Motorola Moto G100
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.2, Videos @1080p/30fps (Camera 1); 8.0MP, f/2.4, wide angle lens (Camera 2)
Price comparison
Average of 42 scores (from 57 reviews)
Reviews for the Motorola Moto G100
A high-quality mid-range phone with a fast processor, fast storage, and a large battery. This is how you could describe the Moto G100, but that would be leaving out an important aspect: Thanks to the Ready For docking software, the smartphone can also be used as a replacement for a desktop PC.
Source: Expert Reviews
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionDiving headfirst into the deep end, it’s quite clear that the Moto G100 is a bit out of its depth. The most expensive Moto G yet – by quite some distance – there’s not much reason to pick up the Moto G100 instead of its rivals, which is especially frustrating since they also cost a bit less than what Motorola is charging too. It’s by far the best Moto G I’ve ever reviewed, but it’s just not the best in value terms. The £130 Moto G10 remains my top affordable pick, but if your buying budget stretches further into the mid-range, then the Galaxy A52 5G, Pixel 4a 5G and iPhone SE (2020) all still earn my recommendation.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/07/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Expert Reviews
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionDiving headfirst into the deep end, it’s quite clear that the Moto G100 is a bit out of its depth. The most expensive Moto G yet – by quite some distance – there’s not much reason to pick up the Moto G100 instead of its rivals, which is especially frustrating since they also cost a bit less than what Motorola is charging too. It’s by far the best Moto G I’ve ever reviewed, but it’s just not the best in value terms. The £130 Moto G10 remains my top affordable pick, but if your buying budget stretches further into the mid-range, then the Galaxy A52 5G, Pixel 4a 5G and iPhone SE (2020) all still earn my recommendation.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/24/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Expert Reviews
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionDiving headfirst into the deep end, it’s quite clear that the Moto G100 is a bit out of its depth. The most expensive Moto G yet – by quite some distance – there’s not much reason to pick up the Moto G100 instead of its rivals, which is especially frustrating since they also cost a bit less than what Motorola is charging too. It’s by far the best Moto G I’ve ever reviewed, but it’s just not the best in value terms. The £130 Moto G10 remains my top affordable pick, but if your buying budget stretches further into the mid-range, then the Galaxy A52 5G, Pixel 4a 5G and iPhone SE (2020) all still earn my recommendation.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/05/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: GSM Choice
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionYou can mainly stick to the screen that does not use AMOLED technology. Motorola has focused on performance, optimization, battery and soft more than the display. The cameras won't impress - but in this area, Motorola has never really stood out. However, it's hard to forgive the lack of stereo speakers and inductive charging. Moreover, we cannot ignore the fact that there is even a POCO F3 on the market, which offers an AMOLED screen, the same processor, and even an identical memory variant - and it is cheaper. If you care about a smartphone with which you can work like a computer, then it is worth looking at Samsung smartphones from the Galaxy S and Galaxy Note series that support Samsung DeX - here I would aim at the Galaxy S20 FE model.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/06/2021
Source: Tom's Guide
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Moto g100 is a real workhorse of a phone, covering all your needs as practically as possible. But unlike other members of the Moto G series, it’s also got some premium features that let the g100 excel in a few key areas. The Moto g100 provides get one of the highest performance to price ratios in all the smartphone market thanks to a generously mighty chipset; you get a lot of display space to make the most of that power, too. At best, the Moto g100’s cameras are serviceable, though the ultrawide selfie camera is a standout. The software, assuming you’re using it on the phone itself, is nice and straightforward to use, and even if it can’t replace your laptop, ReadyFor still has a place as a big-screen gaming, movie watching or video conferencing mode.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/22/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tom's Guide
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionWith the Moto g100, Motorola successfully delivers a powerful set of features in a mid-range package. Any flaws in the premium-like experience are made up for by more unique features like the ReadyFor mode or the secondary ultrawide selfie camera.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/14/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Stuff TV
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionBreaks new ground for the Moto G line-up, but only to limited effect. Unless you have specific plans for the productivity-focused accessory bundle, there are plenty of mid-range rivals that are more well-rounded.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/04/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Tech Advisor
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Moto G100 offers great performance, a decent display and long battery life for less than £450, with the added bonus of Motorola's Ready For tech that turns the phone into an Android-powered desktop. If you can overlook hit-and-miss camera performance, it's a great mid-range smartphone.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/28/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Techradar
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSold on its own, the Moto G100 would be a good-value low-cost phone, thanks to a fast processor, pretty decent cameras for its price and a handy fingerprint scanner, though there are some issues like its big size and slow charging speeds. The real issue, though, is that you have to buy it with a dock for the Ready For multitasking software, which bumps up the price and adds functions not everyone will care about.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/28/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: L&B TechReview
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Motorola Moto G100 is proof that you can not always get in both bag and sack. A mobile for less than 4,000 kroner with as high a performance as the Moto G100 can perform – as mentioned largely on a par with much more expensive smartphones such as OnePlus 8T and Samsung Galaxy S20 FE – is a find for the price, but you have to do without the super sharp and high-resolution screen and the excellent sound that otherwise characterizes the premium class. But having said that, it’s hard to think of another smartphone that gives you so much for so little money as the Motorola Moto G100. The camera is excellent and adequate for the vast majority of users, and the impressive battery life we have hardly seen before since the 1990s. That was when we had Nokia mobiles in our pockets that could hold power for a week. So bad that the Moto G100 does not have wireless charging.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/21/2021
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Tom's Guide
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionYou'll struggle to find a more competent phone than the Moto g10 at this price. However, as user-friendly and refined as the design is, it's hard to ignore the low-powered components when you know there are far better options out there if you’re able to spend a little more.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/03/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Phone Arena
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Motorola G100 launched in Europe with a price tag of €499. There’s no information on whether the phone will arrive in the States and what would be the price but at 499 euros I don’t expect anything below the $500 mark ($600 sounds more realistic). That’s if Motorola decides to sell the phone in the US, of course.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/02/2021
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Expert Reviews
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionDiving headfirst into the deep end, it’s quite clear that the Moto G100 is a bit out of its depth. The most expensive Moto G yet – by quite some distance – there’s not much reason to pick up the Moto G100 instead of its rivals, which is especially frustrating since they also cost a bit less than what Motorola is charging too. It’s by far the best Moto G I’ve ever reviewed, but it’s just not the best in value terms. The £130 Moto G10 remains my top affordable pick, but if your buying budget stretches further into the mid-range, then the Galaxy A52 5G, Pixel 4a 5G and iPhone SE (2020) all still earn my recommendation.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/01/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: GSM Arena
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionHowever, the Moto G100 does not disappoint when it comes to the fundamentals - it offers a solid battery life, a top-tier performance, and display and camera image quality that are very much okay. But the G100's real strength lies in the combination of features that you can't find together in a single phone. Ring lights for close-ups (and actually good close-ups) are only slightly more common than unicorns, dual selfie cameras are nowhere as popular as we'd prefer, and it's not easy to get the equivalent of the Ready For functionality on all Androids. If these sound like they're up your alley, do give the Moto G100 a try.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/31/2021
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: Pocket Lint
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Moto G100 is a shake-up for the G series, bringing performance levels not before seen in this line-up. While that might be a little perplexing on the face of it - especially as it's not a G series device in China, it's the Edge S, muddying the naming convention further - it's a rather refreshing take in a section of the market where there's not a tonne of great options.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/25/2021
Source: Trusted Reviews
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionYou can’t argue with the value Motorola offers: the phone packs power and accessories at a reasonable price. Some risks have paid off, with the dock being a useful addition, albeit a clunky one. That said, with its hit and miss camera and an immature, chunky design it has fallen a bit flat.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Techradar
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Moto G100 is a curious phone because you can’t buy it alone - you have to purchase it at a (relatively) high price along with a dock, so you can use it alongside your computer or TV. Sure, this Ready For mode is pretty fun to play around with, and the phone is big and powerful besides, but it’s hard to recommend for people who want a good low-cost smartphone.
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/25/2021
Source: Nextpit Germany
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/06/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tech Stage
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/18/2021
Source: WinFuture
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/24/2021
Source: Area DVD
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/12/2021
Source: Teltarif
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/21/2021
Rating: Total score: 89% price: 89% performance: 90% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Computerbild
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/17/2021
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Ofertaman
ES→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/01/2022
Source: Computerhoy
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/11/2021
Rating: Total score: 83% features: 90% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Xataka
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/07/2021
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 93% display: 85% mobility: 85% workmanship: 85%
Source: PC Guia
PT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/28/2021
Rating: Total score: 94% price: 80%
Source: Gizmodo Brasil
PT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/18/2021
Source: Canaltech
PT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/06/2021
Source: Showmetech.com.br
PT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 92% performance: 100% features: 80% display: 100% mobility: 100% workmanship: 90%
Source: DDay IT
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/18/2021
Rating: Total score: 73% price: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: HDblog.it
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/29/2021
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 56% features: 78%
Source: Everyeye.it
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/23/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/22/2021
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/05/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 79% display: 71% mobility: 70% workmanship: 71%
Source: Androidiani
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/05/2021
Source: Batista70Phone
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/31/2021
Rating: Total score: 90% features: 90% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/30/2021
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 75% features: 85% display: 80% mobility: 85% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: HDblog.it
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/25/2021
Rating: price: 57% features: 79%
Source: PCM
NL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/04/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: GadgetGear.nl
NL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/23/2021
Source: Nextpit France
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/12/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: 01Net
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/09/2021
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 100% mobility: 80%
Source: Frandroid
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/18/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 90% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 60%
Source: Komputerswiat
PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/17/2021
Source: Komputerswiat
PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/13/2021
Source: Tabletowo
PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/19/2021
Rating: Total score: 88%
Source: Android.com.pl
PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/14/2021
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Smartmania.cz
CZ→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/06/2021
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 84% features: 82% mobility: 85% workmanship: 77%
Source: Tek.no
NO→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/20/2021
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Alt om Data
DA→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 83% performance: 83%
Source: Mere Mobil.dk
DA→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/16/2021
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Lyd og Billede
DA→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/16/2021
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Mobil.se
SV→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/29/2021
Rating: Total score: 72%
Source: M3 PC för alla
SV→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/12/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Go4it.ro
→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/02/2021
Source: Computerblog.ro
→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/14/2021
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 650:
适用于智能手机和平板电脑的图形芯片,集成在Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SoC中。高通公司声称它比Snapdragon 855 SoC中的Adreno 640快25%,并提供了50%以上的计算单元(ALU)。对于Android,它应该是2020年最快的图形卡之一。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 870:
2020年中期上市,在TSMC(改良型N7P)以7nm制造的高端智能手机用SoC。 基于最高3.2GHz的ARM Cortex-A77体系结构,集成一个Prime Core。 此外,3个性能核心基于A77,但时钟最高可达2.42GHz。 此外,基于 ARM Cortex-A55 体系结构和时钟,集成四个节能核心,最高 1.8GHz。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.