Notebookcheck

Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17笔记本电脑评论。165 WGeForce RTX 3080的超薄尺寸

是微星、华硕或Razer的最佳选择。 超薄的游戏笔记本电脑很性感,但它们通常配备100瓦的低功率GPU。Maingear Vector Pro违背了这一趋势,将165瓦的GPU塞进了与Razer Blade Pro一样大小的机箱,但它是否真的能发挥出作用?
Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), 🇺🇸 🇳🇱 ...
Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Tiger Lake
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Vector Pro是定制PC制造商Maingear的一款17.3英寸超薄游戏笔记本电脑。它是一个超薄的高性能系统,与微星GS75相同。 MSI GS75, 雷蛇Blade Pro, 华硕Zephyrus S17,或戴尔Alienware x17系列。

我们的测试装置已经完全配置了第11代酷睿i7-11800H CPU,165瓦GeForce RTX 3080 GPU,以及165赫兹1440p IPS显示屏,零售价约为2500美元。更少的SKU将提供RTX 3070,起步价更低。

值得一提的是,Vector Pro采用了白色标签的同方机箱。因此,用户可以从其他经销商那里找到非常类似的设计和功能,如 申克XMG Neo 17XMG Core 17.

Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Processor
Intel Core i7-11800H 8 x 2.3 - 4.6 GHz, 120 W PL2 / Short Burst, 120 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake H45
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU - 16384 MB, Core: 1605 MHz, Memory: 1750 MHz, 165 W TDP, 471.96, Manual and Optimus switch
Memory
32768 MB 
, DDR4-3200, 22-22-22-52, Dual-Channel
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 170 PPI, BOE NE173QHM-NY2, IPS, BOE0977, glossy: no, 165 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM570
Storage
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, 1024 GB 
Soundcard
Intel Tiger Lake PCH-H - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm headphones, 3.5 mm microphone, Card Reader: MicroSD
Networking
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 19.81 x 393.95 x 260.8
Battery
91 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.254 kg, Power Supply: 846 g
Price
2500 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

potential competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88 %
09/2021
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg19.81 mm17.30"2560x1440
90 %
08/2021
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.8 kg19.9 mm17.30"2560x1440
84 %
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg30.05 mm17.30"2560x1440
85 %
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg27 mm17.30"2560x1440
84 %
Schenker Compact 17
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
2.9 kg29.9 mm17.30"3840x2160
84 %
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.3 kg18.9 mm17.30"1920x1080

案例

机箱可能不像华硕Zephyrus S或微星GS75那样华而不实,但它肯定感觉更强大、更坚硬。当试图扭转其角落时,底座不会屈服或吱吱作响,给人以强烈的第一印象。然而,盖子和铰链可以更硬,以减少调整角度时的摇晃。更厚的 华硕ROG Strix笔记本电脑有更大的铰链,以获得更好的寿命感。

尺寸几乎与Razer Blade Pro相同。然而,重量方面,Maingear几乎轻了半公斤。在Maingear中缺少一个蒸汽室冷却器,这可能是重量较轻的原因。

指纹很容易积聚在机箱周围
指纹很容易积聚在机箱周围
盖子打开到最大角度(~130度)。
盖子打开到最大角度(~130度)。
铰链的硬度不高,因此在调整角度时,显示器会摇晃。
铰链的硬度不高,因此在调整角度时,显示器会摇晃。
铝制外盖和塑料底部的键盘甲板
铝制外盖和塑料底部的键盘甲板
锥形的边缘使外观更薄
锥形的边缘使外观更薄
系统后部有大量的通风格栅
系统后部有大量的通风格栅
399 mm 275 mm 29.9 mm 2.9 kg395.7 mm 260.8 mm 30.05 mm 2.5 kg396 mm 261 mm 27 mm 2.5 kg396 mm 259 mm 18.9 mm 2.3 kg394 mm 264 mm 19.9 mm 2.8 kg393.95 mm 260.8 mm 19.81 mm 2.3 kg

连接性

端口选项几乎与同方GM7ZG7S或GM7MG0R相同,但有一个明显的例外:我们的Maingear机箱集成了一个MicroSD读卡器,而不是一个全尺寸的。通过英特尔芯片组原生支持Thunderbolt 4,与AMD驱动的笔记本电脑不同。

不幸的是,即使在测试了多个USB-C适配器后,该笔记本电脑也不能通过USB-C充电。

前面。没有端口
前面。没有端口
右边。微型SD读卡器,2个USB-A 3.1 Gen.
右边。微型SD读卡器,2个USB-A 3.1 Gen.
后部。USB-C和Thunderbolt 4,HDMI,2.5 Gbps RJ-45,AC适配器
后部。USB-C和Thunderbolt 4,HDMI,2.5 Gbps RJ-45,AC适配器
左边:Kensington锁,USB-A 3.1 Gen. 2,3.5毫米麦克风,3.5毫米耳机
左边:Kensington锁,USB-A 3.1 Gen. 2,3.5毫米麦克风,3.5毫米耳机

SD卡阅读器

集成的MicroSD读卡器的传输速率是平均的。将1GB的图片从我们的UHS-II测试卡移动到桌面上需要大约14秒,而微星GS75的时间还不到一半。

这是为数不多的必须将卡倒置插入的MicroSD读卡器之一。此外,读卡器不是弹簧式的,所以当完全插入时,卡槽会突出来。
这是为数不多的必须将卡倒置插入的MicroSD读卡器之一。此外,读卡器不是弹簧式的,所以当完全插入时,卡槽会突出来。
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
204.8 MB/s ∼100% +174%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
 
183 (181.31min - 182.94max) MB/s ∼89% +145%
Schenker Compact 17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
156.4 MB/s ∼76% +109%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
83 MB/s ∼41% +11%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
  (AV Pro V60)
74.8 MB/s ∼37%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
18.46 MB/s ∼9% -75%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
 
256.95 MB/s ∼100% +191%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
209.7 MB/s ∼82% +137%
Schenker Compact 17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
192.2 MB/s ∼75% +118%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
90 MB/s ∼35% +2%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
  (AV Pro V60)
88.3 MB/s ∼34%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
20.54 MB/s ∼8% -77%

沟通

一个可拆卸的英特尔AX201无线局域网模块是蓝牙5.2和Wi-Fi 6兼容性的标准配备。
一个可拆卸的英特尔AX201无线局域网模块是蓝牙5.2和Wi-Fi 6兼容性的标准配备。
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1541 (1418min - 1606max) MBit/s ∼100% +35%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1350 MBit/s ∼88% +19%
Schenker Compact 17
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1275 (609min - 681max) MBit/s ∼83% +12%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1270 (1080min - 1388max) MBit/s ∼82% +12%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1138 (921min - 1230max) MBit/s ∼74%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
MediaTek MT7921
636 (325min - 728max) MBit/s ∼41% -44%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1711 (861min - 1776max) MBit/s ∼100% +21%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1416 (1350min - 1459max) MBit/s ∼83%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1370 MBit/s ∼80% -3%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1177 (773min - 1353max) MBit/s ∼69% -17%
Schenker Compact 17
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
914 (877min - 940max) MBit/s ∼53% -35%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
MediaTek MT7921
698 (529min - 748max) MBit/s ∼41% -51%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450145913971350145114491435141313821418142113911411140814351413144314241419142014161440143814121376141614141405135714271418145913971350145114491435141313821418142113911411140814351413144314241419142014161440143814121376141614141405135714271418114711211114118711521230118611611169115011911073116012041060921117311521175954119011761190113311511161118410769861209Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1415 (1350-1459)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1138 (921-1230)

网络摄像头

虽然有兼容Windows Hello的红外线,但720p的网络摄像头没有集成隐私快门。

ColorChecker
10.7 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
19 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17: 13.84 ∆E min: 1.76 - max: 20.47 ∆E

维护

卸下下面的十颗飞利浦螺丝后,底板很容易弹开。用户可以直接接触到电池、两个M.2 2280插槽、两个内存插槽和WLAN模块。

配件和保修

除了交流电适配器、文件和几张Maingear的标志贴纸外,零售盒中没有任何额外的东西。标准的一年有限保修期适用于Maingear的扩展选项。

输入设备

键盘

键盘的反馈和行程本可以更牢固和更深入,特别是对于一个游戏笔记本来说。虽然不像廉价的华硕VivoBook那样轻巧或浅薄,但更多的键位可以改善游戏和打字体验。与微星GT或GS型号相比,华硕Zephyrus的反馈更具有可比性。

触摸板

点击板比Razer Blade Pro上的小一点(13.3 x 7.5厘米对13 x 8厘米)。然而,在Maingear上的反馈更强,而且没有海绵状的感觉。

四区RGB照明而不是每键RGB
四区RGB照明而不是每键RGB
点击板略带橡胶,有纹理感,粘性很小。预计随着时间的推移,会有一些明显的指纹积聚。
点击板略带橡胶,有纹理感,粘性很小。预计随着时间的推移,会有一些明显的指纹积聚。
按键反馈不像典型的超极本那样柔软,同时也不像惠普Spectre那样牢固。空格键和回车键的咔哒声适度响亮
按键反馈不像典型的超极本那样柔软,同时也不像惠普Spectre那样牢固。空格键和回车键的咔哒声适度响亮
数字键盘和方向键比QWERTY主键略窄
数字键盘和方向键比QWERTY主键略窄

显示

我们的Vector Pro使用的是京东方的NE173QHM-NY2 IPS面板,与申科XMG Core 17上的面板相同,这意味着这两台笔记本都有类似的显示属性。响应时间很快,具有良好的亮度、对比度和刷新率,代表了专为游戏设计的高端1440p面板。京东方有一个较新的NE173QHM-NY3面板,具有更快的响应时间和更好的颜色,因为发现在华硕ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703因此,我们的Maingear使用的是一个旧版本,这有点令人失望。

哑光面板,没有边缘到边缘的玻璃保护
哑光面板,没有边缘到边缘的玻璃保护
狭窄的边框
狭窄的边框
哑光子像素只是稍有颗粒感,不像光面那样清晰。
哑光子像素只是稍有颗粒感,不像光面那样清晰。
非常轻微的不均匀背光渗出
非常轻微的不均匀背光渗出
358.2
cd/m²
372.3
cd/m²
374
cd/m²
351.9
cd/m²
389.7
cd/m²
370
cd/m²
327.6
cd/m²
379.3
cd/m²
345.7
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE NE173QHM-NY2
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 389.7 cd/m² Average: 363.2 cd/m² Minimum: 20.86 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 389.7 cd/m²
Contrast: 829:1 (Black: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.93 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5, calibrated: 1.31
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
71.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
BOE NE173QHM-NY2, IPS, 17.30, 2560x1440
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
BOE099D (BOE CQ NE173QHM-NY3), IPS, 17.30, 2560x1440
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
BOE CQ NE173QHM-NY2, IPS, 17.30, 2560x1440
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
BOE NE173QHM-NY2 (BOE0977), IPS, 17.30, 2560x1440
Schenker Compact 17
AU Optronics B173ZAN03.0, IPS, 17.30, 3840x2160
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Sharp LQ173M1JW05, IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080
Display
17%
-3%
0%
19%
4%
Display P3 Coverage
70.7
94.2
33%
68.08
-4%
70.46
0%
84.43
19%
75.55
7%
sRGB Coverage
99.4
98.7
-1%
98.46
-1%
99.47
0%
99.9
1%
99.78
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
71.7
84.4
18%
69.35
-3%
71.85
0%
98.04
37%
75.05
5%
Response Times
51%
5%
5%
-197%
57%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
15.6 (8.4, 7.2)
4.8
69%
16.8 (8.4, 8.4)
-8%
16.8 (8.4, 8.4)
-8%
51 (25, 26)
-227%
5 (2.2, 2.8)
68%
Response Time Black / White *
12 (6.8, 5.2)
8
33%
10 (4.8, 5.2)
17%
10 (4, 6)
17%
32 (18, 14)
-167%
6.6 (2.6, 4)
45%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-11%
-7%
4%
-40%
3%
Brightness middle
389.7
322
-17%
370
-5%
410
5%
437
12%
299.4
-23%
Brightness
363
288
-21%
333
-8%
381
5%
413
14%
299
-18%
Brightness Distribution
84
72
-14%
84
0%
88
5%
88
5%
84
0%
Black Level *
0.47
0.3
36%
0.38
19%
0.37
21%
0.6
-28%
0.31
34%
Contrast
829
1073
29%
974
17%
1108
34%
728
-12%
966
17%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.93
3.05
-58%
2.41
-25%
2.55
-32%
4.28
-122%
1.82
6%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.84
5.23
24%
7.32
-7%
4.33
37%
7.65
-12%
3.91
43%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.31
1.92
-47%
1.19
9%
1.28
2%
3.41
-160%
1.59
-21%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.4
3.11
-30%
3.9
-63%
3.4
-42%
3.8
-58%
2.7
-13%
Gamma
2.12 104%
2.13 103%
2.287 96%
2.275 97%
2.49 88%
2.18 101%
CCT
6658 98%
6553 99%
7302 89%
6637 98%
7363 88%
6837 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
84
69
72
87
67.1
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99
93
95
100
99.8
Total Average (Program / Settings)
19% / 4%
-2% / -4%
3% / 3%
-73% / -50%
21% / 11%

* ... smaller is better

色彩空间完全涵盖了sRGB和大约72%的AdobeRGB。更高分辨率的4K IPS面板往往能提供更深的色彩,尽管其代价是刷新率和响应时间更慢。

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. DCI-P3
vs. DCI-P3

颜色和灰度在开箱后相当准确,表明没有必要对终端用户进行修补。尽管如此,我们自己用X-Rite色度计进行的校准会使平均灰度值在全局范围内略有改善。

校准前的灰度
校准前的灰度
校准前的饱和扫频(针对P3)。
校准前的饱和扫频(针对P3)。
校准前的ColorChecker(针对P3)。
校准前的ColorChecker(针对P3)。
校准后的灰度
校准后的灰度
校准后的饱和扫频(针对P3)。
校准后的饱和扫频(针对P3)。
校准后的ColorChecker(针对P3)。
校准后的ColorChecker(针对P3)。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
15.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.4 ms rise
↘ 7.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 15315 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

由于最大亮度接近400尼特,而不是通常的300尼特,因此户外能见度比大多数17.3英寸游戏笔记本要好。然而,你还是要避免阳光直射,否则屏幕会被洗掉。

宽广的IPS可视角度。在极端角度下,颜色和对比度会下降
宽广的IPS可视角度。在极端角度下,颜色和对比度会下降
在一个明亮的阴天,在户外
在一个明亮的阴天,在户外
在户外的阴凉处
在户外的阴凉处
在一个明亮的阴天,在户外
在一个明亮的阴天,在户外

业绩

Maingear挤进了一个165瓦的GeForce RTX 3080 GPU,尽管它的设计很紧凑,在目标TGP方面与更厚的Schenker XMG Ultra 17 上的GPU相似。可调整栏、动态提升2.0和WhisperMode 2.0都支持,而高级优化和内部G-Sync则不支持。因此,可以通过Maingear NODE控制中心软件进行手动切换,在dGPU模式(即全GPU性能模式)或Optimus模式之间切换。我们建议用户熟悉这个软件,因为许多系统特定的设置和LED功能都是在这里切换的。

在运行以下任何性能基准测试之前,我们的系统被设置为涡轮模式和dGPU模式,以获得尽可能高的分数。

 

处理器

CPU的性能非常好,与其他配备相同处理器的笔记本电脑相比,我们期望它能达到这个水平。用户从旧的酷睿i7-10750H酷睿i7-10875H笔记本电脑的用户将分别看到大约40%和20%的性能提升。竞争性的 Ryzen 7 5800H在多线程负载中稍快,而在单线程负载中则比我们的 酷睿i7-11800H.

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

011022033044055066077088099011001210132014301540165017601870198020901866.631871.521780.311755.161758.41759.091761.571772.111765.691711.821762.041784.761734.231751.621767.411759.791768.581731.31723.921753.691746.81750.091736.411755.311759.011747.111746.951757.471755.851740.421726.741755.71748.41742.081743.831762.581757.551763.91724.731756.471761.571753.541740.191749.481715.051775.11749.171730.181724.141735.211845.871803.911769.751720.871721.171749.71750.551767.721739.051726.741733.71751.241742.921769.911752.161758.161721.761763.981728.911739.431766.471724.511764.681739.2817311773.441748.251739.051757.551741.021758.241762.811751.851761.81746.341732.51744.441742.161767.331763.511752.931744.5917261760.721731.981766.241741.251730.481740.491756.471822.571742.081723.171721.241695.631690.691681.661676.871678.841671.821672.81676.021673.921668.541662.931663.411673.011656.251652.071648.061645.141648.461650.371662.11666.62180.072090.082104.272063.772067.722163.682144.3121482093.042064.732165.212043.842143.052160.992098.862070.612183.762151.812081.492062.072163.452153.22167.432087.362059.941866.631871.521780.311755.161758.41759.091761.571772.111765.691711.821762.041784.761734.231751.621767.411759.791768.581731.31723.921753.691746.81750.091736.411755.311759.011747.111746.951757.471755.851740.421726.741755.71748.41742.081743.831762.581757.551763.91724.731756.471761.571753.541740.191749.481715.051775.11749.171730.181724.141735.211845.871803.911769.751720.871721.171749.71750.551767.721739.051726.741733.71751.241742.921769.911752.161758.161721.761763.981728.911739.431766.471724.511764.681739.2817311773.441748.251739.051757.551741.021758.241762.811751.851761.81746.341732.51744.441742.161767.331763.511752.931744.5917261760.721731.981766.241741.251730.481740.491756.471822.571742.081723.171721.241695.631690.691681.661676.871678.841671.821672.81676.021673.921668.541662.931663.411673.011656.251652.071648.061645.141648.461650.371662.11666.62180.072090.082104.272063.772067.722163.682144.3121482093.042064.732165.212043.842143.052160.992098.862070.612183.762151.812081.492062.072163.452153.22167.432087.362059.941866.631871.521780.311755.161758.41759.091761.571772.111765.691711.821762.041784.761734.231751.621767.411759.791768.581731.31723.921753.691746.81750.091736.411755.311759.011747.111746.951757.471755.851740.421726.741755.71748.41742.081743.831762.581757.551763.91724.731756.471761.571753.541740.191749.481715.051775.11749.171730.181724.141735.211845.871803.911769.751720.871721.171749.71750.551767.721739.051726.741733.71751.241742.921769.911752.161758.161721.761763.981728.911739.431766.471724.511764.681739.2817311773.441748.251739.051757.551741.021758.241762.811751.851761.81746.341732.51744.441742.161767.331763.511752.931744.5917261760.721731.981766.241741.251730.481740.491756.471822.571742.081723.171721.241695.631690.691681.661676.871678.841671.821672.81676.021673.921668.541662.931663.411673.011656.251652.071648.061645.141648.461650.371662.11666.62180.072090.082104.272063.772067.722163.682144.3121482093.042064.732165.212043.842143.052160.992098.862070.612183.762151.812081.492062.072163.452153.22167.432087.362059.94Tooltip
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1755 (1711.82-1871.52)
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060 Intel Core i7-11800H; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1750 (1720.87-1845.87)
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Intel Core i7-11800H; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1681 (1645.14-1822.57)
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD Intel Core i9-11900H; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø2117 (2043.84-2183.76)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
5055 Points ∼100% +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
5023 Points ∼99% +17%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4990 Points ∼99% +16%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
4776 Points ∼94% +11%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (3306 - 5408, n=25)
4588 Points ∼91% +7%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4552 Points ∼90% +6%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
4304 Points ∼85%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 Touch 4K, i7-10875H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-10875H
3531 Points ∼70% -18%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
3027 Points ∼60% -30%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
2968 Points ∼59% -31%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
2308 Points ∼46% -46%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
1397 Points ∼28% -68%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
634 Points ∼100% +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
608 Points ∼96% +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
581 Points ∼92% 0%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
581 Points ∼92%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (520 - 586, n=22)
572 Points ∼90% -2%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
554 Points ∼87% -5%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
491 Points ∼77% -15%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 Touch 4K, i7-10875H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-10875H
490 Points ∼77% -16%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
484 Points ∼76% -17%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
470 Points ∼74% -19%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
421 Points ∼66% -28%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
312 Points ∼49% -46%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Multi Core)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
14066 Points ∼100% +17%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
13002 (12859.5min - 13002.3max) Points ∼92% +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
12720 Points ∼90% +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
12373 Points ∼88% +3%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
11981 (11268.1min - 11981.1max) Points ∼85%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (8447 - 14088, n=23)
11875 Points ∼84% -1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 Touch 4K, i7-10875H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-10875H
9071 (8918.34min - 9070.5max) Points ∼64% -24%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
8250 Points ∼59% -31%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
7747 Points ∼55% -35%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Single Core)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
1619 Points ∼100% +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
1586 Points ∼98% +6%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
1503 Points ∼93%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1491 Points ∼92% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1386 - 1520, n=21)
1490 Points ∼92% -1%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1423 Points ∼88% -5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 Touch 4K, i7-10875H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-10875H
1270 Points ∼78% -16%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
1253 Points ∼77% -17%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
1227 Points ∼76% -18%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
2361 Points ∼100% +26%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
2184 (2043.84min - 2183.76max) Points ∼93% +17%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2059 (2019.39min - 2059.31max) Points ∼87% +10%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2041 (1981.96min - 2041.34max) Points ∼86% +9%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1342 - 2173, n=24)
1934 Points ∼82% +3%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1932 (1913.23min - 1932.18max) Points ∼82% +3%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
1872 (1711.82min - 1871.52max) Points ∼79%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 Touch 4K, i7-10875H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-10875H
1489 (1469.35min - 1489.04max) Points ∼63% -20%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
1336 Points ∼57% -29%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
1299 (1187.65min - 1299max) Points ∼55% -31%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
1116 (974.99min - 1115.73max) Points ∼47% -40%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
548 Points ∼23% -71%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
254 Points ∼100% +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
241 Points ∼95% +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
239 Points ∼94% +6%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
229 Points ∼90% +1%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
226 Points ∼89%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (204 - 230, n=21)
225 Points ∼89% 0%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
209 Points ∼82% -8%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 Touch 4K, i7-10875H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-10875H
203 Points ∼80% -10%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
201 Points ∼79% -11%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
187 Points ∼74% -17%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
173 Points ∼68% -23%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
108 Points ∼43% -52%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
528 Seconds * ∼100% -96%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
466 Seconds * ∼88% -73%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
358 Seconds * ∼68% -33%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
333 Seconds * ∼63% -23%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 Touch 4K, i7-10875H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-10875H
302 Seconds * ∼57% -12%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
270 Seconds * ∼51%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (217 - 342, n=21)
266 Seconds * ∼50% +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
250 Seconds * ∼47% +7%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
248 Seconds * ∼47% +8%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
237 Seconds * ∼45% +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
231 Seconds * ∼44% +14%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
227 Seconds * ∼43% +16%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
6174 MIPS ∼100% +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
5795 MIPS ∼94% +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5664 MIPS ∼92% +5%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5520 MIPS ∼89% +2%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (5138 - 5716, n=21)
5470 MIPS ∼89% +1%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
5438 MIPS ∼88% +1%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
5404 MIPS ∼88%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 Touch 4K, i7-10875H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-10875H
5338 MIPS ∼86% -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
5321 MIPS ∼86% -2%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4634 MIPS ∼75% -14%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
4580 MIPS ∼74% -15%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
2945 MIPS ∼48% -46%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
59182 MIPS ∼100% +10%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
57579 MIPS ∼97% +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
57263 MIPS ∼97% +6%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
54172 MIPS ∼92% +1%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
53817 MIPS ∼91%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
50428 MIPS ∼85% -6%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (38156 - 56758, n=21)
49293 MIPS ∼83% -8%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 Touch 4K, i7-10875H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-10875H
45258 MIPS ∼76% -16%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
39581 MIPS ∼67% -26%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
36771 MIPS ∼62% -32%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
29342 MIPS ∼50% -45%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
15146 MIPS ∼26% -72%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
1777 Points ∼100% +101%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
1648 Points ∼93% +87%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1529 Points ∼86% +73%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (882 - 1625, n=18)
1371 Points ∼77% +55%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
1333 Points ∼75% +51%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 Touch 4K, i7-10875H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-10875H
1315 Points ∼74% +49%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
1191 Points ∼67% +35%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1176 Points ∼66% +33%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
1117 Points ∼63% +27%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
882 Points ∼50%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
703 Points ∼40% -20%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
10482 Points ∼100% +215%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
9628 Points ∼92% +190%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
9294 Points ∼89% +180%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 Touch 4K, i7-10875H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-10875H
8134 Points ∼78% +145%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
7864 Points ∼75% +137%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (3323 - 9851, n=18)
7302 Points ∼70% +120%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
6403 Points ∼61% +93%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
6394 Points ∼61% +92%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
4897 Points ∼47% +47%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
3323 Points ∼32%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
2783 Points ∼27% -16%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
17.1 fps ∼100% +26%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
16.7 fps ∼98% +23%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
15.8 fps ∼92% +16%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
14.8 fps ∼87% +9%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (10.5 - 17.4, n=21)
14.1 fps ∼82% +4%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
13.6 fps ∼80%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
13.1 fps ∼77% -4%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 Touch 4K, i7-10875H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-10875H
12.1 fps ∼71% -11%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
10.7 fps ∼63% -21%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
10.2 fps ∼60% -25%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
8.2 fps ∼48% -40%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
6.13 fps ∼36% -55%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
94.04 s * ∼100% -103%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
57.7 s * ∼61% -24%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
54.1 s * ∼58% -17%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
53.5 s * ∼57% -15%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
52.2 s * ∼56% -13%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
49.3 s * ∼52% -6%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
46.4 s * ∼49%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (38.6 - 50.7, n=21)
45.9 s * ∼49% +1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 Touch 4K, i7-10875H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-10875H
45.3 s * ∼48% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
44.4 s * ∼47% +4%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
40.5 s * ∼43% +13%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
1.088 sec * ∼100% -90%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
0.679 sec * ∼62% -19%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
0.6 sec * ∼55% -5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 Touch 4K, i7-10875H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.587 sec * ∼54% -3%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
0.582 sec * ∼53% -2%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.578 sec * ∼53% -1%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.572 sec * ∼53%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (0.548 - 0.605, n=21)
0.566 sec * ∼52% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
0.53 sec * ∼49% +7%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.518 sec * ∼48% +9%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
0.4981 sec * ∼46% +13%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.4926 sec * ∼45% +14%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1872 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
115 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
226 Points
Help

系统性能

PCMark 10的分数非常高,而且比其他大多数游戏笔记本略胜一筹,这可能是由于我们测试设备中的PCIe x4 NVMe固态硬盘。
PCMark 10的分数非常高,而且比其他大多数游戏笔记本略胜一筹,这可能是由于我们测试设备中的PCIe x4 NVMe固态硬盘。
PCMark 10 / Score
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7286 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (7073 - 7470, n=7)
7254 Points ∼100% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7245 Points ∼99% -1%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
6983 Points ∼96% -4%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
6582 Points ∼90% -10%
Schenker Compact 17
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
6364 Points ∼87% -13%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5685 Points ∼78% -22%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10839 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10630 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (10130 - 11064, n=7)
10511 Points ∼97% -3%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
10064 Points ∼93% -7%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
10051 Points ∼93% -7%
Schenker Compact 17
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
9473 Points ∼87% -13%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
9182 Points ∼85% -15%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (8893 - 9803, n=7)
9244 Points ∼100% +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9182 Points ∼99% +3%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8893 Points ∼96%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
8849 Points ∼96% 0%
Schenker Compact 17
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
8549 Points ∼92% -4%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
8469 Points ∼92% -5%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
7217 Points ∼78% -19%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10887 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (10075 - 11323, n=7)
10667 Points ∼98% -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10573 Points ∼97% -3%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
10389 Points ∼95% -5%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
9082 Points ∼83% -17%
Schenker Compact 17
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
8640 Points ∼79% -21%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
7526 Points ∼69% -31%
PCMark 10 Score
7286 points
Help

DPC延时

LatencyMon显示在我们的主页上打开多个浏览器标签时有轻微的DPC延迟问题。在60 FPS的情况下,4K视频播放很流畅,没有丢帧。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
1820.7 μs * ∼100% -246%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1444.5 μs * ∼79% -175%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
742.6 μs * ∼41% -41%
Schenker Compact 17
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
595.7 μs * ∼33% -13%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
525.7 μs * ∼29%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
364 μs * ∼20% +31%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

我们的测试装置配备了三星PM9A1,这是制造商为消费者提供的首要PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD。连续读取和写入率分别接近7000 MB/s和5200 MB/s,比三星PM981a的速度快了约2倍。 三星PM981a系列的速度快约2倍,这在上一代旗舰笔记本电脑上很常见。

CDM 8
CDM 8
AS SSD
AS SSD
系统最多支持两个M.2 2280 PCIe 4固态硬盘
系统最多支持两个M.2 2280 PCIe 4固态硬盘
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
Schenker Compact 17
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
AS SSD
7%
-38%
-28%
-28%
-50%
Seq Read
5366.88
5085
-5%
2875.85
-46%
3019.89
-44%
2879.15
-46%
2326.96
-57%
Seq Write
3965.48
4434
12%
2802.79
-29%
2631.23
-34%
2841.56
-28%
2479.16
-37%
4K Read
79.92
80.35
1%
55.33
-31%
60.35
-24%
51.64
-35%
45.46
-43%
4K Write
194.21
214.69
11%
106.9
-45%
171.59
-12%
142.48
-27%
157.4
-19%
4K-64 Read
2683.94
2572.6
-4%
1662.47
-38%
1410.3
-47%
1671.97
-38%
1049.71
-61%
4K-64 Write
3335.39
2972.36
-11%
2101.1
-37%
2324.17
-30%
2292.59
-31%
938.15
-72%
Access Time Read *
0.027
0.018
33%
0.067
-148%
0.045
-67%
0.034
-26%
0.076
-181%
Access Time Write *
0.066
0.02
70%
0.037
44%
0.024
64%
0.027
59%
0.071
-8%
Score Read
3301
3161
-4%
2005
-39%
1773
-46%
2012
-39%
1328
-60%
Score Write
3926
3631
-8%
2488
-37%
2759
-30%
2719
-31%
1343
-66%
Score Total
8847
8380
-5%
5520
-38%
5429
-39%
5760
-35%
3366
-62%
Copy ISO MB/s
2579.16
3238.69
26%
2028.86
-21%
2383.4
-8%
3091.91
20%
Copy Program MB/s
1132.84
898.63
-21%
691.17
-39%
602.86
-47%
733.08
-35%
Copy Game MB/s
2161.44
2171.21
0%
1513.01
-30%
872.5
-60%
1682.7
-22%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
1%
-32%
-28%
-31%
-37%
Write 4K
227.2
244.2
7%
145.7
-36%
206.1
-9%
167.8
-26%
177.9
-22%
Read 4K
89
89.8
1%
51.34
-42%
53
-40%
53.48
-40%
47.42
-47%
Write Seq
4256
3036
-29%
3018
-29%
3073
-28%
2707
-36%
Read Seq
4364
2837
-35%
2575
-41%
2488
-43%
2369
-46%
Write 4K Q32T1
614.4
606.77
-1%
510.7
-17%
535.2
-13%
523.6
-15%
427.8
-30%
Read 4K Q32T1
658.9
657.86
0%
582.4
-12%
607.6
-8%
594.8
-10%
543.2
-18%
Write Seq Q32T1
5216
5269.7
1%
3294
-37%
3242
-38%
3324
-36%
2703
-48%
Read Seq Q32T1
7073
7090.6
0%
3522
-50%
3617
-49%
3564
-50%
3387
-52%
Write 4K Q8T8
2270.27
Read 4K Q8T8
2489.72
Total Average (Program / Settings)
4% / 5%
-35% / -36%
-28% / -28%
-30% / -29%
-44% / -46%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7073 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5216 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 658.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 614.4 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 4364 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 4256 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 89 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 227.2 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

0335670100513401675201023452680301533503685402043554690502553605695603063656201.466255.596260.636265.036267.346274.476280.346280.976281.186282.446284.546284.956291.046582.966588.836588.836590.096590.516590.726591.356591.566592.616593.036593.246594.086595.126595.546595.756597.646598.066598.96599.116599.116599.116599.536600.586600.796601.426601.626601.626602.676602.886603.36603.516603.726603.936604.146604.986605.616614.42Tooltip
: Ø6513 (6201.46-6614.42)

GPU性能

与Schenker Ultra 17相比,图形性能下降了约15%,尽管每个系统都配备了165 W TGPGeForce RTX 3080。一个 "适当的" 桌面RTX 3080可以比我们的移动版本快40%到60%。即便如此,我们的GPU在测试了超过30台RTX 3080笔记本电脑后,达到了我们预期的水平。 RTX 3080笔记本电脑到目前为止。

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Time Spy
Time Spy
Fire Strike
Fire Strike
Fire Strike Ultra
Fire Strike Ultra
皇家港
皇家港
云门
云门
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, R9 5900X
40910 Points ∼100% +40%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K
30650 Points ∼75% +5%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
29194 Points ∼71%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (20538 - 32366, n=34)
28057 Points ∼69% -4%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK
25597 Points ∼63% -12%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
23649 Points ∼58% -19%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H
22820 Points ∼56% -22%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10750H
21532 Points ∼53% -26%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
20874 Points ∼51% -28%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H
19737 Points ∼48% -32%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
18877 Points ∼46% -35%
Eluktronics RP-17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
16694 Points ∼41% -43%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, R9 5900X
17467 Points ∼100% +55%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K
13144 Points ∼75% +17%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
11235 Points ∼64%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (8920 - 13210, n=33)
11051 Points ∼63% -2%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK
9908 Points ∼57% -12%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H
9480 Points ∼54% -16%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
8906 Points ∼51% -21%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10750H
8267 Points ∼47% -26%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
7901 Points ∼45% -30%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
7597 Points ∼43% -32%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H
7582 Points ∼43% -33%
Eluktronics RP-17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
6374 Points ∼36% -43%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, R9 5900X
15712 Points ∼100% +42%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K
13067 Points ∼83% +18%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
11052 Points ∼70%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (8737 - 13067, n=33)
10807 Points ∼69% -2%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK
9921 Points ∼63% -10%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H
9177 Points ∼58% -17%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
8883 Points ∼57% -20%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10750H
8100 Points ∼52% -27%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
8035 Points ∼51% -27%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H
7778 Points ∼50% -30%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
7475 Points ∼48% -32%
Eluktronics RP-17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
6680 Points ∼43% -40%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, R9 5900X
11238 Points ∼100% +63%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K
7991 Points ∼71% +16%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
6888 Points ∼61%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (5552 - 8032, n=21)
6823 Points ∼61% -1%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H
5582 Points ∼50% -19%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
4835 Points ∼43% -30%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
4405 Points ∼39% -36%
Eluktronics RP-17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
3598 Points ∼32% -48%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, R9 5900X
47287 Points ∼100% +25%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K
41696 Points ∼88% +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (31288 - 43744, n=31)
38767 Points ∼82% +3%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
37714 Points ∼80%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK
35128 Points ∼74% -7%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
32995 Points ∼70% -13%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H
31826 Points ∼67% -16%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10750H
29011 Points ∼61% -23%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
27613 Points ∼58% -27%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
27203 Points ∼58% -28%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H
25793 Points ∼55% -32%
Eluktronics RP-17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
23409 Points ∼50% -38%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K
20233 Points ∼100% +19%
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, R9 5900X
17096 Points ∼84% 0%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
17049 Points ∼84%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (13526 - 20233, n=30)
16744 Points ∼83% -2%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK
16243 Points ∼80% -5%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H
15274 Points ∼75% -10%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H
15274 Points ∼75% -10%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
14000 Points ∼69% -18%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
13858 Points ∼68% -19%
Eluktronics RP-17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
12972 Points ∼64% -24%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
12569 Points ∼62% -26%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10750H
9419 Points ∼47% -45%
3DMark 11 Performance
29298 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
56574 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
23301 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
11052 points
Help
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1280x720 Lite Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (148 - 228, n=2)
188 fps ∼100% +2%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
184 fps ∼98%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (158 - 199, n=20)
178 fps ∼95% -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (151 - 158, n=2)
155 fps ∼82% -16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (137 - 195, n=18)
154 fps ∼82% -16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
 
150 fps ∼80% -18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (121 - 137, n=4)
130 fps ∼69% -29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (125 - 127, n=2)
126 fps ∼67% -32%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (98.4 - 144, n=4)
118 fps ∼63% -36%
1920x1080 Standard Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (132 - 205, n=2)
169 fps ∼100% +17%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
144 fps ∼85%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (113 - 154, n=21)
136 fps ∼80% -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
  (117 - 129, n=2)
123 fps ∼73% -15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (67 - 142, n=19)
111 fps ∼66% -23%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (100 - 106, n=5)
103 fps ∼61% -28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
 
103 fps ∼61% -28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (100 - 106, n=3)
103 fps ∼61% -28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (74 - 89.2, n=5)
82.3 fps ∼49% -43%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (78.1 - 87.6, n=5)
81.5 fps ∼48% -43%
1920x1080 High Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (113 - 156, n=2)
135 fps ∼100% +25%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
108 fps ∼80%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (85.4 - 115, n=24)
103 fps ∼76% -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
  (90.6 - 108, n=3)
99.2 fps ∼73% -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (62 - 103, n=24)
85.9 fps ∼64% -20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (77 - 80.6, n=3)
78.6 fps ∼58% -27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (74 - 81.4, n=5)
77.7 fps ∼58% -28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (67 - 80.8, n=2)
73.9 fps ∼55% -32%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (52 - 67.5, n=7)
61.8 fps ∼46% -43%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (55.4 - 63.9, n=5)
59 fps ∼44% -45%
GTA V
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (182 - 187, n=2)
185 fps ∼100% +1%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
184 (2.63min, 143P1 - 457max) fps ∼99%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (164 - 186, n=24)
181 fps ∼98% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (179 - 180, n=2)
180 fps ∼97% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (164 - 185, n=19)
177 fps ∼96% -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (163 - 179, n=3)
173 fps ∼94% -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (153 - 178, n=4)
171 fps ∼92% -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
 
164 fps ∼89% -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (153 - 168, n=5)
160 fps ∼86% -13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (140 - 171, n=2)
156 fps ∼84% -15%
1920x1080 Lowest Settings possible
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
184 (2.89min, 125P1 - 476max) fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (180 - 187, n=2)
184 fps ∼100% 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (173 - 186, n=23)
180 fps ∼98% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (176 - 177, n=2)
177 fps ∼96% -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (174 - 179, n=2)
177 fps ∼96% -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (150 - 185, n=18)
174 fps ∼95% -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
 
173 fps ∼94% -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (168 - 175, n=4)
173 fps ∼94% -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (124 - 163, n=3)
148 fps ∼80% -20%
1366x768 Normal/Off AF:4x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (175 - 187, n=2)
181 fps ∼100% +1%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
179 (4.18min, 125P1 - 463max) fps ∼99%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (167 - 182, n=20)
176 fps ∼97% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (172 - 174, n=2)
173 fps ∼96% -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (153 - 180, n=15)
170 fps ∼94% -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (156 - 172, n=3)
166 fps ∼92% -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (143 - 171, n=5)
163 fps ∼90% -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
 
160 fps ∼88% -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (135 - 166, n=2)
151 fps ∼83% -16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (133 - 159, n=5)
149 fps ∼82% -17%
1920x1080 Normal/Off AF:4x
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
180 (4.92min, 143P1 - 423max) fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (169 - 187, n=2)
178 fps ∼99% -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (160 - 182, n=24)
173 fps ∼96% -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (169 - 172, n=2)
171 fps ∼95% -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (167 - 173, n=2)
170 fps ∼94% -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (138 - 181, n=19)
167 fps ∼93% -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
 
166 fps ∼92% -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (159 - 169, n=4)
165 fps ∼92% -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (113 - 155, n=3)
138 fps ∼77% -23%
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (169 - 184, n=2)
177 fps ∼100% +2%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
173 (3.89min, 111P1 - 352max) fps ∼98%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (137 - 176, n=25)
162 fps ∼92% -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (153 - 157, n=2)
155 fps ∼88% -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (111 - 173, n=19)
149 fps ∼84% -14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (127 - 160, n=3)
145 fps ∼82% -16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (124 - 140, n=5)
135 fps ∼76% -22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (115 - 144, n=2)
130 fps ∼73% -25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
 
126 fps ∼71% -27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (94.5 - 127, n=5)
114 fps ∼64% -34%
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (104 - 130, n=2)
117 fps ∼100% +7%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
109 (5.47min, 76.9P1 - 203max) fps ∼93%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (84 - 112, n=26)
97.9 fps ∼84% -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (72.6 - 108, n=23)
87.8 fps ∼75% -19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (85.3 - 85.8, n=2)
85.6 fps ∼73% -21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (71.4 - 87, n=3)
80.1 fps ∼68% -27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
 
75 fps ∼64% -31%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (68.1 - 76, n=5)
72.8 fps ∼62% -33%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (62.6 - 77.2, n=2)
69.9 fps ∼60% -36%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (60 - 70.8, n=5)
65.3 fps ∼56% -40%
2560x1440 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (101 - 122, n=2)
112 fps ∼100% +13%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
99.1 (4.71min, 66.7P1 - 197max) fps ∼88%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (82.2 - 99.1, n=9)
91 fps ∼81% -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (70.8 - 83.7, n=8)
77.7 fps ∼69% -22%
Dota 2 Reborn
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (124 - 217, n=2)
170 fps ∼100% +4%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
164 (141.5min) fps ∼96%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (133 - 183, n=33)
157 fps ∼92% -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (127 - 173, n=29)
148 fps ∼87% -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (134 - 156, n=6)
147 fps ∼86% -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
 
145 fps ∼85% -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
  (135 - 153, n=3)
144 fps ∼85% -12%