Notebookcheck Logo

海盗船Voyager a1600笔记本电脑在审查。为游戏玩家、流媒体和创作者提供全面的AMD动力

伦勃朗和纳维联合起来了! 海盗船推出的Voyager a1600是一个非常有趣的设备,它以特殊的Elgato快捷方式在竞争中脱颖而出。由于采用了AMD CPU和AMD GPU的组合,游戏玩家和流媒体人应该得到他们的钱。我们已经把顶级型号的产品通过我们的测试课程,并将在这次审查中具体考察该笔记本的功能和性能。
AMD Ryzen (Zen) Radeon Gaming Laptop / Notebook
海盗船Voyager a1600
海盗船Voyager a1600

当涉及到PC领域的配件时,海盗船是一个著名的名字:外围设备、电源、固态硬盘、机箱、显示器以及预制桌面系统,其中一些我们已经测试过,是制造商目前阵容的一部分。通过Voyager系列,海盗船现在也进入了笔记本领域,并希望通过Voyager a1600参与到游戏领域。起步的位置一点也不差,因为随着 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS和一个专用的 AMD Radeon RX 6800M有一个很好的基础。在顶级配置中,你还可以期待32GB DDR5内存和2TB存储空间的SSD。另一方面,240赫兹的QHD面板,总是必须的。然而,3,550欧元的价格属于上层联盟的范畴。

如果你使用一个 AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS配有16GB内存和1TB SSD。在这里,目前应该是2600欧元。在测试中,海盗船Voyager a1600与当前游戏笔记本领域的强大对手竞争。更多的细节可以在下表中找到。

Corsair Voyager a1600
Processor
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS 8 x 3.3 - 4.9 GHz, 65 W PL2 / Short Burst, 35 W PL1 / Sustained, Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+)
Graphics adapter
AMD Radeon RX 6800M - 12 GB VRAM, Core: 2525 MHz, Memory: 2000 MHz, 135 W TDP ( including 15 W Dynamic Boost), Adrenalin 21.40.56.02, SmartShift
Memory
32 GB 
, DDR5-4800
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 188 PPI, BOE0A3B, IPS, 240 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, 2048 GB 
, M.2-2280, NVMe, 1800 GB free
Soundcard
AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller
Connections
1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 3 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Headphone Combo Jack, AC-in, Card Reader: Full size SD card reader, UHS III, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Integrated CORSAIR SLIPSTREAM
Networking
Qualcomm WCN685x (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 19.9 x 356 x 286.7
Battery
99 Wh, 6410 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Camera
Webcam: Full-HD
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Dolby Atmos custom tuned internal speakers NVMe SSD, Keyboard: CHERRY MX Ultra-Low Profile mechanical key switches with CAPELLIX LED RGB backlighting, Keyboard Light: yes, 230-Watt-Netzteil, Tasche, iCue, Elgato Stream Deck, Camera Hub, Dolby Access, VOYAGER Hub, CORSAIR Diagnostics, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.403 kg, Power Supply: 451 g
Price
3550 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86.6 %
12/2022
Corsair Voyager a1600
R9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
2.4 kg19.9 mm16.00"2560x1600
89.5 %
08/2022
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
R9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.1 kg19.4 mm16.10"2560x1600
90.8 %
09/2022
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
2.6 kg19.4 mm16.00"2560x1600
87.2 %
06/2022
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg19.9 mm16.00"2560x1600
85.5 %
05/2022
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg23 mm16.10"2560x1440
88.9 %
09/2022
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.6 kg20 mm16.00"2560x1600

外壳和功能 - 薄而结实

海盗船Voyager a1600的外壳是由铝制成的,因此使设备具有非常好的稳定性。在我们的扭转测试中,只有显示器的盖子稍微扭曲了一下。否则,这款游戏笔记本的外观相对适中,没有任何RGB照明,这是相当不错的。显示器由两个小铰链固定,不能完全防止弹跳。

在连接方面,海盗船提供了现代接口,尽管数量非常可控。只有一个USB Type-A是很遗憾的,但有三个支持Thunderbolt的USB-C端口。因此,这台笔记本电脑为未来做好了准备。接口数量如此稀少可能是由于Slipstream功能,因为各种配件可以通过这种无线技术直接连接到笔记本上,不需要额外的加密狗。海盗船本身为此提供了自己的鼠标、键盘和耳机。Wi-Fi模块来自富士康,提供当前的Wi-Fi 6E标准。

作为流媒体笔记本电脑的预期用途需要一个好的网络摄像头。测试显示,内置的1080p摄像头的表现比竞争对手更好。尽管如此,我们建议在固定使用时使用外部摄像头。对于移动使用,你可以放心地使用集成的摄像头。

海盗船Voyager a1600
海盗船Voyager a1600
海盗船Voyager a1600
海盗船Voyager a1600
海盗船Voyager a1600
海盗船Voyager a1600
海盗船Voyager a1600
海盗船Voyager a1600
海盗船Voyager a1600
海盗船Voyager a1600 - 包
海盗船Voyager a1600 - 包
Corsair Voyager a1600 - SSD冷却垫
海盗船Voyager a1600 - DDR5内存
海盗船Voyager a1600 - 不含底板
海盗船Voyager a1600 - 不含底板
Corsair Voyager a1600 - Wi-Fi模块

尺寸比较

369 mm 248 mm 23 mm 2.3 kg358.5 mm 262.4 mm 19.9 mm 2.3 kg358 mm 263.5 mm 20 mm 2.6 kg358.1 mm 263.5 mm 19.4 mm 2.6 kg356 mm 286.7 mm 19.9 mm 2.4 kg355 mm 243 mm 19.4 mm 2.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
左边:Kensington锁,AC-in,2个USB Type-C,麦克风/耳机组合插孔
左边:Kensington锁,AC-in,2个USB Type-C,麦克风/耳机组合插孔
对。USB Type-A, Thunderbolt USB4, SD读卡器(UHS-III)。
对。USB Type-A, Thunderbolt USB4, SD读卡器(UHS-III)。
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
158 MB/s +86%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=100, last 2 years)
98.4 MB/s +16%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
84.86 MB/s
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
68 MB/s -20%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
60 MB/s -29%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
182.7 MB/s +103%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=94, last 2 years)
121.3 MB/s +35%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
89.78 MB/s
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
72 MB/s -20%
Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1723 (1681min, 1688.83P1 - 1736max) MBit/s +94%
Average Qualcomm WCN685x
  (886 - 1782, n=19)
1641 MBit/s +85%
Average of class Gaming
  (853 - 1857, n=79, last 2 years)
1516 MBit/s +71%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
MediaTek RZ616
1260 (1156min - 1343max) MBit/s +42%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Qualcomm WCN685x
886 (444min - 941max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel AX1675s 160MHz (211NGW)
1664 (1649min - 1680max) MBit/s +95%
Average Qualcomm WCN685x
  (852 - 1777, n=18)
1579 MBit/s +85%
Average of class Gaming
  (685 - 1890, n=159, last 2 years)
1403 MBit/s +65%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
MediaTek MT7921
967 (489min - 981max) MBit/s +13%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Qualcomm WCN685x
852 (425min - 931max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Corsair Voyager a1600
Qualcomm WCN685x
1875 (859min - 1931max) MBit/s
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1655 (1613min, 1615.32P1 - 1702max) MBit/s -12%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
MediaTek RZ616
1646 (1468min - 1762max) MBit/s -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (648 - 1878, n=77, last 2 years)
1477 MBit/s -21%
Average Qualcomm WCN685x
  (623 - 1961, n=19)
1436 MBit/s -23%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Corsair Voyager a1600
Qualcomm WCN685x
1780 (896min - 1840max) MBit/s
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel AX1675s 160MHz (211NGW)
1565 (988min - 1682max) MBit/s -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1793, n=153, last 2 years)
1272 MBit/s -29%
Average Qualcomm WCN685x
  (521 - 1838, n=18)
1269 MBit/s -29%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
MediaTek MT7921
976 (499min - 1054max) MBit/s -45%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750180018501900Tooltip
Corsair Voyager a1600; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1846 (859-1931)
Corsair Voyager a1600; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø871 (444-941)
ColorChecker
21.6 ∆E
20 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
24.6 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
18 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
24.6 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
14 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Corsair Voyager a1600: 16.78 ∆E min: 2.47 - max: 24.62 ∆E

输入设备

键盘
键盘
键盘(发光的)
键盘(发光的)
触摸板/点击板
触摸板/点击板

海盗船为Voyager a1600提供了一个基于Cherry MX开关的机械键盘。这些都是非常坚固的,设计的寿命非常长。非常短的行程和明显的压力点给了用户良好的触觉反馈。此外,行程没有阻尼,这防止了海绵状的输入感觉。

键盘的照明可以通过iCUE软件根据需要进行配置。用户可以获得不同的效果和完整的颜色调色板。此外,所有按键都可以单独配置。

触摸板的宽度为整整15.5厘米,深度为10厘米。因此,ClickPad非常大,在实践中最适合作为鼠标的替代品。如果你觉得活动输入区域太大,你可以通过双击左上角的白点来停用右侧。不过这个功能没有光学或触觉指示。玻璃表面有一种微妙的缎面效果,即使手指有点出汗,操作起来也很舒服。下方的两个输入键工作良好,按压时相当安静。

显示 - 快速16:10面板

子像素结构
子像素结构
边缘无背光灯渗漏
边缘无背光灯渗漏

海盗船Voyager a1600的显示屏是一个16英寸的IPS面板,频率为240赫兹。16:10的格式,其分辨率为2560 x 1600像素,提供了一个宽大的工作面。到目前为止,Voyager a1600还没有替代的显示屏变体。

在我们的测试中,安装的面板达到了340cd/m²的良好亮度。然而,相比之下,竞争者显然提供了更明亮的显示屏。由于黑值相对较高,对比度受到很大影响。因此,在我们的测试中,Voyager a1600只达到了670:1的对比度。

由于PWM导致的眼睛疲劳不应该是海盗船Voyager a1600的问题。背光出血在我们的设备上不是一个问题。

340
cd/m²
354
cd/m²
339
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
355
cd/m²
324
cd/m²
342
cd/m²
347
cd/m²
326
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE0A3B tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 355 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 339.8 cd/m² Minimum: 17.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 328 cd/m²
Contrast: 670:1 (Black: 0.53 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.43 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.14
ΔE Greyscale 2.62 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
70.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.28
Corsair Voyager a1600
BOE0A3B, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AUO B160QAN02.S, Mini LED, 2560x1600, 16.10
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
NE160QDM-NZ2, IPS LED, 2560x1600, 16.00
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
BOE09E5, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.10
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Display
25%
-5%
22%
3%
1%
Display P3 Coverage
68.7
99.82
45%
63.7
-7%
97.3
42%
71
3%
69.3
1%
sRGB Coverage
98.2
99.99
2%
95.3
-3%
100
2%
97.9
0%
98.2
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
70.1
90.21
29%
65.7
-6%
84.9
21%
73.3
5%
70.8
1%
Response Times
3%
17%
15%
-3%
24%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
13 ?(7, 6)
11 ?(1, 10)
15%
9.2 ?(4.8, 4.4)
29%
13.8 ?(6.3, 7.5)
-6%
14.5 ?(7.2, 7.3)
-12%
12.6 ?(5.9, 6.7)
3%
Response Time Black / White *
10 ?(5, 5)
11 ?(1, 10)
-10%
9.6 ?(4.8, 4.8)
4%
6.4 ?(1.8, 4.6)
36%
9.4 ?(4.4, 5)
6%
5.6 ?(1.5, 4.1)
44%
PWM Frequency
7400 ?(100)
Screen
71%
12%
29%
-30%
18%
Brightness middle
355
498
40%
478.8
35%
498
40%
335
-6%
547
54%
Brightness
340
502
48%
477
40%
468
38%
319
-6%
523
54%
Brightness Distribution
91
94
3%
90
-1%
80
-12%
90
-1%
88
-3%
Black Level *
0.53
0.11
79%
0.43
19%
0.36
32%
0.28
47%
0.44
17%
Contrast
670
4527
576%
1113
66%
1383
106%
1196
79%
1243
86%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.43
1.87
23%
2.24
8%
1.77
27%
4.38
-80%
2.1
14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.31
6.15
-43%
4.49
-4%
5.24
-22%
9.48
-120%
7
-62%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.14
1.94
-70%
1.89
-66%
0.63
45%
1.33
-17%
0.9
21%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.62
3.15
-20%
2.3
12%
2.4
8%
7
-167%
3.2
-22%
Gamma
2.28 96%
330.95 1%
2.25 98%
2.14 103%
2.103 105%
2.23 99%
CCT
6909 94%
7294 89%
6955 93%
7046 92%
6244 104%
6979 93%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
33% / 51%
8% / 9%
22% / 26%
-10% / -19%
14% / 15%

* ... smaller is better

显示质量很好,色彩空间覆盖率也很高。然而,在这种比较中,竞争对手往往也能提供更好的比率。我们的评测样本在这个学科上只能击败联想的Legion 7。由于与sRGB色彩空间相比,灰度和色彩的Delta E-2000值很好,我们认为海盗船在运送该设备时使用了校准的显示器。手动校准又稍微改善了Delta E-2000值。然而,最大的显示器亮度受到影响。我们建议让显示器保持其交付状态。色彩空间的覆盖范围对于半专业的照片和视频编辑来说是足够的。

卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:色彩饱和度
卡尔曼:色彩饱和度
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN:灰度(校准的)。
CalMAN:灰度(校准的)。
CalMAN:色彩饱和度(已校准)。
CalMAN:色彩饱和度(已校准)。
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
Corsair Voyager a1600与sRGB的对比
Corsair Voyager a1600与sRGB的对比
海盗船Voyager a1600与AdobeRGB的对比
海盗船Voyager a1600与AdobeRGB的对比
海盗船Voyager a1600与P3的比较
海盗船Voyager a1600与P3的比较

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17909 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

原则上,哑光显示的表面适合在户外使用。然而,相对较低的显示亮度对它不利。

阴霾天空下的海盗船A1600
阴霾天空下的海盗船A1600

视角测试显示了一个典型的IPS面板的结果。在四个角落的图像中可以看到轻微的颜色变化,这不会导致正常使用中的任何限制。

海盗船Voyager a1600的可视角度
海盗船Voyager a1600的可视角度

性能 - 伦勃朗基地有大量的内存和存储空间

海盗船Voyager a1600的组合为AMD Ryzen 9 6900HSAMD Radeon RX 6800M提供了一个非常好的基础上,目前的游戏与最大的细节在一台笔记本电脑。与32GB工作内存和2TB固态硬盘相连,用户在这里也得到了一个体面的性能。

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO

测试条件

海盗船提供了在三种不同模式下使用该设备的可能性,可以通过iCUE软件进行切换。这些选项是安静平衡极端。差异在于CPU和GPU的最大性能,即使与智能移位技术相结合。所有的性能测试都是在极限模式下进行的。

处理器

淘宝网AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS是一个八核处理器,基于目前的Rembrandt架构。该SoC在Boost状态下的时钟频率为3.3-4.9 GHz,并支持SMT,为用户提供总共16个线程。在与基于英特尔的竞争者的直接比较中,AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS很难保持自己的优势。然而,该测试样本在AIDA64测试中的表现要好一些,在排名中位居第三。

关于进一步的基准测试,我们建议你参考我们的CPU比较表.

Cinebench R15 Multi loop

018036054072090010801260144016201800198021602340252027002880306032403420Tooltip
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS: Ø2152 (2123.71-2170.49)
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS; @Turbo Mode: Ø2279 (2140.75-2332.5)
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2337 (2320.19-2354.74)
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2490 (2422.04-2631.06)
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2557 (2455.34-2812.94)
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX: Ø3279 (3244.91-3512.16)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX
85.2 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
73.5 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
71.2 pt
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
66.6 pt
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
60.5 pt
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
58 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
 
57.7 pt
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
57.6 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX
22449 Points +67%
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 34613, n=229, last 2 years)
19514 Points +45%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
16887 Points +26%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
16253 Points +21%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
14455 (14309.4min - 14455.1max) Points +8%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
14403 Points +7%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
13445 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
  (12606 - 14403, n=5)
13439 Points 0%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX
1935 Points +25%
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 2235, n=227, last 2 years)
1813 Points +17%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
1799 Points +16%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
1743 Points +12%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1564 Points +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
1554 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
  (1526 - 1570, n=5)
1553 Points 0%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
1526 Points -2%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX
8522 Points +65%
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=227, last 2 years)
7419 Points +44%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
6352 Points +23%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
5892 Points +14%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5616 Points +9%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
5552 Points +8%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
  (4829 - 5552, n=5)
5167 Points 0%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
5152 Points
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX
743 Points +25%
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=227, last 2 years)
698 Points +17%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
695 Points +17%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
640 Points +7%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
612 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
  (596 - 620, n=5)
608 Points +2%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
599 Points +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
596 Points
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX
3512 (3244.91min - 3512.16max) Points +63%
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=231, last 2 years)
3089 Points +43%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
2813 (2455.34min - 2812.94max) Points +30%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
2631 (2422.04min - 2631.06max) Points +22%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
2355 (2320.19min - 2354.74max) Points +9%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
2333 (2140.75min - 2332.5max) Points +8%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
  (2054 - 2342, n=5)
2191 Points +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
2161 Points
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX
280 Points +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=230, last 2 years)
268 Points +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
261 Points +7%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
251 Points +2%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
245 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
  (218 - 254, n=5)
242 Points -1%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
241 Points -2%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
231 Points -6%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
  (220 - 277, n=5)
239 Seconds * -5%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
227 Seconds *
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
224 Seconds * +1%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
215 Seconds * +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 1259, n=225, last 2 years)
199.8 Seconds * +12%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
197.6 Seconds * +13%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
182.7 Seconds * +20%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX
149 Seconds * +34%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX
86384 MIPS +39%
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 140932, n=226, last 2 years)
76978 MIPS +24%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
72679 MIPS +17%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
64864 MIPS +5%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
62721 MIPS +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
62024 MIPS
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
62006 MIPS 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
  (52948 - 63591, n=5)
60092 MIPS -3%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX
6358 MIPS +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7581, n=226, last 2 years)
6122 MIPS +5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
5863 MIPS +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
5805 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
  (5538 - 5958, n=5)
5766 MIPS -1%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
5680 MIPS -2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5679 MIPS -2%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
5138 MIPS -11%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX
16447 Points +64%
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 22200, n=231, last 2 years)
13567 Points +35%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
13500 Points +34%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
12463 Points +24%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
10040 Points
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
10018 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
  (8381 - 10040, n=5)
9358 Points -7%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
9224 Points -8%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX
1874 Points +27%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
1810 Points +22%
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2210, n=231, last 2 years)
1808 Points +22%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
1746 Points +18%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1589 Points +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
  (1480 - 1614, n=5)
1541 Points +4%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
1537 Points +4%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
1481 Points
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX
25.4 fps +51%
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 37.6, n=229, last 2 years)
21.2 fps +26%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
20 fps +19%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
18.5 fps +10%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
18.2 fps +8%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
16.8 fps
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
16.2 fps -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
  (14.2 - 17.9, n=5)
16.2 fps -4%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
57.2 s *
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
56.1 s * +2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
54 s * +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
  (47.6 - 57.2, n=5)
51.3 s * +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=223, last 2 years)
49.2 s * +14%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
41.7 s * +27%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
41 s * +28%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX
34.5 s * +40%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
0.5 sec * -2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
0.4907 sec * -0%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
0.4897 sec *
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
  (0.4672 - 0.502, n=5)
0.4874 sec * -0%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 4.47, n=226, last 2 years)
0.4699 sec * +4%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4671 sec * +5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4489 sec * +8%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX
0.4209 sec * +14%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 (电池模式)
Cinebench R15 (电池模式)
Cinebench R20
Cinebench R20
电影院R23
电影院R23
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6406
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
18728 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
73218 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
12340 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
17195
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
41849
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit
21.59 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit
174.61 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.92 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
25.29 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
178.03 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit
2.52 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
245 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
202.73 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2161 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming
 
91.4 pt
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
90.4 pt
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
88.3 pt
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
86.2 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
 
82.7 pt
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
80.9 pt
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
67.3 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
60.8 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (3069 - 60169, n=222, last 2 years)
18585 KRay/s +18%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
17242 KRay/s +9%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
16064 KRay/s +2%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
15798 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
  (14212 - 16072, n=5)
15317 KRay/s -3%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
11535 KRay/s -27%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9316 KRay/s -41%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
7636 KRay/s -52%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
106387 Points +6%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
102881 Points +3%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
99931 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
  (90523 - 102881, n=5)
96872 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (18567 - 252486, n=222, last 2 years)
93302 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
52916 Points -47%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
41656 Points -58%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
36195 Points -64%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 10389, n=222, last 2 years)
4316 MB/s +27%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
4216 MB/s +24%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
3657 MB/s +7%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3614 MB/s +6%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
3410 MB/s
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3378 MB/s -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
  (3035 - 3614, n=5)
3326 MB/s -2%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2673 MB/s -22%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 200651, n=222, last 2 years)
109168 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
105344 Points 0%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
105203 Points
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
104030 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
  (97461 - 105203, n=5)
102908 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
101029 Points -4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99861 Points -5%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
98781 Points -6%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
13062 Points 0%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
13039 Points
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
13011 Points 0%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
12905 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
  (12548 - 13039, n=5)
12830 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 32988, n=222, last 2 years)
12175 Points -7%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9927 Points -24%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9247 Points -29%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
58428 Points +7%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
56486 Points +3%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
54778 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
  (49657 - 56486, n=5)
52606 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (10291 - 134044, n=222, last 2 years)
47772 Points -13%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
31779 Points -42%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
25547 Points -53%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
21106 Points -61%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
142686 MB/s +5%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
142360 MB/s +5%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
135448 MB/s
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
125268 MB/s -8%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
  (51791 - 142686, n=5)
118697 MB/s -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=222, last 2 years)
107334 MB/s -21%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
102111 MB/s -25%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
85401 MB/s -37%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1392 MB/s +61%
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 2409, n=222, last 2 years)
1208 MB/s +39%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1143 MB/s +32%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
948 MB/s +9%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
905 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
888 MB/s +3%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
866 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
  (737 - 888, n=5)
818 MB/s -6%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (1518 - 31796, n=222, last 2 years)
10062 KRay/s +19%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
9147 KRay/s +8%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
8981 KRay/s +6%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
8438 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
  (7530 - 8981, n=5)
8272 KRay/s -2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
6663 KRay/s -21%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
5322 KRay/s -37%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
4457 KRay/s -47%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
40868 MPixel/s +38%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40239 MPixel/s +36%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=223, last 2 years)
36679 MPixel/s +24%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
36231 MPixel/s +22%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
30604 MPixel/s +3%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
29687 MPixel/s
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
29413 MPixel/s -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
  (25757 - 30291, n=5)
28445 MPixel/s -4%

系统性能

基准测试结果显示了良好的系统性能,尽管与基于英特尔的笔记本的明显区别再次明显。然而,主观上,海盗船Voyager a1600提供了非常好的系统性能,在日常使用中没有明显的延迟。

PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
8636 Points +20%
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=197, last 2 years)
7580 Points +5%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
7539 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7377 Points +2%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
7322 Points +2%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7208 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M
  ()
7208 Points 0%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
6860 Points -5%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
11190 Points +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (8300 - 12334, n=196, last 2 years)
10718 Points +8%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
10715 Points +7%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10521 Points +6%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10249 Points +3%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9970 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M
  ()
9970 Points 0%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
9758 Points -2%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
10932 Points +22%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 11833, n=196, last 2 years)
9716 Points +8%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
9632 Points +7%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
9613 Points +7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
9549 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9097 Points +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8983 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M
  ()
8983 Points 0%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
14291 Points +26%
Average of class Gaming
  (6462 - 18475, n=196, last 2 years)
11450 Points +1%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11385 Points 0%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11350 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M
  ()
11350 Points 0%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
11293 Points -1%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10888 Points -4%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
9322 Points -18%
CrossMark / Overall
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2132 Points +51%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2334, n=168, last 2 years)
1877 Points +33%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1861 Points +32%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1661 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1596 Points +13%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1415 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M
  ()
1415 Points 0%
CrossMark / Productivity
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2012 Points +46%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=168, last 2 years)
1787 Points +30%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1786 Points +30%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1609 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1551 Points +12%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1379 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M
  ()
1379 Points 0%
CrossMark / Creativity
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2307 Points +44%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2514, n=168, last 2 years)
2042 Points +28%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1936 Points +21%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1795 Points +12%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1754 Points +10%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1599 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M
  ()
1599 Points 0%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2007 Points +89%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1868 Points +76%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=168, last 2 years)
1700 Points +60%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1449 Points +37%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1310 Points +24%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1060 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M
  ()
1060 Points 0%
PCMark 10 Score
7208 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
63993 MB/s +28%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
63110 MB/s +26%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
60342 MB/s +21%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 92565, n=222, last 2 years)
59222 MB/s +19%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
50837 MB/s +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
  (49150 - 51517, n=5)
50427 MB/s +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
49972 MB/s
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
49150 MB/s -2%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
69716 MB/s +36%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
67695 MB/s +32%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
66496 MB/s +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (24879 - 90647, n=222, last 2 years)
63097 MB/s +23%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
51836 MB/s +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
51270 MB/s
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
51041 MB/s 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
  (43646 - 51838, n=5)
49919 MB/s -3%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
64272 MB/s +16%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
63527 MB/s +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (21619 - 103259, n=222, last 2 years)
61557 MB/s +11%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
55214 MB/s 0%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
55214 MB/s
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
55102 MB/s 0%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
51577 MB/s -7%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
  (15975 - 55235, n=5)
46524 MB/s -16%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
120.6 ns * -27%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M
95.2 ns *
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
94.2 ns * +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
  (79.2 - 110.9, n=5)
93.1 ns * +2%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
90.1 ns * +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 152.5, n=219, last 2 years)
87.3 ns * +8%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
86 ns * +10%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
85.4 ns * +10%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

在Edge中打开多个浏览器标签时,记录的延迟没有增加。Voyager a1600还掌握了4K YouTube视频的播放,没有问题。我们只看到在启动Prime95之后延迟略有增加。

打开多个浏览器标签和播放4K视频时的最大延迟。
打开多个浏览器标签和播放4K视频时的最大延迟。
按最长的执行时间排列的驱动程序
按最长的执行时间排列的驱动程序
Prime95十秒后的最大延时
Prime95十秒后的最大延时
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2127.9 μs * -175%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1393.9 μs * -80%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1194.1 μs * -54%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1155.7 μs * -50%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
773 μs *
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
717.4 μs * +7%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储

三星2TB SSD(NVMe SSD)。
三星2TB SSD(NVMe SSD)。

海盗船Voyager a1600拥有2TB固态硬盘,提供了大量的存储空间,由于其预期用途,这绝对是需要的。在基准测试中,已安装的模型不能跟上竞争者的步伐。尽管如此,对于大多数用户来说,其传输速率还是绰绰有余的。在负载测试中,固态硬盘的性能始终可以不受限制。顺便说一下,笔记本的底板起到了散热的作用。总共可以安装两个M.2-2280格式的大容量存储设备。

关于进一步的比较和基准,请参考我们的SSD/HDD 比较表.

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Sequential Read: 3524 MB/s
Sequential Write: 2050 MB/s
512K Read: 1754 MB/s
512K Write: 2055 MB/s
4K Read: 39.29 MB/s
4K Write: 137.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 443.8 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 493.5 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
91.4 pt
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
 
89.2 pt
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX -1!
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
87.7 pt
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
86.1 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
79.9 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
77.5 pt
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
70.5 pt
Corsair Voyager a1600
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
64.5 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4343 MB/s +35%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4195 (4171.24min - 4194.51max) MB/s +31%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3928 (3889.8min - 3927.66max) MB/s +22%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (2376 - 5676, n=29)
3919 MB/s +22%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3625 (3612.57min - 3624.81max) MB/s +13%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
3595 (3264.19min - 3594.73max) MB/s +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=196, last 2 years)
3536 MB/s +10%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3207 (3148.45min - 3206.84max) MB/s
seq write
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4954 (4429.55min - 4954.26max) MB/s +47%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4780 (3934.47min - 4779.5max) MB/s +42%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4599 (4248.83min - 4598.67max) MB/s +36%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (2461 - 7628, n=29)
4204 MB/s +24%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
4033 (3953.13min - 4032.82max) MB/s +19%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=196, last 2 years)
3825 MB/s +13%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3377 (3301.76min - 3376.79max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3274 (3228.15min - 3273.86max) MB/s -3%
seq q8 t1 read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (3471 - 12556, n=29)
7139 MB/s +17%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
6867 (6210.3min - 6866.91max) MB/s +13%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6697 (4182.58min - 6697.46max) MB/s +10%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
6694 (5547.2min - 6693.9max) MB/s +10%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
6693 (6460.49min - 6692.89max) MB/s +10%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
6499 (5666.71min - 6499.29max) MB/s +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (2268 - 16089, n=196, last 2 years)
6381 MB/s +5%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6099 (5570.64min - 6098.73max) MB/s
seq q8 t1 write
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (3537 - 10261, n=29)
5515 MB/s +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5412 (5265.32min - 5411.99max) MB/s +7%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5048 (5040.92min - 5048.44max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5003 (4959.7min - 5002.55max) MB/s -1%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4985 (4772.28min - 4984.61max) MB/s -1%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4982 (4649.6min - 4981.68max) MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=196, last 2 years)
4805 MB/s -5%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4765 (4460.74min - 4765.06max) MB/s -6%
4k q1 t1 read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (56.2 - 91.2, n=29)
78.5 MB/s +34%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
77.1 (76.91min - 77.11max) MB/s +32%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
74.1 (72.94min - 74.14max) MB/s +26%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
70.3 (69.8min - 70.31max) MB/s +20%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=196, last 2 years)
67.7 MB/s +16%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
67.6 (66.3min - 67.64max) MB/s +15%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
66.7 (66.39min - 66.66max) MB/s +14%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
58.6 (57.33min - 58.61max) MB/s
4k q1 t1 write
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
258 (233.29min - 257.8max) MB/s +83%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 421, n=196, last 2 years)
224 MB/s +59%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
222 (217.59min - 222.42max) MB/s +58%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (134 - 295, n=29)
219 MB/s +56%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
205 (195.73min - 204.56max) MB/s +46%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
161 (159.24min - 160.98max) MB/s +14%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
159.1 (155.4min - 159.1max) MB/s +13%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
140.8 (138.42min - 140.84max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (663 - 4075, n=29)
2978 MB/s +112%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2859 (2841.54min - 2858.59max) MB/s +104%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2842 (2837.59min - 2841.89max) MB/s +102%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2750 (2675.05min - 2750.14max) MB/s +96%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=196, last 2 years)
2580 MB/s +84%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1535 (1515.74min - 1535.37max) MB/s +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
1528 (1477.56min - 1527.59max) MB/s +9%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1404 (1371.85min - 1404.22max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 write
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2786 (2543.84min - 2785.68max) MB/s +461%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2679 (2487.07min - 2678.86max) MB/s +439%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2658 (2651.88min - 2657.7max) MB/s +435%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (422 - 3548, n=29)
2271 MB/s +357%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=196, last 2 years)
2146 MB/s +332%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
585 (555.77min - 584.61max) MB/s +18%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
539 (505.45min - 539.19max) MB/s +8%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
497 (485.81min - 496.85max) MB/s
AS SSD
Score Total
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
7400 Points +26%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (4850 - 9031, n=28)
7378 Points +26%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
7356 Points +25%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
7009 Points +19%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=184, last 2 years)
6816 Points +16%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6475 Points +10%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5985 Points +2%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5878 Points
Score Read
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2855 Points +57%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2814 Points +54%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (1535 - 3399, n=28)
2746 Points +51%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2709 Points +49%
Average of class Gaming
  (760 - 4721, n=184, last 2 years)
2498 Points +37%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
1994 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1957 Points +7%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1824 Points
Score Write
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3614 Points +12%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (1081 - 3999, n=28)
3296 Points +2%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3221 Points
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
3144 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
3128 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=184, last 2 years)
3109 Points -3%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3093 Points -4%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2930 Points -9%
Seq Read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (2591 - 9971, n=28)
5538 MB/s +15%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5396.69 MB/s +12%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
5348.25 MB/s +11%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
5232 MB/s +9%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4996.87 MB/s +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=184, last 2 years)
4955 MB/s +3%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4821 MB/s
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4531.51 MB/s -6%
Seq Write
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4539.36 MB/s +67%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4336 MB/s +59%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4186.78 MB/s +54%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (1900 - 8590, n=28)
4074 MB/s +50%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=184, last 2 years)
3661 MB/s +34%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2851.98 MB/s +5%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2725 MB/s
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2667.04 MB/s -2%
4K Read
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
73.81 MB/s +48%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (49.8 - 86.4, n=28)
73.2 MB/s +47%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
67.72 MB/s +36%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.4 - 112.1, n=184, last 2 years)
66.8 MB/s +34%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
64.38 MB/s +29%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
63.8 MB/s +28%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
61.45 MB/s +24%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
49.75 MB/s
4K Write
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
247.26 MB/s +75%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
212.27 MB/s +50%
Average of class Gaming
  (96.3 - 512, n=184, last 2 years)
210 MB/s +48%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
203.82 MB/s +44%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (112.6 - 254, n=28)
202 MB/s +43%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
160.74 MB/s +14%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
143.61 MB/s +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
141.54 MB/s
4K-64 Read
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2264.38 MB/s +75%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2218.05 MB/s +72%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2191.95 MB/s +70%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (918 - 2811, n=28)
2119 MB/s +64%
Average of class Gaming
  (442 - 3475, n=184, last 2 years)
1929 MB/s +49%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1393.84 MB/s +8%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
1380.56 MB/s +7%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1292.41 MB/s
4K-64 Write
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3168.51 MB/s +13%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2807.18 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (567 - 3414, n=28)
2687 MB/s -4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2579.14 MB/s -8%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2546.85 MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=184, last 2 years)
2535 MB/s -10%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2490.61 MB/s -11%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2298.82 MB/s -18%
Access Time Read
Corsair Voyager a1600
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.078 ms *
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=182, last 2 years)
0.05353 ms * +31%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
0.045 ms * +42%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
0.036 ms * +54%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (0.018 - 0.078, n=28)
0.03364 ms * +57%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.028 ms * +64%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
0.027 ms * +65%
Access Time Write
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.076 ms * -162%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=184, last 2 years)
0.04669 ms * -61%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (0.017 - 0.076, n=28)
0.02943 ms * -1%
Corsair Voyager a1600
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.029 ms *
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
0.027 ms * +7%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
0.022 ms * +24%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
0.021 ms * +28%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
0.016 ms * +45%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

03106209301240155018602170248027903100341037204030434046504960527055805890Tooltip
Corsair Voyager a1600: Ø6086 (5628.61-6111.88)

图形卡

AMD Radeon RX 6800M 是一款配备了12GB VRAM的快速专用显卡。由于RDNA2的存在,AMD目前用于笔记本的6000系列还为光线追踪计算提供了独立的RT核心。在测试中,Corsair Voyager a1600可以拿出良好的3D性能。与拥有GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 图形芯片的竞争对手的差距部分很小。基本上,海盗船Voyager a1600提供足够的性能,目前足以将许多现代游戏流畅地呈现在屏幕上。通过AMD的智能移位技术,CPU总是能从GPU获得最佳性能。

在2D模式下,AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS的iGPU会做工作,从而节省能源。

更多的比较和基准测试,请参考我们的GPU比较表.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
99.1 pt
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
91.7 pt
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M
 
91.7 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
90.3 pt
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
86.5 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
80.8 pt
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
78.3 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
42089 Points +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=230, last 2 years)
40451 Points +4%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M
  (39075 - 41706, n=2)
40391 Points +3%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
39075 Points
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
37288 Points -5%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
36065 Points -8%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
34141 Points -13%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
177650 Points +4%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
170020 Points
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
144658 Points -15%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
144426 Points -15%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M
  (91327 - 170020, n=3)
140735 Points -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=142, last 2 years)
136246 Points -20%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
108854 Points -36%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M
  (30507 - 34993, n=3)
33233 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
32853 Points +8%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
30507 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=234, last 2 years)
29442 Points -3%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
28006 Points -8%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
26612 Points -13%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
25891 Points -15%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22547, n=232, last 2 years)
12060 Points +16%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
11762 Points +13%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
11076 Points +6%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M
  (10439 - 11316, n=4)
11067 Points +6%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
10439 Points
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
10404 Points 0%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
9980 Points -4%
3DMark 05 Standard
57639 points
3DMark 06 Standard Score
46732 points
3DMark Vantage P Result
77244 points
3DMark 11 Performance
30013 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
209564 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
59585 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
25639 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
13599 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
10391 points
Help
Blender
v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
380 Seconds * -503%
Average of class Gaming
  (51 - 668, n=15, last 2 years)
275 Seconds * -337%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
63 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
51 Seconds * +19%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
382 Seconds *
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
378 Seconds * +1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (285 - 459, n=16)
376 Seconds * +2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
372 Seconds * +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 962, n=196, last 2 years)
317 Seconds * +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (261 - 429, n=13)
295 Seconds * +23%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
268 Seconds * +30%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
42 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (36 - 46, n=16)
41.4 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=184, last 2 years)
39.4 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
36 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (32 - 41, n=13)
35 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (22 - 30, n=15)
25.3 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 142, n=177, last 2 years)
23.2 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (20 - 28, n=13)
23.1 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
23 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
251 fps +41%
Average of class Gaming
  (17.5 - 449, n=165, last 2 years)
220 fps +24%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
208.1 (192min) fps +17%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
189 fps +6%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M
  (177.8 - 199, n=2)
188.4 fps +6%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
188 (156min) fps +6%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
186.6 (141min) fps +5%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M
177.8 (43.6min, 105.5P0.1, 142.7P1) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
118.1 (112min) fps +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=225, last 2 years)
116.8 fps +8%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
114.4 (108min, 109P1) fps +6%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M
  (108 - 110, n=2)
109 fps +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M
108 (38min, 58.3P0.1, 88.2P1) fps
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
102.1 (82min) fps -5%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
97.8 fps -9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
97.7 (83min) fps -10%
GTA V
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
183.4 (2.86min, 142.9P1) fps +17%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
176.1 (2.91min, 111.1P1) fps +13%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
173.9 (3.58min, 125P1) fps +11%
Average of class Gaming
  (15.3 - 187.1, n=180, last 2 years)
163.7 fps +5%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
162.4 (8.03min, 90.9P1) fps +4%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
156.3 fps 0%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M
156.2 (7.96min, 76.9P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M
  (124 - 156.2, n=2)
140.1 fps -10%
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
113 (10.1min, 71.4P1) fps +22%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
111.4 (6.89min, 66.7P1) fps +20%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
110.2 (10.6min, 76.9P1) fps +19%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.38 - 167.7, n=215, last 2 years)
107.1 fps +15%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
96.9 (7.1min, 62.5P1) fps +4%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
94.6 fps +2%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M
92.8 (6.46min, 55.6P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M
  (75.1 - 92.8, n=2)
84 fps -9%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1920x1080 Standard Quality
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
163.9 fps +30%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
148.5 fps +18%
Average of class Gaming
  (13 - 230, n=173, last 2 years)
144.3 fps +15%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
134.7 fps +7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
131 (51min) fps +4%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M
125.6 fps
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
123.5 fps -2%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M
  (118 - 125.6, n=2)
121.8 fps -3%
1920x1080 High Quality
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
121.2 fps +24%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
111.9 fps +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (9.13 - 194.9, n=225, last 2 years)
111.1 fps +14%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
103.9 fps +7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99.6 (59min) fps +2%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M
  (97.5 - 99.7, n=2)
98.6 fps +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M
97.5 fps
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
94.9 fps -3%
F1 2021
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
297 (230min) fps +29%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
246 (211min, 167P1) fps +6%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M
231 (185min, 141P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (20.7 - 470, n=46, last 2 years)
221 fps -4%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M
  (187 - 231, n=2)
209 fps -10%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
182.1 (157min, 116P1) fps -21%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
146 (121min) fps +18%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M
124.1 (104min, 92P1) fps
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
121.9 (100min, 78P1) fps -2%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M
  (114 - 124.1, n=2)
119.1 fps -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.5 - 271, n=63, last 2 years)
118.4 fps -5%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
97.5 (82min, 69P1) fps -21%
X-Plane 11.11
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
120.2 fps +165%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
112.5 fps +148%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
103.1 fps +128%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.4 - 166.2, n=240, last 2 years)
101.7 fps +125%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
70.8 fps +56%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M
  (45.3 - 50.4, n=2)
47.9 fps +6%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M
45.3 fps
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
44.1 fps -3%
1920x1080 med (fps_test=2)
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
150.5 fps +197%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
141.3 fps +179%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
130.8 fps +158%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.7 - 193.1, n=231, last 2 years)
128 fps +152%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
87.9 fps +73%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M
  (50.7 - 61.4, n=2)
56.1 fps +11%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
51.2 fps +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M
50.7 fps
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
166 fps +52%
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 232, n=114, last 2 years)
134.7 fps +24%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
113 fps +4%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M
109 (87min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M
  (95 - 109, n=2)
102 fps -6%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
153 fps +51%
Average of class Gaming
  (14 - 218, n=124, last 2 years)
126 fps +25%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
109 fps +8%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M
101 (78min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M
  (89 - 101, n=3)
95 fps -6%
Strange Brigade
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
224 (140min, 162.1P1) fps +9%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M
206 (116.9min, 151.5P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (14.6 - 421, n=223, last 2 years)
206 fps 0%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M
  (179 - 206, n=3)
188.3 fps -9%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
171.2 (74.4min, 123.2P1) fps -17%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
167.2 (107.5min, 131.7P1) fps -19%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
146.6 (72.6min, 102.4P1) fps -29%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
137.6 (22.6min, 94P1) fps -33%
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
261 (74.9min, 186.3P1) fps +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (17.5 - 465, n=188, last 2 years)
232 fps +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M
229 (152.3min, 169.8P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M
  (192 - 229, n=2)
211 fps -8%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
189.4 (106.8min, 136.7P1) fps -17%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
184 (117.2min, 131.2P1) fps -20%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
164.1 (81.9min, 109.9P1) fps -28%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
156 (44min, 107.5P1) fps -32%
Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
177.8 (154.9min) fps +42%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.9 - 244, n=234, last 2 years)
152.1 fps +21%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
151.4 (134.2min) fps +21%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
149.1 (131.9min) fps +19%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M
125.5 (105.8min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M
  ()
125.5 fps 0%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
116 (100.1min) fps -8%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
113.7 (86.4min) fps -9%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
168 (144.9min) fps +46%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
145.2 (127.1min) fps +26%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
144 (127.1min) fps +25%
Average of class Gaming
  (26.9 - 220, n=235, last 2 years)
142.4 fps +24%
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M
114.8 (94.7min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M
  ()
114.8 fps 0%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
112.1 (93.8min) fps -2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
95.2 (75.3min) fps -17%

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip
Corsair Voyager a1600 R9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M: Ø112.7 (97.284-143.2)
low med. high ultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 177.1 172 156.2 92.8 84 85.4
The Witcher 3 (2015) 309 236 177.8 108 59.5
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 146.1 126.2 125.5 114.8 95.2
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 160.8 125.6 97.5 71 41.3
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 60 50.7 45.3 28.8
Far Cry 5 (2018) 129 113 109 101 100 61
Strange Brigade (2018) 394 258 229 206 145 77.2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 143.9 119.7 112.8 106.1 80.5 43.2
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 111 97 94 86 82 62
Metro Exodus (2019) 205 137.4 99.8 78.7 61.4 37.1
Borderlands 3 (2019) 116.1 100.1 89.2 77.6 57 30.3
F1 2020 (2020) 305 247 228 172.4 127.4 70.2
Dirt 5 (2020) 242 154 121 95 76 47
F1 2021 (2021) 342 277 231 124.1 88.2 47.6
New World (2021) 122.5 103 83.7 66.2 34.1
Forza Horizon 5 (2021) 213 165 159 97 79 50
God of War (2022) 88.6 88.3 85.4 68.4 53 33.8
GRID Legends (2022) 233 205 171.2 144.1 115.8 72.8
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) 122.5 95.5 82 76.9 48.1 22.1
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) 196.7 161.5 104.6 80.5 54.9 28.2
F1 22 (2022) 226 226 192.3 49.7 29.9 13.8
A Plague Tale Requiem (2022) 104.9 82.5 61.4 46 32.8 17.9
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection (2022) 93.4 87.9 80.7 76.3 59.2 33.7
Spider-Man Miles Morales (2022) 90.8 94.2 88.6 82.5 63.2 38.1

排放与能源--不可忽视的问题

噪声排放

测量的噪声排放几乎显示了游戏笔记本电脑的典型结果。然而,测得的51.1 dB(A)很响,主观上认为明显更响。原因是非常高频率的风扇噪音。唯一的补救措施是选择平衡安静的配置文件。在压力测试中,噪音水平分别下降到46和36 dB(A)。

Noise Level

Idle
30.5 / 30.6 / 30.7 dB(A)
Load
44.5 / 51.1 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 29.9 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.137.134.633.332.735.12544.541.235.741.834.237.8314336.534.536.931.534.34032.531.930.328.928.929.65039.436.435.133.230.129.36331.828.829.627.525.631802827.226.727.124.829.110026.425.727.426.325.527.212526.425.325.625.123.126.516025.324.324.324.622.826.120023.623.522.822.622.325.325022.921.82221.420.924.331522.821.621.521.619.925.940025.421.821.721.319.629.150026.120.220.320.120.129.763027.720.419.719.72132.680031.920.219.819.61936.5100032.218.818.818.718.437.5125034.318.418.718.417.840.5160033.919.619.519.817.740.9200033.817.617.617.216.740.8250033.517.617.416.916.540.7315037.817.417.317.216.441.6400032.117.217.117.116.741.1500029.117.217.2171739.463002717.417.417.217.236.4800021.817.417.417.31732.31000021.417.817.617.517.429.11250019.717.917.917.817.826.51600018.718.418.418.318.122.7SPL44.530.730.630.53051.1N4.41.51.51.41.37.1median 26.4median 18.8median 18.8median 18.7median 18.1median 32.3Delta5.12.42.41.826.1hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseCorsair Voyager a1600
Corsair Voyager a1600
Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
Noise
7%
22%
0%
-3%
5%
off / environment *
29.9
25.5
15%
22.8
24%
26
13%
26
13%
24.5
18%
Idle Minimum *
30.5
25.5
16%
23
25%
26
15%
30
2%
24.5
20%
Idle Average *
30.6
25.5
17%
23
25%
29
5%
31
-1%
30
2%
Idle Maximum *
30.7
27.4
11%
23
25%
34
-11%
33
-7%
32.5
-6%
Load Average *
44.5
49.9
-12%
26.8
40%
50
-12%
49
-10%
43.9
1%
Load Maximum *
51.1
55
-8%
54.2
-6%
56
-10%
57
-12%
54.2
-6%
Witcher 3 ultra *
54.3
53
53
48.8

* ... smaller is better

温度

海盗船Voyager a1600在压力测试中的表现
海盗船Voyager a1600在压力测试中的表现

在压力测试中,我们测量了机箱底部的最热点,高达54℃。然而,机箱上部的温度也相当高,刚刚超过50℃。在游戏过程中,机箱温度只略微下降了1-2℃。

在压力测试中,CPU和GPU温度分别上升到95和83℃。然而,SoC的平均时钟频率仍然为3.7GHz。AMD的GPU也实现了高时钟频率,略低于2.2GHz。海盗船使用了一个带有蒸汽室和两个风扇的大型冷却系统。

Max. Load
 43.3 °C50.7 °C41.5 °C 
 36.3 °C44.3 °C33.3 °C 
 34 °C31.5 °C32.2 °C 
Maximum: 50.7 °C
Average: 38.6 °C
36 °C54.2 °C36.7 °C
35.5 °C51 °C36.3 °C
33.1 °C36.1 °C34.4 °C
Maximum: 54.2 °C
Average: 39.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  63.5 °C | Room Temperature 23.4 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50.7 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54.2 °C / 130 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).
闲置,顶部
闲置,顶部
压力测试,顶部
压力测试,顶部
TheWitcher 3, top
TheWitcher 3, top
闲置,底部
闲置,底部
压力测试,底部
压力测试,底部
TheWitcher 3, 底部
TheWitcher 3, 底部
Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Heat
-3%
14%
8%
14%
-3%
Maximum Upper Side *
50.7
55.1
-9%
37.2
27%
47
7%
41
19%
44.4
12%
Maximum Bottom *
54.2
50.3
7%
43
21%
49
10%
62
-14%
60.8
-12%
Idle Upper Side *
35.8
35.5
1%
34
5%
31
13%
25
30%
33.8
6%
Idle Bottom *
33
36.1
-9%
32.8
1%
32
3%
26
21%
38.8
-18%

* ... smaller is better

演讲者

两个扬声器位于掌托下方。然而,声音是从键盘旁边的扬声器栅栏中向上引出的。通常情况下,这两个扬声器缺乏低音,所以中音和高音明显占优势。然而,我们建议使用耳机进行游戏。这可以通过USB使用3.5毫米插孔或通过Slipstream连接到笔记本电脑上。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.437.137.42536.136.736.1313431.2344028.929.728.95036.435.836.4632927298025.325.125.310026.725.926.712529.124.229.116038.822.638.820047.821.847.825050.520.750.53155220.35240054.219.854.250053.619.253.663056.719.456.780063.918.563.9100060.617.960.6125059.817.259.8160059.216.759.2200058.816.858.8250050.216.750.2315048.816.648.8400051.616.851.6500049.416.849.4630053.617.253.6800049.117.449.11000046.917.646.91250041.917.941.91600033.118.333.1SPL68.929.768.9N23.41.323.4median 50.5median 17.9median 50.5Delta7.11.87.124.823.524.82828.9282730.42724.323.324.329.231.929.223.322.423.330.21630.242.314.942.350.215.350.252.515.452.547.814.447.856.413.756.462.914.762.966.516.166.562.616.562.663.41263.466.811.366.865.311.565.362.411.762.465.112.265.164.812.364.862.412.762.459.613.459.668.213.868.271.113.571.174.714.274.772.61572.674.515.874.565.713.665.764.713.264.780.825.580.849.40.749.4median 64.7median 13.7median 64.73.81.33.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseCorsair Voyager a1600Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Corsair Voyager a1600 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

消耗功率

230瓦的电源
230瓦的电源

在功耗方面,我们测量了空闲时约16至22瓦的功率。在平均负载下,我们登记了大约133瓦,尽管峰值达到258瓦。根据规格,该电源可以提供230瓦。然而,在测试中,较高的负载峰值并没有导致问题。在压力测试期间,电池没有额外放电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 2.05 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 16.9 / 20.3 / 22.2 Watt
Load midlight 133.4 / Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

Energy consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255Tooltip
Corsair Voyager a1600; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø206 (195.6-225)
Corsair Voyager a1600; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø211 (161.5-258)

Energy consumption with an external monitor

0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
Corsair Voyager a1600; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø93.6 (90.5-133.9)
Corsair Voyager a1600; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø105.5 (96.3-142.2)
Corsair Voyager a1600; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø198.4 (190.7-212)
Corsair Voyager a1600; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø211 (194.2-221)

电池寿命

海盗船的电池容量为99Wh,在电池容量方面用尽了最大限度。由于闲置能耗相对较高,该设备在闲置时落后于竞争对手。然而,联想的Legion 7的得分更差。尽管如此,Voyager a1600在WLAN测试中取得了合格的运行时间,略低于6小时。在这项测试中,显示亮度为52%,相当于150cd/m²的一般条件。海盗船还在电池模式下明显地节制了CPU和GPU的性能。

最大的电池寿命
最大的电池寿命
负载电池寿命
负载电池寿命
WLAN电池寿命
WLAN电池寿命
WLAN电池寿命(最大亮度)
WLAN电池寿命(最大亮度)
H.264电池寿命
H.264电池寿命
充电时间
充电时间
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
6h 58min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge: 107.0.1418.62)
5h 50min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge: 107.0.1418.62)
4h 50min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 58min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 06min
Corsair Voyager a1600
R9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M, 99 Wh
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W
R9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7
R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT, 99 Wh
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.98 Wh
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 83 Wh
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-31%
-6%
14%
10%
-36%
3%
Reader / Idle
418
293
-30%
603
44%
H.264
358
490
37%
306
-15%
WiFi v1.3
350
339
-3%
436
25%
344
-2%
336
-4%
267
-24%
Load
126
53
-58%
110
-13%
133
6%
114
-10%
40
-68%
Witcher 3 ultra
51
55

Pros

+ 高CPU和GPU性能
+ 12 GB VRAM
+ 32 GB DDR5内存
+ 2TB SSD
+ 非常好的做工
+ 纤细的设计
+ 快速、校准的240赫兹显示屏
+ 没有PWM,也没有混浊现象
+ 非常大的触摸板
+ 带Cherry MX开关的机械按键
+ Elgato Stream甲板的特点
+ 海盗船Slipstream

Cons

- 高频率的风扇噪音
- 没有4K选项
- 低于平均水平的SSD性能
- 只有全高清网络摄像头
- 没有RJ-45

结论--多功能的笔记本游戏玩家和流媒体玩家

海盗船Voyager a1600的评测:由德国海盗船提供
海盗船Voyager a1600的评测:由德国海盗船提供

海盗船通过Voyager a1600创造了一个真正伟大的设备。AMD SoC和AMD GPU的组合很好,在测试中相当具有说服力。在与英特尔当前SoC的直接对决中,它往往不得不承认失败。然而,性能上的差异其实并不明显。由于材料的选择,Voyager a1600看起来特别高端,这也使该设备具有非常好的稳定性。该设备看起来一点都不笨重

乍一看,连接性变成了一个有点简陋的东西。然而,那些依靠Slipstream技术来连接外围设备的人几乎不会错过缺席的USB Type-A端口。

AMD的Ryzen 9 6900HS表现良好,在负载下持续快速,没有太大的性能损失。我们也可以证明AMD的Radeon RX 6800M也是如此。我们喜欢16:10格式的显示屏。唯一的缺点是亮度有点低,而且在AdobeRGB和P3色彩空间中的色彩空间覆盖率不是很完美,这就排除了用于视频或照片编辑的专业用途。然而,作为一台游戏笔记本电脑,海盗船Voyager a1600可以轻松地做到没有这些。

海盗船Voyager a1600不仅仅是一个纯粹的游戏笔记本,因为它的强大功能使它成为流媒体和内容创作者的完美设备。

然而,凭借独特的流媒体功能,Voyager a1600将被人记住。可以根据需要分配的快速启动按钮适合流媒体者,你可以不需要额外的流媒体平台。话虽如此,由于预期的用途,我们会希望有一个更高质量的摄像头,而不仅仅是作为一个移动应急解决方案。海盗船Voyager a1600的最大缺点是内置冷却装置。在负载情况下,温度仍然在限制范围内,这是毫无疑问的,但在最大性能下,测量的噪音水平仍然太高。那些放弃极限模式的人将得到低排放的回报,但同时也会放弃一些性能。

价格和可用性

海盗船Voyager a1600可以直接从海盗船商店购买。在那里你必须支付3550欧元的测试配置。另外,亚马逊销售相同的模型,目前为3540欧元.更便宜的配置是Ryzen 7 6800HS和16GB内存,也可以从亚马逊买到,2,725欧元。.

Corsair Voyager a1600 - 12/05/2022 v7
Sebastian Bade

Chassis
91 / 98 → 92%
Keyboard
88%
Pointing Device
86%
Connectivity
62 / 80 → 78%
Weight
60 / 10-66 → 90%
Battery
66 / 95 → 70%
Display
89%
Games Performance
98%
Application Performance
96%
Temperature
83 / 95 → 87%
Noise
72 / 90 → 80%
Audio
56%
Camera
44 / 85 → 52%
Average
77%
87%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 海盗船Voyager a1600笔记本电脑在审查。为游戏玩家、流媒体和创作者提供全面的AMD动力
Sebastian Bade, 2022-12-14 (Update: 2022-12-14)