华为MatePad 11评测--伟大的平板电脑,几乎没有弱点
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Likely Competitors
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.4 % | 09/2021 | Huawei MatePad 11 2021 SD 865, Adreno 650 | 485 g | 7.25 mm | 10.95" | 2560x1600 | |
85.9 % | 01/2021 | Lenovo Tab P11 Pro SD 730G, Adreno 618 | 485 g | 5.8 mm | 11.50" | 2560x1600 | |
83.1 % | 05/2020 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3 | 467 g | 7 mm | 10.40" | 2000x1200 | |
90.1 % | 08/2020 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 SD 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650 | 500 g | 6.3 mm | 11.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88 % | 10/2020 | Apple iPad 10.2 2020 A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU | 495 g | 7.5 mm | 10.20" | 2160x1620 | |
78.4 % | Medion LifeTab E10802 Helio MT8768, PowerVR GE8320 | 503 g | 8.6 mm | 10.00" | 1920x1200 |
外壳 - MatePad 11的外壳由塑料制成
华为MatePad 11的中框和背面是由塑料制成的,这很容易受到指纹的影响。不过塑料的造型看起来像金属。屏幕由某种类型的玻璃保护。尽管后置摄像头从设备上突出1.8毫米,但MatePad 11放在一个平整的表面上时不会晃动。
这块石板的结构很好。没有缝隙或锯齿状的边缘。对屏幕施加很大的压力也不会引起任何波纹效应。这款华为平板电脑既不防水也不防尘。
MatePad 11有以下颜色方案。哑光灰(德国唯一的配色方案),岛屿蓝和橄榄绿。
连接性 - MatePad 11有一个微型SD卡读卡器和一个USB 3.2端口
读卡器
MatePad 11支持目前所有的microSD卡格式。更重要的是,支持exFAT文件系统,这意味着用户将能够在microSD卡上存储大于4GB的文件。使用我们的参考级microSD卡Angelbird AV Pro V60,华为板卡实现了良好的数据传输率。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
软件 - 具有DRM认证的Harmony OS 2.0
华为MatePad 11运行一个专有的操作系统,该系统基于Android 10中的Linux内核。所有Android 应用程序都与华为的Harmony OS 2.0兼容。用户可以从华为AppGallery下载应用程序,包括所有标准的EMUI应用程序。总而言之,Harmony OS和EMUI彼此相当相似。然而,Harmony OS提供了新的功能。
一些应用程序可以作为 "片段 "打开,按住它们,然后向上滑动。在片段模式下,应用程序不会占用整个屏幕。处于片段模式的应用程序也可以作为一个小部件被固定下来。
由于该平板电脑没有运行谷歌的Android ,因此不支持谷歌移动服务。可以安装个别应用程序,但如果它们需要谷歌服务,就无法使用。这在日常使用中会被证明是相当烦人的。
许多应用程序,如WhatsApp、Netflix和Spotify都不能在AppGallery中使用。当搜索这些应用程序时,AppGallery提供了替代品或建议用户尝试直接从应用程序制造商的网站下载这些应用程序。在安装APK时,用户将不得不等待安全扫描,然后手动批准安装。总而言之,这个过程并不复杂。要更新此类应用程序,你需要在AppGallery中手动选择它们。
华为平板电脑可以以高清质量播放受DRM保护的内容。Netflix应用程序显示,情况确实如此。然而,这些内容看起来并不特别好,也不是HDR格式。华为平板电脑有可能无法以全质量的方式播放高清内容。
通信和地理定位 - 精确的导航和快速的Wi-Fi
MatePad 11支持Wi-Fi 6(双频:2.4和5 GHz)。通过我们的参考级路由器Netgear Nighthawk AX 12,该平板电脑能够实现快速和稳定的数据传输率,实际上,这与快速Wi-Fi 5设备的水平相当。
华为平板电脑不支持5G、LTE或NFC。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 | |
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro | |
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 | |
Medion LifeTab E10802 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 | |
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite | |
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro | |
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 | |
Medion LifeTab E10802 |
相机 - 华为平板电脑有一个坚实的摄像头和一个LED闪光灯
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Wide angleWide angle5X zoomLow-light photography

附件和保修 - 包括M-Pencil。
华为MatePad 11配备了一个模块化电源适配器(22.5瓦),一条USB线(Type-A转Type-C),一个拆卡工具和华为M-Pencil 2与替换提示。
智能磁性键盘可以在华为网站上购买,价格为99欧元(约116美元)。华为还为MatePad 11销售一个蓝牙鼠标(39欧元/~45美元)。华为没有为MatePad 11提供保护套。然而,许多其他制造商都有。
这款平板电脑有24个月的保修期。用户可以在服务应用程序中轻松看到保修信息。
输入设备和操作 - MatePad 11支持面部解锁
华为MatePad 11有一个电容式触摸屏,可以同时识别多达10个输入。屏幕表面非常光滑。我们在审查期间没有遇到触摸屏的任何问题。
MatePad 11配备了第二代M-Pencil。它可以分辨出4096个压力级别。这支手写笔以磁力方式固定在平板电脑上。我们在使用该笔时没有遇到任何问题。就像iPad一样,MatePad 11支持手写识别。例如,用户可以通过使用M-Pencil书写将文本输入搜索框。
还有一个可选的键盘,即所谓的智能磁力键盘。它可以固定在MatePad 11的背面,在两个不同的角度保持平板电脑的稳定没有问题。QWERTY键的尺寸为13.9 x 13.9毫米,提供较短的移动距离,并有一个清晰的启动点。
该平板电脑支持2D人脸识别。脸部解锁效果很好,可以配置为直接将用户带到主屏幕。该平板电脑允许用户创建多达5个配置文件。没有指纹传感器。
显示器 - 120-Hz IPS面板
|
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 550 cd/m²
Contrast: 573:1 (Black: 0.96 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.3 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.3
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
98.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 IPS, 2560x1600, 10.95 | Lenovo Tab P11 Pro OLED, 2560x1600, 11.50 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite TFT, 2000x1200, 10.40 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 LTPS, 2560x1600, 11.00 | Apple iPad 10.2 2020 IPS, 2160x1620, 10.20 | Medion LifeTab E10802 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 14% | 18% | 47% | 24% | -28% | |
Brightness middle | 550 | 372 -32% | 503 -9% | 554 1% | 477 -13% | 335 -39% |
Brightness | 515 | 375 -27% | 477 -7% | 535 4% | 452 -12% | 319 -38% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 95 6% | 91 1% | 91 1% | 86 -4% | 85 -6% |
Black Level * | 0.96 | 0.29 70% | 0.33 66% | 0.5 48% | 0.29 70% | |
Contrast | 573 | 1734 203% | 1679 193% | 954 66% | 1155 102% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.3 | 1.8 45% | 4.4 -33% | 2.1 36% | 2.2 33% | 7.6 -130% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.9 | 4.2 47% | 10.4 -32% | 7.1 10% | 5 37% | 14.1 -78% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.9 | 2.8 43% | 7.5 -53% | 1.6 67% | 3.3 33% | 10 -104% |
Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.29 96% | 2.19 100% | 2.32 95% | 2.23 99% | 2.44 90% |
CCT | 7288 89% | 6718 97% | 7700 84% | 6623 98% | 7019 93% | 10228 64% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19959 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
15.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.6 ms rise | |
↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.1 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.8 ms rise | |
↘ 19.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.5 ms). |
性能--MatePad 11中的Snapdragon 865
华为MatePad 11的特点是 骁龙865,这是高通公司去年的旗舰SoC。华为平板电脑配备了6GB的内存。芯片 Adreno 650负责图形渲染。
骁龙865仍然是一个相当强大的SoC,特别是与骁龙860相比。 骁龙860与价格相近的小米Pad 5和Poco X3 Pro.骁龙865在所有领域都比骁龙860快,包括AI。然而,在 Galaxy Tab S7和 iPad 8击败了华为的平板电脑。
Geekbench 5.4 | |
Single-Core | |
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 | |
Xiaomi Poco F3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 | |
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (764 - 924, n=23) | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | |
Average of class Tablet (133 - 1719, n=40, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite | |
Medion LifeTab E10802 | |
Multi-Core | |
Xiaomi Poco F3 | |
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2687 - 3449, n=23) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 | |
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | |
Average of class Tablet (455 - 7378, n=40, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite | |
Medion LifeTab E10802 | |
OpenCL Score 5.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2829 - 3080, n=8) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite | |
Vulkan Score 5.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2487 - 3259, n=8) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite |
PCMark for Android | |
Work 3.0 | |
Xiaomi Poco F3 | |
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | |
Average of class Tablet (4564 - 13996, n=24, last 2 years) | |
Work 2.0 performance score | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 | |
Xiaomi Poco F3 | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (9202 - 15299, n=23) | |
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro | |
Average of class Tablet (4536 - 11351, n=16, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite | |
Medion LifeTab E10802 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (50 - 138, n=23) | |
Xiaomi Poco F3 | |
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 | |
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 | |
Average of class Tablet (19 - 120, n=38, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite | |
Medion LifeTab E10802 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen | |
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 | |
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (168 - 266, n=23) | |
Xiaomi Poco F3 | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | |
Average of class Tablet (14 - 588, n=38, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite | |
Medion LifeTab E10802 |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (50 - 111, n=23) | |
Xiaomi Poco F3 | |
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 | |
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 | |
Average of class Tablet (9.4 - 120, n=37, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite | |
Medion LifeTab E10802 | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 | |
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 | |
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (96 - 151, n=23) | |
Xiaomi Poco F3 | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | |
Average of class Tablet (6.9 - 345, n=38, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite | |
Medion LifeTab E10802 |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (43 - 83, n=24) | |
Xiaomi Poco F3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 | |
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 | |
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 | |
Average of class Tablet (6.3 - 107, n=38, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite | |
Medion LifeTab E10802 | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 | |
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (67 - 103, n=24) | |
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 | |
Xiaomi Poco F3 | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | |
Average of class Tablet (4.7 - 229, n=38, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite | |
Medion LifeTab E10802 |
Antutu v9 - Total Score | |
Xiaomi Poco F3 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (628715 - 714632, n=2) | |
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | |
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 | |
Average of class Tablet (117837 - 1186706, n=26, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro |
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score | |
Xiaomi Poco F3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (527301 - 631025, n=24) | |
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | |
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 | |
Average of class Tablet (75328 - 1037960, n=16, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite | |
Medion LifeTab E10802 |
AImark - Score v2.x | |
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 | |
Xiaomi Poco F3 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (107923 - 119152, n=3) | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | |
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro | |
Average of class Tablet (4281 - 119686, n=24, last 2 years) | |
Medion LifeTab E10802 |
VRMark - Amber Room | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (4988 - 7649, n=4) | |
Xiaomi Poco F3 | |
Average of class Tablet (676 - 5073, n=4, last 2 years) |
在浏览器基准测试中,MatePad 11的表现相当不错,但被iPad和Galaxy Tab S7击败。由于强大的SoC和120Hz的屏幕,华为平板电脑提供了很好的网络浏览体验。
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14) | |
Average of class Tablet (15 - 184.3, n=33, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86) | |
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (45.2 - 77, n=20) | |
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14) | |
Average of class Tablet (22.1 - 436, n=35, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (74.2 - 145.1, n=21) | |
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1) | |
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
Medion LifeTab E10802 (Chrome 87) |
WebXPRT 3 - --- | |
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (97 - 127, n=23) | |
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1) | |
Average of class Tablet (24 - 254, n=37, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
Medion LifeTab E10802 (Chrome 87) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14) | |
Average of class Tablet (12.6 - 255, n=31, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86) | |
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (30.6 - 74.5, n=19) | |
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86) | |
Average of class Tablet (3111 - 66974, n=36, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (14606 - 31224, n=23) | |
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
Medion LifeTab E10802 (Chrome 87) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score | |
Medion LifeTab E10802 (Chrome 87) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
Average of class Tablet (455 - 12972, n=37, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1623 - 2911, n=24) | |
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86) | |
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14) |
* ... smaller is better
华为MatePad 11配备了非常快的UFS 3.1内存,这在这个价格范围内的设备中很少使用。
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 | Lenovo Tab P11 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite | Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 | Medion LifeTab E10802 | Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -53% | -46% | 3% | -87% | 12% | -47% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 1468 | 486.8 -67% | 483.7 -67% | 1512 3% | 274.7 -81% | 1574 ? 7% | 692 ? -53% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 708 | 192.3 -73% | 219.3 -69% | 680 -4% | 101.2 -86% | 768 ? 8% | 370 ? -48% |
Random Read 4KB | 190.7 | 136.3 -29% | 119.8 -37% | 219 15% | 27.36 -86% | 236 ? 24% | 120.7 ? -37% |
Random Write 4KB | 217.5 | 123.3 -43% | 195.8 -10% | 211.5 -3% | 10.32 -95% | 236 ? 9% | 112.3 ? -48% |
游戏--超过60FPS是遥不可及的事
排放--声音适度,性能稳定
温度
Stress Test with 3DMark Wild Life
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 34.4 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30.4 °C / 87 F.
发言人
MatePad 11的四扬声器系统由哈曼卡顿公司调校,并用华为的声音算法Histen 7.0进行优化。总而言之,华为平板电脑的扬声器听起来非常好。在这个价格范围内,没有其他平板电脑有这么好的扬声器。
用户可以通过USB端口将有线耳机或扬声器连接到平板电脑上。然而,为此,你需要一个适当的适配器。该平板电脑有一个蓝牙5.1模块,支持以下无线音频编解码:SBC、AAC和LDAC。不幸的是,华为自己的高清晰度编解码器(L2HC),即华为FreeBuds Studio中使用的编解码器,不被支持。
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%
能源管理--电池运行时间长和快速充电
能源消耗
华为MatePad 11是一款相当节能的平板电脑。然而,现在有一些平板电脑甚至更节能。
MatePad 11配备了一个22.5瓦的电源适配器,为设备充满电大约需要2小时。将平板电脑从0%充到50%需要44分钟。在80分钟内,该平板电脑可以从0%充到80%。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |