Notebookcheck

小米红米6A智能手机评测

Mike Wobker (translated by Zewei Shen), 12/11/2018
Android Smartphone Touchscreen

新一代廉价智能机。 借助这台红米6A,小米推出了物美价廉的红米5A继任者。小米在保持价格不变的同时对硬件设备进行了升级。我们的评测会告诉买家这台700多元的设备有什么值得期待的地方,以及与其竞品的对比。

Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Redmi Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
Graphics adapter
PowerVR GE8320, Core: 650 MHz, PowerVR GE8320
Memory
2048 MB 
, 2GB or 3GB
Display
5.45 inch 18:9, 1440 x 720 pixel 295 PPI, 多点电容触控屏, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 16GB or 32GB, 25 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm耳机接口, Card Reader: microSD 读卡器(最大256 GB), Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 亮度传感器,加速传感器, 距离传感器, 指南针, microUSB
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (900, 1800), UMTS (B1, B8), LTE (B1/B3/B7/B8/B20/B38/B40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.3 x 147.5 x 71.5
Battery
3000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.2
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.2
Additional features
Speakers: 单扬声器, Keyboard: 屏幕键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, USB充电器, microUSB线, SIM卡工具, MIUI 9.6.2, 24 Months Warranty, SAR值(head): 0.78 W/kg, SAR值(body): 1.17 W/kg, fanless
Weight
145 g, Power Supply: 55 g
Price
729元 ~ 150 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

小米红米6A
小米红米6A
小米红米6A
小米红米6A
小米红米6A
小米红米6A
小米红米6A
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=351)
219 MBit/s ∼100% +267%
Nokia 3.1
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750N, 16 GB eMMC Flash
112 MBit/s ∼51% +88%
Gigaset GS100
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 8 GB eMMC Flash
97.9 MBit/s ∼45% +64%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
59.6 (min: 56, max: 61) MBit/s ∼27%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
47.1 MBit/s ∼22% -21%
LG K11
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.1 MBit/s ∼21% -23%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=351)
210 MBit/s ∼100% +277%
Nokia 3.1
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750N, 16 GB eMMC Flash
100 MBit/s ∼48% +80%
Gigaset GS100
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 8 GB eMMC Flash
99.6 MBit/s ∼47% +79%
LG K11
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash
58.6 MBit/s ∼28% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.7 (min: 52, max: 59) MBit/s ∼27%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49 MBit/s ∼23% -12%
010203040506070Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø58.8 (56-61)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø55.9 (52-59)
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 6A
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 6A
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 6A
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 6A
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 6A
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 6A
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Xiaomi Redmi 6A - test chart
Xiaomi Redmi 6A - test chart (detail)
368
cd/m²
392
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
365
cd/m²
404
cd/m²
434
cd/m²
365
cd/m²
402
cd/m²
429
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 443 cd/m² Average: 400.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 404 cd/m²
Contrast: 1554:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.28 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 3.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
93.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.213
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
IPS, 1440x720, 5.45
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Gigaset GS100
IPS, 1440x720, 5.5
Nokia 3.1
IPS, 1440x720, 5.2
LG K11
IPS, 1280x720, 5.3
Screen
-38%
-47%
-9%
-66%
Brightness middle
404
503
25%
442
9%
506
25%
394
-2%
Brightness
400
499
25%
446
12%
490
23%
385
-4%
Brightness Distribution
82
84
2%
86
5%
93
13%
93
13%
Black Level *
0.26
0.73
-181%
0.35
-35%
0.24
8%
0.66
-154%
Contrast
1554
689
-56%
1263
-19%
2108
36%
597
-62%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.28
5.44
-27%
8.03
-88%
6.4
-50%
8.2
-92%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.97
10.01
-0%
15.81
-59%
11.1
-11%
21.5
-116%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.5
6.8
-94%
10.4
-197%
7.5
-114%
7.5
-114%
Gamma
2.213 99%
2.451 90%
2.02 109%
2.2 100%
2.6 85%
CCT
6899 94%
6590 99%
10070 65%
8643 75%
7581 86%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9813 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (25.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40.7 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
1699 Points ∼37%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
1333 Points ∼29% -22%
Nokia 3.1
1908 Points ∼42% +12%
LG K11
1559 Points ∼34% -8%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
1699 Points ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1077 - 21070, n=239)
4593 Points ∼100% +170%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
2471 Points ∼56%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
1874 Points ∼42% -24%
Gigaset GS100
1418 Points ∼32% -43%
Nokia 3.1
2645 Points ∼60% +7%
LG K11
2259 Points ∼51% -9%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
2471 Points ∼56% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1634 - 11598, n=291)
4410 Points ∼100% +78%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
825 Points ∼64%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
681 Points ∼53% -17%
Gigaset GS100
579 Points ∼45% -30%
Nokia 3.1
665 Points ∼51% -19%
LG K11
609 Points ∼47% -26%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
825 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (590 - 4824, n=292)
1293 Points ∼100% +57%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
6194 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
4559 Points ∼74% -26%
Nokia 3.1
3885 Points ∼63% -37%
LG K11
4241 Points ∼68% -32%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
6194 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3977 - 13531, n=470)
5179 Points ∼84% -16%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
763 Points ∼43%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Points ∼0% -100%
Gigaset GS100
611 Points ∼35% -20%
Nokia 3.1
1031 Points ∼58% +35%
LG K11
1121 Points ∼64% +47%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
763 Points ∼43% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (939 - 4439, n=317)
1763 Points ∼100% +131%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
260 Points ∼17%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Points ∼0% -100%
Gigaset GS100
75 Points ∼5% -71%
Nokia 3.1
266 Points ∼18% +2%
LG K11
248 Points ∼17% -5%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
260 Points ∼17% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (138 - 8206, n=317)
1491 Points ∼100% +473%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
305 Points ∼22%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Points ∼0% -100%
Gigaset GS100
93 Points ∼7% -70%
Nokia 3.1
319 Points ∼23% +5%
LG K11
300 Points ∼22% -2%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
305 Points ∼22% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (170 - 5200, n=320)
1392 Points ∼100% +356%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
807 Points ∼47%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
886 Points ∼51% +10%
Gigaset GS100
611 Points ∼35% -24%
Nokia 3.1
1013 Points ∼58% +26%
LG K11
1207 Points ∼70% +50%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
807 Points ∼47% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 4493, n=333)
1733 Points ∼100% +115%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
445 Points ∼22%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
249 Points ∼12% -44%
Gigaset GS100
131 Points ∼6% -71%
Nokia 3.1
397 Points ∼19% -11%
LG K11
384 Points ∼19% -14%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
445 Points ∼22% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=333)
2053 Points ∼100% +361%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
494 Points ∼28%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
296 Points ∼17% -40%
Gigaset GS100
159 Points ∼9% -68%
Nokia 3.1
459 Points ∼26% -7%
LG K11
453 Points ∼26% -8%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
494 Points ∼28% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (159 - 7856, n=334)
1744 Points ∼100% +253%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
828 Points ∼49%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Points ∼0% -100%
Gigaset GS100
549 Points ∼32% -34%
Nokia 3.1
1144 Points ∼67% +38%
LG K11
1233 Points ∼73% +49%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
828 Points ∼49% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (918 - 4216, n=393)
1696 Points ∼100% +105%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
225 Points ∼18%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Points ∼0% -100%
Gigaset GS100
69 Points ∼6% -69%
Nokia 3.1
150 Points ∼12% -33%
LG K11
252 Points ∼21% +12%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
225 Points ∼18% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 5246, n=395)
1221 Points ∼100% +443%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
268 Points ∼23%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Points ∼0% -100%
Gigaset GS100
86 Points ∼7% -68%
Nokia 3.1
186 Points ∼16% -31%
LG K11
306 Points ∼26% +14%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
268 Points ∼23% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (184 - 4734, n=403)
1171 Points ∼100% +337%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
840 Points ∼53%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
903 Points ∼57% +8%
Gigaset GS100
532 Points ∼33% -37%
Nokia 3.1
1099 Points ∼69% +31%
LG K11
1127 Points ∼71% +34%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
840 Points ∼53% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (512 - 4215, n=427)
1595 Points ∼100% +90%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
403 Points ∼24%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
43 Points ∼3% -89%
Gigaset GS100
104 Points ∼6% -74%
Nokia 3.1
103 Points ∼6% -74%
LG K11
381 Points ∼23% -5%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
403 Points ∼24% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 8312, n=427)
1659 Points ∼100% +312%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
456 Points ∼32%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
55 Points ∼4% -88%
Gigaset GS100
127 Points ∼9% -72%
Nokia 3.1
129 Points ∼9% -72%
LG K11
447 Points ∼31% -2%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
456 Points ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 6454, n=435)
1424 Points ∼100% +212%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
14128 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
10556 Points ∼75% -25%
Gigaset GS100
9159 Points ∼65% -35%
Nokia 3.1
10044 Points ∼71% -29%
LG K11
10285 Points ∼73% -27%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
14128 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 37475, n=586)
13218 Points ∼94% -6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
6785 Points ∼36%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
5532 Points ∼30% -18%
Gigaset GS100
2878 Points ∼15% -58%
Nokia 3.1
8163 Points ∼44% +20%
LG K11
8177 Points ∼44% +21%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
6785 Points ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1152 - 162695, n=586)
18733 Points ∼100% +176%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
7671 Points ∼49%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
6186 Points ∼39% -19%
Gigaset GS100
3395 Points ∼22% -56%
Nokia 3.1
8517 Points ∼54% +11%
LG K11
8567 Points ∼54% +12%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
7671 Points ∼49% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=587)
15750 Points ∼100% +105%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
13 fps ∼40%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
7.7 fps ∼24% -41%
Gigaset GS100
5 fps ∼15% -62%
Nokia 3.1
13 fps ∼40% 0%
LG K11
13 fps ∼40% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
13 fps ∼40% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=610)
32.6 fps ∼100% +151%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
19 fps ∼73%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
14 fps ∼54% -26%
Gigaset GS100
8.2 fps ∼32% -57%
Nokia 3.1
20 fps ∼77% +5%
LG K11
22 fps ∼85% +16%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
19 fps ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=613)
25.9 fps ∼100% +36%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
6.3 fps ∼36%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
2.8 fps ∼16% -56%
Nokia 3.1
5.5 fps ∼31% -13%
LG K11
5.3 fps ∼30% -16%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
6.3 fps ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=531)
17.6 fps ∼100% +179%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
12 fps ∼72%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
6 fps ∼36% -50%
Gigaset GS100
4.4 fps ∼26% -63%
Nokia 3.1
10 fps ∼60% -17%
LG K11
11 fps ∼66% -8%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
12 fps ∼72% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=535)
16.7 fps ∼100% +39%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
4 fps ∼27%
Gigaset GS100
1.3 fps ∼9% -67%
Nokia 3.1
3.6 fps ∼24% -10%
LG K11
3.5 fps ∼24% -12%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
4 fps ∼27% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.6 - 88, n=392)
14.8 fps ∼100% +270%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
7.5 fps ∼52%
Gigaset GS100
2.8 fps ∼20% -63%
Nokia 3.1
7.8 fps ∼55% +4%
LG K11
8.6 fps ∼60% +15%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
7.5 fps ∼52% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.5 - 110, n=395)
14.3 fps ∼100% +91%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
2.7 fps ∼29%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
2.7 fps ∼29% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.61 - 59, n=97)
9.25 fps ∼100% +243%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
0.85 fps ∼13%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
0.85 fps ∼13% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.21 - 31, n=97)
6.32 fps ∼100% +644%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
4.3 fps ∼31%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
4.3 fps ∼31% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.4 - 59, n=97)
13.8 fps ∼100% +221%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
2.3 (min: 4.3) fps ∼15%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
2.3 fps ∼15% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.77 - 63, n=96)
15.1 fps ∼100% +557%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
1.9 fps ∼19%
Nokia 3.1
2 fps ∼20% +5%
LG K11
1.9 fps ∼19% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
1.9 fps ∼19% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 54, n=322)
10.1 fps ∼100% +432%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
3.2 fps ∼35%
Nokia 3.1
4.1 fps ∼45% +28%
LG K11
4.3 fps ∼47% +34%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
3.2 fps ∼35% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (9.4 - 58, n=325)
9.11 fps ∼100% +185%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
61753 Points ∼51%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
43861 Points ∼36% -29%
LG K11
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
61753 Points ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (41483 - 348178, n=215)
122050 Points ∼100% +98%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
51633 Points ∼64%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
36883 Points ∼46% -29%
Gigaset GS100
30702 Points ∼38% -41%
Nokia 3.1
43987 Points ∼54% -15%
LG K11
39898 Points ∼49% -23%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
51633 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 273655, n=431)
80811 Points ∼100% +57%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
733 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
723 Points ∼99% -1%
Gigaset GS100
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Nokia 3.1
671 Points ∼92% -8%
LG K11
679 Points ∼93% -7%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
733 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=543)
714 Points ∼97% -3%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
482 Points ∼27%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
444 Points ∼25% -8%
Gigaset GS100
149 Points ∼8% -69%
Nokia 3.1
499 Points ∼28% +4%
LG K11
487 Points ∼27% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
482 Points ∼27% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=543)
1806 Points ∼100% +275%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
607 Points ∼46%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
762 Points ∼57% +26%
Gigaset GS100
431 Points ∼32% -29%
Nokia 3.1
1033 Points ∼78% +70%
LG K11
728 Points ∼55% +20%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
607 Points ∼46% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=543)
1329 Points ∼100% +119%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
1434 Points ∼54%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
1463 Points ∼55% +2%
Gigaset GS100
1115 Points ∼42% -22%
Nokia 3.1
2097 Points ∼79% +46%
LG K11
1599 Points ∼60% +12%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
1434 Points ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=543)
2664 Points ∼100% +86%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
745 Points ∼56%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
774 Points ∼59% +4%
Gigaset GS100
162 Points ∼12% -78%
Nokia 3.1
923 Points ∼70% +24%
LG K11
787 Points ∼60% +6%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
745 Points ∼56% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=547)
1320 Points ∼100% +77%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
93 Points ∼13%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
93 Points ∼13% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (36.3 - 2754, n=82)
711 Points ∼100% +665%

Legend

 
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Redmi 5A Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Gigaset GS100 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 3.1 Mediatek MT6750N, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG K11 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=468)
37.7 Points ∼100% +60%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
23.546 Points ∼62%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
23.5 Points ∼62% 0%
Nokia 3.1 (Chrome 67)
18.015 Points ∼48% -23%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A (Chrome 67)
17.927 Points ∼48% -24%
LG K11 (Chrome 67)
16.634 Points ∼44% -29%
Gigaset GS100 (Chrome 68)
13.378 Points ∼35% -43%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=604)
5843 Points ∼100% +35%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
4332 Points ∼74%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
4332 Points ∼74% 0%
LG K11 (Chrome 67)
3397 Points ∼58% -22%
Nokia 3.1 (Chrome 67)
3274 Points ∼56% -24%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A (Chrome 67)
3224 Points ∼55% -26%
Gigaset GS100 (Chrome 68)
2093 Points ∼36% -52%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Gigaset GS100 (Chrome 68)
15962 ms * ∼100% -49%
LG K11 (Chrome 67)
14149.5 ms * ∼89% -32%
Nokia 3.1 (Chrome 67)
14115.5 ms * ∼88% -31%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A (Chrome 67)
13112.2 ms * ∼82% -22%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=623)
11157 ms * ∼70% -4%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
10740 ms * ∼67% -0%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
10739.7 ms * ∼67%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (24 - 161, n=84)
64.3 Points ∼100% +114%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
30 Points ∼47%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
30 Points ∼47% 0%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Average of class Smartphone (74 - 362, n=308)
117 Points ∼100% +33%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
88 Points ∼75%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
88 Points ∼75% 0%
Nokia 3.1 (Chrome 67)
78 Points ∼67% -11%
Gigaset GS100 (Chrome 68)
52 Points ∼44% -41%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Redmi 6AXiaomi Redmi 5AGigaset GS100Nokia 3.1LG K11Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-19%
-49%
-21%
-20%
-24%
-24%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
65.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
62.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
59.84 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-9%
61.11 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
47.9 (3.4 - 87.1, n=119)
-27%
47.1 (19.2 - 87.1, n=357)
-28%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
82.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
84.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
79.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
77.17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-7%
82.81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
66.8 (8.2 - 96.5, n=119)
-19%
65.3 (29.8 - 96.5, n=357)
-21%
Random Write 4KB
52.23
9.28
-82%
6.2
-88%
9.2
-82%
13.16
-75%
19 (0.75 - 77.3, n=161)
-64%
17.8 (0.14 - 250, n=652)
-66%
Random Read 4KB
33.94
42.32
25%
17.6
-48%
48.62
43%
45.8
35%
37.2 (3.59 - 117, n=161)
10%
41.2 (1.59 - 173, n=652)
21%
Sequential Write 256KB
131.67
49.86
-62%
24
-82%
35.26
-73%
48.32
-63%
94.8 (14.8 - 189, n=161)
-28%
85.9 (2.99 - 253, n=652)
-35%
Sequential Read 256KB
277.54
293.76
6%
97.2
-65%
281.54
1%
252.96
-9%
231 (25.8 - 452, n=161)
-17%
241 (12.1 - 912, n=652)
-13%
Max. Load
 31.5 °C30 °C31 °C 
 31 °C29.6 °C31.4 °C 
 30.4 °C30.1 °C30.2 °C 
Maximum: 31.5 °C
Average: 30.6 °C
29.3 °C31.1 °C32.3 °C
29.4 °C30.7 °C32 °C
29.7 °C31 °C32 °C
Maximum: 32.3 °C
Average: 30.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  39.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.945.52536.544.93137.239.14037.641.25031.7356323.823.78024.425.110023.625.112519.922.716023.32420018.430.725018.238.231515.845.140014.653.450015.557.26301361.580012.364.7100012.166.1125011.965.8160010.768.2200010.768.1250010.566.6315010.366.8400010.767.2500010.565.5630010.565800010.663.21000010.662.51250010.553.71600010.641.4SPL61.552.561.424.177.8N14.68.214.50.639.8median 11.9median 62.5Delta3.412.12727.825.927.629.532.231.428.732.634.224.123.223.122.724.123.117.21916.623.616.833.216.438.714.147.513.85713.662.712.163.311.564.211.566.911.265.511.263.511.264.711.26511.166.211.266.111.266.711.465.211.466.811.360.811.450.311.441.86023.977.113.70.539.7median 11.4median 63.31.811.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi 6AXiaomi Redmi 5A
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Redmi 5A audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.7 / 1.2 / 2 Watt
Load midlight 3.4 / 4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
3000 mAh
Gigaset GS100
3000 mAh
Nokia 3.1
2990 mAh
LG K11
3000 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-18%
-54%
-8%
-14%
0%
-27%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
1.2
-71%
1.3
-86%
0.68
3%
0.57
19%
0.7
-0%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=684)
-26%
Idle Average *
1.2
1.5
-25%
2.1
-75%
1.33
-11%
1.48
-23%
1.2
-0%
1.73 (0.6 - 6.2, n=683)
-44%
Idle Maximum *
2
1.8
10%
2.9
-45%
1.37
31%
1.54
23%
2
-0%
2.01 (0.74 - 6.6, n=684)
-1%
Load Average *
3.4
2.9
15%
4.4
-29%
4.02
-18%
4.56
-34%
3.4
-0%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=678)
-19%
Load Maximum *
4
4.8
-20%
5.3
-33%
5.89
-47%
6.16
-54%
4
-0%
5.84 (1.2 - 14.2, n=678)
-46%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12h 41min
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
3000 mAh
Gigaset GS100
3000 mAh
Nokia 3.1
2990 mAh
LG K11
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
761
1009
33%
532
-30%
562
-26%
741
-3%

Pros

+ 系统性能优秀
+ 价格低廉
+ 外壳坚固
+ 双SIM和SD卡可同时使用

Cons

- 没有NFC
- 严格的联网要求

总结-及其优秀的性价比:

小米红米6A智能手机评测. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de
小米红米6A智能手机评测. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de

通过红米6A,小米给我们带来了一台红米5A应该成为的手机。6A的性能得到了显着的提升,因此简单的应用程序,浏览器任务和操作系统可以顺利地运行。相机仅仅适用于简单的快照。寻找价格合理的备用机的用户也可以拥有双卡双待和SD卡槽。

“只有小米才能提供给用户红米6A这样一台配置不错且价格实惠的智能手机。“

虽然你几乎不需要降低对系统性能的期待,但Redmi 6A还是缺少一些硬件设备。例如,由于价格低廉,所以缺少的指纹传感器和NFC。买家也应该了解小米严格的在线连接要求,因为如果没有MIUI帐户,您将无法对设置进行一些特定调整。

Xiaomi Redmi 6A - 11/16/2018 v6
Mike Wobker

Chassis
77%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 86%
Pointing Device
81%
Connectivity
35 / 60 → 58%
Weight
93%
Battery
96%
Display
85%
Games Performance
16 / 63 → 25%
Application Performance
46 / 70 → 65%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
66 / 91 → 73%
Camera
63%
Average
70%
81%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米红米6A智能手机评测
Mike Wobker, 2018-12-11 (Update: 2018-12-11)