Notebookcheck Logo

谷歌Pixel 7 Pro评论。具备库存的高级智能手机Android

不折不扣的好。 谷歌Pixel 7 Pro正在坚持一个成熟的公式,在几乎所有领域都有改进。价格保持稳定,更新供应再次得到五年的保证。与廉价机型的差异主要与显示屏和摄像头有关,但有些差异比预期的要大。
5G Android ARM Google Pixel Touchscreen Smartphone

谷歌最近才展示了它的中端后代,即 Pixel 6a,而现在该公司又推出了新的Pixel 7系列。这里评论的Pixel 7 Pro是Pixel 6 Pro的直接继任者。 Pixel 6 Pro基本上坚持了成熟的设计,但配备了改进的相机设置和更新的SoC。

前代产品不得不忍受终端用户对其显示屏发黄、接收不力和指纹传感器迟钝的批评,这也是我们在以下评测中特别关注这些问题的原因。

从好的方面看,今年的价格保持稳定,Pixel 7 Pro的128GB型号起价约为899美元,升级到256GB则需额外支付100美元。到目前为止,512GB型号(1300美元)只能在美国购买。今年,所有存储版本也终于可用于所有颜色的选择。

Google Pixel 7 Pro (Pixel 7 Series)
Processor
Google Tensor G2 8 x 1.8 - 2.9 GHz, Cortex X1 / A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5
Display
6.70 inch 19.5:9, 3120 x 1440 pixel 513 PPI, capacitive, 10 Multi-Touch-Points, OLED, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 114 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity, Accelerometer, Magnetometer, Gyroscope, Pressure, OTG
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band: 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.9 x 162.9 x 76.6
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion, USB-PD 3.0, 12W/23W wireless charging
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Samsung GN1, 1/1.31", 1.2 µm, 82°, f/1.85, OIS, aspect ratio: 4:3, 16:9) + 12 MPix (Ultra Wide, 1.25 µm, 125.8°, f/2.2) + 48 MPix (5x Tele, 0.7 µm, 20.6°, f/3.5, OIS); Ultra HD video (up to 60 FPS); Camera2-API-Level: Full
Secondary Camera: 10.8 MPix (1.22 µm, 92.8°, f/2.2, Fixfokus)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, OTG-Adapter, USB-C-Cabel, 24 Months Warranty, GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1, E5a), BeiDou (B1, B2a), QZSS, NavIC (L5); Body-SAR: 1.38 W/kg, Head-SAR: 0.98 W/kg; DRM Widevine L1; IP68, fanless, waterproof
Weight
212 g
Price
899 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
89.1 %
11/2022
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7
212 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3120x1440
90.3 %
03/2023
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16, A16 GPU 5-Core
240 g128 GB NVMe6.70"2796x1290
89.3 %
10/2022
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
198.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
87.7 %
11/2022
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
205 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2712x1220
88.9 %
05/2022
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920
196 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.60"2340x1080
87 %
08/2022
OnePlus 10T
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
203.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2412x1080
89.2 %
12/2022
Sony Xperia 5 IV
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
171 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"2520x1080
89.2 %
04/2022
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20
210 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3120x1440
谷歌Pixel 7 Pro的颜色变体
谷歌Pixel 7 Pro的颜色变体

Pixel 7 Pro的设计与前代产品一样引人注目,但现在摄像头的驼峰与外壳框架无缝融合,看起来更有品质。制造商规定厚度为8.9毫米;我们测量了8.55毫米,没有摄像头。包括摄像头在内,Pixel智能手机的尺寸为11.1毫米。

正面和背面都有康宁大猩猩Victus玻璃保护,手感非常悦目,视觉上也很有说服力。不幸的是,它也极易受到指纹的影响。由于玻璃表面光滑,用户需要在稍微不平的表面上注意智能手机,因为它有滑落的危险。

建造质量很扎实,其特点是缝隙窄而均匀。扭转刚度也很高,在相应的测试中,我们无法从Pixel 7 Pro中引出最轻微的噪音。SIM卡槽的盖子几乎与边框齐平,可以容纳一个nano-SIM卡。

Pixel 7 Pro有Hazel (灰色)、Snow (白色)和Obsidian (黑色)三种颜色。电池是永久安装的,该智能手机符合IP68防尘防水标准。

尺寸比较

163.9 mm 75.9 mm 8.9 mm 210 g162.9 mm 76.6 mm 8.9 mm 212 g163 mm 75.4 mm 8.75 mm 203.5 g163.1 mm 75.9 mm 8.6 mm 205 g161.76 mm 73.5 mm 8.39 mm 198.5 g160.7 mm 77.6 mm 7.85 mm 240 g157.4 mm 75.8 mm 7.6 mm 196 g156 mm 68 mm 8.2 mm 171 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备 - 用于Pixel 7 Pro的USB 3.2 (Gen. 2)和UWB

谷歌为Pixel 7 Pro配备了快速的第二代USB 3.2端口,其数据传输率高达10 GBit/s,支持有线图像输出。除了像素7外,只有 ROG Phone 6提供了如此强大的连接。

需要注意的是,在选择存储空间时,没有支持MicroSD。也没有安装红外辐射器、音频插孔或通知LED。谷歌智能手机顶部边框的凹槽是为5G毫米波天线准备的,但这种移动标准在欧洲还没有普及。谷歌没有透露这些天线是否已经安装,以及它们是否将在以后通过更新激活。

除了蓝牙5.2、Wi-Fi 6E和NFC之外,Pixel 7 Pro还支持UWB。

顶部:麦克风,毫米波天线的开孔
顶部:麦克风,毫米波天线的开孔
左图:SIM卡
左图:SIM卡
右边:电源键,音量摇杆
右边:电源键,音量摇杆
底部:扬声器、USB、麦克风
底部:扬声器、USB、麦克风

软件--谷歌快速更新至2027年

谷歌Pixel 7 Pro配备了库存Android 13和最新的安全补丁,每月都会更新。至少将提供三个版本的升级和两年的安全更新(直到2027年10月)。因此,这意味着这款智能手机至少会得到Android 16;谷歌在一个FAQ页面上透露了相应的细节.

除了众所周知的Pixel功能外,谷歌现在还为Pixel用户提供自己的VPN解决方案。然而,在审查时,该功能还不可用,预计将在2022年12月通过更新加入。

智能手机现在可以通过实时翻译来翻译48种语言。这包括信使中的书面文本,通过相机拍摄的文本,视频中的字幕,甚至是某些语言的语音的实时翻译。后者可以通过谷歌助理的命令 "做我的翻译 "来启动,效果出奇的好。

谷歌预装了自己的大部分应用程序,但避免安装第三方应用程序。

通信与GNSS - Pixel 7 Pro与5G Sub6和Wi-Fi 6E

从纸面上看,谷歌Pixel 7 Pro具有Wi-Fi 6E功能。不幸的是,谷歌智能手机不能识别我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器的6GHz频段。这可能会通过未来的更新进行修正。一旦出现这种情况,我们将提供相应的测试结果。在5GHz网络上,性能值非常可观,在速度和稳定性方面都非常好。

在欧洲,Pixel 7 Pro只支持5G Sub6,由于缺乏毫米波网络,目前这并不是什么问题,但在不久的将来肯定会变得更加重要。Pixel 6(Pro)的信号质量是一个经常被批评的点。相比之下,Pixel 7 Pro在大都市地区给人留下了深刻印象(网络:Telekom,5G),没有留下任何批评的余地。与之直接比较的是iPhone 14 Pro Max和 摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra,同一无线电小区内的衰减(信号损失)略高,但数据传输性能处于类似水平。因此,在这种情况下,没有明显的差异。

Pixel 7 Pro支持大量的频段,所以它应该可以在世界各地使用。

Networking
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
904 (min: 453) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
945 (min: 917) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1645 (min: 1586) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1743 (min: 1585) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
iperf3 receive AXE11000
723 (min: 643) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
817 (min: 751) MBit/s ∼48%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
881 (min: 446) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
839 (min: 531) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1657 (min: 1379) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1522 (min: 1278) MBit/s ∼87%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
672 (min: 443) MBit/s ∼39%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
824 (min: 757) MBit/s ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
826 (min: 765) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
899 (min: 432) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1346 (min: 696) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1565 (min: 777) MBit/s ∼90%
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
934 (min: 768) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
933 (min: 865) MBit/s ∼55%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
582 (min: 509) MBit/s ∼34%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
918 (min: 876) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1728 (min: 880) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1563 (min: 1447) MBit/s ∼90%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1736 (min: 874) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1710 (min: 876) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 receive AXE11000
655 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
692 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1536 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1364 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼78%
09018027036045054063072081090099010801170126013501440153016201710Tooltip
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, ARM Mali-G710 MP7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1645 (1586-1695)
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1657 (1379-1781)
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, ARM Mali-G710 MP7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1742 (1585-1798)
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1520 (1278-1606)
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, ARM Mali-G710 MP7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø888 (453-912)
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø865 (446-922)
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, ARM Mali-G710 MP7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø945 (917-968)
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø839 (531-913)
户外的GPS测试
在户外
室内的GPS测试
在室内
GPS测试。支持GNSS
全球导航卫星系统

在定位方面,谷歌Pixel 7 Pro使用双频GNSS连接到GPS、Glonass、Galileo、QZSS和BeiDou卫星网络。卫星定位在户外非常快速和准确,但在室内需要更长的时间,智能手机需要一些时间才能显示出合适的准确度。

我们在一次短途自行车旅行中,将Pixel与Garmin Venu 2健身智能手表进行了比较。它的追踪能力相当不错,但没有佳明手表那么准确。尽管如此,所提供的性能对于导航任务来说绝对令人满意。

GNSS试骑:环湖航行
GNSS试骑:环湖航行
GNSS试骑:循环
GNSS试骑:循环
GNSS试骑:总结
GNSS试骑:总结

电话和语音质量

谷歌Pixel 7 Pro是一款双SIM卡智能手机,为一个物理nano-SIM卡和一个eSIM卡提供空间。2023年3月,将通过更新提供双eSIM支持。支持VoLTE和WLAN通话等功能,但谷歌已经禁用了Android'的内置SIP账户控制。

我们对测试中的语音质量非常满意。将Pixel智能手机放在耳边时,它能非常自然地再现用户的声音,尽管较好的麦克风使其听起来比平时略显沉闷。但这在日常使用中并不明显。轻微的背景噪音也听不到,而且被过滤掉了,没有任何质量上的损失。Pixel甚至在嘈杂的环境中也能令人满意地应对,例如在繁忙的咖啡馆,尽管背景噪音偶尔会漏掉,用户的声音听起来有点空洞。后者只有在非常嘈杂的环境中才会变得更加清晰,但即使如此,Pixel 7 Pro也能很好地完成它的工作。

接近传感器位于面板中,反应非常迅速和可靠。然而,它的缺点是在通话过程中屏幕会变暗,当我们想访问快速菜单时,这一点没有帮助。

对Pixel 7 Pro的摄像头进行了大量微调

与Pixel 7 Pro的自拍(照片模式)。
与Pixel 7 Pro的自拍(照片模式)。
与Pixel 7 Pro的自拍(纵向模式)。
与Pixel 7 Pro的自拍(纵向模式)。

谷歌Pixel 7 Pro的前置摄像头的分辨率与前代产品相似。前代产品镜头,提供10.8MP。遗憾的是,它只使用了一个固定的焦点。视频可以用超高清录制,速度高达60FPS,但那些想使用HDR的人将被限制在30FPS。谷歌还提供了一个自动夜间模式和 "顶部拍摄 "功能,用于正面摄影。在后者的情况下,智能手机会录制一段简短的视频,并对照片进行选择,用户可以从中选择合适的一张。此外,还可以激活两阶段的脸部修饰功能。一个扩展的广角选项也可用于集体自拍。总体而言,我们喜欢用前置摄像头拍摄的照片。只有在逆光下,照片才会显得有点苍白。

背面的相机设置也与Pixel 6 Pro非常相似。主摄像头采用了三星的5000万像素传感器,辅以1200万像素的超广角和4800万像素的长焦镜头,有望实现5倍(5x)的光学放大。相比之下,前代产品有四倍(x4)光学变焦,超广角只有114度的角度(Pixel 7 Pro:125.8度)。

主摄像头拍摄的照片确实不错,在清晰度方面取得了良好的平衡。特写镜头尤其如此,而全景拍摄的图像质量则稍显薄弱,尤其是在逆光情况下。虽然整个图像的动态范围很高,但在细节方面有一些弱点。轮廓线略显泥泞和冲淡。在我们的测试中,夜间模式也产生了一些错误,除此之外,我们的机器人显得很奇怪,很脏。谷歌肯定会在这方面做出改进,尤其是在低光性能非常好的情况下。

光学变焦在日光下能很好地完成其工作,并能以数字方式放大到30的系数。这种强大的变焦不再适用于打印,但对于从远处放大标志、海报或类似的东西相当有用。实时取景中的光学取景器在15倍的放大率下启动,也很实用。图像稳定功能很好,但它不能像例如三星的Galaxy S22 UltraVivo的X80 Pro 那样很好地捕捉运动或移动物体。

5倍变焦
5倍变焦
10倍变焦
10倍变焦
30倍变焦
30倍变焦
一个额外的取景器从15倍的放大率显示。

尽管现在的分辨率相对较低,但超广角镜头能拍出好照片,即使它不能跟上主摄像头的速度。周边区域可能会出现轻微的畸变,特别是在有硬边缘(即建筑物)的地方,这些区域的拍摄噪音会更大。还可以使用微距镜头。Pixel 7 Pro很早就切换到微距模式,但这可以通过一个小按钮停用。

在摄像方面,谷歌的智能手机提供了良好的效果,但在功能方面无法跟上其他顶级智能手机。缺少8k模式当然是最容易承受的损失,但也没有任何长宽比的选择,而且刷新率被限制在30和60FPS。我们喜欢能够录制10位HDR视频的选项,尽管这只限于30FPS的超高清。慢动作功能只适用于全高清,而延时摄影则适用于所有镜头的4k。

相机设置
扩展的相机设置
照片的快速设置。
视频的快速设置。
视频的稳定选项。
在微距模式下会显示一个控制按钮。
 
 

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide angle5x zoomLow light

在受控的照明条件下,谷歌Pixel 7 Pro提供了良好的图像质量。测试图是在相当暖的白平衡下拍摄的,但细节仍然非常清晰,一直到周边区域。在弱光下(1勒克斯),主体显得很明亮,光线充足,但此时的图像非常冷,相应地偏蓝。

色彩再现也非常好。只有青色有点偏离目标,与DeltaE的偏差略有增加。

ColorChecker
5.9 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
4 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
5 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Google Pixel 7 Pro: 4.98 ∆E min: 1.4 - max: 11.57 ∆E
ColorChecker
30.6 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
26.8 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
32.6 ∆E
54.8 ∆E
42.1 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
49.4 ∆E
54 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
44 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
46.6 ∆E
30.2 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
47.4 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
47 ∆E
39.2 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Google Pixel 7 Pro: 36.03 ∆E min: 13.78 - max: 54.81 ∆E

附件和保修 - 狭窄的交货范围

谷歌Pixel 7 Pro只配备了一条USB-C电缆和一个OTG适配器(Type-C转Type-A)。那些想要直接从谷歌购买配套电源适配器的人,必须再掏出30美元,而无线充电站的价格约为80美元。此外,谷歌还为其智能手机提供保护套,价格约为22美元。

德国的保修期为24个月,不能延长。这在其他地区可能有所不同,所以购买前一定要向供应商咨询。

输入设备和操作 - Pixel 7 Pro现在具有面部识别功能

Pixel 7 Pro的电容式触摸屏可同时识别十次触摸,并有康宁大猩猩玻璃Victus保护。滑动性能很好,特别是由于谷歌没有使用保护膜。物理按键牢牢地坐在框架中,行程较短。

谷歌再次安装了一个用于生物识别安全的光学指纹扫描仪。尽管这比Pixel 6 Pro的工作更可靠。Pixel 6 Pro但接触区域仍然非常小,因此很容易将手指放错地方。Vixo X80 Pro在这方面处于不同的地位,因为它使用了一个大型超声波传感器。至少现在也有了面部识别功能。在测试中,这个功能非常迅速和可靠,但应该注意的是,这是一个不太安全的解锁方法。

振动马达提供了清脆和有触觉吸引力的反馈。一些有用的操作辅助工具也被整合到Pixel 7 Pro中。例如,通过双击智能手机的背面,可以触发一个预设的动作。例如,这可以是打开或关闭手电筒,或进行屏幕截图。直接启动特别选定的应用程序也是可能的。

快速敲击
手势和动作
单手模式

显示屏 - 明亮的LTPO OLED,高达120 Hz

子像素网格
子像素网格

谷歌Pixel 7 Pro的显示屏尺寸为6.7英寸(17.02厘米),可选择提供QHD+分辨率(3,120 x 1,440),但预设了较低像素密度的Full HD+。根据规格,OLED面板能够实现LTPO,这意味着系统应该在10和120赫兹之间自动改变刷新率。不幸的是,这在我们的测试中没有得到证实,因为智能手机只有在激活平滑显示 时才在60和120赫兹之间切换。Pixel 7 Pro支持最常见的HDR标准(HLG、HDR10、HDR10+)。有一个永远开启的功能,但只能在非常有限的范围内进行配置。

在激活环境光传感器的情况下,面板亮度在纯白显示中达到了非常高的1025cd/m²,而且非常均匀。在亮区和暗区均匀分布的情况下(APL18),显示屏的亮度达到1499 cd/m²。如果不使用传感器进行控制,最大可达到585 cd/m²。

我们在用示波器进行的测量中确定了OLED的闪烁,但这在低亮度时是非常恒定的,与120赫兹的刷新率相当。随着显示器越来越亮,频率会跳到稳定的240赫兹。这种效果与永久的直流调光相当,这就是为什么投诉的可能性比那些有更多波段的显示器要低。

我们没有观察到任何时间上的抖动。为此,我们在播放240 FPS的慢动作视频(深灰色,全亮度)时,通过显微镜检查了显示器。

1030
cd/m²
1020
cd/m²
1026
cd/m²
1025
cd/m²
1022
cd/m²
1027
cd/m²
1025
cd/m²
1023
cd/m²
1029
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1030 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1025.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1.91 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 1022 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
97% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Google Pixel 7 Pro
OLED, 3120x1440, 6.70
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Super Retina XDR OLED, 2796x1290, 6.70
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
pOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.67
Samsung Galaxy S22+
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.60
OnePlus 10T
Fluid AMOLED, 2412x1080, 6.70
Sony Xperia 5 IV
OLED, 2520x1080, 6.10
Google Pixel 6 Pro
LTPO-OLED, 3120x1440, 6.70
Screen
-22%
-23%
-19%
-59%
-75%
-62%
-15%
Brightness middle
1022
1061
4%
1020
0%
913
-11%
1090
7%
861
-16%
896
-12%
794
-22%
Brightness
1025
1057
3%
1020
0%
913
-11%
1097
7%
856
-16%
902
-12%
801
-22%
Brightness Distribution
99
99
0%
96
-3%
95
-4%
98
-1%
97
-2%
97
-2%
97
-2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.9
1.3
-44%
1
-11%
1
-11%
2.5
-178%
2.27
-152%
2
-122%
0.9
-0%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.1
3.1
-48%
2.8
-33%
2.4
-14%
3.8
-81%
4.17
-99%
6.4
-205%
2.2
-5%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.1
1.6
-45%
2.1
-91%
1.8
-64%
2.3
-109%
2.9
-164%
1.3
-18%
1.5
-36%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.19 100%
2.29 96%
2.23 99%
2.04 108%
2.303 96%
2.25 98%
2.23 99%
CCT
6650 98%
6511 100%
6502 100%
6273 104%
6492 100%
6141 106%
6618 98%
6654 98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最小的显示亮度
分钟。
25%的显示亮度
25%
50%的显示亮度
50%
75%的显示亮度
75%
最大的显示亮度
100%

在固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置下进行的一系列测量

我们使用光谱仪和CalMAN分析软件检查了色彩表现。预设的色彩配置文件Adaptive 提供了一个略微饱和的显示,并使用了一个扩展的sRGB色彩空间。顾名思义,在自然配置文件下,成像性能更准确。总而言之,Pixel 7 Pro在这方面做得很好,提供了无可挑剔的成像性能。

灰度(配置文件:自适应,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配置文件:自适应,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(配置文件:自适应,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(配置文件:自适应,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:自适应,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:自适应,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(配置文件:自适应,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(配置文件:自适应,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.05 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.528 ms rise
↘ 0.524 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6.01 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.981 ms rise
↘ 3.028 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Pixel 7 Pro在户外的表现非常好,在所有光线条件下都能提供非常好的可读性。最多时候,玻璃表面的反光会让人有点恼火,但这只适用于从侧面看显示屏的时候。

OLED显示屏的视角稳定性达到了预期水平,我们非常喜欢它。只有在非常平坦的视角下才能看到亮度的损失和轻微的绿雾。

谷歌Pixel 7 Pro的可视角度稳定性
谷歌Pixel 7 Pro的可视角度稳定性

性能。谷歌Tensor G2的性能略有提高

谷歌在Pixel 7 Pro上使用了自己的第二代ARM处理器,由三星制造。与第一代Tensor相比,谷歌Tensor G2使用的CPU非常相似,同样由三个集群组成。其中包括两个强大的Cortex X1内核,运行频率高达2.85 GHz,两个Cortex A78(每个高达2.35 GHz)和四个节能的Cortex A55内核(高达1.8 GHz)。这意味着最大时钟仅高出50MHz。

因此,Geekbench中的单核测试只显示了极小的性能增长。但是,由于采用了更现代的A78核心,当所有核心都被利用时,这个数字会略高。然而,Tensor G2落后于其他高端处理器,甚至被迫向Exynos 2200认输。

人工智能性能的提高要高得多。在Procyon中,我们记录到与前代相比,增幅高达53%,但这仍然远远落后于骁龙8+第一代中的 小米12T Pro.

尽管如此,这并不影响Pixel 7 Pro的出色系统速度。在日常使用中,这款谷歌智能手机就像黄油一样光滑。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1885 Points +80%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1356 Points +29%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1328 Points +27%
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
1277 Points +22%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1181 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1133 Points +8%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288
1057 Points +1%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (1036 - 1078, n=4)
1053 Points 0%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
1048 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=217, last 2 years)
918 Points -12%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
5533 Points +72%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
4432 Points +38%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4251 Points +32%
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
3987 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
3599 Points +12%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
3425 Points +6%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
3222 Points
Average Google Tensor G2
  (3093 - 3265, n=4)
3198 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=217, last 2 years)
3009 Points -7%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288
2941 Points -9%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1086424 Points +40%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1073804 Points +39%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
949107 Points +23%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
910383 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
850401 Points +10%
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
846323 Points +9%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
773857 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)
738503 Points -5%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288
720905 Points -7%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (619727 - 773857, n=5)
692109 Points -11%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
17340 Points +52%
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
15944 Points +40%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
15067 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
14998 Points +32%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
12525 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=213, last 2 years)
11798 Points +4%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288
11605 Points +2%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
11397 Points
Average Google Tensor G2
  (10530 - 11736, n=5)
11184 Points -2%
CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1329 Points +50%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1129 Points +27%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1103 Points +24%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
993 Points +12%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288
906 Points +2%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (886 - 934, n=5)
900 Points +2%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
887 Points 0%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
886 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=165, last 2 years)
837 Points -6%
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
806 Points -9%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
8320 Points +35%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
8164 Points +32%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
7345 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
7186 Points +17%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
6423 Points +4%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
6164 Points
Average Google Tensor G2
  (5704 - 6419, n=5)
6057 Points -2%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288
6053 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=165, last 2 years)
5745 Points -7%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
Points -100%
System
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13412 Points +44%
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
12230 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
11373 Points +22%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
11336 Points +22%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
10212 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=165, last 2 years)
9678 Points +4%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
9294 Points
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288
9009 Points -3%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (7803 - 9601, n=5)
8791 Points -5%
Memory
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
8822 Points +62%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
8777 Points +61%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6844 Points +25%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
6697 Points +23%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288
6336 Points +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=165, last 2 years)
6250 Points +15%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
6152 Points +13%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
5456 Points
Average Google Tensor G2
  (4556 - 6548, n=5)
5416 Points -1%
Graphics
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
24037 Points +47%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
21477 Points +31%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
19247 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
17475 Points +7%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
16742 Points +2%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
16375 Points
Average Google Tensor G2
  (15766 - 16375, n=5)
16151 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=165, last 2 years)
14101 Points -14%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288
13319 Points -19%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1960 Points +13%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1960 Points +13%
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
1833 Points +5%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1785 Points +3%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288
1765 Points +1%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (1720 - 1838, n=5)
1750 Points +1%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
1739 Points
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1686 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=165, last 2 years)
1494 Points -14%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
78964 Points +85%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
68954 Points +62%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
42662 Points
Average Google Tensor G2
  (37656 - 44323, n=5)
42050 Points -1%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288
27946 Points -34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=150, last 2 years)
21814 Points -49%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
14572 Points -66%
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
11648 Points -73%
AImark - Score v2.x
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
38169 Points +539%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1043 - 139804, n=50, last 2 years)
21146 Points +254%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
7865 Points +32%
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
6955 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6323 Points +6%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (5976 - 6131, n=2)
6054 Points +1%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6034 Points +1%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
5976 Points
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288
5782 Points -3%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1046 Points -82%
Geekbench ML
TensorFlow Lite CPU 0.5
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1016 Points +218%
Average of class Smartphone
  (215 - 1418, n=19, last 2 years)
604 Points +89%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
568 Points +78%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
319 Points
Average Google Tensor G2
  ()
319 Points 0%
TensorFlow Lite GPU 0.5
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
2540 Points +153%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2186 Points +118%
Average of class Smartphone
  (474 - 2842, n=19, last 2 years)
1780 Points +78%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
1002 Points
Average Google Tensor G2
  ()
1002 Points 0%
TensorFlow Lite NNAPI / Core ML 0.5
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
3204 Points +48%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
2164 Points
Average Google Tensor G2
  ()
2164 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (344 - 3638, n=17, last 2 years)
1668 Points -23%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
619 Points -71%

对于图形加速,谷歌Pixel 7 Pro使用了一个 ARM Mali-G710 MP7,集成在SoC中,这是该系列迄今为止最弱的GPU。更强大的 G710 MP10被用在 ROG Phone 6D,比如说。在ARM方面,即使是拥有多达16个内核的变种也是可能的。

在性能方面,诊断结果是好坏参半。如果使用较早的OpenGL ES API,Pixel智能手机在某些地方的性能能够提高一倍。不幸的是,使用现代的Vulkan API,情况就不一样了,其增幅只有较低的个位数百分比范围。虽然性能仍然很高,但考虑到智能手机的长寿命,它提供的储备较少。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
3196 Points +77%
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2876 Points +59%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2768 Points +53%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2754 Points +52%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2047 Points +13%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1998 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1935 Points +7%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1807 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
3365 Points +82%
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2824 Points +53%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2796 Points +51%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2786 Points +51%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2488 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2202 Points +19%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1973 Points +7%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1847 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
12367 Points +84%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11075 Points +65%
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10989 Points +64%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10982 Points +63%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9268 Points +38%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7890 Points +17%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7057 Points +5%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6721 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5857 Points +25%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5564 Points +19%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4672 Points
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4009 Points -14%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3919 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3909 Points -16%
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3224 Points -31%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20640 Points +88%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20452 Points +86%
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19768 Points +80%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
17859 Points +63%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14680 Points +34%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10987 Points
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10733 Points -2%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13223 Points +57%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12876 Points +52%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10103 Points +20%
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9255 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9105 Points +8%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8449 Points
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7742 Points -8%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps +20%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps -16%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 fps -34%
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
459 fps +83%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
456 fps +82%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
455 fps +81%
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
435 fps +73%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
320 fps +27%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
318 fps +27%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
251 fps
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
125 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps +71%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +43%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +42%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
84 fps
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps -23%
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -29%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -29%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -29%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
289 fps +108%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
275 fps +98%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
237 fps +71%
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
221 fps +59%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
214 fps +54%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
182 fps +31%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
139 fps
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps -36%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +113%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
116 fps +107%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
114 fps +104%
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +7%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps +7%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +7%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps -25%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
187 fps +85%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
185 fps +83%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
179 fps +77%
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
171 fps +69%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
130 fps +29%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
117 fps +16%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps -36%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps +141%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps +103%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73 fps +97%
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +62%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps +62%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps +32%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps -19%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
108 fps +59%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
106 fps +56%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps +51%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
98 fps +44%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
72 fps +6%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66 fps -3%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps -29%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps +143%
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps +111%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps +93%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
54 fps +93%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps +89%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
41 fps +46%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps +14%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps +68%
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps +42%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps +42%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
41 fps +32%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps 0%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps -3%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps -6%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
104 fps +174%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
80 fps +111%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps +76%
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +58%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps +58%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps +50%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps +13%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
38 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
133 fps +77%
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
123 fps +64%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +59%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
116 fps +55%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps -1%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -20%

Basemark GPUScore