Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
MagyarHP Omen 17 (2023)回顾：游戏笔记本使用RTX 4080
Omen 17的2023型号是一款高端游戏笔记本电脑，使用了我们已经知道的前代产品的相同外壳，但包括当前的硬件：这款笔记本电脑由猛禽湖和艾达-洛夫莱斯芯片运行。惠普将酷睿i9与RTX 4080 GPU结合在一起，整套设备要价近3,300欧元（3,582美元）。竞争对手包括笔记本电脑，如 Alienware m17 R5，以及Razer Blade 16（2023年初），以及华硕ROG Strix G16 G614JZ，以及 联想Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H.
你可以在我们对上一代机型的评论中找到关于机箱、设备、输入设备和扬声器的信息。 对前代机型的评论，在这些方面都是相同的。
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Processor
Intel Core i9-13900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.4 GHz, 130 W PL2 / Short Burst, 55 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU - 12 GB VRAM, Core: 2010 MHz, Memory: 2250 MHz, 175 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 31.0.15.3118, Optimus
Memory
32 GB
, DDR5-5600, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (both in use)
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 170 PPI, BOE BOE09BF, IPS, glossy: no, 165 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)
Storage
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, 1024 GB
, 893 GB free
Weight
2.766 kg, Power Supply: 1.154 kg
Price
3299 Euro
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85.4 % | 03/2023 | HP Omen 17-ck2097ng i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 27 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 | |
| 86.1 % | 01/2023 | Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT | 3.4 kg | 26.7 mm | 17.00" | 3840x2160 | |
| 91.2 % | 02/2023 | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 21.99 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 89.4 % | 02/2023 | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 26 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 88.4 % | 03/2023 | Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 30.4 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1443 (733-1546)
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø976 (930-1012)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1155 (495-1441)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1551 (848-1696)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1545 (1189-1625)
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1626 (1381-1714)
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø968 (947-983)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1327 (1093-1448)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1618 (1537-1665)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1530 (795-1691)
9 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
显示屏 - QHD，包括sRGB覆盖
虽然此时许多竞争对手喜欢使用16:10的显示屏，但惠普在Omen中仍然忠实于16:9的格式。一个积极的特征是，反应灵敏的165-Hz面板在任何亮度水平下都不会出现任何PWM闪烁。
哑光的17.3英寸显示屏（2,560 x 1,440像素）的亮度和对比度符合要求（>300 cd/m²和1,000:1）。然而，在我们的竞争对手的显示器中，Omen显示器提供的亮度最低。的 Legion 7 Pro 拥有这里最亮的面板。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
BOE BOE09BF tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 371 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 349.9 cd/m² Minimum: 19 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 371 cd/m²
Contrast: 1159:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.74 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.01
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
69.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng BOE BOE09BF, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30 | Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AU Optronics AUODBA3, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.00 | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 CSOT T3 MNG007DA4-1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H MNG007DA2-3 (CSO1628), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ TL160ADMP03-0, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | HP Omen 17-ck1075ng BOE09EE, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 24% | 26% | 2% | 23% | -11% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 67.4 | 97.2 44% | 98.5 46% | 69.1 3% | 97 44% | 59.03 -12% |
| sRGB Coverage | 97.6 | 99.6 2% | 100 2% | 99.7 2% | 99.9 2% | 87.46 -10% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 69.6 | 88.4 27% | 89.7 29% | 71.2 2% | 84.9 22% | 61.04 -12% |
| Response Times | -18% | 12% | 28% | 47% | -1% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 15.6 ? | 16.4 ? -5% | 6.6 ? 58% | 12.3 ? 21% | 5.1 ? 67% | 14 ? 10% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 8.9 ? | 11.6 ? -30% | 12 ? -35% | 5.9 ? 34% | 6.6 ? 26% | 10 ? -12% |
| PWM Frequency | 100 ? | |||||
| Screen | -88% | -12% | 25% | 3% | -15% | |
| Brightness middle | 371 | 484 30% | 456.8 23% | 511 38% | 470 27% | 321 -13% |
| Brightness | 350 | 449 28% | 437 25% | 469 34% | 459 31% | 302 -14% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 87 -3% | 83 -8% | 86 -4% | 93 3% | 84 -7% |
| Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.55 -72% | 0.35 -9% | 0.4 -25% | 0.42 -31% | 0.41 -28% |
| Contrast | 1159 | 880 -24% | 1305 13% | 1278 10% | 1119 -3% | 783 -32% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.74 | 4.8 -176% | 3.7 -113% | 0.95 45% | 1.86 -7% | 1.62 7% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.59 | 7.48 -108% | 6.42 -79% | 2.07 42% | 3.87 -8% | 4.08 -14% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.01 | 4.74 -369% | 0.66 35% | 0.91 10% | 0.93 8% | 1.93 -91% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 5.5 -96% | 2.6 7% | 0.6 79% | 2.7 4% | 1.24 56% |
| Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.42 91% | 2.3 96% | 2.176 101% | 2.246 98% | 2.41 91% |
| CCT | 6474 100% | 6148 106% | 6108 106% | 6545 99% | 6711 97% | 6261 104% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -27% /
-54% | 9% /
-0% | 18% /
21% | 24% /
13% | -9% /
-12% |
* ... smaller is better
在交付状态下，色彩再现已经非常好，通过校准可以进一步改善，使色彩偏差从1.74下降到1（目标值<3）。此外，灰度也随之更均匀地再现。
该显示器几乎能够完全覆盖sRGB色彩空间，但不能覆盖AdobeRGB和DCI-P3色彩空间。大多数竞争者的显示器在这里表现得更好，仅有的面板的 Legion处于同一水平。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 15.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 8.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
IPS面板的可视角度很稳定，因此可以从任何视角进行阅读。 只要没有阳光直射，就可以在户外阅读该显示屏。
性能 - 惠普笔记本电脑提供强大的硬件
通过Omen 17，惠普公司提供了一款17.3英寸的笔记本电脑，其目标是用于QHD游戏，但在其他需要高性能的应用领域也取得了不错的成绩。必要的计算性能是由Raptor Lake和Ada Lovelace芯片提供的。我们的测试单位Omen的价格约为3,300欧元（约3,582美元）。
测试条件
预装的Omen Gaming Hub软件代表了笔记本电脑的控制中心。除了选择一种电源模式（见表），它还允许你给CPU降压和配置单独的风扇曲线。由于 "性能 "模式在我们的测试装置中产生了一些问题（奇怪的停顿和性能下降），我们主要使用 "平衡 "电源模式和自动风扇控制。Optimus被激活。
| 性能 | 平衡 | 生态 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 功率限制1 | 100瓦 | 55瓦 | 55瓦 |
| 功率限制2 | 130瓦 | 130瓦 | 130瓦 |
处理器
芯片酷睿i9-13900HX猛禽湖）处理器由16个效率核心（无超线程，1.6至3.9GHz）和8个性能核心（超线程，2.2至5.4GHz）组成，总共有32个逻辑CPU核心。
在主电源操作中，该处理器以中高到高（多线程）和高到最高（单线程）的时钟速度运行Cinebench R15基准的CPU测试。虽然单线程性能（254分）在电池运行中略有下降，但多线程性能的下降是显著的（1303分）。
基准结果的范围在CPU的平均水平（单线程）或以下（多线程）。总的来说，"性能 "模式只带来了轻微的性能优势，其中AIDA基准测试获益最大。另一方面，它也会使CPU速度在持续的多线程负载下保持在一个较高的水平，正如CB15循环测试所显示的那样。
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø2810 (2649.18-4311.13)
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2287 (2247.19-2314.81)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX: Ø2740 (2605.18-3101.02)
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng Intel Core i7-12700H; Performance: Ø2434 (2349.9-2579.98)
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng Intel Core i7-12700H; Balanced: Ø1944 (1886.88-2518.1)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø4512 (4463.29-4528.99)
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX; Leistung: Ø4174 (4028.2-4381.06)
CPU Performance Rating | Cinebench R23 | Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
| CPU Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| Cinebench R20 | |
| CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (9152 - 12541, n=20) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (Leistung) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=230, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| CPU (Single Core) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (Leistung) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (722 - 810, n=20) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Average of class Gaming (169 - 855, n=230, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ (turbo) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (3913 - 4970, n=21) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (Leistung) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=235, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ (turbo) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (Leistung) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (247 - 304, n=21) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 318, n=234, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=228, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (101 - 153, n=21) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (Leistung) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (Leistung) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (23.5 - 34.4, n=21) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=232, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=226, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (32.8 - 51.1, n=20) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (Leistung) | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 4.47, n=229, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (0.375 - 0.4564, n=21) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (Leistung) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ (v6.75.6100) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H (v6.85.6300) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (17589 - 27615, n=21) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v6.75.6100, Leistung) | |
| Average of class Gaming (3069 - 60169, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v6.75.6100) | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) (v6.75.6100) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H (v6.85.6300) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ (v6.75.6100) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (88686 - 137015, n=21) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v6.75.6100, Leistung) | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) (v6.75.6100) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18567 - 252486, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v6.75.6100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H (v6.85.6300) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ (v6.75.6100) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (4362 - 7029, n=21) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v6.75.6100, Leistung) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v6.75.6100) | |
| Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) (v6.75.6100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ (v6.75.6100) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H (v6.85.6300) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (125644 - 141385, n=21) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (v6.85.6300) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v6.75.6100, Leistung) | |
| Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) (v6.75.6100) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ (v6.75.6100) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H (v6.85.6300) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v6.75.6100, Leistung) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (12334 - 17179, n=21) | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) (v6.75.6100) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v6.75.6100) | |
| Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H (v6.85.6300) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ (v6.75.6100) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (43850 - 69202, n=21) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v6.75.6100, Leistung) | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) (v6.75.6100) | |
| Average of class Gaming (10291 - 134044, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v6.75.6100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (89413 - 237881, n=21) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ (v6.75.6100) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H (v6.85.6300) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (v6.85.6300) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v6.75.6100, Leistung) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v6.75.6100) | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) (v6.75.6100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H (v6.85.6300) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ (v6.75.6100) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1284 - 1958, n=21) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v6.75.6100, Leistung) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v6.75.6100) | |
| Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2409, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) (v6.75.6100) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H (v6.85.6300) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ (v6.75.6100) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (9481 - 15279, n=21) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v6.75.6100, Leistung) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1518 - 31796, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v6.75.6100) | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) (v6.75.6100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (v6.85.6300) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v6.75.6100) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v6.75.6100, Leistung) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H (v6.85.6300) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (42994 - 51994, n=21) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ (v6.75.6100) | |
| Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=226, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) (v6.75.6100) | |
系统性能
运行平稳的系统为渲染和游戏等耗电的应用领域提供了足够的计算性能。工作内存的传输率在DDR5-5600存储的正常水平。它们伴随着良好的PC-Mark结果。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (7609 - 8549, n=3) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=200, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (10982 - 11824, n=3) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Average of class Gaming (8300 - 12334, n=199, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (9976 - 10788, n=3) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (6662 - 11833, n=199, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (10135 - 14720, n=3) | |
| Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=199, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1991 - 2194, n=2) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2334, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1828 - 2059, n=2) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (2239 - 2411, n=2) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2514, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1808 - 1998, n=2) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5074 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 6244 points | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 7609 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (67716 - 78835, n=21) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Average of class Gaming (21842 - 92565, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (73998 - 88462, n=21) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Average of class Gaming (24879 - 90647, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (65472 - 77045, n=21) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Average of class Gaming (21619 - 103259, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 152.5, n=222, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (80.4 - 91.1, n=21) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
标准化的延迟监测测试（网络冲浪、4k视频再现、Prime95高负荷）显示了一些明显的行为。该系统似乎并不适合实时处理视频和音频。未来的软件更新可能会带来一些改进，或者使事情变得更糟糕。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
* ... smaller is better
存储解决方案
Omen提供了两个M.2-2280格式的PCIe 4固态硬盘的空间。这里使用的SK海力士的PCIe 4 SSD（1TB）提供了非常好的传输速率。然而，在DiskSpd循环的后期，我们观察到一些偶尔的性能下降，可能是由于热节流的原因。
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
7152 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
6095 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
752.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
461.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
5626 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
5120 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
74.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
286.5 MB/s
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N: Ø6777 (3480.47-7122.14)
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024: Ø4118 (1511-6910.52)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024: Ø6412 (5645.36-6872.58)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø5697 (3283.58-6647.05)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00: Ø5002 (4613.53-5017.26)
图形卡
随着GeForce RTX 4080笔记本电脑GPU，惠普使用了目前Nvidia移动GPU组合中的第二号。它有7,424个着色器，192位总线，并能够使用快速的GDDR6存储（12,288 MB）。RTX 4080的TGP配置为175瓦（150瓦+25瓦动态提升），这是Nvidia认为的可配置的最大值。根据我们的TheWitcher 3 测试，TGP并没有完全使用。
基准结果的范围低于我们迄今为止测试的RTX 4080 GPU的平均值。性能 "配置文件将导致一些偶尔的图形性能的小幅增长。dGPU模式将不会导致任何进一步的改善。在dGPU和Optimus之间切换不需要重新启动--支持高级Optimus。
| 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 -1! | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (Leistung) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (45199 - 63128, n=21) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (Leistung, dGPU) | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72070, n=232, last 2 years) | |
| Blender | |
| v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
| Average of class Gaming (9 - 142, n=180, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (3.3.3) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (13 - 20, n=18) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (3.3.3) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H (3.3.3) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ (3.3.3) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (3.3.3, Leistung) | |
| v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
| Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H (3.3.3) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (3.3.3, Leistung) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (21 - 28, n=19) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (3.3.3) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (3.3.3) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ (3.3.3) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (3.3.3, dGPU, Leistung) | |
| V-Ray 5 Benchmark | |
| GPU RTX | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (5.0.1) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (5.0.1, dGPU, Leistung) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (5.0.1) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (5.0.1, Leistung) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (2128 - 2843, n=14) | |
| Average of class Gaming (171 - 3824, n=127, last 2 years) | |
| GPU CUDA | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (5.0.1, dGPU, Leistung) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (5.0.1, Leistung) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (5.0.1) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (5.0.1) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1647 - 2098, n=14) | |
| Average of class Gaming (120 - 2797, n=130, last 2 years) | |
| CPU | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (5.0.1, Leistung) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (5.0.1) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (5.0.1, dGPU, Leistung) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (11906 - 21823, n=14) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (5.0.1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1690 - 26944, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 | |
| GPU | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v4.10.07, Leistung) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H (v4.10.07 ) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v4.10.07 ) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v4.10.07, dGPU, Leistung) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (812 - 1036, n=13) | |
| Average of class Gaming (54 - 1334, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) (v4.10.07 ) | |
| CPU | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ (v4.10.07 ) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v4.10.07, Leistung) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (19636 - 31653, n=13) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v4.10.07, dGPU, Leistung) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Average of class Gaming (2741 - 37629, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 - OpenCL Score | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (Leistung) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (dGPU, Leistung) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (146413 - 189320, n=19) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Average of class Gaming (5039 - 226512, n=233, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| Geekbench 6.0 - GPU OpenCL | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (153564 - 175235, n=3) | |
| Average of class Gaming (30029 - 213472, n=44, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
针对QHD游戏的Omen在高至最高设置下，在连接相应的显示器时，也可以实现更高的分辨率。我们测试的游戏的帧率范围低于我们到目前为止测试的所有RTX 4080 GPU的平均水平。性能 "配置文件导致帧率的增加，略高于平均水平。在一些游戏中，dGPU模式能够提供额外的增加。
Performance Rating | The Witcher 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (dGPU) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (Leistung) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (130.4 - 186.1, n=19) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=226, last 2 years) | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (102.9 - 152.7, n=18) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (Leistung) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (dGPU, Leistung) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (6.38 - 167.7, n=218, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ (1.3) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (1.3, dGPU, Leistung) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (1.3, Leistung) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H (1.3) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (129 - 182.1, n=19) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (1.3) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (1.3) | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) (1.3) | |
| Average of class Gaming (9.13 - 194.9, n=228, last 2 years) | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (1.47.22.14 D3D12, dGPU, Leistung) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (239 - 357, n=18) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Leistung) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
| Average of class Gaming (14.6 - 421, n=226, last 2 years) | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (Leistung) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (dGPU, Leistung) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (136.2 - 194.7, n=19) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (26.9 - 220, n=238, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (dGPU, Leistung) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (95.3 - 141.3, n=20) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (Leistung) | |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (12.4 - 166.2, n=243, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
为了评估帧率是否在较大程度上保持恒定，我们在全高清分辨率和最高质量设置下运行游戏 "TheWitcher 3"约60分钟。在这段时间内，游戏角色没有被移动。我们没有注意到帧率的任何下降。
The Witcher 3 FPS Chart
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU: Ø157.5 (139-169)
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT: Ø114.1 (101-125)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø118.8 (111-126)
Eurocom Nightsky TXi317 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø107.4 (100-116)
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø105.5 (72.6-190.19)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU: Ø166.9 (141-179)
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
| GTA V (2015) | 183.8 | 183.1 | 175.5 | 121.1 | 116 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 459.7 | 400.5 | 287.8 | 164 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 206 | 180.5 | 167.2 | 155.3 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 192.4 | 173 | 145.4 | 117.5 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 169 | 146.9 | 119.4 | ||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 160 | 132 | 129 | 126 | 124 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 388 | 300 | 290 | 276 | 208 |
| F1 22 (2022) | 255 | 248 | 231 | 97.5 | 67.6 |
| The Callisto Protocol (2022) | 167.6 | 153.7 | 148.3 | 111.5 | 83.7 |
| Returnal (2023) | 150 | 147 | 137 | 121 | 92 |
| Atomic Heart (2023) | 170.8 | 142.3 | 121.1 | 100.3 | 79.2 |
| Company of Heroes 3 (2023) | 275 | 244.6 | 206.5 | 205.31 | 153.8 |
| Sons of the Forest (2023) | 78.1 | 75 | 74.6 | 69.7 | 66.8 |
排放物 - 惠普笔记本电脑产生大量的噪音
噪声水平
在日常操作（办公室、互联网）和空闲操作中，持续运行的风扇是可以清楚听到的。在重载情况下（压力测试，Witcher 3 ），噪音水平进一步增加，音量可能达到50dB（A）。在 "性能 "模式下，噪音水平增加得更快，达到最大，并保持在该水平。噪声包括一些呼呼声，伴随着低沉的口哨声。
Omen的BIOS包含惠普自己的 "风扇常开 "选项，该选项在默认情况下被激活。停用这个选项并没有给我们的测试设备带来任何变化。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 31 / 32 / 33 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 45 / 50 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) | ||
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | HP Omen 17-ck1075ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 11% | 12% | -2% | 2% | -2% | |
| off / environment * | 24 | 23 4% | 23 4% | 24 -0% | 25 -4% | 25.4 -6% |
| Idle Minimum * | 31 | 23 26% | 23 26% | 26 16% | 26 16% | 28 10% |
| Idle Average * | 32 | 28.11 12% | 23 28% | 28 12% | 28 12% | 28 12% |
| Idle Maximum * | 33 | 28.11 15% | 23.6 28% | 34 -3% | 30 9% | 31.2 5% |
| Load Average * | 45 | 30.62 32% | 39 13% | 47 -4% | 48 -7% | 52.2 -16% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 45 | 49.75 -11% | 51.6 -15% | 55 -22% | 49 -9% | 52.2 -16% |
| Load Maximum * | 50 | 50.17 -0% | 51.3 -3% | 56 -12% | 52 -4% | 52.2 -4% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在日常操作中（办公、互联网），机箱温度保持在绿色范围内。在负载情况下（压力测试，Witcher 3 ），笔记本电脑明显发热，但这仍然在限制范围内 - 至少在顶部。CPU的温度没有让人担心的理由。
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.7 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.7 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | HP Omen 17-ck1075ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -20% | -8% | -28% | -23% | -16% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 41 | 53 -29% | 40 2% | 48 -17% | 54 -32% | 31.3 24% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 51 | 56 -10% | 37.6 26% | 49 4% | 55 -8% | 43.3 15% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 24 | 30 -25% | 32.4 -35% | 40 -67% | 29 -21% | 31.3 -30% |
| Idle Bottom * | 25 | 29 -16% | 31.4 -26% | 33 -32% | 33 -32% | 43.3 -73% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
我们的Prime95和Furmark持续运行的压力测试代表了一种极端情况，我们用它来评估系统在全负荷下的稳定性。CPU（P：3.8 GHz，E：3.2 GHz）和GPU（2至2.1 GHz）以高时钟速度开始测试。短时间后，CPU速度下降到大约1.8 GHz（P核）和2 GHz（E核），GPU速度同时增加到2.3 - 2.4 GHz。
发言人
立体声扬声器产生了体面的声音，但它几乎没有任何低音。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理--配备330瓦电源的游戏笔记本电脑
消耗功率
对于所使用的硬件来说，耗电量在正常水平。在我们的TheWitcher 3 测试中，功耗保持不变，而在压力测试中，功耗在几分钟后下降--CPU被节流了。附带的电源（330瓦）的大小足够了。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.1 / Watt |
| Idle | 16 / 20 / 26 Watt |
| Load |
135 / 299 Watt |
   
| |
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | HP Omen 17-ck1075ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 18% | -16% | -13% | 5% | 13% | -5% | 10% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 16 | 13 19% | 15.2 5% | 18 -13% | 10 37% | 12.2 24% | 16.2 ? -1% | 13.8 ? 14% |
| Idle Average * | 20 | 16.5 17% | 22.8 -14% | 24 -20% | 16 20% | 18 10% | 21.4 ? -7% | 19.2 ? 4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 26 | 17 35% | 49.8 -92% | 32 -23% | 27 -4% | 19.4 25% | 33.7 ? -30% | 27 ? -4% |
| Load Average * | 135 | 93 31% | 121.2 10% | 130 4% | 129 4% | 128 5% | 118.8 ? 12% | 111.3 ? 18% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 215 | 239 -11% | 242 -13% | 260 -21% | 247 -15% | 209 3% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 299 | 251 16% | 273.7 8% | 320 -7% | 342 -14% | 266 11% | 293 ? 2% | 251 ? 16% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø215 (206-224)
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø232 (197.1-285)
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø18.6 (17.9-20.9)
Power Consumption with External Monitor
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø106.1 (92.1-177.9)
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø193.5 (190.2-205)
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø198 (185.7-205)
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø203 (194.4-211)
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø25.8 (21.1-33.5)
电池寿命
Omen的电池寿命并不令人满意。即使是一台强大的游戏笔记本，也要能在擎天柱的操作下持续更长的时间，电池容量为83瓦时。我们直到现在也无法确定这是由硬件还是软件问题造成的。
日志文件给出了问题的一个迹象：在低负荷运行测试期间（WiFi、空闲、视频），GeForce GPU应该是不活动的，把所有工作留给iGPU。然而，GeForce GPU在这里经常以最大速度运行--在0%的负载下。根据GPU-Z的数据，这导致了高达45瓦的功率消耗。
出于这个原因，我们要求惠普提供一个新的测试装置来仔细检查，但我们还没有收到。一旦我们能够得到它，我们将再次进行测试。
| HP Omen 17-ck2097ng i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT, 97 Wh | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | HP Omen 17-ck1075ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 78 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 31% | 59% | 46% | 73% | 79% | 67% | |
| Reader / Idle | 249 | 533 114% | 385 55% | 532 114% | 544 ? 118% | ||
| H.264 | 220 | 294 34% | 399 ? 81% | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 217 | 290 34% | 365 68% | 303 40% | 583 169% | 371 71% | 368 ? 70% |
| Load | 86 | 107 24% | 81 -6% | 124 44% | 65 -24% | 131 52% | 84.2 ? -2% |
| Gaming | 62 | 62 ? |
Pros
+ 具有165赫兹的QHD显示屏
+ 先进的Optimus
+ 可扩展的工作存储器
+ PCIe-4固态硬盘(可容纳第二个固态硬盘)
+ 独立按键照明
+ 带电源传输的雷电4
+ 通过软件实现欠压
Cons
- 对于RTX 4080来说，性能略低于平均水平
- 高噪音水平
- 箱子很吵
- 电池寿命微不足道
结论 - 一个坚实的高端游戏笔记本电脑
通过Omen 17，惠普提供了一个强大的QHD游戏笔记本电脑的高端领域。凭借其酷睿i9-13900HX处理器和 GeForce RTX 4080笔记本电脑的GPU，这款笔记本电脑在其他应用领域，如视频处理和渲染方面也应该很好地工作。一个快速的PCIe 4固态硬盘（1TB）提供了必要的存储空间，并确保短的加载时间。还有一个空间可以放置第二块固态硬盘。
惠普Omen 17（2023）代表了一个坚实的游戏笔记本电脑，但它并没有充分利用其潜力。
处理器和图形核心能够以持续的高时钟速度运行。噪音和热量的发展处于这个级别的笔记本电脑的正常水平。然而，这款笔记本电脑在日常运行中产生的噪音太大。
哑光的17.3英寸显示屏（QHD，IPS，165Hz，sRGB）给人留下了坚实的印象。它的整体表现比类似结构的FHD面板稍好。 Omen的前辈但比大多数竞争对手差。一个Thunderbolt 4连接提供了一些扩展选项（对接方案、外部GPU）。此外，它还可用于用USB-C充电器为电池充电（最小65瓦，20伏），并支持Power Delivery。
由于可能存在缺陷，我们目前无法对电池寿命做出最终判断。一旦我们从惠普得到一个替换装置，我们将重新测量电池寿命。由于电池寿命对游戏笔记本的最终评价几乎没有任何影响，所以评价最多只是略有变化。
作为替代，你可以看一下 联想Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H，它能够从相同的CPU/GPU组合中获得更高的性能。此外，它在16:10的格式中拥有更明亮的显示屏。
价格和可用性
Omen 17（2023）可从惠普购买，起价1499.99美元。除了拥有i7-13700之外，与我们测试的配置类似的型号在美国需要2429.99美元。
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
-
03/28/2023 v7
Sascha Mölck
Gaming - Weighted Average
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.
Pricecompare
