Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy A03s智能手机评论。便宜的手机,良好的通话质量

终于有了稳定的Wi-Fi。 与去年相比,三星在Galaxy A03s上没有什么变化。这款非常实惠的手机至少配备了更稳定的Wi-Fi,这也是我们对前代产品最大的批评点之一。Galaxy A03s是否值得购买,还是160欧元的价格太贵?
Android ARM Smartphone
三星Galaxy A03s

三星Galaxy A02s在我们的评测中发现了巨大的Wi-Fi问题,传输率波动很大。继任者,Galaxy A03s,打算在Galaxy A家族中恢复最便宜的三星手机的声誉,也有一个至少是稍稍更新的SoC。

规格表没有显示与前代产品有任何重大区别,那么Galaxy A03s的价格只是增加了,Wi-Fi问题也消除了,还是有任何真正的改进?

Samsung Galaxy A03s (Galaxy A Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 8 x 1.8 - 2.3 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
Memory
3072 MB 
Display
6.50 inch 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixel 270 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, PLS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 25 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Sensors: acceleration sensor, proximity sensor
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41) , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.2 x 166.5 x 75.9
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/​2.2, contrast AF, LED flash, videos @1080p/​30fps; (camera 1); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, depth of field (camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.2
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, Keyboard: virtual keyboard, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.67W/​kg (head), 0.79W/​kg (body), fanless
Weight
196 g
Price
160 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
73.6 %
12/2021
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320
196 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
72.5 %
12/2020
Samsung Galaxy A02s
SD 450, Adreno 506
196 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
77.1 %
11/2021
Motorola Moto E40
Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2
198 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
75.2 %
12/2020
Samsung Galaxy A12
Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320
205 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
76.4 %
09/2021
Nokia G20
Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320
197 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720

在外观上,Galaxy A03s与它的前辈有很大不同。虽然前一个型号仍然有一个具有钻石图案的光面背面,但Galaxy A03s只配备了一个相当直接的哑光背面。再一次,塑料是选择的材料,对于这样一款廉价的智能手机来说,这很好。

这款手机有黑色、蓝色或白色可供选择。屏幕下方的边框再次厚了许多,前置摄像头有一个水滴状缺口。对于这个价格范围来说,制造质量是完全没问题的,Galaxy Phone的手感很好。它的重量为196克,属于平均水平,6.5英寸的屏幕使它成为一个中等大小的手机,对于非常小的手来说可能有点不方便。

三星Galaxy A03s
三星Galaxy A03s
三星Galaxy A03s
三星Galaxy A03s
三星Galaxy A03s

Size comparison

166.5 mm 75.9 mm 9.2 mm 196 g165.1 mm 75.6 mm 9.1 mm 198 g164.9 mm 76 mm 9.2 mm 197 g164.2 mm 75.9 mm 9.1 mm 196 g164 mm 75.8 mm 8.9 mm 205 g

连接性 -Galaxy A03s,存储量相当低

在中欧,只有32GB存储空间和3GB内存的版本在售。在国际上,也有配备4GB内存的64GB版本。三星为存储量较少的配置确定的官方价格略低于160欧元(约180美元)。摩托罗拉和诺基亚在这个价格范围内提供64GB存储空间的手机,这意味着Galaxy A03s在这方面有点落后于市场。

作为回报,它具有NFC功能,这在低价位手机中并不常见。例如,你可以用它来使用移动支付服务。Galaxy 手机允许同时使用两张SIM卡,用于内存扩展的microSD卡有自己的插槽,所以可以单独使用。

首页: 麦克风
首页: 麦克风
底部。 3.5毫米接口、麦克风、USB-C接口、扬声器
底部。 3.5毫米接口、麦克风、USB-C接口、扬声器
右边。带有指纹扫描仪的待机按钮,音量摇杆
右边。带有指纹扫描仪的待机按钮,音量摇杆
左边:SIM卡插槽
左边:SIM卡插槽

微型SD卡读卡器

在我们的速度测试中,SD读卡器在使用Angelbird V60参考卡进行数据传输时表现出色,但在CPDT基准测试中表现一般。总而言之,对于这样一款廉价的智能手机来说,这是一个相当不错的结果。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P35 MT6765, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
50 MB/s ∼100%
Nokia G20
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G35, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
12.5 MB/s ∼25% -75%
Motorola Moto E40
Mali-G52 MP2, Tangula T700, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
11.8 MB/s ∼24% -76%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A03s PowerVR GE8320, Helio P35 MT6765, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird V60: Ø31.4 (18.7-39.4)
Motorola Moto E40 Mali-G52 MP2, Tangula T700, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird V60: Ø24.6 (14.6-35.2)
Nokia G20 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G35, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential write: Ø31.1 (21-41.1)
Samsung Galaxy A03s PowerVR GE8320, Helio P35 MT6765, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird V60: Ø55.2 (10.2-58.9)
Motorola Moto E40 Mali-G52 MP2, Tangula T700, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird V60: Ø77.2 (42-85.8)
Nokia G20 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G35, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential read: Ø58.2 (14.6-62.3)

软件--Galaxy 手机上的高清流媒体

Android 11作为操作系统的基础,而三星内部的OneUI 3.1则安装在其之上。它为单手使用进行了优化,看起来很时尚。三星安装了许多自己的应用程序,以及一些开箱即用的第三方应用程序。幸运的是,三星的预算手机还带有DRM L1认证,允许用户以高清分辨率从主要供应商那里流媒体内容。

安全补丁是2021年9月的水平,这使得它们在测试时已经有三个月的时间。由于价格低廉,你不应该期待太多的更新。

三星Galaxy A03s软件
三星Galaxy A03s软件
三星Galaxy A03s软件

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 接收较弱

只有最必要的LTE频率和只在2.4GHz频段工作的Wi-Fi 4再次可用。至少在我们的测试中,Netgear Nighthawk AX12参考路由器所达到的Wi-Fi速度与竞争对手持平;前代产品在这里有大量问题。

同样,只有最必要的4G网络得到支持,所以在出国旅行之前,你应该彻底检查你的智能手机上是否可以使用移动互联网。在我们的测试中,无论是在户外还是在城市环境的室内,4G网络信号质量始终比其他智能手机差一点,但它从未完全丧失。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1395, n=210, last 2 years)
485 MBit/s ∼100% +824%
Motorola Moto E40
Mali-G52 MP2, Tangula T700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
86.9 (78min - 93max) MBit/s ∼18% +66%
Samsung Galaxy A03s
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P35 MT6765, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52.5 (42min - 65max) MBit/s ∼11%
Nokia G20
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G35, 64 GB eMMC Flash
47 (24min - 73max) MBit/s ∼10% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A12
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P35 MT6765, 64 GB eMMC Flash
44.8 (30min - 59max) MBit/s ∼9% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
5.59 (1min - 31max) MBit/s ∼1% -89%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1348, n=210, last 2 years)
472 MBit/s ∼100% +750%
Motorola Moto E40
Mali-G52 MP2, Tangula T700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
87.2 (46min - 105max) MBit/s ∼18% +57%
Samsung Galaxy A03s
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P35 MT6765, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.5 (50min - 63max) MBit/s ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy A12
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P35 MT6765, 64 GB eMMC Flash
50.3 (8min - 62max) MBit/s ∼11% -9%
Nokia G20
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G35, 64 GB eMMC Flash
46.9 (27min - 66max) MBit/s ∼10% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
15.5 (12min - 47max) MBit/s ∼3% -72%
05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø55.1 (50-63)
; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø52.6 (42-65)
室外的GPS测试
室外的GPS测试
可用的卫星网络
可用的卫星网络

在户外,Galaxy A03s能够在短时间内准确定位我们的位置,准确度高达2米,但信号强度相对较低。还支持SBAS支持系统,以获得额外的定位精度。

在我们的实地测试中,智能手机并不总是准确地确定我们在路上的位置,但对于这样一款廉价的智能手机来说,准确度还是不错的。由于天气状况不好,这次我们破例用汽车做了测试。

三星Galaxy A03s定位 - 概述
三星Galaxy A03s定位 - 概述
三星Galaxy A03s定位 - 转折点
三星Galaxy A03s定位 - 转折点
三星Galaxy A03s定位 - 桥梁
三星Galaxy A03s定位 - 桥梁
Garmin Venu 2定位 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2定位 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2定位 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2定位 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2定位 - 桥梁
Garmin Venu 2定位 - 桥梁

电话和通话质量 - 清晰的对话

三星的手机应用程序的设计与标准的Android 应用程序略有不同,但它提供了所有必要的功能,在短暂的熟悉期后非常直接。

通过听筒可以很好地理解电话另一端的人,但声音有时有点不清楚。麦克风能很好地捕捉到我们的声音。然而,当我们说话太大声时,其他用户会抱怨我们的声音听起来失真。通过内置扬声器和免提麦克风进行交流也非常好,不管我们是大声还是小声说话。

照相机 - 分辨率低,光线不足

前置摄像头样本
前置摄像头样本

与前代产品相比,相机系统保持不变:一个1300万像素的镜头被用作主摄像头,它拍摄的照片动态效果不错,但同时细节往往会很快丢失,例如周围照片中墙上有纹理的石膏。自动对焦也并不总是准确定位,当你仔细观察时,它的整体表现也相当平庸。

没有广角摄像头,只有一个微距镜头,可以在相机软件内的特殊模式下使用,但它的分辨率很低,只有200万像素。

视频可以以最高1080p和30帧的速度录制,自动对焦在这里做得相当好,曝光调整也相当可靠地工作。然而,你不应该期望在低光下有太多的清晰度和良好的质量。

自拍相机需要非常好的光线才能拍出像样的照片;否则,它们很快就会变得有颗粒感,缺乏细节。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera - PlantsMain camera - SurroundingsMain camera - Low light
click to load images

在实验室良好的照明条件下,相机在测试照片中只产生了粗糙的轮廓,而且在清晰度和对比度方面也只是一般。在照度为1勒克斯的情况下,你无法辨别照片中的任何细节。

ColorChecker
14.5 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
9 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
10 ∆E
12 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A03s: 9.77 ∆E min: 1.57 - max: 17.52 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.4 ∆E
55 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
45.1 ∆E
63.7 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
36 ∆E
43.7 ∆E
28 ∆E
65.7 ∆E
64.3 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
48.8 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
77.1 ∆E
44 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
92.9 ∆E
71 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A03s: 47.24 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 92.93 ∆E

配件和保修 - 有限的内容

盒子里有一个充电器和一条USB线,以及一个打开SIM卡托盘的工具。除此以外,网上没有关于该智能手机的特殊配件。

三星提供24个月的 保修.有固定的维修价格,也有许多选择,可以在附近较大的城市维修智能手机,也可以把手机送去维修。

输入设备和处理 - 指纹扫描仪有问题

触摸屏的工作相当可靠,外壳右侧的物理按钮有一个清晰的压力点。

指纹识别器被整合到略微凹陷的待机按钮中。传感器需要一秒钟的时间来做出反应。在我们的测试中,我们经常要尝试几次才能让手指被扫描,甚至在尝试了五次之后也经常不成功,这时智能手机会要求输入密码。你也可以注册你的脸,然后由前置摄像头进行扫描。由于这只是一个基于软件的解决方案,这个系统更容易被操纵。

纵向模式下的键盘
纵向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘

显示屏 - 用PWM调光显示

子像素网格
子像素网格

乍一看,在Galaxy A03s的显示屏方面,似乎没有什么变化。一个6.5英寸的PLS显示屏,分辨率扩大到720p,就像 Galaxy A02s.然而,这次的亮度要低得多。平均为354cd/m²,新的Galaxy 手机比所有的对比设备都要暗得多。

至少0.34cd/m²的黑色水平很好,因此对比度也很好,屏幕上的颜色看起来更鲜艳一些。

350
cd/m²
356
cd/m²
344
cd/m²
346
cd/m²
383
cd/m²
358
cd/m²
345
cd/m²
367
cd/m²
337
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 383 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 354 cd/m² Minimum: 15.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 383 cd/m²
Contrast: 1126:1 (Black: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.09 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
93.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.261
Samsung Galaxy A03s
PLS, 1600x720, 6.50
Samsung Galaxy A02s
PLS, 1600x720, 6.50
Motorola Moto E40
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Samsung Galaxy A12
PLS-LCD, 1600x720, 6.50
Nokia G20
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Screen
5%
10%
4%
1%
Brightness middle
383
482
26%
452
18%
458
20%
485
27%
Brightness
354
460
30%
431
22%
427
21%
447
26%
Brightness Distribution
88
92
5%
90
2%
85
-3%
88
0%
Black Level *
0.34
0.44
-29%
0.46
-35%
0.53
-56%
0.44
-29%
Contrast
1126
1095
-3%
983
-13%
864
-23%
1102
-2%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.09
5.52
-8%
4.15
18%
4.04
21%
5.75
-13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.25
7.78
16%
6.47
30%
6.84
26%
10.53
-14%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.5
6.3
3%
4
38%
4.8
26%
5.7
12%
Gamma
2.261 97%
2.54 87%
2.157 102%
2.293 96%
2.095 105%
CCT
8152 80%
7882 82%
7557 86%
7535 86%
8070 81%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 807 Hz ≤ 10 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 807 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 807 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21833 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

我们在低亮度水平下检测到高频率的闪烁,这很可能是由于PWM被用来降低显示屏的亮度。对屏幕闪烁敏感的用户在购买之前应该在低显示亮度下试一试,看看这款智能手机是否也会造成问题。

在我们更广泛的显示测试中,可以观察到明显的蓝色色调,而且色彩还原也只是适度准确。

卡尔曼--灰鳞
卡尔曼--灰鳞
CalMAN--颜色精度
CalMAN--颜色精度
CalMAN - sRGB色彩空间
CalMAN - sRGB色彩空间
CalMAN - AdobeRGB色彩空间
CalMAN - AdobeRGB色彩空间
CalMAN - DCI P3色彩空间
CalMAN - DCI P3色彩空间
卡尔曼--饱和度
卡尔曼--饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
54 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 27 ms rise
↘ 27 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (36.8 ms).

在户外,你只能在有阴影的地方真正使用这款手机。即使在阴天,由于显示亮度低,你仍然难以看清屏幕内容。

除了轻微的亮度变化,你还可以从非常平坦的角度观看屏幕,而不会有图像内容的损失。

视角
视角
户外使用
户外使用

性能 -Galaxy A03s,有足够的动力

三星已经为该型号的升级更新了SoC,安装了一个联发科Helio P35在Galaxy A03s。至少它比骁龙450至少它比前代产品中的骁龙450更先进一些,而且它在原始处理器基准测试中能够略微突出。然而,在日常使用中你几乎不会注意到这种差异。三星Galaxy A03s不是性能怪兽,你应该为应用程序的不流畅和更长的加载时间做好准备。

图形性能与前代产品基本持平,与该价格范围内的其他智能手机相比也不错。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
172 Points ∼26%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
131 Points ∼20% -24%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
356 Points ∼53% +107%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
169 Points ∼25% -2%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
170 Points ∼25% -1%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (150 - 173, n=6)
166.7 Points ∼25% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=254, last 2 years)
669 Points ∼100% +289%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
883 Points ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
493 Points ∼23% -44%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1393 Points ∼64% +58%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1022 Points ∼47% +16%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
607 Points ∼28% -31%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (539 - 1022, n=6)
886 Points ∼40% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=254, last 2 years)
2190 Points ∼100% +148%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
89 Points ∼3%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1021 Points ∼39% +1047%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
89 Points ∼3% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 8702, n=198, last 2 years)
2596 Points ∼100% +2817%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
5059 Points ∼50%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8743 Points ∼86% +73%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
5297 Points ∼52% +5%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
5059 Points ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 18567, n=144, last 2 years)
10155 Points ∼100% +101%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
784 Points ∼23%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
812 Points ∼24% +4%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2203 Points ∼65% +181%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
733 Points ∼22% -7%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
574 Points ∼17% -27%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (244 - 850, n=12)
634 Points ∼19% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=177, last 2 years)
3383 Points ∼100% +332%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
714 Points ∼18%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
701 Points ∼18% -2%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2070 Points ∼53% +190%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
645 Points ∼17% -10%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
517 Points ∼13% -28%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (205 - 789, n=12)
571 Points ∼15% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=177, last 2 years)
3878 Points ∼100% +443%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1198 Points ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1825 Points ∼64% +52%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2844 Points ∼100% +137%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1098 Points ∼39% -8%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
937 Points ∼33% -22%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (722 - 1198, n=12)
1074 Points ∼38% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (677 - 5301, n=177, last 2 years)
2845 Points ∼100% +137%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
877 Points ∼18%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
820 Points ∼17% -6%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2202 Points ∼45% +151%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
879 Points ∼18% 0%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
599 Points ∼12% -32%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (725 - 918, n=12)
827 Points ∼17% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 13121, n=223, last 2 years)
4942 Points ∼100% +464%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
809 Points ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
711 Points ∼10% -12%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2052 Points ∼30% +154%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
811 Points ∼12% 0%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
541 Points ∼8% -33%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (695 - 858, n=12)
775 Points ∼11% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 31940, n=223, last 2 years)
6921 Points ∼100% +756%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1243 Points ∼38%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1766 Points ∼55% +42%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2961 Points ∼91% +138%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1123 Points ∼35% -10%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
954 Points ∼29% -23%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (653 - 1243, n=12)
1096 Points ∼34% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (651 - 6394, n=221, last 2 years)
3237 Points ∼100% +160%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
457 Points ∼18%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
441 Points ∼18% -4%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1486 Points ∼59% +225%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
367 Points ∼15% -20%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
341 Points ∼14% -25%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (178 - 512, n=12)
391 Points ∼16% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=178, last 2 years)
2510 Points ∼100% +449%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
387 Points ∼15%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
362 Points ∼14% -6%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1309 Points ∼50% +238%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
298 Points ∼11% -23%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
289 Points ∼11% -25%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (145 - 508, n=12)
353 Points ∼14% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=178, last 2 years)
2609 Points ∼100% +574%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1238 Points ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1860 Points ∼65% +50%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2821 Points ∼99% +128%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1098 Points ∼39% -11%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
933 Points ∼33% -25%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (435 - 1238, n=12)
1026 Points ∼36% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (688 - 5318, n=178, last 2 years)
2846 Points ∼100% +130%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
522 Points ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
489 Points ∼12% -6%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1554 Points ∼39% +198%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
478 Points ∼12% -8%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
373 Points ∼9% -29%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (478 - 564, n=12)
525 Points ∼13% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 11528, n=231, last 2 years)
4014 Points ∼100% +669%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
447 Points ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
405 Points ∼8% -9%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1368 Points ∼27% +206%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
423 Points ∼8% -5%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
318 Points ∼6% -29%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (423 - 489, n=12)
457 Points ∼9% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 19364, n=231, last 2 years)
5009 Points ∼100% +1021%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1259 Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1798 Points ∼56% +43%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2961 Points ∼92% +135%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1077 Points ∼33% -14%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
949 Points ∼29% -25%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (766 - 1259, n=12)
1116 Points ∼35% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (635 - 5793, n=231, last 2 years)
3234 Points ∼100% +157%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
639 Points ∼27%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
489 Points ∼21% -23%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1556 Points ∼66% +144%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
613 Points ∼26% -4%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
426 Points ∼18% -33%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (433 - 639, n=5)
548 Points ∼23% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (426 - 6977, n=160, last 2 years)
2363 Points ∼100% +270%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
534 Points ∼21%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
401 Points ∼15% -25%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1399 Points ∼54% +162%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
541 Points ∼21% +1%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
349 Points ∼13% -35%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (353 - 541, n=5)
460 Points ∼18% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 11259, n=160, last 2 years)
2604 Points ∼100% +388%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2039 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
2073 Points ∼81% +2%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2568 Points ∼100% +26%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
2065 Points ∼80% +1%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1829 Points ∼71% -10%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (2039 - 2084, n=5)
2063 Points ∼80% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1567 - 3958, n=160, last 2 years)
2571 Points ∼100% +26%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
28 fps ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
32 fps ∼46% +14%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
31 fps ∼45% +11%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (18 - 31, n=6)
25.2 fps ∼36% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.5 - 143, n=194, last 2 years)
69.1 fps ∼100% +147%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
20 fps ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
22 fps ∼16% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
23 fps ∼16% +15%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (19 - 23, n=6)
20.3 fps ∼15% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 439, n=194, last 2 years)
139.9 fps ∼100% +600%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
19 fps ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
16 fps ∼29% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
20 fps ∼36% +5%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (9.1 - 20, n=6)
15.4 fps ∼27% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 121, n=193, last 2 years)
56.1 fps ∼100% +195%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
11 fps ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
9.3 fps ∼12% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
12 fps ∼15% +9%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (9.8 - 12, n=6)
10.6 fps ∼13% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.4 - 251, n=194, last 2 years)
80.1 fps ∼100% +628%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
14 fps ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
12 fps ∼28% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
13 fps ∼30% -7%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (6 - 14, n=6)
10.2 fps ∼23% -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 121, n=193, last 2 years)
43.6 fps ∼100% +211%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
8.1 fps ∼15%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
6.2 fps ∼11% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
7.9 fps ∼15% -2%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (5.8 - 8.1, n=6)
6.82 fps ∼13% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 169, n=194, last 2 years)
54.2 fps ∼100% +569%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
5.5 fps ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
6.4 fps ∼23% +16%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
5 fps ∼18% -9%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (2.8 - 5.5, n=6)
4.17 fps ∼15% -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.3 - 81, n=193, last 2 years)
27.5 fps ∼100% +400%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3.5 fps ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3.4 fps ∼10% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
3.3 fps ∼10% -6%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (2.6 - 3.5, n=6)
2.95 fps ∼9% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 97, n=193, last 2 years)
32.8 fps ∼100% +837%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
7.5 fps ∼26%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
5.9 fps ∼21% -21%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
19 fps ∼66% +153%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
7.5 fps ∼26% 0%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
7.6 fps ∼26% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (3.5 - 7.6, n=12)
6.28 fps ∼22% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 98, n=249, last 2 years)
28.7 fps ∼100% +283%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.1 fps ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3.4 fps ∼10% -17%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
11 fps ∼32% +168%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4.2 fps ∼12% +2%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4.2 fps ∼12% +2%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (3.8 - 4.2, n=12)
3.92 fps ∼12% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.9 - 123, n=250, last 2 years)
34 fps ∼100% +729%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.7 fps ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3.6 fps ∼18% -23%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
12 fps ∼61% +155%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4.7 fps ∼24% 0%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4.8 fps ∼24% +2%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (2.2 - 4.8, n=11)
3.93 fps ∼20% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.1 - 69, n=250, last 2 years)
19.8 fps ∼100% +321%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1.5 fps ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1.2 fps ∼9% -20%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3.7 fps ∼28% +147%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1.5 fps ∼12% 0%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1.5 fps ∼12% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (1.4 - 1.5, n=11)
1.455 fps ∼11% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 47, n=250, last 2 years)
13 fps ∼100% +767%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
117053 Points ∼21%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
117053 Points ∼21% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (111952 - 1041980, n=108, last 2 years)
553757 Points ∼100% +373%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
109518 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
97624 Points ∼27% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
108503 Points ∼30% -1%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (101535 - 109518, n=4)
105631 Points ∼29% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (77514 - 727247, n=127, last 2 years)
360339 Points ∼100% +229%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
5346 Points ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
4293 Points ∼7% -20%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
5346 Points ∼9% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 286905, n=128, last 2 years)
61072 Points ∼100% +1042%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1367 Points ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1282 Points ∼30% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1318 Points ∼31% -4%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (1131 - 1367, n=5)
1248 Points ∼29% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (895 - 8124, n=169, last 2 years)
4231 Points ∼100% +210%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3141 Points ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
2606 Points ∼35% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
2983 Points ∼40% -5%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (2390 - 3141, n=5)
2707 Points ∼36% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1542 - 19657, n=169, last 2 years)
7493 Points ∼100% +139%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1289 Points ∼27%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1326 Points ∼27% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1268 Points ∼26% -2%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (1141 - 1366, n=5)
1257 Points ∼26% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1012 - 9044, n=169, last 2 years)
4850 Points ∼100% +276%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
937 Points ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
962 Points ∼13% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1023 Points ∼14% +9%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (792 - 1023, n=5)
882 Points ∼12% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (478 - 25642, n=169, last 2 years)
7348 Points ∼100% +684%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
920 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
812 Points ∼59% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
887 Points ∼64% -4%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (680 - 920, n=5)
838 Points ∼60% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (718 - 2392, n=169, last 2 years)
1386 Points ∼100% +51%

Galaxy A03s在浏览互联网时比它的前辈快。然而,很难说这仅仅是由于SoC的原因,还是也由于更新的浏览器。在任何情况下,差异不是很大,在目前的Galaxy A手机上滚动时,你仍然需要不时地等待图片加载。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 58042, n=168, last 2 years)
407 Points ∼100% +2259%
Samsung Galaxy A03s (Chrome 96)
17.25 Points ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy A12 (Chrome 88)
17.19 Points ∼4% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 (13.6 - 17.3, n=4)
15.6 Points ∼4% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A02s (Chrome 89)
15.53 Points ∼4% -10%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 414, n=170, last 2 years)
114.4 Points ∼100% +265%
Samsung Galaxy A03s (Chrome 96)
31.3 Points ∼27%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 (23.8 - 31.3, n=5)
26.6 Points ∼23% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A12 (Chrome 88)
25.44 Points ∼22% -19%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
22.68 Points ∼20% -28%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 244, n=154, last 2 years)
60.7 runs/min ∼100% +322%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 (13.7 - 16, n=4)
14.7 runs/min ∼24% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A03s (Chome 96)
14.37 runs/min ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy A12 (Chrome 88)
13.7 runs/min ∼23% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A02s (Chome 89)
12.5 runs/min ∼21% -13%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 265, n=177, last 2 years)
91.8 Points ∼100% +155%
Samsung Galaxy A03s (Chrome 96)
36 Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy A12 (Chrome 88)
32 Points ∼35% -11%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 (29 - 36, n=4)
32 Points ∼35% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A02s (Chrome 89)
28 Points ∼31% -22%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (3526 - 65969, n=182, last 2 years)
23168 Points ∼100% +318%
Samsung Galaxy A03s (Chrome 96)
5543 Points ∼24%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 (4347 - 5543, n=5)
4747 Points ∼20% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A12 (Chrome 88)
4643 Points ∼20% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A02s (Chrome 89)
3977 Points ∼17% -28%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A02s (Chrome 89)
11708 ms * ∼100% -20%
Samsung Galaxy A12 (Chrome 88)
11082 ms * ∼95% -14%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 (9756 - 11323, n=5)
10649 ms * ∼91% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A03s (Chrome 96)
9756 ms * ∼83%
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 15230, n=182, last 2 years)
3203 ms * ∼27% +67%

* ... smaller is better

Galaxy A03s只配备了缓慢的eMMC存储,但对比设备都没有更高质量的存储。尽管如此,Galaxy A03s仍然比同价位的其他智能手机慢一些,特别是在写数据的时候。

Samsung Galaxy A03sSamsung Galaxy A02sMotorola Moto E40Samsung Galaxy A12Nokia G20Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
36%
7%
31%
2%
-23%
264%
Sequential Read 256KB
279.8
299
7%
265
-5%
269.7
-4%
256.1
-8%
240 ?(25.8 - 452, n=231)
-14%
926 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=247, last 2 years)
231%
Sequential Write 256KB
86.8
103.9
20%
156.3
80%
211.6
144%
139.3
60%
98.2 ?(14.8 - 188.7, n=231)
13%
469 ?(11.9 - 1485, n=247, last 2 years)
440%
Random Read 4KB
64
84.8
33%
56
-12%
65.4
2%
63.5
-1%
42.3 ?(3.59 - 117.2, n=231)
-34%
165.6 ?(13.5 - 345, n=247, last 2 years)
159%
Random Write 4KB
48.7
88.5
82%
30.7
-37%
39.1
-20%
27.4
-44%
20.6 ?(0.75 - 89.5, n=231)
-58%
158.9 ?(56.5 - 458, n=248, last 2 years)
226%

游戏--玩家应该到其他地方去看看

Galaxy Phone并不是一款专门的游戏手机。在PUBG手机中,你只能在中等设置下达到25帧,而且你必须处理偶尔的性能下降问题。因此,这款智能手机并不适合快速射击游戏。在2D动作游戏Armajet中,该设备至少可以达到35帧左右。我们用GameBench测量了帧率。.

有更高要求的玩家将不得不寻找其他地方,但对于较简单的游戏来说,性能通常是足够的。使用触摸屏和位置传感器来控制该设备是可靠的。

PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
氩氦刀
氩氦刀
0510152025303540Tooltip
; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø33.8 (23-43)
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 1.7.0: Ø24.7 (14-26)
; PUBG Mobile; Balanced; 1.7.0: Ø23.9 (11-26)

排放--凉爽的手机底盘

温度

GFXBench电池测试
GFXBench电池测试

负载下的最大发热量保持在限制范围内,所以即使在炎热的环境温度下也不应该有任何问题。

不幸的是,Galaxy A03s的SoC无法运行3DMark Wild Life基准测试,迫使我们使用GFXBench电池测试来检查长时间负载下的稳定性。我们只看到那里的性能略有下降,因此没有理由抱怨。

Max. Load
 38.2 °C35.5 °C36.6 °C 
 38.1 °C35.5 °C37.1 °C 
 38.1 °C35.2 °C36.3 °C 
Maximum: 38.2 °C
Average: 36.7 °C
33.8 °C34.7 °C36.1 °C
34.4 °C35 °C37.9 °C
34.7 °C35.3 °C37.8 °C
Maximum: 37.9 °C
Average: 35.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.1 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.2 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

演讲者

底部边缘的小型单声道扬声器并不完全让我们期待高保真声音,但至少Galaxy A03s听起来比它的前辈更有力。声音非常高亢,最多只能让人对一首音乐有一个初步印象。

你可以通过3.5毫米音频插孔或蓝牙5.0连接的耳机或扬声器获得更好的质量。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.9402544.742.5313434.34036.8425042.644.46337.335.38026.225.410028.328.812522.422.316018.926.32001631.325014.540.731513.250.34001355.250016.56063019.56580019.666.2100017.473.2125015.376.1160015.376200015.773.6250016.570.7315017.971.8400020.872.350002275.9630020.975.6800021.775.31000022.882.2125002272.61600022.559.4SPL31.586.5N1.465median 18.9median 70.7Delta312.633.242.237.940.932.330.129.63333.239.527.628.319.419.320.620.517.718.5162411.430.51239.110.143.48.445.18.555.49.763.211.765.311.968.61171.41069.79.66810.365.410.862.411.665.312.368.21366.613.768.814.474.915.26316.153.959.923.88012.50.544.8median 11.7median 63.21.913hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A03sSamsung Galaxy A02s
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A03s audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 37.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy A02s audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命--你可以长时间享受使用Galaxy A03s。

能源消耗

Galaxy A03s的显示屏稍显暗淡,在某些情况下,如涉及最大功耗时,在能耗方面具有优势。在其他情况下,我们使用固定的屏幕亮度,但事实证明这款智能手机在这里也是相当节俭的。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.15 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.7 / 1.1 / 1.3 Watt
Load midlight 2.1 / 4.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Samsung Galaxy A03s
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A02s
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A12
5000 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-58%
-71%
-49%
-60%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
0.8
-14%
1.1
-57%
0.932 ?(0.63 - 1.3, n=9)
-33%
0.913 ?(0.12 - 2.5, n=194, last 2 years)
-30%
Idle Average *
1.1
1.9
-73%
1.6
-45%
1.892 ?(1.1 - 2.35, n=9)
-72%
1.67 ?(0.65 - 3.6, n=194, last 2 years)
-52%
Idle Maximum *
1.3
2.5
-92%
2.6
-100%
2.23 ?(1.3 - 2.9, n=9)
-72%
1.897 ?(0.69 - 3.7, n=194, last 2 years)
-46%
Load Average *
2.1
4.2
-100%
4.5
-114%
3.3 ?(2.1 - 4.5, n=9)
-57%
4.49 ?(2.1 - 7.74, n=194, last 2 years)
-114%
Load Maximum *
4.6
5.1
-11%
6.4
-39%
5.2 ?(4.6 - 6.4, n=9)
-13%
7.33 ?(3.56 - 11.9, n=194, last 2 years)
-59%

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.50.70.91.21.41.61.82.12.32.52.833.23.53.73.94.24.4Tooltip
: Ø2.33 (0.727-4.62)

Energy consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.10.30.40.60.70.811.11.31.41.51.71.822.12.22.42.52.7Tooltip
; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.35 (2.08-2.81)
; Idle 1min: Ø1.077 (0.74-1.279)

电池寿命

由于其略微节俭的SoC和较暗的显示屏,Galaxy A03s在某些情况下比前代产品的持续时间长一些,但在实践中,这种优势应该很难被发现。但情况不应该是这样的。毕竟,Galaxy A03s的5000毫安时电池提供了非常好的运行时间,在我们的Wi-Fi测试中,近20小时的运行时间应该足以满足更长的工作日。

反过来,充电需要很长的时间,最好隔夜进行。附带的充电器仍然只能提供最大的7.8瓦,有时需要近3个小时甚至更长时间才能再次为智能手机充满电。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
45h 57min
WiFi Websurfing
19h 53min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
21h 47min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 46min
Samsung Galaxy A03s
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A02s
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto E40
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A12
5000 mAh
Nokia G20
5050 mAh
Battery Runtime
-1%
-17%
2%
-1%
Reader / Idle
2757
2746
0%
3743
36%
H.264
1307
1295
-1%
887
-32%
WiFi v1.3
1193
1201
1%
995
-17%
1288
8%
1186
-1%
Load
346
329
-5%
336
-3%

Pros

+ NFC
+ 专用的microSD插槽
+ DRM L1认证
+ 相对准确的定位
+ 良好的通话质量
+ 没有节流现象
+ 电池寿命长

Cons

- 不准确的指纹扫描仪
- 过时的安全补丁
- 4G网络信号弱
- 自拍相机模糊不清
- 显示屏昏暗
- 充电速度非常慢

评语 - 不错的小细节

在审查中。三星Galaxy A03s。
在审查中。三星Galaxy A03s。

三星Galaxy A03s现在提供稳定的Wi-Fi,与高端智能手机相比,它可能不是特别快,但至少它能可靠地工作。事实上,我们需要特别提到这一点是由于前代产品,它在这里有明显的缺陷。现在,你不应该期望能够在没有任何滞后的情况下浏览互联网,但至少现在的浏览速度已经与低价位的手机持平。

在非常便宜的手机市场上,A03s有许多小东西做得很好。有用于移动支付或其他应用的NFC,还有一个专用读卡器,这样你就可以同时使用两张SIM卡和一张microSD卡。DRM-L1认证也绝不是理所当然的,通话时体面的语音质量或合格的定位精度也是如此。在性能方面,这款智能手机很难从类似价格的设备中脱颖而出,但至少它的续航时间相当长。

由于清晰的通话质量或DRM L1等漂亮的小装饰,三星Galaxy A03s成功地在低价手机市场上找到了自己的位置。不过,想要花钱买最好的功能的用户,将不得不到其他地方去寻找。

然而,Galaxy A03s有一些事情让我们很恼火。指纹传感器不准确,信号接收有点弱,自拍相机需要大量光线才能拍出好照片,以及充电速度非常慢,只有7.8瓦特。

总的来说,如果你正在寻找一款廉价的手机,也可以用于移动支付,并提供相当好的通话质量,Galaxy A03s是一个不错的选择。然而,如果你想用你的钱获得尽可能多的功能,你将在摩托罗拉Moto E40中获得更高分辨率的摄像头和90赫兹的显示屏。摩托罗拉Moto E40并以类似的价格获得更多的存储空间。 诺基亚G20.

价格和可用性

你可以在亚马逊上找到三星Galaxy A03s,其中32 GB版本价格约为150美元,而64GB版本售价约为180美元。

Samsung Galaxy A03s - 12/13/2021 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
77%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
37 / 70 → 52%
Weight
88%
Battery
92%
Display
82%
Games Performance
6 / 64 → 9%
Application Performance
46 / 86 → 53%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
54 / 90 → 60%
Camera
44%
Average
67%
74%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 三星Galaxy A03s智能手机评论。便宜的手机,良好的通话质量
Florian Schmitt, 2021-12-20 (Update: 2021-12-20)