Notebookcheck

华硕Vivobook Pro 16X的预生产单位审查。性能、耐力和强大的OLED显示屏

大型笔记本电脑,有花纹细节 400 cd/m²的明亮OLED显示屏以及来自Nvidia和AMD的强大硬件使16英寸的Vivobook与宝贵的铝制外壳一起成为一台有吸引力的笔记本电脑。然而,测试的预生产设备只能在测试中几乎显示出可生产的性能。
Marc Herter, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
AMD Geforce Gaming Laptop / Notebook Workstation Zen Zen 3 (Vermeer)

华硕Vivobook Pro 16x拥有非常好的OLED显示屏、哈曼卡顿音响和强大的计算能力,应该主要吸引媒体设计师和内容创作者。集成在触摸板上的微软Surface Dial强调了这一方面。这款笔记本电脑,我们被允许作为预生产设备进行测试,显示出精心的设计和高性能的准备工作。深色的铝制外壳看起来既稳定又优雅。

这款多媒体笔记本电脑的核心是快速的AMD Ryzen R9-5900HX和NvidiaGeForce RTX 3050 Ti。因此,这款笔记本电脑有足够的图形性能,适合许多游戏和视频编辑程序。

华硕Vivobook Pro的竞争来自我们数据库中的所有领域,因为这款笔记本对于多媒体笔记本来说非常强大。因此,Vivobook Pro也可以跟上当前游戏笔记本和一些工作站的入门级。

作为对华硕最新设备的进一步预演 华硕Zenbook 14X的评论可供查阅。

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
Processor
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX 8 x 3.3 - 4.6 GHz, 64 W PL2 / Short Burst, 54 W PL1 / Sustained, Cezanne H (Zen 3)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU - 4096 MB, Memory: 5500 MHz, 50 W TDP, yes
Memory
32768 MB 
, soldered
Display
16.10 inch 16:10, 3840 x 2400 pixel 281 PPI, Samsung ATNA60YV02-0, OLED, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N, 1024 GB 
Soundcard
AMD Raven/Renoir/VanGogh/Cezanne - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller
Connections
4 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Multi Headset, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 19 x 358 x 258
Battery
96 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 0.9 MP
Additional features
Keyboard: Inseltastatur, Keyboard Light: yes
Weight
1.911 kg, Power Supply: 460 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
12/2021
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
1.9 kg19 mm16.10"3840x2400
87.3 %
08/2021
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
i9-11950H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
1.9 kg18 mm15.60"3840x2160
86.5 %
10/2021
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
R7 5800H, Vega 8 R5000
2 kg17.8 mm16.00"2520x1680
85.6 %
02/2021
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.2 kg20 mm15.60"3840x2160
86 %
08/2021
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
i5-11300H, GeForce MX450
1.9 kg18.4 mm16.00"2560x1600
88.4 %
09/2021
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
1.9 kg18 mm15.60"3456x2160

外壳 - 阳极氧化铝和少量塑料

很多深灰色到黑色的阳极氧化铝与一些黑色塑料的点缀决定了华硕Vivobook的外观。虽然这款笔记本电脑并不真正薄,但由于采用了瑞士边缘,设备看起来不那么笨重。小的设计元素,如显示屏铰链上的浮雕,也使事情变得生动起来。

哑光铝的光滑表面总是让人感觉到凉爽。除了有点灵活的显示屏,这台笔记本电脑看起来非常稳定,几乎没有显示任何制造问题。底部有些不均匀的缝隙对于一个预生产的设备来说并不是不典型的。

显示器可以用一只手打开到160°的角度。可以看到下面有一个灰色和红色的键盘以及大的触摸板。

华硕Vivobook对于给定性能级别的16英寸笔记本电脑来说是比较纤薄的。重量和厚度与竞争对手处于同一范围。

Size comparison

358 mm 258 mm 19 mm 1.9 kg356 mm 250 mm 20 mm 2.2 kg356 mm 251 mm 18.4 mm 1.9 kg354 mm 235 mm 18 mm 1.9 kg351 mm 254.9 mm 17.8 mm 2 kg345 mm 230 mm 18 mm 1.9 kg

设备--没有Thunderbolt,Vivobook提供的连接性很小

这款笔记本的四个USB端口(其中一个是USB Type-C)并没有提供很多连接选项。PowerDelivery和Thunderbolt 4在这里是不存在的。HDMI端口是通过电缆连接外部显示器的唯一选择。

3.5毫米耳机,microSD,USB Type C 3.2 Gen 2,HDMI,USB Type A 3.2 Gen 2,电源
3.5毫米耳机,microSD,USB Type C 3.2 Gen 2,HDMI,USB Type A 3.2 Gen 2,电源
2 x USB Type A 3.2 Gen 2
2 x USB Type A 3.2 Gen 2

淘宝网

microSD读卡器的速度相当慢,传输速率为38MB/s。测试中使用的128GB的AV PRO microSD通常提供更快的数据传输率。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
  (AV Pro V60)
224 MB/s ∼100% +502%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
194 MB/s ∼87% +422%
Average of class Multimedia
  (18.1 - 226, n=67, last 2 years)
78.9 MB/s ∼35% +112%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
  (AV Pro V60)
73.8 MB/s ∼33% +98%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
  (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
37.2 MB/s ∼17%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
213 MB/s ∼100% +461%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
  (AV Pro V60)
202.8 MB/s ∼95% +434%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
90.6 MB/s ∼43% +138%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
  (AV Pro V60)
88.64 MB/s ∼42% +133%
Average of class Multimedia
  (23.2 - 217, n=65, last 2 years)
85.4 MB/s ∼40% +125%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
  (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
38 MB/s ∼18%

沟通

一个英特尔AX200模块负责华硕Vivobook的Wi-Fi 6和蓝牙5.1。然而,本来非常快的WLAN模块在测试设备的传输速度上却低于其潜力。在具有金属外壳的笔记本电脑中,天线的定位往往特别困难。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1419 (1169min - 1609max) MBit/s ∼100% +55%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1367 (960min - 1479max) MBit/s ∼96% +49%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (447 - 1645, n=123)
1097 MBit/s ∼77% +20%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1090 MBit/s ∼77% +19%
Average of class Multimedia
  (52 - 1563, n=89, last 2 years)
998 MBit/s ∼70% +9%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
915 (458min - 960max) MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1363 (1311min - 1453max) MBit/s ∼100% +110%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1339 (1289min - 1364max) MBit/s ∼98% +106%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (523 - 1665, n=124)
1182 MBit/s ∼87% +82%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1080 MBit/s ∼79% +66%
Average of class Multimedia
  (119 - 1571, n=89, last 2 years)
1075 MBit/s ∼79% +66%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
649 (613min - 666max) MBit/s ∼48%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950647653655641651661633660654666664661613660646640637655651645645653646648657647638621657651647653655641651661633660654666664661613660646640637655651645645653646648657647638621657651458934905942949947874932956943928878931914933929950913956936936928927873960919907633890900Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø649 (613-666)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø899 (458-960)

网络摄像头

这款全能型笔记本电脑的90万像素网络摄像头显示了笔记本电脑的典型图像质量。一个机械快门可以防止通过这里的摄像头进行不必要的瞥视。麦克风和网络摄像头也可以通过键盘上的一个功能键禁用。小小的橙色LED灯显示了这两者的状态。

ColorChecker
25.5 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
21.7 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
22.4 ∆E
26.4 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
22.4 ∆E
25.8 ∆E
20.8 ∆E
25 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
21 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
20.1 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE: 20.01 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 26.41 ∆E

安全问题

由于采用了AMD Ryzen R9,华硕Vivobook具有最新的安全功能,如SecureBoot和TPM 2.0。Windows Update报告说与Windows 11完全兼容。

集成在电源按钮上的指纹传感器可以作为登录的认证方法。

辅料

除了适当的电源装置外,我们的预生产设备没有配备任何其他附件。

维护

卸下11颗TX5螺丝后,可以用吸盘将下层机壳盖拆下。WLAN模块和M.2-2280 SSD可以被替换。在这个过程中,两个风扇也可以很容易地被清洁。另一方面,工作存储器是焊接的。

担保

我们的预生产设备不在任何保修范围内。通常情况下,华硕提供的设备有24个月的保修期。

输入设备--华硕Dial为创意者提供的功能

键盘

华硕Vivobook的全键盘有一个正常的尺寸,它有16毫米的按键。它很容易工作,具有令人愉快的高输入阻力和明显的触觉反馈。由于有背光灯,键盘很安静,即使在黑暗中也很容易使用。用于打开和关闭麦克风和摄像头的功能键,以及用于屏幕截图菜单和MyAsus应用程序的功能键使键盘的功能更加完善。

触摸板

13×8.5厘米(5.1×3.4英寸)的ClickPad以其反应速度和光滑的表面令人信服。从右上角轻扫就可以进入一个额外的控制元素。华硕拨号盘可以控制屏幕亮度、音量和其他设置,以及启动应用程序。华硕拨号盘也可以在一些Adobe程序中使用。另外,华硕拨号也可以像微软Surface拨号那样进行配置。

显示屏--WQUXGA和OLED在60赫兹下产生了非常好的画面

OLED面板的像素网格
OLED面板的像素网格

华硕Vivobook的OLED显示屏具有400cd/m²的亮度,以16:10的格式提供了3840×2400像素的非常明亮和多彩的画面。按照16.1英寸的尺寸计算,这导致像素密度为281 ppi。因此,单个像素难以识别。60 FPS的最大帧率对于作为媒体设计师的笔记本电脑的预期用途来说可能太低。在OLED屏幕上没有光晕或照明不足的区域。测量结果还显示出非常好的照明效果。

396
cd/m²
392
cd/m²
392
cd/m²
397
cd/m²
392
cd/m²
398
cd/m²
398
cd/m²
397
cd/m²
402
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Samsung ATNA60YV02-0
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 402 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 396 cd/m² Minimum: 5.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 392 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.74 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5, calibrated: 1.85
ΔE Greyscale 1.77 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
96.87% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.75% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.22
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
Samsung ATNA60YV02-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16.10
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
SDC4145, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
BOE TV160DKT-NH0, , 2520x1680, 16.00
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
SDCA029, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Lenovo LEN160WQXGA, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
SDC414D, OLED, 3456x2160, 15.60
Display
-1%
-25%
1%
-17%
0%
Display P3 Coverage
99.75
99.9
0%
63.1
-37%
99.92
0%
74
-26%
99.9
0%
sRGB Coverage
100
100
0%
94.9
-5%
100
0%
98.7
-1%
100
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
96.87
95.3
-2%
65.1
-33%
98.53
2%
74.5
-23%
98.1
1%
Response Times
87%
-1590%
97%
-425%
-40%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
2 ?(1, 1)
2.4 ?(1, 1.4)
-20%
41.2 ?(19.2, 22)
-1960%
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
-20%
13 ?(6, 7)
-550%
3.6 ?(2, 1.6)
-80%
Response Time Black / White *
2 ?(1, 1)
2.4 ?(1.1, 1.3)
-20%
26.4 ?(14, 12.4)
-1220%
1.8 ?(1, 0.8)
10%
8 ?(4, 4)
-300%
2.8 ?(1.2, 1.6)
-40%
PWM Frequency
60 ?(80)
240.4 ?(52)
301%
240 ?(79)
300%
59.52 ?(99)
-1%
Screen
-67%
-1%
-26%
-30%
-11%
Brightness middle
392
379.6
-3%
357
-9%
442
13%
356
-9%
362
-8%
Brightness
396
380
-4%
349
-12%
452
14%
322
-19%
367
-7%
Brightness Distribution
98
95
-3%
93
-5%
95
-3%
80
-18%
97
-1%
Black Level *
0.21
0.05
0.27
0.06
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.74
5.15
-196%
1.6
8%
2.69
-55%
2.4
-38%
2.1
-21%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.18
7.79
-145%
3.9
-23%
8.27
-160%
4.42
-39%
4.1
-29%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.85
3.1
-68%
0.6
68%
2.59
-40%
2.5
-35%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.77
2.6
-47%
2.4
-36%
0.9
49%
2.81
-59%
1.4
21%
Gamma
2.22 99%
1.99 111%
2.14 103%
2.172 101%
2.4 92%
2.18 101%
CCT
6483 100%
6166 105%
6728 97%
6434 101%
6294 103%
6608 98%
Contrast
1700
8840
1319
6033
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
99
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
Total Average (Program / Settings)
6% / -16%
-539% / -272%
24% / 8%
-157% / -98%
-17% / -15%

* ... smaller is better

OLED显示器的无限对比度从来没有让人失望过。同时,Adobe、P3和sRGB色彩空间几乎100%覆盖。出厂时的平均色彩偏差只有ΔΕ1.74,显示器的校准效果非常好。我们创建的色彩配置文件只能改善灰度的表现,但在这个过程中,色彩的再现会略有恶化。

卡尔曼色
卡尔曼色
卡尔曼色彩校准
卡尔曼色彩校准
卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度标定
卡尔曼灰度标定
卡尔曼饱和度
卡尔曼饱和度
卡尔曼饱和度校准
卡尔曼饱和度校准
华硕Vivobook与sRGB色彩空间的对比
华硕Vivobook与sRGB色彩空间的对比
华硕Vivobook与Adobe色彩空间的对比
华硕Vivobook与Adobe色彩空间的对比
华硕Vivobook vs. DisplayP3
华硕Vivobook vs. DisplayP3
 
 
 

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.5 ms).

测试中发现的闪烁是由于所使用的显示技术造成的。在OLED显示器中,图像通常逐行更新。在这个过程中,图像的一个狭窄区域被短暂关闭。根据亮度设置,更多或更宽的条纹也会变暗。然而,与PWM控制的背光相比,闪烁在某种程度上对眼睛更容易,因为在这个过程中,整个显示屏不会变暗。

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 60 Hz ≤ 80 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 80 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 20931 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

作为OLED显示屏的典型代表,华硕Vivobook的屏幕从各个方向都很容易阅读。然而,在尖锐的视角下会出现轻微的彩虹效应。尽管显示屏亮度很高,但光亮的显示屏表面使得在户外使用该笔记本很困难。反射和折射使得在错误的观察角度下无法阅读显示屏。

户外使用华硕Vivobook Pro
户外使用华硕Vivobook Pro
户外使用华硕Vivobook Pro
户外使用华硕Vivobook Pro
华硕Vivobook Pro的可视角度组件
华硕Vivobook Pro的可视角度组件
 

软件 - MyAsus一直要求注册

华硕Vivobook上预装了两个程序,可以用来设置各种硬件组件的设置。在ProArt Creator Hub中,你主要可以调整色彩还原、华硕表盘的功能和性能控制。

MyAsus应用程序,也可以通过其中一个功能键进入,提供很多设置。在那里,可以对屏幕、扬声器、电池、电源控制等进行设置。然而,该应用程序总是要求用华硕账户登录或通过Facebook或Google链接。因此,我们在其余测试中没有使用MyAsus应用程序。

性能 - 54瓦的Ryzen R9让人信服

有了AMD Ryzen R9-5900HX,32GB DDR5内存和NvidiaGeForce RTX 3050 Ti,我们测试设备的主板装备精良。一个1TB的NVMe SSD可作为主存储。其他配置有Ryzen R5和R7以及8GB和16GB工作内存的配置也是已知的,但尚未确认。

测试条件

测试的华硕Vivobook Pro是一个预生产的模型。并非所有的驱动程序都已完全开发。在测试期间,个别驱动程序被反复更新。华硕只在测试期结束前不久,通过ProArt Creator Hub的更新,为我们的测试设备提供了一个有效的性能控制。因此,所有的基准测试都是在全速模式设置下重复进行的。

因此,性能控制有4种不同的选择。在选定的模式下,风扇永久地以全速旋转。这种设置特别适合于在较长的负载阶段获得稳定的性能。

HWinfo
HWinfo
GPU-Z AMD iGPU
GPU-Z AMD iGPU
GPU-Z NVidia dGPU
GPU-Z NVidia dGPU
CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z 主板
CPU-Z 主板
CPU-Z工作存储器
CPU-Z工作存储器
CPU-Z内存插槽
CPU-Z内存插槽
CPU-Z Nvidia dGPU
CPU-Z Nvidia dGPU
CPU-Z AMD iGPU
CPU-Z AMD iGPU
CPU-Z基准测试
CPU-Z基准测试

处理器

作为目前最强大的移动处理器之一,... AMD Ryzen R9-5900HX特别是在大型笔记本电脑中使用。该SoC还配备了AMD Radeon板载图形芯片。由于有足够的冷却尺寸,这款八核处理器可以长期以略高于54瓦的功率(PL1)运行。因此,CineBench循环显示出非常稳定的高性能。在短期负载期间,处理器时钟在65瓦的情况下增加到4.3GHz。在大多数多核处理器基准测试中,强大的R9明显超过了对手。只有 华为MateBook 16 AMD能很好地跟上,尽管AMD Ryzen R7的性能较弱。

然而,在单核基准测试中,英特尔的酷睿处理器仍然明显领先于AMD的顶级核心。

Cinebench R15 Multi Endurance test

010521031542052563073584094510501155126013651470157516801785189019952048.342036.872038.112046.662029.742030.772033.242038.222050.232039.362033.142034.382047.712029.742030.152038.842041.342031.492035.522032.112031.182043.532038.532032.212035.422019.282000.41997.81967.921943.921953.981943.731938.171936.481943.921949.031937.981924.371944.111924.651940.991934.981928.361919.391916.351930.131927.91930.041925.211934.71841.111804.241802.051822.661804.481802.371820.421789.951808.561813.241816.371817.271813.811806.281802.781813.41792.841801.881802.451790.991819.511820.081813.811796.861795.981808.891811.761819.341802.531792.681811.351797.591803.021809.051814.221801.961803.351810.771805.711796.541812.251787.471809.381816.781809.221765.461813.41808.151793.81804.161984.911987.871980.491990.942000.11993.422005.411996.112005.412009.141985.212004.912000.91987.871990.151995.912001.51985.511995.112003.12006.421982.951999.42000.31984.911701.111559.331468.591473.681455.291478.421484.781480.991473.681473.681473.681492.591489.151495.221484.781491.761480.931473.681474.551463.591479.671477.921482.21461.081479.18990.11983.55971.56953.22946.07948.7952.47950.59956.41953.33955.98921.15950.95951.93950.55955.22951.86952.02950.1957.72950.91953.49954.56956.48954.52956.32953.95956.69955.34954.2951.04952.36949.92950.43952.06955.77954.81951.86955.27954.542024.191795.411719.621716.151694.561589.381592.361604.241764.291641.031604.31636.061638.141622.591637.131644.471621.531629.861618.521618.841620.481643.391641.291614.41639.212009.951786.831594.261566.051577.781576.61568.631574.681576.61580.531586.421599.31587.361601.351646.631593.311589.381604.111648.741647.651598.341636.061647.651607.331613.42Tooltip
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX; Settings: Full Speed Mode: Ø2037 (2029.74-2050.23)
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX; Settings Performance Mode: Ø1945 (1916.35-2019.28)
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H: Ø1806 (1765.46-1841.11)
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø1995 (1980.49-2009.14)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC Intel Core i7-10870H: Ø1490 (1455.29-1701.11)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H: Ø954 (921.15-990.11)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H; Ultra Performance: Ø1663 (1589.38-2024.19)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1625 (1566.05-2009.95)
Cinebench R23: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | 64 Bit Single-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (6622 - 14363, n=24)
12557 Points ∼100% +2%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
12309 Points ∼98%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
12031 Points ∼96% -2%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
12166 (11410min - 12166.4max) Points ∼97% -1%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
10531 Points ∼84% -14%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
10336 Points ∼82% -16%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
9633 Points ∼77% -22%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3121 - 13205, n=72, last 2 years)
7342 Points ∼58% -40%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
6465 Points ∼51% -47%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Single Core)
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
1569 Points ∼100% +5%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
1498 Points ∼95% 0%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1495 Points ∼95%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1451 Points ∼92% -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (1218 - 1498, n=23)
1467 Points ∼93% -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
1431 Points ∼91% -4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (980 - 1586, n=67, last 2 years)
1356 Points ∼86% -9%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1338 Points ∼85% -11%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
1234 Points ∼79% -17%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (2242 - 5476, n=24)
4846 Points ∼100% +1%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
4792 Points ∼99%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
4662 Points ∼96% -3%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
4660 Points ∼96% -3%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
3993 Points ∼82% -17%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
3848 Points ∼79% -20%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
3543 Points ∼73% -26%
Average of class Multimedia
  (727 - 5128, n=100, last 2 years)
2456 Points ∼51% -49%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
2382 Points ∼49% -50%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
610 Points ∼100% +6%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
581 Points ∼95% +1%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
576 Points ∼94%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
573 Points ∼94% -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (471 - 584, n=23)
571 Points ∼94% -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
548 Points ∼90% -5%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
518 Points ∼85% -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (311 - 621, n=100, last 2 years)
497 Points ∼81% -14%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
482 Points ∼79% -16%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2050 (2029.74min - 2050.23max) Points ∼100%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2019 (1916.35min - 2019.28max) Points ∼98% -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (1076 - 2267, n=23)
2047 Points ∼100% 0%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
2024.19 Points ∼99% -1%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
2009.95 Points ∼98% -2%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2009 (1980.49min - 2009.14max) Points ∼98% -2%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
1841 (1765.46min - 1841.11max) Points ∼90% -10%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
1701 (1455.29min - 1701.11max) Points ∼83% -17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (334 - 2154, n=114, last 2 years)
1117 Points ∼54% -46%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
990 Points ∼48% -52%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
242 Points ∼100%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
240 Points ∼99% -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (197 - 243, n=19)
237 Points ∼98% -2%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
236 Points ∼98% -2%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
232 Points ∼96% -4%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
228 Points ∼94% -6%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
200 Points ∼83% -17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (126 - 244, n=97, last 2 years)
196 Points ∼81% -19%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
176 Points ∼73% -27%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
542 Seconds * ∼100% -112%
Average of class Multimedia
  (183 - 1439, n=93, last 2 years)
520 Seconds * ∼96% -103%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
308 Seconds * ∼57% -20%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
298 Seconds * ∼55% -16%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
256 Seconds * ∼47%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
249 Seconds * ∼46% +3%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
254 Seconds * ∼47% +1%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
254 Seconds * ∼47% +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (219 - 442, n=23)
250 Seconds * ∼46% +2%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
58576 MIPS ∼100%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
56729 MIPS ∼97% -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (36011 - 62503, n=23)
57433 MIPS ∼98% -2%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
53767 MIPS ∼92% -8%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
50050 MIPS ∼85% -15%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
43601 MIPS ∼74% -26%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
42570 MIPS ∼73% -27%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8984 - 59653, n=90, last 2 years)
29773 MIPS ∼51% -49%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
25353 MIPS ∼43% -57%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5865 MIPS ∼100%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5826 MIPS ∼99% -1%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
5773 MIPS ∼98% -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (4791 - 5865, n=23)
5690 MIPS ∼97% -3%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5593 MIPS ∼95% -5%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
5427 MIPS ∼93% -7%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
5294 MIPS ∼90% -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3289 - 5865, n=90, last 2 years)
4956 MIPS ∼85% -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
4947 MIPS ∼84% -16%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
8479 Points ∼100%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
8355 Points ∼99% -1%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
8164 Points ∼96% -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (5057 - 9294, n=21)
8139 Points ∼96% -4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
7716 Points ∼91% -9%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7641 Points ∼90% -10%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
7286 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1604 - 12708, n=93, last 2 years)
5953 Points ∼70% -30%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
4905 Points ∼58% -42%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
1702 Points ∼100% +10%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1553 Points ∼91%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1542 Points ∼91% -1%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
1540 Points ∼90% -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (1271 - 1561, n=21)
1507 Points ∼89% -3%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1480 Points ∼87% -5%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
1447 Points ∼85% -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (813 - 1782, n=93, last 2 years)
1373 Points ∼81% -12%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
1295 Points ∼76% -17%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
15.5 fps ∼100%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
14.9 fps ∼96% -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (8.26 - 17.1, n=23)
15.2 fps ∼98% -2%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
14.5 fps ∼94% -6%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
14.4 fps ∼93% -7%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
12.4 fps ∼80% -20%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
11.7 fps ∼75% -25%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1.39 - 15.9, n=90, last 2 years)
8.14 fps ∼53% -47%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
7.08 fps ∼46% -54%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
64.4 s * ∼100% -21%
Average of class Multimedia
  (30.2 - 99.2, n=90, last 2 years)
54.6 s * ∼85% -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (44.1 - 87.4, n=23)
53.9 s * ∼84% -1%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
53.2 s * ∼83%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
50.4 s * ∼78% +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
52.4 s * ∼81% +2%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
49.6 s * ∼77% +7%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
48.6 s * ∼75% +9%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
47.5 s * ∼74% +11%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.4851 - 1.002, n=92, last 2 years)
0.618 sec * ∼100% -24%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
0.604 sec * ∼98% -22%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
0.573 sec * ∼93% -15%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.567 sec * ∼92% -14%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
0.551 sec * ∼89% -11%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.517 sec * ∼84% -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (0.4851 - 0.599, n=23)
0.509 sec * ∼82% -3%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.4965 sec * ∼80%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.4851 sec * ∼78% +2%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2050 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
166 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
242 Points
Help
日志分析 Cinebench循环:拔掉电源线后性能下降
日志分析 Cinebench循环:拔掉电源线后性能下降

当笔记本电脑由电池供电时,仍然允许处理器以大约45瓦的功率工作。因此,在10分钟的Cinebench R23循环中,处理器时钟从大约3.6GHz降至3.4GHz。

系统性能

Vivobook Pro是一台非常快的笔记本电脑。在PCMark 10基准测试中,该计算机提供了非常高的分数。作为对比领域中的第二名,在整体非常强大的竞争者中,华硕的笔记本电脑可以提供更令人满意的结果。我们的预生产单位最初在性能管理和一些驱动程序方面存在问题,这使得系统看起来很迟钝,但华硕同时也通过一些更新做出了相当大的改进。笔记本电脑在最新版本上运行平稳,基本没有掉线。

PCMark 10 / Score
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB
6751 Points ∼100% +2%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6592 Points ∼98%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
 
6592 Points ∼98% 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
6442 Points ∼95% -2%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Vega 8 R5000, R7 5800H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
6365 Points ∼94% -3%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
6019 Points ∼89% -9%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5333 Points ∼79% -19%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3028 - 6919, n=86, last 2 years)
5047 Points ∼75% -23%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Vega 8 R5000, R7 5800H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
10690 Points ∼100% +2%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
10491 Points ∼98%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
 
10491 Points ∼98% 0%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB
9915 Points ∼93% -5%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
9490 Points ∼89% -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6441 - 10846, n=86, last 2 years)
9225 Points ∼86% -12%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
9185 Points ∼86% -12%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
8931 Points ∼84% -15%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Vega 8 R5000, R7 5800H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
9729 Points ∼100% +1%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9665 Points ∼99%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
 
9665 Points ∼99% 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
8554 Points ∼88% -11%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB
8461 Points ∼87% -12%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
8344 Points ∼86% -14%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
7916 Points ∼81% -18%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5448 - 9729, n=86, last 2 years)
7491 Points ∼77% -22%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB
9952 Points ∼100% +30%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
8663 Points ∼87% +13%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
7667 Points ∼77%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
 
7667 Points ∼77% 0%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
7475 Points ∼75% -3%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Vega 8 R5000, R7 5800H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
6730 Points ∼68% -12%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5388 Points ∼54% -30%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2148 - 9735, n=86, last 2 years)
5193 Points ∼52% -32%
PCMark 10 Score
6592 points
Help

DPC延迟

在用LatencyMon进行的测试中,不同驱动程序的互动出现了短暂的问题。即使有华硕的最新更新,也不是所有的问题都已经解决了。观察到的延迟的短期波动非常大,这就是结果。

在播放4k60的YouTube测试视频时发生了这样的抽搐。其结果是35个跳帧在一块。一张静止了半秒多一点的图片是明显可以看到的。

LatencyMon主标签
LatencyMon主标签
LatencyMon 驱动程序
LatencyMon 驱动程序
Youtube播放
Youtube播放
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
4336 μs * ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2029 μs * ∼47% +53%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1913.9 μs * ∼44% +56%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB
1508 μs * ∼35% +65%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
628.7 μs * ∼14% +86%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Vega 8 R5000, R7 5800H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
454.3 μs * ∼10% +90%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储

即使AS SSD和CrystalDiskMark 6.0的测量结果有些差距,但SK Hynix的M.2 NVMe SSD在传输较大文件时速度非常快。其余的访问时间和传输较小文件的得分在比较中的笔记本电脑中处于中等水平。有一TB的存储空间,有足够的空间用于小型视频项目。

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Lite-On CA5-8D512
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-3%
15%
1%
27%
-2%
1%
Write 4K
129.9
110.5
-15%
129.29
0%
126.04
-3%
203
56%
109.35
-16%
146 ?(116 - 183, n=10)
12%
Read 4K
47.02
51.75
10%
54.29
15%
44.94
-4%
52.35
11%
53.91
15%
58.9 ?(44.7 - 73.2, n=10)
25%
Write Seq
2071
2763.28
2138
1990.54
4318 ?(1916 - 18545, n=8)
Read Seq
2505
1671.41
1974
1759.22
2131 ?(1991 - 2358, n=8)
Write 4K Q32T1
509.5
429.8
-16%
446.58
-12%
451.63
-11%
640.2
26%
499.78
-2%
464 ?(390 - 525, n=10)
-9%
Read 4K Q32T1
442
418.3
-5%
563.92
28%
551.91
25%
706.9
60%
438.81
-1%
435 ?(346 - 473, n=10)
-2%
Write Seq Q32T1
2783.8
3060
10%
2210.3
-21%
3059.7
10%
2973
7%
2834.8
2%
2832 ?(1390 - 3166, n=10)
2%
Read Seq Q32T1
3601.4
3539
-2%
3418.2
-5%
3191.5
-11%
3559
-1%
3234.8
-10%
3523 ?(3219 - 3607, n=10)
-2%
Write 4K Q8T8
526.5
1254.47
138%
500 ?(485 - 527, n=3)
-5%
Read 4K Q8T8
1775.8
1388.23
-22%
1523 ?(1276 - 1776, n=3)
-14%
AS SSD
13%
-2%
7%
17%
-21%
9%
Seq Read
2912.54
2953.49
1%
2955
1%
2331
-20%
2540.6
-13%
1362
-53%
2852 ?(2635 - 3133, n=11)
-2%
Seq Write
1805.83
1690.74
-6%
2080
15%
2312
28%
2554.63
41%
1440
-20%
1706 ?(1243 - 2969, n=11)
-6%
4K Read
47.67
43.98
-8%
51.06
7%
39.13
-18%
56.05
18%
38.43
-19%
52.7 ?(39.7 - 58, n=11)
11%
4K Write
101.54
105.45
4%
127.48
26%
98.12
-3%
129.6
28%
121.41
20%
127 ?(69 - 160, n=11)
25%
4K-64 Read
1381.5
1065.05
-23%
1321.07
-4%
1662.54
20%
1633.45
18%
370.5
-73%
1296 ?(1011 - 1891, n=11)
-6%
4K-64 Write
2163.94
1957.38
-10%
1103.36
-49%
2138.19
-1%
1862.62
-14%
1053.65
-51%
1929 ?(1342 - 2216, n=11)
-11%
Access Time Read *
0.044
0.04
9%
0.034
23%
0.099
-125%
0.077
-75%
0.042
5%
0.0473 ?(0.028 - 0.093, n=11)
-8%
Access Time Write *
0.109
0.105
4%
0.031
72%
0.038
65%
0.029
73%
0.135
-24%
0.0497 ?(0.028 - 0.109, n=11)
54%
Score Read
1720
1404
-18%
1668
-3%
1935
13%
1944
13%
545
-68%
1634 ?(1330 - 2259, n=11)
-5%
Score Write
2446
2232
-9%
1439
-41%
2468
1%
2248
-8%
1319
-46%
2226 ?(1638 - 2508, n=11)
-9%
Score Total
4995
4297
-14%
3922
-21%
5388
8%
5192
4%
2160
-57%
4647 ?(3615 - 5630, n=11)
-7%
Copy ISO MB/s
2648.76
2473.57
-7%
1479.93
-44%
2903
10%
2246.35
-15%
1405.65
-47%
1913 ?(1277 - 2649, n=7)
-28%
Copy Program MB/s
372.81
1073.8
188%
377.61
1%
686
84%
861.01
131%
843.6
126%
715 ?(373 - 964, n=7)
92%
Copy Game MB/s
1126.04
1929.44
71%
1044.87
-7%
1594
42%
1551.58
38%
1353.42
20%
1382 ?(943 - 1855, n=7)
23%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
5% / 8%
7% / 4%
4% / 6%
22% / 20%
-12% / -15%
5% / 6%

* ... smaller is better

SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3601.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2783.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 442 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 509.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 47.02 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 129.9 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 526.5 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1775.8 MB/s

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

图形卡

华硕Vivobook Pro配备了一个 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3050 Ti作为dGPU。3050 Ti足够强大,可以在全高清分辨率下以高细节水平玩目前的游戏。然而,来自Nvidia RTX 3000系列的第二小的显卡在更高的分辨率下达到了它的极限。Nvidia允许将3050 Ti的最大功耗配置在35至80瓦之间。在华硕Vivobook Pro中,该显卡的最大功率为50瓦。

为了提高能源效率,在R9 APU上支持一个较小的AMD Radeon图形。它能可靠地处理较小的任务。只有在游戏或应用中对图形提出更高的要求时,Nvidia图形芯片才会无缝切换。

3DMark和3DMark11的基准测试结果显示,华硕选择的最大性能非常好。华硕电脑中的显卡运行速度比戴尔XPS 15中的3050 Ti略快。 戴尔XPS 15但在我们的基准测试表中低于3050的平均水平。 基准测试表.

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
31866 Points ∼100% +96%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
28908 Points ∼91% +77%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (15387 - 20905, n=9)
18792 Points ∼59% +15%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
16296 Points ∼51%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
15387 Points ∼48% -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1365 - 33732, n=84, last 2 years)
9869 Points ∼31% -39%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
9580 Points ∼30% -41%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
6117 Points ∼19% -62%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (39886 - 91513, n=8)
69843 Points ∼100% +75%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
63674 Points ∼91% +60%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
48479 Points ∼69% +22%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
45531 Points ∼65% +14%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
39886 Points ∼57%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
33806 Points ∼48% -15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6498 - 87836, n=68, last 2 years)
33182 Points ∼48% -17%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
29795 Points ∼43% -25%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
23674 Points ∼100% +130%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
21399 Points ∼90% +108%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (10288 - 14815, n=9)
13660 Points ∼58% +33%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
12119 Points ∼51% +18%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
10288 Points ∼43%
Average of class Multimedia
  (920 - 25285, n=91, last 2 years)
7099 Points ∼30% -31%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
5573 Points ∼24% -46%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
3734 Points ∼16% -64%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
9323 Points ∼100% +96%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
7909 Points ∼85% +67%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (4591 - 6122, n=10)
5424 Points ∼58% +14%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
4747 Points ∼51%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
4591 Points ∼49% -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (300 - 9323, n=82, last 2 years)
2509 Points ∼27% -47%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
2300 Points ∼25% -52%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1186 Points ∼13% -75%
3DMark 11 Performance
16066 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
41830 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
30802 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9720 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
5016 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
5126 points
Help

图形性能在电池供电时也会下降,但不像其他一些笔记本电脑那样明显。在3DMark 11中获得了将近一万一千分的成绩,在使用外部电源的情况下,该笔记本保留了60%以上的性能。

3DMark 11电池
3DMark 11电池
3DMark 11网络
3DMark 11网络

游戏性能

华硕Vivobook Pro在游戏基准测试中显示了入门级游戏笔记本电脑的性能准备。全高清的游戏对该笔记本来说没有任何障碍,即使是目前的标题和高细节水平。然而,只要你想使用OLED面板的全分辨率,这款多媒体笔记本就会在目前的游戏中达到极限。

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
168 (129min - 191max) fps ∼100% +140%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
154.2 (135min - 171max) fps ∼92% +120%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (70 - 104, n=9)
96.5 fps ∼57% +38%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
91 fps ∼54% +30%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
70 fps ∼42%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9 - 177, n=78, last 2 years)
51.3 fps ∼31% -27%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
42.8 (12.2min, 16.6P0.1, 29.7P1 - 169max) fps ∼25% -39%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000)
22 fps ∼13% -69%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
92.1 (67min) fps ∼100% +92%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
81.5 (72min - 87max) fps ∼88% +70%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (34.3 - 58.4, n=12)
48.9 fps ∼53% +2%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
48 fps ∼52%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
43.7 (32min, 34P1 - 48max) fps ∼47% -9%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
37.1 (33min, 35P1 - 46max) fps ∼40% -23%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
36.2 (31min, 32P1 - 46max) fps ∼39% -25%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
34.3 (30min, 31P1 - 42max) fps ∼37% -29%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5 - 92.1, n=82, last 2 years)
30.5 fps ∼33% -36%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
24.3 (12.1min, 14.5P0.1, 19.1P1 - 111max) fps ∼26% -49%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000)
14.6 (13min, 14P1 - 16max) fps ∼16% -70%
F1 2021
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (123 - 150, n=5)
138 fps ∼100% +5%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
131 (106min, 97P1 - 146max) fps ∼95%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
123 (104min, 86P1 - 136max) fps ∼89% -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (40 - 131, n=7, last 2 years)
90.6 fps ∼66% -31%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
57.7 (41min, 40P1 - 67max) fps ∼42% -56%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000)
40.3 (32min, 32P1 - 46max) fps ∼29% -69%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (105 - 131, n=5)
118 fps ∼100% +12%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
105 (85min, 61P1 - 120max) fps ∼89% 0%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
105 (93min, 79P1 - 118max) fps ∼89%
Average of class Multimedia
  (26 - 110, n=7, last 2 years)
73.9 fps ∼63% -30%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
46.9 (37min, 34P1 - 54max) fps ∼40% -55%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000)
30.9 (26min, 25P1 - 33max) fps ∼26% -71%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (52.3 - 69, n=5)
60.6 fps ∼100% +16%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
52.8 (45min, 44P1 - 59max) fps ∼87% +1%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
52.3 fps ∼86%
Average of class Multimedia
  (21.4 - 52.8, n=5, last 2 years)
45.1 fps ∼74% -14%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000)
21.4 (16min, 16P1 - 24max) fps ∼35% -59%
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (37 - 43.1, n=3)
39.2 fps ∼100% +6%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
37.4 (32min, 31P1 - 42max) fps ∼95% +1%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
37 (30min, 30P1 - 42max) fps ∼94%
Average of class Multimedia
  (36 - 37.4, n=3, last 2 years)
36.8 fps ∼94% -1%
GTA V
1366x768 Normal/Off AF:4x
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
172 (6.33min, 125P1 - 314max) fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (164 - 180, n=6)
172 fps ∼100%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
166 (5min, 100P1 - 392max) fps ∼97%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
154 (5.16min, 90.9P1 - 291max) fps ∼90%
Average of class Multimedia
  (50 - 178, n=31, last 2 years)
130 fps ∼76%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000)
103 (18.8min, 66.7P1 - 174max) fps ∼60%
1920x1080 Normal/Off AF:4x
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
171 (4.86min, 125P1 - 334max) fps ∼100% +1%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
169 (5.09min, 111P1 - 283max) fps ∼99%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (158 - 178, n=8)
168 fps ∼98% -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
135 (5.64min, 76.9P1 - 280max) fps ∼79% -20%
Average of class Multimedia
  (48.4 - 172, n=26, last 2 years)
119 fps ∼70% -30%
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
153 (3.86min, 83.3P1 - 295max) fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (110 - 149, n=8)
130 fps ∼85%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
110 (13.5min, 50P1 - 231max) fps ∼72%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9.2 - 157, n=33, last 2 years)
76.5 fps ∼50%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
68.3 (24.7min, 45.5P1 - 145max) fps ∼45%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000)
26.3 (6.93min, 18.9P1 - 126max) fps ∼17%
Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 high (2/3)
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
135.8 (95.1min) fps ∼100% +4%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
131 (115.3min) fps ∼96%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
125 (109.8min) fps ∼92% -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (111 - 154, n=10)
129 fps ∼95% -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
124 (107.1min) fps ∼91% -5%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
121 (100.3min) fps ∼89% -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
104 (91.9min) fps ∼77% -21%
Average of class Multimedia
  (15.8 - 152, n=90, last 2 years)
84.6 fps ∼62% -35%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000)
53.7 (49min) fps ∼40% -59%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
126 (111.1min) fps ∼100%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
119 (103.2min) fps ∼94% -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (107 - 145, n=10)
122 fps ∼97% -3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
117 (100.7min) fps ∼93% -7%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
116.3 (90.8min) fps ∼92% -8%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
109 (92.1min) fps ∼87% -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
95.5 (80.2min) fps ∼76% -24%
Average of class Multimedia
  (13.4 - 144, n=91, last 2 years)
77.9 fps ∼62% -38%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000)
50.8 (47.1min) fps ∼40% -60%
3840x2160 ultra (3/3) best looking
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
98.8 (86min) fps ∼100% +82%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
93.1 (67.6min) fps ∼94% +71%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (53.7 - 71.4, n=3)
59.8 fps ∼61% +10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (12.1 - 102, n=21, last 2 years)
59.4 fps ∼60% +9%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
54.4 (50.8min) fps ∼55%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
53.7 (50.1min) fps ∼54% -1%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1920x1080 Standard Quality
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
112 fps ∼100% +90%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
104 fps ∼93% +77%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (51.6 - 81.8, n=7)
71.8 fps ∼64% +22%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
58.8 fps ∼53%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
51.6 fps ∼46% -12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.87 - 112, n=41, last 2 years)
40 fps ∼36% -32%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
33 fps ∼29% -44%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000)
18.1 fps ∼16% -69%
1920x1080 High Quality
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
87.6 fps ∼100% +104%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
78.5 fps ∼90% +83%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (37.4 - 57.1, n=7)
51.3 fps ∼59% +19%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
43 fps ∼49%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
37.4 fps ∼43% -13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4.79 - 87.6, n=42, last 2 years)
30.7 fps ∼35% -29%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
21.2 fps ∼24% -51%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000)
12.1 fps ∼14% -72%
2560x1440 High Quality
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
65.7 fps ∼100% +113%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
61.3 fps ∼93% +98%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9.17 - 65.7, n=12, last 2 years)
41.9 fps ∼64% +36%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (26.8 - 53.1, n=3)
36.9 fps ∼56% +19%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
30.9 fps ∼47%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
26.8 fps ∼41% -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
13.5 fps ∼21% -56%
3840x2160 High Quality
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
40.9 fps ∼100% +146%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
36.2 fps ∼89% +118%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2.8 - 40.9, n=9, last 2 years)
25.4 fps ∼62% +53%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
16.6 fps ∼41%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
 
16.6 fps ∼41% 0%
Dirt 5
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (62.6 - 84.3, n=4)
76.9 fps ∼100% +23%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
62.6 (29.9min, 41.4P0.1, 51.7P1 - 107.9max) fps ∼81%
Average of class Multimedia
  (15.2 - 66, n=11, last 2 years)
32.7 fps ∼43% -48%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
25.8 (14.9min, 16.3P0.1, 21P1 - 34.2max) fps ∼34% -59%
1920x1080 High Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (51.2 - 69.1, n=4)
63.7 fps ∼100% +24%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
51.2 (29.3min, 37P0.1, 40.6P1 - 70.4max) fps ∼80%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8.6 - 51.2, n=9, last 2 years)
26.3 fps ∼41% -49%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
16.3 (9.6min, 12.3P0.1, 12.8P1 - 22.1max) fps ∼26% -68%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (40.5 - 54.3, n=4)
50.4 fps ∼100% +24%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
40.5 (28.9min, 32.3P0.1, 33.8P1 - 51.6max) fps ∼80%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.3 - 40.5, n=8, last 2 years)
21.5 fps ∼43% -47%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
11.4 (8.8min, 9.1P0.1, 9.5P1 - 15.1max) fps ∼23% -72%
Strange Brigade
1920x1080 medium AA:medium AF:4
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
224 (73.7min, 176P1 - 365max) fps ∼100% +90%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (117 - 139, n=8)
131 fps ∼58% +11%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
118 (86.8min, 98.7P1 - 182max) fps ∼53%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
117 fps ∼52% -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (12 - 224, n=35, last 2 years)
78.2 fps ∼35% -34%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
53.2 (44.2min, 46.6P1 - 68.5max) fps ∼24% -55%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000)
33 fps ∼15% -72%
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
183 (77.1min, 132P1 - 322max) fps ∼100% +92%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (94 - 114, n=7)
107 fps ∼58% +12%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
95.2 (64.7min, 71.6P1 - 151max) fps ∼52%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
94 fps ∼51% -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11 - 183, n=35, last 2 years)
61.6 fps ∼34% -35%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
46.7 (38.7min, 39.3P1 - 62.7max) fps ∼26% -51%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000)
29 fps ∼16% -70%
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
161 (75.5min, 117P1 - 283max) fps ∼100% +97%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (81.9 - 100, n=8)
92.8 fps ∼58% +13%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
84 fps ∼52% +3%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
81.9 (59.4min, 63.5P1 - 123max) fps ∼51%
Average of class Multimedia
  (7 - 161, n=34, last 2 years)
55.4 fps ∼34% -32%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
32.2 (15.7min, 25.4P1 - 113max) fps ∼20% -61%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000)
25 fps ∼16% -69%
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
100 (68min - 135max) fps ∼100% +41%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (71 - 101, n=6)
91.3 fps ∼91% +29%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
76 fps ∼76% +7%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
71 (54min - 86max) fps ∼71%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9 - 109, n=24, last 2 years)
47.4 fps ∼47% -33%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
41 (35min - 56max) fps ∼41% -42%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000)
21 fps ∼21% -70%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
93 (66min - 118max) fps ∼100% +43%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (65 - 94, n=6)
84.8 fps ∼91% +30%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
73 fps ∼78% +12%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
65 (49min - 81max) fps ∼70%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9 - 104, n=25, last 2 years)
45.6 fps ∼49% -30%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
35 (26min - 51max) fps ∼38% -46%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000)
20 fps ∼22% -69%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
89 (48min - 121max) fps ∼100% +44%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (62 - 89, n=6)
79 fps ∼89% +27%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
65 fps ∼73% +5%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
62 (50min - 73max) fps ∼70%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11 - 95, n=25, last 2 years)
43.6 fps ∼49% -30%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
33 (25min - 47max) fps ∼37% -47%
X-Plane 11.11
1920x1080 med (fps_test=2)
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
104 fps ∼100% +14%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
96.3 fps ∼93% +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (81.6 - 116, n=10)
93.1 fps ∼90% +2%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
91.5 fps ∼88%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
89.4 fps ∼86% -2%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
88.8 fps ∼85% -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
73.4 fps ∼71% -20%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9.75 - 108, n=86, last 2 years)
58.9 fps ∼57% -36%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000)
41.7 fps ∼40% -54%
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
83.5 fps ∼100% +11%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
80.7 fps ∼97% +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (68.4 - 91.6, n=10)
76.3 fps ∼91% +1%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
75.5 fps ∼90%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
72.7 fps ∼87% -4%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
74.2 fps ∼89% -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
62.6 fps ∼75% -17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8.55 - 87.6, n=86, last 2 years)
50.6 fps ∼61% -33%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000)
36.8 fps ∼44% -51%
3840x2160 high (fps_test=3)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
60.4 fps ∼100% +13%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
54.4 fps ∼90% +1%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
53.6 fps ∼89%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
51.8 fps ∼86% -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (49.5 - 53.6, n=3)
51.6 fps ∼85% -4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9.43 - 73.4, n=19, last 2 years)
49.2 fps ∼81% -8%
low med. high ultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 179 63.9 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 191 151 70 48 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 158 146 131 126 54.4 fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 106 58.8 43 30.9 16.6 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 107 91.5 75.5 53.6 fps
Far Cry 5 (2018) 105 71 65 62 50 21 fps
Strange Brigade (2018) 213 118 95.2 81.9 57.7 33.5 fps
Dirt 5 (2020) 121 62.6 51.2 40.5 33.8 fps
F1 2021 (2021) 225 131 105 52.3 37 14.4 fps

排放--不幸的智能风扇

噪声排放

虽然风扇的声音不是特别大,最大为45 dB(A),但由于其频率分布,它们是令人讨厌的。6.3kHz以上的高音调在笔记本电脑中异常响亮。从长远来看,当需要大量的性能时,华硕Vivobook Pro可以被认为是令人不快的声音。令人不安的是,几乎在每一个风扇水平上,中高音构成了大部分的可听噪音。
然而,风扇可以通过ProArt Creator Hub有效控制。笔记本电脑在Whisper模式下更安静。然而,系统性能受到了很大的限制。

Noise Level

Idle
27 / 27 / 27.5 dB(A)
Load