Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy Tab A7 Lite平板电脑评测:非常实惠的迷你版三星平板电脑

稀有价值。 三星的Galaxy Tab A7 Lite是一个异类:罕见的8英寸平板电脑之一,起价169欧元(约合人民币199元),还可以加价30欧元(约合人民币35元)购买LTE。Android-11平板电脑配备了来自联发科的八核SoC,32GB的存储空间,带有杜比全景声的扬声器和家庭友好的儿童模式。我们的测试显示了小三星能做什么。
Android Smartphone Tablet

紧凑型Android 平板电脑很实用,也很方便,但少之又少。因此,我们在评测数据库中只找到了8.7英寸的三星Galaxy Tab A7 Lite的少数几款对比设备。

三星的Galaxy Tab A7 Lite的起价为169欧元(约199美元),采用联发科的Helio P22T MT8768T SoC,在性能方面属于入门级别的产品。尽管如此,八核CPU的计算能力应该也足够用于观看Netflix和游戏环节。这款小型平板电脑还拥有支持杜比全景声的立体声扬声器,5100毫安时的电池容量足以持续到系列赛的最后一刻。

对于它的8.7英寸显示屏,Galaxy Tab A7 Lite依赖于一个分辨率为1340 x 800像素的TFT面板,这相当于一个5:3的长宽比。

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite (Galaxy Tab A Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T 8 x 2.3 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
Memory
3 GB 
Display
8.70 inch 5:3, 1340 x 800 pixel 179 PPI, capacitive, TFT, WXGA+, 16 mio. colors, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 18.7 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm headset jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, geomagnetic sensor, Wi-Fi Direct, Samsung Smart Switch
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, Body SAR 0.68 W/kg
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 212.5 x 124.7
Battery
5100 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix Autofocus, Videos up to 1.920 x 1.080 Pixel@30fps, Camera2 API Level 3
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Dual speakers with Dolby Atmos, Keyboard: virtual, Power supply, USB cable (type C/A), SIM tool, Quick start guide, Warranty card, One UI 3.1, 24 Months Warranty, DRM Widevine L1, fanless
Weight
366 g, Power Supply: 32 g
Price
169 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
79.7 %
08/2021
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320
366 g8 mm8.70"1340x800
88.3 %
06/2019
Apple iPad Mini 5
A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU
300 g6.1 mm7.90"2048x1536
80.6 %
07/2020
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
MT8168, Mali-G52 MP1
355 g9.7 mm8.00"1280x800
80.5 %
06/2020
Huawei MatePad T8
Helio MT8768, PowerVR GE8320
310 g8.55 mm8.00"1280x800
79.6 %
09/2019
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
SD 429, Adreno 504
345 g8 mm8.00"1280x800

机箱 -Galaxy Tab A7 Lite,高质量的机箱

三星提供的迷你平板电脑有 "深灰色 "和 "银色 "两种颜色。这些颜色指的是后盖的颜色。我们测试的 "深灰色 "版本的显示屏边框是黑色的,而 "银色 "版本则是白色的。

屏幕的边缘在两个短边上相对较宽,那里还有一个杜比全景声扬声器,这就是为什么81%的显示与表面比率相当低。由于其紧凑的尺寸,Galaxy Tab A7 Lite很适合拿在手里,但它相当重,有366克(约12.9盎司)。

尽管价格很低,但制造质量很好,因为三星的平板电脑以高质量的外观取胜。由于其稳定的框架,它只能被压抑或扭曲得很小。塑料按键只有极小的发挥,并且有一个令人愉快的坚定的压力点。

Size comparison

212.5 mm 124.7 mm 8 mm 366 g210 mm 124.4 mm 8 mm 345 g202 mm 137 mm 9.7 mm 355 g203.2 mm 134.8 mm 6.1 mm 300 g199.7 mm 121.1 mm 8.55 mm 310 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g

特点 - 三星平板电脑的3GB内存和32GB存储空间

三星的Galaxy Tab A7 Lite配备了3GB的内存和32GB的内部存储。它可以通过microSD卡进行扩展,其大小可以达到1TB。我们测试的Wi-Fi版本在三星商店的价格为169欧元(约合人民币199元),而199欧元(约合人民币235元)的LTE版本则是到期的。

这款平板电脑的其他功能包括一个支持OTG的USB 2.0端口,以及分布在短边上的两个支持Dolby Atmos的扬声器。还包括一个3.5毫米插孔,但没有天线或用于连接耳机的无线电功能。作为回报,三星支持DRM Widevine L1,可以播放高清质量的流媒体。

左边:microSD插槽
左边:microSD插槽
右:音量摇杆、电源按钮
右:音量摇杆、电源按钮
首页: 发言人
首页: 发言人
底部。 3.5毫米插孔、USB-C 2.0、扬声器
底部。 3.5毫米插孔、USB-C 2.0、扬声器

微型SD卡读卡器

用东芝的Exceria Pro M501作为参考存储卡,Galaxy Tab A7 Lite的microSD性能很稳定。复制速度很高,即使是昂贵的平板电脑也无法在连续读取方面做得更好。Galaxy Tab A7 Lite只是在顺序写入方面有点慢。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
53.2 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø34.8 (22.7-43.5)
Amazon Fire HD 10 Kids Pro 2021 Mali-G72 MP3, MT8183, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø35.4 (11-44.1)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø76.1 (48.6-80.9)
Amazon Fire HD 10 Kids Pro 2021 Mali-G72 MP3, MT8183, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø62.7 (23.6-79.9)

软件 -Android 11和儿童模式

三星为其小型平板电脑配备了Android 11和内部用户界面OneUI 3.1。在8月初测试时,Android 安全补丁是在5月1日更新的,所以它们已经不完全是最新的了。

与标准的Android ,OneUI只做了一些改变,并以清晰的布局包括一个应用抽屉来得分。除了谷歌和三星的应用程序外,只有少数第三方应用程序被预装:Netflix、Spotify和微软的Office、OneDrive和Outlook。除了Netflix和OneDrive,所有第三方应用都可以卸载。

一个特殊的功能是三星儿童模式。它可以通过访问栏方便地激活,为年轻人提供一个安全的媒体和游戏环境。

这款平板电脑的32GB存储空间中只有不到19GB是免费的。micro-SD卡可以作为媒体数据的标准存储空间,如照片。然而,在测试中,我们无法在上面存储应用程序数据。

通信和GNSS - 快速和稳定的WiFi 5

Galaxy Tab A7 Lite的WiFi版本在WLAN中以WiFi 5的速度进行通信,还支持蓝牙5.0,但不支持NFC。

通过我们的参考路由器Netgear Nighthawk AX12,三星平板电脑实现了良好的传输速率,在发送和接收方向都非常稳定。Galaxy Tab A7 Lite的最高传输速率为342 MBit/s,在对比设备中排名相当靠前,甚至可以超过更昂贵的 Apple iPad Mini 5.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei MatePad T8
PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 16 GB eMMC Flash
350 (174min - 394max) MBit/s +19%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
Mali-G52 MP1, MT8168, 32 GB eMMC Flash
348 (175min - 353max) MBit/s +19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
293 (287min - 299max) MBit/s
Apple iPad Mini 5
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
194 (119min - 263max) MBit/s -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
Adreno 504, SD 429, 32 GB eMMC Flash
115 (109min - 121max) MBit/s -61%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei MatePad T8
PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 16 GB eMMC Flash
347 (311min - 360max) MBit/s +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
342 (312min - 367max) MBit/s
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
Mali-G52 MP1, MT8168, 32 GB eMMC Flash
330 (313min - 336max) MBit/s -4%
Apple iPad Mini 5
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
236 MBit/s -31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
Adreno 504, SD 429, 32 GB eMMC Flash
101 (86min - 107max) MBit/s -70%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø340 (312-367)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø293 (287-299)
大楼里的GPS接收
大楼里的GPS接收
室外的GPS接收
室外的GPS接收

由于其方便的格式,Galaxy Tab A7 Lite很适合移动使用。这也得到了该平板电脑通过GPS(L1,L5)、GLONASS(L1)、BeiDou(B1,B2a)和Galileo(E1,E5a)精确定位的支持。三星可以在室内对我们进行定位,精确度可达2米(约6.6英尺),在室外甚至在1米(约3.3英尺)之内--这都是非常好的结果。

在道路上的精确度也保持很高。三星的Galaxy Tab A7 Lite记录了我们10公里(约6.2英里)的自行车骑行,几乎和Garmin Edge 500专业导航设备一样精确。

GPS测试:总结
GPS测试:总结
GPS测试。环湖航行
GPS测试。环湖航行
GPS测试。转折点
GPS测试。转折点

照相机 - 仅适用于快照

用主相机拍摄
用主相机拍摄

三星只提供了关于Galaxy Tab A7 Lite的摄像头的极少细节,当然是因为它们不是该平板电脑的旗舰产品。自拍相机的分辨率为200万像素,主摄像头为800万像素。两者都能以每秒30帧的速度录制最大为1920 x 1080像素的视频。

你不一定期望一个廉价的平板电脑有好的照片和视频质量。不幸的是,Galaxy Tab A7 Lite也不例外。用自拍相机拍摄的照片模糊不清,有噪音,缺乏对比度。

主摄像头提供了更好的图片质量,在良好的照明条件下拍摄的照片相对清晰。然而,照片显示的细节很少,这在变焦拍摄中特别明显,一般在黑暗的图片区域。它们往往曝光过度或曝光不足,并且由于色彩平淡而几乎缺乏任何动态。在弱光条件下,相机最终投降,只能捕捉到模糊的轮廓。

用自拍相机拍摄
用自拍相机拍摄
用主相机拍摄
用主相机拍摄
用主相机拍摄
用主相机拍摄

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight scene 1Daylight scene 25x ZoomLow light exposure

我们再看一下主摄像头在受控光线条件下的表现。在最佳亮度下(上色图),除了深灰色调外,平板电脑相当准确地再现了原始色彩,并相对清晰地呈现了测试图。然而,在最低亮度下(较低的颜色图),所有的准确性都消失了,测试图只能模糊地看到。

ColorChecker
4.5 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
5 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite: 5.84 ∆E min: 2.49 - max: 11.09 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.8 ∆E
51.7 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
41.3 ∆E
61.5 ∆E
52.3 ∆E
31.6 ∆E
39.5 ∆E
25.9 ∆E
63.6 ∆E
63.2 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
47.5 ∆E
34.1 ∆E
74.6 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
42.3 ∆E
75.2 ∆E
68.2 ∆E
50.4 ∆E
36.2 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
13 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite: 44.39 ∆E min: 12.99 - max: 75.22 ∆E

配件和保修 - 三星平板电脑与7.8瓦的电源适配器

三星包括一个7.8瓦的电源适配器(5V/1.55A),一条USB线(A型到C型),一个SIM卡工具,一个快速入门指南,以及一个带有保修信息的小册子,与Galaxy Tab A7 Lite一起。三星不为其平板电脑提供任何特殊配件。

三星Galaxy Tab A7 Lite的保修期为24个月。

输入设备和操作 -Galaxy Tab A7 Lite带有面部识别功能

三星的Galaxy Tab A7 Lite的电容式触摸屏对手指的阻力小得令人愉快,并对输入的内容作出精确的反应,直至角落。然而,响应速度可以时不时地快一点。对内存和性能要求较高的应用程序,如PUBG Mobile,给平板电脑带来了明显的压力--在游戏中一切都能顺利运行,但在Android 界面和游戏之间的切换却有点迟缓。

这款平板电脑没有指纹传感器,但它通过面部扫描提供生物识别认证。只要环境足够明亮,二维解锁的效果相当可靠,但速度不是很快。

键盘景观
键盘景观
键盘画像
键盘画像

显示屏 - 5:3长宽比的TFT屏幕

子像素
子像素

Galaxy Tab A7 Lite的TFT屏幕为8.7英寸,分辨率为1340 x 800像素。这导致179PPI的像素密度相当低,这在日常使用中部分是明显的。例如,在5:3的屏幕上,小字体不是太清晰。

在白色背景下,TFT显示屏的平均亮度为332.1cd/m²,但不能实现非常均匀的照明(85%)。在均匀分布的明亮和黑暗图像区域,亮度增加到360 cd/m²(APL50)。在有源环境光传感器的作用下,最大可达到355cd/m²。在最低的亮度设置下,屏幕仍然以13.12 cd/m²的亮度闪耀。很好。Galaxy Tab A7 Lite不使用PWM来控制显示亮度。

331
cd/m²
349
cd/m²
314
cd/m²
335
cd/m²
360
cd/m²
305
cd/m²
345
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
319
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 360 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 332.1 cd/m² Minimum: 13.12 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 360 cd/m²
Contrast: 1500:1 (Black: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 7.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
83.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.33
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
TFT, 1340x800, 8.70
Apple iPad Mini 5
IPS, 2048x1536, 7.90
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
IPS, 1280x800, 8.00
Huawei MatePad T8
LCD, 1280x800, 8.00
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
TFT, 1280x800, 8.00
Screen
19%
34%
25%
2%
Brightness middle
360
515
43%
490
36%
331
-8%
377
5%
Brightness
332
495
49%
447
35%
326
-2%
372
12%
Brightness Distribution
85
87
2%
88
4%
92
8%
87
2%
Black Level *
0.24
0.6
-150%
0.23
4%
0.16
33%
0.29
-21%
Contrast
1500
858
-43%
2130
42%
2069
38%
1300
-13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.7
0.88
87%
4
40%
4.1
39%
6.1
9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
12.4
2.15
83%
8.3
33%
7.2
42%
10.9
12%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
7.6
1.4
82%
2
74%
3.9
49%
6.6
13%
Gamma
2.33 94%
2.183 101%
2.29 96%
2.31 95%
2.13 103%
CCT
8744 74%
6944 94%
6618 98%
7355 88%
7861 83%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

除了亮度之外,你无法在三星平板电脑上调整任何图片参数,所以你必须接受你得到的东西。而这充其量是平均水平。由于0.24cd/m²的低黑值,Galaxy Tab A7显示的内容具有很高的对比度(1500:1),但由于8744K的色温太高,这只发生在一个明显的蓝色偏移。由于delta E值为6.7(颜色)和7.6(灰度),该显示器也不是特别真实的颜色。

色彩保真度(目标色彩空间sRGB
色彩保真度(目标色彩空间sRGB
色彩空间(目标色彩空间sRGB
色彩空间(目标色彩空间sRGB
灰度(目标色彩空间sRGB
灰度(目标色彩空间sRGB
色彩饱和度(目标色彩空间sRGB
色彩饱和度(目标色彩空间sRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
27.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14.4 ms rise
↘ 13.2 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
52.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26 ms rise
↘ 26.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

由于其最大亮度为360cd/m²,Galaxy Tab A7 Lite在户外使用时很快达到了极限。在阳光直射下很难阅读内容。长此以往,眼睛在阴凉处也会感到紧张。

户外使用(阳光直射,最大显示亮度
户外使用(阳光直射,最大显示亮度
户外使用(阳光直射,最大显示亮度
户外使用(阳光直射,最大显示亮度
户外使用(在阴凉处,自动亮度)。
户外使用(在阴凉处,自动亮度)。

视角照片没有太好地反映出来,但三星平板电脑的TFT面板在视角上并不太稳定。当你从一个小角度看显示器时,它已经变暗很多了。然而,屏幕不会进一步变暗,即使从极端的侧面看也仍然清晰可辨。

观点
视角

性能 - 入门级的联发科MT8768T系统芯片

三星的Galaxy Tab A7 Lite采用了联发科的Helio P22T(MT8768T)。这款八核SoC属于入门级性能类别,由8个ARM Cortex-A53内核组成。它们分布在两个各有4个核心的集群中,时钟频率分别高达2.3和1.8GHz。MT8768T的图形芯片是 PowerVR GE8320.

采用联发科SoC,Galaxy Tab A7 Lite的系统性能其实并不突出。总的来说,处理起来很迟钝,因为总是有小的延迟,例如在许多打开的应用程序之间切换时,平板电脑在任何时候都不能快速反应。

在性能方面,联发科MT8768T仅仅领先于其对应的华为MatePad T8。 华为MatePad T8的性能。 MT8768.两者都紧随其后的是 亚马逊Fire HD 8 Plus 2020,它配备的是 MT8168一个稍弱的联发科SoC。高通 高通骁龙429三星Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2019)不能完全跟上联发科的三人组。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1892, n=68, last 2 years)
664 Points +286%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
172 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
168 Points -2%
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T (160 - 172, n=2)
166 Points -3%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
141 Points -18%
Huawei MatePad T8
135 Points -22%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8524, n=68, last 2 years)
2362 Points +157%
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T (920 - 952, n=2)
936 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
920 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
566 Points -38%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
499 Points -46%
Huawei MatePad T8
498 Points -46%
Vulkan Score
Average of class Tablet (521 - 11502, n=14, last 2 years)
3537 Points +3830%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
496 Points +451%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
90 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T (89 - 90, n=2)
89.5 Points -1%
Huawei MatePad T8
79 Points -12%
PCMark for Android
Work 3.0
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 17267, n=65, last 2 years)
8736 Points +71%
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T (5120 - 5221, n=2)
5171 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
5120 Points
Work 2.0 performance score
Huawei MatePad T8
4964 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
4895 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T ()
4895 Points 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
4509 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
4267 Points -13%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Apple iPad Mini 5
6765 Points +228%
Average of class Tablet (507 - 8472, n=19, last 2 years)
2878 Points +40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
2061 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T ()
2061 Points 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
958 Points -54%
Huawei MatePad T8
687 Points -67%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
428 Points -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Apple iPad Mini 5
9966 Points +1232%
Average of class Tablet (454 - 10759, n=19, last 2 years)
3021 Points +304%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
901 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
748 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T ()
748 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad T8
602 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
364 Points -51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Apple iPad Mini 5
3184 Points +372%
Average of class Tablet (863 - 4858, n=19, last 2 years)
2901 Points +330%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1228 Points +82%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1178 Points +75%
Huawei MatePad T8
1102 Points +64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
674 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T ()
674 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Apple iPad Mini 5
8230 Points +578%
Average of class Tablet (539 - 17675, n=28, last 2 years)
5681 Points +368%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
1214 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T ()
1214 Points 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
956 Points -21%
Huawei MatePad T8
809 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
428 Points -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Apple iPad Mini 5
14040 Points +1512%
Average of class Tablet (485 - 35165, n=28, last 2 years)
8154 Points +836%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
892 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
871 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T ()
871 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad T8
765 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
336 Points -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Average of class Tablet (463 - 6449, n=28, last 2 years)
3683 Points +357%
Apple iPad Mini 5
3361 Points +317%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1280 Points +59%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1145 Points +42%
Huawei MatePad T8
1136 Points +41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
806 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T ()
806 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Apple iPad Mini 5
4388 Points
Average of class Tablet (361 - 14235, n=51, last 2 years)
2019 Points
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
651 Points
Huawei MatePad T8
471 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T ()
465 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
190 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Apple iPad Mini 5
4940 Points +1036%
Average of class Tablet (290 - 24605, n=51, last 2 years)
2126 Points +389%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
573 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
435 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T (393 - 435, n=2)
414 Points -5%
Huawei MatePad T8
403 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
153 Points -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Apple iPad Mini 5
3152 Points +754%
Average of class Tablet (858 - 5751, n=51, last 2 years)
2790 Points +656%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1243 Points +237%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1188 Points +222%
Huawei MatePad T8
1126 Points +205%
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T (369 - 1289, n=2)
829 Points +125%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
369 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Apple iPad Mini 5
4861 Points +317%
Average of class Tablet (267 - 14235, n=60, last 2 years)
3212 Points +175%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
1166 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T (534 - 1166, n=2)
850 Points -27%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
643 Points -45%
Huawei MatePad T8
581 Points -50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
257 Points -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Apple iPad Mini 5
5703 Points +1005%
Average of class Tablet (240 - 24605, n=60, last 2 years)
3812 Points +639%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
563 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
516 Points
Huawei MatePad T8
487 Points -6%
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T (457 - 516, n=2)
487 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
210 Points -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Tablet (441 - 5751, n=60, last 2 years)
3237 Points +631%
Apple iPad Mini 5
3204 Points +623%
Huawei MatePad T8
2101 Points +374%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1277 Points +188%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1155 Points +161%
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T (443 - 1295, n=2)
869 Points +96%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
443 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (615 - 4741, n=50, last 2 years)
1749 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
1219 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T (660 - 1219, n=2)
940 Points -23%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
713 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
550 Points -55%
Huawei MatePad T8
469 Points -62%
Apple iPad Mini 5
Points -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (521 - 5731, n=50, last 2 years)
1730 Points +171%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
638 Points
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
607 Points -5%
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T (552 - 638, n=2)
595 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
460 Points -28%
Huawei MatePad T8
402 Points -37%
Apple iPad Mini 5
Points -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Tablet (1671 - 3199, n=50, last 2 years)
2480 Points +365%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1833 Points +244%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1786 Points +235%
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T (533 - 2103, n=2)
1318 Points +147%
Huawei MatePad T8
1152 Points +116%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
533 Points
Apple iPad Mini 5
Points -100%
Wild Life Score
Average of class Tablet (286 - 7933, n=60, last 2 years)
1631 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
1215 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T ()
1215 Points 0%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Tablet (289 - 25317, n=66, last 2 years)
2922 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
Points
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Tablet (75 - 6919, n=66, last 2 years)
837 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
Points
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (72 - 6909, n=64, last 2 years)
887 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (14 - 144, n=59, last 2 years)
61.1 fps +111%
Apple iPad Mini 5
59.5 fps +105%
Huawei MatePad T8
30 fps +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
29 fps
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T ()
29 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
17 fps -41%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad Mini 5
274.1 fps +1205%
Average of class Tablet (15 - 873, n=59, last 2 years)
139.7 fps +565%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
21 fps
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T ()
21 fps 0%
Huawei MatePad T8
20 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
11 fps -48%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad Mini 5
58.9 fps +195%
Average of class Tablet (8.1 - 122, n=59, last 2 years)
47.3 fps +137%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
20 fps
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T ()
20 fps 0%
Huawei MatePad T8
19 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
9.5 fps -52%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad Mini 5
124.1 fps +1028%
Average of class Tablet (7.3 - 494, n=59, last 2 years)
84.6 fps +669%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
11 fps
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T ()
11 fps 0%
Huawei MatePad T8
10 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
4.8 fps -56%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (4.8 - 118.3, n=59, last 2 years)
35 fps +150%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
14 fps
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T ()
14 fps 0%
Huawei MatePad T8
13 fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
6.9 fps -51%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (5 - 340, n=59, last 2 years)
58 fps +634%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
7.9 fps
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T ()
7.9 fps 0%
Huawei MatePad T8
7.1 fps -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
3.2 fps -59%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (3.1 - 94.5, n=58, last 2 years)
21 fps +268%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
5.7 fps
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T ()
5.7 fps 0%
Huawei MatePad T8
5.3 fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
3.8 fps -33%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.2 - 214, n=58, last 2 years)
33.9 fps +897%
Huawei MatePad T8
6.1 fps +79%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
3.4 fps
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T ()
3.4 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1.8 fps -47%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 97.3, n=70, last 2 years)
14.3 fps +186%
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T (5 - 5.2, n=2)
5.1 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
5 fps
Huawei MatePad T8
4.6 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
2 fps -60%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (0.9 - 90, n=70, last 2 years)
13.2 fps +780%
Huawei MatePad T8
1.5 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
1.5 fps
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T (1.5 - 1.5, n=2)
1.5 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
0.8 fps -47%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (3 - 111, n=70, last 2 years)
21.2 fps +168%
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T (7.9 - 8.1, n=2)
8 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
7.9 fps
Huawei MatePad T8
7.6 fps -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
3.1 fps -61%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.5 - 279, n=70, last 2 years)
35.5 fps +788%
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T (4 - 4.2, n=2)
4.1 fps +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
4 fps
Huawei MatePad T8
3.9 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1.7 fps -57%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1416727, n=52, last 2 years)
453858 Points +285%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
117837 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T ()
117837 Points 0%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
105754 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T ()
105754 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad T8
91467 Points -14%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
90422 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
78450 Points -26%
AImark - Score v2.x
Average of class Tablet (4468 - 6865, n=6, last 2 years)
5427 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
5352 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T ()
5352 Points 0%
VRMark - Amber Room
Average of class Tablet (1183 - 8816, n=4, last 2 years)
3565 Score +427%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
676 Score
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T ()
676 Score 0%
Huawei MatePad T8
669 Score -1%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Apple iPad Mini 5
5097 Points +289%
Average of class Tablet (444 - 8886, n=52, last 2 years)
3631 Points +177%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
1310 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T ()
1310 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad T8
1269 Points -3%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1150 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
987 Points -25%
System
Apple iPad Mini 5
11973 Points +288%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 14097, n=52, last 2 years)
6543 Points +112%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
3082 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T ()
3082 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad T8
2598 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1945 Points -37%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1788 Points -42%
Memory
Average of class Tablet (916 - 8890, n=52, last 2 years)
4284 Points +237%
Apple iPad Mini 5
2078 Points +64%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1416 Points +11%
Huawei MatePad T8
1365 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
1270 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T ()
1270 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1258 Points -1%
Graphics
Apple iPad Mini 5
15659 Points +1587%
Average of class Tablet (580 - 31738, n=52, last 2 years)
6639 Points +615%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
946 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
928 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T ()
928 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad T8
898 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
487 Points -48%
Web
Apple iPad Mini 5
1732 Points +114%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 1907, n=52, last 2 years)
1205 Points +49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
811 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T ()
811 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
809 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad T8
762 Points -6%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
731 Points -10%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPad Mini 5 Apple A12 Bionic, Apple A12 Bionic GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 MediaTek MT8168, ARM Mali-G52 MP1, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MatePad T8 Mediatek MT8768, PowerVR GE8320, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Qualcomm Adreno 504, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Galaxy Tab A7 Lite还在联发科内部的浏览器性能竞争中以微弱优势战胜了 华为MatePad T8亚马逊Fire HD 8 Plus 2020.而 Apple iPad Mini 5正如它在合成基准中一样,被排除在竞争之外,因为它在性能和价格方面与三星平板电脑完全不同。然而,我们仍然包括它,因为它是相当罕见的8英寸平板电脑之一。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Mini 5 (Safari 12.1)
109.9 Points +493%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 236, n=59, last 2 years)
84.9 Points +358%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite (Chrome 92.0.4515.115)
18.53 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T ()
18.5 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
16.09 Points -13%
Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 )
13.96 Points -25%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (57.3 - 135.7, n=5, last 2 years)
85.4 Points +204%
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T ()
28.1 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite (Chrome 92.0.4515.115)
28.09 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
25.07 Points -11%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 (Silk Browser)
23.56 Points -16%
Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 )
22.97 Points -18%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPad Mini 5 (Safari 12.1)
160 Points +357%
Average of class Tablet (34 - 342, n=42, last 2 years)
120.7 Points +245%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite (Chrome 92.0.4515.115)
35 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T ()
35 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
32 Points -9%
Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 )
31 Points -11%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 (Silk Browser)
30 Points -14%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad Mini 5 (Safari 12.1)
124 runs/min +792%
Average of class Tablet (14.7 - 376, n=52, last 2 years)
77.2 runs/min +455%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite (Chrome 92.0.4515.115)
13.9 runs/min
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T ()
13.9 runs/min 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
13.5 runs/min -3%
Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 )
13.34 runs/min -4%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Mini 5 (Safari 12.1)
41367 Points +702%
Average of class Tablet (2672 - 74614, n=72, last 2 years)
23028 Points +347%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite (Chrome 92.0.4515.115)
5156 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T (5004 - 5156, n=2)
5080 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
4297 Points -17%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 (Silk Browser)
4222 Points -18%
Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 )
4215 Points -18%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite (Chrome 92.0.4515.115)
12972 ms *
Average Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T ()
12972 ms * -0%
Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 )
11258 ms * +13%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 (Silk Browser)
11103 ms * +14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
10655 ms * +18%
Average of class Tablet (451 - 34733, n=59, last 2 years)
3209 ms * +75%
Apple iPad Mini 5 (Safari 12.1)
643 ms * +95%

* ... smaller is better

Galaxy Tab A7 Lite并没有提供特别突出的读写速度,这是因为它的eMMC闪存相当迟钝。然而,竞争对手也没有提供更高的速度。

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LiteAmazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020Huawei MatePad T8Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-4%
-23%
-8%
-17%
295%
Sequential Read 256KB
271.1
314.2
16%
274.1
1%
291.9
8%
Sequential Write 256KB
87.2
100.2
15%
67.4
-23%
108.5
24%
100.5 ?(14.8 - 196, n=247)
15%
Random Read 4KB
60.8
69.1
14%
57.5
-5%
57.8
-5%
Random Write 4KB
39.51
15.62
-60%
14.63
-63%
16.89
-57%
22.4 ?(0.75 - 91, n=247)
-43%

游戏--性能良好,图形细节减少

作为一款紧凑的游戏平板电脑,Galaxy Tab A7 Lite的表现相当出色。它支持杜比全景声的扬声器提供了坚实的立体声,而且它对输入的反应相当快。然而,你不能指望目前的游戏能在全细节下顺利运行。

其中一个例子是PUBG Mobile,它不允许比 "平衡"/"中等 "更好的图形设置,然后仍然由平板电脑显示,平均每秒不超过25帧。然而,你仍然可以用它来玩好这个射击游戏。在图形要求不高的游戏中,更高的帧率也是可能的。Asphalt 8(Google Play不提供Asphalt 9在三星上的下载)和Armajet 都以每秒30帧运行。

我们用工具Gamebench来确定帧率.

氩氦刀
氩氦刀
沥青8
沥青8
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
051015202530Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite; Armajet; 1.60.13: Ø30.1 (21-32)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite; Asphalt 8: Airborne; 5.8.0k: Ø29.7 (28-31)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite; PUBG Mobile; 1.5.0: Ø24.4 (17-26)

排放 - 凉爽的三星平板电脑

温度

三星平板电脑在操作过程中几乎没有发热。我们在主摄像头周围的 "热点 "处测量了37°C(98.6°F),这几乎不超过人体温度。因此,Galaxy Tab A7 Lite拿在手里时总是感觉很舒服。

联发科的SoC也确保了平板电脑内部温度适中。Wild Life基准测试不受支持,所以我们不能对Wild Life压力测试的稳定性做出说明。然而,GFXBench的T-Rex和曼哈顿压力测试方案运行平稳。它们表明,即使在运行这两个基准测试30次后,该平板电脑也不必对其性能进行节流,因此它的内部永远不会太热。

GFXBench电池测试T-Rex
GFXBench电池测试T-Rex
GFXBench电池测试 曼哈顿
GFXBench电池测试 曼哈顿
Max. Load
 34.9 °C31.3 °C37 °C 
 34 °C32.8 °C36.8 °C 
 33.5 °C31 °C36 °C 
Maximum: 37 °C
Average: 34.1 °C
30.5 °C31.9 °C32.8 °C
30.9 °C30.7 °C32.7 °C
30.2 °C30.3 °C32.2 °C
Maximum: 32.8 °C
Average: 31.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  30.8 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

演讲者

Galaxy Tab A7 Lite的立体声扬声器支持杜比全景声(Dolby Atmos),并产生一个良好的声音,具有线性的中音和非常线性的高音。然而,尽管有著名的名字,但几乎听不到低音,这就是为什么扬声器听起来有点薄。

耳机和外部扬声器可以通过3.5毫米插孔或蓝牙5.0连接到平板电脑。一个小缺点。音频插孔的信噪比为58.09dBFS,不是特别好。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.739.82531.831.33126.525.44023.624.45038.536.9633028.18027.625.410024.527.412514.831.416018.345.120015.944.225016.651.531515.353.740014.25850015.161.763014.164.180012.572.4100014.773.9125015.173.8160014.774200014.371.5250014.771.5315014.576.9400014.376.4500014.176.2630014.372.4800014.468.61000014.366.21250014.356.41600013.148.4SPL26.785.5N0.861.3median 14.5median 66.2Delta0.710.536.947.62945.521.941.3224729.948.42249.419.349.116.352.91452.316.954.214.955.814.156.31057.3115911.763.910.968.211.972.61173.910.277.911.477.112.879.412.984.512.587.2138813.184.713.481.615.777.113.5741469.413.765.124.894.60.695.3median 13median 73.91.312.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Tab A7 LiteHuawei MatePad T8
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei MatePad T8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (94.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理--三星平板电脑具有良好的电池运行时间

消耗功率

Galaxy Tab A7 Lite在功耗方面并不突出,因为它既不消耗大量电力,也不消耗很少的电力。因此,它加入了其他Android 平板电脑的行列,与三星一样,在空闲状态下只需要不到3瓦,在负载状态下平均需要约4瓦。

5100毫安时的电池通过附带的7.8瓦特电源进行充电。在测试中,完全将电池从0充电到100%需要整整4个小时。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.78 / 2.88 / 2.91 Watt
Load midlight 4 / 6.04 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
5100 mAh
Apple iPad Mini 5
5124 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
4850 mAh
Huawei MatePad T8
5100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
5100 mAh
Power Consumption
-75%
7%
21%
16%
Idle Minimum *
0.78
1.3
-67%
0.74
5%
0.68
13%
0.62
21%
Idle Average *
2.88
2.2
24%
2.81
2%
2.24
22%
2.68
7%
Idle Maximum *
2.91
5.3
-82%
2.83
3%
2.27
22%
2.7
7%
Load Average *
4
9.8
-145%
3.73
7%
3.06
23%
3.61
10%
Load Maximum *
6.04
12.5
-107%
4.97
18%
4.45
26%
4
34%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T: Ø3.05 (1.548-5.38)
Amazon Fire HD 10 Kids Pro 2021 Mediatek MT8183: Ø3.44 (1.746-6.31)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.50.70.91.11.41.61.822.32.52.72.93.23.43.63.84.14.3Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.91 (2.07-3.7)
Amazon Fire HD 10 Kids Pro 2021 Mediatek MT8183; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.69 (1.842-4.51)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.589 (1.564-1.929)
Amazon Fire HD 10 Kids Pro 2021 Mediatek MT8183; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.871 (1.767-2.72)

电池寿命

三星的平板电脑在电池充满电的情况下实现了良好的运行时间。Galaxy Tab A7 Lite在模拟网络冲浪和连续循环播放高清视频的过程中持续了近13个半小时。比较设备都有类似的运行时间,而 华为MatePad T8整体得分最高。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
41h 03min
WiFi Websurfing
13h 23min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13h 20min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 05min
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
5100 mAh
Apple iPad Mini 5
5124 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
4850 mAh
Huawei MatePad T8
5100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
5100 mAh
Battery Runtime
-14%
8%
26%
22%
Reader / Idle
2463
1733
-30%
2393
-3%
3132
27%
H.264
800
891
11%
1137
42%
934
17%
WiFi v1.3
803
791
-1%
869
8%
949
18%
831
3%
Load
245
158
-36%
359
47%
342
40%

Pros

+ 高对比度显示
+ 快速而稳定的WLAN
+ 精确的GPS
+ 杜比阿特莫斯扬声器
+ 良好的电池运行时间

Cons

- 低分辨率
- 视角稳定性低
- 只有32GB内存
- 中等水平的摄像头

结论 - 没有高级功能的迷你平板电脑

在审查中。三星Galaxy Tab A7 Lite。测试设备由
在审查中。三星Galaxy Tab A7 Lite。测试设备由

三星的Galaxy Tab A7 Lite是一款非常方便的多媒体平板电脑,尽管它的起价为169欧元(约199美元),但在其核心任务上绝对可以令人信服。它有一个高对比度的显示屏,杜比全景声(Dolby Atmos)扬声器,声音扎实但略显单薄,电池运行时间良好。还有一个儿童模式,这使得三星平板电脑适合家庭使用。

由于采用了联发科MT8768T,三星的平板电脑性能一般,因为操作过程中偶尔会有延迟。八核SoC在游戏中很快达到极限,但游戏在较低的细节中运行流畅。

三星的Galaxy Tab A7 Lite是一款廉价的8英寸平板电脑,适用于网上冲浪和多媒体,也适用于一两款游戏。缺点是显示屏分辨率低,性能平平,摄像头弱,存储量少。

低价也要求在功能方面做出妥协。尽管有良好的GPS,但你在户外使用Galaxy Tab A7 Lite会很困难,因为它的屏幕不会太亮,而且可视角度也不稳定。此外,32GB的内存是相当少的存储空间,尽管它可以通过microSD卡扩展。相机也有负面评价,它只有快照的质量。

三星Galaxy Tab A7 Lite的替代品是,例如 亚马逊Fire HD 8 Plus 2020,以及 华为MatePad T8三星Galaxy Tab A 8.0.的 Apple iPad Mini 5 (2019)处于一个完全不同的价格和性能联盟,但不应该从8英寸平板电脑的名单中消失。它可能会在今年年底前作为iPad Mini 6重新推出。

价格和可用性

如果你选择Wi-Fi版本,三星Galaxy Tab A7 Lite在三星商店的价格为169欧元(约合199美元)。如果使用LTE,该平板电脑的价格为199欧元(约合235美元)。在其他一些网上商店,例如在Amazon两个版本的价格都要低一点。

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite - 08/09/2021 v7
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
76 / 98 → 78%
Keyboard
72 / 80 → 89%
Pointing Device
85%
Connectivity
43 / 70 → 61%
Weight
85 / 40-88 → 94%
Battery
89%
Display
78%
Games Performance
10 / 78 → 12%
Application Performance
45 / 92 → 49%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
72 / 91 → 79%
Camera
47 / 85 → 55%
Average
69%
80%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 三星Galaxy Tab A7 Lite平板电脑评测:非常实惠的迷你版三星平板电脑
Manuel Masiero, 2021-08-18 (Update: 2021-08-18)