回顾 Palworld：笔记本电脑和台式机基准测试

令人兴奋的流派组合 在短短几天内，《Palworld》迅速在 Steam 上取得了惊人的成功。这款早期进入的游戏融合了《口袋妖怪》、《方舟》和《塞尔达》等多款游戏的元素。我们深入了解了这款对视觉要求极高的游戏。

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 01/27/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Laptop / Notebook Desktop Gamecheck

测试系统

华硕 TUF Gaming Advantage A16（RX 7600S 和 780M）

飞利浦 Evnia 8000 系列 41.5 英寸 UHD OLED 游戏显示器

我们在这些设备上进行了游戏基准测试。点击各种图片可进入相应生产商的网站。有关设备规格的更多详情，请参阅文章末尾。

技术

Palworld 几乎凭空迅速登上了 Steam 排行榜的榜首。这款开放世界游戏由日本工作室 Pocket Pair 开发，采用了强大的虚幻引擎 5，确保了令人印象深刻的视觉效果。尽管这款游戏色彩鲜艳，整体画面风格卡通，但其底层技术无疑是值得一提的。除了扎实的纹理（尤其是在较高的级别）之外，该游戏的积极特点还包括茂密的植被、出色的可视性和美丽的光照氛围。

游戏还提供了多样的气候区和迷人的昼夜循环。虽然偶尔也能看到与《口袋妖怪》十分相似的地方，但游戏中众多生物的设计都很有爱。作为一款早期进入的游戏，《Palworld》的精良程度令人印象深刻。不过，问题更多地表现在细节上。物体有时会突兀地弹出，剪切和碰撞检测偶尔也会出现问题。

图形界面需要考虑一些因素。例如，我们不得不重新运行某些基准测试，因为 "最大每秒帧数"（Max FPS）开关无法始终正常工作，尽管设置了 "无限制"（No Limit），但偶尔还是会将帧数限制在 120 FPS。此外，简单的更改就会显示 "Restart due"（重新启动）信息，而且全屏模式仅适用于原始分辨率，这些都不是最佳选择。不过，选项菜单还是值得称赞的。除了五项画质和细节控制外，还有五项实用的预设（我们将其评为 "不错"）。

VSync、运动模糊和 DLSS 也是可选项，但目前玩家只能使用 FSR。在边缘平滑方面，有 FXAA、TAA 和 TSR 可供选择，后者在大多数预设中都是默认激活的。希望开发人员能对各项设置做出更多解释。同时，游戏的启动和加载时间也令人满意。从本质上讲，《Palworld》运行相当流畅，这对于一款早期接入游戏来说并非必然。Palworld 的游戏范围也同样令人瞩目，不可否认，它在游戏性方面有其魅力，能激励玩家进行探索和尝试。

基准

在测量过程中，我们使用了游戏的初始阶段，特别是当主角自由进入开放世界时。我们使用 CapFrameX 工具记录了一条预定路线，时间不到 20 秒。

成果

全高清（1,920 x 1,080）

Palworld 对硬件的要求属于中等水平，不高也不低。iGPU Radeon 780M可以在全高清条件下流畅处理低预设值。与此同时，当前的中端显卡在处理较高预设值时也没有问题，如表所示。

Palworld
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:TSR 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:TSR 1920x1080 High Preset AA:TSR 1920x1080 Epic Preset AA:TSR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	237 (51^min, 91.8^P0.1, 159.1^P1) fps ∼100% 219 (55.4^min, 110.5^P0.1, 165.4^P1) fps ∼100% 218 (75.5^min, 95.5^P0.1, 145.3^P1) fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	173.9 (72.6^min, 98.7^P0.1, 135.2^P1) fps ∼73% 153.9 (50.3^min, 57.5^P0.1, 108.6^P1) fps ∼70% 149.9 (47^min, 55.3^P0.1, 98^P1) fps ∼69%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H Asus ROG Zephyrus M16	171.6 (48^min, 69.4^P0.1, 98.7^P1) fps ∼72% 139.3 (26.8^min, 48^P0.1, 85.2^P1) fps ∼64% 138.8 (26.3^min, 42.5^P0.1, 86.9^P1) fps ∼64%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX Razer Blade 16 Mid 23	162.3 (33.9^min, 57.9^P0.1, 95.5^P1) fps ∼68% 133.5 (32.2^min, 39.3^P0.1, 77.7^P1) fps ∼61% 130.8 (23.6^min, 34.4^P0.1, 73.8^P1) fps ∼60%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Pro 15 E23	118.4 (7.9^min, 42.5^P0.1, 73.7^P1) fps ∼50% 111 (29.1^min, 46.7^P0.1, 73^P1) fps ∼51% 108.5 (34.6^min, 46.6^P0.1, 70.2^P1) fps ∼50%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS Razer Blade 14 Mid 23	110.7 (31.6^min, 34.9^P0.1, 54.4^P1) fps ∼47% 91.9 (13.2^min, 23.2^P0.1, 53.7^P1) fps ∼42% 87.8 (13.4^min, 18.4^P0.1, 44.8^P1) fps ∼40%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H Medion Erazer Scout E20	99.1 (25.7^min, 37.4^P0.1, 68.1^P1) fps ∼42% 76.3 (31.8^min, 36.1^P0.1, 58.9^P1) fps ∼35% 74.9 (28.8^min, 39.1^P0.1, 61^P1) fps ∼34%
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16	117 (59.9^min, 75.4^P0.1, 90.1^P1) fps ∼100% 97.7 (25.5^min, 41^P0.1, 67.6^P1) fps ∼41% 71.9 (32.2^min, 39.2^P0.1, 51.8^P1) fps ∼33% 69.5 (29.4^min, 35.7^P0.1, 50.6^P1) fps ∼32%
AMD Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16	37.9 (6.67^min, 8.65^P0.1, 25^P1) fps ∼32% 30.3 (13.1^min, 14^P0.1, 19.8^P1) fps ∼13% 20.5 (4.68^min, 5.5^P0.1, 11.8^P1) fps ∼9% 20.2 (10.6^min, 10.9^P0.1, 12.5^P1) fps ∼9%

QHD (2,560 x 1,440)

即使是 QHD 分辨率，也不需要高端显卡。A GeForce RTX 4050或 Radeon RX 7600S就能满足 2560 x 1440 像素和史诗预设的要求。

Palworld
2560x1440 Epic Preset AA:TSR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	178.1 (64.7^min, 112.8^P0.1, 147.1^P1) fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	135.2 (14.2^min, 49.8^P0.1, 85.1^P1) fps ∼76%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H Asus ROG Zephyrus M16	110.5 (31^min, 40.3^P0.1, 61.9^P1) fps ∼62%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX Razer Blade 16 Mid 23	106.7 (25.6^min, 31.6^P0.1, 53.9^P1) fps ∼60%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Pro 15 E23	81.3 (33.5^min, 35.1^P0.1, 56.1^P1) fps ∼46%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS Razer Blade 14 Mid 23	65.6 (7.31^min, 12.6^P0.1, 39.2^P1) fps ∼37%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H Medion Erazer Scout E20	50.6 (21.2^min, 27.7^P0.1, 40.2^P1) fps ∼28%
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16	48.9 (14.9^min, 17^P0.1, 35.8^P1) fps ∼27%

超高清（3,840 x 2,160）

实际测试结果为 3,840 x 2,160 像素，尤其是在不使用升频的情况下。史诗预设仅在使用 GeForce RTX 4070 或更高。在包含 DLSS 的情况下 GeForce RTX 4060 就足够了。

Palworld
3840x2160 Epic Preset AA:TSR 3840x2160 Epic Preset + Quality DLSS AA:TSR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	101.6 (46.1^min, 58.5^P0.1, 82.9^P1) fps ∼100% 139.8 (9.18^min, 61.1^P0.1, 105.5^P1) fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	71.3 (10.3^min, 12.3^P0.1, 46.3^P1) fps ∼70%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H Asus ROG Zephyrus M16	66.5 (23.9^min, 26.1^P0.1, 38.8^P1) fps ∼65% 86.2 (11.9^min, 21.2^P0.1, 40.8^P1) fps ∼62%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX Razer Blade 16 Mid 23	61 (20.7^min, 22.8^P0.1, 35.8^P1) fps ∼60% 83 (16.5^min, 20.7^P0.1, 39.4^P1) fps ∼59%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Pro 15 E23	42.7 (16.8^min, 19.5^P0.1, 33.4^P1) fps ∼42% 58.1 (24.4^min, 29^P0.1, 43.4^P1) fps ∼42%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS Razer Blade 14 Mid 23	34.8 (14.7^min, 14.9^P0.1, 24.3^P1) fps ∼34% 49.9 (17.6^min, 20.9^P0.1, 30.6^P1) fps ∼36%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H Medion Erazer Scout E20	26 (11.6^min, 12.4^P0.1, 15.1^P1) fps ∼26% 36.3 (15.5^min, 20.4^P0.1, 31.7^P1) fps ∼26%
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16	25.2 (9.17^min, 9.74^P0.1, 12.2^P1) fps ∼25%

Overview

Test system details

笔记本	显卡	处理器	内存
华硕 ROG Zephyrus M16	NvidiaGeForce RTX 4090 @150 W TGP (16 GB GDDR6X)	Intel Core i9-13900H	2 x 16 GB DDR5
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23	NvidiaGeForce RTX 4080 @175 W TGP (12 GB GDDR6X)	Intel Core i9-13950HX	2 x 16 GB DDR5
XMG Pro 15 E23	NvidiaGeForce RTX 4070 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i9-13900HX	2 x 16 GB DDR5
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23	NvidiaGeForce RTX 4060 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6)	AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2 x 8 GB DDR5
Medion Erazer Scout E20	NvidiaGeForce RTX 4050 @100 W TGP (6 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-13700H	2 x 8 GB DDR5
华硕 TUF Gaming Advantage A16	AMD Radeon RX 7600S (8 GB GDDR6) & AMD Radeon 780M	AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2 x 8 GB DDR5

塔式电脑	显卡	处理器	内存
华硕 ROG Strix Z790-F	NvidiaGeForce RTX 4080 (16 GB GDDR6X) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT (20 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i9-13900K	2 x 24 GB DDR5 G.Skill

4K 显示器	操作系统	Nvidia 驱动程序	AMD 驱动程序
Philips Evnia 42M2N8900	Windows 11	ForceWare 546.65	Adrenalin 23.12.1

Editor of the original article: Carmen Pol - Translator - 115 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 390604 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 回顾 Palworld：笔记本电脑和台式机基准测试

Florian Glaser, 2024-01-27 (Update: 2024-01-27)

Pos	Model	< Prev Next > Palworld (2024)
Pos	Model	low 1920x1080 Low Preset TSRAA	med. 1920x1080 Medium Preset TSRAA	high 1920x1080 High Preset TSRAA	ultra 1920x1080 Epic Preset TSRAA	QHD 2560x1440 Epic Preset TSRAA	4K 3840x2160 Epic Preset TSRAA	3840x2160 Epic Preset + Quality DLSS TSRAA
2	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	240	239	234	232	211	138.7	198.3
3	AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX	236	223	187.3	184.1	154.5	92.2
4	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super	240ⁿ²	238ⁿ²	225.5ⁿ²	224ⁿ²	181.05ⁿ²	103.95ⁿ²	140.4ⁿ²
5	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080		237	219	218	178.1	101.6	139.8
8	AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT		173.9	153.9	149.9	135.2	71.3
11	AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT	236	219	172.8	165.3	121.1	67.3
12	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	211	176.25ⁿ²	145.3ⁿ²	144.85ⁿ²	115.15ⁿ²	66.5	86.2
14	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090	239	233	208	157.3	120.4	71.5	96.4
22	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU		162.3	133.5	130.8	106.7	61	83
24	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB		209	165.5	152.7	113.4	66.5
30	AMD Radeon RX 6800	209	167.8	124	117.4	86.4	46.5
32	NVIDIA Titan RTX	146.6	123.8	98.7	91.4	65.8	36.3	70.9
36	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU				115.6	86.6	47.1
37	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU		118.4	106.6ⁿ²	102.55ⁿ²	75.2ⁿ²	42.7	58.1
40	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070		173.9	138.8	124.6	91.4	51.8
41	AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT	184.2	148.3	110.7	100.9	71.8	38.4
43	AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT	172.2	140.6	99.9	93.1	67.1	36.3
44	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	119.9	116.4	102.5	96.8ⁿ²	70.95ⁿ²	40.15ⁿ²	54.6ⁿ²
45	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	185.7	156.9	121.6	109.3	81.5	43.7	61.1
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Palworld
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
46	Intel Arc A770	127.4	105.8	82	78.8	60.2	33.5
48	AMD Radeon RX 7600	158.3	131.5	96.9	85.7	59.6	28.3
53	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU		110.7	91.9	87.8	65.6	34.8	49.9
58	AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT	145.7	115.7	80.9	74.8	52.2	27.4
62	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	116.7	106.1	103	102.1	72.9	38.7	54.9
66	Intel Arc A750	125.2	112.2	89.5	81.7	59.3	32.3
76	NVIDIA Titan X Pascal	133.5	112.2	90.3	83.7	57.8	32.2
80	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Desktop)	143.7	120.1	94.4	86.3	58.4	31.2	45
84	AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop)	125.7	100.7	73	68.2	47.1	25.9
91	AMD Radeon RX 7600S	117	97.7	71.9	69.5	48.9	25.2
97	Intel Arc A580	111.9	94.8	73.5	67.9	48.5	26.7
98	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop)	124.7	105	82	75.1	51.5	25.9	40.2
100	AMD Radeon RX 6600	119.4	104	78.4	70.7	47.2	22.1
104	AMD Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop)	112.5	89	67.1	62.9	42.7	23.3
134	AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (Desktop)	109.8	89.2	66.5	62.4	42.8	21.7
142	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop)	86ⁿ²	70.75ⁿ²	54.15ⁿ²	49.65ⁿ²	34ⁿ²	17.35ⁿ²
143	AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT	68.7	43.7	30.1	21.7
144	AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop)	71.8	60.7	43.4	40.8	28	14.9
145	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU		96.2ⁿ²	74.4ⁿ²	73.4ⁿ²	50.6	26	36.3
148*	Intel Arc A730M	80.1	67.4	53.8	50.7	36.5	18.9
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Palworld
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
152	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	80.5	69.9	55.3	50.7
161	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop)	70.9	53.4	51.3	47.4	26	11.8
173	AMD Radeon RX 6500M	59.5	47.9	26.8	21.1
198	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	57.2	48	37.5	35
202	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	50.6	43.8	33.6	31
203	Intel Arc A380	46.3	37.4	27.4	24.4
222*	Intel Arc A310	38.3	33.2	23.2	20.9
223*	Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU	40.6	37.1	29.5	27.3
225*	Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU	34.8	32.6	25.2	23.4
241*	AMD Radeon 780M	42.4ⁿ²	35.1ⁿ²	24.95ⁿ²	23.1ⁿ²	17.7	8.9
420*	Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)	11.1
585	Intel UHD Graphics 630	5.96
669*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 3	6.28

Legend
5	Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
	May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
	May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
?	Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
	Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.