Notebookcheck

华为MatePad 11评测--伟大的平板电脑,几乎没有弱点

出于需要的德行。 华为MatePad 11是一款非常有能力的中档平板电脑,支持笔输入。此外,该平板电脑还可以与键盘配对。MatePad 11配备了Harmony操作系统,没有谷歌服务。在日常使用中,这被证明比我们预期的限制要少。
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Convertible / 2-in-1 Tablet Touchscreen
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

MatePad 11是华为推出的一款非常通用的平板电脑,它的性能水平非常好,并支持笔输入。此外,这款华为平板电脑可以与键盘配对,用于办公。它也可以用于媒体消费,因为它可以播放受DRM保护的内容。四个麦克风阵列应该能够实现 "清晰的通信"。

MatePad 11采用的是高通公司去年的旗舰SoC。10.95英寸显示屏支持120赫兹刷新率。64GB版本售价399欧元(约470美元),而128GB版本售价499欧元(约590美元)。此外,华为平板电脑支持Wi-Fi 6和microSD卡。

Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (MatePad Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 8 x 2.4 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Graphics adapter
Memory
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
10.95 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 276 PPI, capacitive, 10-point multitouch, native pen support, IPS, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 110.58 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.25 x 253.8 x 165.3
Battery
7250 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Huawei HarmonyOS
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix (f/1.8)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.0)
Additional features
Speakers: four speakers, Keyboard: Onscreen, 22.5W charger, USB cable, card removal tool, Quick Start Guide, 24 Months Warranty, GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1), Galileo (E1); DRM Widevine L1, fanless
Weight
485 g, Power Supply: 70 g
Price
399 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Likely Competitors

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88.4 %
09/2021
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
SD 865, Adreno 650
485 g7.25 mm10.95"2560x1600
85.9 %
01/2021
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
SD 730G, Adreno 618
485 g5.8 mm11.50"2560x1600
83.1 %
05/2020
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3
467 g7 mm10.40"2000x1200
90.1 %
08/2020
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
SD 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650
500 g6.3 mm11.00"2560x1600
88 %
10/2020
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU
495 g7.5 mm10.20"2160x1620
78.4 %
Medion LifeTab E10802
Helio MT8768, PowerVR GE8320
503 g8.6 mm10.00"1920x1200

外壳 - MatePad 11的外壳由塑料制成

华为MatePad 11的中框和背面是由塑料制成的,这很容易受到指纹的影响。不过塑料的造型看起来像金属。屏幕由某种类型的玻璃保护。尽管后置摄像头从设备上突出1.8毫米,但MatePad 11放在一个平整的表面上时不会晃动。

这块石板的结构很好。没有缝隙或锯齿状的边缘。对屏幕施加很大的压力也不会引起任何波纹效应。这款华为平板电脑既不防水也不防尘。

MatePad 11有以下颜色方案。哑光灰(德国唯一的配色方案),岛屿蓝和橄榄绿。

Size Comparison

264.28 mm 171.4 mm 5.8 mm 485 g253.8 mm 165.3 mm 7.25 mm 485 g253.8 mm 165.3 mm 6.3 mm 500 g250.6 mm 174.1 mm 7.5 mm 495 g247 mm 171 mm 8.6 mm 503 g244.5 mm 154.3 mm 7 mm 467 g

连接性 - MatePad 11有一个微型SD卡读卡器和一个USB 3.2端口

华为MatePad 11配备了一个快速的USB 3.2端口,可以实现高达5Gb/s的传输速度。支持OTG功能。这意味着许多不同的外围设备可以连接到该平板电脑。

显示屏可以用华为M-Pencil 2操作,该设备在德国随附。目前,还没有LTE版本。

顶部:麦克风,音量摇杆,两个麦克风
顶部:麦克风,音量摇杆,两个麦克风
左侧。两个扬声器,电源按钮
左侧。两个扬声器,电源按钮
右侧。扬声器、USB接口、音箱
右侧。扬声器、USB接口、音箱
底部。卡槽
底部。卡槽

读卡器

MatePad 11支持目前所有的microSD卡格式。更重要的是,支持exFAT文件系统,这意味着用户将能够在microSD卡上存储大于4GB的文件。使用我们的参考级microSD卡Angelbird AV Pro V60,华为板卡实现了良好的数据传输率。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
40.3 MB/s ∼100%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
24.4 MB/s ∼61% -39%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580859047.338.143.149.328.344.846.642.739.745.342.342.544.44142.735.240.443.243.143.442.74044.34242.245.142.542.235.43633.544.841.841.945.442.242.646.243.535.242.84641.840.843.541.940.24739.843.146.142.233.444.541.931.645.641.939.546.842.142.742.934.443.442.547.642.942.244.74241.845.64241.835.442.641.844.742.141.533.941.9414642.335.944.642.240.644.443.538.544.24339.936.737.744.243.444.342.146.943.442.646.341.931.744.644.136.544.133.837.942.546.242.340.747.442.543.243.433.943.446.242.44245.846.745.249.859.256.757.351.145.743.344.240.350.14644.648.846.247.537.640.440.942.938.541.337.245.546.427.937.542.74035.144.348.252.94337.444.137.334.935.538.740.548.138.440.345.438.944.137.945.547.645.147.447.638.341.442.736.34343.340.839.74739.943.951.34349.642.741.846.750.344.250.938.345.138.935.339.142.838.349.843.24943.939.846.746.145.147.74741.446.63145.746.243.740.842.242.542.944.330.740.24044.147.135.338.450.5484432.239.34134.143.736.742.338.237.938.944.647.242.44741.345.447.338.143.149.328.344.846.642.739.745.342.342.544.44142.735.240.443.243.143.442.74044.34242.245.142.542.235.43633.544.841.841.945.442.242.646.243.535.242.84641.840.843.541.940.24739.843.146.142.233.444.541.931.645.641.939.546.842.142.742.934.443.442.547.642.942.244.74241.845.64241.835.442.641.844.742.141.533.941.9414642.335.944.642.240.644.443.538.544.24339.936.737.744.243.444.342.146.943.442.646.341.931.744.644.136.544.133.837.942.546.242.340.747.442.543.243.433.943.446.242.44245.846.745.249.859.256.757.351.145.743.344.240.350.14644.648.846.247.537.640.440.942.938.541.337.245.546.427.937.542.74035.144.348.252.94337.444.137.334.935.538.740.548.138.440.345.438.944.137.945.547.645.147.447.638.341.442.736.34343.340.839.74739.943.951.34349.642.741.846.750.344.250.938.345.138.935.339.142.838.349.843.24943.939.846.746.145.147.74741.446.63145.746.243.740.842.242.542.944.330.740.24044.147.135.338.450.5484432.239.34134.143.736.742.338.237.938.944.647.242.44741.345.42976.776.275.676.276.576.772.476.872.276.575.974.476.776.777.476.377.676.675.275.376.477.676.472.46676.964.272.176.576.475.167.173.17776.676.768.2757774.175.174.377.276.176.475.767.977.2767776.977.577.477.277.276.870.86172.575.777.177.275.471.576.569.37565.173.873.57771.674.944.381.473.364.47375.668.158.176.176.676.377.2716777.37777.961.974.871.177.274.763.576.461.876.666.776.476.577.576.672.876.16876.976.644.142.544.144.143.541.244.744.744.54443454543.744.746.947.145.677.987.487.884.788.884.987.889.188.387.788.885.785.488.885.286.586.785.587.686.983.584.986.586.286.885.989.588.487.886.287.687.487.28583.88787.485.18784.985.786.487.587.689.187.584.486.786.985.48684.783.386.18686.290.287.788.885.585.288.586.887.88783.18684.68787.885.786.782.785.384.684.387.887.385.785.979.285.486.582.181.686.886.58783.886.687.983.484.84986.985.586.686.885.188.484.887.787.388.186.184.28484.486.688.185.286.185.683.584.788.985858485.780.986.688.782.985.683.386.686.1Tooltip
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø41.9 (28.3-49.3)
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; Sequential write; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø43.1 (27.9-59.2)
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø69.3 (29-81.4)
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; Sequential read; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø85.8 (49-90.2)

软件 - 具有DRM认证的Harmony OS 2.0

华为MatePad 11运行一个专有的操作系统,该系统基于Android 10中的Linux内核。所有Android 应用程序都与华为的Harmony OS 2.0兼容。用户可以从华为AppGallery下载应用程序,包括所有标准的EMUI应用程序。总而言之,Harmony OS和EMUI彼此相当相似。然而,Harmony OS提供了新的功能。

一些应用程序可以作为 "片段 "打开,按住它们,然后向上滑动。在片段模式下,应用程序不会占用整个屏幕。处于片段模式的应用程序也可以作为一个小部件被固定下来。

由于该平板电脑没有运行谷歌的Android ,因此不支持谷歌移动服务。可以安装个别应用程序,但如果它们需要谷歌服务,就无法使用。这在日常使用中会被证明是相当烦人的。

许多应用程序,如WhatsApp、Netflix和Spotify都不能在AppGallery中使用。当搜索这些应用程序时,AppGallery提供了替代品或建议用户尝试直接从应用程序制造商的网站下载这些应用程序。在安装APK时,用户将不得不等待安全扫描,然后手动批准安装。总而言之,这个过程并不复杂。要更新此类应用程序,你需要在AppGallery中手动选择它们。

华为平板电脑可以以高清质量播放受DRM保护的内容。Netflix应用程序显示,情况确实如此。然而,这些内容看起来并不特别好,也不是HDR格式。华为平板电脑有可能无法以全质量的方式播放高清内容。

通信和地理定位 - 精确的导航和快速的Wi-Fi

MatePad 11支持Wi-Fi 6(双频:2.4和5 GHz)。通过我们的参考级路由器Netgear Nighthawk AX 12,该平板电脑能够实现快速和稳定的数据传输率,实际上,这与快速Wi-Fi 5设备的水平相当。

华为平板电脑不支持5G、LTE或NFC。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
902 (886min - 925max) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
679 (653min - 709max) MBit/s ∼75% -25%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
645 (630min - 659max) MBit/s ∼72% -28%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
459 (223min - 497max) MBit/s ∼51% -49%
Medion LifeTab E10802
PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 64 GB eMMC Flash
329 (99min - 384max) MBit/s ∼36% -64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
231 (114min - 380max) MBit/s ∼26% -74%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
836 (624min - 890max) MBit/s ∼100% +7%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
780 (635min - 867max) MBit/s ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
613 (300min - 633max) MBit/s ∼73% -21%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
555 (508min - 597max) MBit/s ∼66% -29%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
342 (291min - 400max) MBit/s ∼41% -56%
Medion LifeTab E10802
PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 64 GB eMMC Flash
317 (164min - 333max) MBit/s ∼38% -59%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900646657726667715738635697760747757788798779776818798838806845858860830845831856867822837790300608600612613622618625633624619616605606617628620616607626605614622550609621614619578597646657726667715738635697760747757788798779776818798838806845858860830845831856867822837790300608600612613622618625633624619616605606617628620616607626605614622550609621614619578597895898910911889912886886898889920897893897896925903895904890916894918918909911903889908906136380170137343286217274200263114252278236196226182261253234254163297249130263222277211239Tooltip
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Qualcomm Adreno 650; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø780 (635-867)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite Samsung Exynos 9611, ARM Mali-G72 MP3; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø601 (300-633)
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Qualcomm Adreno 650; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø902 (886-925)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite Samsung Exynos 9611, ARM Mali-G72 MP3; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø231 (114-380)
GPS测试。室外
户外活动
GPS测试:室内
在室内

MatePad 11配备了一个单频的GNSS模块。这款平板电脑能快速连接到卫星,但需要很长时间才能准确获取用户的位置。在室内,用户将不得不等待相当长的时间来获取他们的位置。

我们对MatePad 11在骑车过程中被证明比我们的专业导航仪Garmin Edge 500更准确这一事实感到相当惊讶。在这里,华为平板电脑做得非常好。

GNSS自行车骑行。绕着池塘骑行
GNSS自行车骑行。绕着池塘骑行
GNSS自行车骑行。转身
GNSS自行车骑行。转身
全球卫星导航系统自行车骑行。概述
全球卫星导航系统自行车骑行。概述

相机 - 华为平板电脑有一个坚实的摄像头和一个LED闪光灯

用MatePad 11拍摄的自拍
用MatePad 11拍摄的自拍

华为MatePad 11拥有一个800万像素的前置摄像头,可以以30 FPS的速度拍摄1080p视频。锐度和色彩还原度都处于良好水平。然而,在某些场景中,高光部分可能会被遮挡。华为平板电脑适合举行电话会议。不过,麦克风并不总是能很好地拾取声音。

后置摄像头有一个1300万像素的传感器。用主摄像头拍摄的照片变得相当暗淡。总而言之,主摄像头对于扫描文件来说是足够好的。更重要的是,有一个LED闪光灯,可以用来照亮一个场景。后置摄像头可以录制30FPS的UHD视频。奇怪的是,720p的视频也被限制在30FPS。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide angleWide angle5X zoomLow-light photography
click to load images
ColorChecker
3.1 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
6 ∆E
0.6 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
1.1 ∆E
3 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei MatePad 11 2021: 3.67 ∆E min: 0.65 - max: 6.93 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.9 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
61.6 ∆E
53 ∆E
33.8 ∆E
41.7 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
63.7 ∆E
63.2 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
47.2 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
74.4 ∆E
42.2 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
85.5 ∆E
69.9 ∆E
51.6 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei MatePad 11 2021: 45.72 ∆E min: 13.76 - max: 85.47 ∆E

附件和保修 - 包括M-Pencil。

华为MatePad 11配备了一个模块化电源适配器(22.5瓦),一条USB线(Type-A转Type-C),一个拆卡工具和华为M-Pencil 2与替换提示。

智能磁性键盘可以在华为网站上购买,价格为99欧元(约116美元)。华为还为MatePad 11销售一个蓝牙鼠标(39欧元/~45美元)。华为没有为MatePad 11提供保护套。然而,许多其他制造商都有。

这款平板电脑有24个月的保修期。用户可以在服务应用程序中轻松看到保修信息。

输入设备和操作 - MatePad 11支持面部解锁

华为MatePad 11有一个电容式触摸屏,可以同时识别多达10个输入。屏幕表面非常光滑。我们在审查期间没有遇到触摸屏的任何问题。

MatePad 11配备了第二代M-Pencil。它可以分辨出4096个压力级别。这支手写笔以磁力方式固定在平板电脑上。我们在使用该笔时没有遇到任何问题。就像iPad一样,MatePad 11支持手写识别。例如,用户可以通过使用M-Pencil书写将文本输入搜索框。

还有一个可选的键盘,即所谓的智能磁力键盘。它可以固定在MatePad 11的背面,在两个不同的角度保持平板电脑的稳定没有问题。QWERTY键的尺寸为13.9 x 13.9毫米,提供较短的移动距离,并有一个清晰的启动点。

该平板电脑支持2D人脸识别。脸部解锁效果很好,可以配置为直接将用户带到主屏幕。该平板电脑允许用户创建多达5个配置文件。没有指纹传感器。

华为智能磁性键盘
华为智能磁性键盘

显示器 - 120-Hz IPS面板

像素排列
像素排列

华为MatePad 11有一个10.95英寸的IPS屏幕,原始分辨率为2560x1600像素。平均亮度达到515 cd/m²。亮度水平在APL50文本中没有波动。

最低亮度在一个非常好的水平上。这就是为什么用户可以在晚上舒适地阅读书籍。MatePad 11甚至配备了一个特殊的夜间模式,可以减少屏幕产生的蓝光。此外,显示屏不依赖脉冲宽度调制(PWM)进行亮度控制。这意味着没有闪烁,而闪烁可能导致易感人群的头痛和/或眼疲劳。

黑值出奇地高(几乎为1坎德拉),这就是为什么对比度相当低。尽管如此,屏幕上的内容看起来相当有冲击力。

493
cd/m²
517
cd/m²
497
cd/m²
513
cd/m²
550
cd/m²
536
cd/m²
513
cd/m²
500
cd/m²
515
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 550 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 514.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.23 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 550 cd/m²
Contrast: 573:1 (Black: 0.96 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.3 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
98.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
IPS, 2560x1600, 10.95
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
OLED, 2560x1600, 11.50
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
TFT, 2000x1200, 10.40
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
LTPS, 2560x1600, 11.00
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
IPS, 2160x1620, 10.20
Medion LifeTab E10802
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.00
Screen
14%
18%
47%
24%
-28%
Brightness middle
550
372
-32%
503
-9%
554
1%
477
-13%
335
-39%
Brightness
515
375
-27%
477
-7%
535
4%
452
-12%
319
-38%
Brightness Distribution
90
95
6%
91
1%
91
1%
86
-4%
85
-6%
Black Level *
0.96
0.29
70%
0.33
66%
0.5
48%
0.29
70%
Contrast
573
1734
203%
1679
193%
954
66%
1155
102%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.3
1.8
45%
4.4
-33%
2.1
36%
2.2
33%
7.6
-130%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.9
4.2
47%
10.4
-32%
7.1
10%
5
37%
14.1
-78%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.9
2.8
43%
7.5
-53%
1.6
67%
3.3
33%
10
-104%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.29 96%
2.19 100%
2.32 95%
2.23 99%
2.44 90%
CCT
7288 89%
6718 97%
7700 84%
6623 98%
7019 93%
10228 64%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17031 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

刚开箱时,颜色显得相当冷,而且过饱和。当使用正常配置文件时,颜色看起来更自然,它被限制在较小的sRGB色彩空间而不是DCI-P3。

灰度(配置文件:正常,白平衡:温暖,色彩空间:sRGB
灰度(配置文件:正常,白平衡:温暖,色彩空间:sRGB
色彩准确性(配置文件:正常,白平衡:温暖,色彩空间:sRGB
色彩准确性(配置文件:正常,白平衡:温暖,色彩空间:sRGB
色彩空间覆盖(配置文件:正常,白平衡:温暖,色彩空间:sRGB
色彩空间覆盖(配置文件:正常,白平衡:温暖,色彩空间:sRGB
饱和度(配置文件:正常,白平衡:温暖,色彩空间:sRGB
饱和度(配置文件:正常,白平衡:温暖,色彩空间:sRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
15.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.6 ms rise
↘ 11.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.8 ms rise
↘ 19.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.7 ms).

由于其明亮的屏幕,MatePad 11可以在户外使用。不过,由于屏幕表面反光,在阳光直射下很难看清显示屏。

IPS面板提供了非常好的可视角度。但在非常尖锐的角度下,亮度会略有下降。屏幕不会出现混浊现象,而且IPS的发光效果非常温和。

户外使用
户外使用
视角
视角

性能--MatePad 11中的Snapdragon 865

3DMark结果
3DMark

华为MatePad 11的特点是 骁龙865,这是高通公司去年的旗舰SoC。华为平板电脑配备了6GB的内存。芯片 Adreno 650负责图形渲染。

骁龙865仍然是一个相当强大的SoC,特别是与骁龙860相比。 骁龙860与价格相近的小米Pad 5和Poco X3 Pro.骁龙865在所有领域都比骁龙860快,包括AI。然而,在 Galaxy Tab S7iPad 8击败了华为的平板电脑。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
1116 Points ∼58% +23%
Xiaomi Poco F3
998 Points ∼52% +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
963 Points ∼50% +6%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
905 Points ∼47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (764 - 924, n=23)
903 Points ∼47% 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
728 Points ∼38% -20%
Average of class Tablet (133 - 1716, n=40, last 2 years)
635 Points ∼33% -30%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
523 Points ∼27% -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
345 Points ∼18% -62%
Medion LifeTab E10802
158 Points ∼8% -83%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Xiaomi Poco F3
3368 Points ∼20% +2%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
3288 Points ∼19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2687 - 3449, n=23)
3268 Points ∼19% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
3201 Points ∼19% -3%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
2772 Points ∼16% -16%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
2657 Points ∼16% -19%
Average of class Tablet (455 - 7378, n=40, last 2 years)
2236 Points ∼13% -32%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
1764 Points ∼10% -46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
1207 Points ∼7% -63%
Medion LifeTab E10802
817 Points ∼5% -75%
OpenCL Score 5.1
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2829 - 3080, n=8)
2981 Points ∼2%
Average of class Tablet (735 - 5353, n=4, last 2 years)
2830 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
1477 Points ∼1%
Vulkan Score 5.1
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2487 - 3259, n=8)
2723 Points ∼2%
Average of class Tablet (623 - 4654, n=4, last 2 years)
2438 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
1081 Points ∼1%
PCMark for Android
Work 3.0
Xiaomi Poco F3
13610 Points ∼80% +17%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
11610 Points ∼68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
11610 Points ∼68% 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
11153 Points ∼65% -4%
Average of class Tablet (4564 - 11694, n=12, last 2 years)
7916 Points ∼46% -32%
Work 2.0 performance score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
12603 Points ∼82%
Xiaomi Poco F3
12440 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
11699 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
11699 Points ∼76%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (9202 - 15299, n=23)
11246 Points ∼74%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
7459 Points ∼49%
Average of class Tablet (4412 - 12603, n=28, last 2 years)
6052 Points ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
5518 Points ∼36%
Medion LifeTab E10802
4536 Points ∼30%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
9238 Points ∼82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8215 - 9611, n=20)
8915 Points ∼79%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
6636 Points ∼59%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
3490 Points ∼31%
Average of class Tablet (252 - 9238, n=32, last 2 years)
2568 Points ∼23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
2088 Points ∼19%
Medion LifeTab E10802
710 Points ∼6%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
14283 Points ∼86%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (10599 - 13305, n=20)
11750 Points ∼70%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
10023 Points ∼60%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
3526 Points ∼21%
Average of class Tablet (211 - 14283, n=32, last 2 years)
3051 Points ∼18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
2048 Points ∼12%
Medion LifeTab E10802
655 Points ∼4%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (3965 - 5274, n=20)
4844 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
4482 Points ∼83%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
3371 Points ∼62%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
3040 Points ∼56%
Average of class Tablet (674 - 4482, n=32, last 2 years)
2290 Points ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
2199 Points ∼41%
Medion LifeTab E10802
1009 Points ∼19%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
9901 Points ∼59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8499 - 11492, n=22)
9645 Points ∼57% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
9283 Points ∼55% -6%
Xiaomi Poco F3
7970 Points ∼47% -20%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
7752 Points ∼46% -22%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
3668 Points ∼22% -63%
Average of class Tablet (261 - 13682, n=37, last 2 years)
3581 Points ∼21% -64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
2074 Points ∼12% -79%
Medion LifeTab E10802
775 Points ∼5% -92%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
13779 Points ∼32% +6%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
13005 Points ∼30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (11956 - 16809, n=22)
12921 Points ∼30% -1%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
12070 Points ∼28% -7%
Xiaomi Poco F3
12033 Points ∼28% -7%
Average of class Tablet (219 - 42751, n=37, last 2 years)
6002 Points ∼14% -54%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
3756 Points ∼9% -71%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
2021 Points ∼5% -84%
Medion LifeTab E10802
733 Points ∼2% -94%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
5394 Points ∼78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (3956 - 5765, n=22)
5138 Points ∼75% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
4319 Points ∼63% -20%
Xiaomi Poco F3
3653 Points ∼53% -32%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
3442 Points ∼50% -36%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
3390 Points ∼49% -37%
Average of class Tablet (781 - 5623, n=37, last 2 years)
2650 Points ∼38% -51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
2283 Points ∼33% -58%
Medion LifeTab E10802
969 Points ∼14% -82%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (5996 - 7653, n=21)
7103 Points ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
7098 Points ∼35%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
4472 Points ∼22%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
2437 Points ∼12%
Average of class Tablet (169 - 7098, n=32, last 2 years)
1920 Points ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
1586 Points ∼8%
Medion LifeTab E10802
400 Points ∼2%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
8894 Points ∼77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (6500 - 9167, n=20)
8128 Points ∼70%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
5053 Points ∼44%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
2261 Points ∼20%
Average of class Tablet (139 - 9612, n=33, last 2 years)
1999 Points ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
1472 Points ∼13%
Medion LifeTab E10802
341 Points ∼3%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (4582 - 5209, n=20)
4941 Points ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
4201 Points ∼71%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
3350 Points ∼57%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
3189 Points ∼54%
Average of class Tablet (369 - 4201, n=33, last 2 years)
2291 Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
2178 Points ∼37%
Medion LifeTab E10802
1018 Points ∼17%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
8089 Points ∼79%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (7517 - 8947, n=23)
8073 Points ∼78% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
7701 Points ∼75% -5%
Xiaomi Poco F3
7377 Points ∼72% -9%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
6871 Points ∼67% -15%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
5049 Points ∼49% -38%
Average of class Tablet (167 - 9630, n=39, last 2 years)
2904 Points ∼28% -64%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
2626 Points ∼25% -68%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
1649 Points ∼16% -80%
Medion LifeTab E10802
455 Points ∼4% -94%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
9893 Points ∼38% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8633 - 11999, n=22)
9501 Points ∼37% +1%
Xiaomi Poco F3
9498 Points ∼37% +1%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
9428 Points ∼37%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
8218 Points ∼32% -13%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
6175 Points ∼24% -35%
Average of class Tablet (136 - 25707, n=39, last 2 years)
3938 Points ∼15% -58%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
2469 Points ∼10% -74%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
1528 Points ∼6% -84%
Medion LifeTab E10802
396 Points ∼2% -96%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
5403 Points ∼68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (4733 - 5780, n=22)
5319 Points ∼67% -2%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
4367 Points ∼55% -19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
4298 Points ∼54% -20%
Xiaomi Poco F3
4140 Points ∼52% -23%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
3380 Points ∼42% -37%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
3082 Points ∼39% -43%
Average of class Tablet (443 - 5634, n=39, last 2 years)
2625 Points ∼33% -51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
2280 Points ∼29% -58%
Medion LifeTab E10802
957 Points ∼12% -82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
6292 Points ∼46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (4582 - 6961, n=20)
6202 Points ∼46%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
5406 Points ∼40%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
2293 Points ∼17%
Average of class Tablet (469 - 6292, n=28, last 2 years)
1952 Points ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
1543 Points ∼11%
Medion LifeTab E10802
575 Points ∼4%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
8768 Points ∼34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (7618 - 9104, n=19)
8249 Points ∼32%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
6987 Points ∼27%
Average of class Tablet (400 - 25909, n=28, last 2 years)
2726 Points ∼11%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
2186 Points ∼8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
1437 Points ∼6%
Medion LifeTab E10802
477 Points ∼2%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1786 - 4061, n=19)
3414 Points ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
3285 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
3017 Points ∼57%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
2766 Points ∼53%
Average of class Tablet (533 - 3658, n=28, last 2 years)
2311 Points ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
2076 Points ∼39%
Medion LifeTab E10802
2048 Points ∼39%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
Points ∼0%
Wild Life Score
Average of class Tablet (371 - 17263, n=17, last 2 years)
5049 Points ∼5% +32%
Xiaomi Poco F3
4288 Points ∼4% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (3789 - 5038, n=7)
3992 Points ∼4% +5%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
3818 Points ∼3%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
3488 Points ∼3% -9%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
736 Points ∼1% -81%
Medion LifeTab E10802
Points ∼0% -100%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Tablet (366 - 18326, n=15, last 2 years)
5907 Points ∼5% +55%
Xiaomi Poco F3
4271 Points ∼4% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (3789 - 5039, n=7)
3991 Points ∼3% +4%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
3823 Points ∼3%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
3455 Points ∼3% -10%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
637 Points ∼1% -83%
Medion LifeTab E10802
Points ∼0% -100%
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Tablet (185 - 5035, n=13, last 2 years)
1846 Points ∼7% +65%
Xiaomi Poco F3
1223 Points ∼5% +10%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
1116 Points ∼4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
1116 Points ∼4% 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
987 Points ∼4% -12%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (182 - 4975, n=13, last 2 years)
1781 Points ∼7% +61%
Xiaomi Poco F3
1222 Points ∼5% +11%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
1103 Points ∼4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
1103 Points ∼4% 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
974 Points ∼4% -12%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
119 fps ∼4% +98%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
119 fps ∼4% +98%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (50 - 138, n=23)
75.4 fps ∼2% +26%
Xiaomi Poco F3
71 fps ∼2% +18%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
60 fps ∼2% 0%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
60 fps ∼2%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
55 fps ∼2% -8%
Average of class Tablet (9.2 - 120, n=39, last 2 years)
51.2 fps ∼2% -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
44 fps ∼1% -27%
Medion LifeTab E10802
19 fps ∼1% -68%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
239 fps ∼2% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
225 fps ∼2% +9%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
206 fps ∼2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (168 - 266, n=23)
206 fps ∼2% 0%
Xiaomi Poco F3
200 fps ∼2% -3%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
184 fps ∼1% -11%
Average of class Tablet (4.4 - 588, n=39, last 2 years)
127 fps ∼1% -38%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
85 fps ∼1% -59%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
48 fps ∼0% -77%
Medion LifeTab E10802
19 fps ∼0% -91%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
103 fps ∼28% +78%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
82 fps ∼22% +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (50 - 111, n=23)
71.7 fps ∼20% +24%
Xiaomi Poco F3
60 fps ∼16% +3%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
58 fps ∼16% 0%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
58 fps ∼16%
Average of class Tablet (4.4 - 120, n=37, last 2 years)
39.7 fps ∼11% -32%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
25 fps ∼7% -57%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
24 fps ∼7% -59%
Medion LifeTab E10802
10 fps ∼3% -83%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
134 fps ∼15% +6%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
131 fps ∼14% +3%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
127 fps ∼14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (96 - 151, n=23)
124 fps ∼14% -2%
Xiaomi Poco F3
119 fps ∼13% -6%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
110 fps ∼12% -13%
Average of class Tablet (4.2 - 345, n=38, last 2 years)
73.7 fps ∼8% -42%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
42 fps ∼5% -67%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
26 fps ∼3% -80%
Medion LifeTab E10802
11 fps ∼1% -91%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
74 fps ∼2% +64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (43 - 83, n=24)
60.1 fps ∼2% +34%
Xiaomi Poco F3
59 fps ∼2% +31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
51 fps ∼1% +13%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
49.51 fps ∼1% +10%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
45 fps ∼1%
Average of class Tablet (2.8 - 107, n=38, last 2 years)
28.9 fps ∼1% -36%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
16 fps ∼0% -64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
14 fps ∼0% -69%
Medion LifeTab E10802
7 fps ∼0% -84%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
93 fps ∼2% +4%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
89 fps ∼2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (67 - 103, n=24)
86 fps ∼2% -3%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
85.82 fps ∼2% -4%
Xiaomi Poco F3
81 fps ∼2% -9%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
77 fps ∼2% -13%
Average of class Tablet (2.6 - 227, n=38, last 2 years)
49.8 fps ∼1% -44%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
30 fps ∼1% -66%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
16 fps ∼0% -82%
Medion LifeTab E10802
6.9 fps ∼0% -92%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F3
44 fps ∼1% +63%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
44 fps ∼1% +63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (25 - 54, n=24)
40.5 fps ∼1% +50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
32 fps ∼1% +19%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
31.72 fps ∼1% +17%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
27 fps ∼1%
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 87, n=37, last 2 years)
20.1 fps ∼1% -26%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
9.7 fps ∼0% -64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
9.6 fps ∼0% -64%
Medion LifeTab E10802
3.3 fps ∼0% -88%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
57 fps ∼0% +10%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
52 fps ∼0%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
51.34 fps ∼0% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (39 - 62, n=24)
51.1 fps ∼0% -2%
Xiaomi Poco F3
48 fps ∼0% -8%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
46 fps ∼0% -12%
Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 150, n=37, last 2 years)
32.4 fps ∼0% -38%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
17 fps ∼0% -67%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
10 fps ∼0% -81%
Medion LifeTab E10802
3 fps ∼0% -94%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F3
33 fps ∼21% +83%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
29 fps ∼18% +61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (18 - 40, n=25)
27.8 fps ∼18% +54%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
25.34 fps ∼16% +41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
21 fps ∼13% +17%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
18 fps ∼11%
Average of class Tablet (2 - 75, n=40, last 2 years)
14 fps ∼9% -22%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
6.5 fps ∼4% -64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
5.8 fps ∼4% -68%
Medion LifeTab E10802
2.3 fps ∼1% -87%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
23.09 fps ∼10% +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
22 fps ∼9% +5%
Xiaomi Poco F3
22 fps ∼9% +5%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
21 fps ∼9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (20 - 27, n=25)
20.5 fps ∼8% -2%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
17 fps ∼7% -19%
Average of class Tablet (0.85 - 70, n=40, last 2 years)
12.6 fps ∼5% -40%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
6.6 fps ∼3% -69%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
3.6 fps ∼1% -83%
Medion LifeTab E10802
1.4 fps ∼1% -93%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F3
49 fps ∼24% +69%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
45 fps ∼22% +55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (28 - 57, n=25)
43.2 fps ∼21% +49%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
37.01 fps ∼18% +28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
33 fps ∼16% +14%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
29 fps ∼14%
Average of class Tablet (3.2 - 102, n=40, last 2 years)
20.6 fps ∼10% -29%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
10 fps ∼5% -66%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
9.7 fps ∼5% -67%
Medion LifeTab E10802
3.7 fps ∼2% -87%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
62.4 fps ∼11% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
58 fps ∼10% +7%
Xiaomi Poco F3
57 fps ∼10% +6%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
54 fps ∼9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (27 - 67, n=25)
52.7 fps ∼9% -2%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
46 fps ∼8% -15%
Average of class Tablet (2.3 - 191, n=40, last 2 years)
34.4 fps ∼6% -36%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
16 fps ∼3% -70%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
10 fps ∼2% -81%
Medion LifeTab E10802
3.9 fps ∼1% -93%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F3
680139 Points ∼83% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (628715 - 714632, n=2)
671674 Points ∼82% +7%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
628715 Points ∼77%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
563850 Points ∼69% -10%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
549549 Points ∼67% -13%
Average of class Tablet (117837 - 774680, n=12, last 2 years)
464812 Points ∼57% -26%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
341542 Points ∼42% -46%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F3
595585 Points ∼57% +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
584052 Points ∼56% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (527301 - 631025, n=24)
579049 Points ∼56% +6%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
548798 Points ∼53%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
483527 Points ∼47% -12%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
411764 Points ∼40% -25%
Average of class Tablet (75328 - 1037960, n=27, last 2 years)
356606 Points ∼34% -35%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
275660 Points ∼27% -50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
177197 Points ∼17% -68%
Medion LifeTab E10802
89714 Points ∼9% -84%
AImark - Score v2.x
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
119152 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Poco F3
111838 Points ∼41% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (107923 - 119152, n=3)
111673 Points ∼41% -6%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
46152 Points ∼17% -61%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
34522 Points ∼13% -71%
Average of class Tablet (4281 - 119686, n=13, last 2 years)
29582 Points ∼11% -75%
Medion LifeTab E10802
4333 Points ∼2% -96%
VRMark - Amber Room
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
6950 Score ∼91%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (4988 - 7649, n=4)
6205 Score ∼81%
Xiaomi Poco F3
5042 Score ∼66%
Average of class Tablet (669 - 5073, n=6, last 2 years)
1607 Score ∼21%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Poco F3
6356 Points ∼75% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (5264 - 6402, n=23)
5871 Points ∼69% +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
5592 Points ∼66% +6%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
5276 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
5224 Points ∼62% -1%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
3421 Points ∼40% -35%
Average of class Tablet (157 - 6164, n=27, last 2 years)
2689 Points ∼32% -49%
Medion LifeTab E10802
1185 Points ∼14% -78%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
637 Points ∼8% -88%
System
Xiaomi Poco F3
9997 Points ∼51% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8412 - 10147, n=23)
9660 Points ∼49% 0%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
9624 Points ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
8994 Points ∼46% -7%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
8549 Points ∼43% -11%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
6753 Points ∼34% -30%
Average of class Tablet (946 - 10489, n=27, last 2 years)
5044 Points ∼26% -48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
4657 Points ∼24% -52%
Medion LifeTab E10802
2564 Points ∼13% -73%
Memory
Xiaomi Poco F3
7692 Points ∼85% +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (5304 - 8874, n=23)
7073 Points ∼78% +31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
6501 Points ∼72% +21%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
5716 Points ∼63% +6%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
5388 Points ∼60%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
4053 Points ∼45% -25%
Average of class Tablet (464 - 8167, n=27, last 2 years)
3261 Points ∼36% -39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
1670 Points ∼18% -69%
Medion LifeTab E10802
1089 Points ∼12% -80%
Graphics
Xiaomi Poco F3
12801 Points ∼44% +13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
12048 Points ∼42% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (11366 - 13833, n=23)
11779 Points ∼41% +4%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
11366 Points ∼39%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
10549 Points ∼37% -7%
Average of class Tablet (143 - 12350, n=27, last 2 years)
4012 Points ∼14% -65%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
3875 Points ∼13% -66%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
2154 Points ∼7% -81%
Medion LifeTab E10802
871 Points ∼3% -92%
Web
Xiaomi Poco F3
1658 Points ∼69% +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1276 - 2169, n=23)
1497 Points ∼63% +14%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
1445 Points ∼60% +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
1409 Points ∼59% +7%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
1314 Points ∼55%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro
1291 Points ∼54% -2%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 1544, n=27, last 2 years)
1009 Points ∼42% -23%
Medion LifeTab E10802
810 Points ∼34% -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
10 Points ∼0% -99%

Legend

 
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Qualcomm Adreno 618, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite Samsung Exynos 9611, ARM Mali-G72 MP3, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 Apple A12 Bionic, Apple A12 Bionic GPU, 128 GB NVMe
 
Medion LifeTab E10802 Mediatek MT8768, PowerVR GE8320, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Qualcomm Adreno 640, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Xiaomi Poco F3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

在浏览器基准测试中,MatePad 11的表现相当不错,但被iPad和Galaxy Tab S7击败。由于强大的SoC和120Hz的屏幕,华为平板电脑提供了很好的网络浏览体验。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14)
123.809 Points ∼100% +86%
Average of class Tablet (14 - 183, n=33, last 2 years)
72.4 Points ∼58% +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86)
71.821 Points ∼58% +8%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)
66.572 Points ∼54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (45.2 - 77, n=20)
63.6 Points ∼51% -4%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105)
47.583 Points ∼38% -29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
27.459 Points ∼22% -59%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14)
266.77 Points ∼100% +136%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86)
126.98 Points ∼48% +13%
Average of class Tablet (11.2 - 403, n=41, last 2 years)
121 Points ∼45% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (74.2 - 145, n=21)
113 Points ∼42% 0%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)
112.87 Points ∼42%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105)
84.382 Points ∼32% -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
50.255 Points ∼19% -55%
Medion LifeTab E10802 (Chrome 87)
22.083 Points ∼8% -80%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14)
166 Points ∼100% +58%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86)
116 Points ∼70% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (97 - 127, n=23)
107 Points ∼64% +2%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)
105 Points ∼63%
Average of class Tablet (13 - 246, n=43, last 2 years)
90.2 Points ∼54% -14%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105)
67 Points ∼40% -36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
54 Points ∼33% -49%
Medion LifeTab E10802 (Chrome 87)
24 Points ∼14% -77%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14)
139 runs/min ∼100% +112%
Average of class Tablet (5.68 - 228, n=33, last 2 years)
72.4 runs/min ∼52% +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86)
70.9 runs/min ∼51% +8%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)
65.5 runs/min ∼47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (30.6 - 74.5, n=19)
63.9 runs/min ∼46% -2%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105)
41.4 runs/min ∼30% -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
29.2 runs/min ∼21% -55%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14)
41443 Points ∼100% +71%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86)
26495 Points ∼64% +10%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)
24196 Points ∼58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (14606 - 31224, n=23)
22518 Points ∼54% -7%
Average of class Tablet (1712 - 62946, n=42, last 2 years)
20961 Points ∼51% -13%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105)
16476 Points ∼40% -32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
9415 Points ∼23% -61%
Medion LifeTab E10802 (Chrome 87)
4070 Points ∼10% -83%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Medion LifeTab E10802 (Chrome 87)
12342 ms * ∼100% -539%
Average of class Tablet (455 - 19212, n=43, last 2 years)
4899 ms * ∼40% -153%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
4871.7 ms * ∼39% -152%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105)
2888 ms * ∼23% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1623 - 2911, n=24)
2031 ms * ∼16% -5%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)
1932.6 ms * ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86)
1900.3 ms * ∼15% +2%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14)
652.5 ms * ∼5% +66%

* ... smaller is better

华为MatePad 11配备了非常快的UFS 3.1内存,这在这个价格范围内的设备中很少使用。

Huawei MatePad 11 2021Lenovo Tab P11 ProSamsung Galaxy Tab S6 LiteSamsung Galaxy Tab S7Medion LifeTab E10802Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-53%
-46%
3%
-87%
12%
-56%
Sequential Read 256KB
1468.24
486.77
-67%
483.72
-67%
1511.54
3%
274.66
-81%
1587 ?(1330 - 1790, n=24)
8%
573 ?(123 - 2031, n=37, last 2 years)
-61%
Sequential Write 256KB
708.37
192.32
-73%
219.34
-69%
680.21
-4%
101.17
-86%
761 ?(527 - 1095, n=24)
7%
288 ?(53.1 - 1559, n=37, last 2 years)
-59%
Random Read 4KB
190.66
136.32
-29%
119.84
-37%
218.97
15%
27.36
-86%
236 ?(133 - 317, n=24)
24%
107 ?(25.4 - 310, n=37, last 2 years)
-44%
Random Write 4KB
217.51
123.34
-43%
195.78
-10%
211.5
-3%
10.32
-95%
232 ?(121 - 306, n=24)
7%
87.4 ?(4.27 - 370, n=37, last 2 years)
-60%

游戏--超过60FPS是遥不可及的事

由于强大的SoC,华为MatePad 11可以在高设置下处理所有当前的标题。不过,侧面加载的游戏不支持120-Hz刷新率。华为平板电脑可以在奶油般光滑的60FPS下运行大多数现代游戏。

在《PUBG》中,MatePad 11能够在高设置下保持稳定的40 FPS。我们对Armajet有点失望,它以30 FPS运行,尽管它应该支持120-Hz刷新率。

华为平板电脑的扬声器为游戏提供了一个体面的声场。

氩氦刀
氩氦刀
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
0510152025303540455055603030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303029313030303029313029312930313030302931303030303029312931302931303029313030303030303030303030293129313029303130302931303030303029313029312930313030303030303029303031293130303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030302931303030302931302931293031303030293130303030302931293130293130302931303030303030303030303029312931302930313030293130303030302931302931293031303030303030302930303129313030303060605660606060605960605858606059615860605860596059596059596060605960606058585753595960595949605959595659606060595959606057596058605960606060605960605960605959605959576059605860595860606060586060585760586059586060605759605960605760615760606059596059606060606059606057605960596059585760586060605860606059586059596059595858605860595960595960605860586059605660606059606059606059606058605960605960606059605961596060585959605959605860606058606059605961605960606054596059606059605960606059606059596059596059596060596060605960605959586058606059605959605958606060586059606059595960595758605659603030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303029313030303029313029312930313030302931303030303029312931302931303029313030303030303030303030293129313029303130302931303030303029313029312930313030303030303029303031293130303030606056606060606059606058586060596158606058605960595960595960606059606060585857535959605959496059595956596060605959596060575960586059606060606059606059606059596059595760596058605958606060605860605857605860595860606057596059606057606157606060595960596060606060596060576059605960595857605860606058606060595860595960595958586058605959605959606058605860596056606060596060596060596060586059606059606060596059615960605859596059596058606060586060596059616059606060545960596060596059606060596060595960595960595960605960606059606059595860586060596059596059586060605860596060595959605957586056596040404040403941404040404039404040404040404040404040404040404040403941394139404040404040413940403940404040404040403940404040404040404040394040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040403940404139404040404040403940404040394140403940404040394040404040404040394140413940404039404041394040404040404040404040394139404040404040404040403941394139404040394040404040404039404040404139404139404040404040404040404040404040404040404139404040404040404040404040403940404040404040404040404040394140403941384139404139404041403940394040404040403940404040404040403940404040404040404040404040Tooltip
; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø30 (29-31)
; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.6.0: Ø59.3 (49-61)
; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 1.6.0: Ø39.9 (38-41)

排放--声音适度,性能稳定

温度

MatePad 11的表面温度永远不会太高。这款平板电脑拿在手里总是很舒服。

即使在满负荷的情况下,华为平板电脑也能保持其全部性能。

GFXBench电池测试。T-Rex (OpenGL ES 2.0)
GFXBench电池测试。T-Rex (OpenGL ES 2.0)
GFXBench电池测试。曼哈顿(OpenGL ES 3.1
GFXBench电池测试。曼哈顿(OpenGL ES 3.1

Stress Test with 3DMark Wild Life