戴尔Inspiron 16 Plus 7620评论。具备所有功能的多媒体笔记本电脑

2022年的戴尔Inspiron 16 Plus 7620直接接替了2021年的Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 ,引入了第12代CPU和更快的GeForce RTX GPU,以取代去年型号的第11代CPU。制造商甚至在该系列进入市场仅一年后,就对机箱进行了修改,以获得不同的外观。
我们的测试装置配置了桤木湖-H酷睿i7-12700H CPU,65WGeForce RTX 3050 Ti,以及16:10 3072 x 1280 IPS显示屏,价格约为1400美元。其他配有酷睿i5-12500H、60W RTX 3060和1920 x 1200触摸屏的SKU也有供应。该机型有一个二合一版本,名为Inspiron 16 Plus 7620二合一。
这一领域的竞争对手包括其他中高端16英寸多媒体或创作者笔记本电脑,如联想Yoga 7 16IAP7 ,华为MateBook D 16 ,宏碁Swift X ,华硕Vivobook Pro 16X ,甚至微星创造者Z16 。
更多戴尔的评论。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
87.4 % | 08/2022 | Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 18.99 mm | 16.00" | 3072x1920 | |
86.7 % | 10/2021 | Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 18.99 mm | 16.00" | 3072x1920 | |
88.7 % | 08/2022 | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 2 kg | 19.2 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
83.6 % | 07/2022 | Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.7 kg | 18.4 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
86.2 % | 07/2022 | Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 i5-11320H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 18.9 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 | |
12/2021 | Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 19 mm | 16.10" | 3840x2400 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例 - 暗色调
从视觉上看,2021年和2022年的车型之间的差异是立即可以看到的。例如,沿着侧面和后面的通风格栅,现在分别是长方形和椭圆形,而不是圆形。铬合金切割的边缘和角落现在已经消失,外观更加单色,不那么华丽。
构建质量仍然大致相同。与价格较高的XPS或Spectre相比,金属底座的扭曲和吱吱作响有点多,这在盖子上尤其如此。我们希望所有的视觉变化会导致一个更强大的底盘,但情况似乎并非如此。如果你还在摇晃2021年的机型,那么从设计的角度来看,2022年的机型不会让你错过太多。
我们对Inspiron 16 Plus 7610的抱怨之一是它的重量,尽管对机箱进行了重新设计,但7620仍是如此。该系统的重量为2至2.1公斤,比16英寸的 "S "型电脑重了几百克。Acer Swift X或华为MateBook D 16。新设计也不小,因为尺寸实际上比7610略大。
连接性 - 支持Thunderbolt 4
尽管外观有变化,但7620携带的所有端口与7610相同。第二个USB-C端口就像在 联想瑜伽7 16代7考虑到该设备的体积和重量,如果能有第二个USB-C接口就更好了。
SD卡阅读器
使用SD卡的传输速率仍然非常慢。现在很明显,戴尔希望用户升级到 价格较高的XPS系列如果他们想要更快的SD卡性能。
请注意,RTX 3060 SKU配备了一个MicroSD读卡器,而不是一个全尺寸的读卡器。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) |
沟通
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 |
网络摄像头 - 现在是200万像素而不是100万像素
戴尔将网络摄像头从Inspiron 16 Plus 7610的720p或100万像素升级到7620型号的1080p或200万像素,以获得更清晰的图像。支持Windows Hello,并有一个物理网络摄像头快门以保护隐私。

维护
底部面板只需一把飞利浦螺丝刀就能轻松卸下。一旦进入内部,用户会注意到与老款7610相比,冷却解决方案有所修改。正如我们下面的图片所示,这些变化实际上已经从7620中删除了一个SODIMM插槽和一个M.2 SSD插槽,只留下一个SSD插槽和一个SODIMM插槽可以使用。更令人困惑的是,选择RTX 3060 SKU的用户将有两个SODIMM插槽。
8GB的内存焊接在我们的电路板上,如果配置了可移动的32GB DDR5内存模块,最大可达到40GB。RTX 3060 SKU最多可以配置64GB,因为它们有2个SODIMM插槽,没有焊接的RAM。
配件和保修
除了交流电适配器和文件外,盒子里没有其他额外的东西。如果在美国购买,则适用标准的一年有限保修。
输入设备 - 与Inspiron 16 Plus 7620二合一相同
键盘
戴尔今年对键盘进行了改造,排除了小键盘。在其他方面,打字体验类似于Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 2-in-1因为按键仍然比LG Gram 16或惠普Spectre系列的按键稍软。
触摸板
显示 - 无重大变化
有趣的是,戴尔已经将面板供应商从去年Inspiron 16 Plus 7610的AU Optronics换成了这个最新机型的BOE。响应时间稍快,重影现象不那么严重,但其他一切基本保持不变,包括全sRGB覆盖、约1000:1的对比度和约290 nit的最大亮度。
视觉体验很好,但与XPS系列或华硕VivoBook Pro 16X上的OLED面板相比,还是差了几步。 华硕VivoBook Pro 16X.由于采用了积极的磨砂覆盖层,画质明显更有颗粒感,而色彩也不如OLED那样鲜艳。我们知道Inspiron系列不应该是顶级的,但令人失望的是,戴尔今年没有对显示屏进行任何重大改变。
有三种300尼特面板可供选择:3072 x 1920亚光非触摸,1920 x 1200亚光非触摸,以及1920 x 1200光面触摸。我们下面的测量结果只反映了较高的分辨率面板。
|
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 288.9 cd/m²
Contrast: 1111:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.88 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.1, calibrated: 0.42
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
73.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 BOE NE16N41, IPS, 3072x1920, 16.00 | Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 AU Optronics B160QAN, IPS, 3072x1920, 16.00 | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Lenovo LEN160WQXGA, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 BOE NV160WUM-NH0, IPS, 1920x1200, 16.00 | Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Chi Mei N161HCA-EA3, , 1920x1080, 16.10 | Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE Samsung ATNA60YV02-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16.10 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 3% | -5% | -5% | -7% | 25% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 70.8 | 74.1 5% | 67 -5% | 66.2 -6% | 65.1 -8% | 99.8 41% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.5 | 99.4 0% | 95.7 -4% | 96.4 -3% | 95.65 -4% | 100 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 73.2 | 75.8 4% | 69.3 -5% | 68.3 -7% | 66.75 -9% | 96.9 32% |
Response Times | -30% | 8% | 27% | 25% | 94% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 38 ? | 49.2 ? -29% | 36 ? 5% | 30.5 ? 20% | 30 ? 21% | 2 ? 95% |
Response Time Black / White * | 28 ? | 36.8 ? -31% | 24.8 ? 11% | 18.7 ? 33% | 20 ? 29% | 2 ? 93% |
PWM Frequency | 60 ? | |||||
Screen | -47% | -13% | -56% | -6% | -35% | |
Brightness middle | 288.9 | 296.8 3% | 393.7 36% | 319 10% | 276 -4% | 392 36% |
Brightness | 276 | 292 6% | 367 33% | 317 15% | 264 -4% | 396 43% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 87 -5% | 84 -9% | 90 -2% | 85 -8% | 98 7% |
Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.21 19% | 0.38 -46% | 0.23 12% | 0.16 38% | |
Contrast | 1111 | 1413 27% | 1036 -7% | 1387 25% | 1725 55% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.88 | 2.56 -36% | 1.97 -5% | 3.4 -81% | 1.8 4% | 1.74 7% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.37 | 4.76 -9% | 5.46 -25% | 8.1 -85% | 3.77 14% | 3.18 27% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.42 | 1.86 -343% | 0.62 -48% | 0.8 -90% | 0.63 -50% | 1.85 -340% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 2.6 -86% | 2.1 -50% | 5.7 -307% | 2.76 -97% | 1.77 -26% |
Gamma | 2.3 96% | 2.07 106% | 2.1 105% | 2.1 105% | 2.37 93% | 2.22 99% |
CCT | 6634 98% | 6628 98% | 6461 101% | 7433 87% | 6564 99% | 6483 100% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -25% /
-34% | -3% /
-9% | -11% /
-33% | 4% /
-2% | 28% /
1% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.2 ms rise | |
↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise | |
↘ 16.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (34.6 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19019 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
性能--第12代产品带来了更高的性能和功率消耗
测试条件
处理器
原始多线程性能比上一代产品快约30%至50%。 酷睿i7-11800H以代表一个相当显著的同比提升。然而,性能的可持续性可能会更好一点,因为CineBench R15 xT的分数在循环运行基准时将下降约18%。我们不确定如果降级到酷睿i5-12500H,用户应该期待多少性能下降 酷睿i5-12500H配置,因为截至目前我们还没有测试过任何配备这种CPU的笔记本电脑。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1576 - 7407, n=62) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (300 - 704, n=62) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1379 - 2916, n=68) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (113 - 263, n=63) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (168 - 732, n=61) | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (22844 - 73067, n=61) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (2743 - 5972, n=61) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 |
Geekbench 5.4 / Multi-Core | |
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (5144 - 13745, n=62) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng |
Geekbench 5.4 / Single-Core | |
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (803 - 1851, n=62) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (4.67 - 21.8, n=62) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (34.2 - 95.3, n=61) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F | |
HP Victus 16-e0145ng | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (0.4441 - 1.052, n=61) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (8855 - 9542, n=5) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (1595 - 1792, n=5) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (1383 - 1768, n=5) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 |
PCMark 10 Score | 6846 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的测试装置配备了一个经济型的512GB PCIe4 x4 M.2的固态硬盘顺序读取和写入率分别高达2700MB/s。一个铜质散热器位于顶部以帮助冷却。在循环运行DiskSpd时,我们设备中的驱动器没有表现出性能节流的问题。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能--比以前略微快了一些
来自我们的图形性能 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti只比RTX 3050 Ti快10%左右。 RTX 3050在去年的模型。虽然RTX 3050系列一般来说是令人失望的,因为更老更便宜的 GTX 1660 Ti更胜一筹,但至少戴尔在这里的实现要比其他大多数采用相同GPU的笔记本电脑快。
升级到RTX 3060 配置,预计可以将图形性能提高20%。然而,该GPU将被限制在60W的TGP上,这在移动RTX 3060选项中属于低端。
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (7917 - 15611, n=26) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (3744 - 6122, n=27) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Score | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (4013 - 6417, n=26) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (7952 - 20905, n=27) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 |