Notebookcheck Logo

面向游戏玩家和内容创作者。联想Legion 5 Pro笔记本评测

赫斯基i7胜过竞争对手 凭借高达120W的恒定CPU功耗,i7-12700H甚至在挑战更昂贵的i9 CPU。而16GB的内存、2TB的NVME存储和未释放的RTX 3060,游戏玩家和内容创建者有各种方式的性能储备可供他们使用。16英寸的QHD显示屏和超一流的连接性是否提供了令人信服的整体包装?这就是我们在这里要澄清的问题。
Intel Alder Lake Geforce Gaming Laptop / Notebook

去年,联想在Legion 5 Pro中提供了一个特别令人印象深刻和极其受欢迎的高端游戏笔记本电脑。我们已经测试了Nvidia的RTX 3070 Ti版本,所以我们认为我们现在应该仔细看看稍微便宜的120W RTX 3060版本。对于那些优先考虑性价比,并且满足于在QHD的最新游戏中以60FPS运行的游戏玩家,或者注重CPU性能的创作者,联想在这里把一个令人信服的组合放在一起。竞争者将包括其他RTX-3060笔记本电脑,以及具有可比性的英特尔i7或AMD Ryzen 7 CPU,例如最近测试的 HP Omen 16或者更昂贵的笔记本,如 Gigabyte Aero 16等。后者将很难在同等程度上开发其性能潜力。

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H (Legion 5 Pro Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-12700H 14 x 1.7 - 4.7 GHz, 120 W PL2 / Short Burst, 100 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-P
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU - 6144 MB, Core: 1702 MHz, Memory: 1750 MHz, 115 W TDP ( including 15 W Dynamic Boost), 512.96, Advanced Optimus
Memory
16384 MB 
, DDR5-4800, Dual-Chanel-Mode, two memory slots (both in use)
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, BOE CCQ_NE160QDM_NY1, IPS, glossy: no, HDR, 165 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0), 2048 GB 
, 2x 1 TB in RAID 0, NVMe PCIe 4.0, 1800 GB free
Soundcard
Realtek ALC3306
Connections
3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 1 Audio Combo Port
Networking
Intel I210 Gigabit Network Connection (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 27 x 359 x 264.4
Battery
80 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 720p with E-Shutter
Additional features
Speakers: 2 x 2W , Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty, X-Rite Pantone factory color calibration
Weight
2.55 kg, Power Supply: 1.05 kg
Price
1999 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86.6 %
07/2022
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.6 kg27 mm16.00"2560x1600
85.5 %
05/2022
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg23 mm16.10"2560x1440
86 %
04/2022
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
R7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
2.3 kg26 mm16.10"2560x1440
84.7 %
03/2022
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg22.4 mm16.00"3840x2400
86.7 %
03/2022
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
1.8 kg14.5 mm14.00"1920x1080
88 %
03/2022
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.6 kg26.6 mm16.00"2560x1600

外壳 -Legion 5 Pro,有大量的金属材料

联想为Legion 5 Pro提供了一个坚实的金属外壳。它的做工完美无瑕,这台16英寸的游戏笔记本电脑散发着质量的气息,无论是随意还是故意的操作都不会导致表面弯曲或唤起任何不愉快的吱嘎声。即使是盖子,这通常是许多有竞争力的笔记本电脑的一个致命弱点,测试时也很牢固,使显示器僵硬地处于所需位置。

在重量方面,大量使用金属材料是很明显的。Legion ,是所有同类设备中最重的一个。冷却通风口就分布在设备的底部。联想违背了推出越来越薄、越来越小的设备的趋势,并明确地将重点放在这个强大的硬件展示的坚固性和冷却潜力上。

尺寸比较

370 mm 245 mm 26 mm 2.3 kg369 mm 248 mm 23 mm 2.3 kg359 mm 264.4 mm 27 mm 2.6 kg356 mm 248.5 mm 22.4 mm 2.3 kg321.5 mm 262.77 mm 14.5 mm 1.8 kg

连接性--有雷电4和USB-C电力传输,一切都在那里。

联想在分布在机箱三面的端口和插槽的类型和数量方面也树立了一个好榜样。从人体工程学的角度来看,它有利于右手用户,在机箱的右侧只提供一个USB-A端口(USB 3.2 Gen 1)。这减少了使用鼠标时被显示器或网线缠住的风险。举例来说,这个端口是外围设备的无线加密狗的理想选择。

左边有两个最先进的USB-C端口,一个是Thunderbolt 4,另一个符合USB 3.2 Gen 2标准,完全支持20Gbit/s和Displayport 1.4。其余的端口可以在机箱背面找到,联想在这里充分地利用了可用空间。除了另外两个USB-A 3.2 Gen-1端口外,还有第三个USB-C端口,通过它,笔记本电脑还可以以高达135W的功率进行充电。电源插头插槽也在机箱背面。

鉴于端口和插槽的多样性和位置,Legion 5 Pro可以很容易地被部署为具有多个显示器和外围设备的桌面替代设备,而作为一个移动设备,它的装备可以满足任何情况。还有机会将电子狗的使用限制在DisplayPort适配器上。

右边。网络摄像头快门,音频组合端口,USB-A 3.2 Gen 1
右边。网络摄像头快门,音频组合端口,USB-A 3.2 Gen 1
后部。RJ45,USB-C 3.2 Gen 2,HDMI,2个USB-A 3.2 Gen 1,电源连接器
后部。RJ45,USB-C 3.2 Gen 2,HDMI,2个USB-A 3.2 Gen 1,电源连接器
左边:1个Thunderbolt 4,1个USB-C 3.2 Gen 2
左边:1个Thunderbolt 4,1个USB-C 3.2 Gen 2

沟通

Legion 5 Pro配备了极为流行的英特尔AX211 WLAN模块。由于板载了Wi-Fi 6E,它不仅提供了最新的Wi-Fi标准。该卡发挥了全部潜力,在同类设备中占据了首要位置。这不仅仅是数据传输速度令人印象深刻,而且在日常使用中,作为游戏笔记本也不会令人失望。凭借稳定而快速的传输速度,即使是大型游戏下载也不会有什么影响。一个千兆以太网端口可用于有线连接。在这里,我们更喜欢更快的2.5GbE端口,因为它已经被安装在许多竞争设备上。在相称的网络中或连接到NAS系统时,其速度优势是巨大的,而且会与硬件配置的其他部分很好地匹配。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1410 (1239min - 1603max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (1003 - 1501, n=6)
1276 MBit/s ∼90%
Average of class Gaming
  (450 - 1603, n=137, last 2 years)
1160 MBit/s ∼82%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
904 (826min - 950max) MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (1178 - 1711, n=6)
1476 MBit/s ∼100%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1371 (1221min - 1483max) MBit/s ∼93%
Average of class Gaming
  (90 - 1743, n=137, last 2 years)
1237 MBit/s ∼84%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
720 (664min - 751max) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1696 (853min - 1723max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (1461 - 1857, n=8, last 2 years)
1659 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (1277 - 1857, n=20)
1573 MBit/s ∼93% -7%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1567 (549min - 1655max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (1348 - 1648, n=7, last 2 years)
1497 MBit/s ∼96% -4%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (1082 - 1851, n=20)
1440 MBit/s ∼92% -8%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1549 (549-1655)
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1667 (853-1723)
HP Omen 16-b1090ng MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø950 (489-981)
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1371 (1221-1483)
HP Omen 16-b1090ng MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø960 (499-1054)
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1411 (1239-1603)

网络摄像头

说到网络摄像头,联想提供了标准的票价;不幸的是, 没有比我们多年来习惯的游戏笔记本更好的。图像质量对于一个或另一个变焦电话来说无疑是可以接受的,但在这里我们希望看到在色彩表现、分辨率和动态范围方面的全面改进。

ColorChecker
40 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
38.5 ∆E
38.7 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
37.7 ∆E
49.9 ∆E
45 ∆E
44.3 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
32.6 ∆E
38.3 ∆E
37.1 ∆E
42.4 ∆E
30.7 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
35 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H: 33.34 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 49.91 ∆E

辅料

除了笔记本电脑本身之外,盒子里只有电源。这已被标准化为所有Legion 5 Pro的配置,所以我们的RTX-3060模型也得到了有点超大的300W电源。如果你打算带着Legion ,就应该考虑到电源的额外1公斤(约2.2磅)重量。

维护

为了维修或升级,Legion ,需要松开十个飞利浦头的螺丝。联想使用三种不同的尺寸,所以你应该注意记住不同螺丝的归属。拆卸底板需要比我们想象中更多的努力。特别是底板后三分之一处的塑料元件被固定得非常紧。我们通过适当的辅助工具,逐步从板子的前部中心向后部推进。要松开塑料盖,可能最好使用来自iFixit(关联链接)的适当工具。.另外,也可以使用塑料信用卡,巧妙地施加力量,直到它们松开。

在机箱内部,我们可以期待一个整洁的画面,最重要的是对强大硬件的精心冷却解决方案的洞察。原则上,用户可以接触到两个M.2插槽和内存。为了冷却它们,巨大的散热器覆盖了快速驱动器,而内存则在一个塑料罩下。

松开底板需要一定的灵巧和力量
松开底板需要一定的灵巧和力量
看一下令人印象深刻的冷却解决方案和升级潜力
看一下令人印象深刻的冷却解决方案和升级潜力

担保

在德国,Legion 5 Pro联想的基本保修期为2年。

输入设备--为游戏玩家和内容创造者提供了引人注目的全面解决方案

键盘

在这个16英寸的设备上,密集游戏环节的键盘性能是非常出色的。Chiclet键的形状和弧度有点不寻常,提供了一个可触及的压力点,令人愉快的阻力以及坚实的行程。RGB按键的背光可以在键盘上的四个区域进行调整,照明效果很好。从视觉上看,数字键盘上稍小的按键和普通尺寸的方向键并不像它们可能的那样清晰,但从纯粹的功能上看,没有理由抱怨。

适合多产的作家以及游戏者:Legion 5 Pro键盘
适合多产的作家以及游戏者:Legion 5 Pro键盘

触摸板

触摸板对于游戏笔记本来说足够大,可以在其表面平滑滑动。 滚动和点击时的触觉特性是高质量的。鼠标触摸板稍稍向左偏移,这有时会导致在过于随意地使用时向右点击而不是向左点击。由于165赫兹的高刷新率,使用Legion 似乎非常流畅和精确。尽管大多数游戏者会使用鼠标,但在Windows中导航或滚动网站时应该没有任何问题。

显示 - 快速的165赫兹满足G-Sync和WQHD分辨率

子像素渲染
子像素渲染
几乎不可见的混浊
几乎不可见的混浊

16英寸显示屏正在成为最新游戏笔记本的越来越多的标准,而Legion 版本就是一个很好的例子。这里为游戏玩家、内容编写者以及日常使用提供了相当多的东西。哑光显示屏提供典型的IPS对比度,几乎从任何角度都有很好的可读性。与竞争对手相比,联想的最大亮度水平是最高的,尽管显示亮度只有85%左右,但还可以更好。

16:10版本的QHD分辨率为2,560 x 1,600像素,在任何使用场景下都能提供清晰的图像,而磨砂显示屏和高亮度水平的结合甚至使户外使用成为可能。游戏玩家将欣赏165赫兹的高刷新率和令人愉快的快速响应时间。虽然这款显示器并没有对最近测试的360赫兹4毫秒的屏幕构成严重挑战 MSI Vector GP76的360赫兹4毫秒屏幕构成严重挑战,但它仍能满足快速射击者的需要。

465
cd/m²
455
cd/m²
454
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
515
cd/m²
438
cd/m²
510
cd/m²
492
cd/m²
472
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE CCQ_NE160QDM_NY1
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 515 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 474.6 cd/m² Minimum: 5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Contrast: 1144:1 (Black: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.38 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.3, calibrated: 1.1
ΔE Greyscale 2.71 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
70.45% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.38% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.53% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.49
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
BOE CCQ_NE160QDM_NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
BOE09E5, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.10
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
BOE09E5, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.10
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Samsung SDC416B, AMOLED, 3840x2400, 16.00
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
SHP154D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Display
3%
-0%
24%
Display P3 Coverage
68.53
71
4%
68.8
0%
99.6
45%
sRGB Coverage
98.38
97.9
0%
96.9
-2%
100
2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
70.45
73.3
4%
71.1
1%
87.6
24%
Response Times
-31%
-30%
75%
2%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
14 ?(6, 8)
14.5 ?(7.2, 7.3)
-4%
13 ?(6, 7)
7%
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
83%
9.6 ?(4.4, 5.2)
31%
Response Time Black / White *
6 ?(2, 4)
9.4 ?(4.4, 5)
-57%
10 ?(5, 5)
-67%
2 ?(1, 1)
67%
7.6 ?(2.8, 4.8)
-27%
PWM Frequency
60 ?(58)
Screen
-44%
-27%
406%
-8%
Brightness middle
515
335
-35%
297
-42%
368
-29%
434
-16%
Brightness
475
319
-33%
283
-40%
368
-23%
411
-13%
Brightness Distribution
85
90
6%
91
7%
93
9%
89
5%
Black Level *
0.45
0.28
38%
0.22
51%
0.01
98%
0.25
44%
Contrast
1144
1196
5%
1350
18%
36800
3117%
1736
52%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.38
4.38
-84%
3.25
-37%
2.33
2%
3
-26%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.37
9.48
-117%
6.33
-45%
4.34
1%
7.1
-62%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.1
1.33
-21%
1.11
-1%
0.7
36%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.71
7
-158%
6.97
-157%
0.8
70%
5.1
-88%
Gamma
2.49 88%
2.103 105%
2.3 96%
2.119 104%
2.19 100%
CCT
6117 106%
6244 104%
6050 107%
6569 99%
6204 105%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-24% / -32%
-19% / -22%
241% / 340%
6% / 1%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN ColorChecker,已校准
CalMAN ColorChecker,已校准
卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN灰度,已校准
CalMAN灰度,已校准
卡尔曼饱和度
卡尔曼饱和度
卡尔曼饱和度,已校准
卡尔曼饱和度,已校准

凭借常见色彩空间的坚实数值和良好的工厂校准,Legion 5 Pro的色彩再现无疑适合日常使用。由于平均色差约为2.5 DeltaE ex works,这台16英寸设备的色彩再现立即可以用于半专业的图像编辑,而专业人士可以通过一些手动校准从显示器中获得更多。

我们用专业设备进行校准,将DeltaE降低到1以下(配置文件可在上面下载),从而在sRGB的范围内提供出色的色彩再现。为了能够在专业和色彩关键的应用中不使用外部显示器,我们希望在AdobeRGB和DCI-P3色彩空间中能有更好的覆盖。在这方面,尤其是摄影师和图像编辑,有点不足。然而,对于那些主要为网络制作的摄像师来说,该显示器是绰绰有余的。

联想的X-Rite色彩应用程序允许它为经常使用的色彩空间提供几个额外的预设,这对日常创意内容工作有很大帮助。例如,sRGB模式可能对在线设计感兴趣,而使用Rec709配置文件的摄像师甚至可以在某种程度上放心地给视频材料着色。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19971 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

如前所述,超过500cd/m²的高亮度水平在户外也有帮助。仍应避免阳光直射,但这适用于所有笔记本电脑的大部分显示屏。哑光涂层当然可以防止你看到自己比屏幕内容更多。

显示器的亚光表面有助于分散和减少直接反射。
显示器的亚光表面有助于分散和减少直接反射。
有了适当的定位,户外使用不应该是一个问题。
有了适当的定位,户外使用不应该是一个问题。


性能 - 无限的i7-12700H与快速的RTX 3060相遇

虽然到目前为止,联想已经能够提供比大多数竞争对手更多的东西(大量的端口、出色的外壳和出色的显示屏),但其提供的性能几乎是无与伦比的。i7超越了它的竞争对手,尽管它有一部分配备了i9处理器。RTX 3060也提供了彻底令人印象深刻的性能。为了实现如此出色的系统性能,联想用16GB最先进的DDR5 4800内存和反应迅速的2TB RAID-0 NVME SSD阵列来支撑其核心组件。

测试条件

该设备附带的Vantage软件可能有些矫枉过正,但确实提供了三种不同的性能模式。我们所有的性能测试都是在电源模式下进行的,该模式名副其实,为i7提供了高达120W的峰值和100W的恒定功率。电源按钮上的彩色LED会发生变化,作为一个视觉指示器(红色:电源模式,白色:平衡,蓝色:静音)。静音模式也名副其实:在最初的120瓦峰值之后,处理器的功耗为65瓦,风扇的声音令人愉快地抑制。如果你不一定要追求最高的Cinebench分数,那么平衡模式也是CPU密集型计算的一个好选择。功耗约为85-90W,但与电源模式相比,风扇的噪音要小一些。

处理器

现在是2022年中期,i7-12700H已经成为一个熟悉的熟人。它已经成为快速内容创作者和游戏笔记本的英特尔标准。不同设备的性能差异很大,既取决于制造商的配置,也取决于特定设备的冷却管理。

i7是英特尔最新一代Alder Lake的主流动力,提供六个性能核心,支持超线程,时钟频率为2.4至4.7GHz。后台任务或多核支持由8个效率核心(1.8-3.5 GHz)提供,并完成14个核心提供总共20个线程。

联想允许CPU在Legion ,让16英寸笔记本在多核性能有要求的情况下,可以轻松达到领导者的顶端。一些笔记本提供的单核性能略高,配备i9的笔记本在此略微领先。然而,如今单核性能与很少的应用有关,这种性能优势在日常使用中几乎无法察觉。

Legion 5 Pro削减了一个优秀的数字,特别是在持续负载下。许多笔记本只能在著名的第一次或第二次Cinebench运行中保持其硬件性能,而Legion 5 Pro却能提供持续的性能,没有波动。无论是游戏还是创意内容的应用,都有足够的动力。

除了我们的标准化测试序列,我们还在我们的YouTube频道上使用这台笔记本电脑。我们用BlackMagics DaVinci Resolve 17对视频进行了剪辑、上色和输出。与常见的Adobe应用软件主要使用处理器不同,在这个编辑软件中,CPU和GPU被平等地使用。由于功能强大,我们的源材料(4k,BlackMagic RAW)处理起来没有任何问题,也没有掉帧。此外,在PhaseOnes Capture One和一流的Photoshop中进行的图像编辑也没有给我们带来任何问题。

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

01452904355807258701015116013051450159517401885203021752320246526102755Tooltip
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2831 (2783.19-2883.92)
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2557 (2455.34-2812.94)
HP Omen 16-c0077ng AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2015 (1981.18-2029.63)
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2616 (2562.79-2779.9)
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2194 (2063.56-2534.53)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
84.2 pt ∼84%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
Intel Core i7-12700H
82.3 pt ∼82%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
81.8 pt ∼82%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H
77.7 pt ∼78%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
 
74.6 pt ∼75%
Average of class Gaming
 
61 pt ∼61%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
52.6 pt ∼53%
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
Intel Core i7-12700H
19069 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
18106 Points ∼95% -5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
16253 Points ∼85% -15%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H
15783 Points ∼83% -17%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (4032 - 19250, n=36)
15627 Points ∼82% -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 23482, n=187, last 2 years)
12664 Points ∼66% -34%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
12173 Points ∼64% -36%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1940 Points ∼100% +12%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
1799 Points ∼93% +4%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H
1763 Points ∼91% +2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (778 - 1825, n=35)
1756 Points ∼91% +1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
Intel Core i7-12700H
1731 Points ∼89%
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 1936, n=186, last 2 years)
1518 Points ∼78% -12%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1415 Points ∼73% -18%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
Intel Core i7-12700H
7230 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
6941 Points ∼96% -4%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H
5967 Points ∼83% -17%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1576 - 7382, n=36)
5908 Points ∼82% -18%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
5892 Points ∼81% -19%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4726 Points ∼65% -35%
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 9042, n=228, last 2 years)
4632 Points ∼64% -36%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
695 Points ∼100% +4%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
685 Points ∼99% +3%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H
684 Points ∼98% +3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (300 - 702, n=36)
675 Points ∼97% +1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
Intel Core i7-12700H
667 Points ∼96%
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 745, n=228, last 2 years)
570 Points ∼82% -15%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
551 Points ∼79% -17%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
Intel Core i7-12700H
2884 (2783.19min - 2883.92max) Points ∼100%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
2813 (2455.34min - 2812.94max) Points ∼98% -2%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
2780 Points ∼96% -4%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H
2535 (2063.56min - 2534.53max) Points ∼88% -12%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1379 - 2903, n=41)
2519 Points ∼87% -13%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2030 (1981.18min - 2029.63max) Points ∼70% -30%
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 3652, n=233, last 2 years)
1959 Points ∼68% -32%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
279 Points ∼100% +12%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
261 Points ∼94% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (113 - 263, n=37)
253 Points ∼91% +1%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H
252 Points ∼90% +1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
Intel Core i7-12700H
250 Points ∼90%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
229 Points ∼82% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 282, n=223, last 2 years)
227 Points ∼81% -9%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (146.4 - 1259, n=229, last 2 years)
287 Seconds * ∼100% -66%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
251.8 Seconds * ∼88% -46%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (171 - 732, n=35)
229 Seconds * ∼80% -33%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H
223 Seconds * ∼78% -29%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
200 Seconds * ∼70% -16%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
182.7 Seconds * ∼64% -6%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
Intel Core i7-12700H
172.4 Seconds * ∼60%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
72679 MIPS ∼100% +5%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
Intel Core i7-12700H
69237 MIPS ∼95%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
68520 MIPS ∼94% -1%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H
66498 MIPS ∼91% -4%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (22844 - 73067, n=35)
60244 MIPS ∼83% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 88128, n=227, last 2 years)
51553 MIPS ∼71% -26%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0 MIPS ∼0% -100%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
6186 MIPS ∼100% +13%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
5863 MIPS ∼95% +7%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (2743 - 5863, n=35)
5606 MIPS ∼91% +2%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H
5605 MIPS ∼91% +2%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
Intel Core i7-12700H
5475 MIPS ∼89%
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 6582, n=227, last 2 years)
5467 MIPS ∼88% 0%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5423 MIPS ∼88% -1%
Geekbench 5.4 / Multi-Core
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
13865 Points ∼100% +8%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
13500 Points ∼97% +6%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H
13400 Points ∼97% +5%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
Intel Core i7-12700H
12795 Points ∼92%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (5144 - 13745, n=36)
11748 Points ∼85% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 16925, n=222, last 2 years)
8896 Points ∼64% -30%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7326 Points ∼53% -43%
Geekbench 5.4 / Single-Core
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1870 Points ∼100% +10%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
1810 Points ∼97% +7%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H
1796 Points ∼96% +6%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (803 - 1851, n=36)
1728 Points ∼92% +2%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
Intel Core i7-12700H
1694 Points ∼91%
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 1949, n=222, last 2 years)
1493 Points ∼80% -12%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1336 Points ∼71% -21%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
Intel Core i7-12700H
21.2 fps ∼100%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
20 fps ∼94% -6%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
18.1 fps ∼85% -15%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H
17.7 fps ∼83% -17%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (4.67 - 21.4, n=37)
16.7 fps ∼79% -21%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
15.2 fps ∼72% -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 26.6, n=231, last 2 years)
14.4 fps ∼68% -32%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
92.3 s * ∼100% -130%
Average of class Gaming
  (23.9 - 332, n=225, last 2 years)
52.5 s * ∼57% -31%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (34.2 - 92, n=35)
45.4 s * ∼49% -13%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
41 s * ∼44% -2%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
Intel Core i7-12700H
40.2 s * ∼44%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H
39.4 s * ∼43% +2%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
39 s * ∼42% +3%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Gaming
  (0.412 - 4.47, n=226, last 2 years)
0.555 sec * ∼100% -17%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.516 sec * ∼93% -9%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (0.4441 - 1.052, n=35)
0.4756 sec * ∼86% -0%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.475 sec * ∼86%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4564 sec * ∼82% +4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4489 sec * ∼81% +5%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
0.4155 sec * ∼75% +13%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2884 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
190.1 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
250 Points
Help
Performance Rating
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
89.6 pt ∼90%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
77.1 pt ∼77%
Average of class Gaming
 
73.5 pt ∼74%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
72.2 pt ∼72%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
71.4 pt ∼71%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
 
68 pt ∼68%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
67.8 pt ∼68%
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
14590 KRay/s ∼100% +53%
Average of class Gaming
  (2585 - 22183, n=183, last 2 years)
11579 KRay/s ∼79% +21%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
9567 KRay/s ∼66%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (2585 - 15078, n=35)
8620 KRay/s ∼59% -10%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
8357 KRay/s ∼57% -13%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
8265 KRay/s ∼57% -14%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
7636 KRay/s ∼52% -20%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
91947 Points ∼100% +120%
Average of class Gaming
  (12439 - 117712, n=183, last 2 years)
62678 Points ∼68% +50%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
41744 Points ∼45%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (12439 - 75435, n=35)
40372 Points ∼44% -3%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
38442 Points ∼42% -8%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
38277 Points ∼42% -8%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
36195 Points ∼39% -13%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
3435 MB/s ∼100%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
3142 MB/s ∼91% -9%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2931 MB/s ∼85% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 5123, n=183, last 2 years)
2930 MB/s ∼85% -15%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2906 MB/s ∼85% -15%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (833 - 3791, n=35)
2875 MB/s ∼84% -16%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2673 MB/s ∼78% -22%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
107042 Points ∼100% +8%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99861 Points ∼93% +1%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
99631 Points ∼93% +1%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
99215 Points ∼93% +1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
98674 Points ∼92%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (57923 - 102833, n=35)
96906 Points ∼91% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 132615, n=183, last 2 years)
90696 Points ∼85% -8%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
11831 Points ∼100% +19%
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 17639, n=183, last 2 years)
10017 Points ∼85% +1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
9927 Points ∼84%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9655 Points ∼82% -3%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
9325 Points ∼79% -6%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9247 Points ∼78% -7%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (3249 - 9928, n=35)
9048 Points ∼76% -9%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
50615 Points ∼100% +85%
Average of class Gaming
  (7135 - 64776, n=183, last 2 years)
34157 Points ∼67% +25%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
27390 Points ∼54%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (7135 - 37158, n=35)
23358 Points ∼46% -15%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
22873 Points ∼45% -16%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
22701 Points ∼45% -17%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
21106 Points ∼42% -23%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
124070 MB/s ∼100% +22%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
102069 MB/s ∼82%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
92214 MB/s ∼74% -10%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
91041 MB/s ∼73% -11%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
85401 MB/s ∼69% -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (11368 - 183146, n=183, last 2 years)
82959 MB/s ∼67% -19%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (31839 - 136241, n=35)
78536 MB/s ∼63% -23%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
1171 MB/s ∼100%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
991 MB/s ∼85% -15%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
988 MB/s ∼84% -16%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (305 - 1171, n=35)
968 MB/s ∼83% -17%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
948 MB/s ∼81% -19%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
811 MB/s ∼69% -31%
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 1408, n=204, last 2 years)
721 MB/s ∼62% -38%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
7665 KRay/s ∼100% +33%
Average of class Gaming
  (1437 - 11913, n=183, last 2 years)
6295 KRay/s ∼82% +9%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
5760 KRay/s ∼75%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1437 - 7989, n=35)
4925 KRay/s ∼64% -14%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
4806 KRay/s ∼63% -17%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
4776 KRay/s ∼62% -17%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
4457 KRay/s ∼58% -23%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
46643 MPixel/s ∼100% +39%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
40868 MPixel/s ∼88% +22%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
38990 MPixel/s ∼84% +16%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
33615 MPixel/s ∼72%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (12863 - 46643, n=35)
32738 MPixel/s ∼70% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (8341 - 47710, n=183, last 2 years)
25617 MPixel/s ∼55% -24%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
19911 MPixel/s ∼43% -41%

系统性能

这款顶级笔记本电脑的系统性能是无可辩驳的,尽管有 "小 "安培显卡,我们的测试配置相对于其他笔记本电脑来说是非常好的。正如我们的PC Mark结果和我们自己的观察所显示的那样,Legion 以闪电般的速度掌握了日常任务,没有什么能使它脱离其步伐。在Photoshop中编辑图片,跳转到视频编辑程序,并在YouTube上观看4K视频日志,都是很容易的事;即使打开大量的浏览器标签,仍有足够的容量。

PCMark 10 / Score
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
7816 Points ∼100% +4%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
7531 Points ∼96%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
7322 Points ∼94% -3%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
7170 Points ∼92% -5%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
7150 Points ∼91% -5%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (5986 - 7531, n=6)
7010 Points ∼90% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (4077 - 8426, n=187, last 2 years)
6697 Points ∼86% -11%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
11053 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
10945 Points ∼99% -1%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
10479 Points ∼95% -5%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10294 Points ∼93% -7%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (9289 - 11053, n=6)
10281 Points ∼93% -7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10249 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (7148 - 11205, n=186, last 2 years)
9938 Points ∼90% -10%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
10050 Points ∼100% +7%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
9602 Points ∼96% +3%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
9549 Points ∼95% +2%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
9358 Points ∼93%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9231 Points ∼92% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (6161 - 10785, n=186, last 2 years)
8895 Points ∼89% -5%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (6161 - 9602, n=6)
8782 Points ∼87% -6%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
11777 Points ∼100% +5%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
11207 Points ∼95%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10888 Points ∼92% -3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (8950 - 11672, n=6)
10426 Points ∼89% -7%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
10257 Points ∼87% -8%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10118 Points ∼86% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (3670 - 13707, n=186, last 2 years)
9329 Points ∼79% -17%
CrossMark / Overall
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
2113 Points ∼100% +20%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1910 Points ∼90% +9%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (1649 - 1910, n=5)
1801 Points ∼85% +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (974 - 2170, n=43, last 2 years)
1791 Points ∼85% +2%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
1755 Points ∼83%
CrossMark / Productivity
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
2031 Points ∼100% +20%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1797 Points ∼88% +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (907 - 2062, n=43, last 2 years)
1730 Points ∼85% +3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (1536 - 1797, n=5)
1709 Points ∼84% +1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
1686 Points ∼83%
CrossMark / Creativity
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
2161 Points ∼100% +18%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
2072 Points ∼96% +13%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (1835 - 2084, n=5)
1968 Points ∼91% +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (1027 - 2366, n=43, last 2 years)
1888 Points ∼87% +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
1835 Points ∼85%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
2228 Points ∼100% +29%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1798 Points ∼81% +4%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
1731 Points ∼78%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 2230, n=43, last 2 years)
1711 Points ∼77% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (1210 - 1798, n=5)
1633 Points ∼73% -6%
PCMark 10 Score
7531 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
77803 MB/s ∼100% +42%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
63110 MB/s ∼81% +15%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62419 MB/s ∼80% +14%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (31252 - 77803, n=35)
54974 MB/s ∼71% 0%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
54861 MB/s ∼71%
Average of class Gaming
  (18074 - 77803, n=183, last 2 years)
44703 MB/s ∼57% -19%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
41377 MB/s ∼53% -25%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
76185 MB/s ∼100% +21%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
66496 MB/s ∼87% +5%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65835 MB/s ∼86% +4%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
63055 MB/s ∼83%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (32677 - 76185, n=35)
58206 MB/s ∼76% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (20318 - 76185, n=183, last 2 years)
48413 MB/s ∼64% -23%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
46645 MB/s ∼61% -26%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
64272 MB/s ∼100% +9%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
64219 MB/s ∼100% +9%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
61981 MB/s ∼96% +5%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
59113 MB/s ∼92%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (30592 - 66475, n=35)
54913 MB/s ∼85% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (15975 - 68782, n=183, last 2 years)
46378 MB/s ∼72% -22%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
41254 MB/s ∼64% -30%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
116.5 ns * ∼100%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
111 ns * ∼95% +5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
90.1 ns * ∼77% +23%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
89.7 ns * ∼77% +23%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
86.6 ns * ∼74% +26%
Average of class Gaming
  (0 - 122, n=206, last 2 years)
61.4 ns * ∼53% +47%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (76.2 - 122, n=36)
61.3 (76.2min - 122max) ns * ∼53% +47%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

我们的评测设备的LatencyMon测试结果在某种程度上比竞争对手的要好得多,但当涉及到实时音频编辑时,Legion 不是首选的设备。然而,考虑到它本质上是一台游戏笔记本电脑,并考虑到我们的YouTube视频只掉了一小部分帧,LatencyMon的结果可能是可以接受的。然而,在4K视频播放过程中,CPU/GPU的负载确实相当高,我们希望看到系统资源的部署更有效一些。

LatencyMon, 结果
LatencyMon, 结果
LatencyMon, Driver
LatencyMon, Driver
 
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2098 μs * ∼100% -222%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1140 μs * ∼54% -75%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
717.4 μs * ∼34% -10%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
650.7 μs * ∼31%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
623 μs * ∼30% +4%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

最新的PCI-E第4代NVME固态硬盘实际上已经非常快了,以至于它们在日常使用中的性能差异几乎不起作用,几乎感觉不到。尽管如此,联想还是决定在Legion 5i Pro的RAID-0阵列中加入两块最快的指数。

虽然这些固态硬盘中的每一个都有很好的单独得分,并在我们的性能表上名列前茅,但它们在双阵列中的读写率几乎翻了一番。约12GB的峰值测量值在纸面上听起来非常令人印象深刻,但可能没有多少应用会受益于这种突破性的速度。当然,这绝不是一种抱怨,因为有2TB的总存储空间可用于游戏、图片或高分辨率视频数据。特别是在日常工作中,不得不使用各种外部硬盘的烦扰变得可以避免。固态硬盘的耐力测试确实在较长时间后出现了反复下降的情况。这可能是温度过高的表现,在固态硬盘持续高负荷下会出现这种情况。

2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
Sequential Read: 9681.3MB/s
Sequential Write: 8205.5MB/s
4K Read: 80.52MB/s
4K Write: 197.41MB/s
4K-64 Read: 1679.76MB/s
4K-64 Write: 1613.52MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.021ms
Access Time Write: 0.021ms
Copy ISO: 2622MB/s
Copy Program: 428MB/s
Copy Game: 1199MB/s
Score Read: 2728Points
Score Write: 2631Points
Score Total: 6691Points
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
80.3 pt ∼80%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
76.7 pt ∼77%
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
 
76.7 pt ∼77%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
57.5 pt ∼58%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
55.4 pt ∼55%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
45.8 pt ∼46%
Average of class Gaming
 
43.8 pt ∼44%
DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
5544 (5525.64min - 5543.85max) MB/s ∼100%
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
 
5544 MB/s ∼100% 0%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3928 (3889.8min - 3927.66max) MB/s ∼71% -29%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3922 (3902.75min - 3922.43max) MB/s ∼71% -29%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
3819 (3405.77min - 3819.33max) MB/s ∼69% -31%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2746 (2728.19min - 2745.84max) MB/s ∼50% -50%
Average of class Gaming
  (170 - 5544, n=181, last 2 years)
2507 MB/s ∼45% -55%
seq write
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
7667 (7620.91min - 7667.19max) MB/s ∼100%
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
 
7667 MB/s ∼100% 0%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
4457 MB/s ∼58% -42%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
4033 (3953.13min - 4032.82max) MB/s ∼53% -47%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3931 (3911.33min - 3931.01max) MB/s ∼51% -49%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2786 (2776.21min - 2785.86max) MB/s ∼36% -64%
Average of class Gaming
  (174 - 7889, n=180, last 2 years)
2722 MB/s ∼36% -64%
seq q8 t1 read
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
12143 (11574.5min - 12143max) MB/s ∼100%
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
 
12143 MB/s ∼100% 0%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
7028 (6634.28min - 7027.76max) MB/s ∼58% -42%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
6867 (6210.3min - 6866.91max) MB/s ∼57% -43%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
6858 (6042.6min - 6858.23max) MB/s ∼56% -44%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 13195, n=181, last 2 years)
4179 MB/s ∼34% -66%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
3503 (3178.09min - 3503.42max) MB/s ∼29% -71%
seq q8 t1 write
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
10203 (10182.9min - 10203.3max) MB/s ∼100%
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
 
10203 MB/s ∼100% 0%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5412 (5265.32min - 5411.99max) MB/s ∼53% -47%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5168 (5037.36min - 5167.53max) MB/s ∼51% -49%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
5004 (4980.32min - 5004.43max) MB/s ∼49% -51%
Average of class Gaming
  (86.2 - 10203, n=181, last 2 years)
3283 MB/s ∼32% -68%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
3016 (2902.04min - 3015.7max) MB/s ∼30% -70%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
90.6 (90.17min - 90.55max) MB/s ∼100%
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
 
90.6 MB/s ∼100% 0%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
88.7 MB/s ∼98% -2%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
79.3 (77.62min - 79.29max) MB/s ∼88% -12%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
77.1 (76.91min - 77.11max) MB/s ∼85% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.53 - 97.4, n=181, last 2 years)
58.6 MB/s ∼65% -35%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
48.8 (47.91min - 48.76max) MB/s ∼54% -46%
4k q1 t1 write
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
373 (371.9min - 373.21max) MB/s ∼100% +57%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
237 (232.48min - 236.93max) MB/s ∼64%
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
 
237 MB/s ∼64% 0%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
222 (216.3min - 221.72max) MB/s ∼60% -6%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
205 (195.73min - 204.56max) MB/s ∼55% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.79 - 421, n=180, last 2 years)
179.9 MB/s ∼48% -24%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
144 (143.57min - 144.35max) MB/s ∼39% -39%
4k q32 t16 read
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
3555 (3552.55min - 3555.1max) MB/s ∼100% +79%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
1982 (1800.55min - 1982.03max) MB/s ∼56%
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
 
1982 MB/s ∼56% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.1 - 4260, n=180, last 2 years)
1928 MB/s ∼54% -3%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
1798 (1787.41min - 1797.64max) MB/s ∼51% -9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
1528 (1477.56min - 1527.59max) MB/s ∼43% -23%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
839 (826.17min - 839.11max) MB/s ∼24% -58%
4k q32 t16 write
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
3612 (3585.78min - 3612.01max) MB/s ∼100% +96%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2142 (2133.48min - 2142.48max) MB/s ∼59% +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.15 - 4249, n=180, last 2 years)
1873 MB/s ∼52% +2%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
1842 (1678.82min - 1841.75max) MB/s ∼51%
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
 
1842 MB/s ∼51% 0%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
585 (555.77min - 584.61max) MB/s ∼16% -68%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
573 (461.98min - 572.89max) MB/s ∼16% -69%
AS SSD
Score Total
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
9380 Points ∼100% +40%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
6691 Points ∼71%
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
 
6691 Points ∼71% 0%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5985 Points ∼64% -11%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5866 Points ∼63% -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (910 - 9279, n=172, last 2 years)
5521 Points ∼59% -17%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
4984 Points ∼53% -26%
Score Read
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
3634 Points ∼100% +33%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
2728 Points ∼75%
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
 
2728 Points ∼75% 0%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2363 Points ∼65% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (389 - 3629, n=172, last 2 years)
2067 Points ∼57% -24%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
1994 Points ∼55% -27%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
1631 Points ∼45% -40%
Score Write
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
3991 Points ∼100% +52%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3093 Points ∼77% +18%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2658 Points ∼67% +1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
2631 Points ∼66%
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
 
2631 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (335 - 4414, n=172, last 2 years)
2421 Points ∼61% -8%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2325 Points ∼58% -12%
Seq Read
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
9681.3 MB/s ∼100%
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
 
9681 MB/s ∼100% 0%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
5588 MB/s ∼58% -42%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5404 MB/s ∼56% -44%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5396.69 MB/s ∼56% -44%
Average of class Gaming
  (252 - 9681, n=172, last 2 years)
3443 MB/s ∼36% -64%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
3148 MB/s ∼33% -67%
Seq Write
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
 
8206 MB/s ∼100% 0%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
8205.5 MB/s ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
3267 MB/s ∼40% -60%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2667.04 MB/s ∼33% -67%
Average of class Gaming
  (308 - 8206, n=172, last 2 years)
2628 MB/s ∼32% -68%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2565 MB/s ∼31% -69%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2236 MB/s ∼27% -73%
4K Read
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
109.4 MB/s ∼100% +36%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
80.52 MB/s ∼74%
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
 
80.5 MB/s ∼74% 0%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
76.3 MB/s ∼70% -5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
73.81 MB/s ∼67% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (20 - 108, n=172, last 2 years)
57.1 MB/s ∼52% -29%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
52.1 MB/s ∼48% -35%
4K Write
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
321.6 MB/s ∼100% +63%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
272.6 MB/s ∼85% +38%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
247.26 MB/s ∼77% +25%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
197.41 MB/s ∼61%
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
 
197.4 MB/s ∼61% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (18 - 364, n=172, last 2 years)
157.7 MB/s ∼49% -20%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
136.8 MB/s ∼43% -31%
4K-64 Read
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
2966 MB/s ∼100% +77%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
1996 MB/s ∼67% +19%
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
 
1680 MB/s ∼57% 0%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
1679.76 MB/s ∼57%
Average of class Gaming
  (216 - 2963, n=172, last 2 years)
1666 MB/s ∼56% -1%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
1380.56 MB/s ∼47% -18%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
1014 MB/s ∼34% -40%
4K-64 Write
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
3342 MB/s ∼100% +107%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2579.14 MB/s ∼77% +60%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2161 MB/s ∼65% +34%
Average of class Gaming
  (191.8 - 3859, n=172, last 2 years)
2012 MB/s ∼60% +25%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
1931 MB/s ∼58% +20%
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
 
1614 MB/s ∼48% 0%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
1613.52 MB/s ∼48%
Access Time Read
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
0.066 ms * ∼100% -214%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.018 - 0.23, n=165, last 2 years)
0.06271 ms * ∼95% -199%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
0.056 ms * ∼85% -167%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
0.045 ms * ∼68% -114%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
0.029 ms * ∼44% -38%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
0.021 ms * ∼32%
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
 
0.021 ms * ∼32% -0%
Access Time Write
Average of class Gaming
  (0.012 - 0.588, n=172, last 2 years)
0.06436 ms * ∼100% -206%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
0.027 ms * ∼42% -29%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAH7H
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
0.021 ms * ∼33%
Average 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
 
0.021 ms * ∼33% -0%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
0.016 ms * ∼25% +24%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
0.013 ms * ∼20% +38%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
0.012 ms * ∼19% +43%

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8