Notebookcheck Logo

摩托罗拉Moto G22评测 - 廉价的预算智能手机,有严重的假象

有利于进入,Android 12。 Moto G22的主要优势在于其价格。不到170欧元(约180美元)就有NFC、50MP摄像头和90Hz面板。摩托罗拉还在其入门级手机中关注最新的Android ,并改进了数据保护功能。尽管存在一些缺点,但计算结果是否可行?
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Touchscreen Smartphone
测试摩托罗拉Moto G22

摩托G22摩托罗拉希望解决价格敏感的买家群体,因为这款拥有4GB工作内存的低预算手机的零售价仅为169欧元(约合179美元)。然而,在Moto G22的配置上必须做出一些妥协,例如,动力不足的 联发科SoC,不得不接受。另一方面,亮点之一可能是四摄像头,包括一个5000万像素的主摄像头。

这款重达185克(约6.5盎司)的Moto智能手机还拥有5000毫安时容量的电池,可通过USB-C充电,充电功率高达15瓦。摩托罗拉还在其入门级智能手机中安装了一个帧率为90赫兹的6.5英寸LCD,但分辨率只有1600 x 720像素。

Motorola Moto G22 (Moto Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G37 8 x 1.8 - 2.3 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
Memory
4096 MB 
Display
6.50 inch 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixel 270 PPI, Capacitve Touchscreen, IPS LCD, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 52 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, , OTG, Status LED, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B38/​B40/​B41), Dual SIM, LTE
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.5 x 164 x 75
Battery
5000 mAh
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (ƒ/1,8, 0,64 µm) + 8 MP (ƒ/2,2, 1,12 µm) + 2 MP (ƒ/2,4, 1,75 µm) + 2 MP (ƒ/2,4, 1,75 µm)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (ƒ/2,45, 1,0 µm)
Additional features
Speakers: Mono, charger, USB cable, MyUX, 24 Months Warranty, SAR value 0.840W/​kg Head, 1.490W/​kg Body, widevine L1, fanless
Weight
185 g, Power Supply: 51 g
Price
169 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
75.1 %
05/2022
Motorola Moto G22
Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320
185 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
78.5 %
03/2022
Nokia G21
T606, Mali-G57 MP1
190 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
78.4 %
12/2021
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2
190 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.30"2340x1080
78.6 %
01/2022
Motorola Moto G31
Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2
181 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.40"2400x1080
80.5 %
01/2022
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2
195 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2400x1080
77.7 %
08/2021
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2
186 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.40"1600x720

保护壳 - Moto G22 with Punch Hole

冰山蓝的Moto G22
冰山蓝的Moto G22
珍珠白的Moto G22
珍珠白的Moto G22

Moto G22的正面由防刮的显示玻璃制成,与塑料框架平齐。由于下巴明显,很明显,这款摩托手机是一款相对廉价的智能手机。然而,由于采用了冲孔式切割,显示屏占据了正面的很大一部分,超过84%。

背面使用了一种名为PMMA的热塑性材料。这种材料感觉很吸引人,指纹被很好地掩盖了。除了黑色的变体,还有冰山蓝和珍珠白的颜色选择。由于背面是平的,由于有棱有角的设计,我们对人体工程学只有部分的信服。

Moto G22没有IP认证,但制造商宣传说有防水设计,这应该可以提供保护,防止与水的适度接触,如不小心打翻的饮料、水溅或小雨。然而,摩托罗拉手机不应浸泡在水或其他液体中。

测试摩托罗拉Moto G22
测试摩托罗拉Moto G22
测试摩托罗拉Moto G22
测试摩托罗拉Moto G22
测试摩托罗拉Moto G22
测试摩托罗拉Moto G22
测试摩托罗拉Moto G22

尺寸比较

164.6 mm 75.9 mm 8.5 mm 190 g164 mm 75 mm 8.5 mm 185 g163.56 mm 75.78 mm 8.75 mm 195 g161.9 mm 73.9 mm 8.6 mm 181 g159.3 mm 73.6 mm 8.4 mm 186 g158.3 mm 75.3 mm 8.4 mm 190 g

设备 - 带有3.5毫米插孔的摩托罗拉智能手机

Moto G22的内部eMMC存储容量只有64GB。由于预装的软件,如操作系统或应用程序,用户可用的存储空间被限制在52GB。然而,可以用一张microSD卡来扩展这款双SIM卡智能手机的存储空间。外围设备,如U盘,也可以通过安装的USB端口使用OTG适配器连接。支持USB 2.0标准的USB Type-C端口也被用来为5000毫安时的电池充电。

这款入门级手机的其他设备清单包括一个用于通知的状态LED和一个3.5毫米插孔。由于没有通过Widevine L1的认证程序,所以用Moto G22不能以高清质量观看Netflix、Amazon Prime Video和其他视频流服务的视频内容。支持通过Miracast无线传输外部显示器上的显示内容。

外壳的左侧(卡槽)
外壳的左侧(卡槽)
上部外壳一侧(3.5毫米插孔)。
上部外壳一侧(3.5毫米插孔)。
外壳右侧(钥匙)
外壳右侧(钥匙)
底部外壳(扬声器、USB端口、麦克风)
底部外壳(扬声器、USB端口、麦克风)

微型SD卡读卡器

我们用AV PRO V60参考存储卡仔细观察一下内存插槽的速度。CPDT基准测试和JPEG复制测试的结果都证实了Moto G22的良好性能。虽然摩托罗拉智能手机的24MB/s只是平均水平,但内存插槽在连续读取时的高速度令人信服。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
44.2 MB/s ∼100% +82%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
24.3 MB/s ∼55%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
20.6 MB/s ∼47% -15%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
17.7 MB/s ∼40% -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro)
15.71 MB/s ∼36% -35%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
15.47 MB/s ∼35% -36%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Motorola Moto G22 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird V60: Ø35.9 (20.7-46.1)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential write: Ø32.2 (24.3-39.7)
Motorola Moto G22 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird V60: Ø72.5 (27.9-75.8)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential read: Ø54.7 (8-62.4)

软件 - 摩托罗拉智能手机与Android 12

摩托罗拉通过其MyUX界面提供了一个结构良好的系统界面,在12版中补充了谷歌的Android 。熟悉的Moto Experiences也在其中,还有许多自定义选项,用于调整字体或颜色和指纹传感器动画。摩托G22不提供内部的Ready For功能。

入门级测试设备上的安全补丁从2022年2月开始更新。据摩托罗拉德国公司称,前2年的更新,即到2024年,可升级到Android 13。还实施了名为ThinkShield for Mobile的硬件和软件安全功能,所以应该有一个特殊的保护,以防止恶意软件、网络钓鱼和网络攻击。

测试摩托罗拉Moto G22
测试摩托罗拉Moto G22
测试摩托罗拉Moto G22

通信和GNSS - 带有NFC的Moto G22

在通信模块方面,摩托罗拉依靠蓝牙5.0版本和一个NFC芯片,通过谷歌支付进行非接触式支付。集成的Wi-Fi模块支持IEEE 802.11标准a/b/g/n/ac。结合我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器,Moto G22实现了超过300Mbps的传输速率,考虑到价格范围,这很好。

然而,使用移动互联网必须接受一些缺点。安装的蜂窝调制解调器只覆盖9个LTE频率。在这个国家使用的LTE频段28不被支持。使用Helio G37不可能接入5G网络。 Helio G37由于频率多样性有限,在旅行中使用Moto G22可能会有问题。

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (72.5 - 1736, n=36, last 2 years)
704 MBit/s ∼100% +116%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
326 (305min - 332max) MBit/s ∼46%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
299 (224min - 315max) MBit/s ∼42% -8%
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (78.3 - 1710, n=36, last 2 years)
716 MBit/s ∼100% +94%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
370 (351min - 376max) MBit/s ∼52%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
339 (328min - 362max) MBit/s ∼47% -8%
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1395, n=236, last 2 years)
481 MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
347 (338min - 353max) MBit/s ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
346 (267min - 353max) MBit/s ∼72%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
346 (334min - 352max) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1348, n=236, last 2 years)
469 MBit/s ∼100%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
353 (261min - 359max) MBit/s ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
328 (255min - 340max) MBit/s ∼70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
320 (290min - 330max) MBit/s ∼68%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø325 (305-332)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø370 (351-376)
在建筑物内定位
在建筑物内定位
户外定位
户外定位

为了评估摩托罗拉手机在实践中的定位精度,我们用Garmin Venu 2记录了一条路线进行比较。尽管在2.5公里(约1.6英里)的测试路线终点,Moto G22和Garmin智能手表之间只有10米(约33英尺)的距离,但定位仍然可以更准确一些。入门级智能手机的偏差在详细的GPS记录中清晰可见,但使用Moto G22应该仍然可以完成导航任务。

入门级智能手机通过主要的卫星系统确定位置。GPS、伽利略、GLONASS和北斗。信号强度不是很明显,SNR值为24.3。

定位Garmin Venu 2
定位Garmin Venu 2
追踪摩托罗拉Moto G22
追踪摩托罗拉Moto G22

手机功能和语音质量 - 摩托罗拉双卡手机

测试摩托罗拉Moto G22
测试摩托罗拉Moto G22

摩托手机有空间容纳两张nano-SIM卡。但是,在使用双SIM卡功能时,仍然可以使用microSD卡作为内存扩展。通过移动网络的语音质量还可以。然而,噪音在嘈杂的环境中非常明显,这也是因为只安装了一个麦克风,这可能使有效的噪音抑制变得困难。

在测试中,使用内置前置摄像头通过Skype进行视频通话没有问题。通过安装的单声道扬声器进行的通话质量处于良好水平。

照相机 - 摩托罗拉智能手机,50MP

使用Moto G22的人像
使用Moto G22的人像
与Moto G22的自拍
与Moto G22的自拍

前置摄像头被放置在中央的冲孔凹槽中,分辨率为16MP。对于一款入门级手机来说,其结果是可敬的。用Moto G22拍摄的自拍有扎实的基本锐度,人像模式下的曝光和模糊看起来很连贯,即使明亮的背景被显示出来也会被烧掉。

摩托罗拉宣传主摄像头的5000万像素传感器是其亮点之一。它将四个0.64微米的小像素组合成一个大的四像素,从而提供了12.5MP的照片分辨率。三星ISOCELL JN1的传感器尺寸为1/2.76英寸,与Moto G22的f/1.8的开放光圈一起工作。

使用5000万像素传感器的照片具有良好的动态和可用的清晰度。然而,对于这款入门级手机来说,拍摄对象的焦距相对较弱。在弱光环境下,尽管有像素分选,但图像的锐度还是很低。摩托罗拉优化得非常好的是--除了白平衡之外--是色彩匹配。图像看起来对比强烈,但没有过度饱和。用ColorChecker Passport进行的分析也显示,与实际参考颜色相比,偏差相对较小。

除了主摄像头,摩托罗拉手机还有一个800万像素的超广角镜头,一个用于微距拍摄的200万像素镜头和一个200万像素的深度传感器。超广角镜头具有118°的宽广视野,当然可以用于社交媒体内容,但图像质量不足以满足更多要求。广角镜头的动态范围很低,有伪影和明显的模糊,不仅是在周边地区。

用超广角镜头拍摄的视频被限制在全高清质量的上限。使用5000万像素的传感器,移动图像也只能以30帧/秒的速度记录到1080p。在运行中的视频记录中,不可能在两种光学器件之间进行切换。

宏观
主摄像头
5倍变焦
8倍变焦
测试摩托罗拉Moto G22
测试摩托罗拉Moto G22
测试摩托罗拉Moto G22

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow LightWide angle
click to load images
ColorChecker
9 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
3 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G22: 6.05 ∆E min: 1.2 - max: 12.39 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.4 ∆E
54.1 ∆E
39.1 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
44.7 ∆E
61.9 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
35.2 ∆E
42.3 ∆E
28 ∆E
64.5 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
47.2 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
75.4 ∆E
42.7 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
88.4 ∆E
70.2 ∆E
52 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G22: 46.36 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 88.42 ∆E

附件和保修 - Moto G22带电源适配器

摩托G22的10瓦特电源
摩托G22的10瓦特电源

Moto G22配备了一个模块化的10瓦电源和一条USB线。摩托罗拉没有为其入门级手机配备保护套。

保修 保修期是购买日期后的24个月。Moto智能手机的机械故障保险期为12个月,可选择延长保险,保险费约为20欧元(约21美元)。

输入设备和操作 - 带有FaceUnlock的摩托罗拉手机

Moto G22有一个电容式触摸屏,可以同时识别多达四个触摸点。输入是精确实现的。90赫兹的刷新率使滚动比原生的60赫兹面板更流畅,但系统被缓慢的SoC拖慢了,所以较高刷新率的优势并不完全有效。

位于电源键上的指纹传感器确保了安全。识别率很吸引人,但在Moto G22脱离待机状态之前需要很长的时间。通过前置摄像头的人脸识别也能可靠地解锁这款入门级手机,但这种二维方法相当不安全。

测试摩托罗拉Moto G22
测试摩托罗拉Moto G22
测试摩托罗拉Moto G22

显示器 - 摩托G22,90赫兹

子像素表示法
子像素表示法

Moto G22的LCD屏幕对角线尺寸为6.5英寸,提供20:9格式的HD+分辨率,相当于1,600 x 720像素。IPS面板的原生分辨率导致其像素密度低于300 ppi,因此内容相对模糊。采用1080p屏幕的竞争对手提供了明显更好的图像清晰度。

当显示纯白色的表面时,液晶显示器实现了451cd/m²的稳固亮度,并有一个激活的环境光传感器来控制显示亮度。此外,我们在测试中检查了Moto G22的最大亮度,黑暗和明亮区域的份额均匀分布(APL50)。在这里,我们可以确定类似473cd/m²的亮度。幸运的是,没有使用PWM。

421
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
441
cd/m²
451
cd/m²
413
cd/m²
433
cd/m²
460
cd/m²
428
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 460 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 430.6 cd/m² Minimum: 11.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 451 cd/m²
Contrast: 902:1 (Black: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.82 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
93.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.776
Motorola Moto G22
IPS LCD, 1600x720, 6.50
Nokia G21
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
IPS LCD, 2340x1080, 6.30
Motorola Moto G31
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.40
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
TFT-LCD, 2400x1080, 6.60
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Super AMOLED, 1600x720, 6.40
Screen
0%
32%
28%
7%
-10%
Brightness middle
451
492
9%
496
10%
423
-6%
504
12%
349
-23%
Brightness
431
484
12%
491
14%
425
-1%
499
16%
352
-18%
Brightness Distribution
90
86
-4%
91
1%
94
4%
91
1%
92
2%
Black Level *
0.5
0.46
8%
0.19
62%
0.72
-44%
Contrast
902
1070
19%
2611
189%
700
-22%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.82
6.02
-3%
5.5
5%
1.58
73%
3.3
43%
5.87
-1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.3
9.13
2%
8.88
5%
4.68
50%
6
35%
15.51
-67%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5
7.1
-42%
6.6
-32%
2.7
46%
4.1
18%
2.7
46%
Gamma
2.776 79%
2.345 94%
2.36 93%
2.219 99%
2.28 96%
2.07 106%
CCT
7683 85%
8918 73%
8432 77%
6674 97%
7041 92%
6970 93%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21940 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

在我们的显示测量中,Moto G22的IPS面板达到了0.5cd/m²的黑值,即使对于这个价格范围内的LC显示屏来说,这也有点多。因此,对比度明显低于1:1000的标准,黑色区域有轻微的灰雾。

显示器的颜色分析是在光谱仪和CalMAN软件的帮助下进行的。颜色(5.8)和灰度(5.0)表示的偏差在颜色配置文件标准中是比较高的。显示器的色温也被校准得太冷了--在实践中可以看到略带蓝色的偏色。

色彩准确性(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:自然)。
色彩准确性(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:AdobeRGB,配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:AdobeRGB,配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:P3,配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:P3,配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:自然)。
灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:自然)。
灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:自然)。
色彩饱和度(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:自然)。
色彩饱和度(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:自然)。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 72 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (37 ms).

在户外,Moto智能手机给人留下了满意的印象--至少在多云的天空下。IPS面板的亮度确保了在户外的可读性,但应避免反射。在阳光直射下几乎看不到内容。

在正常观看时,显示屏的可视角度处于良好水平。然而,当面板稍微倾斜时,亮度下降非常明显。

测试摩托罗拉Moto G22
测试摩托罗拉Moto G22
测试摩托罗拉Moto G22

性能 - 采用联发科SoC的摩托罗拉手机

Moto G22配备了一个 Helio G37,是联发科的12纳米SoC。该处理器有8个Cortex-A53核心,比Helio G35支持更多的CPU。 Helio G35具有90赫兹的面板。这家台湾制造商的Helio G系列应该是为了吸引游戏玩家,特别是PowerVR GE8320从2014年开始,但用户不应该对它有太多期望。

结合4GB LPDDR4X内存,摩托罗拉手机中的Helio G37提供了一个非常平庸的系统性能。尽管有90赫兹的面板,但动画看起来并不流畅,系统挂起是用户体验的特点。在执行多任务时,性能会急剧下降,所以Moto G22经常无法使用几分钟。虽然工作内存实际上很稳固,但复杂的应用程序,特别是游戏,很快就会从缓冲区中删除。

摩托智能手机在我们的基准测试领域处于末端。在CPU基准测试中,Moto G22与 诺基亚G21其中甚至有 Unisoc Tiger T606得分也比Helio G37好。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=262, last 2 years)
649 Points ∼100% +277%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
598 Points ∼92% +248%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
364 Points ∼56% +112%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
355 Points ∼55% +106%
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
353 Points ∼54% +105%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
312 Points ∼48% +81%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
172 Points ∼27%
Average Mediatek Helio G37
 
172 Points ∼27% 0%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=262, last 2 years)
2142 Points ∼100% +126%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1809 Points ∼84% +91%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1370 Points ∼64% +45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
1336 Points ∼62% +41%
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1295 Points ∼60% +37%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1185 Points ∼55% +25%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
947 Points ∼44%
Average Mediatek Helio G37
 
947 Points ∼44% 0%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (111952 - 1041980, n=100, last 2 years)
547376 Points ∼100% +389%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
353908 Points ∼65% +216%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
204547 Points ∼37% +83%
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
191865 Points ∼35% +71%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
111952 Points ∼20%
Average Mediatek Helio G37
 
111952 Points ∼20% 0%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 18567, n=131, last 2 years)
10125 Points ∼100% +106%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
9402 Points ∼93% +91%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
7805 Points ∼77% +59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
7090 Points ∼70% +44%
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
6596 Points ∼65% +34%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
6570 Points ∼65% +33%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4922 Points ∼49%
Average Mediatek Helio G37
 
4922 Points ∼49% 0%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (226 - 1169, n=43, last 2 years)
743 Points ∼100% +220%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
232 Points ∼31%
Average Mediatek Helio G37
 
232 Points ∼31% 0%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (895 - 8124, n=179, last 2 years)
4144 Points ∼100% +238%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3268 Points ∼79% +167%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
2374 Points ∼57% +94%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2346 Points ∼57% +91%
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2229 Points ∼54% +82%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1226 Points ∼30%
Average Mediatek Helio G37
 
1226 Points ∼30% 0%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (1542 - 19657, n=179, last 2 years)
7360 Points ∼100% +187%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
6361 Points ∼86% +148%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5353 Points ∼73% +109%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
4773 Points ∼65% +86%
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4366 Points ∼59% +70%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
2565 Points ∼35%
Average Mediatek Helio G37
 
2565 Points ∼35% 0%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (1012 - 9044, n=179, last 2 years)
4780 Points ∼100% +295%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
4589 Points ∼96% +279%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
3085 Points ∼65% +155%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2843 Points ∼59% +135%
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2691 Points ∼56% +122%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1210 Points ∼25%
Average Mediatek Helio G37
 
1210 Points ∼25% 0%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (478 - 25642, n=179, last 2 years)
7046 Points ∼100% +593%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2929 Points ∼42% +188%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
1849 Points ∼26% +82%
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1838 Points ∼26% +81%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1811 Points ∼26% +78%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1017 Points ∼14%
Average Mediatek Helio G37
 
1017 Points ∼14% 0%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (718 - 2392, n=179, last 2 years)
1374 Points ∼100% +91%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1334 Points ∼97% +86%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
1183 Points ∼86% +65%
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1143 Points ∼83% +59%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1099 Points ∼80% +53%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
718 Points ∼52%
Average Mediatek Helio G37
 
718 Points ∼52% 0%
AImark - Score v2.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 286905, n=120, last 2 years)
63713 Points ∼100% +1374%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
9008 Points ∼14% +108%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7242 Points ∼11% +68%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
7145 Points ∼11% +65%
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5912 Points ∼9% +37%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4323 Points ∼7%
Average Mediatek Helio G37
 
4323 Points ∼7% 0%
UL Procyon AI Inference - Overall Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (1555 - 68880, n=56, last 2 years)
12672 Points ∼100% +404%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
6400 Points ∼51% +155%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
3849 Points ∼30% +53%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3400 Points ∼27% +35%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
2514 Points ∼20%
Average Mediatek Helio G37
 
2514 Points ∼20% 0%

在图形测试中也可以看到类似的情况,但这里的差异甚至更加严重。小米 小米Poco M4 Pro 5G配备了 Dimensity 810在GFXBench测试中,与Moto G22相比,有时能达到4倍的速率。

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2882 Points ∼100% +34%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2488 Points ∼86% +16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2456 Points ∼85% +14%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2423 Points ∼84% +13%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2298 Points ∼80% +7%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2145 Points ∼74%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2396 Points ∼100% +310%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1271 Points ∼53% +118%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1255 Points ∼52% +115%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1224 Points ∼51% +110%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
783 Points ∼33% +34%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
584 Points ∼24%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2489 Points ∼100% +279%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1432 Points ∼58% +118%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1426 Points ∼57% +117%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1375 Points ∼55% +109%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
917 Points ∼37% +40%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
657 Points ∼26%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3804 Points ∼100% +196%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2811 Points ∼74% +119%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2675 Points ∼70% +108%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2603 Points ∼68% +103%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2559 Points ∼67% +99%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1283 Points ∼34%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2570 Points ∼100% +459%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1267 Points ∼49% +175%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1253 Points ∼49% +172%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1211 Points ∼47% +163%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
814 Points ∼32% +77%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
460 Points ∼18%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2770 Points ∼100% +417%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1453 Points ∼52% +171%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1430 Points ∼52% +167%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1379 Points ∼50% +157%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
959 Points ∼35% +79%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
536 Points ∼19%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3553 Points ∼100% +184%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2674 Points ∼75% +114%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2601 Points ∼73% +108%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2565 Points ∼72% +105%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2400 Points ∼68% +92%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1250 Points ∼35%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3846 Points ∼100% +433%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1732 Points ∼45% +140%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1674 Points ∼44% +132%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1604 Points ∼42% +122%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1236 Points ∼32% +71%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
722 Points ∼19%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3777 Points ∼100% +374%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1876 Points ∼50% +135%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1818 Points ∼48% +128%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1750 Points ∼46% +120%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1385 Points ∼37% +74%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
797 Points ∼21%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2714 Points ∼100% +499%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1463 Points ∼54% +223%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1408 Points ∼52% +211%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1354 Points ∼50% +199%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
945 Points ∼35% +109%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
453 Points ∼17%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2546 Points ∼100% +565%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1264 Points ∼50% +230%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1246 Points ∼49% +225%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1198 Points ∼47% +213%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
806 Points ∼32% +110%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
383 Points ∼15%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3529 Points ∼100% +179%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2654 Points ∼75% +110%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2578 Points ∼73% +104%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2492 Points ∼71% +97%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2379 Points ∼67% +88%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1265 Points ∼36%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3965 Points ∼100% +331%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1897 Points ∼48% +106%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1785 Points ∼45% +94%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1783 Points ∼45% +94%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1414 Points ∼36% +54%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
921 Points ∼23%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4014 Points ∼100% +372%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1765 Points ∼44% +107%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1633 Points ∼41% +92%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1630 Points ∼41% +92%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1255 Points ∼31% +47%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
851 Points ∼21%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3801 Points ∼100% +194%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2778 Points ∼73% +115%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2654 Points ∼70% +105%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2644 Points ∼70% +105%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2546 Points ∼67% +97%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1292 Points ∼34%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
59 fps ∼100% +103%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps ∼95% +93%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps ∼69% +41%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
40 fps ∼68% +38%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
29 fps ∼49%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
66 fps ∼100% +200%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
46 fps ∼70% +109%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
45 fps ∼68% +105%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
44 fps ∼67% +100%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
22 fps ∼33%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
42 fps ∼100% +133%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
36 fps ∼86% +100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
23 fps ∼55% +28%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
22 fps ∼52% +22%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
18 fps ∼43%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps ∼100% +233%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
25 fps ∼63% +108%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
25 fps ∼63% +108%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
24 fps ∼60% +100%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
12 fps ∼30%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
30 fps ∼100% +150%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps ∼77% +92%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps ∼47% +17%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps ∼47% +17%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
12 fps ∼40%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps ∼100% +247%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps ∼62% +113%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps ∼62% +113%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps ∼58% +100%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7.5 fps ∼29%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps ∼100% +196%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps ∼81% +141%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.8 fps ∼55% +63%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.5 fps ∼53% +57%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5.4 fps ∼34%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps ∼100% +357%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9.6 fps ∼60% +174%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
9.3 fps ∼58% +166%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9 fps ∼56% +157%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3.5 fps ∼22%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
9.5 fps ∼100% +90%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.3 fps ∼98% +86%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6 fps ∼63% +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5.5 fps ∼58% +10%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5.4 fps ∼57% +8%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5 fps ∼53%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.2 fps ∼100% +313%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3.5 fps ∼56% +133%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3.5 fps ∼56% +133%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3.3 fps ∼53% +120%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2 fps ∼32% +33%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1.5 fps ∼24%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
17 fps ∼100% +143%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps ∼88% +114%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9.5 fps ∼56% +36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.5 fps ∼50% +21%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.4 fps ∼49% +20%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7 fps ∼41%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps ∼100% +325%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9.7 fps ∼57% +143%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9.6 fps ∼56% +140%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
9.2 fps ∼54% +130%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5.2 fps ∼31% +30%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4 fps ∼24%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal / Overall Score
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
959 Points ∼100% +377%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
498 Points ∼52% +148%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
201 Points ∼21%
Basemark GPU 1.2 / OpenGL Medium Native
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
29.33 fps ∼100% +103%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24.03 (7.17min - 39.18max) fps ∼82% +66%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14.45 (5.13min - 43.77max) fps ∼49%
Basemark GPU 1.2 / OpenGL Medium Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25.78 (8.99min - 41.58max) fps ∼100% +183%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
19.15 fps ∼74% +110%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9.12 (3min - 25.95max) fps ∼35%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 182.6, n=176, last 2 years)
59.7 Points ∼100% +182%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
43.83 Points ∼73% +107%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Chrome 92)
31.57 Points ∼53% +49%
Motorola Moto G31 (Chrome 97)
31.19 Points ∼52% +47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021 (Chrome96)
30.77 Points ∼52% +45%
Average Mediatek Helio G37
21.2 Points ∼36% 0%
Motorola Moto G22 (Chrome101)
21.156 Points ∼35%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 244, n=161, last 2 years)
59 runs/min ∼100% +293%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
39.8 runs/min ∼67% +165%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Chome 92)
29.1 runs/min ∼49% +94%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021 (Chrome96)
27.9 runs/min ∼47% +86%
Motorola Moto G31 (Chome 97)
27.9 runs/min ∼47% +86%
Motorola Moto G22 (Chrome101)
15.01 runs/min ∼25%
Average Mediatek Helio G37
15 runs/min ∼25% 0%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 265, n=188, last 2 years)
89.7 Points ∼100% +142%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
62 Points ∼69% +68%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Chrome 92)
51 Points ∼57% +38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021 (Chrome96)
47 Points ∼52% +27%
Motorola Moto G31 (Chrome 97)
45 Points ∼50% +22%
Motorola Moto G22 (Chrome101)
37 Points ∼41%
Average Mediatek Helio G37
37 Points ∼41% 0%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (3526 - 65969, n=192, last 2 years)
22121 Points ∼100% +292%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
19010 Points ∼86% +237%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021 (Chrome96)
12554 Points ∼57% +122%
Motorola Moto G31 (Chrome 97)
11597 Points ∼52% +105%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Chrome 92)
11313 Points ∼51% +100%
Motorola Moto G22 (Chrome101)
5648 Points ∼26%
Average Mediatek Helio G37
5648 Points ∼26% 0%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Motorola Moto G22 (Chrome101)
9051.2 ms * ∼100%
Average Mediatek Helio G37
9051 ms * ∼100% -0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021 (Chrome96)
3475 ms * ∼38% +62%
Motorola Moto G31 (Chrome 97)
3469 ms * ∼38% +62%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Chrome 92)
3349 ms * ∼37% +63%
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 15230, n=194, last 2 years)
3285 ms * ∼36% +64%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
2410 ms * ∼27% +73%

* ... smaller is better

在存储速度方面,Moto G22的eMMC存储并没有提供良好的性能。特别是在读取和写入小数据块时,AndroBench的得分非常低。这些结果也与应用程序或游戏的加载时间非常长相匹配。

Motorola Moto G22Nokia G21Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021Motorola Moto G31Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5GSamsung Galaxy A22 4GAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
109%
154%
207%
474%
142%
55%
431%
Sequential Read 256KB
215.45
257.6
20%
309.4
44%
309.8
44%
964
347%
297.7
38%
273 ?(95.6 - 704, n=186)
27%
891 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=259, last 2 years)
314%
Sequential Write 256KB
112.78
180.6
60%
159.7
42%
221.5
96%
471
318%
183
62%
176.3 ?(40 - 274, n=186)
56%
430 ?(11.9 - 1465, n=259, last 2 years)
281%
Random Read 4KB
39.32
74
88%
73.6
87%
84
114%
148.8
278%
101.2
157%
58.8 ?(9.58 - 148.5, n=186)
50%
158.3 ?(13.5 - 325, n=259, last 2 years)
303%
Random Write 4KB
16.34
60.2
268%
88.9
444%
109.8
572%
171.8
951%
66.9
309%
30.7 ?(2.34 - 146.9, n=186)
88%
151 ?(5.5 - 449, n=259, last 2 years)
824%

游戏--Moto G22管理30 fps

想在智能手机上玩一两个Play商店的游戏的用户绝对不应该选择Moto G22。除了非常长的加载时间,测得的FPS率也在一个水平上,尽管图形细节很低,但也不允许有游戏乐趣。

使用GameBench的应用程序 我们确定了PUBG Mobile Armajet的帧率。稍微复杂一点的游戏,如Asphalt 9 Legends,可以安装,但不能玩。英雄联盟》。荒野大镖客》也对Moto G22造成了过度消耗,因此我们的GameBench应用程序被从缓存中删除--但我们也可以观察到这个游戏的帧率大量下降。

在我们的游戏测试中,PowerVR GE8320的图形性能只允许在低细节下玩射击游戏PUBG Mobile,甚至连高清都没有。然而,在 "平滑 "状态下的渲染已经非常生硬。在Armajet 中也不能使用IPS面板的全部90赫兹,我们没有超过30帧的限制。

测试摩托罗拉Moto G22
测试摩托罗拉Moto G22
051015202530Tooltip
; Armajet: Ø24.4 (9-31)
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø23.5 (11-26)
; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø22.3 (19-25)

排放 - 摩托罗拉Moto G22保持凉爽

温度

3DMark与Moto G22部分不兼容

Moto G22的外壳即使在永久性负载下也几乎没有发热,而是保持着相对凉爽。由于3DMark基准的不兼容性,我们无法像往常一样检查压力测试中性能发展的一致性。GFXBench的电池测试也总是在测量过程中中止。

Max. Load
 35.9 °C32.9 °C31.2 °C 
 35.7 °C32.2 °C31.3 °C 
 34.9 °C33 °C31.2 °C 
Maximum: 35.9 °C
Average: 33.1 °C
32.1 °C35.1 °C33.9 °C
32.3 °C34.7 °C37.5 °C
32.3 °C35 °C36.8 °C
Maximum: 37.5 °C
Average: 34.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  38.7 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
测试摩托罗拉Moto G22
测试摩托罗拉Moto G22

演讲者

摩托罗拉的智能手机在底部只有一个扬声器,但它足够响亮和强大,最高可达87分贝(A)。然而,其音质并不理想,最多只适合播放短视频。

扬声器的再现倾向于以中度声音序列为特征,这不是非常线性地再现。低音没有出现在声音图像中,高音也没有得到充分体现。

幸运的是,Moto G22有一个音频插孔,因此可以连接喜爱的耳机。想使用TWS或蓝牙扬声器的用户,除了SBC之外,还可以享受aptX、aptXHD、AAC和LDAC的编解码器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2048.648.42547.648.83139.741.64031.538.45035.230.66345.4338040.530.110038.930.512537.225.316030.328.720023.137.925021.645.631520.848.640024.157.550021.460.363021.8658002369.1100022.872.8125023.472.6160019.571.8200019.674.1250017.374.9315016.876.8400014.778.3500012.180.2630014.275.2800012.771.11000010.568.41250010.565.21600010.362.2SPL32.786.9N1.864.3median 20.8median 68.4Delta3.412.545.642.240.236.233.427.231.2303533.727.525.220.12019.619.217.220.915.931.712.440.11247.410.251.510.155.18.758.215.260.716.362.515.667.913.169.211.17011.57111.769.814.171.414.464.517.764.216.567.416.769.218.165.517.554.118.852.227.180.10.845.2median 15.2median 62.52.610.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto G22Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto G22 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy A22 4G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命--Moto G22的5,000 mAh电量

能源消耗

摩托手机通过TurboPower技术以最大15瓦的功率进行充电。电源由5000毫安时的强电池提供,它通过附带的10瓦电源装置获得能量。因此,Moto G22在大约2.5小时内就能完全充电。

由于低性能的硬件,功耗是相当低的。然而,我们仍然看到优化潜力,HD+面板的能量消耗超过1瓦。而且,与配备 Helio G35 负载下的功耗是相当高的。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.2 / 1.5 Watt
Load midlight 4.5 / 5.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Motorola Moto G22
5000 mAh
Nokia G21
5050 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
4000 mAh
Motorola Moto G31
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
5000 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio G37
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-16%
4%
-10%
-33%
0%
-23%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
0.8
11%
0.7
22%
0.51
43%
1.5
-67%
0.9
-0%
0.915 ?(0.12 - 2.5, n=206, last 2 years)
-2%
Idle Average *
1.2
1.3
-8%
0.9
25%
1.96
-63%
2.1
-75%
1.2
-0%
1.702 ?(0.65 - 3.6, n=206, last 2 years)
-42%
Idle Maximum *
1.5
2.1
-40%
1.3
13%
2.01
-34%
2.5
-67%
1.5
-0%
1.931 ?(0.69 - 4, n=206, last 2 years)
-29%
Load Average *
4.5
5
-11%
3.5
22%
3.86
14%
2.9
36%
4.5
-0%
4.47 ?(2.1 - 7.74, n=206, last 2 years)
1%
Load Maximum *
5.2
6.9
-33%
8.5
-63%
5.62
-8%
4.9
6%
5.2
-0%
7.33 ?(3.56 - 11.9, n=206, last 2 years)
-41%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37: Ø2.86 (1.311-5.2)
Motorola Moto G31 Mediatek Helio G85: Ø6.28 (3.53-10.1)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456Tooltip
Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.9 (2.61-4.13)
Motorola Moto G31 Mediatek Helio G85; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.89 (5.48-6.19)
Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37; Idle 1min: Ø0.829 (0.75-1.018)
Motorola Moto G31 Mediatek Helio G85; Idle 1min: Ø0.839 (0.785-1.042)

电池寿命

在我们的WLAN测试中,Moto G22可以用非常长的运行时间来说服我们,调整后的显示亮度为150cd/m²。尽管采用了90赫兹的面板,摩托罗拉还是从这款6.5英寸的入门级智能手机中获得了将近18.5个小时。事实证明,Moto G22在禁用Wi-Fi的情况下无休止地播放视频内容时,也能保持约20小时。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
46h 25min
WiFi Websurfing
18h 21min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
19h 56min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 58min
  
Motorola Moto G22
5000 mAh
Nokia G21
5050 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
4000 mAh
Motorola Moto G31
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-1%
-29%
-11%
-6%
6%
Reader / Idle
2785
1698
-39%
2140
-23%
2722
-2%
2867
3%
H.264
1196
946
-21%
1294
8%
1008
-16%
1297
8%
WiFi v1.3
1101
1087
-1%
748
-32%
1032
-6%
966
-12%
1252
14%
Load
298
226
-24%
226
-24%
322
8%
299
0%

Pros

+ 做工良好
+ 坚实的主摄像头
+ 几乎没有任何废热
+ 电池寿命长
+ 90赫兹面板

Cons

- 性能低下
- 内存慢/加载时间长
- 只有IPS面板的高清分辨率

摩托罗拉Moto G22的结论

在测试中。摩托罗拉Moto G22。测试设备由摩托罗拉德国公司提供
在测试中。摩托罗拉Moto G22。测试设备由摩托罗拉德国公司提供

鉴于系统性能上的巨大缺陷,建议使用 摩托G22困难。在我们看来,与目前约160欧元(约169美元)的价格水平相比,摩托罗拉目前的入门级智能手机提供的性能太少。除了游戏中明显的图形弱点外,日常使用中的用户体验也表现为myUX界面的延迟和许多秒的停顿。由于内存连接非常慢,加载时间也同样令人讨厌。

由于SoC较弱,Moto G22很难有竞争力。

然而,Moto G22也有积极的特点,如良好的制造质量,非常长的电池运行时间,以及低废热。我们还喜欢在良好照明条件下的5000万像素主摄像头,它的色彩还原很吸引人,成像性能很扎实。安装的面板的90赫兹在规格表上听起来很诱人,但系统的抖动破坏了平稳的操作。

如果你正在寻找一款廉价的中档手机,我们推荐我们对 Poco M4 Pro 5G.喜欢myUX界面的人应该去看看 摩托G31它的性能比它的姐妹机型好得多,而且有一个高质量的全高清AMOLED屏幕。

价格和可用性

摩托罗拉Moto G22的售价为169欧元(约178美元),在AmazonCyberport,等等。

Motorola Moto G22 - 05/04/2022 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
79%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
87%
Connectivity
44 / 70 → 63%
Weight
89%
Battery
92%
Display
82%
Games Performance
6 / 64 → 9%
Application Performance
39 / 86 → 45%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
69 / 90 → 77%
Camera
55%
Average
69%
75%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Ninh Duy
Editor of the original article: Ninh Duy - Editorial Assistant - 232897 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008
contact me via: Facebook
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 摩托罗拉Moto G22评测 - 廉价的预算智能手机,有严重的假象
Marcus Herbrich, 2022-05-12 (Update: 2022-05-12)