惠普Victus 16回顾。配备AMD CPU和Nvidia GPU的经济实惠的游戏笔记本电脑
在我们已经测试了一个更昂贵的Victus 16版本,配备了一个Ryzen 7 5800H和 GeForce RTX 3060几个月前,我们现在把实惠的Victus 16-0145ng模型进行测试。尽管惠普通过不包括Windows操作系统来削减成本(我们安装了Windows 11 Home),但一个 Ryzen 5 5600H和一个 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti约为920欧元(975美元),仍然令人印象深刻。同样,以这个价格包括16GB的DDR4-RAM和512-GB的NVMe SSD也没有理由抱怨。至少在纸面上,IPS显示屏也是一个很好的数字,因为144赫兹表明充分再现了快速游戏的效果。
由于除了一些小细节外,这款机箱与我们之前测试的型号完全相同,所以我们不会在这里进一步讨论机箱、设备(连接等)和输入设备。你可以在 "Victus 16-e0179ng "的评论中找到相应的信息。 Victus 16-e0179ng.
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
82.3 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | HP Victus 16-e0145ng R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 23.5 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 | |
84.3 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | HP Victus 16-e0179ng R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 23.5 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 | |
79.7 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE i5-11300H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 24.2 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82.7 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | Dell G15 5515 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 24.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
83.4 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 24.6 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 |
这款16英寸笔记本的竞争对手包括其他经济实惠的游戏笔记本,配备了GeForce RTX 3050 Ti,如 联想Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU,以及戴尔G15 5515,以及 华硕Strix G17 G713QE.这些笔记本电脑作为对比设备出现在图表中--只要它们的数值可用。
SD卡阅读器
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=88, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) |
沟通
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1843, n=147, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Average of class Gaming (680 - 1890, n=147, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng |
网络摄像头
显示
虽然更昂贵的兄弟姐妹配备了良好的全高清显示屏,但不幸的是,制造商的一些成本削减措施在Victus 16-e0145ng上明显可见。
|
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 257 cd/m²
Contrast: 1028:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.91 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.9, calibrated: 3.61
ΔE Greyscale 7.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
43% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.125
HP Victus 16-e0145ng CMN1609, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1" | HP Victus 16-e0179ng BOE09BE, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1" | Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE LEN156FHD, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell G15 5515 BOE092A, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 AU Optronics B173HAN04.9, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 69% | -4% | -7% | -3% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 41.6 | 72.6 75% | 39.7 -5% | 39.1 -6% | 40.2 -3% |
sRGB Coverage | 61.9 | 100 62% | 59.6 -4% | 56.9 -8% | 60.3 -3% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 43 | 73.5 71% | 41.1 -4% | 40.4 -6% | 41.6 -3% |
Response Times | 47% | -69% | 14% | 5% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 29.6 ? | 9.6 ? 68% | 46.4 ? -57% | 25.2 ? 15% | 26.8 ? 9% |
Response Time Black / White * | 19.4 ? | 14.4 ? 26% | 35.2 ? -81% | 16.8 ? 13% | 19.2 ? 1% |
PWM Frequency | 200 ? | ||||
Screen | 36% | 13% | 0% | 27% | |
Brightness middle | 257 | 361 40% | 307 19% | 278 8% | 270.5 5% |
Brightness | 239 | 341 43% | 292 22% | 262 10% | 269 13% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 88 0% | 88 0% | 83 -6% | 92 5% |
Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.3 -20% | 0.21 16% | 0.36 -44% | 0.19 24% |
Contrast | 1028 | 1203 17% | 1462 42% | 772 -25% | 1424 39% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.91 | 2.44 65% | 5.9 15% | 5.74 17% | 4.39 36% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 22.27 | 6.37 71% | 21.6 3% | 19.63 12% | 20.8 7% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.61 | 1.26 65% | 4.8 -33% | 4.7 -30% | 1.56 57% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.5 | 4.6 39% | 4.9 35% | 3.1 59% | 3.1 59% |
Gamma | 2.125 104% | 2.268 97% | 2.26 97% | 2.011 109% | 2.14 103% |
CCT | 6025 108% | 6609 98% | 6504 100% | 6207 105% | 6927 94% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 51% /
44% | -20% /
-2% | 2% /
1% | 10% /
18% |
* ... smaller is better
即使竞争对手在这方面也不是模范,提供类似的微不足道的结果,但在2022年,无论是亮度还是色彩空间的覆盖率都不再足够。只有62%的sRGB色彩空间和239cd/m²的平均亮度使得图像非常苍白和黑暗,特别是在明亮的环境下。
色彩准确度结果也同样令人失望。在交付状态下,该面板在绿色色调中挣扎,但至少你可以通过校准来缓解这种情况(像往常一样,你可以从上述亮度分布示意图右侧的链接中下载我们的ICC文件)。
响应时间的主题给了我们较少的抱怨理由。考虑到这个价格,将近19毫秒的黑色到白色和30毫秒的灰色到灰色是可以的。视角稳定性也是如此,其范围在IPS屏幕的典型水平上。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
19.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.7 ms rise | |
↘ 9.7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.8 ms rise | |
↘ 15.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8684 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
业绩
在我们的测试设备中,Victus 16属于游戏的中端产品。所用的组件是平衡的,应该能吸引有价格意识的游戏者。
测试条件
Omen游戏集线器应该预装在装有Windows的机型中,提供三种不同的性能配置。除了电池测试,所有的测量都是使用最高模式进行的(见截图#3)。风扇控制始终被调整为自动设置。
处理器
Ryzen 5 5600H是一个六核处理器,指定功率为45瓦,能够同时在多达12个线程上运行。在负载下,这个7纳米模型的时钟速度为3.3至4.2GHz。
在我们的Cinebench循环中,性能发展非常均匀,与竞争对手类似。正如你在表中看到的,Ryzen 5600H明显快于英特尔的 酷睿i5-11300H,虽然它只包含4个核心(最大8个线程)。由于使用了Ryzen 7 5800H(8C/16T),其他竞争对手的速度略快。
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H | |
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=181, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (9181 - 12636, n=14) | |
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=181, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (51994 - 78250, n=14) | |
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=181, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (1587 - 2675, n=14) | |
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=181, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (66699 - 77213, n=14) | |
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=181, last 2 years) | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (8340 - 9159, n=14) | |
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=181, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (28268 - 43274, n=14) | |
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=181, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (39852 - 98939, n=14) | |
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=181, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (507 - 649, n=14) | |
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=181, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (4811 - 6652, n=14) | |
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=182, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (7419 - 24746, n=14) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE |
系统性能
尽管配备了顶级的固态硬盘,但在我们的测试领域,它的系统性能只够排在倒数第二位。然而,PCMark 10的6076分仍然是一个很好的结果,表明它是一个有能力的全能型产品。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=163, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12600, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average of class Gaming (6807 - 18475, n=162, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=143, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=143, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=143, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=143, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE |
PCMark 10 Score | 6076 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=181, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (20549 - 42141, n=14) | |
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=181, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (22917 - 47595, n=14) | |
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=181, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (20226 - 44872, n=14) | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=181, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (75 - 89.1, n=14) | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
正如经常发生的那样,延迟方面有一些需要改进的地方。根据LatencyMon工具,Victus 16在没有任何进一步调整的情况下,并不理想地适合实时音频和视频处理。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Dell G15 5515 |
* ... smaller is better
存储解决方案
我们的测试配置通过其存储解决方案收集了一些积极的观点。尽管三星PM981a的512GB存储容量并没有引起任何热情,但基于NVMe的M.2驱动器在基准测试中表现非常好,甚至将更昂贵的Victus 16型号的1-TB驱动器勉强甩在后面。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Average of class Gaming | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE |
* ... smaller is better
Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
通过GeForce RTX 3050 Ti,Nvidia提供了一个成功的中档GPU,只要你不考虑平庸的光线追踪性能。DirectX-12模型能够使用2560个着色器,包括4GB的GDDR6-VRAM。不幸的是,后者在这一点上已经不是最新的了。我们目前期望中档设备至少有6GB。因此,要求高的游戏在更高的分辨率和设置中会达到其极限。
一般来说,Nvidia的安培芯片的性能在很大程度上取决于配置的TGP。在75瓦(包括动态提升),HD为RTX 3050 Ti选择了一个相当高的数值,这也反映在合成图形基准测试和使用真实游戏的测试中高于平均分。然而,Victus 16在与竞争对手的竞争中仍有一段艰难的时期。华硕Strix G17 G713QE和戴尔G5 5515都能在大多数情况下取得小的优势。更昂贵的Victus 16的GeForce RTX 3060在大多数情况下领先约30%。
3DMark 11 Performance | 17816 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 36899 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 13022 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 5910 points | |
Help |
游戏性能
The Witcher 3 | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Average of class Gaming (40.1 - 449, n=117, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (30 - 110, n=26) | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=160, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (19 - 58.5, n=29) | |
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE |
在恒定负荷测试中,有的情况下 Witcher 3(1小时@FHD/Ultra),我们没有看到任何明显的行为。在整个过程中,性能保持相当稳定。