Notebookcheck Logo

英特尔酷睿i9-12900H首次亮相。联合利华科技GM7AG8P笔记本评测

一个没有Razer Blade名字的Razer Blade 17。 你真的能把GeForce RTX 3080 Ti和Core i9 CPU同时塞进一个超薄的外形尺寸而不需要扼杀性能吗?当然,一定会有一些问题。我们对GM7AG8P裸机进行了深入研究,以了解用户可以期待哪些削减的角落,如果有的话。
Alder Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook

英特尔终于以其第12代Alder Lake-H平台回应了AMD令人印象深刻的移动Zen 3 H系列。Schenker和Uniwill Technology为我们提供了首批搭载基于GM7AG8P机箱的12代酷睿i9-12900H的笔记本电脑之一。截至目前,Schenker还没有公开提供这种确切的配置,但零售选择可能会在以后出现。

我们的测试装置配备了上述的Core i9 CPU,新的GeForce RTX 3080 Ti GPU,DDR5-4800内存,以及1440p(QHD)IPS 165 Hz显示屏。这篇评论将集中在性能方面,以显示用户在与各自的上一代同类产品相比时,可以对新的英特尔CPU和英伟达GPU有什么期待。

更多申克评论。

SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Processor
Intel Core i9-12900H 14 x 1.8 - 5 GHz, 75 W PL2 / Short Burst, 75 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Core: 1590 MHz, Memory: 2000 MHz ( including 175 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 511.65, MSHybrid
Memory
32 GB 
, DDR5-4800, PC5-38400, 40-39-39-76, Quad-Channel
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 170 PPI, BOE NE173QHM-NY2, IPS, Controller: BOE0977, glossy: no, 165 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, 512 GB 
Soundcard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm microphone, 3.5 mm earphones, Card Reader: MicroSD
Networking
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 20 x 394 x 260.8
Battery
91 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Camera
Webcam: 1080p
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Control Center, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.264 kg, Power Supply: 983 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86.9 %
02/2022
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg20 mm17.30"2560x1440
87.4 %
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.6 kg27.45 mm17.30"2560x1440
89 %
09/2021
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
3.2 kg21.4 mm17.30"3840x2160
89.4 %
09/2021
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.8 kg19.9 mm17.30"1920x1080
86.2 %
09/2021
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg20 mm17.30"3840x2160
87.8 %
09/2021
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg19.81 mm17.30"2560x1440

案例--典型的 "同方"。

前身为同方科技,同方科技在其许多游戏笔记本和移动工作站中使用了类似的材料和设计。在这种情况下,GM7AG8P与XMG Neo 17和XMG Pro 17在功能、硬度和质地方面有很多共同之处,即使它们的尺寸、外观和大小略有不同。整体尺寸与Razer Blade Pro 17几乎相同,而重量却少了500克,主要是因为GM7AG8P没有蒸汽室冷却器。

底座主要是ABS塑料,与大多数基于同方设计的其他笔记本电脑一样。
底座主要是ABS塑料,与大多数基于同方设计的其他笔记本电脑一样。
指纹相对容易积累在哑光的外盖和掌托上。
指纹相对容易积累在哑光的外盖和掌托上。
铰链的硬度很好,但不如华硕ROG或TUF系列的大铰链强。
铰链的硬度很好,但不如华硕ROG或TUF系列的大铰链强。
盖子打开到最大角度(~130度)。
盖子打开到最大角度(~130度)。
专用的涡轮按钮,可快速切换风扇速度
专用的涡轮按钮,可快速切换风扇速度
底部面板有更多的表面变化,与简约的Razer Blade Pro 17形成对比
底部面板有更多的表面变化,与简约的Razer Blade Pro 17形成对比

尺寸比较

395.7 mm 260.8 mm 27.45 mm 2.6 kg399.23 mm 299.49 mm 21.4 mm 3.2 kg396 mm 259 mm 20 mm 2.4 kg395 mm 260 mm 19.9 mm 2.8 kg394 mm 260.8 mm 20 mm 2.3 kg393.95 mm 260.8 mm 19.81 mm 2.3 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性 - Thunderbolt 4...有时

端口选项基本上与Schenker XMG Neo 17相同,但有几个重要的区别。例如,GM7AG8P使用较小的MicroSD读卡器,而Thunderbolt 4和外部G-Sync/Adaptive Sync兼容性只有在MSHybrid模式下运行时才会启用。

前面。没有端口
前面。没有端口
右边。微型SD读卡器,2个USB-A 3.1 Gen.
右边。微型SD读卡器,2个USB-A 3.1 Gen.
后部。USB-C带雷电4(5V/3A输出),HDMI 2.1,2.5Gbit RJ-45,AC适配器
后部。USB-C带雷电4(5V/3A输出),HDMI 2.1,2.5Gbit RJ-45,AC适配器
左边:Kensington锁,USB-A 3.1 Gen. 2,3.5毫米麦克风,3.5毫米耳机
左边:Kensington锁,USB-A 3.1 Gen. 2,3.5毫米麦克风,3.5毫米耳机

SD卡读卡器 - 仅限MicroSD

尽管有17.3英寸大的外形尺寸,该系统还是集成了一个MicroSD读卡器。此外,与其他大多数MicroSD读卡器不同,GM7AG8P上的读卡器不是弹簧式的,完全插入的卡也必须倒着插入。传输速率是平均的,因为从我们的UHS-II测试卡中移动1GB的图像需要大约15秒,而在最新的Razer Blade 17.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H (AV Pro V60)
208.9 MB/s +200%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
196 MB/s +181%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H (AV Pro V60)
174.7 MB/s +151%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H (AV Pro V60)
74.8 MB/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Intel Core i7-11800H
72.1 (72.11min - 72.11max) MB/s +3%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro V60)
69.7 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H (AV Pro V60)
245.4 MB/s +210%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
199 MB/s +151%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H (AV Pro V60)
190.1 MB/s +140%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Intel Core i7-11800H
91.2 MB/s +15%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H (AV Pro V60)
88.3 MB/s +11%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro V60)
79.2 MB/s

沟通

可拆卸的M.2英特尔AX201 WLAN模块。当与我们的Netgear RAX200测试路由器配对时,我们在两个方向都记录了稳定的性能。
可拆卸的M.2英特尔AX201 WLAN模块。当与我们的Netgear RAX200测试路由器配对时,我们在两个方向都记录了稳定的性能。
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
1499 (1390min - 1622max) MBit/s +5%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1422 (1091min - 1492max) MBit/s
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1239 (1143min - 1322max) MBit/s -13%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
1220 (1110min - 1275max) MBit/s -14%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1138 (921min - 1230max) MBit/s -20%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
963 (300min - 1245max) MBit/s -32%
iperf3 receive AX12
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1491 (1415min - 1540max) MBit/s +2%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1468 (1377min - 1515max) MBit/s
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1416 (1350min - 1459max) MBit/s -4%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
1328 (642min - 1384max) MBit/s -10%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
1242 (1169min - 1337max) MBit/s -15%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
852 (602min - 1058max) MBit/s -42%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500Tooltip
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1468 (1377-1515)
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1422 (1091-1492)

网络摄像头

尽管有200万像素的传感器,但相机质量很差。即使按照已经很低的笔记本网络摄像头标准,图像的颗粒度也比预期的要大。

红外线是内置的,用于支持Windows Hello。

ColorChecker
17 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
31 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
5 ∆E
10 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
ColorChecker SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P: 12.04 ∆E min: 1.28 - max: 30.98 ∆E

维护

底部面板由10颗飞利浦螺钉固定,便于维修。用户可以直接接触到两个M.2 2280存储托架、两个SODIMM插槽、主电池和WLAN模块。

联合利华科技GM7AG8P
联合利华科技GM7AG8P
用于比较的XMG Neo 17
用于比较的XMG Neo 17

配件和保修

除了交流电适配器和文件之外,盒子里没有任何额外的东西。制造商的标准保修期为1至2年,具体取决于地区。

输入设备

键盘

GM7AG8P使用了传统的基于膜的按键,更类似于XMG Core 17或XMG Pro 17,而不是XMG Neo 17的机械按键。然而,与XMG Core 17或XMG Pro 17的传统按键不同,这里的按键在物理上更大,更容易输入。键的反馈是统一的,所有的键之间都有相对安静的咔哒声,但我们确实希望行程和反馈整体上能更坚定。

触摸板

点击板的大小与Blade Pro 17上的几乎一样(13.3 x 7.6厘米对13 x 8厘米),但按下时的点击声更坚定、更响亮。滑动性能平稳,即使以较慢的速度移动光标,也几乎没有粘连。

在点击板上按压时,行程较浅,但敏锐的反馈弥补了这一点。
在点击板上按压时,行程较浅,但敏锐的反馈弥补了这一点。
按键感觉比微星GS系列的按键略浅,也更轻。
按键感觉比微星GS系列的按键略浅,也更轻。
与许多其他Schenker笔记本电脑的按键布局相似,但有较大的键帽
与许多其他Schenker笔记本电脑的按键布局相似,但有较大的键帽
四区RGB照明是标准配置。没有每个键的RGB照明
四区RGB照明是标准配置。没有每个键的RGB照明

显示 - 快速和多彩

我们的GM7AG8P测试装置使用了与去年的GM7AG8P完全相同的BOE0977显示控制器和NE173QHM-NY2 IPS面板。申克XMG Neo 17 GM7TG8S.因此,这两台笔记本电脑之间的观看体验和显示属性非常相似,包括1440p原生分辨率、快速响应时间、~1000:1对比度、165赫兹刷新率和全sRGB覆盖。最大亮度也继续保持在400尼特以下。

如下图所示,我们的特定测试设备上的背光出血可以得到改善。虽然一些出血是IPS的预期,但我们的设备表现出的出血比我们希望的要多。

哑光面板,没有边到边的玻璃或触摸屏选项。有一个更快的240赫兹选项
哑光面板,没有边到边的玻璃或触摸屏选项。有一个更快的240赫兹选项
狭窄的侧边框,较厚的顶部和底部边框。内部显示器没有G-Sync支持
狭窄的侧边框,较厚的顶部和底部边框。内部显示器没有G-Sync支持
沿着面板的边缘和左下角有中度-重度不均匀的背光渗出
沿着面板的边缘和左下角有中度-重度不均匀的背光渗出
RGB子像素阵列。只有在近距离观察屏幕时,才会发现轻微的颗粒感。
RGB子像素阵列。只有在近距离观察屏幕时,才会发现轻微的颗粒感。
374.9
cd/m²
364.5
cd/m²
355
cd/m²
366.3
cd/m²
387.1
cd/m²
359.8
cd/m²
333.4
cd/m²
369.8
cd/m²
340
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE NE173QHM-NY2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 387.1 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 361.2 cd/m² Minimum: 19.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 387.1 cd/m²
Contrast: 1210:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.32 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.67
ΔE Greyscale 6.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
70.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
BOE NE173QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
BOE0977 (NE173QHM-NY2), IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
AU Optronics B173ZAN, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
AU Optronics B173HAN05.4, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
AUO B173ZAN06.1 (AUODE95), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
BOE NE173QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
Display
-3%
24%
3%
-7%
2%
Display P3 Coverage
68.9
67.1
-3%
88.3
28%
71.7
4%
63
-9%
70.7
3%
sRGB Coverage
97.8
96.3
-2%
100
2%
98.8
1%
94.8
-3%
99.4
2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
70.7
68.6
-3%
100
41%
73.6
4%
65
-8%
71.7
1%
Response Times
16%
14%
54%
47%
4%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
14.8 ?(8, 6.8)
15.2
-3%
14.4 ?(7.6, 6.8)
3%
4.2 ?(1.6, 2.6)
72%
8.8 ?(2.8, 6)
41%
15.6 ?(8.4, 7.2)
-5%
Response Time Black / White *
13.6 ?(7.6, 6)
8.8
35%
10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2)
24%
8.8 ?(4.4, 4.4)
35%
6.4 ?(2, 4.4)
53%
12 ?(6.8, 5.2)
12%
PWM Frequency
Screen
18%
11%
-9%
22%
9%
Brightness middle
387.1
396
2%
438.7
13%
323.3
-16%
474
22%
389.7
1%
Brightness
361
366
1%
435
20%
315
-13%
454
26%
363
1%
Brightness Distribution
86
82
-5%
91
6%
91
6%
88
2%
84
-2%
Black Level *
0.32
0.45
-41%
0.48
-50%
0.33
-3%
0.46
-44%
0.47
-47%
Contrast
1210
880
-27%
914
-24%
980
-19%
1030
-15%
829
-31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.32
1.43
67%
4.34
-0%
4.59
-6%
1.5
65%
1.93
55%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.58
2.2
74%
7.3
15%
10.82
-26%
5.59
35%
6.84
20%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.67
1.34
20%
0.72
57%
1.4
16%
0.86
49%
1.31
22%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.6
1.8
73%
2.4
64%
7.9
-20%
2.8
58%
2.4
64%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.4 92%
2.09 105%
2.28 96%
2.158 102%
2.12 104%
CCT
6114 106%
6489 100%
6413 101%
5941 109%
6597 99%
6658 98%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
10% / 13%
16% / 14%
16% / 3%
21% / 19%
5% / 7%

* ... smaller is better

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. DCI-P3
vs. DCI-P3

灰度在开箱后没有得到很好的校准,由于6100K左右的暖色温,其平均deltaE值相对较高,为6.6。一旦用X-Rite色度计进行校准,灰度和ColorChecker都会得到改善,最终的平均deltaE值分别只有1.1和1.67。

校准前的灰度
校准前的灰度
校准前的饱和扫频
校准前的饱和扫频
校准前的ColorChecker
校准前的ColorChecker
校准后的灰度
校准后的灰度
校准后的饱和扫频
校准后的饱和扫频
校准后的ColorChecker
校准后的ColorChecker

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
13.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.6 ms rise
↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8 ms rise
↘ 6.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

阳光下的室外
阳光下的室外
在户外的阴凉处
在户外的阴凉处
阳光下的室外
阳光下的室外
宽广的IPS可视角度。颜色和对比度只在极端角度下才会下降
宽广的IPS可视角度。颜色和对比度只在极端角度下才会下降

性能--对于尺寸来说是极端的

高级优化(或优化2.0)不可用,这意味着用户将不得不通过BIOS在独立GPU和MSHybrid之间手动切换。此外,请记住,GeForce RTX 3080 Ti GPU默认设置为150 W TGP,尽管Nvidia控制面板指出它能够达到175 W。用户必须通过附带的控制中心软件将GPU手动设置为175 W。

测试条件

在运行以下任何性能基准测试之前,我们将我们的设备设置为默认的BIOS和控制中心设置,尽管涡轮增压电源配置文件处于激活状态。 我们强烈建议用户熟悉控制中心,因为重要的功能在这里被切换。

处理器--明显的跨代改进

原始的CPU性能只比普通的CPU慢大约9%。 酷睿i9-12900HK上发现的 微星GE76.当与上一代的 酷睿i9-11900H的情况下,该 酷睿i9-12900H直接取代,用户可以期待单线程和多线程性能分别提高约20%和30%。这一提升足以推动新的英特尔CPU高于 Ryzen 7 5800HRyzen 9 5900HX它们是一些最快的移动Zen 3 CPU。

关于桤木湖平台的其他细节可以在我们的概述中找到 这里.

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

01503004506007509001050120013501500165018001950210022502400255027002850Tooltip
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2545 (2524.61-2567.06)
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1746 (1721.47-1773.68)
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2073 (2064.09-2085.83)
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K: Ø2057 (2014.3-2361.09)
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i9-10900K: Ø2359 (2290.43-2532.77)
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS Intel Core i9-9900KS: Ø1835 (1810.86-1981.87)
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2722 (2660.99-2908.88)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
85.5 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
84.6 pt
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H
81.1 pt
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
 
76.2 pt
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
72.3 pt
MSI WE76 11UM-456 -1!
Intel Core i9-11980HK
67.8 pt
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
66.1 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
65.5 pt
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
65 pt
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
63.2 pt
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 -2!
Intel Core i7-11800H
59.9 pt
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
58.2 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
49.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
49.3 pt
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
42.9 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 34613, n=232, last 2 years)
19581 Points +18%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
18288 Points +10%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H
16587 (14797.9min - 16587.2max) Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (7359 - 19648, n=26)
15137 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
14066 Points -15%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
13387 Points -19%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
13012 Points -22%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
12693 Points -23%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
12476 Points -25%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
12373 Points -25%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
11981 (11268.1min - 11981.1max) Points -28%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
11641 Points -30%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
8504 Points -49%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
8408 Points -49%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5216 Points -69%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H
1920 Points
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1909 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1634 - 1921, n=26)
1822 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 2235, n=230, last 2 years)
1816 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
1619 Points -16%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
1613 Points -16%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
1575 Points -18%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1504 Points -22%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
1503 Points -22%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1491 Points -22%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1479 Points -23%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1429 Points -26%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1305 Points -32%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
1225 Points -36%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
1208 Points -37%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=230, last 2 years)
7442 Points +16%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
6849 Points +7%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H
6395 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (2681 - 7471, n=26)
5705 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
5055 Points -21%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4925 Points -23%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
4878 Points -24%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
4850 Points -24%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
4776 Points -25%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
4456 Points -30%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
4437 Points -31%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
4304 Points -33%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
3244 Points -49%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
3235 Points -49%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1994 Points -69%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H
736 Points
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
734 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (624 - 738, n=26)
705 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=230, last 2 years)
699 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
634 Points -14%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
622 Points -15%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
610 Points -17%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
581 Points -21%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
581 Points -21%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
580 Points -21%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
573 Points -22%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
560 Points -24%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
506 Points -31%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
476 Points -35%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
471 Points -36%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=235, last 2 years)
3101 Points +21%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
2909 (2660.99min - 2908.88max) Points +13%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H
2567 (2524.61min - 2567.06max) Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1395 - 3077, n=26)
2468 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
2361 Points -8%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
2192 (1955.32min - 2192.14max) Points -15%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
2148 (1832.59min - 2147.65max) Points -16%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2087 (2046.66min - 2087.25max) Points -19%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2086 (2064.09min - 2085.83max) Points -19%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2041 (1981.96min - 2041.34max) Points -20%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
1872 (1711.82min - 1871.52max) Points -27%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1853 (1809.95min - 1853.31max) Points -28%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
1508 (1385.57min - 1507.73max) Points -41%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
1382 Points -46%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
832 (785.79min - 831.69max) Points -68%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
275 Points 0%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H
275 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=234, last 2 years)
268 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (235 - 277, n=27)
262 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
254 Points -8%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
244 Points -11%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
241 Points -12%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
239 Points -13%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
238 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
233 Points -15%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
226 Points -18%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
222 Points -19%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
209 Points -24%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
196 Points -29%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
192 Points -30%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
581 Seconds * -206%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
326 Seconds * -72%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
326 Seconds * -72%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
270 Seconds * -42%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
250 Seconds * -32%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
249 Seconds * -31%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
247 Seconds * -30%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
246 Seconds * -29%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
242 Seconds * -27%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (160 - 451, n=26)
232 Seconds * -22%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
227 Seconds * -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 1259, n=228, last 2 years)
198.9 Seconds * -5%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H
190 Seconds *
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
181 Seconds * +5%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 140932, n=229, last 2 years)
77274 MIPS +15%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
72836 MIPS +8%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H
67423 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (34684 - 76677, n=26)
60982 MIPS -10%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
59986 MIPS -11%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
59182 MIPS -12%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
57579 MIPS -15%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
55231 MIPS -18%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
53817 MIPS -20%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
53426 MIPS -21%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
53205 MIPS -21%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
49275 MIPS -27%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
42138 MIPS -38%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
40876 MIPS -39%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
23768 MIPS -65%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
6174 MIPS +5%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
6144 MIPS +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7581, n=229, last 2 years)
6133 MIPS +4%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H
5885 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (5302 - 6289, n=26)
5836 MIPS -1%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
5726 MIPS -3%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5681 MIPS -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5664 MIPS -4%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
5640 MIPS -4%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5535 MIPS -6%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
5463 MIPS -7%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
5404 MIPS -8%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
5393 MIPS -8%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5380 MIPS -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
5068 MIPS -14%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
13648 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 22200, n=234, last 2 years)
13627 Points +7%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H
12710 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (8519 - 14376, n=28)
11993 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
10482 Points -18%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
10081 Points -21%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
9856 Points -22%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
9294 Points -27%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
9062 Points -29%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
8135 Points -36%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
7599 Points -40%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
7353 Points -42%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
6688 Points -47%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5056 Points -60%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1918 Points +5%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H
1820 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2210, n=234, last 2 years)
1811 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1631 - 1892, n=28)
1796 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
1777 Points -2%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
1679 Points -8%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
1632 Points -10%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1569 Points -14%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1538 Points -15%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1529 Points -16%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1505 Points -17%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1351 Points -26%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
1264 Points -31%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
1237 Points -32%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 37.6, n=232, last 2 years)
21.3 fps +10%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
19.9 fps +3%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H
19.4 fps
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
17.1 fps -12%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (8.05 - 22.5, n=26)
17.1 fps -12%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
16 fps -18%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
15.8 fps -19%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
15.8 fps -19%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
15 fps -23%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
14.8 fps -24%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
14.3 fps -26%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
13.6 fps -30%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
11.1 fps -43%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
11.1 fps -43%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
6.38 fps -67%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
56.5 s * -27%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
56.1 s * -26%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
51.7 s * -16%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
51.5 s * -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
49.8 s * -12%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
49.3 s * -11%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
49.3 s * -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=226, last 2 years)
49.1 s * -11%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
48.7 s * -10%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
47.7 s * -7%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
46.4 s * -5%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H
44.4 s *
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (36.8 - 59.8, n=26)
42.6 s * +4%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
40.5 s * +9%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
38.9 s * +12%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
0.621 sec * -45%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
0.577 sec * -35%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
0.574 sec * -34%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.572 sec * -34%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.566 sec * -33%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
0.545 sec * -28%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
0.533 sec * -25%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.511 sec * -20%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.502 sec * -18%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
0.4981 sec * -17%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.4926 sec * -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 4.47, n=229, last 2 years)
0.4687 sec * -10%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (0.4218 - 0.506, n=26)
0.4551 sec * -7%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.4269 sec *
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
0.4252 sec * -0%
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2567 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
247 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
275 Points
Help
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
8540 KRay/s
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
39721 Points
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2983 MB/s
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
101357 Points
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9985 Points
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
23539 Points
AIDA64 / CPU AES
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
61517 MB/s
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1053 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
0 MB/s -100%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
0 MB/s -100%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
0 MB/s -100%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
0 MB/s -100%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
5016 KRay/s
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40529 MPixel/s

系统性能

PCMark分数是我们数据库中最高的一些分数,基本上可以与配备台式机Core i9-11900K的Schenker XMG Ultra 17相媲美。

PCMark 10 / Score
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
7884 Points 0%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
7883 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7139 - 8083, n=6)
7705 Points -2%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
7511 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10900K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB
7461 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
7212 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
6972 Points -12%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
11266 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
11050 Points +2%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
10854 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (10254 - 11178, n=6)
10808 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10900K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB
10608 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10450 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
10226 Points -6%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9102 - 11186, n=6)
10038 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
9827 Points 0%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
9789 Points
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9564 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
9136 Points -7%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
9077 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10900K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB
8985 Points -8%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
12511 Points
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
12250 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10900K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB
11829 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9847 - 12627, n=6)
11487 Points -8%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
11245 Points -10%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10184 Points -19%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
9847 Points -21%
PCMark 10 Score
7883 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62554 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
61251 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
47304 MB/s -23%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
44180 MB/s -28%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65452 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65301 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
47698 MB/s -27%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
46438 MB/s -29%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65518 MB/s
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
64282 MB/s -2%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
47022 MB/s -28%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
46176 MB/s -30%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
92.6 ns *
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
92.3 ns *
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
80.3 ns *
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
0 ns *
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
0 ns *
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
0 ns *

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

LatencyMon显示在我们的主页上打开多个标签时有轻微的DPC问题。在60 FPS下的4K视频播放很流畅,但并不完美,因为我们在长达一分钟的视频测试中能够记录到14个丢帧。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6767 μs * -948%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
4407 μs * -582%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
762 μs * -18%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
646 μs *
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
526 μs * +19%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
395.1 μs * +39%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备 - 2x M.2 PCIe4 x4 NVMe固态硬盘

512GB的 三星PM9A1硬盘提供的连续读取和写入速度分别高达6900MB/s和5000MB/s。在循环运行DiskSpd时,我们能够达到接近最高速度,但性能最终会从悬崖上跌落,在测试结束时 "只有 "3200MB/s,如下图所示。结果表明,由于温度的限制,该硬盘可能无法长时间保持最高性能。

AS SSD
AS SSD
CDM 8
CDM 8
两块固态硬盘都包括了散热片,但它们似乎不足以无限期地保持最大性能。
两块固态硬盘都包括了散热片,但它们似乎不足以无限期地保持最大性能。
最多支持两个PCIe4 x4 SSD。我们的测试装置在发货时,两个驱动器不在RAID配置中,但如果需要,用户可以配置为RAID 0或1。
最多支持两个PCIe4 x4 SSD。我们的测试装置在发货时,两个驱动器不在RAID配置中,但如果需要,用户可以配置为RAID 0或1。
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6790 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5012 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 705 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 485.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 4425 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 4045 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 90.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 226.7 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
91.2 pt
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
90 pt
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
84.8 pt
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
83.8 pt
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
80.9 pt
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
52.6 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4426 (4422.86min - 4426.46max) MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4251 (4236.46min - 4250.93max) MB/s +1%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4209 (4177.98min - 4209.4max) MB/s
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3980 (3953.55min - 3979.77max) MB/s -5%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3167 (2857.53min - 3167.08max) MB/s -25%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
2161 (2137.42min - 2160.91max) MB/s -49%
seq write
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4288 (4263.58min - 4288.05max) MB/s +9%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4283 (4269.53min - 4283.43max) MB/s +9%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3945 (3883.08min - 3944.74max) MB/s
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3840 (3826.15min - 3839.76max) MB/s -3%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3834 (3789.52min - 3833.59max) MB/s -3%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
2978 (2936.01min - 2977.75max) MB/s -25%
seq q8 t1 read
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
6684 (5510.27min - 6684.46max) MB/s +62%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6678 (5921.52min - 6678.38max) MB/s +62%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6670 (6036.74min - 6669.78max) MB/s +61%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6653 (6275.76min - 6652.91max) MB/s +61%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6371 (5985.48min - 6371.15max) MB/s +54%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4134 (3437.91min - 4133.91max) MB/s
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5013 (4970.67min - 5012.61max) MB/s +3%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4999 (4987.66min - 4998.77max) MB/s +3%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4949 (4924.12min - 4949.28max) MB/s +2%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4921 (4905.7min - 4920.56max) MB/s +1%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
4917 (4616.04min - 4917.19max) MB/s +1%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4855 (4802.31min - 4855.33max) MB/s
4k q1 t1 read
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
91.7 (91.52min - 91.69max) MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
90.5 (90.32min - 90.48max) MB/s +3%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
87.6 (87.01min - 87.6max) MB/s
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
59 (58.85min - 58.97max) MB/s -33%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
56.2 (55.28min - 56.2max) MB/s -36%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
51.2 (51.08min - 51.21max) MB/s -42%
4k q1 t1 write
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
232 (230.16min - 231.56max) MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
227 (226.1min - 227.27max) MB/s 0%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
227 (226.47min - 227.34max) MB/s
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
174 (171.94min - 173.87max) MB/s -23%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
170 (169.81min - 170.42max) MB/s -25%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
166 (164.47min - 165.73max) MB/s -27%
4k q32 t16 read
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4180 (4177.07min - 4179.97max) MB/s +22%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4080 (4052.11min - 4079.84max) MB/s +19%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4071 (4064.6min - 4070.6max) MB/s +19%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3423 (3416.77min - 3422.76max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3408 (3395.09min - 3407.81max) MB/s 0%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
724 (719.56min - 724.12max) MB/s -79%
4k q32 t16 write
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3545 (3290.66min - 3545.47max) MB/s +22%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3531 (3517.4min - 3531.03max) MB/s +22%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3295 (3221.5min - 3294.97max) MB/s +14%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2975 (2942.71min - 2974.69max) MB/s +2%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2903 (2888.07min - 2902.85max) MB/s
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
376 (372.82min - 375.8max) MB/s -87%
AS SSD
Score Total
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8874 Points +6%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8847 Points +5%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8830 Points +5%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
8404 Points
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
7794 Points -7%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
4314 Points -49%
Score Read
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3301 Points +9%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3300 Points +9%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3285 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3044 Points +1%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3019 Points
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
1801 Points -40%
Score Write
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3963 Points +1%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3953 Points +1%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3926 Points 0%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3917 Points
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3252 Points -17%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
1737 Points -56%
Seq Read
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5459 MB/s
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5408 MB/s -1%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5367 MB/s -2%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5302 MB/s -3%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5223 MB/s -4%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
4978 MB/s -9%
Seq Write
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3977 MB/s +4%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3965 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3922 MB/s +2%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3863 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3842 MB/s
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
2058 MB/s -46%
4K Read
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
82.2 MB/s +4%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
79.9 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
78.8 MB/s
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
55 MB/s -30%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
52.7 MB/s -33%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
43.4 MB/s -45%
4K Write
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
207.6 MB/s +10%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
194.2 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
188.5 MB/s
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
153.1 MB/s -19%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
148.7 MB/s -21%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
146.9 MB/s -22%
4K-64 Read
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2715 MB/s +13%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2692 MB/s +12%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2684 MB/s +12%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2439 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2394 MB/s
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
1260 MB/s -47%
4K-64 Write
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3416 MB/s +2%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3414 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3345 MB/s
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3335 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2652 MB/s -21%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
1385 MB/s -59%
Access Time Read
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.046 ms * -12%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.044 ms * -7%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.041 ms *
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
0.039 ms * +5%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.027 ms * +34%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.022 ms * +46%
Access Time Write
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.085 ms * -33%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
0.074 ms * -16%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.066 ms * -3%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.064 ms *
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.027 ms * +58%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.021 ms * +67%

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

034068010201360170020402380272030603400374040804420476051005440578061206460Tooltip
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P: Ø5606 (2290.12-6783.3)

GPU性能--比移动版GeForce RTX 3080好一点

与台式机GeForce RTX 3080 Ti比台式机GeForce RTX 3080快约10%一样,笔记本GeForce RTX 3080 Ti也只比笔记本GeForce RTX 3080快约10%。预计性能与台式机GeForce RTX 3070最为相似,这与原生QHD 165 Hz显示屏完美契合。

在MSHybrid模式而不是dGPU模式下运行将导致Time Spy GPU得分降低1.2%(12176分对12020分),以表明切换到MSHybrid时的性能下降几乎可以忽略不计。

当通过控制中心将GPU设置为175W时,我们的Time Spy 图形得分将增加到12714分,性能提升只有4%到5%。

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Cloud Gate
Cloud Gate
Time Spy
Time Spy
Fire Strike
Fire Strike
Fire Strike Ultra
Fire Strike Ultra
皇家港
皇家港
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
45785 Points +46%
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
40910 Points +31%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
31341 Points
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
31096 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (6928 - 34439, n=43)
29496 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
28036 Points -11%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
27228 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
27138 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, Intel Core i9-10900K
25504 Points -19%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK
22391 Points -29%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
14599 Points -53%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
19081 Points +57%
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
17467 Points +43%
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
13579 Points +12%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
12176 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (4921 - 13835, n=43)
11850 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
11099 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, Intel Core i9-10900K
10938 Points -10%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
10797 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
10098 Points -17%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK
8479 Points -30%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
5591 Points -54%
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
12074 Points +56%
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
10793 Points +39%
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
8483 Points +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (6613 - 8613, n=17)
7891 Points +2%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
7741 Points
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
6379 Points -18%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK
5166 Points -33%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
12798 Points +66%
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
11238 Points +46%
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
8191 Points +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (6423 - 8462, n=28)
7800 Points +1%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
7721 Points
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, Intel Core i9-10900K
6633 Points -14%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
6540 Points -15%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK
5092 Points -34%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
569 Points -93%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
61244 Points +54%
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
47287 Points +19%
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
40646 Points +2%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
39791 Points
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
39651 Points 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (13920 - 45841, n=45)
39402 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
37779 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
37405 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, Intel Core i9-10900K
36838 Points -7%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK
29220 Points -27%
3DMark 11 Performance
33697 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
65615 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
26968 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
12364 points
Help

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø112.2 (106-119)
low med. high ultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 186 183 179 125 111
The Witcher 3 (2015) 472.4 368.4 236.3 117.2
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 186 172 166 159
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 167 155 117
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 160 142 107
Far Cry 5 (2018) 186 160 150 138 120
Strange Brigade (2018) 472 290 231 203 151
Hunt Showdown (2020) 243.2 197.9 167.6 103.6
Doom Eternal (2020) 491.8 321.3 292.4 279 210.6
Gears Tactics (2020) 366.3 270 195.5 136.5 97.1
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) 162 141 130 118 98
Watch Dogs Legion (2020) 137 128 116 84 64
Dirt 5 (2020) 217.5 167.8 136.8 105.4 85.6
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020) 166 118 99 85 68
Hitman 3 (2021) 297.5 228.9 211.9 201.8 133.9
F1 2021 (2021) 364 328 271 103 71
Far Cry 6 (2021) 158 131 117 107 88
Guardians of the Galaxy (2021) 157 157 157 152 122
Riders Republic (2021) 207 159 133 122 90
Halo Infinite (2021) 260.3 165.7 146.7 137.3 96.3
God of War (2022) 158.5 135.2 110.1 79 64.4

排放

系统噪音 - 不出所料的响亮

像大多数其他游戏笔记本一样,不需要很多屏幕上的活动就能让内部风扇旋转起来。像网页浏览或视频流等要求不高的动作会使风扇噪音达到30.8 dB(A),而静音背景为23.1 dB(A)。噪音的增加是明显的,但是在GM7AG8P上,风扇转速的调整通常是渐进的,而不是急剧的,因此更容易忍受。

运行更高的负载,如游戏,会导致噪音水平与我们在XMG Neo 17 GM7TG8S上观察到的非常相似。预计在这种情况下,风扇噪音会在50dB(A)的低到中的范围内,这是发烧级游戏笔记本的常见范围。风扇的声音很大,我们建议在玩《堡垒之夜》等游戏时戴上耳机,因为安静的音频提示对游戏至关重要。

风扇噪音曲线(白色。背景,红色。系统空闲,蓝色:3DMark 06,橙色:Witcher 3 ,绿色。Prime95+FurMark压力)
风扇噪音曲线(白色。背景,红色。系统空闲,蓝色:3DMark 06,橙色:Witcher 3 ,绿色。Prime95+FurMark压力)
双50至55毫米的风扇,中间有五根铜质热管。没有蒸气室冷却
双50至55毫米的风扇,中间有五根铜质热管。没有蒸气室冷却
在浏览网页或视频流时,风扇几乎是默认激活的。
在浏览网页或视频流时,风扇几乎是默认激活的。
可访问的2个SODIMM DDR5插槽,每个高达32GB
可访问的2个SODIMM DDR5插槽,每个高达32GB
在CPU上使用Liquif金属散热膏。我们的设备会表现出轻微的电子噪音,因此它从来没有真正的安静。
在CPU上使用Liquif金属散热膏。我们的设备会表现出轻微的电子噪音,因此它从来没有真正的安静。

Noise Level

Idle
28.1 / 28.1 / 30.8 dB(A)
Load
39.1 / 52.5 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 23.1 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2027.13629.233.439.42524.326.923.428.232.83131.623.820.522.226.24023.527.819.223.624.55022.82922.223.724.66321.325.825.823.524.28025.124.122.623.92810026.823.819.718.827.112527.423.720.117.628.416030.924.619.913.831.720034.926.82014.834.225037.62824.114.43731539.328.922.315.438.54004030.923.413.239.850040.931.623.312.441.463039.128.82011.638.380038.225.823.28.838.1100041.226.918.59.740.7125041.829.222.89.642.3160042.32917.59.942.4200041.72816.29.941.7250042.828.716.210.443315040.726.116.210.541.1400039.925.614.410.94050003923.913.911.239.3630038.120.314.211.338.2800035.116.613.511.53510000321716.211.631.712500291818.411.527.91600025.715.215.410.524.5SPL52.439.130.823.152.5N8.63.11.40.58.7median 39median 26.1median 18.5median 11.5median 38.3Delta4.93.82.61.84.7hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Noise
7%
6%
4%
-2%
6%
off / environment *
23.1
23
-0%
24.9
-8%
24.2
-5%
24
-4%
23.8
-3%
Idle Minimum *
28.1
23
18%
24.9
11%
24.7
12%
24
15%
23.9
15%
Idle Average *
28.1
23
18%
24.9
11%
24.7
12%
25
11%
23.9
15%
Idle Maximum *
30.8
23
25%
29.6
4%
24.7
20%
42
-36%
23.9
22%
Load Average *
39.1
39.5
-1%
31.1
20%
44.3
-13%
46
-18%
38
3%
Witcher 3 ultra *
52.4
54.5
-4%
49.7
5%
56.3
-7%
48
8%
55.9
-7%
Load Maximum *
52.5
55.09
-5%
54.8
-4%
47.7
9%
48
9%
55.9
-6%

* ... smaller is better

温度 - 热中心,冷角落

机箱中心区域的表面温度总是很高。例如,当在桌面上闲置,没有其他运行的应用程序时,键盘中心和底板后部的温度可以达到40℃。

平均表面温度通常比竞争者Razer Blade Pro 17的温度低,后者使用镁合金底盘而不是ABS塑料。因此,我们的GM7AG8P的掌托在游戏时能比Razer的掌托保持更凉爽和舒适,超过几摄氏度。

四组排风口
四组排风口
游戏一小时后,AC适配器
游戏一小时后,AC适配器
Max. Load
 46.8 °C50.2 °C38.2 °C 
 37.6 °C56.8 °C28.6 °C 
 29.6 °C30.2 °C28.8 °C 
Maximum: 56.8 °C
Average: 38.5 °C
40 °C59.2 °C43.2 °C
30.8 °C60.2 °C37 °C
28.4 °C33.8 °C30.8 °C
Maximum: 60.2 °C
Average: 40.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  43 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 56.8 °C / 134 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 60.2 °C / 140 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.3 °C / -2.4 F).
系统空闲(顶部)
系统空闲(顶部)
系统闲置(底部)
系统闲置(底部)
Witcher 3 压力(顶部)
Witcher 3 压力(顶部)
Prime95+FurMark的压力(底部)。
Prime95+FurMark的压力(底部)。
Prime95+FurMark的压力(顶)。
Prime95+FurMark的压力(顶)。
Witcher 3 应力(底部)
Witcher 3 应力(底部)
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Heat
8%
13%
19%
20%
7%
Maximum Upper Side *
56.8
51
10%
58.4
-3%
41
28%
49
14%
54.2
5%
Maximum Bottom *
60.2
62
-3%
49
19%
47.2
22%
57
5%
52.2
13%
Idle Upper Side *
40.2
35
13%
33.6
16%
33.2
17%
28
30%
37.4
7%
Idle Bottom *
43
38
12%
34.6
20%
39
9%
30
30%
41.4
4%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

运行Prime95给CPU施加压力将导致时钟频率提升到3.2至3.6GHz的范围,并且核心温度稳定在80C。CPU封装的功率也将无限期地稳定在75W,这是默认的TDP设置。如果需要,用户可以通过控制中心将PL1和PL2的限制提高到120W。

运行时 Witcher 3根据GPU-Z的数据,在dGPU设置为默认的150W时,将导致GPU的稳定温度为76C,板子的耗电量约为150W。如果通过控制中心设置为175 W,内存时钟将从1750 MHz增加到1800 MHz,而GPU温度也将从76 C增加到86 C,主板功耗将稳定在170 W左右,或略微低于175 W的最大值。有趣的是,在150W或175W的TGP模式下,GPU时钟速率将保持在1500-1600MHz的范围内。

用电池供电运行将比预期的更大程度地限制性能。在dGPU和电池上进行的Time Spy 测试将返回物理和图形分数,分别为7150和897分,而在主电源上则为13552和12176分,即使禁用Nvidia Whisper Mode 2.0和Battery Boost。

系统空闲
系统空闲
Witcher 3 压力(150W TGP模式)
Witcher 3 压力(150W TGP模式)
Prime95压力
Prime95压力
Prime95+FurMark压力
Prime95+FurMark压力
CPU时钟(GHz) GPU时钟(MHz) CPU平均温度(°C) GPU平均温度(°C)
系统空闲 -- -- 40 38
Prime95压力 3.2 - 3.6 -- 80 58
Prime95 + FurMark压力 2.5 ~1102 90 85
Witcher 3 应力(150 W TGP模式) ~1.0 ~1537 73 76

发言人

靠近前角的向下发射的立体声扬声器
靠近前角的向下发射的立体声扬声器
在最大音量下有粉红噪音。扬声器的音量不错,但与微星GP66上的扬声器相比,几乎没有那么大的音量或那么宽的范围。
在最大音量下有粉红噪音。扬声器的音量不错,但与微星GP66上的扬声器相比,几乎没有那么大的音量或那么宽的范围。
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2028.929.228.9252423.424312320.5234024.219.224.25024.122.224.16322.525.822.5802122.62110020.519.720.512523.320.123.316033.119.933.120043.12043.125049.924.149.931552.522.352.540055.723.455.750059.423.359.463066.22066.280072.123.272.1100068.818.568.8125062.922.862.9160061.917.561.9200063.116.263.1250060.716.260.7315063.616.263.6400068.314.468.3500070.113.970.1630067.914.267.9800060.813.560.81000056.416.256.41250054.718.454.71600062.715.462.7SPL78.230.878.2N41.41.441.4median 60.8median 18.5median 60.8Delta7.12.67.126.325.821.422.12624.925.127.622.532.523.448.72655.818.860.922.167.2267019.372.317.674.217.774.319.575.31571.711.871.311.27410.574.21072.710.17210.67210.97511.374.811.671.71269.71269.612.371.112.669.61270.111.269.824.784.70.666.6median 12median 71.73.42.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8PApple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理

功率消耗--要求高的部件

我们上面的基准测试显示,与Core i9-11900H和GeForce RTX 3080相比,CPU性能提高了20%至30%,GPU性能提高了10%,这在Schenker XMG Neo 17 GM7TG8S.尽管如此,Metrahit的测量结果显示,在类似的条件下,我们的GM7AG8P比旧的GM7TG8S略微更耗电。尤其是运行Prime95时,GM7AG8P的耗电量增加了约10%至15%,这意味着上述CPU性能的提升并不是完全免费的。因此,与Tiger Lake-H相比,Alder Lake-H的每瓦性能并没有高出很多。

在同时运行Prime95和FurMark压力时,我们能够从大型(约18 x 8.5 x 3.5厘米)280瓦的AC适配器上记录到292瓦的临时最大耗电。如果手动将GPU设置为175 W模式,预计这一最大值甚至会高出20 W或更多。这一速度将持续约20秒,然后下降并稳定在250W左右,如我们下面的截图所示,可能是由于散热限制。

3DMark 06的耗电量
3DMark 06的耗电量
Witcher 3 ,在1080p的最大设置下的耗电量
Witcher 3 ,在1080p的最大设置下的耗电量
Prime95压力在10秒后启动。消耗量将保持稳定,没有下降,表明涡轮增压的可持续性良好。
Prime95压力在10秒后启动。消耗量将保持稳定,没有下降,表明涡轮增压的可持续性良好。
Prime95+FurMark在10s标记处启动。消耗量将飙升至近300W,然后下降到250W左右。
Prime95+FurMark在10s标记处启动。消耗量将飙升至近300W,然后下降到250W左右。
Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.09 / 11.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 29.7 / 33.6 / 35.5 Watt
Load midlight 113.8 / 292 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
Power Consumption
18%
9%
11%
29%
28%
Idle Minimum *
29.7
19
36%
10.2
66%
20.9
30%
14
53%
11
63%
Idle Average *
33.6
25
26%
21.2
37%
25.1
25%
19
43%
15.6
54%
Idle Maximum *
35.5
28
21%
48.4
-36%
45
-27%
31
13%
34
4%
Load Average *
113.8
105
8%
118.7
-4%
102
10%
97
15%
81.2
29%
Witcher 3 ultra *
210
223
-6%
249
-19%
189
10%
156
26%
204
3%
Load Maximum *
292
226
23%
262
10%
234.8
20%
231
21%
257.3
12%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255270285Tooltip
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø210 (205-258)
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø254 (144-292)

Power Consumption external Monitor

0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø142.4 (138-147)
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø130.4 (88.7-136)
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø194.9 (188-202)
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø206 (202-210)

电池寿命

集成电池的功率相对较大,为91瓦,而采用11代英特尔的XMG Neo 17只有62瓦。尽管如此,电池寿命仍然很平庸,即使设置为平衡或办公电源配置文件,实际使用WLAN的时间也只有3小时。

用附带的交流适配器从空到满的充电时间比预期的3小时要慢得多。换句话说,在浏览网页时,系统的充电时间和耗电时间一样长。大多数超极本和其他游戏笔记本电脑可以在2小时或更短时间内完全充电。

可悲的是,该系统不能通过第三方USB-C适配器充电,这与雷蛇Blade Pro和华硕或Alienware的大多数其他游戏笔记本不同。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
0h 00min
WiFi Websurfing
6h 24min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 32min
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 91 Wh
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 62 Wh
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 87 Wh
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 70 Wh
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 91 Wh
Battery Runtime
-19%
-30%
-11%
-8%
8%
Reader / Idle
419
404
592
WiFi v1.3
384
224
-42%
353
-8%
314
-18%
382
-1%
416
8%
Load
92
96
4%
45
-51%
88
-4%
79
-14%
H.264
222

Pros

+ 轻薄的GeForce RTX 3080 Ti游戏笔记本
+ 广泛的控制中心性能选项
+ 快速的显示响应时间,没有PWM
+ 支持PCIe4 x4 RAID 0/1
+ 易维修性

Cons

- 不能长时间保持最大的SSD传输率
- 不能通过第三方USB-C适配器为笔记本电脑充电
- 显示屏可以在开箱时进行更好的校准
- 网络摄像头质量差,没有每个键的RGB灯光
- 大而重的280瓦交流适配器
- 明显的均匀背光渗漏

结论--每体积的性能非常高

在审查中。联合利华科技GM7AG8P。测试装置由申克公司和Uniwill Technology提供。
在审查中。联合利华科技GM7AG8P。测试装置由申克公司和Uniwill Technology提供。

移动GeForce RTX 3070 Ti和 RTX 3080 Ti是为了在移动GeForce RTX 3000系列不可避免地推出之前延长其寿命而推出的,GeForce 4000系列。然而,在那之前,移动RTX 3080 Ti可以提供发烧友所渴望的额外性能提升。尽管该GPU只比移动RTX 3080 Ti快一点,但看到像GM7AG8P这样的超薄型号超过像微星GE76 10UH这样的更厚更重的替代产品的旧版RTX 3080,仍然令人印象深刻。

也许GM7AG8P更值得注意的方面是它能够维持150+W的TGP目标,尽管它的外形纤细,重量相对较低。这款 Razer Blade ProMSI GS76 Stealth根据我们对其他超薄游戏笔记本的经验,Uniwill Technology已经成功地安装了一个比我们最初预期更强大的GPU。

无论尺寸和重量如何,CPU和GPU在任何游戏笔记本电脑中都是最快的,但笨重的280瓦交流适配器使笔记本电脑原本轻薄便携的设计大打折扣。

至于 酷睿i9-12900HCPU,其性能提升超过了 酷睿i9-11900H比从移动RTX 3080到移动RTX 3080 Ti的跳跃更显著。代与代之间的改进足够大,足以舒适地取代AMD Zen 3 H系列,成为游戏笔记本电脑的顶级CPU。

GM7AG8P最大的缺点之一是它的大型280瓦砖,需要为里面的苛刻处理器供电。几乎整整一公斤,适配器和相关电缆与一些15.6英寸超极本一样重。令人遗憾的是,该系统不能通过USB-C充电,这迫使业主在旅行时携带庞大的适配器。相比之下,华硕ROG Zephyrus和Alienware笔记本电脑可以通过适合旅行的第三方USB-C适配器进行充电。游戏时预期会有很大的风扇噪音,这是这个特定类别中所有游戏笔记本的共同特征。

价格和可用性

联合利华科技的GM7AG8P还没有被广泛购买。像Schenker和Eluktronics这样的经销商可能会在未来的某一天采用类似规格的机箱。

SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P - 02/22/2022 v7
Allen Ngo

Chassis
81 / 98 → 83%
Keyboard
88%
Pointing Device
84%
Connectivity
67 / 80 → 84%
Weight
61 / 10-66 → 92%
Battery
52 / 95 → 55%
Display
85%
Games Performance
100%
Application Performance
98%
Temperature
80 / 95 → 84%
Noise
77 / 90 → 86%
Audio
70%
Camera
43 / 85 → 51%
Average
76%
87%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 英特尔酷睿i9-12900H首次亮相。联合利华科技GM7AG8P笔记本评测
Allen Ngo, 2022-02-25 (Update: 2022-02-25)