Notebookcheck Logo

Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD笔记本电脑评测。下一代4K OLED

大量的端口。 随着最新的模型,Aero 15 OLED XD,技嘉为笔记本电脑配备了Tiger Lake ,Thunderbolt 4和HDMI 2.1,使几乎所有的组件都得到了更新。一个iGPU和一个105瓦的笔记本电脑GeForce RTX 3070一起作为图形解决方案。
Geforce GPU Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt Tiger Lake Gaming

技嘉Aero系列专注于多媒体以及内容创作;因此,它试图满足图形设计师和媒体设计师的高要求。在Aero系列中也有一些游戏空间,因为自从Nvidia给予制造商影响RTX 30XX显卡性能(TDP)的自由后,强大的GPU,如我们评测单元中发现的RTX 3070

,也找到了一个位置。

由于外部变化不大,我们将在评测的相应部分参考对技嘉Aero 15 OLED XC的评价。

我们选择下面列出的竞争设备进行比较,在每个部分下都可以添加额外的笔记本电脑。

Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD (Aero 15 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-11800H 8 x 2.3 GHz @ 4.6 GHz, 109 W PL2 / Short Burst, 62 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1290 MHz, Memory: 1500 MHz, 105 W TDP ( including 15 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 27.21.14.6235, Nvidia Optimus
Memory
32 GB 
, DDR4-3200, dual-channel
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 282 PPI, Samsung SDC4143, OLED, Pantone, glossy: no, HDR, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM570
Storage
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, 1024 GB 
, 890 GB free
Soundcard
Realtek ALC255 @ High Definition Audio-Controller
Connections
3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio jack, Card Reader: SD
Networking
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 20 x 356 x 250
Battery
99 Wh Lithium-Polymer, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 8 h
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD 720p
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, thermal pad for M.2 SSD, Gigabyte Control Center, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.23 kg, Power Supply: 720 g
Price
2 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
85.6 %
08/2021
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.2 kg20 mm15.60"3840x2160
85 %
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg24 mm15.60"1920x1080
85 %
03/2021
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg27.2 mm15.60"1920x1080
85.6 %
02/2021
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.2 kg20 mm15.60"3840x2160
85.8 %
07/2021
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg21.5 mm15.60"3840x2160

案例 - 除了微小的修改外,与前代产品完全相同

Aero 15 OLED XD - 只有显示屏盖子上的图案发生了变化
Aero 15 OLED XD - 只有显示屏盖子上的图案发生了变化

由于机箱与前代产品相比没有太大变化,我们在此参考Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC。只有显示屏盖子表面的图案发生了变化。另外值得一提的是,当开孔高度在10厘米左右或以下时,盖子会自动关闭。此外,显示屏盖子的上边框是凹进去的,这使得抬起盖子更容易。

尺寸和重量也没有变化。如果将测试设备与竞争对手相比,Aero 15 OLED XD以最低的重量和两厘米的高度脱颖而出。

Size comparison

360 mm 256 mm 24 mm 2.3 kg359.8 mm 249.2 mm 21.5 mm 2.4 kg354 mm 259 mm 27.2 mm 2.3 kg356 mm 250 mm 20 mm 2.2 kg356 mm 250 mm 20 mm 2.2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性 - 相同的端口,升级到Thunderbolt 4

Aero 15 OLED XD配备了一个创作者可能需要的所有端口。其中包括一个完整的SD读卡器和一个以太网端口。事实上,技嘉已经成功地将一个完整的以太网端口整合到薄薄的机箱中,这是非常了不起的然而,不幸的是,除了增加了Thunderbolt 4端口外,与前代产品相比没有任何变化。我们希望端口能更好地放在右边,因为当电源适配器、Thunderbolt 4端口和两个USB Type-A端口都在使用时,用鼠标工作就很困难。不幸的是,技嘉牺牲了整个后部,以支持冷却系统,至少电源通常在这里。

左边:HDMI 2.1,Mini DisplayPort 1.4,USB Type-A 3.2 Gen. 1,组合式3.5毫米音频插孔,2.5Gb/s网络
左边:HDMI 2.1,Mini DisplayPort 1.4,USB Type-A 3.2 Gen. 1,组合式3.5毫米音频插孔,2.5Gb/s网络
右边:2个USB Type-A 3.2 Gen. 1,USB-C Thunderbolt 4(带DisplayPort和Power Delivery),SD读卡器,电源
右边:2个USB Type-A 3.2 Gen. 1,USB-C Thunderbolt 4(带DisplayPort和Power Delivery),SD读卡器,电源
Aero 15 OLED XD - 不方便的端口位置
Aero 15 OLED XD - 不方便的端口位置

SD卡阅读器

Aero 15 OLED XD有一个成熟的SD读卡器,在使用我们的128GB UHS-II AV PRO V60 microSD参考存储卡时能提供良好的效果。前代产品在相同的读取速度下,使用东芝Exceria Pro的性能要高出10%左右。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
194 MB/s +1%
Aorus 15P XC
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
194 MB/s +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
192 MB/s
Alienware m15 R4
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
190 MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=100, last 2 years)
98.4 MB/s -49%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Alienware m15 R4
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
237 MB/s +21%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
213 MB/s +9%
Aorus 15P XC
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
210 MB/s +7%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
196 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=94, last 2 years)
121.3 MB/s -38%

沟通

Gigabyte继续使用英特尔AX200 WLAN模块,它支持蓝牙5.1和Wi-Fi 6等(速率仍比前代产品略高)。相比之下,华硕TUF Gaming A15在数据传输测试中比我们的审查样本高出19%,在数据接收测试中甚至高出整整40%。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1480 (720min - 1589max) MBit/s +19%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1394 (497min - 1498max) MBit/s +13%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1239 (1161min - 1273max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (885 - 1412, n=4, last 2 years)
1139 MBit/s -8%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (447 - 1645, n=127)
1104 MBit/s -11%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1090 MBit/s -12%
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1613 (1351min - 1677max) MBit/s +40%
Average of class Gaming
  (881 - 1700, n=4, last 2 years)
1379 MBit/s +20%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1285 (728min - 1461max) MBit/s +12%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (523 - 1684, n=128)
1191 MBit/s +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1151 (577min - 1211max) MBit/s
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1080 MBit/s -6%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650Tooltip
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1131 (577-1211)
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1613 (1351-1677)
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1285 (728-1461)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1239 (1161-1273)
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1456 (720-1589)
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1377 (497-1498)

网络摄像头

Aero 15 OLED XD - 网络摄像头
Aero 15 OLED XD - 网络摄像头

网络摄像头位置的选择在我们方面引起了一些疑问。虽然这里有一个手动开关来隐藏网络摄像头,但与机箱相比,它的质量较差。此外,它还提供了一个不利于从下面观看的角度。任何依赖网络摄像头的人都希望这里有一个更好的摄像头。最重要的是,有足够的空间来安装更大的传感器,从而提高分辨率。在我们看来,为了至少提供一个正常位置的网络摄像头,可以放弃顶部区域的狭窄显示屏边框。

ColorChecker
15.7 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
11 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
12 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
7 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD: 9.79 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 20.53 ∆E

维护

为了能够打开机箱,需要卸下12颗Torx TR6螺丝。与前代产品一样,其中两个被密封条覆盖。根据经验判断,技嘉可能想增加打开设备的难度,或者在保修情况下表明设备是否被打开过。这也使得更换SSD、内存和WLAN模块变得困难。其他组件的更换也不容易,而且不费吹灰之力。至少技嘉充分利用了Aero 15的空间,允许用户因此而安装第二块M.2固态硬盘。

Aero 15 OLED XD - 内部
Aero 15 OLED XD - 内部
Aero 15 OLED XD - 附加M.2插槽
Aero 15 OLED XD - 附加M.2插槽

担保

德国技嘉为用户提供两年的保修期。如果你想延长保修期,你必须在网上注册该设备。

输入设备 - 键盘再次缺乏对特殊字符的照明

键盘

Aero 15 OLED XD有一个全尺寸的键盘,按键大小正常。用户将体验到相当粘稠的打字体验,以及相当差和不精确的压力点。键盘的音量一般,敏感的用户可能会觉得太吵。我们注意到在轻按空格键时有 "吱吱 "的噪音。此外,它感觉非常摇晃,在输入较长的文字段落时经常导致打错。当涉及到单独的RGB照明时,技嘉可能已经从其前辈那里学到了东西,因为键盘的特殊字符再次没有被照亮。因此,在夜间或光线不足的情况下,很难甚至不可能识别特殊字符,我们发现这一点很令人讨厌。此外,该键盘非常容易受到指纹的影响。

Aero 15 OLED XD - 键盘
Aero 15 OLED XD - 键盘
Aero 15 OLED XD - 键盘背光
Aero 15 OLED XD - 键盘背光

触摸板

与前代产品一样,触摸板结构紧凑,但具有良好的滑行性能。集成的指纹传感器进一步阻碍了已经很小的触摸板的使用。集成的鼠标按钮有一个清晰的压力点和体面的反馈。触摸板也很容易受到指纹的影响。

Aero 15 OLED XD - 带有指纹扫描仪的触摸板
Aero 15 OLED XD - 带有指纹扫描仪的触摸板

显示屏--神奇的4K OLED面板,60赫兹

所使用的4K AMOLED面板的分辨率为3840x2160像素,并具有Pantone X-Rite认证,这使得该设备对设计师和专业图像编辑特别有吸引力。由此产生的色彩准确性与OLED面板相结合,提供了一个非常好的画面。Gigabyte在这里几乎得到了所有的东西,因为高分辨率在显示屏上提供了更多的空间。这在编辑视频时也很明显,例如在Adobe Premiere中使用较长的时间线。

不幸的是,没有120赫兹选项。内置面板只有60赫兹的刷新率,这使用户在玩快节奏游戏时处于不利地位。

如同OLED面板的惯例,亮度是通过PWM调节的。由于这里的频率很低,为240赫兹,用户在较长的工作流程中会出现眼睛疲劳、头痛和恶心的情况。

441
cd/m²
445
cd/m²
438
cd/m²
427
cd/m²
440
cd/m²
438
cd/m²
456
cd/m²
466
cd/m²
459
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Samsung SDC4143 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 466 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 445.6 cd/m² Minimum: 5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 440 cd/m²
Contrast: 11000:1 (Black: 0.04 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.53 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 2.57
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.206
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Samsung SDC4143, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
Sharp SHP1532, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
LQ156M1JW25, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
SDCA029, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
SDC4143, OLED + IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60
Display
-23%
-0%
0%
Display P3 Coverage
99.9
67.7
-32%
99.9
0%
99.9
0%
sRGB Coverage
100
94.3
-6%
100
0%
100
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
99.5
68.2
-31%
98.5
-1%
99.7
0%
Response Times
-69%
-277%
8%
-27%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
2.8 ?(1.6, 1.2)
12 ?(6, 6)
-329%
8.2 ?(2.6, 5.6)
-193%
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
14%
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
14%
Response Time Black / White *
2 ?(1, 1)
8 ?(4, 4)
-300%
9.2 ?(4.4, 4.8)
-360%
1.8 ?(1, 0.8)
10%
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
-20%
PWM Frequency
240 ?(83)
1250 ?(20)
421%
240 ?(79)
0%
59.5 ?(81)
-75%
Screen
-72%
-103%
-3%
-20%
Brightness middle
440
297
-32%
308
-30%
442
0%
345
-22%
Brightness
446
268
-40%
288
-35%
452
1%
332
-26%
Brightness Distribution
92
84
-9%
86
-7%
95
3%
87
-5%
Black Level *
0.04
0.22
-450%
0.23
-475%
0.05
-25%
Contrast
11000
1350
-88%
1339
-88%
8840
-20%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.53
1.36
46%
3.28
-30%
2.69
-6%
3.3
-30%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.82
3.82
51%
8.51
-9%
8.27
-6%
7.2
8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.57
0.83
68%
2.59
-1%
2.6
-1%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.2
1.88
-57%
5
-317%
0.9
25%
2
-67%
Gamma
2.206 100%
2.48 89%
2.057 107%
2.172 101%
2.01 109%
CCT
6371 102%
6768 96%
7393 88%
6434 101%
6566 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
63
68
99
89.2
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99
90
100
100
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-71% / -72%
-134% / -110%
2% / -0%
-16% / -17%

* ... smaller is better

光滑的4K显示屏非常锐利,所有其他数值,如黑度和对比度,也由于OLED技术而提供了出色的成绩。通过我们的测量,我们还可以确认,这款笔记本电脑非常适用于数字图像和视频编辑。覆盖率分别为100%和99.5%,sRGB和AdobeRGB色彩空间(几乎)被完全覆盖。

当涉及到显示亮度时,你在这里得到了很好的率。亮度分布为92%,根据我们的独立测量,最大亮度约为446 cd/m²。

卡尔曼:灰鳞
卡尔曼:灰鳞
卡尔曼:色彩饱和度
卡尔曼:色彩饱和度
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: 灰度表(已校准
CalMAN: 灰度表(已校准
CalMAN:色彩饱和度(已校准)。
CalMAN:色彩饱和度(已校准)。
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)

Aero 15 OLED XD可以在户外使用,但你应该找一个阴凉的地方,因为该显示器提供了高亮度,但它也是反光的。

Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD与sRGB对比
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD与sRGB对比
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD与AdobeRGB的对比
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD与AdobeRGB的对比
子像素网格
子像素网格
Aero 15 OLED XD - 户外使用
Aero 15 OLED XD - 户外使用

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 Hz ≤ 83 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 83 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

由于采用了OLED面板,Aero 15的可视角度在各个方向上都很好。

Aero 15 OLED XD - 可视角度
Aero 15 OLED XD - 可视角度

性能 - 面向未来的性能包

我们的测试设备配备了一个英特尔酷睿i7-11800H ,一个笔记本版本的GeForce RTX 3070,TDP为105瓦,以及一个NVMe SSD。此外,还有32GB的DDR4-3200内存,以双通道模式运行。通过这套方案,技嘉为客户提供了足够的性能,适用于所有常见的多媒体应用,以及视频和图像编辑所需的所有性能要求高的程序。

CPU-Z-CPU
CPU-Z-CPU
CPU-Z - 缓存
CPU-Z - 缓存
CPU-Z - 主板
CPU-Z - 主板
CPU-Z - 内存
CPU-Z - 内存
HWiNFO
HWiNFO
技嘉控制中心 - 仪表板
技嘉控制中心 - 仪表板
技嘉控制中心--AI
技嘉控制中心--AI
技嘉控制中心 - 经理
技嘉控制中心 - 经理
技嘉控制中心 - 键盘
技嘉控制中心 - 键盘
技嘉控制中心 - 风扇设置
技嘉控制中心 - 风扇设置

处理器

这里使用的处理器是英特尔酷睿i7-11800H :英特尔目前的Tiger Lake 组合中的一个八核CPU,适用于游戏笔记本以及工作站。八个处理器核心可以在2,300 MHz至4,600 MHz的时钟速率下运行,并处理多达16个线程。

技嘉特意选择了Tiger Lake ,而不是AMD,是考虑到创作者。由于英特尔的快速同步技术,视频编辑的速度更快。提供的性能非常高,但它不能完全跟上AMD 5900HX。

仔细观察里面的硬件发现,该芯片组已经配备了被动冷却装置。除此之外,技嘉在这里使用了Windforce Infinity Next Gen冷却系统,它配备了四根热管,其中两根分担GPU和CPU的废热。这两个锋利的风扇有71个叶片。

我们的CPU基准测试文章,显示了其他笔记本电脑的性能是否能在比较中跟上。

Aero 15 OLED XD - 被动式芯片组散热
Aero 15 OLED XD - 被动式芯片组散热
Aero 15 OLED XD - 带有双风扇系统的散热器
Aero 15 OLED XD - 带有双风扇系统的散热器
Aero 15 OLED XD - 抬高3毫米以获得更多新鲜空气
Aero 15 OLED XD - 抬高3毫米以获得更多新鲜空气

Cinebench R15 Multi loop

01052103154205256307358409451050115512601365147015751680178518901995Tooltip
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1746 (1719.69-1885.99)
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø1903 (1786.91-2018.67)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC Intel Core i7-10870H: Ø1490 (1455.29-1701.11)
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 Intel Core i7-10870H; Performance Mode: Ø1580 (1551.59-1622.32)
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 Intel Core i7-10870H; Standard Mode: Ø1390 (1323.67-1564.2)
Cinebench R23
Single Core
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 2235, n=231, last 2 years)
1818 Points +30%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1386 - 1522, n=45)
1497 Points +7%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1478 Points +6%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H
1399 Points
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H
1235 Points -12%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
1234 Points -12%
Multi Core
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 34613, n=233, last 2 years)
19629 Points +77%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
13066 Points +18%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (6508 - 14088, n=48)
11650 Points +5%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H
11102 Points
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H
10095 Points -9%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
9633 Points -13%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=231, last 2 years)
700 Points +35%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
577 Points +11%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (520 - 586, n=47)
576 Points +11%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
559 Points +8%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H
520 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
482 Points -7%
Alienware m15 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
477 Points -8%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H
476 Points -8%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=231, last 2 years)
7460 Points +81%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5045 Points +22%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4553 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (2498 - 5408, n=50)
4459 Points +8%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H
4128 Points
Alienware m15 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
3915 Points -5%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H
3806 Points -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
3543 Points -14%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=235, last 2 years)
269 Points +32%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
238 Points +17%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
233 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (201 - 231, n=46)
225 Points +10%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H
204 Points
Alienware m15 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
202 Points -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
200 Points -2%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H
199 Points -2%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=236, last 2 years)
3108 Points +65%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2151 (1969.09min - 2151.12max) Points +14%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2019 (1786.91min - 2018.67max) Points +7%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1342 - 2173, n=50)
1894 Points 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H
1886 (1719.69min - 1885.99max) Points
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
1701 (1455.29min - 1701.11max) Points -10%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H
1622 (1551.59min - 1622.32max) Points -14%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H
1564 (1325min - 1564max) Points -17%
Alienware m15 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1606 (1501.78min - 1606.36max) Points -15%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H
313 Seconds *
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
308 Seconds * +2%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H
284 Seconds * +9%
Alienware m15 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
279 Seconds * +11%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (217 - 454, n=46)
277 Seconds * +12%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
268 Seconds * +14%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
245 Seconds * +22%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 1259, n=229, last 2 years)
198.5 Seconds * +37%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7581, n=230, last 2 years)
6139 MIPS +14%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5568 MIPS +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5558 MIPS +3%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (5138 - 5732, n=46)
5492 MIPS +2%
Alienware m15 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
5437 MIPS +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H
5392 MIPS
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
5294 MIPS -2%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H
5145 MIPS -5%
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 140932, n=230, last 2 years)
77467 MIPS +73%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
55335 MIPS +24%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
53767 MIPS +20%
Alienware m15 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
48838 MIPS +9%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (33718 - 56758, n=46)
48384 MIPS +8%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H
44771 MIPS 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H
44739 MIPS
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
43601 MIPS -3%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2210, n=235, last 2 years)
1813 Points +20%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1429 - 1625, n=40)
1561 Points +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H
1516 Points
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1487 Points -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1443 Points -5%
Alienware m15 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1316 Points -13%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
1295 Points -15%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H
1272 Points -16%
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 22200, n=235, last 2 years)
13658 Points +54%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H
8864 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (4655 - 9851, n=40)
8551 Points -4%
Alienware m15 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
7789 Points -12%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
7716 Points -13%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7621 Points -14%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H
7602 Points -14%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
7518 Points -15%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 37.6, n=233, last 2 years)
21.3 fps +79%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
14.4 fps +21%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (7.38 - 17.4, n=46)
13.8 fps +16%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
13.4 fps +13%
Alienware m15 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
13.1 fps +10%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H
12.5 fps +5%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H
11.9 fps
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
11.7 fps -2%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
64.4 s * -36%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H
60.6 s * -28%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
50.3 s * -6%
Alienware m15 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
49.3 s * -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
49.1 s * -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=227, last 2 years)
49.1 s * -3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H
47.5 s *
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (38.6 - 59.9, n=45)
46.5 s * +2%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H
0.614 sec * -5%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.587 sec *
Alienware m15 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
0.578 sec * +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
0.573 sec * +2%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (0.548 - 0.615, n=46)
0.566 sec * +4%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.512 sec * +13%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.512 sec * +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 4.47, n=230, last 2 years)
0.4682 sec * +20%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1886 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
163 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
204 Points
Help
Aero 15 OLED XD - 内存(DDR4-3200)以双通道模式运行
Aero 15 OLED XD - 内存(DDR4-3200)以双通道模式运行

系统性能

在PCMark 10基准测试中,它模拟了计算机上的日常工作,然后根据不同的类别来衡量设备的强大程度,我们的测试设备显示了出色的成绩。所有的竞争设备在总分上都被超越了。有趣的是,这里使用的11800H与32GB的DDR4-3200内存和快速的NVMe SSD相结合,甚至让华硕ROG Strix G15 G513QRAMD Ryzen 9 5900HX

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=200, last 2 years)
7592 Points +8%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7062 Points
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6922 Points -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6917 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (6126 - 7311, n=11)
6912 Points -2%
Alienware m15 R4
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-10980HK, Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
6640 Points -6%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
6442 Points -9%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5660 Points -20%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average of class Gaming
  (8300 - 12334, n=199, last 2 years)
10731 Points +7%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
10198 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (9248 - 10832, n=11)
10104 Points +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10028 Points
Alienware m15 R4
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-10980HK, Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
9577 Points -4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
9185 Points -8%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
8963 Points -11%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 11833, n=199, last 2 years)
9725 Points +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9669 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9514 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (8571 - 9669, n=11)
9051 Points -6%
Alienware m15 R4
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-10980HK, Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
8605 Points -11%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
7916 Points -18%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
7012 Points -27%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming
  (6462 - 18475, n=199, last 2 years)
11476 Points +16%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9858 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (7627 - 10851, n=11)
9833 Points 0%
Alienware m15 R4
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-10980HK, Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
9643 Points -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9257 Points -6%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
8663 Points -12%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
7831 Points -21%
PCMark 10 Score
7062 points
Help

DPC延迟

与对笔记本电脑预期的目的相反,Latency-Mon在AI模式下显示出有问题的高DPC延迟,表明该笔记本电脑不适合实时编辑视频和音频文件。经过仔细检查,我们发现这可能是由于控制中心的设置造成的。在创造者、游戏和AI模式下,根据该工具,数值太高。显然,唯一的解决办法是打开涡轮模式,虽然这很吵。

Aero 15 OLED XD - LatencyMon AI模式
Aero 15 OLED XD - LatencyMon AI模式
Aero 15 OLED XD - LatencyMon Drivers AI模式
Aero 15 OLED XD - LatencyMon Drivers AI模式
Aero 15 OLED XD - LatencyMon游戏模式
Aero 15 OLED XD - LatencyMon游戏模式
Aero 15 OLED XD - LatencyMon 驱动程序 游戏模式
Aero 15 OLED XD - LatencyMon 驱动程序 游戏模式
Aero 15 OLED XD - LatencyMon Turbo模式
Aero 15 OLED XD - LatencyMon Turbo模式
Aero 15 OLED XD - LatencyMon 驱动程序 Turbo模式
Aero 15 OLED XD - LatencyMon 驱动程序 Turbo模式
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2029 μs * -147%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
999 μs * -21%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
995 μs * -21%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
823 μs *
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
466.9 μs * +43%

* ... smaller is better

储存

Aero 15 OLED XD - 通过机箱底部的热垫来冷却固态硬盘
Aero 15 OLED XD - 通过机箱底部的热垫来冷却固态硬盘

通过使用通过PCI Express Gen 4连接的合适的NVMe SSD,Aero 15 OLED XD在我们的存储测试中超过了整个竞争对手,并提供了非常好的速率。三星980 Pro的OEM兄弟姐妹,三星PM9A1,在CrystalDiskMark的SeqWrite测试中达到每秒7,000MB,在SeqRead测试中超过每秒5,000MB。技嘉在这里也考虑到了创造者,提供了安装另一个NVMe SSD的选项。然而,这只能通过PCI Express Gen 3连接。

进一步的信息和基准比较可以在我们的 HDD/SSD基准测试文章中找到

Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-35%
-42%
-56%
Write 4K
231.4
182.5
-21%
126
-46%
102.8
-56%
Read 4K
89.5
73.2
-18%
44.94
-50%
51.9
-42%
Write Seq
4208
3005
-29%
2763
-34%
1625
-61%
Read Seq
4512
2358
-48%
1671
-63%
1720
-62%
Write 4K Q32T1
648
389.5
-40%
451.6
-30%
313.4
-52%
Read 4K Q32T1
691
463.8
-33%
552
-20%
329.4
-52%
Write Seq Q32T1
5111
3166
-38%
3060
-40%
1604
-69%
Read Seq Q32T1
7002
3590
-49%
3192
-54%
3321
-53%
AS SSD
-20%
-28%
-37%
-41%
Seq Read
5357
3133
-42%
2881
-46%
2331
-56%
1938
-64%
Seq Write
3978
2969
-25%
1570
-61%
2312
-42%
1248
-69%
4K Read
50.6
55.2
9%
52.4
4%
39.13
-23%
47.35
-6%
4K Write
156.2
129.7
-17%
124
-21%
98.1
-37%
93.7
-40%
4K-64 Read
2465
1891
-23%
1334
-46%
1663
-33%
1060
-57%
4K-64 Write
3360
1795
-47%
2189
-35%
2138
-36%
1932
-42%
Access Time Read *
0.08
0.052
35%
0.055
31%
0.099
-24%
0.061
24%
Access Time Write *
0.027
0.028
-4%
0.03
-11%
0.038
-41%
0.04
-48%
Score Read
3052
2259
-26%
1675
-45%
1935
-37%
1301
-57%
Score Write
3914
2221
-43%
2470
-37%
2468
-37%
2151
-45%
Score Total
8449
5630
-33%
4943
-41%
5388
-36%
4092
-52%
Copy ISO MB/s
1277
2903
2841
Copy Program MB/s
575
686
613
Copy Game MB/s
1272
1594
1391
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-28% / -26%
-28% / -28%
-40% / -39%
-49% / -48%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7002 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5111 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 691 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 648 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 4512 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 4208 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 89.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 231.4 MB/s

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

图形卡

我们对测试设备的配置使用了NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070的笔记本版本,其TDP为105瓦。如果你让技嘉的控制中心的微软Azure AI自动管理性能配置文件,就不能实现最大的性能,3DMark的分数甚至比前代产品略低。我们的建议是,对于需要最高性能的标题,手动切换到涡轮模式。在某些情况下,不同性能配置文件的风扇控制没有被优化。在手动切换到游戏模式时,风扇的反应有时不够快,这可能导致不必要的性能下降。

一般来说,我们在电池供电的情况下无法实现全部性能。此外,针对创作者的Nvidia Studio驱动程序完成了它的工作,与游戏驱动程序相比,只有很小的差别。

我们测试过的其他显卡所提供的性能可以在我们的 GPU基准测试文章中找到

Time Spy 靠电池供电
Time Spy 靠电池供电
Time Spy 在游戏模式下
Time Spy 在游戏模式下
Time Spy 在涡轮模式下
Time Spy 在涡轮模式下
Fire Strike 在游戏模式下使用Studio驱动程序
Fire Strike 在游戏模式下使用Studio驱动程序
Fire Strike 在游戏模式下使用游戏驱动
Fire Strike 在游戏模式下使用游戏驱动
 
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=233, last 2 years)
40513 Points +32%
Alienware m15 R4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-10980HK
37287 Points +22%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
33862 Points +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (12535 - 38275, n=54)
32331 Points +6%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
31866 Points +4%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
31788 Points +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
30601 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
29289 Points -4%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=236, last 2 years)
29457 Points +29%
Alienware m15 R4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-10980HK
27977 Points +22%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
25509 Points +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (7178 - 29128, n=52)
24302 Points +6%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
23674 Points +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
22864 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
22200 Points -3%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
21178 Points -7%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22547, n=234, last 2 years)
12066 Points +42%
Alienware m15 R4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-10980HK
11019 Points +29%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
10148 Points +19%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
9323 Points +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (2644 - 11019, n=53)
9300 Points +9%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
9060 Points +6%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
8523 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
8407 Points -1%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
47262 points
3DMark 11 Performance
25754 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
19887 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
8565 points
Help

游戏性能

由于RTX 3070的105瓦TDP和伟大的4K显示器,技嘉Aero 15 OLED XD也适用于4K标题。如果你稍微调整一下细节,你将在几乎所有的游戏中实现流畅的帧率。与竞争对手相比,制造商提供的性能有些不稳定,但很高。在一些标题中,我们的测试设备甚至击败了具有更高TDP的设备,如华硕Strix G15 G513QR不幸的是,Aero 15 OLED XD并没有接近Alienware m15 R4的性能。如果你把它与老款,技嘉Aero 15 OLED XC ,其性能与后继者相同。然而,这里没有120赫兹的面板,而只有一个60赫兹的面板。这或多或少自动取消了笔记本电脑的竞争性游戏资格,因为你必须连接一个外部显示器以防止缺点。

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (17.5 - 449, n=167, last 2 years)
220 fps +27%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
173 fps
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
170 fps -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
168 (129min - 191max) fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (122.1 - 207, n=34)
168 fps -3%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
157 (128min - 170max) fps -9%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=228, last 2 years)
117.2 fps +28%
Alienware m15 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
101 (76min) fps +10%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
92.9 (70min) fps +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
92.1 (67min) fps +1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (34.9 - 109, n=52)
91.8 fps 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
91.6 (76min) fps
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
82.8 (79min, 79P1 - 87max) fps -10%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
73.5 (67min, 70P1 - 78max) fps -20%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
78 fps -15%
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0
1920x1080 High Preset
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
72.6 fps +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (57.9 - 82, n=9)
71.3 fps +6%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
67 fps
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
64.6 fps -4%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Alienware m15 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
70.5 fps +22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (50 - 70.5, n=11)
62 fps +7%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
61.8 fps +7%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
58 fps
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
57 fps -2%
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 232, n=116, last 2 years)
134.8 fps +21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (93 - 137, n=26)
114.2 fps +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
111 fps
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
104 fps -6%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
98 (78min - 126max) fps -12%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (14 - 218, n=126, last 2 years)
126.3 fps +23%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (89 - 140, n=36)
108.6 fps +5%
Alienware m15 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
107 fps +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
103 fps
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
100 fps -3%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
92 (68min - 117max) fps -11%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1280x720 Lite Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (24.6 - 234, n=141, last 2 years)
192.1 fps +12%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
172 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (137 - 207, n=30)
163.5 fps -5%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
157 fps -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
152 fps -12%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
150 fps -13%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
145 fps -16%
1920x1080 Standard Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (13 - 230, n=175, last 2 years)
144.6 fps +23%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
118 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (67 - 144, n=32)
117.9 fps 0%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
115 fps -3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
112 fps -5%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
112 fps -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
106 fps -10%
Alienware m15 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
67 fps -43%
1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (9.13 - 194.9, n=229, last 2 years)
111.5 fps +25%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
88.9 fps 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
88.9 fps
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
87.6 fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (27.9 - 107, n=49)
86.4 fps -3%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
83.3 fps -6%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
80.1 fps -10%
Alienware m15 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
62 fps -30%
2560x1440 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (19.8 - 162.9, n=164, last 2 years)
97.2 fps +46%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (19.8 - 79.9, n=25)
67.3 fps +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
66.5 fps
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
65.7 fps -1%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
61.6 fps -7%
3840x2160 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (32.2 - 94.7, n=68, last 2 years)
62.6 fps +59%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (36.2 - 46.9, n=8)
42.3 fps +7%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
40.9 fps +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
39.4 fps
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
38.7 fps -2%
Strange Brigade
1280x720 lowest AF:1
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
427 (79.6min, 325P1 - 725max) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (56.1 - 656, n=153, last 2 years)
421 fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (106.8 - 522, n=34)
378 fps -11%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
375 (93.3min, 287P1 - 592max) fps -12%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
356 (197min, 278P1 - 597max) fps -17%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
295 (109min, 234P1 - 434max) fps -31%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
272 (106min, 214P1 - 447max) fps -36%
1920x1080 medium AA:medium AF:4
Average of class Gaming
  (22.2 - 508, n=174, last 2 years)
270 fps +28%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
224 (73.7min, 176P1 - 365max) fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (44.1 - 279, n=35)
217 fps +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
211 (141min, 166P1 - 328max) fps
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
206 (82.2min, 175P1 - 360max) fps -2%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
182 (54min, 137P1 - 307max) fps -14%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
170 (111min, 125P1 - 315max) fps -19%
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
Average of class Gaming
  (17.5 - 465, n=190, last 2 years)
232 fps +34%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
183 (77.1min, 132P1 - 322max) fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (39.6 - 225, n=35)
182 fps +5%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
173 (121min, 124P1 - 267max) fps
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
172 (89.5min, 131P1 - 344max) fps -1%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
166 (61.8min, 116P1 - 304max) fps -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
152 (103min, 116P1 - 282max) fps -12%
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (14.6 - 421, n=227, last 2 years)
207 fps +36%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
161 (75.5min, 117P1 - 283max) fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (36.2 - 194, n=46)
159 fps +5%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
158 (53.8min, 110P1 - 275max) fps +4%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
153 (35.8min, 116P1 - 309max) fps +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
152 (107min, 110P1 - 256max) fps
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
139 (62.6min, 109P1 - 257max) fps -9%
2560x1440 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (79.8 - 322, n=140, last 2 years)
179.3 fps +57%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (82.3 - 140.5, n=18)
121.8 fps +7%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
114 (86.6min, 88.8P1 - 181max) fps
3840x2160 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (54.5 - 298, n=57, last 2 years)
113.2 fps +66%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
72 (48.1min, 60.8P1 - 135max) fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (61.1 - 78.6, n=6)
71.2 fps +5%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
69.1 (45.5min, 51.5P1 - 167max) fps +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
68.1 (56.1min, 57.3P1 - 91.2max) fps
GTA V
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
184 (2.07min, 143P1 - 259max) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (114.7 - 187.8, n=134, last 2 years)
181.3 fps -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
179 (3.63min, 125P1 - 376max) fps -3%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
179 (5.37min, 125P1 - 332max) fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (124.5 - 186.9, n=37)
178.4 fps -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
174 (3.76min, 125P1 - 350max) fps -5%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
171 (5.5min, 125P1 - 301max) fps -7%
1920x1080 Lowest Settings possible
Average of class Gaming
  (61.3 - 187.9, n=134, last 2 years)
179.7 fps +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
178 (3.88min, 125P1 - 343max) fps
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
176 (7.43min, 125P1 - 398max) fps -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
175 (3.99min, 125P1 - 380max) fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (98 - 186, n=36)
175 fps -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
169 (4.17min, 125P1 - 345max) fps -5%
1366x768 Normal/Off AF:4x
Average of class Gaming
  (88.6 - 187.6, n=160, last 2 years)
177.2 fps +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
175 (3.35min, 111P1 - 372max) fps
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
173 (6.81min, 125P1 - 305max) fps -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
172 (6.33min, 125P1 - 314max) fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (102.8 - 183.4, n=34)
171.9 fps -2%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
158 (4.81min, 90.9P1 - 284max) fps -10%
1920x1080 Normal/Off AF:4x
Average of class Gaming
  (53 - 187.7, n=158, last 2 years)
175.2 fps +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
171 (4.86min, 125P1 - 334max) fps 0%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
171 (6.35min, 125P1 - 308max) fps 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
171 (4.8min, 111P1 - 372max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (94.3 - 186.2, n=38)
169.2 fps -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
163 (4.88min, 100P1 - 292max) fps -5%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
156 (4.39min, 90.9P1 - 270max) fps -9%
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Average of class Gaming
  (15.3 - 187.1, n=182, last 2 years)
163.9 fps +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
159 (3.9min, 90.9P1 - 269max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (58.2 - 181.4, n=38)
153.2 fps -4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
153 (3.86min, 83.3P1 - 295max) fps -4%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
151 (5.09min, 100P1 - 263max) fps -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
141 (4.95min, 90.9P1 - 237max) fps -11%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
130 (21.1min, 90.9P1 - 220max) fps -18%
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (6.38 - 167.7, n=219, last 2 years)
107.6 fps +14%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
94 (19min, 66.7P1 - 198max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (21.7 - 125.8, n=50)
91 fps -3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
90.6 (6.36min, 62.5P1 - 179max) fps -4%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
88.2 (10.9min, 58.8P1 - 164max) fps -6%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
83.1 (11.4min, 58.8P1 - 147max) fps -12%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
78.6 (10.4min, 55.6P1 - 141max) fps -16%
2560x1440 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (5.61 - 160.6, n=140, last 2 years)
102.1 fps +30%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (70.8 - 97.1, n=19)
82.9 fps +6%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
78.4 (16.2min, 50P1 - 149max) fps
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
76.1 (6.87min, 52.6P1 - 144max) fps -3%
3840x2160 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (33.6 - 90.9, n=49, last 2 years)
64.3 fps +45%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
46.7 (5.31min, 31.3P1 - 106max) fps +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (39.8 - 50.8, n=5)
46.4 fps +5%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
44.4 (8.4min, 29.4P1 - 79.3max) fps
3840x2160 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:FX AF:8x
Average of class Gaming
  (68.8 - 183.2, n=53, last 2 years)
131.1 fps +57%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (74.3 - 100.8, n=5)
83.8 fps +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
83.3 (32.8min, 58.8P1 - 150max) fps
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
75 (27min, 52.6P1 - 179max) fps -10%

在我们对TheWitcher 3的测试中,帧率保持不变,只是略有下降。我们没有发现任何重大的帧数下降,与竞争对手相比,我们的测试设备提供了非常好的性能。

The Witcher 3 FPS diagram

05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø90.1 (87-93)
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N: Ø78.3 (72-86)
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N: Ø91.6 (77-95)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00: Ø89.6 (84-95)
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR; Performance Mode: Ø82.8 (79-87)
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR; Standard Mode: Ø73.5 (67-78)
low med. high ultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 184 175 159 94 78.4 83.3
The Witcher 3 (2015) 339 241 173 91.6 64.3
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 158 142.2 135.8 126.7 107.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 172 118 88.9 66.5 39.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 122 104 84 57.8
Far Cry 5 (2018) 138 117 111 103 94 51
Strange Brigade (2018) 427 211 173 152 114 68.1
F1 2020 (2020) 119 186 159 132 99.8 57.7
Immortals Fenyx Rising (2020) 104 89 87 69 56 37
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 (2020) 116 81 67 58 39 17

排放 - 热和可变的风扇行为


噪声排放

我们的测试设备在空闲使用和低负载下保持相对安静。不幸的是,风扇的速度在这里也是波动的。只有在会议模式下,Aero 15 OLED XD的风扇才会保持在一个恒定的、只能略微感觉到的水平。我们发现测试中的噪音模式有点高频率,使其在工作时成为一种干扰。在这种情况下,我们建议手动调整风扇曲线并停用技嘉控制中心的AI。虽然风扇在负载下的表现各不相同,但噪音水平仍在可容忍的范围内,只有在特殊情况下才会真正变大。

Noise Level

Idle
30 / 32 / 35 dB(A)
Load
44 / 60 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.941.237.336.944.840.42536.935.536.535.940.935.33145.249.245.547.749.647.64034.933.533.532.935.5375041.829.827.627.227.541.76330.332.132.131.527.530.48023.722.825.523.621.230.910025.921.72528.121.938.912526.82422.722.822.333.216027.323.423.52318.634.520027.9282625.921.53825027.526.321.822.918.339.331531.225.22322.414.742.34003024.72321.712.941.750030.426.221.721.21241.763032.524.621.120.1124380031.423.721.52011.843.9100031.823.321.118.711.745.1125032.823.321.218.711.746.616003323.520.518.711.749.1200032.222.719.917.611.950250030.723.421.320.212.348.2315032.225.618.215.91347.6400036.31916.415.513.648.6500029.718.216.415.413.649.8630025.216.315.214.813.549.4800021.714.314.614.213.545.51000018.314.214.51413.142.61250015.513.814.113.712.538.31600016.314.514.313.912.232.9SPL43.734.731.830.425.259.5N4.52.11.61.40.713.6median 30median 23.4median 21.1median 18.7median 13median 43Delta3.83.733.624.738.739.839.338.840.139.438.936.238.236.134.235.948.841.650.649.342.64437.228.335.138.230.333.828.438.238.638.138.330.735.424.736.429.430.136.729.519.828.519.524.833.728.720.621.72020.125.728.119.922.119.217.52931.822.224.123.420.332.832.820.523.221.32031.73120.721.819.617.834.231.421.6242014.135.630.320.722.419.212.435.531.620.622.619.211.735.933.520.121.918.911.337.431.319.42118.511.538.531.119.221.117.511.239.132.920.122.318.711.44232.820.222.318.311.2423219.32117.311.540.930.82122.418.211.638.831.516.720.814.51238.432.114.816.813.612.438.727.514.415.413.612.64025.313.814.513.612.737.422.513.413.613.512.833.317.613.513.313.312.828.815.913.913.71312.524.215.213.413.712.812.118.542.930.632.629.124.651.14.41.31.71.10.67.8median 31.1median 19.9median 21.7median 18.3median 12.4median 35.93.82.72.632.54.8hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseGigabyte Aero 15 OLED XDGigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC

温度

Gigabyte在这里专注于以高温为代价的基本安静的操作。由于强大的NVMe固态硬盘是用热垫冷却的,它通过机箱底部传导废热,除了反应缓慢的风扇造成的温度上升外,后者会变得更热。笔记本电脑不仅在极端情况下会变得非常热,而且在闲置使用或浏览网页时也是如此。在这个过程中,键盘表面也会发热,这一点一针见血,使整个情况看起来更加糟糕。

ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试

在压力测试中,Aero 15 OLED XD的CPU开始时略高于4,000 MHz,然后稳定在2,900 MHz。一个有趣的方面是温度,它在很短的时间内上升到92℃(约198°F),然后稳定在80℃(约176°F)至90℃(约194°F)。显卡在1,445 MHz和1,155 MHz的时钟频率下保持相对凉爽,最高温度仅达到71 °C(约160 °F)。我们在日常使用中没有发现任何问题,因为这样的极端情况应该很少发生。

Max. Load
 42 °C45 °C44 °C 
 34 °C43 °C41 °C 
 30 °C36 °C35 °C 
Maximum: 45 °C
Average: 38.9 °C
52 °C54 °C43 °C
52 °C51 °C41 °C
37 °C38 °C37 °C
Maximum: 54 °C
Average: 45 °C
Power Supply (max.)  52 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).

发言人

说到扬声器,技嘉设法在Aero 15 OLED XD中提供了平衡的中音,但几乎没有的低音几乎没有改善。此外,现在的声音听起来并不像在前代产品中那么消沉。我们在这一点上也有共识。Aero 15 OLED XD为VoIP应用或YouTube视频提供了足够的质量,但想要更多的用户将不得不求助于集成音频插孔或蓝牙。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2044.833.82540.933.13149.640.24035.535.25027.526.76327.531.98021.227.710021.922.812522.327.416018.632.120021.541.725018.352.531514.753.340012.954.85001259.96301265.380011.866.3100011.766.6125011.765.3160011.754.1200011.956.9250012.354.231501360.5400013.661.6500013.664630013.567.1800013.560.21000013.156.31250012.559.71600012.259.4SPL25.274.8N0.735.1median 13median 59.4Delta26.638.237.137.736.748.745.235.735.444.946.829.734.525.727.224.327.428.133.526.238.523.647.324.358.819.360.814.462.114.86616.970.411.173.41175.811.676.111.272.811.372.211.86912.273.112.767.812.57112.772.712.768.112.562.112.460.611.858.826.4840.859.6median 12.7median 67.83.48hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGigabyte Aero 15 OLED XDGigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理--现在有了更高的功率消耗

能源消耗

尽管它具有相同的CPU和GPU TDP以及相当的亮度,但与前代产品相比,功耗有所增加。这样一来,最低值为23至34瓦,取决于配置文件和亮度,它甚至超过了华硕ZenBook Pro Duo

。虽然后者的亮度较低,但它有两个显示屏,其中一个是OLED面板,另一个是IPS技术的面板。

我们测得负载下的最大消耗为190瓦,与前代产品相比,这是一个进步。技嘉在这里很谨慎,附带的230瓦的电源适配器有足够的容量。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.6 / 1.4 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 23 / 26 / 34 Watt
Load midlight 99 / 190 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, OLED + IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60
Alienware m15 R4
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
25%
14%
16%
23%
-39%
9%
9%
Idle Minimum *
23
10.2
56%
4
83%
11
52%
9
61%
35
-52%
15.6 ?(4 - 64, n=39)
32%
Idle Average *
26
12.8
51%
9
65%
14
46%
14
46%
39
-50%
20.1 ?(9 - 68.2, n=39)
23%
Idle Maximum *
34
15
56%
36
-6%
34
-0%
15
56%
48
-41%
29.4 ?(14.6 - 76, n=39)
14%
Load Average *
99
130
-31%
130
-31%
95
4%
107.2
-8%
135
-36%
110.8 ?(76.8 - 214, n=39)
-12%
Witcher 3 ultra *
163
137
16%
174
-7%
152
7%
156
4%
194
-19%
Load Maximum *
190
184
3%
227
-19%
216
-14%
235
-24%
252
-33%
214 ?(157 - 290, n=39)
-13%

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption during The Witcher 3

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170Tooltip
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø163.1 (159-177)
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N: Ø136.7 (121-170)

电池寿命

与前代产品一样,Aero 15 OLED XD配备了99Wh的电池,提供了允许的最大电池容量,仍然能够登上飞机。如果你比较我们的标准化Wi-Fi测试的速率(网络浏览脚本,150cd/m²亮度),技嘉用它的Tiger Lake 处理器管理了一个体面的8:28小时,这不是你根据耗电率所期望的。这是一个不寻常的高比率,这可能是由于积极的能源管理。然而,在这个测试中,将亮度增加到最大水平,运行时间减少了一半以上。

Battery Runtime
Witcher 3 ultra 150cd
2h 11min
WiFi Websurfing
8h 28min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
3h 43min
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 92 Wh
Alienware m15 R4
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-21%
35%
-13%
-13%
-68%
-33%
WiFi v1.3
508
399
-21%
685
35%
441
-13%
441
-13%
164
-68%
Witcher 3 ultra
131
H.264
427
809
492
Load
202
145
100
76
52
Reader / Idle
1043
220

Pros

+ 具有X-Rite Pantone认证的超级AMOLED显示屏
+ 升级到Tiger Lake 和 HDMI 2.1
+ 平衡的RTX 3070,具有105瓦的TDP
+ 良好的电池寿命
+ M.2 PCIe第4代插槽
+ 雷电4
+ 快速的SD读卡器

Cons

- 由于港口的原因,右侧的活动范围受到严重限制
- 负载下温度高
- AI风扇控制导致恼人的风扇噪音
- 摄像头位置不佳
- 键盘可以做得更好
- 空格键在按下时发出明显的吱吱声
- 特殊字符缺乏背光
- 对敏感用户来说,眼睛可能会感到不适

判决书

在审查中。Aero 15 OLED XD。测试设备由德国Gigabyte公司提供
在审查中。Aero 15 OLED XD。测试设备由德国Gigabyte公司提供

制造商希望在最狭小的空间里装入尽可能多的性能,而且它在牺牲高热量的情况下成功地做到了这一点。我们还对技嘉将大量的端口装入仅有两厘米厚的机箱留下了积极的印象。然而,它们在右侧的位置有点不合适。在我们看来,电源可以很容易地移到后面,这样就不会妨碍使用鼠标工作。该公司无疑为内容创作者开发了一个设备,为用户长期提供良好的性能和现代端口。

Tiger Lake ,结合快速的NVMe固态硬盘,通过PCI Express Gen 4连接,削减了一个非常精细的数字。一个成熟的HDMI 2.1端口,Thunderbolt 4,以及可以添加另一个固态硬盘的选项,完善了该套件。全面的SD读卡器和以太网端口也提供了高传输率。NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070提供105瓦的TDP,只要你稍微调整一下细节,甚至可以将4K标题流畅地呈现在屏幕上。与前代产品相比,在我们的标准化Wi-Fi测试中,在测试设备不得不再次插电之前,电池寿命现在多了近2小时。

技嘉Aero 15 OLED XD的第一印象是光彩夺目。简洁、高质量的设计与梦幻般的、非常明亮的OLED显示屏相结合,包括潘通X-Rite认证,以及坚固的铝制底盘,真的很突出。

在我们的测试中,我们发现键盘的粘性是一个负面因素;当长时间打字时,它可能很快导致挫败感。此外,在我们的测试样本中,已经摇摇欲坠的空格键在被轻轻按压时发出吱吱声。在夜间使用键盘可能会变成一场猫捉老鼠的游戏,因为键盘上的特殊字符并没有被照亮。除了表面有点小,我们在触摸板上找不到任何其他弱点。此外,内置的按键具有可感知的、坚实的反馈。不幸的是,需要网络摄像头的用户在这里会感到失望。网络摄像头的位置在显示屏下面,没有给人留下好印象。

迟缓的风扇也是一个缺点,因为它们有时不能及时提供必要的气流,导致高温峰值迅速发展,从而导致CPU节流。

与60赫兹的4K OLED显示屏相比,游戏玩家可能会希望有一个120赫兹的显示屏,因为高帧率正慢慢成为4K领域的标准。由于性能和奇妙的显示屏,我们可以向设计师或专业图像编辑推荐该设备。尽管如此,游戏玩家也没有被排除在外。拥有105瓦的RTX 3070始终提供非常好的性能。

价格和可用性

你可以在亚马逊上找到Aero 15 OLED XD。上找到Aero 15 OLED XD,价格约为1,899美元,尽管它的内存为16GB而不是32GB。同样的版本目前也可在newegg也有同样的价格。

Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD - 07/23/2021 v7
Patrick Schüdzig

Chassis
88 / 98 → 90%
Keyboard
73%
Pointing Device
83%
Connectivity
73 / 80 → 91%
Weight
62 / 10-66 → 92%
Battery
82 / 95 → 87%
Display
90%
Games Performance
95%
Application Performance
94%
Temperature
75 / 95 → 79%
Noise
62 / 90 → 69%
Audio
67%
Camera
38 / 85 → 44%
Average
66%
86%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD笔记本电脑评测。下一代4K OLED
Patrick Schüdzig, 2021-08-14 (Update: 2021-08-14)