Notebookcheck

Blackview Tab 10平板电脑评测:Android 11,仅售190美元

你会得到你所付出的。 一台明亮的10.1英寸1080p平板电脑运行在最新的Android ,其低廉的要价听起来像是一笔交易,直到你发现它的性能甚至在最简单的任务中都不太理想。
Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Tablet Touchscreen Chinese Tech
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

黑视Tab 10是一款超预算的Android 11平板电脑,运行在低端八核联发科MT8768 SoC上。不可否认的是,其低于200美元的价格对那些只想用简单的Andoid平板电脑进行基本浏览和收发电子邮件的用户来说是很有吸引力的。Tab 10绝对有一些令人惊讶的优点,但缺点也很难忽视。

官方产品页面关于Blackview Tab 10的完整规格列表。Tab 10的直接竞争对手包括其他非常便宜的Android 平板电脑,如 全视通iPlay 20, 联想Tab M10系列,或Medion LifeTab系列.

更多关于Blackview的评论。

Blackview Tab 10
Processor
Mediatek MT8768 8 x 1.5 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
PowerVR GE8320
Memory
4096 MB 
, LPDDR3
Display
10.10 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 218 PPI, 2-point capacitive, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Sensors: Accelerometer
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5)
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.4 x 243 x 162
Battery
7480 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Additional features
AC adapter, USB-A to USB-C charging cable, USB-C to USB-A adapter, USB-C earbuds, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
523 g
Price
190 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

potential competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
74 %
09/2021
Blackview Tab 10
Helio MT8768, PowerVR GE8320
523 g8.4 mm10.10"1920x1080
88 %
09/2021
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
SD 865, Adreno 650
485 g7.25 mm10.95"2560x1600
77 %
Alcatel 3T 10 4G 2020
Helio MT8766B, PowerVR GE8300
462 g9.35 mm10.10"1280x800
78 %
Medion LifeTab E10802
Helio MT8768, PowerVR GE8320
503 g8.6 mm10.00"1920x1200
78 %
Allview iPlay 20
SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322
444 g7.95 mm10.10"1920x1200
91 %
10/2020
Apple iPad Air 2020
A14, A14 Bionic GPU
458 g6.1 mm10.90"2360x1640

案例 - 坚实,但巨大

这款箱子很结实,感觉比便宜的价格所显示的质量要高。它的金属背板和玻璃正面可以防止扭曲、嘎吱声和凹陷。

值得注意的是,这款平板电脑在其尺寸级别中是比较重的。我们自己的秤显示594克,不包括可拆卸的盖子,明显比制造商声称的523克要重得多。

可拆卸的对开盒是软塑料和仿皮的结合。
可拆卸的对开盒是软塑料和仿皮的结合。
用于充电、数据和耳机的现代USB-C端口(含适配器)。
用于充电、数据和耳机的现代USB-C端口(含适配器)。
这款手机壳没有提供在桌子上调整平板电脑角度的定位模式。
这款手机壳没有提供在桌子上调整平板电脑角度的定位模式。
可拆卸的箱子使总重量增加了约158克
可拆卸的箱子使总重量增加了约158克
后置摄像头和LED闪光灯略微凸出
后置摄像头和LED闪光灯略微凸出
底盘和刚度是黑观音Tab 10的亮点
底盘和刚度是黑观音Tab 10的亮点
253.8 mm 165.3 mm 7.25 mm 485 g247 mm 171 mm 8.6 mm 503 g247.6 mm 178.5 mm 6.1 mm 458 g245.2 mm 149.4 mm 7.95 mm 444 g243.3 mm 161.2 mm 9.35 mm 462 g243 mm 162 mm 8.4 mm 523 g

连接性

这款平板电脑集成了USB-C、MicroSD和一个Nano-SIM插槽。USB-C端口用于数据和充电,不支持视频输出。

底部的针脚用于连接特定的键盘底座
底部的针脚用于连接特定的键盘底座
电源和音量摇杆在按下时感觉有点太软了
电源和音量摇杆在按下时感觉有点太软了
毗邻USB-C充电接口的Nano-SIM和MicroSD插槽
毗邻USB-C充电接口的Nano-SIM和MicroSD插槽
沿着平板电脑底部边缘的扬声器栅栏
沿着平板电脑底部边缘的扬声器栅栏

沟通

传输速率在300Mbps的范围内达到最大值,可实现稳定的视频流。Wi-Fi 6不被支持。

我们将T-Mobile Nano-SIM卡插入平板电脑,只收到边缘网络速度。用户要在购买前,检查该平板电脑是否与当地频段兼容。是否与他们当地的频段兼容。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
902 (886min - 925max) MBit/s ∼100% +192%
Apple iPad Air 2020
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
645 (569min - 750max) MBit/s ∼72% +109%
Medion LifeTab E10802
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
329 (99min - 384max) MBit/s ∼36% +6%
Blackview Tab 10
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
309 MBit/s ∼34%
Alcatel 3T 10 4G 2020
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
297 (149min - 312max) MBit/s ∼33% -4%
Allview iPlay 20
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
99.9 MBit/s ∼11% -68%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
780 (635min - 867max) MBit/s ∼100% +120%
Apple iPad Air 2020
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
541 (500min - 571max) MBit/s ∼69% +52%
Blackview Tab 10
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
355 MBit/s ∼46%
Alcatel 3T 10 4G 2020
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
348 (310min - 358max) MBit/s ∼45% -2%
Medion LifeTab E10802
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
317 (164min - 333max) MBit/s ∼41% -11%
Allview iPlay 20
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
295 MBit/s ∼38% -17%

网络摄像头

相机质量比预期的价格更清晰。然而,颜色是不对的,而且温度过高。

ColorChecker
18.8 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
20.8 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
18 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
25.3 ∆E
16 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
21 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Blackview Tab 10: 14.01 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 25.32 ∆E

配件和保修

零售包装盒包括一个USB-C转USB-A适配器、USB-C耳塞、说明书、18W交流适配器、USB-C转USB-A电缆和可拆卸的对开盒。标准的一年有限制造商保修适用,但对于海外买家来说,要求上述保修可能比较困难。

显示屏 - 比预期的更亮

该显示屏最好的一点是它的亮度相对较高,接近500尼特,而联想M10等竞争机型的亮度为300至350尼特。否则,从其黑白响应时间、对比度、色彩,甚至是多点触控能力来看,几乎所有其他方面都是平均水平。该面板难以识别2个手指以上的多点触摸输入,与Allview iPlay 20等其他廉价平板电脑相比,其有限的色域是立即可以看到的。

边缘到边缘的玻璃保护
边缘到边缘的玻璃保护
厚厚的边框
厚厚的边框
像素位于厚厚的玻璃层之下,因此图像不会像IPad或Galaxy Tab S那样突出或显得鲜艳。
像素位于厚厚的玻璃层之下,因此图像不会像IPad或Galaxy Tab S那样突出或显得鲜艳。
沿着边缘有适度不均匀的背光渗出
沿着边缘有适度不均匀的背光渗出
414.8
cd/m²
467.4
cd/m²
442.4
cd/m²
427.5
cd/m²
467
cd/m²
438.6
cd/m²
440.7
cd/m²
463.7
cd/m²
440.6
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 467.4 cd/m² Average: 444.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1.78 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 467 cd/m²
Contrast: 708:1 (Black: 0.66 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.9 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 9.9 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
Gamma: 1.72
Blackview Tab 10
IPS, 10.10, 1920x1080
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
IPS, 10.95, 2560x1600
Alcatel 3T 10 4G 2020
IPS, 10.10, 1280x800
Medion LifeTab E10802
IPS, 10.00, 1920x1200
Allview iPlay 20
IPS, 10.10, 1920x1200
Apple iPad Air 2020
IPS, 10.90, 2360x1640
Response Times
28%
-37%
-85%
4%
-16%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
35.2 (18, 17.2)
30.4 (10.8, 19.6)
14%
50.4 (23.6, 26.8)
-43%
71.2
-102%
29.6 (14.8, 14.8)
16%
46.8 (23.6, 23.2)
-33%
Response Time Black / White *
26 (12, 14)
15.2 (3.6, 11.6)
42%
34 (18.8, 15.2)
-31%
43.6 (22.4, 21.2)
-68%
28 (18, 10)
-8%
25.6 (12.4, 13.2)
2%
PWM Frequency
Screen
17%
46%
11%
27%
49%
Brightness middle
467
550
18%
375
-20%
335
-28%
396
-15%
509
9%
Brightness
445
515
16%
362
-19%
319
-28%
389
-13%
486
9%
Brightness Distribution
89
90
1%
87
-2%
85
-4%
90
1%
93
4%
Black Level *
0.66
0.96
-45%
0.17
74%
0.29
56%
0.44
33%
0.39
41%
Contrast
708
573
-19%
2206
212%
1155
63%
900
27%
1305
84%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
9.9
3.3
67%
5.6
43%
7.6
23%
2.39
76%
1.3
87%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
15.66
7.9
50%
10.6
32%
14.1
10%
7.81
50%
2.8
82%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
9.9
4.9
51%
5
49%
10
-1%
4.7
53%
2.2
78%
Gamma
1.72 128%
2.24 98%
2.17 101%
2.44 90%
2.24 98%
2.21 100%
CCT
9142 71%
7288 89%
7667 85%
10228 64%
7326 89%
6833 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
99.3
Total Average (Program / Settings)
23% / 20%
5% / 30%
-37% / -8%
16% / 22%
17% / 36%

* ... smaller is better

色温太冷了,这是大多数经济型显示器的典型特征。因此,平均灰度和彩色DeltaE值非常高,几乎都是10。

灰度
灰度
饱和度扫描
饱和度扫描
颜色检测器
颜色检测器

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (23.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
35.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (37.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 15315 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

尽管有不可避免的眩光,但在树荫下的户外能见度还是不错的。在较亮的环境条件下,屏幕会被冲淡。
尽管有不可避免的眩光,但在树荫下的户外能见度还是不错的。在较亮的环境条件下,屏幕会被冲淡。
宽广的IPS可视角度。注意过冷或过蓝的色温
宽广的IPS可视角度。注意过冷或过蓝的色温

业绩 - 蜗牛的步伐

由于慢速的联发科SoC,整体性能远不流畅。简单的动作,如浏览网页或在主屏幕上导航,会导致频繁的跳帧,错过输入,明显的延迟,以及加载时间,所有这些加起来有时会让人感到沮丧。游戏性能同样令人失望,即使是预装的Asphalt Nitro游戏也很难保持20至30帧。

Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPad Air 2020
Apple A14 Bionic
1593 Points ∼100% +948%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
905 Points ∼57% +495%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
HiSilicon Kirin 810
592 Points ∼37% +289%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9611
345 Points ∼22% +127%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
316 Points ∼20% +108%
Amazon Fire HD 10 Plus 2021
Mediatek MT8183
305 Points ∼19% +101%
Medion LifeTab E10802
Mediatek MT8768
158 Points ∼10% +4%
Allview iPlay 20
UNISOC SC9863A
152 Points ∼10% 0%
Blackview Tab 10
Mediatek MT8768
152 Points ∼10%
Average Mediatek MT8768
  (135 - 158, n=3)
148 Points ∼9% -3%
Alcatel 3T 10 4G 2020
Mediatek MT8766B
133 Points ∼8% -12%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Apple iPad Air 2020
Apple A14 Bionic
4334 Points ∼100% +456%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
3288 Points ∼76% +322%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
HiSilicon Kirin 810
1890 Points ∼44% +142%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
1381 Points ∼32% +77%
Amazon Fire HD 10 Plus 2021
Mediatek MT8183
1293 Points ∼30% +66%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9611
1207 Points ∼28% +55%
Allview iPlay 20
UNISOC SC9863A
848 Points ∼20% +9%
Medion LifeTab E10802
Mediatek MT8768
817 Points ∼19% +5%
Blackview Tab 10
Mediatek MT8768
780 Points ∼18%
Average Mediatek MT8768
  (498 - 817, n=3)
698 Points ∼16% -11%
Alcatel 3T 10 4G 2020
Mediatek MT8766B
455 Points ∼10% -42%
PCMark for Android / Work 3.0
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
11610 Points ∼100% +154%
Amazon Fire HD 10 Plus 2021
Mediatek MT8183
5346 Points ∼46% +17%
Blackview Tab 10
Mediatek MT8768
4564 Points ∼39%
Average Mediatek MT8768
 
4564 Points ∼39% 0%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Air 2020
Apple A14 Bionic
35.6 fps ∼100% +1518%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
18 fps ∼51% +718%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
HiSilicon Kirin 810
13 fps ∼37% +491%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9611
5.8 fps ∼16% +164%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
4.6 fps ∼13% +109%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Mediatek MT8183
4.3 fps ∼12% +95%
Amazon Fire HD 10 Plus 2021
Mediatek MT8183
4.3 fps ∼12% +95%
Average Mediatek MT8768
  (2.2 - 4.6, n=3)
3.03 fps ∼9% +38%
Alcatel 3T 10 4G 2020
Mediatek MT8766B
3 fps ∼8% +36%
Medion LifeTab E10802
Mediatek MT8768
2.3 fps ∼6% +5%
Blackview Tab 10
Mediatek MT8768
2.2 fps ∼6%
Allview iPlay 20
UNISOC SC9863A
2 fps ∼6% -9%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 2020
Apple A14 Bionic
32.9 fps ∼100% +2250%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
21 fps ∼64% +1400%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
HiSilicon Kirin 810
7.8 fps ∼24% +457%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9611
3.6 fps ∼11% +157%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
2.9 fps ∼9% +107%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Mediatek MT8183
2.6 fps ∼8% +86%
Amazon Fire HD 10 Plus 2021
Mediatek MT8183
2.5 fps ∼8% +79%
Average Mediatek MT8768
  (1.4 - 1.5, n=3)
1.433 fps ∼4% +2%
Medion LifeTab E10802
Mediatek MT8768
1.4 fps ∼4% 0%
Blackview Tab 10
Mediatek MT8768
1.4 fps ∼4%
Allview iPlay 20
UNISOC SC9863A
1.2 fps ∼4% -14%
Alcatel 3T 10 4G 2020
Mediatek MT8766B
0.87 fps ∼3% -38%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Air 2020
Apple A14 Bionic
40.5 fps ∼100% +1025%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
29 fps ∼72% +706%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
HiSilicon Kirin 810
20 fps ∼49% +456%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9611
9.7 fps ∼24% +169%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
7.8 fps ∼19% +117%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Mediatek MT8183
7.4 fps ∼18% +106%
Amazon Fire HD 10 Plus 2021
Mediatek MT8183
7.1 fps ∼18% +97%
Average Mediatek MT8768
  (3.6 - 7.6, n=3)
4.97 fps ∼12% +38%
Alcatel 3T 10 4G 2020
Mediatek MT8766B
4.7 fps ∼12% +31%
Medion LifeTab E10802
Mediatek MT8768
3.7 fps ∼9% +3%
Blackview Tab 10
Mediatek MT8768
3.6 fps ∼9%
Allview iPlay 20
UNISOC SC9863A
3.2 fps ∼8% -11%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 2020
Apple A14 Bionic
105.6 fps ∼100% +2608%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
54 fps ∼51% +1285%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
HiSilicon Kirin 810
22 fps ∼21% +464%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9611
10 fps ∼9% +156%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
8.4 fps ∼8% +115%
Amazon Fire HD 10 Plus 2021
Mediatek MT8183
7.9 fps ∼7% +103%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Mediatek MT8183
7.6 fps ∼7% +95%
Medion LifeTab E10802
Mediatek MT8768
3.9 fps ∼4% 0%
Blackview Tab 10
Mediatek MT8768
3.9 fps ∼4%
Average Mediatek MT8768
  (3.9 - 3.9, n=3)
3.9 fps ∼4% 0%
Allview iPlay 20
UNISOC SC9863A
3.3 fps ∼3% -15%
Alcatel 3T 10 4G 2020
Mediatek MT8766B
2.4 fps ∼2% -38%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
5403 Points ∼100% +361%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
HiSilicon Kirin 810
3720 Points ∼69% +218%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Mediatek MT8183
2966 Points ∼55% +153%
Apple iPad Air 2020
Apple A14 Bionic
2631 Points ∼49% +125%
Amazon Fire HD 10 Plus 2021
Mediatek MT8183
2542 Points ∼47% +117%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
2471 Points ∼46% +111%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9611
2280 Points ∼42% +95%
Alldocube Alldocube X
Mediatek MT8176
1880 Points ∼35% +61%
Lenovo Tab M10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
1785 Points ∼33% +52%
Average Mediatek MT8768
  (957 - 2101, n=3)
1410 Points ∼26% +20%
Allview iPlay 20
UNISOC SC9863A
1373 Points ∼25% +17%
Blackview Tab 10
Mediatek MT8768
1171 Points ∼22%
Medion LifeTab E10802
Mediatek MT8768
957 Points ∼18% -18%
Alcatel 3T 10 4G 2020
Mediatek MT8766B
853 Points ∼16% -27%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Apple iPad Air 2020
Apple A14 Bionic
12112 Points ∼100% +2750%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
9428 Points ∼78% +2118%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
HiSilicon Kirin 810
2798 Points ∼23% +558%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9611
1528 Points ∼13% +260%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
1043 Points ∼9% +145%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Mediatek MT8183
986 Points ∼8% +132%
Amazon Fire HD 10 Plus 2021
Mediatek MT8183
972 Points ∼8% +129%
Alldocube Alldocube X
Mediatek MT8176
809 Points ∼7% +90%
Average Mediatek MT8768
  (396 - 487, n=3)
436 Points ∼4% +3%
Blackview Tab 10
Mediatek MT8768
425 Points ∼4%
Lenovo Tab M10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
413 Points ∼3% -3%
Allview iPlay 20
UNISOC SC9863A
404 Points ∼3% -5%
Medion LifeTab E10802
Mediatek MT8768
396 Points ∼3% -7%
Alcatel 3T 10 4G 2020
Mediatek MT8766B
258 Points ∼2% -39%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
8089 Points ∼100% +1534%
Apple iPad Air 2020
Apple A14 Bionic
6727 Points ∼83% +1259%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
HiSilicon Kirin 810
2961 Points ∼37% +498%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9611
1649 Points ∼20% +233%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
1197 Points ∼15% +142%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Mediatek MT8183
1158 Points ∼14% +134%
Amazon Fire HD 10 Plus 2021
Mediatek MT8183
1142 Points ∼14% +131%
Alldocube Alldocube X
Mediatek MT8176
926 Points ∼11% +87%
Average Mediatek MT8768
  (455 - 581, n=3)
510 Points ∼6% +3%
Lenovo Tab M10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
498 Points ∼6% +1%
Blackview Tab 10
Mediatek MT8768
495 Points ∼6%
Allview iPlay 20
UNISOC SC9863A
479 Points ∼6% -3%
Medion LifeTab E10802
Mediatek MT8768
455 Points ∼6% -8%
Alcatel 3T 10 4G 2020
Mediatek MT8766B
305 Points ∼4% -38%
WebXPRT 3 /
Apple iPad Air 2020
Apple A14 Bionic
195 Points ∼100% +491%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
105 Points ∼54% +218%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
HiSilicon Kirin 810
83 Points ∼43% +152%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9611
54 Points ∼28% +64%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Mediatek MT8183
52 Points ∼27% +58%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
52 Points ∼27% +58%
Amazon Fire HD 10 Plus 2021
Mediatek MT8183
46 Points ∼24% +39%
Lenovo Tab M10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
34 Points ∼17% +3%
Blackview Tab 10
Mediatek MT8768
33 Points ∼17%
Average Mediatek MT8768
  (24 - 33, n=3)
29.3 Points ∼15% -11%
Allview iPlay 20
UNISOC SC9863A
29 Points ∼15% -12%
Alcatel 3T 10 4G 2020
Mediatek MT8766B
27 Points ∼14% -18%
Medion LifeTab E10802
Mediatek MT8768
24 Points ∼12% -27%

存储设备

传输速度还不错,但在处理4K大小的文件时,传输速度就开始慢下来了。

存储可以通过集成的MicroSD读卡器扩展。从我们的UHS-II测试卡中复制价值1GB的图片到平板电脑需要20秒左右。

Blackview Tab 10
64 GB eMMC Flash
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Alcatel 3T 10 4G 2020
32 GB eMMC Flash
Medion LifeTab E10802
64 GB eMMC Flash
Allview iPlay 20
64 GB eMMC Flash
Lenovo Tab M10
16 GB eMMC Flash
AndroBench 3-5
901%
11%
-6%
-27%
8%
Random Write 4KB
9.4
217.51
2214%
13.54
44%
10.32
10%
4.27
-55%
11.32
20%
Random Read 4KB
31.37
190.66
508%
36.01
15%
27.36
-13%
25.43
-19%
52.5
67%
Sequential Write 256KB
135.31
708.37
424%
104
-23%
101.17
-25%
160.32
18%
52.6
-61%
Sequential Read 256KB
263.62
1468.24
457%
287.27
9%
274.66
4%
123.27
-53%
279.94
6%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
63.05
61.11
62.94
61.22
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.66
80.74
81.67
83.48

Emissions

温度

沿着离USB-C端口最远的边缘,表面温度最热。当长时间处于高负荷状态时,前面和后面的热点可以达到40℃和35℃。

系统空闲(正面
系统空闲(正面
系统空闲(背面
系统空闲(背面
CPU的压力(前面)。
CPU的压力(前面)。
CPU的压力(背面)。
CPU的压力(背面)。
Max. Load
 30 °C34 °C40.6 °C 
 27.8 °C28.4 °C35.4 °C 
 27 °C27.6 °C37 °C 
Maximum: 40.6 °C
Average: 32 °C
33.2 °C34.8 °C33.8 °C
32.6 °C32.6 °C32 °C
31.8 °C31 °C31 °C
Maximum: 34.8 °C
Average: 32.5 °C
Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 30.5 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 34.5 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22.2 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.5 °C / 87 F.

发言人

最大音量下的粉红噪音。低音不足不足为奇,但至少音频是相对响亮的。
最大音量下的粉红噪音。低音不足不足为奇,但至少音频是相对响亮的。
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.534.838.52534.127.534.13132.324.932.3403324.9335037.525.937.56335.822.135.88037.72637.710037.722.137.712539.820.339.816044.616.844.62004816.94825054.717.354.731557.920.657.940061.516.461.550064.314.364.363067.612.867.68006711.967100071.111.171.1125077.310.977.3160080.110.680.1200082.511.382.5250081.811.281.8315080.711.180.7400077.411.377.4500078.611.678.6630076.811.576.8800079.611.679.61000084.111.584.11250072.511.372.51600061.510.561.5SPL91.124.491.1N83.50.683.5median 71.1median 11.6median 71.1Delta11.62.811.635.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseBlackview Tab 10Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Blackview Tab 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Energy Management

消耗功率

运行CPU节流测试时的持续耗电量
运行CPU节流测试时的持续耗电量

根据亮度水平,在主屏幕上空转消耗2瓦至6瓦。在运行CPU节流测试应用程序时,我们能够记录到最大功耗只有8W。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.48 / 0.61 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 2 / 6 / 6.1 Watt
Load midlight 6.8 / 8.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Blackview Tab 10
Helio MT8768, PowerVR GE8320, 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1080, 10.10
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
SD 865, Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, IPS, 2560x1600, 10.95
Alcatel 3T 10 4G 2020
Helio MT8766B, PowerVR GE8300, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1280x800, 10.10
Medion LifeTab E10802
Helio MT8768, PowerVR GE8320, 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1200, 10.00
Allview iPlay 20
SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10
Apple iPad Air 2020
A14, A14 Bionic GPU, 256 GB NVMe, IPS, 2360x1640, 10.90
Power Consumption
6%
54%
32%
-98%
-19%
Idle Minimum *
2
1.33
33%
0.82
59%
1.25
37%
7.4
-270%
1.3
35%
Idle Average *
6
5.37
10%
2.73
54%
3.79
37%
10.9
-82%
7.89
-32%
Idle Maximum *
6.1
5.41
11%
2.74
55%
3.82
37%
11
-80%
7.91
-30%
Load Average *
6.8
6.87
-1%
3.08
55%
4.99
27%
7.7
-13%
9.28
-36%
Load Maximum *
8.1
10.08
-24%
4.41
46%
6.33
22%
11.9
-47%
10.78
-33%

* ... smaller is better

电池寿命--适合一天的时间

运行时间长可能是由于上述的低功耗。我们能够从内部7480毫安时的电池中挤出近13小时的实际无线网络使用时间。

Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12h 54min
Blackview Tab 10
Helio MT8768, PowerVR GE8320,  Wh
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
SD 865, Adreno 650,  Wh
Alcatel 3T 10 4G 2020
Helio MT8766B, PowerVR GE8300,  Wh
Medion LifeTab E10802
Helio MT8768, PowerVR GE8320, 22.8 Wh
Allview iPlay 20
SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322,  Wh
Apple iPad Air 2020
A14, A14 Bionic GPU, 28.6 Wh
Battery Runtime
8%
18%
-6%
-38%
-9%
Reader / Idle
1972
2039
WiFi v1.3
774
835
8%
915
18%
730
-6%
481
-38%
702
-9%
Load
236
388

Pros

+ 集成的MicroSD读卡器
+ 明亮的触摸屏
+ 电池寿命长
+ 价格低廉
+ 坚固的底盘

Cons

- 4G频段可能与大多数美国无线运营商不兼容
- USB-C不支持视频输出
- 色彩范围窄
- 性能缓慢
- 相对较重

结论 - 廉价、明亮、沉重和缓慢

在审查中。Blackview Tab 10.测试装置由黑视提供
在审查中。Blackview Tab 10.测试装置由黑视提供

Blackview Tab 10在几个方面表现出色,而在其他许多方面却掉链子。我们喜欢它明亮的触摸屏,它比许多其他预算Android ,如阿尔卡特3T 10 4G联想Tab M10以提高户外能见度。我们也很欣赏强大的底盘设计,感觉比眼前的竞争对手更坚韧、更持久。假设在明亮的条件下,相机质量对于这个价格来说也是不错的。

缺点太明显,无法忽视。如果你打算每天使用这款平板电脑进行网络浏览或文字处理,那么它的性能是非常缓慢的,以至于让人感到沮丧。缺乏外部显示器支持或更深的颜色也是明显的,尽管考虑到价格更容易被原谅。用户可能想考虑三星Galaxy Tab A7 10.4它配备了明显更快的Snapdragon处理器,可以获得更流畅的体验,但代价是更脆弱的结构。

价格和可用性

Blackview Tab 10可直接从Blackview购买,价格为189美元。.另外,该型号在亚马逊上也有,售价219美元。.

Blackview Tab 10 - 09/14/2021 v7
Allen Ngo

Chassis
75 / 98 → 76%
Keyboard
70 / 80 → 87%
Pointing Device
59%
Connectivity
29 / 70 → 41%
Weight
83 / 40-88 → 89%
Battery
90%
Display
78%
Games Performance
7 / 78 → 8%
Application Performance
49 / 92 → 53%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
75 / 91 → 82%
Camera
52 / 85 → 61%
Average
66%
74%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Allen Ngo
Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 4645 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011
contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC
Stefan Hinum
Translator: Stefan Hinum - Founder, CEO, CFO - 18074 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2006
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Blackview Tab 10平板电脑评测:Android 11,仅售190美元
Allen Ngo, 2021-09-15 (Update: 2021-09-15)