Notebookcheck Logo

realme GT NEO 2 智能手机评测--挑战顶级水平

霓虹绿色的上层社会。 realme GT NEO 2在测试中以不寻常的颜色选择给人以惊喜,并以大量的性能和较长的运行时间说服了相当少的钱。只有相机有一些需要改进的地方......
5G Android ARM Smartphone
realme GT NEO 2
Realme GT Neo 2 (GT Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G 8 x 2.4 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
Display
6.62 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 398 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 240 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B6/​B8/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B66), 5G (n1/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n28/​n66/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n77/​n78) , Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.6 x 162.9 x 75.8
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 65 Watt realme SuperDart Charge
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison-AF, dual LED-flash, Videos @2160p/​60fps (Camera 1); 8.0MP, f/​2.3, wide angle lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.5, 26mm, 1/3.09", 1.0µm, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, Keyboard: virtual keyboard, charger, USB cable, silicone bumper, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
200 g
Price
549 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
85.2 %
12/2021
Realme GT Neo 2
SD 870, Adreno 650
200 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.62"2400x1080
85.1 %
08/2021
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9
189 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.43"2400x1080
84.2 %
11/2021
Motorola Edge 20
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L
163 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.70"2400x1080
82.2 %
04/2021
Samsung Galaxy A72
SD 720G, Adreno 618
203 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.70"2400x1080

箱子和设备 - 霓虹绿色挑战者

在500欧元(约合568美元)左右的价格范围内,有许多挑战者的顶级智能手机都有超强的配置。同时,它们并没有配备所有的最新技术,许多用户在日常使用中可能根本不需要这些技术。

realme GT NEO 2现在就是其中之一,它想凭借120赫兹的显示屏、超快的充电技术和应要求的奢侈色彩设计再次洗牌。

根据制造商的说法,背面是由铜合金制成的,应该可以特别有效地散去智能手机内部的热量。表面覆盖有纳米涂层,闪耀着哑光,有黑色、浅蓝色或不寻常的霓虹绿色可供选择。外壳看起来很结实,具有高质量的构造。

有两种设备的变体。

  • realme GT NEO 2 - 8GB内存/128GB存储。450欧元(约511美元)
  • realme GT NEO 2 - 12 GB RAM / 256 GB存储。550欧元(约合人民币625元)

然而,较大的存储选项只有绿色或黑色可供选择。

NFC和蓝牙5.2都在船上,但没有microSD读卡器来扩展存储。

realme GT NEO 2
realme GT NEO 2
realme GT NEO 2
realme GT NEO 2
realme GT NEO 2
realme GT NEO 2

Size comparison

165 mm 77.4 mm 8.4 mm 203 g162.9 mm 75.8 mm 8.6 mm 200 g163 mm 76 mm 7 mm 163 g159.1 mm 73.3 mm 8.3 mm 189 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

通信、软件和操作 - 由于120赫兹,滚动平稳

由于支持WiFi 6,这款智能手机在互联网上的速度非常快,特别是与之相比。 三星Galaxy A72.当然,realme GT NEO 2也支持5G,频率的多样性也应该足以让你去更多异国他乡旅行。

realme UI很整洁,以Android 11为基础,并从2021年10月开始打安全补丁,在测试时它仍然是相当最新的。该系统使用起来特别有趣,因为它的屏幕很快,这使得一切看起来比60赫兹的屏幕更流畅。

屏幕下的指纹传感器和面部识别可用于生物识别解锁。两者都工作得相当迅速和可靠,两者的结合使其更加方便。然而,你应该记住,面部识别没有红外或深度摄像头的支持,所以它不那么安全,在黑暗中也有其局限性。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
888 (842min - 904max) MBit/s +2%
Realme GT Neo 2
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
867 (836min - 893max) MBit/s
Motorola Edge 20
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
697 (664min - 716max) MBit/s -20%
Samsung Galaxy A72
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
287 (144min - 338max) MBit/s -67%
iperf3 receive AX12
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
877 (657min - 928max) MBit/s +14%
Motorola Edge 20
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
809 (717min - 844max) MBit/s +5%
Realme GT Neo 2
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
771 (585min - 832max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A72
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
295 (143min - 319max) MBit/s -62%
04590135180225270315360405450495540585630675720765810855Tooltip
Realme GT Neo 2; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø770 (585-832)
Realme GT Neo 2; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø867 (836-893)

照相机--不完全令人信服

前置摄像头的录制
前置摄像头的录制

realme GT NEO 2的主摄像头采用了6400万像素的镜头。它采用了像素分选,即4个像素总是合并成一个像素,因此通常会产生1600万像素的图像,但如果需要也可以使用全分辨率。

照片实际上相当清晰悦目,细节尚可,但在昏暗的日子里,周围的图像显示出明显的模糊不清。在弱光和高对比度下,亮度还可以,图像清晰度达到平均水平。视频可以用4K录制,最多60FPS。这里只能使用数码变焦。如果你想用广角摄像头录制视频,你必须在开始录制前选择它。自动对焦和曝光控制工作相当可靠。

你只能在主摄像头和广角摄像头之间直接切换;渐进式混合变焦是不可能的。该相机在广角模式下拍摄的照片还不错,但当你走近看时,许多细节就会丢失。

1600万像素的前置摄像头能拍出体面的自拍,即使放大后仍能显示各种细节。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera PlantMain camera LandscapeMain camera Low LightWeitwinkelkamera
click to load images
ColorChecker
23.5 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
13 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Realme GT Neo 2: 13.58 ∆E min: 3.42 - max: 23.48 ∆E
ColorChecker
29 ∆E
49.8 ∆E
37.6 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
42.6 ∆E
56.2 ∆E
50.1 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
37 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
57.8 ∆E
58.8 ∆E
29.9 ∆E
45.4 ∆E
34.6 ∆E
66.5 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
40.8 ∆E
72.6 ∆E
67.4 ∆E
50.1 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Realme GT Neo 2: 43.08 ∆E min: 12.89 - max: 72.61 ∆E

显示 - 可以更真实地反映颜色

子像素记录
子像素记录

realme GT NEO 2的AMOLED显示屏具有扩展的全高清分辨率,由于刷新率高达120赫兹,可以显示流畅的运动。最大亮度在一个非常好的水平上,但色彩的再现是相当平庸的。即使在调整为sRGB的 "温和 "色彩模式下,也能看到蓝色偏移。

像所有的OLED屏幕一样,PWM是存在的,但你可以激活直流调光模式,这样屏幕就只随刷新率更新,不会闪烁。

769
cd/m²
771
cd/m²
776
cd/m²
755
cd/m²
767
cd/m²
767
cd/m²
754
cd/m²
767
cd/m²
774
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 776 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 766.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 767 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.47 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 5.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
98.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.275
Realme GT Neo 2
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.62
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
Motorola Edge 20
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.70
Samsung Galaxy A72
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.70
Response Times
-48%
-34%
3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
6 ?(3, 3)
8 ?(5, 3)
-33%
9 ?(5, 4)
-50%
6.4 ?(2.8, 3.6)
-7%
Response Time Black / White *
6 ?(3, 3)
8 ?(3, 5)
-33%
6 ?(3, 3)
-0%
3.2 ?(1.6, 1.6)
47%
PWM Frequency
532
119.6
-78%
252.5
-53%
367.6 ?(2)
-31%
Screen
7%
9%
8%
Brightness middle
767
594
-23%
479
-38%
730
-5%
Brightness
767
594
-23%
480
-37%
734
-4%
Brightness Distribution
97
99
2%
94
-3%
97
0%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.47
2.74
21%
2.06
41%
3.2
8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.23
6
35%
4.54
51%
8.8
5%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.9
4.2
29%
3.5
41%
3.5
41%
Gamma
2.275 97%
2.278 97%
2.205 100%
2.05 107%
CCT
7800 83%
7322 89%
6794 96%
6605 98%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-21% / -11%
-13% / -5%
6% / 6%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 532 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 532 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 532 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17915 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

启用直流调光
启用直流调光
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 快速而持久

凭借其SoC,即 高通骁龙870 5G。realme GT NEO 2不能成为真正高端智能手机的威胁。然而,它在其价格范围内提供了大量的性能,可以超越所有的对比设备。这款手机 骁龙870 5G也被用于原本更昂贵的智能手机,如 摩托罗拉Edge 20 Pro.

UFS 3.1的存储是个好东西。与UFS 2.0中慢得多的存储相比,速度上的差异是很大的。 三星Galaxy A72是特别引人注目的。

realme特别强调了GT NEO 2的创新冷却系统。 然而,在我们的测试中,外壳发热相当严重。 44.8 °C (112.6 °F)作为较长负荷后的最大值,几乎令人不快。我们主要在室温下测量。在炎热的夏天使用该智能手机的用户可能会有问题。

realme手机将听筒用作混合扬声器,以获得立体声效果,从而支持实际的主扬声器,该扬声器位于底部边缘。因此,在需要的时候可以达到一个体面的音量,同时声音不会过度膨胀,相当平衡和令人愉快。外部音频设备可以通过蓝牙或USB-C连接。

realme GT NEO 2在我们的电池测试中持续了16个小时以上,这是一个不错的速度。5,000毫安时的电池可以用最大的65瓦特进行充电,因此几乎不需要超过半小时就能充满。如果你只为智能手机充电几分钟,在适度使用的情况下,你仍然可以获得几个小时的运行时间。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Realme GT Neo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
1004 Points
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
809 Points -19%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
767 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
555 Points -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (943 - 1046, n=16)
989 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=217, last 2 years)
918 Points -9%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Realme GT Neo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
3095 Points
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
2463 Points -20%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2785 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1656 Points -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (2725 - 4455, n=16)
3245 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=217, last 2 years)
3009 Points -3%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Realme GT Neo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
14573 Points
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
8486 Points -42%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
13296 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
7471 Points -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (9827 - 16054, n=15)
12937 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=213, last 2 years)
11798 Points -19%
3DMark
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Realme GT Neo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
4232 Points
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4208 Points -1%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2505 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
826 Points -80%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (4166 - 4374, n=16)
4264 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (395 - 9839, n=134, last 2 years)
2569 Points -39%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Realme GT Neo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
4230 Points
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4214 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2499 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
824 Points -81%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (4152 - 4352, n=16)
4247 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (394 - 20068, n=202, last 2 years)
6307 Points +49%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Realme GT Neo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
1232 Points
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
1283 Points +4%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
695 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
318 Points -74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (1203 - 1254, n=15)
1232 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 5226, n=206, last 2 years)
1697 Points +38%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Realme GT Neo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
1236 Points
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
1256 Points +2%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
690 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1047 Points -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (1195 - 1246, n=15)
1226 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (110 - 5248, n=201, last 2 years)
1705 Points +38%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Realme GT Neo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
54 fps
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
48 fps -11%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
30 fps -44%
Samsung Galaxy A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (22 - 54, n=16)
45.2 fps -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=225, last 2 years)
44 fps -19%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Realme GT Neo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
61 fps
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
54 fps -11%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
34 fps -44%
Samsung Galaxy A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
15 fps -75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (50 - 62, n=16)
58.2 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 229, n=225, last 2 years)
64.5 fps +6%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Realme GT Neo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
34 fps
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
31 fps -9%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
19 fps -44%
Samsung Galaxy A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps -68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (17 - 34, n=16)
28.8 fps -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.8 - 118, n=225, last 2 years)
32.9 fps -3%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Realme GT Neo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
22 fps
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
21 fps -5%
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
13 fps -41%
Samsung Galaxy A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
6.8 fps -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
  (18 - 23, n=16)
21.8 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 94, n=225, last 2 years)
25.7 fps +17%
Realme GT Neo 2OnePlus Nord 2 5GMotorola Edge 20Samsung Galaxy A72Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
10%
-33%
-63%
17%
6%
Sequential Read 256KB
1761
1827
4%
1011
-43%
490.8
-72%
Sequential Write 256KB
763
1256
65%
471.4
-38%
260
-66%
Random Read 4KB
281.1
223.7
-20%
190.2
-32%
119.2
-58%
Random Write 4KB
260.2
239
-8%
210.6
-19%
114.7
-56%

温度

Max. Load
 44.1 °C41.6 °C37.4 °C 
 44.7 °C40.8 °C37.4 °C 
 44.8 °C41 °C37.5 °C 
Maximum: 44.8 °C
Average: 41 °C
35.1 °C38.6 °C39 °C
35.4 °C38.8 °C41.7 °C
35.5 °C38.9 °C41.8 °C
Maximum: 41.8 °C
Average: 38.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.3 °C | Room Temperature 19.7 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.4 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.


热图背面
热图背面
热力图前线
热力图前线

演讲者

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2045.545.32542.239.73133.844.54039.139.45044.144.56334.435.18025.626.310024.227.312520.231.216021.240.520017.346.525018.155.931516.160.840015.464.550016.471.963017.174.180020.877.7100020.977.8125017.979.5160018.178.220001878.7250018.878.8315019.878.9400020.580.3500020.874.4630021.671.5800022.369.2100002374.51250023.871.91600024.757.2SPL32.389.3N1.679.6median 20.2median 74.1Delta2.110.745.642.640.237.133.43231.229.53537.727.526.920.122.919.619.717.22515.935.312.442.21249.310.253.410.156.18.759.415.264.616.366.115.670.413.170.911.171.611.569.311.768.814.171.214.473.517.768.416.567.216.765.718.169.317.563.218.853.727.181.60.850.3median 15.2median 65.72.79.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseRealme GT Neo 2OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Realme GT Neo 2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

OnePlus Nord 2 5G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

Realme GT Neo 2
5000 mAh
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
4500 mAh
Motorola Edge 20
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A72
5000 mAh
Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
962
958
0%
716
-26%
877
-9%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
16h 02min

Pros

+ 性价比很高
+ 屏幕明亮
+ 可以启动直流调光
+ 快速的WLAN和5G
+ 平衡的声音
+ 电池寿命长,充电快

Cons

- 显示器中出现蓝光
- 负载下的强烈加热
- 没有混合变焦

评语--良好的整体包装,价格实惠

评测中:realme GT NEO 2.测试设备由德国realme提供。
评测中:realme GT NEO 2.测试设备由德国realme提供。

realme GT NEO 2再次向上层社会发起进攻。 尽管它在功能上不能完全跟上真正的顶级手机,但它在日常使用的大量性能和定价上的轻松之间找到了一个很好的妥协。

具有良好运行时间和极快充电时间的大电池是一个亮点,由铜合金制成的外壳也很稳定,制作精良。扬声器的声音很干净,无线局域网的速度很快,而且由于采用了直流调光模式,敏感的人有更大的机会不会因为屏幕而感到头痛。

长时间负载下相当高的发热对用户来说可能是一个问题,但作为回报,该智能手机为其价格范围带来了很多性能。

realme GT NEO 2提供了大量的性能和长时间的运行时间,而且价格低廉。长时间加载时,非常温暖的外壳可能是一个问题。

如果你在折扣活动中以更低的价格买到该设备(该设备在2021年黑色星期五期间发布后不久就以不到370欧元(约420美元)的价格出售),那么它就会变成一个性价比很高的产品,让竞争者难以下手。在这个价格范围内,几乎没有人提供更多的动力,但你会得到类似的长运行时间与 一加诺德2 5G.这款手机 摩托罗拉Edge 20配备了更快的屏幕,但扬声器却很平庸。

价格和可用性

realme GT NEO 2可从制造商处获得,也可在各种零售商处获得。在各种零售商。在大型在线零售商中,例如,我们的合作伙伴amazon.de,notebooksbilliger.deCyberport都有这款手机的报价。

Realme GT Neo 2 - 08/31/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
82%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
51 / 70 → 72%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
87%
Games Performance
58 / 64 → 91%
Application Performance
80 / 86 → 93%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 84%
Camera
67%
Average
79%
85%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > realme GT NEO 2 智能手机评测--挑战顶级水平
Florian Schmitt, 2021-12- 1 (Update: 2021-12- 1)