Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar联想Legion 5i 16 G9 评测--配备 Raptor Lake-HX 和人工智能引擎的快速游戏笔记本电脑
联想刚刚在今年的 CES 上发布了它的新游戏本Legion 5i 16 G9，我们已经有机会对它进行了测试。联想的这款中端游戏笔记本介于更便宜的 LOQ 系列和更昂贵的Legion 5 Pro 之间。它配备了全新的 Raptor-Lake-HX 处理器，即 酷睿 i7-14650HX的 115 瓦版本 RTX 4060 笔记本电脑(包括高级 Optimus）和快速的 240-Hz WQXGA 面板，新的Legion 5i 16 完全专注于性能，省去了大量的机箱照明。此外，制造商还使用了特殊的 AI 芯片--据称联想的 AI Engine+ 将进一步改善用户的游戏体验。
我们测试的是Legion 5i 16IRX G9 版本，配备酷睿 i7 处理器、RTX 4060 笔记本电脑、240 赫兹显示屏、16 GB 内存以及 1 TB PCIe SSD，售价 1610 美元。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89.1 % | 02/2024 | Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 25.2 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 89.2 % | 10/2023 | SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 26.1 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 85.1 % | 09/2023 | HP Victus 16-r0077ng i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 24 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 | |
| 87.3 % | 09/2023 | Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 25.9 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 87.7 % | 08/2023 | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 25.2 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 85.6 % | 09/2023 | HP Victus 16-r0076TX i5-13500HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 22.9 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 | |
| 88.3 % | 09/2023 | Alienware m16 R1 Intel i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 3 kg | 25.4 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 87.9 % | 05/2023 | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 26.8 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
外壳 -Legion 部分采用铝制外壳。
作为一款游戏笔记本电脑，该设备的外壳非常光滑，如果你喜欢更醒目的东西，那么Legion 5i 很可能会让你失望。除了黑色键盘和边框外，它没有更多的色彩对比，此外，联想还决定不安装任何外壳照明。只有电源按钮周围的 LED 状态指示灯会亮起四种颜色，取决于正在使用的能源配置文件。至少这意味着你还可以在大学等更专业的场合使用这款笔记本电脑。
在质量方面，虽然只有机盖是铝制的，但机壳却给人一种高端的感觉。底座完全由塑料制成，但顶部的手感仍然非常好。只有底部比较粗糙，给人一种廉价的感觉。该机箱的一个优点是不易沾染灰尘和指纹。它的整体稳定性很好，但这并不令人惊讶，因为底座非常厚（后部最多 2 厘米）。显示屏铰链设置合理，单手即可打开笔记本电脑；最大打开角度为 180 度。
它重达 2.4 千克，绝非轻如鸿毛，但在同类产品中，我们的测试样品表现出色。它的占地面积也使其成为最紧凑的机型之一。230 瓦的电源需要额外增加 869 克。
连接性 - 联想放弃了 Thunderbolt
在Legion 5i 16（以及Legion Pro 5i）上，联想决定不安装 Thunderbolt 4，但反过来，它的三面都分布着其他不错的端口。背面是电源接口和 HDMI 端口，左侧有三个 USB 端口，右侧还有两个 USB 接口。所有视频输出都通过 dGPU 连接，这意味着在连接外部显示器时，Nvidia GPU 始终处于激活状态。
SD 读卡器
设备右侧的 microSD 读卡器不能完全读卡，而且速度也不是特别快。结合我们的参考卡（Angelibird AV Pro V60），我们测得的传输速率较低，约为 30 MB/s。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 (PNY EliteX-Pro60 V60 256 GB) | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 (PNY EliteX-Pro60 V60 256 GB) | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
交流
联想为Legion 配备了英特尔的 AX211 WLAN 模块，除了蓝牙 5.3 之外，它还掌握了当前 6 GHz 网络的 Wi-Fi-6E 标准。与华硕的参考路由器配合使用，它的传输速率总体上非常出色，尽管有时竞争对手的传输速率仍然更快。不过，在实际使用中你应该不会注意到这一点，而且在测试过程中，我们从未遇到过任何信号质量问题。此外，这款笔记本电脑还配备了一个千兆以太网端口，用于有线连接。
| Networking | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
网络摄像头
Legion 5i 的 1080p 网络摄像头可以在光线良好的条件下拍摄出漂亮的照片。另一方面，它不支持任何额外的工作室效果，也没有通过 Windows Hello 进行面部识别的红外传感器。右侧有一个开关，可以关闭网络摄像头。
维护
底壳部分使用普通的十字头螺钉连接，但卸下这些螺钉后，底壳仍能牢牢固定。您应该使用合适的工具将其撬开。笔记本内部的维护选项很不错，除了两个内存插槽外，还有两个 M.2-2280 SSD 插槽。WLAN 模块和电池（旋入式）也可以更换。
输入设备 - 1.5 毫米升降器，不带 RGB 灯光
黑色键盘（包括专用数字小键盘和偏移方向键）是我们在其他Legion 机型上已经熟悉的键盘。它的键程为 1.5 毫米，总的来说，在上面打字感觉很舒适。除了游戏，用这款键盘输入较长的文字也不成问题。我们的测试配置配备了背光键盘，有两种亮度设置；您还可以选择配备彩色四区背光的键盘。
点击板的位置略微偏左，其大小（12 x 7.5 厘米）非常适合正常的指针操作--效果也绝对不错。点击板的底部可以向下按压，但不幸的是，按压时会发出很大的噪音。在游戏时，大多数用户都会使用游戏手柄或鼠标。这些都可以连接到设备的两侧。
显示屏 - 240 赫兹 IPS
联想提供两种不同的 WQXGA 雾面显示屏，分辨率为 2,560 x 1,600 像素。除了刷新率为 165 赫兹、亮度为 300 尼特的版本外，您还可以选择刷新率为 240 赫兹、亮度为 500 尼特的版本。后者还支持 HDR，我们的测试设备安装的就是这一款。主观而言，屏幕看起来非常不错；内容看起来非常清晰，色彩鲜艳，即使是浅色区域也不会出现颗粒感。不过，在调高亮度观看暗色图像时，你会发现一些明显的光晕。
我们的面板最高亮度为 528 cd/m²，平均亮度为 500 cd/m²，这意味着已经达到了目标值。它的黑色值为 0.33，表现尚可，最大对比度超过 1,500:1。显示屏的反应速度很快，与其他 IPS 竞争对手处于同一水平。总而言之，该屏幕非常适合游戏，其数值也优于竞争对手。它还支持 HDR 内容（但 HDR 必须通过 Windows 设置手动激活）。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 519 cd/m²
Contrast: 1594:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
74.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
72.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 NE160QDM-NZ3, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) BOE0AF0 (), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | HP Victus 16-r0077ng CMN162D, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10 | Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 AUOC1A5 (B160QAN03.L), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 BOE NJ NE160QDM-NYC, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | HP Victus 16-r0076TX Chi Mei CMN1629, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10 | Alienware m16 R1 Intel BOE NE16NYB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 AU Optronics B160QAN03.1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -4% | -6% | -2% | -3% | -5% | -5% | -1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 72.4 | 68.3 -6% | 66.7 -8% | 70.5 -3% | 69.3 -4% | 67.5 -7% | 67.7 -6% | 71.2 -2% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 98.6 -1% | 98 -2% | 98.9 -1% | 100 0% | 97.5 -2% | 97.2 -3% | 98.8 -1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 74.1 | 69.6 -6% | 69 -7% | 72.6 -2% | 70 -6% | 69.7 -6% | 70 -6% | 73.3 -1% |
| Response Times | 9% | 0% | 29% | 12% | 32% | 42% | -18% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 12.5 ? | 13.2 ? -6% | 13.3 ? -6% | 7.2 ? 42% | 10.7 ? 14% | 6.18 ? 51% | 4 ? 68% | 14.5 ? -16% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 8.7 ? | 6.6 ? 24% | 8.2 ? 6% | 7.4 ? 15% | 7.8 ? 10% | 7.62 ? 12% | 7.3 ? 16% | 10.4 ? -20% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||||||
| Screen | -67% | -16% | -24% | -14% | -21% | -51% | -20% | |
| Brightness middle | 526 | 376 -29% | 308 -41% | 407 -23% | 371.6 -29% | 290 -45% | 306 -42% | 405.7 -23% |
| Brightness | 500 | 358 -28% | 285 -43% | 369 -26% | 343 -31% | 275 -45% | 302 -40% | 368 -26% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 88 1% | 85 -2% | 85 -2% | 84 -3% | 82 -6% | 89 2% | 87 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.33 -0% | 0.25 24% | 0.45 -36% | 0.44 -33% | 0.21 36% | 0.3 9% | 0.38 -15% |
| Contrast | 1594 | 1139 -29% | 1232 -23% | 904 -43% | 845 -47% | 1381 -13% | 1020 -36% | 1068 -33% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 2.74 -128% | 1.3 -8% | 1.43 -19% | 1.52 -27% | 1.7 -42% | 2.57 -114% | 1.65 -38% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.1 | 6.78 -223% | 2.76 -31% | 3.58 -70% | 2.68 -28% | 3.57 -70% | 4.26 -103% | 4.2 -100% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1 | 0.88 12% | 0.92 8% | 1.07 -7% | 0.33 67% | 0.93 7% | 0.85 15% | 0.53 47% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 3.57 -175% | 1.7 -31% | 1.13 13% | 1.2 8% | 1.5 -15% | 3.3 -154% | 1.2 8% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.4 92% | 2.167 102% | 2.5 88% | 2.1 105% | 2.1 105% | 1.997 110% | 2.3 96% |
| CCT | 6391 102% | 7246 90% | 6767 96% | 6526 100% | 6503 100% | 6538 99% | 6895 94% | 6453 101% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -21% /
-42% | -7% /
-12% | 1% /
-12% | -2% /
-8% | 2% /
-10% | -5% /
-28% | -13% /
-16% |
* ... smaller is better
Legion 5i 的显示屏经过预校准，有几种不同的色彩配置文件可供选择。我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件（X-Rite i1 Pro2），使用 "原生 "配置文件对其进行了分析。它的显示效果已经非常出色，灰度和色彩的 DeltaE-2000 偏差都没有超过 3。此外，我们没有发现色彩偏差，用户校准甚至可以说是多余的。我们也许可以通过自己的校准（可在上面免费下载）来提高描绘质量，但这只是可测量的，而不是可见的。加上其完整的 sRGB 覆盖范围，该面板可以放心地用于编辑照片或视频。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 12.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 6.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
由于Legion 5i 16 显示屏亮度高且表面采用磨砂处理，因此在户外或明亮的环境中也能很好地使用。IPS 的视角稳定性还不错，但从对角线上方观看会导致画面变亮。
性能 - Raptor Lake-HX Refresh 和 Ada Lovelace
联想为Legion 5i 16 G9 提供了五种不同的英特尔 HX 处理器，不过两种较弱的型号仍属于去年的第 13 代处理器。旗舰版最多可配备酷睿 i9-14900HX，而我们的测试样品配备的是酷睿 i7-14650HX。可用的显卡包括当前的 Nvidia 型号GeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑、4060 笔记本电脑和 4070 笔记本电脑，最大 TGP 为 115 瓦，并配有用于高级 Optimus 显卡切换的 MUX 开关。
测试条件
联想在预装的 Vantage 应用程序中提供了三种不同的性能模式，还有一种用户可以广泛调整的自定义模式（CPU/GPU 功耗限制、CPU/GPU 温度限制、CPU/GPU 动态提升）。因此，你可以尽情发挥这些功能。我们在下表列出了三种预定义设置的相应参数（安静模式、平衡模式 和 性能模式）。
| 能源概况 | CPU 负载 | CB R23 Multi | GPU 负载 | Time Spy 显卡 | 赛博朋克 2077 QHD Ultra | 风扇最大排放量 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 静音模式 | 65->55 瓦 | 16,720 点 | 65 瓦 | 8,443 点 | 35.4 fps | 34.6 dB(A) |
| 平衡模式 | 120->70 瓦 | 19,897 分 | 80 瓦 | 9,749 分 | 43.4 帧/秒 | 49.8 分贝(A) |
| 性能模式 | 140->100 瓦 | 24,455 分 | 125 瓦 | 11,267 分 | 49.7 帧/秒 | 55.7 dB(A) |
我们使用性能模式进行了以下基准测试和测量，因为在该模式下，设备的游戏性能要高得多。当然，风扇的声音最终也会变大，但即使在平衡模式下，游戏时风扇的声音也会非常大，而且无论如何你都可能需要一个耳机，所以你不妨使用性能模式。可以通过 Fn+Q 组合键选择配置文件，电源按钮上的彩色 LED 状态指示灯会显示当前使用的模式（红色：性能模式，白色：平衡模式，蓝色：安静模式，紫色：调整模式）。在简单的日常工作中，您可以轻松使用静音模式，同时经常可以享受到完全静音的设备。在使用电池时，不能使用性能模式。
联想为Legion 5i 16 的 AI Engine+ 配备了自己的 LA1 AI 芯片，可以与平衡模式一起激活。据说它能自动识别游戏并优化笔记本电脑的性能，因此温度和风扇噪音都会增加。但总的来说，这并不是什么新鲜事，在早期的机型上已经可以看到类似的功能，即玩游戏时自动切换到 性能模式。另一方面，在使用新的 AI Engine+ 时，我们并没有发现与平衡模式相比有什么不同，设备的性能往往与性能模式相同，甚至更差。
处理器 - 酷睿 i7-14650HX
新的 酷睿 i7-14650HX的继任者 酷睿 i7-13700HX的继任者，提供相同的核心配置（8 倍性能 + 8 倍效率）和略高的时钟频率（高达 5.2 GHz）--但在总体架构方面没有任何变化。在Legion 5i 16 中，新 HX CPU 的功耗在短时间内达到 140 瓦，然后平衡到 100 瓦。由此产生的性能非常出色，与旧款 13700HX 相比优势达 10%。AMD 型号的性能也明显较差。在单核测试中，Legion 也名列前茅。在电池使用情况下，它的功耗限制在 50 瓦，因此多核性能下降了约 40%（CB R23 Multi：14202 分）。
更多 CPU 基准测试结果请访问技术版块 。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 -2! | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 -2! | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX -3! | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34613, n=232, last 2 years) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (527 - 2235, n=230, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=230, last 2 years) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (169 - 855, n=230, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=234, last 2 years) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 318, n=233, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=228, last 2 years) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=229, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=229, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Geekbench 6.2 / Multi-Core | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Average of class Gaming (5340 - 18590, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Geekbench 6.2 / Single-Core | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1599 - 3095, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=234, last 2 years) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (158 - 2210, n=234, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=232, last 2 years) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=226, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 4.47, n=229, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| Average of class Gaming (3069 - 60169, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| Average of class Gaming (18567 - 252486, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Average of class Gaming (10291 - 134044, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2409, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| Average of class Gaming (1518 - 31796, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=226, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
系统性能
Legion 5i 16 是一款反应非常迅速的设备，所有输入都能毫不犹豫地执行。只是在启动游戏时系统会短暂挂起，但这与高级 Optimus 图形切换功能有关。你可以通过激活普通 Optimus 切换功能来避免这种情况，但这样就无法获得最佳性能。在测试过程中，我们的测试设备从未出现过任何问题（死机等）。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=198, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Average of class Gaming (8300 - 12334, n=197, last 2 years) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (6662 - 11833, n=197, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=197, last 2 years) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2334, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2514, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=194, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (157.9 - 328, n=163, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Average of class Gaming (421 - 824, n=209, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 7645 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| Average of class Gaming (21842 - 92565, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Average of class Gaming (24879 - 90647, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (21619 - 103259, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 152.5, n=222, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在我们的标准化延迟测试（网上冲浪、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载）中，使用当前 BIOS 版本的测试设备在使用实时音频应用程序时显示出一些限制。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
如前所述，Legion 有两个固态硬盘插槽，我们的测试设备安装的是 1 TB 版本的三星 PM9A1（980 Pro 的 OEM 版本），用户在首次启动笔记本电脑后可自由使用的容量为 888 GB。PCIe-4.0固态硬盘的总体性能非常出色，但在长期负载的情况下，它并不能保持稳定。在日常使用中，这应该不会造成任何限制，但额外的冷却器（或散热器）可以解决这个问题。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里。
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
在测试设备中，联想安装了当前的 英伟达GeForce RTX 4060 笔记本电脑你甚至可以通过 Vantage 应用程序对 GPU 进行超频。在我们的测试中，其最高时钟频率为 2430 MHz。通过 MUX 开关支持高级 Optimus，这在我们的测试中运行稳定，但你也可以完全关闭处理器的 iGPU。
RTX 4060 笔记本电脑在基准测试中表现非常出色，仅输给了RTX-4070 两款机型--不过，与HP Victus 的差距并不大。GPU 的性能在长期负载下保持完全稳定，但在电池使用情况下，GPU 只能消耗 50 瓦。这导致性能损失略高于 30%。更多 GPU 基准测试请访问。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 32891 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 25376 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 11731 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (19 - 28, n=32) | |
| Average of class Gaming (9 - 142, n=182, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (40 - 53, n=32) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=189, last 2 years) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (189 - 452, n=32) | |
| Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
总的来说，这款笔记本电脑的游戏性能非常出色，达到了 RTX 4060 笔记本电脑的高端水平。所有当前的游戏都能以 QHD 和最大细节流畅运行，即使是《赛博朋克 2077》或《现代战争 3》等要求苛刻的游戏也不例外。只有光线追踪技术可能会导致一些问题，明智的做法是使用 DLSS 等升频技术。此外，它的游戏性能完全保持稳定，即使长时间运行也是如此。更多游戏基准测试 这里。
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=227, last 2 years) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (6.38 - 167.7, n=218, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
| GTA V (2015) | 186 | 182.8 | 120.2 | 89 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 229 | 97.2 | 83 | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 209 | 189.7 | 179.9 | 168.7 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 154.2 | 106.3 | 77.5 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 180.8 | 171 | 130.9 | ||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 161 | 155 | 147 | 111 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 243 | 210 | 130 | ||
| F1 2021 (2021) | 464 | 380 | 292 | 146.7 | 104.6 |
| F1 22 (2022) | 296 | 287 | 217 | 71.4 | 45.2 |
| F1 23 (2023) | 306 | 292 | 207 | 63.7 | 39.4 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 133.1 | 110.4 | 95.3 | 81.8 | 49.7 |
| Assassin's Creed Mirage (2023) | 93 | 72 | |||
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023 (2023) | 134 | 121 | 92 | 86 | 58 |
排放--响亮但冷静
噪音排放
Legion 5i 16 的两个风扇都有很多工作要做，如果不使用静音模式，它们会经常在执行简单任务时旋转。在高负载情况下，设备的噪音会达到 55 分贝（A），但老实说，我们在平衡模式下测得的近 50 分贝（A）的噪音实在太大了，在没有耳机的情况下根本无法正常玩游戏。因此，根据游戏的不同，最好还是检查一下安静模式下的性能，因为 35 分贝（A）的音量会让人感觉舒服很多。我们没有注意到测试设备发出任何其他电子噪音。
| 能耗曲线 | 3DMark 06 | Witcher 3 | 赛博朋克 2077 自由魅影 | 压力测试 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 静音模式 | 34.6 dB(A) | 34.6 dB(A) | 30.4 dB(A) | 34.6 dB(A) |
| 平衡模式 | 34.6 dB(A) | 49.8 dB(A) | 49.8 dB(A) | 49.8 dB(A) |
| 性能模式 | 45.5 dB(A) | 55.7 dB(A) | 53.1 dB(A) | 55.7 dB(A) |
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 24 / 28.8 / 32 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 45.5 / 55.7 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 | Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Solidigm SSDPFINW512GZL | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N | HP Victus 16-r0076TX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i5-13500HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF | Alienware m16 R1 Intel NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Kioxia KXG70ZNV512G | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 8% | 2% | 4% | 10% | 9% | 2% | 12% | |
| off / environment * | 24 | 23 4% | 25 -4% | 23 4% | 22.9 5% | 21.57 10% | 25 -4% | 23 4% |
| Idle Minimum * | 24 | 23 4% | 28 -17% | 23 4% | 23.1 4% | 23.68 1% | 25 -4% | 23.1 4% |
| Idle Average * | 28.8 | 28.48 1% | 29 -1% | 23 20% | 23.1 20% | 23.68 18% | 26 10% | 23.1 20% |
| Idle Maximum * | 32 | 28.48 11% | 30 6% | 27.66 14% | 27.7 13% | 23.68 26% | 27 16% | 26.6 17% |
| Load Average * | 45.5 | 30 34% | 43 5% | 53.62 -18% | 33.3 27% | 39.44 13% | 52 -14% | 34.7 24% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 53.1 | 54.12 -2% | 46 13% | 53.5 -1% | 54 -2% | 55.4 -4% | 51 4% | 47.6 10% |
| Load Maximum * | 55.7 | 54.12 3% | 48 14% | 53.5 4% | 54 3% | 55.37 1% | 53 5% | 54.8 2% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
Legion 上的一些位置在空闲模式下已经明显发热，但反过来，其在负载情况下的低表面温度却让我们大吃一惊。即使在压力测试中，我们也只在顶部测得略高于 40°C 的温度，而在底座底部测得的温度则略高于 43°C。这些都是极好的结果，而且在操作设备时没有任何限制。
除了使用性能模式，我们还使用平衡模式进行了压力测试，并将结果汇总到下图中。在这两种模式下，你可以看到处理器的消耗量波动很大，但 GPU 的消耗量保持不变，这就是两种模式的明显区别所在。在性能模式下，图形处理器的功耗为 115 瓦，而在平衡模式下，我们测得的功耗略高于 60 瓦。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.9 °C / 80.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+2 °C / 3.6 F).
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | HP Victus 16-r0076TX Intel Core i5-13500HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Alienware m16 R1 Intel Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -3% | -13% | -6% | 9% | -3% | -18% | -4% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 40.4 | 46 -14% | 51 -26% | 48 -19% | 40.6 -0% | 48 -19% | 49 -21% | 42.8 -6% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 43.8 | 44 -0% | 54 -23% | 59 -35% | 42 4% | 48 -10% | 48 -10% | 50 -14% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 30.3 | 32 -6% | 37 -22% | 28 8% | 27.8 8% | 29.6 2% | 40 -32% | 29.6 2% |
| Idle Bottom * | 35.3 | 33 7% | 29 18% | 28 21% | 26.6 25% | 30.2 14% | 39 -10% | 34 4% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
两个立体声扬声器（每个 2 瓦）只能提供一般的音效，足以播放一些视频和背景音乐。不过，在玩游戏时，扬声器无论如何也不会让你受益，因为风扇的声音太大了。
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Alienware m16 R1 Intel audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理
耗电量
我们在该设备的功耗方面没有发现什么大的意外，在空闲模式下测得的最大功耗约为 20 瓦，考虑到其大显示屏和高亮度，这还是可以接受的。在压力测试中，其最大功耗曾一度达到 247 瓦，但随后立即降至 230 瓦。因此，如果使用性能模式，230 瓦的电源将达到极限。在平衡模式下，笔记本电脑的耗电量稳定在 180 瓦左右。
| Off / Standby | 0.27 / 1.2 Watt |
| Idle | 15.4 / 19.7 / 20.7 Watt |
| Load |
102.6 / 246.6 Watt |
   
| |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | HP Victus 16-r0077ng i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10 | Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Solidigm SSDPFINW512GZL, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | HP Victus 16-r0076TX i5-13500HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10 | Alienware m16 R1 Intel i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Kioxia KXG70ZNV512G, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 18% | 21% | 4% | 21% | 2% | 3% | -27% | 9% | -6% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 15.4 | 11 29% | 8 48% | 17.2 -12% | 9.4 39% | 16.12 -5% | 10 35% | 24.5 -59% | 13 ? 16% | 13.9 ? 10% |
| Idle Average * | 19.7 | 15.2 23% | 13 34% | 19.3 2% | 15.5 21% | 20.47 -4% | 14 29% | 29.2 -48% | 17.1 ? 13% | 19.2 ? 3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 20.7 | 16 23% | 22 -6% | 21.2 -2% | 24.4 -18% | 22.11 -7% | 21 -1% | 34.3 -66% | 21.5 ? -4% | 27 ? -30% |
| Load Average * | 102.6 | 64 38% | 86 16% | 90 12% | 74.1 28% | 94.8 8% | 119 -16% | 98.7 4% | 96.4 ? 6% | 111.4 ? -9% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 191.3 | 179 6% | 141.8 26% | 168 12% | 112.9 41% | 166.9 13% | 186.7 2% | 178.6 7% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 246.6 | 280 -14% | 233 6% | 211 14% | 206.5 16% | 237 4% | 323 -31% | 249.6 -1% | 214 ? 13% | 251 ? -2% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
Legion 5i 16 的电池容量为 80 瓦时，是同类产品中容量最小的。在 150 cd/m²（测试设备全亮度的 61%）条件下，视频播放时间约为 9.5 小时，WLAN 测试时间约为 7.5 小时（最大亮度下约为 5.5 小时）。在负载情况下，笔记本电脑在 46 分钟后就已经耗尽，而在最大亮度下播放 HDR 视频也只持续了 2:14 小时。在选择 240 Hz 时，我们的 WLAN 测试运行时间降至 5:27 小时（150 cd/m²）和 4:33 小时（全亮）。
在设备打开的情况下，充满电需要 106 分钟，大约 60 分钟后就能充满 80%。在 Vantage 应用程序中，您还有一个名为 "快速充电 "的选项，可以加快前 60% 的充电速度。使用该模式充满电仅需 69 分钟（31 分钟后达到 80%）。
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | HP Victus 16-r0077ng i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | HP Victus 16-r0076TX i5-13500HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | Alienware m16 R1 Intel i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 77% | -4% | 14% | 24% | 17% | -14% | -33% | 12% | |
| H.264 | 576 | 609 6% | 385 -33% | 459 -20% | 336 -42% | 400 ? -31% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 444 | 501 13% | 426 -4% | 376 -15% | 425 -4% | 531 20% | 286 -36% | 205 -54% | 367 ? -17% |
| Load | 46 | 143 211% | 88 91% | 70 52% | 70 52% | 62 35% | 41 -11% | 84.4 ? 83% | |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 91 | 80.6 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论 -Legion 5i 16 性能卓越
总而言之，新款联想Legion 5i 16 在我们的测试中给人留下了非常好的印象。联想将注意力集中在最重要的功能上，提供了快速的组件和出色的 240-Hz IPS 显示屏，开箱即可准确显示色彩，而且无需 PWM。它的游戏性能非常出色，你可以在最高分辨率和设置下运行当前的游戏，只是在光线追踪时无法绕过 DLSS 升频。新的 Raptor-Lake-HX 处理器绝不是高效的奇迹，但它的性能很好。
同时，笔记本电脑的散热装置确保其性能在任何时候都能得到发挥。此外，我们喜欢各种能耗配置文件的分布，联想在 CPU 和 GPU 设置方面为用户提供了大量自定义选项。在玩游戏时，设备依然出奇地凉爽，但反过来，两个风扇的声音也相当大，这意味着在游戏过程中，耳机是必不可少的。
出色的性能和令人印象深刻的 240-Hz 显示屏：联想Legion 5i 16 是一款快速的中端游戏机，将性能放在首位。不过，它的人工智能功能目前还只是个噱头。
联想新推出的 "AI Engine+"（人工智能引擎+）本应在人工智能芯片的帮助下提高游戏性能，但在我们的测试中却没有发挥作用。它可能会通过更新得到改进，但就目前而言，你可能需要激活手动性能模式。有几点可以看出，联想节省了一些成本，因为这款笔记本电脑没有配备 Thunderbolt 或 2.5 GBit/s 以太网端口。
新款Legion 5i 16 的售价为 1610 美元，并不便宜，这个价格已经可以买到采用 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑的机型（尤其是 2023 年以后的笔记本电脑），但即使在这种情况下，也避免不了要在显示效果上做出一定的妥协。
价格和供应情况
新款联想Legion 5i 16IRX G9 可直接从联想网站上购买，售价为 1,609.99 美元。
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
-
01/29/2024 v7
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.
Pricecompare
