联想ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500工作站回顾。比戴尔Precision 7670更快
ThinkPad P16 G1是新一代的16英寸ThinkPad工作站,旨在超越现有的16英寸ThinkPad P1系列 。它搭载了一些目前最快的移动CPU和工作站GPU,分别达到Core i9-12950HX和RTX A5500,成为市场上最快的移动工作站之一。我们配置的单位售价约为9000美元。当然,配备较慢的集成UHD显卡或英特尔ARC Pro A30M的低端SKU也有,起价反而为3400美元。
该机型直接与其他高端移动工作站和一些Nvidia Studio笔记本电脑竞争,如戴尔Precision 7670,华硕ProArt StudioBook Pro 16,微星CreatorPro Z16P, 或惠普ZBook Studio 16 G9 。请看我们对ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A2000 配置的完整评论,以了解更多关于该机型的机箱和其他物理特征。这篇评论将侧重于用户在配置最高端CPU和GPU选项的情况下对ThinkPad P16 G1的性能有何期待。
更多联想评论。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
91 % | 02/2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU | 3 kg | 30.23 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 | |
12/2021 | Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 W-11955M, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 21.4 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 | ||
89.1 % | 12/2022 | Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 25.95 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 | |
88.2 % | 02/2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB i7-12850HX, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU | 3 kg | 30.23 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
84.3 % | 11/2022 | MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 19 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
90.1 % | 11/2022 | HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 19 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例
SD卡阅读器
集成读卡器提供的传输速率只是平均水平。将1GB的图片从我们的UHS-II测试卡移到桌面上需要14秒,而Precision 7670的时间还不到一半。对于像我们的ThinkPad P1这样的高端移动工作站,我们期待着更多一点。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST (AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA (Angelbird AV PRO V60) | |
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB (AV Pro V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST (AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA (Angelbird AV PRO V60) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB (AV Pro V60) |
沟通
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance |
网络摄像头
维护
底部面板由12颗飞利浦螺钉固定。必须卸下键盘才能接触到WAN模块、主M.2 SSD插槽和四个SODIMM插槽中的两个。联想有一个官方维护手册供终端用户参考。
有趣的是,ThinkPad P16 G1是极少数配备可拆卸GPU的笔记本电脑之一。除非出于维修或更换的目的,一般不建议更换笔记本显卡。
配件和保修
除了交流电适配器和文件外,零售盒中没有任何额外的东西。
一年的有限保修期,而戴尔Precision 7670的标准保修期为三年。不过,如果需要,联想在一年的期限内提供现场服务。
显示
联想提供了四种不同的60赫兹显示器选项,所有这些都是经过潘通工厂校准的直流调光。我们下面的测量结果只反映了加粗的选项,而我们第二个配备RTX A2000 GPU的设备配备了1600p选项。
- 1920 x 1200,非触摸,IPS,300尼特,哑光,100% sRGB
- 2560 x 1600,非触摸,IPS,400尼特,哑光,100% sRGB
- 3840 x 2400,非触摸,IPS,600尼特,哑光,100% AdobeRGB
- 3840 x 2400,触摸,OLED,400尼特,光面,100% DCI-P3
我们的独立测量可以确认AdobeRGB的全覆盖和600尼特的亮度。然而,尽管有600尼特的目标,亮度分布也只是平均水平。例如,我们显示器的左上角象限比右下角象限要亮29%(642尼特对497尼特)。选择OLED面板会改善亮度分布,但考虑到ThinkPad P1 G1的要价,我们对IPS面板的期望更高。
值得注意的是,联想在ThinkPad P1 G1上使用了相同的LP160UQ1-SPB1 IPS面板,用于其其他16英寸ThinkPad型号,包括ThinkPad P1 G4和ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4.
|
Brightness Distribution: 77 %
Center on Battery: 601.9 cd/m²
Contrast: 1281:1 (Black: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.45 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
95.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
82.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 LP160UQ1-SPB1, IPS, 3840x2400, 16.00 | Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 ATNA60YV02-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16.00 | Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance Samsung 160YV03, OLED, 3840x2400, 16.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB NE160QDM-N63 , IPS LED, 2560x1600, 16.00 | MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST B160QAN02.N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA BOE0A52, IPS, 3840x2400, 16.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 8% | 8% | -12% | 3% | 3% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 82.9 | 99.9 21% | 99.9 21% | 71.5 -14% | 97.6 18% | 97.5 18% |
sRGB Coverage | 98.9 | 100 1% | 100 1% | 100 1% | 99.9 1% | 99.9 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 95.9 | 98.6 3% | 98.1 2% | 73.3 -24% | 87.4 -9% | 86.3 -10% |
Response Times | 96% | 96% | 23% | 76% | 75% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 45.6 ? | 2 ? 96% | 1.84 ? 96% | 37.7 ? 17% | 12.8 ? 72% | 15.3 ? 66% |
Response Time Black / White * | 36.8 ? | 2 ? 95% | 1.92 ? 95% | 26.3 ? 29% | 7.4 ? 80% | 6.1 ? 83% |
PWM Frequency | 240 ? | 59.52 ? | ||||
Screen | -2% | -36% | -4% | 9% | 16% | |
Brightness middle | 601.9 | 353 -41% | 325.2 -46% | 424 -30% | 407 -32% | 554 -8% |
Brightness | 569 | 360 -37% | 328 -42% | 398 -30% | 388 -32% | 516 -9% |
Brightness Distribution | 77 | 96 25% | 97 26% | 90 17% | 88 14% | 84 9% |
Black Level * | 0.47 | 0.24 49% | 0.36 23% | 0.47 -0% | ||
Contrast | 1281 | 1767 38% | 1131 -12% | 1179 -8% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.45 | 2.45 -0% | 4.59 -87% | 2.6 -6% | 1.3 47% | 1 59% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.46 | 3.75 16% | 7.65 -72% | 4.9 -10% | 2.5 44% | 2.4 46% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.6 | 1.88 28% | 2.5 4% | 4.1 -58% | 2.1 19% | 1.6 38% |
Gamma | 2.3 96% | 2.31 95% | 2.1 105% | 2.13 103% | 2.26 97% | 2.29 96% |
CCT | 6805 96% | 6441 101% | 6541 99% | 7252 90% | 6437 101% | 6458 101% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.77 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.6 | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 34% /
19% | 23% /
-0% | 2% /
-2% | 29% /
18% | 31% /
22% |
* ... smaller is better
颜色配置文件可以通过预装的X-Rite Color Assistant软件来改变。尽管我们的面板完全覆盖了AdobeRGB,但它目前似乎是有问题的,因为颜色并不像开箱时那样准确。例如,当设置为sRGB模式时,平均灰度和色彩deltaE值将分别只有2.6和2.45,而设置为AdobeRGB模式时则为4.8和3.87。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
36.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.6 ms rise | |
↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
45.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise | |
↘ 24.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
室外能见度很好,因为显示屏比其他大多数笔记本电脑更亮,300至400 nit的范围更常见。然而,仍然建议尽可能在阴凉处工作,因为阳光直射会降低图像质量和色彩。
业绩
测试条件
在运行以下任何性能基准测试之前,我们通过Windows和Nvidia控制面板分别将我们的设备设置为性能模式和dGPU模式。建议用户熟悉预装的联想Vantage软件,因为它是联想特定BIOS更新、功能、保修状态等的中心枢纽。
没有Xeon CPU选项,因此不支持ECC RAM。然而,GPU的ECC状态可以通过Nvidia控制面板切换为开或关。
处理器
原始的多线程性能要比现在快10%左右。 竞争对手的酷睿i9-12900H在竞争的 微星CreatorPro Z16P.升级后的酷睿i7-12850HX配置升级到我们的 酷睿i9-12950HX的配置将提高15%的性能。也许最值得注意的是,Precision 7670大约慢了15%至20%,尽管它与我们的联想一样,配备了相同的Core i9-12950HX CPU。
涡轮增压的可持续性很好,但并不完美。例如,在循环运行CineBench R15 xT时,原来的3141分会随着时间的推移下降到~2830分,性能下降10%。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
系统性能
PCMark分数是我们在任何移动工作站上看到的最高的一些分数。我们的系统甚至超过了 戴尔Precision 7670它的CPU和GPU选项与ThinkPad P16 G1相同。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 Score | 7236 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示,在打开我们的主页的多个浏览器标签时,存在轻微的DPC问题,这对于一台工作站来说是令人失望的。在60FPS下的4K视频播放是非常好的,在我们的测试视频中只有一个丢帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的A2000配置将配备美光3400固态硬盘,而我们的A5500配置则配备了一个 WD SN810 OPAL固态硬盘代替。两者之间的连续读取和写入率是相当的,但我们的WD硬盘在大约5分钟的压力后似乎有问题,以维持最大的传输率,正如我们下面的对比图所示。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE -34! | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance -1! | |
Average NVIDIA RTX A5500 Laptop GPU | |
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 -19! | |
MSI WE76 11UM-456 -9! | |
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 -1! | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST -17! | |
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 -17! | |
HP ZBook Studio G7 -17! | |
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA -9! | |
Dell Precision 5000 5470 -9! | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB -17! |
3DMark 11 Performance | 32536 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 54323 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 25940 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 10760 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
GTA V (2015) | 185.9 | 183.4 | 177.7 | 124.4 | 103.5 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 489.4 | 329.9 | 211.8 | 110.4 | 63.7 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 194.3 | 174.5 | 166.1 | 156.3 | 132.8 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 212 | 142.5 | 113.1 | 83.5 | 45.4 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 155.8 | 137.6 | 108.8 | 93.7 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 442 | 264 | 223 | 197.7 | 138.6 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 132.3 | 117.7 | 96.1 | 80.7 | 47 | 20.4 |
排放
系统噪音
在默认的平衡模式下,尽管内部有高性能的处理器,但风扇保持安静的时间比预期的长。例如,当运行3DMark 06时,在第一个基准场景结束时,风扇噪音最高只有28 dB(A)。要经过多次运行,风扇才会跳动到高达40 dB(A)的更大的转速范围。
如下表所示,在性能模式下运行要求更高的负载时,风扇噪音最高将超过50分贝(A),明显高于包括Precision 7670在内的竞争工作站。当然,这些替代品也比我们的联想配置要慢。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.1 / 23.1 / 23.1 dB(A) |
Load |
| 28.9 / 51.4 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.1 dB(A) |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB | Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, W-11955M, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0) | Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-12850HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH | MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -14% | -16% | -6% | -11% | -9% | |
off / environment * | 23.1 | 26 -13% | 23.9 -3% | 23.2 -0% | 24.1 -4% | 24 -4% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.1 | 26 -13% | 24 -4% | 23.2 -0% | 27.1 -17% | 24 -4% |
Idle Average * | 23.1 | 26 -13% | 24 -4% | 23.2 -0% | 27.1 -17% | 27.7 -20% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.1 | 26.5 -15% | 38 -65% | 23.2 -0% | 27.1 -17% | 27.7 -20% |
Load Average * | 28.9 | 42 -45% | 46.3 -60% | 47.8 -65% | 42.9 -48% | 39.8 -38% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 51.6 | 41.9 19% | 34.1 34% | 44 15% | 44.3 14% | |
Load Maximum * | 51.4 | 43 16% | 47.9 7% | 56.3 -10% | 47 9% | 47.7 7% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
即使在没有运行应用程序的情况下在桌面上空转,表面温度也比预期的要高。例如,底部的温度可以达到37摄氏度,而Precision 7670上只有31摄氏度。如果运行更高的负载,联想的这些热点可以达到49摄氏度或更高,而键盘中心可以达到40摄氏度。如果笔记本电脑放在腿上而不是桌子上,皮肤温度会感觉不舒服。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 38.1 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.8 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.4 °C / 90.3 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-4.6 °C / -8.3 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA RTX A5500 Laptop GPU | Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU | Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA RTX A5500 Laptop GPU | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB Intel Core i7-12850HX, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU | MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU | HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -1% | -3% | 17% | -3% | 9% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 44.8 | 45.7 -2% | 53 -18% | 43.1 4% | 56.3 -26% | 38.7 14% |
Maximum Bottom * | 49.8 | 48.3 3% | 43.2 13% | 39.9 20% | 68.3 -37% | 53.4 -7% |
Idle Upper Side * | 30.6 | 35.3 -15% | 36.8 -20% | 26 15% | 25.2 18% | 27.3 11% |
Idle Bottom * | 38.6 | 34.4 11% | 33.8 12% | 27.6 28% | 25.9 33% | 31.6 18% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
当处理器处于重载状态时,系统肯定是紧张的。例如,当运行Prime95时,CPU时钟速率和电路板功耗将分别提升到4.1 GHz和135 W。不幸的是,核心温度几乎会立即飙升到100摄氏度,因此时钟频率会迅速下降,以防止更高的温度。该处理器最终将稳定在3 GHz、82 W和100 C,这意味着它正在挑战ThinkPad P16 G1冷却解决方案的极限。在配备相同处理器的Precision 7670上重复这一测试,将导致2.3 GHz的较慢稳定时钟速率和78 C的较低核心温度。
当运行 Witcher 3代表高负载时,GPU时钟速率、内存时钟和温度将分别稳定在1477 MHz、2000 MHz和78 C,而在类似条件下,Precision 7670则为1417 MHz、1750 MHz和82 C。联想的板卡功耗也会更高,为129W,而戴尔的板卡功耗仅为100W,这将解释上述GPU性能优势。
用电池供电运行限制了性能。在电池上进行的Fire Strike 测试,物理学和图形学得分分别为18903和12395分,而在电源上则为31226和28885分。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(°C) | GPU平均温度(°C) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 39 | 39 |
Prime95压力 | 3.0 | -- | 100 | 45 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 2.1 - 2.8 | ~500 - 1550 | 88 - 100 | 75 |
Witcher 3 应力 | ~1.2 | 1477 | 72 | 78 |
发言人
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
消耗功率
闲置时的功耗比Precision 7670低几瓦,可能是因为后者的OLED面板要求更高。当运行更高的负载如 Witcher 3然而,联想的功耗会明显高于戴尔(208瓦对159瓦)。正如我们上面的基准测试所显示的那样,较高的耗电量与比戴尔的竞争机型更快的CPU和GPU性能相吻合。
尽管电力用户可能会欣赏额外的性能,但我们满载的联想比大多数其他移动工作站的要求要高得多。事实上,当CPU和GPU处于高利用率时,中等大小(约15 x 8.6 x 2.6厘米)的230瓦交流适配器可能不足以为机器供电。我们能够从230瓦的适配器测量到286瓦的临时最大电流,然后最终下降并稳定在223瓦左右。因此,在运行高要求的负载时,预计电池充电速度会减慢,甚至变成负值。当运行 Witcher 3例如,当连续运行90分钟时,我们观察到我们的电池水平从100%下降到87%。类似的行为也出现在 旧的XPS 17或 Precision 5750.太糟糕了,联想在结账时没有提供高于230W的交流适配器选项。
用低端的RTX A2000进行配置,可以将消耗量降低一半左右。在这种情况下,230瓦的交流适配器就足够了。
Off / Standby | 0.03 / 1.6 Watt |
Idle | 7.5 / 20.1 / 40 Watt |
Load |
137 / 285.9 Watt |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 2TB, IPS, 3840x2400, 16.00 | Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 W-11955M, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0), OLED, 3840x2400, 16.00 | Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, , OLED, 3840x2400, 16.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB i7-12850HX, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, IPS LED, 2560x1600, 16.00 | MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, IPS, 3840x2400, 16.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 14% | -35% | 45% | 19% | 28% | |
Idle Minimum * | 7.5 | 12.4 -65% | 16.4 -119% | 5.1 32% | 10.8 -44% | 7.2 4% |
Idle Average * | 20.1 | 16.5 18% | 35.9 -79% | 9.2 54% | 16.3 19% | 18.1 10% |
Idle Maximum * | 40 | 25 37% | 47 -18% | 9.9 75% | 16.9 58% | 18.5 54% |
Load Average * | 137 | 132 4% | 147.1 -7% | 124.1 9% | 111.7 18% | 112.8 18% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 208 | 132 37% | 158.8 24% | 87.7 58% | 152.1 27% | 106.7 49% |
Load Maximum * | 285.9 | 134 53% | 311 -9% | 168.9 41% | 177.4 38% | 186 35% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
运行时间比我们较小的RTX A2000 SKU短几个小时,如果设置为平衡电源配置文件,总共不到6小时。
从空电到满电大约需要2小时。然而,联想的估计充电时间并不那么准确,因为Vantage可能会显示,在自动重新校准之前,一开始长达4小时。请记住,如果运行上面提到的高要求的应用程序,充电速度会明显减慢。
该系统不能通过USB-C充电。
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, 94 Wh | Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 W-11955M, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, 93 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB i7-12850HX, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, 94 Wh | MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -14% | -20% | 61% | -1% | 8% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 350 | 301 -14% | 280 -20% | 564 61% | 348 -1% | 377 8% |
H.264 | 106 | 509 | ||||
Witcher 3 ultra | 94 | |||||
Load | 106 | 63 |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 230瓦的交流适配器是不够的
从纯粹的性能角度来看,ThinkPad P16 G1是目前最快的移动工作站之一,无论屏幕大小如何。它的酷睿i9-12950HX CPU和RTX A5500 GPU的性能略微但始终超过了 Precision 7670即使戴尔的机型有类似的处理器选项。
有两个关键的缺点,我们希望联想能在未来的迭代中解决。首先,在运行高要求的负载时,CPU温度比平均温度高很多。当然,高温并不出乎意料,但是当上述戴尔型号的相同CPU在类似条件下几乎没有突破80摄氏度的时候,100摄氏度的高温实在是太让人舒服了。高温也许是为稍快的性能所付出的代价。
其次,230瓦的交流适配器正在为100多瓦的CPU和130瓦的GPU供电而大汗淋漓。在运行高要求的负载时,这种挣扎是可以观察到的,因为在某些情况下,系统充电速度会明显减慢,甚至开始消耗电池。当我们能够从一个额定功率只有230W的交流适配器上测量到285W的峰值电流时,那么这里显然存在一个瓶颈。考虑到我们的配置水平,一个更大的280W或330W交流适配器会更合适。
ThinkPad P16 Gen 1将性能最大化,即使这意味着更高的功耗和更高的核心温度。然而,考虑到我们最高端配置的非常苛刻的处理器,230W的交流适配器可能过于保守了。
然而,尽管温度很高,230瓦电源砖不足,但整体的高系统性能是不可否认的。请确保退出任何苛刻的应用,以获得体面的充电速度。
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500
-
02/06/2023 v7
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.