Notebookcheck

小米Pad 5 Pro平板电脑评测。快速的iPad竞争者,120赫兹

内幕消息。 小米Pad 5 Pro在这里还没有正式上市,目前只能通过进口渠道购买。然而,这种途径是值得的,因为这款11英寸的平板电脑在外观和性能方面确实可以替代Apple iPad。然而,Pad 5 Pro的价格要低得多,并且拥有120赫兹的显示屏和67瓦的快速充电,领先于Apple 型。
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Tablet Touchscreen
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

具有强大功能的紧凑型平板电脑主要是由Apple 。小米现在推出的Pad 5 Pro是一个替代品,让你坐立不安。这款11英寸的平板电脑搭载了 骁龙870这是目前最快的移动SoC之一。这实际上排除了性能瓶颈。

在价格方面,小米低于类似设计的Apple 平板电脑,如 Apple iPad Air 4显著。配备6GB内存、128GB存储和WiFi连接的Pad 5 Pro售价约为430欧元(约489美元)。作为比较。iPad Air 4最小的型号价格约为550欧元(约合625美元)。但是,你只能得到64GB的存储空间,而且必须忍受60赫兹的显示屏。Pad 5 Pro的IPS面板提供120赫兹。

Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Pad Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G 8 x 2.4 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Graphics adapter
Memory
6144 MB 
, LPDDR5
Display
11.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 275 PPI, capacitive, native pen support, IPS, WQXGA, 1 billion colors, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 109.8 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C to 3.5mm headset jack adapter, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity sensor, Compass, HDR10, Dolby Atmos, Camera2 API Level 3, DRM Widevine L1
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6.85 x 254.69 x 166.25
Battery
8600 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix 13 MP main camera (f/2.0, AF) + 5 MP depth sensor (f/2.4), videos up to [email protected]
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix 8 MP, videos up to [email protected]
Additional features
Speakers: 8 speakers, Keyboard: virtual, USB-C to 3.5mm headset jack adapter, Quick start guide, MIUI 12.5, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
515 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88.7 %
11/2021
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
SD 870, Adreno 650
515 g6.85 mm11.00"2560x1600
90.7 %
10/2020
Apple iPad Air 2020
A14, A14 Bionic GPU
458 g6.1 mm10.90"2360x1640
88.4 %
09/2021
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
SD 865, Adreno 650
485 g7.25 mm10.95"2560x1600
85.9 %
01/2021
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
SD 730G, Adreno 618
485 g5.8 mm11.50"2560x1600
90.1 %
08/2020
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
SD 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650
500 g6.3 mm11.00"2560x1600

案例 -Apple iPad Air作为设计模板

狭窄的显示屏边缘和圆角。小米Pad 5 Pro的设计显然是基于竞争对手,如目前的 Apple iPad Air 4.它的重量同样很轻,为550克(约19.4盎司),几乎同样纤细,为6.85毫米(约0.27英寸)。加利福尼亚州人也是建造质量的典范。

小米Pad 5 Pro依靠的是坚固的铝制框架和具有丝绸般表面光泽的磨砂后盖,这使它看起来和感觉都很高端。这同样适用于布置在角落里的物理按键。电源键(也集成了指纹传感器)和音量摇杆牢牢地坐在机身中,以其清晰的压力点取悦于人。然而,低价需要妥协。大猩猩玻璃不能保护面板,背面也只是用塑料制成。小米也缺乏IP等级。

从显示屏一侧看,集成在后盖左上方的1300万像素摄像头只从外壳上突出了约2毫米。因此,这款平板电脑实际上不会在桌子上来回晃动。然而,当你敲击显示屏的左下角或右上角时,你可以激起轻微的摇晃。扬声器分布在两个短边上。底部有一个磁力基座,用于可选键盘盖。

Pad 5 Pro有黑色、白色和绿色三种颜色。

Size comparison

264.28 mm 171.4 mm 5.8 mm 485 g254.69 mm 166.25 mm 6.85 mm 515 g253.8 mm 165.3 mm 7.25 mm 485 g253.8 mm 165.3 mm 6.3 mm 500 g247.6 mm 178.5 mm 6.1 mm 458 g

功能 - Pad 5 Pro目前仅作为进口产品提供。

小米Pad 5 Pro的WiFi版价格约为430欧元(约489美元),配备6GB LPDDR4x内存和128GB UFS 3.1存储。如果有256GB的存储空间,则为470欧元(约534美元)。5G版本有8/256GB的存储空间,价格约为100欧元(约114美元)。由于缺乏microSD插槽,存储空间无法扩展。5G版本有一个50MP的摄像头,而Wi-Fi版本只有一个13MP的摄像头。

Pad 5 Pro目前不打算在欧洲市场销售。然而,如果你想购买它,你可以在进口专家那里找到它,比如我们的贷款人TradingShenzhen.我们问过小米,这款平板电脑是否以及何时也会在这个国家上市,希望能很快提供答案。

Pad 5不应与Pad 5 Pro相混淆。只有Wi-Fi版本的Pad 5与Pad 5 Pro共享一些功能,包括120 Hz显示屏和存储配置。随着 骁龙860Pad 5使用的是较慢的SoC。充电也被限制在33瓦,外壳只有4个扬声器。而 骁龙870骁龙870的充电功率为67瓦,8个扬声器和一个指纹传感器只在Pad 5 Pro中使用。

Pad 5 Pro的USB-C端口以USB 2.0的速度工作,由于缺乏3.5毫米插孔,它还可以作为音频端口。不过,交货范围中包括一个合适的适配器。该平板电脑支持DRM Widevine L1,因此也可以播放高清质量的流媒体。

左边。带指纹传感器的电源按钮,扬声器
左边。带指纹传感器的电源按钮,扬声器
对。扬声器、USB-C 2.0
对。扬声器、USB-C 2.0
头部一侧。音量摇杆
头部一侧。音量摇杆
脚侧:用于可选的键盘盖的磁性底座
脚侧:用于可选的键盘盖的磁性底座

软件 -Android 11 英文

小米Pad 5 Pro与小米的用户界面MIUI一起运行Android 11,目前版本为12.5。在测试时(10月底),Android 安全更新是截至7月1日,因此已经有些过时了。

由于Pad 5 Pro目前只能通过进口获得,该平板电脑只运行英文/中文ROM。Google Play也没有安装。然而,这些都不是问题。

除了这款平板电脑不懂德语之外,它可以像其他小米移动设备一样使用。MIUI 12.5仍然是一个直观的用户界面,即使是英文界面。而且,Google Play可以通过APK文件快速而方便地安装,因为Google Play所需的所有其他服务已经在Pad 5 Pro上运行。

通信和GNSS - Pad 5 Pro中的快速WiFi 6

Pad 5 Pro支持蓝牙5.2,但不支持NFC。它与Wi-Fi 6通信,这也是我们用参考路由器Netgear Nighthawk AX12确定的稳定传输速率的速度。

说到传输速度,只有 华为MatePad 11还算快一点,而 三星Galaxy Tab S7在接收方面仅仅领先于小米。而 Apple iPad Air 4显然落后于Pad 5 Pro。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
902 (886min - 925max) MBit/s ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
864 (829min - 888max) MBit/s ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
679 (653min - 709max) MBit/s ∼75% -21%
Apple iPad Air 2020
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 256 GB NVMe
645 (569min - 750max) MBit/s ∼72% -25%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
645 (630min - 659max) MBit/s ∼72% -25%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
836 (624min - 890max) MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
827 (708min - 899max) MBit/s ∼99%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
780 (635min - 867max) MBit/s ∼93% -6%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
555 (508min - 597max) MBit/s ∼66% -33%
Apple iPad Air 2020
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 256 GB NVMe
541 (500min - 571max) MBit/s ∼65% -35%
04590135180225270315360405450495540585630675720765810855708715760759734757802806791829796830843825823805853857842860870834889876899875874875899881708715760759734757802806791829796830843825823805853857842860870834889876899875874875899881852872849865874875829876845877877838869869860866868867875853870876842876863856885888850862Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø826 (708-899)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø864 (829-888)
大楼里的GPS接收
大楼里的GPS接收
室外的GPS接收
室外的GPS接收

Pad 5 Pro使用GPS(L1)、GLONASS(L1)、Galileo(E1)和BeiDou(B1)来确定位置。在测试中,该平板电脑没有设法在室内捕获可用的卫星信号。在室外,它做得更多,但需要半分钟,直到我们得到位置信息。它们至少可以精确到6米(约19.7英尺)。

这款平板电脑在运动中表现更好。Pad 5 Pro记录了一次10公里(约6.2英里)的自行车之旅,精确度与专业导航设备Garmin Edge 500相似。

GPS测试。环湖航行
GPS测试。环湖航行
GPS测试。转折点
GPS测试。转折点
GPS测试:总结
GPS测试:总结

相机 - 坚实的1300万像素相机

用主相机拍摄
用主相机拍摄

相机在许多平板电脑中都相当被忽视。然而,小米的Pad 5 Pro做得相当好,尽管它在图像质量方面无法与Apple iPad竞争。800万像素的自拍相机一开始就有稳定的画质,并以每秒30帧的速度录制1080p的视频。它在人像模式下会自动模糊背景。

如果光线条件合适,如样本图片1和2,1300万像素的主摄像头(f/2.0,自动对焦)可以拍摄出体面的照片,自然地再现色彩,并仍然显示许多图像细节。这对于偶尔的快照来说是相当足够的。只要你不把照片放大太多,变焦拍摄仍然是可以接受的。在低光照条件下,该相机只能拍出模糊的照片。1300万像素的摄像头记录的视频质量可以接受,每秒30帧,最高可达4K。

与许多智能手机的区别明显体现在相机软件上,因为Pad 5 Pro只提供了一些图片模式,这些模式或多或少地限于照片、肖像和夜景。因此,这款平板电脑也缺乏手动调整拍摄参数的专业模式。然而,可以添加闪光灯、HDR和各种过滤器等基本功能,以及用于自动图像优化的AI模式。

用自拍相机拍摄
用自拍相机拍摄
用主相机拍摄
用主相机拍摄
用主相机拍摄
用主相机拍摄

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight scene 1Daylight scene 25x ZoomLow light exposure

我们在照片实验室里又看了一下1300万像素的主摄像头。在最佳照明条件下(上色图),它能相对准确地再现颜色,但并不总是能准确地击中较暗的色调。在1勒克斯的亮度下(下色图),拍摄的颜色和原始颜色几乎没有任何共同之处。在其他方面相当清晰的测试图,即使有很多善意,实际上也是无法识别的。

ColorChecker
13.6 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
10 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro: 8.84 ∆E min: 1.86 - max: 17.52 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.1 ∆E
54.3 ∆E
39.9 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
44.7 ∆E
63.3 ∆E
53.8 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
42.9 ∆E
27.4 ∆E
66.3 ∆E
64.3 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
50.2 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
76.4 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
92.9 ∆E
71 ∆E
52.1 ∆E
37.1 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro: 47.06 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 92.92 ∆E

配件和保修 - 67瓦的电源需要额外费用

小米包括一个用于USB-C端口的3.5毫米插孔适配器,以及Pad 5 Pro的快速启动指南,但由于我们不懂中文,无法使用。

因此,67瓦的电源不属于交付范围。然而,我们的借阅者TradingShenzen也提供了它。以及Pad 5 Pro的其他配件,包括磁力对接键盘盖、翻盖和小米手写笔。

小米为其移动设备提供12个月的保修。除此之外,各商店或进口商的保修自然适用。

输入设备和操作 - 120赫兹显示器和指纹传感器

小米Pad 5 Pro的120赫兹显示屏,加上八核SoC 骁龙870和6GB的内存,确保了整个操作的流畅性。用户只是被预装的键盘稍微拖慢了速度。

由于Pad 5 Pro目前还没有在欧洲上市,你必须使用 "iFlytek IME for MIUI "出厂的键盘,它是为中国用户优化的。然而,像谷歌Gboard这样的标准键盘可以通过谷歌游戏轻松安装。退掉小米浏览器,用Chrome或Firefox等替代品取代它,也是一个好主意。

与小米Pad 5不同的是,Pad 5 Pro有一个集成在电源按钮上的指纹传感器,可以快速、可靠地工作。第二种,但不太安全的生物识别认证方法是面部扫描。如果有足够的环境光线和/或屏幕足够明亮,通过人脸解锁解锁平板电脑也能顺利进行。

横向模式下的预装键盘(MIUI的iFlytek IME)。
横向模式下的预装键盘(MIUI的iFlytek IME)。
键盘高
键盘高

显示器 - IPS面板,带HDR10和杜比视界

亚像素
亚像素

小米Pad 5 Pro的IPS显示屏的分辨率为2560 x 1600像素。刷新率可以设置为60或120赫兹。触摸采样率为240赫兹。很好。我们没有注意到PWM的闪烁。

除了笔输入,该显示器还支持HDR10和杜比视界,这应该会让电影迷们满意。然而,该面板的亮度不够高,无法吸引人地显示HDR

平均亮度为475.4cd/m²,最大亮度为497cd/m²,该面板几乎完全满足制造商500尼特的亮度规范。如果你用均匀分布的明亮暗区(APL50)而不是纯白背景来重复测量,你可以达到477 cd/m²。我们在最低亮度设置下测得1.22cd/m²。

453
cd/m²
488
cd/m²
490
cd/m²
453
cd/m²
497
cd/m²
494
cd/m²
444
cd/m²
477
cd/m²
483
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 497 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 475.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.22 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 497 cd/m²
Contrast: 1183:1 (Black: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
99.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
IPS, 2560x1600, 11.00
Apple iPad Air 2020
IPS, 2360x1640, 10.90
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
IPS, 2560x1600, 10.95
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
OLED, 2560x1600, 11.50
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
LTPS, 2560x1600, 11.00
Screen
5%
-72%
-22%
-9%
Brightness middle
497
509
2%
550
11%
372
-25%
554
11%
Brightness
475
486
2%
515
8%
375
-21%
535
13%
Brightness Distribution
89
93
4%
90
1%
95
7%
91
2%
Black Level *
0.42
0.39
7%
0.96
-129%
0.33
21%
Contrast
1183
1305
10%
573
-52%
1679
42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.4
1.3
7%
3.3
-136%
1.8
-29%
2.1
-50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3
2.8
7%
7.9
-163%
4.2
-40%
7.1
-137%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.3
2.2
4%
4.9
-113%
2.8
-22%
1.6
30%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.21 100%
2.24 98%
2.29 96%
2.32 95%
CCT
6744 96%
6833 95%
7288 89%
6718 97%
6623 98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
99.3

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21061 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Pad 5 Pro提供了3个颜色配置文件。"鲜艳 "是预设的,其他是 "饱和 "和 "标准"。此外,色温可以通过色轮或4个设置来改变。如果你激活 "自适应颜色 "按钮,平板电脑会根据环境光线调整显示颜色。

我们在色彩配置文件 "标准 "和色温设置为 "默认 "的情况下,可以得到最佳的色彩表现。颜色和灰度是如此精确,Delta E值远低于3,以至于你用肉眼无法看到显示的颜色和原始颜色之间的任何差异。

色彩保真度(色彩方案默认,色温默认,目标色彩空间sRGB)。
色彩保真度(色彩方案默认,色温默认,目标色彩空间sRGB)。
色彩空间(色彩方案默认,色温默认,目标色彩空间sRGB)。
色彩空间(色彩方案默认,色温默认,目标色彩空间sRGB)。
灰度(色彩方案默认,色温默认,目标色彩空间sRGB)。
灰度(色彩方案默认,色温默认,目标色彩空间sRGB)。
灰度(色彩方案默认,色温默认,目标色彩空间sRGB)。
灰度(色彩方案默认,色温默认,目标色彩空间sRGB)。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
16.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 10.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.6 ms rise
↘ 18.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (37.6 ms).

由于其良好的亮度值,Pad 5 Pro也可以在大多数光线情况下在户外使用,没有任何问题。即使在阳光直射下,仍然可以从显示屏上合理地阅读内容。

室外使用(阳光直射)。
室外使用(阳光直射)。
室外使用(在阴凉处)。
室外使用(在阴凉处)。

视角的稳定性非常好。即使从非常平坦的角度观看,亮度和色彩的再现也不会改变。

观点
观点

性能 - Pad 5 Pro是速度最快的平板电脑之一Android

配备了 骁龙870和其上层GPU Adreno 650小米Pad 5 Pro是目前最快的Android 平板电脑之一。安兔兔v9的成绩刚刚超过70万分(安兔兔v8不幸崩溃),Geekbench的多核分数为3317分,这些都说明了问题。

在合成基准测试和浏览器性能方面,小米平板电脑只需要与 Apple iPad Air 4的对比设备中。在Android ,,三星Galaxy Tab S7始终紧随其后,其 骁龙865+.

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPad Air 2020
1593 Points ∼78% +56%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
1019 Points ∼50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (967 - 1046, n=9)
997 Points ∼49% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
963 Points ∼47% -5%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
905 Points ∼44% -11%
Average of class Tablet (133 - 1716, n=42, last 2 years)
622 Points ∼30% -39%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
523 Points ∼26% -49%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Apple iPad Air 2020
4334 Points ∼15% +31%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
3317 Points ∼12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (2870 - 4455, n=9)
3309 Points ∼11% 0%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
3288 Points ∼11% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
3201 Points ∼11% -3%
Average of class Tablet (455 - 7378, n=42, last 2 years)
2182 Points ∼8% -34%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
1764 Points ∼6% -47%
PCMark for Android
Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (10829 - 16054, n=8)
12896 Points ∼75% +10%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
11694 Points ∼68%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
11610 Points ∼68% -1%
Average of class Tablet (4564 - 11694, n=15, last 2 years)
8138 Points ∼48% -30%
Work 2.0 performance score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
12603 Points ∼82% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (10060 - 14315, n=4)
11995 Points ∼78% +19%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
10060 Points ∼66%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
7459 Points ∼49% -26%
Average of class Tablet (4454 - 12603, n=26, last 2 years)
6357 Points ∼42% -37%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
9238 Points ∼82%
Apple iPad Air 2020
7564 Points ∼67%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
3490 Points ∼31%
Average of class Tablet (484 - 9238, n=30, last 2 years)
2627 Points ∼23%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
14283 Points ∼86%
Apple iPad Air 2020
13334 Points ∼80%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
3526 Points ∼21%
Average of class Tablet (427 - 14283, n=30, last 2 years)
3141 Points ∼19%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
4482 Points ∼83%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
3371 Points ∼62%
Apple iPad Air 2020
3008 Points ∼56%
Average of class Tablet (674 - 4482, n=30, last 2 years)
2310 Points ∼43%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
10486 Points ∼62%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
9901 Points ∼59% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (7970 - 11064, n=5)
9560 Points ∼57% -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
9283 Points ∼55% -11%
Apple iPad Air 2020
9134 Points ∼54% -13%
Average of class Tablet (517 - 13682, n=36, last 2 years)
3824 Points ∼23% -64%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
3668 Points ∼22% -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Apple iPad Air 2020
23094 Points ∼54% +64%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
14054 Points ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
13779 Points ∼32% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (12033 - 14968, n=5)
13671 Points ∼32% -3%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
13005 Points ∼30% -7%
Average of class Tablet (458 - 42751, n=36, last 2 years)
6408 Points ∼15% -54%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
3756 Points ∼9% -73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
5552 Points ∼81%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
5394 Points ∼78% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (3318 - 5784, n=5)
4742 Points ∼69% -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
4319 Points ∼63% -22%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
3390 Points ∼49% -39%
Apple iPad Air 2020
2931 Points ∼43% -47%
Average of class Tablet (806 - 5623, n=36, last 2 years)
2722 Points ∼40% -51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
7098 Points ∼35%
Apple iPad Air 2020
6614 Points ∼33%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
2437 Points ∼12%
Average of class Tablet (279 - 7098, n=30, last 2 years)
1927 Points ∼9%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Apple iPad Air 2020
9612 Points ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
8894 Points ∼77%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
2261 Points ∼20%
Average of class Tablet (233 - 9612, n=31, last 2 years)
2006 Points ∼17%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
4201 Points ∼71%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
3350 Points ∼57%
Apple iPad Air 2020
3161 Points ∼54%
Average of class Tablet (369 - 4201, n=31, last 2 years)
2312 Points ∼39%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
8844 Points ∼86%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (6960 - 8975, n=5)
8141 Points ∼79% -8%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
8089 Points ∼79% -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
7701 Points ∼75% -13%
Apple iPad Air 2020
6727 Points ∼65% -24%
Average of class Tablet (302 - 9630, n=38, last 2 years)
3065 Points ∼30% -65%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
2626 Points ∼25% -70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Apple iPad Air 2020
12112 Points ∼47% +15%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
10563 Points ∼41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (9498 - 10646, n=5)
10231 Points ∼40% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
9893 Points ∼38% -6%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
9428 Points ∼37% -11%
Average of class Tablet (253 - 25707, n=38, last 2 years)
4160 Points ∼16% -61%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
2469 Points ∼10% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
5634 Points ∼71%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
5403 Points ∼68% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (3296 - 5793, n=5)
4854 Points ∼61% -14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
4298 Points ∼54% -24%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
3380 Points ∼42% -40%
Average of class Tablet (443 - 5634, n=38, last 2 years)
2696 Points ∼34% -52%
Apple iPad Air 2020
2631 Points ∼33% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
6292 Points ∼46%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
2293 Points ∼17%
Average of class Tablet (469 - 6292, n=28, last 2 years)
2020 Points ∼15%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
8768 Points ∼33%
Average of class Tablet (400 - 25909, n=28, last 2 years)
2855 Points ∼11%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
2186 Points ∼8%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
3285 Points ∼62%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
2766 Points ∼53%
Average of class Tablet (533 - 3285, n=28, last 2 years)
2280 Points ∼43%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Points ∼0%
Wild Life Score
Apple iPad Air 2020
8630 Points ∼8% +102%
Average of class Tablet (371 - 17263, n=20, last 2 years)
4524 Points ∼4% +6%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
4273 Points ∼4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (4166 - 4351, n=9)
4250 Points ∼4% -1%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
3818 Points ∼3% -11%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
736 Points ∼1% -83%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Air 2020
8955 Points ∼8% +109%
Average of class Tablet (366 - 18326, n=18, last 2 years)
5180 Points ∼5% +21%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
4290 Points ∼4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (4152 - 4352, n=9)
4238 Points ∼4% -1%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
3823 Points ∼3% -11%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
637 Points ∼1% -85%
Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Air 2020
2466 Points ∼9% +101%
Average of class Tablet (135 - 5035, n=16, last 2 years)
1581 Points ∼6% +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (1203 - 1243, n=8)
1229 Points ∼5% 0%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
1228 Points ∼5%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
1116 Points ∼4% -9%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad Air 2020
2398 Points ∼9% +94%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (1195 - 4236, n=8)
1600 Points ∼6% +30%
Average of class Tablet (132 - 4975, n=16, last 2 years)
1559 Points ∼6% +26%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
1235 Points ∼5%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
1103 Points ∼4% -11%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
119 fps ∼4% 0%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
119 fps ∼4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (60 - 142, n=8)
105 fps ∼3% -12%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
60 fps ∼2% -50%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
55 fps ∼2% -54%
Average of class Tablet (9.8 - 120, n=37, last 2 years)
54.4 fps ∼2% -54%
Apple iPad Air 2020
40 fps ∼1% -66%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 2020
325 fps ∼3% +42%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
229 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
225 fps ∼2% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (200 - 231, n=8)
223 fps ∼2% -3%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
206 fps ∼2% -10%
Average of class Tablet (4.4 - 588, n=37, last 2 years)
135 fps ∼1% -41%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
85 fps ∼1% -63%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (60 - 116, n=8)
92.3 fps ∼25% +14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
82 fps ∼22% +1%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
81 fps ∼22%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
58 fps ∼16% -28%
Apple iPad Air 2020
52 fps ∼14% -36%
Average of class Tablet (9.4 - 120, n=35, last 2 years)
42.1 fps ∼12% -48%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
25 fps ∼7% -69%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 2020
179 fps ∼14% +31%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
137 fps ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
134 fps ∼10% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (119 - 140, n=8)
132 fps ∼10% -4%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
127 fps ∼10% -7%
Average of class Tablet (6.6 - 345, n=36, last 2 years)
78.7 fps ∼6% -43%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
42 fps ∼3% -69%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (50 - 95, n=8)
73.1 fps ∼2% +46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
51 fps ∼1% +2%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
50 fps ∼1%
Apple iPad Air 2020
45.4 fps ∼1% -9%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
45 fps ∼1% -10%
Average of class Tablet (6.3 - 107, n=36, last 2 years)
30.4 fps ∼1% -39%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
16 fps ∼0% -68%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 2020
136.8 fps ∼3% +43%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
96 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
93 fps ∼2% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (81 - 99, n=8)
90.8 fps ∼2% -5%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
89 fps ∼2% -7%
Average of class Tablet (4.3 - 227, n=36, last 2 years)
53.3 fps ∼1% -44%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
30 fps ∼1% -69%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (31 - 51, n=8)
45 fps ∼1% +45%
Apple iPad Air 2020
40 fps ∼1% +29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
32 fps ∼1% +3%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
31 fps ∼1%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
27 fps ∼1% -13%
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 87, n=36, last 2 years)
20.6 fps ∼1% -34%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
9.7 fps ∼0% -69%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 2020
87.2 fps ∼0% +50%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
58 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
57 fps ∼0% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (48 - 59, n=8)
56.5 fps ∼0% -3%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
52 fps ∼0% -10%
Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 150, n=36, last 2 years)
33.4 fps ∼0% -42%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
17 fps ∼0% -71%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Air 2020
35.6 fps ∼23% +70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (21 - 34, n=9)
30.3 fps ∼19% +44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
21 fps ∼13% 0%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
21 fps ∼13%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
18 fps ∼11% -14%
Average of class Tablet (2 - 75, n=40, last 2 years)
14.2 fps ∼9% -32%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
6.5 fps ∼4% -69%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 2020
32.9 fps ∼11% +43%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
23 fps ∼7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (22 - 23, n=9)
22.3 fps ∼7% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
22 fps ∼7% -4%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
21 fps ∼7% -9%
Average of class Tablet (0.85 - 70, n=40, last 2 years)
12.7 fps ∼4% -45%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
6.6 fps ∼2% -71%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (33 - 54, n=9)
48 fps ∼23% +45%
Apple iPad Air 2020
40.5 fps ∼20% +23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
33 fps ∼16% 0%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
33 fps ∼16%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
29 fps ∼14% -12%
Average of class Tablet (3.2 - 102, n=40, last 2 years)
21 fps ∼10% -36%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
10 fps ∼5% -70%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 2020
105.6 fps ∼14% +76%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
60 fps ∼8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (57 - 62, n=9)
59.2 fps ∼8% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
58 fps ∼8% -3%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
54 fps ∼7% -10%
Average of class Tablet (2.3 - 191, n=40, last 2 years)
34.7 fps ∼5% -42%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
16 fps ∼2% -73%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 2020
776812 Points ∼95% +10%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
704209 Points ∼86%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (676505 - 716502, n=7)
690112 Points ∼85% -2%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
628715 Points ∼77% -11%
Average of class Tablet (117837 - 776812, n=15, last 2 years)
472872 Points ∼58% -33%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
341542 Points ∼42% -51%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 2020
647374 Points ∼62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (573296 - 595585, n=3)
585665 Points ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
584052 Points ∼56%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
548798 Points ∼53%
Average of class Tablet (75328 - 1037960, n=26, last 2 years)
357364 Points ∼34%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
275660 Points ∼27%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Points ∼0%
AImark - Score v2.x
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
119152 Points ∼45% +1%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
118331 Points ∼45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (111838 - 119686, n=5)
116877 Points ∼44% -1%
Average of class Tablet (4281 - 119686, n=15, last 2 years)
36140 Points ∼14% -69%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
34522 Points ∼13% -71%
Apple iPad Air 2020
Points ∼0% -100%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (5916 - 6369, n=7)
6174 Points ∼73% +1%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
6139 Points ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
5592 Points ∼66% -9%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
5276 Points ∼62% -14%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
3421 Points ∼40% -44%
Average of class Tablet (157 - 6164, n=26, last 2 years)
2757 Points ∼33% -55%
Apple iPad Air 2020
Points ∼0% -100%
System
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
10171 Points ∼52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (8852 - 10489, n=7)
9807 Points ∼50% -4%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
9624 Points ∼49% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
8994 Points ∼46% -12%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
6753 Points ∼34% -34%
Average of class Tablet (946 - 10489, n=26, last 2 years)
5183 Points ∼26% -49%
Apple iPad Air 2020
Points ∼0% -100%
Memory
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
8167 Points ∼90%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (6757 - 8167, n=7)
7585 Points ∼84% -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
6501 Points ∼72% -20%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
5388 Points ∼60% -34%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
4053 Points ∼45% -50%
Average of class Tablet (464 - 8167, n=26, last 2 years)
3265 Points ∼36% -60%
Apple iPad Air 2020
Points ∼0% -100%
Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (11431 - 12801, n=7)
12151 Points ∼42% 0%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
12118 Points ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
12048 Points ∼42% -1%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
11366 Points ∼39% -6%
Average of class Tablet (143 - 12350, n=26, last 2 years)
4185 Points ∼15% -65%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
3875 Points ∼13% -68%
Apple iPad Air 2020
Points ∼0% -100%
Web
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (1411 - 1791, n=7)
1619 Points ∼68% +15%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
1411 Points ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
1409 Points ∼59% 0%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
1314 Points ∼55% -7%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
1291 Points ∼54% -9%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 1544, n=26, last 2 years)
1040 Points ∼43% -26%
Apple iPad Air 2020
Points ∼0% -100%

Legend

 
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Apple iPad Air 2020 Apple A14 Bionic, Apple A14 Bionic GPU, 256 GB NVMe
 
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Qualcomm Adreno 618, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 2020 (Safari Mobile 14)
166.551 Points ∼100% +108%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (60.7 - 94, n=6)
82.4 Points ∼49% +3%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
80.006 Points ∼48%
Average of class Tablet (14 - 183, n=32, last 2 years)
75.2 Points ∼45% -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86)
71.821 Points ∼43% -10%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)
66.572 Points ∼40% -17%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105)
47.583 Points ∼29% -41%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 2020 (Safari Mobile 14)
375.89 Points ∼100% +179%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (105 - 171, n=7)
141 Points ∼38% +5%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
134.71 Points ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86)
126.98 Points ∼34% -6%
Average of class Tablet (11.2 - 403, n=39, last 2 years)
124 Points ∼33% -8%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)
112.87 Points ∼30% -16%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105)
84.382 Points ∼22% -37%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPad Air 2020 (Safari Mobile 14)
195 Points ∼100% +61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (99 - 147, n=7)
124 Points ∼64% +2%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
121 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86)
116 Points ∼59% -4%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)
105 Points ∼54% -13%
Average of class Tablet (13 - 246, n=41, last 2 years)
92.4 Points ∼47% -24%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105)
67 Points ∼34% -45%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad Air 2020 (Safari Mobile 14)
198 runs/min ∼100% +187%
Average of class Tablet (5.68 - 228, n=32, last 2 years)
74.2 runs/min ∼37% +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86)
70.9 runs/min ∼36% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (51.4 - 74.8, n=6)
69.1 runs/min ∼35% 0%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
68.9 runs/min ∼35%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)
65.5 runs/min ∼33% -5%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105)
41.4 runs/min ∼21% -40%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 2020 (Safari Mobile 14)
58568 Points ∼100% +93%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (20543 - 39985, n=7)
30538 Points ∼52% +1%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
30367 Points ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86)
26495 Points ∼45% -13%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)
24196 Points ∼41% -20%
Average of class Tablet (1712 - 62946, n=39, last 2 years)
22071 Points ∼38% -27%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105)
16476 Points ∼28% -46%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (455 - 19212, n=40, last 2 years)
4821 ms * ∼100% -233%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105)
2888 ms * ∼60% -100%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)
1932.6 ms * ∼40% -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86)
1900.3 ms * ∼39% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (1158 - 1744, n=7)
1476 ms * ∼31% -2%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
1446.5 ms * ∼30%
Apple iPad Air 2020 (Safari Mobile 14)
464.2 ms * ∼10% +68%

* ... smaller is better

Pad 5 Pro的UFS 3.1内存确保了较短的加载时间和较高的连续读取率。4K随机读/写的速度也高于平均水平。

Xiaomi Pad 5 ProHuawei MatePad 11 2021Lenovo Tab P11 ProSamsung Galaxy Tab S7Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-20%
-64%
-18%
-12%
-65%
Sequential Read 256KB
1684.48
1468.24
-13%
486.77
-71%
1511.54
-10%
1585 ?(1330 - 1790, n=25)
-6%
572 ?(123 - 2031, n=36, last 2 years)
-66%
Sequential Write 256KB
772.29
708.37
-8%
192.32
-75%
680.21
-12%
740 ?(233 - 1095, n=25)
-4%
296 ?(53.1 - 1559, n=36, last 2 years)
-62%
Random Read 4KB
289.31
190.66
-34%
136.32
-53%
218.97
-24%
232 ?(126 - 317, n=25)
-20%
108 ?(16.3 - 310, n=36, last 2 years)
-63%
Random Write 4KB
281.45
217.51
-23%
123.34
-56%
211.5
-25%
231 ?(121 - 306, n=25)
-18%
91.2 ?(4.27 - 370, n=36, last 2 years)
-68%

游戏--运行顺畅,但120FPS仍是个例外

通过其 骁龙870-SoC,小米Pad 5 Pro有足够的动力来流畅地运行当前的每一款游戏。8个扬声器提供了强大的背景声音。

理论上,鉴于SoC的能力,你不必在细节水平和帧率上做出妥协。至少在我们的两个测试游戏中,Armajet PUBG Mobile,Pad 5 Pro不能利用其120 Hz的屏幕。这两款游戏都被限制在30帧/秒。

我们用工具Gamebench来确定帧率。.

氩氦刀
氩氦刀
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
05101520253029303030303030303030303030303130303030303030303030303030303030303031302931303031303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303129302931303031293129313029303031302930312930313030303030303129303130303030303031303029303030303030303030303030303031303030303030303130293030303030303030303030303031303030303030303030303030303030303030313029313030313030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303031293029313030312931293130293030313029303129303130303030303031293031303030303030313030293030303030303030303030303030313030303030303031303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030273130293030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030Tooltip
; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø30 (29-31)
; PUBG Mobile; 1.6.0: Ø30 (27-31)

排放 - 8个带杜比全景声的扬声器

温度

在操作过程中,Pad 5 Pro触摸起来很热。在一小时的压力测试后,我们测得表面最高温度为35.4℃(约96°F)。在内部,这款平板电脑的温度也得到了控制,正如GFXBench和3DMark的压力测试所示。因此,这款平板电脑可以在任何时候充分发挥其性能。

GFXBench电池测试T-Rex
GFXBench电池测试T-Rex
GFXBench电池测试 曼哈顿
GFXBench电池测试 曼哈顿

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

0510152025303540455025.625.525.525.425.525.525.525.525.525.525.525.525.425.525.525.525.525.525.525.551.650.549.749.649.649.749.649.549.649.649.649.649.549.649.549.649.549.449.249.122.922.822.722.722.722.722.822.822.822.722.722.822.722.722.722.722.822.722.722.725.625.525.525.425.525.525.525.525.525.525.525.525.425.525.525.525.525.525.525.551.650.549.749.649.649.749.649.549.649.649.649.649.549.649.549.649.549.449.249.122.922.822.722.722.722.722.822.822.822.722.722.822.722.722.722.722.822.722.722.77.377.377.377.367.367.377.357.367.367.377.367.367.377.367.357.367.377.377.377.3514.914.414.114.114.114141414141414141414141413.913.913.96.676.656.656.656.656.666.666.666.666.676.666.666.656.666.666.666.666.666.666.66Tooltip
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø25.5 (25.4-25.6)
Apple iPad Air 2020 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø49.7 (49.1-51.6)
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø22.7 (22.7-22.9)
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø7.36 (7.35-7.37)
Apple iPad Air 2020 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø14.1 (13.9-14.9)
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.4.2: Ø6.66 (6.65-6.67)
Max. Load
 32.1 °C31 °C35.2 °C 
 32 °C32 °C34.6 °C 
 31 °C30.6 °C35.4 °C 
Maximum: 35.4 °C
Average: 32.7 °C
30.7 °C33 °C32.7 °C
30.6 °C31.1 °C34.4 °C
30.6 °C31.5 °C32.6 °C
Maximum: 34.4 °C
Average: 31.9 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 30.5 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 34.4 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 30.5 °C / 87 F.

演讲者

说到音频,Pad 5 Pro拿出了大炮。这款平板电脑有8个支持杜比全景声的扬声器,比姐妹机型Pad 5(不含Pro)多4个。在设置中可以选择动态、视频、音乐和语音四个杜比全景声预设,以获得最佳音效。

这在纸面上读起来令人印象深刻,但在实践中听起来并不那么壮观。无论我们选择哪种预设,与典型的智能手机扬声器相比,低音的存在感要强得多,但在声音组合中的代表性仍然不足,而中音的空间太大。这款平板电脑只呈现出非常平衡的高音调。总的来说,扬声器提供了一个坚实的立体声。

耳机和外部扬声器可以通过附带的3.5毫米插孔适配器连接到Pad 5 Pro上。这可以通过蓝牙5.2无线工作。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203732.42525.630.23129.127.64023.424.35036.840.16328.439.18024.845.710022.444.612519.24916016.959.420015.656.725013.860.231513.465.840013.365.350013.870.16301272.280012.772.4100012.27512501378.6160013.775.2200013.271.1250013.466.531501367.5400013.370.9500013.673.8630013.378.8800013.874.91000013.767.4125001460.61600013.565.1SPL25.585.9N0.768.6median 13.5median 67.5Delta0.76.433.54034.927.624.624.724.727.130.938.923.626.917.723.216.538.414.147.212.659.112.75912.158.412.462.513.561.612.165.612.268.111.670.810.970.212.172.11275.112.373.812.67812.578.912.876.613.172.413.769.113.768.313.564.914.368.314.76324.886.30.664.2median 12.6median 68.30.86.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Pad 5 ProApple iPad Air 2020
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Apple iPad Air 2020 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电源管理 - 72分钟内充满电

能源消耗

在某些情况下,Pad 5 Pro的耗电量要比对比设备少很多。只有 联想Tab P11 Pro在负载情况下甚至比小米更节能。然而,在其他负载情况下,Pad 5 Pro仍然不落下风。

8600毫安时的电池可以通过可选的67瓦的电源快速充电。在测试中,只需要1:12小时就能将空电池恢复到100%。该 Apple iPad Air 4需要两倍的时间。50分钟后已经达到80%的填充水平。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.03 / 0.27 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.14 / 4.3 / 4.31 Watt
Load midlight 8.09 / 10.32 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
8600 mAh
Apple iPad Air 2020
 mAh
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
7250 mAh
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
8600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
8000 mAh
Power Consumption
-40%
-10%
3%
-6%
Idle Minimum *
1.14
1.3
-14%
1.33
-17%
1.55
-36%
1.16
-2%
Idle Average *
4.3
7.89
-83%
5.37
-25%
4.91
-14%
4.42
-3%
Idle Maximum *
4.31
7.91
-84%
5.41
-26%
5.02
-16%
4.43
-3%
Load Average *
8.09
9.28
-15%
6.87
15%
4.38
46%
8.86
-10%
Load Maximum *
10.32
10.78
-4%
10.08
2%
6.81
34%
11.6
-12%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567894.854.644.784.553.674.34.592.254.054.974.444.632.174.841.8592.714.763.571.9952.044.91.8983.443.424.854.815.234.942.083.941.9085.895.936.126.061.8844.232.054.654.862.033.552.365.44.521.8494.411.874.895.785.145.095.322.093.6255.192.351.964.12.098.168.157.397.777.647.597.337.547.467.287.497.481.9517.437.27.641.8885.139.118.928.268.76.823.742.682.14.856.631.9576.676.684.556.541.9567.128.935.512.188.822.445.027.651.987.337.342.397.344.217.126.841.977.347.367.357.311.8738.818.931.8998.438.438.47.717.866.842.273.523.717.637.647.637.637.357.637.637.627.637.647.639.441.9264.554.737.877.847.857.77.827.827.883.752.45.763.123.063.133.133.033.062.552.923.152.223.073.33.013.3943.4342.513.422.813.612.753.133.452.243.332.563.093.112.583.262.593.353.43.414.353.433.363.362.232.862.882.213.273.483.523.533.523.553.012.222.812.263.323.242.922.232.82.832.482.943.013.193.492.243.082.232.883.33.063.213.242.973.192.82.932.573.313.613.53.673.022.252.332.752.336.226.035.396.356.036.36.176.076.296.166.126.296.162.36.035.665.675.82.273.173.246.646.956.956.966.963.942.256.272.296.165.272.853.756.467.183.612.262.267.156.447.12.267.357.22.276.46.512.494.935.035.672.247.213.652.692.265.33.462.345.265.527.857.972.256.87.217.232.268.046.56.777.267.576.267.162.466.622.566.567.167.757.16.727.416.897.155.737.818.055.168.498.422.272.393.143.053.163.077.467.347.547.467.467.547.377.72Tooltip
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G: Ø5.35 (1.849-9.44)
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865: Ø4.42 (2.21-8.49)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456784.294.815.655.835.824.025.335.597.187.217.217.287.297.327.357.427.337.337.327.367.357.357.347.357.547.557.547.467.477.527.587.547.537.467.738.988.898.488.368.318.28.218.18.388.378.468.118.218.358.348.338.338.28.118.168.078.28.728.348.338.458.468.358.168.198.218.198.188.158.268.228.168.186.773.23.213.223.123.233.293.183.283.313.513.373.33.233.263.143.243.233.293.223.243.253.033.013.123.173.223.574.164.696.317.117.317.427.037.897.867.537.357.567.337.477.57.557.437.497.487.477.667.647.227.387.57.267.57.527.577.577.467.537.67.627.727.67.567.57.637.67.657.527.428.637.797.97.577.577.727.367.387.717.77.737.747.567.617.667.587.637.567.57.567.627.557.627.54.294.815.655.835.824.025.335.597.187.217.217.287.297.327.357.427.337.337.327.367.357.357.347.357.547.557.547.467.477.527.587.547.537.467.738.988.898.488.368.318.28.218.18.388.378.468.118.218.358.348.338.338.28.118.168.078.28.728.348.338.458.468.358.168.198.218.198.188.158.268.228.168.186.773.23.213.223.123.233.293.183.283.313.513.373.33.233.263.143.243.233.293.223.243.253.033.013.123.173.223.574.164.696.317.117.317.427.037.897.867.537.357.567.337.477.57.557.437.497.487.477.667.647.227.387.57.267.57.527.577.577.467.537.67.627.727.67.567.57.637.67.657.527.428.637.797.97.577.577.727.367.387.717.77.737.747.567.617.667.587.637.567.57.567.627.557.627.51.9051.9171.911.9232.061.9011.9121.9051.961.90922.061.8971.9131.9131.9051.9041.9672.051.9261.9011.9121.9581.9251.9111.9141.91.9251.9131.9191.9061.9161.8971.9031.911.9371.9051.9082.041.9161.9121.9131.9092.331.9091.9091.9091.91.9331.9071.9021.9131.9031.9041.9011.9141.9091.9061.9152.051.9682.312.312.332.342.322.322.312.312.352.322.322.312.322.322.332.322.332.322.322.392.282.322.332.322.332.332.322.322.322.312.362.322.32.342.312.442.922.522.322.332.322.32.322.332.332.322.322.322.322.322.332.312.312.332.332.332.312.312.422.342.32Tooltip
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.62 (4.02-8.98)
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.24 (3.01-8.63)
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G; Idle 1min: Ø1.934 (1.897-2.33)
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865; Idle 1min: Ø2.34 (2.28-2.92)

电池寿命

它的大电池有助于Pad 5 Pro实现高于平均水平的运行时间。而这也足以让组装的平板电脑竞争者望尘莫及。

超过15小时的模拟网络冲浪和近17小时的连续视频播放,小米的平板电脑是对比设备中最好的。再加上充电时间短,Pad 5 Pro在日常使用中可以非常灵活地使用。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
50h 13min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
15h 21min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 49min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 15min
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
8600 mAh
Apple iPad Air 2020
 mAh
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
7250 mAh
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
8600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
8000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-9%
-16%
-15%
-18%
Reader / Idle
3013
2039
-32%
1972
-35%
1641
-46%
1963
-35%
H.264
1009
671
-33%
864
-14%
851
-16%
885
-12%
WiFi v1.3
921
702
-24%
835
-9%
624
-32%
811
-12%
Load
255
388
52%
236
-7%
348
36%
221
-13%

Pros

+ 高质量的做工
+ 非常快的SoC
+ 快速的WLAN
+ 明亮的IPS面板,120赫兹
+ HDR10, Dolby Vision, Dolby Atmos
+ 良好的立体声效果
+ 电池运行时间长
+ 充电时间非常短

Cons

- 没有IP认证
- 没有音频插孔
- 没有microSD插槽
- 不包括电源适配器

关于小米Pad 5 Pro的结论

在审查中。小米Pad 5 Pro。测试设备由以下单位提供
在审查中。小米Pad 5 Pro。测试设备由以下单位提供

小米推出的Pad 5 Pro是一款强大的11英寸平板电脑。它不仅能在外观上与Apple iPad竞争,而且在性能上也能与之竞争。配备了 骁龙870,以及 Adreno 650图形加速器和6GB内存,它是目前最快的Android 平板电脑之一。

Pad 5 Pro的进一步论据是其明亮的120赫兹IPS屏幕,这使小米能够实现两倍于iPad Air 4的刷新率。 Apple iPad Air 4.然而,在摄像头方面,小米没有接近Apple ,但它做得相当好。电池运行时间和通过67瓦的电源适配器为平板电脑快速充电的选项又非常强大。

强大的性能,明亮的120赫兹显示屏,长的电池运行时间,除此之外,还有良好的性价比。如果你正在寻找一款方便而强大的Android ,并且不想为它支付Apple ,小米Pad 5 Pro是一个不错的选择。

Pad 5 Pro目前只能通过进口获得。因此,Android 11和MIUI 12.5只有英文版本。然而,Google Play可以立即安装,所以用户体验其实并不逊于标准的MIUI。

然而,考虑到低价,它也不是没有妥协。Pad 5 Pro缺乏IP认证和屏幕保护器。然而,它使用了一种未指定的 "防刮防碎 "显示玻璃。没有金属或玻璃机身,你不得不忍受一个设计别致的塑料后盖。也不包括OLED屏幕。交付的范围实际上仅限于USB-C端口的3.5毫米插孔适配器。电源适配器与手写笔和对接键盘一样是可选的。

小米自己提供了Pad 5 Pro的替代品:Pad 5。这个 "非专业 "的变体依靠的是 骁龙860而不是骁龙870,声音来自4个而不是8个扬声器,没有指纹传感器,并且只能以最大33瓦的功率充电。然而,它可以被正式购买,一些买家已经为6/128GB的小存储版本支付了不到400欧元(约454美元)。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

小米Pad 5 Pro目前只能通过进口零售商购买,比如我们的借贷宝TradingShenzhen.目前,它的价格约为430欧元(约489美元),6/128GB存储空间,约470欧元(约534美元),256GB存储空间。带有8/256GB的5G版本价格为540欧元(约合613美元)。

Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro - 10/29/2021 v7
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
80 / 98 → 82%
Keyboard
71 / 80 → 89%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
47 / 70 → 67%
Weight
83 / 40-88 → 89%
Battery
90%
Display
89%
Games Performance
65 / 78 → 84%