惠普 Omen 16 笔记本电脑评测:Zen 4 也是游戏玩家的不错选择
Omen 16-xf0376ng 目前的售价不到 1,900 欧元(约合 2026 美元)。在这个价格上,购买者可以获得 AMD 最先进的 Zen 4 处理器:Ryzen 7 7840HS、Ryzen 7 7840HS、Ryzen 7 7840HS。 Ryzen 7 7840HS不仅提供了强大的 CPU 性能,还配备了 Radeon 780MiGPU 的速度也相当快。不过,要求苛刻的图形计算由 GeForce RTX 4070负责。由于显存略显不足(仅 8GB GDDR6),Ada-Lovelace 加速器更偏向于中高端而非高端市场。不过,16 GB DDR5-5600 内存对于 2023 年的游戏笔记本来说还是比较合适的。显示屏为基于 IPS 的 16.1 英寸哑光面板,像素为 1,920 x 1,080 和 165 Hz。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Omen 16 的竞争对手包括其他配备 RTX 4070 的 16 英寸游戏机,如 微星隐形 16 Studio A13VG以及 技嘉 Aero 16 OLED BSF以及 宏碁 Nitro 16 AN16-41和 联想Legion Pro 5 16ARX8虽然价格更高。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86.6 % | 09/2023 | HP Omen 16-xf0376ng R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 23.5 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 | |
87.4 % | 07/2023 | HP Omen 16-wf000 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 23.6 mm | 16.10" | 2560x1440 | |
88.8 % | 07/2023 | MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 19.95 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
86.2 % | 03/2023 | Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 18 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 | |
88.1 % | 06/2023 | Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 27.9 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.4 % | 05/2023 | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 26.8 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
由于该机箱与已测试过的 16-wf000 型号基本相同,配备了 酷睿 i7-13700HX和 GeForce RTX 4080(遗憾的是 AMD 版本没有 Thunderbolt 4),我们在本文中将不再重新分析机箱、设备和输入设备,而是参考现有的 测试报告.
交流
网络摄像头
显示屏
我们评测的英特尔版本采用 QHD 显示屏(2560 x 1440 像素),而 AMD 版本则采用经典的全高清面板。
|
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 350 cd/m²
Contrast: 1000:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.29 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 2.23
ΔE Greyscale 3.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
72.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
72.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.131
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng BOE0B81, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10 | HP Omen 16-wf000 BOE0B7D, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.10 | MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG AUO26A9, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Samsung SDC4191 (ATNA60YV09-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16.00 | Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 BOE CQ NE16QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 CSOT T3 MNG007DA1-Q, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -2% | 17% | 24% | -3% | -1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 72.1 | 69 -4% | 96.4 34% | 99.9 39% | 67.9 -6% | 70.4 -2% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.6 | 99.2 0% | 99.7 0% | 100 0% | 99.1 -1% | 99.6 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 72.3 | 71.2 -2% | 84.8 17% | 96.4 33% | 69.9 -3% | 72.6 0% |
Response Times | 14% | 43% | 78% | 21% | 9% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 12.3 ? | 4.6 ? 63% | 4.4 ? 64% | 2 ? 84% | 11 ? 11% | 7 ? 43% |
Response Time Black / White * | 7.2 ? | 9.7 ? -35% | 5.6 ? 22% | 1.98 ? 72% | 5 ? 31% | 9.1 ? -26% |
PWM Frequency | 60 | |||||
Screen | 16% | -0% | 164% | 30% | 33% | |
Brightness middle | 350 | 310.9 -11% | 424 21% | 389.97 11% | 520 49% | 355.3 2% |
Brightness | 338 | 296 -12% | 411 22% | 395 17% | 494 46% | 340 1% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 91 0% | 88 -3% | 97 7% | 91 0% | 91 0% |
Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.35 -0% | 0.37 -6% | 0.03 91% | 0.39 -11% | 0.32 9% |
Contrast | 1000 | 888 -11% | 1146 15% | 12999 1200% | 1333 33% | 1110 11% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.29 | 2.18 34% | 3.04 8% | 2 39% | 1.94 41% | 1.13 66% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.47 | 3.58 58% | 7.5 11% | 4.1 52% | 5.62 34% | 2.78 67% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.23 | 0.52 77% | 3.04 -36% | 1.68 25% | 0.74 67% | 0.32 86% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.2 | 2.8 12% | 4.34 -36% | 2.23 30% | 2.94 8% | 1.4 56% |
Gamma | 2.131 103% | 2.18 101% | 2.32 95% | 2.41 91% | 2.37 93% | 2.24 98% |
CCT | 6317 103% | 6002 108% | 6952 93% | 6323 103% | 6443 101% | 6372 102% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 9% /
12% | 20% /
10% | 89% /
121% | 16% /
21% | 14% /
22% |
* ... smaller is better
不过,确定的图像值是相似的。两款机型都能分别覆盖几乎 100% 的 sRGB 色彩空间和约 70% 的 AdobeRGB 和 DCI-P3 色彩空间,尽管一些竞争对手(微星、技嘉)在这方面表现更好。响应时间也不错,可以满足大多数需求。
照度(91%)和黑色值(0.35 cd/m²)完全相同,但 AMD 版的对比度(1000:1 对 888:1)稍好,因为亮度略高(平均为 338 cd/m²,而不是 296 cd/m²)。不过,这两款设备都无法与竞争对手相提并论。最重要的是,如果你能接受光滑的表面和显示屏闪烁,那么 Aero 16 的 OLED 面板在很多方面都要胜出一筹。
但回到 Omen 16 上:它的可视角度与典型的 IPS 面板一样好,因此即使从倾斜的位置观看,画面也相当稳定。顺便说一句,如果你需要尽可能精确的色彩,你应该进行校准或下载并使用我们在照明图旁边链接的 ICC 文件(假设它是相同的全高清面板)。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
7.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4 ms rise | |
↘ 3.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
12.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.9 ms rise | |
↘ 6.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
电源
Omen 16 有多种不同的配置。调色板范围从 GeForce RTX 4050到GeForce RTX 4080。如前所述,惠普采用了 AMD 和英特尔当前的 CPU 型号。我们的评测样本在价格和性能方面都处于中(高)端水平。
测试条件
作为一款游戏笔记本,制造商在电脑上安装了大量的系统和调整软件。在 Omen Gaming Hub 中,可以对键盘背光、图形切换(混合或独立)和性能配置文件等进行调整(见截图)。由于使用性能模式时的噪音水平与(略微)更好的 3D 性能不成正比,而且设备在空闲模式下已经相当出色,因此我们在 "平衡 "模式下进行了所有测量。此外还有 "Eco "模式,但在性能和噪音方面与测试设置非常相似。
Witcher 3 (FHD/Ultra) Eco Balanced 性能 |
---|
帧频 ~110 fps ~112 fps ~120 fps |
噪音 ~44 dB(A) ~44 dB(A) ~55 dB(A) |
处理器
Ryzen 7 7840HS 是 AMD 的 Phoenix 系列产品,拥有 16 MB 三级缓存、5.1 GHz 最高主频和 8 个内核,由于采用了 SMT 技术,最多可并行处理 16 个线程。这款 4 纳米机型位于基准测试领域的中间位置,介于 Ryzen 7 7735HS宏碁 Nitro 16 的 Ryzen 7 735HS(仍基于 Zen 3+)和 Ryzen 7 7745HX和联想Legion Pro 5 的 Ryzen 7 7745HX。电脑 酷睿 i7-13700H(X)的电脑通常速度更快一些。这同样适用于 酷睿 i9-13900H同样适用于技嘉 Aero 16 的酷睿 i9-13900H。最重要的是,我们不得不称赞其稳定的性能。在我们的 Cinebench 循环中,Ryzen 7 7840HS 的长期性能也非常接近。
Cinebench R15 Multi-Endurance test
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Average of class Gaming | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (24712 - 28921, n=17) | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Average of class Gaming (3069 - 60169, n=227, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (103755 - 123167, n=17) | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average of class Gaming (18567 - 252486, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (4293 - 5096, n=17) | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=227, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (105028 - 122681, n=17) | |
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (14385 - 15525, n=17) | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=227, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (55540 - 65812, n=17) | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Average of class Gaming (10291 - 134044, n=227, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (67389 - 177158, n=17) | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=227, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2409, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (949 - 1123, n=17) | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (13100 - 15599, n=17) | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Average of class Gaming (1518 - 31796, n=227, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (17615 - 41157, n=17) | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=228, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
系统性能
在系统性能方面,Omen 16 在对比设备中排名第二,仅次于联想的Legion Pro 5。其他制造商只为其游戏笔记本配备了 DDR5-4,800 内存,而惠普则为其 16 英寸笔记本配备了 DDR5-5,600 内存。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (8167 - 8183, n=2) | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=200, last 2 years) | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (10934 - 11250, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average of class Gaming (8300 - 12334, n=199, last 2 years) | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (10179 - 10526, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 11833, n=199, last 2 years) | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (12908 - 12920, n=2) | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=199, last 2 years) | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2334, n=170, last 2 years) | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU () | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=170, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU () | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2514, n=170, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU () | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=170, last 2 years) | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU () | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
PCMark 10 Score | 8167 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (30937 - 72158, n=17) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 92565, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average of class Gaming (24879 - 90647, n=227, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (30497 - 61911, n=17) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (34590 - 93323, n=17) | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average of class Gaming (21619 - 103259, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (85.1 - 112, n=17) | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 152.5, n=224, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
正如通常的情况一样,延迟让人有理由抱怨。根据 LatencyMon 工具,笔记本电脑在交付状态下不适合执行对延迟敏感的任务,如实时音频和视频编辑。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
固态硬盘并不出众。WDC 安装的 512 GB 型号固态硬盘实现了更稳定的速率,除了轻微的波动(比较 DiskSpd 循环),长期性能也很稳定,但在 AS SSD 基准测试中,Omen 16 无法与竞争对手的固态硬盘相媲美,日常使用中很少能注意到这种性能差异。
* ... smaller is better
Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
GeForce RTX 4070 在合成基准测试中没有表现出任何弱点。根据我们的性能评级,其速度略高于之前确定的 RTX 4070 平均值。这也难怪,因为惠普赋予 Ada-Lovelace 型号最大 140 W TGP。至于 RTX 4080 的附加费用是否值得,则取决于用户:Omen 16-wf000 在 3DMarks 中几乎比 16-xf0376ng 快了 40%。得益于其 12 GB GDDR6 VRAM(并不是特别大),RTX 4080 更加面向未来。
3DMark 11 Performance | 34584 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 189312 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 66071 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 27559 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 11726 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
Performance Rating - Percent | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Average of class Gaming | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=228, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average of class Gaming (6.38 - 167.7, n=220, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Average of class Gaming (9.13 - 194.9, n=230, last 2 years) | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average of class Gaming (14.6 - 421, n=228, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Average of class Gaming (26.9 - 220, n=240, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
Immortals of Aveum - 1920x1080 Ultra AF:16x | |
XMG Pro 15 E23 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (46.1 - 49.9, n=4) | |
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-41-R9LN | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Average of class Gaming (14.9 - 106.3, n=10, last 2 years) |
Armored Core 6 - 1920x1080 Maximum Preset | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
XMG Pro 15 E23 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (87.2 - 107, n=4) | |
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-41-R9LN | |
Average of class Gaming (10.7 - 107, n=12, last 2 years) |
Atlas Fallen - 1920x1080 Very High Preset | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (105.3 - 111.1, n=4) | |
XMG Pro 15 E23 | |
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-41-R9LN | |
Average of class Gaming (9.8 - 161, n=12, last 2 years) |
Sons of the Forest - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (71.1 - 87.5, n=4) | |
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-41-R9LN | |
Average of class Gaming (14.8 - 93.9, n=18, last 2 years) |
A Plague Tale Requiem - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (38 - 96.8, n=15, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (54.9 - 57.5, n=2) | |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng |
我们测试了大约 60 分钟后的游戏性能。 的Witcher 3(FHD/Ultra)测试游戏性能。没有发现帧速率下降或其他不一致的情况。
Witcher 3 FPS-Diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | |
GTA V (2015) | 177.7 | 166.8 | 105.9 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 112 | |||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 164.1 | 149.2 | 144.1 | 137.8 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 141.1 | 108.7 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 121 | 103.8 | 84.8 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 277 | 221 | 190.3 | |
A Plague Tale Requiem (2022) | 67.2 | 58.9 | 54.9 | |
Sons of the Forest (2023) | 88.1 | 85.8 | 85.4 | |
Atlas Fallen (2023) | 143.1 | 132.4 | 111.1 | |
Immortals of Aveum (2023) | 57.3 | 46.9 | ||
Armored Core 6 (2023) | 110.1 | 109.4 | 107 |
排放量
噪音排放
在性能模式下,Omen 16 的游戏噪音高达 55 分贝(A),而在平衡模式下,噪音发展则保持在一定范围内。44 dB(A)绝非安静,但考虑到性能,还是可以接受的。在空闲状态下,风扇有时会完全关闭。在大多数情况下,风扇的运行水平相当不错,甚至可以更低,以满足我们的口味--竞争对手在这方面往往做得更好。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 25 / 29 / 32 dB(A) |
Load |
| 44 / 46 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | HP Omen 16-wf000 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -7% | 8% | -5% | 1% | 7% | |
off / environment * | 24 | 23 4% | 24 -0% | 23 4% | 25.7 -7% | 23.2 3% |
Idle Minimum * | 25 | 29.6 -18% | 24 4% | 23 8% | 25.7 -3% | 23.2 7% |
Idle Average * | 29 | 29.8 -3% | 24 17% | 23 21% | 25.7 11% | 23.2 20% |
Idle Maximum * | 32 | 30.4 5% | 24 25% | 33.64 -5% | 26.3 18% | 26.2 18% |
Load Average * | 44 | 33.8 23% | 34.81 21% | 51.49 -17% | 33.9 23% | 31.4 29% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 44 | 57 -30% | 44.05 -0% | 55.27 -26% | 48.4 -10% | |
Load Maximum * | 46 | 58.3 -27% | 51.57 -12% | 55.24 -20% | 62 -35% | 53.8 -17% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
笔记本电脑在压力情况下会发热,尤其是机箱底部。在使用 FurMark 和 Prime95 一小时后,最高温度达到 57 °C(约 135 °F),这对在膝上玩游戏是不利的。机箱上部的温度也相当高,最高达 49 °C(约 120 °F),但由于掌托区域始终保持在 40 °C(约 104 °F)以下,因此这个温度值还在可以接受的范围内。尽管如此,Omen 16 在这一类别中仍落后于竞争对手--温度更高的微星 Stealth 16 除外。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 57 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.1 °C / -14.6 F).
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | HP Omen 16-wf000 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 9% | -19% | 22% | 3% | 13% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 49 | 45 8% | 60 -22% | 41 16% | 41.5 15% | 41.8 15% |
Maximum Bottom * | 57 | 48.8 14% | 61 -7% | 47 18% | 51.8 9% | 41.4 27% |
Idle Upper Side * | 31 | 29.2 6% | 38.2 -23% | 23 26% | 31.6 -2% | 29 6% |
Idle Bottom * | 31 | 28.8 7% | 37.7 -22% | 23 26% | 34.5 -11% | 30.4 2% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
您不必担心元件发热致死。Ryzen 7 7840HS 在长时间满负荷运行后,主频会降至 3.3 GHz,但 82 °C(约 180 °F)左右的温度还是可以接受的。GeForce RTX 4070 的情况与之相当,略低于 78 ℃(约 172 ℉)。核心时钟频率约为 1700 MHz,这并不值得批评。
发言人
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理
能源消耗
能耗方面也没有太大的惊喜。对于这样一款功能强大的笔记本电脑来说,84 至最高 176 瓦的能耗甚至相对较低,这也说明了 CPU 和 GPU 的效率。附带的 280 瓦电源也没有耗尽。在空闲模式下,Omen 16 的功耗仅为 9 至 20 瓦,而图形处理器的功耗则适中。
Off / Standby | 0.1 / Watt |
Idle | 9 / 14 / 20 Watt |
Load |
84 / 176 Watt |
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | HP Omen 16-wf000 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -75% | -13% | -12% | -22% | -31% | -40% | |
Idle Minimum * | 9 | 21.8 -142% | 11 -22% | 11.8 -31% | 11.6 -29% | 8.1 10% | 13.8 ? -53% |
Idle Average * | 14 | 26 -86% | 18 -29% | 16.1 -15% | 15.6 -11% | 15.9 -14% | 19.2 ? -37% |
Idle Maximum * | 20 | 36 -80% | 19 5% | 17 15% | 16.5 17% | 37.2 -86% | 27 ? -35% |
Load Average * | 84 | 115.5 -38% | 91 -8% | 100.6 -20% | 155 -85% | 90.9 -8% | 111.3 ? -33% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 140.9 | 214 -52% | 130 8% | 158 -12% | 154.8 -10% | 189.6 -35% | |
Load Maximum * | 176 | 269.7 -53% | 228 -30% | 192 -9% | 205 -16% | 263.5 -50% | 251 ? -43% |
* ... smaller is better
Energy consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test
Energy consumption with external Monitor
电池寿命
电池续航时间以英特尔版本为基础,不过在我们进行的实际 WLAN 测试中,AMD 版本的电池续航时间更长一些,亮度降低到 150 cd/m²,续航时间为 344 至 307 分钟。对于一款游戏笔记本电脑来说,不到 6 小时的续航时间还是很有用的,不过有些竞争对手的续航时间甚至更长。
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | HP Omen 16-wf000 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 88 Wh | Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -11% | 35% | 30% | 57% | -30% | 7% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 344 | 307 -11% | 466 35% | 448 30% | 540 57% | 240 -30% | 368 ? 7% |
Reader / Idle | 328 | 661 | 729 | 392 | 546 ? | ||
Load | 68 | 142 | 126 | 105 | 61 | 84.7 ? | |
H.264 | 462 | 442 | 614 | 400 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论
Omen 16 配备了性能出色的Ryzen 7 7840HS.
这款 16 英寸机型没有犯任何明显的错误,在几乎所有类别中都至少获得了 "满意"。
在大多数类别中,它甚至可以获得 "良好 "或 "非常好 "的评价,因此我们最终获得了 87% 的可观综合评分--就像英特尔版本一样。
在积极的一面,我们要提到稳定的连续性能、165 Hz 的快速显示、稳固的扬声器和(至少在平衡模式下)可接受的噪音排放。由于噪音较大(无论空闲还是负载),我们不推荐使用性能模式。
惠普可以改进连接性(无读卡器、无 USB 4)、网络摄像头和机箱温度发展,后者高于平均水平。
RTX-4070 采用 AMD 处理器的同类笔记本电脑可在宏碁(Nitro 16 )或联想(Legion Pro 5 )等公司找到。
价格和供应情况
惠普 Omen 16-xf0376ng 配有 Ryzen 7 7840HS、GeForce RTX 4070 和 165 Hz 面板,测试时在Saturn和Mediamarkt的售价略低于 1,900 欧元(约合 2026 美元)。
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng
-
09/13/2023 v7
Florian Glaser
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.