Notebookcheck Logo

华硕ROG Flow Z13的评论。配备强大的Alder Lake i9处理器的游戏平板电脑

在旅途中的游戏。 通过新的ROG Flow Z13,华硕推出了一款游戏平板电脑,结合了全新的Alder Lake Core i9处理器和GeForce RTX 3050 Ti。它还配备了快速的120赫兹面板,并可选择连接外部GPU。
Alder Lake Gaming Geforce Convertible / 2-in-1 Tablet Touchscreen Windows

华硕称新的ROG Flow Z13是市场上最强大的游戏平板电脑,看一下规格表绝对支持这一说法。我们的评测样品配备了一个全新的英特尔 Alder Lake Core i9 CPU,一个专用的Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti,以及16GB的LPDDR5-5200内存。为了能够合理利用组件的性能,制造商在处理器上实施了蒸气室冷却以及液态金属,以改善热传导。此外,还有一个13.4英寸的16:10显示屏,分辨率为1,920x1,200像素,刷新率为120赫兹,以及G-Sync。

可选的是,还有其他配备较弱的i7或i5 CPU的机型,以及普通的RTX 3050,甚至只有Alder Lake处理器的集成Xe图形。如果你不想在旅途中玩游戏,但想使用外部的iGPU,这种配置肯定会很有趣。XG移动电子GPU(NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080或AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT)在家里。我们的测试配置大约为2100欧元(约2367美元)。ROG Flow Z13的直接竞争对手并不多,这就是为什么我们也采用具有类似组件的普通笔记本电脑作为对比设备。

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE (ROG Flow Z13 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-12900H 14 x 1.8 - 5 GHz, 114 W PL2 / Short Burst, 55 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU - 4 GB VRAM, Core: 1297 MHz, Memory: 1375 MHz, 40 W TDP ( including 5 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 511.79, Optimus
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5-5200, dual-channel, onboard
Display
13.40 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 169 PPI, capacitive, LQ134N1JW54, IPS, glossy: yes, detachable screen, HDR, 120 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK, 1024 GB 
, 875 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm stereo, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 12 x 302 x 204
Battery
56 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 100-watt PSU, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.185 kg, Power Supply: 407 g
Price
2 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86.8 %
03/2022
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
1.2 kg12 mm13.40"1920x1200
87.7 %
01/2022
SCHENKER Vision 14
i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
1.1 kg15.6 mm14.00"2880x1800
82.7 %
10/2021
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
1.7 kg19.9 mm14.00"2560x1440
89.1 %
11/2021
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
891 g8.5 mm13.00"2880x1920
87.5 %
07/2021
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
1.8 kg16.8 mm14.00"2560x1440
84.7 %
02/2021
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
R9 5980HS, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
1.4 kg15.8 mm13.40"3840x2400

案例--一个被抽空的Surface Pro

总的来说,ROG Flow Z13是一款普通的敞篷车,有一个集成的脚架和一个可安装的键盘,就像我们在微软Surface Pro中看到的那样。微软Surface Pro中看到的一样。然而,Flow Z13的体积和重量要大得多。不过,由于重量较大,这款敞篷车看起来也很高档,这种印象得到了铝制外壳的稳定性和做工的支持。集成的脚架,允许最大打开角度达170度,看起来也相当高质量。虽然这里的材料非常薄,但当你改变角度时它不会弯曲。两个铰链原则上调整得非常好,只有最低程度的摆动。音量摇杆和电源按钮(包括指纹扫描仪)都整齐地集成在外壳上。

后面有照明的窗户
后面有照明的窗户

激进的设计语言与ROG笔记本电脑一致,也适合游戏平板电脑。背面的外壳上还有一个小窗口,可以照明,也支持Aura Sync技术(就像键盘背光一样)。然而,这也造成了一个小的驼峰,这就是为什么平板电脑无法平躺在背面,会摇晃。背面的风扇格栅也被作为设计元素实现了,所以它们几乎不引人注意。顶部有一个巨大的Republic of Gamers标志,两边是两个风扇出口。

附带的键盘盖也可以作为一个盖子,在设备不使用时保护显示屏。盖子的背面有某种天鹅绒饰面,触感很好,提供了一个很好的抓地力,但也会很快吸走灰尘和污垢。

重量为1.185公斤,仅ROG Flow Z13的重量就已经超过了许多超极本,例如 配备RTX 3050 Ti的Schenker Vision 14.加上键盘盖,重量攀升至1.5公斤多一点,而且包装也有近2厘米厚。当然,这仍然使它非常便携,但你可以清楚地注意到与Surface Pro 8等较弱的转换机的区别。 100瓦的电源适配器使重量增加了400多克。

尺寸比较

324 mm 222 mm 19.9 mm 1.7 kg319.7 mm 220 mm 16.8 mm 1.8 kg308.8 mm 215 mm 15.6 mm 1.1 kg299 mm 222 mm 15.8 mm 1.4 kg302 mm 204 mm 12 mm 1.2 kg292 mm 201 mm 8.5 mm 891 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性 - Thunderbolt 4与USB 2.0的比较

用于外部XG移动GPU的端口位于一个橡胶盖后面。
用于外部XG移动GPU的端口位于一个橡胶盖后面。

考虑到这是一款平板电脑,可用的端口一点也不差。在左侧,有一个USB-C端口,包括支持Thunderbolt 4,以及一个由USB-C端口和一个具有8个PCIe通道的专有端口组成的小盖子后面的外部图形卡的连接。右侧有一个微型SD读卡器和一个普通的USB-A端口。然而,后者只支持过时的USB 2.0标准,这有点难以理解。

在我们的评测样本中,雷电4端口有问题,因为我们无法通过这个端口给设备充电,无论我们是使用附带的电源适配器还是其他USB-C电源适配器。操作系统只显示一个通知,说设备没有充电,应该使用附带的电源适配器。经过一些研究,我们发现德国机型的雷电4端口不支持充电。我们对此感到非常惊讶,因为充电功能实际上是Thunderbolt 4认证的强制性要求。我们已经就此联系了华硕,一旦收到官方反馈,我们将相应更新这篇文章。

左边:USB-C与Thunderbolt 4(USB 4.0,DisplayPort 1.4),XG Mobile的专有连接,USB-C 3.2 Gen. 2(Power Delivery,DisplayPort)。
左边:USB-C与Thunderbolt 4(USB 4.0,DisplayPort 1.4),XG Mobile的专有连接,USB-C 3.2 Gen. 2(Power Delivery,DisplayPort)。
右:3.5毫米立体声,USB-A 2.0,音量摇杆,电源按钮
右:3.5毫米立体声,USB-A 2.0,音量摇杆,电源按钮
底部。键盘盖的Pogo引脚
底部。键盘盖的Pogo引脚
顶部:出风口
顶部:出风口

SD卡阅读器

背面的microSD插槽。
背面的microSD插槽。

在脚架后面有一个小型microSD读卡器,它能够完全容纳存储卡。读卡器的速度非常快,我们能够用我们的参考卡(Angelbird AV Pro V60)确定一个非常高的最大传输速率,超过260 MB/s。这使Flow Z13在比较领域中稳居榜首。在复制数据时,性能稍低,但超过100MB/s的结果仍然很好。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
108 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=103, last 2 years)
99 MB/s -8%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
80.1 MB/s -26%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
263.4 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (26 - 269, n=94, last 2 years)
122.9 MB/s -53%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
87.6 MB/s -67%

沟通

华硕集成了英特尔的尖端Wi-Fi 6E模块(AX210E),它支持所有现代标准,包括蓝牙5.2。Wi-Fi 6E在欧洲仍有一些问题,目前你只能用技巧让它工作,但至少你在未来几年有了最佳装备。与我们的参考路由器(Netgear AX12)连接的传输速率非常好,我们在测试期间没有注意到任何信号质量问题,无论是与Wi-Fi 6路由器还是与FritzBox 7490(Wi-Fi 5)。然而,没有集成的LTE或5G调制解调器可用。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1451 (1385min - 1504max) MBit/s 0%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1444 (776min - 1663max) MBit/s
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1386 (1229min - 1460max) MBit/s -4%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1183 (575min - 1294max) MBit/s -18%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (675 - 1602, n=27)
1166 MBit/s -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (885 - 1412, n=7, last 2 years)
1147 MBit/s -21%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
916 (427min - 1023max) MBit/s -37%
iperf3 receive AX12
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1617 (1531min - 1678max) MBit/s +18%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1425 (1295min - 1493max) MBit/s +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (881 - 1700, n=7, last 2 years)
1391 MBit/s +2%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1366 (853min - 1480max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (914 - 1716, n=27)
1309 MBit/s -4%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1079 (989min - 1182max) MBit/s -21%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
924 (867min - 950max) MBit/s -32%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650Tooltip
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1365 (853-1480)
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1418 (776-1663)

网络摄像头

ROG Flow Z13配备了两个摄像头。背面有一个800万像素的传感器,只要曝光正确,就可以拍出非常体面的照片。前面只有720p的传感器(90万像素),但照片相对较好。当然,这里仍有很大的改进空间,但我们也见过更差的720p相机。

使用后置摄像头的测试图
使用后置摄像头的测试图
ColorChecker
12.3 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
6 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE: 6.63 ∆E min: 1.92 - max: 12.43 ∆E

辅料

华硕为ROG Flow Z13默认配备了键盘盖,但在诱人的包装中没有包含其他配件。当然,XG Mobile eGPU是可选的,我们已经有机会将其与ROG Flow Z13一起测试。 ROG Flow X13.此外,还有华硕笔和各种输入设备,以及带有ROG品牌的耳机。

维护

ROG Flow Z13的外壳不能被用户打开,而且几乎每个部件也都是焊接的。然而,背面至少有一个小的维护舱口,可以接触到M.2-2230固态硬盘,可以进行更换。但在存储部分会有更多关于这个问题的介绍。

输入设备 - 带有Aura同步功能的摇摆式键盘

键盘

ROG Flow Z13配备了一个键盘盖,该键盘盖使用Pogo引脚磁力吸附在平板电脑的底部,同时也可以供电。与 键盘盖与Surface Pro一样,键盘可以平放或以小角度使用(见图片)。这里的问题是,键盘的材料保留了一点角度,所以键盘从表面略微抬起,打字时就会出现问题,例如,当你想在桌子上再次以平面形式使用它时。这有点影响打字的稳定性,但这是这类键盘套的常态。

键盘 - 平面
键盘 - 平面
键盘 - 倾斜的
键盘 - 倾斜的

不过,按键本身的机械性能还是不错的。键程不是太短(1.7毫米),而且可以同时注册几个键(N键滚动)。然而,在实践中,你几乎总是需要激活键盘背光(RGB,一个区域,支持Aura Sync),因为黑键和它们的标签之间的对比不是最佳的。键盘提供了德国的QWERTZ布局,但为了实现这一目标,必须做出一些妥协,如单行回车键或小方向键。

输入设备
输入设备
键盘照明
键盘照明

小巧的ClickPad(9.8 x 5.6厘米)提供了良好的滑行性能,鼠标控制也没有问题,但小的表面不是特别适合做手势。鼠标垫的下部也可以被按下,但这时会出现非常响亮的、听起来很廉价的点击噪音。然而,我们推测大多数用户无论如何都会使用外部鼠标,特别是在游戏时。此外,电容式触摸屏仍可用于日常使用,而且效果非常好。

显示屏--华硕为游戏平板电脑提供了全高清或4K显示。

子像素网格
子像素网格
在全亮度下几乎没有屏幕出血现象
在全亮度下几乎没有屏幕出血现象

华硕为ROG Flow Z13提供两种不同的13.4英寸IPS触摸屏,长宽比为16:10。除了4K显示屏(3840x2,400像素,WQUXGA,60赫兹,450尼特,P3色彩空间),你还可以选择全高清面板(1920x1,200像素,WUXGA),它只覆盖较小的sRGB色彩空间,但亮度略高(500尼特),刷新率较高,为120赫兹。全高清分辨率也更适合RTX 3050 Ti,所以总体而言,我们认为全高清面板更适合游戏平板。

主观的图像印象非常好,即使在较低的全高清分辨率下,一切看起来都非常清晰。颜色看起来也很丰富,对比度高,这一点在我们的测量中也得到了证实。屏幕中心的最大亮度约为515cd/m²,但平均 "只有 "476cd/m²。黑色水平略微提高了0.35cd/m²,但这仍然是一个非常好的对比度,几乎达到1500:1。响应时间没有显示任何问题,即使在全亮度下,屏幕出血也不是一个问题。

500
cd/m²
490
cd/m²
479
cd/m²
476
cd/m²
515
cd/m²
446
cd/m²
460
cd/m²
463
cd/m²
459
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LQ134N1JW54 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 515 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 476.4 cd/m² Minimum: 27.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 515 cd/m²
Contrast: 1471:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.2
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
69.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
LQ134N1JW54, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.40
SCHENKER Vision 14
MNE007ZA1, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
TL140BDXP01-0, IPS, 2560x1440, 14.00
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
LP129WT212166, IPS, 2880x1920, 13.00
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
TL140BDXP02-2, IPS, 2560x1440, 14.00
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
LQ134R1JW51, IPS, 3840x2400, 13.40
Display
7%
22%
10%
23%
9%
Display P3 Coverage
67.5
74.3
10%
94.2
40%
78.2
16%
97.2
44%
77.8
15%
sRGB Coverage
97.1
97.6
1%
99.9
3%
100
3%
99.9
3%
99.5
2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
69.3
75.7
9%
84.5
22%
77.6
12%
85.4
23%
76.8
11%
Response Times
2%
61%
-19%
51%
-46%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
44 ?(22, 22)
40.4 ?(18.8, 21.6)
8%
20 ?(11, 9)
55%
46.4 ?(22.8, 23.6)
-5%
16.4 ?(8, 8.4)
63%
48 ?(23, 25)
-9%
Response Time Black / White *
17.6 ?(6, 11.6)
18.4 ?(6, 12.4)
-5%
6 ?(2, 4)
66%
23.2 ?(10.8, 12.4)
-32%
10.8 ?(5.6, 5.2)
39%
32 ?(16, 16)
-82%
PWM Frequency
29760 ?(50)
Screen
-15%
-96%
-10%
-16%
-9%
Brightness middle
515
407
-21%
333
-35%
444
-14%
331.1
-36%
359
-30%
Brightness
476
407
-14%
317
-33%
451
-5%
318
-33%
331
-30%
Brightness Distribution
87
94
8%
89
2%
91
5%
91
5%
86
-1%
Black Level *
0.35
0.25
29%
0.36
-3%
0.43
-23%
0.36
-3%
0.23
34%
Contrast
1471
1628
11%
925
-37%
1033
-30%
920
-37%
1561
6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.6
2.6
-63%
5.58
-249%
2
-25%
2.25
-41%
2.46
-54%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4
4.4
-10%
10.62
-166%
3.2
20%
4.62
-16%
3.85
4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.2
2
-67%
2.88
-140%
1.7
-42%
1.6
-33%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.5
2.7
-8%
7.5
-200%
1.8
28%
1.7
32%
1.89
24%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.18 101%
2.28 96%
2.11 104%
2.3 96%
2.38 92%
CCT
6939 94%
6316 103%
7220 90%
6417 101%
6751 96%
6835 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
68.2
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.4
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-2% / -8%
-4% / -48%
-6% / -7%
19% / 3%
-15% / -10%

* ... smaller is better

设备插电时默认刷新率为120赫兹,但在电池供电时自动切换到60赫兹。因此,当电源适配器插入或拔出时,屏幕会变黑约一秒钟。这可以在Armoury Crate软件中修改,那里有一个叫做 "节能面板 "的选项。只要你停用它,即使在电池供电的情况下,频率也会保持在120赫兹。在日常使用中,120赫兹模式主要导致在滚动浏览文件或网站时有更流畅的图像印象,而且在游戏时也会有好处。

卡尔曼--灰鳞
卡尔曼--灰鳞
卡尔曼--饱和度
卡尔曼--饱和度
CalMAN - ColorChecker
CalMAN - ColorChecker
CalMAN - 灰度表(已校准)
CalMAN - 灰度表(已校准)
CalMAN - 饱和度(校准的)。
CalMAN - 饱和度(校准的)。
CalMAN - ColorChecker(已校准)。
CalMAN - ColorChecker(已校准)。

我们用专业的CalMAN软件和X-Rite i1 Pro 2分光光度计分析了显示器。开箱后,我们注意到在灰度上有轻微的色差,朝向绿色/蓝色,再加上略微过冷的色温。这在日常使用中并不发挥主要作用,只有在使用经过校准的显示器时,你才能用肉眼识别它。制造商喜欢使用这种技巧来增加最大亮度。因此,我们的校准配置文件(可在上面免费下载)也导致最大亮度从515cd/m²降低到480cd/m²。然而,由于颜色和灰度的偏差在开箱时就已经非常好了,所以严格来说,校准并不是必须的。全高清显示屏几乎完全覆盖了sRGB色彩空间,这使得它适合编辑图片/视频。

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. DCI-P3
vs. DCI-P3
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
17.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 11.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 69 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

亮度非常高,而且对电池电量没有减少。尽管如此,在光泽的触摸屏上很快就能看到反光。特别是在非常明亮的环境中,内容的可见度因此变得有限。但是,只要位置合适,在阴凉处或阴天应该可以舒适地使用该设备。IPS面板提供了非常稳定的可视角度,没有颜色偏移或强烈的对比度损失。

在阳光下
在阳光下
在阳光下
在阳光下
视角稳定性
视角稳定性

性能 - ROG Flow Z13的CPU是过剩的

我们的评测配置代表了ROG Flow Z13的最强大型号,并由新的桤木湖酷睿i9-12900H结合专用的 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti这款产品的最大运行功率为40瓦(35瓦+来自处理器的5瓦Dynamic Boost功率)。该套件由16GB的LPDDR5-5200内存(双通道)完成,目前没有32GB内存的型号。我们在下面列出了三种基本型号,但它们在内存配置和内置显示屏方面仍有可能不同。

型号 GZ301ZE GZ301ZC GZ301ZA
CPU Core i9-12900H Core i7-12700H Core i5-12500H
GPU GeForce RTX 3050 Ti(40瓦) GeForce RTX 3050(40瓦) Iris Xe Graphics
内存 16 GB LPDR5 16 GB LPDR5 16 GB LPDR5

在一个紧凑的游戏平板电脑中安装如此强大的酷睿i9 CPU对我们来说并不完全合理,尤其是与RTX 3050 Ti的最慢变体相结合。这里当然有一点不平衡,酷睿i7 CPU在ROG Flow Z13中运行的速度不太可能明显变慢(核心数量相同,但涡轮频率较低)。

 
 

测试条件

军械库板条箱
军械库板条箱

要找到正确的测试设置并不那么容易,因为除了正常的Windows设置外,在预装的Armoury Crate软件中还有一系列额外的能源设置,反正也是覆盖了Windows的节能计划。此外,还有通过MUX开关完全禁用集成GPU的选项,但这需要重新启动。此外,还有各种混合图形的设置。例如,你可以将专用GPU配置为只在设备插电时使用。总而言之,有这么多选项可以根据你的需要调整设备,但也有可能会有点混乱,可能没有使用最佳设置。

我们尝试了所有合理的组合,并能够通过常规的Windows "平衡 "电源计划以及Armoury Crate软件中的Windows设置和Windows性能滑块设置为 "最佳性能 "获得最佳结果(有点令人惊讶)。可能仍有更新,但我们目前没有看到额外的能源计划有任何优势。

处理器 - 酷睿i9-12900H

新的酷睿i9-12900H来自英特尔Alder Lake系列(第12代)的新酷睿i9-12900H是目前市场上最快的移动芯片之一,它提供了总共14个核心(6个超线程性能核心和8个效率核心)和20个线程,以及高达5.0 GHz的最大时钟速率。你可能会期望这样的CPU出现在高端游戏笔记本电脑中,当然不会出现在一个紧凑的游戏平板电脑中。标称的TDP仍然是45瓦,但华硕在实践中并没有限制消耗,我们看到在多核测试的前30秒,消耗量高达114瓦(!!!),之后消耗量平缓在55瓦。这意味着,特别是在短时间的负载高峰期(也是在许多基准测试中),ROG Flow Z13提供了出色的性能。然而,这款平板电脑总是短暂地使用内部电池,因为正如我们稍后看到的,电源适配器最多只能提供103瓦的能量。

Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test

0140280420560700840980112012601400154016801820196021002240238025202660Tooltip
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2190 (2140.64-2779.32)
SCHENKER Vision 14 Intel Core i7-11370H; Performance Enthusiast: Ø1053 (1030.18-1070.35)
SCHENKER Vision 14 Intel Core i7-11370H; Performance Balanced: Ø770 (751.09-876.81)
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS: Ø2116 (2070.39-2126.64)
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7: Ø839 (789.09-994.68)
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø2052 (2009.65-2060.79)
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS: Ø1873 (1728.01-2089.32)

因此,在CPU基准测试中,评测样本实际上总是处于比较领域的顶端。在Cinebench循环中,你可以清楚地看到,在第三次运行中,功耗已经稳定在55瓦,所以与第一次运行相比,性能降低了20%以上。尽管如此,英特尔芯片在55瓦的情况下仍然具有竞争力,它的性能与目前Ryzen 9 5000芯片的性能相当,在 华硕Zephyrus G14Razer Blade 14,在这些设备中分别以75瓦和80瓦的功率运行。目前Tiger Lake H35芯片,目前仍用于许多紧凑型笔记本电脑,其4个核心在这里完全没有机会。

55瓦的高持续消耗量对XG移动电子GPU的用户来说也是个好消息,因为这意味着CPU不会成为瓶颈。然而,在电池供电的情况下,功耗被大大限制在30瓦,但这仍能实现非常好的基准测试结果。尽管如此,必须明确指出的是,酷睿i7-12700H(相同的内核数量,略低的时钟频率)在这种情况下会取得几乎相同的性能(特别是当55瓦的限制开始生效时),而酷睿i9不会提供明显的优势。其他基准测试可在我们各自的 CPU基准测试文章.

在Cinebench R15多重循环中的CPU数据
在Cinebench R15多重循环中的CPU数据
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming
 
85.2 pt
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H
81.9 pt
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
 
78.3 pt
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
67.3 pt
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
65.1 pt
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 -2!
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
58 pt
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
49.9 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
45.5 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 34613, n=239, last 2 years)
19100 Points +25%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (7359 - 19648, n=25)
15301 Points 0%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H
15229 Points
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
13214 Points -13%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
12652 (12516min - 12651.7max) Points -17%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
12629 Points -17%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
5904 Points -61%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5668 Points -63%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H
1917 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1634 - 1921, n=25)
1822 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 2235, n=237, last 2 years)
1799 Points -6%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
1529 Points -20%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
1512 Points -21%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
1488 Points -22%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
1467 Points -23%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1218 Points -36%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=237, last 2 years)
7255 Points +32%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (2681 - 7471, n=25)
5761 Points +5%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H
5491 Points
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
5167 Points -6%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
4953 Points -10%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
4876 Points -11%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
2351 Points -57%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
2097 Points -62%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H
734 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (624 - 738, n=25)
705 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=237, last 2 years)
693 Points -6%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
604 Points -18%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
595 Points -19%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
584 Points -20%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
578 Points -21%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
471 Points -36%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=242, last 2 years)
3024 Points +9%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H
2779 (2140.64min - 2779.32max) Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1395 - 3077, n=25)
2482 Points -11%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
2180 Points -22%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
2083 Points -25%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2061 (2009.65min - 2060.79max) Points -26%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
1070 (1030.18min - 1070.35max) Points -61%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
877 (1030.18min - 1070.35max) Points -68%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
995 (789.61min - 994.68max) Points -64%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H
275 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=241, last 2 years)
266 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (235 - 277, n=26)
262 Points -5%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
243 Points -12%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
240 Points -13%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
232 Points -16%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
224 Points -19%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
197 Points -28%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
569 Seconds * -162%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
451 Seconds * -108%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
251 Seconds * -16%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
245.6 Seconds * -13%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
230.9 Seconds * -6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (160 - 451, n=25)
229 Seconds * -6%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H
217 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 1259, n=235, last 2 years)
205 Seconds * +6%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 140932, n=236, last 2 years)
75363 MIPS +17%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H
64146 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (34684 - 76677, n=25)
61535 MIPS -4%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
58875 MIPS -8%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
57319 MIPS -11%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
52370 MIPS -18%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
28410 MIPS -56%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
24679 MIPS -62%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H
6102 MIPS
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7581, n=236, last 2 years)
6062 MIPS -1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (5302 - 6289, n=25)
5835 MIPS -4%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
5804 MIPS -5%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
5623 MIPS -8%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
5550 MIPS -9%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5168 MIPS -15%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
4791 MIPS -21%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H
13796 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 22200, n=241, last 2 years)
13326 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (8519 - 14376, n=26)
12163 Points -12%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
8620 Points -38%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
7767 Points -44%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
5775 Points -58%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5759 Points -58%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H
1892 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1631 - 1892, n=26)
1797 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2193, n=241, last 2 years)
1795 Points -5%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
1601 Points -15%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
1548 Points -18%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
1547 Points -18%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
1537 Points -19%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 37.6, n=239, last 2 years)
20.8 fps +21%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (8.05 - 22.5, n=25)
17.3 fps +1%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H
17.2 fps
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
15.4 fps -10%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
15.3 fps -11%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
15.2 fps -12%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
8.82 fps -49%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
6.49 fps -62%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
71.9 s * -72%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
58.9 s * -41%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
53.5 s * -28%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
51.1 s * -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=233, last 2 years)
49.1 s * -17%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
47.9 s * -14%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (36.8 - 59.8, n=25)
42.7 s * -2%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H
41.9 s *
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.599 sec * -40%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7
0.568 sec * -33%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
0.544 sec * -27%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
0.512 sec * -20%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
0.504 sec * -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 4.47, n=236, last 2 years)
0.4734 sec * -11%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (0.4218 - 0.506, n=25)
0.4547 sec * -6%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.428 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
60567
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
13558
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
9498
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
32.77 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
169.3 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
3.3 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
275 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
221 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2779 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming
 
93.5 pt
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
84.8 pt
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
80.1 pt
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
 
70.2 pt
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
63.7 pt
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
46.9 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
41.8 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (2585 - 60169, n=232, last 2 years)
17811 KRay/s +135%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
15078 KRay/s +99%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
14653 KRay/s +93%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (4074 - 18289, n=25)
11031 KRay/s +45%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
8413 KRay/s +11%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
7594 KRay/s
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
7249 KRay/s -5%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
96811 Points +177%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
95088 Points +172%
Average of class Gaming
  (12439 - 252486, n=232, last 2 years)
89327 Points +155%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (22307 - 93236, n=25)
54480 Points +56%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
35010 Points
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
34020 Points -3%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
30075 Points -14%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 10389, n=232, last 2 years)
4191 MB/s +55%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
3305 MB/s +22%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
3161 MB/s +17%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1378 - 4215, n=25)
3063 MB/s +14%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
2698 MB/s
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
2287 MB/s -15%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1983 MB/s -27%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 200651, n=232, last 2 years)
107789 Points +4%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
103950 Points
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
103846 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (78172 - 111241, n=25)
101523 Points -2%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
87865 Points -15%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
52839 Points -49%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
47866 Points -54%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
12597 Points +38%
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 32988, n=232, last 2 years)
11928 Points +31%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
10899 Points +19%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
9125 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (5709 - 10410, n=25)
9091 Points 0%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
5025 Points -45%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
4598 Points -50%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
53310 Points +156%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
52839 Points +154%
Average of class Gaming
  (7135 - 134044, n=232, last 2 years)
45987 Points +121%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (11257 - 45581, n=25)
28345 Points +36%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
20833 Points
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
20417 Points -2%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
18122 Points -13%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
132345 MB/s +59%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
120371 MB/s +45%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=232, last 2 years)
104954 MB/s +26%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (31935 - 151546, n=25)
85224 MB/s +3%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
82978 MB/s
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
76839 MB/s -7%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
42339 MB/s -49%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 2409, n=232, last 2 years)
1184 MB/s +29%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (449 - 1193, n=25)
941 MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
919 MB/s
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
853 MB/s -7%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
772 MB/s -16%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
422 MB/s -54%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
319 MB/s -65%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (1437 - 31796, n=232, last 2 years)
9669 KRay/s +119%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
8425 KRay/s +91%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
7873 KRay/s +78%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (2235 - 10511, n=25)
6131 KRay/s +39%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
4551 KRay/s +3%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
4417 KRay/s
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
3857 KRay/s -13%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
43917 MPixel/s
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
37197 MPixel/s -15%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (20960 - 48269, n=26)
36777 MPixel/s -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (11451 - 60161, n=233, last 2 years)
36304 MPixel/s -17%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
27992 MPixel/s -36%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
15432 MPixel/s -65%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
15332 MPixel/s -65%

系统性能

ROG Flow Z13是一个非常强大的系统,这也被良好的基准测试结果所证实。然而,在测试过程中,我们不时遇到轻微的卡顿,例如在打开Windows设置时。我们还不知道其原因,但这似乎不是图形切换功能的问题。这可能与Armoury Crate软件有关,也可能与处理器内核的新混合结构有关。尽管如此,在我们的测试中,卡顿只是很少发生,因此并不是一个真正的问题。除此之外,主观的性能印象也非常好。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=203, last 2 years)
7573 Points +20%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
6967 Points +10%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
6617 Points +4%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
6335 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
 
6335 Points 0%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, R9 5980HS, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
5971 Points -6%
SCHENKER Vision 14
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5838 Points -8%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
5041 Points -20%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
10755 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
 
10755 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (8300 - 12334, n=202, last 2 years)
10701 Points -1%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
10413 Points -3%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
10094 Points -6%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, R9 5980HS, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
9758 Points -9%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
9689 Points -10%
SCHENKER Vision 14
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9234 Points -14%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
9785 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
 
9785 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (7244 - 11833, n=202, last 2 years)
9729 Points -1%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
9458 Points -3%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9381 Points -4%
SCHENKER Vision 14
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
8806 Points -10%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, R9 5980HS, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
8653 Points -12%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
6537 Points -33%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming
  (6462 - 18475, n=202, last 2 years)
11407 Points +74%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9395 Points +43%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
8236 Points +26%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, R9 5980HS, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
6844 Points +4%
SCHENKER Vision 14
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6641 Points +1%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
6556 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
 
6556 Points 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
5488 Points -16%
CrossMark / Overall
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
2108 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
 
2108 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (974 - 2334, n=173, last 2 years)
1870 Points -11%
SCHENKER Vision 14
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1502 Points -29%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
1394 Points -34%
CrossMark / Productivity
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
2033 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
 
2033 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (907 - 2204, n=173, last 2 years)
1782 Points -12%
SCHENKER Vision 14
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1555 Points -24%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
1389 Points -32%
CrossMark / Creativity
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
2165 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
 
2165 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (1027 - 2514, n=173, last 2 years)
2029 Points -6%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
1513 Points -30%
SCHENKER Vision 14
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1452 Points -33%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
2168 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
 
2168 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 2327, n=173, last 2 years)
1703 Points -21%
SCHENKER Vision 14
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1501 Points -31%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
1103 Points -49%
PCMark 10 Score
6335 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
74264 MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
59683 MB/s -20%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (34438 - 74264, n=25)
59157 MB/s -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (23850 - 92565, n=232, last 2 years)
58650 MB/s -21%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
46072 MB/s -38%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
39050 MB/s -47%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
38214 MB/s -49%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
69882 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (24879 - 90647, n=232, last 2 years)
62444 MB/s -11%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (36365 - 74642, n=25)
61866 MB/s -11%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
58483 MB/s -16%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
47864 MB/s -32%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
45459 MB/s -35%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
43848 MB/s -37%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
63215 MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
61266 MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (21619 - 103259, n=232, last 2 years)
60999 MB/s -4%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (32276 - 67858, n=25)
59295 MB/s -6%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
46199 MB/s -27%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
34240 MB/s -46%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
30954 MB/s -51%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
106 ns *
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
101 ns * +5%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (88 - 118.1, n=24)
85.8 ns * +19%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 152.5, n=229, last 2 years)
85.8 ns * +19%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
84.8 ns * +20%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
84 ns * +21%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
73.4 ns * +31%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

在我们的标准化延迟测试中(网页浏览、YouTube 4K播放、CPU负载),Flow Z13表现出升高的延迟。因此,在目前的BIOS版本下,这款游戏平板电脑只适合在有限范围内使用实时音频软件。

LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, R9 5980HS, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
3927 μs * -166%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
1474 μs *
SCHENKER Vision 14
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1052 μs * +29%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
1048 μs * +29%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
489 μs * +67%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
392.6 μs * +73%

* ... smaller is better

储存

紧凑的M.2-2230 SSD可以被替换。
紧凑的M.2-2230 SSD可以被替换。

华硕选择使用一个紧凑的M.2-2230固态硬盘,通过背面的小舱门也非常容易进入。尽管尺寸很小,但这是一款PCIe 4.0固态硬盘,在我们的案例中,它来自美光,提供1TB的存储容量。其中875GB在第一次启动后仍然可用。基准测试结果绝对不差,在日常使用或游戏中没有问题,但最大的连续传输率更符合快速PCIe 3.0 x4驱动器。作为交换,美光SSD在4K测试中提供了非常好的性能。更多的SSD基准测试可在 这里.

Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3341 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3222 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 780 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 621 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 72.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 340.2 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 2063 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1570 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
82.3 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
80.4 pt
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
76.3 pt
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
 
73.8 pt
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
61.7 pt
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
46.4 pt
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
39.1 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
36 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4315 (4271.27min - 4314.68max) MB/s +92%
Average of class Gaming
  (1291 - 7045, n=202, last 2 years)
3524 MB/s +56%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2425 (2418.63min - 2424.52max) MB/s +8%
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
  (2252 - 2411, n=3)
2308 MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
2252 (2241.23min - 2252.02max) MB/s
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
1905 (1898.32min - 1905.05max) MB/s -15%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
1853 (1835.11min - 1853.11max) MB/s -18%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
1770 (1735.81min - 1770.42max) MB/s -21%
seq write
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4326 (4303.78min - 4326.21max) MB/s +34%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=202, last 2 years)
3796 MB/s +18%
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
  (3217 - 3460, n=3)
3377 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
3217 (2128.61min - 3217.03max) MB/s
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2957 (2951.32min - 2957.19max) MB/s -8%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
1958 (1939.66min - 1957.55max) MB/s -39%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
1638 (1632.72min - 1638.16max) MB/s -49%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
1324 (1199.03min - 1323.72max) MB/s -59%
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6701 (6057.41min - 6701.03max) MB/s +100%
Average of class Gaming
  (1983 - 16089, n=202, last 2 years)
6335 MB/s +89%
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
  (3345 - 3603, n=3)
3504 MB/s +5%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
3395 (2336.65min - 3395.42max) MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
3345 (2561.25min - 3345.4max) MB/s
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
3130 (2702.81min - 3130.03max) MB/s -6%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
2450 (2327.38min - 2449.89max) MB/s -27%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
2260 (1924min - 2259.89max) MB/s -32%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4955 (4937.74min - 4955.15max) MB/s +54%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=202, last 2 years)
4758 MB/s +48%
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
  (3215 - 3471, n=3)
3380 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
3215 (3201.61min - 3214.59max) MB/s
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2994 (2986.03min - 2994.1max) MB/s -7%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
1982 (1958.18min - 1981.83max) MB/s -38%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
1703 (1685.67min - 1702.84max) MB/s -47%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
1588 (1424.3min - 1588.17max) MB/s -51%
4k q1 t1 read
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
94.2 (93.47min - 94.2max) MB/s +40%
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
  (62.4 - 75, n=3)
68.3 MB/s +1%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=202, last 2 years)
68.3 MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
67.4 (65.12min - 67.38max) MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
55.7 (54.81min - 55.71max) MB/s -17%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
48.4 (44.27min - 48.4max) MB/s -28%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
46.3 (46.19min - 46.3max) MB/s -31%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
43.4 (42.72min - 43.38max) MB/s -36%
4k q1 t1 write
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
391 (388.2min - 391max) MB/s
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
  (249 - 407, n=3)
349 MB/s -11%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
247 (244.59min - 247.11max) MB/s -37%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 421, n=202, last 2 years)
227 MB/s -42%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
168 (152.94min - 168.15max) MB/s -57%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
139 (135.15min - 138.9max) MB/s -64%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
124 (123.62min - 124.21max) MB/s -68%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
114 (112.22min - 114.22max) MB/s -71%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3297 (3266.49min - 3297.01max) MB/s +79%
Average of class Gaming
  (313 - 6172, n=202, last 2 years)
2581 MB/s +40%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
1897 (1895.38min - 1897.45max) MB/s +3%
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
  (1841 - 1860, n=3)
1849 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
1846 (1842.83min - 1846max) MB/s
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
1294 (1280.16min - 1293.7max) MB/s -30%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
1249 (1220.11min - 1248.59max) MB/s -32%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
805 (800.4min - 804.86max) MB/s -56%
4k q32 t16 write
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
  (2629 - 3364, n=3)
2915 MB/s +6%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
2751 (2683.65min - 2751.16max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=202, last 2 years)
2173 MB/s -21%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2154 (2150min - 2154.41max) MB/s -22%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
964 (961.85min - 964.1max) MB/s -65%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
571 (564.67min - 570.64max) MB/s -79%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
505 (497.69min - 504.92max) MB/s -82%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
384 (378.78min - 383.65max) MB/s -86%
AS SSD
Score Total
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
7472 Points
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
  (5894 - 7568, n=3)
6978 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (1923 - 13854, n=190, last 2 years)
6821 Points -9%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
6095 Points -18%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5763 Points -23%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
3700 Points -50%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
3464 Points -54%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
2566 Points -66%
Score Read
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2920 Points +13%
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
  (2592 - 2722, n=3)
2663 Points +3%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
2592 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (528 - 4721, n=190, last 2 years)
2508 Points -3%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2449 Points -6%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
1598 Points -38%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
1275 Points -51%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
1184 Points -54%
Score Write
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
3541 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=190, last 2 years)
3097 Points -13%
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
  (1834 - 3541, n=3)
2942 Points -17%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2410 Points -32%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
1805 Points -49%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1412 Points -60%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
1121 Points -68%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
818 Points -77%
Seq Read
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5367 MB/s +85%
Average of class Gaming
  (1759 - 12763, n=190, last 2 years)
4916 MB/s +69%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
3066 MB/s +6%
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
  (2903 - 3209, n=3)
3005 MB/s +4%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
2903 MB/s
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
2618 MB/s -10%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
2137 MB/s -26%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
1972 MB/s -32%
Seq Write
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3955 MB/s +37%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=190, last 2 years)
3632 MB/s +26%
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
  (2886 - 3131, n=3)
2994 MB/s +4%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
2886 MB/s
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2805 MB/s -3%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
1334 MB/s -54%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
1157 MB/s -60%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
856 MB/s -70%
4K Read
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
88.7 MB/s
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
  (77.7 - 88.7, n=3)
84.7 MB/s -5%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
83.6 MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.4 - 112.1, n=190, last 2 years)
67.6 MB/s -24%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
56.7 MB/s -36%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
49.8 MB/s -44%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
45.37 MB/s -49%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
38.32 MB/s -57%
4K Write
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
334.6 MB/s
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
  (218 - 351, n=3)
301 MB/s -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (96.3 - 512, n=190, last 2 years)
212 MB/s -37%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
205.3 MB/s -39%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
179.3 MB/s -46%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
176.4 MB/s -47%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
119.7 MB/s -64%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
96.4 MB/s -71%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2300 MB/s +4%
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
  (2213 - 2323, n=3)
2278 MB/s +3%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
2213 MB/s
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2093 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (312 - 3475, n=190, last 2 years)
1943 MB/s -12%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
1298 MB/s -41%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
1016 MB/s -54%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
930 MB/s -58%
4K-64 Write
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
2917 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=190, last 2 years)
2524 MB/s -13%
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
  (1187 - 2920, n=3)
2341 MB/s -20%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2009 MB/s -31%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
1492 MB/s -49%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
909 MB/s -69%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
811 MB/s -72%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
557 MB/s -81%
Access Time Read
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
0.112 ms * -300%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.02 - 0.379, n=188, last 2 years)
0.05335 ms * -91%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
0.046 ms * -64%
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
  (0.023 - 0.065, n=3)
0.03867 ms * -38%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
0.036 ms * -29%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
0.033 ms * -18%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
0.028 ms *
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.024 ms * +14%
Access Time Write
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
0.182 ms *
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
  (0.174 - 0.182, n=3)
0.178 ms * +2%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
0.156 ms * +14%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
0.086 ms * +53%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=190, last 2 years)
0.04879 ms * +73%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
0.043 ms * +76%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
0.04 ms * +78%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.02 ms * +89%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

017034051068085010201190136015301700187020402210238025502720289030603230Tooltip
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE: Ø3355 (3155.77-3367.61)

显卡 -GeForce RTX 3050 Ti

GPU-Z NvidiaGeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU-Z NvidiaGeForce RTX 3050 Ti

在日常使用中,该处理器的高效Iris Xe Graphics G7通常负责图形处理。这是有96个EU的版本,我们已经从上一代Tiger Lake U的酷睿i7处理器中熟悉了这个版本(例如: 酷睿i7-1165G7).对于要求更高的应用,如游戏,专用的NvidiaGeForce RTX 3050 Ti是由Optimus技术自动启用的。正如我们之前提到的,这是RTX 3050 Ti的最慢版本,TGP只有35瓦,其中处理器仍然可以根据使用情况提供5瓦,这要感谢动态提升。我们在基准测试中观察到最大的核心时钟频率为1,297 MHz,并且有4GB的GDDR6 VRAM可用。

合成基准测试再次表明,这是RTX 3050 Ti最慢的版本之一,因为ROG Flow Z13比我们数据库中RTX 3050 Ti的平均结果落后约20%。然而,在长时间的负载下,性能仍然稳定,3DMarkTime Spy 压力测试以97%的比例完成。在电池供电方面,消耗量最初被限制在35瓦。当电池电量降到50%以下时,最大仍为26瓦。其他GPU基准测试可在 这里.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
100 pt
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
82.3 pt
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
49 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
 
44.1 pt
SCHENKER Vision 14
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11370H
39.3 pt
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
35.1 pt
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH -1!
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
28 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7
16.7 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=241, last 2 years)
39928 Points +186%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
33833 Points +143%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
19866 Points +43%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7952 - 20905, n=27)
17562 Points +26%
SCHENKER Vision 14
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11370H
16128 Points +16%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
13939 Points
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
10852 Points -22%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7
6825 Points -51%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22547, n=243, last 2 years)
11907 Points +195%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
9768 Points +142%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
5748 Points +42%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (3744 - 6122, n=27)
5177 Points +28%
SCHENKER Vision 14
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11370H
4721 Points +17%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
4041 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7
1666 Points -59%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=245, last 2 years)
29195 Points +175%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
23373 Points +121%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
14262 Points +35%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7917 - 15611, n=26)
13090 Points +23%
SCHENKER Vision 14
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11370H
11055 Points +4%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
10600 Points
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
8396 Points -21%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7
5570 Points -47%
3DMark 11 Performance
14864 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9794 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
4530 points
Help

游戏性能

由于内置的MUX开关,集成显卡可以被完全禁用,这可能会导致延迟的改善和更高的游戏性能。然而,在我们的测试中,无论我们是运行合成3DMarks还是游戏测试,都无法检测到性能的提高。这当然是你可以试验一下的东西,但一般来说,我们会建议简单地让混合图形处于启用状态,因为Nvidia的Optimus技术工作得非常好。

在现代游戏中,RTX 3050 Ti的游戏性能往往只满足于中等细节,但至少要求不高或较老的游戏往往可以在高细节下玩。我们在去年审查了外部XG Mobile eGPU 与ROG Flow X13的组合。,但那时你最好在外部显示器上玩,因为否则性能会受到影响。在任何情况下,150瓦版本的移动GeForce RTX 3080提供了一个可观的性能提升。

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (17.5 - 449, n=172, last 2 years)
216 fps +192%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
164.2 (155min) fps +122%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
101 (20.4min, 59.3P0.1, 77.6P1) fps +36%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30 - 110, n=26)
88.8 fps +20%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
74 fps
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
73 fps -1%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
56.3 (51min) fps -24%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
35 fps -53%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=238, last 2 years)
115.1 fps +210%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
88.6 (79min) fps +139%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
53 (48.6min, 56.6P0.1, 76P1) fps +43%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (19 - 58.5, n=29)
47.5 fps +28%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
41.4 (39min, 40P1) fps +12%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
37.1 (34min, 35P1) fps
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
33 (30min) fps -11%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
14.7 (13min, 13.99P1) fps -60%
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 232, n=119, last 2 years)
134.4 fps +107%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
105 (84min) fps +62%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (36 - 94, n=14)
73.6 fps +13%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
65 fps
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
64 fps -2%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
28 fps -57%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
22 (20min) fps -66%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (14 - 218, n=129, last 2 years)
125.8 fps +113%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
99 (74min) fps +68%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30 - 89, n=14)
68.4 fps +16%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
59 fps 0%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
59 fps
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
26 fps -56%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
21 (19min) fps -64%
Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
151 (132.8min) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (29.9 - 244, n=247, last 2 years)
150.6 fps 0%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
121.4 (107.6min) fps -20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (74.8 - 154, n=27)
119.9 fps -21%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
117 (101.4min) fps -23%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
112 (97min) fps -26%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
110.8 (98.3min) fps -27%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
63.4 (35.7min) fps -58%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Gaming
  (26.9 - 220, n=248, last 2 years)
141.2 fps +3%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
137 (116.9min) fps
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
116 (101.7min) fps -15%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
113 (95.5min) fps -18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (67.3 - 145, n=27)
113 fps -18%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
107 (92.7min) fps -22%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
105.6 (92.7min) fps -23%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
56.7 (32.8min) fps -59%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1920x1080 Standard Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (13 - 230, n=178, last 2 years)
143.1 fps +35%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
114 fps +8%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
106 fps
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
74.2 fps -30%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (33.4 - 106, n=24)
70 fps -34%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
58.3 fps -45%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
45.7 fps -57%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
26.9 fps -75%
1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (9.13 - 194.9, n=237, last 2 years)
109.6 fps +3%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
106 fps
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
88 fps -17%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
53.1 fps -50%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (23.5 - 106, n=24)
51.2 fps -52%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
40.8 fps -62%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
33.1 fps -69%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
26.9 fps -75%
X-Plane 11.11
1920x1080 med (fps_test=2)
Average of class Gaming
  (13.7 - 193.1, n=244, last 2 years)
126.6 fps +11%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
114 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (54.6 - 117, n=27)
93.7 fps -18%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
88.3 fps -23%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
85.1 fps -25%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
77.6 fps -32%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
75.4 fps -34%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
28.8 fps -75%
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming
  (12.4 - 166.2, n=253, last 2 years)
100.8 fps +9%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
92.5 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (48.8 - 100.6, n=27)
77.4 fps -16%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
75.7 fps -18%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
71.5 fps -23%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
64.4 fps -30%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
62.7 fps -32%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
30.2 fps -67%
Strange Brigade
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
Average of class Gaming
  (17.5 - 465, n=195, last 2 years)
229 fps +189%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
163 (43.5min, 114P1) fps +106%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
112 (80.3min, 82.9P1) fps +41%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (79.2 - 117.3, n=23)
103.3 fps +30%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
89.4 (64.6min, 67.3P1) fps +13%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
79.2 (58.1min, 59.6P1) fps
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
33 fps -58%
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (14.6 - 421, n=235, last 2 years)
203 fps +199%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
154 (36.9min, 111P1) fps +126%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
97.5 (70.5min, 75.8P1) fps +43%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (34.8 - 101.3, n=25)
87.5 fps +29%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
76.7 (54min, 57.9P1) fps +13%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
68 (49.8min, 52.8P1) fps
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
27 fps -60%
F1 2021
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (20.7 - 470, n=49, last 2 years)
221 fps +135%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
122 (105min, 82P1) fps +30%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (68 - 131, n=11)
104.8 fps +12%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
97.1 (63min, 56P1) fps +3%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
93.9 (82min, 55P1) fps
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (13.5 - 271, n=71, last 2 years)
118.1 fps +151%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
62.3 (52min, 52P1) fps +32%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (44.4 - 69, n=11)
54 fps +15%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
47.1 (39min, 29P1) fps
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
46.8 (38min, 37P1) fps -1%
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (39 - 45.6, n=4)
41.8 fps +7%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
39 fps
1920x1080 High Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (32 - 36.2, n=4)
34.7 fps +8%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
32 fps

原则上,你仍然可以用电池供电进行游戏,但你应该记住,当电池电量低于50%时,性能会下降一些(此时TGP只有26瓦而不是35瓦)。在我们对《Witcher 3》的测试中,帧率从37FPS下降到27FPS,使游戏看起来有点不流畅,并要求你降低一点细节水平。无论如何,游戏期间的电池运行时间非常短,只有47分钟。进一步的游戏基准测试可在我们的 游戏基准测试文章.

The Witcher 3 FPS diagram

05101520253035Tooltip
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø37.1 (34-40)
在我们的TheWitcher 3 Ultra测试中,CPU和GPU数据。
在我们的TheWitcher 3 Ultra测试中,CPU和GPU数据。
low med. high ultra
GTA V (2015) 181 174 114 54.9
The Witcher 3 (2015) 225 142 74 37.1
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 187 172 151 137
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 106 106
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 134 114 92.5
Far Cry 5 (2018) 132 70 65 59
Strange Brigade (2018) 232 100 79.2 68
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 (2020) 75 39 32 26
F1 2021 (2021) 224 118 93.9 47.1

排放--具有令人惊讶的安静冷却效果的游戏平板电脑

噪声排放

华硕为其游戏平板电脑使用了高质量的冷却解决方案,为处理器选择了液态金属,以及带有两个风扇的蒸汽室冷却。考虑到高性能,我们对其噪音水平感到非常惊讶。在日常使用中,该设备通常是完全无声的,风扇根本不运行或根本听不见。然而,在负载情况下,风扇会迅速转动起来。一旦你将显卡置于负载之下(例如游戏时),噪音水平很快就会达到41 dB(A),但这一点也不令人感到困扰。你可以在背景中听到它,但你仍然可以毫无问题地进行游戏,并实际使用扬声器来播放游戏声音。如果你只对处理器施加压力(例如在使用XG Mobile eGPU时),ROG Flow Z13仍然更安静,为37.5 dB(A)。当负载结束时,风扇速度也会很快降低(逐渐在31.9和29.6 dB(A)之间),而且它们也会很快再次变得不可闻。可选的涡轮模式并没有提供更高的性能,但噪音水平增加到44dB(A)左右。但正如我们稍后看到的,无论如何,温度并不关键,所以涡轮模式并没有真正意义。

我们在合成的GPU基准测试中注意到一些轻微的电子噪音,但在实际游戏和日常任务中没有问题。

Noise Level

Idle
24.5 / 24.5 / 24.5 dB(A)
Load
41 / 41 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24.5 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.335.438.436.637.537.52533.83736.634.731.533.83126.633.933.630.924.228.64031.331.435.435.832.930.65033.432.635.332.529.434.36329.631.328.527.825.326.58023.928.429.526.4242210022.6232537.320.12212519.620.422.525.520.220.416018.718.42020.814.918.42002021.522.323.518.721.325020.420.726.824.418.519.631518.820.922.627.416.416.840019.921.330.324.714.415.55001819.927.428.312.814.463018.520.124.227.414.315.180019.421.725.928.511.712100020.223.128.531.71212.4125018.821.826.431.311.112.1160018.921.928.131.411.812.4200018.721.527.431.811.312.2250018.220.426.230.811.211.9315016.518.624.528.911.311.8400014.716.622.927.211.812.4500014.715.820.925.512.112.5630013.615.720.92512.112.7800012.81317.321.912.3131000012.812.714.318.812.4131250012.612.613.516.613.214.21600012.412.112.814.911.912.8SPL29.631.937.541.124.525.3N1.21.52.73.60.60.7median 18.7median 20.4median 24.2median 27.2median 12.3median 13Delta2.62.73.44.12.22.6hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
SCHENKER Vision 14
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, R9 5980HS, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
Noise
-6%
-23%
1%
-3%
-16%
off / environment *
24.5
24.3
1%
30.5
-24%
24.7
-1%
25.1
-2%
30.5
-24%
Idle Minimum *
24.5
24.3
1%
33.3
-36%
24.7
-1%
25.2
-3%
30.5
-24%
Idle Average *
24.5
24.3
1%
33.3
-36%
24.7
-1%
25.2
-3%
30.5
-24%
Idle Maximum *
24.5
25.9
-6%
33.3
-36%
24.7
-1%
25.2
-3%
32.1
-31%
Load Average *
41
43.3
-6%
36.1
12%
36.8
10%
31
24%
43
-5%
Witcher 3 ultra *
41
44.6
-9%
36.8
10%
44
-7%
42.8
-4%
Load Maximum *
41
49.5
-21%
48.6
-19%
43.8
-7%
51.7
-26%
41.3
-1%

* ... smaller is better

温度

尽管噪音水平相当低,ROG Flow Z13在游戏过程中并没有变得特别热,因为我们可以在这里的背面记录到最高约44℃(约111°F)。即使在压力测试中,也没有超过50°C(约122°F)的标志。然而,由于你在游戏(要求高的游戏)时几乎不会把平板电脑拿在手里,所以你在这里不会有任何问题。此外,热空气被向上疏散,所以它不会成为一个麻烦。在日常工作中,机箱温度甚至没有达到30℃(约86°F)。

压力测试显示了一个有趣的情况。GPU的性能在35瓦时完全稳定,但处理器在最初的105瓦峰值消耗后,总是在23瓦和55瓦之间波动。55瓦的间隔在20分钟后变得更短,这也解释了从这时开始CPU温度降低的原因。这种CPU行为在Armoury Crate软件的所有性能模式下都是相同的,这意味着华硕应该在这里做更多的工作,因为我们更希望CPU性能恒定。测试结束后没有立即出现性能下降。

压力测试期间的CPU和GPU数据
压力测试期间的CPU和GPU数据
Max. Load
 44.9 °C45.3 °C44.7 °C 
 40.6 °C43 °C42.8 °C 
 37.5 °C37.8 °C37.5 °C 
Maximum: 45.3 °C
Average: 41.6 °C
47.3 °C48.3 °C42 °C
46.2 °C47 °C43.2 °C
39.9 °C41 °C40.2 °C
Maximum: 48.3 °C
Average: 43.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  50.2 °C | Room Temperature 20.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.3 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.3 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.8 °C / 100 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.9 °C / -16 F).
压力测试--正面
压力测试--正面
压力测试 - 背部
压力测试 - 背部
压力测试--背面(带脚架)
压力测试--背面(带脚架)
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Heat
-7%
-30%
11%
-15%
-19%
Maximum Upper Side *
45.3
49.7
-10%
53.6
-18%
45
1%
45
1%
51.8
-14%
Maximum Bottom *
48.3
56
-16%
49.9
-3%
47.2
2%
44.4
8%
52.8
-9%
Idle Upper Side *
29.2
28.8
1%
44.8
-53%
24.1
17%
40.2
-38%
37.3
-28%
Idle Bottom *
30
30.6
-2%
44.1
-47%
23.4
22%
39.2
-31%
37.7
-26%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

华硕集成了两个所谓的智能AMP扬声器,它们位于两侧的下部区域,向两侧投射声音。尽管机箱宽度很窄,但这实际上创造了一个轻微的立体声效果,而且扬声器总体上提供了一个体面的性能,但它们根本缺乏力度。这也被我们的音频测量所证实。麦克风也令人满意地完成了它们的工作,但大多数游戏者可能无论如何都会使用一个耳机。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.538.42531.535.93124.231.54032.930.95029.431.76325.328.8802428.610020.130.212520.235.316014.939.120018.748.425018.553.331516.459.540014.463.950012.861.163014.359.180011.758.910001260.7125011.166.4160011.865.8200011.369.5250011.266.5315011.364.2400011.864.8500012.163.6630012.161.2800012.356.91000012.459.71250013.264.61600011.949.9SPL24.576.6N0.637.9median 12.3median 60.7Delta2.27.231.929.529.631.626.927.727.626.423.526.523.430.222.232.220.644.520.25119.347.319.953.816.655.316.757.916.96113.363.112.264.811.167.812.968.611.170.112.372.611.573.811.57311.771.311.868.712.268.512.465.412.661.312.560.612.465.612.26224.781.90.650.3median 12.4median 64.82.55.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZEMicrosoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理--华硕耗尽电池

能源消耗

当你看一下处理器的功耗,然后考虑专用的GPU和其他组件,你会很快注意到,附带的100瓦电源适配器不足以满足高峰负荷时的电力需求。在压力测试中,我们在开始时测得的最大消耗为103瓦,因为电源适配器根本无法提供更多。在这些情况下,剩余的~40-50瓦都是从电池中提取的,这也可以从我们压力测试中的电池电量的下图中看出。随着处理器迅速被限制在55瓦(+35瓦的DGPU和系统其他部分),我们仍然测量到103瓦的消耗,而且电池仍然被使用了一些。因此,这个限制完全是由设备的电源适配器造成的;冷却系统当然可以处理更多(例如,更强大的图形卡版本)。

正如我们在压力测试中看到的,处理器的TDP总是周期性地波动,类似地,在压力测试中,功耗也在80-103瓦之间波动。在压力测试中大约20分钟后,处理器以55瓦运行的时间变得更短,这就是为什么电池电量再次增加。由于电池只在负载高峰期或只在非常短暂的时间内被 "耗尽",这对设备的运行没有影响,但这是否对电池的寿命有好处是另一回事。

闲置率也相当高,这是由于屏幕亮度高的缘故。2.5瓦的待机消耗绝对是太高了;华硕应该在这里做出改进。

100瓦的电源适配器是不够的...
100瓦的电源适配器是不够的...
...在高负荷下(如这里的压力测试),电池被反复耗尽。
...在高负荷下(如这里的压力测试),电池被反复耗尽。
Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.52 / 2.5 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 8.8 / 12.1 / 12.7 Watt
Load midlight 72.3 / 103.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.40
SCHENKER Vision 14
i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB, IPS, 2560x1440, 14.00
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe, IPS, 2880x1920, 13.00
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 2560x1440, 14.00
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
R9 5980HS, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00, IPS, 3840x2400, 13.40
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-6%
-20%
38%
-53%
9%
-19%
-84%
Idle Minimum *
8.8
6.7
24%
8.1
8%
3.9
56%
9.4
-7%
7.4
16%
8.2 ?(2.6 - 23, n=25)
7%
13.8 ?(2 - 64, n=185, last 2 years)
-57%
Idle Average *
12.1
12.6
-4%
12.9
-7%
8.5
30%
15.8
-31%
10.3
15%
12.6 ?(6.5 - 25, n=25)
-4%
19.1 ?(8 - 67, n=185, last 2 years)
-58%
Idle Maximum *
12.7
15.4
-21%
16.1
-27%
9.8
23%
24.1
-90%
13.4
-6%
17.2 ?(7.9 - 30, n=25)
-35%
26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=185, last 2 years)
-110%
Load Average *
72.3
85.7
-19%
102.4
-42%
48
34%
76.8
-6%
75.9
-5%
92 ?(45.9 - 129, n=25)
-27%
111.2 ?(32.1 - 202, n=185, last 2 years)
-54%
Witcher 3 ultra *
77.3
83
-7%
41.5
46%
154
-99%
Load Maximum *
103.1
110.9
-8%
135.8
-32%
63
39%
189.7
-84%
78
24%
139.1 ?(63 - 195, n=25)
-35%
250 ?(64.5 - 418, n=184, last 2 years)
-142%

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption during our The Witcher 3 test / stress test

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø77.3 (75.3-87.5)
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø95.6 (80.9-103)

Energy consumption with an external monitor

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø93.8 (89.8-103)
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø103 (103-103)
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø78.5 (76.2-81.7)
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø81.4 (79.7-86.9)

电池寿命

充电过程
充电过程

56Wh的电池和相对较高的消耗率的结合并不预示着特别长的电池运行时间,这也被我们的测试所证实。在调整亮度为150cd/m²(相当于我们测试设备最大亮度的35%)的情况下,我们在Wi-Fi或视频模式下获得了5:30至6小时。相比之下,我们的Wi-Fi测试在最大亮度下只运行了4小时多一点。顺便说一下,在我们的测试中,120赫兹模式并不影响运行时间。鉴于这些结果,我们不会推荐可选的4K面板,因为它可能会消耗更多的电力。

在设备开启的情况下,充满电需要大约100分钟,但在不到28分钟后,50%的容量又可以使用。

Battery Runtime
Witcher 3 ultra 150cd
0h 47min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 98)
5h 38min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 98)
4h 22min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 58min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 12min
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 56 Wh
SCHENKER Vision 14
i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 53 Wh
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC
R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 76 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 51.5 Wh
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 62 Wh
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
R9 5980HS, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 62 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
10%
98%
34%
20%
22%
28%
H.264
358
405
13%
616
72%
604
69%
411
15%
391 ?(56 - 747, n=95, last 2 years)
9%
WiFi v1.3
338
327
-3%
674
99%
456
35%
439
30%
347
3%
364 ?(57 - 745, n=188, last 2 years)
8%
Witcher 3 ultra
47
81.6 ?(47 - 155, n=22, last 2 years)
74%
Load
72
86
19%
161
124%
70
-3%
79
10%
107
49%
85.5 ?(36 - 173, n=150, last 2 years)
19%
Reader / Idle
1144
828
623
541 ?(57 - 1290, n=87, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 坚固和高质量的外壳,包括照明
+ 非常高的CPU性能
+ 良好的120赫兹IPS触摸屏
+ 非常有效和安静的冷却
+ 具有8条PCIe通道的eGPU连接

Cons

- 最慢的RTX 3050 Ti版本
- 电源适配器缺乏容量
- 雷电4没有充电功能
- USB 2.0

结论 - ROG Flow Z13以其良好的冷却效果给人留下深刻印象

在审查中。华硕ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE。测试设备由德国华硕提供。
在审查中。华硕ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE。测试设备由德国华硕提供。

新的华硕ROG Flow Z13是一款游戏平板电脑,也是目前市场上相当无敌的可转换产品。经过我们的审查,印象主要是正面的。除了非常快的Alder Lake CPU和稳定的游戏性能外,特别是冷却系统令人惊讶地有效和安静。你可以在游戏中使用集成的扬声器,没有任何问题。16:10格式的1200p显示屏也以良好的色彩还原和高亮度给人留下深刻印象。由于电池运行时间不是特别长,我们不建议使用可选的4K面板。

然而,也有一些地方有改进的余地。首先,CPU/GPU的组合相对不平衡,因为高端i9 CPU与最慢版本的GeForce RTX 3050 Ti相结合。酷睿i9提供了极高的性能,特别是在短时间的负载高峰和单核基准测试中,但酷睿i7-12700H在日常使用中会提供同样的性能,特别是一旦功率限制在55瓦时启动。此外,该处理器在负载高峰期需要高达114瓦的功率,除了100瓦的电源适配器外,该设备还必须借助于电池来提供足够的能量。有了可选的XG Mobile eGPU(RTX 3080或RX 6850M XT),图形性能可以大幅提高,而且由于良好的CPU性能,平板电脑在这里也不会出现瓶颈。在这方面,带有Core i5和iGPU的配置也很有趣,但不幸的是,它并没有在所有地区提供。

终于有了一款合适的游戏平板电脑。华硕通过ROG Flow Z13提供了一款强大的游戏平板电脑,具有良好的冷却效果。然而,桤木湖酷睿i9处理器有点矫枉过正,我们更希望看到更快的RTX 3050 Ti版本。

在配置方面也有改进的余地。除了PCIe 4.0和Thunderbolt 4等现代接口,一个缓慢的USB 2.0端口不知何故进入了Flow Z13。此外,在德国型号中,通过Thunderbolt 4端口供电也有问题。我们正在与制造商联系,一旦收到官方声明,我们将立即更新评论。此外,Armoury Crate软件的额外配置文件目前并没有真正增加任何价值;华硕应该再看看这里。

最后,还有德国的价格,2,100欧元(美国为1,899美元),这个价格并不低。与XG Mobile eGPU(RTX 3080)捆绑的价格甚至达到了令人印象深刻的3500欧元(约3920美元,目前在美国没有)。对于这个价格,强大的游戏笔记本电脑如Razer Blade 14已经可以买到了,你也可以买一个普通的平板电脑用于随身使用。偶尔在家玩游戏的用户也可以使用几乎所有的敞篷电脑,比如说 Surface Pro 8,例如,用雷电接口连接外部GPU,尽管CPU性能肯定没有那么高。

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE - 02/25/2022 v7
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
89 / 98 → 90%
Keyboard
82%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
66 / 80 → 83%
Weight
73 / 10-66 → 100%
Battery
66 / 95 → 69%
Display
88%
Games Performance
88%
Application Performance
96%
Temperature
84 / 95 → 89%
Noise
92 / 90 → 100%
Audio
73%
Camera
44 / 85 → 51%
Average
80%
87%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华硕ROG Flow Z13的评论。配备强大的Alder Lake i9处理器的游戏平板电脑
Andreas Osthoff, 2022-03- 1 (Update: 2022-03- 1)