Notebookcheck

Oppo A16s智能手机评测--价格低廉的耐力跑,带NFC功能

对于一个小的预算。 Oppo A16s是一款廉价的入门级智能手机,它想用5000毫安时的强劲电池、对眼睛友好的显示屏和最后但并非最不重要的三合一摄像头来说服人们。这款不到180欧元(约208美元)的Oppo智能手机的表现如何,可以在评论中阅读。
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Touchscreen Smartphone
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Oppo A16s (A Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G35 8 x 2.3 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
PowerVR GE8320, Core: 680 MHz
Memory
4096 MB 
Display
6.52 inch 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixel 269 PPI, Capacitive, LCD, Panda-MN228-Glass, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 48.1 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: Audio Jack (3.5 mm), Card Reader: microSD up to 256 GB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, proximity, compass, OTG
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 5, 8), LTE (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.4 x 163.8 x 75.6
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.2, 26 mm, 1/3.06", 1.12 µm) + 2MPix (f/2.4) + 2MPix (f/2.4); Camera2-API-Level: Full
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.0)
Additional features
Speakers: Mono, Keyboard: Virtual, 10W-Charger, USB-Cabel (Type-A to Type-C), Headset, SIM-Tool, Bumper, Quick Start Guide, ColorOS 11.1, 24 Months Warranty, Single-Band-GNSS: GPS, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo and SBAS; Head-SAR: 0.99 W/kg, Body-SAR: 1.24 W/kg, fanless
Weight
190 g, Power Supply: 81 g
Price
179 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Bewertung
Datum
Modell
Gewicht
Speicher
Groesse
Aufloesung
Refresh-Rate
Preis ab
77 %
11/2021
Oppo A16s
Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320
190 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.52"1600x720060 Hz
80.5 %
08/2021
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2
190 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.50"2400x1080090 Hz
75.7 %
02/2021
Samsung Galaxy M12
Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2
214 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720090 Hz
77.2 %
10/2020
realme 7i
Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2
208 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720060 Hz

案例、设备和操作

Oppo A16s主要由塑料制成,但仍有高质量的外观和坚实的结构。只有正面有熊猫MN228玻璃保护。这款Oppo智能手机有水晶黑和珍珠蓝两种颜色,根据IPX4标准有防泼水保护。

这款手机的功能在同类产品中是典型的。A16s提供全面的双SIM卡(2x nano)和microSD支持。用于内存扩展的插槽在复制测试中显示出良好的传输速率,并且还掌握了exFAT文件系统。USB端口根据2.0标准工作,并提供OTG,以便将外部存储媒体和外围设备连接到智能手机。顺便说一下,与没有s附属物的Oppo A16的唯一区别是,测试版本有一个NFC芯片。

谷歌Android 11被用作操作系统,Oppo在其11.1版本中剥离了其ColorOS用户界面。在测试时,安全更新截至2021年8月5日,这仍然是相当最新的。不幸的是,缺少一个DRM认证,所以相应的受保护的内容不能以高清播放。

充其量,LTE可用于移动互联网接入。频率设备还算不错,所以在欧洲应该不会有任何限制。只要把A16s拿在耳边,噪音不太大,电话功能就很好,因为后者只被适度过滤掉。它在扬声器模式下确实有轻微的混响,但其他方面的质量和麦克风范围都很好。支持VoLTE。

Wi-Fi 5的双频模块可用于Wi-Fi连接,与我们的参考路由器Netgear Nighthawk AX12相结合,可提供体面的传输速率。在日常使用中,观察到的数据接收波动并没有被注意到的负面作用。

触摸屏受到屏幕保护膜的保护,该保护膜具有良好的滑行性能,并且应用得很干净。电源按钮上的指纹传感器可用于生物识别安全。它具有良好的识别率,工作速度也不错。另外,通过前置摄像头进行面部识别也是可能的,但它的安全性较低。

Size comparison

164.1 mm 75.5 mm 9.8 mm 208 g164 mm 75.9 mm 9.7 mm 214 g163.8 mm 75.6 mm 8.4 mm 190 g161.81 mm 75.34 mm 8.92 mm 190 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Oppo A16s
  (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
45.73 MB/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (11.8 - 55.3, n=48, last 2 years)
26.1 MB/s ∼57% -43%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13.66 MB/s ∼30% -70%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707539.829.640.642.244.641.541.440.737.635.64038.337.831.936.535.73738.437.636.635.536.438.439.237.537.539.421.632.139.536.136.639.135.736.839.637.429.237.53938.136.838.836.236.238.636.736.739.135.729.239.928.736.240.536.536.939.238.138.832.43737.238.639.536.233.738.537.936.338.337.337.240.137.137.538.436.627.438.937.336.340.440.430.936.639.337.23739.338.737.639.338.136.739.736.929.539.137.936.739.536.73630.83736.838.432.937.738.637.237.432.836.236.739.736.337.140.136.438.5393736.431.336.838.74238.23740.240.73137.133.133.432.233.733.932.632.131.832.932.832.923.525.72930.13330.835.831.332.631.436.631.833.227.731.43432.332.33233.529.432.234.529.831.133.833.532.131.93433.832.831.832.634.633.531.733.233.227.431.932.332.235.730.131.432.831.835.632.332.132.735.431.934.332.233.831.833.232.134.631.93430.428.824.230.433.331.937.330.930.531.234.531.831.632.134.832.132.531.635.131.331.930.936.429.331.733.531.728.831.634.130.635.130.632.630.835.232.233.13134.43233.7312934.732.932.439.829.640.642.244.641.541.440.737.635.64038.337.831.936.535.73738.437.636.635.536.438.439.237.537.539.421.632.139.536.136.639.135.736.839.637.429.237.53938.136.838.836.236.238.636.736.739.135.729.239.928.736.240.536.536.939.238.138.832.43737.238.639.536.233.738.537.936.338.337.337.240.137.137.538.436.627.438.937.336.340.440.430.936.639.337.23739.338.737.639.338.136.739.736.929.539.137.936.739.536.73630.83736.838.432.937.738.637.237.432.836.236.739.736.337.140.136.438.5393736.431.336.838.74238.23740.240.73137.133.133.432.233.733.932.632.131.832.932.832.923.525.72930.13330.835.831.332.631.436.631.833.227.731.43432.332.33233.529.432.234.529.831.133.833.532.131.93433.832.831.832.634.633.531.733.233.227.431.932.332.235.730.131.432.831.835.632.332.132.735.431.934.332.233.831.833.232.134.631.93430.428.824.230.433.331.937.330.930.531.234.531.831.632.134.832.132.531.635.131.331.930.936.429.331.733.531.728.831.634.130.635.130.632.630.835.232.233.13134.43233.7312934.732.932.416.674.573.473.872.672.8727373.273.472.772.873.573.572.473.471.57372.772.273.672.372.772.673.172.573.373.572.572.57373.2737273.773.27372.872.873.272.973.472.472.773.572.972.47373.172.375.972.573.273.173.472.573.272.473.47173.172.97372.273.972.672.972.372.972.772.274.27372.572.973.272.773.573.37373.373.173.471.874.775.372.173.473.37274.672.855.261.474.874.17473.473.97673.873.174.774.375.174.873.353.746.94747.348.64747.547.247.147.547.447.847.647.726.852.648.24848.348.149.346.555.454.554.254.554.353.954.553.252.549.75153.448.854.552.355.148.955.55454.455.355.755.55554.654.554.255.15551.554.353.154.454.655.355.254.354.454.755.455.154.754.854.754.954.252.35554.754.75455.554.955.553.955.553.354.654.854.352.454.755.154.554.554.955.254.455.155.25554.755.154.45554.755.454.453.953.254.555.254.254.455.754.454.354.147.955.755.454.154.949.350.347.251.351.556.95353.154.152.55154.454.655.25455.254.154.155.251.553.154.755.153.955.752.45754.955.253.755.448.450.249.5Tooltip
Oppo A16s PowerVR GE8320, Helio G35, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø37 (21.6-44.6)
Samsung Galaxy M12 Mali-G52 MP2, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential write: Ø32.5 (23.5-42)
Oppo A16s PowerVR GE8320, Helio G35, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø68.2 (16.6-76)
Samsung Galaxy M12 Mali-G52 MP2, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential read: Ø53.9 (46.5-57)
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
realme 7i
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
352 (319min - 359max) MBit/s ∼100% +20%
Oppo A16s
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
294 (151min - 315max) MBit/s ∼84%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
802.11a/ac/b/g/n
292 (236min - 352max) MBit/s ∼83% -1%
Samsung Galaxy M12
802.11 b/g/n
41.6 (8min - 65max) MBit/s ∼12% -86%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
802.11a/ac/b/g/n
353 (177min - 358max) MBit/s ∼100% +18%
Oppo A16s
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
299 (200min - 346max) MBit/s ∼85%
realme 7i
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
288 (261min - 319max) MBit/s ∼82% -4%
Samsung Galaxy M12
802.11 b/g/n
45 (33min - 51max) MBit/s ∼13% -85%
02040608010012014016018020022024026028030032034028728031832731330530834630927829933227628325331832920029226732031129529132427326827732333039484848423947504639414846494842475049344547495135494843483328728031832731330530834630927829933227628325331832920029226732031129529132427326827732333039484848423947504639414846494842475049344547495135494843483315128630229228230629829228829130429529629229129329328829629929229629528929529329328131529165524743214751534084451494322535150381047515137235450513211Tooltip
Oppo A16s Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø298 (200-346)
Samsung Galaxy M12 Samsung Exynos 850, ARM Mali-G52 MP1; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø44.9 (33-51)
Oppo A16s Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø289 (151-315)
Samsung Galaxy M12 Samsung Exynos 850, ARM Mali-G52 MP1; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø41.5 (8-65)

奥普A16s的AI三摄像头

与Oppo A16s的自拍
与Oppo A16s的自拍

前置摄像头没有特别高的分辨率,但它仍然可以实现相当好的自拍。特别是自动HDR功能在背光下提供了比许多对手更好的效果。

三重摄像头提供了标准配置。主镜头拍摄的照片相当不错,但它们的特点是动态较弱,精细的细节在背景中看起来很模糊。两个附加镜头负责景深和特写(微距)。

前置和后置摄像头均以每秒30帧的全高清方式记录视频。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide-angleWide-angleZoom (5x)Low-Light
click to load images
ColorChecker
7.3 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
6 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
6 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
3 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
4 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo A16s: 5.21 ∆E min: 2.76 - max: 8.78 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.9 ∆E
55.1 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
29 ∆E
65.1 ∆E
64.6 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
41.9 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo A16s: 47.12 ∆E min: 13.38 - max: 93.7 ∆E

显示屏 - Oppo智能手机采用明亮的LCD

子像素结构
子像素结构

OPPO的A16s的6.52英寸LC屏幕只有一个小的高清分辨率。这并不导致特别高的像素密度,但你必须非常仔细地看才能看到像素结构。

在激活环境光的情况下,屏幕的亮度要高一些,在屏幕中心达到607 cd/m²。如果手动调节亮度,仍然可以达到549cd/m²,在亮区和暗区均匀分布的情况下(APL50),可以达到576cd/m²。

在默认设置中,显示器的白平衡是相当冷的。然而,如果在设置中把色温设置为尽可能的暖色,显示效果就相当自然,特别是考虑到这个价格范围,真的很好。然而,黑色水平可以更好一点,但对于强大的对比度来说还是足够的。

600
cd/m²
617
cd/m²
560
cd/m²
593
cd/m²
607
cd/m²
555
cd/m²
593
cd/m²
592
cd/m²
560
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 617 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 586.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.98 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 607 cd/m²
Contrast: 1167:1 (Black: 0.52 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.1 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
92.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.17
Oppo A16s
LCD, 1600x720, 6.52
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50
Samsung Galaxy M12
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
realme 7i
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Response Times
0%
-17%
-4%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
48 ?(22, 26)
39.6 ?(18.4, 21.2)
17%
44 ?(21, 23)
8%
40 ?(19, 21)
17%
Response Time Black / White *
24 ?(10.8, 13.2)
28 ?(14, 14)
-17%
34 ?(17, 17)
-42%
30 ?(13, 17)
-25%
PWM Frequency
925.9 ?(25)
Screen
32%
-38%
-60%
Brightness middle
607
427
-30%
426
-30%
597
-2%
Brightness
586
404
-31%
428
-27%
569
-3%
Brightness Distribution
90
87
-3%
89
-1%
91
1%
Black Level *
0.52
0.17
67%
0.46
12%
0.74
-42%
Contrast
1167
2512
115%
926
-21%
807
-31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.1
1.5
52%
4.89
-58%
5.47
-76%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.7
2.1
69%
9.42
-41%
12.11
-81%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2
1.6
20%
4.8
-140%
6.9
-245%
Gamma
2.17 101%
2.3 96%
2.27 97%
2.363 93%
CCT
6806 96%
6652 98%
7669 85%
8091 80%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
16% / 26%
-28% / -34%
-32% / -49%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.8 ms rise
↘ 13.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (37.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21061 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

灰度(色温:最高为暖色,目标色彩空间:sRGB
灰度(色温:最高为暖色,目标色彩空间:sRGB
颜色(色温:最大暖色,目标色彩空间:sRGB
颜色(色温:最大暖色,目标色彩空间:sRGB
色彩空间(色温:最大暖色,目标色彩空间:sRGB
色彩空间(色温:最大暖色,目标色彩空间:sRGB
饱和度(色温:最大暖色,目标色彩空间:sRGB
饱和度(色温:最大暖色,目标色彩空间:sRGB
在户外
在户外
视角稳定
视角稳定

性能、排放和电池寿命

Oppo A16s可以依靠一个 联发科Helio G35有4GB的工作内存。集成的 集成的PowerVR GE8320负责。该处理器提供了一个吸引人的日常性能,但不时可以看到小的停顿。其性能可与 Exynos 850但G35的旧GPU是一个真正的游戏乐趣杀手。作为回报,Oppo智能手机始终保持着令人愉快的冷却。

下巴一侧的扬声器提供了相当好的声音输出,虽然高音偏重,但特别是在中等音量范围内可以说服人。音频插孔通过电缆实现了体面的声音(信噪比:66.43 dBFS)。蓝牙与所有常见的音频编解码器(SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive、aptX TWS+和LDAC)可作为一种选择。

A16s的5000毫安时电池确保了极长的屏幕运行时间,因此,在零星使用的情况下,两天的使用应该是很容易的。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
176 Points ∼29%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
454 Points ∼74% +158%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
178 Points ∼29% +1%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
354 Points ∼58% +101%
Average Mediatek Helio G35
  (163 - 176, n=3)
170 Points ∼28% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=258, last 2 years)
611 Points ∼100% +247%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
965 Points ∼47%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1347 Points ∼65% +40%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1042 Points ∼50% +8%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1305 Points ∼63% +35%
Average Mediatek Helio G35
  (607 - 965, n=3)
827 Points ∼40% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=258, last 2 years)
2069 Points ∼100% +114%
PCMark for Android
Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
5272 Points ∼51%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
9100 Points ∼88% +73%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
6065 Points ∼59% +15%
Average Mediatek Helio G35
  (5272 - 5309, n=3)
5293 Points ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 17085, n=79, last 2 years)
10313 Points ∼100% +96%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
8311 Points ∼96%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8655 Points ∼100%
Average Mediatek Helio G35
  (5279 - 5594, n=2)
5437 Points ∼63%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=225, last 2 years)
8146 Points ∼94%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
928 Points ∼21%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3277 Points ∼75% +253%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1260 Points ∼29% +36%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1844 Points ∼42% +99%
Average Mediatek Helio G35
  (599 - 928, n=3)
803 Points ∼18% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=254, last 2 years)
4386 Points ∼100% +373%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
853 Points ∼15%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3435 Points ∼61% +303%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1133 Points ∼20% +33%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1693 Points ∼30% +98%
Average Mediatek Helio G35
  (541 - 853, n=3)
740 Points ∼13% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 31940, n=254, last 2 years)
5670 Points ∼100% +565%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1343 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2824 Points ∼92% +110%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2079 Points ∼68% +55%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2684 Points ∼87% +100%
Average Mediatek Helio G35
  (954 - 1343, n=3)
1157 Points ∼38% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (640 - 5784, n=252, last 2 years)
3080 Points ∼100% +129%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
486 Points ∼18%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2411 Points ∼89% +396%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
864 Points ∼32% +78%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1400 Points ∼51% +188%
Average Mediatek Helio G35
  (341 - 486, n=3)
416 Points ∼15% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=224, last 2 years)
2719 Points ∼100% +459%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
412 Points ∼14%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2313 Points ∼80% +461%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
746 Points ∼26% +81%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1237 Points ∼43% +200%
Average Mediatek Helio G35
  (289 - 412, n=3)
353 Points ∼12% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=224, last 2 years)
2878 Points ∼100% +599%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1301 Points ∼45%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2829 Points ∼99% +117%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1942 Points ∼68% +49%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2600 Points ∼91% +100%
Average Mediatek Helio G35
  (933 - 1301, n=3)
1123 Points ∼39% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=224, last 2 years)
2867 Points ∼100% +120%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
539 Points ∼15%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2449 Points ∼68% +354%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
866 Points ∼24% +61%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1411 Points ∼39% +162%
Average Mediatek Helio G35
  (373 - 539, n=3)
464 Points ∼13% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=256, last 2 years)
3606 Points ∼100% +569%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
462 Points ∼11%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2336 Points ∼55% +406%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
744 Points ∼18% +61%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1243 Points ∼29% +169%
Average Mediatek Helio G35
  (318 - 462, n=3)
403 Points ∼10% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 16221, n=256, last 2 years)
4220 Points ∼100% +813%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1304 Points ∼42%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2948 Points ∼95% +126%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2042 Points ∼66% +57%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2681 Points ∼86% +106%
Average Mediatek Helio G35
  (839 - 1304, n=3)
1031 Points ∼33% -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (626 - 5793, n=256, last 2 years)
3114 Points ∼100% +139%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
422 Points ∼14%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
706 Points ∼23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 9680, n=125, last 2 years)
3087 Points ∼100%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
423 Points ∼13%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
698 Points ∼22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (174 - 11700, n=122, last 2 years)
3203 Points ∼100%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
59.1 (253min - 428max) % ∼66%
Average of class Smartphone
  (26.6 - 99.8, n=110, last 2 years)
89.7 % ∼100%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
119 Points ∼12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102 - 3080, n=73, last 2 years)
992 Points ∼100%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
117 Points ∼12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 4236, n=72, last 2 years)
1015 Points ∼100%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
94.2 (114min - 121max) % ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (38.6 - 100, n=63, last 2 years)
89.9 % ∼95%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
7.8 fps ∼31%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
14 fps ∼56% +79%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
11 fps ∼44% +41%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
18 fps ∼71% +131%
Average Mediatek Helio G35
  (7.4 - 7.8, n=3)
7.6 fps ∼30% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=267, last 2 years)
25.2 fps ∼100% +223%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4.2 fps ∼14%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
14 fps ∼47% +233%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
6.2 fps ∼21% +48%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.7 fps ∼33% +131%
Average Mediatek Helio G35
  (4.1 - 4.2, n=3)
4.17 fps ∼14% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=267, last 2 years)
29.7 fps ∼100% +607%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
5 fps ∼30%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
8.8 fps ∼52% +76%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7.1 fps ∼42% +42%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
12 fps ∼71% +140%
Average Mediatek Helio G35
  (4.7 - 5, n=3)
4.83 fps ∼29% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=268, last 2 years)
16.9 fps ∼100% +238%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1.5 fps ∼13%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
5.5 fps ∼48% +267%
Samsung Galaxy M12
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2.2 fps ∼19% +47%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3.5 fps ∼30% +133%
Average Mediatek Helio G35
  (1.5 - 1.5, n=3)
1.5 fps ∼13% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=268, last 2 years)
11.5 fps ∼100% +667%
Oppo A16sXiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5GSamsung Galaxy M12realme 7iAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
273%
79%
61%
4%
208%
Sequential Read 256KB
289.19
953.73
230%
311.4
8%
316.4
9%
274 ?(95.6 - 704, n=177)
-5%
841 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=271, last 2 years)
191%
Sequential Write 256KB
168.36
489.13
191%
249.3
48%
187.2
11%
177 ?(40 - 274, n=177)
5%
381 ?(11.9 - 1321, n=271, last 2 years)
126%
Random Read 4KB
45.32
155.75
244%
120.9
167%
77.4
71%
58.7 ?(11.4 - 149, n=177)
30%
147 ?(13.5 - 325, n=271, last 2 years)
224%
Random Write 4KB
35.23
186.06
428%
67.2
91%
89.5
154%
29.7 ?(3.4 - 147, n=177)
-16%
137 ?(5.5 - 330, n=271, last 2 years)
289%

温度

Max. Load
 30.9 °C30.5 °C33.5 °C 
 30.5 °C30.2 °C34.1 °C 
 30 °C29.6 °C32.5 °C 
Maximum: 34.1 °C
Average: 31.3 °C
29.7 °C30.2 °C32 °C
29.4 °C30 °C31.7 °C
29.1 °C29.6 °C30.9 °C
Maximum: 32 °C
Average: 30.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  29.5 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.


演讲者

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203734.92525.634.93129.138.14023.439.55036.840.56328.439.28024.844.910022.444.812519.244.116016.946.420015.646.125013.853.931513.45940013.362.950013.866.36301269.380012.771.3100012.275.512501377.9160013.780.1200013.280.4250013.479.931501381.6400013.383.3500013.683630013.382.4800013.880.11000013.779.5125001475.91600013.563.5SPL25.592.1N0.790.3median 13.5median 75.5Delta0.711.13046.326.742.625.645.826.141.836.443.829.246.32547.217.852.818.351.318.655.917.455.414.255.915.958.412.861146713.368.312.276.112.378.411.981.712.883.212.784.412.184.812.983.413.280.313.479.913.678.313.478.813.981.11484.214.271.925.293.50.795.9median 13.4median 78.31.211hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOppo A16sXiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oppo A16s audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命

Oppo A16s
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy M12
5000 mAh
realme 7i
6000 mAh
Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing 1.3
1053
1025
-3%
926
-12%
1307
24%
904 ?(442 - 1953, n=276, last 2 years)
-14%
Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 94)
17h 33min

Pros

+ 明亮的LC显示屏
+ 可扩展的内存
+ 双SIM卡
+ 电池寿命长

Cons

- 缺少DRM认证
- GPU性能较弱

结论--Oppo A16的小加号

在审查中。Oppo A16s。测试设备由德国Oppo公司提供。
在审查中。Oppo A16s。测试设备由德国Oppo公司提供。

奥普A16s是一款成功的入门级智能手机,主要以明亮的无PWM显示屏、成熟的双SIM卡和非常长的电池运行时间来说服人们。它也是同类手机中为数不多的配备了NFC芯片的手机之一,它不仅能实现蓝牙设备的快速配对,还能实现移动支付。

尽管价格低廉,但Oppo A16s有很多优点。

唯一遗憾的是,Oppo没有DRM认证。那些还喜欢在智能手机上玩游戏的人将不得不习惯A16s的细节减少和加载时间长。相机当然不是一个亮点,但对于偶尔的快照来说还是足够的。

一个强有力的选择是 Poco M3 Pro 5G,除了5G,它还拥有更高分辨率的90赫兹显示屏,但它更暗。该 Galaxy M12另一方面,它提供了更好的摄像头,但不得不在电池运行时间和Wi-Fi速度方面做出让步。

价格和可用性

Oppo A16s的建议零售价为179欧元(约207美元),但已经可以以低于150欧元(约173美元)的价格买到。除其他外,它可以在Amazon(DE),MediaMarkt(A16不带NFC)或Saturn但也可以在Sparhandy购买,无论有无合同。.

Oppo A16s - 10/26/2021 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
84%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
86%
Connectivity
48 / 70 → 68%
Weight
89%
Battery
92%
Display
87%
Games Performance
6 / 64 → 10%
Application Performance
61 / 86 → 71%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
75 / 90 → 84%
Camera
51%
Average
72%
77%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Ninh Duy
Editor of the original article: Ninh Duy - Editorial Assistant - 207326 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008
contact me via: Facebook
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Oppo A16s智能手机评测--价格低廉的耐力跑,带NFC功能
Daniel Schmidt, 2021-11- 5 (Update: 2021-11- 5)