结论 - 高端笔记本电脑硬件的典范
全新 ProArt P16 是一款令人惊艳的笔记本电脑,即便已经使用了一周多,我们仍然惊叹于这款 16 英寸笔记本竟能如此轻薄,同时又不牺牲稳定性、做工或功能。它配备了堪称一流的键盘、宽大的触觉反馈触控板、出色的扬声器、丰富的连接选项(包括高速 SD-Express 读卡器),以及可能是目前最好的笔记本显示屏之一。这块双层 OLED 屏幕与去年机型的屏幕非常相似,同样拥有惊艳的画质和极高的亮度(最高可达 1600 尼特),但这次的 PWM 频率比以往更高。
P16 能够充分发挥全新 RTX Spark N1X 芯片的潜力,我们已经在深入分析中探讨过它的性能表现。其 CPU 性能非常出色,优于 Intel 和 AMD 的产品(甚至包括 Strix Halo),不过 M5 Pro 的速度要快得多。GPU 方面,它能提供 RTX 5070 级别的性能,同时拥有显存容量大得多的优势。而且,即使使用电池供电,也能发挥全部性能。正如我们之前所说,N1X 并没有在哪个方面特别突出,而是针对所有工作负载(内容创作、AI、游戏、日常生产力)提供了一套出色的综合方案,并首次让用户能够享受到采用统一内存的 Blackwell GPU 的优势。如需了解全新 N1X 芯片的更多信息,也请参阅我们的详细分析。
作为一款产品,P16 值得批评的地方并不多。电池续航不算出色,摄像头仅为 1080p,而且尽管这款笔记本支持 PCIe 5.0,Asus 却只采用了 PCIe 4.0 SSD。虽然这可能是存储设备价格所致,但考虑到它的高昂售价,还是让人觉得有些奇怪,因为我们这台配备 128 GB RAM 的评测机零售价高达 6,999 美元,令人咋舌。
Pros
Cons
价格与供货情况
配备 128 GB 内存的 ProArt P16 H7607 零售价为 6,999 美元。
规格参数
机身、连接性和输入设备
2025 款 ProArt P16 已经是一款轻薄笔记本电脑,但全新的 2026 款更胜一筹。对于一款性能强劲的 16 英寸笔记本电脑来说,它的机身仅厚 13 mm,重量也仅为 1.79 kg,非常轻薄;在实际使用中,尤其是与 MacBook Pro 16 或最新的 Surface Book Ultra 等竞品对比时,这一点尤为明显。我们的评测机为黑色版本,虽然指纹问题并不严重(看得见,但容易清理),但你也可以选择白色机身。机身的稳固性和做工都非常出色,没有任何异响。屏幕上盖同样非常稳固,转轴调校得当(最大开合角度为 135 °)。这是我们迄今用过的最出色的机身之一,输入设备也同样出色。键盘使用起来非常舒适,大尺寸触觉反馈触控板的表现也很好,不过此前机型集成的拨盘已被取消。可维护的部件包括两个 SSD 插槽、Wi-Fi 模块、风扇以及电池。
接口配置齐全,提供三个 USB-C 4.0 接口、USB-A、HDMI 以及高速 SD-Express 读卡器。Wi-Fi 7 模块的传输速率出色且稳定,只有 1080p 摄像头(无隐私遮挡盖)不太符合这款高端设备应有的水准。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 (A-DATA SD-Express 8.0 512 GB) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (22.3 - 567, n=35, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 (A-DATA SD-Express 8.0 512 GB) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (37.3 - 1455, n=34, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Networking | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |

显示屏 - 4K Tandem OLED-面板
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 717 cd/m²
Contrast: 23900:1 (Black: 0.03 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.6 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.69}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.3 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.94}
89% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
98.9% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
99% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
CCT: 6547 K
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 ATNA60HC05-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16", 120 Hz | Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 ATNA60HC03-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16", 120 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 ATNA60KA01-0, OLED, 3200x2000, 16", 120 Hz | Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra ATNA60HR05-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.2", 120 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | 1% | -8% | 2% | |
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 1644 | 1600 -3% | 1600 -3% | 1182 -28% | 1737 6% |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 99 | 98.9 0% | 97.4 -2% | 97 -2% | 99.3 0% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 98.9 | 100 1% | 100 1% | 99.9 1% | 100 1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 89 | 88.6 0% | 96.8 9% | 85.3 -4% | 88.2 -1% |
| Response Times | 22% | 45% | -39% | -3827% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 2.23 ? | 0.3 ? 87% | 0.27 ? 88% | 0.5 ? 78% | 43 ? -1828% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 0.43 ? | 0.45 ? -5% | 0.37 ? 14% | 0.4 ? 7% | 41.2 ? -9481% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 960 ? | 480 ? | 1200 | 240 ? | 14880 |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 33 | 38 -15% | 22 33% | 100 -203% | 90 -173% |
| Screen | 35% | 40% | 15% | 16% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 717 | 661 -8% | 974 36% | 499 -30% | 710 -1% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 722 | 663 -8% | 979 36% | 505 -30% | 682 -6% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 98 | 99 1% | 98 0% | 97 -1% | 93 -5% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.03 | ||||
| Contrast (:1) | 23900 | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 0.5 69% | 0.9 44% | 0.9 44% | 1.1 31% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.8 | 1.4 71% | 1.7 65% | 2.1 56% | 2.1 56% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.3 | 0.6 82% | 1.3 61% | 1.6 52% | 2.7 18% |
| Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.19 100% | 2.21 100% | 2.22 99% | 2 110% |
| CCT | 6547 99% | 6565 99% | 6751 96% | 6445 101% | 6760 96% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 19% /
21% | 29% /
29% | -11% /
-5% | -1270% /
-876% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.24 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.6 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 2.23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.9 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.93 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 960 Hz Amplitude: 33 % | ≤ 79 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 960 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 79 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 960 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7579 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能 - 配备 128 GB RAM 的 Nvidia RTX Spark
测试条件
Asus 提供了常见的性能模式,我们在基准测试中使用了 Turbo 模式。
| 个人资料 | TDP | CB24 Multi | Steel Nomad | Cyberpunk 2077 QHD 超高画质 | 最大风扇噪音 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 低语 | 50/35 W | 1529 积分 | 2406 积分 | 43.2 帧/秒 | 41.5 dB(A) |
| 标准 | 60/45 W | 1604 积分 | 2831 积分 | 48.4 帧/秒 | 44.4 dB(A) |
| 性能 | 85/70 W | 1726 分 | 3146 积分 | 56.8 帧/秒 | 51.1 dB(A) |
| 电池(性能) | 80/70 W | 1706 积分 | 2633 积分 | 56.2 帧/秒 | 51.1 dB(A) |
处理器性能
ProArt P16 配备 RTX Spark N1X 20 核 ARM CPU。它采用 10 个性能核心和 10 个能效核心(3 nm),我们已在 RTX Spark 分析中介绍过其技术规格,其中也包含能效数据。CPU 的整体性能非常出色,明显超越上一代 ProArt P16 中的 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 和 Galaxy Book6 Ultra 中的 Panther Lake CPU。它也胜过 Ryzen AI Max+ 395(Strix Halo),但 Apple 的 M5 Pro 和 M5 Max 芯片则明显更快。持续性能非常出色。下表仅采用原生 CPU 基准测试,但我们也在下方列出了常规的 CPU 测试项目,这些测试需要在 ARM 系统上通过模拟运行。
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1x 675 | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1x 675 (1682 - 1726, n=2) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (327 - 2490, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Average of class Multimedia (72.5 - 201, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1x 675 (130 - 131, n=2) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Multi-Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1x 675 (20031 - 20296, n=2) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4983 - 30057, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Single-Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1x 675 (3092 - 3096, n=2) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1591 - 4336, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
Cinebench R15 多核循环测试
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max -10! | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1x 675 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1x 675 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4861 - 33362, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1237 - 2459, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1x 675 (n=1) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1x 675 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1887 - 12912, n=52, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (482 - 833, n=52, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1x 675 (n=1) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1x 675 (n=1) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (856 - 5224, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (184.8 - 326, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1x 675 (n=1) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1x 675 (n=1) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (26062 - 130368, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4526 - 7337, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1x 675 (n=1) | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6.08 - 36.1, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1x 675 (n=1) | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1x 675 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (23.9 - 72.5, n=52, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1x 675 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (0.3903 - 0.609, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1x 675 | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (2214 - 50388, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1x 675 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (12867 - 201874, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1x 675 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1x 675 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (626 - 8623, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (886 - 28794, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1x 675 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6395 - 105740, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1x 675 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1x 675 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8171 - 126790, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1x 675 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (143.8 - 2022, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1014 - 26875, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1x 675 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1x 675 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8187 - 88533, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 (v6.92.6600) | |
系统和存储设备
系统性能非常出色,ProArt P16 的响应也非常迅速。与采用 Advanced Optimus 的系统相比,激活独立显卡时也没有延迟,这一点很好。我们没有遇到任何稳定性问题,对于一款全新的 SoC 来说,这是个好兆头,但 ARM 版 Windows 意味着某些应用或配件可能存在兼容性问题。一如既往,我们建议您在购买前检查 ARM 兼容性,以免遇到意料之外的麻烦。有关 AI 基准测试,请参阅我们的 RTX Spark 分析文章。
在存储方面,我们的 SKU 配备了 SanDisk 的 2 TB 硬盘,但它仅为 PCIe 4.0 硬盘。传输速率尚可且稳定,但考虑到高昂的售价,Asus 没有采用其支持的 PCIe 5.0 硬盘,令人意外。得益于第二个 M.2-2280 插槽(PCIe 4.0),您可以轻松扩展存储容量。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 5: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1x 675, NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 -1! | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA -1! | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 -1! | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (866 - 3231, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1x 675, NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU (n=1) | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (931 - 2677, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1x 675, NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU (n=1) | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (907 - 4522, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1x 675, NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU (n=1) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (605 - 2073, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1x 675, NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU (n=1) | |
| WebXPRT 5 / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Average of class Multimedia (107 - 124, n=18, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1x 675, NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU (n=1) | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1x 675, NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU (n=1) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (167.3 - 415, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (228 - 835, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1x 675, NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU (n=1) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
* ... smaller is better
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1x 675 (n=1) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (11299 - 153516, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1x 675 (n=1) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (11624 - 174586, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1x 675 (n=1) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (11755 - 225242, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (84.1 - 535, n=47, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
* ... smaller is better
* ... smaller is better
磁盘限流:DiskSpd 读取循环,队列深度 8
GPU 和游戏性能
Blackwell GPU 拥有 6144 个 CUDA 核心,我们的评测机默认分配了 64 GB 显存。其原始 GPU 性能大致与较高性能版本的移动版 GeForce RTX 5070 相当,但由于模拟运行,游戏性能可能会略低。大多数游戏(目前)尚无原生版本,我们在运行 F1 25 或 Battlefield 6 等游戏时也遇到了一些兼容性问题,根本无法启动。不过,我们测试的大多数游戏都运行得相当不错,但不同游戏之间可能存在差异。得益于对 DLSS 和帧生成的支持,目前大多数游戏都能在高画质设置下流畅运行(使用电池供电时性能也不会下降),但配备强大 Nvidia 独立 GPU 的笔记本电脑(例如上一代搭载 RTX 5090 的 ProArt P16)在游戏方面仍然更胜一筹。更多面向内容创作者的基准测试,请参阅我们的 RTX Spark 分析。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 25983 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 23538 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 13030 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 3134 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 13266 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL | |
| Average of class Multimedia (17.8 - 68, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
| Average of class Multimedia (12 - 105, n=18, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU (n=1) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (20 - 186, n=18, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU (n=1) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Average of class Multimedia (133 - 1042, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Average NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU (n=1) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
* ... smaller is better
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7.61 - 144.4, n=52, last 2 years) | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (13.3 - 303, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP | |
| Average of class Multimedia (30.3 - 170.9, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 超高画质 FPS 图表
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 62.9 | 54.7 | ||||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 103.4 | 101.3 | 95.8 | 91.8 | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 122.1 | 113.4 | 99.9 | 83 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 73.1 | 60.2 | 52.8 | |||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 295 | 201 | 192 | 180 | 133 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 114 | 100.9 | 94.3 | 93.4 | 79.1 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 95.3 | 91.5 | 83 | 76.6 | 63.6 | 56.8 |
排放与功耗
系统噪声
Noise level
| Idle |
| 24 / 24 / 30.1 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 38.7 / 51.1 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: | ||
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 Spark RTX N1x 675, RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU | Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra Ultra 7 356H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max M5 Max, M5 Max 40-Core GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -6% | -7% | -0% | 2% | 3% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 24 | 24.2 -1% | 23.5 2% | 24.1 -0% | 25.1 -5% | 24.8 -3% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 24 | 24.2 -1% | 26.7 -11% | 24.1 -0% | 25.1 -5% | 24.8 -3% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 24 | 27.6 -15% | 26.7 -11% | 24.1 -0% | 25.1 -5% | 24.8 -3% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 30.1 | 32.6 -8% | 31.1 -3% | 25.1 17% | 25.1 17% | 24.8 18% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 38.7 | 42.6 -10% | 44.8 -16% | 44.2 -14% | 36.9 5% | 33.8 13% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 51.1 | 51.2 -0% | 53.7 -5% | 52.7 -3% | 48.5 5% | 48.9 4% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 51.1 | 53.2 -4% | 53.7 -5% | 52.7 -3% | 48.5 5% | 53.9 -5% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
尽管机身纤薄,但表面温度并不令人担忧。在满载情况下,设备会明显发热,皮肤直接接触底部后方区域可能会感到不适,但它仍比去年的 ProArt P16 更凉爽。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.6 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28 °C / 82.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (+0.7 °C / 1.3 F).
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 Spark RTX N1x 675, RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU | Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra Ultra 7 356H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max M5 Max, M5 Max 40-Core GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 3% | 4% | 6% | 12% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 43 | 47 -9% | 41.8 3% | 42.7 1% | 43.3 -1% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 48.6 | 51.6 -6% | 47.9 1% | 49.1 -1% | 42.9 12% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 28.2 | 24.9 12% | 26.3 7% | 25.4 10% | 23.4 17% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 29.3 | 25.5 13% | 27.6 6% | 25.5 13% | 23.5 20% |
* ... smaller is better
扬声器
配备六个单元(2个高音单元、4个低音单元)并支持 Dolby Atmos 的扬声器系统非常出色。
Asus ProArt P16 H7607 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 6.2% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 0.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
功耗和电池续航时间
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU, Spark RTX N1x 675, SanDisk PC SN5100S 2TB | Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101 | Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ultra 7 356H, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1 | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max M5 Max 40-Core GPU, M5 Max, Apple SSD AP2048Z | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro M5 Pro 20-Core GPU, M5 Pro 18-Core, Apple SSD AP4096Z | Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -24% | -19% | 24% | 11% | 9% | -22% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 7.7 | 10.9 -42% | 8.8 -14% | 4.4 43% | 2.7 65% | 4.4 43% | 9.9 -29% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 13.4 | 12.1 10% | 16.1 -20% | 6.4 52% | 13.3 1% | 18.3 -37% | 13.6 -1% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 13.7 | 12.5 9% | 16.5 -20% | 7.1 48% | 13.5 1% | 18.4 -34% | 14 -2% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 131.3 | 172.8 -32% | 157.9 -20% | 133 -1% | 136.7 -4% | 79.8 39% | 158.3 -21% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 134.5 | 176.6 -31% | 160.6 -19% | 134.3 -0% | 128.9 4% | 82.5 39% | 162.1 -21% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 146.8 | 233.9 -59% | 177.4 -21% | 143.9 2% | 150.3 -2% | 145 1% | 229 -56% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 129.3 | 89.3 | 55.1 | 141 | 84.2 | 93.8 |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 Cyberpunk / 压力测试
功率 消耗 外接 显示器
Notebookcheck 评分
Asus ProArt P16 H7607
- 10/16/2026 v8
Andreas Osthoff
对比中的潜在竞争对手
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asus ProArt P16 H7607 Nvidia RTX Spark N1x 675 ⎘ NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU ⎘ 128 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $6,199.00 HIDevolution [2025] ASUS Pro... 2. $4,599.00 HIDevolution [2025] ASUS Pro... 3. $499.99 ASUS ProArt PA169CDV 15.6 In... List Price: 6699€ | 1.8 kg | 13 mm | 16.00" 3840x2400 283 PPI OLED | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: $4,390.64 List Price: 4799€ | 2 kg | 18.3 mm | 16.00" 3840x2400 283 PPI OLED | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 2800€ | 1.9 kg | 17.9 mm | 16.00" 3200x2000 236 PPI OLED | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 356H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD | List Price: 3599€ | 1.9 kg | 15.4 mm | 16.00" 2880x1800 212 PPI OLED | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max Apple M5 Max ⎘ Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU ⎘ 48 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | List Price: 5699€ | 2.1 kg | 16.8 mm | 16.20" 3456x2234 254 PPI Mini-LED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.





























































