Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
MagyarMedion Erazer Beast X40 (2024) 评测：配备 RTX 4090 和机械键盘的高端游戏笔记本电脑
Medion Beast X40 是目前功能最强大的笔记本电脑之一。英特尔 Raptor Lake、Nvidia Ada Lovelace、2 TB 存储空间和 32 GB 内存的完美组合，让这款笔记本电脑具备了流媒体、渲染和游戏的能力，而价格却高达 4000 欧元左右。
正如其 前代Beast X40 采用了同方裸机（GM7IX9N）机箱。竞争对手包括游戏笔记本电脑，如 华硕 ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV以及 Schenker Key 17 Pro（早期 23 款）和 微星 Titan 18 HX A14VIG.
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (Erazer Beast Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-14900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.8 GHz, 160 W PL2 / Short Burst, 160 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX Refresh
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Core: 2040 MHz, Memory: 2250 MHz, 175 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 31.0.15.5123, Advanced Optimus + MUX-Switch
Memory
32 GB
, DDR5-5600, Dual-Channel-Mode, two memory slots (both in use)
Display
17.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 178 PPI, BOE NE170QDM-NZ1, IPS, G-Sync, glossy: no, 240 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)
Storage
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5, 1024 GB
, 2 SSDs, PCIe 4, M.2-2280, 1884 GB free
Weight
2.88 kg, Power Supply: 990 g
Price
4000 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89.2 % | 02/2024 | Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.9 kg | 36 mm | 17.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 87.2 % | 08/2023 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X R9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.9 kg | 28.3 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 | |
| 85.5 % | 06/2023 | SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 3.4 kg | 24.9 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 | |
| 88.3 % | 02/2024 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 3.1 kg | 30.8 mm | 18.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 88.8 % | 01/2024 | MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 3.6 kg | 32.1 mm | 18.00" | 3840x2400 |
机箱和功能Beast X40 提供雷电 4
Beast X40 的技术封装在坚固耐用、设计优雅、表面光滑的黑色哑光金属外壳中。底座覆盖有防滑橡胶涂层。后部出风口上方的两条 RGB LED 灯带、发光的盖子徽标和 RGB 按键照明增添了一抹亮色。取下底板后，可以看到电池（螺钉固定，非胶粘）和其他内部组件。
Erazer 配备了三个 USB-A 端口（2 个 USB 3.2 Gen 1 和 1 个 USB 3.2 Gen 2）和一个雷电 4 形式的 USB Type-C 端口。我们可以确认，后者可以输出 DisplayPort 信号并支持 Power Delivery。这款笔记本电脑总共有两个视频输出接口（HDMI 2.1 和 DisplayPort）。
我们用参考 AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60 卡测试了 SD 存储卡读卡器，发现它的读取速度高于平均水平。1080p 网络摄像头是标准配置。
Erazer Beast X40 使用英特尔 Wi-Fi 6E AX211 芯片，有线连接由 Realtek RTL8125 2.5 GbE 控制器处理。在我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器进行的测试中，笔记本电脑提供了稳定的 Wi-Fi 性能，周围没有其他 Wi-Fi 设备，笔记本电脑和服务器 PC 之间的距离也很短。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=101, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=95, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø636 (601-671)
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1440 (749-1502)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø968 (656-1200)
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø993 (514-1160)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1364 (1079-1473)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1671 (1585-1711)
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1724 (1641-1756)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1681 (1662-1704)
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1116 (932-1352)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1578 (1516-1627)
8.8 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
6 ∆E
8 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
输入设备：机械键盘，配备 Cherry MX 开关
Beast X40 的机械键盘以其丰富的键入感和精确的输入获得好评。其 Cherry MX 开关行程适中，压力点清晰可闻、可感知。数字键盘和独立的 RGB 按键照明使键盘整体更加和谐。
多点触摸板（15.5 x 10 厘米）的行程较短，压力点清晰。它可以完全关闭，也可以只关闭一侧（右侧）。
显示屏QHD+ 显示屏，具有不错的 sRGB 覆盖率
2024 Beast X40 采用与 2023 Beast X40 类似的由京东方开发的 QHD+ 240 Hz 雾面显示屏（2,560 x 1,600 像素）。 2023 魔兽 X40.该面板具有良好的亮度水平、较短的响应时间、较高的帧速率，并且不会出现 PWM 闪烁。
Medion 目前没有提供其他显示屏可供选择。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
BOE NE170QDM-NZ1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 422 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 388 cd/m² Minimum: 21 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 422 cd/m²
Contrast: 1005:1 (Black: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.42 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.7
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
69% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.078
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 BOE NE170QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 17.00 | SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) BOE CQ NE173QUM-NY1, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 NE173QHM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) BOE NE180QDM-NM1, Mini LED, 2560x1600, 18.00 | MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG AU Optronics B180ZAN01.0, Mini-LED, 3840x2400, 18.00 | Medion Erazer Beast X40 BOE NE170QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 17.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 21% | 23% | 26% | 23% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 68.1 | 96.4 42% | 98 44% | 99.9 47% | 98.1 44% | 68.6 1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.5 | 99.9 0% | 100 1% | 100 1% | 99.8 0% | 99.8 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 69 | 84.3 22% | 85.6 24% | 90 30% | 86.2 25% | 69.4 1% |
| Response Times | -15% | -9% | -29% | -530% | -3% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 11.7 ? | 14.8 ? -26% | 6.2 ? 47% | 12 ? -3% | 8.6 ? 26% | 11.3 ? 3% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 6.9 ? | 7.2 ? -4% | 11.4 ? -65% | 10.7 ? -55% | 81.8 ? -1086% | 7.5 ? -9% |
| PWM Frequency | 5733 ? | 2592 ? | ||||
| Screen | -0% | -6% | 166% | -119% | -29% | |
| Brightness middle | 422 | 487 15% | 322.5 -24% | 937 122% | 467.5 11% | 384 -9% |
| Brightness | 388 | 485 25% | 317 -18% | 934 141% | 459 18% | 377 -3% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 87 0% | 86 -1% | 89 2% | 90 3% | 90 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.42 | 0.51 -21% | 0.29 31% | 0.066 84% | 0.45 -7% | |
| Contrast | 1005 | 955 -5% | 1112 11% | 14197 1313% | 853 -15% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.42 | 1.51 -6% | 1.15 19% | 1.52 -7% | 3.77 -165% | 2.05 -44% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 1.97 | 2.19 -11% | 3.03 -54% | 2.82 -43% | 6.12 -211% | 3.64 -85% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.7 | 0.56 20% | 1.21 -73% | 2.94 -320% | 0.74 -6% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 1.2 -0% | 1.7 -42% | 1.7 -42% | 3.2 -167% | 2.3 -92% |
| Gamma | 2.078 106% | 2.273 97% | 2.27 97% | 2.042 108% | 2.43 91% | 2.017 109% |
| CCT | 6581 99% | 6451 101% | 6299 103% | 6578 99% | 6478 100% | 6546 99% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 2% /
2% | 3% /
-1% | 54% /
108% | -209% /
-152% | -10% /
-19% |
* ... smaller is better
显示屏显示出良好的色彩显示效果：偏差约为 1.4，符合目标值（DeltaE < 3）。校准可将偏差降至 0.7，并确保灰度更加均衡。
该面板能完全再现 sRGB 色彩空间，但不能再现 AdobeRGB 和 DCI P3 色彩空间。竞争对手的显示器能提供更多。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 11.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17908 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
视角稳定的 IPS 面板可以从任何位置读取。如果阳光不太强烈，在户外也可以阅读显示屏。
性能Medion Beast X40 配备高端硬件
Medion 的高端笔记本在所有对性能要求极高的应用领域（如游戏、渲染）都表现出色。Raptor Lake 和 Ada Lovelace 提供了必要的计算能力。这款 X40 型号的售价约为 4000 欧元。更便宜的版本最低售价为2,500欧元。作为可选配件，Medion 提供水冷系统（约 200 欧元），可略微提高性能并降低排放。
测试条件
电源按钮旁边有一个专用按键，可以快速切换三种制造商特定的性能模式（见下表）。我们使用的是 "平衡模式"（基准测试）和 "静音模式"（电池测试）。
可以使用预装的控制中心软件创建个人配置文件，其中可以调整 CPU 的功率限制、GPU 的 TGP 和/或温度上限。
| 游戏模式 | 平衡模式 | 静音模式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 功率限制 1 (HWInfo) | 160 瓦 | 160 瓦 | 160 瓦 |
| 功率限制 2 (HWInfo) | 160 瓦 | 160 瓦 | 160 瓦 |
| 噪音 (Witcher 3) | 52 dB(A) | 50 dB(A) | 34 dB(A) |
| 性能 (Witcher 3) | ~214 帧/秒 | ~204 帧/秒 | 30 帧/秒（锁定） |
处理器
Raptor Lake-HX 的 24 个 CPU 内核（8P + 16E 和 32 个线程 酷睿 i9-14900HX的最大时钟频率为 5.8 GHz（P 核）和 4.1 GHz（E 核）。由于时钟频率略高，该 CPU 的性能比 2023 野兽 X40的 CPU 性能略高一些。 酷睿 i9-13900HX.
持续的多线程负载（CB15 循环）以恒定的时钟频率得到确认，其水平取决于电源模式。"平衡模式 "的基准值低于 CPU 平均值，而 "游戏模式 "则高于 CPU 平均值。单线程性能则有所不同：在所有三种配置文件中，单线程性能都处于较高水平，几乎完全相同。
有关酷睿 i9-14900HX 的更多信息，请参阅我们的分析文章 。
Cinebench R15 Multi Dauertest
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø3224 (3189.54-3263.11)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D: Ø5282 (5177.32-5599.89)
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø3837 (3703.7-4399.06)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4024 (3961.18-4098.11)
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4753 (4700.35-4782.4)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø4532 (4437.05-4828.15)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX; Gaming Mode: Ø4408 (4323.86-4631.16)
CPU Performance Rating | Cinebench R23 | Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Geekbench 6.2 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
| CPU Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 -2! | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) -2! | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Cinebench R20 | |
| CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (Gaming Mode) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (8427 - 12419, n=23) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=230, last 2 years) | |
| CPU (Single Core) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (Gaming Mode) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (779 - 859, n=23) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| Average of class Gaming (169 - 855, n=230, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (Gaming Mode) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (3263 - 4875, n=23) | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=234, last 2 years) | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (Gaming Mode) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (287 - 320, n=23) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) | |
| Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 318, n=233, last 2 years) | |
| Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=228, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (102 - 164, n=23) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (Gaming Mode) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| Geekbench 6.2 | |
| Multi-Core | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (6.2.1, Gaming Mode) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (6.2.1) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (15849 - 18643, n=23) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (6.2.1) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (6.2.1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (5340 - 18590, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Single-Core | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (6.2.1, Gaming Mode) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (6.2.1) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (6.2.1) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (2800 - 3095, n=23) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (6.2.1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1599 - 3095, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (Gaming Mode) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (22.7 - 34.4, n=23) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=232, last 2 years) | |
| LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=226, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (6.3.4.2) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (33.9 - 85.1, n=23) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (6.3.4.2) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (6.3.4.2) | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (6.3.4.2, Gaming Mode) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
| Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 4.47, n=229, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (0.3609 - 0.4225, n=23) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (Gaming Mode) | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X (v6.88.6413 Beta) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (v6.92.6600, Gaming Mode) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 (v6.75.6100) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (17244 - 29351, n=22) | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) (v6.75.6100) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (3069 - 60169, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X (v6.88.6413 Beta) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (v6.92.6600, Gaming Mode) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 (v6.75.6100) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (88537 - 148888, n=22) | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) (v6.75.6100) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18567 - 252486, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X (v6.88.6413 Beta) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (v6.92.6600, Gaming Mode) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 (v6.75.6100) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (4267 - 7229, n=22) | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) (v6.75.6100) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X (v6.88.6413 Beta) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (v6.92.6600, Gaming Mode) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (118405 - 148773, n=22) | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) (v6.75.6100) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 (v6.75.6100) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X (v6.88.6413 Beta) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (v6.92.6600, Gaming Mode) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 (v6.75.6100) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (12217 - 18256, n=22) | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) (v6.75.6100) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X (v6.88.6413 Beta) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (v6.92.6600, Gaming Mode) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 (v6.75.6100) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (43302 - 72594, n=22) | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) (v6.75.6100) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| Average of class Gaming (10291 - 134044, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X (v6.88.6413 Beta) | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) (v6.75.6100) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (86964 - 241777, n=22) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (v6.92.6600, Gaming Mode) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 (v6.75.6100) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (v6.92.6600, Gaming Mode) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X (v6.88.6413 Beta) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 (v6.75.6100) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (1265 - 2149, n=22) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) (v6.75.6100) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2409, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X (v6.88.6413 Beta) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (v6.92.6600, Gaming Mode) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 (v6.75.6100) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (9170 - 16128, n=22) | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) (v6.75.6100) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1518 - 31796, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) (v6.75.6100) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (33960 - 51118, n=22) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (v6.92.6600, Gaming Mode) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 (v6.75.6100) | |
| Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=226, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X (v6.88.6413 Beta) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (v6.92.6600) | |
系统性能
只需粗略浏览一下规格表，就足以确认系统提供了足够的动力，可流畅运行游戏、渲染和流媒体等要求苛刻的应用程序。内存的传输速率达到了 DDR5-5600 内存的正常水平。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (8230 - 9234, n=8) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 | |
| Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=198, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (10871 - 11628, n=8) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| Average of class Gaming (8300 - 12334, n=197, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (9951 - 11759, n=8) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Average of class Gaming (6662 - 11833, n=197, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (13219 - 16462, n=8) | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) | |
| Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=197, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1877 - 2238, n=8) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2334, n=171, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1738 - 2113, n=8) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=171, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2195 - 2543, n=8) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2514, n=171, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1478 - 2327, n=8) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=171, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (322 - 339, n=7) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) | |
| Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=194, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (287 - 309, n=5) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Average of class Gaming (157.9 - 328, n=163, last 2 years) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Average of class Gaming (421 - 824, n=209, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (430 - 467, n=8) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 8963 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (56992 - 83392, n=22) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 | |
| Average of class Gaming (21842 - 92565, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (54443 - 87507, n=22) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 | |
| Average of class Gaming (24879 - 90647, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (51387 - 78199, n=22) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 | |
| Average of class Gaming (21619 - 103259, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 152.5, n=222, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (79.7 - 105, n=22) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
延迟监控器在延迟测试（网上冲浪、4K 视频播放和 Prime95 高负载）期间显示异常。该系统似乎不适合实时视频和音频编辑。未来的软件和驱动程序更新可能会带来潜在的改进甚至恶化。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
X40 板载了两个 PCIe Gen 4 M.2 2280 固态硬盘，每个 1 TB，但没有配置 RAID 阵列。一个固态硬盘用作系统硬盘，另一个用作数据存储。数据传输率非常高。不会因为热节流而导致性能下降。
X40 通常支持 RAID-0/1，但必须先在 BIOS 中激活相应的选项，然后重新安装 Windows。不建议新手执行此程序。
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
7029 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
5745 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
981.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
730.1 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
4110 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
4900 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
57.22 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
263.5 MB/s
* ... smaller is better
Disk throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6943 (5621.29-6984.69)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N: Ø6593 (4837.89-6648.18)
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB: Ø7072 (6291.04-7098.5)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7049 (6155.14-7094.74)
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0); diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø12928 (8511.29-13109.92)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R: Ø6904 (5576.5-6952.06)
图形卡
Medion Erazer Beast X40 依赖于 GeForce RTX 4090- 目前 Nvidia 最强大的移动 GPU。它拥有 9,728 个着色器、256 位宽内存总线和快速的 16 GB GDDR6 内存。RTX 4090 的最大 TGP 为 175 瓦（150 瓦 + 25 瓦 Dynamic Boost）--没有办法超过这个限制。
基准测试结果与之前 RTX 4090 的平均水平持平（平衡模式）或高于（游戏模式）。但在游戏中情况有所不同。
在这两种情况下，帧率都高于 GPU 的平均水平。支持高级 Optimus，因此在 dGPU 和 Optimus 之间切换无需重启。
| 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (Gaming Mode) | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (56764 - 73027, n=36) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72070, n=231, last 2 years) | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (Gaming Mode) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (41210 - 53059, n=34) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) | |
| Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=236, last 2 years) | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (Gaming Mode) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (17620 - 23292, n=36) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (224 - 22547, n=233, last 2 years) | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 41974 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 32572 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 19655 points | |
Help | ||
Blender | Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.2 | V-Ray 5 Benchmark | V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 | SPECviewperf 2020
| Geekbench 6.2 | |
| GPU Vulkan | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (6.2.1, Gaming Mode) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (6.2.1) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (6.2.1) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (6.2.1) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (9584 - 196201, n=13) | |
| Average of class Gaming (4286 - 196201, n=73, last 2 years) | |
| GPU OpenCL | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (6.2.1) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (6.2.1, Gaming Mode) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (6.2.1) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (159127 - 209521, n=15) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (6.2.1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (4321 - 207373, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 | |
| GPU | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (v4.10.07, Gaming Mode) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X (v4.10.07 ) | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (873 - 1334, n=25) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Average of class Gaming (54 - 1334, n=188, last 2 years) | |
| CPU | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (v4.10.07, Gaming Mode) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (18206 - 37629, n=25) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (v4.10.07 ) | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Average of class Gaming (2741 - 37629, n=188, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating | The Witcher 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (Gaming Mode) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (139.2 - 216, n=32) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=227, last 2 years) | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (Gaming Mode) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (91.1 - 167.7, n=35) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (6.38 - 167.7, n=218, last 2 years) | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (1.3, Gaming Mode) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (1.3) | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) (1.3) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (1.3) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X (1.3) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 (1.3) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (122.2 - 194.9, n=35) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (1.3) | |
| Average of class Gaming (9.13 - 194.9, n=228, last 2 years) | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Gaming Mode) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (233 - 421, n=34) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
| Average of class Gaming (14.6 - 421, n=226, last 2 years) | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (Gaming Mode) | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (115.7 - 220, n=37) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (26.9 - 220, n=238, last 2 years) | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (Gaming Mode) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (77.8 - 166.2, n=41) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Average of class Gaming (12.4 - 166.2, n=243, last 2 years) | |
| Helldivers 2 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (130.2 - 141.2, n=2) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 | |
| Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 141.2, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra Preset | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (105.5 - 122.6, n=2) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 | |
| Average of class Gaming (37.9 - 122.6, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Enshrouded | |
| 1920x1080 Max. Quality AA:FX | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (79 - 101.5, n=3) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 | |
| Average of class Gaming (21.3 - 101.5, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| 2560x1440 Max. Quality AA:FX | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (61.8 - 76, n=3) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 | |
| Average of class Gaming (42.3 - 76, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Ready or Not | |
| 1920x1080 Epic Preset | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (155.1 - 203, n=2) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 155.1, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| 2560x1440 Epic Preset | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (141.1 - 144.3, n=2) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 | |
| Average of class Gaming (84.8 - 144.3, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Immortals of Aveum | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra AF:16x | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (90.6 - 106.3, n=2) | |
| Average of class Gaming (14.9 - 106.3, n=10, last 2 years) | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra AF:16x | |
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (62.9 - 76.5, n=2) | |
| Average of class Gaming (28 - 76.5, n=5, last 2 years) | |
The Witcher 3 FPS chart
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø190.8 (167-207)
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø199.1 (178-207)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø181.9 (172-189)
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø201 (189-215)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø189.4 (179-197)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; Gaming Mode: Ø196.8 (186-219)
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
| GTA V (2015) | 187.3 | 186.7 | 183 | 141.5 | 139.8 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 555 | 518 | 394 | 204 | 157.6 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 241 | 214 | 205 | 189.9 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 225 | 210 | 181.1 | 147.7 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 207 | 182.2 | 143.9 | ||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 484 | 401 | 387 | 371 | 289 |
| Immortals of Aveum (2023) | 119.3 | 109.6 | 106.3 | 76.5 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 133.2 | 131 | 120.9 | 118.9 | 87.5 |
| Ready or Not (2023) | 289 | 166.6 | 158 | 155.1 | 144.3 |
| Enshrouded (2024) | 150.5 | 134.5 | 116.2 | 101.5 | 76 |
| Helldivers 2 (2024) | 146.8 | 143.8 | 143.3 | 141.2 | 122.6 |
排放和能源：Beast X40 可以安静地工作
噪音排放
满负荷工作时，Beast X40 的声压级可高达 52 dB(A)。笔记本电脑在 "游戏模式 "下仅略微安静一些。
静音模式 "确保了极低的噪音水平，但仍能为办公和上网等日常任务提供足够的动力。在该模式下也可以玩游戏。不过，在我们的Witcher 3 测试中，系统将帧速率锁定为 30 fps。
在某些情况下，例如在进行Witcher 3 测试或运行 Specviewperf 基准测试时，可以听到笔记本内部发出的电子呼呼声。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 28 / 29 / 32 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 48 / 52 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) | ||
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X R9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Medion Erazer Beast X40 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 0% | -17% | 1% | 6% | -1% | |
| off / environment * | 25 | 23 8% | 26 -4% | 24 4% | 22.8 9% | 24 4% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28 | 23 18% | 26 7% | 27 4% | 23.8 15% | 25 11% |
| Idle Average * | 29 | 27.7 4% | 33 -14% | 28 3% | 23.8 18% | 29 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * | 32 | 34.7 -8% | 46 -44% | 32 -0% | 28 12% | 35 -9% |
| Load Average * | 48 | 53.4 -11% | 56 -17% | 50 -4% | 38 21% | 51 -6% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 50 | 53.4 -7% | 62 -24% | 50 -0% | 57.3 -15% | 51 -2% |
| Load Maximum * | 52 | 53.4 -3% | 64 -23% | 52 -0% | 62.8 -21% | 53 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
压力测试和Witcher 3 测试会使笔记本电脑明显发热，但不会过热。在某些情况下会达到 50 摄氏度以上。在日常使用中（办公、上网），数值保持在绿色范围内。
压力测试（连续运行 Prime95 和 Furmark）是测试系统在满负荷情况下稳定性的极端场景。CPU 时钟频率在最初几分钟内降至 1.9 至 2 GHz（P-cores）或 1.7 GHz（E-cores），并保持在这一水平。GPU 运行速度介于 2 至 2.1 GHz 之间。
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).
| Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (Early 23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 14% | -11% | 4% | 5% | 1% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 47 | 40.1 15% | 57 -21% | 49 -4% | 37.8 20% | 48 -2% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 54 | 46.7 14% | 60 -11% | 47 13% | 37.6 30% | 52 4% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 30 | 26.5 12% | 32 -7% | 29 3% | 34.8 -16% | 30 -0% |
| Idle Bottom * | 32 | 27.7 13% | 34 -6% | 31 3% | 36 -13% | 31 3% |
* ... smaller is better
扬声器
立体声扬声器发出的声音整体上非常不错。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源消耗
在能耗方面，Beast X40 的表现并不出人意料。对于所安装的硬件而言，能耗值处于正常水平。
Witcher 3 测试和压力测试的能耗略低。事实证明，330 瓦的供电设备在压力测试中足以应付。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.1 / Watt |
| Idle | 7 / 15 / 33 Watt |
| Load |
134 / 294 Watt |
   
| |
Power consumption: The Witcher 3 / Stress test
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø280 (257-294)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø279 (271-293)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø15.4 (6.88-32.9)
Power consumption: External monitor
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø119.3 (118.1-125.3)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø114.3 (113.2-120.3)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø207 (204-218)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø274 (267-284)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø22.1 (20.6-31.3)
电池寿命
Beast X40 在实际 WLAN 测试（使用脚本访问网站时的负载说明）中的运行时间为 6:14 h，这是一个不错的数值。
这使 X40 与前代产品 前代产品.
Pros
+ QHD+ 屏幕（16:10、240 Hz、G-Sync）
+ 高系统性能
+ 坚固的金属外壳
+ 先进的 Optimus
+ 2 个 PCIe 4 SSD á 1 TB
+ 可扩展内存
+ 液态金属导电膏
+ 雷电 4
+ 电力传输
+ 机械键盘
+ 可选水冷
Cons
- 色彩空间应更大
- 在负载（平衡/游戏）情况下声音较大
- 电子溅射/啸叫
结论：高端动力
Medion Erazer Beast X40 是一款性能较高的产品：RTX 4090、RTX 4090、RTX 4090、RTX 4090、RTX 4090、RTX 4090。 GeForce RTX 4090和 酷睿 i9-14900HX为游戏、流媒体、渲染和视频编辑提供了必要的动力。性能与噪音之间的折衷是可能的。通过可选的水冷系统（约 200 欧元），可以实现性能的小幅提升和整体排放的降低。
Medion 推出的 Erazer Beast X40 是一款功能极为强大的游戏笔记本电脑。
从优点来看，它配备了 16:10 格式的高质量 17 英寸显示屏（2560 x 1600 像素、240 Hz、G-Sync、sRGB）、触感机械键盘和雷电 4 端口。后者提供了扩展选项（外置 GPU、基座解决方案），支持 Power Delivery，并可输出 DisplayPort 信号。此外，它的电池续航能力也不错。
目前的 X40 与去年的 X40 的区别 去年的 X40的差异并不大。酷睿 i9-14900HX 的时钟速度略高，因此在相同内核和线程数的情况下，其性能略高于酷睿 i9-13900HX。 酷睿 i9-13900HX的性能略高。后者将是（更便宜的）替代品：Medion 目前的售价略低于 3500 欧元。
另一种选择是 华硕 ROG Strix Scar 17 X3D.它的性能水平相当，屏幕覆盖 DCI-P3。不过，华硕笔记本电脑不提供 Thunderbolt 4。此外，它在电池续航时间方面也逊色不少。
价格和供应情况
Medion Erazer Beast X40 (2024) 可在Medion 商店和Cyberport.de购买，价格低于 4,000 欧元。
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
-
02/21/2024 v7
Sascha Mölck
Gaming - Weighted Average
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.
Pricecompare
