Notebookcheck Logo

微星造物主Z16:带AdobeRGB的创意笔记本电脑回顾

3个风扇的庞然大物。 微星敢于争夺16英寸超级明星的创意皇冠。创意者应该在最短的时间内以高性能取得成果。这个想法基本上是成功的,但细节上略有欠缺,这使得Z16错过了非常好的标志。
Laptop / Notebook Windows MSI Tiger Lake Touchscreen Thunderbolt
创造者Z16 A11UET-209 - 几乎100%的Adobe和RGB单键照明(迷你LED)
创造者Z16 A11UET-209 - 几乎100%的Adobe和RGB单键照明(迷你LED)

微星公司用16英寸的Creator Z16填补了方便的15英寸和通常太大的17英寸之间的利基。这里没有4K屏幕或OLED,而是一个3K、16:10、AdobeRGB显示屏和两个雷电4端口。

虽然 RTX 3060在目前的游戏中可能会被4K所淹没,但它应该能够处理3K。微星公司是否在这里放弃了过大的尺寸,而选择了一个准确的分辨率来提供性能?纤细的三风扇机箱与180瓦的电源相结合,能否将组件的性能发挥到极致?它应该如此,因为对一台2000欧元(约2263美元)的笔记本电脑的期望很高。

英特尔的Tiger Lake H处理器应该在性能方面定下基调,而 RTX 3060已经以其高游戏能力而闻名。再加上良好的可升级性和每个键都有RGB灯的键盘,这是不是一个色彩鲜艳的全能型创造者?

我们将微星的16英寸机与目前的一些竞争者进行比较,包括全新的 Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro,以及 惠普ZBook Studio G7Razer Blade 15 Advanced(2021年中期),所有笔记本电脑的评分都是 "非常好"。

MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209 (Creator Z16 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-11800H 8 x 2.3 - 4.6 GHz, 70 W PL2 / Short Burst, 60 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU - 6 GB VRAM, Core: 1357 MHz, Memory: 1500 MHz, 65 W TDP, GDDR6, GA106M, Nvidia 496.49, Optimus
Memory
32 GB 
, DDR4-3200 Dual Channel SK Hynix
Display
16.00 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, Multi-Touch, AUO B160QAN02.P, IPS True Pixel, True Pixel (~100% DCI-P3), glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Mainboard
Intel WM590 (Tiger Lake PCH-H)
Storage
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162, 1024 GB 
, 2x M.2 PCIe 4.0 x4, 790 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Tiger Lake PCH-H - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
2 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: Headset Combo Port, Card Reader: microSD (UHS-III), 1 Fingerprint Reader, Sensors: IR-Sensor for Windows Hello, 2x M.2 PCIe 4.0 x4
Networking
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW) (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 15.9 x 359 x 256
Battery
90 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Additional features
Speakers: Dynaudio Two-Way-Stereo-Speaker, Keyboard: SteelSeries, 84 keys, Big-Size, RGB-Mini-LED, Keyboard Light: yes, MSI Software inc. MSI Center Pro, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.2 kg, Power Supply: 770 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86.7 %
11/2021
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.2 kg15.9 mm16.00"2560x1600
90.6 %
02/2021
HP ZBook Studio G7
i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
2 kg18 mm15.60"3840x2160
88.9 %
10/2021
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2 kg16.99 mm15.60"1920x1080
87 %
09/2021
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2 kg19.5 mm16.00"2560x1600
87.9 %
09/2021
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg19.5 mm17.00"3840x2400
88.4 %
09/2021
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
1.9 kg18 mm15.60"3456x2160
93.2 %
11/2021
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro, M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
2.2 kg16.8 mm16.20"3456x2234

外壳 - 稳定的创意笔记本电脑

底盘具有合格的抗扭性,但仍然容易打开
底盘具有合格的抗扭性,但仍然容易打开

虽然我们的同事批评说,底盘的 创造者17,但我们不必抱怨Z16:铝和塑料结构提供了良好的--尽管不是很好的--扭转刚度。16英寸的宽度很容易弯曲,当我们在转角处抬起它时,底盘确实有点弯曲(2.2公斤/~4.9磅)。工作区以及盖子是由铝制成的,边缘经过抛光处理,表面经过阳极氧化处理。屏幕有很好的强度,背面不能凹陷。

创造者Z16 A11UET-209
创造者Z16 A11UET-209
创造者Z16 A11UET-209
创造者Z16 A11UET-209
创造者Z16 A11UET-209
创造者Z16 A11UET-209

这款16英寸的产品比Apple"的占地面积稍大。 MacBook Pro 162021年,但在重量相同的情况下,它略显单薄。如果你朝15.6的方向看,你会看到一个 Razer Blade 15 Advanced在宽度大致相同的情况下,深度明显减少,但少了200克(约7盎司)。圆形的17英寸机。 戴尔XPS 17 9710比Z16重300克(约11盎司),而且明显更宽。

Size comparison

374.45 mm 248.05 mm 19.5 mm 2.5 kg359 mm 256 mm 15.9 mm 2.2 kg354.6 mm 252 mm 19.5 mm 2 kg355.7 mm 248.1 mm 16.8 mm 2.2 kg354 mm 235 mm 18 mm 2 kg355 mm 235 mm 16.99 mm 2 kg345 mm 230 mm 18 mm 1.9 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

设备 - 现代化的雷电4和USB4.0

微星提供现代化的端口,这在这个价格范围内是可以预期的。Type-C外围设备可以连接到两个Thunderbolt 4端口,或者一个或两个平面屏幕(通过Type-C的DisplayPort)。电源不是通过Type-C,这对于180瓦的电源来说是不合适的,而且一个端口也会被阻断。16英寸机没有任何其他显示输出。

电源,USB 3.2 Gen 2(超高速10 Gbps),带DisplayPort的Thunderbolt 4,Hi-Res音频,用于CTIA和OMTP耳机的组合连接器
电源,USB 3.2 Gen 2(超高速10 Gbps),带DisplayPort的Thunderbolt 4,Hi-Res音频,用于CTIA和OMTP耳机的组合连接器
microSD (UHS-III), Thunderbolt 4 with DisplayPort, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (SuperSpeed 10 Gbps)
microSD (UHS-III), Thunderbolt 4 with DisplayPort, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (SuperSpeed 10 Gbps)

SD卡阅读器

我们使用我们的参考SD卡(AV Pro V60)来测试所用读卡器的性能。在复制大的数据块时,最大的传输速率可达185MB/s,而对于普通的JPG图像文件(每个约5MB),甚至可以预计225MB/s。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
  (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
225.8 MB/s
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
  (AV Pro V60)
224 MB/s -1%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
178.1 MB/s -21%
HP ZBook Studio G7
  (AV Pro V60)
168 MB/s -26%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
  (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
121 MB/s -46%
Average of class Multimedia
  (17.6 - 205, n=66, last 2 years)
93.3 MB/s -59%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
 
78.2 (78.11min - 78.35max) MB/s -65%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
  (AV Pro V60)
202.8 MB/s +9%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
  (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
185.6 MB/s
HP ZBook Studio G7
  (AV Pro V60)
177 MB/s -5%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
175.7 MB/s -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (16.8 - 266, n=62, last 2 years)
122.6 MB/s -34%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
 
87.9 MB/s -53%

沟通

随着英特尔杀手Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s的推出,Wi-Fi 6E也随之而来。Wi-Fi 6E首次使用6GHz频率,缓解了拥挤的2.4和5GHz频段。这需要一个合适的路由器,例如FRITZ!Boxes 7530 AX或6660 Cable。

在使用5GHz路由器的测试中,Killer WLAN的速度不是特别快,但该卡仍然远远高于平均水平。竞争者如 惠普ZBook Studio G7,它只有一个 "简单的 "英特尔Wi-Fi 6 AX201,明显领先。有趣的是 Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro显然落后于其他人。

登录是通过指纹扫描或Windows Hello的面部识别完成的。后者工作顺利而迅速。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1368 (669min - 1440max) MBit/s +18%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1312 (682min - 1432max) MBit/s +13%
Average Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
  (1066 - 1499, n=8)
1272 MBit/s +9%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
1163 (551min - 1300max) MBit/s
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
772 (748min - 792max) MBit/s -34%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
649 (351min - 778max) MBit/s -44%
Average of class Multimedia
  (285 - 998, n=2, last 2 years)
642 MBit/s -45%
iperf3 receive AX12
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1553 (1260min - 1648max) MBit/s +29%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1017 - 1675, n=2, last 2 years)
1346 MBit/s +12%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1319 (1015min - 1489max) MBit/s +10%
Average Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
  (1037 - 1469, n=8)
1309 MBit/s +9%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
1203 (1011min - 1314max) MBit/s
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
772 (474min - 988max) MBit/s -36%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
760 (404min - 869max) MBit/s -37%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600Tooltip
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209 Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW); iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1202 (1011-1314)
HP ZBook Studio G7 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1553 (1260-1648)
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209 Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW); iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1145 (551-1300)
HP ZBook Studio G7 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1290 (682-1432)

网络摄像头

正如通常的情况一样,网络摄像头被忽略了。它的分辨率和质量无法描述--就像比较领域中的几乎所有笔记本电脑一样。在这次比较中,几乎没有任何制造商能够将高质量的摄像头放入框架中--Apple 是唯一的例外,正如下面的测试图表图片所示。

ColorChecker
10.3 ∆E
24.7 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
25.2 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
9 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
25.8 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
27 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
21 ∆E
24.9 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
ColorChecker MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209: 17.9 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 27.03 ∆E
ColorChecker
15.8 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
7 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
9 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
15 ∆E
4 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro: 11.2 ∆E min: 3.97 - max: 24.53 ∆E

维护

升级Z16是可能的,但比看起来更难。有两个M.2插槽,其中一个被Phison SSD占据。内存可以升级到64GB,有两个插槽。在样品中,这两个插槽被两个16GB的双通道占用,除非你购买16GB的Z16变体,在这种情况下,有一个插槽是免费的。

如果你想升级,你应该阅读如何操作。底部看起来像一个居中的维护舱口,其实根本不是。我们是在拆下前脚后才意识到这一点的--当时不幸的是,前脚已经坏了,无法修复。整个底板是由后脚下可见的螺丝之类的东西固定的。

你可以快速进入第一个维护层,在那里可以更换电池、Wi-Fi芯片和两个固态硬盘。然而,必须完全拆下主板才能接触到RAM插座。这是一个很大的努力,因为所有的电缆都必须被拆除。这里有一个非常好的视频教程:微星创造者Z16升级教程.

维护是可能的,但比较困难
维护是可能的,但比较困难
在此之前,你需要认识到,螺丝不在支架的脚下。
在此之前,你需要认识到,螺丝不在支架的脚下。
中间的标记板不是维修舱口。整个车底被掀开了。
中间的标记板不是维修舱口。整个车底被掀开了。
内存和SSD插座位于主板下方
内存和SSD插座位于主板下方
只有WiFi芯片是容易接触到的。
只有WiFi芯片是容易接触到的。
 

辅料

纤细的180瓦电源是盒子里唯一的配件。

担保

在德国,制造商提供两年的保修期(提货和退货)。

输入设备 - 笔记本电脑键盘下的RGB灯光效果

键盘

该键盘配有迷你LED键盘背光,这意味着每个字母都可以用不同的颜色来照明。预装的设置是一种移动的灯光。如果这让你感到困扰,或者你想设置其他颜色或混合物,那么必须安装Mystic Light。不幸的是,MSI Center Pro不允许修改按键的照明。

SteelSeries的输入法呈现出非常硬的冲程,宽大的按键以及坚固的底座,即使用力冲程也不会让步。我们喜欢的是清晰的压力点,尽管行程很短,却能提供良好的反馈。另一方面,坚硬的键程和短行程使打字变得令人厌烦。简而言之:SteelSeries到目前为止不是一个糟糕的键盘,大手可以很好地使用它。然而,如果有更多的行程,速度会更好。

钥匙的尺寸很大,但有一个硬而短的反馈。
钥匙的尺寸很大,但有一个硬而短的反馈。
开机是集成在键盘上的
开机是集成在键盘上的

触摸板

狭窄的ClickPad对某些人来说是一个失败的设计。虽然竞争对手,如MacBook Pro 162021年M1或 戴尔XPS 15 9510(15 x 9 cm/~5.9 x 3.5 in),通常提供巨大的ClickPads,而微星只使用12 x 6 cm (~4.7 x 2.4 in)。特别是在垂直滑动物体的时候,低矮的高度会让人很不爽。

这是一个遗憾,因为垫子本身很容易使用,在垫子的下部区域有一个清晰的压力点和适度的行程,以及一个光滑的表面。

一个宽的点击板,12厘米宽
一个宽的点击板,12厘米宽

触摸屏

光滑的表面允许直接在屏幕上快速工作,可以轻松擦拭。遗憾的是,盖子有点晃动,打字的手指无意中把显示屏从大约140度的开口处推了下去。

显示器 - 笔记本,几乎具有AdobeRGB色彩空间

友达QHD显示屏的子像素
友达QHD显示屏的子像素
真彩色设置
真彩色设置
根据需要自动切换
根据需要自动切换

16英寸的面板是宽视角IPS,120赫兹和QHD+分辨率(2,560 x 1,600像素)。微星表示完全覆盖了DCI-P3,并称其为真像素。该显示器为16:10格式。微星在这里宣传的是黄金比例。

那些不想要触摸屏但喜欢防眩光的人可以购买三种防眩光的变体之一,它们也有一个120赫兹的真像素屏幕。

我们测得平均亮度为347cd/m²,最大亮度为347。亮度是均匀分布的,这就是89%所代表的意义。积极的一面。微星不使用PWM来调节亮度。响应时间为7和14毫秒,非常好。

我们不知道为什么微星没有提供OLED变体。在竞争中的OLED选项的背景下,必须指出良好的IPS面板的优势。OLED面板不应该长期在最大亮度下运行,OLED屏幕需要更多的能量,(可禁用的)强制屏幕保护程序因为烧毁问题而被预装。OLED屏幕对能源的不必要的高需求,我们在对华硕Zenbook 14X OLED的评测中体会到了。这在电池模式下尤其令人讨厌。

出厂校准的显示屏完全覆盖了DCI-P3的色彩空间。然而,这种扩展的空间并不总是需要的,而且可能是令人讨厌的,例如在使用Outlook和Excel的办公室中。这就是微星真彩发挥作用的地方。在那里,可以选择适合该场景的显示模式。程序可以通过App Sync来分配。因此,在下次启动Photoshop时,匹配的颜色配置文件会自动激活。

337
cd/m²
345
cd/m²
352
cd/m²
345
cd/m²
375
cd/m²
362
cd/m²
346
cd/m²
333
cd/m²
335
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AUO B160QAN02.P tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 375 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 347.8 cd/m² Minimum: 19 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 375 cd/m²
Contrast: 915:1 (Black: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.59 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 2.18
ΔE Greyscale 1.88 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
96% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.37
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
AUO B160QAN02.P, IPS True Pixel, 2560x1600, 16.00
HP ZBook Studio G7
LGD0661, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
TL156VDXP02-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
Lenovo LEN8A95 (AUO B160QAN02.M), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Sharp LQ170R1, IPS, 3840x2400, 17.00
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
SDC414D, OLED, 3456x2160, 15.60
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Liquid Retina XDR, Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.20
Display
-4%
-21%
-14%
-0%
1%
-3%
Display P3 Coverage
100
98.2
-2%
66.9
-33%
76.4
-24%
94.8
-5%
99.9
0%
99.1
-1%
sRGB Coverage
100
99.9
0%
97.1
-3%
100
0%
100
0%
100
0%
100
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
96
86.5
-10%
69
-28%
77.4
-19%
100
4%
98.1
2%
88
-8%
Response Times
-370%
14%
-146%
-289%
67%
-708%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
14 ?(8, 6)
56.4 ?(27.6, 28.8)
-303%
4.2 ?(2.6, 1.6)
70%
36
-157%
44.8 ?(20.8, 24)
-220%
3.6 ?(2, 1.6)
74%
42.8 ?(19.6, 23.2)
-206%
Response Time Black / White *
7 ?(3, 4)
37.6 ?(19.6, 18)
-437%
10 ?(5.2, 4.8)
-43%
16.4
-134%
32 ?(15.6, 16.4)
-357%
2.8 ?(1.2, 1.6)
60%
91.6 ?(76, 15.6)
-1209%
PWM Frequency
59.5 ?(99)
14880
Screen
57%
6%
19%
12%
81%
372%
Brightness middle
375
723
93%
353.4
-6%
439
17%
536.5
43%
362
-3%
514
37%
Brightness
348
707
103%
340
-2%
397
14%
489
41%
367
5%
497
43%
Brightness Distribution
89
92
3%
92
3%
83
-7%
85
-4%
97
9%
95
7%
Black Level *
0.41
0.35
15%
0.31
24%
0.44
-7%
0.37
10%
0.06
85%
0.02
95%
Contrast
915
2066
126%
1140
25%
998
9%
1450
58%
6033
559%
25700
2709%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.59
1.4
46%
2.17
16%
1.68
35%
2.46
5%
2.1
19%
1.4
46%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.08
2.9
59%
5.69
20%
2.36
67%
7.74
-9%
4.1
42%
2.8
60%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.18
0.5
77%
1.05
52%
1.57
28%
1.85
15%
2.5
-15%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.88
2
-6%
3.4
-81%
1.64
13%
2.9
-54%
1.4
26%
2.3
-22%
Gamma
2.37 93%
2.14 103%
2.2 100%
2.39 92%
2.12 104%
2.18 101%
2.27 97%
CCT
6470 100%
6484 100%
6830 95%
6616 98%
6868 95%
6608 98%
6792 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
77.3
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.9
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-106% / -17%
-0% / 1%
-47% / -12%
-92% / -34%
50% / 62%
-113% / 119%

* ... smaller is better

我们校准了面板并创建了我们自己的颜色配置文件。我们只是稍微改善了已经很好的数值。工厂校准似乎是非常好的。微星承诺DeltaE<2,这就是工厂校准应该有的准确度。我们的测量结果证实了灰度的准确度,而颜色的准确度则刚好高于这个值(2.5)。

卡尔曼颜色检查器
卡尔曼颜色检查器
卡尔曼颜色检查器已校准
卡尔曼颜色检查器已校准
卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度标定
卡尔曼灰度标定
考尔曼饱和度
考尔曼饱和度
Calman 饱和度校准
Calman 饱和度校准

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8 ms rise
↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

TFT的反射表面只能在户外阳光下有限地使用,最大亮度略低于350cd/m²(平均),用处不大。

外面的真像素IPS屏幕--它清晰地反映出来,亮度有一点帮助
外面的真像素IPS屏幕--它清晰地反映出来,亮度有一点帮助

视角非常宽,是典型的IPS面板。从每个观察方向看,颜色都保持清晰,轮廓鲜明。

友达120赫兹面板的可视角度
友达120赫兹面板的可视角度
友达120赫兹面板的可视角度
友达120赫兹面板的可视角度
友达120赫兹面板的可视角度
友达120赫兹面板的可视角度

性能 - 英特尔酷睿i7带来的压力

在Z16中安装了三个风扇,在薄薄的机箱中,对于i7-11800H和RTX 3060来说,这是否足够?
在Z16中安装了三个风扇,在薄薄的机箱中,对于i7-11800H和RTX 3060来说,这是否足够?

Tiger Lake H45芯片(Willow Cove,10纳米)是一个45瓦的模型,目前属于移动处理器的先锋。英特尔的 酷睿i7-11800H(8个核心)工作频率高达4.60 GHz,并有24 MB+10 MB的巨大缓存。

在测试设备中配备了两个RAM插座(2x 16 GB),我们有32 GB DDR4-3200。然而,该系统可以做得更多,即高达64 GB(2x 32 GB)。

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060是Z16的标准配置,而且不能取消选择。GA106(安培,8纳米)的最大GPU功率为65W。当闲置或做简单的工作时,RTX会自行关闭,而支持英特尔Xe(32个EU)。

HWinfo摘要
CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z 主板
CPU-Z内存
CPU-Z SPD
GPU-Z Nvidia RTX 3060
GPU-Z Intel Xe (32 EUs)

测试条件

在MSI Center Pro中--或者通过一个功能键--你可以在电源配置文件之间切换。我们选择了高性能作为基准。我们将风扇速度保持在自动状态,在高性能状态下只能从自动到扩展/冷却器提升进行设置。Cooler Boost提供了一个永久的、难以忍受的巨大噪音,几乎没有人会在出现时激活它。所提到的配置文件被固定在硬件方面的BIOS中,也可以在那里设置。

MSI Center Pro - Power Profile 基准测试的高性能,运行时间的超级电池
MSI Center Pro - Power Profile 基准测试的高性能,运行时间的超级电池

处理器

8核处理器 i7-11800H可以执行高达4.60 GHz,但只能有选择地在一个核心上执行。在多核实践中,那么它在所有核心上最多只有4GHz,正如我们在Cinebench中看到的那样。但这不是永久性的,因为SoC希望避免超过90°C(194°F)的过热,这就是为什么它被降低到最高3.6GHz。在这种情况下,CPU封装的功率从最初的75瓦下降到62瓦。

在循环中,取得的R15分数因此从1933分滑落到平均1820分(-6%)。以下是采用相同SoC的相同定位 Razer Blade 15 Advanced(2021年中期)和XPS 17,但这些机型的起点水平较低(1,840)。戴尔的XPS 15 9510 ,其11800H显示,功率输出并不总是那么恒定。即使在性能模式下,15.6英寸机型在R15回路中下降了28%。简而言之:Z16的性能令人印象深刻,这就是为什么CPU的基准测试全面高于平均水平。

在Prime95中,我们注意到与Cinebench中非常相似的行为。在这里,所有核心的连续工作甚至只用3.0GHz运行,因为温度已经上升到刚刚超过90℃(194°F)。

Logfile Cinebench R15
Logfile Cinebench R15
日志文件 Prime95
日志文件 Prime95

Cinebench R15 Multi Endurance test

01102203304405506607708809901100121013201430154016501760187019802090Tooltip
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209 Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1830 (1801.96-1933.39)
HP ZBook Studio G7 Intel Core i9-10885H: Ø1601 (1574.8-1726.44)
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen2-20W6000GGE Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø884 (837.5-1003.59)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1867 (1776.59-1876.96)
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø2135 (2115.28-2153.78)
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060 Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1750 (1720.87-1845.87)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H; Ultra Performance: Ø1663 (1589.38-2024.19)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1625 (1566.05-2009.95)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro: Ø1681 (1674.55-1690.12)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Average of class Multimedia
 
80.6 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro -5!
Apple M1 Pro
75.9 pt
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
75.2 pt
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209 -3!
Intel Core i7-11800H
71.4 pt
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) -2!
Intel Core i7-11800H
70.1 pt
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
 
68.7 pt
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060 -2!
Intel Core i7-11800H
68.4 pt
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
65.5 pt
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H
60.6 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Multimedia
  (4624 - 30789, n=101, last 2 years)
14189 Points +17%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
13205 Points +9%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
12370 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
12197 (11396.1min - 12197.5max) Points +1%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Intel Core i7-11800H
12113 Points
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-11800H
11668 (7361.61min - 11667.6max) Points -4%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (6508 - 14088, n=48)
11650 Points -4%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
10531 Points -13%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H
10074 Points -17%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average of class Multimedia
  (878 - 2110, n=99, last 2 years)
1713 Points +13%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
1534 Points +1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1513 Points 0%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Intel Core i7-11800H
1513 Points
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-11800H
1502 Points -1%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
1498 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1386 - 1522, n=45)
1497 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1488 Points -2%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H
1295 Points -14%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Multimedia
  (1783 - 11768, n=97, last 2 years)
5352 Points +11%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5128 Points +6%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Intel Core i7-11800H
4826 Points
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
4706 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (2498 - 5408, n=50)
4459 Points -8%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-11800H
4352 Points -10%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
3848 Points -20%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H
3762 Points -22%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
2721 Points -44%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Multimedia
  (341 - 812, n=97, last 2 years)
646 Points +11%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
582 Points 0%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
581 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
580 Points 0%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Intel Core i7-11800H
580 Points
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-11800H
579 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (520 - 586, n=47)
576 Points -1%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H
513 Points -12%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
393 Points -32%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia
  (785 - 4703, n=106, last 2 years)
2321 Points +20%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2154 (2115.28min - 2153.78max) Points +11%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
2024 Points +5%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
2010 Points +4%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Intel Core i7-11800H
1933 (1801.96min - 1933.39max) Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1342 - 2173, n=50)
1894 Points -2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1877 (1776.59min - 1876.96max) Points -3%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-11800H
1846 (1720.87min - 1845.87max) Points -5%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H
1726 (1574.8min - 1726.44max) Points -11%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
1690 (1675min - 1690max) Points -13%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia
  (142.6 - 308, n=99, last 2 years)
251 Points +25%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
240 Points +19%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
228 Points +13%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
227 Points +13%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-11800H
225 Points +12%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (201 - 231, n=46)
225 Points +12%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H
212 Points +5%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
209 Points +4%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Intel Core i7-11800H
201 Points
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
298 Seconds * -17%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H
283 Seconds * -11%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (217 - 454, n=46)
277 Seconds * -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (107 - 662, n=95, last 2 years)
265 Seconds * -4%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-11800H
261 Seconds * -3%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
259 Seconds * -2%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Intel Core i7-11800H
254.1 Seconds *
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
233 Seconds * +8%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
183.3 Seconds * +28%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
59653 MIPS
Average of class Multimedia
  (20166 - 119900, n=90, last 2 years)
57411 MIPS
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
53597 MIPS
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-11800H
51729 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (33718 - 56758, n=46)
48384 MIPS
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H
42993 MIPS
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
42570 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5777 MIPS
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H
5668 MIPS
Average of class Multimedia
  (3398 - 7163, n=90, last 2 years)
5639 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (5138 - 5732, n=46)
5492 MIPS
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-11800H
5481 MIPS
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
5480 MIPS
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
5427 MIPS
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
12499 Points +34%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3828 - 23059, n=100, last 2 years)
11372 Points +22%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Intel Core i7-11800H
9337 Points
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Intel Core i7-11800H
9167 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
8578 Points -8%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (4655 - 9851, n=40)
8551 Points -8%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
8164 Points -13%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H
7693 Points -18%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
1768 Points +12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (926 - 2342, n=100, last 2 years)
1758 Points +12%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Intel Core i7-11800H
1575 Points
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Intel Core i7-11800H
1571 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1429 - 1625, n=40)
1561 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1548 Points -2%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
1540 Points -2%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H
1376 Points -13%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
15.9 fps +12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4.99 - 30.5, n=88, last 2 years)
15.6 fps +10%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
15 fps +6%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-11800H
14.6 fps +3%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Intel Core i7-11800H
14.2 fps
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (7.38 - 17.4, n=46)
13.8 fps -3%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H
12.5 fps -12%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
12.4 fps -13%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H
59.6 s *
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
54.1 s *
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.7 - 84.9, n=92, last 2 years)
48 s *
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
47.5 s *
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (38.6 - 59.9, n=45)
46.5 s *
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
45.9 s *
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-11800H
45.4 s *
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.567 sec * -1%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (0.548 - 0.615, n=46)
0.566 sec * -1%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H
0.564 sec * -1%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.561 sec *
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.56 sec * -0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.55 sec * +2%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.4998 sec * +11%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.3826 - 0.723, n=90, last 2 years)
0.4811 sec * +14%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1933 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
186 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
201 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Average of class Multimedia
 
90.5 pt
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
 
86.7 pt
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209 -7!
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
85.4 pt
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
81.4 pt
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) -9!
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
0 pt
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060 -9!
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
0 pt
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED -9!
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
0 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (8772 - 15961, n=20)
13481 KRay/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (3804 - 27411, n=88, last 2 years)
12788 KRay/s
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
12606 KRay/s
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Multimedia
  (16379 - 136048, n=88, last 2 years)
65480 Points
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
62851 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (39404 - 65636, n=20)
57444 Points
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (2599 - 4439, n=20)
3855 MB/s
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
3152 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (1099 - 6681, n=88, last 2 years)
3047 MB/s
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Multimedia
  (21547 - 134321, n=88, last 2 years)
92085 Points
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
91573 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (85233 - 91941, n=20)
90603 Points
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
10353 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (6420 - 9792, n=20)
9145 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (3099 - 15484, n=88, last 2 years)
9055 Points
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (23365 - 39464, n=20)
34552 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (9602 - 68591, n=88, last 2 years)
33558 Points
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
31914 Points
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (74617 - 149388, n=20)
123317 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (23702 - 169946, n=88, last 2 years)
76070 MB/s
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
39136 MB/s
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Multimedia
  (302 - 1901, n=88, last 2 years)
868 MB/s +8%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
802 MB/s
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
754 MB/s -6%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (461 - 830, n=43)
358 (461min - 830max) MB/s -55%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
0 MB/s -100%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
0 MB/s -100%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
0 MB/s -100%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
8097 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (4545 - 8717, n=21)
7332 KRay/s -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1996 - 14590, n=88, last 2 years)
6829 KRay/s -16%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
6533 KRay/s -19%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average of class Multimedia
  (7419 - 53918, n=88, last 2 years)
36824 MPixel/s +57%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
23497 MPixel/s
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (11898 - 26757, n=21)
22376 MPixel/s -5%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
19112 MPixel/s -19%

系统性能

电池模式。PCMark 10得分从6,156分降至5,351分
电池模式。PCMark 10得分从6,156分降至5,351分

根据PCMark 10的应用性能低于平均水平,考虑到处理器的速率,这令人惊讶。这主要不是由于Phison固态硬盘的原因,正如固态硬盘的基准测试随后显示的那样。这可能是由于组件之间的相互作用,这一点在 Razer Blade 15 Advanced联想ThinkBook 16p.在电池模式下,PCMark 10得分从6,156分下降到5,351分(-13%)(最大性能配置文件)。相应地,几乎所有的性能都可以在旅途中使用。

PCMark 10 / Score
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7356 Points +19%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
6725 Points +9%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
6706 Points +9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4635 - 8670, n=85, last 2 years)
6602 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (6156 - 6865, n=4)
6558 Points +7%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
6156 Points
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
6019 Points -2%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
5324 Points -14%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
11064 Points +22%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8480 - 12420, n=85, last 2 years)
10473 Points +16%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
10324 Points +14%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
10035 Points +11%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (9063 - 10522, n=4)
9829 Points +8%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
9490 Points +5%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
9063 Points
HP ZBook Studio G7
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
8704 Points -4%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
9128 Points +11%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
9015 Points +10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5845 - 11186, n=85, last 2 years)
8709 Points +6%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
8660 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (8200 - 8874, n=4)
8648 Points +5%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
8344 Points +2%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
8200 Points
HP ZBook Studio G7
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
7080 Points -14%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
10831 Points +27%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
9415 Points +11%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (8520 - 9423, n=4)
9011 Points +6%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
8759 Points +3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4688 - 13548, n=85, last 2 years)
8686 Points +2%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
8520 Points
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
7475 Points -12%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
6646 Points -22%
PCMark 10 Score
6156 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Multimedia
  (20513 - 94254, n=88, last 2 years)
61455 MB/s +39%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
44329 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen2-20W6000GGE
Intel Core i7-1165G7, T500 Laptop GPU
43229 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (24508 - 48144, n=21)
42778 MB/s -3%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
41675 MB/s -6%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
36402 MB/s -18%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Multimedia
  (22917 - 90142, n=88, last 2 years)
60555 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen2-20W6000GGE
Intel Core i7-1165G7, T500 Laptop GPU
48403 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
46384 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (25882 - 50365, n=20)
45259 MB/s
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
40443 MB/s
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Multimedia
  (20226 - 95196, n=88, last 2 years)
63628 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen2-20W6000GGE
Intel Core i7-1165G7, T500 Laptop GPU
46390 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (22240 - 46214, n=20)
42489 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
41871 MB/s
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
40763 MB/s
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average of class Multimedia
  (75 - 346, n=87, last 2 years)
102.3 ns * -7%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
95.6 ns *
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
76.5 ns * +20%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen2-20W6000GGE
Intel Core i7-1165G7, T500 Laptop GPU
75.2 ns * +21%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
56.1 ns * +41%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (71.9 - 104.1, n=44)
43.3 (71.9min - 104.1max) ns * +55%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
0 ns * +100%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
0 ns * +100%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
0 ns * +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

延迟监测器观察到由内核和ACPI驱动程序驱动的高延迟。对于实时音频和视频,这可能是一个问题。测量是基于目前的驱动程序和硬件配置。

DPC LatencyMonitor: 最高执行率(ms)
DPC LatencyMonitor: 最高执行率(ms)
DPC LatencyMonitor。需要优化内核和ACPI驱动程序
DPC LatencyMonitor。需要优化内核和ACPI驱动程序
4K视频中只有14个丢帧
4K视频中只有14个丢帧
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
HP ZBook Studio G7
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
5475 μs * -104%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen2-20W6000GGE
T500 Laptop GPU, i7-1165G7, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-1T00
5064 μs * -89%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4392 μs * -64%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
2684 μs *
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1914 μs * +29%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
566 μs * +79%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
560 μs * +79%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储

总容量为一兆字节的Phison固态硬盘占据了两个M.2插座中的一个,所以有升级的可能。RAID显然是不可能的,BIOS也没有提供任何相应的选项--至少在升级状态下没有SSD。

驱动器性能评级总结了不同的测量结果。Phison固态硬盘紧跟在SSSTC后面,从 Razer并将其他所有型号的产品甩在后面。特别是在小块的读写方面,Phison显得特别好。

Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
Sequential Read: 3641MB/s
Sequential Write: 1557MB/s
4K Read: 69.3MB/s
4K Write: 226MB/s
4K-64 Read: 1913MB/s
4K-64 Write: 2268MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.082ms
Access Time Write: 0.017ms
Score Read: 2347Points
Score Write: 2650Points
Score Total: 6101Points
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
89 pt
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
72.9 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
69.6 pt
Average Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
 
68.9 pt
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
68.4 pt
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
51.5 pt
HP ZBook Studio G7
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
49.5 pt
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
39.6 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3802 (3789.11min - 3801.66max) MB/s +48%
Average of class Multimedia
  (756 - 4861, n=87, last 2 years)
2872 MB/s +12%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
2561 (2531.05min - 2561.04max) MB/s
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
2503 (2425.36min - 2502.5max) MB/s -2%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2536 (2493.51min - 2536.34max) MB/s -1%
Average Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
  (2241 - 2565, n=5)
2425 MB/s -5%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1877 (1850.74min - 1877.16max) MB/s -27%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
1864 (1740.72min - 1864.2max) MB/s -27%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
1461 (1172.14min - 1461.09max) MB/s -43%
seq write
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3804 (3790.18min - 3804.02max) MB/s +56%
Average of class Multimedia
  (790 - 5709, n=87, last 2 years)
2977 MB/s +22%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2830 (2787.66min - 2829.68max) MB/s +16%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
2432 (2422.42min - 2431.86max) MB/s
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
2421 (2411.52min - 2420.95max) MB/s 0%
Average Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
  (2402 - 2432, n=5)
2415 MB/s -1%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2094 (2014.52min - 2093.59max) MB/s -14%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
2049 (2036.12min - 2048.8max) MB/s -16%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
1860 (1746.02min - 1859.54max) MB/s -24%
seq q8 t1 read
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
6883 (1.68min - 6882.51max) MB/s +38%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1023 - 7121, n=87, last 2 years)
5217 MB/s +4%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
4999 (4511.39min - 4998.56max) MB/s
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
4977 (4153.41min - 4976.54max) MB/s 0%
Average Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
  (4959 - 4999, n=5)
4984 MB/s 0%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
3436 (2468.46min - 3436.35max) MB/s -31%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
3224 (2977.45min - 3223.74max) MB/s -36%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
3213 (2586.28min - 3212.84max) MB/s -36%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
3203 (2954.22min - 3203.49max) MB/s -36%
seq q8 t1 write
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4658 (45.63min - 4657.56max) MB/s +92%
Average of class Multimedia
  (871 - 6761, n=87, last 2 years)
3947 MB/s +63%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
3160 (3003.54min - 3160.2max) MB/s +30%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
3097 (3017.8min - 3096.77max) MB/s +28%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
3074 (2804.1min - 3074.42max) MB/s +27%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2869 (2808.3min - 2869.32max) MB/s +18%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
2425 (2411.1min - 2424.73max) MB/s
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
2422 (2390.75min - 2421.79max) MB/s 0%
Average Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
  (2407 - 2425, n=5)
2416 MB/s 0%
4k q1 t1 read
Average of class Multimedia
  (14.6 - 149.1, n=87, last 2 years)
64.5 MB/s +8%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
59.5 (59.03min - 59.5max) MB/s
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
59 (57.89min - 58.98max) MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
57 (56.75min - 56.96max) MB/s -4%
Average Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
  (54.5 - 59.5, n=5)
56.9 MB/s -4%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
48.9 (48.13min - 48.87max) MB/s -18%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
45.8 (44.91min - 45.84max) MB/s -23%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
44.6 (39.06min - 44.62max) MB/s -25%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
29 (20.95min - 28.96max) MB/s -51%
4k q1 t1 write
Average Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
  (226 - 330, n=5)
258 MB/s +14%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
226 (225.82min - 226.46max) MB/s
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
226 (225.18min - 226.13max) MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
201 (200.58min - 201.14max) MB/s -11%
Average of class Multimedia
  (80.9 - 378, n=87, last 2 years)
178.7 MB/s -21%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
157 (155.18min - 156.78max) MB/s -31%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
113 (108.47min - 113.45max) MB/s -50%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
112 (108.82min - 112.38max) MB/s -50%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
103 (100.76min - 102.59max) MB/s -54%
4k q32 t16 read
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3197 (3193.46min - 3197.21max) MB/s +94%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2269 (2228.24min - 2269.28max) MB/s +38%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
1649 (1644.31min - 1649.42max) MB/s
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
1648 (1645.56min - 1648.39max) MB/s 0%
Average Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
  (1635 - 1652, n=5)
1645 MB/s 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (416 - 4358, n=87, last 2 years)
1350 MB/s -18%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
912 (808.73min - 912.41max) MB/s -45%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
723 (660.69min - 722.57max) MB/s -56%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
720 (687.45min - 719.86max) MB/s -56%
4k q32 t16 write
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
2426 (2419.83min - 2426max) MB/s
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
2426 (2417.3min - 2425.92max) MB/s 0%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2308 (1960.46min - 2307.69max) MB/s -5%
Average Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
  (2069 - 2426, n=5)
2273 MB/s -6%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2129 (2122.07min - 2128.79max) MB/s -12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (192.1 - 4074, n=87, last 2 years)
1067 MB/s -56%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
426 (417.99min - 426.38max) MB/s -82%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
425 (414.48min - 425.47max) MB/s -82%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
422 (416.05min - 421.67max) MB/s -83%
AS SSD
Score Total
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7821 Points +28%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
6101 Points
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
5441 Points -11%
Average Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
  (4207 - 6101, n=4)
5079 Points -17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2010 - 9972, n=84, last 2 years)
5067 Points -17%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
4757 Points -22%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
4342 Points -29%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2160 Points -65%
Score Read
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3587 Points +53%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
2347 Points
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2028 Points -14%
Average Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
  (1567 - 2347, n=4)
1864 Points -21%
Average of class Multimedia
  (669 - 3501, n=84, last 2 years)
1695 Points -28%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
1619 Points -31%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
1235 Points -47%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
545 Points -77%
Score Write
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
2650 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (545 - 4813, n=84, last 2 years)
2567 Points -3%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
2528 Points -5%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2490 Points -6%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2405 Points -9%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
2358 Points -11%
Average Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
  (1901 - 2650, n=4)
2336 Points -12%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1319 Points -50%
Seq Read
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
5739 MB/s +58%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1192 - 5730, n=84, last 2 years)
4005 MB/s +10%
Average Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
  (3597 - 3845, n=4)
3718 MB/s +2%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
3641 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2986 MB/s -18%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
2688 MB/s -26%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
2548 MB/s -30%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1362 MB/s -63%
Seq Write
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4201 MB/s +170%
Average of class Multimedia
  (388 - 5175, n=84, last 2 years)
2553 MB/s +64%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2426 MB/s +56%
Average Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
  (1557 - 2283, n=4)
2050 MB/s +32%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
1566 MB/s +1%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
1557 MB/s
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1440 MB/s -8%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
1312 MB/s -16%
4K Read
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
69.3 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (30 - 98.5, n=84, last 2 years)
62.7 MB/s -10%
Average Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
  (54.2 - 69.3, n=4)
60.1 MB/s -13%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
55.2 MB/s -20%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
53.8 MB/s -22%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
45.93 MB/s -34%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
45.38 MB/s -35%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
38.43 MB/s -45%
4K Write
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
226 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (66.5 - 328, n=84, last 2 years)
188.5 MB/s -17%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
179.2 MB/s -21%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
152.3 MB/s -33%
Average Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
  (78.5 - 226, n=4)
148 MB/s -35%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
125.8 MB/s -44%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
121.4 MB/s -46%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
83 MB/s -63%
4K-64 Read
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2959 MB/s +55%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
1913 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
1683 MB/s -12%
Average Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
  (1145 - 1913, n=4)
1432 MB/s -25%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
1295 MB/s -32%
Average of class Multimedia
  (413 - 2989, n=84, last 2 years)
1231 MB/s -36%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
935 MB/s -51%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
370.5 MB/s -81%
4K-64 Write
HP ZBook Studio G7
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
2314 MB/s +2%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
2268 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (281 - 4265, n=84, last 2 years)
2123 MB/s -6%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
2076 MB/s -8%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2010 MB/s -11%
Average Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
  (1482 - 2268, n=4)
1983 MB/s -13%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1891 MB/s -17%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1054 MB/s -54%
Access Time Read
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
0.082 ms *
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.018 - 0.168, n=84, last 2 years)
0.0578 ms * +30%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
0.057 ms * +30%
Average Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
  (0.042 - 0.082, n=4)
0.05575 ms * +32%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
0.045 ms * +45%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
0.042 ms * +49%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
0.034 ms * +59%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.027 ms * +67%
Access Time Write
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
0.246 ms * -1347%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.154 ms * -806%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
0.135 ms * -694%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
0.098 ms * -476%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.013 - 0.414, n=84, last 2 years)
0.05992 ms * -252%
Average Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
  (0.017 - 0.041, n=4)
0.02925 ms * -72%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
0.025 ms * -47%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
0.017 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

02555107651020127515301785204022952550280530603315357038254080433545904845Tooltip
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209 Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162: Ø4992 (4653.03-5005.22)

图形卡

的。 GeForce RTX 3060显卡以其良好的性价比而闻名,它为办公室带来了中上等的游戏能力。在Z16中,它可以访问6GB的VRAM,并以高达1,357MHz的提升时钟工作。

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
100 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
 
76.2 pt
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
68.8 pt
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
68.1 pt
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
63.3 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
52.1 pt
HP ZBook Studio G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
49.4 pt
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
44.1 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
35663 Points +56%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (13799 - 30772, n=43)
26816 Points +17%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
24844 Points +9%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
24689 Points +8%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
22875 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (3505 - 60250, n=89, last 2 years)
18929 Points -17%
HP ZBook Studio G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
17523 Points -23%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
15387 Points -33%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
27266 Points +58%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (16354 - 23109, n=49)
20436 Points +19%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
17960 Points +4%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
17855 Points +4%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
17205 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (1835 - 46022, n=90, last 2 years)
14005 Points -19%
HP ZBook Studio G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
13617 Points -21%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
12119 Points -30%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
10250 Points +59%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (6285 - 9235, n=49)
8057 Points +25%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
7361 Points +14%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
7042 Points +9%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
6437 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (622 - 17620, n=90, last 2 years)
5310 Points -18%
HP ZBook Studio G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
5048 Points -22%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
4591 Points -29%
3DMark 11 Performance
21117 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
15753 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
6721 points
Help

游戏性能

3DMark性能评级将3DMark和3DMark 11捆绑成一个数字。这里的 RTX 3060落后于其自身的平均水平,因此它的得分低于联想ThinkBook 16p戴尔XPS 17 9710.毫无疑问, RTX 3080作为一个基准,显然高于所有其他产品。

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
102.8 (96min) fps +65%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (58.2 - 91.5, n=48)
76.9 fps +23%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
73 fps +17%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
72.3 (68min) fps +16%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
62.4 fps
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
52.1 (49min, 50P1) fps -17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8 - 143.2, n=99, last 2 years)
50.6 fps -19%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
43.7 (32min, 34P1) fps -30%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
37.1 (33min, 35P1) fps -41%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
36.2 (31min, 32P1) fps -42%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
34.3 (30min, 31P1) fps -45%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
110 (4.87min, 76.9P1) fps +24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (69.2 - 109.8, n=46)
89.7 fps +1%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
89 fps
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
87.3 (9.06min, 62.5P1) fps -2%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
81.6 (8.6min, 52.6P1) fps -8%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
57.2 (7.15min, 31.3P1) fps -36%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4.24 - 123, n=88, last 2 years)
56.3 fps -37%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 2560x1440 High Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (41.1 - 73.7, n=25)
59.5 fps +23%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
54.9 fps +14%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
48.3 fps
Average of class Multimedia
  (7.31 - 132.7, n=57, last 2 years)
47 fps -3%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
26.8 fps -45%
X-Plane 11.11 - 3840x2160 high (fps_test=3)
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
73.4 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (58.5 - 92.3, n=12)
69.5 fps -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (22.2 - 95.2, n=23, last 2 years)
63.8 fps -13%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
63.5 fps -13%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
60.2 fps -18%
Far Cry 5 - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (58 - 92, n=12)
79.8 fps +35%
Average of class Multimedia
  (18 - 117, n=39, last 2 years)
64.9 fps +10%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
59 (52min) fps
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
50 fps -15%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
179 (70.9min, 138P1) fps +57%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (102.2 - 166.3, n=43)
137.6 fps +21%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
125 (86.6min, 95.8P1) fps +10%
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
123 (55.3min, 90.6P1) fps +8%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
114 (49min, 87.7P1) fps
Average of class Multimedia
  (11 - 233, n=86, last 2 years)
89.9 fps -21%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
84 fps -26%
New World - 2560x1440 Very High Video Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (52.9 - 54.2, n=3)
53.4 fps +1%
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
53 fps

微星指定动态提升的最大图形功率为65W。 Witcher 3超质量设置大约证实了这一点。我们看到恒定负载下的功率为60瓦。帧率是恒定的,因此,他们没有下降。

图中 Witcher 3FPS图表显示 RTX 3060在较低的中场。 联想ThinkBook 16p戴尔XPS 17 9710具有相同的图形做得更好。因此,竞争对手从RTX中榨取了更多的性能。游戏基准测试证实了这一点。联想ThinkBook 16p戴尔XPS 17 9710始终领先。平均而言 RTX 3060 - 在我们数据库中的所有笔记本电脑中都配备了它--比安装在Z16中的那台表现得更多。

LogfileWitcher 3 Ultra - 在重载情况下恒定60瓦的GPU功率
LogfileWitcher 3 Ultra - 在重载情况下恒定60瓦的GPU功率

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU: Ø58.9 (56-63)
HP ZBook Studio G7 i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q: Ø52.1 (49-55)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU: Ø92.9 (88-101)
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU: Ø70.4 (65-74)
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU: Ø67.4 (57-72)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU; BIOS 1.4 Ultra Performance: Ø43.7 (32-48)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU; BIOS 1.4: Ø37.1 (33-46)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU; BIOS 1.3.2 Ultra Performance: Ø36.2 (31-46)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU; BIOS 1.3.2: Ø34.3 (30-42)
low med. high ultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 89 74
The Witcher 3 (2015) 204 81 62.4
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 164 146 140 131 84.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 64.4 48.3
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 123 103 83.4 73.4
Far Cry 5 (2018) 92 86 59
Strange Brigade (2018) 339 159 129 114
New World (2021) 71 65 53

排放 - 怠速时很舒适,负载时声音很大

噪声排放

微星Z16中的三个风扇,这里是其中的两个
微星Z16中的三个风扇,这里是其中的两个

噪声排放和风扇特性基本上说服了我们。风扇在空闲模式下定期关闭,甚至在性能模式下也是如此。静音模式带来了永久的安静,但当然只有在CPU/GPU无事可做的时候。当风扇运转时--有三个风扇--它们也是可以听到的,但只比办公室里的背景噪音强一点儿。

在负载情况下,风扇的速度逐渐增加,但不可能分辨出哪个风扇启动。我们在中等负荷下测得54和55 dB(A)(在Ultra质量设置下),在办公室里测得54和55 dB(A)。Witcher 3在超质量设置下)和压力测试中。因此,高负荷和最大负荷之间没有明显的区别;噪音的决定性因素是它持续的时间。

Noise Level

Idle
26.3 / 26.3 / 26.3 dB(A)
Load
53.9 / 54.8 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 26.3 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.830.233.531.234.8254136.837.739.7413145.139.244.146.845.14035.233.233.335.835.25034.436.429.136.334.46328.629.324.726.428.68028.322.219.221.628.310026.924.826.434.326.912524.32120.724.724.316023.820.618.518.223.820025.322.123.926.425.325026.119.91616.126.131529.723.81819.929.740028.523.812.813.828.550028.924.71213.928.963029.626.312.11229.680031.628.51211.531.6100031.830.612.612.231.8125034.233.413.111.934.2160036.53513.411.936.5200039.338.113.713.339.3250039.436.113.312.639.4315039.736.713.61339.7400043.740.213.713.143.7500044.340.414.213.544.3630045.444.114.513.645.4800048.348.416.214.148.31000050.951.516.814.650.91250044.145.115.613.344.11600029.228.91412.429.2SPL54.853.926.426.354.8N8.47.40.80.88.4median 31.8median 30.6median 14median 13.5median 31.8Delta8.18.21.92.68.134.534.93634.639.328.63028.727.53422.724.423.322.530.622.921.121.319.125.432.722.421.521.124.127.623.427.326.526.234.434.634.934.834.832.526.22524.731.235.43231.330.836.434.222.417.718.636.935.521.517.416.735.733.820.516.91639.234.621.616.216.338.434.420.615.716.237.834.119.914.214.337.733.518.813.81437.335.11913.513.739.236.319.61312.539.835.61912.512.139.335.218.312.812.539.134.717.112.412.838.534.41512.812.738.534.413.512.612.438.336.313121240.532.41312.212.138.83012.512.312.136.32612.112.211.832.224.61212.111.831.422.311.912.111.729.120.611.511.811.124.746.229.225.625.550.45.81.20.80.77.9median 34.4median 18.8median 12.8median 12.7median 37.83.14.42.62.93.1hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseMSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
HP ZBook Studio G7
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
Noise
10%
9%
15%
7%
19%
off / environment *
26.3
24.4
7%
25.1
5%
23
13%
25.5
3%
23.8
10%
Idle Minimum *
26.3
24.4
7%
25.3
4%
23
13%
25.2
4%
23.8
10%
Idle Average *
26.3
24.4
7%
25.3
4%
23
13%
25.2
4%
23.8
10%
Idle Maximum *
26.3
27.9
-6%
25.3
4%
23
13%
25.2
4%
23.8
10%
Load Average *
53.9
38.8
28%
42
22%
35.66
34%
45.9
15%
36
33%
Witcher 3 ultra *
53.9
46.3
14%
45.6
15%
48.7
10%
49
9%
36
33%
Load Maximum *
54.8
46.3
16%
51.6
6%
48.13
12%
50.4
8%
38.2
30%

* ... smaller is better

温度

Z16在空闲时几乎保持低温,顶部和底部的平均温度为30℃(86°F)。在静音模式下,只要没有负载,风扇很少启动,而且只是非常短暂的启动。在负载情况下,温度急剧上升,在某些地方的底部达到57℃(134.6°F),平均42℃(107.6°F)。

Max. Load
 41.7 °C52.5 °C47.7 °C 
 41.3 °C43.7 °C37.3 °C 
 35.3 °C32.1 °C33.9 °C 
Maximum: 52.5 °C
Average: 40.6 °C
50.9 °C56.7 °C38.1 °C
39.5 °C43.6 °C39.3 °C
36.4 °C37.3 °C36.8 °C
Maximum: 56.7 °C
Average: 42.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  56.5 °C | Room Temperature 23.1 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52.5 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56.7 °C / 134 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.3 °C / 95.5 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-6.5 °C / -11.7 F).
废热 闲置,静音模式,顶部
废热 闲置,静音模式,顶部
余热闲置,静音模式,底面
余热闲置,静音模式,底面
废热应力测试,最高性能,顶面
废热应力测试,最高性能,顶面
废热应力测试,最高性能,底部
废热应力测试,最高性能,底部
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
Heat
18%
-2%
9%
5%
18%
27%
Maximum Upper Side *
52.5
45.7
13%
51
3%
50
5%
50.2
4%
45.5
13%
41
22%
Maximum Bottom *
56.7
50.6
11%
52
8%
53
7%
38.4
32%
44.2
22%
39
31%
Idle Upper Side *
33.9
24.8
27%
35.2
-4%
29
14%
37.6
-11%
27
20%
24
29%
Idle Bottom *
32.7
26.1
20%
37.8
-16%
30
8%
34.2
-5%
26.7
18%
24
27%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

压力测试是一种极端情况,它提供了关于在100%的GPU和CPU负载的情况下热能和计算性能如何表现的信息。Prime95和FurMark为此同时运行。CPU的时钟从近4.5GHz大幅降低到2.8GHz。它这样做是因为SoC温度很快达到90°C(194°F),需要防止进一步加热。

值得注意的是。虽然RTX的GPU温度上升较慢,但显卡可以永久性地消耗60瓦。要么GPU散热与CPU完全分离,要么GPU有优先权。

Logfile压力测试。CPU大幅降低时钟,GPU在65瓦的60瓦下保持稳定
Logfile压力测试。CPU大幅降低时钟,GPU在65瓦的60瓦下保持稳定
Logfile压力测试:在静音模式下,CPU时钟下降更多,GPU允许自己浪费更多的热量,但只损失少量性能。
Logfile压力测试:在静音模式下,CPU时钟下降更多,GPU允许自己浪费更多的热量,但只损失少量性能。
CPU时钟(GHz) GPU时钟(MHz) 平均CPU温度(℃) 平均GPU温度(℃)
系统空闲 1.5 210 43
Prime95压力 2.9 210 92
Prime95 + FurMark压力 2.6 1200 89
Witcher 3 Stress 4,2 1556 83

演讲者

Dynaudio两路立体声扬声器--你可以听到它!
Dynaudio两路立体声扬声器--你可以听到它!

Dynaudio的两路立体声扬声器是基于一个高音扬声器和一个低音扬声器。这使你能够更好地划分高低音,你可以在音乐和游戏中听到这一点,但特别是在讲话中。我们可以感觉到清晰和高音量,可以填满一个20平方米(215平方英尺)的中等大小的房间。不过,低音是不存在的。

双阵列麦克风只有在我们停在笔记本前面时才会以恒定的音量记录声音。在房间里走来走去,甚至看向不同的方向,都会导致音量的明显波动。另一方面,质量在任何地方都很好,也就是没有噪音。微星中心提供了一个语音放大器模式。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.531.238.5254539.7453153.246.853.2404235.8425045.236.345.26339.126.439.18036.921.636.910044.334.344.312551.124.751.116054.818.254.82005326.45325062.916.162.931571.319.971.34007613.87650079.413.979.463082.11282.180080.111.580.1100075.612.275.6125078.911.978.9160086.111.986.1200083.513.383.5250073.312.673.3315076.81376.8400079.513.179.5500074.513.574.5630070.913.670.9800074.314.174.3100008014.6801250077.813.377.81600066.512.466.5SPL91.926.391.9N95.50.895.5median 76median 13.5median 76Delta62.6638.33227.426.433.135.832.5372633.920.744.619.453.823.761.318.563.416.765.517.568.317.269.113.169.211.670.810.772.311.171.511.571.710.873.310.781.310.783.11178.61174.811.475.411.869.31274.312.273.712.472.112.369.212.365.611.556.323.888.80.577.6median 11.8median 71.72326.325.821.422.12624.925.127.622.532.523.448.72655.818.860.922.167.2267019.372.317.674.217.774.319.575.31571.711.871.311.27410.574.21072.710.17210.67210.97511.374.811.671.71269.71269.612.371.112.669.61270.111.269.824.784.70.666.6median 12median 71.73.42.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLEDApple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理

能源消耗

空闲时的功耗在9到27瓦之间,比大多数竞争对手(性能模式)要高。然而,如果我们以空闲平均数为基础(14瓦),Z16处于良好范围。该 RTX 3060被Optimus禁用,那么Iris Xe是活跃的,这非常有利于节俭。相比之下,只有 Razer Blade 15 Advanced明显出众,这可能是由于其 RTX 3080在手动模式下没有禁用它。

119瓦的负载平均值是Z16中11800h良好的电源开发--即Turbo利用--的另一个迹象。具有相同SoC的可比设备没有这样的数值。

Witcher 3在Ultra质量设置下,这对RTX 3060来说是一个很高的游戏负荷。 RTX 3060,我们指定用125瓦。如下图所示,功耗是恒定的,而且GPU的计算性能是一致的。

在压力测试中,180瓦的电源确实必须在最大负荷下工作。它必须在开始时的一个短暂的峰值中提供190瓦的功率。正如压力测试所显示的,节流使功耗在三分钟后降低到150瓦。

戴尔的 XPS 15 9510的功耗下降了 Witcher 3甚至在压力测试中下降更多(-47%!)。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 3 / 1.15 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 9 / 14 / 26.7 Watt
Load midlight 119 / 160 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162, IPS True Pixel, 2560x1600, 16.00
HP ZBook Studio G7
i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV, IPS, 3840x2400, 17.00
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro, M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP1024R, Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.20
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
10%
-48%
1%
12%
35%
-4%
28%
Idle Minimum *
9
5.5
39%
19.5
-117%
13.2
-47%
7.5
17%
5
44%
10.4 ?(5 - 22.8, n=41)
-16%
Idle Average *
14
13.7
2%
23.3
-66%
17
-21%
15.7
-12%
15.1
-8%
Idle Maximum *
26.7
16.6
38%
40.1
-50%
18.6
30%
23.1
13%
15.5
42%
Load Average *
119
118.4
1%
98.9
17%
88.8
25%
87.2
27%
54
55%
Witcher 3 ultra *
125
120
4%
174
-39%
123
2%
116
7%
Load Maximum *
160
203.3
-27%
214
-34%
132
17%
131.6
18%
90
44%

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180Tooltip
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø120.7 (115-129)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø76.2 (68.3-82.9)
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø160.8 (138-189)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø83.5 (68.3-132)

电池寿命

Z16的运行时间是好到非常好。它在Wi-Fi测试中持续了9:30小时,空闲状态下持续了13小时(飞行模式,最低亮度)。我们在平衡模式下进行了Wi-Fi测试,在超级电池下进行了空闲测试。最低运行时间约为1.5小时。

Zenbook的电池容量为90Wh,而诸如 戴尔XPS 17 9710(97Wh)的电池甚至更多,但在开始时仍然缩短了20%。该 Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021M1(100Wh)在Wi-Fi测试中以17小时的出色成绩击败了Z16。然而,这里没有安装如此强大的GPU。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
12h 59min
WiFi Websurfing
9h 27min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 29min
MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
HP ZBook Studio G7
i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, 83 Wh
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 71 Wh
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 97 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro, M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, 99.6 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Battery Runtime
-5%
-38%
12%
31%
79%
10%
Reader / Idle
779
1060
36%
WiFi v1.3
567
468
-17%
353
-38%
509
-10%
453
-20%
1016
79%
Load
89
96
8%
118
33%
157
76%
H.264
647
420
1048

Pros

+ 稳定、纤细的外壳
+ 明亮的触摸显示屏
+ 几乎100%的Adobe RGB
+ 良好的CPU/GPU性能
+ 快速的SD卡读卡器

Cons

- 反射式显示屏--但可选择无眩光
- 冗长的按键反馈
- 内存交换更加困难
- 网络摄像头质量差

结论--创意王位的竞争者

创造者Z16 A11UET-209,由德国微星公司提供
创造者Z16 A11UET-209,由德国微星公司提供

微星以其Z16提供了一个超轻薄但功能强大的创意巨兽。它的制造质量、端口和屏幕都令人印象深刻。这款机箱的质量和稳定性适合日常使用,但它仍然可以通过一些努力进行升级(内存、SSD 2x M.2、Wi-Fi芯片)。

Thunderbolt 4和USB 4.0都在机上。屏幕通过Type-C的DisplayPort运行,没有笨重的HDMI或以太网端口。2,560 x 1,600像素的显示屏(QHD+)囊括了96%的AdobeRGB色彩空间,P3是完全可见的。触摸面板使使用更加灵活,但不可避免地防止了哑光表面。然而,良好的亮度和高对比度弥补了这一缺陷;微星还提供了一个非眩光版本,应该包含一个相同的True Pixel面板。

性能处于高水平,特别是处理器。45瓦的i7 SoC 11800H在一个联盟中与Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro, Razer刀片15和XPS 17,除了Apple ,它们依靠相同的英特尔芯片。

正如我们的随机测试所显示的,性能的展开有利于 RTX 3060 - CPU和GPU的负载是相同的。因此,在CPU压力测试中,GPU继续以65瓦的60瓦计算。因此,随着时间的推移,游戏性能是稳定的。尽管如此, RTX 3060略低于平均水平(在游戏和合成基准测试中),但这并不影响一般游戏的适用性。

现代化的端口,哑光显示选项,具有AdobeRGB的快速TFT和出色的处理器性能。然后是像键盘和负载量这样的细节,搞砸了Z16的非常好的评级。

在散热方面,Z16的定位是合格的。在平衡模式下,风扇在怠速时大多保持关闭状态,但在性能下偶尔会打开。浪费的热量与性能相适应,主要是在笔记本电脑的后部区域被注意到。在负载情况下,三个风扇产生了相当大的噪音,但至少是稳定的,从不紧张。

弱点表现在输入设备上。由于键程短,敲击力度大,我们体验到了疲惫和嘈杂的打字体验,即使是RGB键的照明也不能掩盖这一点。Z16不是一个打字的世界冠军。Windows Hello与红外摄像头和指纹的配合非常好,但网络摄像头的快照却无法描述。

竞争者是什么样子的?XPS 17在显示方面(亮度、分辨率)似乎要好一些。XPS 15(15.6英寸,分辨率更高)提供了一个OLED。Apple's MacBook Pro 162021年的M1 Pro没有装相当多的AdobeRGB,而且响应时间更差。作为回报,Liquid Retina XDR的亮度更高。

如果你喜欢游戏,你会找到比微星更好的设备,它的 RTX 3060这里有 Razer Blade 15 Advanced(2021年中期)位居榜首,但它的屏幕在平衡上要差一些。在这里 MacBook Pro 162021不是一个游戏的选择,因为可用的游戏以及弱的GPU。

底线是,Z16非常好,或者至少在各方面都得到了很好的服务。这款16英寸手机没有任何严重的弱点。输入设备、音量、摄像头和相对较高的重量在评级中被划伤。如果这些对你来说都不是什么问题,那么Z16将是你在合理价格下的一个候选产品。

价格和可用性

目前,测试配置Creator Z16 A11UET-209与Core i7-11800H1TB内存和32GB DDR4-3200,在亚马逊的价格为2400欧元(~2716美元)的价格,与同等竞争对手持平。

创造者Z16 A11UET-209
创造者Z16 A11UET-209

MSI Creator Z16 A11UET-209 - 11/18/2021 v7
Sebastian Jentsch

Chassis
90 / 98 → 92%
Keyboard
83%
Pointing Device
81%
Connectivity
65 / 80 → 82%
Weight
62 / 20-72 → 80%
Battery
88 / 95 → 92%
Display
87%
Games Performance
92 / 90 → 100%
Application Performance
94 / 90 → 100%
Temperature
84%
Noise
73 / 95 → 77%
Audio
84%
Camera
24 / 85 → 29%
Average
77%
87%
Multimedia - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 微星造物主Z16:带AdobeRGB的创意笔记本电脑回顾
Sebastian Jentsch, 2021-11-29 (Update: 2021-11-29)