Notebookcheck Logo

宏碁掠夺者Triton 500 SE回顾。配备RTX 3080 Ti和Alder Lake的超薄游戏笔记本

昂贵的乐趣。 游戏笔记本电脑通常是厚厚的砖头--但宏碁掠夺者Triton 500 SE却不是这样。凭借相对纤细的铝制外壳，这家台湾制造商向Razer Blade 17等知名竞争对手发起进攻。我们的详细测试揭示了这种尝试是否以成功为冠。
Windows Thunderbolt Laptop / Notebook Geforce Gaming Alder Lake

宏碁将掠夺者Triton 500 SE宣传为 "超薄游戏笔记本电脑"。如果从相对尺寸来看，当然也有笔记本明显更厚。但是，宏碁Predator Triton 500 SE的尺寸约为20毫米（约0.8英寸），从绝对尺寸来看，并不是非常薄。但是，你是否希望看到更薄的尺寸是另一个问题，因为宏碁仍然必须以某种方式冷却16英寸16:10格式的所有电源组件，这种格式正变得越来越流行。除了45瓦的 英特尔酷睿i7-12700H处理器外，我们的测试设备还配备了一个 NvidiaGeForce 3080 Ti.

这种组合保证了游戏的最高质量。但我们的详细审查将找出它是否也导致了一个好的笔记本电脑。


Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX (Predator Triton 500 SE PT516 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-12700H 14 x 1.7 - 4.7 GHz, 115 W PL2 / Short Burst, 95 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Core: 1125 MHz, Memory: 1705 MHz, 115 W TDP, GA103, 512.44, Optimus
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5-5200, on-board
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, NE160QDM-NZ2, IPS LED, glossy: no, 240 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, 1024 GB 
, M.2 2280, NVMe PCIe 4.0, 877 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port, Card Reader: SD card, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Killer E3100G 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel AX1675s 160MHz (211NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 19.9 x 358.5 x 262.4
Battery
99.98 Wh Lithium-Ion
Camera
Webcam: 2 MP
Additional features
Speakers: surround speakers, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.3 kg, Power Supply: 610 g
Price
3000 Euro
Links
Acer homepage
Acer notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
87.2 %
06/2022
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		2.3 kg19.9 mm16.00"2560x1600
91.2 %
03/2022
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		2.7 kg19.9 mm17.30"2560x1440
88 %
03/2022
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU		2.6 kg26.6 mm16.00"2560x1600
87.5 %
01/2022
MSI GE76 Raider
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		3 kg26 mm17.30"1920x1080

外壳。宏碁笔记本电脑采用铝制外壳设计，有大量的灰色

Acer Predator Triton 500 SE
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE

宏碁掠夺者Triton 500 SE的设计对于游戏笔记本来说相当低调，深灰色外壳的外观并没有透露出太多目的。唯一指向游戏的东西是显示屏盖和边框上的捕食者标志，而默认为蓝色的键盘照明也可能吸引一些人的注意。在游戏专用的设计细节方面，还有键盘上方左侧的Turbo键和背面独特的风扇通风口，这些都是强大性能的明显标志。一个能提供一些人体工程学舒适度的设计特征是掌托的圆形前缘。

外壳几乎完全由铝制成。只有显示屏框架是由塑料制成的。这种材料的选择有助于提高机箱的坚固性。底座几乎不能被翘起，也不能被压入。唯一可以做到这一点的地方是键盘和触摸板之间的位置，然后只有当你使用很大的力量时才可以。所以你不必担心键盘的稳定性。不太坚固的是显示屏盖子，因为只用很少的力就已经可以使显示屏翘起来了。 但至少显示屏盖子的背面也有很好的触觉质量，就像机箱底部。

显示屏可以打开到几乎180度的开启角度，这一点非常好。宏碁笔记本电脑可以用一只手打开的事实是另一个积极点。固定在底座上的两个铰链调整得很好，只允许显示器在移动后有一些轻微的晃动。

对于一台游戏笔记本电脑来说，宏碁掠夺者Triton 500SE事实上是很苗条的，只有 雷蛇刀片17可以在这方面进行竞争，因为它同样纤细。然而，那也是明显更宽，其17.3英寸的显示屏为16:9格式。虽然 MSI GE76 Raider也明显更大，但联想Legion 5 Pro 16有一个类似的足迹，但这也是更厚。

就重量而言，宏碁掠夺者Triton 500 SE是明显的赢家。它只有2.3公斤（约5磅），显然是我们比较中的游戏笔记本中的轻量级。

尺寸比较

❌
397 mm 284 mm 26 mm 3 kg395 mm 260 mm 19.9 mm 2.7 kg359.9 mm 264.4 mm 26.6 mm 2.6 kg358.5 mm 262.4 mm 19.9 mm 2.3 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

设备。Predator Triton 500 SE以2.5Gbit以太网给人留下深刻印象

连接设备令人印象深刻。现在你可能需要的东西几乎都有。除了HDMI和两个USB-A端口外，宏碁掠夺者Triton 500 SE还提供RJ45以太网和一个全尺寸的SD读卡器。另一个积极的观点是，这些连接分布在两边的事实。另一方面，专有充电端口在中间的位置不是很理想，我们更希望这个连接的位置能在后面更远的地方。

右侧。SD读卡器、USB A 3.2、Thunderbolt 4、HDMI 2.1、Kensington
右侧。SD读卡器、USB A 3.2、Thunderbolt 4、HDMI 2.1、Kensington
左侧：电源连接、RJ45、USB-A 3.2、Thunderbolt 4、3.5毫米音频
左侧：电源连接、RJ45、USB-A 3.2、Thunderbolt 4、3.5毫米音频

SD卡阅读器

由于SD卡不能完全插入右侧的读卡器，它不适合作为永久存储扩展使用。通过对AV Pro V60存储卡的测量，SD读卡器在基准测试中的表现一般。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H (AV Pro V60)
139.5 MB/s +105%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=99, last 2 years)
98.6 MB/s +45%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
79.9 MB/s +18%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
68 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H (AV Pro V60)
169 MB/s +135%
Average of class Gaming
  (26 - 269, n=92, last 2 years)
122.8 MB/s +71%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
72 MB/s

沟通

除了RJ45连接，即2.5千兆以太网端口外，宏碁掠夺者Triton 500 SE还提供最新一代的Wi-Fi模块。杀手AX1675是一个带有Wi-Fi 6E的2x2卡。

在我们仅限于Wi-Fi 6的基准测试中，该卡可提供高达1664 Mbit/s的速度。接收时绝对稳定的性能非常突出。另一方面，在发送数据时，性能会有变化。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel AX1675s 160MHz (211NGW)
1565 (988min - 1682max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1793, n=150, last 2 years)
1275 MBit/s -19%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel AX1675s 160MHz (211NGW)
1664 (1649min - 1680max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (685 - 1890, n=156, last 2 years)
1407 MBit/s -15%
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1493 (1284min - 1716max) MBit/s
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1470 (1368min - 1570max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (881 - 1700, n=5, last 2 years)
1369 MBit/s
MSI GE76 Raider
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1137 (588min - 1235max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1580 (738min - 1775max) MBit/s
MSI GE76 Raider
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1257 (650min - 1337max) MBit/s
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1160 (1095min - 1239max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (885 - 1412, n=5, last 2 years)
1135 MBit/s
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650Tooltip
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1663 (1649-1680)
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1565 (988-1682)

网络摄像头

屏幕上方的显示框包含一个分辨率为200万像素的网络摄像头。虽然它的图像比那些典型的720p网络摄像头要好，但与智能手机中的自拍摄像头的质量相比仍有很大差距。

ColorChecker
7.4 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
10 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX: 8.62 ∆E min: 3.43 - max: 13.78 ∆E

辅料

除了带有专用连接器的230瓦电源外，没有其他附带的配件。

维护

为了进入宏碁笔记本电脑内部的组件，你首先要卸下机箱底部的8颗Torx螺丝。底板还被额外的夹子固定，最好用塑料撬工具小心地松开。要做到这一点，以太网端口为自己提供了一个开始的地方。你只需要打开侧面和前面的塑料夹子，然后当你取下底板时，后面的夹子会自动松开。

然而，你不妨省点力气，因为在改变宏碁掠夺者Triton 500 SE的内部组件方面，你其实没有太多的选择。工作内存是焊接在一起的，如果不先拆下主板，就无法访问固态硬盘。但至少你可以更换电池，而且风扇也可以用来清洁。

宏碁掠夺者Triton 500 SE：内部观察
宏碁掠夺者Triton 500 SE：内部观察

担保

宏碁掠夺者Triton 500 SE提供了两年的提货和退货保证。因此，在出现缺陷的情况下，宏碁笔记本电脑在维修店内被取走和维修。

输入设备。宏碁Predator提供了一个良好的触摸板

键盘

宏碁使用的是Chiclet风格的键盘，并采用了六个键行的布局。有趣的是，宏碁在Predator Triton 500 SE中放弃了添加数字块，因为我们通常在大型笔记本电脑中看到。这也意味着键盘被放置在机箱的中心，这在人体工程学上是很舒适的。另一个积极的方面是常规尺寸的方向键。另一方面，右边的Shift键必须要小一些才行，这在你试图使用它的时候是很烦人的。回车键右边的特殊按键也很不寻常。由于键盘的其他部分因为它们而变得稍小，这也可能成为更频繁的打字错误的一个原因。

我们估计，黑键提供的行程约为1.5毫米（约0.06英寸）。打字体验很好，按键提供了一个舒适的压力点和阻力，没有海绵的感觉。虽然打字体验不是绝对的顶级，但对于日常打字任务来说仍然足够。

我们应该提到背景照明作为一个相关的特殊功能。默认情况下，它整个是蓝色的，可以分四步调整。使用预装的PredatorSense软件，可以非常自由地调整颜色，你还可以激活各种效果，如缓慢闪烁或彩虹色的波浪效果。

宏碁掠夺者Triton 500 SE：键盘区
宏碁掠夺者Triton 500 SE：键盘区

触摸板

Acer Predator的触摸板尺寸为12.5 x 8厘米（约4.9 x 3.15英寸），这是一个相当大的尺寸。其表面光滑但不滑溜。由于其良好的滑动特性，可以毫不费力地控制鼠标指针，软件实施也很准确。

触摸板是一个ClickPad，相应地，你可以在底部区域按压表面。机械装置很安静，点击有一个明确的压力点。这是一个高质量的实现。

宏碁掠夺者Triton 500 SE：集成指纹识别器的触摸板
宏碁掠夺者Triton 500 SE：集成指纹识别器的触摸板

显示。宏碁以240赫兹的液晶显示器取悦玩家的心

宏碁掠夺者Triton 500 SE的子像素网格
宏碁掠夺者Triton 500 SE的子像素网格
轻微的背光出血（这里显示的是放大的）。
轻微的背光出血（这里显示的是放大的）。

宏碁掠夺者Triton 500 SE始终配备相同的显示屏：16:10格式的16英寸IPS液晶显示器，提供2560 x 1600像素的分辨率（QHD和2.5k）。宏碁在这款笔记本电脑中不提供4K UHD显示屏。

另一方面，这里使用的面板还提供一些其他优势，例如高亮度。宏碁规定500cd/m²，这也是我们测量的最高值。该面板的平均亮度为468cd/m²，这尤其是因为显示屏底部边缘的亮度明显下降。然而，没有明显的阴影，用肉眼就可以发现。在这方面，只有 联想Legion 5 Pro能够在我们的直接比较中跟上宏碁捕食者的步伐。

显示器的响应时间也变得非常好。此外，该显示器提供240赫兹的刷新率，这使得运动看起来绝对流畅。

495
cd/m²		498
cd/m²		509
cd/m²
481
cd/m²		498
cd/m²		494
cd/m²
406
cd/m²		423
cd/m²		409
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
NE160QDM-NZ2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 509 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 468.1 cd/m² Minimum: 21 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 80 %
Center on Battery: 498 cd/m²
Contrast: 1383:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.77 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.63
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
84.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.14
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
NE160QDM-NZ2, IPS LED, 2560x1600, 16.00		Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
BOE NE173QHM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30		Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00		MSI GE76 Raider
AU Optronics B173HAN05.4 (AUOE295), IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 17.30
Display
1%
-16%
-21%
Display P3 Coverage
97.3
98.7
1%
68.7
-29%
63.1
-35%
sRGB Coverage
100
99.9
0%
97.6
-2%
94
-6%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
84.9
86.2
2%
70.9
-16%
65.2
-23%
Response Times
-53%
-24%
5%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
13.8 ?(6.3, 7.5)
17.6 ?(8.4, 9.2)
-28%
17.6 ?(9.2, 8.4)
-28%
5.6 ?(2, 3.6)
59%
Response Time Black / White *
6.4 ?(1.8, 4.6)
11.4 ?(4.8, 5.6)
-78%
7.6 ?(2.4, 5.2)
-19%
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
-50%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-18%
-18%
-3%
Brightness middle
498
335.9
-33%
502
1%
290
-42%
Brightness
468
294
-37%
491
5%
290
-38%
Brightness Distribution
80
75
-6%
91
14%
96
20%
Black Level *
0.36
0.38
-6%
0.37
-3%
0.23
36%
Contrast
1383
884
-36%
1357
-2%
1261
-9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.77
2.82
-59%
2.7
-53%
1.59
10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.24
5.04
4%
4.5
14%
3.17
40%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.63
1.4
-122%
0.87
-38%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.4
1.7
29%
2.7
-13%
2.5
-4%
Gamma
2.14 103%
2.14 103%
2.44 90%
2.253 98%
CCT
7046 92%
6382 102%
6326 103%
6640 98%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-23% / -19%
-19% / -18%
-6% / -6%

* ... smaller is better

卡尔曼：灰度
卡尔曼：灰度
卡尔曼：饱和度
卡尔曼：饱和度
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN：灰度（校准的）。
CalMAN：灰度（校准的）。
CalMAN: 饱和度(已校准)
CalMAN: 饱和度(已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)

正如我们用CalMan和X-Rite i1 Pro 2色度计测量的那样，在交付状态下，显示器的色温略微过低。然而，这可以通过使用X-Rite i1 Profiler进行校准来补救。校准后，色彩再现相当准确。 像往常一样，我们创建的颜色配置文件可供您免费下载.

根据宏碁的说法，该显示器能够覆盖100%的小型sRGB色彩空间。我们的测量结果也证实了这一点，甚至更多：该显示器也能够几乎完全覆盖DCI-P3色彩空间。这也使得宏碁Predator Triton 500 SE适用于简单的图像和视频处理。

Acer Predator Triton 500 SE与sRGB的对比
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE与sRGB的对比
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE与AdobeRGB的对比
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE与AdobeRGB的对比
宏碁掠夺者Triton 500 SE VS P3
宏碁掠夺者Triton 500 SE VS P3
室外（阴天）
室外（阴天）

由于该显示器提供了哑光表面和高亮度，它也非常适合在户外使用。

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
6.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.8 ms rise
↘ 4.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
13.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.3 ms rise
↘ 7.5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17933 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.


一个良好的视角稳定性...
一个良好的视角稳定性...
...是典型的IPS显示屏
...是典型的IPS显示屏

性能。Alder Lake CPU和GeForce RTX 3080 Ti带来强大的性能

在我们测试的时候，宏碁掠夺者Triton 500 SE有两个版本：一个型号配备了英特尔酷睿i7-12700H和另一个带有 酷睿i9-12900H.由于还配备了 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 Ti是两款机型的共同点。i7型号提供16GB的内存，而在i9中，32GB的LPDDR5-5200被焊接在一起。同时，更昂贵的i9型号提供2TB的固态硬盘存储，而宏碁i7型号的笔记本电脑有1TB的固态硬盘。

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z 主板
CPU-Z 主板
CPU-Z内存
CPU-Z内存
HWiNFO
HWiNFO
GPU-Z英特尔Iris Xe图形
GPU-Z英特尔Iris Xe图形
 

测试条件

有各种性能模式，你可以通过 "PredatorSense "软件调整。静音、标准、极限和涡轮，后者迫使风扇以最大噪音水平持续运行。我们的性能测试是在极限模式下进行的，其结果是最高性能的功率限制为115瓦，CPU的持续消耗为95瓦。

处理器

ǞǞǞ英特尔酷睿i7-12700H是一个总共有14个内核的处理器。根据Alder Lake架构的混合结构，其中六个是 "大型 "性能核心，八个是 "小型 "效率核心。P核心的最高时钟速度为4.7 GHz（基本时钟速度：2.4 GHz），E核心的最高为3.5 GHz（1.8 GHz）。作为Alder Lake H系列的一部分，i7-12700H的TDP为45瓦，英特尔指定的最大消耗为115瓦。你可以在我们的《CPU比较列表》中找到更多信息和广泛的基准。 CPU比较列表.

宏碁能够从相对较薄的机箱中获得大量的性能，Razer Blade 17 ，在多核恒定性能方面可以明显超越，而其i7-12800H ，只是在单核性能方面更好。另一方面，与联想和微星的明显更厚的游戏笔记本相比，宏碁掠夺者Triton 500 SE有一个缺点。

在电池运行时，笔记本自动切换到标准性能模式，更快的模式无法使用。但性能也受到了额外的限制，虽然标准 模式在主电源运行时允许持续消耗80瓦，但在电池运行时却只有35瓦。在对CPU要求较高的3DMark 11物理得分中，它在电池运行时只达到9142分，而不是24020分（减去62%）。

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

01503004506007509001050120013501500165018001950210022502400255027002850Tooltip
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2490 (2422.04-2631.06)
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti Intel Core i7-12800H: Ø2150 (2140.41-2221.61)
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2829 (2783-2902.76)
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2722 (2660.99-2908.88)
CPU Performance Rating | Cinebench R23 | Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
80 pt
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
78.3 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
77.8 pt
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
70.5 pt
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H
69.2 pt
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
 
68 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 34613, n=229, last 2 years)
19422 Points +15%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
19250 Points +14%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
18288 Points +8%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
16887 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (4032 - 19330, n=63)
15636 Points -7%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H
15283 (13561.5min - 15283.1max) Points -9%
Single Core
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1909 Points +10%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H
1839 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
1819 Points +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 2235, n=227, last 2 years)
1809 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (778 - 1826, n=62)
1758 Points +1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
1743 Points
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=227, last 2 years)
7383 Points +16%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
7382 Points +16%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
6849 Points +8%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
6352 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1576 - 7407, n=63)
5933 Points -7%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H
5928 Points -7%
CPU (Single Core)
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
734 Points +15%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H
708 Points +11%
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=227, last 2 years)
697 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
696 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (300 - 704, n=63)
679 Points +6%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
640 Points
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=231, last 2 years)
3074 Points +17%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
2909 (2660.99min - 2908.88max) Points +11%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
2903 (2783min - 2902.76max) Points +10%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
2631 (2422.04min - 2631.06max) Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1379 - 2916, n=69)
2517 Points -4%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H
2222 (2140.41min - 2221.61max) Points -16%
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
275 Points +19%
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=230, last 2 years)
268 Points +16%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H
265 Points +15%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
263 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (113 - 263, n=64)
253 Points +10%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
231 Points
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (168 - 732, n=62)
225 Seconds * -14%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H
222 Seconds * -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 1259, n=225, last 2 years)
201 Seconds * -2%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
197.6 Seconds *
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
181 Seconds * +8%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
171 Seconds * +13%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 140932, n=226, last 2 years)
76641 MIPS +18%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
72836 MIPS +12%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
70903 MIPS +9%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
64864 MIPS
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H
62100 MIPS -4%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (22844 - 73067, n=62)
60292 MIPS -7%
7z b 4 -mmt1
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
6144 MIPS +20%
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7581, n=226, last 2 years)
6113 MIPS +19%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
5835 MIPS +14%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H
5820 MIPS +13%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (2743 - 5972, n=62)
5648 MIPS +10%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
5138 MIPS
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
13648 Points +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 22200, n=231, last 2 years)
13504 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
12981 Points +4%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H
12797 Points +3%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
12463 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (5144 - 13745, n=63)
11729 Points -6%
Single-Core
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1918 Points +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2193, n=231, last 2 years)
1805 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
1746 Points 0%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
1746 Points
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H
1739 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (803 - 1851, n=63)
1732 Points -1%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
21.4 fps +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 37.6, n=229, last 2 years)
21.1 fps +14%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
19.9 fps +8%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
18.5 fps
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H
16.8 fps -9%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (4.67 - 21.8, n=63)
16.7 fps -10%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=223, last 2 years)
49.3 s * -18%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H
46.4 s * -11%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (34.2 - 95.3, n=62)
45.7 s * -10%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
42.1 s * -1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
41.7 s *
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
38.9 s * +7%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (0.4441 - 1.052, n=62)
0.4723 sec * -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 4.47, n=226, last 2 years)
0.4706 sec * -1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4671 sec *
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H
0.4583 sec * +2%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4495 sec * +4%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
0.4252 sec * +9%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2631 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
169.2 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
231 Points
Help
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming
 
98.9 pt
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
73.8 pt
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
73.5 pt
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
73.2 pt
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
 
71.2 pt
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62.6 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (3069 - 60169, n=222, last 2 years)
18514 KRay/s +99%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (2585 - 17957, n=62)
10834 KRay/s +16%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9576 KRay/s +3%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9316 KRay/s
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9065 KRay/s -3%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
7455 KRay/s -20%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Gaming
  (18567 - 252486, n=222, last 2 years)
93043 Points +123%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (12439 - 90760, n=62)
52825 Points +27%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
41712 Points 0%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
41656 Points
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40570 Points -3%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
36201 Points -13%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 10389, n=222, last 2 years)
4297 MB/s +27%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3442 MB/s +2%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3378 MB/s
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3178 MB/s -6%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (833 - 4242, n=62)
3077 MB/s -9%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2674 MB/s -21%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 200651, n=222, last 2 years)
108858 Points +10%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
106414 Points +8%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
101957 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99671 Points +1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
98781 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (57923 - 103202, n=62)
97916 Points -1%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 32988, n=222, last 2 years)
12143 Points +22%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
10237 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9928 Points 0%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9927 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (3249 - 9939, n=62)
9055 Points -9%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9036 Points -9%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average of class Gaming
  (10291 - 134044, n=222, last 2 years)
47650 Points +87%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (7135 - 44760, n=62)
27939 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
27081 Points +6%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
25547 Points
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
24693 Points -3%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
21409 Points -16%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=222, last 2 years)
106724 MB/s +5%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
102398 MB/s 0%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
102111 MB/s
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
100062 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (31839 - 144360, n=62)
85388 MB/s -16%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
55371 MB/s -46%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 2409, n=222, last 2 years)
1202 MB/s +5%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
1158 MB/s +1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1143 MB/s
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1085 MB/s -5%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (305 - 1171, n=62)
970 MB/s -15%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
922 MB/s -19%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (1518 - 31796, n=222, last 2 years)
10025 KRay/s +88%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1437 - 9692, n=62)
5986 KRay/s +12%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
5742 KRay/s +8%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
5322 KRay/s
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
5239 KRay/s -2%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
4287 KRay/s -19%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40894 MPixel/s +13%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40000 MPixel/s +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=223, last 2 years)
36547 MPixel/s +1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
36231 MPixel/s
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
33458 MPixel/s -8%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (12863 - 52207, n=62)
33149 MPixel/s -9%

系统性能

即使宏碁Predator Triton 500 SE在PCMark 10中仍然落后于竞争对手，但距离很小。该系统在日常操作中运行绝对平稳。

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score
MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8007 Points +6%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7744 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=197, last 2 years)
7573 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7555 Points 0%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
7539 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (6868 - 7638, n=7)
7382 Points -2%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10814 Points +1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
10715 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (8300 - 12334, n=196, last 2 years)
10708 Points 0%
MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10688 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9987 - 11318, n=7)
10543 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10004 Points -7%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10100 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9875 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (7244 - 11833, n=196, last 2 years)
9727 Points +1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
9613 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (8944 - 10726, n=7)
9480 Points -1%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9470 Points -1%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
12905 Points +14%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
12306 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11849 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (6462 - 18475, n=196, last 2 years)
11407 Points +1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
11293 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (8956 - 12249, n=7)
10984 Points -3%
CrossMark / Overall
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1955 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2334, n=167, last 2 years)
1876 Points +1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1861 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1761 - 1861, n=4)
1823 Points -2%
CrossMark / Productivity
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1869 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=167, last 2 years)
1787 Points 0%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1786 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1645 - 1800, n=4)
1732 Points -3%
CrossMark / Creativity
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2050 Points +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2514, n=167, last 2 years)
2040 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1936 - 2041, n=4)
1984 Points +2%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1936 Points
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1940 Points +4%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1868 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=167, last 2 years)
1700 Points -9%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1461 - 1868, n=4)
1658 Points -11%
PCMark 10 Score
7539 points
Help
AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62554 MB/s +4%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62324 MB/s +3%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
60342 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 92565, n=222, last 2 years)
59056 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (25615 - 80511, n=62)
53891 MB/s -11%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
51726 MB/s -14%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
67695 MB/s
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
66199 MB/s -2%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65452 MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (24879 - 90647, n=222, last 2 years)
62916 MB/s -7%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
59324 MB/s -12%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (25586 - 79442, n=62)
57340 MB/s -15%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65991 MB/s +28%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
64282 MB/s +25%
Average of class Gaming
  (21619 - 103259, n=222, last 2 years)
61374 MB/s +19%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
58630 MB/s +14%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (23679 - 88660, n=62)
54793 MB/s +6%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
51577 MB/s
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
120.6 ns *
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
96.9 ns * +20%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
92.6 ns * +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 152.5, n=219, last 2 years)
87.2 ns * +28%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (76.2 - 133.9, n=60)
77.8 ns * +35%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
0 ns * +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

宏碁掠夺者Triton 500 SE在DPC延迟方面存在问题，这可能导致在实时视频或音频处理过程中出现一些掉帧。

但至少在YouTube的测试中没有出现掉帧。

延迟监测
延迟监测
LatencyMon 驱动程序
LatencyMon 驱动程序
YouTube测试
YouTube测试
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2127.9 μs *
MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1642 μs * +23%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1000 μs * +53%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
748 μs * +65%

* ... smaller is better

存储解决方案

美光公司的NVMe固态硬盘使用最新的PCIe 4.0标准连接。它提供的容量为1TB，比竞争对手的三星固态硬盘略慢。然而，差异并不大，即使在持续的负载下，该固态硬盘也总是能提供其最大的性能。

AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
Sequential Read: 4531.51MB/s
Sequential Write: 4186.78MB/s
4K Read: 64.38MB/s
4K Write: 212.27MB/s
4K-64 Read: 2191.95MB/s
4K-64 Write: 2298.82MB/s
Access Time Write: 0.022ms
Copy ISO: 2026.49MB/s
Copy Program: 425.19MB/s
Copy Game: 1091.74MB/s
Score Read: 2709Points
Score Write: 2930Points
Score Total: 7009Points
Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
95.4 pt
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
87 pt
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
84.8 pt
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX -1!
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
81 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
71.7 pt
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
 
69.3 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4486 (4475.68min - 4485.6max) MB/s +25%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4164 (4124.89min - 4163.69max) MB/s +16%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
3595 (3264.19min - 3594.73max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (1291 - 7045, n=196, last 2 years)
3528 MB/s -2%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
  (1306 - 4343, n=23)
3283 MB/s -9%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2529 (2450.31min - 2528.54max) MB/s -30%
seq write
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4599 (4248.83min - 4598.67max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4368 (4353.59min - 4368.3max) MB/s -5%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4005 (3962.61min - 4004.93max) MB/s -13%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3923 (3818.83min - 3922.64max) MB/s -15%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
  (2416 - 4954, n=23)
3856 MB/s -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=196, last 2 years)
3808 MB/s -17%
seq q8 t1 read
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6722 (5765.49min - 6722max) MB/s +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6637 (6082.37min - 6637.28max) MB/s +2%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6629 (6031.72min - 6628.63max) MB/s +2%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
  (6207 - 6734, n=23)
6571 MB/s +1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
6499 (5666.71min - 6499.29max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (1983 - 16089, n=196, last 2 years)
6357 MB/s -2%
seq q8 t1 write
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4999 (4978.75min - 4998.98max) MB/s +5%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4949 (4931.87min - 4948.65max) MB/s +4%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4940 (4909.85min - 4939.63max) MB/s +4%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
  (4259 - 4991, n=23)
4807 MB/s +1%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=196, last 2 years)
4779 MB/s 0%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4765 (4460.74min - 4765.06max) MB/s
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
97.4 (97.34min - 97.43max) MB/s +39%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
89.8 (89.42min - 89.75max) MB/s +28%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
87.8 (86.95min - 87.8max) MB/s +25%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
70.3 (69.8min - 70.31max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=196, last 2 years)
67.6 MB/s -4%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
  (39.2 - 74.3, n=23)
59.4 MB/s -16%
4k q1 t1 write
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
275 (273.95min - 275.11max) MB/s +24%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
274 (272.01min - 273.96max) MB/s +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 421, n=196, last 2 years)
224 MB/s +1%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
222 (221.74min - 222.26max) MB/s 0%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
222 (217.59min - 222.42max) MB/s
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
  (125.8 - 273, n=23)
189.4 MB/s -15%
4k q32 t16 read
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4158 (4151.05min - 4157.8max) MB/s +51%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4073 (4064.94min - 4073.47max) MB/s +48%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3909 (3749.5min - 3908.66max) MB/s +42%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2750 (2675.05min - 2750.14max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (313 - 6172, n=196, last 2 years)
2576 MB/s -6%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
  (636 - 2868, n=23)
2075 MB/s -25%
4k q32 t16 write
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3544 (3518.93min - 3543.6max) MB/s +27%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2904 (2278.99min - 2904.09max) MB/s +4%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2786 (2543.84min - 2785.68max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=196, last 2 years)
2147 MB/s -23%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
  (328 - 2786, n=23)
1765 MB/s -37%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1066 (1060.72min - 1066.17max) MB/s -62%
AS SSD
Score Total
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9094 Points +30%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8982 Points +28%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8764 Points +25%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
7009 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1923 - 13854, n=184, last 2 years)
6784 Points -3%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
  (3998 - 7575, n=21)
6303 Points -10%
Score Read
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
  (1123 - 26650, n=21)
3402 Points +26%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3380 Points +25%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3344 Points +23%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3198 Points +18%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2709 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (528 - 4721, n=184, last 2 years)
2489 Points -8%
Score Write
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4043 Points +38%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3998 Points +36%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3997 Points +36%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=184, last 2 years)
3089 Points +5%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
  (2373 - 3304, n=21)
2942 Points 0%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2930 Points
Seq Read
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5329 MB/s +18%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5120 MB/s +13%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5036 MB/s +11%
Average of class Gaming
  (1759 - 12763, n=184, last 2 years)
4937 MB/s +9%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4531.51 MB/s
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
  (2201 - 5348, n=21)
4468 MB/s -1%
Seq Write
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4186.78 MB/s
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3922 MB/s -6%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3784 MB/s -10%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3692 MB/s -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=184, last 2 years)
3647 MB/s -13%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
  (1876 - 4539, n=21)
3311 MB/s -21%
4K Read
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
88.1 MB/s +37%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
82.8 MB/s +29%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
79.3 MB/s +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.4 - 112.1, n=184, last 2 years)
66.7 MB/s +4%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
64.38 MB/s
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
  (40.6 - 67.7, n=21)
58.6 MB/s -9%
4K Write
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
241.3 MB/s +14%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
240.4 MB/s +13%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
212.27 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (96.3 - 512, n=184, last 2 years)
210 MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
190.5 MB/s -10%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
  (97.9 - 242, n=21)
177.9 MB/s -16%
4K-64 Read
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2788 MB/s +27%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2749 MB/s +25%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2586 MB/s +18%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2191.95 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (312 - 3475, n=184, last 2 years)
1923 MB/s -12%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
  (603 - 2264, n=21)
1754 MB/s -20%
4K-64 Write
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3424 MB/s +49%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3415 MB/s +49%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3387 MB/s +47%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=184, last 2 years)
2517 MB/s +9%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
  (1959 - 2807, n=21)
2433 MB/s +6%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2298.82 MB/s
Access Time Read
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=182, last 2 years)
0.05422 ms *
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
  (0.023 - 0.089, n=20)
0.04675 ms *
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.031 ms *
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.029 ms *
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.02 ms *
Access Time Write
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.066 ms * -200%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=184, last 2 years)
0.04705 ms * -114%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
  (0.019 - 0.092, n=21)
0.0369 ms * -68%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
0.022 ms *
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.018 ms * +18%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.018 ms * +18%

* ... smaller is better

Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

03306609901320165019802310264029703300363039604290462049505280561059406270Tooltip
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX: Ø6407 (5705.51-6545.21)

图形卡

GPU-Z NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 Ti
GPU-Z NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 Ti

的NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 Ti是Nvidia最强大的移动GPU之一。7,424个着色器单元应提供高达165瓦的消耗，使GPU的时钟速度达到1.59GHz。你可以了解与其他图形芯片的其他比较，在我们的 GPU列表.

不幸的是，在宏碁掠夺者Triton 500SE中，图形芯片并不能发挥其全部潜力。我们看到的不是完整的165瓦，而是115瓦的消耗。有了这个，宏碁笔记本电脑的表现比拥有相同GPU的竞争对手更差，而 Razer Blade 17和 MSI GE76 Raider分别快了14%和24%。笔记本电脑的 联想Legion 5 Pro与其名义上更差的 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti也平均快了约8%。

与CPU一样，在没有连接电源的情况下，GPU也明显被扼杀。在3DMark 11 GPU得分中，结果大约差81%，只有6,900分，而不是37,288分--在电池运行中，性能大幅下降。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
MSI GE76 Raider
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
100 pt
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
92.2 pt
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti -2!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
87 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
 
84.7 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
83.9 pt
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
80.8 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GE76 Raider
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
45050 Points +21%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
42432 Points +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=229, last 2 years)
40173 Points +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (13920 - 45841, n=45)
39402 Points +6%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
37288 Points
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI GE76 Raider
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
192520 Points +33%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
157324 Points +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (73574 - 192520, n=26)
145836 Points +1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
144426 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=142, last 2 years)
135868 Points -6%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GE76 Raider
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
34041 Points +22%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
32106 Points +15%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
29630 Points +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (6928 - 34439, n=43)
29496 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=233, last 2 years)
29268 Points +5%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
28006 Points
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI GE76 Raider
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
13324 Points +20%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
13135 Points +19%
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22547, n=231, last 2 years)
11960 Points +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (4921 - 13835, n=43)
11850 Points +7%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
11577 Points +5%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
11076 Points
3DMark 11 Performance
32346 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
61970 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
25051 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
11428 points
Help

游戏性能

在3DMark测试中已经暗示的内容在游戏基准测试中得到确认。宏碁Predator Triton 500 SE无法完全跟上竞争对手的步伐。特别是 MSI GE76 Raider在所有领域都领先。

然而，这当然不意味着宏碁的笔记本电脑会是一台糟糕的游戏笔记本电脑。它仍然足够强大，甚至可以在最高细节水平的QHD分辨率下进行非常苛刻的游戏而没有任何问题。使用外部显示器的4K游戏也不应该构成任何重大问题。

The Witcher 3 | F1 2021 | GTA V
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK
126 (108min) fps +23%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H
124.6 (114min) fps +22%
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=224, last 2 years)
116.1 fps +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30 - 130.6, n=43)
112.1 fps +10%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
103 (89min, 97P1) fps +1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
102.1 (82min) fps
F1 2021 - 2560x1440 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK
117 (100min) fps +28%
Average of class Gaming
  (47.5 - 204, n=39, last 2 years)
102.4 fps +12%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
99.2 (85min, 77P1) fps +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30 - 120.1, n=19)
94.1 fps +3%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
91.7 (78min, 62P1) fps
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK
125 (10.6min, 83.3P1) fps +11%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
117 (5.59min, 55.6P1) fps +4%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H
113 (5.67min, 71.4P1) fps 0%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
113 (10.1min, 71.4P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30 - 139.2, n=42)
111 fps -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.38 - 167.7, n=215, last 2 years)
106.7 fps -6%

在我们的TheWitcher 3恒定负载测试中，我们没有看到任何性能下降，因此在日常游戏操作中应该不会出现节流现象。

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø104.8 (88-110)
low med. high ultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 185.7 182.8 176.1 113 91
The Witcher 3 (2015) 398 291 186.6 102.1
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 171.7 157.8 151.4 144
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 193.3 134.7 103.9 80.9
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 142.5 130.8 103.1
Strange Brigade (2018) 442 234 189.4 171.2 127.8
F1 2021 (2021) 384 287 246 121.9 91.7

排放物。宏碁笔记本电脑的风扇声音非常大

噪声排放

宏碁掠夺者Triton 500 SE对于耳朵敏感的人来说显然不是一个好选择。虽然它在空闲运行时基本保持安静，但情况并非总是如此，特别是在更激进的性能模式下，风扇会迅速打开，甚至在低活动时也是如此。

而当风扇运行时，它很快就会变得很吵。在我们的测试领域中，宏碁笔记本电脑产生的噪音水平最高，达到56 dB(a)，尽管竞争对手也不怎么安静。唯一的例外是Razer Blade 17 ，它至少在平均负荷下只有适度的噪音。

Noise Level

Idle
26 / 29 / 34 dB(A)
Load
50 / 56 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 26 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2044.944.546.638.138.844.1254442.837.336.63740.13152.947.847.748.74152.74036.735.834.132.131.237.45042.441.640.940.326.536.36337.73030.626.527.234.58040.424.526.823.921.842.61002619.121.620.318.230.112529.520.921.618.720.331.516029.321.423.121.418.431.320029.424.325.224.221.732.225032.225.926.924.124.133.131531.122.524.221.820.634.740032.718.927.715.414.436.650034.520.224.117.816.53863035.21923.616.215.738.680039.318.12614.613.842.7100040.117.325.213.513.444.5125040.216.323.712.412.744.3160038.315.721.411.71343.2200037.814.720.912.413.343.1250037.713.818.813.213.442.6315038.413.919.11313.543.8400040.114.218.913.213.345.4500039.414.517.514.413.645.6630038.416.517.915.413.846.4800034.116.5181413.442.11000031.114.315.413.212.839.31250026.313.614.412.713.135.11600021.41313.513.713.330SPL50.228.9342726.555.6N7.41.220.90.810.6median 34.5median 16.5median 21.6median 14.4median 13.6median 39.3Delta4.52.83.22.81.85.8hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAcer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH		Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR		Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR		MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Noise
15%
3%
-1%
off / environment *
26
23.3
10%
24.6
5%
26
-0%
Idle Minimum *
26
23.3
10%
28.4
-9%
26
-0%
Idle Average *
29
23.3
20%
28.4
2%
27
7%
Idle Maximum *
34
26.3
23%
28.4
16%
40
-18%
Load Average *
50
38.2
24%
49.4
1%
50
-0%
Witcher 3 ultra *
53
50.9
4%
49.4
7%
53
-0%
Load Maximum *
56
49.1
12%
54.7
2%
53
5%

* ... smaller is better

温度

在空闲运行时，机箱温度已经比其他笔记本电脑略高。在负载情况下，宏碁Predator Triton 500 SE也明显发热。尽管底部的最高温度为49 ºC (120 ºF)，仍然低于50 ºC (122 ºF)的临界值，但掌托的温度明显升高。这也适用于我们的TheWitcher 3测试，所以当用宏碁笔记本电脑玩游戏时，你也必须期待一些手汗。

在TheWitcher 3 的负载情况下，我们测量到完全没有节流，这主要是由于负载主要放在GPU上，而不是CPU上的事实。在压力测试中，情况有所不同，图形芯片和处理器都必须放弃一些性能。一小时后，处理器仍然得到88瓦特，而GPU大约为60瓦特。

ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
压力测试(Prime95 + FurMark)
压力测试(Prime95 + FurMark)
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
Max. Load
 42 °C47 °C44 °C 
 43 °C46 °C43 °C 
 39 °C39 °C38 °C 
Maximum: 47 °C
Average: 42.3 °C
49 °C49 °C40 °C
46 °C46 °C39 °C
41 °C41 °C38 °C
Maximum: 49 °C
Average: 43.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  55 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41 °C / 105.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-12.1 °C / -21.8 F).
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU		MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Heat
-8%
-3%
-2%
Maximum Upper Side *
47
46
2%
45.3
4%
43
9%
Maximum Bottom *
49
46.8
4%
61.2
-25%
47
4%
Idle Upper Side *
31
36.2
-17%
28.6
8%
33
-6%
Idle Bottom *
32
38.6
-21%
31.4
2%
37
-16%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

键盘上方的扬声器是体面的，但不是很好。它们指向用户，提供平衡的声音，略微缺乏音量，但特别缺乏低音。在 Razer Blade 17显示了这一点可以做得更好。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.839253739.4314147.44031.232.75026.541.66327.232.38021.824.310018.221.112520.327.916018.43720021.744.225024.152.731520.654.440014.456.350016.559.663015.76280013.862.5100013.466.9125012.76716001370.2200013.370.8250013.470.9315013.565.6400013.366.9500013.663.2630013.862.1800013.463.51000012.868.51250013.162.31600013.357.9SPL26.579.2N0.843.2median 13.6median 62.3Delta1.88.937.937.337.929.732.329.725.828.325.823.731.223.724.22424.227.823.127.840.822.940.853.619.253.658.11958.161.615.861.664.114.164.167.112.467.169.514.869.569.812.769.866.711.766.771.411.671.471.79.871.771.29.971.268.29.768.265.49.865.470.410.970.471.110.471.169.211.169.268.911.568.968.911.668.967.91267.97011.9706911.86965.511.665.560.810.760.881.523.381.5570.557median 68.9median 11.6median 68.92.91.32.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAcer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KXRazer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 0.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理。宏碁掠夺者的电池寿命很一般

消耗功率

怠速运行时的最小功耗比竞争对手的要好。然而，在中度空闲消耗期间，对竞争对手的优势消失了。但至少，它可以击败 Razer Blade 17在所有情况下。

绝对峰值消耗为227瓦，这几乎正好是电源的极限，它可以提供最大230瓦的功率。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 7 / 19 / 28 Watt
Load midlight 114 / 227 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, IPS LED, 2560x1600, 16.00		Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30		Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00		MSI GE76 Raider
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 17.30		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-105%
-9%
-24%
-20%
Idle Minimum *
7
29.8
-326%
8.6
-23%
12
-71%
13.7 ?(2 - 64, n=177, last 2 years)
-96%
Idle Average *
19
37.1
-95%
17.6
7%
17
11%
19.1 ?(8 - 67, n=177, last 2 years)
-1%
Idle Maximum *
28
60.8
-117%
18.5
34%
28
-0%
26.8 ?(9 - 101.1, n=177, last 2 years)
4%
Load Average *
114
135.3
-19%
110
4%
118
-4%
110.9 ?(32.1 - 202, n=177, last 2 years)
3%
Witcher 3 ultra *
159
243
-53%
227
-43%
252
-58%
Load Maximum *
227
273.1
-20%
294.6
-30%
272
-20%
250 ?(64.5 - 418, n=176, last 2 years)
-10%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø159 (145.6-177.5)
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø186 (145.8-211)

Power Consumption With External Monitor

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180Tooltip
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø136.4 (121.3-155.9)
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø177.7 (175.5-180.1)
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø150.1 (146.4-155.1)
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø148 (144.2-154.9)

电池寿命

直到完全充电的时间：151分钟
直到完全充电的时间：151分钟

尽管电池容量为99.98Wh，根据飞行旅行的一些规定，这是笔记本电脑允许的最大容量，但在我们的Wi-Fi测试中，宏碁Predator Triton 500 SE在150cd/m²亮度下的电池寿命只达到了约5小时45分钟。在最大显示亮度下，运行时间减少了约1小时。

这意味着宏碁笔记本电脑是一个不适合长时间移动使用的设备，但这也是一般游戏笔记本电脑的情况，直接竞争对手在这方面也没有做得更好。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 101)
5h 44min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 101)
4h 35min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 10min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 13min
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.98 Wh		Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 82 Wh		Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 80 Wh		MSI GE76 Raider
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.99 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-27%
-33%
-11%
-16%
H.264
490
377
-23%
399 ?(56 - 747, n=91, last 2 years)
-19%
WiFi v1.3
344
330
-4%
326
-5%
306
-11%
368 ?(57 - 745, n=181, last 2 years)
7%
Load
133
68
-49%
37
-72%
84.2 ?(36 - 173, n=143, last 2 years)
-37%

Pros

+ 高性能的能力
+ 卓越的、明亮的240-Hz显示屏
+ 坚固且相对轻薄的铝制外壳
+ 良好的触摸板
+ 广泛的连接设备
+ 快速WiFi和2.5G比特以太网

Cons

- 已售出的RAM
- 无法访问的SSD
- 风扇噪音和温暖的掌托
- 键盘布局
- 电池模式下强烈的节流现象
- DPC延迟问题

结论。宏碁掠夺者Triton 500 SE以高价提供优质性能

宏碁掠夺者Triton 500 SE，测试单位由NBB.com（notebooksbilliger.de）提供。
宏碁掠夺者Triton 500 SE，测试单位由NBB.com（notebooksbilliger.de）提供。

有吸引力的设计和强大的性能--这些都是宏碁在Predator Triton 500 SE中旨在结合的方面。经过我们的测试，我们可以说这项任务在很大程度上已经成功了。

简单和相对纤细的设计使Predator Triton比许多其他游戏代表更适合于日常工作。连接设备非常好，就像显示器一样，它的高色彩空间覆盖率和高刷新率尤其令人印象深刻。此外，2560 x 1600也是一个16英寸笔记本电脑的理想分辨率。在性能方面，宏碁笔记本电脑在最高细节设置和高分辨率下也能流畅地显示游戏。

然而，与竞争对手相比，在游戏性能方面也有一些劣势。主观上，宏碁错误地强调了CPU的性能，而对GPU的限制更为明显。同时，Predator Triton 500 SE也变得相当热，而且非常吵。除了这个弱点之外，我们还看到内部结构非常关键。内存是焊接在一起的，固态硬盘也是无法触及的。这导致在可维护性方面存在一些明显的缺陷，而键盘的布局也得到了较低的评价。电池寿命也不是很好，但这在游戏领域是比较正常的。但是，电池运行期间的性能也低得多，这绝对值得批评。

不能维持，但由于性能非常好，仍然值得推荐。Acer Predator Triton 500 SE

总的来说，缺乏可维护性是我们最大的抱怨点。但如果你不需要改变任何东西，宏碁掠夺者Triton 500 SE作为一款相对纤薄的游戏笔记本电脑，值得我们推荐。然而，我们绝对不应该无视其高昂的价格，当稍厚的外壳也可以接受时，你可以用更少的钱获得相当的性能--例如，联想Legion 5 Pro 。另一方面，你需要为Razer Blade 17 ，所以Predator Triton 500 SE作为它的替代品，值得考虑。

价格和可用性

宏碁掠夺者Triton 500 SE可从亚马逊起价1425美元，而高端型号的价格为3000美元(关联链接)。

Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX - 06/10/2022 v7
Benjamin Herzig

Chassis
84 / 98 → 85%
Keyboard
83%
Pointing Device
86%
Connectivity
68 / 80 → 84%
Weight
61 / 10-66 → 91%
Battery
71 / 95 → 75%
Display
92%
Games Performance
97%
Application Performance
96%
Temperature
81 / 95 → 85%
Noise
67 / 90 → 74%
Audio
76%
Camera
37 / 85 → 44%
Average
77%
87%
Gaming - Weighted Average

More articles related to this device

Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX (Predator Triton 500 SE PT516 Series)

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 宏碁掠夺者Triton 500 SE回顾。配备RTX 3080 Ti和Alder Lake的超薄游戏笔记本
Benjamin Herzig, 2022-06-12 (Update: 2022-06-12)