戴尔XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070笔记本电脑评论:既令人印象深刻又令人失望
XPS 15 9530是比2022年的XPS 15 9520的内部更新。去年型号上的第12代Alder Lake-H CPU和Nvidia Ampere GPU已分别升级为第13代Raptor Lake-H和Ada Lovelace选项。除此以外,机箱和显示器选项同比仍然相同,因此我们建议查看我们现有的对 XPS 15 9520, 9510, 和 9500 以了解更多关于该型号的物理特征。
我们的具体审查单位是一个更高端的配置,配备酷睿i7-13700H,RTX 4070,32GB内存,1TB SSD,以及光面3.5K OLED触摸屏,价格约为2800美元。其他SKU有更快的酷睿i9-13900H,更慢的RTX 4060,或更低分辨率的雾面FHD+面板。请注意,这是极少数配备50瓦GeForce RTX 4070的笔记本电脑之一,而其他大多数配备相同GPU的笔记本电脑则为100瓦或以上。
竞争者包括其他高端15英寸多媒体笔记本电脑,如华硕Zenbook Pro 15, MSI Summit E15,技嘉Aero 15,或 Razer Blade 15 Studio.
更多戴尔评论:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
90.3 % | 04/2023 | Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 3456x2160 | |
89.5 % | 05/2022 | Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 3456x2160 | |
90.1 % | 06/2020 | Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD i7-10875H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | 2 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2400 | |
87.7 % | 05/2022 | Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
85.4 % | 12/2022 | MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 i7-1280P, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 20.1 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
85.6 % | 08/2021 | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2.2 kg | 20 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 自XPS 15 9500以来没有重大变化
SD卡阅读器
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
沟通
一个英特尔AX211的标准配置是支持Wi-Fi 6E和蓝牙5.2。我们能够毫无问题地连接到我们的华硕AXE11000 Wi-Fi 6网络,但笔记本电脑很奇怪地不能识别或连接到我们的6GHz Wi-Fi 6E网络。其他支持Wi-Fi 6E的设备,如 像素7 Pro可以识别并连接到我们的6GHz网络,没有任何问题。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 |
网络摄像头 - 100万像素的分辨率越来越令人尴尬
最新的XPS 15 *仍然*依赖一个低分辨率的100万像素/720p网络摄像头,尽管它的要价超过2000美元。竞争机型如 HP Spectre x360 16或Razer Blade系列已经转向200万像素或甚至500万像素的传感器。不用说,在原本漂亮的OLED显示屏上,图片质量非常模糊。至少支持红外线。
戴尔表示,低分辨率的网络摄像头是笔记本电脑上最窄的边框之一的结果。据称,一个更高分辨率的网络摄像头会使边框变厚。
维护
配件和保修
戴尔仍然在每个零售盒内包括一个方便的USB-C转USB-A和HDMI适配器,我们对此表示赞赏。通常的一年有限制造商保修适用。
显示屏--3.5K的三星OLED看起来仍然令人惊讶
戴尔在其2023年和2022年的XPS 15机型上采用了相同的三星156XG01 OLED面板,使它们之间有类似的观看体验。这不一定是坏事,因为三星面板仍然提供完整的DCI-P3色彩和清晰的画面,但我们很希望在未来看到90赫兹或更快的面板选项。 某些华硕VivoBook机型例如,配备120赫兹的OLED面板,以获得更流畅的视觉体验。
|
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 389.5 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.95 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.53
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
98.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Samsung 156XG01, OLED, 3456x2160, 15.60 | Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti Samsung 156XG01, OLED, 3456x2160, 15.60 | Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD Sharp LQ156R1, IPS, 3840x2400, 15.60 | Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q Samsung ATNA56YX03-0, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.60 | MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 Sharp LQ156D1JW42, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60 | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD Samsung SDC4143, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -5% | -3% | -12% | -9% | 0% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.8 | 97.8 -2% | 89.7 -10% | 79.3 -21% | 80.48 -19% | 99.9 0% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.9 0% | 100 0% | 95.6 -4% | 96.95 -3% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 98.4 | 86 -13% | 99.8 1% | 87.3 -11% | 94.02 -4% | 99.5 1% |
Response Times | -29% | -2363% | -40% | -2088% | -23% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 1.68 ? | 1.9 ? -13% | 54 ? -3114% | 2.1 ? -25% | 51 ? -2936% | 2.8 ? -67% |
Response Time Black / White * | 1.94 ? | 1.9 ? 2% | 33.2 ? -1611% | 2.3 ? -19% | 26 ? -1240% | 2 ? -3% |
PWM Frequency | 239 | 59.52 ? -75% | 60.2 -75% | 240 ? 0% | ||
Screen | -0% | -17% | 13% | 18% | 7% | |
Brightness middle | 389.5 | 381.4 -2% | 557.9 43% | 342.9 -12% | 441 13% | 440 13% |
Brightness | 392 | 384 -2% | 541 38% | 346 -12% | 416 6% | 446 14% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 95 -3% | 91 -7% | 98 0% | 85 -13% | 92 -6% |
Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.155 | 0.04 | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.95 | 4.34 12% | 4.54 8% | 2.42 51% | 1.51 69% | 2.53 49% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.65 | 9.24 -7% | 7.92 8% | 4.05 53% | 3.56 59% | 7.82 10% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.53 | 3.82 -150% | 2.57 -68% | |||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 2 -0% | 3.2 -60% | 2.1 -5% | 2.49 -25% | 1.2 40% |
Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.13 103% | 1.99 111% | 2.21 100% | 2.17 101% | 2.206 100% |
CCT | 6265 104% | 6210 105% | 6451 101% | 6364 102% | 6292 103% | 6371 102% |
Contrast | 1431 | 2845 | 11000 | |||
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 89.5 | |||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | |||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -11% /
-9% | -794% /
-405% | -13% /
-7% | -693% /
-372% | -5% /
-1% |
* ... smaller is better
该面板开箱即被校准,但用户仍然可以应用我们上面的校准过的ICM配置文件来略微提高色彩准确性。戴尔最终将各种颜色配置文件(如sRGB、AdobeRGB、DCI-P3和其他)整合到了Windows显示菜单上,以方便配置文件的切换。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.94 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.97 ms rise | |
↘ 0.97 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1.68 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.8 ms rise | |
↘ 0.88 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 239 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 239 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 239 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18080 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
在所有亮度水平上都存在闪烁,就像其他笔记本电脑上的OLED面板一样。我们能够记录从0到52%亮度的240赫兹频率,以及从53%到100%亮度的60赫兹频率。
性能 - 第13代英特尔+GeForce RTX 4070图形
测试条件
在运行下面的基准测试之前,我们将设备设置为性能和dGPU模式。不支持Advanced Optimus或MUX。
处理器
由于该系统的Turbo Boost潜力有限,CPU的性能是一个混合的袋子。例如,我们的 酷睿i7-13700HCineBench R15 xT得分将比 i7-12700H去年的XPS 15 9520中的i7-12700H。然而,经过几个基准循环后,性能差距将缩小,并更接近去年的处理器。较小的微星Stealth 14 Studio,采用了与我们的XPS 15 9530相同的Core i7-13700H CPU,也会表现出类似的节流行为。
升级到 酷睿i9-13900H配置,预计可以将性能提高15%至25%。然而,好处可能更少,因为酷睿i9处理器在像XPS 15这样的薄型多媒体笔记本电脑上往往会有更剧烈的节流。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (5890 - 20034, n=27) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513RW | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1323 - 1914, n=27) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513RW | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (6.72 - 21.2, n=27) | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513RW | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513RW | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (0.4308 - 0.607, n=27) | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4986 - 18908, n=27) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4800 - 11050, n=27) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (2540 - 10135, n=27) | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (19552 - 52727, n=27) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q |
系统性能
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (10358 - 12908, n=8) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1451 - 2202, n=6) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q |
PCMark 10 Score | 7253 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (40018 - 78081, n=27) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (44583 - 79656, n=27) | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (42710 - 99898, n=27) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示了在打开我们的主页的多个浏览器标签时的DPC问题。4K60视频播放也不完美,在我们长达1分钟的测试视频中出现了4个丢帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备 - 多达两个PCIe4驱动器
我们的评测单元采用的是 SK Hynix PC801PCIe4 x4 NVMe固态硬盘,而不是我们旧版XPS 15 9510测试单元上的WD SN810。这两块固态硬盘的性能通常是相当的,但它们落后于流行的三星PM9A1。
性能的可持续性很好,在压力下没有节流。在结账时没有提供PCIe5固态硬盘,这太糟糕了。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能--一半的TGP等于一半的功率
很明显,图形性能应该比 "平均 "GeForce RTX 4070笔记本电脑因为XPS 15的50W TGP目标很低,但我们不知道是多少。现在我们有一个测试装置在手,根据3DMark基准测试,赤字可能是相当惊人的,比我们数据库的平均速度慢40%至50%。它是如此糟糕,甚至像惠普Omen 15这样的四年前的RTX 2070笔记本电脑也能与我们更昂贵的RTX 4070 XPS 15表现差不多。如果你打算玩很多游戏,那么XPS 15就成为一个糟糕的价值主张。
好消息是,图形性能仍然比 RTX 3050 Ti快了大约30%到35%。因此,尽管这是我们所见过的移动RTX 4070最慢的迭代之一,但还是有一个明显的同比提升。
有趣的是,相对于50W的TGP,运行3D软件工具时的图形加速要比预期的快得多。例如,采用CUDA加速的Blender Classroom只需46秒就能完成,这比一般的RTX 4070笔记本慢25%,而100W或更高的TGP是典型的。老式的RTX 3050 Ti在相同的基准测试中会花费几乎2.5倍的时间。因此,内容创作者在选择2023年的XPS 15时,将比旧型号受益最大。
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F -1! | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB -1! | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD -2! | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
MSI Stealth 15M A11SEK -2! | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti -2! | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD -2! |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (24229 - 45606, n=43) | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
MSI Stealth 15M A11SEK | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD |
3DMark 11 Performance | 22258 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 13535 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 5860 points | |
Help |
Blender | |
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (18 - 28, n=40) | |
v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (32 - 142, n=41) | |
v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (158 - 428, n=40) |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
尽管上述RTX 4070的性能令人失望,但该系统仍然可以在1080p和60FPS的中高设置下运行任何当前的标题。然而,再高的话,GPU就会开始挣扎。像《赛博朋克2077》或《Returnal》 这样的高要求游戏,如果设置高于中等水平,就会在没有G-Sync帮助的情况下出现明显的屏幕撕裂。除了像《DOTA 2》这样要求不高的多人游戏外,大多数游戏几乎不能在原生3.5K分辨率下运行。
此外,游戏时性能可能不稳定。闲置时的帧率 Witcher 3会周期性地从50FPS下降到40FPS,然后似乎没有任何理由地跳回50FPS。这种行为表明后台活动的优先级不高。
另一个不幸的缺点是,非常低的设置下的帧率有时会比高设置下的帧率慢。这是在低1080p设置下运行《赛博朋克2077》和《Returnal》 时观察到的,即使经过重复测试,帧率也一直比中等1080p设置下的慢。这种行为表明,当CPU和GPU都受到压力时,PSU的限制和随之而来的CPU和GPU之间的权力斗争。
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F -1! | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD -3! | |
MSI Stealth 15M A11SEK | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
MSI Stealth 15M A11SEK | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
MSI Stealth 15M A11SEK | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
MSI Stealth 15M A11SEK | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
MSI Stealth 15M A11SEK | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
MSI Stealth 15M A11SEK | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
MSI Stealth 15M A11SEK | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD |
Returnal | |
1920x1080 Low Preset | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (65 - 119, n=10) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (69 - 117, n=11) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
1920x1080 High Preset | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (64 - 106, n=11) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
1920x1080 Epic Preset | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (54 - 90, n=11) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
2560x1440 Epic Preset | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (39 - 66, n=11) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
3840x2160 Epic Preset | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (21 - 39, n=7) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
GTA V (2015) | 180 | 168.1 | 134.3 | 63.5 | 52.9 | 53 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 354.2 | 233.3 | 123.9 | 69.8 | 47 | 26.5 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 189.5 | 163.1 | 147.6 | 137 | 88.4 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 108.6 | 84 | 66 | 48.8 | 26.6 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 134.2 | 91.6 | 90.6 | 67.3 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 334 | 172.1 | 136.6 | 117.7 | 79.9 | 42.7 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 55.3 | 70 | 57.5 | 48 | 30 | 12.8 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 98.1 | 92.5 | 74.3 | 58.6 | 49.8 | 39.2 |
F1 22 (2022) | 155.1 | 148.5 | 123.5 | 39.2 | 10.6 | 4.7 |
Returnal (2023) | 65 | 69 | 64 | 54 | 39 | 21 |
排放
系统噪音 - 对尺寸来说不算太大
在浏览网页或流媒体视频时,风扇噪音往往徘徊在24 dB(A)左右,而安静的背景为23 dB(A),几乎听不见。引入更高的负载,如游戏,将诱发40至45分贝(A)之间的风扇噪音,这是安静比华硕Zenbook Pro 15或Gigabyte Aero 15在负载下更安静。XPS 15通常不像其他高性能15英寸多媒体笔记本电脑那样吵闹。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.1 / 23.1 / 24.2 dB(A) |
Load |
| 27.1 / 44.6 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.1 dB(A) |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 512GB | Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10875H, SK Hynix PC611 512GB | Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-1280P, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 0% | -24% | -7% | -22% | -35% | |
off / environment * | 23.1 | 22.8 1% | 28.4 -23% | 22.8 1% | 26 -13% | 25 -8% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.1 | 22.9 1% | 28.4 -23% | 22.9 1% | 26 -13% | 30 -30% |
Idle Average * | 23.1 | 22.9 1% | 28.4 -23% | 22.9 1% | 30.7 -33% | 32 -39% |
Idle Maximum * | 24.2 | 22.9 5% | 28.4 -17% | 22.9 5% | 30.7 -27% | 35 -45% |
Load Average * | 27.1 | 30.9 -14% | 46 -70% | 33.2 -23% | 41.9 -55% | 44 -62% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 40.1 | 37.8 6% | 42 -5% | 47.3 -18% | 51 -27% | |
Load Maximum * | 44.6 | 44.7 -0% | 47.1 -6% | 52.8 -18% | 40.7 9% | 60 -35% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
由于薄型机箱的高功率密度,即使只是在桌面上空转,表面温度也相对较高,约为30℃。然而,这与去年的机型没有任何不同,因为电源包络线大致保持不变。在运行游戏等高要求的负载时,机箱底部的皮肤温度在45摄氏度,会让人感觉不舒服。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.6 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.6 °C / 87.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.8 °C / -3.3 F).
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 Intel Core i7-1280P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -5% | -2% | -4% | -3% | -9% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 45.6 | 51.4 -13% | 44 4% | 36 21% | 49 -7% | 45 1% |
Maximum Bottom * | 42 | 51 -21% | 48.8 -16% | 47.2 -12% | 52.6 -25% | 54 -29% |
Idle Upper Side * | 34.4 | 30 13% | 33 4% | 37 -8% | 29.7 14% | 34 1% |
Idle Bottom * | 33.2 | 33 1% | 32.4 2% | 39.2 -18% | 30.7 8% | 36 -8% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试--CPU温度过高
在启动Prime95压力时,CPU将提升到3.7 GHz和96 W,只有一两秒钟。这将稳步下降到只有2.7 GHz和55 W,因为当CPU完全受压时,核心温度非常高,达到88至100 C。相比之下,在配备AMD的华硕Zenbook Pro 15 UM5上重复这个相同的测试 华硕Zenbook Pro 15 UM535Q戴尔系统的核心温度高于平均水平并不令人惊讶,因为这是XPS 15系列的一个共同特征。因此,升级到酷睿i9配置可能最多只是带来一点好处,因为我们的酷睿i7配置已经接近100℃的上限。
当运行 Witcher 3代表典型的游戏负载时,GPU将稳定在1590 MHz核心,1375 MHz内存,70 C和43 W,而目标是50 W。在较大的联合利华GM6PX7X IDX在更强大的130W RTX 4070上重复同样的测试将导致稳定的核心时钟、内存时钟、温度和GPU功率分别为2370MHz、2125MHz、73C和100W。在这个例子中,50W和100+W RTX 4070之间的性能差异非常明显。
令人惊讶的是,在电池电源上运行并不影响性能,这对任何GeForce RTX供电的笔记本电脑来说都是罕见的。在电池上进行的3DMark 11测试将返回物理和图形分数,分别为20751和24569分,而在主电源上则为18112和24229分。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | GPU平均温度(℃) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 52 | 46 |
Prime95压力 | 2.4 | -- | 88 | 62 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 2.4 | ~1095 | 93 | 75 |
Witcher 3 应力 | ~0.9 | 1590 | 72 | 70 |
发言人
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理 - Core H和GeForce RTX on USB-C
消耗功率
与去年的机型相比,耗电量普遍较高。例如,当在桌面上以最低设置空转时,XPS 15 9530将消耗约20瓦,而旧版XPS 15 9520只有5至6瓦。当游戏时,消耗量将高出约25%,这意味着比老款RTX 3050 Ti的额外性能并不完全是免费的。
我们能够从中小型(约14.3 x 6.6 x 2.2厘米)的130瓦交流适配器中记录到133瓦的临时最大消耗。XPS 15是首批同时采用Core H系列CPU和GeForce RTX 4070 GPU的笔记本电脑之一,完全由USB-C供电。这在便携性和多功能性方面当然有其优势,但由于电源包络有限,性能和充电会受到影响。例如,从空到满的充电时间比平时慢,约为2.5小时,如果同时运行高要求的负载,这将更慢。
值得庆幸的是,在游戏或运行高要求的负载时,电池不会像我们观察到的那样,慢慢耗尽。 旧的XPS 17型号.
Off / Standby | 0.51 / 1.67 Watt |
Idle | 20 / 20.7 / 22.4 Watt |
Load |
77.1 / 133.4 Watt |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, OLED, 3456x2160, 15.60 | Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 512GB, OLED, 3456x2160, 15.60 | Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD i7-10875H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, SK Hynix PC611 512GB, IPS, 3840x2400, 15.60 | Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.60 | MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 i7-1280P, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60 | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 28% | 12% | 34% | 51% | -39% | |
Idle Minimum * | 20 | 5.5 72% | 5.7 71% | 5.5 72% | 5.4 73% | 23 -15% |
Idle Average * | 20.7 | 7.2 65% | 13.5 35% | 7.4 64% | 11.8 43% | 26 -26% |
Idle Maximum * | 22.4 | 16 29% | 19.6 12% | 14.9 33% | 12.7 43% | 34 -52% |
Load Average * | 77.1 | 91.8 -19% | 114.1 -48% | 78.2 -1% | 45.9 40% | 99 -28% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 95.4 | 74.6 22% | 93 3% | 80.1 16% | 45.7 52% | 163 -71% |
Load Maximum * | 133.4 | 134.7 -1% | 135.2 -1% | 110.9 17% | 63 53% | 190 -42% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命 - 稍微短一些,但还不错
运行时间普遍比去年的机型短,这并不奇怪,因为第13代英特尔CPU和GeForce 40 GPU的功率包络与它们各自的前辈相似。我们能够记录8小时的实际WLAN使用时间,或比2022年的XPS 15短40分钟。尽管比华硕Zenbook Pro 15等竞争机型的时间短一些,但仍然不错。
电池寿命可以通过在OLED配置上显示较深的颜色而不是白色来延长,详见 这里.我们预计较低分辨率的IPS SKU将提供比我们在这里记录的更长的运行时间。
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh | Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 86 Wh | Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD i7-10875H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, 86 Wh | Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 96 Wh | MSI Prestige 15 A12UD-093 i7-1280P, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 52% | 50% | 110% | 2% | 6% | |
Reader / Idle | 688 | 886 29% | 1382 101% | 1571 128% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 481 | 528 10% | 546 14% | 766 59% | 531 10% | 508 6% |
Load | 89 | 192 116% | 121 36% | 215 142% | 83 -7% | |
H.264 | 423 | |||||
Witcher 3 ultra | 131 |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 为了瘦身而牺牲了性能
酷睿i7-13700H和GeForce RTX 4070通常保留给更大的游戏笔记本电脑,如华硕ROG Strix G18或Aorus 15X ASF每个都有笨重的200多瓦的电源砖。把它们塞进像XPS 15这样的低功率薄型设计中当然可以,但性能不可避免地受到重大打击。在这种情况下,TGP已经被削减了一半或更多,每美元的性能很差。如果你打算同时运行图形编辑和游戏,那么像Alienware x15这样的专用游戏机就可以了。 Alienware x15即使配置相同的CPU和GPU,也会以相当大的优势胜过我们的XPS 15。
与具有更高TGP目标的大型笔记本电脑相比,运行图形编辑时的性能打击并不像游戏性能的打击那么严重。这主要是因为即使是50瓦的RTX 4070也带有与100瓦以上版本相同数量的CUDA核心用于加速。因此,XPS 15 9530在内容创作方面表现出色,只有偶尔的游戏。毕竟,这是一台Nvidia Studio笔记本电脑。
如果你想平衡性能和便携性,XPS 15 9530是值得拥有的内容创作笔记本电脑。然而,不要指望它的性能会像其他大多数具有相同GPU的笔记本电脑一样。
我们希望在未来的机型上看到很多变化。首先,更新的90赫兹或120赫兹刷新率的显示器选项将对改善用户体验大有帮助。第二,720p的网络摄像头是非常糟糕的,因为它感觉甚至与十年前没有变化。第三,可能采用液态金属的修正冷却解决方案可以帮助提高Turbo Boost性能,而不需要加厚设计。最后,DPC问题、跳帧和掉帧问题当然应该得到关注,特别是对于一个面向内容创作的旗舰笔记本电脑。XPS 15有很多值得喜欢的地方,特别是如果你看重其类似MacBook Pro的便携性,但里面的处理器已经超过了机箱,并因此感到有些受限。
价格和可用性
在撰写本文时,XPS 15 9530还没有通过零售商广泛销售。获得机型的最佳机会是直接通过戴尔。基本配置的价格从2250美元开始,如果完全配置了最大的存储和内存,价格将达到4700美元。
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
-
04/23/2023 v7
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.