Notebookcheck Logo

微星Alpha 15游戏笔记本电脑评测。Ryzen 7 5800H和Radeon RX 6600M是主流1080p游戏的良好预兆

YayyMD的优势! 微星Alpha 15是为数不多的AMD优势游戏笔记本电脑之一。由Ryzen 7 5800H和Radeon RX 6600M提供动力,Alpha 15承诺在现代游戏中实现1080p高帧率100帧。我们发现这在很大程度上是真实的,给拥有酷睿i7-11800H和RTX 3060的笔记本电脑一个机会。然而,为了在价格和性能之间取得平衡,微星不得不在某些方面做出妥协。
AMD Cezanne (Zen 3) Gaming Laptop / Notebook MSI Ryzen (Zen)

早在2021年电脑展期间,AMD 推出了Radeon RX 6000M系列移动GPU和AMD优势设计框架。AMD优势计划包括配备Ryzen 5000 APU、Radeon RX 6000M图形、智能访问内存、SmartShift和FreeSync Premium显示器的笔记本电脑。该计划在这些笔记本电脑中承诺了几个最低标准,如1080p 100 fps游戏,144 Hz低延迟300-nit显示器,NVMe存储,以及电池10小时的视频播放时间。

尽管有很好的潜力,但到目前为止,我们在市场上只看到少数几款由RX 6000M/AMD Advantage驱动的笔记本电脑。这些产品包括 华硕ROG Strix G15ROG Strix G17, HP Omen 16。 微星Delta 15, 以及 微星阿尔法15和阿尔法17系列。我们现在有了微星Alpha 15供我们评测。

我们的微星Alpha 15审查样本是由 AMD Ryzen 7 5800HAPU与 Radeon RX Vega 8图形和一个独立的 芯片GPU。此外,还有16GB DDR4-3200内存,1TB PCIe NVMe SSD,以及90Whr电池。这个配置将使你的MRP为1,45,990(1,959美元),但目前可以通过在线零售商以约1,06,990(1,436美元)的价格获得。

微星Alpha 15主要是针对1080p 100帧的游戏玩家。在这篇评论中,我们将微星Alpha 15的性能与以英特尔/英伟达产品为特色的竞争产品进行比较,并看看全红队是否真的提供任何所谓的好处。

Alpha 15 B5EEK (Alpha 15 Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H 8 x 3.2 - 4.4 GHz, 132 W PL2 / Short Burst, 110 W PL1 / Sustained, Cezanne H (Zen 3)
Graphics adapter
AMD Radeon RX 6600M - 8192 MB, Core: 2,034 MHz MHz, Memory: 1,750  MHz, 100 W TDP, GDDR6, Radeon Adrenalin 21.12.1, Switchable Graphics
Memory
16384 MB 
, DDR4-3200 Dual-Channel, Timings: 22-22-22-52
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, No, AU Optronics B156HAN08.0, IPS, AMD FreeSync Premium, glossy: no, 144 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD, 1024 GB 
, 1 TB NVMe PCIe Gen 3, 890 GB free
Soundcard
AMD Raven/Renoir/Van Gogh/Cezanne/Rembrandt/Raphael - HD Audio Controller
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo audio jack, 1 RJ-45
Networking
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 23.95 x 359 x 259
Battery
90 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 4-cell, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 13.2 h
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, MSI Center , 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.35 kg
Price
1400 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Potential Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
82.6 %
01/2022
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
R7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
2.4 kg23.95 mm15.60"1920x1080
79.2 %
09/2021
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg25 mm15.60"1920x1080
82.9 %
10/2021
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
R9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6700M
2 kg19 mm15.60"1920x1080
84.4 %
11/2021
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.1 kg29 mm15.60"1920x1080
84.7 %
08/2021
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
R9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6800M
2.4 kg27.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
87.9 %
11/2021
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2 kg18.9 mm15.60"3840x2160
85.4 %
12/2021
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg23.4 mm15.60"1920x1080
85.9 %
10/2021
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg24.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
82.8 %
10/2021
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.7 kg26 mm17.30"1920x1080
85.6 %
08/2021
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.2 kg20 mm15.60"3840x2160

外壳:塑料材质,但不太理想

阿尔法15的外壳让人联想到了 卡塔纳GF66 11UG并不是你会遇到的最高档的。整个机箱是由塑料制成的,除了盖子的背面,它是由铝制成的。这个设计与它的前辈微星Alpha 15 A3DDK非常相似。这个想法显然是为了在建造质量方面尽可能地保持低成本,同时更注重内部能力。

由于采用了铝制结构,除非故意扭曲,否则盖子不会弯曲。盖子可以用一个手指打开,但底座在这样做的时候确实有点滑动。铰链感觉很结实,盖子可以平着旋转到180°。显示器在受到干扰时有一些晃动。当施加压力时,我们还感觉到键盘甲板有一些弯曲。

笔记本电脑的底盖也是塑料的,但与机箱的其他部分相比感觉有些脆弱。它为主要部件提供了足够的间隙,并有足够的通风格栅供空气吸入。2.35公斤的重量也是偏高的,因为它的表弟Delta 15的重量只有1.96公斤左右。

总的来说,尽管是塑料结构,微星Alpha 15 B5EEK在大多数情况下感觉很结实。只是不要指望它能散发出任何高级的气息。

Size Comparison

399 mm 269 mm 26 mm 2.7 kg361 mm 258 mm 29 mm 2.1 kg359 mm 259 mm 25 mm 2.3 kg359 mm 256 mm 24.9 mm 2.3 kg359 mm 259 mm 23.95 mm 2.4 kg354 mm 257 mm 27.9 mm 2.4 kg358 mm 267 mm 23.4 mm 2.3 kg357 mm 247 mm 19 mm 2 kg356 mm 250 mm 20 mm 2.2 kg356 mm 252 mm 18.9 mm 2 kg

连接性。足够完成工作

微星Alpha 15没有提供大量的端口,但涵盖了大部分的基本要素。在左边,我们有一个USB 3.2 Gen1 Type-A和一个USB 2.0 Type-A。在右边,我们有一个带DisplayPort输出的USB 3.2 Gen1 Type-C端口,另一个USB 3.2 Gen1 Type-A,一个支持4K60输出的HDMI 2.0b端口,以及一个3.5毫米的组合音频插孔。还提供一个RJ-45千兆端口。

虽然我们在连接相邻的多个USB设备时没有遇到任何问题,但端口在两侧的中央位置对于使用有线鼠标的无障碍移动可能不是很理想。由于这是一个基于AMD的平台,没有雷电4端口可用。不幸的是,一个Kensington锁插槽和一个读卡器也没有。

左边:DC-in,USB 3.2 Gen1 Type-A,USB 2.0 Type-A
左边:DC-in,USB 3.2 Gen1 Type-A,USB 2.0 Type-A
右边。电池指示灯,3.5毫米组合音频插孔,USB 3.2 Gen1 Type-A,USB 3.2 Gen1 Type-C,HDMI 2.0b输出,RJ-45千兆以太网
右边。电池指示灯,3.5毫米组合音频插孔,USB 3.2 Gen1 Type-A,USB 3.2 Gen1 Type-C,HDMI 2.0b输出,RJ-45千兆以太网
后方。没有端口
后方。没有端口

沟通

英特尔AX200 WLAN卡是用户可更换的
英特尔AX200 WLAN卡是用户可更换的

Alpha 15采用了英特尔Wi-Fi 6 AX200无线局域网卡和蓝牙5.1。在我们的标准化Wi-Fi测试程序中,我们观察到良好的发射和接收速度,在距离我们的参考Netgear Nighthawk AX12 RAX120路由器1米处,达到了接近1.5Gbps。

Alpha 15的Wi-Fi吞吐量和稳定性似乎比Delta 15要好,唯一的一个主要实例是在第14轮发射测试中看到的节流现象。因此,用户在通过Wi-Fi进行大量数据传输或在线游戏时应该不会有太大问题。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1424 (731min - 1507max) MBit/s ∼100%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1409 (1308min - 1550max) MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1362 (682min - 1570max) MBit/s ∼96% -4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1239 (1161min - 1273max) MBit/s ∼87% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (450 - 1603, n=153, last 2 years)
1168 MBit/s ∼82% -18%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (447 - 1645, n=127)
1104 MBit/s ∼78% -22%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1084 (531min - 1102max) MBit/s ∼76% -24%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
1066 (902min - 1102max) MBit/s ∼75% -25%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
951 (665min - 1326max) MBit/s ∼67% -33%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
MediaTek MT7921
787 (675min - 851max) MBit/s ∼55% -45%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
 
582 (312min - 680max) MBit/s ∼41% -59%
iperf3 receive AX12
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1487 (1350min - 1522max) MBit/s ∼100%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1358 (1242min - 1548max) MBit/s ∼91% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (90 - 1743, n=153, last 2 years)
1237 MBit/s ∼83% -17%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1200 (1128min - 1253max) MBit/s ∼81% -19%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (523 - 1684, n=128)
1191 MBit/s ∼80% -20%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1151 (577min - 1211max) MBit/s ∼77% -23%
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1135 (422min - 1355max) MBit/s ∼76% -24%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
1037 (502min - 1055max) MBit/s ∼70% -30%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
992 (835min - 956max) MBit/s ∼67% -33%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
MediaTek MT7921
878 (827min - 896max) MBit/s ∼59% -41%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
 
569 (350min - 709max) MBit/s ∼38% -62%
66571576581586591596510151065111511651215126513151365141514651515Tooltip
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1487 (1350-1522)
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1200 (1128-1253)
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1400 (731-1507)
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø929 (665-1326)

网络摄像头

网络摄像头是标准的720p规格,色彩偏差大,即使在良好的环境光线下也缺乏足够的清晰度。在光线不足的情况下,图像会变得非常有颗粒感。

没有用于Windows Hello的红外摄像头或物理隐私快门,但按下F6键上的快捷键可以切换摄像头的开启和关闭。

ColorChecker
21.4 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
18 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
30.4 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
25.6 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
25.9 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
26.6 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
25.1 ∆E
24.6 ∆E
2 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
21.3 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
ColorChecker MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008: 19.51 ∆E min: 2.01 - max: 30.39 ∆E

安全问题

该设备没有内置特殊的安全功能。Alpha 15缺乏任何形式的生物识别认证。然而,一个独立的TPM 2.0模块是存在的,它应该能使Windows 11轻松升级。

辅料

除了通常的文件和一个180瓦的电源适配器外,盒子里没有特别的附件。

维护

卸下底部的13颗PH0螺丝,就可以撬开笔记本的底盖,从而接触到各种内部零件。请注意,其中一颗螺丝藏在工厂密封贴纸下。

WLAN卡、M.2固态硬盘和内存都是用户可更换的。一个额外的M.2 SSD插槽也可用于存储扩展。如果需要,电池也可以更换。

微星Alpha 15的内部结构
微星Alpha 15的内部结构

担保

微星为Alpha 15提供了标准的一年随身保修,但在一些零售商那里可能会得到长达两年的保障。根据微星公司的官方文件,保修一般仅限于购买的国家,除非特别申请了全球旅行保险。

输入设备。良好的键盘,但触摸板很拥挤

键盘

阿尔法15的键盘有优点也有缺点。键盘提供了良好的打字体验,有足够大小的按键,提供了适当的触觉反馈。虽然全尺寸方向键的存在会得到很多人的赞赏,但它的代价是截断了右键的Shift键。

最上面一排的功能键比其他的要窄。小键盘比我们希望的更紧凑,但这不应该构成任何特别的问题,尽管Fn键的奇怪位置需要一些时间来适应。

微星为键盘启用了RGB功能,可以通过按F8键上的快捷键进行循环,或者通过微星中心应用程序进行定制。然而,没有每个键或区域的RGB照明选项。RGB照明效果很好,而且按键提供了足够的透明度,使照明效果能够照亮。

总的来说,Alpha 15的键盘足以满足大多数打字和游戏需求。也就是说,像前一代的SteelSeries键盘 阿尔法15 A3DDK将是一个受欢迎的功能。

触摸板

触摸板面积约为10.5厘米x6.5厘米,感觉相当拥挤,而且位置偏离中心。然而,游戏玩家最有可能使用外部鼠标,所以这是一个没有意义的问题。

触摸板表面的滑动相对容易,而且完全支持WindowsPrecision 手势。整个表面就像一个鼠标左键,点击噪音虽然有点高,但还是可以忍受的。

键盘提供了良好的打字体验,但触摸板面积相当小
键盘提供了良好的打字体验,但触摸板面积相当小

显示器。FreeSync Premium具有良好的响应时间,没有PWM。

我们的微星Alpha 15单元配备了15.6英寸的AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 1080p面板,具有良好的响应时间和144 Hz的高刷新率。该面板支持AMD FreeSync Premium,实现无泪视觉效果。

由于磨砂涂层,子像素的排列显得很模糊。长时间曝光显示显示器角落有明显的背光渗出。亮度分布为84%,还算不错,不过面板中心的亮度不如其他区域。

带有哑光涂层的子像素排列
带有哑光涂层的子像素排列
在长时间曝光的情况下,在角落里看到明显的背光渗出。
在长时间曝光的情况下,在角落里看到明显的背光渗出。
326
cd/m²
341
cd/m²
324
cd/m²
290
cd/m²
311
cd/m²
318
cd/m²
323
cd/m²
341
cd/m²
347
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AU Optronics B156HAN08.0
X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3
Maximum: 347 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 324.6 cd/m² Minimum: 14.42 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 306 cd/m²
Contrast: 1414:1 (Black: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.06 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4, calibrated: 2.62
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
67% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AU Optronics B156HAN08.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
AU Optronics B156HAN08.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
LQ156M1JW03 (SHP155D), IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 15.60
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
LG Philips LGD0625 (LP156WFG-SPB3), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
Sharp SHP152C, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
CSOT T3 MNF601EA1-6, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
LGD0625 (LP156WFG-SPB3), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
AU Optronics AUI8294 (B173HAN04.9), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Samsung SDC4143, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60
Display
-0%
3%
0%
3%
28%
1%
-34%
-37%
37%
Display P3 Coverage
65.9
65.4
-1%
66.5
1%
64.5
-2%
66.5
1%
85.2
29%
65.2
-1%
41.9
-36%
40.1
-39%
99.9
52%
sRGB Coverage
91.6
91.3
0%
97.8
7%
95.9
5%
97.7
7%
98.8
8%
95.8
5%
62.9
-31%
60
-34%
100
9%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
67
66.7
0%
67.6
1%
65.8
-2%
67.6
1%
98.2
47%
66
-1%
43.3
-35%
41.4
-38%
99.5
49%
Response Times
-49%
-97%
-126%
-46%
-320%
-111%
-326%
-371%
59%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
5.06 ?(2.5, 2.56)
7.4 ?(3.8, 3.6)
-46%
12.8 ?(6.8, 6)
-153%
15
-196%
8 ?(3, 5)
-58%
31.6 ?(8, 23.6)
-525%
14 ?(7, 7)
-177%
28.4 ?(15.6, 12.8)
-461%
32.4
-540%
2.8 ?(1.6, 1.2)
45%
Response Time Black / White *
7.44 ?(3.76, 3.68)
11.2 ?(6, 5.2)
-51%
10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2)
-40%
11.6
-56%
10 ?(5, 5)
-34%
16 ?(4, 12)
-115%
10.8 ?(6.2, 4.6)
-45%
21.6 ?(11.6, 10)
-190%
22.4
-201%
2 ?(1, 1)
73%
PWM Frequency
23580 ?(22)
240 ?(83)
Screen
-2%
0%
4%
-4%
45%
1%
-28%
-9%
109%
Brightness middle
311
307
-1%
291
-6%
393
26%
306
-2%
607
95%
390
25%
268.3
-14%
266
-14%
440
41%
Brightness
325
321
-1%
266
-18%
353
9%
283
-13%
605
86%
362
11%
257
-21%
264
-19%
446
37%
Brightness Distribution
84
83
-1%
88
5%
83
-1%
86
2%
93
11%
87
4%
84
0%
79
-6%
92
10%
Black Level *
0.22
0.27
-23%
0.36
-64%
0.47
-114%
0.25
-14%
0.41
-86%
0.41
-86%
0.34
-55%
0.32
-45%
0.04
82%
Contrast
1414
1137
-20%
808
-43%
836
-41%
1224
-13%
1480
5%
951
-33%
789
-44%
831
-41%
11000
678%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.06
4.67
8%
2.98
41%
2.84
44%
4.97
2%
0.84
83%
2.66
47%
5.05
-0%
3.97
22%
2.53
50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.37
7.53
10%
7.59
9%
7.15
15%
10.12
-21%
3.02
64%
7.14
15%
15.43
-84%
8.93
-7%
7.82
7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.62
2.41
8%
0.91
65%
0.67
74%
0.7
73%
0.69
74%
2.56
2%
3.21
-23%
3.5
-34%
2.57
2%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.8
4.5
6%
4.2
12%
3.73
22%
7.2
-50%
1.1
77%
3.63
24%
5.5
-15%
1.8
62%
1.2
75%
Gamma
2.12 104%
2.276 97%
2.293 96%
2.53 87%
2.23 99%
2.131 103%
2.57 86%
2.35 94%
2.31 95%
2.206 100%
CCT
8002 81%
6824 95%
7624 85%
7312 89%
7784 84%
6648 98%
6894 94%
7392 88%
6754 96%
6371 102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
67.6
41.4
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
97.7
60
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-17% / -8%
-31% / -13%
-41% / -16%
-16% / -9%
-82% / -11%
-36% / -15%
-129% / -72%
-139% / -67%
68% / 86%

* ... smaller is better

友达光电的B156HAN08.0面板已经开始显示出它的年龄,微星公司完全可以采用一个更新的面板,具有更好的整体色彩特性。Alpha 15覆盖了接近92%的sRGB色彩空间。Adobe RGB和DCI-P3的覆盖率在这个类别的预期范围内。

开箱后的色彩准确性不是很好,平均灰度Delta E为4.8,平均ColorChecker Delta E为5.06,白平衡偏冷。然而,我们的校准程序大大改善了色彩准确性,并有助于将平均灰度和ColorChecker Delta E值分别降至0.7和2.62。 我们发现,该面板在再现光谱的100%蓝色部分时显示出最高的偏差。

读者可以从上述链接中下载经过校准的ICC文件。

虽然整体显示质量对游戏来说还不错,但竞争已经转移到更好的显示器上,具有更广泛的色域覆盖和改进的开箱即用的色彩准确性。

vs. sRGB - 91.6%的覆盖率
vs. sRGB - 91.6%的覆盖率
vs. Adobe RGB - 67%的覆盖率
vs. Adobe RGB - 67%的覆盖率
对比DCI-P3 - 65.9%的覆盖率
对比DCI-P3 - 65.9%的覆盖率
校准前的灰度
校准前的灰度
校准前的ColorChecker
校准前的ColorChecker
校准前的饱和扫频
校准前的饱和扫频
校准后的灰度
校准后的灰度
校准后的ColorChecker
校准后的ColorChecker
校准后的饱和扫频
校准后的饱和扫频

该面板提供了快速的响应时间,这应该会让竞争激烈的游戏玩家满意。我们测量了黑色到白色和50%灰色到80%灰色的综合响应时间,分别为7.44毫秒和5.06毫秒。

Alpha 15的面板可能使用了超速,以实现如此低的50%灰色到80%灰色的响应时间,我们在示波器数据中看到的信号过冲 "喇叭 "就是证明。

我们没有观察到所有亮度级别的PWM闪烁,所以这个面板对眼睛的影响应该相对较小。

欲了解更多信息,请查看我们的文章"为什么脉冲宽度调制(PWM)是如此令人头痛",还有我们的 PWM排名表对所有评测设备的PWM频率进行比较。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
7.44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.76 ms rise
↘ 3.68 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5.06 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.5 ms rise
↘ 2.56 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected ≤ 100 % brightness setting

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21833 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

由于面板亮度低,在阳光直射下,户外观看会受到影响。视角似乎相对稳定,但在极端角度可以观察到一些亮度和色彩信息的损失。

在明亮条件下的户外观看
在明亮条件下的户外观看
在树荫下的户外观赏
在树荫下的户外观赏
在极端的视角下会看到一些亮度和颜色的损失
在极端的视角下会看到一些亮度和颜色的损失

性能。无阻碍的Ryzen 7 5800H对抗酷睿i7-11800H

我们的微星Alpha 15 B5EEK样品搭载了 AMD Ryzen 7 5800HAPU和一个 Radeon RX 6600MdGPU。买家还可以选择Alpha 15 B5EE,规格类似,但键盘只有一个红色背光。

测试条件

微星中心应用程序允许在四种性能模式之间进行选择--极限性能、平衡、静音和超级电池。我们在所有的基准测试和测量中使用极限性能模式作为默认,除了电池寿命测试,我们使用平衡模式。

这些性能模式会对分数和噪音档案产生重大影响,因此我们在适用的地方显示了极限性能、平衡和静音模式之间的比较。微星中心应用程序还允许用户为CPU和GPU单独定制风扇曲线。还提供了一个冷却器提升模式,无论负载如何,风扇都会持续全速旋转。

性能模式
性能模式
定制风扇曲线
定制风扇曲线
风扇速度控制,包括冷却器提升
风扇速度控制,包括冷却器提升
硬件监控
硬件监控
应用程序优先权设置
应用程序优先权设置
系统信息
系统信息

下表显示了各种性能模式如何影响功率限制。我们建议在繁重的工作负荷和游戏中使用极限性能,除非风扇噪音是个问题。

性能模式 PL0 / AMD STAPM 限制 (W) PL1 限制 (W) PL2 限制 (W)
Extreme Performance 132 110 132
平衡模式 78 90 108
静音 55 60 72
超级电池 50 45 54

处理器

微星Alpha 15中的Ryzen 7 5800H没有功率限制
微星Alpha 15中的Ryzen 7 5800H没有功率限制
Cinebench R20显示电池电量的性能明显下降
Cinebench R20显示电池电量的性能明显下降

微星Alpha 15中的AMD Ryzen 7 5800H是没有功率限制的。因此,我们看到PL1和PL2的限制分别显示为110W和132W。这给了Alpha 15很大的空间,可以很好地利用AMD SmartShift。

由于冷却系统的能力,我们的Cinebench R15循环测试显示该处理器没有节流问题。Ryzen 7 5800H的多核分数仅次于 Ryzen 9 5900HXMSI Delta 15华硕ROG Strix G15,这两款产品也都是AMD的优势笔记本电脑。

尽管英特尔Tiger Lake-H芯片,如 酷睿i7-11800H酷睿i9-11900H在单核基准测试中确实占了上风,但Ryzen 7 5800H能够与这两款产品拉开距离。因此,需要单核和多核能力的工作负载可以从这款APU中受益。

在Extreme Performance、Balanced和Silent之间切换似乎不会对单核分数产生太大的影响。然而,多核性能在这三种模式之间显示出很大的差异。

在电池上,PL1和PL2分别下降到54W和68W,笔记本切换到平衡模式。因此,Cinebench R20的分数在单核和多核运行中分别下降了26%和11.5%。

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

1698.41808.41918.42028.42138.4Tooltip
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø1973 (1963.86-1985.21)
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø2078 (2068.68-2093.36)
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø2130 (2119.21-2144.54)
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1910 (1886.79-2011.67)
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H: Ø1874 (1698.44-2029.22)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1746 (1719.69-1885.99)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | 64 Bit Single-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
80.9 pt ∼81%
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
80.4 pt ∼80%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
80.3 pt ∼80%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GP66 Leopard 11UH
80.1 pt ∼80%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, XMG Apex 15
79.7 pt ∼80%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H,
79.1 pt ∼79%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM -2!
Intel Core i7-11800H,
78.8 pt ∼79%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK
77.3 pt ∼77%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Balanced)
75.9 pt ∼76%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
 
74.8 pt ∼75%
Average of class Gaming
 
73.9 pt ∼74%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H,
70.8 pt ∼71%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Silent)
67.5 pt ∼68%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H,
67.3 pt ∼67%
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
13523 Points ∼100% +12%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H,
13445 (12565.7min - 13444.6max) Points ∼99% +11%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
13149 Points ∼97% +9%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, XMG Apex 15
12663 Points ∼94% +5%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GP66 Leopard 11UH
12563 Points ∼93% +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 19282, n=170, last 2 years)
12311 Points ∼91% +2%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK
12083 Points ∼89%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (8812 - 13214, n=25)
11878 Points ∼88% -2%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
11746 Points ∼87% -3%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H,
11567 Points ∼86% -4%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Balanced)
11338 Points ∼84% -6%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H,
11102 Points ∼82% -8%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Silent)
8812 Points ∼65% -27%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H,
8447 Points ∼62% -30%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H,
1574 Points ∼100% +11%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GP66 Leopard 11UH
1522 Points ∼97% +8%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H,
1517 Points ∼96% +7%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H,
1509 Points ∼96% +7%
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
1494 Points ∼95% +6%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
1488 Points ∼95% +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 1920, n=169, last 2 years)
1484 Points ∼94% +5%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
1449 Points ∼92% +2%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, XMG Apex 15
1427 Points ∼91% +1%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Balanced)
1420 Points ∼90% 0%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK
1415 Points ∼90%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Silent)
1415 Points ∼90% 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (1294 - 1441, n=25)
1409 Points ∼90% 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H,
1399 Points ∼89% -1%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
5223 Points ∼100% +12%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H,
5182 Points ∼99% +11%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
5158 Points ∼99% +11%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, XMG Apex 15
4913 Points ∼94% +5%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GP66 Leopard 11UH
4810 Points ∼92% +3%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK
4663 Points ∼89%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (3430 - 5020, n=27)
4597 Points ∼88% -1%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
4529 Points ∼87% -3%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H,
4403 Points ∼84% -6%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Balanced)
4400 Points ∼84% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 7382, n=228, last 2 years)
4398 Points ∼84% -6%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H,
4128 Points ∼79% -11%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Silent)
3430 Points ∼66% -26%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H,
3306 Points ∼63% -29%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H,
600 Points ∼100% +8%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
583 Points ∼97% +5%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H,
583 Points ∼97% +5%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H,
582 Points ∼97% +5%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GP66 Leopard 11UH
582 Points ∼97% +5%
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
578 Points ∼96% +4%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
577 Points ∼96% +4%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, XMG Apex 15
558 Points ∼93% +1%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK
554 Points ∼92%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Balanced)
554 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 740, n=228, last 2 years)
551 Points ∼92% -1%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Silent)
550 Points ∼92% -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (502 - 560, n=26)
549 Points ∼92% -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H,
520 Points ∼87% -6%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
2194 Points ∼100% +11%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
2176 Points ∼99% +10%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H,
2121 (1799.78min - 2120.55max) Points ∼97% +7%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H,
1342 (1300.31min - 1341.52max) Points ∼61% -32%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H,
2095 (1963.38min - 2095.12max) Points ∼95% +6%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
2093 (2068.68min - 2093.36max) Points ∼95% +5%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, XMG Apex 15
2085 (2055.92min - 2084.96max) Points ∼95% +5%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H,
2029 Points ∼92% +2%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GP66 Leopard 11UH
2012 (1886.79min - 2011.67max) Points ∼92% +1%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK
1985 (1963.86min - 1985.21max) Points ∼90%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (1487 - 2119, n=24)
1981 Points ∼90% 0%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Balanced)
1892 (1871.87min - 1892.15max) Points ∼86% -5%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H,
1886 (1719.69min - 1885.99max) Points ∼86% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 3077, n=237, last 2 years)
1853 Points ∼84% -7%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Silent)
1487 (1474.6min - 1487.38max) Points ∼68% -25%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H,
241 Points ∼100% +5%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
241 Points ∼100% +5%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
239 Points ∼99% +4%
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
236 Points ∼98% +3%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, XMG Apex 15
230 Points ∼95% 0%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H,
229 Points ∼95% 0%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H,
229 Points ∼95% 0%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H,
228 Points ∼95% 0%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK
229 Points ∼95%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GP66 Leopard 11UH
229 Points ∼95% 0%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Balanced)
229 Points ∼95% 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (209 - 234, n=25)
229 Points ∼95% 0%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Silent)
227 Points ∼94% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 277, n=227, last 2 years)
221 Points ∼92% -3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H,
204 Points ∼85% -11%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H,
342 Seconds * ∼100% -33%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Silent)
339.8 Seconds * ∼99% -32%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H,
313 Seconds * ∼92% -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (168 - 1259, n=227, last 2 years)
296 Seconds * ∼87% -15%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Balanced)
270.3 Seconds * ∼79% -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (237 - 340, n=25)
258 Seconds * ∼75% -0%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK
257 Seconds * ∼75%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, XMG Apex 15
244 Seconds * ∼71% +5%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GP66 Leopard 11UH
244 Seconds * ∼71% +5%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H,
242 Seconds * ∼71% +6%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
241 Seconds * ∼70% +6%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H,
235 Seconds * ∼69% +9%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
229.9 Seconds * ∼67% +11%
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
227 Seconds * ∼66% +12%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
60505 MIPS ∼100% +7%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
58752 MIPS ∼97% +4%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, XMG Apex 15
58467 MIPS ∼97% +4%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK
56348 MIPS ∼93%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
55954 MIPS ∼92% -1%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Balanced)
55020 MIPS ∼91% -2%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GP66 Leopard 11UH
53564 MIPS ∼89% -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (47854 - 59986, n=25)
52178 MIPS ∼86% -7%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H,
51046 MIPS ∼84% -9%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H,
50441 MIPS ∼83% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 83533, n=227, last 2 years)
49725 MIPS ∼82% -12%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Silent)
45773 MIPS ∼76% -19%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H,
44739 MIPS ∼74% -21%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H,
38156 MIPS ∼63% -32%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H,
5870 MIPS ∼100% +7%
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
5754 MIPS ∼98% +4%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
5737 MIPS ∼98% +4%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
5678 MIPS ∼97% +3%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H,
5659 MIPS ∼96% +3%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, XMG Apex 15
5590 MIPS ∼95% +1%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GP66 Leopard 11UH
5569 MIPS ∼95% +1%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H,
5567 MIPS ∼95% +1%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK
5508 MIPS ∼94%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Balanced)
5489 MIPS ∼94% 0%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Silent)
5487 MIPS ∼93% 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (5038 - 5632, n=25)
5479 MIPS ∼93% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 6582, n=227, last 2 years)
5404 MIPS ∼92% -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H,
5392 MIPS ∼92% -2%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GP66 Leopard 11UH
9379 Points ∼100% +13%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H,
8864 Points ∼95% +7%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
8689 Points ∼93% +5%
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
8557 Points ∼91% +4%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Balanced)
8423 Points ∼90% +2%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, XMG Apex 15
8389 Points ∼89% +1%
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 14294, n=220, last 2 years)
8389 Points ∼89% +1%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK
8266 Points ∼88%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (6551 - 9062, n=24)
7768 Points ∼83% -6%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Silent)
7734 Points ∼82% -6%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H,
7725 Points ∼82% -7%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
7607 Points ∼81% -8%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H,
6758 Points ∼72% -18%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H,
1585 Points ∼100% +6%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GP66 Leopard 11UH
1578 Points ∼100% +6%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H,
1576 Points ∼99% +6%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
1561 Points ∼98% +5%
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
1541 Points ∼97% +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H,
1516 Points ∼96% +2%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, XMG Apex 15
1501 Points ∼95% +1%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
1496 Points ∼94% 0%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK
1492 Points ∼94%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Balanced)
1490 Points ∼94% 0%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Silent)
1487 Points ∼94% 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (1336 - 1505, n=24)
1446 Points ∼91% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 1933, n=220, last 2 years)
1443 Points ∼91% -3%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
16 fps ∼100% +5%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H,
15.6 fps ∼98% +3%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
15.6 fps ∼98% +3%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, XMG Apex 15
15.6 fps ∼98% +3%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GP66 Leopard 11UH
15.5 fps ∼97% +2%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
15.3 fps ∼96% +1%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK
15.2 fps ∼95%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H,
14.9 fps ∼93% -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (11.6 - 16.1, n=25)
14.6 fps ∼91% -4%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Balanced)
14.1 fps ∼88% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 22.5, n=228, last 2 years)
13.9 fps ∼87% -9%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H,
11.9 fps ∼74% -22%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Silent)
11.6 fps ∼73% -24%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H,
11 fps ∼69% -28%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
87.4 s * ∼100% -56%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (47.4 - 113, n=25)
65.8 s * ∼75% -18%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK
55.9 s * ∼64%
Average of class Gaming
  (23.9 - 332, n=225, last 2 years)
53.6 s * ∼61% +4%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, XMG Apex 15
53.5 s * ∼61% +4%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
52.9 s * ∼61% +5%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
52.4 s * ∼60% +6%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Silent)
52 s * ∼59% +7%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Balanced)
51.4 s * ∼59% +8%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H,
49.5 s * ∼57% +11%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GP66 Leopard 11UH
48.6 s * ∼56% +13%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H,
47.5 s * ∼54% +15%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H,
45.8 s * ∼52% +18%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H,
44.5 s * ∼51% +20%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H,
0.587 sec * ∼100% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.412 - 4.47, n=224, last 2 years)
0.567 sec * ∼97% -9%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GP66 Leopard 11UH
0.566 sec * ∼96% -9%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H,
0.556 sec * ∼95% -7%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H,
0.548 sec * ∼93% -5%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H,
0.529 sec * ∼90% -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (0.511 - 0.559, n=24)
0.525 sec * ∼89% -1%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Silent)
0.521 sec * ∼89% -0%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK
0.52 sec * ∼89%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Balanced)
0.519 sec * ∼88% -0%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
0.512 sec * ∼87% +2%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, XMG Apex 15
0.512 sec * ∼87% +2%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
0.4969 sec * ∼85% +4%
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX,
0.4947 sec * ∼84% +5%
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | 64 Bit Single-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1985 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
176 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
229 Points
Help

下图说明了在Cinebench R15循环测试中,CPU时钟、核心温度和CPU封装功率在每种性能模式下的变化。尽管平衡模式以较低的时钟和温度开始,但由于功率分配的增加,它最终能够与极限性能相匹配。

在静音模式下,封装功率仅徘徊在40W左右。虽然这有助于将温度保持在60°C和70°C之间,但处理器在大多数情况下只能达到3.8GHz,偶尔会飙升到4.2GHz。

因此,用户将不得不根据他们的工作流程选择适当的性能模式。关于每种性能模式下的风扇噪音特性比较,请参考排放部分。

在各种性能模式下的Cinebench R15循环中,CPU时钟、核心温度和封装功率。(红色--极端性能,绿色--平衡,蓝色--静音)
在各种性能模式下的Cinebench R15循环中,CPU时钟、核心温度和封装功率。(红色--极端性能,绿色--平衡,蓝色--静音)
Performance Rating
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU,
95.1 pt ∼95%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6700M,
92.8 pt ∼93%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6800M,
91.8 pt ∼92%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, XMG Apex 15
90.6 pt ∼91%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK
88 pt ∼88%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, GP66 Leopard 11UH
87.2 pt ∼87%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Balanced)
85.5 pt ∼86%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
 
85.5 pt ∼86%
Average of class Gaming
 
73.8 pt ∼74%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Silent)
70 pt ∼70%
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU,
15594 KRay/s ∼100% +9%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6800M,
15257 KRay/s ∼98% +7%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6700M,
14974 KRay/s ∼96% +5%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, XMG Apex 15
14725 KRay/s ∼94% +3%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, GP66 Leopard 11UH
14722 KRay/s ∼94% +3%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK
14273 KRay/s ∼92%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (10349 - 15169, n=25)
14063 KRay/s ∼90% -1%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Balanced)
13712 KRay/s ∼88% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2585 - 19199, n=182, last 2 years)
11384 KRay/s ∼73% -20%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Silent)
10349 KRay/s ∼66% -27%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU,
99411 Points ∼100% +11%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6800M,
97173 Points ∼98% +8%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6700M,
94860 Points ∼95% +6%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, XMG Apex 15
94497 Points ∼95% +5%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK
89725 Points ∼90%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (63663 - 95954, n=25)
88110 Points ∼89% -2%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Balanced)
85376 Points ∼86% -5%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Silent)
63663 Points ∼64% -29%
Average of class Gaming
  (12439 - 117712, n=182, last 2 years)
61776 Points ∼62% -31%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, GP66 Leopard 11UH
61519 Points ∼62% -31%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, GP66 Leopard 11UH
4129 MB/s ∼100% +35%
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU,
3392 MB/s ∼82% +11%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6800M,
3319 MB/s ∼80% +9%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6700M,
3235 MB/s ∼78% +6%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, XMG Apex 15
3230 MB/s ∼78% +6%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK
3049 MB/s ∼74%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (2096 - 3287, n=25)
3000 MB/s ∼73% -2%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Balanced)
2907 MB/s ∼70% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 4851, n=182, last 2 years)
2848 MB/s ∼69% -7%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Silent)
2110 MB/s ∼51% -31%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6700M,
103065 Points ∼100% +7%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6800M,
102977 Points ∼100% +7%
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU,
102424 Points ∼99% +7%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, XMG Apex 15
97488 Points ∼95% +2%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Balanced)
97080 Points ∼94% +1%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Silent)
96648 Points ∼94% +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (92948 - 99215, n=25)
96160 Points ∼93% 0%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK
96014 Points ∼93%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, GP66 Leopard 11UH
91941 Points ∼89% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 132615, n=182, last 2 years)
89191 Points ∼87% -7%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6700M,
12577 Points ∼100% +8%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6800M,
12511 Points ∼99% +8%
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU,
12430 Points ∼99% +7%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, XMG Apex 15
11821 Points ∼94% +2%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Balanced)
11638 Points ∼93% 0%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK
11629 Points ∼92%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (9962 - 11871, n=25)
11547 Points ∼92% -1%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Silent)
9962 Points ∼79% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 17639, n=182, last 2 years)
9914 Points ∼79% -15%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, GP66 Leopard 11UH
9787 Points ∼78% -16%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU,
54630 Points ∼100% +11%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6800M,
53538 Points ∼98% +9%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6700M,
52448 Points ∼96% +6%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, XMG Apex 15
52072 Points ∼95% +6%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK
49254 Points ∼90%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (36083 - 52732, n=25)
48385 Points ∼89% -2%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Balanced)
47231 Points ∼86% -4%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, GP66 Leopard 11UH
36578 Points ∼67% -26%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Silent)
36083 Points ∼66% -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (7135 - 64776, n=182, last 2 years)
33637 Points ∼62% -32%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, GP66 Leopard 11UH
147287 MB/s ∼100% +22%
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU,
134287 MB/s ∼91% +11%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6800M,
132413 MB/s ∼90% +9%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6700M,
128205 MB/s ∼87% +6%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, XMG Apex 15
125127 MB/s ∼85% +3%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK
121180 MB/s ∼82%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Balanced)
116137 MB/s ∼79% -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (50226 - 127832, n=25)
114646 MB/s ∼78% -5%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Silent)
91357 MB/s ∼62% -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (11368 - 166300, n=182, last 2 years)
77273 MB/s ∼52% -36%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU,
865 MB/s ∼100% +10%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6800M,
842 MB/s ∼97% +7%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6700M,
825 MB/s ∼95% +5%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, XMG Apex 15
803 MB/s ∼93% +2%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK
789 MB/s ∼91%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, GP66 Leopard 11UH
784 MB/s ∼91% -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (591 - 828, n=25)
775 MB/s ∼90% -2%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Balanced)
758 MB/s ∼88% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 1209, n=203, last 2 years)
690 MB/s ∼80% -13%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Silent)
591 MB/s ∼68% -25%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU,
8221 KRay/s ∼100% +9%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6800M,
7985 KRay/s ∼97% +6%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, GP66 Leopard 11UH
7926 KRay/s ∼96% +5%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6700M,
7880 KRay/s ∼96% +5%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, XMG Apex 15
7826 KRay/s ∼95% +4%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK
7526 KRay/s ∼92%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (5457 - 7884, n=25)
7405 KRay/s ∼90% -2%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Balanced)
7228 KRay/s ∼88% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (1437 - 10472, n=182, last 2 years)
6174 KRay/s ∼75% -18%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Silent)
5457 KRay/s ∼66% -27%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average of class Gaming
  (8341 - 46643, n=182, last 2 years)
24394 MPixel/s ∼100% +19%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, GP66 Leopard 11UH
23153 MPixel/s ∼95% +13%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK
20495 MPixel/s ∼84%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Balanced)
20371 MPixel/s ∼84% -1%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6700M,
20367 MPixel/s ∼83% -1%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Silent)
20250 MPixel/s ∼83% -1%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, XMG Apex 15
19901 MPixel/s ∼82% -3%
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU,
19376 MPixel/s ∼79% -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (14445 - 25421, n=25)
17679 MPixel/s ∼72% -14%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6800M,
14768 MPixel/s ∼61% -28%

查看我们专门的 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H页面了解更多信息和性能基准。

系统性能

微星Alpha 15的整体系统性能很好。大多数生产力应用程序的响应速度很高,启动速度很快。开机时间和从待机状态恢复的速度也令人印象深刻。

PCMark 10得分显示,Alpha 15紧跟在Tiger Lake-H-powered游戏笔记本的后面,如 Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED, 华硕TUF Gaming F17和微星自己的 GP66 Leopard 11UH.

AIDA64内存基准测试显示,在三个测试的性能模式中没有可察觉的差异。

PCMark 10 / Score
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
Radeon RX 6700M, R9 5900HX, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
7316 Points ∼100% +6%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
Radeon RX 6800M, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU
7167 Points ∼98% +4%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7066 Points ∼97% +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7062 Points ∼97% +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M
  (6875 - 7150, n=2)
7013 Points ∼96% +2%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6901 Points ∼94% 0%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
6875 Points ∼94%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6865 Points ∼94% 0%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
6703 Points ∼92% -3%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1
6666 Points ∼91% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (4077 - 8186, n=190, last 2 years)
6541 Points ∼89% -5%
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
6505 Points ∼89% -5%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
10602 Points ∼100% +7%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
10522 Points ∼99% +6%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
Radeon RX 6700M, R9 5900HX, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
10444 Points ∼99% +5%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10208 Points ∼96% +3%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
Radeon RX 6800M, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU
10204 Points ∼96% +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M
  (9907 - 10479, n=2)
10193 Points ∼96% +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10028 Points ∼95% +1%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
9907 Points ∼93%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
9905 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (7148 - 11205, n=189, last 2 years)
9856 Points ∼93% -1%
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9827 Points ∼93% -1%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1
9248 Points ∼87% -7%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9669 Points ∼100% +8%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
Radeon RX 6700M, R9 5900HX, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
9481 Points ∼98% +6%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1
9217 Points ∼95% +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M
  (8922 - 9231, n=2)
9077 Points ∼94% +2%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9071 Points ∼94% +2%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
Radeon RX 6800M, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU
9060 Points ∼94% +2%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
8922 Points ∼92%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
8859 Points ∼92% -1%
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
8803 Points ∼91% -1%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
8798 Points ∼91% -1%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8784 Points ∼91% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (6161 - 10638, n=189, last 2 years)
8731 Points ∼90% -2%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
Radeon RX 6800M, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU
10806 Points ∼100% +8%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
Radeon RX 6700M, R9 5900HX, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
10731 Points ∼99% +8%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10677 Points ∼99% +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M
  (9977 - 10257, n=2)
10117 Points ∼94% +1%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
9977 Points ∼92%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9858 Points ∼91% -1%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1
9431 Points ∼87% -5%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9423 Points ∼87% -6%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
9377 Points ∼87% -6%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9274 Points ∼86% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (3670 - 13098, n=189, last 2 years)
8944 Points ∼83% -10%
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
8634 Points ∼80% -13%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5722 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5804 points
PCMark 10 Score
6875 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, GP66 Leopard 11UH
43938 MB/s ∼100% +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (18074 - 77803, n=182, last 2 years)
42866 MB/s ∼98% +3%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Silent)
41820 MB/s ∼95% 0%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, XMG Apex 15
41788 MB/s ∼95% 0%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Balanced)
41751 MB/s ∼95% 0%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK
41740 MB/s ∼95%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6700M,
41209 MB/s ∼94% -1%
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU,
41154 MB/s ∼94% -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (34964 - 44180, n=25)
39662 MB/s ∼90% -5%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6800M,
36725 MB/s ∼84% -12%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, GP66 Leopard 11UH
50013 MB/s ∼100% +6%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, XMG Apex 15
47260 MB/s ∼94% 0%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK
47139 MB/s ∼94%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Balanced)
47040 MB/s ∼94% 0%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Silent)
46992 MB/s ∼94% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (20318 - 76185, n=182, last 2 years)
46642 MB/s ∼93% -1%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6700M,
46425 MB/s ∼93% -2%
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU,
45789 MB/s ∼92% -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (39990 - 47260, n=25)
44863 MB/s ∼90% -5%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6800M,
41984 MB/s ∼84% -11%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, GP66 Leopard 11UH
45566 MB/s ∼100% 0%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK
45343 MB/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (15975 - 66256, n=182, last 2 years)
44785 MB/s ∼98% -1%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Silent)
44773 MB/s ∼98% -1%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, XMG Apex 15
44339 MB/s ∼97% -2%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Balanced)
43601 MB/s ∼96% -4%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6700M,
43507 MB/s ∼95% -4%
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU,
41299 MB/s ∼91% -9%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (28456 - 47022, n=25)
37911 MB/s ∼83% -16%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6800M,
32536 MB/s ∼71% -28%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, GP66 Leopard 11UH
92.6 ns * ∼100% -16%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (76.3 - 105.1, n=25)
82 ns * ∼89% -3%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6800M,
81.3 ns * ∼88% -2%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Silent)
80.2 ns * ∼87% -0%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK
79.9 ns * ∼86%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, Alpha 15 B5EEK (Balanced)
79.7 ns * ∼86% -0%
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU,
78.5 ns * ∼85% +2%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, XMG Apex 15
77.8 ns * ∼84% +3%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6700M,
77.4 ns * ∼84% +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (82.1 - 122, n=205, last 2 years)
61.4 ns * ∼66% +23%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

在我们的标准化DPC延迟测量程序中,我们观察到从中断到处理的最大延迟约为1010.4微秒,其中包括打开几个浏览器标签,在YouTube上播放我们的演示4K60视频,以及运行Prime95原地大型FFT折磨测试的实例10秒。

这个延迟比Alpha 15的一些竞争对手要低,但是那些实时音频和视频工作流程的用户仍然会遇到潜在的障碍。在系统中的所有其他驱动程序中,TCP/IP驱动程序的执行时间是最高的。

请看我们专门的 DPC延时排名页面,了解更多测试设备的延迟比较。

微星Alpha 15的DPC延迟有点高
微星Alpha 15的DPC延迟有点高
Tcpip.sys似乎有最高的执行时间
Tcpip.sys似乎有最高的执行时间
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
Radeon RX 6800M, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU
2542 μs * ∼100% -152%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
Radeon RX 6700M, R9 5900HX, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
1581 μs * ∼62% -57%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1431 μs * ∼56% -42%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1399 μs * ∼55% -39%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
1330 μs * ∼52% -32%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
1010 μs * ∼40%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1
953 μs * ∼37% +6%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
829 μs * ∼33% +18%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
823 μs * ∼32% +19%
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
503 μs * ∼20% +50%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

美光NVMe固态硬盘提供了体面的性能,但没有散热解决方案
美光NVMe固态硬盘提供了体面的性能,但没有散热解决方案

美光NVMe固态硬盘的性能在大多数使用情况下是没有问题的。然而,在原始基准测试中,它确实明显落后于以三星PM991、PM981a和PM9A1产品为特色的竞争对手。

Alpha 15的固态硬盘在大多数情况下都能提供良好的持续性能,但在DiskSpd读取循环测试中,我们确实观察到两次明显的节流,队列深度为8。 无论是在主机箱还是在后盖,都没有为固态硬盘提供散热解决方案。

没有安装2.5英寸SATA SSD或HDD的范围。然而,微星提供了一个空置的M.2 2280插槽用于NVMe存储扩展。

更多的存储性能比较可以在我们专门的 SSD和HDD基准测试页面中找到更多的存储性能比较。

Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2118 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1941 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 549 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 344.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1731 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1889 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 59 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 134 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 1286 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 956 MB/s
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU
Lenovo Legion S7 15ACH6 82K80030GE
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Average Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Drive Performance Rating
Percent
44.6
21.6
-52%
45.4
2%
46.5
4%
60.5
36%
98.5
121%
43.8
-2%
60.6
36%
DiskSpd
-18%
12%
18%
60%
193%
-5%
61%
seq read
1049
1389
32%

1389
32%

1725
64%
2025
93%
2466
135%
4608
339%
1342 ?(882 - 1725, n=4)
28%
2370 ?(170 - 5544, n=186, last 2 years)
126%
seq write
1891
1157
-39%
1923
2%
1588
-16%
2788
47%
4304
128%
1635 ?(882 - 1923, n=4)
-14%
2577 ?(174 - 7889, n=185, last 2 years)
36%
seq q8 t1 read
1665
2008
21%

2008
21%

2138
28%
2876
73%
3529
112%
6670
301%
1753 ?(970 - 2238, n=4)
5%
3911 ?(144 - 13195, n=186, last 2 years)
135%
seq q8 t1 write
1960
1194
-39%

1194
-39%

1995
2%
1607
-18%
2801
43%
4933
152%
1706 ?(923 - 1995, n=4)
-13%
3102 ?(86.2 - 10203, n=186, last 2 years)
58%
4k q1 t1 read
60.7
29.9
-51%

29.9
-51%

61.6
1%
48
-21%
49.8
-18%
93
53%
59.9 ?(51.4 - 66, n=4)
-1%
56.1 ?(0.53 - 97.4, n=186, last 2 years)
-8%
4k q1 t1 write
145
114
-21%
146
1%
143
-1%
144
-1%
237
63%
134.8 ?(84.3 - 164, n=4)
-7%
170.6 ?(0.79 - 421, n=185, last 2 years)
18%
4k q32 t16 read
961
493
-49%
968
1%
1443
50%
1851
93%
4183
335%
819 ?(419 - 968, n=4)
-15%
1771 ?(1.1 - 4198, n=185, last 2 years)
84%
4k q32 t16 write
1289
891
-31%
1253
-3%
1125
-13%
2131
65%
3549
175%
1047 ?(594 - 1289, n=4)
-19%
1759 ?(1.15 - 4249, n=185, last 2 years)
36%
AS SSD
-144%
-1%
8%
41%
122%
-0%
29%
Score Total
3300
1033
-69%
3233
-2%
3818
16%
5318
61%
8764
166%
3182 ?(3053 - 3300, n=4)
-4%
5214 ?(910 - 9279, n=177, last 2 years)
58%
Score Read
1157
478
-59%
1158
0%
1658
43%
1959
69%
3353
190%
1162 ?(1157 - 1168, n=4)
0%
1943 ?(389 - 3587, n=177, last 2 years)
68%
Score Write
1546
387
-75%
1478
-4%
1360
-12%
2355
52%
3755
143%
1419 ?(1283 - 1546, n=4)
-8%
2296 ?(335 - 4414, n=177, last 2 years)
49%
Seq Read
2016
1978
-2%
2023
0%
2706
34%
2790
38%
5189
157%
2016 ?(2002 - 2023, n=4)
0%
3175 ?(252 - 6562, n=177, last 2 years)
57%
Seq Write
1830
308.3
-83%
1836
0%
1652
-10%
2768
51%
3941
115%
1820 ?(1781 - 1836, n=4)
-1%
2459 ?(308 - 7663, n=177, last 2 years)
34%
4K Read
55.2
24.04
-56%
56.4
2%
45.46
-18%
50.4
-9%
84.8
54%
61 ?(55.2 - 70.6, n=4)
11%
55 ?(20 - 108, n=177, last 2 years)
0%
4K Write
127.7
113.7
-11%
130.2
2%
128.5
1%
134.5
5%
208.8
64%
135.6 ?(127.7 - 155.7, n=4)
6%
149.7 ?(18 - 364, n=177, last 2 years)
17%
4K-64 Read
901
256.5
-72%
899
0%
1342
49%
1630
81%
2749
205%