华为MatePad 11评测--伟大的平板电脑，几乎没有弱点

出于需要的德行。 华为MatePad 11是一款非常有能力的中档平板电脑，支持笔输入。此外，该平板电脑还可以与键盘配对。MatePad 11配备了Harmony操作系统，没有谷歌服务。在日常使用中，这被证明比我们预期的限制要少。

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), 09/23/2021 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Convertible / 2-in-1 Tablet Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Huawei Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (MatePad Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 8 x 2.4 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 650

Memory

6144 MB

, LPDDR4x

Display

10.95 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 276 PPI, capacitive, 10-point multitouch, native pen support, IPS, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB

, 110.58 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.25 x 253.8 x 165.3

Battery

7250 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Huawei HarmonyOS

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix (f/1.8)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.0)

Additional features

Speakers: four speakers, Keyboard: Onscreen, 22.5W charger, USB cable, card removal tool, Quick Start Guide, 24 Months Warranty, GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1), Galileo (E1); DRM Widevine L1, fanless

Weight

485 g, Power Supply: 70 g

Price

399 Euro

Links

Huawei homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Likely Competitors

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
88.4 %	09/2021	Huawei MatePad 11 2021 SD 865, Adreno 650	485 g	7.25 mm	10.95"	2560x1600
85.9 %	01/2021	Lenovo Tab P11 Pro SD 730G, Adreno 618	485 g	5.8 mm	11.50"	2560x1600
83.1 %	05/2020	Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3	467 g	7 mm	10.40"	2000x1200
90.1 %	08/2020	Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 SD 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650	500 g	6.3 mm	11.00"	2560x1600
88 %	10/2020	Apple iPad 10.2 2020 A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU	495 g	7.5 mm	10.20"	2160x1620
78.4 %		Medion LifeTab E10802 Helio MT8768, PowerVR GE8320	503 g	8.6 mm	10.00"	1920x1200

外壳 - MatePad 11的外壳由塑料制成

华为MatePad 11的中框和背面是由塑料制成的，这很容易受到指纹的影响。不过塑料的造型看起来像金属。屏幕由某种类型的玻璃保护。尽管后置摄像头从设备上突出1.8毫米，但MatePad 11放在一个平整的表面上时不会晃动。

这块石板的结构很好。没有缝隙或锯齿状的边缘。对屏幕施加很大的压力也不会引起任何波纹效应。这款华为平板电脑既不防水也不防尘。

MatePad 11有以下颜色方案。哑光灰（德国唯一的配色方案），岛屿蓝和橄榄绿。

Size Comparison

Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Apple iPad 10.2 2020 Medion LifeTab E10802 Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite ❌

连接性 - MatePad 11有一个微型SD卡读卡器和一个USB 3.2端口

华为MatePad 11配备了一个快速的USB 3.2端口，可以实现高达5Gb/s的传输速度。支持OTG功能。这意味着许多不同的外围设备可以连接到该平板电脑。

显示屏可以用华为M-Pencil 2操作，该设备在德国随附。目前，还没有LTE版本。

读卡器

MatePad 11支持目前所有的microSD卡格式。更重要的是，支持exFAT文件系统，这意味着用户将能够在microSD卡上存储大于4GB的文件。使用我们的参考级microSD卡Angelbird AV Pro V60，华为板卡实现了良好的数据传输率。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	40.3 MB/s ∼100%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	24.4 MB/s ∼61% -39%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø41.9 (28.3-49.3)

Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø43.1 (27.9-59.2)

Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø69.3 (29-81.4)

Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø85.8 (49-90.2)

软件 - 具有DRM认证的Harmony OS 2.0

华为MatePad 11运行一个专有的操作系统，该系统基于Android 10中的Linux内核。所有Android 应用程序都与华为的Harmony OS 2.0兼容。用户可以从华为AppGallery下载应用程序，包括所有标准的EMUI应用程序。总而言之，Harmony OS和EMUI彼此相当相似。然而，Harmony OS提供了新的功能。

一些应用程序可以作为 "片段 "打开，按住它们，然后向上滑动。在片段模式下，应用程序不会占用整个屏幕。处于片段模式的应用程序也可以作为一个小部件被固定下来。

由于该平板电脑没有运行谷歌的Android ，因此不支持谷歌移动服务。可以安装个别应用程序，但如果它们需要谷歌服务，就无法使用。这在日常使用中会被证明是相当烦人的。

许多应用程序，如WhatsApp、Netflix和Spotify都不能在AppGallery中使用。当搜索这些应用程序时，AppGallery提供了替代品或建议用户尝试直接从应用程序制造商的网站下载这些应用程序。在安装APK时，用户将不得不等待安全扫描，然后手动批准安装。总而言之，这个过程并不复杂。要更新此类应用程序，你需要在AppGallery中手动选择它们。

华为平板电脑可以以高清质量播放受DRM保护的内容。Netflix应用程序显示，情况确实如此。然而，这些内容看起来并不特别好，也不是HDR格式。华为平板电脑有可能无法以全质量的方式播放高清内容。

通信和地理定位 - 精确的导航和快速的Wi-Fi

MatePad 11支持Wi-Fi 6（双频：2.4和5 GHz）。通过我们的参考级路由器Netgear Nighthawk AX 12，该平板电脑能够实现快速和稳定的数据传输率，实际上，这与快速Wi-Fi 5设备的水平相当。

华为平板电脑不支持5G、LTE或NFC。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	902 (886^min - 925^max) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	679 (653^min - 709^max) MBit/s ∼75% -25%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	645 (630^min - 659^max) MBit/s ∼72% -28%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe	459 (223^min - 497^max) MBit/s ∼51% -49%
Medion LifeTab E10802 PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 64 GB eMMC Flash	329 (99^min - 384^max) MBit/s ∼36% -64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	231 (114^min - 380^max) MBit/s ∼26% -74%
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	836 (624^min - 890^max) MBit/s ∼100% +7%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	780 (635^min - 867^max) MBit/s ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	613 (300^min - 633^max) MBit/s ∼73% -21%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	555 (508^min - 597^max) MBit/s ∼66% -29%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe	342 (291^min - 400^max) MBit/s ∼41% -56%
Medion LifeTab E10802 PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 64 GB eMMC Flash	317 (164^min - 333^max) MBit/s ∼38% -59%

Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Qualcomm Adreno 650; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø780 (635-867)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite Samsung Exynos 9611, ARM Mali-G72 MP3; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø601 (300-633)

Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Qualcomm Adreno 650; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø902 (886-925)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite Samsung Exynos 9611, ARM Mali-G72 MP3; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø231 (114-380)

MatePad 11配备了一个单频的GNSS模块。这款平板电脑能快速连接到卫星，但需要很长时间才能准确获取用户的位置。在室内，用户将不得不等待相当长的时间来获取他们的位置。

我们对MatePad 11在骑车过程中被证明比我们的专业导航仪Garmin Edge 500更准确这一事实感到相当惊讶。在这里，华为平板电脑做得非常好。

相机 - 华为平板电脑有一个坚实的摄像头和一个LED闪光灯

华为MatePad 11拥有一个800万像素的前置摄像头，可以以30 FPS的速度拍摄1080p视频。锐度和色彩还原度都处于良好水平。然而，在某些场景中，高光部分可能会被遮挡。华为平板电脑适合举行电话会议。不过，麦克风并不总是能很好地拾取声音。

后置摄像头有一个1300万像素的传感器。用主摄像头拍摄的照片变得相当暗淡。总而言之，主摄像头对于扫描文件来说是足够好的。更重要的是，有一个LED闪光灯，可以用来照亮一个场景。后置摄像头可以录制30FPS的UHD视频。奇怪的是，720p的视频也被限制在30FPS。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide angle Wide angle 5X zoom Low-light photography

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

附件和保修 - 包括M-Pencil。

华为MatePad 11配备了一个模块化电源适配器（22.5瓦），一条USB线（Type-A转Type-C），一个拆卡工具和华为M-Pencil 2与替换提示。

智能磁性键盘可以在华为网站上购买，价格为99欧元（约116美元）。华为还为MatePad 11销售一个蓝牙鼠标（39欧元/~45美元）。华为没有为MatePad 11提供保护套。然而，许多其他制造商都有。

这款平板电脑有24个月的保修期。用户可以在服务应用程序中轻松看到保修信息。

输入设备和操作 - MatePad 11支持面部解锁

华为MatePad 11有一个电容式触摸屏，可以同时识别多达10个输入。屏幕表面非常光滑。我们在审查期间没有遇到触摸屏的任何问题。

MatePad 11配备了第二代M-Pencil。它可以分辨出4096个压力级别。这支手写笔以磁力方式固定在平板电脑上。我们在使用该笔时没有遇到任何问题。就像iPad一样，MatePad 11支持手写识别。例如，用户可以通过使用M-Pencil书写将文本输入搜索框。

还有一个可选的键盘，即所谓的智能磁力键盘。它可以固定在MatePad 11的背面，在两个不同的角度保持平板电脑的稳定没有问题。QWERTY键的尺寸为13.9 x 13.9毫米，提供较短的移动距离，并有一个清晰的启动点。

该平板电脑支持2D人脸识别。脸部解锁效果很好，可以配置为直接将用户带到主屏幕。该平板电脑允许用户创建多达5个配置文件。没有指纹传感器。

显示器 - 120-Hz IPS面板

华为MatePad 11有一个10.95英寸的IPS屏幕，原始分辨率为2560x1600像素。平均亮度达到515 cd/m²。亮度水平在APL50文本中没有波动。

最低亮度在一个非常好的水平上。这就是为什么用户可以在晚上舒适地阅读书籍。MatePad 11甚至配备了一个特殊的夜间模式，可以减少屏幕产生的蓝光。此外，显示屏不依赖脉冲宽度调制（PWM）进行亮度控制。这意味着没有闪烁，而闪烁可能导致易感人群的头痛和/或眼疲劳。

黑值出奇地高（几乎为1坎德拉），这就是为什么对比度相当低。尽管如此，屏幕上的内容看起来相当有冲击力。


493 cd/m²	517 cd/m²	497 cd/m²
513 cd/m²	550 cd/m²	536 cd/m²
513 cd/m²	500 cd/m²	515 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 550 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 514.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.23 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 550 cd/m²
Contrast: 573:1 (Black: 0.96 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.3 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.3
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
98.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24

	Huawei MatePad 11 2021 IPS, 2560x1600, 10.95	Lenovo Tab P11 Pro OLED, 2560x1600, 11.50	Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite TFT, 2000x1200, 10.40	Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 LTPS, 2560x1600, 11.00	Apple iPad 10.2 2020 IPS, 2160x1620, 10.20	Medion LifeTab E10802 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.00
Screen		14%	18%	47%	24%	-28%
Brightness middle	550	372 -32%	503 -9%	554 1%	477 -13%	335 -39%
Brightness	515	375 -27%	477 -7%	535 4%	452 -12%	319 -38%
Brightness Distribution	90	95 6%	91 1%	91 1%	86 -4%	85 -6%
Black Level *	0.96		0.29 70%	0.33 66%	0.5 48%	0.29 70%
Contrast	573		1734 203%	1679 193%	954 66%	1155 102%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.3	1.8 45%	4.4 -33%	2.1 36%	2.2 33%	7.6 -130%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.9	4.2 47%	10.4 -32%	7.1 10%	5 37%	14.1 -78%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.9	2.8 43%	7.5 -53%	1.6 67%	3.3 33%	10 -104%
Gamma	2.24 ^98%	2.29 ^96%	2.19 ^100%	2.32 ^95%	2.23 ^99%	2.44 ^90%
CCT	7288 ^89%	6718 ^97%	7700 ^84%	6623 ^98%	7019 ^93%	10228 ^64%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19959 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

刚开箱时，颜色显得相当冷，而且过饱和。当使用正常配置文件时，颜色看起来更自然，它被限制在较小的sRGB色彩空间而不是DCI-P3。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
15.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3.6 ms rise
15.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 11.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.1 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10.8 ms rise
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.5 ms).

由于其明亮的屏幕，MatePad 11可以在户外使用。不过，由于屏幕表面反光，在阳光直射下很难看清显示屏。

IPS面板提供了非常好的可视角度。但在非常尖锐的角度下，亮度会略有下降。屏幕不会出现混浊现象，而且IPS的发光效果非常温和。

性能--MatePad 11中的Snapdragon 865

华为MatePad 11的特点是骁龙865，这是高通公司去年的旗舰SoC。华为平板电脑配备了6GB的内存。芯片 Adreno 650负责图形渲染。

骁龙865仍然是一个相当强大的SoC，特别是与骁龙860相比。骁龙860与价格相近的小米Pad 5和Poco X3 Pro.骁龙865在所有领域都比骁龙860快，包括AI。然而，在 Galaxy Tab S7和 iPad 8击败了华为的平板电脑。

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core
Apple iPad 10.2 2020	1116 Points ∼55% +23%
Xiaomi Poco F3	998 Points ∼49% +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7	963 Points ∼47% +6%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	905 Points ∼44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (764 - 924, n=23)	903 Points ∼44% 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	728 Points ∼36% -20%
Average of class Tablet (133 - 1719, n=40, last 2 years)	689 Points ∼34% -24%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	523 Points ∼26% -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite	345 Points ∼17% -62%
Medion LifeTab E10802	158 Points ∼8% -83%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Poco F3	3368 Points ∼12% +2%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	3288 Points ∼11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2687 - 3449, n=23)	3268 Points ∼11% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7	3201 Points ∼11% -3%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020	2772 Points ∼10% -16%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	2657 Points ∼9% -19%
Average of class Tablet (455 - 7378, n=40, last 2 years)	2360 Points ∼8% -28%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	1764 Points ∼6% -46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite	1207 Points ∼4% -63%
Medion LifeTab E10802	817 Points ∼3% -75%
OpenCL Score 5.1
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2829 - 3080, n=8)	2981 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite	1477 Points ∼1%
Vulkan Score 5.1
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2487 - 3259, n=8)	2723 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite	1081 Points ∼1%

PCMark for Android
Work 3.0
Xiaomi Poco F3	13610 Points ∼73% +17%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	11610 Points ∼63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865	11610 Points ∼63% 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	11153 Points ∼60% -4%
Average of class Tablet (4564 - 13996, n=24, last 2 years)	8932 Points ∼48% -23%
Work 2.0 performance score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7	12603 Points ∼82%
Xiaomi Poco F3	12440 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	11699 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	11699 Points ∼76%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (9202 - 15299, n=23)	11246 Points ∼74%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	7459 Points ∼49%
Average of class Tablet (4536 - 11351, n=16, last 2 years)	6788 Points ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite	5518 Points ∼36%
Medion LifeTab E10802	4536 Points ∼30%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7	9238 Points ∼82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8215 - 9611, n=20)	8915 Points ∼79%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020	6636 Points ∼59%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	3490 Points ∼31%
Average of class Tablet (504 - 7564, n=25, last 2 years)	2346 Points ∼21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite	2088 Points ∼19%
Medion LifeTab E10802	710 Points ∼6%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7	14283 Points ∼86%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (10599 - 13305, n=20)	11750 Points ∼70%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020	10023 Points ∼60%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	3526 Points ∼21%
Average of class Tablet (453 - 13334, n=25, last 2 years)	2587 Points ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite	2048 Points ∼12%
Medion LifeTab E10802	655 Points ∼4%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (3965 - 5274, n=20)	4844 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7	4482 Points ∼83%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	3371 Points ∼62%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020	3040 Points ∼56%
Average of class Tablet (674 - 3425, n=25, last 2 years)	2409 Points ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite	2199 Points ∼41%
Medion LifeTab E10802	1009 Points ∼19%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	9901 Points ∼59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8499 - 11492, n=22)	9645 Points ∼57% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7	9283 Points ∼55% -6%
Xiaomi Poco F3	7970 Points ∼47% -20%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	7752 Points ∼46% -22%
Average of class Tablet (527 - 13682, n=35, last 2 years)	4486 Points ∼27% -55%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	3668 Points ∼22% -63%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite	2074 Points ∼12% -79%
Medion LifeTab E10802	775 Points ∼5% -92%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020	Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7	13779 Points ∼32% +6%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	13005 Points ∼30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (11956 - 16809, n=22)	12921 Points ∼30% -1%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	12070 Points ∼28% -7%
Xiaomi Poco F3	12033 Points ∼28% -7%
Average of class Tablet (475 - 42751, n=35, last 2 years)	7944 Points ∼19% -39%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	3756 Points ∼9% -71%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite	2021 Points ∼5% -84%
Medion LifeTab E10802	733 Points ∼2% -94%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020	Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	5394 Points ∼78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (3956 - 5765, n=22)	5138 Points ∼75% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7	4319 Points ∼63% -20%
Xiaomi Poco F3	3653 Points ∼53% -32%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	3442 Points ∼50% -36%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	3390 Points ∼49% -37%
Average of class Tablet (806 - 5623, n=35, last 2 years)	2970 Points ∼43% -45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite	2283 Points ∼33% -58%
Medion LifeTab E10802	969 Points ∼14% -82%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020	Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (5996 - 7653, n=21)	7103 Points ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7	7098 Points ∼35%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020	4472 Points ∼22%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	2437 Points ∼12%
Average of class Tablet (281 - 6614, n=25, last 2 years)	1726 Points ∼8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite	1586 Points ∼8%
Medion LifeTab E10802	400 Points ∼2%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7	8894 Points ∼77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (6500 - 9167, n=20)	8128 Points ∼70%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020	5053 Points ∼44%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	2261 Points ∼20%
Average of class Tablet (236 - 9612, n=26, last 2 years)	1699 Points ∼15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite	1472 Points ∼13%
Medion LifeTab E10802	341 Points ∼3%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (4582 - 5209, n=20)	4941 Points ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7	4201 Points ∼71%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	3350 Points ∼57%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020	3189 Points ∼54%
Average of class Tablet (369 - 3462, n=26, last 2 years)	2406 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite	2178 Points ∼37%
Medion LifeTab E10802	1018 Points ∼17%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	8089 Points ∼68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (7517 - 8947, n=23)	8073 Points ∼68% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7	7701 Points ∼65% -5%
Xiaomi Poco F3	7377 Points ∼62% -9%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	6871 Points ∼58% -15%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020	5049 Points ∼42% -38%
Average of class Tablet (305 - 9630, n=37, last 2 years)	3692 Points ∼31% -54%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	2626 Points ∼22% -68%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite	1649 Points ∼14% -80%
Medion LifeTab E10802	455 Points ∼4% -94%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7	9893 Points ∼38% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8633 - 11999, n=22)	9501 Points ∼37% +1%
Xiaomi Poco F3	9498 Points ∼37% +1%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	9428 Points ∼37%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	8218 Points ∼32% -13%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020	6175 Points ∼24% -35%
Average of class Tablet (258 - 25707, n=37, last 2 years)	5227 Points ∼20% -45%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	2469 Points ∼10% -74%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite	1528 Points ∼6% -84%
Medion LifeTab E10802	396 Points ∼2% -96%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	5403 Points ∼68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (4733 - 5780, n=22)	5319 Points ∼67% -2%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	4367 Points ∼55% -19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7	4298 Points ∼54% -20%
Xiaomi Poco F3	4140 Points ∼52% -23%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	3380 Points ∼42% -37%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020	3082 Points ∼39% -43%
Average of class Tablet (443 - 5634, n=37, last 2 years)	2975 Points ∼37% -45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite	2280 Points ∼29% -58%
Medion LifeTab E10802	957 Points ∼12% -82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7	6292 Points ∼46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (4582 - 6961, n=20)	6202 Points ∼46%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	5406 Points ∼40%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	2293 Points ∼17%
Average of class Tablet (488 - 6019, n=24, last 2 years)	1869 Points ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite	1543 Points ∼11%
Medion LifeTab E10802	575 Points ∼4%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020	Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7	8768 Points ∼33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (7618 - 9104, n=19)	8249 Points ∼31%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	6987 Points ∼27%
Average of class Tablet (400 - 25909, n=24, last 2 years)	2657 Points ∼10%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	2186 Points ∼8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite	1437 Points ∼5%
Medion LifeTab E10802	477 Points ∼2%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020	Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1786 - 4061, n=19)	3414 Points ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7	3285 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	3017 Points ∼57%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	2766 Points ∼53%
Average of class Tablet (230 - 2811, n=24, last 2 years)	2258 Points ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite	2076 Points ∼39%
Medion LifeTab E10802	2048 Points ∼39%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020	Points ∼0%
Wild Life Score
Average of class Tablet (371 - 17263, n=30, last 2 years)	4521 Points ∼4% +18%
Xiaomi Poco F3	4288 Points ∼4% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (3789 - 5038, n=7)	3992 Points ∼4% +5%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	3818 Points ∼3%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	3488 Points ∼3% -9%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	736 Points ∼1% -81%
Medion LifeTab E10802	Points ∼0% -100%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Tablet (366 - 18326, n=28, last 2 years)	5274 Points ∼4% +38%
Xiaomi Poco F3	4271 Points ∼4% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (3789 - 5039, n=7)	3991 Points ∼3% +4%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	3823 Points ∼3%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	3455 Points ∼3% -10%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	637 Points ∼1% -83%
Medion LifeTab E10802	Points ∼0% -100%
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Tablet (135 - 5035, n=26, last 2 years)	1533 Points ∼3% +37%
Xiaomi Poco F3	1223 Points ∼3% +10%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	1116 Points ∼2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865	1116 Points ∼2% 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	987 Points ∼2% -12%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (132 - 4975, n=26, last 2 years)	1466 Points ∼3% +33%
Xiaomi Poco F3	1222 Points ∼3% +11%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	1103 Points ∼2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865	1103 Points ∼2% 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	974 Points ∼2% -12%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7	119 fps ∼4% +98%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	119 fps ∼4% +98%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (50 - 138, n=23)	75.4 fps ∼2% +26%
Xiaomi Poco F3	71 fps ∼2% +18%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020	60 fps ∼2% 0%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	60 fps ∼2%
Average of class Tablet (19 - 120, n=38, last 2 years)	58.9 fps ∼2% -2%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	55 fps ∼2% -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite	44 fps ∼1% -27%
Medion LifeTab E10802	19 fps ∼1% -68%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad 10.2 2020	239 fps ∼2% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7	225 fps ∼2% +9%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	206 fps ∼2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (168 - 266, n=23)	206 fps ∼2% 0%
Xiaomi Poco F3	200 fps ∼2% -3%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	184 fps ∼1% -11%
Average of class Tablet (14 - 588, n=38, last 2 years)	166.7 fps ∼1% -19%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	85 fps ∼1% -59%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite	48 fps ∼0% -77%
Medion LifeTab E10802	19 fps ∼0% -91%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	103 fps ∼28% +78%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7	82 fps ∼22% +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (50 - 111, n=23)	71.7 fps ∼20% +24%
Xiaomi Poco F3	60 fps ∼16% +3%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020	58 fps ∼16% 0%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	58 fps ∼16%
Average of class Tablet (9.4 - 120, n=37, last 2 years)	46.1 fps ∼13% -21%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	25 fps ∼7% -57%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite	24 fps ∼7% -59%
Medion LifeTab E10802	10 fps ∼3% -83%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7	134 fps ∼10% +6%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020	131 fps ∼10% +3%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	127 fps ∼10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (96 - 151, n=23)	123.6 fps ∼10% -3%
Xiaomi Poco F3	119 fps ∼9% -6%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	110 fps ∼9% -13%
Average of class Tablet (6.9 - 345, n=38, last 2 years)	94.9 fps ∼7% -25%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	42 fps ∼3% -67%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite	26 fps ∼2% -80%
Medion LifeTab E10802	11 fps ∼1% -91%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	74 fps ∼2% +64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (43 - 83, n=24)	60.1 fps ∼2% +34%
Xiaomi Poco F3	59 fps ∼2% +31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7	51 fps ∼1% +13%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020	49.51 fps ∼1% +10%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	45 fps ∼1%
Average of class Tablet (6.3 - 107, n=38, last 2 years)	33.8 fps ∼1% -25%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	16 fps ∼0% -64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite	14 fps ∼0% -69%
Medion LifeTab E10802	7 fps ∼0% -84%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7	93 fps ∼2% +4%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	89 fps ∼2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (67 - 103, n=24)	86 fps ∼2% -3%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020	85.8 fps ∼2% -4%
Xiaomi Poco F3	81 fps ∼2% -9%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	77 fps ∼2% -13%
Average of class Tablet (4.7 - 229, n=38, last 2 years)	64.9 fps ∼1% -27%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	30 fps ∼1% -66%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite	16 fps ∼0% -82%
Medion LifeTab E10802	6.9 fps ∼0% -92%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F3	44 fps ∼1% +63%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	44 fps ∼1% +63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (25 - 54, n=24)	40.5 fps ∼1% +50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7	32 fps ∼1% +19%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020	31.72 fps ∼1% +17%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	27 fps ∼1%
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 87, n=38, last 2 years)	23.3 fps ∼1% -14%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	9.7 fps ∼0% -64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite	9.6 fps ∼0% -64%
Medion LifeTab E10802	3.3 fps ∼0% -88%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7	57 fps ∼0% +10%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	52 fps ∼0%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020	51.3 fps ∼0% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (39 - 62, n=24)	51.1 fps ∼0% -2%
Xiaomi Poco F3	48 fps ∼0% -8%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	46 fps ∼0% -12%
Average of class Tablet (2.1 - 153.5, n=38, last 2 years)	40.2 fps ∼0% -23%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	17 fps ∼0% -67%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite	10 fps ∼0% -81%
Medion LifeTab E10802	3 fps ∼0% -94%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F3	33 fps ∼21% +83%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	29 fps ∼18% +61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (18 - 40, n=25)	27.8 fps ∼18% +54%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020	25.34 fps ∼16% +41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7	21 fps ∼13% +17%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	18 fps ∼11%
Average of class Tablet (2 - 75, n=41, last 2 years)	16.9 fps ∼11% -6%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	6.5 fps ∼4% -64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite	5.8 fps ∼4% -68%
Medion LifeTab E10802	2.3 fps ∼1% -87%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad 10.2 2020	23.09 fps ∼7% +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7	22 fps ∼7% +5%
Xiaomi Poco F3	22 fps ∼7% +5%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	21 fps ∼7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (20 - 27, n=25)	20.5 fps ∼7% -2%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	17 fps ∼5% -19%
Average of class Tablet (0.87 - 70, n=41, last 2 years)	16 fps ∼5% -24%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	6.6 fps ∼2% -69%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite	3.6 fps ∼1% -83%
Medion LifeTab E10802	1.4 fps ∼0% -93%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F3	49 fps ∼24% +69%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	45 fps ∼22% +55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (28 - 57, n=25)	43.2 fps ∼21% +49%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020	37.01 fps ∼18% +28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7	33 fps ∼16% +14%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	29 fps ∼14%
Average of class Tablet (3.2 - 102, n=41, last 2 years)	24.1 fps ∼12% -17%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	10 fps ∼5% -66%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite	9.7 fps ∼5% -67%
Medion LifeTab E10802	3.7 fps ∼2% -87%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad 10.2 2020	62.4 fps ∼8% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7	58 fps ∼8% +7%
Xiaomi Poco F3	57 fps ∼8% +6%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	54 fps ∼7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (27 - 67, n=25)	52.7 fps ∼7% -2%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	46 fps ∼6% -15%
Average of class Tablet (2.4 - 191, n=41, last 2 years)	42.7 fps ∼6% -21%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	16 fps ∼2% -70%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite	10 fps ∼1% -81%
Medion LifeTab E10802	3.9 fps ∼1% -93%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F3	680139 Points ∼57% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (628715 - 714632, n=2)	671674 Points ∼57% +7%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	628715 Points ∼53%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	563850 Points ∼48% -10%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020	549549 Points ∼46% -13%
Average of class Tablet (117837 - 1186706, n=26, last 2 years)	530398 Points ∼45% -16%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	341542 Points ∼29% -46%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F3	595585 Points ∼57% +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7	584052 Points ∼56% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (527301 - 631025, n=24)	579049 Points ∼56% +6%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	548798 Points ∼53%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	483527 Points ∼47% -12%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020	411764 Points ∼40% -25%
Average of class Tablet (75328 - 1037960, n=16, last 2 years)	371799 Points ∼36% -32%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	275660 Points ∼27% -50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite	177197 Points ∼17% -68%
Medion LifeTab E10802	89714 Points ∼9% -84%

AImark - Score v2.x
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	119152 Points ∼42%
Xiaomi Poco F3	111838 Points ∼39% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (107923 - 119152, n=3)	111673 Points ∼39% -6%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	46152 Points ∼16% -61%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	34522 Points ∼12% -71%
Average of class Tablet (4281 - 119686, n=24, last 2 years)	29184 Points ∼10% -76%
Medion LifeTab E10802	4333 Points ∼2% -96%

VRMark - Amber Room
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	6950 Score ∼91%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (4988 - 7649, n=4)	6205 Score ∼81%
Xiaomi Poco F3	5042 Score ∼66%
Average of class Tablet (676 - 5073, n=4, last 2 years)	2015 Score ∼26%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Poco F3	6356 Points ∼73% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (5264 - 6402, n=23)	5871 Points ∼67% +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7	5592 Points ∼64% +6%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	5276 Points ∼60%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	5224 Points ∼60% -1%
Average of class Tablet (806 - 6908, n=25, last 2 years)	3479 Points ∼40% -34%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	3421 Points ∼39% -35%
Medion LifeTab E10802	1185 Points ∼14% -78%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite	637 Points ∼7% -88%
System
Xiaomi Poco F3	9997 Points ∼51% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8412 - 10147, n=23)	9660 Points ∼49% 0%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	9624 Points ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7	8994 Points ∼46% -7%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	8549 Points ∼43% -11%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	6753 Points ∼34% -30%
Average of class Tablet (1492 - 10926, n=25, last 2 years)	6236 Points ∼32% -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite	4657 Points ∼24% -52%
Medion LifeTab E10802	2564 Points ∼13% -73%
Memory
Xiaomi Poco F3	7692 Points ∼85% +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (5304 - 8874, n=23)	7073 Points ∼78% +31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7	6501 Points ∼72% +21%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	5716 Points ∼63% +6%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	5388 Points ∼60%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	4053 Points ∼45% -25%
Average of class Tablet (675 - 8167, n=25, last 2 years)	3835 Points ∼42% -29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite	1670 Points ∼18% -69%
Medion LifeTab E10802	1089 Points ∼12% -80%
Graphics
Xiaomi Poco F3	12801 Points ∼44% +13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7	12048 Points ∼42% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (11366 - 13833, n=23)	11779 Points ∼41% +4%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	11366 Points ∼39%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	10549 Points ∼37% -7%
Average of class Tablet (542 - 22308, n=25, last 2 years)	6445 Points ∼22% -43%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	3875 Points ∼13% -66%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite	2154 Points ∼7% -81%
Medion LifeTab E10802	871 Points ∼3% -92%
Web
Xiaomi Poco F3	1658 Points ∼69% +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1276 - 2169, n=23)	1497 Points ∼63% +14%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro	1445 Points ∼60% +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7	1409 Points ∼59% +7%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021	1314 Points ∼55%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	1291 Points ∼54% -2%
Average of class Tablet (772 - 1581, n=25, last 2 years)	1225 Points ∼51% -7%
Medion LifeTab E10802	810 Points ∼34% -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite	10 Points ∼0% -99%

Legend

Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Qualcomm Adreno 618, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite Samsung Exynos 9611, ARM Mali-G72 MP3, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Apple iPad 10.2 2020 Apple A12 Bionic, Apple A12 Bionic GPU, 128 GB NVMe

Medion LifeTab E10802 Mediatek MT8768, PowerVR GE8320, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Qualcomm Adreno 640, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Xiaomi Poco F3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865

Average of class Tablet

在浏览器基准测试中，MatePad 11的表现相当不错，但被iPad和Galaxy Tab S7击败。由于强大的SoC和120Hz的屏幕，华为平板电脑提供了很好的网络浏览体验。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14)	123.8 Points ∼100% +86%
Average of class Tablet (15 - 184.3, n=33, last 2 years)	78.8 Points ∼64% +18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86)	71.8 Points ∼58% +8%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)	66.6 Points ∼54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (45.2 - 77, n=20)	63.6 Points ∼51% -5%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105)	47.58 Points ∼38% -29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	27.46 Points ∼22% -59%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14)	266.8 Points ∼100% +136%
Average of class Tablet (22.1 - 436, n=35, last 2 years)	150.8 Points ∼57% +34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86)	127 Points ∼48% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (74.2 - 145.1, n=21)	113.1 Points ∼42% 0%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)	112.9 Points ∼42%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105)	84.4 Points ∼32% -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	50.3 Points ∼19% -55%
Medion LifeTab E10802 (Chrome 87)	22.08 Points ∼8% -80%

WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14)	166 Points ∼100% +58%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86)	116 Points ∼70% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (97 - 127, n=23)	106.7 Points ∼64% +2%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)	105 Points ∼63%
Average of class Tablet (24 - 254, n=37, last 2 years)	103.3 Points ∼62% -2%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105)	67 Points ∼40% -36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	54 Points ∼33% -49%
Medion LifeTab E10802 (Chrome 87)	24 Points ∼14% -77%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14)	139 runs/min ∼100% +112%
Average of class Tablet (12.6 - 255, n=31, last 2 years)	83.6 runs/min ∼60% +28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86)	70.9 runs/min ∼51% +8%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)	65.5 runs/min ∼47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (30.6 - 74.5, n=19)	63.9 runs/min ∼46% -2%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105)	41.4 runs/min ∼30% -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	29.2 runs/min ∼21% -55%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14)	41443 Points ∼100% +71%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86)	26495 Points ∼64% +10%
Average of class Tablet (3111 - 66974, n=36, last 2 years)	26110 Points ∼63% +8%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)	24196 Points ∼58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (14606 - 31224, n=23)	22518 Points ∼54% -7%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105)	16476 Points ∼40% -32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	9415 Points ∼23% -61%
Medion LifeTab E10802 (Chrome 87)	4070 Points ∼10% -83%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Medion LifeTab E10802 (Chrome 87)	12342 ms * ∼100% -538%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	4872 ms * ∼39% -152%
Average of class Tablet (455 - 12972, n=37, last 2 years)	3514 ms * ∼28% -82%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Chrome 89.0.4389.105)	2888 ms * ∼23% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1623 - 2911, n=24)	2031 ms * ∼16% -5%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)	1933 ms * ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86)	1900 ms * ∼15% +2%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14)	653 ms * ∼5% +66%

* ... smaller is better

华为MatePad 11配备了非常快的UFS 3.1内存，这在这个价格范围内的设备中很少使用。

	Huawei MatePad 11 2021	Lenovo Tab P11 Pro	Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite	Samsung Galaxy Tab S7	Medion LifeTab E10802	Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		-53%	-46%	3%	-87%	12%	-47%
Sequential Read 256KB	1468	486.8 -67%	483.7 -67%	1512 3%	274.7 -81%	1574 ?(1030 - 1898, n=36) 7%	692 ?(123.3 - 2031, n=34, last 2 years) -53%
Sequential Write 256KB	708	192.3 -73%	219.3 -69%	680 -4%	101.2 -86%	768 ?(233 - 1095, n=36) 8%	370 ?(87.2 - 1559, n=34, last 2 years) -48%
Random Read 4KB	190.7	136.3 -29%	119.8 -37%	219 15%	27.36 -86%	236 ?(126.2 - 322, n=36) 24%	120.7 ?(10.1 - 310, n=34, last 2 years) -37%
Random Write 4KB	217.5	123.3 -43%	195.8 -10%	211.5 -3%	10.32 -95%	236 ?(121.4 - 323, n=36) 9%	112.3 ?(4.27 - 370, n=34, last 2 years) -48%

游戏--超过60FPS是遥不可及的事

由于强大的SoC，华为MatePad 11可以在高设置下处理所有当前的标题。不过，侧面加载的游戏不支持120-Hz刷新率。华为平板电脑可以在奶油般光滑的60FPS下运行大多数现代游戏。

在《PUBG》中，MatePad 11能够在高设置下保持稳定的40 FPS。我们对Armajet有点失望，它以30 FPS运行，尽管它应该支持120-Hz刷新率。

华为平板电脑的扬声器为游戏提供了一个体面的声场。

; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø30 (29-31)

; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.6.0: Ø59.3 (49-61)

; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 1.6.0: Ø39.9 (38-41)

排放--声音适度，性能稳定

温度

MatePad 11的表面温度永远不会太高。这款平板电脑拿在手里总是很舒服。

即使在满负荷的情况下，华为平板电脑也能保持其全部性能。

Stress Test with 3DMark Wild Life

; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø22.7 (22.7-22.9)

; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.4.2: Ø6.66 (6.65-6.67)

Max. Load

Idle


32.2 °C	31.7 °C	35.3 °C
31.9 °C	31.9 °C	33.6 °C
30.6 °C	30.8 °C	32.5 °C

Maximum: 35.3 °C
Average: 32.3 °C


30.7 °C	33.2 °C	34.7 °C
31.2 °C	32.2 °C	34.1 °C
30.1 °C	30.8 °C	32.1 °C

Maximum: 34.7 °C
Average: 32.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 32.7 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 30.4 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 34.4 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30.4 °C / 87 F.

发言人

MatePad 11的四扬声器系统由哈曼卡顿公司调校，并用华为的声音算法Histen 7.0进行优化。总而言之，华为平板电脑的扬声器听起来非常好。在这个价格范围内，没有其他平板电脑有这么好的扬声器。

用户可以通过USB端口将有线耳机或扬声器连接到平板电脑上。然而，为此，你需要一个适当的适配器。该平板电脑有一个蓝牙5.1模块，支持以下无线音频编解码：SBC、AAC和LDAC。不幸的是，华为自己的高清晰度编解码器（L2HC），即华为FreeBuds Studio中使用的编解码器，不被支持。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Huawei MatePad 11 2021 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

能源管理--电池运行时间长和快速充电

能源消耗

华为MatePad 11是一款相当节能的平板电脑。然而，现在有一些平板电脑甚至更节能。

MatePad 11配备了一个22.5瓦的电源适配器，为设备充满电大约需要2小时。将平板电脑从0%充到50%需要44分钟。在80分钟内，该平板电脑可以从0%充到80%。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.08 / 0.29 Watt
Idle	1.33 / 5.37 / 5.41 Watt