的是第二个显示屏,包括触摸屏功能(Screenpad Plus)。竞争对手包括如下设备 Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model,以及Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5, 微星MSI GE76 Raider,Medion Erazer Beast X30Medion Erazer Beast X30,以及 Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021.

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
Processor
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX 8 x 3.3 - 4.9 GHz, 80 W PL2 / Short Burst, 80 W PL1 / Sustained, Rembrandt H (Zen 3+)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU - 16384 MB, Core: 1395 MHz, Memory: 2000 MHz, 165 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 30.0.15.1259, Optimus
Memory
65536 MB 
, DDR5-4800, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (both in use)
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 3840 x 2400 pixel 283 PPI, BOE NE160QAM-NX1, IPS level, FreeSync Premium, Pantone Validated, (second screen: 14 in, 3840 x 1100 pixels, IPS level, capacitive, stylus support), glossy: no, HDR, 120 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0), 4096 GB 
, 3620 GB free
Soundcard
Realtek ALC285
Connections
4 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: combined audio port, Card Reader: MicroSD, TPM 2.0
Networking
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 20.5 x 355 x 266
Battery
90 Wh, 5845 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 4 cells
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Camera
Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 6 speakers, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, palm rest, Microsoft 365 (trial), Microsoft OneNote (trial), 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.56 kg, Power Supply: 850 g
Price
4999 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88.2 %
05/2022
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.6 kg20.5 mm16.00"3840x2400
92.5 %
11/2021
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
M1 Max, M1 Max 32-Core GPU
2.2 kg16.8 mm16.20"3456x2234
88.3 %
05/2022
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.1 kg16.99 mm15.60"1920x1080
87.5 %
01/2022
MSI GE76 Raider
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3 kg26 mm17.30"1920x1080
86.7 %
05/2022
Medion Erazer Beast X30
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.2 kg23 mm17.30"2560x1440
84.7 %
03/2022
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg22.4 mm16.00"3840x2400

外壳 - GX650采用坚固的金属外壳

哑光的黑色金属外壳提供了良好的做工。没有明显的缝隙,也没有明显的尖锐边缘。另一个积极的方面是,基本单元不能被扭曲。另一方面,盖子可以使用更多的硬度。铰链能够将盖子紧紧地固定在位置上。最大开启角度约为130度,你可以用一只手打开盖子。

一旦你打开显示屏盖子,Screenpad(具有触摸屏功能的第二个显示屏)就会以大约15度的固定角度向用户升起。此外,它还向主屏幕方向移动约2厘米(约0.8英寸)。由此产生的缝隙显示了一块透明的塑料板,在某些地方可以看到机箱的内部。 Screenpad的提升不仅有人体工程学的原因,而且在显示屏下面还有通风口,使空气流进机箱。

Zephyrus是我们比较领域中较重的笔记本电脑之一。只有 MSI GE76 Raider更重。其尺寸也比同类的16英寸笔记本电脑略大,如 MacBook Pro 16.

尺寸比较

397 mm 284 mm 26 mm 3 kg395 mm 262 mm 23 mm 2.2 kg356 mm 248.5 mm 22.4 mm 2.3 kg355 mm 266 mm 20.5 mm 2.6 kg355.7 mm 248.1 mm 16.8 mm 2.2 kg355 mm 235 mm 16.99 mm 2.1 kg

设备--Zephyrus不提供Thunderbolt 4。

所有四个USB连接(2个USB-A,2个USB-C)都支持USB 3.2 Gen 2标准。两个USB-C端口中的一个提供电源交付,两个端口都通过USB-C支持DisplayPort。有了这个,该笔记本电脑提供了三个视频输出端口和HDMI 2.1连接。连接由一个组合音频端口和一个千兆以太网端口完成。

左侧:电源、USB 3.2 Gen 2(USB-A)、USB 3.2 Gen 2(USB-C;DisplayPort、Power Delivery、G-Sync)、存储卡阅读器(MicroSD)、音频组合
左侧:电源、USB 3.2 Gen 2(USB-A)、USB 3.2 Gen 2(USB-C;DisplayPort、Power Delivery、G-Sync)、存储卡阅读器(MicroSD)、音频组合
右侧。USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C; DisplayPort)
右侧。USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C; DisplayPort)
背面。千兆以太网,USB 3.2 Gen 2(USB-A),HDMI 2.1
背面。千兆以太网,USB 3.2 Gen 2(USB-A),HDMI 2.1

SD卡阅读器

MicroSD存储卡读卡器是快速型号之一,使用我们的AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60参考存储卡,最大传输速率为155 MB/s(传输250个jpg图像文件,每个约5MB)和185 MB/s(复制大数据块)。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
155 MB/s ∼100% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
155 MB/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (18 - 222, n=94, last 2 years)
116.1 MB/s ∼75% -25%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
79.9 MB/s ∼52% -48%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
66 MB/s ∼43% -57%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
185 MB/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (20.5 - 263, n=87, last 2 years)
135 MB/s ∼73% -27%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
83 MB/s ∼45% -55%

沟通

在最佳条件下确定的WLAN传输率(附近没有额外的WLAN设备,笔记本电脑和服务器PC距离很近)结果非常好,与WiFi芯片(联发科MT7922;802.11 ax,WiFi 6E)的能力相符。有线网络连接由Realtek的千兆以太网芯片(RTL8125)处理。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1695 (1556min - 1768max) MBit/s ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1621 (1412min - 1672max) MBit/s ∼96% -4%
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
  (1492 - 1695, n=3)
1568 MBit/s ∼93% -7%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1503 (1451min - 1558max) MBit/s ∼89% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (851 - 1695, n=16, last 2 years)
1451 MBit/s ∼86% -14%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1333 (1044min - 1390max) MBit/s ∼79% -21%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1727 (866min - 1759max) MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1721 (1500min - 1744max) MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1692 (1567min - 1738max) MBit/s ∼98%
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
  (1553 - 1692, n=3)
1617 MBit/s ∼94% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (787 - 1748, n=19, last 2 years)
1574 MBit/s ∼91% -7%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1030 (752min - 1313max) MBit/s ∼60% -39%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1691 (1567-1738)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1697 (866-1759)
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1721 (1500-1744)
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1029 (752-1313)
MSI GE76 Raider Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1117 (588-1235)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1695 (1556-1768)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1621 (1412-1672)
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1503 (1451-1558)
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1333 (1044-1390)
MSI GE76 Raider Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1235 (650-1337)

网络摄像头

Zephyrus的0.9MP网络摄像头产生的图像最大分辨率为1280 x 720像素。它缺乏色彩准确性,颜色与目标有很大偏差。该摄像头不具备机械盖。

ColorChecker
16.5 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
23.2 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
25.4 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
4 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX: 15.96 ∆E min: 2.53 - max: 27.32 ∆E

辅料

除了通常的文件(快速启动手册和保修信息)外,该笔记本电脑还包括一个橡胶掌托。

维护

要取下机箱的底部,首先要取下底部的螺丝。但你需要注意,因为机箱中间的一颗螺丝被一块小橡胶板覆盖。机箱的背面也被一些夹子固定住,可以通过一些小心的扭动或借助于扁平的撬动工具来松开。拆下机箱底部后,你可以看到工作内存库(两个都占用)、两个固态硬盘(PCIe 4)、风扇和电池。

GX650RX的内部
GX650RX的内部

担保

华硕为Zephyrus提供2年的保修。延长保修期至3年需要额外支付129欧元(约136美元)。

输入设备 - 华硕笔记本电脑的第二个显示屏

键盘

只有当你使用附带的由橡胶制成的掌托(深度:约5.5厘米,2.2英寸,有角度)时,键盘才可以舒适地打字。虽然它做得相当好,但它真的只在固定的表面上工作。发光小键盘的光滑按键行程短,压力点清晰。键的阻力还可以,键盘在打字时不会弯曲。三段式RGB照明是通过一个功能键控制的。总的来说,华硕在这里提供了一个适合日常工作的键盘。

触摸板

一个纵向的具有多点触摸功能的点击板(~5.8 x 9.6厘米,~2.3 x 3.8英寸)可作为鼠标的替代品。其光滑的表面有利于手指的滑动。鼠标垫有一个短的行程和清晰的压力点。敲击键盘上的相应符号将显示一个数字键盘。

Zephyrus Duo输入设备
Zephyrus Duo输入设备

华硕Screenpad Plus

还有一个额外的输入选项,即Screenpad Plus(14英寸,3840 x 1100像素,哑光),这是一个包括触摸屏功能(支持主动输入笔)的第二个显示屏。它的行为与任何其他插入式外部显示器一样,可以通过单独的键打开和关闭。

屏幕板提供了将应用程序或其导航元素移动到触摸屏上的选项。例如,当游戏在主屏幕上运行时,我们可以将聊天窗口移到屏幕板上。

有几个预装的小应用程序,让人对Screenpad的可能性有了印象。例如,有一个计算器和一个手写输入区域,一个快速键应用程序捆绑了经常使用的功能,如剪切、复制和粘贴。

显示 - 良好的色彩再现

哑光16英寸显示屏(3840 x 2400像素)的亮度(433.9 cd/m²)和对比度(1043:1)符合要求。积极的一点是快速响应时间和缺乏PWM闪烁。

该显示器支持AMD的FreeSync技术,该技术可以动态地调整显示器的刷新率和GPU的帧率,使之相互适应。通过这种方式,创建的图像应该是尽可能平滑的,特别是在电脑游戏期间。

子像素网格
子像素网格
光晕
光晕
464
cd/m²
431
cd/m²
430
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
459
cd/m²
409
cd/m²
442
cd/m²
432
cd/m²
412
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE NE160QAM-NX1
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 464 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 433.9 cd/m² Minimum: 22 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 459 cd/m²
Contrast: 1043:1 (Black: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.97 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4, calibrated: 1.03
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
86.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.235
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
BOE NE160QAM-NX1, IPS-Level, 3840x2400, 16.00
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.20
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
TL156VDXP02-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
MSI GE76 Raider
AU Optronics B173HAN05.4 (AUOE295), IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 17.30
Medion Erazer Beast X30
BOE CQ NE173QHM-NZ3, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Samsung SDC416B, AMOLED, 3840x2400, 16.00
Display
-23%
-22%
-18%
Display P3 Coverage
98
65.3
-33%
63.1
-36%
67.7
-31%
sRGB Coverage
99.9
85.1
-15%
94
-6%
97.6
-2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
86.3
67.4
-22%
65.2
-24%
69.2
-20%
Response Times
-9%
-5%
-26%
74%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
14.6 ?(6.7, 7.9)
4.3 ?(2.4, 1.9)
71%
5.6 ?(2, 3.6)
62%
14.7 ?(7, 7.7)
-1%
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
84%
Response Time Black / White *
5.6 ?(2, 3.6)
10.5 ?(5.7, 4.8)
-88%
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
-71%
8.4 ?(3.2, 5.2)
-50%
2 ?(1, 1)
64%
PWM Frequency
60 ?(58)
Screen
329%
27%
20%
3%
456%
Brightness middle
459
507
10%
330
-28%
290
-37%
377
-18%
368
-20%
Brightness
434
494
14%
315
-27%
290
-33%
352
-19%
368
-15%
Brightness Distribution
88
96
9%
89
1%
96
9%
86
-2%
93
6%
Black Level *
0.44
0.02
95%
0.24
45%
0.23
48%
0.32
27%
0.01
98%
Contrast
1043
25350
2330%
1375
32%
1261
21%
1178
13%
36800
3428%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.97
1.4
53%
1.47
51%
1.59
46%
2.91
2%
2.33
22%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.13
2.8
66%
2.73
66%
3.17
61%
6.78
17%
4.34
47%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.03
0.63
39%
0.87
16%
1.3
-26%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.9
2.3
53%
1.8
63%
2.5
49%
3.4
31%
0.8
84%
Gamma
2.235 98%
2.27 97%
2.282 96%
2.253 98%
2.109 104%
2.119 104%
CCT
6775 96%
6792 96%
6499 100%
6640 98%
7273 89%
6569 99%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
329% / 329%
-2% / 11%
-2% / 8%
-14% / -6%
265% / 380%

* ... smaller is better

显示器的X Rite Pantone认证确保了非常自然的色彩再现。相应地,色彩显示在交付状态下已经相当准确。虽然颜色偏差仍在目标范围内,但校准仍会带来明显的改善。屏幕几乎能够完全显示sRGB(99.9%)和DCI-P3(98%)色彩空间,86%的AdobeRGB色彩空间也被覆盖。

卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:饱和度
卡尔曼:饱和度
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN:灰度(校准的)。
CalMAN:灰度(校准的)。
CalMAN: 饱和度(已校准)
CalMAN: 饱和度(已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 VS sRGB
ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 VS sRGB
ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 VS AdobeRGB
ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 VS AdobeRGB
ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 VS P3
ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 VS P3

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 3.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.7 ms rise
↘ 7.9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21805 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

IPS面板的可视角度很稳定,可以从任何角度阅读。如果阳光不是太亮,显示屏可以在户外阅读。

在户外的Zephyrus
在户外的Zephyrus
视角
视角

表演 - 伦勃朗与安培的相遇

通过Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX,华硕提供了一款16英寸笔记本电脑,主要定位为游戏笔记本电脑。然而,该设备也是针对流媒体和内容创作者的。

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
Nvidia系统信息
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
 

测试条件

笔记本电脑提供三个制造商特定的性能配置文件("静音"、"性能 "和 "涡轮"),你可以通过使用 "Fn "+"F5 "组合键在它们之间切换。涡轮增压 "配置文件只能在主电源操作中使用。我们的电池测试是使用 "静音 "模式进行的,所有的基准测试都是在 "性能 "模式下进行的。

性能 涡轮增压 静音
功率限制1 80瓦 100瓦 70瓦
功率限制2 80瓦 125瓦 70瓦

预装的Armoury Crate软件允许你创建个人配置文件("手动")。例如,我们单独配置了CPU的功率限制和GPU的动态提升。你还可以对图形存储进行超频。

 
 

处理器

的CPU部分 Ryzen 9-6900HXAPU(Rembrandt)由一个八核处理器组成,以3.3 GHz的基本时钟速度运行。该速度可以通过涡轮增压提高到4.9GHz。支持同步多线程(每个核心两个线程)。

Cinebench R15基准测试的多线程测试短暂地以4至4.4GHz的时钟速度运行,而单线程测试则在3.1至4.7GHz之间。在电池运行中,CPU运行在3至4.1GHz(多线程)和2至4.7GHz(单线程)。

多线程(主电源操作)
多线程(主电源操作)
单线程(主电源运行)。
单线程(主电源运行)。

我们通过对Cinebench R15基准的多线程测试进行至少30分钟的持续循环,来评估CPU Turbo在主电源运行中是否被持续使用。Turbo的使用水平很高。通过使用 "Turbo "性能配置文件,可以将时钟速度稍微提高。

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

01503004506007509001050120013501500165018001950210022502400255027002850Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2247 (2222.47-2257.72)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max; Rosetta 2: Ø1687 (1667.29-1693.05)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H: Ø1535 (1448.91-1565.5)
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2722 (2660.99-2908.88)
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2761 (2697.24-2854.49)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX; Leise: Ø2069 (2039.36-2194.43)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX; Turbo: Ø2369 (2355.85-2411.64)
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2616 (2562.79-2779.9)
运行CB15循环时的CPU时钟速度
运行CB15循环时的CPU时钟速度
运行CB15循环时的CPU时钟速度(涡轮)。
运行CB15循环时的CPU时钟速度(涡轮)。
运行CB15循环时的CPU时钟速度(静音)
运行CB15循环时的CPU时钟速度(静音)
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2292 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
158.6 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
249 Points
Help
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
84 pt ∼84%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
82 pt ∼82%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
76.6 pt ∼77%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
71.2 pt ∼71%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
68.8 pt ∼69%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
 
68.8 pt ∼69%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
67.7 pt ∼68%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max -5!
Apple M1 Max
65.2 pt ∼65%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
60.7 pt ∼61%
Average of class Gaming
 
56 pt ∼56%
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
18935 Points ∼100% +34%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
18288 Points ∼97% +30%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
18106 Points ∼96% +29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
15100 Points ∼80% +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (13966 - 15100, n=4)
14318 Points ∼76% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
14085 Points ∼74%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
13966 Points ∼74% -1%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max
12385 Points ∼65% -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 19282, n=173, last 2 years)
12293 Points ∼65% -13%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
9777 Points ∼52% -31%
Single Core
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1940 Points ∼100% +24%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1909 Points ∼98% +22%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1799 Points ∼93% +15%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1659 Points ∼86% +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
1576 Points ∼81% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
1570 Points ∼81% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1566 Points ∼81%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (1529 - 1576, n=4)
1560 Points ∼80% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max
1530 Points ∼79% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 1920, n=172, last 2 years)
1490 Points ∼77% -5%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
7203 Points ∼100% +31%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
6941 Points ∼96% +26%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
6849 Points ∼95% +25%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
5813 Points ∼81% +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (5403 - 5813, n=4)
5542 Points ∼77% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5489 Points ∼76%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
5403 Points ∼75% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 7382, n=230, last 2 years)
4402 Points ∼61% -20%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
3741 Points ∼52% -32%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max
2735 Points ∼38% -50%
CPU (Single Core)
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
734 Points ∼100% +23%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
695 Points ∼95% +17%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
685 Points ∼93% +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
612 Points ∼83% +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
610 Points ∼83% +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (595 - 612, n=4)
605 Points ∼82% +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
596 Points ∼81% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
595 Points ∼81%
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 740, n=230, last 2 years)
553 Points ∼75% -7%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max
390 Points ∼53% -34%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
2909 (2660.99min - 2908.88max) Points ∼100% +27%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
2854 Points ∼98% +25%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
2780 Points ∼96% +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
2411 Points ∼83% +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (2194 - 2411, n=4)
2296 Points ∼79% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
2292 Points ∼79%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
2194 Points ∼75% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 3077, n=239, last 2 years)
1857 Points ∼64% -19%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max (Rosetta 2)
1693 (1667min - 1693max) Points ∼58% -26%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1566 (1448.91min - 1565.5max) Points ∼54% -32%
CPU Single 64Bit
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
279 Points ∼100% +12%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
275 Points ∼99% +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
253 Points ∼91% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
249 Points ∼89%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
249 Points ∼89% 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (245 - 253, n=4)
249 Points ∼89% 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
242 Points ∼87% -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
240 Points ∼86% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 277, n=229, last 2 years)
221 Points ∼79% -11%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max (Rosetta 2)
197 Points ∼71% -21%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
306 Seconds * ∼100% -39%
Average of class Gaming
  (168 - 1259, n=229, last 2 years)
296 Seconds * ∼97% -35%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
242 Seconds * ∼79% -10%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (212 - 242, n=5)
223 Seconds * ∼73% -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
220 Seconds * ∼72%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
212 Seconds * ∼69% +4%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
200 Seconds * ∼65% +9%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max (Blender 3.0 beta for mac)
189 Seconds * ∼62% +14%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
181 Seconds * ∼59% +18%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
175.8 Seconds * ∼57% +20%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
73485 MIPS ∼100% +14%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
72836 MIPS ∼99% +13%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
68520 MIPS ∼93% +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
65336 MIPS ∼89% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
64457 MIPS ∼88%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (62123 - 65336, n=4)
63906 MIPS ∼87% -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
63706 MIPS ∼87% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 83533, n=229, last 2 years)
49801 MIPS ∼68% -23%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
44553 MIPS ∼61% -31%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
6186 MIPS ∼100% +8%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
6144 MIPS ∼99% +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
5920 MIPS ∼96% +3%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
5892 MIPS ∼95% +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (5727 - 5920, n=4)
5825 MIPS ∼94% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
5813 MIPS ∼94% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5727 MIPS ∼93%
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 6582, n=229, last 2 years)
5409 MIPS ∼87% -6%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
5257 MIPS ∼85% -8%
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
13865 Points ∼100% +36%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
13648 Points ∼98% +34%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max
12708 Points ∼92% +25%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
12559 Points ∼91% +24%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
10490 Points ∼76% +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
10167 Points ∼73%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (9647 - 10490, n=4)
10094 Points ∼73% -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
10071 Points ∼73% -1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
9607 Points ∼69% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 14294, n=222, last 2 years)
8421 Points ∼61% -17%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1918 Points ∼100% +20%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1870 Points ∼97% +17%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1842 Points ∼96% +16%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max
1782 Points ∼93% +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
1604 Points ∼84% +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1596 Points ∼83% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1594 Points ∼83%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (1523 - 1604, n=4)
1570 Points ∼82% -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
1523 Points ∼79% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 1933, n=222, last 2 years)
1448 Points ∼75% -9%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
20.5 fps ∼100% +14%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
19.9 fps ∼97% +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
18.7 fps ∼91% +4%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
18.1 fps ∼88% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
18 fps ∼88%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (17.6 - 18.7, n=4)
18 fps ∼88% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
17.6 fps ∼86% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 22.5, n=231, last 2 years)
13.9 fps ∼68% -23%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
11.7 fps ∼57% -35%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Gaming
  (23.9 - 332, n=226, last 2 years)
53.4 s * ∼100% -19%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
49.5 s * ∼93% -10%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (44.8 - 50.1, n=4)
46.3 s * ∼87% -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
45.2 s * ∼85% -0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
45 s * ∼84%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
44.8 s * ∼84% -0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
42.9 s * ∼80% +5%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
39 s * ∼73% +13%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
38.9 s * ∼73% +14%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Average of class Gaming
  (0.412 - 4.47, n=227, last 2 years)
0.565 sec * ∼100% -18%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
0.4936 sec * ∼87% -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
0.4808 sec * ∼85% -0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
0.4799 sec * ∼85%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (0.4742 - 0.4808, n=4)
0.4787 sec * ∼85% -0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
0.4742 sec * ∼84% +1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
0.4522 sec * ∼80% +6%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
0.4252 sec * ∼75% +11%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
0.4155 sec * ∼74% +13%

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
95.2 pt ∼95%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
 
91.6 pt ∼92%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
91.5 pt ∼92%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
90 pt ∼90%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
70.7 pt ∼71%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
70.7 pt ∼71%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
66.5 pt ∼67%
Average of class Gaming
 
64.6 pt ∼65%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
51 pt ∼51%
AIDA64
FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)
17963 KRay/s ∼100% +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
16852 KRay/s ∼94%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (16192 - 17963, n=4)
16847 KRay/s ∼94% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)
16192 KRay/s ∼90% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2585 - 19199, n=184, last 2 years)
11310 KRay/s ∼63% -33%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
9405 KRay/s ∼52% -44%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
9065 KRay/s ∼50% -46%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
8265 KRay/s ∼46% -51%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
5839 KRay/s ∼33% -65%
FPU Julia
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)
110797 Points ∼100% +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (101849 - 110797, n=4)
104690 Points ∼94% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
103794 Points ∼94%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)
101849 Points ∼92% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (12439 - 117712, n=184, last 2 years)
61343 Points ∼55% -41%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
42843 Points ∼39% -59%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
40570 Points ∼37% -61%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
38277 Points ∼35% -63%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
27801 Points ∼25% -73%
CPU SHA3
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)
3804 MB/s ∼100% +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (3480 - 3804, n=4)
3583 MB/s ∼94% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
3547 MB/s ∼93%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)
3480 MB/s ∼91% -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
3354 MB/s ∼88% -5%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
3178 MB/s ∼84% -10%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
2931 MB/s ∼77% -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 4851, n=184, last 2 years)
2839 MB/s ∼75% -20%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
2013 MB/s ∼53% -43%
CPU Queen
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
107042 Points ∼100% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)
107007 Points ∼100% +2%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
106414 Points ∼99% +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
106369 Points ∼99% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
104920 Points ∼98%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (102463 - 107007, n=4)
104760 Points ∼98% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)
104649 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 132615, n=184, last 2 years)
89292 Points ∼83% -15%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
85965 Points ∼80% -18%
FPU SinJulia
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)
13062 Points ∼100% +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (12861 - 13062, n=4)
12959 Points ∼99% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)
12957 Points ∼99% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
12955 Points ∼99%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
10237 Points ∼78% -21%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
10226 Points ∼78% -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 17639, n=184, last 2 years)
9886 Points ∼76% -24%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
9655 Points ∼74% -25%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
7027 Points ∼54% -46%
FPU Mandel
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)
61370 Points ∼100% +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (56121 - 61370, n=4)
57821 Points ∼94% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
57334 Points ∼93%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)
56121 Points ∼91% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (7135 - 64776, n=184, last 2 years)
33417 Points ∼54% -42%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
26859 Points ∼44% -53%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
24693 Points ∼40% -57%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
22873 Points ∼37% -60%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
15765 Points ∼26% -73%
CPU AES
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)
140776 MB/s ∼100% +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (137667 - 140776, n=4)
139475 MB/s ∼99% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
139407 MB/s ∼99%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)
137667 MB/s ∼98% -1%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
100062 MB/s ∼71% -28%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
91041 MB/s ∼65% -35%
Average of class Gaming
  (11368 - 166300, n=184, last 2 years)
76982 MB/s ∼55% -45%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
67814 MB/s ∼48% -51%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
65871 MB/s ∼47% -53%
CPU ZLib
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
1174 MB/s ∼100% +32%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
1085 MB/s ∼92% +22%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
988 MB/s ∼84% +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)
911 MB/s ∼78% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
890 MB/s ∼76%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (863 - 911, n=4)
886 MB/s ∼75% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)
863 MB/s ∼74% -3%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
701 MB/s ∼60% -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 1209, n=205, last 2 years)
691 MB/s ∼59% -22%
FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)
9540 KRay/s ∼100% +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (8748 - 9540, n=4)
9012 KRay/s ∼94% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
9001 KRay/s ∼94%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)
8759 KRay/s ∼92% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (1437 - 10472, n=184, last 2 years)
6135 KRay/s ∼64% -32%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
5596 KRay/s ∼59% -38%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
5239 KRay/s ∼55% -42%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
4776 KRay/s ∼50% -47%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
3257 KRay/s ∼34% -64%
CPU PhotoWorxx
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
40095 MPixel/s ∼100% +35%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
40000 MPixel/s ∼100% +35%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
39666 MPixel/s ∼99% +34%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
38990 MPixel/s ∼97% +31%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)
29975 MPixel/s ∼75% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)
29894 MPixel/s ∼75% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
29705 MPixel/s ∼74%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (28094 - 29975, n=4)
29417 MPixel/s ∼73% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (8341 - 46643, n=184, last 2 years)
24619 MPixel/s ∼61% -17%

系统性能

运行平稳的系统为未来几年的游戏、视频编辑和渲染提供了足够的性能。内置工作存储器的传输率仍然低于配备DDR5-4800存储的同类笔记本电脑的数值。伴随着这一点的是非常好的PC-Mark结果。

工作存储器以双通道模式运行。
工作存储器以双通道模式运行。
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4418 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5798 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4622 points
PCMark 10 Score
6351 points
Help
PCMark 10 / Score
MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8007 Points ∼100% +26%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
7816 Points ∼98% +23%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7313 Points ∼91% +15%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7149 Points ∼89% +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (4077 - 8186, n=190, last 2 years)
6545 Points ∼82% +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
6351 Points ∼79%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
10945 Points ∼100% +17%
MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10688 Points ∼98% +14%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10597 Points ∼97% +13%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9870 Points ∼90% +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (7148 - 11205, n=189, last 2 years)
9859 Points ∼90% +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
9374 Points ∼86%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10100 Points ∼100% +31%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
10050 Points ∼100% +30%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9675 Points ∼96% +26%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9173 Points ∼91% +19%
Average of class Gaming
  (6161 - 10638, n=189, last 2 years)
8737 Points ∼87% +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
7704 Points ∼76%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
12905 Points ∼100% +34%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
11777 Points ∼91% +22%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10951 Points ∼85% +14%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10351 Points ∼80% +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
9626 Points ∼75%
Average of class Gaming
  (3670 - 13098, n=189, last 2 years)
8955 Points ∼69% -7%
CrossMark / Overall
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
2113 Points ∼100% +23%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1768 Points ∼84% +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (974 - 2108, n=32, last 2 years)
1741 Points ∼82% +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1727 Points ∼82% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1711 Points ∼81%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R
1586 Points ∼75% -7%
CrossMark / Productivity
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
2031 Points ∼100% +20%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1719 Points ∼85% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1698 Points ∼84%
Average of class Gaming
  (907 - 2062, n=32, last 2 years)
1692 Points ∼83% 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1585 Points ∼78% -7%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R
1361 Points ∼67% -20%
CrossMark / Creativity
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
2161 Points ∼100% +25%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R
2102 Points ∼97% +22%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1985 Points ∼92% +15%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1868 Points ∼86% +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (1027 - 2165, n=32, last 2 years)
1823 Points ∼84% +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1724 Points ∼80%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
2228 Points ∼100% +30%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1715 Points ∼77%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 2230, n=32, last 2 years)
1671 Points ∼75% -3%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1633 Points ∼73% -5%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1471 Points ∼66% -14%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R
1080 Points ∼48% -37%
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
62554 MB/s ∼100% +18%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
62419 MB/s ∼100% +17%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
61946 MB/s ∼99% +17%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
61605 MB/s ∼98% +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
53162 MB/s ∼85%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (48427 - 53345, n=4)
52043 MB/s ∼83% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (18074 - 77803, n=184, last 2 years)
43187 MB/s ∼69% -19%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
65865 MB/s ∼100% +24%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
65835 MB/s ∼100% +23%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
65452 MB/s ∼99% +23%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
65277 MB/s ∼99% +22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
53321 MB/s ∼81%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (50457 - 53321, n=4)
52476 MB/s ∼80% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (20318 - 76185, n=184, last 2 years)
46944 MB/s ∼71% -12%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
65772 MB/s ∼100% +15%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
65159 MB/s ∼99% +14%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
64282 MB/s ∼98% +12%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
61981 MB/s ∼94% +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
57180 MB/s ∼87%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (54912 - 57202, n=4)
56374 MB/s ∼86% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (15975 - 66256, n=184, last 2 years)
45040 MB/s ∼68% -21%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
95.2 ns * ∼100% -3%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
92.6 ns * ∼97% -0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
92.3 ns * ∼97%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
89.7 ns * ∼94% +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (83.4 - 92.3, n=4)
86.1 ns * ∼90% +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (0 - 122, n=208, last 2 years)
60.3 ns * ∼63% +35%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
0 ns * ∼0% +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

标准化的延迟监测测试(网络冲浪、4k视频再现、Prime95高负荷)显示了DPC延迟的一些明显的延迟。该系统似乎并不适合实时视频和音频处理。然而,未来的软件更新可能会带来一些改进,甚至使情况变得更糟。

延迟监测
延迟监测
延迟监测
延迟监测
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4836 μs * ∼100% -827%
MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1642 μs * ∼34% -215%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
879.6 μs * ∼18% -69%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
623 μs * ∼13% -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
521.5 μs * ∼11%

* ... smaller is better

存储解决方案

两个存储容量为2TB的PCIe 4固态硬盘(M.2-2280)被组合在一个RAID 0阵列中,因此操作系统将这两个固态硬盘视为一个4TB的固态硬盘。所有需要存储的数据都分布在这两块SSD上。由此产生的高传输率和短加载时间是游戏的最佳选择。

两个PCIe 4固态硬盘...
两个PCIe 4固态硬盘...
...形成一个RAID 0阵列。
...形成一个RAID 0阵列。
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 9490 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 10135 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 563.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 412 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 5266 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 9867 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 71.92 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 327.5 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
82.7 pt ∼83%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
76.5 pt ∼77%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
74.6 pt ∼75%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
72.7 pt ∼73%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
72.6 pt ∼73%
Average of class Gaming
 
42.8 pt ∼43%
DiskSpd
seq read
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
4903 MB/s ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3946 (3883.92min - 3946.42max) MB/s ∼80% -20%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3887 MB/s ∼79% -21%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
3819 (3405.77min - 3819.33max) MB/s ∼78% -22%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2529 (2450.31min - 2528.54max) MB/s ∼52% -48%
Average of class Gaming
  (170 - 5544, n=186, last 2 years)
2377 MB/s ∼48% -52%
seq write
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
7889 (6495.73min - 7888.81max) MB/s ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
4457 MB/s ∼56% -44%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3923 (3818.83min - 3922.64max) MB/s ∼50% -50%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3899 (3880.57min - 3898.61max) MB/s ∼49% -51%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3863 (3808.78min - 3862.78max) MB/s ∼49% -51%
Average of class Gaming
  (174 - 7889, n=185, last 2 years)
2584 MB/s ∼33% -67%
seq q8 t1 read
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
10557 (9742.97min - 10557.3max) MB/s ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
7028 (6634.28min - 7027.76max) MB/s ∼67% -33%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6722 (5765.49min - 6722max) MB/s ∼64% -36%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6666 (5850.89min - 6666.43max) MB/s ∼63% -37%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6643 (6200.62