Notebookcheck Logo

微星Titan GT77 HX 13V评测--带RTX 4090和Core i9-13950HX的终极游戏笔记本电脑

世界上第一块4K 144 Hz微型LED面板。 新的微星Titan GT77 HX 13 VI是2023年游戏笔记本电脑的一个令人印象深刻的展示,它结合了你现在可以得到的最快的组件,包括炽热的GeForce RTX 4090,它为全新的4K迷你LED屏幕提供了144赫兹的足够性能。
Gaming Geforce GPU Intel Laptop / Notebook Raptor Lake Thunderbolt Windows

微星的泰坦GT77系列提供了为最大性能而设计的旗舰级游戏笔记本电脑。新的2023款GT77 HX 13VI延续了这一概念,并使用了一些现有的最好的移动组件。除了英特尔最新的Raptor Lake-HX CPU之外,你还可以享受Nvidia的全新笔记本GPU:GeForce RTX 4080或GeForce RTX 4090.微星还为新的GT77配备了刷新率为144赫兹的4K Mini-LED屏幕。

我们的审查单位是一个预生产单位,配备了酷睿i9-13950HX,GeForce RTX 4090,64GB内存,4TB SSD存储,以及4K Mini-LED屏幕。具有相同规格的零售配置(GT77 HX 13VI)将配备酷睿i9-13980HX(稍高的时钟,但没有vPro支持),在德国的零售价为6599欧元(5299美元);带有RTX 4080和2TB SSD存储的SKU售价为5499欧元(GT77 HX 13VH,4299美元)。

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI (Titan GT77 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-13950HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.5 GHz, 220 W PL2 / Short Burst, 150 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Core: 2340 MHz, Memory: 2250 MHz, 175 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 528.37, Optimus, MUX
Memory
64 GB 
, DDR5-4800, Dual-Channel, 2/4 slots free, max. 128 GB
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 255 PPI, B173ZAN06.C, Mini-LED, glossy: no, HDR, 144 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)
Storage
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, 2048 GB 
, 2x 2TB RAID 0, 3970 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Raptor Lake-S PCH - cAVS
Connections
3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm, Card Reader: SDXC, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Killer E3100G 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 23 x 397 x 330
Battery
99.9 Wh, 6578 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, 2 Woofers, Keyboard: Cherry MX Mechanical, Keyboard Light: yes, 330W PSU, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
3.468 kg, Power Supply: 1.426 kg
Price
6600 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
89 %
02/2023
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
3.5 kg23 mm17.30"3840x2160
91.2 %
02/2023
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg21.99 mm16.00"2560x1600
86.9 %
11/2022
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.9 kg28.3 mm17.30"2560x1440
88.3 %
08/2022
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3.3 kg23 mm17.30"1920x1080
89.2 %
05/2022
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3.1 kg20.9 mm17.30"1920x1080
87.6 %
09/2022
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.8 kg27 mm17.00"2560x1600

案例 - 泰坦,照明有限

微星公司为去年的泰坦GT77,所以新的型号没有视觉上的变化。黑色的机箱对于高端玩家来说是非常克制的,RGB照明也仅限于盖子上的标志以及后面的风扇排气口。这取决于个人喜好,但当你关闭照明时,你至少还可以在专业环境中使用这台笔记本电脑。你会很快看到光滑表面上的指纹,这需要定期清洁。微星公司在2023型号上仍然使用16:9的长宽比屏幕。

机箱的质量还算不错,尽管它几乎完全由塑料制成。特别是底部的粗糙材料并没有真正达到高价位的预期,也可以在500欧元的笔记本电脑上使用。不过,整体的制造质量还是不错的;底座非常结实,只有轻微的吱吱声。另一方面,盖子比较灵活,但我们无法引起图片的失真。我们希望显示器的铰链稍微硬一些,而且当你调整开启角度(最高可达135度)时,盖子会有一点晃动。

GT77仍然是一台相对较薄的机器,只有2.3厘米,特别是考虑到强大的硬件。然而,由于后部有大型冷却装置,这款笔记本非常深,占地面积比竞争对手大得多。它也非常重,几乎有3.5公斤,你必须为笨重的330瓦电源适配器再增加1.4公斤。

尺寸比较

395 mm 282 mm 28.3 mm 2.9 kg399.23 mm 299.57 mm 20.9 mm 3.1 kg397 mm 330 mm 23 mm 3.5 kg397 mm 330 mm 23 mm 3.3 kg381.7 mm 272.8 mm 27 mm 2.8 kg355 mm 244 mm 21.99 mm 2.4 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性--Thunderbolt和读卡器

在端口方面没有任何变化,你仍然得到所有重要的标准。所有的端口都位于两边,因为后面的区域专门用于冷却。你也可以在后部的USB-C端口为电池充电,但需要一个100W的电源适配器(65W的模块不起作用)。

左侧。电源,2个USB-A 3.2 Gen2(10 Gbps),SD读卡器,3.5毫米立体声插孔
左侧。电源,2个USB-A 3.2 Gen2(10 Gbps),SD读卡器,3.5毫米立体声插孔
右侧。USB-A 3.2 Gen.2 (10 Gbps), 2x USB-C 4.0 w/ Thunderbolt 4 (40 Gbps, DisplayPort-ALT模式, 1x w/ Power Delivery), Mini-DisplayPort, HDMI 2.1, 2.5 Gbps以太网
右侧。USB-A 3.2 Gen.2 (10 Gbps), 2x USB-C 4.0 w/ Thunderbolt 4 (40 Gbps, DisplayPort-ALT模式, 1x w/ Power Delivery), Mini-DisplayPort, HDMI 2.1, 2.5 Gbps以太网

SD卡阅读器

SD卡读卡器可以容纳全尺寸的存储卡,使用我们的参考卡(AV Pro V60),平均传输速率超过80 MB/s。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK (AV Pro V60)
182.9 MB/s +119%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
125 MB/s +50%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=100, last 2 years)
98.4 MB/s +18%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)
83.5 MB/s
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
69.1 (68.5min - 72.99max) MB/s -17%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
69 MB/s -17%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK (AV Pro V60)
220.6 MB/s +156%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
207.6 MB/s +141%
Average of class Gaming
  (26 - 269, n=93, last 2 years)
122.3 MB/s +42%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
88.14 MB/s +2%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)
86.2 MB/s

沟通

微星为新的泰坦GT77配备了Wi-Fi模块杀手AX1690i,它支持当前的Wi-Fi 6E标准以及蓝牙5.3。我们的美国样品没有连接到华硕的参考路由器的6GHz,但是当我们使用5GHz网络(Wi-Fi 6)时,信号质量也非常好。你也可以使用2.5Gbps的以太网端口。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1691 (1589min - 1731max) MBit/s +9%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1545 (1508min, 1510.9P1 - 1569max) MBit/s
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
  (917 - 1727, n=8)
1477 MBit/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (685 - 1890, n=158, last 2 years)
1406 MBit/s -9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1328 (1093min - 1448max) MBit/s -14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
MediaTek RZ608
967 (949min - 978max) MBit/s -37%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1610 (1421min - 1675max) MBit/s +2%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1582 (1517min, 1518.74P1 - 1636max) MBit/s
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
  (1145 - 1650, n=7)
1470 MBit/s -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1793, n=152, last 2 years)
1274 MBit/s -19%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1155 (495min - 1441max) MBit/s -27%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
MediaTek RZ608
936 (898min - 971max) MBit/s -41%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600Tooltip
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1545 (1508-1569)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1582 (1517-1636)

网络摄像头

网络摄像头配备了一个机械快门,但这几乎是所有的积极方面。微星仍然使用糟糕的720p网络摄像头,即使在良好的照明条件下也不能拍出好照片。你可以在2023年期待更多,特别是考虑到价格。

ColorChecker
4.5 ∆E
4 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
1.1 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
7 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
10 ∆E
ColorChecker MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI: 4.94 ∆E min: 1.07 - max: 9.97 ∆E

维护

整个底盖由标准的飞利浦螺钉固定,可以拆卸,但盖子贴得很紧,过程并不容易。除了四个SO-DIMM插槽外,你还可以使用三个M.2插槽进行升级。也可以更换Wi-Fi模块和清洁风扇。微星改变了冷却布局,使用了更多的热管,相比于 以前的模型,这意味着第四个M.2插槽必须被移除。

内部布局
内部布局
4x SODIMM
4x SODIMM

输入设备--微星具有出色的机械键盘

我们已经喜欢上了上一个型号的机械键盘。 以前的型号而这一点没有改变。与传统的橡胶圆顶键盘相比,打字的噪音要高一些,但樱桃单元明显比你能得到的机械键盘要安静。XMG Neo 17比如说。方向键和专用数字键盘(有点窄)使用传统的开关。可以单独调整每个键的灯光,但你也可以为所有的键选择一种不显眼的颜色。指纹扫描仪被安装在方向键正下方的掌托上。

在我们的审查中,大型点击板工作良好,标准的光标操作没有问题,但点击噪音有点大。然而,大多数游戏玩家无论如何都会使用外部鼠标或游戏手柄。

输入设备
输入设备

显示器 - 4K迷你LED,144赫兹

子像素布局
子像素布局

微星不仅使用了最新的CPU和GPU模型,还提供了全新的Mini-LED面板,分辨率为4K(16:9,3840 x 2160像素),刷新率为144Hz。也有可能得到一个240赫兹的QHD IPS屏幕。友达光电的哑光Mini-LED面板(B173ZAN06.C)的主观画质令人印象深刻,内容锐利,色彩丰富。黑色图像实际上是黑色的,而且在Mini-LED屏幕上没有背光渗出。微星公司宣传说有1000多个调光区,但你仍然可以注意到开花。由于整个调光区被照亮,黑暗背景上的明亮物体会产生明亮的云彩。然而,你只有在标志出现时才会真正注意到它,但我们在游戏或日常事物中没有注意到它。我们测量的平均亮度为600尼特,由于黑值低,对比度非常高。

最大HDR亮度:1014尼特
最大HDR亮度:1014尼特

该面板支持HDR 1000,我们可以确认在完全白色的图像上的最大亮度超过1000尼特,但该面板并没有达到更高的数值,而MacBook Pro 16的Mini-LED面板Apple MacBook Pro 16而MacBook Pro 16的Mini-LED面板在显示的小部分可以达到1600尼特。与MacOS相比,Windows中的HDR实现仍然是一场灾难。HDR必须手动激活,你不能再使用任何颜色配置文件,而且你不能在电池上使用HDR。考虑到这些问题,如果许多用户根本不使用HDR,我们不会感到惊讶,这是一种耻辱。尽管有磨砂表面,但HDR视频的质量与MacBook Pro 16相当,我们对它进行了并列测试。

612
cd/m²
607
cd/m²
619
cd/m²
601
cd/m²
606
cd/m²
600
cd/m²
595
cd/m²
575
cd/m²
607
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
B173ZAN06.C tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 619 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 602.4 cd/m² Minimum: 41.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 402 cd/m²
Contrast: 6060000:1 (Black: 0.0001 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.8
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
92.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.63
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
B173ZAN06.C, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 17.30
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
CSOT T3 MNG007DA4-1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
NE173QHM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Sharp SHP1544 LQ173M1JW08, IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 17.30
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
AU Optronics B173HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
BOE0A99, IPS, 2560x1600, 17.00
Display
0%
-2%
-16%
-10%
-17%
Display P3 Coverage
94.9
98.5
4%
97.1
2%
70.8
-25%
79.2
-17%
69
-27%
sRGB Coverage
99.9
100
0%
99.9
0%
98.9
-1%
99.8
0%
99.8
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
92.4
89.7
-3%
84.8
-8%
73
-21%
79.6
-14%
69.6
-25%
Response Times
69%
74%
86%
67%
75%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
38.4 ?(13.6, 24.8, n)
6.6 ?(3.4, 3.2)
83%
5.7 ?(2.7, 3)
85%
3.03 ?(1.28, 1.75)
92%
12.4 ?(6.4, 6)
68%
10.8 ?(5.1, 5.7)
72%
Response Time Black / White *
26.6 ?(9.2, 17.4, n)
12 ?(6.8, 5.2)
55%
10.1 ?(5, 5.1)
62%
5.28 ?(2.32, 2.96)
80%
9.2 ?(5.2, 4)
65%
6.1 ?(2.5, 3.6)
77%
PWM Frequency
2380 ?(100)
Screen
-38877%
-37485%
-44442%
-32218%
-47756%
Brightness middle
606
456.8
-25%
320
-47%
280
-54%
365.4
-40%
415
-32%
Brightness
602
437
-27%
303
-50%
275
-54%
344
-43%
399
-34%
Brightness Distribution
93
83
-11%
87
-6%
79
-15%
85
-9%
90
-3%
Black Level *
0.0001
0.35
-349900%
0.3
-299900%
0.4
-399900%
0.29
-289900%
0.43
-429900%
Contrast
6060000
1305
-100%
1067
-100%
700
-100%
1260
-100%
965
-100%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.8
3.7
23%
1.1
77%
2.1
56%
3.17
34%
1.44
70%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.2
6.42
22%
2.7
67%
5.83
29%
7.69
6%
2.33
72%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.8
0.66
63%
1.58
12%
0.51
72%
0.89
51%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.5
2.6
60%
1.1
83%
3.3
49%
5.3
18%
1.8
72%
Gamma
2.63 84%
2.3 96%
2.13 103%
2.13 103%
2.18 101%
2.132 103%
CCT
6596 99%
6108 106%
6599 98%
7060 92%
5879 111%
6327 103%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-12936% / -24983%
-12471% / -23057%
-14791% / -28561%
-10720% / -20704%
-15899% / -30693%

* ... smaller is better

微星为Titan GT77提供了真彩软件,它为色彩空间和场景(如玩家、办公室、电影)提供了不同的预设,你甚至可以使用该软件来校准屏幕。我们将专业的CalMAN软件与X-Rite i1 Pro 2分光光度计和Profile Display P3结合使用,因为该面板应该覆盖全部P3色域。

CalMAN灰度(目标色彩空间P3)。
CalMAN灰度(目标色彩空间P3)。
卡尔曼饱和度扫描(目标色彩空间P3)。
卡尔曼饱和度扫描(目标色彩空间P3)。
CalMAN ColorCheker(目标色彩空间P3)。
CalMAN ColorCheker(目标色彩空间P3)。
CalMAN 灰度校准(目标色彩空间P3)。
CalMAN 灰度校准(目标色彩空间P3)。
CalMAN 饱和度扫描已校准(目标色彩空间P3)
CalMAN 饱和度扫描已校准(目标色彩空间P3)
CalMAN ColorChecker已校准(目标色彩空间P3)。
CalMAN ColorChecker已校准(目标色彩空间P3)。

与P3参考色域相比,开箱后的偏差非常大,无论是灰度还是颜色。我们自己的校准(相应的配置文件可在上面的显示框中免费获得)明显改善了色彩性能,但也使最大亮度降低了约50尼特。我们仍然推荐使用校准后的配置文件,并且可以编辑图片/视频,尽管我们的测量显示P3色彩空间只覆盖了95%。

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. P3
vs. P3
vs. Adobe
vs. Adobe

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.2 ms rise
↘ 17.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.6 ms rise
↘ 24.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 52 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2380 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2380 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2380 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

0 %的亮度
0 %的亮度
20%的亮度
20%的亮度
40%的亮度
40%的亮度
60%的亮度
60%的亮度
80%的亮度
80%的亮度
100 %的亮度
100 %的亮度
最大HDR亮度
最大HDR亮度

我们在所有亮度水平(甚至是最大HDR亮度)检测PWM,频率为2.38 kHz,这使得确定响应时间真的很棘手。我们将在以后添加相应的结果。

户外使用
户外使用

哑光面板和高亮度在户外应该很不错,但微星限制了GT77的户外能力。在电池供电的情况下,HDR是不可能的,而且只要你拆开电源适配器,SDR的最大亮度也会从~600尼特降低到~400尼特。在可视角度的稳定性方面没有任何限制。

视角稳定
视角稳定

性能 - Core i9 HX & RTX 4090

我们的评测设备配备了酷睿i9-13950HX,是英特尔最快的移动CPU之一。零售版将配备酷睿i9-13980HX但它只为P核提供了100MHz的最高时钟,以支持vPro。当你玩游戏时,后者并不重要,但当你计划将泰坦作为移动工作站使用时,可能会有兴趣。微星仍然使用DDR5-4800,而不是更快的DDR5-5600,你可以选择新的GeForce RTX 4080RTX 4090用于笔记本电脑。

 
 
 

审查设置

预装的微星中心软件提供了不同的性能设置,包括AI模式和四个额外的预设(极限性能、平衡、静音、超级电池)。由于有MUX,你还可以选择图形模式(混合,只有dGPU,只有iGPU),但不支持高级优化,这意味着改变需要重新启动。

MSI中心的性能设置
MSI中心的性能设置

我们使用独立GPU模式(iGPU停用)的极限性能预设来进行基准测试,但我们使用iGPU进行电池测试。我们在使用微星软件时没有遇到任何严重的问题,但在独立显卡模式下有一个错误,我们无法降低显示亮度。我们预计这个问题将在零售设备上得到解决。

处理器 - Core i9-13950HX

猛禽湖HX-CPU(来源:英特尔)
猛禽湖HX-CPU(来源:英特尔)

与之相反的是 较慢的Raptor Lake移动处理器,英特尔改变了高端HX系列芯片的核心配置,与旧的Alder Lake CPU相比。频率更高,但现在也有两倍的效率核心(从8到16),这意味着CPU可以同时执行多达32个线程(16个E-cores + 8个P-cores与超线程)。

新的酷睿i9-13950HX在微星Titan GT77中的表现非常好,这要归功于慷慨的功率限制。性能有一些波动,但我们可以观察到在基准测试开始时的功耗超过200W,然后芯片会稳定在150W左右。性能比旧的泰坦GT77酷睿i9-12900HX在所有CPU基准测试中的性能提升了22%,而新的Razer Blade 16中的Core i9-13950HXRazer Blade 16也被击败了14%。

正如预期的那样,我们在多核测试中看到了最大的改进,在那里你只是注意到了更高的核心数量。比如说。在Cinebench R23多核测试中,新GT77比配备Core i9-12900HX的旧GT77快45%。与其他猛禽湖HX处理器相比,其优势也表明这是一个非常快的实现。新模型在单核测试中也更快,但优势要低得多,只有6-10%。

即使在最快的性能模式下,CPU性能也被锁定在25W,这导致在多核情况下的性能赤字超过70%。其他CPU基准测试列在 我们的技术部分.

Cinebench R15 Multi Dauertest

02655307951060132515901855212023852650291531803445371039754240450547705035Tooltip
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø4980 (4889.98-5226.71)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø4366 (4298.3-4875.08)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø4512 (4463.29-4528.99)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX: Ø2740 (2605.18-3101.02)
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX: Ø3311 (3259.45-3569.52)
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2889 (2849.61-2917.79)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2230 (2203.37-2292.39)
CPU数据 Cinebench R15多循环
CPU数据 Cinebench R15多循环
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
84.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
80.6 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX
 
79.8 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
74 pt
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
69 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
64.7 pt
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
61.4 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
59 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
48.5 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
33277 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX
  (24560 - 33277, n=7)
29352 Points -12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
28707 (26191.7min - 28706.8max) Points -14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
28010 (26406.1min - 28009.8max) Points -16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
26703 Points -20%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
26736 (22394.1min - 26736.1max) Points -20%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
22982 Points -31%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
19965 Points -40%
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 34613, n=229, last 2 years)
19422 Points -42%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
18870 (18654.1min - 18869.7max) Points -43%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
14152 Points -57%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
2100 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX
  (1952 - 2113, n=7)
2067 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2055 Points -2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
2029 Points -3%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
1913 Points -9%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1905 Points -9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
1903 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 2235, n=227, last 2 years)
1809 Points -14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1557 Points -26%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
12648 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
11289 Points -11%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX
  (8697 - 12648, n=7)
10973 Points -13%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
8697 Points -31%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
8667 Points -31%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
7511 Points -41%
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=227, last 2 years)
7383 Points -42%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
7169 Points -43%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5549 Points -56%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
803 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX
  (742 - 816, n=7)
788 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
756 Points -6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
742 Points -8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
741 Points -8%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
738 Points -8%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
727 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=227, last 2 years)
697 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
605 Points -25%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
5227 (4889.98min - 5226.71max) Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
4913 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
4875 (4298.3min - 4875.08max) Points -7%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX
  (3625 - 5227, n=7)
4565 Points -13%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
4529 (4463.29min - 4528.99max) Points -13%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
3570 (3259.45min - 3569.52max) Points -32%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
3101 (2605.18min - 3101.02max) Points -41%
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=231, last 2 years)
3074 Points -41%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
2918 (2849.61min - 2917.79max) Points -44%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
2296 Points -56%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
300 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
295 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
294 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX
  (274 - 303, n=7)
293 Points -2%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
278 Points -7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
274 Points -9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
274 Points -9%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
272 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=230, last 2 years)
268 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
248 Points -17%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
216 Seconds * -116%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 1259, n=225, last 2 years)
201 Seconds * -101%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
175 Seconds * -75%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
173.6 Seconds * -74%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
147 Seconds * -47%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
114 Seconds * -14%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX
  (100 - 137, n=7)
112.4 Seconds * -12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
111 Seconds * -11%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
100 Seconds *
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
127295 MIPS
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
118715 MIPS -7%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX
  (99351 - 127295, n=7)
115415 MIPS -9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
109330 MIPS -14%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
86234 MIPS -32%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
77003 MIPS -40%
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 140932, n=226, last 2 years)
76641 MIPS -40%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
69146 MIPS -46%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
64439 MIPS -49%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
6897 MIPS
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
6800 MIPS -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX
  (6445 - 7064, n=7)
6775 MIPS -2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
6445 MIPS -7%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
6256 MIPS -9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
6255 MIPS -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7581, n=226, last 2 years)
6113 MIPS -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5872 MIPS -15%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
5803 MIPS -16%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
20784 Points +1%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
20634 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX
  (16776 - 21853, n=7)
19501 Points -5%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
18152 Points -12%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
16250 Points -21%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
15144 Points -27%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
13717 Points -34%
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 22200, n=231, last 2 years)
13504 Points -35%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
10126 Points -51%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
2043 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2023 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX
  (1805 - 2097, n=7)
2013 Points -1%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
1923 Points -6%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1878 Points -8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
1868 Points -9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
1805 Points -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2193, n=231, last 2 years)
1805 Points -12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1590 Points -22%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
32.7 fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
30.9 fps -6%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX
  (26 - 34.5, n=7)
30.7 fps -6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
28.7 fps -12%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
25.6 fps -22%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
22.5 fps -31%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
21.4 fps -35%
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 37.6, n=229, last 2 years)
21.1 fps -35%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
17.5 fps -46%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
56 s * -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=223, last 2 years)
49.3 s * -6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
47.5 s * -2%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
46.5 s *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
46 s * +1%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX
  (32.8 - 52.1, n=7)
44.7 s * +4%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
40.7 s * +12%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
39 s * +16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
34.7 s * +25%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
0.4808 sec * -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 4.47, n=226, last 2 years)
0.4706 sec * -17%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
0.4323 sec * -7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX
0.4251 sec * -5%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
0.4194 sec * -4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
0.4121 sec * -2%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
0.4033 sec *
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX
  (0.3823 - 0.4121, n=7)
0.3956 sec * +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
0.3866 sec * +4%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
80693
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
16004
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
11424
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
59.98 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
199.4 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
3.57 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
300 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
283 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
5227 Points
Help
Performance Rating
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
95.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
90.2 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
89.2 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX
 
88.4 pt
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
76.6 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
67.8 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
65.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62.8 pt
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
51.2 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
28957 KRay/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
26763 KRay/s -8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
25857 KRay/s -11%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX
  (18131 - 28957, n=7)
24817 KRay/s -14%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
21797 KRay/s -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (3069 - 60169, n=222, last 2 years)
18514 KRay/s -36%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
17542 KRay/s -39%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
16115 KRay/s -44%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9759 KRay/s -66%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
144303 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
128498 Points -11%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX
  (102591 - 144303, n=7)
127039 Points -12%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
125944 Points -13%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
107354 Points -26%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
98800 Points -32%
Average of class Gaming
  (18567 - 252486, n=222, last 2 years)
93043 Points -36%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
86936 Points -40%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
43695 Points -70%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
7093 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
6567 MB/s -7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
6350 MB/s -10%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX
  (4981 - 7093, n=7)
6323 MB/s -11%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
4945 MB/s -30%
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 10389, n=222, last 2 years)
4297 MB/s -39%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
4179 MB/s -41%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3504 MB/s -51%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3422 MB/s -52%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
139649 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
136871 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX
  (131931 - 140103, n=7)
136822 Points -2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
133226 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 200651, n=222, last 2 years)
108858 Points -22%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
107120 Points -23%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
104422 Points -25%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
103770 Points -26%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
102167 Points -27%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
17057 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
16291 Points -4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
15813 Points -7%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX
  (12381 - 17057, n=7)
15365 Points -10%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
12969 Points -24%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
12783 Points -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 32988, n=222, last 2 years)
12143 Points -29%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
11502 Points -33%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
10402 Points -39%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
71038 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
65558 Points -8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
63308 Points -11%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX
  (46539 - 71038, n=7)
61883 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
54060 Points -24%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
52544 Points -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (10291 - 134044, n=222, last 2 years)
47650 Points -33%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
42613 Points -40%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
27285 Points -62%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
179186 MB/s +31%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
167077 MB/s +22%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
136551 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX
  (99981 - 204491, n=7)
135969 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
135833 MB/s -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
126434 MB/s -7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
125644 MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=222, last 2 years)
106724 MB/s -22%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
106367 MB/s -22%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2059 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
1891 MB/s -8%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX
  (1472 - 2069, n=7)
1854 MB/s -10%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
1850 MB/s -10%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1389 MB/s -33%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1205 MB/s -41%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1203 MB/s -42%
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 2409, n=222, last 2 years)
1202 MB/s -42%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
845 MB/s -59%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
15573 KRay/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
14479 KRay/s -7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
13844 KRay/s -11%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX
  (9787 - 15573, n=7)
13467 KRay/s -14%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
11612 KRay/s -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (1518 - 31796, n=222, last 2 years)
10025 KRay/s -36%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9507 KRay/s -39%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
8529 KRay/s -45%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
5748 KRay/s -63%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
50834 MPixel/s +24%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX
  (40233 - 50864, n=7)
47552 MPixel/s +16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
44238 MPixel/s +8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
42438 MPixel/s +4%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
41007 MPixel/s 0%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
40896 MPixel/s
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=223, last 2 years)
36547 MPixel/s -11%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
34534 MPixel/s -16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
30226 MPixel/s -26%

系统性能

GT77的主观性能非常好,合成基准测试结果也非常好,但考虑到强大的硬件,这几乎不足为奇。竞争对手的速度也非常快,你会注意到系统之间的巨大差异。

PCMark 10 / Score
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8884 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (7597 - 8884, n=2)
8241 Points -7%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8203 Points -8%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
8186 Points -8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7888 Points -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=197, last 2 years)
7573 Points -15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7208 Points -19%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6966 Points -22%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11761 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (10903 - 11761, n=2)
11332 Points -4%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
11205 Points -5%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11093 Points -6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
11078 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (8300 - 12334, n=196, last 2 years)
10708 Points -9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10306 Points -12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9740 Points -17%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10178 Points +3%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
10144 Points +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9856 Points 0%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9851 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (7244 - 11833, n=196, last 2 years)
9727 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9564 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (8330 - 9851, n=2)
9091 Points -8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
8271 Points -16%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
16424 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (13099 - 16424, n=2)
14762 Points -10%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
14535 Points -12%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
13270 Points -19%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
13098 Points -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (6462 - 18475, n=196, last 2 years)
11407 Points -31%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10003 Points -39%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9848 Points -40%
CrossMark / Overall
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2139 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2112 Points -1%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2108 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (2019 - 2139, n=2)
2079 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
1993 Points -7%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
1903 Points -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2334, n=167, last 2 years)
1876 Points -12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1699 Points -21%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1592 Points -26%
CrossMark / Productivity
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1978 Points 0%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1977 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1966 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (1909 - 1977, n=2)
1943 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
1820 Points -8%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
1808 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=167, last 2 years)
1787 Points -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1646 Points -17%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1509 Points -24%
CrossMark / Creativity
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2423 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
2384 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2336 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (2222 - 2423, n=2)
2323 Points -4%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2288 Points -6%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
2095 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2514, n=167, last 2 years)
2040 Points -16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1867 Points -23%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1780 Points -27%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1991 Points +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1936 Points +4%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1861 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (1792 - 1861, n=2)
1827 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=167, last 2 years)
1700 Points -9%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
1666 Points -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
1528 Points -18%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1405 Points -25%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1342 Points -28%
PCMark 10 Score
8884 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
77060 MB/s +21%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX
  (61938 - 78494, n=7)
73266 MB/s +15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
67828 MB/s +6%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
64030 MB/s 0%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
63863 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
63831 MB/s 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 92565, n=222, last 2 years)
59056 MB/s -8%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
53861 MB/s -16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
50231 MB/s -21%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
84869 MB/s +35%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX
  (62368 - 86207, n=7)
78833 MB/s +26%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
74607 MB/s +19%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
69256 MB/s +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (24879 - 90647, n=222, last 2 years)
62916 MB/s 0%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
62807 MB/s
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62140 MB/s -1%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
57237 MB/s -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
51403 MB/s -18%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
80441 MB/s +33%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX
  (59501 - 80441, n=7)
72257 MB/s +20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
67490 MB/s +12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65800 MB/s +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (21619 - 103259, n=222, last 2 years)
61374 MB/s +2%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
60389 MB/s
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
60014 MB/s -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
55263 MB/s -8%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
54443 MB/s -10%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
99.5 ns * -7%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
98.4 ns * -6%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
92.8 ns *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
90.8 ns * +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
90.6 ns * +2%
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX
  (84.4 - 99.5, n=7)
90.3 ns * +3%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
88.8 ns * +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 152.5, n=219, last 2 years)
87.2 ns * +6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
85.2 ns * +8%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

我们的标准化延迟测试(网页浏览、4K YouTube播放、CPU负载)显示了当前BIOS版本(1.04)对实时音频应用的重大限制。

LatencyMon概述
LatencyMon概述
LatencyMon 驱动程序
LatencyMon 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4710.9 μs *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4362 μs * +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3413 μs * +28%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2448.6 μs * +48%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2203.2 μs * +53%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
638.25 μs * +86%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
1101.9 μs * +77%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

GT77有三个M.2-2280插槽(1个PCIe 5.0,2个PCIe 4.0)。
GT77有三个M.2-2280插槽(1个PCIe 5.0,2个PCIe 4.0)。

2023泰坦是首批拥有快速PCIe 5.0接口的笔记本电脑之一,但目前市场上几乎没有任何合适的SSD。另外两个插槽支持PCIe 4.0,我们的评测单元配备了两个来自三星的2TB固态硬盘(PM9A1,980 Pro的OEM版本),采用RAID 0配置。除了4TB的巨大容量(用户有3.97个免费容量),我们还可以记录到11GB/s以北的传输率。然而,这种性能不能维持很久,几分钟后就会大幅下降,所以SSD冷却器可能是一个好主意。更多的SSD基准测试可在 这里.

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 11730 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 9961 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 879 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 626 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 80.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 198.2 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 1108 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1242 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
82.6 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
77.3 pt
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
73.8 pt
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
 
69.9 pt
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
69.7 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
61.7 pt
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
59.5 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
59 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake -11!
 
41.8 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5598 (5462.22min - 5597.85max) MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5568 (5541.55min - 5568.34max) MB/s -1%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
4931 (4875.77min - 4930.83max) MB/s -12%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (2376 - 5676, n=29)
3919 MB/s -30%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3872 (3855.82min - 3871.97max) MB/s -31%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3844 (3257.93min - 3843.87max) MB/s -31%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3561 (3468.06min - 3560.96max) MB/s -36%
Average of class Gaming
  (1291 - 7045, n=196, last 2 years)
3528 MB/s -37%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
 
3180 (3109.94min - 3179.84max) MB/s -43%
seq write
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7533 (7482.85min - 7532.79max) MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7531 (7479min - 7530.7max) MB/s 0%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
4819 (4728.89min - 4819.25max) MB/s -36%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4242 (4225.7min - 4241.7max) MB/s -44%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (2461 - 7628, n=29)
4204 MB/s -44%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3966 (3885.39min - 3966.13max) MB/s -47%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=196, last 2 years)
3808 MB/s -49%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
 
3434 (3027.24min - 3434.35max) MB/s -54%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3242 (1498min - 3241.78max) MB/s -57%
seq q8 t1 read
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
13195 (9412.86min - 13194.8max) MB/s +17%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
12556 (4870.54min - 12556.3max) MB/s +12%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11242 (10740.3min - 11242.2max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (3471 - 12556, n=29)
7139 MB/s -36%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
6872 (4963.33min - 6872.25max) MB/s -39%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6722 (987.46min - 6721.79max) MB/s -40%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
 
6637 (5645.11min - 6636.65max) MB/s -41%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6384 (5573.36min - 6384.17max) MB/s -43%
Average of class Gaming
  (1983 - 16089, n=196, last 2 years)
6357 MB/s -43%
seq q8 t1 write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10261 (10045.2min - 10261.4max) MB/s +3%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9942 (9912.92min - 9941.76max) MB/s
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
8227 (8104.29min - 8226.71max) MB/s -17%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (3537 - 10261, n=29)
5515 MB/s -45%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5043 (5032.12min - 5043.21max) MB/s -49%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5037 (5025min - 5036.73max) MB/s -49%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
 
4985 (4706.66min - 4985.24max) MB/s -50%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=196, last 2 years)
4779 MB/s -52%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4244 (427.59min - 4244.22max) MB/s -57%
4k q1 t1 read
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
83.1 (79.37min - 83.07max) MB/s
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
79.3 (77.82min - 79.25max) MB/s -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
79.1 (78.08min - 79.08max) MB/s -5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
79 (77.42min - 79.03max) MB/s -5%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (56.2 - 91.2, n=29)
78.5 MB/s -6%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
77 (74.91min - 76.95max) MB/s -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=196, last 2 years)
67.6 MB/s -19%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
56.5 (49.8min - 56.49max) MB/s -32%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
 
46.6 (45.38min - 46.63max) MB/s -44%
4k q1 t1 write
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
241 MB/s +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 421, n=196, last 2 years)
224 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
221 (218.91min - 220.66max) MB/s +4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
220 (56.84min - 219.56max) MB/s +3%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (134 - 295, n=29)
219 MB/s +3%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
213 (205.52min - 212.72max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
195.1 (194.02min - 195.09max) MB/s -8%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
170.2 (168.21min - 170.2max) MB/s -20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
 
108.4 (106.69min - 108.4max) MB/s -49%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4483 (4465.42min - 4482.78max) MB/s +205%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3797 (3780.09min - 3796.62max) MB/s +158%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3111 (2388.54min - 3111.42max) MB/s +112%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (663 - 4075, n=29)
2978 MB/s +103%
Average of class Gaming
  (313 - 6172, n=196, last 2 years)
2576 MB/s +75%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2148 (1952.04min - 2148.3max) MB/s +46%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1469 (1266.81min - 1469.47max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
 
973 (941.21min - 972.98max) MB/s -34%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
874 (867.39min - 873.79max) MB/s -41%
4k q32 t16 write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4383 (4358.15min - 4383.06max) MB/s +208%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3504 (3465.89min - 3503.69max) MB/s +146%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (422 - 3548, n=29)
2271 MB/s +59%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=196, last 2 years)
2147 MB/s +51%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2101 (1969.73min - 2101.4max) MB/s +48%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1424 (1251.47min - 1423.75max) MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1282 (960.6min - 1281.78max) MB/s -10%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
461 (442.02min - 461.29max) MB/s -68%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
 
460 (453.59min - 459.8max) MB/s -68%
AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9218 Points +90%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8492 Points +75%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7498 Points +55%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (4850 - 9031, n=28)
7378 Points +52%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7311 Points +51%
Average of class Gaming
  (1923 - 13854, n=184, last 2 years)
6784 Points +40%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
4941 Points +2%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4850 Points
Score Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3428 Points +68%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3327 Points +63%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3308 Points +63%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3012 Points +48%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (1535 - 3399, n=28)
2746 Points +35%
Average of class Gaming
  (528 - 4721, n=184, last 2 years)
2489 Points +22%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2035 Points
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
1948 Points -4%
Score Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4113 Points +119%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3531 Points +88%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (1081 - 3999, n=28)
3296 Points +76%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=184, last 2 years)
3089 Points +65%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3013 Points +61%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2428 Points +29%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
2137 Points +14%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1877 Points
Seq Read
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9971 MB/s +5%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9511 MB/s
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
6561.69 MB/s -31%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (2591 - 9971, n=28)
5538 MB/s -42%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5157 MB/s -46%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
5144.76 MB/s -46%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5061.06 MB/s -47%
Average of class Gaming
  (1759 - 12763, n=184, last 2 years)
4937 MB/s -48%
Seq Write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8590 MB/s +20%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7181 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (1900 - 8590, n=28)
4074 MB/s -43%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3764.99 MB/s -48%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3733 MB/s -48%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=184, last 2 years)
3647 MB/s -49%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
3480.87 MB/s -52%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3058.47 MB/s -57%
4K Read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (49.8 - 86.4, n=28)
73.2 MB/s +1%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
72.8 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
72.43 MB/s -1%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
69.89 MB/s -4%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
69.21 MB/s -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
68.93 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.4 - 112.1, n=184, last 2 years)
66.7 MB/s -8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
49.65 MB/s -32%
4K Write
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
211.73 MB/s +19%
Average of class Gaming
  (96.3 - 512, n=184, last 2 years)
210 MB/s +18%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
204.33 MB/s +15%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (112.6 - 254, n=28)
202 MB/s +14%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
184.49 MB/s +4%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
177.9 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
157.01 MB/s -12%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
144.8 MB/s -19%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2842.96 MB/s +181%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2751.05 MB/s +172%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2744.3 MB/s +171%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (918 - 2811, n=28)
2119 MB/s +110%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1942.29 MB/s +92%
Average of class Gaming
  (312 - 3475, n=184, last 2 years)
1923 MB/s +90%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
1223.07 MB/s +21%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1011 MB/s
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3582.58 MB/s +265%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2942.87 MB/s +200%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (567 - 3414, n=28)
2687 MB/s +174%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=184, last 2 years)
2517 MB/s +157%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1949.41 MB/s +99%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1944.47 MB/s +98%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
1604.89 MB/s +64%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
981 MB/s
Access Time Read
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=182, last 2 years)
0.05422 ms * -51%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.049 ms * -36%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.036 ms *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.034 ms * +6%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (0.018 - 0.078, n=28)
0.03364 ms * +7%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
0.03 ms * +17%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.028 ms * +22%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.022 ms * +39%
Access Time Write
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.082 ms * -257%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
0.066 ms * -187%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=184, last 2 years)
0.04705 ms * -105%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (0.017 - 0.076, n=28)
0.02943 ms * -28%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.025 ms * -9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.023 ms * -0%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.023 ms *
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.02 ms * +13%

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

069013802070276034504140483055206210690075908280897096601035011040117301242013110Tooltip
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI: Ø6785 (2053.41-13760.21)

GPU性能 - RTX 4090 笔记本电脑

gpu-zGeForce rtx 4090
gpu-zGeForce rtx 4090

GeForce RTX 4090是Nvidia新的高端移动GPU,GT77使用最快的版本,最大功耗为175W(150W TGP + 25W来自CPU的动态提升),16GB VRAM,最大核心时钟为2340 MHz。

图形性能很好,新的RTX 4090位于桌面型号之间RTX 3090/RTX 3090 Ti和台式机型号RTX 4070 TiRTX 4080在合成基准测试中。与老式移动设备相比,其优势在于RTX 3080 Ti在以前的GT77是40-60%(取决于基准测试),尽管TGP相同。而移动RTX 4080中的Razer Blade 16的移动RTX 4080慢了大约17-19%,这取决于基准测试。

新泰坦可以保持图形性能,3dMarkTime Spy 压力测试很容易通过,达到99%。虽然在电池供电的情况下,功耗被限制在27W,这导致了几乎80%的性能赤字。

3DMark / Fire Strike Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
65190 Points +32%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
53360 Points +8%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 Ti AMP Extreme Holo, AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
53110 Points +8%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Titan GT77 HX 13VI, Intel Core i9-13950HX
49247 Points
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
48709 Points -1%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
Intel Core i5-13400F
48334 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (41210 - 53059, n=33)
46500 Points -6%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake, Intel Core i9-13900HX
46240 Points -6%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Blade 16 Early 2023, Intel Core i9-13950HX
40570 Points -18%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Titan GT77 12UHS, Intel Core i9-12900HX
34439 Points -30%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
XMG Neo 17 M22, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
33120 Points -33%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
x17 R2 P48E, Intel Core i9-12900HK
32849 Points -33%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W, Intel Core i9-12950HX
32505 Points -34%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
x15 R2 P111F, Intel Core i9-12900H
30521 Points -38%
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=233, last 2 years)
29268 Points -41%
3DMark / Time Spy Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
27791 Points +25%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
22584 Points +1%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Titan GT77 HX 13VI, Intel Core i9-13950HX
22254 Points
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake, Intel Core i9-13900HX
21786 Points -2%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 Ti AMP Extreme Holo, AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
21645 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (17620 - 23292, n=35)
21017 Points -6%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
19460 Points -13%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
Intel Core i5-13400F
19322 Points -13%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Blade 16 Early 2023, Intel Core i9-13950HX
18441 Points -17%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Titan GT77 12UHS, Intel Core i9-12900HX
13554 Points -39%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
x17 R2 P48E, Intel Core i9-12900HK
13455 Points -40%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W, Intel Core i9-12950HX
12791 Points -43%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
XMG Neo 17 M22, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
12684 Points -43%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
x15 R2 P111F, Intel Core i9-12900H
12253 Points -45%
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22547, n=231, last 2 years)
11960 Points -46%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 Ti AMP Extreme Holo, AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
46562 Points +5%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Titan GT77 HX 13VI, Intel Core i9-13950HX
44487 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (34519 - 44487, n=5)
40582 Points -9%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Titan GT77 12UHS, Intel Core i9-12900HX
28879 Points -35%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
XMG Neo 17 M22, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
27878 Points -37%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W, Intel Core i9-12950HX
26982 Points -39%
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max, Apple M2 Max
25103 Points -44%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
x15 R2 P111F, Intel Core i9-12900H
24304 Points -45%
Average of class Gaming
  (1891 - 44487, n=32, last 2 years)
22325 Points -50%
3DMark / Speed Way Score
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
7127 Points +24%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake, Intel Core i9-13900HX
5940 Points +3%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Titan GT77 HX 13VI, Intel Core i9-13950HX
5748 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (4401 - 5940, n=25)
5486 Points -5%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
5424 Points -6%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
5223 Points -9%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
Intel Core i5-13400F
5215 Points -9%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Blade 16 Early 2023, Intel Core i9-13950HX
4642 Points -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (116 - 5940, n=91, last 2 years)
3392 Points -41%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W, Intel Core i9-12950HX
3234 Points -44%
3DMark / Port Royal Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
17728 Points +26%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 Ti AMP Extreme Holo, AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
14506 Points +3%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake, Intel Core i9-13900HX
14457 Points +2%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Titan GT77 HX 13VI, Intel Core i9-13950HX
14121 Points
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
14012 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (10798 - 14457, n=26)
13320 Points -6%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
Intel Core i5-13400F
13005 Points -8%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Blade 16 Early 2023, Intel Core i9-13950HX
11665 Points -17%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
x17 R2 P48E, Intel Core i9-12900HK
8416 Points -40%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Titan GT77 12UHS, Intel Core i9-12900HX
8389 Points -41%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W, Intel Core i9-12950HX
8120 Points -42%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
XMG Neo 17 M22, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
8074 Points -43%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
x15 R2 P111F, Intel Core i9-12900H
7694 Points -46%
Average of class Gaming
  (280 - 14457, n=152, last 2 years)
7658 Points -46%
Geekbench 5.5 / OpenCL Score
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
267859 Points +24%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 Ti AMP Extreme Holo, AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
235251 Points +9%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
Intel Core i5-13400F
218825 Points +2%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Titan GT77 HX 13VI, Intel Core i9-13950HX
215425 Points
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake, Intel Core i9-13900HX
213253 Points -1%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
202831 Points -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (6841 - 226512, n=33)
199666 Points -7%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Blade 16 Early 2023, Intel Core i9-13950HX
173311 Points -20%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W, Intel Core i9-12950HX
151633 Points -30%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
x17 R2 P48E, Intel Core i9-12900HK
147189 Points -32%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
XMG Neo 17 M22, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
138625 Points -36%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Titan GT77 12UHS, Intel Core i9-12900HX
136135 Points -37%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
x15 R2 P111F, Intel Core i9-12900H
134841 Points -37%
Average of class Gaming
  (5039 - 226512, n=230, last 2 years)
120637 Points -44%
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max, Apple M2 Max
71726 Points -67%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (240 - 246, n=2)
243 fps +1%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Titan GT77 HX 13VI, Intel Core i9-13950HX
239.5 fps
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Blade 16 Early 2023, Intel Core i9-13950HX
212 fps -11%
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max, Apple M2 Max
179.9 fps -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.1 - 246, n=12, last 2 years)
107 fps -55%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (522 - 550, n=2)
536 fps +3%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Titan GT77 HX 13VI, Intel Core i9-13950HX
522 fps
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Blade 16 Early 2023, Intel Core i9-13950HX
485 fps -7%
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max, Apple M2 Max
397.6 fps -24%
Average of class Gaming
  (27 - 550, n=12, last 2 years)
242 fps -54%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
67927 points
3DMark Vantage P Result
113387 points
3DMark 11 Performance
49253 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
37594 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
25475 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
20862 points
Help
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Alienware x15 R2 P111F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
28 Seconds * -155%
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 142, n=176, last 2 years)
23.3 Seconds * -112%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX
23 Seconds * -109%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
22 Seconds * -100%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
15 Seconds * -36%
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
14 Seconds * -27%
Intel Core i5-13400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, Intel Core i5-13400F
14 Seconds * -27%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
12 Seconds * -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (9 - 19, n=33)
11.9 Seconds * -8%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
11 Seconds *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
11 Seconds * -0%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
9 Seconds * +18%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Alienware x15 R2 P111F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
41 Seconds * -141%
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=183, last 2 years)
39.5 Seconds * -132%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX
34 Seconds * -100%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
32 Seconds * -88%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
22 Seconds * -29%
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
21 Seconds * -24%
Intel Core i5-13400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, Intel Core i5-13400F
21 Seconds * -24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (16 - 24, n=33)
18.3 Seconds * -8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
18 Seconds * -6%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
17 Seconds *
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Alienware x15 R2 P111F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
339 Seconds * -94%
Intel Core i5-13400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, Intel Core i5-13400F
336 Seconds * -92%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU, Apple M2 Max
326 Seconds * -86%
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 962, n=195, last 2 years)
317 Seconds * -81%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12950HX
301 Seconds * -72%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
263 Seconds * -50%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
207 Seconds * -18%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
200 Seconds * -14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (144 - 287, n=33)
197.5 Seconds * -13%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
175 Seconds *
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
134 Seconds * +23%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU, Apple M2 Max
51.2 Seconds *
Photoshop PugetBench / Filter Score
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
185.4 Points +80%
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
184.6 Points +79%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
177.3 Points +72%
Intel Core i5-13400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, Intel Core i5-13400F
131.4 Points +27%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU, Apple M2 Max
107.5 Points +4%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
103.1 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (91.9 - 104.6, n=5)
99.7 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (41.2 - 135.1, n=12, last 2 years)
95.3 Points -8%
Photoshop PugetBench / General Score
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
168.2 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (151.8 - 168.2, n=5)
159.1 Points -5%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU, Apple M2 Max
136.1 Points -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (69.1 - 168.2, n=12, last 2 years)
128.3 Points -24%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
127.2 Points -24%
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
126.3 Points -25%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
109.2 Points -35%
Intel Core i5-13400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, Intel Core i5-13400F
91.7 Points -45%
Photoshop PugetBench / GPU Score
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
158.4 Points +39%
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
155.2 Points +36%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
123.9 Points +9%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU, Apple M2 Max
122.8 Points +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (109.1 - 119.4, n=5)
114.3 Points 0%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
114 Points
Intel Core i5-13400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, Intel Core i5-13400F
109.8 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (40 - 119.4, n=12, last 2 years)
100.3 Points -12%
Photoshop PugetBench / Overall Score
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
1563 Points +15%
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
1555 Points +15%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
1433 Points +6%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
1356 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (1225 - 1356, n=5)
1294 Points -5%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU, Apple M2 Max
1218 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (552 - 1356, n=12, last 2 years)
1118 Points -18%
Intel Core i5-13400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, Intel Core i5-13400F
1116 Points -18%
Premiere Pro PugetBench / GPU 0.9
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
103.5 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (75.8 - 109.2, n=3)
96.2 Points -7%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
85.1 Points -18%
Intel Core i5-13400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, Intel Core i5-13400F
82.7 Points -20%
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
81.3 Points -21%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
76.8 Points -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (41.1 - 109.2, n=9, last 2 years)
69.3 Points -33%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU, Apple M2 Max
61.5 Points -41%
Premiere Pro PugetBench / Live Playback 0.9
Average of class Gaming
  (47.3 - 232, n=9, last 2 years)
123 Points +10%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
112.3 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (91.7 - 118, n=3)
107.3 Points -4%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
87 Points -23%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
85 Points -24%
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
82.3 Points -27%
Intel Core i5-13400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, Intel Core i5-13400F
76.1 Points -32%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU, Apple M2 Max
74.9 Points -33%
Premiere Pro PugetBench / Export 0.9
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
110 Points
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
108.3 Points -2%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
105.3 Points -4%
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
103.1 Points -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (78.4 - 113.4, n=3)
100.6 Points -9%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU, Apple M2 Max
99.8 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (42.8 - 113.4, n=9, last 2 years)
74.9 Points -32%
Intel Core i5-13400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, Intel Core i5-13400F
66.9 Points -39%
Premiere Pro PugetBench / Overall Score 0.9
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU, Apple M2 Max
1118 Points +2%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
1097 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (821 - 1105, n=3)
1008 Points -8%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
967 Points -12%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
962 Points -12%
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
927 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (456 - 1308, n=9, last 2 years)
891 Points -19%
Intel Core i5-13400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, Intel Core i5-13400F
715 Points -35%

* ... smaller is better

RTX 4090没有像工作站GPU那样的特殊驱动,但性能仍然令人印象深刻,新的GeForce GPU甚至可以击败专业的RTX A5500在一些SPECviewperf测试中(如Maya、SiemensNX)。然而,消费级GPU有时也是垫底的,所以这取决于你的工作负荷,但专业GPU并不总是需要的。

LuxMark v2.0 64Bit
Room GPUs-only
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600 GS
12190 Samples/s +42%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
10491 Samples/s +22%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8614 Samples/s
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600
7785 Samples/s -10%
Intel Core i5-13400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i5-13400F, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
5931 Samples/s -31%
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600
5857 Samples/s -32%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Radeon RX 7900 XTX, R9 7950X
5161 Samples/s -40%
Sala GPUs-only
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600 GS
26576 Samples/s +33%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
24835 Samples/s +24%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
20001 Samples/s
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600
18407 Samples/s -8%
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600
15115 Samples/s -24%
Intel Core i5-13400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i5-13400F, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
15056 Samples/s -25%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Radeon RX 7900 XTX, R9 7950X
15019 Samples/s -25%
SPECviewperf 13
Solidworks (sw-04)
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Radeon RX 7900 XTX, R9 7950X
323 fps +103%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
206.94 fps +30%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
183 fps +15%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600 GS
182 fps +14%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600
168 fps +6%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
159.12 fps
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600
153 fps -4%
Intel Core i5-13400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i5-13400F, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
140 fps -12%
Siemens NX (snx-03)
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Radeon RX 7900 XTX, R9 7950X
725 fps +2009%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
413.09 fps +1102%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600 GS
47.9 fps +39%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
42.1 fps +22%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
34.38 fps
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600
34.2 fps -1%
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600
29.9 fps -13%
Intel Core i5-13400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i5-13400F, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
28.9 fps -16%
Showcase (showcase-02)
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600 GS
448 fps +59%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Radeon RX 7900 XTX, R9 7950X
323 fps +15%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
305 fps +9%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
281.1 fps
Intel Core i5-13400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i5-13400F, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
264 fps -6%
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600
252 fps -10%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600
246 fps -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
142.9 fps -49%
Medical (medical-02)
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Radeon RX 7900 XTX, R9 7950X
263 fps +114%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600 GS
182 fps +48%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
148 fps +21%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
140.01 fps +14%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600
134 fps +9%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
122.82 fps
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600
107 fps -13%
Intel Core i5-13400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i5-13400F, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
107 fps -13%
Maya (maya-05)
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Radeon RX 7900 XTX, R9 7950X
735 fps +22%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
726 fps +21%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600 GS
715 fps +19%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
600.78 fps
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600
596 fps -1%
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600
569 fps -5%
Intel Core i5-13400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i5-13400F, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
569 fps -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
362.87 fps -40%
Energy (energy-02)
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Radeon RX 7900 XTX, R9 7950X
187 fps +150%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600 GS
123 fps +65%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
91.7 fps +23%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
74.73 fps
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600
74.3 fps -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
69.02 fps -8%
Intel Core i5-13400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i5-13400F, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
44.2 fps -41%
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600
44.1 fps -41%
Creo (creo-02)
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Radeon RX 7900 XTX, R9 7950X
613 fps +33%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
544 fps +18%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600 GS
544 fps +18%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
461.26 fps
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600
461 fps 0%
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600
402 fps -13%
Intel Core i5-13400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i5-13400F, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
401 fps -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
330.97 fps -28%
Catia (catia-05)
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Radeon RX 7900 XTX, R9 7950X
825 fps +193%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600 GS
396 fps +41%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
369.46 fps +31%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
333 fps +18%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600
292 fps +4%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
281.44 fps
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600
258 fps -8%
Intel Core i5-13400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i5-13400F, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
245 fps -13%
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Radeon RX 7900 XTX, R9 7950X
564 fps +51%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600 GS
558 fps +50%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
478 fps +28%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600
437 fps +17%
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600
382 fps +3%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
372.51 fps
Intel Core i5-13400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i5-13400F, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
369 fps -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
241.24 fps -35%
SPECviewperf 2020
1920x1080 Solidworks (solidworks-05)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
499.25 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
258.01 fps -48%
1920x1080 Siemens NX (snx-04)
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
410.78 fps +1098%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
34.28 fps
1920x1080 Medical (medical-03)
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
68.3 fps +20%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
56.7 fps
1920x1080 Maya (maya-06)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
610.71 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
403.83 fps -34%
1920x1080 Energy (energy-03)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
74.95 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
69.15 fps -8%
1920x1080 Creo (creo-03)
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
165.08 fps +19%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
138.99 fps
1920x1080 CATIA (catia-06)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
116.64 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
109.77 fps -6%
1920x1080 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
212.6 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
144.56 fps -32%
3840x2160 Solidworks (solidworks-05)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
226 fps +9%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
207.55 fps
Intel Core i5-13400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i5-13400F, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
192 fps -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
109.04 fps -47%
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04)
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Radeon RX 7900 XTX, R9 7950X
514 fps +1721%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
301.3 fps +967%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600 GS
41.1 fps +46%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
34.1 fps +21%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
28.23 fps
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600
27.6 fps -2%
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600
24.9 fps -12%
Intel Core i5-13400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i5-13400F, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
24.2 fps -14%
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03)
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Radeon RX 7900 XTX, R9 7950X
62.3 fps +155%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600 GS
44.8 fps +83%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
28.3 fps +16%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600
27.5 fps +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
25.78 fps +6%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
24.42 fps
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600
22.9 fps -6%
Intel Core i5-13400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i5-13400F, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
20.7 fps -15%
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06)
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600 GS
525 fps +41%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Radeon RX 7900 XTX, R9 7950X
481 fps +29%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
426 fps +15%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600
375 fps +1%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
371.75 fps
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600
366 fps -2%
Intel Core i5-13400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i5-13400F, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
358 fps -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
218.16 fps -41%
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03)
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600 GS
137 fps +22%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Radeon RX 7900 XTX, R9 7950X
129 fps +15%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600
126 fps +12%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
112.25 fps
Intel Core i5-13400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i5-13400F, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
57.6 fps -49%
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600
57.5 fps -49%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
45.6 fps -59%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
24.11 fps -79%
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03)
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Radeon RX 7900 XTX, R9 7950X
187 fps +59%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
136 fps +16%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600 GS
133 fps +13%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600
120 fps +2%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
117.51 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
117.5 fps 0%
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600
114 fps -3%
Intel Core i5-13400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i5-13400F, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
105 fps -11%
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06)
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Radeon RX 7900 XTX, R9 7950X
127 fps +95%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600 GS
94.7 fps +45%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
76.5 fps +17%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
68.64 fps +5%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
65.16 fps
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600
62 fps -5%
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600
59.9 fps -8%
Intel Core i5-13400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i5-13400F, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
59.3 fps -9%
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600 GS
231 fps +56%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
172 fps +16%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Radeon RX 7900 XTX, R9 7950X
167 fps +13%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600
148 fps 0%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
147.71 fps
Intel Core i5-13400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i5-13400F, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
143 fps -3%
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600
139 fps -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
79.63 fps -46%

游戏性能

游戏性能非常惊人,酷睿i9-13950HX和RTX 4090的组合可以流畅地处理所有测试的游戏,甚至在4K的最大设置下。唯一的例外是极端情况,如4K下RT Ultra预设的《赛博朋克2077》,在那里你可以用升频来帮助你(后面会有更多介绍)。我们在每台笔记本电脑上测试的默认游戏显示,与旧的RTX 3080 Ti相比,平均优势为26%。RTX 3080 Ti但在较新的游戏和较高的分辨率下,优势更大。

Performance Rating - Percent
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
97.6 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
96.4 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
92.1 pt
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
77.2 pt
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
73 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
72.8 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
65 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
61.4 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
216.4 (5.6P0.1, 144.3P1) fps +9%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
198.9 (190min, 191P1) fps
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
176.8 (159min) fps -11%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
129.3 (110min, 111.14P1) fps -35%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
128 (124min) fps -36%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
121 (98min) fps -39%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
118.8 (111min, 113P1) fps -40%
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=225, last 2 years)
116.1 fps -42%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
140.9 (3.54min, 83.3P1) fps
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
140.7 (3.02min, 100P1) fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
137.5 (3.4min, 100P1) fps -2%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
131.8 (6.21min, 90.9P1) fps -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
126.7 (9.75min, 76.9P1) fps -10%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
126.3 (5.94min, 90.9P1) fps -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.38 - 167.7, n=215, last 2 years)
106.7 fps -24%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
101.8 (18.4min, 71.4P1) fps -28%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
187.4 fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
180.7 (119min, 128.92P1) fps -4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
157.8 fps -16%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
137.6 fps -27%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
127.8 fps -32%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
122.8 fps -34%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
118.5 fps -37%
Average of class Gaming
  (9.13 - 194.9, n=225, last 2 years)
110.5 fps -41%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
373 (29.9min, 272P1) fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
350 (32.1min, 230P1) fps -6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
323 (61.7min, 222P1) fps -13%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
219 (67.8min, 154.6P1) fps -41%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
213 (71.8min, 156.1P1) fps -43%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
211 (14.1min, 155.4P1) fps -43%
Average of class Gaming
  (14.6 - 421, n=223, last 2 years)
205 fps -45%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
201 (41.3min, 148.1P1) fps -46%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
194.7 (160min) fps +5%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
185.9 (157.5min) fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
177.3 (150.3min) fps -5%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
170.5 (148.2min) fps -8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
169.8 (147.2min) fps -9%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
158.9 (139.1min) fps -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (26.9 - 220, n=235, last 2 years)
142.1 fps -24%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
121.4 (106.8min) fps -35%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
137 fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
137 fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
135.7 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
135.5 fps +1%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
134.2 fps
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
134.1 fps 0%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
123.8 fps -8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
116.2 fps -13%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
112.9 fps -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.4 - 166.2, n=240, last 2 years)
101.2 fps -25%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
80.3 fps -40%

雷电追踪的性能也非常好,新的RTX 4090大致上与桌面RTX 4070 Ti.

The Witcher 3 v4.00 - 1920x1080 RT Ultra Preset / On AA:FX
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
67.1 (7.35min, 13.8P0.1, 28.6P1) fps +2%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
66 fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
65.3 fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (53.1 - 66, n=4)
62.2 fps -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.9 - 66, n=10, last 2 years)
42.5 fps -36%
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
3840x2160 Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off)
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
29.8 (22.7min) fps +35%
Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 Ti AMP Extreme Holo
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
24.3 (16.3min) fps +10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
22.43 (17.52min) fps +2%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
22 fps
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
21.6 (9.54min) fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (16.5 - 22.4, n=7)
19.7 fps -10%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
19.3 (13.3min) fps -12%
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
18.6 (9.13min) fps -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (3.3 - 22.4, n=13, last 2 years)
15.3 fps -30%
1920x1080 Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off)
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
96.1 (60.6min) fps +30%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
81.5 (62.2min) fps +10%
Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 Ti AMP Extreme Holo
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
74.7 (57.7min) fps +1%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
74 fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
73.86 (23.84min) fps 0%
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
69.1 (53.3min) fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (56.5 - 74, n=8)
65.6 fps -11%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
65.3 (31.7min) fps -12%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
46.7 (34.5min) fps -37%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 74, n=38, last 2 years)
43 fps -42%
Alienware x15 R2 P111F
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
42.3 (31.7min) fps -43%
The Callisto Protocol - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (without FSR Upscaling) + Full Ray-Tracing
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
87 fps +16%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
82.1 fps +9%
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
76 fps +1%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
75 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (32 - 79.6, n=5)
63.7 fps -15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
57.9 fps -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (32 - 79.6, n=15, last 2 years)
57 fps -24%
Spider-Man Miles Morales - 1920x0180 Very High Preset + Ray-Tracing AA:T
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
114.7 (49.8min, 65.7P0.1, 93.2P1) fps +26%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
102 (65.6min, 73.3P0.1, 87.1P1) fps +12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
96.2 (41.3P0.1, 65.3P1) fps +6%
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
93.9 (66.7min, 73.8P0.1, 79.2P1) fps +3%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
91 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (79.6 - 96.2, n=4)
87.8 fps -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (19.1 - 96.2, n=13, last 2 years)
60.2 fps -34%
Far Cry 6 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures + DXR AA:T
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
133.4 (109min) fps +15%
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
128.6 (109min) fps +11%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
126.7 (103min) fps +9%
Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 Ti AMP Extreme Holo
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
122 (95min) fps +5%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
119 (88min) fps +3%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
116 fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
108 (90min) fps -7%
Intel Core i5-13400F
Intel Core i5-13400F, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
102 (87min) fps -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (81 - 116, n=5)
97.6 fps -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (53 - 119, n=11, last 2 years)
86.5 fps -25%
Metro Exodus - 1920x1080 Ultra Quality DXR AF:16x
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
148.6 (73.78min) fps +38%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
133.3 (68.29min) fps +23%
Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 Ti AMP Extreme Holo
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
128.5 (64.07min) fps +19%
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
121.2 (66.05min) fps +12%
Intel Core i5-13400F
Intel Core i5-13400F, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
116.5 (58.82min) fps +8%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
108 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (93.9 - 118.8, n=4)
105.5 fps -2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
104.4 (50.2min) fps -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
101.25 (55.8min) fps -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (50.9 - 118.8, n=13, last 2 years)
80.7 fps -25%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
77.9 (40.97min) fps -28%
Watch Dogs Legion - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing (DX12)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
90 (26min) fps +7%
Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 Ti AMP Extreme Holo
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
88.7 (50.06min, 72.42P1) fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (84 - 90, n=2)
87 fps +4%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
84 fps
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
80 (58min) fps -5%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
55.8 (29.04min, 45.55P1) fps -34%
Alienware x15 R2 P111F
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
50 (11.97min, 38.44P1) fps -40%
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 90, n=10, last 2 years)
46.5 fps -45%
游戏 设置 DLSS关闭 DLSS开启(平衡) 差异
Spider-Man Miles Morales 4K Ultra 83 FPS 132 FPS +59 %
Witcher 3 4.00 4K RT Ultra 27 FPS 50 FPS +85 %
Cyberpunk 2077 1.5 RT 4K 22 FPS 95 FPS +331 %
战争之神 4K Ultra 80 FPS 111 FPS +38 %

我们通常在没有像Nvidia DLSS或AMD FSR这样的升级技术的情况下进行我们的游戏基准测试。然而,当标题支持它时,性能可以受益匪浅,我们注意到激活DLSS 3.0的一些重大改进,没有任何视觉缺陷。考虑到这些结果,即将推出的小型变种RTX 4060RTX 4070应该能够在DLSS激活时处理4K游戏。

游戏性能是完全稳定的,这也是我们的Witcher 3 循环所显示的。然而,在电池电量上,性能再次被大量降低。

Witcher 3 FPS-Diagramm

0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø198.9 (190-214)
CPU和GPU数据Witcher 3 循环(超级设置)。
CPU和GPU数据Witcher 3 循环(超级设置)。

我们还用我们的Witcher 3 测试检查了新GPU的效率。CPU的影响不是很大,我们使用连接到外部屏幕的数值,所以我们可以消除不同类型的显示器,也可以与桌面GPU的结果进行比较。新的RTX 4090的结果令人印象深刻,因为该GPU比RTX 3080 Ti Mobile(140W)的效率高约40%,在Alienware x15桌面RTX 4080.新的GT77的效率也比以前的型号高53%。 之前的型号RTX 3080 Ti在相同的TGP下。

Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Efficiency (external Monitor)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI, i9-13950HX
0.796 fps per Watt
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023, i9-13950HX
0.71 fps per Watt -11%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Alienware x15 R2 P111F, i9-12900H
0.581 fps per Watt -27%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG, R9 7950X
0.581 fps per Watt -27%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG, R9 7950X
0.548 fps per Watt -31%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22, R9 6900HX
0.545 fps per Watt -32%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS, i9-12900HX
0.521 fps per Watt -35%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Alienware x17 R2 P48E, i9-12900HK
0.512 fps per Watt -36%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
Intel Core i5-13400F, i5-13400F
0.3954 fps per Watt -50%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC, R9 7950X
0.3496 fps per Watt -56%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 Ti AMP Extreme Holo, R7 5800X3D
0.345 fps per Watt -57%
low med. high ultraQHD4K DLSS4K
GTA V (2015) 184.1 182.6 140.9 138.5 175.7
The Witcher 3 (2015) 619 546 422 198.9 160
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 225 206 194.1 185.9 178.9
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 230 221 187.4 162.9 94.7
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 203 177.5 134.1 114.3
Far Cry 5 (2018) 186 173 160 159 113
Strange Brigade (2018) 490 396 391 373 309 159.3
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 245 227 219 214 187 103
Metro Exodus (2019) 204 183 153 132 116 81
Control (2019) 240 232 187 122 63
Borderlands 3 (2019) 201 176 162 151 130 76
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) 209 189 174 163 154 131 95
Mafia Definitive Edition (2020) 219 189 179 161 93
Watch Dogs Legion (2020) 152 144 131 120 109 69
F1 2021 (2021) 501 449 417 209 192.4 114.4
Far Cry 6 (2021) 167 147 144 135 89
Forza Horizon 5 (2021) 220 181 174 124 113 95
God of War (2022) 201 200 180 133 115 80
Rainbow Six Extraction (2022) 378 347 346 314 219 112
Dying Light 2 (2022) 240 206 174 121 62
GRID Legends (2022) 254 230 210 199 190 132
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) 156 144 138 135 98 56
Ghostwire Tokyo (2022) 237 236 234 231 206 100
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) 339 289 224 182 131 70
F1 22 (2022) 316 294 283 138.2 90.1 44.9
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022) 230 215 183 176 135 126 85
Spider-Man Miles Morales (2022) 134 131 118 116 113 83
The Callisto Protocol (2022) 195 181 145 144 114 68
The Witcher 3 v4.00 (2023) 240 189 173 150 104 50
Dead Space Remake (2023) 147 141 130 129 100 53

排放--GT77有更多的热管

系统噪音

Titan GT77使用四个风扇和大量的热管来散发所有的热量。其中一个风扇(根据微星控制的说法是风扇1)总是以大约1500转/分钟的速度旋转,与电源设置无关,这导致了29.2分贝(A)的杂音。因此,这绝不是一个安静的系统,你有时也能听到29 dB(A)的电子噪音。持续的风扇活动意味着在轻度工作负荷如网络浏览时,风扇不会旋转。然而,如果你开始给CPU或GPU施加压力,它将很快变得非常嘈杂。非常有趣的是,我们在CPU负载期间得到了最响亮的风扇,为61 dB(A),而压力测试 "只 "得到了53.3 dB(A)。原因是风扇的行为,这在下面的图片中也可以看到。

风扇 CPU负载
风扇 CPU负载
粉丝压力测试
粉丝压力测试

我们测量了53至56 dB(A),取决于标题,这显然是非常响亮的。这里有两种不同的方法,你可以使用耳机(最好有降噪功能),或者使用静音模式,这将把风扇噪音限制在39.6 dB(A)。性能也会受到影响,但由于巨大的性能储备,大多数游戏仍然可以顺利运行。你可以手动激活Cooler Boost功能,这将导致62.8 dB(A),但我们在测试中从未达到这个水平。

极端性能 平衡 静音
Witcher 3 4.00 Ultra 4K 55.7 dB(A) 55.7 dB(A) 39.6 dB(A)
Witcher 3 Ultra 53.3 dB(A) 53.3 dB(A) 39.6 dB(A)
死亡空间重制版超4K 55.7 dB(A) 53.3 dB(A) 39.6 dB(A)
CB R23 Multi 61 dB(A) 55.7 dB(A) 36.8 dB(A)
Furmark 56.1 dB(A) 53.3 dB(A) 39.6 dB(A)

Noise Level

Idle
29.2 / 29.2 / 29.2 dB(A)
Load
50.7 / 61 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24.6 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2024.526.72623.527.925.128.826.425.927.32532.628.829.228.128.926.431.328.326.533.43127.228.231.327.729.927.630.72826.628.14034.532.536.430.232.931.734.634.432.332.95032.231.233.531.732.130.532.831.331.732.16329.43033.231.731.330.631.629.630.429.28032.734.535.836.238.334.53534.932.834.11002326.131.730.534.231.227.723.822.826.712524.526.83432.433.732.826.921.321.72716022.22429.627.43332.734.52120.523.720022.525.631.431.734.931.627.920.120.424.525025.227.333.632.236.732.430.622.118.72631525.927.234.533.339.334.231.222.417.125.640026.831.637.936.14136.933.822.513.628.450025.128.739.437.142.738.234.320.113.226.763025.929.840.438.742.938.635.220.112.426.980027.130.341.439.244.639.736.819.711.227.71000293143.741.947.342.438.819.811.129.2125028.230.443.941.848.442.940.317.710.428.1160026.229.545.24349.143.240.416.410.627.3200025.628.446.544.351.745.842.415.710.925.6250024.127.248.245.65348.34214.911.525.23150222443.741.250.442.538.314.611.422.540002324.743.54150.6423914.11222.8500020.322.942.139.348.242.53613.112.120.1630015.418.839.436.34738.633.513.812.416.3800013.316.536.333.44534.431.412.912.613.81000013.218.434.6314432.529.313.112.413.51250012.716.729.625.140.82823.713.212.513.41600012.317.123.219.134.820.3181411.813.4SPL36.839.655.753.36154.950.729.224.637.3N2.53.2108.514.29.47.21.20.62.6median 24.1median 26.8median 39.4median 36.3median 44median 38.2median 34.3median 17.7median 12.4median 25.6Delta3.94.55.74.56.15.45.33.22.84hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseMSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
Noise
16%
19%
10%
18%
-2%
off / environment *
24.6
23
7%
23.9
3%
21.9
11%
22.7
8%
26
-6%
Idle Minimum *
29.2
23
21%
23.9
18%
24.53
16%
23.1
21%
26
11%
Idle Average *
29.2
23
21%
23.9
18%
24.53
16%
23.1
21%
29
1%
Idle Maximum *
29.2
23.6
19%
23.9
18%
24.53
16%
23.1
21%
40
-37%
Load Average *
50.7
39
23%
34.3
32%
46.25
9%
31.9
37%
47
7%
Witcher 3 ultra *
53.3
51.6
3%
56.86
-7%
52.5
2%
52
2%
Load Maximum *
61
51.3
16%
45.9
25%
54.25
11%
52.5
14%
54
11%

* ... smaller is better

温度

响亮的风扇有很大的优势,因为表面温度出奇的低,在较长时间的游戏过程中,你仍然可以不受任何限制地使用键盘。我们多次检查结果,但数字都是一样的。我们几乎无法在负载下测量到超过40℃的温度,考虑到性能,这是一个很好的结果。

在压力测试中,CPU和GPU会很快分别达到75W和150W的水平,性能也很稳定。该系统的总冷却功率为225W,但微星甚至宣传说,对于使用Core i9-13980HX因此,温度可能会更高一些(我们并不期望风扇的声音更大)。

CPU和GPU数据压力测试
CPU和GPU数据压力测试
Max. Load
 39.2 °C40.1 °C40.6 °C 
 38.2 °C40 °C39.8 °C 
 27.9 °C25.1 °C28.4 °C 
Maximum: 40.6 °C
Average: 35.5 °C
38.4 °C36.6 °C37.8 °C
41.1 °C40.4 °C37.3 °C
27 °C32.1 °C30.8 °C
Maximum: 41.1 °C
Average: 35.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  47.2 °C | Room Temperature 20.7 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.6 °C / 85.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-0.7 °C / -1.3 F).
表面温度应力测试(顶部)
表面温度应力测试(顶部)
表面温度应力测试(底)。
表面温度应力测试(底)。
后部的散热
后部的散热
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Heat
-5%
-19%
-22%
-11%
-18%
Maximum Upper Side *
40.6
40
1%
48.8
-20%
40.8
-0%
49.6
-22%
49
-21%
Maximum Bottom *
41.1
37.6
9%
52.4
-27%
52.4
-27%
42.4
-3%
52
-27%
Idle Upper Side *
26.2
32.4
-24%
30.4
-16%
34.6
-32%
29.2
-11%
30
-15%
Idle Bottom *
30.3
31.4
-4%
34.1
-13%
38.4
-27%
32
-6%
33
-9%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

GT77仍然提供两个良好的立体声扬声器与两个低音扬声器的组合,产生了一个体面的声音。然而,你不能在游戏过程中真正享受,因为风扇的声音实在太大,但对于偶尔的音乐和视频播放来说,这个音响系统绝对足够了。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2025.938.12526.539.93126.640.44032.340.75031.737.86330.440.28032.845.210022.847.312521.751.816020.558.820020.465.925018.770.631517.173.640013.675.550013.279.863012.48280011.282100011.181.3125010.479.7160010.675.6200010.976.7250011.576.5315011.476.140001273.8500012.175630012.479.9800012.677.31000012.472.31250012.569.11600011.864.3SPL24.690.1N0.691.8median 12.4median 75.6Delta2.85.725.426.825.424.123.624.121.919.421.92418.92424.619.424.634.417.534.447.91547.953.415.553.454.713.454.75712.55759.411.359.462.311.462.366.714.366.769.912.769.969.510.769.572.810.972.872.49.172.468.9968.969.49.369.468.59.468.567.19.767.167.210.267.268.610.968.663.911.163.96411.26476.611.876.680.511.680.572.811.672.873.412.273.469.311.269.384.322.884.362.20.462.2median 68.6median 11.2median 68.64.41.24.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI Titan GT77 HX 13VIAlienware x17 R2 P48E
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Alienware x17 R2 P48E audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理--泰坦号配备99.9Wh电池

消耗功率

新的GT77在空转时的功耗与iGPU并不差,而且在负载下与以前的型号也没有大的差别,考虑到性能的提高,这令人印象深刻。当我们开始进行压力测试时,我们可以观察到最大消耗量高达420W,但一旦组件稳定下来,它将迅速下降到~290W。这意味着330W的电源适配器是足够的。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.59 / 0.82 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 14 / 21.6 / 24.8 Watt
Load midlight 122.5 / 418 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 17.30
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 17.30
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2560x1600, 17.00
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-12%
-7%
-30%
-37%
33%
-10%
11%
Idle Minimum *
14
15.2
-9%
19.3
-38%
30.21
-116%
24.1
-72%
7
50%
16.8 ?(7 - 32.3, n=22)
-20%
Idle Average *
21.6
22.8
-6%
26.5
-23%
32.42
-50%
28.5
-32%
11
49%
Idle Maximum *
24.8
49.8
-101%
27.1
-9%
33.7
-36%
60
-142%
17
31%
34.3 ?(14.5 - 57.9, n=22)
-38%
Load Average *
122.5
121.2
1%
141
-15%
125.09
-2%
128.7
-5%
92
25%
Witcher 3 ultra *
265
242
9%
225
15%
256
3%
254
4%
221
17%
Load Maximum *
418
273.7
35%
307.9
26%
321.88
23%
323
23%
306
27%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

0255075100125150175200225250275300325350375400Tooltip
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø265 (259-273)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø298 (262-418)

Power consumption external screen

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255Tooltip
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø219 (204-262)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø259 (253-262)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø73.8 (69.8-100.2)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø246 (227-264)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø218 (183.4-250)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø250 (245-260)

电池运行时间

微星已经实现了99.9Wh的最大电池,但由于高消耗的数字,电池运行时间仍然有限。我们已经提到,在电池供电的情况下,显示亮度会降低,你也不能使用HDR,但在实际情况下,在150尼特的亮度下(占我们评测设备最大亮度的69%),你仍然可以期待大约5-6小时。最短的运行时间是1.5小时,但我们已经提到,性能会大大降低。当设备打开时,充满电需要158分钟;在超过1.5小时后,可使用80%的容量。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 109)
5h 19min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 109)
4h 03min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 58min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 26min
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 87 Wh
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
4%
-22%
15%
-55%
35%
8%
H.264
358
433
21%
398
11%
WiFi v1.3
319
365
14%
250
-22%
412.1
29%
117
-63%
537
68%
Load
86
81
-6%
82
-5%
46
-47%
109
27%
Witcher 3 ultra
90

Pros

+ 极快的GPU和CPU
+ 4K下的高游戏性能
+ 伟大的4K迷你LED显示屏
+ 卓越的机械式Cherry MX键盘
+ Wi-Fi 6E、PCIe 5.0和TB4
+ 3x M.2-SSD和4x SODIMM
+ 良好的温度管理

Cons

- 非常响亮的风扇
- 糟糕的HDR实现
- 所有亮度水平的PWM
- 差劲的720P网络摄像头
- SSD节流
- 昂贵

结论 - GT77具有极端的游戏性能和出色的显示效果

在审查中。微星Titan GT77。测试模型由英特尔德国公司提供。
在审查中。微星Titan GT77。测试模型由英特尔德国公司提供。

由于价格高昂,新的微星泰坦GT77很可能只能接触到非常小的用户群,但它仍然是一个令人印象深刻的可能展示。这款高端游戏机结合了你目前在几乎所有方面可以得到的最好的组件,它是一个非常好的整体包装,它不必躲在成熟的桌面系统后面。

我们已经知道了前代产品的底盘,它给人留下了体面的印象,但照明选择相当有限(这可能是好的或坏的,取决于你的喜好),光滑的表面非常容易留下指纹。机械键盘仍然很出色,而且有足够的端口。新的 来自英特尔当前猛禽湖一代的HX处理器比上一代平均快22%左右,但新的GeForce RTX 4090更加令人印象深刻。尽管TGP类似于175W,但它比旧的RTX 3080 Ti快40-60 %。RTX 3080 Ti并能与桌面版的RTX 3090/RTX 3090 Ti竞争。与目前的RTX-40xx桌面GPU相比,新的RTX 4090笔记本电脑正好位于RTX 4070 Ti和RTX 4080之间。

现在没有任何游戏笔记本电脑能提供更多的性能。配备酷睿i9-13950HX的微星GT77和GeForce RTX 4090使用的是你能得到的最快的笔记本电脑硬件。游戏在新的4K Mini-LED面板上看起来也令人难以置信。

硬件组合在新的Mini-LED屏幕的原生4K分辨率(144赫兹)上没有任何问题。主观的画质很好,游戏看起来就非常好。你还可以在校准后使用该面板进行图片编辑,这可以通过预装的真彩软件实现。该显示器还支持亮度超过1000尼特的HDR,但与macOS相比,Windows中的HDR实现仍然很糟糕,在macOS中它只是无缝运行。

考虑到强大的硬件、不显眼的机箱设计、良好的显示效果和出色的键盘,泰坦GT77作为移动工作站也非常好用,甚至RTX A5500在一些专业应用中也落后。

四个风扇和大量热管的冷却效果非常好,即使在负载下,我们也很难测出超过40℃的表面温度,但风扇的噪音却非常大。在游戏过程中,你应该期待54-57 dB(A),当你只强调CPU时,甚至超过60 dB(A)。风扇的噪音非常稳定,但我们仍然建议使用耳机(最好有主动降噪功能)。也可以使用静音模式,将风扇噪音降低到40 dB(A)。性能会受到影响,但在大多数游戏中仍然绰绰有余。

微星泰坦GT77也有一些缺点,特别是考虑到其高昂的价格。这包括使用廉价的塑料(尤其是底盖),缓慢的DDR5-4800内存和糟糕的720p网络摄像头。两个2TB固态硬盘在RAID 0配置中的性能非常高,但不稳定。GT77是我们评测中第一台采用新硬件的17英寸游戏笔记本电脑,我们已经迫不及待地想在接下来的几周内测试竞争对手。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

新的微星Titan GT77 HX 13 VI在微星的商店,售价5299美元.

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI - 02/07/2023 v7
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
83 / 98 → 85%
Keyboard
90%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
72 / 80 → 90%
Weight
53 / 10-66 → 77%
Battery
65 / 95 → 68%
Display
90%
Games Performance
100%
Application Performance
96%
Temperature
89 / 95 → 94%
Noise
62 / 90 → 69%
Audio
90%
Camera
30 / 85 → 35%
Average
78%
89%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 微星Titan GT77 HX 13V评测--带RTX 4090和Core i9-13950HX的终极游戏笔记本电脑
Andreas Osthoff, 2023-02- 8 (Update: 2023-02- 8)