宏碁的安静的Nitro 17笔记本电脑被审查：RTX 4060，完美配置

Name: Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER
Brand: Acer

安静的时候。 这款游戏笔记本的i7-13700H和RTX 4060完全适合现代游戏。而且，除此之外，Nitro 17几乎没有任何弱点。到目前为止，是可以预测的。巧妙的电源管理实现了所有的差异，并确保宏碁的笔记本电脑尽管功率大，但很安静。

Mario Petzold, 👁 Christian Hintze (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 07/02/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Raptor Lake Windows

宏碁Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER是一款坚实的中档游戏笔记本电脑。采用英特尔酷睿i7而不是i9，RGB键盘上只有四个区域和大量的塑料，妥协是必要的，但它们有助于将建议零售价保持在2000美元以下。

作为回报，宏碁宣传这款笔记本电脑具有稳定的帧率，这种帧率可以从配置良好的NvidiaGeForce RTX 4000系列设备中期待。几乎更关键的是据称是完美的冷却。四个通风口、液态金属冷却和易于使用的控制软件为此提供了坚实的基础。

幸运的是，在其直接前辈中发现的一些恼人的弱点，即Acer Nitro 5 AN517现在已经看不到了。它们不会被错过。

我们的审查揭示了Nitro 17是如何在竞争对手中脱颖而出的，如Medion Erazer Defender P40或联想Legion Pro 5.这两款笔记本电脑的规格与我们的评测设备相似，都配备了RTX 4060最大TGP为140瓦。同样，冷却将不得不在测试中证明自己。

Test device courtesy of Acer Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER (Nitro 17 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-13700H 14 x 1.8 - 5 GHz, 115 W PL2 / Short Burst, 80 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-H

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 2250 MHz, Memory: 2000 MHz, 140 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, Game Ready 536.23, Advanced Optimus, MUX Switch

Memory

16 GB

, DDR5-4800, Dual-Cannel, Samsung

Display

17.30 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 170 PPI, BOE0B7C NE173QHM-NY6, glossy: no, 165 Hz

Mainboard

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH

Storage

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, 1024 GB

Soundcard

Intel Raptor Lake-P/U/H PCH - cAVS

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Headset, Card Reader: microSD

Networking

Killer E2600 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 30.3 x 401 x 299

Battery

90 Wh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 1 MPix HD camera

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard Light: yes, NitroSense, Acer Care Center, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

3.03 kg, Power Supply: 1.24 kg

Price

1900 Euro

Links

Acer homepage
Acer notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
87.2 %	07/2023	Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	3 kg	30.3 mm	17.30"	2560x1440
87.9 %	05/2023	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	2.5 kg	26.8 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
86.9 %	06/2023	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	2.2 kg	22.1 mm	16.00"	1920x1200
85.9 %	06/2023	SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.9 kg	29.3 mm	17.30"	2560x1440
84.6 %	05/2023	Medion Erazer Defender P40 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	2.9 kg	33 mm	17.30"	2560x1440
83.9 %	11/2022	Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2.5 kg	26.8 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
83.2 %	01/2023	MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	2.6 kg	24.2 mm	17.30"	1920x1080

箱子 - 一个超大的17英寸笔记本电脑

盖子上和显示屏下方的彩虹色 "N "都泄露了宏碁Nitro 17的游戏资质。此外，还有一些小的颜色点缀，但仅此而已。在光滑的塑料外壳上寻找LED照明效果或丰富多彩的突出元素，结果是徒劳的。

缺乏金属部件并不影响该设备的坚固性。外壳不弯曲，只能被最小限度地扭曲，同样，也不能从它那里哄骗出噪音。此外，显示屏框架也只能轻微弯曲。屏幕在被抬起或移动时保持稳定，可以打开超过150°的角度。一切看起来都很整齐。

同时，宏碁的笔记本电脑很重，而且真的很大。即使在17英寸的机器中，也很难找到其他更厚的型号。与它已经很大的前辈相比， Acer Nitro 517，已经增加了几毫米。正如在上一代机型中所看到的那样，大型冷却装置让人感觉到它的存在。笔记本电脑也继续增加了重量。出门在外，几乎有4.3公斤的重量，因为PSU也非常重，有1.2公斤。

尺寸比较

Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Medion Erazer Defender P40 SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS DIN A4 ❌

特点 - 对Nitro 17没有抱怨

虽然对其前任的批评是有道理的，因为它没有读卡器或第二个USB-C端口，但宏碁Nitro 17做得很好。所有的视频输出，包括Thunderbolt 4、支持DisplayPort的USB-C和HDMI，都可以在设备的后面找到。在笔记本电脑的左侧和右侧，我们有USB-A端口。右边的两个端口甚至允许10 Gbit/s，除其他外，这足以满足快速U盘和许多便携式SSD的需求。

令人费解的是，为什么读卡器只是一个microSD的变体，因为有足够的空间容纳一个更大的读卡器。局域网端口也希望能管理2.5Gbit/s，而不是只有1Gbit/s。就质量和价格而言，宏碁Nitro 17的端口选择绝对是好的。无论应用场景如何，其数量和性能都应符合任务要求。

左侧端口：1 Gbit LAN, USB-A (5 Gbit/s), microSD插槽, 耳机

右边的端口：2 x USB-A (10 Gbit/s), Kensington锁

SD卡阅读器

我们用AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60参考卡获得了明显低于平均水平的测量结果。内置的microSD读卡器比游戏笔记本的平均速度慢了三分之一。

对于一个32GB的卡来说，这意味着在读取数据时有超过2分钟的额外等待时间。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=99, last 2 years)	98.6 MB/s +38%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	86 MB/s +21%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	83.5 (74.23^min - 83.48^max) MB/s +17%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H	71.2 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=93, last 2 years)	122.2 MB/s +51%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	91 MB/s +12%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	90.7 MB/s +12%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H	81.1 MB/s

沟通

WLAN模块，我们确定了预期的结果，是没有批评的。然而，Wi-Fi 6E并不在船上，这意味着多个重叠的网络将导致带宽的大幅减少。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)	1639 (1566^min - 1713^max) MBit/s
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1445 (1373^min - 1515^max) MBit/s -12%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 Qualcomm WCN685x	1398 (1197^min - 1589^max) MBit/s -15%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW) (947 - 1639, n=3)	1359 MBit/s -17%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1308 (1166^min - 1399^max) MBit/s -20%
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1793, n=153, last 2 years)	1263 MBit/s -23%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	930 (678^min - 980^max) MBit/s -43%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	802 (579^min - 1120^max) MBit/s -51%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Realtek RTL8852BE	776 (392^min - 802^max) MBit/s -53%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1734 (1706^min - 1750^max) MBit/s +23%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 Qualcomm WCN685x	1665 (1427^min - 1712^max) MBit/s +18%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)	1408 (1385^min - 1443^max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming (685 - 1890, n=159, last 2 years)	1397 MBit/s -1%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW) (917 - 1717, n=3)	1347 MBit/s -4%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1267 (1119^min - 1343^max) MBit/s -10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1223 (1136^min - 1272^max) MBit/s -13%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	941 (935^min - 947^max) MBit/s -33%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Realtek RTL8852BE	905 (765^min - 969^max) MBit/s -36%

Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW); iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1639 (1566-1713)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø802 (579-1120)

Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1445 (1373-1515)

Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 Qualcomm WCN685x; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1398 (1197-1589)

Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW); iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1408 (1385-1443)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1223 (1136-1272)

Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1733 (1706-1750)

Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 Qualcomm WCN685x; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1665 (1427-1712)

网络摄像头

基本的高清摄像头足以应付要求不高的视频通话，尽管低分辨率对接收者来说是很明显的。我们测量到的强烈的颜色偏差是由于相机良好的增亮功能造成的。但是，这绝不是真正的理想，我们仍然建议抓紧时间购买一个外部摄像头。

同样地，麦克风也令人满意地完成了它的工作。声音被记录在一个稳定的音量上，无论是从不同的距离还是从多个说话的方向都可以很容易地听到。然而，当调整音量时，很难忽视尖锐的低音和轻微的失真。

ColorChecker Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER: 22.61 ∆E min: 0.59 - max: 34.6 ∆E

维护

必须卸下11个容易接触到的十字头螺钉，这样就可以在几乎没有阻力的情况下将底板撬开。开始的最佳位置似乎是后部连接控制台，因为有很少的塑料夹子可以额外固定底座。没有必要使用额外的工具。

内部空间相当宽敞，考虑到所提供的空间，这并不令人惊讶。有一个插槽可以容纳一个额外的M.2 NVMe固态硬盘。WLAN、第一块固态硬盘和内存和电池一样容易访问，也可以相对轻松地进行更换。

与前代产品相比，值得注意的是固态硬盘插槽上缺乏额外的散热片。除此之外，在我们的评测设备中，内存的冷却垫被粘在了大容量存储连接器上。这影响了我们的压力测试，下面可以看到。相比之下，游戏基准基本上没有受到影响。

输入设备--为游戏笔记本而生

典型的扁平格式的橡胶圆顶键盘给你留下了与这种输入设备相关的非常积极的印象。1.4毫米的键程（我们的测量值）确保了愉快的打字体验，但阻力可以再大一点。由于键盘框架只有在施加强大的打字压力时才会有最小的弯曲，所以持续的打字过程不是一个问题。

键盘的白色侧面在视觉上非常醒目，其高对比度确实使它们脱颖而出。此外，"WASD "键、方向键和NitroSense软件的特殊键都有额外的亮点。键的照明是均匀的，但定制的选项仅限于四个区域和一些效果。广泛的颜色范围使这些看起来相当不错。

相反，触摸板是一个令人失望的东西。在近8 x 12厘米的范围内，它的比例很好，但它的准确性以及底部区域隐藏的按键的压力点都不太令人满意。此外，我们注意到在放置和抬起手指时有轻微的咔哒声。因此，我们绝对建议使用一个单独的鼠标。

显示 - 总而言之，就是游戏的门票。

Nitro 17的IPS面板不能再被说成是拥有在上一代型号中看到的潜在弱点。上一代机型的潜在弱点。.要想在QHD分辨率的17.3英寸显示屏上找出单个像素，需要付出很大的努力。正常的工作也可以在该设备上完成，而不必增加文字或符号的大小。

165赫兹的帧率对于游戏来说也相当完美。响应时间也非常体面。此外，屏幕显示强烈、鲜艳的色彩，即使不需要校准也能准确再现。亮度为360cd/m²，对于桌面使用来说也是绰绰有余。

然而，对比度可以做得更好，由于黑电平值只有600:1，看起来很差。这在一个完全黑暗的房间里尤其明显。黑色的背景总是略微被照亮，显示屏的右上方有明显的屏幕出血。

当然，有可能找到颜色更多、每秒帧数更多、像素密度更高的显示器，但是，对于一台中端游戏笔记本电脑来说，图像值是非常连贯的。


315 cd/m²	315 cd/m²	318 cd/m²
320 cd/m²	361 cd/m²	318 cd/m²
317 cd/m²	352 cd/m²	314 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BOE0B7C NE173QHM-NY6 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 361 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 325.6 cd/m² Minimum: 4.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 360 cd/m²
Contrast: 602:1 (Black: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.83 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 3.48
ΔE Greyscale 3.29 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
85.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.29

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 3)

	Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER BOE0B7C NE173QHM-NY6, , 2560x1440, 17.30	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 AU Optronics B160QAN03.1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS BOE NE160WUM-NX2, IPS, 1920x1200, 16.00	SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) BOE09F9 NE173QHM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30	Medion Erazer Defender P40 BOE CQ NE173QHM-NZ3, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30	Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AU Optronics B156HAN12.H, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Sharp LQ173M1JW08, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Display		-14%	-17%	-1%	-17%	-17%	-14%
Display P3 Coverage	98.3	71.2 -28%	69.3 -30%	96.6 -2%	68.3 -31%	68.8 -30%	71.9 -27%
sRGB Coverage	100	98.8 -1%	97.3 -3%	99.9 0%	98.1 -2%	98.1 -2%	99.9 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	85.7	73.3 -14%	70.7 -18%	84.5 -1%	69.8 -19%	69.7 -19%	73.7 -14%
Response Times		-14%	-15%	-23%	-4%	6%	15%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	14.8 ?(7, 7.8)	14.5 ?(7, 7.5) 2%	15.6 ?(7.3, 8.3) -5%	16.4 ?(7.4, 9) -11%	14.6 ?(7.1, 7.5) 1%	13 ?(6, 7) 12%	4.6 ?(2.2, 2.4) 69%
Response Time Black / White *	8 ?(3.4, 4.6)	10.4 ?(5.7, 4.7) -30%	10 ?(5.7, 4.3) -25%	10.8 ?(4.6, 6.2) -35%	8.7 ?(3.6, 5.1) -9%	8 ?(4, 4) -0%	11.2 ?(6.8, 4.4) -40%
PWM Frequency
Screen		41%	41%	28%	45%	19%	4%
Brightness middle	361	405.7 12%	301 -17%	349 -3%	364 1%	327 -9%	337.7 -6%
Brightness	326	368 13%	294 -10%	318 -2%	343 5%	320 -2%	331 2%
Brightness Distribution	87	87 0%	94 8%	82 -6%	86 -1%	93 7%	82 -6%
Black Level *	0.6	0.38 37%	0.21 65%	0.56 7%	0.28 53%	0.24 60%	0.31 48%
Contrast	602	1068 77%	1433 138%	623 3%	1300 116%	1363 126%	1089 81%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.83	1.65 57%	1.79 53%	1.08 72%	1.67 56%	3.26 15%	4.12 -8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.71	4.2 26%	3.48 39%	3.05 47%	2.78 51%	8.73 -53%	8.89 -56%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	3.48	0.53 85%	1.2 66%	1.08 69%	1.14 67%	0.87 75%	0.98 72%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.29	1.2 64%	2.5 24%	1.14 65%	1.4 57%	4.87 -48%	6.3 -91%
Gamma	2.29 ^96%	2.3 ^96%	2.265 ^97%	2.41 ^91%	2.091 ^105%	2.3 ^96%	2.48 ^89%
CCT	6679 ^97%	6453 ^101%	6157 ^106%	6687 ^97%	6568 ^99%	7070 ^92%	6542 ^99%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		4% / 21%	3% / 20%	1% / 15%	8% / 25%	3% / 9%	2% / 2%

* ... smaller is better

在色彩再现方面，宏碁Nitro 17做得很好。sRGB色彩空间--这对游戏很重要--被完全覆盖。即使是用于电影制作的DCI P3，也几乎完全再现。

与类似的以游戏为重点的笔记本电脑相比，这些都是优秀的结果。

将亮度降低到50%后，0.21的黑度（而不是0.59），要好很多。这样做，对比度也增加到几乎900：1。特别是在晚上，当全亮度通常不是必须的时候，图像的还原度也相应提高。甚至3.5的色彩偏差DeltaE也比全亮度时低。

我们测量到DelatE与理想的色彩再现有3.8的偏差。校准并没有带来进一步的改善。尽管训练有素的眼睛可以找出差异，特别是在涉及到黄色和橙色色调时，色彩再现没有任何问题。

只要用户不打算将该设备用于专业的照片或视频编辑，该显示器就能非常自然地再现色彩。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3.4 ms rise
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.6 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
14.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 7.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17853 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

在户外，在阳台上或在花园的阴凉处，文字甚至照片都清晰可辨。当然，颜色并没有如愿出现。正如预期的那样，在阳光下看不到多少东西，但文字是可读的--只是。

即使从一个尖锐的角度看，也看不到颜色的偏差。从45°左右的角度看，图像上有轻微的灰雾。

性能--Nitro 17位于游戏包的中间位置

随着第13代英特尔酷睿i7（Raptor Lake）和和NvidiaGeForce RTX 4060，目前大多数游戏都可以在显示器的原生QHD分辨率下播放，但这里和那里有一些限制。只要你的要求不是设置得太高，这款游戏笔记本将在相当长的一段时间内提供很好的娱乐。

除了我们的候选评测，目前还有其他一些Nitro 17的变体可供选择，它们都配备了英特尔酷睿i5-13500H或i7-13700H以及RTX 4050或RTX 4060.目前的标题应该很容易用最低规格的模型来玩，尽管是全高清。

测试条件

通过使用NitroSense软件，可以定义各种场景。当CPU和GPU的行为被设置为四种可能的操作模式时，风扇行为、按键照明和声音配置文件也可以相应选择。

为了真实地确定基准，我们选择了 "性能 "模式。宏碁在其说明中建议这样做，以获得最佳的操作，也是在长时间内。涡轮 "模式下的风扇噪音要大得多。在我们的测试中，在 "平衡 "和 "性能 "模式下，我们能够以大约一半的噪音水平获得几乎相同的测试结果。然而，在 "安静 "模式下的性能下降是相当大的，而风扇仍然可以听到，至少。

这意味着平衡工作模式应该是大多数应用场景的理想选择。通过内置的扬声器，游戏中的声音是完全可以听到的，风扇的噪音也不是特别烦人。

	涡轮增压	性能	均衡	静音
CPU PL2	115瓦	115瓦	115瓦	115瓦
CPU PL1	100瓦	80瓦	70瓦	45瓦特
音量 (Time Spy)	58 分贝	55 分贝	43分贝	38分贝
分数 (Time Spy)	11,042	10,759	10,608	4,210

处理器

有了英特尔酷睿i7-13700宏碁Nitro 17采用了一个非常强大但并不卓越的CPU。它的设计在很大程度上对应于前代产品，即 i7-12700H6个性能核心和8个效率核心，总共有20个线程。缓存的大小也保持不变。相比之下，时钟速率从4.7GHz略微提高到5.0GHz。

其他游戏笔记本电脑可以依靠一个更好规格的CPU，例如英特尔酷睿i7-13700HX.然而，这意味着冷却必须做得很好。例如，一个Medion Erazer Defender P40在我们的CineBench R15连续循环中以10%的数值开始，但在第二次运行后就不相上下了。最后，Nitro 17的表现几乎好了20％。在这方面，连续性能处于一个令人印象深刻的高水平。

相反，对于许多过程和任务来说，短时间内可用的功率很重要。在这方面，i7-13700H对于一个移动CPU来说是强大的，但它被第七代AMD处理器甚至 "HX "系列的英特尔型号所取代。在单核性能方面也出现了类似的情况。被限制在115瓦，而不是在 "HX "系列中看到的157瓦，阻碍了更好的结果。此外，在 "性能 "模式下，功耗突然降低，这解释了在这一领域低于平均值的结果。然而，关于游戏等级，这并没有起到决定性的作用。

你可以在我们的 "CPU基准列表 "中找到进一步的信息和测量数据。 CPU基准测试列表.

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø2728 (2664.71-2893.73)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX: Ø3057 (3008.42-3230.23)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: Ø2646 (2596.9-2666.67)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø3815 (3467.41-4465.28)

Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX: Ø2369 (2270.92-3189.19)

Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H: Ø2153 (2083.98-2206.17)

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2511 (2457.61-2693.6)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	83.7 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	69.1 pt
Average of class Gaming	67.2 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	67.1 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	64 pt
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H	61.5 pt
Average Intel Core i7-13700H	59.1 pt
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H	58.5 pt
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	53.2 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	26884 Points +43%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	20341 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	19987 (10270.1^min - 19987.3^max) Points +6%
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34613, n=229, last 2 years)	19747 Points +5%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H	18843 Points
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H	17075 (15585.9^min - 17075^max) Points -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	16907 Points -10%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (5890 - 20034, n=27)	15155 Points -20%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	13623 Points -28%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	2006 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2235, n=227, last 2 years)	1823 Points +18%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1323 - 1914, n=27)	1793 Points +16%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1791 Points +16%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H	1711 Points +10%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	1668 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	1666 Points +8%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H	1549 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1542 Points 0%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	10132 Points +44%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	7710 Points +10%
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=227, last 2 years)	7506 Points +7%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H	7041 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	6889 Points -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6571 Points -7%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H	6570 Points -7%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (2322 - 7674, n=27)	5907 Points -16%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	5311 Points -25%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	771 Points +30%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	702 Points +18%
Average of class Gaming (169 - 855, n=227, last 2 years)	702 Points +18%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (508 - 741, n=27)	692 Points +16%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H	664 Points +12%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	652 Points +10%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	644 Points +8%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	605 Points +2%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H	594 Points

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	4465 (3467.41^min - 4465.28^max) Points +54%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	3230 (3008.42^min - 3230.23^max) Points +12%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	3189 Points +10%
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=231, last 2 years)	3119 Points +8%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H	2894 (2664.71^min - 2893.73^max) Points
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H	2694 (2457.61^min - 2693.6^max) Points -7%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2666.7 Points -8%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (905 - 2982, n=27)	2444 Points -16%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	2206.17 Points -24%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	284 Points +27%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	283 Points +27%
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 318, n=230, last 2 years)	269 Points +21%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	265 Points +19%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (213 - 276, n=27)	260 Points +17%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H	255 Points +14%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	248 Points +11%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	243 Points +9%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H	223 Points

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	234 Seconds * -29%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (169 - 555, n=27)	231 Seconds * -27%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	198 Seconds * -9%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=224, last 2 years)	198 Seconds * -9%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H	190 Seconds * -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	189 Seconds * -4%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H	182 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	151 Seconds * +17%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	125 Seconds * +31%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	105324 MIPS +48%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	78076 MIPS +10%
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=226, last 2 years)	77824 MIPS +9%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	72220 MIPS +1%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H	71260 MIPS
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	70081 MIPS -2%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H	65292 MIPS -8%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	61342 MIPS -14%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (27322 - 76344, n=27)	61327 MIPS -14%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	6747 MIPS +37%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6621 MIPS +34%
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=226, last 2 years)	6152 MIPS +25%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4825 - 6238, n=27)	5850 MIPS +19%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	5720 MIPS +16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	5718 MIPS +16%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H	5672 MIPS +15%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	5552 MIPS +13%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H	4933 MIPS

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	18109 Points +38%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	14222 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	14144 Points +8%
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=231, last 2 years)	13733 Points +5%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H	13090 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	12111 Points -7%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H	11979 Points -8%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (6165 - 14215, n=27)	11884 Points -9%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	9392 Points -28%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2032 Points +33%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	1944 Points +27%
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2210, n=231, last 2 years)	1818 Points +19%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1362 - 1919, n=27)	1791 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	1777 Points +16%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H	1683 Points +10%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	1666 Points +9%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1549 Points +1%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H	1527 Points

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	27.9 fps +40%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	24.2 fps +22%
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=229, last 2 years)	21.4 fps +8%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	20.8 fps +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	20.8 fps +5%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H	19.9 fps
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H	19 fps -5%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	16.7 fps -16%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (6.72 - 21.2, n=27)	16.7 fps -16%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H	55.8 s *
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	50.8 s * +9%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	50.6 s * +9%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	49.8 s * +11%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=223, last 2 years)	49.3 s * +12%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (31.3 - 62.4, n=27)	48 s * +14%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H	45.8 s * +18%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	41.7 s * +25%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	36.5 s * +35%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H	0.536 sec *
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	0.493 sec * +8%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	0.4876 sec * +9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	0.4769 sec * +11%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H	0.473 sec * +12%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 4.47, n=226, last 2 years)	0.4679 sec * +13%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (0.4308 - 0.607, n=27)	0.4658 sec * +13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	0.4253 sec * +21%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	0.4234 sec * +21%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2894 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

208 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

223 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	88.6 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	86.3 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	78.6 pt
Average of class Gaming	75.2 pt
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	74.3 pt
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	71.2 pt
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	67.2 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	63.1 pt
Average Intel Core i7-13700H	59.2 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	28033 KRay/s +53%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	21492 KRay/s +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	20413 KRay/s +11%
Average of class Gaming (3069 - 60169, n=222, last 2 years)	18803 KRay/s +3%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	18335 KRay/s
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	16483 KRay/s -10%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	16101 KRay/s -12%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	15397 KRay/s -16%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4986 - 18908, n=27)	13884 KRay/s -24%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	122098 Points +38%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	110631 Points +25%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	103903 Points +18%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	100983 Points +15%
Average of class Gaming (18567 - 252486, n=222, last 2 years)	94169 Points +7%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	88187 Points
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	80935 Points -8%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	77807 Points -12%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (25360 - 92359, n=27)	69749 Points -21%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	5395 MB/s +28%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	4633 MB/s +10%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	4566 MB/s +8%
Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=222, last 2 years)	4369 MB/s +3%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	4224 MB/s
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	3854 MB/s -9%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	3412 MB/s -19%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	3364 MB/s -20%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1339 - 4224, n=27)	3248 MB/s -23%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	134893 Points +35%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	124433 Points +25%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	113990 Points +14%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	113837 Points +14%
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=222, last 2 years)	110053 Points +10%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	106229 Points +6%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	103119 Points +3%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	99940 Points
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (68763 - 107159, n=27)	97786 Points -2%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	15380 Points +48%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	13832 Points +33%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	13285 Points +28%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	13120 Points +26%
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=222, last 2 years)	12240 Points +18%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	10416 Points
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	10407 Points 0%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	9811 Points -6%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4800 - 11050, n=27)	8796 Points -16%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	63432 Points +44%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	55594 Points +26%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	53409 Points +21%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	50250 Points +14%
Average of class Gaming (10291 - 134044, n=222, last 2 years)	48087 Points +9%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	44093 Points
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	39765 Points -10%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	38311 Points -13%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (12321 - 45118, n=27)	34225 Points -22%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	151254 MB/s
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	137201 MB/s -9%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	134500 MB/s -11%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=222, last 2 years)	107642 MB/s -29%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	103076 MB/s -32%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	94177 MB/s -38%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	86309 MB/s -43%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (28769 - 151254, n=27)	76256 MB/s -50%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	72510 MB/s -52%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1581 MB/s +30%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	1339 MB/s +10%
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2409, n=222, last 2 years)	1223 MB/s +1%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	1215 MB/s
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	1089 MB/s -10%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	1089 MB/s -10%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	981 MB/s -19%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (389 - 1215, n=27)	936 MB/s -23%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	871 MB/s -28%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	15209 KRay/s +61%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	11608 KRay/s +23%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	11057 KRay/s +17%
Average of class Gaming (1518 - 31796, n=222, last 2 years)	10179 KRay/s +8%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	9441 KRay/s
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	8867 KRay/s -6%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	8609 KRay/s -9%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	8145 KRay/s -14%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (2540 - 10135, n=27)	7440 KRay/s -21%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	49738 MPixel/s +31%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (19552 - 52727, n=27)	41296 MPixel/s +9%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	37987 MPixel/s
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=223, last 2 years)	37003 MPixel/s -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	36147 MPixel/s -5%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	36118 MPixel/s -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	29922 MPixel/s -21%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	28224 MPixel/s -26%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	27269 MPixel/s -28%

系统性能

在上网、创建、渲染等方面，性能始终很高。等待时间很短，加载程序、安装或卸载程序都没有给系统带来任何特别的问题。从PCMark和CrossMark的分数来看，使用平衡模式似乎有一点优势。这意味着这款处理器甚至能够明显地高于我们在所有测试中记录的数值。 i7-13700H处理器。

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	7927 Points +11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	7691 Points +7%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	7647 Points +7%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H (Ausgeglichen)	7628 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=197, last 2 years)	7603 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (7157 - 7661, n=4)	7449 Points +4%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7157 Points
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	6956 Points -3%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	6909 Points -3%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	6783 Points -5%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	10926 Points +7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	10872 Points +7%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	10844 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming (8300 - 12334, n=196, last 2 years)	10739 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (10179 - 11200, n=4)	10672 Points +5%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H (Ausgeglichen)	10613 Points +4%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	10343 Points +2%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10179 Points
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	9865 Points -3%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	9760 Points -4%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	10505 Points +28%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H (Ausgeglichen)	10249 Points +24%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	9877 Points +20%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	9760 Points +18%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 11833, n=196, last 2 years)	9738 Points +18%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	9470 Points +15%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (8238 - 10249, n=4)	9311 Points +13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	9131 Points +11%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	8991 Points +9%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8238 Points

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	12434 Points +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	11868 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	11862 Points
Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=196, last 2 years)	11509 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (10763 - 11862, n=4)	11325 Points -5%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	11245 Points -5%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H (Ausgeglichen)	11075 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	9776 Points -18%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	9393 Points -21%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	9108 Points -23%

CrossMark / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2029 Points +25%
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2334, n=169, last 2 years)	1883 Points +16%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1844 Points +13%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	1774 Points +9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1774 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1629 - 1849, n=4)	1713 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	1663 Points +2%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H (Ausgeglichen)	1640 Points +1%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1629 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1522 Points -7%

CrossMark / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	1872 Points +20%
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=169, last 2 years)	1792 Points +15%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1785 Points +14%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1715 Points +10%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	1643 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1561 - 1743, n=4)	1626 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	1618 Points +4%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H (Ausgeglichen)	1580 Points +1%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1561 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1530 Points -2%

CrossMark / Creativity
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2310 Points +37%
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2514, n=169, last 2 years)	2050 Points +21%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	1992 Points +18%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1990 Points +18%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1912 Points +13%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1691 - 2064, n=4)	1881 Points +11%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H (Ausgeglichen)	1766 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	1710 Points +1%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1691 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1589 Points -6%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1824 Points +10%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	1752 Points +6%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=169, last 2 years)	1704 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	1663 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1656 Points
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	1577 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1381 - 1656, n=4)	1524 Points -8%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H (Ausgeglichen)	1471 Points -11%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1388 Points -16%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1316 Points -21%

PCMark 10 Score		7157 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	77068 MB/s +34%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (40018 - 78081, n=27)	63892 MB/s +11%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	59712 MB/s +4%
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 92565, n=222, last 2 years)	59692 MB/s +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	58458 MB/s +2%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	57552 MB/s
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	57466 MB/s 0%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	49061 MB/s -15%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	45358 MB/s -21%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	84677 MB/s +30%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	67644 MB/s +4%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	67639 MB/s +4%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (44583 - 79656, n=27)	67456 MB/s +4%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	65092 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (24879 - 90647, n=222, last 2 years)	63689 MB/s -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	61609 MB/s -5%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	50640 MB/s -22%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	49450 MB/s -24%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	74791 MB/s +16%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	72541 MB/s +12%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (42710 - 99898, n=27)	70383 MB/s +9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	65896 MB/s +2%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	64704 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (21619 - 103259, n=222, last 2 years)	61895 MB/s -4%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	57744 MB/s -11%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	55113 MB/s -15%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	46603 MB/s -28%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	136.8 ns *
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (82.4 - 136.8, n=27)	94.3 ns * +31%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	93.7 ns * +32%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	93 ns * +32%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	91.1 ns * +33%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	90.4 ns * +34%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	89.6 ns * +35%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 152.5, n=219, last 2 years)	87.1 ns * +36%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	81.9 ns * +40%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

Nitro 17不一定适合实时音频编辑，但它仍然能够处理，而且故障很少。总而言之，结果是好的。此外，当涉及到4K视频播放时，我们无法检测到任何丢帧。

与我们确定的结果相比，驱动程序的更新和软件的改变都可能大大改善或恶化性能。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4853 μs * -236%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	4343.1 μs * -201%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1444 μs *
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1128.7 μs * +22%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	971 μs * +33%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	950 μs * +34%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	869.7 μs * +40%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储

在我们的性能测试中，三星的PCIe 4.0固态硬盘获得了令人印象深刻的结果，使自己与竞争对手有了一定的距离，特别是在4kbit块的读写速度方面。

相比之下，连续读取的耐力测试结果真的很差。在最初可以接受的传输速度之后，数值下降到低于500MB/s（红线），这代表了可能的理论性能的一小部分。在我们的测试设备中，将冷却垫从RAM上移开--它一直延伸到SSD的控制器--带来了50%的改善（黑线）。如果将风扇设置到最大，那么固态硬盘最终会表现出你所期望的那样（黄线）。

与联想Legion Pro 5 显示了测试应该如何进行。前代产品底板上的冷却装置在这里缺失，这是在我们的结果中明显反映出来的东西。

然而，这似乎对游戏性能的影响可以忽略不计。至少，与配备类似硬件的竞争者相比，我们无法确定任何可谈的偏差。

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

Sequential Read: 4853MB/s

Sequential Write: 4373MB/s

4K Read: 73.43MB/s

4K Write: 234.6MB/s

4K-64 Read: 2718MB/s

4K-64 Write: 2745MB/s

Access Time Write: 0.019ms

Score Read: 3277Points

Score Write: 3417Points

Score Total: 8345Points

	Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	Average of class Gaming
Drive Performance Rating
Percent	88	85.4 -3%	42.1 -52%	73.3 -17%	75.8 -14%	73.1 -17%	79.4 -10%	74.8 -15%	73.4 -17%
DiskSpd		-6%	-50%	-11%	-7%	-11%	-1%	-11%	-11%
seq read	3670	5346 46%	2253 -39%	3510 -4%	2501 -32%	3770 3%	3889 6%	3780 ?(1761 - 4677, n=82) 3%	3520 ?(1319 - 7045, n=196, last 2 years) -4%
seq write	4284	1495 -65%	1671 -61%	3961 -8%	4675 9%	4216 -2%	4579 7%	3590 ?(2220 - 4564, n=82) -16%	3793 ?(535 - 9307, n=196, last 2 years) -11%
seq q8 t1 read	5276	7127 35%	4294 -19%	6520 24%	5009 -5%	6689 27%	6697 27%	6471 ?(3421 - 7100, n=82) 23%	6348 ?(2268 - 16089, n=196, last 2 years) 20%
seq q8 t1 write	5114	4903 -4%	1773 -65%	4907 -4%	4797 -6%	4664 -9%	4956 -3%	4809 ?(2216 - 5281, n=82) -6%	4779 ?(539 - 14571, n=196, last 2 years) -7%
4k q1 t1 read	70.6	65.9 -7%	32.8 -54%	53.6 -24%	51.1 -28%	59.5 -16%	69.8 -1%	77 ?(48.4 - 97.4, n=82) 9%	67.6 ?(30.6 - 95.9, n=196, last 2 years) -4%
4k q1 t1 write	267	328 23%	132 -51%	205 -23%	281 5%	151.1 -43%	263 -1%	188.1 ?(49.9 - 280, n=82) -30%	223 ?(66.6 - 421, n=196, last 2 years) -16%
4k q32 t16 read	3726	2889 -22%	1705 -54%	2835 -24%	3335 -10%	2819 -24%	2861 -23%	2567 ?(376 - 4185, n=82) -31%	2578 ?(417 - 6172, n=196, last 2 years) -31%
4k q32 t16 write	3355	1457 -57%	1585 -53%	2664 -21%	3737 11%	2670 -20%	2700 -20%	1938 ?(291 - 3559, n=82) -42%	2143 ?(162.3 - 4869, n=196, last 2 years) -36%
AS SSD		-7%	-94%	-22%	-17%	-20%	-31%	-21%	-27%
Score Total	8345	9125 9%	4261 -49%	6631 -21%	7599 -9%	7145 -14%	7307 -12%	6848 ?(2577 - 9147, n=82) -18%	6807 ?(2271 - 13854, n=184, last 2 years) -18%
Score Read	3277	3235 -1%	1830 -44%	2593 -21%	2625 -20%	2804 -14%	2792 -15%	2415 ?(983 - 3469, n=82) -26%	2492 ?(760 - 4721, n=184, last 2 years) -24%
Score Write	3417	4288 25%	1604 -53%	2674 -22%	3618 6%	2979 -13%	3117 -9%	3269 ?(921 - 4043, n=82) -4%	3109 ?(515 - 7208, n=184, last 2 years) -9%
Seq Read	4853	5856.12 21%	3690.93 -24%	3344 -31%	3667.76 -24%	4920.82 1%	4843.81 0%	4909 ?(2638 - 5621, n=82) 1%	4950 ?(2260 - 12763, n=184, last 2 years) 2%
Seq Write	4373	4750.28 9%	1633.49 -63%	4175 -5%	3884.67 -11%	3550.64 -19%	4200.32 -4%	3325 ?(1617 - 4526, n=82) -24%	3638 ?(495 - 11316, n=184, last 2 years) -17%
4K Read	73.43	77.12 5%	42.75 -42%	53.4 -27%	63.89 -13%	56.67 -23%	67.56 -8%	72.5 ?(45.9 - 89.2, n=82) -1%	66.6 ?(30.4 - 112.1, n=184, last 2 years) -9%
4K Write	234.6	276.66 18%	118.17 -50%	177.9 -24%	207.32 -12%	135.96 -42%	213.7 -9%	186 ?(118.6 - 246, n=82) -21%	210 ?(96.3 - 512, n=184, last 2 years) -10%
4K-64 Read	2718	2572.63 -5%	1429.83 -47%	2205 -19%	2194.79 -19%	2254.97 -17%	2240.41 -18%	1851 ?(421 - 2854, n=82) -32%	1925 ?(442 - 3475, n=184, last 2 years) -29%
4K-64 Write	2745	3536.78 29%	1411.25 -49%	2078 -24%	3021.8 10%	2488.35 -9%	2483.08 -10%	2750 ?(367 - 3451, n=82) 0%	2538 ?(277 - 5909, n=184, last 2 years) -8%
Access Time Read *		0.044	0.058	0.03	0.08	0.057	0.038	0.03737 ?(0.018 - 0.083, n=81)	0.05345 ?(0.016 - 0.379, n=183, last 2 years)
Access Time Write *	0.019	0.053 -179%	0.118 -521%	0.023 -21%	0.033 -74%	0.029 -53%	0.061 -221%	0.03445 ?(0.017 - 0.101, n=82) -81%	0.04716 ?(0.011 - 1.028, n=184, last 2 years) -148%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-5% / -6%	-65% / -73%	-17% / -17%	-13% / -12%	-16% / -16%	-14% / -17%	-16% / -16%	-18% / -20%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø1096 (492.06-6187.02)

Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER ; Maximale Lüftung: Ø4658 (4190.75-6818.26)

Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER ; Kühlpad versetzt: Ø1462 (754.72-6971.15)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N: Ø6448 (5744.31-7139.12)

图形卡

的RTX 4060是一个中端GPU，可以可靠地与上一代的RTX 3070 Ti.这很了不起，因为着色器以及用于光线追踪或张量计算的各种核心的数量已经减少了接近50%。8GB，只有VRAM保持不变，可能有点微不足道，特别是当涉及到4K分辨率时--至少对于个别游戏标题。

宏碁Nitro 17的图形芯片的最大功率为140瓦，其中25瓦从处理器中转移出来作为动态提升。右边的图形显示，"涡轮 "模式下的数值在长期内也是稳定的。在其他模式下，功耗有所降低。在 "安静 "模式下，需要85瓦的功率。在 "平衡 "模式下，允许使用105瓦，在 "性能 "模式下，最大可使用130瓦。图中缺少电池模式。我们随后记录了15瓦的功率，即使是在最高细节设置下的TheWitcher 3 也是足够的。

3DMark是在最大功率为130瓦的情况下进行的（"性能 "模式），其水平可与竞争对手如Erazer Defender P40或 Legion Pro 5等竞争者的水平，具有相同的GPU。同样在这一领域，尽管显卡只提供了105瓦，但平衡模式的结果部分地优于性能模式的记录。由于处理器同时不完全负责发热，因此GPU可以可靠地在这种模式下以最大功率运行。相比之下，在 "性能 "模式下，当达到临界温度时，时钟速度会在短时间内受到限制，而这一点在平衡模式下不会发生得那么快。

在，对目前的Nvidia RTX-4000 GPU进行了广泛的分析。中，我们强调，低规格的RTX 4050和 RTX 4060当功耗增加到100瓦以上时，几乎没有体验到性能提升。

你可以在我们的《GPU基准列表》中找到更多的基准和信息。 GPU基准测试列表.

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	95.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	94.5 pt
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	93.2 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	90.4 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	89.5 pt
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	89.5 pt
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	89.2 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	85 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	84.7 pt
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	80.9 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	40776 Points +14%
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72070, n=227, last 2 years)	40669 Points +14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	37654 Points +5%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	37084 Points +4%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	36470 Points +2%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H (Ausgeglichen)	35770 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	35731 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (28136 - 37796, n=36)	34335 Points -4%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	33048 Points -8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	33037 Points -8%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H (Ausgeglichen)	159463 Points +1%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	158354 Points
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	157190 Points -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	155806 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (81407 - 180228, n=22)	146295 Points -8%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	139201 Points -12%
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=139, last 2 years)	136277 Points -14%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	130117 Points -18%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	30705 Points +19%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	29713 Points +15%
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=232, last 2 years)	29586 Points +14%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	27122 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	26561 Points +3%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H (Ausgeglichen)	26466 Points +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	26154 Points +1%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	25896 Points
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	25419 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (20533 - 27752, n=33)	25146 Points -3%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22547, n=229, last 2 years)	12096 Points +17%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	12048 Points +16%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	11417 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	10855 Points +5%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	10347 Points
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	10329 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H (Ausgeglichen)	10182 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (7484 - 11267, n=35)	9785 Points -5%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	9548 Points -8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	9203 Points -11%

3DMark 11 Performance		31129 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		61140 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		23561 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		10759 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	26 Seconds * -13%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	25 Seconds * -9%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	25 Seconds * -9%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	24 Seconds * -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (19 - 28, n=32)	23.4 Seconds * -2%
Average of class Gaming (9 - 142, n=182, last 2 years)	23.1 Seconds * -0%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	23 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	21 Seconds * +9%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	45 Seconds * -7%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	44 Seconds * -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (40 - 53, n=32)	44 Seconds * -5%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	42 Seconds *
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	41 Seconds * +2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	40 Seconds * +5%
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=189, last 2 years)	39.2 Seconds * +7%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	36 Seconds * +14%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	390 Seconds * -22%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	345 Seconds * -8%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	329 Seconds * -3%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	320 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (189 - 452, n=32)	316 Seconds * +1%
Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=202, last 2 years)	315 Seconds * +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	301 Seconds * +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	264 Seconds * +17%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	220 Seconds * +31%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

说到游戏性能，没有什么大的惊喜。再一次，凭借其更强大的CPU，Medion Erazer Defender P40只是输掉了。可能会有一个更显著的差距，以 Acer Nitro 5 AN515有更大的差距，因为它的 RTX 3070 Ti.再一次，在F1 22等新游戏中，这两款游戏笔记本电脑都能看到眼睛。我们几乎没有确定平衡模式和性能模式之间的任何差异。在3DMark得分方面，这或多或少是一个平局。在Witcher 3 ，平衡模式落后约2％。F1 22的成绩差了大约5%。

此外，在右边的图形中，我们还添加了系统的功耗和与性能增益相关的记录噪音水平。为了实现这一点，在3DMarkTime Spy 平衡模式的结果中，所有的数值都被归一化，并且将对数的噪音水平刻度转换成线性数值。从中可以看出，性能的最小改进比电费更容易让人听得进去。正如我们在显卡分析中已经提到的，这清楚地表明，RTX 4060的TGP的最大值要对更多的排放负责，但没有相当多的额外功率。

Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	99.3 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 ^-1! Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	96.9 pt
Average of class Gaming	92.8 pt
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	90.1 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	89.4 pt
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	80.9 pt
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	78.8 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	72.2 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=224, last 2 years)	117.6 fps +12%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	115 fps +10%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	108.5 (26.7^min, 33.1^P0.1, 61.4^P1) fps +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	107.6 (101^min) fps +2%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	105 fps
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	103 (89^min) fps -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	98.1 (84^min) fps -7%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	92.8 (88^min) fps -12%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	119.6 (3.03^min, 76.9^P1) fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	117.4 (3.41^min, 71.4^P1) fps +3%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	114.1 (4.15^min, 66.7^P1) fps
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	113.9 (5.92^min, 76.9^P1) fps 0%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	108.1 (4.6^min, 76.9^P1) fps -5%
Average of class Gaming (6.38 - 167.7, n=214, last 2 years)	107.8 fps -6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	92.9 (26.7^min, 62.5^P1) fps -19%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	92.5 (11.7^min, 66.7^P1) fps -19%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	114.8 fps +11%
Average of class Gaming (9.13 - 194.9, n=225, last 2 years)	111.5 fps +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	109.8 fps +6%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	108.6 fps +5%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	103.3 fps
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	100.8 fps -2%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	89.7 fps -13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	85.2 fps -18%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	211 (12.3^min, 156.1^P1) fps +8%
Average of class Gaming (14.6 - 421, n=222, last 2 years)	208 fps +7%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	195.2 (34.4^min, 140.1^P1) fps
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	188.3 (28^min, 137.1^P1) fps -4%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	177 (84.5^min, 122.9^P1) fps -9%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	164.5 (62.4^min, 122.8^P1) fps -16%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	163.3 (16.3^min, 119.3^P1) fps -16%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	164.5 (133.8^min) fps +21%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	161.8 (140.3^min) fps +19%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	144.3 (117.7^min) fps +6%
Average of class Gaming (26.9 - 220, n=234, last 2 years)	143.8 fps +6%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	135.7 (113.9^min) fps
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	132.8 (116.8^min) fps -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	121.6 (100.8^min) fps -10%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	108.5 (94.6^min) fps -20%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	123 fps +10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	121.9 fps +9%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	111.7 fps
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	109.3 fps -2%
Average of class Gaming (12.4 - 166.2, n=239, last 2 years)	102.6 fps -8%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	97.7 fps -13%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	72.3 fps -35%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	57.3 fps -49%

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	226 fps +8%
Average of class Gaming (17.5 - 449, n=164, last 2 years)	221 fps +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	215.8 (197^min) fps +3%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	210 fps
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	195.9 (174^min) fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (110 - 229, n=30)	183.6 fps -13%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	179.4 (18.5^min, 39.3^P0.1, 96.4^P1) fps -15%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	170.5 (159^min) fps -19%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	166.5 (140^min) fps -21%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=224, last 2 years)	117.6 fps +12%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	115 fps +10%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	108.5 (26.7^min, 33.1^P0.1, 61.4^P1) fps +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	107.6 (101^min) fps +2%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	105 fps
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	103 (89^min) fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (77 - 159.7, n=36)	100.3 fps -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	98.1 (84^min) fps -7%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	92.8 (88^min) fps -12%

Far Cry 5
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	151 (127^min) fps
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	145 (116^min) fps -4%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	136 (109^min) fps -10%
Average of class Gaming (16 - 232, n=115, last 2 years)	134.9 fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (104 - 155, n=23)	131 fps -13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	115 (88^min) fps -24%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	112 (91^min) fps -26%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	142 (115^min) fps
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	136 (101^min) fps -4%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	128 (100^min) fps -10%
Average of class Gaming (14 - 218, n=125, last 2 years)	126.3 fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (95 - 147, n=24)	123.5 fps -13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	108 (77^min) fps -24%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	106 (83^min) fps -25%

Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	102.3 (55.6^min) fps +29%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	87.4 (50.9^min) fps +10%
Average of class Gaming (16.7 - 159.7, n=99, last 2 years)	87.2 fps +10%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	79.4 (50.8^min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (57.9 - 93.2, n=18)	75.5 fps -5%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	69.8 (41.8^min) fps -12%
1920x1080 High Preset
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	106 (64.9^min) fps +23%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	100.7 (66.6^min) fps +17%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	95 (55.3^min) fps +10%
Average of class Gaming (11.3 - 205, n=87, last 2 years)	94.4 fps +9%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	86.4 (62.3^min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (63.5 - 114.9, n=16)	84.2 fps -3%
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	83.2 (41.6^min) fps -4%

F1 22
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	211 (177^min, 107^P1) fps +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	208 (180^min, 128^P1) fps +5%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	198.4 (168^min, 115^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (17.1 - 322, n=101, last 2 years)	196.4 fps -1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	192.3 (140^min, 112^P1) fps -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	190 (164^min, 130^P1) fps -4%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	178 (159^min, 104^P1) fps -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (124.7 - 217, n=21)	173.9 fps -12%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Gaming (13 - 144.7, n=109, last 2 years)	80.1 fps +25%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	77.8 (63^min, 59^P1) fps +21%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	73.2 (62^min, 57^P1) fps +14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	70.1 (60^min, 58^P1) fps +9%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	65.7 (56^min, 49^P1) fps +2%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	64.2 (52^min, 38^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (48.7 - 71.4, n=21)	61.1 fps -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	50.5 (36^min, 36^P1) fps -21%

Hogwarts Legacy
1920x1080 High Preset AA:High T
Average of class Gaming (12.8 - 186.5, n=25, last 2 years)	88.1 fps +16%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	86 (36^P0.1, 53^P1) fps +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (70.8 - 107.7, n=6)	85.2 fps +12%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	76 (38^P0.1, 49^P1) fps
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	72 (35.4^min, 42.2^P0.1, 52.4^P1) fps -5%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:High T
Average of class Gaming (10.3 - 166.1, n=26, last 2 years)	73.6 fps +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (61.9 - 91.9, n=6)	72.8 fps +12%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	71 (14^P0.1, 40^P1) fps +9%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	65 (28^P0.1, 40^P1) fps
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	55.4 (27^min, 28.2^P0.1, 39^P1) fps -15%

Star Wars Jedi Survivor
1920x1080 Epic Preset
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	73 (26^P0.1, 49^P1) fps +22%
Average of class Gaming (27.2 - 117.4, n=22, last 2 years)	63.8 fps +6%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	61.7 (17^min, 20.5^P0.1, 42.5^P1) fps +3%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	60 (12^P0.1, 26^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (45.5 - 66.7, n=10)	58.8 fps -2%
1920x1080 High Preset
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	79 (26^P0.1, 50^P1) fps +20%
Average of class Gaming (27.7 - 122.1, n=20, last 2 years)	67.9 fps +3%
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	66 (29^P0.1, 41^P1) fps
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	64.8 (9.18^min, 17.6^P0.1, 45.3^P1) fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (50.1 - 77.6, n=8)	64.8 fps -2%

在Witcher 3 耐力测试中，系统性能保持稳定。波动的原因是游戏的昼夜循环。在平衡模式下记录的帧率几乎是相同的。这超越了例如 Medion Erazer Defender P40消耗更多的能量。

在平衡模式下，可以看到一个最小的数值下降趋势（绿色）。风扇的速度限制确保了一小时内帧率的轻微下降。最后，即使在节能模式下，其数值也比80fps高出不少。

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø103.9 (98-107)

Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø102 (98-107)

Medion Erazer Defender P40 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø100.7 (96-104)

Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; Ausgeglichen: Ø101.9 (95-110)

Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; Leise: Ø89 (84-107)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD
GTA V (2015)			177.8	114.1
The Witcher 3 (2015)			210	105
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)			153.4	135.7
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)			103.3		73.7
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)			111.7
Far Cry 5 (2018)			151	142	101
Strange Brigade (2018)			227	195.2	129.3
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022)			86.4	79.4	49.1
F1 22 (2022)			198.4	64.2	40.9
Hogwarts Legacy (2023)			76	65	45
Star Wars Jedi Survivor (2023)			66	60	39

排放--在安静的环境中也能进行游戏

噪声排放

在性能模式下，风扇的噪音很大，在涡轮增压模式下往往难以忍受。正如我们所做的那样，在性能模式下，一副像样的耳机将起到抑制永久噪音的作用。我们没有观察到任何自发的啸叫或频繁的风扇速度变化。

实际上，Nitro 17从未完全安静。即使在电池模式下，风扇偶尔也能听到，当选择 "平衡 "时，风扇的声音会大一点。这里听到的噪音远低于室内音量，很容易被内置的扬声器淹没。在相当可接受的性能水平上进行游戏总是可能的，即使是在安静的环境中和没有耳机的情况下。

Noise Level

Idle		24 / 24 / 32.32 dB(A)
Load		35.18 / 54.78 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A)

	Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
Noise		6%	-2%	-7%	-13%	-16%	-3%
off / environment *	24	23 4%	25 -4%	24 -0%	25 -4%	25 -4%	24.1 -0%
Idle Minimum *	24	23.1 4%	25 -4%	24 -0%	26 -8%	25 -4%	26.9 -12%
Idle Average *	24	23.1 4%	26 -8%	24 -0%	27 -13%	28.6 -19%	26.9 -12%
Idle Maximum *	32.32	26.6 18%	28 13%	26.47 18%	32 1%	44.3 -37%	27 16%
Load Average *	35.18	34.7 1%	43 -22%	55.72 -58%	53 -51%	47.6 -35%	43.8 -25%
Witcher 3 ultra *	54.78	47.6 13%	51 7%	57.94 -6%	56 -2%		44.7 18%
Load Maximum *	54.78	54.8 -0%	53 3%	57.94 -6%	64 -17%	53.6 2%	58.3 -6%

* ... smaller is better

温度

在键盘中央，我们测得的温度远远超过40℃，设备底部的温度进一步上升。当游戏时，它不能被称为一种愉快的体验，笔记本电脑应该只在坚硬的表面上使用。这也适用于要求不高的任务。即使在这个领域，相当多的热量产生是有形的。

平衡 "模式并没有改善情况。在这些设置下，我们甚至测量到比使用更快和更大声的模式时更高的温度。在热天唯一有帮助的是通过使用NitroSense手动（非常容易）提高风扇速度。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


42 °C	45 °C	46 °C
38 °C	42 °C	42 °C
32 °C	32 °C	33 °C

Maximum: 46 °C
Average: 39.1 °C


50 °C	51 °C	46 °C
39 °C	47 °C	38 °C
35 °C	31 °C	31 °C

Maximum: 51 °C
Average: 40.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 45 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


33 °C	34 °C	33 °C
31 °C	32 °C	31 °C
28 °C	28 °C	31 °C

Maximum: 34 °C
Average: 31.2 °C


32 °C	33 °C	31 °C
33 °C	33 °C	31 °C
31 °C	30 °C	29 °C

Maximum: 33 °C
Average: 31.4 °C

Power Supply (max.) 25 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


41 °C	44 °C	45 °C
37 °C	40 °C	41 °C
32 °C	31 °C	33 °C

Maximum: 45 °C
Average: 38.2 °C


48 °C	49 °C	45 °C
37 °C	44 °C	37 °C
34 °C	31 °C	31 °C

Maximum: 49 °C
Average: 39.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 46 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.1 °C / -7.4 F).

	Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Heat		5%	3%	-9%	12%	4%	1%
Maximum Upper Side *	46	42.8 7%	53 -15%	50 -9%	42 9%	48.1 -5%	44.2 4%
Maximum Bottom *	51	50 2%	48 6%	56 -10%	45 12%	49.7 3%	45.2 11%
Idle Upper Side *	34	29.6 13%	30 12%	37 -9%	28 18%	30 12%	35.4 -4%
Idle Bottom *	33	34 -3%	30 9%	36 -9%	30 9%	31.7 4%	35 -6%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

如果需要系统的最高性能，处理器的功耗会在短时间内增加到100瓦以上，然后永久下沉到45瓦。短时间后，时钟速度也不高于2.5GHz。

相反，图形芯片则永久供应105瓦。基于 "性能 "模式下的最大供应量为130瓦，减去动态提升--在压力测试中CPU不能没有动态提升--这代表了可能的最大负荷。时钟速度也保持在一个较高但稳定的水平上，只比理论上的最大值低一点。这使得宏碁Nitro 17有能力处理图形密集型任务，甚至在连续使用时也是如此。

同时，组件的温度保持在90℃以下。

发言人

小型的Nitro 17立体声扬声器在再现深沉的低音方面做得很好--对于一台笔记本电脑来说。同样，声音听起来也很好，可以准确地听到，而且非常详细。这意味着游戏中最重要的频率范围都得到了很好的覆盖。

即使是音乐，也可以在笔记本电脑上听，即使低中音和高低音缺乏力量。其结果是，摇滚乐和以吉他或鼓为基础的曲目有点不那么令人兴奋。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理 - 宏碁Nitro 17拥有高效的硬件

消耗功率

在空闲使用时，Nitro 17非常经济，最低为8瓦，最高为15瓦。其他游戏笔记本电脑，如申克XMG Focus 17 (E23)连续耗电超过17瓦。Witcher 3 测试突出了该组件的效率。比如说Medion Erazer Defender P40几乎需要额外的30瓦，但只能管理较低的帧率。

我们测得的最大功率为263瓦，这意味着畸形的、沉重的330瓦PSU是绰绰有余的。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.05 / 1.2 Watt
Idle	8.3 / 13.5 / 14.8 Watt
Load	77 / 263 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, , 2560x1440, 17.30	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM, IPS, 1920x1200, 16.00	SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30	Medion Erazer Defender P40 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30	MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-80%	10%	-70%	-11%	-24%	-27%	-46%
Idle Minimum *	8.3	24.5 -195%	7 16%	17 -105%	8 4%	12.4 -49%	12.9 ?(3 - 33, n=31) -55%	13.9 ?(2 - 64, n=177, last 2 years) -67%
Idle Average *	13.5	29.2 -116%	10 26%	18 -33%	12 11%	13.1 3%	17 ?(7.1 - 35, n=31) -26%	19.1 ?(8 - 67, n=177, last 2 years) -41%
Idle Maximum *	14.8	34.3 -132%	15 -1%	25.8 -74%	18 -22%	25.3 -71%	21.5 ?(7.6 - 45, n=31) -45%	26.9 ?(9 - 101.1, n=177, last 2 years) -82%
Load Average *	77	98.7 -28%	86 -12%	178 -131%	101 -31%	105.4 -37%	97.2 ?(59 - 190, n=31) -26%	111.5 ?(32.1 - 202, n=177, last 2 years) -45%
Witcher 3 ultra *	154	178.6 -16%	160.6 -4%	265 -72%	180.8 -17%	150 3%
Load Maximum *	263	249.6 5%	172 35%	275 -5%	284 -8%	240.5 9%	215 ?(99 - 364, n=31) 18%	251 ?(64.5 - 418, n=176, last 2 years) 5%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø154.4 (142.88-198.5)

Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø198.8 (159.5-262.62)

Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø13.5 (11.109-19.496)

Power consumption with an external monitor

Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø146.2 (120.01-164.77)

Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø164 (162.74-165.17)

Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø141.2 (39.062-179.78)

Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø166.5 (59.244-199.7)

Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø149.7 (139.79-174.2)

Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø18.3 (5.3324-49.863)

电池寿命

当涉及到电池寿命时，低的空闲功耗使自己变得很明显。对于一台游戏笔记本电脑来说，宏碁Nitro 17有很好的耐力，因为它在Wi-Fi测试中，在不断变化的网站中，能够超过8小时。然而，将亮度提高到最大，会使电池寿命减少约2小时。

在电池模式下进行游戏时，Nitro的得分很高。宏碁的笔记本电脑没有简单地关闭GPU，而是用游戏完全压倒了处理器，而是帮助自己只用了最大25瓦，GPU用了15瓦。这意味着我们能够在笔记本电脑放弃之前玩测试的《Witcher 3 》近2.5小时。

Battery Runtime

Witcher 3 ultra 150cd		2h 31min
WiFi Websurfing		8h 14min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		6h 21min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		6h 53min

	Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S, 90 Wh	Medion Erazer Defender P40 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh	Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 57.5 Wh	MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-59%	66%	-21%	-23%	-29%	-26%
H.264	413		746 81%	339 -18%	343 -17%		397 ?(56 - 747, n=92, last 2 years) -4%
WiFi v1.3	494	205 -59%	745 51%	373 -24%	349 -29%	353 -29%	366 ?(57 - 745, n=181, last 2 years) -26%
Witcher 3 ultra	151						80.6 ?(47 - 155, n=23, last 2 years) -47%

Pros

+ 高、稳定的系统性能

+ 可以进行安静的游戏

+ 165赫兹的QHD显示屏和鲜艳的色彩

+ 电池寿命长

+ 易于维护

+ 非常快的端口

Cons

- 对比度差

- 负载下产生大量热量

- 固态硬盘运行发热

结论 - Nitro 17不具备任何真正的弱点

特别是与它的前辈相比，...Acer Nitro 5 AN517-5552- 一个我们去年评测过的设备--宏碁Nitro 17有了很大的改进。色彩再现、最大的风扇噪音和端口的选择现在都具有竞争力。

特别是，平衡模式令人印象深刻地展示了略微降低功耗的积极效果。风扇噪音下降到一个可容忍的水平，功耗也降低了。这意味着你可以在没有耳机和恼人噪音的情况下进行游戏。帧率和合成基准几乎没有下滑。然而，使用这些设置，我们的传感器测出了最高温度。

强大的基准测试结果，安静的风扇和坚实的规格--宏碁Nitro 17是一个完美的中档设备。

当然，也有一些（不必要的）缺陷。非常差的网络摄像头不再是最新的了。没有被动冷却元件，固态硬盘很快就达到了它的极限。即使不可能检测到对游戏性能的任何影响，但笔记本电脑的温度持续上升应该会对设备的寿命产生负面影响。此外，宏碁Nitro 17比其他大多数具有类似大显示屏的游戏笔记本更重、更大。

任何想从类似的组件中寻找更多动力的人应该看看联想Legion Pro 5 16IRX8，这是一个好的但也是更大的替代品，这款笔记本电脑也更薄更轻。不再是街区中最年轻的孩子，但在大多数游戏中仍处于同等地位的是（通常）更便宜的Acer Nitro AN517-41-R5Z7配备RTX 3070。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

我们的宏碁Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER评测机型以及配备英特尔酷睿i5-13500H和RTX 4050的宏碁Nitro 17 AN17-51-59VT的最小变体目前在美国的宏碁在线商店、亚马逊和百思买都无法购买。然而，我们的评论模型目前可以在宏碁的英国商店以1599.99英镑买到。

Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER - 2023-09-07 09/07/2023 v7
Mario Petzold

Chassis

79 / 98 → 80%

Keyboard

87%

Pointing Device

75%

Connectivity

69 / 80 → 86%

Weight

56 / 10-66 → 83%

Battery

75 / 95 → 79%

Display

86%

Games Performance

99%

Application Performance

96%

Temperature

85 / 95 → 89%

Noise

85 / 90 → 94%

Audio

71%

Camera

33 / 85 → 39%

Average

77%

87%

Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Andrew Dickson - Translator - 88 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 391930 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 宏碁的安静的Nitro 17笔记本电脑被审查：RTX 4060，完美配置

Mario Petzold, 2023-07- 2 (Update: 2023-07- 2)

宏碁的安静的Nitro 17笔记本电脑被审查：RTX 4060，完美配置

潜在的竞争对手比较

箱子 - 一个超大的17英寸笔记本电脑

尺寸比较

特点 - 对Nitro 17没有抱怨

SD卡阅读器

沟通

网络摄像头

维护

输入设备--为游戏笔记本而生

显示 - 总而言之，就是游戏的门票。

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能--Nitro 17位于游戏包的中间位置

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

系统性能

DPC延迟

大容量存储

Continuous performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

游戏性能

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

排放--在安静的环境中也能进行游戏

噪声排放

温度

压力测试

发言人

Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER audio analysis

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

能源管理 - 宏碁Nitro 17拥有高效的硬件

消耗功率

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

Power consumption with an external monitor

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论 - Nitro 17不具备任何真正的弱点

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Pricecompare