华硕ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY笔记本电脑评测:英特尔不再是国王
在2023年的CES上亮相,华硕刷新了其顶级的17.3英寸ROG Strix Scar 17系列,采用了最新的13代英特尔CPU、Zen 4 AMD CPU和Nvidia Ada Lovelace GPU来取代去年的阵容。然而,除了这些内部升级外,外部机箱设计同比几乎保持一致。我们建议查看我们现有的关于2022年ROG Strix Scar 17的评论,以了解更多关于2023年机型的物理特征。它们之间的任何差异都将在下面指出。
我们审查的配置是最高端的SKU,配备Ryzen 9 7945HX CPU和175 WGeForce RTX 4090 GPU。其他SKU可低至RTX 4060,但截至目前,它们都配备了相同的240 Hz 1440p IPS面板。
Strix Scar 17的竞争对手包括其他高端17英寸游戏笔记本电脑,如 Razer Blade 17, 阿利安人m17, 微星GE77, 或 Aorus 17.
更多华硕评论:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.3 % | 04/2023 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.9 kg | 28.3 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 | |
88.3 % | 03/2023 | MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 3 kg | 23 mm | 17.00" | 2560x1600 | |
89.9 % | 03/2023 | Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.9 kg | 27 mm | 17.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.4 % | 04/2023 | Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 30.7 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 | |
83.7 % | 08/2022 | Aorus 17X XES i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 30 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
86.1 % | 01/2023 | Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT | 3.4 kg | 26.7 mm | 17.00" | 3840x2160 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例 - 没有变化...几乎
2023年和2022年的模型之间有以下三个重要区别:
- 华硕基石不再得到支持。制造商可能认识到,当初很少有业主使用该功能。
- 新的网络摄像头。现在有一个集成的网络摄像头,而去年的型号会完全缺乏一个。
- 掌托和外盖上有新的表面标记。
整体底盘在其他方面与前一年相同。
沟通
Wi-Fi 6E由联发科MT7922提供,而不是更常见的英特尔AX211,可能是因为这是一个以AMD-NVIDIA为重点的设计。然而,当与我们的华硕AXE11000测试路由器配对时,传输速率和性能是稳定和可靠的。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 |
网络摄像头
尽管有网络摄像头总比没有网络摄像头好,但华硕通过安装一个100万像素的传感器,而不是200万或500万像素的传感器,采用了最低限度的共同标准。其他游戏笔记本电脑,如 阿利安人m17 R1或 Razer Blade有更高的分辨率网络摄像头相比。华硕不支持红外线。
维护
显示屏 - 1440p甜蜜点
2023年的机型采用了与2022年机型相同的240赫兹京东方NE173QHM-NZ2 IPS面板。因此,我们下面的测量结果几乎是同比相同的。这不一定是坏事,因为该面板提供了非常快的响应时间,完整的DCI-P3色彩,以及一个体面的对比度,适合图形编辑和游戏。然而,正在寻找4K或OLED选项的用户,目前运气不佳。
|
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 322.5 cd/m²
Contrast: 1112:1 (Black: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.15 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.56
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
85.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 NE173QHM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W NE173QHM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30 | MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US AU Optronics B170QAN01.2, IPS, 2560x1600, 17.00 | Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 BOE NE170QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 17.00 | Aorus 17X XES Sharp SHP1563, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AU Optronics AUODBA3, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -1% | 0% | -16% | -15% | 1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 98 | 97.1 -1% | 97.6 0% | 69.1 -29% | 70.1 -28% | 97.2 -1% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.9 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.7 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.6 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 85.6 | 84.8 -1% | 86.5 1% | 69.8 -18% | 71.9 -16% | 88.4 3% |
Response Times | 10% | 38% | -38% | 47% | -84% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 6.2 ? | 5.7 ? 8% | 4.2 ? 32% | 12 ? -94% | 3.4 ? 45% | 16.4 ? -165% |
Response Time Black / White * | 11.4 ? | 10.1 ? 11% | 6.4 ? 44% | 9.4 ? 18% | 5.8 ? 49% | 11.6 ? -2% |
PWM Frequency | ||||||
Screen | 5% | -93% | -20% | -102% | -161% | |
Brightness middle | 322.5 | 320 -1% | 398.6 24% | 417.3 29% | 278 -14% | 484 50% |
Brightness | 317 | 303 -4% | 384 21% | 387 22% | 273 -14% | 449 42% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 87 1% | 89 3% | 87 1% | 79 -8% | 87 1% |
Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.3 -3% | 0.46 -59% | 0.42 -45% | 0.26 10% | 0.55 -90% |
Contrast | 1112 | 1067 -4% | 867 -22% | 994 -11% | 1069 -4% | 880 -21% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.15 | 1.1 4% | 4.05 -252% | 2.14 -86% | 3.96 -244% | 4.8 -317% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.03 | 2.7 11% | 8.68 -186% | 4.09 -35% | 10.78 -256% | 7.48 -147% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.56 | 1.02 -82% | 0.42 25% | 1.07 -91% | 4.74 -746% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 1.1 35% | 6.5 -282% | 3.1 -82% | 6.8 -300% | 5.5 -224% |
Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.13 103% | 2.11 104% | 2.19 100% | 2.224 99% | 2.42 91% |
CCT | 6299 103% | 6599 98% | 7518 86% | 6040 108% | 7651 85% | 6148 106% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 5% /
4% | -18% /
-54% | -25% /
-22% | -23% /
-62% | -81% /
-116% |
* ... smaller is better
该显示器开箱即预校准,平均灰度和彩色deltaE值非常低,分别只有1.7和1.15。因此不需要进行最终用户校准。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
11.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.9 ms rise | |
↘ 5.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
6.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.8 ms rise | |
↘ 3.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17933 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
性能--瑞星Ryzen
测试条件
在运行以下任何基准测试之前,我们通过华硕Armoury Crate将我们的设备设置为涡轮模式和独立GPU模式。我们鼓励用户熟悉Armoury Crate,因为它是电源模式、MUX、华硕灵气以及其他特定型号功能和更新的控制中心。
值得注意的是,我们在测试设备上遇到了几个问题。当在Optimus和dGPU模式之间切换时,系统有时会在重启时无法加载。这时需要进行硬重启。
处理器
处理器性能是所有笔记本电脑中最快的之一,详见我们对Ryzen 9 7945HX的评论。 我们对Ryzen 9 7945HX的回顾.尽管如此,它仍然落后于竞争对手的酷睿i9-13950HX或i9-13900HX只是在单线程操作方面略微落后。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (52479 - 60169, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Aorus 17X XES |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (227882 - 252486, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Aorus 17X XES |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (8525 - 10389, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (180473 - 200651, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Aorus 17X XES |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (29598 - 32988, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Aorus 17X XES |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (118401 - 134044, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Aorus 17X XES |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (149040 - 178594, n=3) | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (2090 - 2409, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (28105 - 31796, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Aorus 17X XES |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (31421 - 34957, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
系统性能
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (8733 - 9151, n=2) | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (11165 - 12176, n=2) | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (10266 - 11833, n=2) | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (14432 - 15768, n=2) | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1993 - 2078, n=2) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1838 - 1946, n=2) | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2334 - 2377, n=2) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1584 - 1689, n=2) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
PCMark 10 Score | 8733 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (48948 - 51423, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (59620 - 61564, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (58602 - 61092, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (82.9 - 91.3, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示,在打开我们主页的多个浏览器标签时,没有DPC问题。然而,运行Prime95,将诱发高中断延迟。在回放我们一分钟的4K60测试视频时,我们能够记录到2个丢帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备 - 检测到性能节流现象
我们的设备配备了一个 1TB SK hynix PC801顺序读取和写入率分别为7200MB/s和6200MB/s。然而,我们的设备中的驱动器在大约4分钟的压力后会表现出性能节流的问题,如下图所示。固态硬盘上没有散热器或热垫来帮助散热。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能 - 175 WGeForce RTX 4090
的 移动GeForce RTX 4090比去年的移动RTX 3080 Ti的性能快60%至80%。 ROG Strix Scar 17 G733.因此,同比的性能差异相当大。降级到 RTX 4080或 4070 SKU预计将分别影响GPU性能15%至20%和40%至50%。因此,爱好者可能希望避免使用移动RTX 4070,因为从移动RTX 4080到移动RTX 4070的性能下降比从移动RTX 4090到移动RTX 4080的下降大得多。
在性能模式下运行,而不是在涡轮模式下运行,对性能略有影响。在性能模式下进行的Fire Strike 测试将导致图形得分下降4%至5%。我们下面的压力测试部分将进一步探讨这两种模式。
3DMark 11 Performance | 46484 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 43163 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 20295 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | |
1920x1080 Low Preset (DX12) | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (268 - 378, n=8) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset (DX12) | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (230 - 302, n=8) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
1920x1080 High Preset (DX12) | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (168 - 233, n=9) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
1920x1080 Badass Preset (DX12) | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (141.1 - 189.4, n=14) | |
2560x1440 Badass Preset (DX12) | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (103.4 - 137.8, n=14) | |
3840x2160 Badass Preset (DX12) | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (53.3 - 73.7, n=12) |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
GTA V (2015) | 185 | 180.4 | 175.2 | 112.6 | 114.8 | 170.5 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 490.1 | 405.6 | 370.3 | 203.8 | 154.8 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 165.6 | 150.5 | 154.2 | 139 | 135.4 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 214 | 205 | 163.9 | 151 | 93.3 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 132.2 | 118 | 94.3 | 78.5 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 157 | 145 | 142 | 108 | ||
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 238 | 228 | 190 | 104 | ||
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020) | 187 | 169 | 135 | 79 | ||
Far Cry 6 (2021) | 117 | 112 | 109 | 82 | ||
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 146.4 | 140.5 | 132.6 | 133.8 | 104.3 | 48.6 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 267.7 | 230 | 194.6 | 176.2 | 134.2 | 71.9 |
F1 22 (2022) | 266 | 243 | 221 | 116.3 | 92.1 | 45.8 |
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022) | 188 | 180 | 135 | 82 | ||
Star Wars Jedi Survivor (2023) | 105.6 | 103.1 | 88.4 | 43 |
排放 - 性能比涡轮更安静
系统噪音
无论在什么性能设置下,风扇噪音都在23至27 dB(A)之间,而静音背景为22.7 dB(A)。值得庆幸的是,这个范围足够安静,基本上不会被人察觉,而且在运行稍高的负载(如网络浏览或流媒体)时,风扇在保持低于30分贝(A)方面做得很好。
性能模式下的游戏比涡轮模式下更安静。在性能模式下运行时的风扇噪音 Witcher 3在性能模式下的风扇噪音约为46.4分贝(A),而在涡轮模式下则为51.4至54分贝(A)。因此,用户可能希望用5%的图形性能缺陷来换取性能模式的更安静的噪音水平。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.5 / 27.7 / 27.7 dB(A) |
Load |
| 30.5 / 54.1 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 22.7 dB(A) |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | Aorus 17X XES GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 | Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -10% | -10% | -9% | -24% | 1% | |
off / environment * | 22.7 | 23.4 -3% | 25.2 -11% | 25 -10% | 26 -15% | 23 -1% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.5 | 24.2 -3% | 28 -19% | 26 -11% | 28 -19% | 23 2% |
Idle Average * | 27.7 | 25.6 8% | 28 -1% | 29 -5% | 32 -16% | 28.11 -1% |
Idle Maximum * | 27.7 | 31 -12% | 30.4 -10% | 30 -8% | 38 -37% | 28.11 -1% |
Load Average * | 30.5 | 43.3 -42% | 41 -34% | 46 -51% | 53 -74% | 30.62 -0% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 51.4 | 56.3 -10% | 50.7 1% | 46 11% | 54 -5% | 49.75 3% |
Load Maximum * | 54.1 | 59.1 -9% | 52.6 3% | 47 13% | 55 -2% | 50.17 7% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
键盘和掌托的大部分地方在游戏时保持凉爽。热点反而是沿着甲板的边缘,手指不太可能接触的地方。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.2 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 20.8 °C / 69.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+8.1 °C / 14.6 F).
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Aorus 17X XES Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -13% | -13% | -18% | -46% | -29% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 34.6 | 37.4 -8% | 39 -13% | 42 -21% | 54 -56% | 53 -53% |
Maximum Bottom * | 35.6 | 45 -26% | 44 -24% | 41 -15% | 58 -63% | 56 -57% |
Idle Upper Side * | 27.2 | 29.8 -10% | 31 -14% | 33 -21% | 37 -36% | 30 -10% |
Idle Bottom * | 30 | 32.4 -8% | 29.8 1% | 34 -13% | 39 -30% | 29 3% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试--温暖的核心温度
当在Prime95下受压时,CPU将在4.2和4.9GHz之间循环,同时将CPU的封装功率保持在114W和128W之间。然而,核心温度将非常高,超过90C。
当运行在性能模式下时,GPU时钟速率、内存时钟、温度和电路板功耗将分别稳定在2055 MHz、2250 MHz、79 C和149 W。 Witcher 3在性能模式下运行。当设置为Turbo模式时,这些数值将改变为2280 MHz、2275 MHz、74 C和170 W。因此,如果你想接近宣传的移动RTX 4090的175 W TGP,就需要涡轮模式。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | GPU平均温度(℃) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 53 | 36 |
Prime95压力 | 4.2 - 4.9 | - | 90 - 94 | 51 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 4.2 - 4.8 | ~850 - 1545 | 94 | 58 |
Witcher 3 压力(性能模式) | ~3.2 | 2055 | 97 | 79 |
Witcher 3 压力(涡轮模式) | ~1.1 | 2280 | 88 | 74 |
发言人
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理--有需求的机器
消耗功率
我们的2023型号通常比英特尔驱动的2022型号更耗电。例如,当运行Prime95时,功耗将稳定在205瓦,而去年的i9-12950HX配置只有117瓦。同样地,运行 Witcher 3将比旧的RTX 3080 Ti配置多消耗约24%的电力。性能可能比原来更快,但消耗也随之上升。
我们能够从大型(约18.4 x 8.4 x 3.6厘米)的330瓦交流适配器中记录到280瓦的最大消耗。
Off / Standby | 0.02 / 3.8 Watt |
Idle | 14.5 / 21.1 / 42.8 Watt |
Load |
116.7 / 279.6 Watt |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30 | MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 17.00 | Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 17.00 | Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30 | Aorus 17X XES i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -3% | -1% | 13% | -9% | 23% | |
Idle Minimum * | 14.5 | 16.1 -11% | 14 3% | 15 -3% | 18 -24% | 13 10% |
Idle Average * | 21.1 | 24 -14% | 19.3 9% | 20 5% | 28 -33% | 16.5 22% |
Idle Maximum * | 42.8 | 34 21% | 36.8 14% | 29 32% | 36 16% | 17 60% |
Load Average * | 116.7 | 123.6 -6% | 117.2 -0% | 121 -4% | 153 -31% | 93 20% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 278 | 286 -3% | 304 -9% | 179.8 35% | 221 21% | 239 14% |
Load Maximum * | 279.6 | 285.7 -2% | 342.5 -22% | 246 12% | 290 -4% | 251 10% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
在Optimus和iGPU处于激活状态的平衡模式下,WLAN运行时间约为平均4小时。其他17英寸游戏笔记本电脑,如 ROG Strix G17 G713PI或Aorus 17X XES将返回类似的结果。
该系统可以通过第三方USB-C适配器进行充电。然而,一些适配器可能无法工作;我们的135瓦联想USB-C充电器可以毫无问题地工作,而我们的130瓦戴尔XPS USB-C充电器则根本无法充电。
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Aorus 17X XES i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT, 97 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 46% | 23% | 3% | 7% | 17% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 248 | 363 46% | 305 23% | 255 3% | 266 7% | 290 17% |
Reader / Idle | 439 | |||||
Load | 89 | 58 | 86 | 107 | ||
H.264 | 166 | 226 | 294 | |||
Witcher 3 ultra | 64 |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 性能卓越,外观老化
对于2022年,AMD和Nvidia推出了Zen 3+和移动GeForce 30 Ti系列,分别取代了2021年的Zen 3和非Ti选项。然而,这些升级被证明是相对较小的,因为较新的选项在架构层面上没有带来任何新东西。对于2023年,Zen 4和移动GeForce RTX 40系列终于带来了笔记本电脑玩家一直在等待的重大性能升级。功耗可能会更高,但马力的增加弥补了这一点,特别是Ryzen 9 7945HX比竞争性的13代酷睿i9-13950HX既稍快又更省电。
2023年的ROG Strix Scar 17展示了Ryzen 9 7945HX和GeForce RTX 4090的最佳状态。然而,一些外部设计特征可能需要更新。
虽然今年的处理器令人印象深刻,但ROG Strix Scar 17的整体外部设计可以使用更大的更新。例如,游戏时的CPU温度比预期的要高,而PCIe4 x4固态硬盘在重度使用几分钟后就会节流。小的数字键盘和方向键仍然很拥挤,键盘上的一些次要标签在背光激活时仍然不亮。一些竞争机型,如更薄的 微星GE78也已经转为16:10,而Strix Scar 17系列仍然是16:9。这款机型有可能很快看起来和感觉到陈旧,尽管它的性能并不缓慢。
价格和可用性
测试模型的名称价格和可用性,如果必要的话,偏离相关设备的变体。从链接窗口的列表中链接到一个商店。
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96
-
04/10/2023 v7
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.