联想Legion Pro 7 16笔记本电脑回顾:得益于RTX 4090的全面游戏能力
这款Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H不仅是最强大的,也是最昂贵的游戏笔记本之一。目前,你必须支付至少4,500欧元的组合,以获得 酷睿i9-13900HX, GeForce RTX 4090, 32GB内存(2x 16GB DDR5-5600),2TB大容量存储(2x 1TB NVMe SSD)和240Hz显示屏(2660 x 1600像素)。每个玩家都必须决定他是否要支持制造商目前的价格政策,这似乎与任何通货膨胀无关。
Legion Pro 7的竞争者包括其他16和17英寸范围内的RTX 4090高端玩家,如 Razer Blade 16,以及 XMG Neo 16,以及 华硕Strix Scar 17和 MSI Titan GT77.更加便宜的姐妹型号,配备 RTX 4080也出现在表格中作为对比设备。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.8 % | 06/2023 | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 26 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
89.8 % | 03/2023 | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 21.99 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 | |
88.3 % | 04/2023 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.9 kg | 28.3 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 | |
87.7 % | 04/2023 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 29.9 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
89 % | 02/2023 | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 3.5 kg | 23 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 | |
89.4 % | 02/2023 | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 26 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
由于这款机箱在结构上与已经测试过的变体相同,我们在这篇文章中不会再讨论关于机箱、端口和输入设备的细节。你可以在下面的评论中找到相应的信息 链接的评论.
沟通
网络摄像头
显示
除了外壳,显示屏也与4080版本相同。 这是一个好消息,因为我们上次测试证实,WQXGA屏幕几乎在各方面都令人印象深刻。
|
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 491 cd/m²
Contrast: 1228:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.97
ΔE Greyscale 3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
71.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.211
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 MNG007DA2-3 (CSO1628), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 AUO B160ZAN01.U, mini-LED, 3840x2400, 16.00 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 NE173QHM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 BOE0AF0 NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI B173ZAN06.C, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 17.30 | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H MNG007DA2-3 (CSO1628), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 24% | 20% | -3% | 22% | -1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 69.5 | 99.9 44% | 98 41% | 67.3 -3% | 94.9 37% | 69.1 -1% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.8 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 96.7 -3% | 99.9 0% | 99.7 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 71.6 | 90.9 27% | 85.6 20% | 68.9 -4% | 92.4 29% | 71.2 -1% |
Response Times | -622% | -53% | -60% | -365% | -21% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 10.9 ? | 10.2 ? 6% | 6.2 ? 43% | 14.5 ? -33% | 38.4 ? -252% | 12.3 ? -13% |
Response Time Black / White * | 4.6 ? | 62.04 ? -1249% | 11.4 ? -148% | 8.6 ? -87% | 26.6 ? -478% | 5.9 ? -28% |
PWM Frequency | 2420 ? | 2380 ? | ||||
Screen | 1412% | 11% | -5% | 54786% | 21% | |
Brightness middle | 491 | 730 49% | 322.5 -34% | 372 -24% | 606 23% | 511 4% |
Brightness | 472 | 729 54% | 317 -33% | 349 -26% | 602 28% | 469 -1% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 94 3% | 86 -5% | 88 -3% | 93 2% | 86 -5% |
Black Level * | 0.4 | 0.0045 99% | 0.29 27% | 0.32 20% | 0.0001 100% | 0.4 -0% |
Contrast | 1228 | 162222 13110% | 1112 -9% | 1163 -5% | 6060000 493385% | 1278 4% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 5.65 -253% | 1.15 28% | 2.06 -29% | 4.8 -200% | 0.95 41% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.15 | 10.11 -96% | 3.03 41% | 3 42% | 8.2 -59% | 2.07 60% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.97 | 1.85 -91% | 0.56 42% | 1.5 -55% | 1.8 -86% | 0.91 6% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3 | 8.1 -170% | 1.7 43% | 1.9 37% | 6.5 -117% | 0.6 80% |
Gamma | 2.211 100% | 1.98 111% | 2.27 97% | 2.312 95% | 2.63 84% | 2.176 101% |
CCT | 6979 93% | 5874 111% | 6299 103% | 6747 96% | 6596 99% | 6545 99% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 271% /
824% | -7% /
4% | -23% /
-12% | 18148% /
35172% | -0% /
10% |
* ... smaller is better
不管是亮度(~470 cd/m²)、对比度(~1,230:1)还是色彩准确性(平均DeltaE 1.6):测得的数值对IPS面板来说是非常公正的。响应时间也是令人满意的,这主要归功于240赫兹的刷新率。在色彩空间方面还有改进的余地。虽然100%的sRGB对于游戏笔记本来说已经足够了,但对于专业用户来说,大约72%的AdobeRGB覆盖率和70%的DCI-P3都有点差。其他竞争者在这里提供更多(见表)。
总的来说,该显示屏给人留下了良好到非常好的印象,尽管它在技术上还达不到像Razer Blade 16和MSI Titan GT 77那样的迷你LED面板的水平。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
4.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.6 ms rise | |
↘ 3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
10.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.1 ms rise | |
↘ 5.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17853 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
业绩
Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H在价格和性能方面处于绝对上风。这款16英寸的笔记本提供了足够的储备,为未来几年的新游戏做好了准备。虽然CPU和GPU是焊接的(这在现代笔记本电脑中很常见),但如果需要,工作内存和大容量存储可以被替换。
测试条件
预装的联想Vantage软件包含许多定制系统的选项。热量模式和可选的混合模式尤其相关。除了电池测量(平衡与图形切换)之外,我们所有的测试都是在性能模式下进行的,并有一个永久激活的dGPU。
静音模式 | 平衡模式 | 性能模式 | |
CPU PL1 (HWiNFO) | 55 W | 80 W | 130 W |
CPU PL2 (HWiNFO) | 65 W | 119 W | 185 W |
噪音 (Witcher 3 @FHD/Ultra) | ~37 dB(A) | ~47 dB(A) | ~53 dB(A) |
性能 (Witcher 3 @FHD/Ultra) | 40 FPS (锁定) | ~160 FPS | ~200 FPS |
处理器
正如预期的那样, 酷睿i9-13900HX提供了与RTX 4080型号非常相似的性能。猛禽湖芯片的性能在较长时间内也相当稳定(见Cinebench循环)。一般来说,CPU的性能略高于迄今为止确定的13900HX的平均水平。英特尔将8个带超线程的性能核心和16个不带超线程的效率核心结合起来,这意味着总共有32个平行线程。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (17589 - 27615, n=21) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average of class Gaming (3069 - 60169, n=222, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (88686 - 137015, n=21) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (18567 - 252486, n=222, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (4362 - 7029, n=21) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=222, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (125644 - 141385, n=21) | |
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=222, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (12334 - 17179, n=21) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=222, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (43850 - 69202, n=21) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average of class Gaming (10291 - 134044, n=222, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (89413 - 237881, n=21) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=222, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1284 - 1958, n=21) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2409, n=222, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (9481 - 15279, n=21) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average of class Gaming (1518 - 31796, n=222, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (42994 - 51994, n=21) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=223, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 |
系统性能
系统功率也处于非常高的水平:PCMark 10中的8158分比RTX 4080模型的结果高出几个百分点。相比之下,DDR5工作内存的基准测试结果也令人印象深刻。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (7690 - 9331, n=8) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (10972 - 11983, n=8) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (8300 - 12334, n=196, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (9038 - 11680, n=8) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 11833, n=196, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (10605 - 16395, n=8) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=196, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H |
CrossMark / Overall | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1825 - 2295, n=8) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2334, n=169, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1666 - 2166, n=8) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=169, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2162 - 2514, n=8) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2514, n=169, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1441 - 2275, n=8) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=169, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 |
PCMark 10 Score | 8158 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (67716 - 78835, n=21) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 92565, n=222, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (73998 - 88462, n=21) | |
Average of class Gaming (24879 - 90647, n=222, last 2 years) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (65472 - 77045, n=21) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average of class Gaming (21619 - 103259, n=222, last 2 years) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 152.5, n=219, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (80.4 - 91.1, n=21) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
测试配置在延迟方面的表现不尽如人意。根据LatencyMon工具,由于数值极高,16-incher在其交付状态下不适合进行实时音频和视频编辑。有趣的是,RTX 4080版本的延迟明显更低。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储
联想没有安装更大的固态硬盘,而是简单地使用了便宜的Legion 型号的两个1-TB的固态硬盘,完全占据了M.2插槽。流行的三星PM9A1取得了非常好的效果,但在较长时间的负载中经常要处理较强的波动或下降--如Pro 7的情况。然而,这种现象也影响到其他制造商的NVMe SSD(见图)。
* ... smaller is better
Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
的 GeForce RTX 4090是目前最快的移动游戏显卡。来自Nvidia的Ada-Lovelace一代的顶级型号配备了9,728个着色器和16GB GDDR6内存。当涉及到合成基准时,Legion Pro 7在RTX 4090的竞争中排名居中,它也依靠175瓦的最大TGP(包括动态提升)。
3DMark 11 Performance | 44779 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 34742 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 20039 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
16英寸的显示器在游戏测试中尤其发挥了它的力量。目前的游戏在原生分辨率下运行流畅(我们的QHD基准测试是以2,560 x 1,440而不是2,560 x 1,600像素创建的),即使在最大的细节下,也几乎总是能达到60 FPS以上。即使在4K显示器上,完全设置通常也不会有问题--即使没有DLSS或帧生成的帮助。
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (139.2 - 216, n=32) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=224, last 2 years) |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (91.1 - 167.7, n=35) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Average of class Gaming (6.38 - 167.7, n=214, last 2 years) |
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 | |
3840x2160 Extreme Quality Preset AA:T2X Filmic SM | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (63 - 86, n=12) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average of class Gaming (34 - 86, n=21, last 2 years) | |
2560x1440 Extreme Quality Preset AA:T2X Filmic SM | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (104 - 137, n=14) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average of class Gaming (47 - 137, n=35, last 2 years) |
Spider-Man Miles Morales | |
3840x2160 Very High Preset AA:T | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (65.7 - 84.3, n=7) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average of class Gaming (30 - 84.2, n=11, last 2 years) | |
2560x1440 Very High Preset AA:T | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (93.3 - 119.8, n=7) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average of class Gaming (51.4 - 115.7, n=18, last 2 years) |
像往常一样,我们测试了GPU的性能是否在较长的负载下保持不变,用 的方式进行测试。Witcher 3.与竞争对手类似,除了轻微的波动外,我们没有注意到任何性能下降或类似情况。
Witcher 3 FPS-Diagramm
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
GTA V (2015) | 186.3 | 186.9 | 184.9 | 143.6 | 137.7 | 173.6 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 200 | |||||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 230 | 204 | 193.9 | 182.1 | 175.1 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 223 | 212 | 181.2 | 154 | 91.7 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 201 | 177.7 | 136.4 | 111.7 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 439 | 369 | 359 | 347 | 302 | 158.4 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 185 | 120 | ||||
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 100.93 | 50.05 | ||||
F1 22 (2022) | 301 | 303 | 279 | 129.2 | 85.2 | 45.9 |
A Plague Tale Requiem (2022) | 77.2 | 43.8 | ||||
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022) | 132 | 82 | ||||
Spider-Man Miles Morales (2022) | 108.1 | 80 | ||||
The Witcher 3 v4.00 (2023) | 101.2 | 48.7 | ||||
The Last of Us (2023) | 85.8 | 45.7 |
排放
噪声排放
如此强大的高端组件的最大缺点是噪音的发展,这一点不足为奇。在性能模式下,16英寸处理器在3D应用中的噪音在48 dB(A)(平均3DMark 06)和55 dB(A)(最大压力测试)之间。在游戏中,你可以期待大约53 dB(A),如果不戴耳机,这也是非常令人不快的。闲置时的情况要轻松得多。虽然风扇偶尔会有点响(例如在开机时),但平均28至30分贝(A)是可以接受的,特别是因为如果需要的话,可以使用静音或平衡模式。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 28 / 30 / 38 dB(A) |
Load |
| 48 / 55 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 18% | 14% | -10% | 1% | 4% | |
off / environment * | 25 | 20.84 17% | 22.7 9% | 25 -0% | 24.6 2% | 24 4% |
Idle Minimum * | 28 | 23.65 16% | 23.5 16% | 31 -11% | 29.2 -4% | 26 7% |
Idle Average * | 30 | 23.65 21% | 27.7 8% | 33 -10% | 29.2 3% | 28 7% |
Idle Maximum * | 38 | 23.65 38% | 27.7 27% | 42 -11% | 29.2 23% | 34 11% |
Load Average * | 48 | 43.35 10% | 30.5 36% | 58 -21% | 50.7 -6% | 47 2% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 53 | 46.7 12% | 51.4 3% | 57 -8% | 53.3 -1% | 55 -4% |
Load Maximum * | 55 | 46.72 15% | 54.1 2% | 59 -7% | 61 -11% | 56 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
该机箱的温度比竞争对手高,顶部最高为53℃,底部最高为59℃。在闲置模式下,温度的发展仍然在限制范围内。例如,掌托的温度达到29°C左右,这是一个适度的速度。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 59 °C / 138 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-16.1 °C / -29 F).
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 7% | 25% | 14% | 20% | 1% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 53 | 52 2% | 34.6 35% | 50 6% | 40.6 23% | 48 9% |
Maximum Bottom * | 59 | 47.6 19% | 35.6 40% | 51 14% | 41.1 30% | 49 17% |
Idle Upper Side * | 34 | 33 3% | 27.2 20% | 28 18% | 26.2 23% | 40 -18% |
Idle Bottom * | 32 | 30.6 4% | 30 6% | 26 19% | 30.3 5% | 33 -3% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在使用FurMark和Prime95工具进行的压力测试中没有问题。虽然CPU的温度超过了90℃,但它并没有低于基本时钟的速度。GPU(约80°C)的表现与此类似。
演讲者
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理
消耗功率
即使一些对手的消耗更少,但对于RTX 4090设备来说,其功耗是典型的。虽然我们在空闲模式下测得20至35瓦,但在负载下却在136至320瓦之间。因此,附带的330瓦电源的尺寸是足够的。
Off / Standby | 0.1 / Watt |
Idle | 20 / 25 / 35 Watt |
Load |
136 / 320 Watt |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -11% | 8% | 14% | 10% | 6% | 23% | |
Idle Minimum * | 20 | 27.5 -38% | 14.5 27% | 8 60% | 14 30% | 18 10% | 13.9 ? 30% |
Idle Average * | 25 | 34.4 -38% | 21.1 16% | 18 28% | 21.6 14% | 24 4% | 19.2 ? 23% |
Idle Maximum * | 35 | 35.4 -1% | 42.8 -22% | 28 20% | 24.8 29% | 32 9% | 27.1 ? 23% |
Load Average * | 136 | 147.8 -9% | 116.7 14% | 133 2% | 122.5 10% | 130 4% | 111.6 ? 18% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 282 | 256 9% | 278 1% | 294 -4% | 265 6% | 260 8% | |
Load Maximum * | 320 | 286.7 10% | 279.6 13% | 399 -25% | 418 -31% | 320 -0% | 251 ? 22% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power consumption external monitor
电池寿命
Legion Pro 7的电池寿命既不坏也不特别好。这款16英寸的产品在显示亮度降低到150cd/m²的情况下,在我们的实际WLAN测试中,可以维持5小时左右。
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 12% | -19% | 30% | 4% | -2% | 19% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 308 | 345.5 12% | 248 -19% | 399 30% | 319 4% | 303 -2% | 366 ? 19% |
H.264 | 503 | 349 | 358 | 397 ? | |||
Witcher 3 ultra | 95 | 84 | 80.6 ? | ||||
Load | 81 | 86 | 124 | 83.9 ? | |||
Reader / Idle | 385 | 539 ? |
Pros
Cons
判决书
那些能够接受至少4500欧元的高昂价格的人将在Legion Pro 7中找到一个几乎彻底成功的16英寸格式的高端游戏机。
联想不仅依靠稳定和高质量的外观机箱,而且还依靠良好的输入设备。连接性(包括Thunderbolt 4)和WQXGA显示屏也会让大多数买家满意。16:10屏幕(240赫兹)除其他外,提供了良好的亮度,令人信服的色彩准确性,以及IPS标准的短响应时间。
在消极方面,我们会有--不幸的是,高端笔记本很常见--负载下的温度和噪音发展非常高。如果没有耳机,性能模式是没有乐趣的。我们建议在这里使用静音或平衡模式。
总的来说,带有RTX 4090 的Legion Pro 7--像RTX 4080型号 --仍然得到非常好的评价,因此属于市场上最好的高端笔记本电脑。
如果你希望它更安静和/或更轻,你应该看看 刀锋16.这个来自Razer的竞争对手在测试中的得分甚至略高。
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
-
06/16/2023 v7
Florian Glaser
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.