Alienware m18 R1笔记本电脑评测:比微星泰坦GT77更大、更重
今年早些时候发布的 与移动英特尔猛禽湖-H系列和移动Ada LovelaceGeForce RTX 40系列一起,旗舰Alienware m18 R1是其家族中自2013年以来的第一个18英寸模型。当然,从那时起已经发生了很多变化,但是想要比通常的17英寸解决方案更大的性能猎手可能会发现18英寸的形式因素有很多值得喜欢的地方,在那里可以最大限度地发挥功能和热能。
我们审查的配置是一个更高端的规格,配备第13代酷睿i9-13980HX CPU,175瓦GeForce RTX 4090,基于膜的RGB键盘,以及1200p 480 Hz IPS显示器,价格约为2900美元。其他SKU有RTX 4060、Core i7-13700HX和1600p 165 Hz显示屏,以及CherryMX超低调机械键盘。所有配置都以其他方式支持G-Sync和全DCI-P3色彩。
直接竞争对手包括其他18英寸游戏笔记本电脑,如 雷蛇刀片18或华硕ROG Strix Scar 18.在撰写本文时,微星还没有宣布新的18英寸机型。
更多戴尔的评论:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
90.7 % | 04/2023 | Alienware m18 R1 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 3.9 kg | 26.7 mm | 18.00" | 1920x1200 | |
91.4 % | 02/2023 | Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 3 kg | 21.9 mm | 18.00" | 2560x1600 | |
86.6 % | 02/2023 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 3.1 kg | 30.8 mm | 18.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.3 % | 03/2023 | MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 3 kg | 23 mm | 17.00" | 2560x1600 | |
89.9 % | 03/2023 | Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.9 kg | 27 mm | 17.00" | 2560x1600 | |
89 % | 02/2023 | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 3.5 kg | 23 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例 - 传奇3设计
机箱的印象与最近的 印象与最近的Alienware x17 R2相似。因为Alienware m18 R1使用了类似的材料。其密集的结构和材料之间的紧密排列表明,你不需要像Razer Blade 18那样采用一体式设计来获得高质量的感觉。与包括微星GE78在内的许多其他游戏笔记本电脑相比,从键盘中心到外盖的一切都更坚固,更耐任何扭曲或凹陷。
哑光橡胶键盘甲板可能是一个混合袋,因为它很容易随着时间的推移收集难看的油脂和指纹。
Alienware型号明显比18英寸的Blade 18或ROG Strix Scar 18几乎整整一公斤,成为今年最重的笔记本电脑之一。事实上,我们的快递员甚至评论说,相对于它的小尺寸,运输箱有多重。大部分的重量可以归因于延长的后部、更厚的轮廓和蒸汽室冷却器,这些都是为了改善冷却。如果你关心旅行的重量,那么你可能要考虑 微星泰坦GT77它实际上比我们的Alienware更轻、更薄。
连通性--比通常情况下更多
与竞争对手雷蛇Blade 18或华硕ROG Strix Scar 18相比,Alienware上的集成端口更多。然而,问题是,大多数端口都紧紧地挤在后部边缘,这使得它们更难接近。
USB-C显示器只支持后方的两个USB-C端口,因为沿右边缘的第三个USB-C端口不支持视频输出。
SD卡阅读器
与其他大多数笔记本电脑不同,集成的SD卡读卡器在设备的后面。然而,传输速度是非常快的,超过2倍的速度在 微星泰坦GT77.
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 (Angelibird AV Pro V60) | |
Alienware m18 R1 (Angelibird AV Pro V60) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (AV Pro V60) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI (Angelibird AV Pro V60) | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 (Angelibird AV Pro V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (AV Pro V60) | |
Alienware m18 R1 (Angelibird AV Pro V60) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 (Angelibird AV Pro V60) | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 (Angelibird AV Pro V60) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI (Angelibird AV Pro V60) |
沟通
英特尔杀手1675i的标准配置是Wi-Fi 6E和蓝牙5.2兼容性。杀手是英特尔为游戏笔记本优化的子品牌,因此杀手1675i本质上是英特尔AX211的核心。当与我们的华硕AXE11000测试路由器配对时,性能是优秀和可靠的。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Alienware m18 R1 |
网络摄像头
200万像素的网络摄像头在这些天的大多数笔记本电脑上是典型的,但考虑到机箱有多大,我们对没有看到一个500万像素的传感器略感失望。红外线是标准配置,而网络摄像头的快门却没有,这与Razer Blade 18不同。
维护
只需一把飞利浦螺丝刀,底板就可以非常容易地脱落。相比之下,新的微星GE78的底板需要更多的摆弄和撕开防篡改贴纸。
用户可以直接接触到电池、可拆卸的WLAN模块、4个M.2 SSD插槽和2个DDR5 SODIMM插槽。这是为数不多的支持四个内部NVMe固态硬盘(2x M.2 2230 + 2x M.2 2280)的笔记本电脑之一。看到以下情况会很有趣 CAMM 而不是SODIMM,特别是因为戴尔一直在倡导更快的RAM技术。
配件和保修
除了交流电适配器和文件外,盒子里没有任何额外的东西。请注意,戴尔已经放弃了其专有的Alienware对接端口,因此不再支持旧的Alienware eGPU对接站。
如果在美国购买,标准的一年有限保修期适用。
输入设备 - 舒适的键盘,海绵状的触摸板
键盘
我们设备上的膜基按键可能是我们在任何游戏笔记本上使用过的最好的。与微星GE78或Razer Blade 18上的按键相比,行程感觉更深,反馈更硬。就舒适度而言,这里的键盘没有什么可抱怨的。
可选的CherryMX机械开关可能会更容易被点击,但声音也更大。这些开关可能是戴尔为现有的Alienware M15和M17系列提供的那些开关。
当背光激活时,所有的按键符号都会被照亮,这与老款Alienware x15/x17型号不同,后者的次级符号是不亮的。
触摸板
表面积几乎与微星GE78上的点击板相同。 微星GE78(13.2 x 8 cm vs. 13 x 8.2 cm),尽管Alienware的外形尺寸更大。虽然滑行时牵引力平稳,粘性很小,但点击时的反馈却偏软,这使得体验不尽人意。双击也会感觉很累,因为每一次点击都需要手指比其他大多数笔记本电脑多一点力气。
显示器 - 极快的480赫兹刷新率
Alienware采用的是1200p的奇美180JME面板,与1600p的AU Optronics B180QAN01.0或BOE NE180QDM面板形成对比。雷蛇Blade 18和华硕ROG Strix Scar 18的面板。将这块奇美面板与其他两块分开的独特特征是其2倍的原始刷新率,即480赫兹而不是240赫兹。否则,这三块面板都有类似的色彩覆盖率、像素响应时间和对比度。完整的P3色彩和快速刷新率使这一特定的Alienware型号适用于游戏和图形编辑。
第二种显示器选项具有更高的1600p原始分辨率,但刷新率较低,为165 Hz。
|
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 372.8 cd/m²
Contrast: 1165:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.92 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.51
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
89.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.34
Alienware m18 R1 Chi Mei 180JME, IPS, 1920x1200, 18.00 | Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 AU Optronics B180QAN01.0, IPS, 2560x1600, 18.00 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NE180QDM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1600, 18.00 | Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 BOE NE170QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 17.00 | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI B173ZAN06.C, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 17.30 | Alienware x17 R2 P48E AU Optronics B173HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -2% | -2% | -17% | 0% | -10% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 97.7 | 96.9 -1% | 97.2 -1% | 69.1 -29% | 94.9 -3% | 79.2 -19% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.8 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.7 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.8 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 89.8 | 85.3 -5% | 84.9 -5% | 69.8 -22% | 92.4 3% | 79.6 -11% |
Response Times | -11% | -34% | -148% | -675% | -153% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 3 ? | 4.2 ? -40% | 5.41 ? -80% | 12 ? -300% | 38.4 ? -1180% | 12.4 ? -313% |
Response Time Black / White * | 9.9 ? | 8 ? 19% | 8.62 ? 13% | 9.4 ? 5% | 26.6 ? -169% | 9.2 ? 7% |
PWM Frequency | 2380 ? | |||||
Screen | -68% | -141% | -17% | 57715% | -48% | |
Brightness middle | 372.8 | 549.6 47% | 490 31% | 417.3 12% | 606 63% | 365.4 -2% |
Brightness | 367 | 524 43% | 468 28% | 387 5% | 602 64% | 344 -6% |
Brightness Distribution | 97 | 89 -8% | 86 -11% | 87 -10% | 93 -4% | 85 -12% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.53 -66% | 0.54 -69% | 0.42 -31% | 0.0001 100% | 0.29 9% |
Contrast | 1165 | 1037 -11% | 907 -22% | 994 -15% | 6060000 520072% | 1260 8% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.92 | 3.32 -73% | 4.97 -159% | 2.14 -11% | 4.8 -150% | 3.17 -65% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.65 | 6.63 -82% | 11.02 -202% | 4.09 -12% | 8.2 -125% | 7.69 -111% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.51 | 2.7 -429% | 2.97 -482% | 0.42 18% | 1.8 -253% | 0.51 -0% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 2 -33% | 7.2 -380% | 3.1 -107% | 6.5 -333% | 5.3 -253% |
Gamma | 2.34 94% | 2.29 96% | 2.161 102% | 2.19 100% | 2.63 84% | 2.18 101% |
CCT | 6607 98% | 6319 103% | 6515 100% | 6040 108% | 6596 99% | 5879 111% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -27% /
-46% | -59% /
-96% | -61% /
-36% | 19013% /
37006% | -70% /
-55% |
* ... smaller is better
该显示器开箱即预校准了准确的颜色和灰度。我们自己进一步校准面板不会明显改善平均deltaE值,因此没有必要进行终端用户校准。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
9.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.4 ms rise | |
↘ 4.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.5 ms rise | |
↘ 1.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
室外能见度在该类别中属于平均水平,因为大多数游戏笔记本电脑的显示屏通常在300至400尼特之间。即便如此,Alienware的巨大重量也不鼓励在户外使用。刀锋18和泰坦GT77的亮度更高,在户外能见度更好。
性能--英特尔第13代+英伟达Ada Lovelace
测试条件
在运行以下任何基准测试之前,我们通过Windows将我们的设备设置为性能模式,通过Nvidia控制面板设置为独立GPU模式,并通过Alienware命令中心设置为超速模式。戴尔今年彻底刷新了命令中心软件,使其更容易使用,字体也比以前更大。然而,它的加载速度仍然很慢,特别是与速度更快的微星中心或申克控制中心的同类产品相比。
即使在写作时更新到最新版本,我们在Alienware命令中心上也遇到了一些值得一提的错误。首先,如果连接了外部显示器,该软件就无法加载。其次,即使系统在性能或超速模式下处于睡眠或休眠状态,内部风扇有时也会继续非常响亮地运行。
支持高级优化,这意味着用户可以通过Nvidia控制面板在独立GPU和优化模式之间切换,而不需要重新启动。G-Sync仅在dGPU模式下可用,而Optimus在连接外部显示器时自动启动。
处理器
处理器性能是目前市场上任何移动CPU中最快的之一。用户可以期望单线程和多线程性能比第12代酷睿i9-12900HK分别提高约10%和75%。酷睿i9-12900HK老款Alienware x17 R2中的12代酷睿i9-12900HK。AMD的顶级Zen 4竞争者是Ryzen 9 7945HX在单线程负载方面的差距约为10%至15%。
尽管比Alder Lake-H有了巨大的性能飞跃,但Core i9-13900HX和Ryzen 9 7945HX之间的性能差距仍然很大。酷睿i9-13900HX,酷睿i9-13950HX和酷睿i9-13980HX是非常小的,低于5%。因此,如果在这三个CPU之间进行选择,你可能想通过选择 "较慢 "的i9-13900HX来节省一些钱。
可用的最低CPU选项是 酷睿i7-13700HX它比我们的i9-13980HX慢了大约33%。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (21332 - 29553, n=9) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (108001 - 148168, n=9) | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (5264 - 7142, n=9) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (126758 - 143409, n=9) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (13785 - 17117, n=9) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (53398 - 73758, n=9) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (105169 - 136520, n=9) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (1513 - 2039, n=9) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (11431 - 16325, n=9) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (37069 - 52949, n=9) | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E |
系统性能
PCMark 10得分与其他具有类似13代英特尔CPU和GeForce 40 GPU的旗舰游戏笔记本电脑相当,如华硕ROG Strix Scar 18或微星Titan GT77 HX。我们的Alienware还成功地超越了在RAID 0中使用两块三星PM9A1固态硬盘运行的老款Alienware x17 R2。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (8650 - 9068, n=4) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (11215 - 11644, n=3) | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (10125 - 11067, n=3) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (15052 - 16012, n=3) | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1935 - 2176, n=4) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1764 - 2005, n=4) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2267 - 2469, n=4) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1556 - 1904, n=4) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W |
PCMark 10 Score | 8758 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (62189 - 80776, n=9) | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (62624 - 89096, n=9) | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (59912 - 79917, n=9) | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (79.4 - 93.2, n=9) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Alienware m18 R1 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon揭示了在打开我们主页的多个浏览器标签时的DPC问题。此外,该系统在播放4K视频内容时也有问题,因为在我们长达1分钟的测试视频中,即使经过重复测试,也能记录到37个丢帧。CPU和iGPU的利用率也异常高,分别为19%和55%。这些观察结果表明,对可能影响焦点活动的后台进程处理不力。
就其价值而言,Nvidia已经承认了一个与图形驱动531.29的DPC延迟增加有关的错误。希望无论哪种方式都能很快得到修复。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备 - 共有四个M.2硬盘
我们的设备配置了一个 SK Hynix PC801PCIe4 x4 NVMe固态硬盘,连续读取和写入速度分别高达7000 MB/s和6500 MB/s。与三星PMA1系列相比,性能是有竞争力的,我们的驱动器没有表现出任何问题,保持最大的速度,没有节流。
Alienware不支持PCIe5 NVMe固态硬盘,这与微星GE78或GT77系列不同。尽管如此,它比大多数其他笔记本电脑支持更多的内部固态硬盘。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能 - 175 WGeForce RTX 4090
整体图形性能从 移动GeForce RTX 4090的整体图形性能最类似于 桌面GeForce RTX 4070.它提供的性能足以在4K Ultra设置下玩任何当前游戏,包括F1 22。然而,如果启用了光线追踪,建议在支持的情况下启用DLSS或帧生成,以保持帧率的稳定。
当与上一代的 移动RTX 3080 Ti相比,移动RTX 4090的性能提高了40%至70%,同时保持了类似的175瓦的功率包络。
在Overdrive模式下运行Fire Strike ,与更安静的Performance模式相比,没有显示出重大优势,因为它们的最终得分几乎相同。然而,在平衡模式下重复测试,将导致GPU和CPU性能分别下降5%和9%。
3DMark 11 Performance | 50411 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 35598 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 21617 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
GTA V (2015) | 186.7 | 185.3 | 184.5 | 149 | 145.5 | 176.4 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 649.2 | 563.8 | 441.6 | 213.9 | 165.6 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 251 | 220 | 210 | 194.2 | 190.2 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 231 | 227 | 194.8 | 159.5 | 92.6 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 210 | 187.1 | 143.5 | 124 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 475 | 388 | 388 | 373 | 308 | 159.8 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 157.2 | 151.8 | 148.2 | 127.92 | 102.16 | 49.99 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 359.1 | 301.8 | 232.5 | 187.7 | 133.8 | 71.3 |
F1 22 (2022) | 336 | 320 | 318 | 144.7 | 92.2 | 45.5 |
排放--四个速度与激情的粉丝
系统噪音
如果你认为一台有四个风扇的笔记本电脑会很吵,那么你就......嗯,绝对正确。在性能模式下的游戏会引起51 dB(A)的风扇噪音,这与Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2相似。Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2但比Razer Blade 18更吵。如果在Overdrive模式下游戏,风扇噪音会更大,几乎达到57 dB(A)。任何超过50分贝(A)的声音都需要一副好的耳机来淹没呼呼作响的风扇。请记住,正如我们下面的压力测试部分所显示的那样,超速模式对大多数游戏来说是没有必要的。
值得庆幸的是,该系统在低负载时能更好地保持安静,因为在低配置文件设置时,风扇不会跳动。因此,你仍然可以在舒适的风扇噪音水平下浏览网页或流媒体视频内容。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23 / 23 / 23 dB(A) |
Load |
| 35.6 / 56.7 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 22.8 dB(A) |
Alienware m18 R1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) | Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -3% | -15% | -13% | -20% | 2% | |
off / environment * | 22.8 | 23.5 -3% | 23.9 -5% | 25.2 -11% | 24.6 -8% | 22.7 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 23 | 23.8 -3% | 23.9 -4% | 28 -22% | 29.2 -27% | 23.1 -0% |
Idle Average * | 23 | 23.8 -3% | 32.6 -42% | 28 -22% | 29.2 -27% | 23.1 -0% |
Idle Maximum * | 23 | 26.8 -17% | 32.6 -42% | 30.4 -32% | 29.2 -27% | 23.1 -0% |
Load Average * | 35.6 | 37.3 -5% | 35.9 -1% | 41 -15% | 50.7 -42% | 31.9 10% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 51.3 | 48 6% | 50.7 1% | 53.3 -4% | 52.5 -2% | |
Load Maximum * | 56.7 | 53.5 6% | 55.8 2% | 52.6 7% | 61 -8% | 52.5 7% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
表面温度不是一个问题,部分原因是大机箱几乎每一面都有充足的通风栅栏。最热的地方是沿后部远离键盘键和掌托的地方,以保持手的舒适。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23.8 °C / 74.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+5.1 °C / 9.2 F).
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -7% | -20% | -9% | -4% | -15% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 39 | 39.2 -1% | 54 -38% | 39 -0% | 40.6 -4% | 49.6 -27% |
Maximum Bottom * | 36.4 | 35.6 2% | 46 -26% | 44 -21% | 41.1 -13% | 42.4 -16% |
Idle Upper Side * | 29.2 | 31.8 -9% | 30 -3% | 31 -6% | 26.2 10% | 29.2 -0% |
Idle Bottom * | 27.8 | 33.2 -19% | 31 -12% | 29.8 -7% | 30.3 -9% | 32 -15% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
当运行Prime95对CPU施加压力时,时钟频率和电路板功耗将分别飙升至4.5 GHz和198 W,仅持续几秒钟或直到核心温度达到99 C。此后,CPU将在接下来的几分钟内降至4.2 GHz和175 W,最后稳定在3.4 GHz、143 W和99 C。CPU的温度也很极端,即使对游戏笔记本来说也是如此。
当运行在超速模式时,GPU的时钟频率、温度和主板功耗将分别稳定在2370 MHz、63 C和162 W。 Witcher 3超速模式下,GPU时钟频率、温度和板卡功耗将分别稳定在2370 MHz、63 C和162 W。请注意,在更安静的性能模式下运行时,GPU性能没有受到影响,这与我们在上面的Fire Strike 。相反,是CPU的性能受到了轻微的冲击。由于大多数游戏都与GPU有关,如果担心风扇噪音,我们建议在性能模式下进行游戏,而不是在较响亮的超速模式下。
在电池供电的情况下,性能受到限制,这是预料之中的。在电池上进行的Fire Strike 测试将返回物理和图形分数,分别为25319和18778分,而在主电源上则为41644和46998分。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | GPU平均温度(℃) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 38 | 29 |
Prime95压力 | 3.4 | -- | 100 | 44 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 2.6+ | 1070 - 2370 | 82 - 100 | 57 |
Witcher 3 压力(超速模式) | ~2.0+ | 2370 | 96 | 63 |
Witcher 3 压力(性能模式) | ~1.8+ | 2370 | 81 | 66 |
Witcher 3 压力(平衡模式) | ~1.8 | 2310 | 81 | 67 |
发言人
Alienware m18 R1 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理 - 游戏时超过300W
消耗功率
即使在不运行任何应用程序的情况下,该系统也毫不奇怪地要求非常高。在省电模式、优化模式和最低亮度设置下空转时,我们能够记录到最低的21瓦。在 "性能 "或 "涡轮增压 "模式下空转会增加2倍以上的空转消耗,因此,如果不需要额外的马力,强烈建议避免使用更高的配置文件设置。
运行 Witcher 3代表典型的游戏负载,将消耗311瓦,或比去年的RTX 3080 Ti电源多50瓦 Alienware x17 R2.因此,虽然性能比上一代更快,但由于要求更高的CPU,用户仍将不得不通过更高的电费来支付它。
当CPU和GPU都处于100%的利用率时,我们能够记录到339W的最大功耗。笨重的交流适配器(约19.5×9.8×4厘米)的额定功率为330瓦,因此,我们完全配置的设备正在最大限度地利用可用功率。请记住,游戏时笔记本电池的充电速度会变慢。事实上,我们可以观察到我们的电池在同时运行Prime95和FurMark等要求极高的负载时,从100%下降到91%。
Off / Standby | 0.04 / 0.23 Watt |
Idle | 21.6 / 25.2 / 56.7 Watt |
Load |
164.1 / 338.9 Watt |
Alienware m18 R1 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, IPS, 1920x1200, 18.00 | Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, IPS, 2560x1600, 18.00 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0), IPS, 2560x1600, 18.00 | MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 17.00 | Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 17.00 | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 17.30 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 7% | 11% | 20% | 21% | 20% | |
Idle Minimum * | 21.6 | 24.5 -13% | 17.3 20% | 16.1 25% | 14 35% | 14 35% |
Idle Average * | 25.2 | 34.1 -35% | 27 -7% | 24 5% | 19.3 23% | 21.6 14% |
Idle Maximum * | 56.7 | 47.7 16% | 46 19% | 34 40% | 36.8 35% | 24.8 56% |
Load Average * | 164.1 | 140 15% | 133 19% | 123.6 25% | 117.2 29% | 122.5 25% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 311 | 202 35% | 286 8% | 304 2% | 265 15% | |
Load Maximum * | 338.9 | 261 23% | 329 3% | 285.7 16% | 342.5 -1% | 418 -23% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命 - 对于尺寸来说并不可怕
电池寿命从来都是Alienware系列的强项。例如,去年的Alienware x17 R2,即使只是浏览网页,也只能维持几个小时。Alienware m18包括一个更高容量的电池(97瓦特对87瓦特),有更好的电源管理,浏览时间明显延长到4小时左右。这当然没有典型的超极本那么长,但对于这么大的游戏笔记本来说,这也不错了。
使用随附的桶式交流电适配器,从空电到满电大约需要2小时。不支持USB-C充电器,这是一个耻辱,因为这意味着无论你走到哪里,你都会被拴在巨大的330瓦交流适配器上。
Alienware m18 R1 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 97 Wh | Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 91.7 Wh | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | Alienware x17 R2 P48E i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 87 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 33% | 46% | 17% | 59% | -27% | |
Reader / Idle | 334 | 420 26% | 234 -30% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 260 | 240 -8% | 428 65% | 305 17% | 319 23% | 117 -55% |
Load | 44 | 80 82% | 56 27% | 86 95% | 46 5% | |
H.264 | 419 | 358 | ||||
Witcher 3 ultra | 53 |
Pros
Cons
结论--九磅的纯粹力量
Alienware笔记本电脑一直都有 "不惜一切代价提高性能 "的心态,Alienware m18 R1也不例外。这台机器不怕成为市场上最大、最重、甚至最吵的笔记本电脑之一,只要这意味着它可以从CPU和GPU中挤出更多的性能,或者加入更多狂热的游戏玩家可能喜欢的功能。如果用户打算利用4倍的M.2固态硬盘、大量的端口选项、集成的小键盘和快速的480赫兹刷新率,并且不介意笨重的重量或巨大的AC适配器,那么Alienware m18 R1将有更多值得享受的地方。
如果你想最大限度地提高性能和功能,即使这意味着需要一台更重更大的笔记本电脑,那么Alienware m18 R1就适合你。
如果上述辅助功能没有让你感到兴奋,那么你可以从明显更轻的Razer Blade 18获得几乎相同的核心性能。 雷蛇刀片18或 华硕ROG Strix 18.我们还希望看到新的Alienware指挥中心软件的改进,因为它的加载速度有时会异常缓慢。
价格和可用性
Alienware m18 R1现在直接从戴尔发货,Core i7/RTX 4060配置的起价为2100美元,如果配置齐全,则超过5000美元。我们评测的设备售价约为3700美元。在撰写本文时,该机型尚未在其他主要零售商处广泛销售。
Alienware m18 R1
-
04/01/2023 v7
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.