Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
MagyarOneXPlayer 2评测--配备AMD Zen3+和可拆卸控制器的游戏掌机
游戏掌机正在慢慢走出小众化的生存状态，最迟自去年Steam Deck的成功以来，选择越来越多。制造商One-Netbook也提供了几款掌机，包括我们今天测试的OneXPlayer 2。与像Steam Deck或最近测试的 ROG Ally，OneXPlayer 2看起来更像任天堂Switch，因为侧面的两个控制器可以被移除。
硬件是著名的 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U加上快速的Radeon 680M iGPU，驱动8.4英寸IPS显示屏，分辨率为2560 x 1600像素。内存和固态硬盘有多种选择，最高可达32GB/2TB。我们的评测样本分别配备了16GB和1TB固态硬盘。该设备的价格目前约为1,100欧元。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84 % | 07/2023 | One Netbook XPlayer 2 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M | 864 g | 23 mm | 8.40" | 2560x1600 | |
| 87.5 % | 05/2023 | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M | 611 g | 21.22 mm | 7.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| Valve Steam Deck 512 GB LCD , | 669 g | 49 mm | 7.00" | 1280x800 | |||
| 80.3 % | 03/2023 | GPD Win 4 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M | 607 g | 28 mm | 6.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84.5 % | 07/2022 | GPD Win Max 2 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1 kg | 23 mm | 10.10" | 2560x1600 | |
| 86.3 % | 11/2021 | GPD Pocket 3 i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 730 g | 20 mm | 8.00" | 1920x1200 |
案例与设备
OneXPlayer 2有白色或黑色两种颜色，每种情况下都有橙色光元素（但可以禁用）。外壳由塑料制成，做工尚可，但侧面控制器的两个连接处在结构上造成了很小的偏差。不过，连接机制本身运作良好，控制器也能整齐地卡住。中央部分最终是一个带有集成脚架的小平板，所有部件都安装在其中。一个有点恼人的事实是，两个控制器没有电池，因此在断开连接时只能用一个额外的适配器工作，这个适配器必须单独购买。另外，你当然也可以通过USB或蓝牙连接一个普通的控制器。
OneXPlayer 2提供广泛的端口，包括2个USB-C（1个USB 4.0），一个microSD读卡器，甚至一个普通的USB-A端口。还安装了一个普通的M.2-2280固态硬盘，但整个设备必须被拆下才能使用。由于有了USB 4.0，即使是外部显卡也可以在家里连接到设备上。microSD读卡器的速度甚至真的很快，最高可达246MB/s，因此也可以作为内存扩展使用。英特尔的AX210卡作为WLAN模块，因此也支持现代Wi-Fi 6连接。我们在测试中没有遇到任何连接问题，传输速率也很好。这款手持设备不提供网络摄像头。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| GPD Win Max 2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (17.6 - 205, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Win 4 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Valve Steam Deck 512 GB LCD (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| GPD Win Max 2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (16.8 - 266, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Win 4 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Networking | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| GPD Win 4 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 |
|
| iperf3 receive AX12 |
|
操作--没有优化的Windows
使用Windows 11 Home作为操作系统，但没有针对触摸操作进行任何调整。两个操纵杆可用于指针控制和滚动，这有点笨拙，但基本上可以使用。然而，与Steam Deck或ROG Ally不同，没有中央软件可以用来安装/启动游戏或调整设置等。在这里，仅限于一个名为Gamer Zone的小型控制中心，它允许你改变CPU的性能、振动和亮度以及音量。这个菜单相当实用，而且总是可以通过专用按钮进入，但我们希望在这里也能看到一个FPS锁，比如说。另一个缺点是，它是一个独立的应用程序，而不是一个覆盖，这就是为什么你不能在游戏中使用它，但它被扔到了桌面上。
操纵杆本身给人留下了体面的印象，我们在测试过程中对按钮没有任何问题。然而，特别是上侧的触发器并没有留下特别高质量的印象，控制器支持振动功能。电容式触摸屏本身的工作没有问题，正如预期的那样。总而言之，你只需注意到没有特别的软件优化，不幸的是，Windows主要通过触摸屏操作仍然不理想。
显示屏 - IPS面板，WQHD分辨率
8.4英寸的IPS面板提供了2,560 x 1,600像素的高分辨率（16:10，WQHD），但只有60 Hz。主观的画面印象非常好，所有内容都很清晰。此外，明亮的表面看起来没有颗粒感。然而，也有一个明显的蓝色偏移，颜色整体看起来非常冷。我们的分析证实了这一点，但制造商设法实现了宣传的250cd/m²的亮度。事实上，我们的样品的平均亮度略高于360 cd/m²，最大亮度几乎达到390 cd/m²。黑值也同样不错，最大对比度超过1300:1。
然而，颜色的准确性还有待提高，即使在我们的校准之后，仍然有很大的偏差。灰度和偏色包括色温都在控制之中，但亮度下降了大约70cd/m²。竞争对手总体上提供了更好的速率，在响应时间方面也是如此。我们无法检测到PWM。视角的稳定性很好，但由于高反射的触摸屏，在户外有反射的问题。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 369 cd/m²
Contrast: 1318:1 (Black: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 2.6
ΔE Greyscale 8.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
71.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
75.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.01
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 FLQ8423, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.40 | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme TL070FVSX01-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7.00 | Valve Steam Deck 512 GB LCD 1280x800, 7.00 | GPD Win 4 G1618-04, IPS, 1920x1080, 6.00 | GPD Win Max 2 Toshiba HX_10.1_LCD, IPS, 2560x1600, 10.10 | GPD Pocket 3 Digital Flat Panel, IPS, 1920x1200, 8.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -8% | -10% | -6% | -27% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 75.4 | 65.6 -13% | 63.1 -16% | 69.8 -7% | 51.1 -32% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 97 | 92.1 -5% | 92 -5% | 91 -6% | 74.7 -23% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 71.1 | 67.9 -5% | 64.6 -9% | 66.6 -6% | 52.8 -26% | |
| Response Times | 73% | 27% | 18% | 30% | -19% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 36.8 ? | 10.5 ? 71% | 30.1 ? 18% | 26.8 ? 27% | 21.2 ? 42% | 37.2 ? -1% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 22.8 ? | 6 ? 74% | 14.5 ? 36% | 20.9 ? 8% | 18.7 ? 18% | 31.2 ? -37% |
| PWM Frequency | 1080 ? | |||||
| Screen | 18% | 8% | -4% | 7% | 2% | |
| Brightness middle | 369 | 513 39% | 517 40% | 413.1 12% | 396.7 8% | 438.4 19% |
| Brightness | 363 | 474 31% | 524 44% | 407 12% | 381 5% | 421 16% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 84 -6% | 97 9% | 81 -9% | 89 0% | 92 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.28 | 0.38 -36% | 0.47 -68% | 0.39 -39% | 0.36 -29% | 0.4 -43% |
| Contrast | 1318 | 1350 2% | 1100 -17% | 1059 -20% | 1102 -16% | 1096 -17% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.1 | 3.7 48% | 5.7 20% | 6.97 2% | 6.31 11% | 5.02 29% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.9 | 8.3 24% | 10.5 4% | 14.11 -29% | 10.23 6% | 9.59 12% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.6 | 1.24 52% | 1.44 45% | 4.05 -56% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.3 | 5.1 39% | 5.7 31% | 9.9 -19% | 5.5 34% | 4 52% |
| Gamma | 2.01 109% | 2.14 103% | 2.18 101% | 2.04 108% | 2.17 101% | 2.29 96% |
| CCT | 8838 74% | 7732 84% | 7733 84% | 9571 68% | 7502 87% | 7087 92% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 28% /
20% | 18% /
12% | 1% /
-2% | 10% /
8% | -15% /
-7% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 36.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19.9 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
性能 - AMD Zen3+
我们在以下基准和测量中默认使用28瓦的TDP，这是最高的性能值。的 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U提供8个Zen3+核心，多核心性能也非常好，最重要的是稳定。然而，在所有基准测试中，单核性能低于平均水平，但这几乎没有被注意到，至少在日常使用中。在这里，OneXPlayer仍然反应灵敏，特别是当你还在外部屏幕上使用它时（最好是通过USB-C），那么你可以把它当作一台完全正常的PC来使用。
Radeon 680M的图形性能完全满足我们的期望，也与GPD Win4、the ROG Ally与新的 Ryzen Z1 Extreme然而，在CPU和GPU测试中都更快。在长时间的负载以及电池模式下，OneXPlayer 2的性能没有下降。
1TB固态硬盘在出厂时被分成两个分区（首次启动后有409GB+499GB空闲），PCIe 3.0 x4固态硬盘的传输率在3GB/s左右，很不错。此外，即使在较长的负载下，这里的性能仍然稳定。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 -2! | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4624 - 30789, n=101, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (9130 - 11741, n=7) | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2110, n=99, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (878 - 1534, n=7) | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1783 - 11768, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (3529 - 4574, n=8) | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (341 - 812, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (341 - 602, n=8) | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class Multimedia (785 - 4703, n=106, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (1463 - 1979, n=7) | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (142.6 - 308, n=99, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (142.6 - 246, n=6) | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (272 - 347, n=7) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (107 - 662, n=95, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class Multimedia (20166 - 119900, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (40058 - 53934, n=6) | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7163, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (3398 - 5511, n=6) | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3828 - 23059, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (6854 - 8935, n=9) | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class Multimedia (926 - 2342, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (926 - 1555, n=9) | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4.99 - 30.5, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (11.8 - 14.2, n=6) | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (50.1 - 84.9, n=6) | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 84.9, n=92, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3804 - 27411, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (10902 - 12818, n=6) | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (67503 - 84031, n=6) | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (16379 - 136048, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1099 - 6681, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (2296 - 2818, n=6) | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 134321, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (62082 - 96306, n=6) | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (7753 - 11982, n=6) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3099 - 15484, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (37417 - 45748, n=6) | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (9602 - 68591, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (50547 - 115681, n=6) | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class Multimedia (23702 - 169946, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class Multimedia (302 - 1901, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (554 - 755, n=6) | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1996 - 14590, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (5825 - 6694, n=6) | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (24728 - 27274, n=6) | |
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4635 - 8670, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (5057 - 6639, n=7) | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (8143 - 10766, n=6) | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (5845 - 11186, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (6089 - 9328, n=6) | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4688 - 13548, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (6066 - 8144, n=6) | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1009 - 2146, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (1009 - 1575, n=7) | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (971 - 2064, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (971 - 1596, n=7) | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2865, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (1054 - 1686, n=7) | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (926 - 2171, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (994 - 1473, n=7) | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5057 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (20513 - 94254, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (47010 - 52159, n=6) | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 90142, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (39197 - 45084, n=6) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 95196, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (48723 - 51117, n=6) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (106.3 - 123.1, n=6) | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (75 - 346, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
* ... smaller is better
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
* ... smaller is better
| Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| Global Average -3 | |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
| 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| Average AMD Radeon 680M | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 9184 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6490 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 2673 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD | |
| Average of class Multimedia (110 - 683, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Radeon 680M (270 - 555, n=29) | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| Average AMD Radeon 680M (389 - 572, n=29) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (190 - 1374, n=83, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
* ... smaller is better
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=99, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4.24 - 123, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6.53 - 141.8, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (11 - 233, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Average of class Multimedia (26.3 - 171.6, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (23 - 131.1, n=95, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Win 4 | |
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
| GPD Win Max 2 | |
| Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
| GPD Pocket 3 | |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
| GTA V (2015) | 138.6 | 60.7 | 49.6 | 24.5 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 36 | 23.1 | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 93.7 | 86.7 | 71.7 | 63.1 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 32.5 | 23.9 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 53.1 | 39 | 33.5 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 143.5 | 56.7 | 47 | 40.9 |
| F1 2021 (2021) | 133.1 | 92.3 | 64.4 | |
| F1 22 (2022) | 77.3 | 65.4 | 52.5 | 13.1 |
排放与能源
即使在要求不高的任务中，OneXPlayer 2的风扇也经常处于活动状态，然后也以近32 dB(A)的速度运行，这一点可以清楚地注意到。降低TDP设置有一些帮助，但在日常使用中，它并不是一个真正安静的设备。在游戏时，这又取决于处理器的配置，因为我们测量到28瓦的全功率下有43分贝（A）。如果你把处理器的功率降到15瓦，它就会有一个更令人愉快的35.7分贝（A）。
游戏时的电池寿命也得益于TDP降低到15瓦，因为Witcher 3 （高设置，150cd/m²）可以运行142分钟，而在28瓦和超细节的情况下，只有96分钟。在这里，65.5瓦的大电池起到了积极的作用，这也使得WLAN测试中的运行时间非常好（10.5小时@150cd/m²，8.5小时@最高亮度）。
游戏时，表面温度完全不是问题，因为只有中央部分会变热，而控制器总是保持令人愉快的凉爽。底部的两个立体声扬声器可以变得非常响亮，声音总体上是好的，但它缺乏低音，结果是不太强大。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 26.1 / 31.6 / 31.6 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 35.7 / 43.3 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 26.1 dB(A) | ||
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM | Valve Steam Deck 512 GB LCD , | GPD Win 4 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB | GPD Win Max 2 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB | GPD Pocket 3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1195G7, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 10% | 9% | -10% | 10% | 9% | |
| off / environment * | 26.1 | 23.3 11% | 24.3 7% | 24 8% | 22.6 13% | 23.4 10% |
| Idle Minimum * | 26.1 | 23.3 11% | 24.3 7% | 31.2 -20% | 23.7 9% | 24.3 7% |
| Idle Average * | 31.6 | 23.3 26% | 24.3 23% | 31.2 1% | 23.7 25% | 25.6 19% |
| Idle Maximum * | 31.6 | 27.3 14% | 30 5% | 33.5 -6% | 28.5 10% | 25.6 19% |
| Load Average * | 35.7 | 39.2 -10% | 45.5 -27% | 36.5 -2% | 38.3 -7% | |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 43.3 | 39.2 9% | 40.7 6% | 48.6 -12% | 39.8 8% | 40.7 6% |
| Load Maximum * | 43.3 | 39.2 9% | 40.7 6% | 49 -13% | 40.5 6% | 40.7 6% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41 °C / 105.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-12.2 °C / -22 F).
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M | GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M | GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 6% | 22% | 24% | 1% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 42.6 | 44.4 -4% | 35 18% | 28.6 33% | 40.4 5% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 39.6 | 37.9 4% | 26.8 32% | 33 17% | 39.4 1% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 32.4 | 29.9 8% | 28.4 12% | 24.6 24% | 32.6 -1% |
| Idle Bottom * | 34.3 | 28.3 17% | 25 27% | 27.6 20% | 34.4 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
One Netbook XPlayer 2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.58 / 0.65 Watt |
| Idle | 7.2 / 9.3 / 9.7 Watt |
| Load |
33.1 / 50.7 Watt |
   
| |
Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test
| One Netbook XPlayer 2 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 65.5 Wh | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, 40 Wh | GPD Win 4 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 46 Wh | GPD Win Max 2 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 70 Wh | GPD Pocket 3 i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 39 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -34% | -28% | -17% | -43% | -12% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 628 | 465 -26% | 450 -28% | 523 -17% | 360 -43% | 572 ? -9% |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 96 | 57 -41% | 81.8 ? -15% |
Pros
Cons
评语--有趣的掌上电脑，但缺乏优化
OneXPlayer 2实际上是一个带有触摸屏和可附加控制器的小型迷你PC，因此与其他手持设备如Steam Deck或华硕ROG Ally不同。这带来了一些优势，例如在手柄的温度或应用的可能性方面。例如，控制器可以像任天堂的Switch一样被拆下，单独使用，例如作为沙发上的控制器。然而，这里的情况并没有完全考虑清楚，因为控制器不提供电池，需要单独购买一个适配器。
该设备看起来也相对笨重和厚实，但这反过来也使大电池和包括USB-C 4.0在内的大量端口成为可能。因此，OneXPlayer 2也可以用外部GPU操作，例如在家里的桌子上。性能产量的 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U和手持设备的性能不必在永久负载或电池模式下节流。电池寿命主要取决于所选设置和游戏时的TDP。附带的控制软件提供了最重要的设置，但我们缺少进一步的优化，缺少一个用于游戏库的中央软件，或者仅仅是一个覆盖，你也可以在游戏时改变设置。根据设置，我们可以合理地玩大约1.5-2.5小时，这并不是一个糟糕的表现。在WLAN或视频模式下，在调整亮度的情况下，这款掌上电脑也很容易持续10小时以上。
性能不错，但在操作上有弱点，而且显示效果不是特别好：OneXPlayer 2是一款令人兴奋的游戏掌上电脑，具有广泛的应用可能性，但并非所有的功能都被充分考虑。此外，该设备非常昂贵，超过1,000欧元。
除了缺乏软件优化，包括不良校准在内的显示屏也有些令人失望，因为它既没有提供更高的频率，也没有快速的响应时间。价格当然也是一个很大的障碍，因为虽然你可以购买较小的 ROG Ally你已经可以用800欧元买到包括120赫兹显示屏的新Zen4处理器，但你必须为我们的测试设备支付约1100欧元，而拥有更多内存的版本很快就会达到1500欧元。
价格和可用性
OneXPlayer2目前在各零售商处有售。我们的测试设备配有16GB内存/1TB，在美国亚马逊上的售价约为1480美元。
One Netbook XPlayer 2
-
07/06/2023 v7
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.
Pricecompare
