Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022评测 - 具有快速显示功能的紧凑型游戏笔记本电脑

装有最新的英特尔和Nvidia芯片,Razer Blade 15 2022春季型号承诺对流行的15英寸游戏笔记本电脑系列进行迭代改进。这里审查的模型和之前审查的模型之间的主要区别是 之前审查的Blade 15 2022的主要区别是1080p 360 Hz的面板,所以读者可以坚持在这篇评论中了解基本相同的物理规格的细节。刀锋15的直接竞争对手包括其他高性能15.6英寸游戏笔记本电脑,如 申克XMG Neo 15 E22,以及 华硕ROG Strix Scar 15,以及 MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS和 微星Vector GP66 12UGS.
进一步的Razer评论。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.3 % | 05/2022 | Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 16.99 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
89.1 % | 03/2022 | Razer Blade 15 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 16.99 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
03/2022 | Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.2 kg | 26.6 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | ||
86.3 % | 09/2021 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 27.2 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
84.5 % | 02/2022 | MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.2 kg | 19.8 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
86.9 % | 03/2022 | MSI Vector GP66 12UGS i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 23.4 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
箱子 - 结构紧凑,适合旅行
在表壳方面,我们再次看到熟悉的、光滑的金属结构,Blade系列最初就是以这种结构而闻名的。因此,稳定性、做工和抗扭性仍然很好。反面是对指纹的高敏感度。
Razer Blade 15是一款非常紧凑的15.6英寸笔记本电脑,比大多数竞争对手既小又薄。特别是,ROG Strix Scar 15和XMG Neo 15 E22明显更厚,比我们2.1公斤的审查设备重约100-200克。
硬件 - 具有现代连接功能的刀片15
在连接方面没有什么大的惊喜。值得一提的是全面的SD读卡器和支持2.1版本的HDMI端口。与许多竞争对手不同,如 XMG Neo 15 E22的情况,这里没有专用的LAN端口。但是,如果需要的话,可以通过雷电底座来解决这个问题。
SD卡阅读器
SD读卡器的性能处于较高的水平。在用我们的microSD AV PRO 128GB V60卡进行的连续AS-SSD读取测试中,我们的评测设备上出现了一个错误。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (18 - 222, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) |
沟通
当连接到我们的华硕GT-AXE11000测试路由器时,集成的杀手Wi-Fi 6E 1690i模块提供了非常快的传输速率。还提供了蓝牙5.2支持。
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000 | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Average of class Gaming (976 - 1695, n=10, last 2 years) | |
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000 | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Average of class Gaming (967 - 1727, n=11, last 2 years) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS |
网络摄像头

输入设备 - 大型点击板和整洁的键盘
键盘
触摸板
触摸板的面积约为13x8厘米,允许手指出色地滑行。点击的特点是键程短,触觉反馈清晰。
显示屏------快速面板,色彩光谱有限
|
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 330 cd/m²
Contrast: 1375:1 (Black: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.47 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4, calibrated: 0.63
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
67.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
85.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.282
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 TL156VDXP02-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Razer Blade 15 2022 Sharp LQ156T1JW03, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60 | Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) BOE0A67 (BOE CQ NE156QHM-NZ1), IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60 | MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Sharp LQ156T1JW04 (SHP153C), IPS-Level, 2560x1440, 15.60 | MSI Vector GP66 12UGS BOE NE156FHM-NZ3, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 33% | 31% | 31% | 10% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 65.3 | 99.1 52% | 97.6 49% | 96.4 48% | 70.1 7% | |
sRGB Coverage | 85.1 | 99.9 17% | 99.9 17% | 99.7 17% | 99.5 17% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67.4 | 86.8 29% | 85.3 27% | 85.6 27% | 72.1 7% | |
Response Times | -123% | -119% | -122% | -10% | -13% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 4.3 ? | 14.4 ? -235% | 14.4 ? -235% | 14 ? -226% | 6 ? -40% | 5.8 ? -35% |
Response Time Black / White * | 10.5 ? | 11.6 ? -10% | 10.8 ? -3% | 12.4 ? -18% | 8.4 ? 20% | 9.6 ? 9% |
PWM Frequency | ||||||
Screen | -54% | -38% | -77% | -87% | -45% | |
Brightness middle | 330 | 286 -13% | 295 -11% | 304.3 -8% | 272 -18% | 353.1 7% |
Brightness | 315 | 271 -14% | 277 -12% | 286 -9% | 253 -20% | 325 3% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 89 0% | 62 -30% | 76 -15% | 87 -2% | 85 -4% |
Black Level * | 0.24 | 0.25 -4% | 0.28 -17% | 0.33 -38% | 0.25 -4% | 0.38 -58% |
Contrast | 1375 | 1144 -17% | 1054 -23% | 922 -33% | 1088 -21% | 929 -32% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.47 | 2.74 -86% | 2.36 -61% | 2.76 -88% | 3.73 -154% | 2.24 -52% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.73 | 5.21 -91% | 4.24 -55% | 5.57 -104% | 9.43 -245% | 5 -83% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.63 | 2.52 -300% | 2.38 -278% | 0.98 -56% | 1.02 -62% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 1.1 39% | 3.43 -91% | 4 -122% | 6.5 -261% | 4 -122% |
Gamma | 2.282 96% | 2.2 100% | 2.44 90% | 2.14 103% | 2.172 101% | 2.24 98% |
CCT | 6499 100% | 6408 101% | 6266 104% | 6844 95% | 6485 100% | 6864 95% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -48% /
-45% | -79% /
-54% | -56% /
-60% | -22% /
-51% | -16% /
-28% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
10.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.7 ms rise | |
↘ 4.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.4 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
4.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.4 ms rise | |
↘ 1.9 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21940 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
可视角度是一流的。即使在陡峭的角度,IPS显示屏的颜色和对比度也几乎没有失真。
性能 - 拥有顶级硬件的Razer游戏笔记本
我们的Razer Blade 15配备了一个 英特尔酷睿i7-12800H和一个 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 Ti.还有32GB四通道模式的DDR5内存和1TB PCIe 4.0固态硬盘。结合4K面板, 笔记本电脑是可供选择的与 酷睿i9-12900H.
测试条件
为了在测试中获得新的见解,我们用Synapse "平衡 "配置文件进行了所有测量。这使得GPU的最大TGP约为95W,同时也限制了CPU的工作。你可以在我们的评论中找到可实现的最大分数。 其他评论.
处理器
在我们选择的配置文件下,Cinebench R15多线程测试在电池模式下取得了相同的分数。 英特尔酷睿i7-12800H是一个全新的第12代英特尔处理器,支持DDR5内存。DDR5功能允许两个RAM模块以四通道模式运行。
在 "平衡 "模式下,Razer Blade 15在CPU性能方面不如没有性能限制的情况下能跟上竞争对手。即使是名义上较弱的 酷睿i7-12700H在Cinebench R15多循环测试中,即使是XMG Neo 15 E22的名义上较弱的酷睿i7-12700H也能在两种情况下击败我们的评测设备。一些单线程基准测试结果更好的事实,可能是由于在TDP限制之前就达到了温度限制。涡轮增压只在短时间内保持活跃。
在我们选择的配置文件下,Cinebench R15多线程测试在电池模式下提供相同的分数。
Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load
Cinebench R23 | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (9777 - 15386, n=4) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Average of class Gaming (4032 - 19282, n=150, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (1796 - 1839, n=4) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Average of class Gaming (778 - 1920, n=149, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (3741 - 5928, n=4) | |
Average of class Gaming (1397 - 7382, n=223, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (690 - 708, n=4) | |
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Average of class Gaming (300 - 736, n=223, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (1566 - 2697, n=4) | |
Average of class Gaming (536 - 2944, n=236, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (242 - 266, n=4) | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Average of class Gaming (108 - 277, n=226, last 2 years) |
Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Average of class Gaming (168 - 732, n=221, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (220 - 306, n=4) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) |
7-Zip 18.03 | |
7z b 4 | |
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (44553 - 62231, n=4) | |
Average of class Gaming (21148 - 76063, n=222, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (5726 - 5892, n=4) | |
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Average of class Gaming (2743 - 6506, n=222, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 5.3 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (9607 - 12797, n=4) | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Average of class Gaming (2783 - 14294, n=215, last 2 years) | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (1739 - 1842, n=4) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Average of class Gaming (703 - 1918, n=215, last 2 years) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (11.7 - 17.2, n=4) | |
Average of class Gaming (4.67 - 22, n=221, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
Average of class Gaming (23.9 - 113, n=220, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (41.3 - 51.5, n=4) | |
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
Average of class Gaming (0.4218 - 1.088, n=218, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (0.4522 - 0.4715, n=4) | |
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Average of class Gaming (2585 - 19199, n=176, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (5839 - 7694, n=4) | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Average of class Gaming (12439 - 102318, n=176, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (27801 - 37471, n=4) | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Average of class Gaming (833 - 4851, n=176, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (2013 - 2693, n=4) | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (85965 - 101957, n=4) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average of class Gaming (30447 - 132615, n=176, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Average of class Gaming (3007 - 17639, n=176, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (7027 - 9271, n=4) | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Average of class Gaming (7135 - 56460, n=176, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (15765 - 21600, n=4) | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Average of class Gaming (11368 - 156370, n=176, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (55371 - 65871, n=4) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (701 - 1034, n=4) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Average of class Gaming (305 - 1209, n=197, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Average of class Gaming (1437 - 10472, n=176, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (3257 - 4287, n=4) | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (31329 - 40992, n=4) | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Average of class Gaming (8341 - 46643, n=176, last 2 years) |
系统性能
根据PCMark 10的测试,系统性能很稳定。在日常使用中,操作速度平稳,没有明显的延迟,这就是为什么你可以无忧无虑地使用 "平衡 "模式。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (7313 - 7744, n=3) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Average of class Gaming (4077 - 8186, n=190, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (10597 - 10814, n=3) | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
Average of class Gaming (7148 - 11205, n=189, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (9470 - 9675, n=3) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
Average of class Gaming (6161 - 10638, n=189, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (10351 - 12306, n=3) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Average of class Gaming (3670 - 13098, n=189, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | |
Average of class Gaming (974 - 2108, n=21, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | |
Average of class Gaming (907 - 2062, n=21, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | |
Average of class Gaming (1027 - 2165, n=21, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | |
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 2230, n=21, last 2 years) |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 6657 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 7009 points | |
PCMark 10 Score | 7313 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (48643 - 62522, n=4) | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Average of class Gaming (18074 - 77803, n=176, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (56629 - 66199, n=4) | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Average of class Gaming (20318 - 76185, n=176, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (50923 - 66074, n=4) | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Average of class Gaming (15975 - 66256, n=176, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Average of class Gaming (92.2 - 122, n=198, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (95.2 - 95.2, n=4) | |
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
在我们的评测设备中安装了一个1TB的三星PM9A1 M.2 SDD,带有PCIe 4.0,这导致了非常高的数据传输率。由于SSTC的PCIe 4.0固态硬盘 "CA6-8D1024 "被安装在我们的 第一个Blade 15评测设备因此,驱动器型号和传输速率可能有所不同。