Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17笔记本电脑评论。165 WGeForce RTX 3080的超薄尺寸

Name: Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Brand: Maingear

是微星、华硕或Razer的最佳选择。 超薄的游戏笔记本电脑很性感，但它们通常配备100瓦的低功率GPU。Maingear Vector Pro违背了这一趋势，将165瓦的GPU塞进了与Razer Blade Pro一样大小的机箱，但它是否真的能发挥出作用？

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), Published 09/12/2021 🇺🇸 🇳🇱 ...

Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Tiger Lake

Vector Pro是定制PC制造商Maingear的一款17.3英寸超薄游戏笔记本电脑。它是一个超薄的高性能系统，与微星GS75相同。 MSI GS75, 雷蛇Blade Pro, 华硕Zephyrus S17，或戴尔Alienware x17系列。

我们的测试装置已经完全配置了第11代酷睿i7-11800H CPU，165瓦GeForce RTX 3080 GPU，以及165赫兹1440p IPS显示屏，零售价约为2500美元。更少的SKU将提供RTX 3070，起步价更低。

值得一提的是，Vector Pro采用了白色标签的同方机箱。因此，用户可以从其他经销商那里找到非常类似的设计和功能，如申克XMG Neo 17或XMG Core 17.

Test device courtesy of Maingear

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17

Processor

Intel Core i7-11800H 8 x 2.3 - 4.6 GHz, 120 W PL2 / Short Burst, 120 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-H

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Core: 1605 MHz, Memory: 1750 MHz, 165 W TDP, 471.96, Manual and Optimus switch

Memory

32 GB

, DDR4-3200, 22-22-22-52, Dual-Channel

Display

17.30 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 170 PPI, BOE NE173QHM-NY2, IPS, BOE0977, glossy: no, 165 Hz

Mainboard

Intel HM570

Storage

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, 1024 GB

Soundcard

Intel Tiger Lake PCH-H - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Connections

4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm headphones, 3.5 mm microphone, Card Reader: MicroSD

Networking

Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 19.81 x 393.95 x 260.8

Battery

91 Wh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

2.254 kg, Power Supply: 846 g

Price

2500 USD

Links

Maingear homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

potential competitors in comparison

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
87.8 %	09/2021	Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	19.81 mm	17.30"	2560x1440
90.1 %	08/2021	Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	2.8 kg	19.9 mm	17.30"	2560x1440
83.9 %		SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	2.5 kg	30.05 mm	17.30"	2560x1440
85.1 %		SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	2.5 kg	27 mm	17.30"	2560x1440
84 %		SCHENKER Compact 17 i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	2.9 kg	29.9 mm	17.30"	3840x2160
83.7 %		MSI GS75 10SF-609US i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	2.3 kg	18.9 mm	17.30"	1920x1080

案例

机箱可能不像华硕Zephyrus S或微星GS75那样华而不实，但它肯定感觉更强大、更坚硬。当试图扭转其角落时，底座不会屈服或吱吱作响，给人以强烈的第一印象。然而，盖子和铰链可以更硬，以减少调整角度时的摇晃。更厚的华硕ROG Strix笔记本电脑有更大的铰链，以获得更好的寿命感。

尺寸几乎与Razer Blade Pro相同。然而，重量方面，Maingear几乎轻了半公斤。在Maingear中缺少一个蒸汽室冷却器，这可能是重量较轻的原因。

SCHENKER Compact 17 SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) MSI GS75 10SF-609US Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 DIN A4 ❌

连接性

端口选项几乎与同方GM7ZG7S或GM7MG0R相同，但有一个明显的例外：我们的Maingear机箱集成了一个MicroSD读卡器，而不是一个全尺寸的。通过英特尔芯片组原生支持Thunderbolt 4，与AMD驱动的笔记本电脑不同。

不幸的是，即使在测试了多个USB-C适配器后，该笔记本电脑也不能通过USB-C充电。

后部。USB-C和Thunderbolt 4，HDMI，2.5 Gbps RJ-45，AC适配器

左边：Kensington锁，USB-A 3.1 Gen. 2，3.5毫米麦克风，3.5毫米耳机

SD卡阅读器

集成的MicroSD读卡器的传输速率是平均的。将1GB的图片从我们的UHS-II测试卡移动到桌面上需要大约14秒，而微星GS75的时间还不到一半。

这是为数不多的必须将卡倒置插入的MicroSD读卡器之一。此外，读卡器不是弹簧式的，所以当完全插入时，卡槽会突出来。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI GS75 10SF-609US (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)	204.8 MB/s +174%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD	183 (181.31^min - 182.94^max) MB/s +145%
SCHENKER Compact 17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	156.4 MB/s +109%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	83 MB/s +11%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 (AV Pro V60)	74.8 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	18.46 MB/s -75%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD	257 MB/s +191%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)	209.7 MB/s +137%
SCHENKER Compact 17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	192.2 MB/s +118%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	90 MB/s +2%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 (AV Pro V60)	88.3 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	20.54 MB/s -77%

沟通

一个可拆卸的英特尔AX201无线局域网模块是蓝牙5.2和Wi-Fi 6兼容性的标准配备。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1541 (1418^min - 1606^max) MBit/s +35%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1350 MBit/s +19%
SCHENKER Compact 17 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1275 (609^min - 681^max) MBit/s +12%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1270 (1080^min - 1388^max) MBit/s +12%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1138 (921^min - 1230^max) MBit/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD MediaTek MT7921	636 (325^min - 728^max) MBit/s -44%
iperf3 receive AX12
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1711 (861^min - 1776^max) MBit/s +21%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1416 (1350^min - 1459^max) MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1370 MBit/s -3%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1177 (773^min - 1353^max) MBit/s -17%
SCHENKER Compact 17 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	914 (877^min - 940^max) MBit/s -35%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD MediaTek MT7921	698 (529^min - 748^max) MBit/s -51%

Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1415 (1350-1459)

Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1138 (921-1230)

网络摄像头

虽然有兼容Windows Hello的红外线，但720p的网络摄像头没有集成隐私快门。

ColorChecker Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17: 13.84 ∆E min: 1.76 - max: 20.47 ∆E

维护

卸下下面的十颗飞利浦螺丝后，底板很容易弹开。用户可以直接接触到电池、两个M.2 2280插槽、两个内存插槽和WLAN模块。

配件和保修

除了交流电适配器、文件和几张Maingear的标志贴纸外，零售盒中没有任何额外的东西。标准的一年有限保修期适用于Maingear的扩展选项。

输入设备

键盘

键盘的反馈和行程本可以更牢固和更深入，特别是对于一个游戏笔记本来说。虽然不像廉价的华硕VivoBook那样轻巧或浅薄，但更多的键位可以改善游戏和打字体验。与微星GT或GS型号相比，华硕Zephyrus的反馈更具有可比性。

触摸板

点击板比Razer Blade Pro上的小一点（13.3 x 7.5厘米对13 x 8厘米）。然而，在Maingear上的反馈更强，而且没有海绵状的感觉。

点击板略带橡胶，有纹理感，粘性很小。预计随着时间的推移，会有一些明显的指纹积聚。

按键反馈不像典型的超极本那样柔软，同时也不像惠普Spectre那样牢固。空格键和回车键的咔哒声适度响亮

显示

我们的Vector Pro使用的是京东方的NE173QHM-NY2 IPS面板，与申科XMG Core 17上的面板相同，这意味着这两台笔记本都有类似的显示属性。响应时间很快，具有良好的亮度、对比度和刷新率，代表了专为游戏设计的高端1440p面板。京东方有一个较新的NE173QHM-NY3面板，具有更快的响应时间和更好的颜色，因为发现在华硕ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703因此，我们的Maingear使用的是一个旧版本，这有点令人失望。


358.2 cd/m²	372.3 cd/m²	374 cd/m²
351.9 cd/m²	389.7 cd/m²	370 cd/m²
327.6 cd/m²	379.3 cd/m²	345.7 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BOE NE173QHM-NY2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 389.7 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 363.2 cd/m² Minimum: 20.86 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 389.7 cd/m²
Contrast: 829:1 (Black: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.93 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.31
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
71.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 BOE NE173QHM-NY2, IPS, 17.30, 2560x1440	Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD BOE099D (BOE CQ NE173QHM-NY3), IPS, 17.30, 2560x1440	SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) BOE CQ NE173QHM-NY2, IPS, 17.30, 2560x1440	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) BOE NE173QHM-NY2 (BOE0977), IPS, 17.30, 2560x1440	SCHENKER Compact 17 AU Optronics B173ZAN03.0, IPS, 17.30, 3840x2160	MSI GS75 10SF-609US Sharp LQ173M1JW05, IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080
Display		17%	-3%	0%	19%	4%
Display P3 Coverage	70.7	94.2 33%	68.1 -4%	70.5 0%	84.4 19%	75.6 7%
sRGB Coverage	99.4	98.7 -1%	98.5 -1%	99.5 0%	99.9 1%	99.8 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	71.7	84.4 18%	69.3 -3%	71.8 0%	98 37%	75.1 5%
Response Times		51%	5%	5%	-197%	57%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	15.6 ?(8.4, 7.2)	4.8 69%	16.8 ?(8.4, 8.4) -8%	16.8 ?(8.4, 8.4) -8%	51 ?(25, 26) -227%	5 ?(2.2, 2.8) 68%
Response Time Black / White *	12 ?(6.8, 5.2)	8 33%	10 ?(4.8, 5.2) 17%	10 ?(4, 6) 17%	32 ?(18, 14) -167%	6.6 ?(2.6, 4) 45%
PWM Frequency
Screen		-11%	-7%	4%	-40%	3%
Brightness middle	389.7	322 -17%	370 -5%	410 5%	437 12%	299.4 -23%
Brightness	363	288 -21%	333 -8%	381 5%	413 14%	299 -18%
Brightness Distribution	84	72 -14%	84 0%	88 5%	88 5%	84 0%
Black Level *	0.47	0.3 36%	0.38 19%	0.37 21%	0.6 -28%	0.31 34%
Contrast	829	1073 29%	974 17%	1108 34%	728 -12%	966 17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.93	3.05 -58%	2.41 -25%	2.55 -32%	4.28 -122%	1.82 6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.84	5.23 24%	7.32 -7%	4.33 37%	7.65 -12%	3.91 43%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.31	1.92 -47%	1.19 9%	1.28 2%	3.41 -160%	1.59 -21%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.4	3.11 -30%	3.9 -63%	3.4 -42%	3.8 -58%	2.7 -13%
Gamma	2.12 ^104%	2.13 ^103%	2.287 ^96%	2.275 ^97%	2.49 ^88%	2.18 ^101%
CCT	6658 ^98%	6553 ^99%	7302 ^89%	6637 ^98%	7363 ^88%	6837 ^95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		84	69	72	87	67.1
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		99	93	95	100	99.8
Total Average (Program / Settings)		19% / 4%	-2% / -4%	3% / 3%	-73% / -50%	21% / 11%

* ... smaller is better

色彩空间完全涵盖了sRGB和大约72%的AdobeRGB。更高分辨率的4K IPS面板往往能提供更深的色彩，尽管其代价是刷新率和响应时间更慢。

颜色和灰度在开箱后相当准确，表明没有必要对终端用户进行修补。尽管如此，我们自己用X-Rite色度计进行的校准会使平均灰度值在全局范围内略有改善。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6.8 ms rise
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
15.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 8.4 ms rise
15.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 7.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

由于最大亮度接近400尼特，而不是通常的300尼特，因此户外能见度比大多数17.3英寸游戏笔记本要好。然而，你还是要避免阳光直射，否则屏幕会被洗掉。

业绩

Maingear挤进了一个165瓦的GeForce RTX 3080 GPU，尽管它的设计很紧凑，在目标TGP方面与更厚的Schenker XMG Ultra 17 上的GPU相似。可调整栏、动态提升2.0和WhisperMode 2.0都支持，而高级优化和内部G-Sync则不支持。因此，可以通过Maingear NODE控制中心软件进行手动切换，在dGPU模式（即全GPU性能模式）或Optimus模式之间切换。我们建议用户熟悉这个软件，因为许多系统特定的设置和LED功能都是在这里切换的。

在运行以下任何性能基准测试之前，我们的系统被设置为涡轮模式和dGPU模式，以获得尽可能高的分数。

处理器

CPU的性能非常好，与其他配备相同处理器的笔记本电脑相比，我们期望它能达到这个水平。用户从旧的酷睿i7-10750H或酷睿i7-10875H笔记本电脑的用户将分别看到大约40%和20%的性能提升。竞争性的 Ryzen 7 5800H在多线程负载中稍快，而在单线程负载中则比我们的酷睿i7-11800H.

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1755 (1711.82-1871.52)

Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060 Intel Core i7-11800H; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1750 (1720.87-1845.87)

MSI Katana GF76 11UE Intel Core i7-11800H; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1681 (1645.14-1822.57)

Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD Intel Core i9-11900H; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø2117 (2043.84-2183.76)

Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	5055 Points +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD Intel Core i9-11900H	5023 Points +17%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	4990 Points +16%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	4776 Points +11%
Eluktronics RP-17 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4552 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (2498 - 5408, n=50)	4459 Points +4%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H	4304 Points
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) Intel Core i7-10875H	3531 Points -18%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	3027 Points -30%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H	2968 Points -31%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G Intel Core i7-9750H	2308 Points -46%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 Intel Core i5-10300H	1397 Points -68%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	634 Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD Intel Core i9-11900H	608 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	581 Points 0%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H	581 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (520 - 586, n=47)	576 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	554 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H	491 Points -15%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) Intel Core i7-10875H	490 Points -16%
Eluktronics RP-17 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	484 Points -17%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	470 Points -19%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G Intel Core i7-9750H	421 Points -28%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 Intel Core i5-10300H	312 Points -46%

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	14066 Points +17%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	13002 (12859.5^min - 13002.3^max) Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD Intel Core i9-11900H	12720 Points +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	12373 Points +3%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H	11981 (11268.1^min - 11981.1^max) Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (6508 - 14088, n=48)	11650 Points -3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) Intel Core i7-10875H	9071 (8918.34^min - 9070.5^max) Points -24%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	8250 Points -31%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H	7747 Points -35%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	1619 Points +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD Intel Core i9-11900H	1586 Points +6%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H	1503 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (1386 - 1522, n=45)	1497 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	1491 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1423 Points -5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) Intel Core i7-10875H	1270 Points -16%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H	1253 Points -17%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	1227 Points -18%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	2361 Points +26%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD Intel Core i9-11900H	2184 (2043.84^min - 2183.76^max) Points +17%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	2059 (2019.39^min - 2059.31^max) Points +10%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	2041 (1981.96^min - 2041.34^max) Points +9%
Eluktronics RP-17 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1932 (1913.23^min - 1932.18^max) Points +3%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (1342 - 2173, n=50)	1894 Points +1%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H	1872 (1711.82^min - 1871.52^max) Points
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) Intel Core i7-10875H	1489 (1469.35^min - 1489.04^max) Points -20%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	1336 Points -29%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H	1299 (1187.65^min - 1299^max) Points -31%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G Intel Core i7-9750H	1116 (974.99^min - 1115.73^max) Points -40%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 Intel Core i5-10300H	548 Points -71%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	254 Points +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD Intel Core i9-11900H	241 Points +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	239 Points +6%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	229 Points +1%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H	226 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (201 - 231, n=46)	225 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H	209 Points -8%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) Intel Core i7-10875H	203 Points -10%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	201 Points -11%
Eluktronics RP-17 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	187 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G Intel Core i7-9750H	173 Points -23%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 Intel Core i5-10300H	108 Points -52%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 Intel Core i5-10300H	528 Seconds * -96%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G Intel Core i7-9750H	466 Seconds * -73%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H	358 Seconds * -33%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	333 Seconds * -23%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) Intel Core i7-10875H	302 Seconds * -12%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (217 - 454, n=46)	277 Seconds * -3%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H	270 Seconds *
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	250 Seconds * +7%
Eluktronics RP-17 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	248 Seconds * +8%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	237 Seconds * +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD Intel Core i9-11900H	231 Seconds * +14%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	227 Seconds * +16%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	6174 MIPS +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD Intel Core i9-11900H	5795 MIPS +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	5664 MIPS +5%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	5520 MIPS +2%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (5138 - 5732, n=46)	5492 MIPS +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H	5438 MIPS +1%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H	5404 MIPS
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) Intel Core i7-10875H	5338 MIPS -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	5321 MIPS -2%
Eluktronics RP-17 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4634 MIPS -14%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G Intel Core i7-9750H	4580 MIPS -15%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 Intel Core i5-10300H	2945 MIPS -46%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	59182 MIPS +10%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	57579 MIPS +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD Intel Core i9-11900H	57263 MIPS +6%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	54172 MIPS +1%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H	53817 MIPS
Eluktronics RP-17 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	50428 MIPS -6%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (33718 - 56758, n=46)	48384 MIPS -10%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) Intel Core i7-10875H	45258 MIPS -16%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	39581 MIPS -26%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H	36771 MIPS -32%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G Intel Core i7-9750H	29342 MIPS -45%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 Intel Core i5-10300H	15146 MIPS -72%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	1777 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD Intel Core i9-11900H	1648 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (1429 - 1625, n=40)	1561 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	1529 Points
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H	1333 Points
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) Intel Core i7-10875H	1315 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	1191 Points
Eluktronics RP-17 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1176 Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G Intel Core i7-9750H	1117 Points
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 Intel Core i5-10300H	703 Points

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	10482 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD Intel Core i9-11900H	9628 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	9294 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (4655 - 9851, n=40)	8551 Points
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) Intel Core i7-10875H	8134 Points
Eluktronics RP-17 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	7864 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	6403 Points
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H	6394 Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G Intel Core i7-9750H	4897 Points
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 Intel Core i5-10300H	2783 Points

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	17.1 fps +26%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD Intel Core i9-11900H	16.7 fps +23%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	15.8 fps +16%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	14.8 fps +9%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (7.38 - 17.4, n=46)	13.8 fps +1%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H	13.6 fps
Eluktronics RP-17 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	13.1 fps -4%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) Intel Core i7-10875H	12.1 fps -11%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	10.7 fps -21%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H	10.2 fps -25%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G Intel Core i7-9750H	8.2 fps -40%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 Intel Core i5-10300H	6.13 fps -55%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 Intel Core i5-10300H	94 s * -103%
Eluktronics RP-17 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	57.7 s * -24%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H	54.1 s * -17%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	53.5 s * -15%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	52.2 s * -13%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	49.3 s * -6%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (38.6 - 59.9, n=45)	46.5 s * -0%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H	46.4 s *
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) Intel Core i7-10875H	45.3 s * +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD Intel Core i9-11900H	44.4 s * +4%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	40.5 s * +13%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 Intel Core i5-10300H	1.088 sec * -90%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G Intel Core i7-9750H	0.679 sec * -19%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	0.6 sec * -5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) Intel Core i7-10875H	0.587 sec * -3%
Eluktronics RP-17 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	0.582 sec * -2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H	0.578 sec * -1%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H	0.572 sec *
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (0.548 - 0.615, n=46)	0.566 sec * +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD Intel Core i9-11900H	0.53 sec * +7%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	0.518 sec * +9%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	0.4981 sec * +13%
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	0.4926 sec * +14%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1872 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

115 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

226 Points

Help

... in comparison

系统性能

PCMark 10的分数非常高，而且比其他大多数游戏笔记本略胜一筹，这可能是由于我们测试设备中的PCIe x4 NVMe固态硬盘。

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation

PCMark 10 / Score
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7286 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7245 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (6673 - 7470, n=11)	7154 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	6983 Points -4%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	6582 Points -10%
SCHENKER Compact 17 GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	6364 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	5685 Points -22%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10839 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	10630 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (9862 - 11064, n=11)	10328 Points -5%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	10064 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	10051 Points -7%
SCHENKER Compact 17 GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	9473 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	9182 Points -15%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9182 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (8278 - 9803, n=11)	9115 Points +2%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8893 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	8849 Points 0%
SCHENKER Compact 17 GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	8549 Points -4%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	8469 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	7217 Points -19%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10887 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	10573 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (9881 - 11323, n=11)	10560 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	10389 Points -5%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	9082 Points -17%
SCHENKER Compact 17 GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	8640 Points -21%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	7526 Points -31%

PCMark 10 Score		7286 points
Help

DPC延时

LatencyMon显示在我们的主页上打开多个浏览器标签时有轻微的DPC延迟问题。在60 FPS的情况下，4K视频播放很流畅，没有丢帧。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	1821 μs * -246%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1445 μs * -175%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	743 μs * -41%
SCHENKER Compact 17 GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	596 μs * -13%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	526 μs *
MSI GS75 10SF-609US GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	364 μs * +31%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

我们的测试装置配备了三星PM9A1，这是制造商为消费者提供的首要PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD。连续读取和写入率分别接近7000 MB/s和5200 MB/s，比三星PM981a的速度快了约2倍。三星PM981a系列的速度快约2倍，这在上一代旗舰笔记本电脑上很常见。

	Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	SCHENKER Compact 17 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	MSI GS75 10SF-609US WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
AS SSD		7%	-38%	-28%	-28%	-50%
Seq Read	5367	5085 -5%	2876 -46%	3020 -44%	2879 -46%	2327 -57%
Seq Write	3965	4434 12%	2803 -29%	2631 -34%	2842 -28%	2479 -37%
4K Read	79.9	80.3 1%	55.3 -31%	60.3 -25%	51.6 -35%	45.46 -43%
4K Write	194.2	214.7 11%	106.9 -45%	171.6 -12%	142.5 -27%	157.4 -19%
4K-64 Read	2684	2573 -4%	1662 -38%	1410 -47%	1672 -38%	1050 -61%
4K-64 Write	3335	2972 -11%	2101 -37%	2324 -30%	2293 -31%	938 -72%
Access Time Read *	0.027	0.018 33%	0.067 -148%	0.045 -67%	0.034 -26%	0.076 -181%
Access Time Write *	0.066	0.02 70%	0.037 44%	0.024 64%	0.027 59%	0.071 -8%
Score Read	3301	3161 -4%	2005 -39%	1773 -46%	2012 -39%	1328 -60%
Score Write	3926	3631 -8%	2488 -37%	2759 -30%	2719 -31%	1343 -66%
Score Total	8847	8380 -5%	5520 -38%	5429 -39%	5760 -35%	3366 -62%
Copy ISO MB/s	2579	3239 26%	2029 -21%		2383 -8%	3092 20%
Copy Program MB/s	1133	899 -21%	691 -39%		603 -47%	733 -35%
Copy Game MB/s	2161	2171 0%	1513 -30%		873 -60%	1683 -22%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		1%	-32%	-28%	-31%	-37%
Write 4K	227.2	244.2 7%	145.7 -36%	206.1 -9%	167.8 -26%	177.9 -22%
Read 4K	89	89.8 1%	51.3 -42%	53 -40%	53.5 -40%	47.42 -47%
Write Seq	4256		3036 -29%	3018 -29%	3073 -28%	2707 -36%
Read Seq	4364		2837 -35%	2575 -41%	2488 -43%	2369 -46%
Write 4K Q32T1	614	607 -1%	511 -17%	535 -13%	524 -15%	427.8 -30%
Read 4K Q32T1	659	658 0%	582 -12%	608 -8%	595 -10%	543 -18%
Write Seq Q32T1	5216	5270 1%	3294 -37%	3242 -38%	3324 -36%	2703 -48%
Read Seq Q32T1	7073	7091 0%	3522 -50%	3617 -49%	3564 -50%	3387 -52%
Write 4K Q8T8		2270
Read 4K Q8T8		2490
Total Average (Program / Settings)		4% / 5%	-35% / -36%	-28% / -28%	-30% / -29%	-44% / -46%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7073 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5216 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 659 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 614 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 4364 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 4256 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 89 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 227.2 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

GPU性能

与Schenker Ultra 17相比，图形性能下降了约15%，尽管每个系统都配备了165 W TGPGeForce RTX 3080。一个 "适当的" 桌面RTX 3080可以比我们的移动版本快40%到60%。即便如此，我们的GPU在测试了超过30台RTX 3080笔记本电脑后，达到了我们预期的水平。 RTX 3080笔记本电脑到目前为止。

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, R9 5900X	40910 Points +40%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K	30650 Points +5%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H	29194 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (16455 - 32366, n=45)	27464 Points -6%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK	25597 Points -12%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H	23649 Points -19%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H	22820 Points -22%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10750H	21532 Points -26%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H	20874 Points -28%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H	19737 Points -32%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	18877 Points -35%
Eluktronics RP-17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H	16694 Points -43%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, R9 5900X	17467 Points +55%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K	13144 Points +17%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H	11235 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (6407 - 13210, n=44)	10695 Points -5%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK	9908 Points -12%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H	9480 Points -16%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H	8906 Points -21%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10750H	8267 Points -26%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H	7901 Points -30%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	7597 Points -32%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H	7582 Points -33%
Eluktronics RP-17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H	6374 Points -43%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, R9 5900X	15712 Points +42%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K	13067 Points +18%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H	11052 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (6499 - 13067, n=44)	10438 Points -6%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK	9921 Points -10%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H	9177 Points -17%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H	8883 Points -20%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10750H	8100 Points -27%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H	8035 Points -27%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H	7778 Points -30%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	7475 Points -32%
Eluktronics RP-17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H	6680 Points -40%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, R9 5900X	11238 Points +63%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K	7991 Points +16%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H	6888 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (5338 - 8032, n=26)	6675 Points -3%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H	5582 Points -19%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H	4835 Points -30%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	4405 Points -36%
Eluktronics RP-17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H	3598 Points -48%

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, R9 5900X	47287 Points +25%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K	41696 Points +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (31288 - 43744, n=39)	38345 Points +2%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H	37714 Points
Alienware m17 R3 P45E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK	35128 Points -7%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H	32995 Points -13%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H	31826 Points -16%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10750H	29011 Points -23%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H	27613 Points -27%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	27203 Points -28%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H	25793 Points -32%
Eluktronics RP-17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H	23409 Points -38%
1280x720 Performance Combined
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K	20233 Points +19%
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, R9 5900X	17096 Points 0%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H	17049 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (10637 - 20233, n=38)	16622 Points -3%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK	16243 Points -5%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H	15274 Points -10%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H	15274 Points -10%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H	14000 Points -18%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H	13858 Points -19%
Eluktronics RP-17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H	12972 Points -24%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	12569 Points -26%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10750H	9419 Points -45%

3DMark 11 Performance		29298 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		56574 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		23301 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		11052 points
Help

... in comparison

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1280x720 Lite Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (148 - 228, n=2)	188 fps +2%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	184 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (123 - 199, n=26)	175.9 fps -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (137 - 207, n=30)	163.5 fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (151 - 158, n=2)	154.5 fps -16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile ()	150 fps -18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (120.9 - 137, n=4)	130 fps -29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (125.2 - 127.4, n=2)	126.3 fps -31%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (98.4 - 144, n=4)	118.2 fps -36%
1920x1080 Standard Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (132 - 205, n=2)	168.5 fps +17%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	144 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (97 - 154, n=28)	133.7 fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile (117 - 129, n=2)	123 fps -15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (67 - 144, n=32)	117.9 fps -18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q ()	103 fps -28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (100 - 106, n=3)	103 fps -28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (100.1 - 106, n=5)	102.6 fps -29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (74 - 89.2, n=5)	82.3 fps -43%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (78.1 - 87.6, n=5)	81.5 fps -43%
1920x1080 High Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (113 - 156, n=2)	134.5 fps +25%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	108 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile (90.6 - 108, n=3)	99.2 fps -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (55.5 - 115, n=33)	98.9 fps -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (27.9 - 107, n=49)	86.4 fps -20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (77 - 80.6, n=3)	78.6 fps -27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (74 - 81.4, n=5)	77.7 fps -28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (67 - 80.8, n=2)	73.9 fps -32%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (52 - 67.5, n=7)	61.8 fps -43%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (55.4 - 63.9, n=5)	59 fps -45%

GTA V
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (182 - 187, n=2)	184.5 fps 0%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	184 (2.63^min, 143^P1 - 457^max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (164 - 186, n=28)	181.1 fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (179 - 180, n=2)	179.5 fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (124.5 - 186.9, n=37)	178.4 fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (163.4 - 179, n=3)	173.5 fps -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (152.7 - 178, n=4)	171.2 fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile ()	164 fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (153 - 168, n=5)	159.8 fps -13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (140 - 171, n=2)	155.5 fps -15%
1920x1080 Lowest Settings possible
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	184 (2.89^min, 125^P1 - 476^max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (180 - 187, n=2)	183.5 fps 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (173 - 186, n=27)	180.2 fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (176 - 177, n=2)	176.5 fps -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (174 - 179, n=2)	176.5 fps -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (98 - 186, n=36)	175 fps -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q ()	173 fps -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (168 - 175, n=4)	172.5 fps -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (124 - 163, n=3)	147.7 fps -20%
1366x768 Normal/Off AF:4x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (175 - 187, n=2)	181 fps +1%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	179 (4.18^min, 125^P1 - 463^max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (167 - 182, n=24)	176.6 fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (172 - 174, n=2)	173 fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (102.8 - 183.4, n=34)	171.9 fps -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (155.7 - 172, n=3)	165.9 fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (142.5 - 171, n=5)	163.1 fps -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile ()	159.6 fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (135.3 - 166, n=2)	150.7 fps -16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (133 - 159, n=5)	148.6 fps -17%
1920x1080 Normal/Off AF:4x
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	180 (4.92^min, 143^P1 - 423^max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (169 - 187, n=2)	178 fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (160 - 182, n=28)	173.5 fps -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (169 - 172, n=2)	170.5 fps -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (167 - 173, n=2)	170 fps -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (94.3 - 186.2, n=38)	169.2 fps -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q ()	166 fps -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (159 - 169, n=4)	164.8 fps -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (113 - 155, n=3)	138.3 fps -23%
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (169 - 184, n=2)	176.5 fps +2%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	173 (3.89^min, 111^P1 - 352^max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (137 - 176, n=29)	162.4 fps -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (153 - 157, n=2)	155 fps -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (58.2 - 181.4, n=38)	153.2 fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (126.6 - 160, n=3)	144.9 fps -16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (123.7 - 140, n=5)	134.5 fps -22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (115.4 - 144, n=2)	129.7 fps -25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile ()	126.4 fps -27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (94.5 - 127, n=5)	113.7 fps -34%
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (104 - 130, n=2)	117 fps +7%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	109 (5.47^min, 76.9^P1 - 203^max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (68.6 - 112, n=33)	97.2 fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (21.7 - 125.8, n=50)	91 fps -17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (85.3 - 85.8, n=2)	85.6 fps -21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (71.4 - 87, n=3)	80.1 fps -27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile ()	75 fps -31%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (68.1 - 76, n=5)	72.8 fps -33%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (62.6 - 77.2, n=2)	69.9 fps -36%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (60 - 70.8, n=5)	65.3 fps -40%
2560x1440 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (101 - 122, n=2)	111.5 fps +13%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	99.1 (4.71^min, 66.7^P1 - 197^max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (82.2 - 99.1, n=11)	91 fps -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (70.8 - 97.1, n=19)	82.9 fps -16%

Dota 2 Reborn
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (124.1 - 217, n=2)	170.4 fps +4%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	164 (141.5^min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (132.7 - 183, n=44)	158.6 fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (35.2 - 211, n=58)	151.5 fps -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (134.3 - 156, n=6)	147.5 fps -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q ()	144.9 fps -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (129.7 - 153, n=9)	144.4 fps -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile (134.8 - 152.8, n=3)	144.3 fps -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (109 - 150, n=11)	136 fps -17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (103.8 - 149, n=18)	132.8 fps -19%
1366x768 med (1/3)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (113.2 - 197.1, n=2)	155.2 fps +7%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	145 (116.1^min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (82.7 - 170, n=44)	141.3 fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (31.5 - 183.8, n=58)	137.3 fps -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (128.7 - 141, n=6)	135.4 fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile (125.5 - 144.7, n=3)	135.2 fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q ()	132.2 fps -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (120.7 - 140, n=9)	131.3 fps -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (110.4 - 135, n=11)	126.8 fps -13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (94.7 - 135, n=18)	122.1 fps -16%
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (109.3 - 184.4, n=2)	146.9 fps +3%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	142 (118.2^min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (108.1 - 161, n=44)	134.1 fps -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (30.9 - 178, n=59)	128.8 fps -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile (109 - 140.7, n=3)	126.7 fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (117.4 - 139, n=6)	126.6 fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q ()	126.4 fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (104.1 - 131, n=9)	122.3 fps -14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (103.3 - 130, n=11)	119.8 fps -16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (85.4 - 128, n=18)	112.9 fps -20%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (101.1 - 168.7, n=2)	134.9 fps +6%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	127 (110.1^min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (98 - 156, n=44)	126.1 fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile (103.9 - 133.8, n=3)	120.8 fps -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (26.9 - 163.9, n=58)	120.7 fps -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (115 - 128, n=6)	120 fps -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q ()	119.6 fps -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (98.4 - 124, n=9)	115.9 fps -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (94.6 - 125, n=11)	113.6 fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (81.3 - 124, n=18)	107.3 fps -16%

The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	439.6 (420^min - 496^max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (427 - 446, n=2)	437 fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (209 - 672, n=31)	360 fps -18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (151 - 465, n=27)	358 fps -19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (308 - 348, n=5)	328 fps -25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile (195.8 - 414, n=9)	322 fps -27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (193.9 - 357, n=12)	290 fps -34%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (255 - 327, n=15)	289 fps -34%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (188.7 - 295, n=27)	256 fps -42%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (177.3 - 298, n=14)	254 fps -42%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (375 - 413, n=2)	394 fps +23%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	321.2 (271^min - 370^max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (236 - 374, n=24)	290 fps -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (169.6 - 339, n=31)	261 fps -19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile (157.5 - 284, n=9)	247 fps -23%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (236 - 251, n=6)	241 fps -25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (192.7 - 259, n=15)	226 fps -30%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (154 - 250, n=12)	222 fps -31%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (152.2 - 215, n=24)	185.1 fps -42%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (148 - 200, n=14)	176.1 fps -45%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (286 - 320, n=2)	303 fps +42%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	212.9 (199^min - 235^max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (149 - 242, n=31)	190.4 fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile (126.1 - 194.4, n=15)	170.5 fps -20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (122.1 - 207, n=34)	168 fps -21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (138 - 160, n=7)	148.6 fps -30%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (117.3 - 179.9, n=19)	143.6 fps -33%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (115.7 - 160.8, n=17)	140.1 fps -34%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (74.4 - 131, n=33)	111.3 fps -48%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (93 - 120.4, n=17)	104.7 fps -51%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (145 - 152, n=2)	148.5 fps +37%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	108.6 (103^min - 113^max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (85.1 - 123, n=39)	105.2 fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile (82.2 - 105, n=16)	95.6 fps -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (34.9 - 109, n=52)	91.8 fps -15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (74.3 - 96, n=11)	85.3 fps -21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (65.7 - 92.7, n=22)	79.2 fps -27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (64 - 82.1, n=21)	74.3 fps -32%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (50.6 - 74, n=40)	61.1 fps -44%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (51.6 - 65.1, n=21)	56.2 fps -48%

X-Plane 11.11
1280x720 low (fps_test=1)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (163 - 165, n=2)	164 fps +30%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	126 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (93.7 - 156, n=44)	117.4 fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (15.3 - 152.8, n=61)	112.8 fps -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (102 - 114, n=6)	109.8 fps -13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (96.1 - 128.4, n=8)	107.9 fps -14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile (98.2 - 114, n=3)	104.7 fps -17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (83 - 117, n=11)	99.5 fps -21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (82.9 - 108, n=4)	96 fps -24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (69.9 - 108, n=18)	95 fps -25%
1920x1080 med (fps_test=2)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (153 - 153, n=2)	153 fps +34%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	114 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (80.6 - 139, n=43)	102.8 fps -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (13.7 - 144.7, n=61)	99.9 fps -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (90.9 - 104, n=6)	96.9 fps -15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (85 - 114.1, n=8)	94.8 fps -17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile (86.2 - 102, n=3)	92.4 fps -19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (76 - 106, n=11)	88.7 fps -22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (68.9 - 97.4, n=4)	84 fps -26%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (63.5 - 95, n=18)	82.7 fps -27%
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (122.5 - 123, n=2)	122.8 fps +43%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	85.7 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (65.6 - 113, n=43)	83.4 fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (76.8 - 87.6, n=6)	82 fps -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (12.4 - 118.8, n=61)	81.1 fps -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (71.9 - 92.5, n=8)	79.9 fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile (73.1 - 84.7, n=3)	77.6 fps -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (64 - 85, n=11)	74.8 fps -13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (55.6 - 79.9, n=18)	70.7 fps -18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (55.8 - 81.6, n=4)	69.9 fps -18%

Strange Brigade
1280x720 lowest AF:1
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	521 (156^min, 382^P1 - 772^max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (426 - 567, n=2)	497 fps -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (313 - 535, n=28)	420 fps -19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (106.8 - 522, n=34)	378 fps -27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile ()	313 fps -40%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (292 - 311, n=2)	302 fps -42%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (236 - 287, n=2)	262 fps -50%
1920x1080 medium AA:medium AF:4
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (350 - 416, n=2)	383 fps +33%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	289 (32.7^min, 244^P1 - 434^max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (186 - 306, n=28)	254 fps -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (44.1 - 279, n=35)	217 fps -25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile ()	183 fps -37%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (148 - 149, n=2)	148.5 fps -49%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (144 - 150, n=2)	147 fps -49%
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (315 - 336, n=2)	326 fps +40%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	233 (67^min, 173^P1 - 458^max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (165 - 248, n=29)	212 fps -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (39.6 - 225, n=35)	182 fps -22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile ()	149 fps -36%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (122 - 124, n=2)	123 fps -47%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (114 - 122, n=2)	118 fps -49%
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (285 - 289, n=2)	287 fps +41%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	204 (68.4^min, 155^P1 - 417^max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (117 - 219, n=33)	184 fps -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (36.2 - 194, n=46)	159 fps -22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile ()	125 fps -39%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (104 - 109, n=2)	106.5 fps -48%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (97.4 - 104, n=2)	100.7 fps -51%
2560x1440 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (218 - 220, n=2)	219 fps +45%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	151 (64.7^min, 121^P1 - 327^max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (123 - 165, n=13)	143.4 fps -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (82.3 - 140.5, n=18)	121.8 fps -19%

Far Cry 5
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (132 - 137, n=2)	134.5 fps +22%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	110 (95^min - 130^max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (86 - 112, n=16)	101.5 fps -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (81 - 101, n=18)	91.2 fps -17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile (67 - 96, n=2)	81.5 fps -26%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q ()	77 fps -30%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile ()	76 fps -31%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (72 - 79, n=2)	75.5 fps -31%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile ()	63 fps -43%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile ()	60 fps -45%
1280x720 Low Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (175 - 184, n=2)	179.5 fps +11%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	162 (110^min - 221^max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (94 - 189, n=25)	149.6 fps -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile ()	147 fps -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (123 - 176, n=25)	142.6 fps -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (111 - 154, n=3)	136 fps -16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile (123 - 123, n=2)	123 fps -24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (114 - 123, n=3)	119.7 fps -26%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (107 - 124, n=4)	116.8 fps -28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (95 - 128, n=5)	113 fps -30%
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	154 (120^min - 209^max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (126 - 180, n=18)	146.7 fps -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (108 - 163, n=18)	134.8 fps -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (109 - 136, n=3)	123.3 fps -20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (91 - 107, n=3)	101.3 fps -34%
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (152 - 162, n=2)	157 fps +12%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	140 (114^min - 192^max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (84 - 162, n=25)	126.8 fps -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (119 - 125, n=2)	122 fps -13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (100 - 143, n=26)	119.7 fps -14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (100 - 122, n=3)	112.3 fps -20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (94 - 109, n=6)	103.8 fps -26%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile (72 - 130, n=3)	102 fps -27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (85 - 105, n=6)	94.3 fps -33%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (90 - 97, n=4)	93 fps -34%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (144 - 155, n=2)	149.5 fps +12%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	134 (106^min - 180^max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (79 - 155, n=27)	121.1 fps -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (93 - 137, n=26)	114.2 fps -15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (110 - 115, n=2)	112.5 fps -16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (96 - 116, n=3)	106.7 fps -20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile (84 - 123, n=3)	101.3 fps -24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (68 - 106, n=7)	93.4 fps -30%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (81 - 96, n=6)	88.8 fps -34%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (84 - 90, n=4)	88 fps -34%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (135 - 145, n=2)	140 fps +13%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	124 (95^min - 168^max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (75 - 146, n=32)	113.3 fps -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (89 - 140, n=36)	108.6 fps -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (103 - 109, n=2)	106 fps -15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (91 - 110, n=4)	101 fps -19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile (73 - 115, n=3)	94.7 fps -24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (66 - 100, n=7)	89 fps -28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (82 - 87, n=5)	84 fps -32%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (76 - 90, n=9)	83.3 fps -33%

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU: Ø103.1 (98-110)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD
GTA V (2015)	184	179	173	109	99.1
The Witcher 3 (2015)	439.6	321.2	212.9	108.6
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	164	145	142	127
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	184	144	108		83.5
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	126	114	85.7
Far Cry 5 (2018)	162	140	134	124	110
Strange Brigade (2018)	521	289	233	204	151

Emissions

系统噪音

风扇噪音是一个混合的袋子。当在桌面上闲置或浏览网页时，风扇噪音通常很安静，最高只有28.7 dB(A)，而安静的背景只有23.8 dB(A)。然而，当运行3DMark 06的第一个基准场景时，风扇噪音在场景中间会提升到38 dB(A)，然后在接近结束时回落到28.7 dB(A)。建议在办公室模式下运行，而不是在涡轮模式下运行，以防止风扇频繁地跳动。

如果不戴耳机，游戏时的风扇噪音非常大，几乎达到56 dB(A)，会让人分心。启用风扇增强功能将使风扇达到最大的56 dB(A)，而不考虑处理负荷，但是无论风扇增强功能设置如何，用户在游戏时都会达到这个上限。

风扇噪音曲线（白色。背景，红色。系统空闲，蓝色：3DMark 06，橙色和绿色：Witcher 3 压力)

	Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	SCHENKER Compact 17 GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	MSI GS75 10SF-609US GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
Noise		5%	-20%	-20%	-21%	-21%
off / environment *	23.8	23 3%	25 -5%	24 -1%	25.4 -7%	26.2 -10%
Idle Minimum *	23.9	23 4%	30 -26%	29 -21%	25.4 -6%	31.2 -31%
Idle Average *	23.9	23 4%	32 -34%	32 -34%	25.4 -6%	31.4 -31%
Idle Maximum *	23.9	23 4%	36 -51%	38 -59%	40 -67%	34 -42%
Load Average *	38	41 -8%	53 -39%	49 -29%	54.6 -44%	49.5 -30%
Witcher 3 ultra *	55.9	45 19%	51 9%	53 5%		50.6 9%
Load Maximum *	55.9	52 7%	54 3%	55 2%	54.6 2%	60.7 -9%

* ... smaller is better

Noise Level

Idle		23.9 / 23.9 / 23.9 dB(A)
Load		38 / 55.9 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.8 dB(A)

温度

键盘中心的表面温度最高，而WASD键、数字键盘和掌托上的温度则低得多。这样的分布在游戏时是可取的，因为手指和手掌更有可能停留在这些较冷的区域，而不是在键盘中心的任何地方。在游戏时，我们能够在 "J "键上测量到超过53摄氏度的热点，而在 "W "键上只有26摄氏度，冷空气被拉入。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


43 °C	50.2 °C	42 °C
33.2 °C	54.2 °C	31.8 °C
30 °C	32.6 °C	31.8 °C

Maximum: 54.2 °C
Average: 38.8 °C


40 °C	52.2 °C	38.8 °C
31.8 °C	43.8 °C	32.6 °C
30.2 °C	32 °C	30 °C

Maximum: 52.2 °C
Average: 36.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 56 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


33.4 °C	37.4 °C	33.4 °C
28.4 °C	36.8 °C	31 °C
27 °C	28 °C	28.4 °C

Maximum: 37.4 °C
Average: 31.5 °C


37 °C	41.4 °C	34.2 °C
32.8 °C	37.6 °C	31.6 °C
30.4 °C	30.6 °C	29.6 °C

Maximum: 41.4 °C
Average: 33.9 °C

Room Temperature 22.8 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


39.2 °C	46 °C	38.6 °C
32.8 °C	52 °C	29.6 °C
27.6 °C	29.8 °C	29.2 °C

Maximum: 52 °C
Average: 36.1 °C


39.8 °C	50.8 °C	40.4 °C
32 °C	43.4 °C	33.2 °C
30.4 °C	32.4 °C	30.2 °C

Maximum: 50.8 °C
Average: 37 °C

Power Supply (max.) 57 °C | Room Temperature 22.8 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54.2 °C / 130 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52.2 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.6 °C / 90.7 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-3.7 °C / -6.7 F).

压力测试

当使用Prime95时，CPU在最初几秒钟会提升到4.1GHz，然后下降，最终在3.2GHz至3.8GHz范围内波动。核心温度会达到90℃以上，而搭载Ryzen 7的处理器只有76℃。华硕ROG Strix G17 G713QE在类似条件下。

运行 Witcher 3更能代表真实世界的游戏压力。我们的CPU和GPU将稳定在80 C，稳定的TGP功耗为130 W，而不是目标的165 W。这个赤字可以解释为什么我们的Maingear落后于Schenker Ultra 17，尽管两者都配备了165 W RTX 3080 GPU。启用Fan Boost模式似乎根本没有改善图形性能或温度，因为该模式只是将风扇转速设置为最高，而不考虑处理负荷。

用电池供电运行将严重限制性能，即使设置为涡轮模式。在电池上进行的Fire Strike 测试，物理学和图形学得分分别只有6513和2345分，而在主电源上则为22907和29194分。

	CPU时钟(GHz)	GPU时钟(MHz)	CPU平均温度(℃)	GPU平均温度(℃)
系统空闲	--	--	49	46
Prime95压力	3.2 - 3.8	--	91	53
Prime95 + FurMark压力	2.8 - 3.2	1100 - 1770	88	81
Witcher 3 应力	3.4 - 3.8	1635	79	80

发言人

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Energy Management

消耗功率

在Turbo模式和dGPU激活的情况下，桌面上的空闲时间可以消耗多达34W，而在Optimus模式下仅为16W。因此，如果不需要额外的功率，值得调低性能水平。

运行 Witcher 3消耗的功率比大多数其他17.3英寸GeForce RTX笔记本电脑略高，与我们的RTX 3080供电的Maingear更快的图形性能相关。例如，配备RTX 3060图形的Schenker XMG Core 17消耗的电力约为15%，而提供的图形性能比我们的RTX 3080慢了25%。

在同时运行Prime95和FurMark时，我们能够从中等尺寸（约15.3 x 7.4 x 3厘米）的240瓦交流适配器中记录到257瓦的最大功耗。因此，该系统有可能受益于更大的交流适配器，其额定功率更高。值得庆幸的是，当连接到插座时，运行游戏不会耗尽电池。与一些早期的戴尔XPS 17型号不同.

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.54 / 1.5 Watt
Idle	11 / 15.6 / 34 Watt
Load	81.2 / 257.3 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30	Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30	SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30	SCHENKER Compact 17 i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30	MSI GS75 10SF-609US i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Power Consumption		-30%	1%	-7%	-9%	-21%
Idle Minimum *	11	21.7 -97%	13 -18%	13 -18%	13.6 -24%	19.2 -75%
Idle Average *	15.6	27 -73%	16 -3%	16 -3%	19.8 -27%	22.4 -44%
Idle Maximum *	34	33 3%	29 15%	26 24%	23.5 31%	34.7 -2%
Load Average *	81.2	108 -33%	100 -23%	125 -54%	105 -29%	106.7 -31%
Witcher 3 ultra *	204	195 4%	173 15%	187 8%		160.5 21%
Load Maximum *	257.3	210 18%	213 17%	259 -1%	243 6%	248.7 3%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest

Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø204 (197-219)

Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø231 (201-257)

电池寿命

尽管机箱设计很薄，但电池容量却很大，为91Wh。当系统设置为iGPU模式时，我们能够在充满电的情况下挤出近7小时的实际WLAN使用时间。

从空电到满电只需要不到2小时。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing		6h 56min

	Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 91 Wh	Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 62 Wh	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 62 Wh	SCHENKER Compact 17 i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, 62 Wh	MSI GS75 10SF-609US i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 80.25 Wh
Battery Runtime		8%	-30%	-50%	-33%	-29%
WiFi v1.3	416	449 8%	293 -30%	208 -50%	280 -33%	295 -29%
Witcher 3 ultra		62
Load		162	80	44		243
Reader / Idle			462	281		513

Pros

+ 快速刷新率，快速响应时间，以及全sRGB覆盖率

+ 对于17.3英寸的RTX 3080笔记本电脑来说非常轻巧

+ 在低至中度负荷时相对安静

+ 可获得2个SODIMM和2个PCIe4 2280插槽

+ 可敬的电池寿命

Cons

- 钥匙反馈可以更强

- 不能通过USB-C充电

- 没有每个键的RGB照明

- 游戏时风扇声音大

- 没有网络摄像头快门

结论 - 重量和性能的出色平衡

在审查中。Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP1。测试装置由Maingear提供

你真的能在一个只有Razer Blade Pro那么大的机箱里运行165瓦的TGP GPU，而重量却少了500克吗？我们的测试表明，Maingear的GPU在游戏时反而会在130W左右徘徊，考虑到目前市场上的其他RTX 3080笔记本电脑，这大约是平均水平。如果你想最大限度地提高RTX 3080的性能，那么你仍然要考虑更庞大的笔记本电脑，如申科XMG Ultra 17.

在铰链硬度方面，Maingear系统也可以使用一些改进。虽然它的底座感觉比华硕Zephyrus S更结实，但它的铰链可以更硬，以获得更好的寿命和质量感。风扇在游戏时也非常响亮，但这是其他超薄游戏笔记本的共同特征，因此我们不能因为Vector Pro的噪音而对其进行独特的批评。

功能强大，而且就其尺寸而言出乎意料地轻。一些小功能被省略了，但核心系统、显示、性能和可扩展性都很稳固。

对于一台超薄的游戏笔记本电脑来说，长的电池寿命和容易升级是值得一提的。对于未来的型号，我们希望看到每键RGB照明、USB-C PD、更大的扬声器和网络摄像头快门，所有这些都成为高端型号的标准。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

我们的确切配置目前可以在在亚马逊上找到2499美元，而较小的RTX 3070 SKU则是零售价为2099美元.

Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 - 2021-09-10 09/10/2021 v7
Allen Ngo

Chassis

81 / 98 → 83%

Keyboard

84%

Pointing Device

83%

Connectivity

69 / 80 → 86%

Weight

61 / 10-66 → 92%

Battery

74 / 95 → 78%

Display

89%

Games Performance

99%

Application Performance

97%

Temperature

82 / 95 → 87%

Noise

82 / 90 → 91%

Audio

71%

Camera

37 / 85 → 43%

Average

78%

88%

Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5192 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011

contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC

Translator: Stefan Hinum - Founder, CEO, CFO - 22339 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2006

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17笔记本电脑评论。165 WGeForce RTX 3080的超薄尺寸

Allen Ngo, 2021-09-12 (Update: 2021-09-12)