结论
对于 Aorus Master 16 而言，纯粹的性能显然是首要考量。得益于其较高的 TDP 和 TGP 设置，处理器和显卡表现极为出色，得以尽情施展实力。 我们此次AM6J测试配置的其他部分同样配置精良，配备了2×16 GB DDR5内存和两块1 TB固态硬盘。技嘉在显示屏方面也毫不妥协：这款高刷新率的240 Hz OLED面板凭借出色的亮度、宽广的色域以及清晰的对比度脱颖而出。
在接口方面也几乎无可挑剔；例如，其中一个 USB-C 接口支持 USB4。主要的妥协在于噪音和发热。在高负载下，这款 16 英寸笔记本会变得相当烫手，而且最重要的是噪音很大。即使在空闲状态下，其风扇控制也远非理想，这一点我们稍后会详细讨论。 电池续航时间也不算特别充裕：尽管配备了99 Wh电池，这款游戏本的电量消耗得还是相当快。
Pros
Cons
价格与供货情况
在测试时，一款搭载 Core Ultra 9 275HX 和 GeForce RTX 5080 的类似配置，起售价约为 3,200 欧元（例如在 Computeruniverse 上）。
译者注：在美国，同款基于英特尔平台的 Aorus Master 16 配置在亚马逊上的售价约为 3,000 美元。
Table of Contents
规格
机箱、功能和输入设备
尽管 Master 16 价格不菲，但其机身主要由塑料制成。话虽如此，主机底座的刚性已绰绰有余。不过，机盖在抗扭转方面还有提升空间。 铰链同样如此，其结构可以更坚固一些，尤其是考虑到最大开合角度被严格限制在130°以内。购买者还必须接受深色表面容易留下指纹这一事实。不过，其做工质量几乎无可挑剔。 Aorus 重量约为 2.3 公斤，是本次对比评测中重量最轻的 16 英寸笔记本电脑。其竞争对手的重量则在 2.6 至 3.3 公斤之间。
无线模块方面还有改进空间。尽管支持 Wi-Fi 7，但在我们的测试中，其传输速率表现平平。 全高清网络摄像头的表现同样平平。相比之下，microSD卡读卡器的速度却出人意料地快。在物理接口方面，该笔记本除配备HDMI 2.1接口、音频插孔和RJ45以太网端口外，还提供了四个USB端口（见图）。 USB-C 端口支持 Power Delivery 充电和 DisplayPort 输出。
要打开机身，需要拆下 10 颗 Torx 螺丝。请注意：前置灯条通过一条线缆与底盖相连。内部，Master 16 配备两个 SO-DIMM 插槽和两个 M.2 插槽，所有插槽均已被占用。 我们认为这款游戏本的输入设备表现相对不错，但并不出众。配备三区RGB背光的键盘布局需要一些时间来适应。触控板的主要优势在于其宽敞的13.5 × 9厘米尺寸。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Average of class Gaming (718 - 4473, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UM | |
| Average Realtek 8922AE WiFi 7 PCI-E NIC (718 - 1772, n=2) | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Average of class Gaming (788 - 3208, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UM | |
| Average Realtek 8922AE WiFi 7 PCI-E NIC (1642 - 1791, n=2) | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
显示
与此前评测的搭载 Core Ultra 9 275HX 和 GeForce RTX 5090 的同系列机型一样，技嘉为该版本配备了 16:10 比例的 OLED 显示屏。 该面板分辨率为2,560 × 1,600像素，并支持HDR。尽管其平均亮度高达467 cd/m²，但高反射表面使其不太适合户外使用。
很大程度上得益于出厂校准，该显示屏的色彩还原相当准确，尽管仍有改进空间。其他亮点包括快速的响应时间和出色的黑位表现。不过，屏幕也存在典型的OLED弱点，例如闪烁现象。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 468 cd/m²
Contrast: 15600:1 (Black: 0.03 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 4 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.71}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.8 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.96}
88.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
95.9% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.597
CCT: 6626 K
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J Samsung ATNA60HU02-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Alienware 16 Area-51 AU Optronics B160QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 NE160QDM-NZC, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Samsung ATNA60HU01-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H ATNA60DL03-0 (SDC41AB), OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 NE160QDM-NM9, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16", 300 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | 1% | 4% | 2% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 95.9 | 96 0% | 99.1 3% | 99.5 4% | 95.3 -1% | 99.9 4% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 100 | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 100 0% | 98.8 -1% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 88.2 | 89.2 1% | 89.1 1% | 94.4 7% | 94.1 7% | 88.5 0% |
| Response Times | -2295% | -2001% | -19% | -31% | -3630% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 0.371 ? | 4.8 ? -1194% | 4.6 ? -1140% | 0.28 ? 25% | 0.24 ? 35% | 17.4 ? -4590% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 0.206 ? | 7.2 ? -3395% | 6.1 ? -2861% | 0.43 ? -109% | 0.43 ? -109% | 13 ? -6211% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 1158 ? | 1438 ? | 960 | 20253 | ||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 40 | 29 27% | 47 -18% | 75 -88% | ||
| Screen | -215% | -150% | 19% | -20% | 34% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 468 | 554 18% | 545 16% | 490.4 5% | 435 -7% | 888 90% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 467 | 532 14% | 536 15% | 498 7% | 437 -6% | 859 84% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 96 | 88 -8% | 89 -7% | 97 1% | 96 0% | 94 -2% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.03 | 0.52 -1633% | 0.41 -1267% | 0.08 -167% | ||
| Contrast (:1) | 15600 | 1065 -93% | 1329 -91% | 5438 -65% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4 | 2.81 30% | 1.6 60% | 3.2 20% | 2.42 39% | 3.3 17% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.59 | 8.32 -26% | 4 39% | 6.04 8% | 4.81 27% | 5.5 17% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.8 | 4.7 -24% | 2.4 37% | 1 74% | 3.11 18% | 3.8 -0% |
| Gamma | 2.597 85% | 2.3 96% | 2.25 98% | 2.24 98% | 2.48 89% | 2.46 89% |
| CCT | 6626 98% | 6476 100% | 6737 96% | 6373 102% | 6270 104% | 6267 104% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.65 | 0.8 | 0.84 | 2.03 | 1.5 | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -837% /
-485% | -717% /
-400% | 1% /
6% | -16% /
-18% | -1198% /
-890% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.206 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.112 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.094 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.8 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.371 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.289 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.082 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1158 Hz Amplitude: 40 % | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 1158 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1158 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7738 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
该测试配置显然属于高端类别。尤其是基于Zen 5架构的AMD处理器，堪称真正的性能怪兽。
测试条件
预装的 GiMATE 实用程序提供了多种性能配置文件，我们在测试中使用了“游戏模式”。不过，对于日常使用，我们建议不要使用“游戏模式”，因为其噪音水平极高。而“平衡模式”能让系统保持明显更安静的状态（见下表）。
| 模式 | 节能 |
| 平衡 | |
| 游戏 《赛博朋克2077》 噪音水平 | |
| 41 dB(A) | |
| 51 dB(A) | |
| 59 dB(A) | |
| 《赛博朋克2077》帧率（FHD/极高画质） | |
| 111.6 fps | |
| 135.4 fps | |
| 144.5 fps | |
| GPU功耗 | |
| 100 W | |
| 150 W | |
| 165 W | |
| CPU PL1 | |
| 65 W | |
| 90 W | |
| 145 W | |
| CPU PL2 | |
| 140 W | |
| 140 W | |
| 145 W | |
| Cinebench R15 多核得分 | |
| 4,972 分 | |
| 5,806 分 | |
| 5,893 分 |
处理器性能
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D 不仅能与英特尔的旗舰产品 Core Ultra 9 275HX 抗衡，甚至在整体性能上还以几个百分点的优势胜出。其 16 核、32 线程以及 128 MB 的 L3 缓存，足以说明一切。 正如我们的 Cinebench 循环测试所示，该处理器稳定的持续性能同样值得称赞。
Cinebench R15 多核耐力测试
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D | |
| Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (80619 - 84943, n=3) | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J (v8.20.8100) | |
| Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (10227 - 85542, n=101, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (230738 - 372155, n=3) | |
| Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (51376 - 372155, n=101, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (9630 - 9750, n=3) | |
| Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (2180 - 10115, n=101, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (32252 - 33636, n=3) | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Gaming (4424 - 33636, n=101, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (122088 - 196829, n=3) | |
| Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25115 - 196829, n=101, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (160619 - 163423, n=3) | |
| Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (39258 - 247074, n=101, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (2436 - 2517, n=3) | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (574 - 2531, n=101, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (42676 - 45384, n=3) | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J (v8.20.8100) | |
| Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (5509 - 45446, n=101, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (12271 - 89891, n=101, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J (v8.20.8100) | |
| Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (38765 - 44266, n=3) | |
系统与存储性能
因此，Master 16 在系统基准测试中同样位居对比组前列，这并不令人意外。其高速 SSD 为这些成绩做出了贡献，尽管某些竞争对手在此方面的表现略胜一筹。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | |
| Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (8859 - 10636, n=2) | |
| Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
| Average of class Gaming (5828 - 12414, n=92, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (11564 - 11806, n=2) | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
| Average of class Gaming (8810 - 11935, n=96, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (10793 - 19653, n=2) | |
| Average of class Gaming (6845 - 25323, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
| Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (14368 - 14805, n=2) | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Average of class Gaming (7602 - 19954, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (2126 - 2265, n=2) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1366 - 2409, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (1914 - 2017, n=2) | |
| Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Average of class Gaming (1386 - 2254, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (2547 - 2729, n=2) | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1343 - 2786, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
| Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (1691 - 1833, n=2) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1226 - 2334, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (335 - 366, n=2) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Average of class Gaming (220 - 532, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (309 - 333, n=2) | |
| Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Average of class Gaming (165 - 354, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Average of class Gaming (391 - 590, n=99, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (397 - 405, n=2) | |
| Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 10636 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| Average of class Gaming (21750 - 129946, n=101, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (56383 - 63173, n=3) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| Average of class Gaming (22956 - 118858, n=101, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (59750 - 66539, n=3) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
| Average of class Gaming (22297 - 135096, n=101, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (59506 - 72898, n=3) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (75.3 - 165.4, n=101, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (96.1 - 103.6, n=3) | |
* ... smaller is better
* ... smaller is better
持续读取性能：DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
GPU与游戏性能
GeForce RTX 5080 目前是英伟达性能第二强的笔记本显卡。其 16 GB GDDR7 显存在 2026 年绰绰有余，即使是运行要求苛刻的游戏，这款 16 英寸笔记本也极少遇到显存瓶颈。与 CPU 一样，该显卡的表现也令人满意且稳定。 我们在 3DMark 测试及游戏基准测试套件中均未发现任何异常。总体而言，Master 16 几乎可以在其原生 QHD+ 分辨率（2,560 × 1,600 像素）下，以最高画质设置流畅运行所有游戏，即使启用光线追踪功能也是如此。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 50397 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 41128 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 18453 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
| Average of class Gaming (47.3 - 169.9, n=111, last 2 years) | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
| Average of class Gaming (84.8 - 252, n=103, last 2 years) | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 280 | 252 | |||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 148.5 | ||||
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 177 | 175 | 123 | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 169.3 | 144.5 | 99.8 | ||
| Resident Evil Requiem (2026) | 168.3 | 87.5 | 56.9 | ||
| Death Stranding 2 (2026) | 109.5 | 87.5 | 67 | ||
| Crimson Desert (2026) | 106.8 | 94.9 | 73.2 | ||
| Pragmata (2026) | 140 | 101.9 | |||
| 007 First Light (2026) | 100.9 | 96.3 | 66.4 | ||
| Assassin's Creed Black Flag Resynced (2026) | 97 | 64 | 50 |
《赛博朋克2077》极致画质帧率图表
排放与能源
系统噪音
迄今为止，这款16英寸笔记本最大的缺点是风扇噪音过大。在高负载状态下，系统在“游戏模式”下的噪音接近60 dB(A)，这一噪音水平对大多数用户来说都令人感到不适。 此外，即使在笔记本电脑空闲或执行简单任务时，风扇转速有时也会显著提升——而在这一方面，其他制造商的表现更为出色。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 28 / 29 / 35 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 58 / 60 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) | ||
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Alienware 16 Area-51 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 16% | 11% | 20% | 16% | 12% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 25 | 23.6 6% | 24 4% | 22.9 8% | 23 8% | 24.1 4% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 28 | 25.4 9% | 24 14% | 22.9 18% | 23 18% | 25.6 9% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 29 | 27.8 4% | 30.1 -4% | 22.9 21% | 23 21% | 25.6 12% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 35 | 28.1 20% | 30.1 14% | 26.3 25% | 23 34% | 25.6 27% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 58 | 28.8 50% | 41.1 29% | 27.8 52% | 40.46 30% | 47.2 19% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 59 | 50.4 15% | 54.2 8% | 54.2 8% | 59.75 -1% | 55.5 6% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 60 | 56.4 6% | 54.2 10% | 53.9 10% | 59.75 -0% | 55.5 7% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
除了产生更多噪音外，Master 16 在某些区域的温度也比部分竞品更高。在使用 FurMark 和 Prime95 进行压力测试时，其顶部和底部的部分区域温度均超过了 50 °C。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-6.2 °C / -11.2 F).
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Alienware 16 Area-51 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 18% | 13% | 18% | 12% | 11% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 50 | 43.8 12% | 39.6 21% | 42.6 15% | 39 22% | 46.3 7% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 52 | 40 23% | 49.7 4% | 41.2 21% | 51 2% | 44.3 15% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 35.8 | 26.3 | 32.6 | 36 | 30 | |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 35.2 | 27.3 | 32.4 | 38 | 31.1 |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
整体音质尚可至良好，但低音表现仍存在常见不足。
Aorus Master 16 AM6J audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
Alienware 16 Area-51 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.36 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
功耗与电池续航时间
虽然英特尔/RTX 5090版本似乎受到了空闲功耗漏洞的影响，但当前型号的功耗读数却相当普通，约为14至19瓦。
不过，较旧的测试机型在电池续航方面表现更佳。在我们的Wi-Fi测试中，其续航时间略低于7小时，而AMD/RTX 5080版本则仅能维持5小时多一点。
| Off / Standby | 0.1 / 1.4 Watt |
| Idle | 14.4 / 16.8 / 19.3 Watt |
| Load |
151 / 338 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Alienware 16 Area-51 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -48% | 3% | -64% | -31% | -2% | 3% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 14.4 | 27 -88% | 10.8 25% | 28.5 -98% | 25 -74% | 13.2 8% | 13.1 ? 9% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 16.8 | 33.5 -99% | 17.7 -5% | 38.8 -131% | 29.4 -75% | 16.8 -0% | 19.1 ? -14% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 19.3 | 41.4 -115% | 18.8 3% | 45.6 -136% | 31 -61% | 17.1 11% | 24.7 ? -28% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 151 | 124.7 17% | 139.4 8% | 132.2 12% | 109 28% | 164.2 -9% | 111.8 ? 26% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 272 | 256 6% | 295 -8% | 318 -17% | 290 -7% | 284 -4% | |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 338 | 367.2 -9% | 359.3 -6% | 384 -14% | 325 4% | 392.8 -16% | 261 ? 23% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 249 | 291 | 319 | 292 | 282 |
* ... smaller is better
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 99 Wh | Alienware 16 Area-51 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 96 Wh | Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 90 Wh | Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 99 Wh | Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 99 Wh | Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 99.8 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -46% | 50% | 4% | 29% | 13% | 36% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 5.2 | 2.8 -46% | 7.8 50% | 5.4 4% | 6.7 29% | 5.9 13% | 7.05 ? 36% |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 3.1 | 6.91 ? | |||||
| H.264 (h) | 11 | 5.8 | 7.95 ? | ||||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd (h) | 0.8 | ||||||
| Load (h) | 1.5 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 1.468 ? |
Notebookcheck 综合评分
对于能够忍受风扇有时过大的噪音——或者从一开始就切换到性能更适中的模式——的用户来说，Aorus Master 16 是一款性能非常强劲的游戏笔记本电脑。
Aorus Master 16 AM6J
- 07/29/2026 v8
Florian Glaser
Total Sustainability Score: 可能替代方案的比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 83.5%  | Aorus Master 16 AM6J AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $4,899.99 GIGABYTE - AORUS Master 16 G... 2. $3,499.99 GIGABYTE - AORUS Master 16 G... 3. GIGABYTE - AORUS MASTER 16 G... | 2.3 kg | 24.5 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED |
2. 85.7%  | Alienware 16 Area-51 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $2,426.16 Alienware 16 Area-51 Gaming ... 2. $3,799.99 Alienware 16 Area-51 Gaming ... 3. $3,358.57 Alienware 18 Area-51 Gaming ... List Price: 3500 USD | 3.3 kg | 28.5 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
3. 87.3%  | Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,323.97 ASUS ROG Strix G16 (2025) Ga... 2. $2,355.00 ASUS ROG Strix G16 (2025) Ga... 3. $2,424.99 ASUS ROG Strix G16 (2025) Ga... List Price: 3299€ | 2.6 kg | 30.8 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
4. 87.5%  | Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 4200 USD | 2.6 kg | 26.65 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED |
5. 85.1%  | Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 4.75 Euro | 2.5 kg | 29.9 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED |
6. 89.4%  | Schenker XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB NVMe | Amazon: List Price: 4480€ | 2.9 kg | 27.9 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI Mini-LED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
