realme GT Neo 3T智能手机评论。拥有明亮的AMOLED的多彩手机

Name: Realme GT Neo 3T
Brand: Realme

卡梅哈梅哈。 realme GT Neo 3T以其华丽的色彩和 "龙珠Z "特别版的外壳吸引了人们的注意。这一切都只是炒作，还是这款中端智能手机也在我们的审查中证明了自己？

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 07/12/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android ARM Smartphone

realme GT Neo 3T是GT Neo 3T的略微便宜的变体。旗舰机3我们不久前评测过。在颜色选择方面，它也更加大胆。潜在的买家可以选择醒目的黄色或我们作为评测样本的蓝色和橙色的 "龙珠Z "版。

这款手机的价格在430-470美元之间（取决于配置），属于中档产品，面临强大的竞争对手，如一加诺德2T或三星Galaxy A53看看Realme的彩色智能手机是否在以下评论中证明了自己。

Test device courtesy of realme Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Realme GT Neo 3T (GT Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G 8 x 2.4 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 650

Memory

8 GB

Display

6.62 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 398 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, 360Hz sampling rate, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB

, 235 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B39/B40/B41/B66), 5G (n1/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n28/n38/n40/n41/n66/n77/n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.65 x 162.9 x 75.8

Battery

5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 80W UltraDart Charge

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 12

Camera

Primary Camera: 64 MPix f/1.79, phase comparison-AF, dual LED-flash, Videos @2160p/60fps (Camera 1); 8.0MP, f/2.25, wide angle lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/2.4, macro lens (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.45, Videos @1080p/30fps

Additional features

Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), charger, screen protector, USB-C cable, SIM card, bumper, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.730W/kg (head), 0.990W/kg (body) , fanless

Weight

194.5 g

Price

470 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
85.7 %	07/2022	Realme GT Neo 3T SD 870, Adreno 650	194.5 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.62"	2400x1080
86.3 %	06/2022	Realme GT Neo 3 Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6	188 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	2412x1080
83.4 %	06/2022	Samsung Galaxy A53 Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4	189 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.50"	2400x1080
86.4 %	12/2021	Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L	158 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.55"	2400x1080
85.4 %	06/2022	OnePlus Nord 2T Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9	190 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.43"	2400x1080
85.3 %	02/2022	Motorola Moto G200 5G SD 888+ 5G, Adreno 660	202 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.80"	2460x1080

外壳：可大胆选择颜色

如前所述，在颜色选择方面，它并不乏味。我们的评测样本是 "龙珠Z "版，它与标准版的GT Neo 3T仅在视觉细节上有区别。带有标志的橙色背面和蓝色侧面给了智能手机一个独特的外观。这款手机的用户界面也采用了动漫风格的特殊设计，还有一个特殊的充电动画。

普通的realme GT Neo 3T在颜色选择方面已经很突出了：带有荧光颗粒的黄色变体在背面有赛车旗帜设计。白色变体也使用赛车旗设计。只有黑色的变体比较矜持，背面采用统一的磨砂设计。

GT Neo 3T与GT Neo 3T的区别很小。 GT Neo 3在尺寸上差别很小，但要重得多。这款智能手机可以最小限度地扭转，并在扭转时悄悄地发出吱吱声，但总体上外壳稳定性很好。

由于缺乏IP认证，所以你无法确定这款手机是否能在掉入水中后幸存下来。

尺寸比较

Motorola Moto G200 5G Realme GT Neo 3T Realme GT Neo 3 Samsung Galaxy A53 Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE OnePlus Nord 2T DIN A6 ❌

设备。3个版本的realme GT Neo 3T

总的来说，realme在3个价格范围内提供其智能手机。

realme GT Neo 3T 8GB内存/128GB存储。430美元（估计）
realme GT Neo 3T 8 GB RAM / 256 GB存储。470美元（估计）
realme GT Neo 3T Dragon Ball Z Edition 8 GB RAM / 256 GB存储。500美元（估计）。

没有用于内存扩展的microSD阅读器，但双SIM卡是可能的。NFC也在船上，所以没有什么能阻止将智能手机作为移动支付手段的方式。蓝牙5.2是一个相当最新的音频和数据传输的无线接口版本。

软件。标准的更新时间框架

realme UI 3是基于Android 12。制造商承诺提供2个Android 更新和3年的安全补丁，但其他制造商，如三星，现在已经远远超出了这个范围。在审查时，最后一次安全更新是2022年5月的，因此已经有几个月了。因此，购买者不能指望每月都有补丁。

对于Android 行家来说，realme UI是快速和容易使用的，即使一些细节的设计与股票Android 。然而，制造商通常在大多数应用程序中使用谷歌的应用程序，所以调整应该不会有问题。

通信和GNSS：良好的WLAN速度

现实世界中的GT Neo 3T支持大量的4G频率，因此你可以在世界许多国家使用它进行移动互联网接入。5G也是在相当宽的频谱下进行的。在测试过程中，我们随机检查了智能手机的接收质量，我们非常满意：即使是旗舰手机在许多情况下也没有更好的表现，接收效果通常很好，甚至在室内。

WiFi 6可作为最快的WLAN标准。因此，realme手机能够实现快速的数据传输，这一点在我们的华硕ROG AXE11000参考路由器的测试中得到了证实。智能手机在发送方向上击败了所有对比设备。然而，在接收方向上，它在速度方面排名居中。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	803 (630^min - 853^max) MBit/s +14%
Realme GT Neo 3T Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	707 (654^min - 807^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=209, last 2 years)	655 MBit/s -7%
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	451 (397^min - 461^max) MBit/s -36%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	345 (328^min - 351^max) MBit/s -51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Realme GT Neo 3T Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	899 (804^min - 933^max) MBit/s
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	884 (867^min - 902^max) MBit/s -2%
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	860 (787^min - 887^max) MBit/s -4%
Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=210, last 2 years)	692 MBit/s -23%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	269 (255^min - 281^max) MBit/s -70%
iperf3 transmit AX12
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	864 (759^min - 906^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	845 (779^min - 895^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	836 (809^min - 863^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	766 (339^min - 805^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	376 MBit/s

Realme GT Neo 3T; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø707 (654-807)

Realme GT Neo 3T; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø899 (804-933)

经过短暂的延迟后，realme手机在户外被精确定位，精确度可达3米。众多卫星网络被用来确定智能手机的位置，包括GPS、伽利略、格洛纳斯或北斗，但不包括SBAS支持系统，该系统可以提高精确度。

在我们的实际测试中，即骑自行车的时候，我们也带着Garmin Venu 2智能手表进行比较，realme GT Neo 3T证明是一个好的导航设备。偶尔，位置稍微偏离了路线，把我们放在前面的院子里，或者让我们看起来好像是在骑车穿过房屋。Garmin Venu 2在这里更准确一些，特别是在老城区的狭窄街道上。但那些不需要绝对精确的人将发现realme智能手机的定位能力足以完成导航任务。

电话和语音质量。清晰的通信

realme默认使用谷歌的电话应用，这是其他Android 手机所熟悉的，应该能使切换智能手机更容易。

通过听筒与对方的沟通清晰而顺畅地进行。来电者也可以通过扬声器和免提麦克风非常清楚地了解对方，除非我们说话声音太小，然后给realme GT Neo 3T的麦克风带来问题。

照相机：缺少混合变焦

该相机系统由3个摄像头组成，包括一个广角摄像头和一个微距镜头。因此，它与realme GT Neo 3的相机设置非常相似。 realme GT Neo 3。唯一的区别是主摄像头的传感器。 GT Neo 3使用索尼IMX766，而便宜的型号使用OmniVision的OV64B。

这可以让你拍出像样的照片，但GT Neo 3T使用的颜色非常强烈，有时看起来非常明亮。另外，第一张照片中的紫红色的白色花朵过亮，这样就失去了一些细节。

在用高端摄像头拍摄的周围环境的照片中也可以看到更多的细节，而且这里的天空看起来也比realme手机的照片中的颗粒感要小得多。我们相当喜欢弱光下的锐度，但黑暗区域在这里没有得到很好的提亮。

广角相机拍摄的快照还算不错。然而，其他智能手机的照片要好得多，比如Honor Magic4 Pro，它对河对面的大建筑的屋顶的细节比realme手机的相机要清晰得多，它只产生了像素的混杂。

与 GT Neo 3的情况一样，我们也对超广角和主摄像头之间的混合变焦不可能实现，而只能直接切换这一事实感到困扰。其他相机系统在这里提供了更多的灵活性。

用主摄像头可以以最高60帧/秒的速度录制4K视频。在我们的测试中，自动对焦和亮度调整工作得相当好。广角摄像头也可以进行拍摄，但你必须事先决定一个镜头，因为这在拍摄过程中无法改变。

前置摄像头的分辨率为1600万像素。在良好的照明条件下，自拍是成功的，也可以在不损失太多细节的情况下进行一定程度的放大。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera: flower Main camera: surroundings Main camera: low light Wide angle camera

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

主摄像头在照片实验室里做得很好。只有在仔细检查时才能看到文本中的轻微模糊现象。在1勒克斯的照明下，照片变得相当嘈杂。我们非常喜欢完美照明条件下的色彩再现，但它有点太亮了。

ColorChecker Realme GT Neo 3T: 10.5 ∆E min: 3.14 - max: 17.62 ∆E

配件和保修：包括80瓦的电源

在购买时包含充电设备已不再是所有制造商的标准。另一方面，GT Neo 3T包括一个快速充电器和其他一切你需要的东西，包括一个用硅胶制成的保护壳。然而，我们希望 "龙珠Z "版能有更多创意。保护壳是简单的无烟煤色。但SIM卡工具有一个合适的设计。

在欧盟购买时的保修期为24个月。这在其他国家和地区可能有所不同。

输入设备和操作。指纹传感器放置在深处

操作120赫兹的触摸屏是一种乐趣。realme规定了1,000赫兹的采样率，这意味着触摸屏每秒要扫描1000次的触摸。显示屏可以根据相应的内容分4步调整其帧率，在我们的测试中可靠地工作，没有明显的抖动。

屏幕下方是指纹传感器，它还可以测量心率（作为一个不错的噱头）。但这一功能主要用于解锁智能手机或个别应用程序，在手指被注册后，它能很准确地解锁，而且几乎没有明显的延迟。然而，传感器的位置对我们来说有点太低了。

面部识别也可用于生物识别安全检查。然而，这是一个软件解决方案，工作可靠，但不像基于硬件的脸部三维识别那样安全。

显示。OLED屏幕，可选择直流调光

与其更昂贵的兄弟姐妹一样，realme GT Neo 3T也有一个明亮的AMOLED屏幕，具有扩展的全高清分辨率。这个价格范围内的大多数其他手机也提供这样的屏幕，但小米11 Lite 5G NE通过一个完全暴露的亮度传感器提供了更多的亮度。

在APL-18模式下，我们实现了高达1010cd/m²的亮度，因此，正如制造商所言，这款智能手机适合播放HDR内容。

由于OLED显示屏可以完全关闭单个像素，因此理论上可以实现完全的黑色，并随之实现无限的对比度。


745 cd/m²	766 cd/m²	759 cd/m²
757 cd/m²	754 cd/m²	764 cd/m²
755 cd/m²	757 cd/m²	765 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 766 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 758 cd/m² Minimum: 1.87 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 754 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.57 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.165

	Realme GT Neo 3T AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.62	Realme GT Neo 3 AMOLED, 2412x1080, 6.70	Samsung Galaxy A53 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50	Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55	OnePlus Nord 2T AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43	Motorola Moto G200 5G IPS LCD, 2460x1080, 6.80
Screen		9%	-6%	24%	-50%	-58%
Brightness middle	754	759 1%	718 -5%	797 6%	561 -26%	512 -32%
Brightness	758	758 0%	730 -4%	800 6%	573 -24%	488 -36%
Brightness Distribution	97	97 0%	92 -5%	97 0%	96 -1%	87 -10%
Black Level *						0.36
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.57	1.3 17%	1.62 -3%	0.9 43%	2.67 -70%	3.42 -118%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.51	2.73 22%	4.21 -20%	2 43%	6.15 -75%	5.9 -68%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2	1.7 15%	2 -0%	1.1 45%	4.1 -105%	3.7 -85%
Gamma	2.165 ^102%	2.232 ^99%	2.156 ^102%	2.26 ^97%	2.245 ^98%	7154 ^0%
CCT	6506 ^100%	6616 ^98%	6545 ^99%	6397 ^102%	7104 ^91%	1.944 ^334362%
Contrast						1422

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

471.8 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 471.8 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 471.8 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

镜头下的画面是固定的放大镜和不一样的智能显示。

在我们用CalMAN软件和分光光度计进行的测量中，证明这款手机的颜色非常准确，因此你也可以通过适当的设置在屏幕上评估印刷油墨的颜色。响应时间非常短，因此对要求高的用户来说是最佳选择。

我们注意到OLED屏幕在低亮度时常见的PWM闪烁，这可以通过直流调光模式来缓冲，但这隐藏在开发者设置中。在50%的亮度以上，两种模式之间几乎没有任何差别。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.6 ms rise
1.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.5 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.6 ms rise
1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

这款智能手机可以在明亮的日子里在户外使用，没有问题，但由于显示屏上有强烈的反射，最好是在阴凉处。

由于采用了OLED面板，可视角度无可挑剔，即使从一个非常平坦的视角看显示屏也是如此。

性能。对于中端产品来说有很大的动力

的高通骁龙870是一款高端SoC，其性能略逊于联发科Dimensity 8100骁龙870是高端SoC，其性能略低于联发科Dimensity 8100，后者安装在GT Neo 3中。尽管如此，在实践中应该很少能注意到差异，特别是在使用要求不高的应用程序时。

总的来说，在realme GT Neo 3T上浏览菜单和应用程序是顺畅和没有问题的。这款智能手机只有在性能非常密集的应用程序中才达到极限。与这个价格范围内的其他手机相比，GT Neo 3T提供了更多的动力。只有摩托罗拉Moto G200再次证明了它是一个难以超越的动力源。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Motorola Moto G200 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	1076 Points +7%
Realme GT Neo 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	1006 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (943 - 1046, n=16)	989 Points -2%
Realme GT Neo 3 MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288	971 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 2138, n=217, last 2 years)	918 Points -9%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	787 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	740 Points -26%
OnePlus Nord 2T MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288	415 Points -59%
Multi-Core
Realme GT Neo 3 MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288	4012 Points +47%
Motorola Moto G200 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	3286 Points +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (2725 - 4455, n=16)	3245 Points +19%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6681, n=217, last 2 years)	3009 Points +10%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	2962 Points +9%
Realme GT Neo 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	2725 Points
OnePlus Nord 2T MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288	2700 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	1878 Points -31%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Realme GT Neo 3 MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288	819433 Points +17%
Motorola Moto G200 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	794271 Points +13%
Average of class Smartphone (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)	738503 Points +5%
Realme GT Neo 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	701949 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (581322 - 716502, n=13)	682849 Points -3%
OnePlus Nord 2T MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288	600384 Points -14%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	509185 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	409976 Points -42%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Moto G200 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	18567 Points +41%
Realme GT Neo 3 MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288	14650 Points +12%
Realme GT Neo 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	13127 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (9827 - 16054, n=15)	12937 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (4761 - 21385, n=213, last 2 years)	11798 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	11470 Points -13%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	10755 Points -18%
OnePlus Nord 2T MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288	10678 Points -19%

CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (200 - 1474, n=165, last 2 years)	837 Points +5%
Realme GT Neo 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	798 Points
Realme GT Neo 3 MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288	789 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (719 - 844, n=8)	762 Points -5%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	678 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	579 Points -27%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Realme GT Neo 3 MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288	6015 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (5289 - 6369, n=13)	5926 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=165, last 2 years)	5745 Points +5%
Motorola Moto G200 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	5711 Points +5%
Realme GT Neo 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	5448 Points
OnePlus Nord 2T MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288	4856 Points -11%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	4809 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	3626 Points -33%
System
Realme GT Neo 3 MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288	11696 Points +37%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	10455 Points +22%
OnePlus Nord 2T MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288	9996 Points +17%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=165, last 2 years)	9678 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (8463 - 10489, n=13)	9469 Points +11%
Realme GT Neo 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	8563 Points
Motorola Moto G200 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	8546 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	7157 Points -16%
Memory
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (5689 - 8167, n=13)	7166 Points +26%
Realme GT Neo 3 MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288	6356 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=165, last 2 years)	6250 Points +10%
Realme GT Neo 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	5689 Points
Motorola Moto G200 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	5648 Points -1%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	4957 Points -13%
OnePlus Nord 2T MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288	4699 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	3855 Points -32%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=165, last 2 years)	14101 Points +11%
Motorola Moto G200 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	13865 Points +9%
Realme GT Neo 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	12670 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (10386 - 12801, n=13)	12016 Points -5%
Realme GT Neo 3 MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288	10106 Points -20%
OnePlus Nord 2T MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288	8672 Points -32%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	6729 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	5178 Points -59%
Web
Realme GT Neo 3 MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288	1742 Points +22%
Motorola Moto G200 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	1665 Points +17%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	1534 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (1315 - 1791, n=13)	1517 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=165, last 2 years)	1494 Points +5%
Realme GT Neo 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	1427 Points
OnePlus Nord 2T MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288	1365 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	1210 Points -15%

AImark - Score v2.x
Motorola Moto G200 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	286905 Points +144%
Realme GT Neo 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	117724 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (111838 - 123847, n=9)	117183 Points 0%
OnePlus Nord 2T MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288	58244 Points -51%
Average of class Smartphone (1043 - 139804, n=50, last 2 years)	21146 Points -82%
Realme GT Neo 3 MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288	6893 Points -94%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	4714 Points -96%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	Points -100%

的高通Adreno 650为该级别提供了非常好的结果，并使该智能手机在基准测试中处于一个可敬的位置。

3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1453 Points +19%
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1295 Points +6%
Realme GT Neo 3T Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1222 Points
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1152 Points -6%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	688 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	621 Points -49%
Wild Life Extreme
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1564 Points +27%
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1481 Points +20%
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1324 Points +7%
Realme GT Neo 3T Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1236 Points
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	695 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	636 Points -49%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5711 Points +35%
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4548 Points +8%
Realme GT Neo 3T Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4230 Points
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3406 Points -19%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2500 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2275 Points -46%
Wild Life Score
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5765 Points +35%
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4623 Points +8%
Realme GT Neo 3T Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4273 Points
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3336 Points -22%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2505 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2293 Points -46%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps +102%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	89 fps +48%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	81 fps +35%
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Realme GT Neo 3T Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	274 fps +18%
Realme GT Neo 3T Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	233 fps
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	200 fps -14%
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	161 fps -31%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	133 fps -43%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	92 fps -61%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81 fps +35%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	69 fps +15%
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Realme GT Neo 3T Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	57 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	56 fps -7%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	169 fps +19%
Realme GT Neo 3T Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	142 fps
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	129 fps -9%
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	92 fps -35%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	79 fps -44%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	61 fps -57%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Realme GT Neo 3T Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	54 fps -10%
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	54 fps -10%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	51 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	35 fps -42%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	109 fps +10%
Realme GT Neo 3T Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99 fps
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	79 fps -20%
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	62 fps -37%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	57 fps -42%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	38 fps -62%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53 fps +4%
Realme GT Neo 3T Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	51 fps
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	41 fps -20%
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	35 fps -31%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	29 fps -43%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	20 fps -61%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps 0%
Realme GT Neo 3T Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	50 fps -15%
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	42 fps -29%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	33 fps -44%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	23 fps -61%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	42 fps +24%
Realme GT Neo 3T Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	34 fps
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	33 fps -3%
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	31 fps -9%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	20 fps -41%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	15 fps -56%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Realme GT Neo 3T Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	22 fps
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	19 fps -14%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps -36%
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	12 fps -45%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	10 fps -55%
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9.7 fps -56%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps +11%
Realme GT Neo 3T Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53 fps
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47 fps -11%
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	42 fps -21%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	33 fps -38%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	23 fps -57%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	69 fps +15%
Realme GT Neo 3T Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56 fps -7%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	39 fps -35%
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps -35%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	26 fps -57%

互联网浏览也很流畅。网站迅速出现，图片在很短的加载时间后弹出，甚至在滚动的时候也是如此。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)	106.1 Points +2%
Realme GT Neo 3T (Chrome 103)	103.827 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (60.7 - 108.3, n=12)	87.7 Points -16%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)	86.2 Points -17%
Realme GT Neo 3 (Chrome 103)	80.505 Points -22%
Motorola Moto G200 5G (Chrome97)	75.9 Points -27%
OnePlus Nord 2T (Chrome 102)	66.955 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)	63.5 Points -39%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)	107.1 runs/min +39%
Motorola Moto G200 5G (Chrome97)	79.8 runs/min +4%
Realme GT Neo 3T (Chome 103)	77.04 runs/min
Realme GT Neo 3 (Chome 103)	72.4 runs/min -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (51.4 - 77, n=12)	67.2 runs/min -13%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)	61.5 runs/min -20%
OnePlus Nord 2T (Chome 102)	59.7 runs/min -23%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chome 101)	51.24 runs/min -33%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Realme GT Neo 3T (Chrome 103)	150 Points
Motorola Moto G200 5G (Chrome97)	147 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)	133.1 Points -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (94 - 155, n=13)	127.5 Points -15%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)	113 Points -25%
Realme GT Neo 3 (Chrome 103)	101 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)	69 Points -54%
OnePlus Nord 2T (Chrome 102)	65 Points -57%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Realme GT Neo 3T (Chrome 103)	37977 Points
OnePlus Nord 2T (Chrome 102)	33879 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=211, last 2 years)	33640 Points -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (20543 - 41256, n=13)	33246 Points -12%
Realme GT Neo 3 (Chrome 103)	33238 Points -12%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)	31915 Points -16%
Motorola Moto G200 5G (Chrome97)	28695 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)	24159 Points -36%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)	1920.3 ms * -77%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)	1595 ms * -47%
OnePlus Nord 2T (Chrome 102)	1406.4 ms * -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (1055 - 1792, n=13)	1401 ms * -29%
Motorola Moto G200 5G (Chrome97)	1358 ms * -25%
Realme GT Neo 3 (Chrome 103)	1326.2 ms * -22%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)	1323 ms * -22%
Realme GT Neo 3T (Chrome 103)	1084.9 ms *

* ... smaller is better

UFS 3.1存储也确保了快速加载时间。写入时，它的工作速度并不像 realme GT Neo 3或在一加诺德2T，但它仍然非常有利于系统的速度。

	Realme GT Neo 3T	Realme GT Neo 3	Samsung Galaxy A53	Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE	OnePlus Nord 2T	Motorola Moto G200 5G	Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		33%	-37%	-29%	16%	-5%	17%	6%
Sequential Read 256KB	1619.7	1779 10%	510.1 -69%	944 -42%	1891.3 17%	1898 17%	1760 ?(1004 - 2037, n=87) 9%	1505 ?(226 - 4512, n=215, last 2 years) -7%
Sequential Write 256KB	754.5	1421 88%	486.7 -35%	679 -10%	1300.6 72%	712 -6%	1134 ?(452 - 1873, n=87) 50%	1112 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=215, last 2 years) 47%
Random Read 4KB	283.8	331 17%	229.9 -19%	208.7 -26%	235.8 -17%	155.9 -45%	281 ?(173.5 - 543, n=87) -1%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=215, last 2 years) -13%
Random Write 4KB	286	330 15%	210.8 -26%	178.8 -37%	262.2 -8%	322.5 13%	311 ?(197.5 - 499, n=88) 9%	271 ?(13 - 709, n=215, last 2 years) -5%

游戏：基本可以达到60帧

关于游戏，你可以希望在绝大多数游戏中达到60帧。即使是PUBG Mobile的高设置也不例外。帧率是用GameBench工具测量的。

然而，更多的帧率只是很少可能。虽然支持90或120赫兹的游戏确实存在，但它们也必须得到智能手机制造商的明确支持，才能实现更快的帧率。GT模式，据说可以进一步提高性能，在制造商的游戏叠加中可以使用，但也没有帮助。

通过精确的触摸屏和位置传感器的控制工作没有问题。

Realme GT Neo 3T; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø59.4 (53-61)

Realme GT Neo 3T; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.0.0: Ø59.5 (56-61)

Realme GT Neo 3T; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.0.0: Ø59.6 (55-61)

排放。音响系统的Hi-Res Audio认证

温度

realme GT Neo 3T有时会明显变热。智能手机的正面有可能达到44.5℃，特别是在需要长时间大量性能的情况下。这在炎热的环境温度下可能会有问题。

然而，这似乎并没有对性能产生任何影响。3DMark压力测试显示了一致的性能，甚至在20次运行Wild Life Extreme时也是如此。

Max. Load

Idle


44.5 °C	40.6 °C	37.6 °C
44.2 °C	42.3 °C	37.6 °C
42.1 °C	40.3 °C	39.6 °C

Maximum: 44.5 °C
Average: 41 °C


38.7 °C	43.1 °C	43.2 °C
38.6 °C	42.4 °C	42.1 °C
38.6 °C	42.2 °C	43.8 °C

Maximum: 43.8 °C
Average: 41.4 °C

Power Supply (max.) 39.9 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.5 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.9 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	99.6 (13.7^min) % 0%
Realme GT Neo 3T Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.4 (25.4^min) %
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.2 (14.8^min) % 0%
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	90.1 (19.7^min) % -9%
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	80.4 (27.4^min) % -19%
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59.1 (16.4^min) % -41%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.5 (4.14^min) % 0%
Realme GT Neo 3T Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.4 (7.35^min) %
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	97.8 (3.75^min) % -2%
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	93.5 (8.28^min) % -6%
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	79 (7.1^min) % -21%
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	65.9 (5.25^min) % -34%

Realme GT Neo 3T Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø7.35 (7.35-7.39)

Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø8.63 (8.28-8.85)

Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø3.81 (3.75-3.84)

Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø4.15 (4.14-4.17)

OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø7.7 (5.25-7.97)

Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø7.57 (7.1-8.98)

Realme GT Neo 3T Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø25.4 (25.4-25.5)

Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø31.6 (29.7-33)

Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.7 (13.7-13.7)

Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø14.9 (14.8-15)

OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø24.1 (16.4-27.7)

Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø28.8 (27.4-34.2)

发言人

realme GT Neo 3T将听筒作为第二个扬声器，因此试图使立体声效果成为可能。这在某种程度上是有效的，但混合型扬声器明显比主扬声器更安静，所以它不能完全取代一个成熟的第二扬声器。

声音很好，在高音量时不会发出轰鸣声，让你偶尔享受一下流行歌曲。即使是古典音乐，听起来也相当得体。但电影的声音缺乏低音，所以外部扬声器或耳机在这里更好。这些可以通过蓝牙或USB-C连接。

目前所有的aptX编解码器都可用于无线通信，LHDC和LDAC也是如此。这款手机通过了Hi-Res Audio认证，并且由于Dolby Atmos，还支持3D音频格式。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Realme GT Neo 3T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Motorola Moto G200 5G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命。良好的耐力和快速充电

消耗功率

耗电量处于通常水平，只在绝对最大功率范围内有所增加。

用附带的80瓦电源适配器给电池充满电大约需要40分钟。如果你时间不多，10分钟的充电就能让你有足够的电量使用几个小时，这与手机的赛车设计很吻合。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0 / 0.1 Watt
Idle	0.9 / 1.2 / 1.8 Watt
Load	4.8 / 10.1 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Realme GT Neo 3T 5000 mAh	Realme GT Neo 3 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A53 5000 mAh	Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE 4250 mAh	OnePlus Nord 2T 4500 mAh	Motorola Moto G200 5G 5000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-4%	2%	0%	10%	9%	-37%	-2%
Idle Minimum *	0.9	1.1 -22%	0.9 -0%	0.78 13%	0.9 -0%	0.6 33%	1.23 ?(0.7 - 3, n=13) -37%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) -0%
Idle Average *	1.2	1.5 -25%	1.3 -8%	1.97 -64%	1.3 -8%	0.9 25%	2.17 ?(0.9 - 4.91, n=13) -81%	1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) -21%
Idle Maximum *	1.8	2.1 -17%	1.6 11%	1.99 -11%	1.7 6%	1.5 17%	2.49 ?(1.2 - 5.07, n=13) -38%	1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) 9%
Load Average *	4.8	3.8 21%	5.7 -19%	3.23 33%	4 17%	7 -46%	6.39 ?(3.78 - 11.8, n=13) -33%	5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) -16%
Load Maximum *	10.1	7.8 23%	7.3 28%	7.08 30%	6.8 33%	8.4 17%	9.94 ?(5.5 - 15.9, n=13) 2%	8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) 18%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Realme GT Neo 3T: Ø6.23 (1.463-11)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Realme GT Neo 3T; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.16 (8.63-9.73)

Realme GT Neo 3T; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.397 (1.241-1.841)

电池寿命

得益于5000毫安时的电池，realme在我们的WLAN测试中能够运行约16小时。这在同类产品中是非常好的，而且这款智能手机在所有其他电池测试中也取得了不错的成绩。

那些正在寻找一款在正常使用情况下一次充电可持续2天的智能手机的人，应该考虑realme GT Neo 3T。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		39h 46min
WiFi Websurfing		16h 03min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		18h 53min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 28min

	Realme GT Neo 3T 5000 mAh	Realme GT Neo 3 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A53 5000 mAh	Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE 4250 mAh	OnePlus Nord 2T 4500 mAh	Motorola Moto G200 5G 5000 mAh
Battery Runtime		5%	-3%	-16%	-4%	6%
Reader / Idle	2386	2432 2%	2431 2%	1648 -31%	1936 -19%	2695 13%
H.264	1133	1206 6%	1146 1%	1215 7%	1158 2%	1501 32%
WiFi v1.3	963	989 3%	886 -8%	705 -27%	949 -1%	905 -6%
Load	268	295 10%	246 -8%	233 -13%	279 4%	229 -15%

Pros

+ 大胆的设计，丰富多彩的思想

+ 良好的电池运行时间

+ 真彩色AMOLED显示屏

+ 直流调光

+ 良好的性能值，无节流现象

+ 快速充电

+ 在许多国家都有移动互联网

Cons

- 箱子在压力下会发出吱吱声

- 没有知识产权认证

- 更新时间相对较短

- 没有混合变焦的摄像头

评语。良好的中档产品，但相机性能平平

realme GT Neo 3T与它更大的兄弟姐妹相比，有一些区别。 ǞǞǞ.最重要的是，它的SoC有点老，而且速度较慢，但仍有很大的性能。尽管主传感器不同，但相机系统在图像质量方面也非常相似，所以几乎没有任何真正的论据支持更昂贵的机型。

当然，外壳只有塑料的，而不是像GT Neo 3那样的玻璃底盘。 GT Neo 3而且，GT Neo 3T也没有150瓦的超级快速充电功能，但电池充电速度非常快，即使是80瓦的充电。

为了节省至少130美元，GT Neo 3T是一个不错的选择，特别是它给其他同价位的设备带来了实惠。Realme GT Neo 3T拥有快速的无线网络、60赫兹的游戏、良好的性能率而没有节流、声音很好的混合立体声扬声器和OLED显示屏的直流调光模式（尽管有些隐蔽），提供了一个良好的整体包装。在审查过程中，我们确实遇到了一些缺点。广角摄像头和主摄像头之间的混合变焦缺失，IP认证缺失，更新时限相对较短。扭转时发出的吱吱声略微降低了我们对机箱的质量印象。

realme GT Neo 3T设计大胆，拥有中端智能手机需要的一切。然而，在相机图像质量方面，还有更好的机型。

在这个价格范围内存在很多其他替代品。那些想把智能手机连接到电脑上以促进工作流程的人应该看看摩托罗拉Moto G200.这款手机谷歌Pixel 6的价格最近已大幅下降，它提供了一个更好的相机。

价格和可用性

类似于妗子GT Neo 3在全球范围内，GT Neo 3T的供应似乎是零星的。因此，建议读者定期通过谷歌或亚马逊查询供应情况。

英国亚马逊，该智能手机的价格为369.00英镑（截至2022年7月11日的定价）

。

Realme GT Neo 3T - 2022-08-30 08/30/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

81%

Keyboard

65 / 75 → 87%

Pointing Device

93%

Connectivity

50 / 70 → 72%

Weight

89%

Battery

91%

Display

92%

Games Performance

59 / 64 → 92%

Application Performance

83 / 86 → 97%

Temperature

87%

Noise

100%

Audio

75 / 90 → 83%

Camera

67%

Average

79%

86%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Jacob Fisher - Translator - 897 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 388744 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > realme GT Neo 3T智能手机评论。拥有明亮的AMOLED的多彩手机

Florian Schmitt, 2022-07-12 (Update: 2022-07-12)

realme GT Neo 3T智能手机评论。拥有明亮的AMOLED的多彩手机

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳：可大胆选择颜色

尺寸比较

设备。3个版本的realme GT Neo 3T

软件。标准的更新时间框架

通信和GNSS：良好的WLAN速度

电话和语音质量。清晰的通信

照相机：缺少混合变焦

配件和保修：包括80瓦的电源

输入设备和操作。指纹传感器放置在深处

显示。OLED屏幕，可选择直流调光

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能。对于中端产品来说有很大的动力

游戏：基本可以达到60帧

排放。音响系统的Hi-Res Audio认证

温度

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

发言人

Realme GT Neo 3T audio analysis

Motorola Moto G200 5G audio analysis

电池寿命。良好的耐力和快速充电

消耗功率

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

评语。良好的中档产品，但相机性能平平

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare