戴尔XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060笔记本电脑回顾。比以前快50%的处理器
戴尔XPS 17 9720是始于2020年XPS 17 9700的17.0英寸XPS 17系列的第三次迭代。虽然XPS 17 9700和2021年的9710版本会分别搭载第10代和第11代英特尔CPU，但2022年的9720在组合中加入了第12代CPU和DDR5内存选项。其他核心特征，如机箱和GPU选项与XPS 17 9700或9710完全相同，因此我们建议查看我们的 关于该系列的现有评论以了解更多关于该机型的物理特征。
我们的评测单位是一个中高端配置，配备酷睿i7-12700H处理器，UHD+（3840 x 2400）IPS触摸屏，以及GeForce RTX 3060 GPU，价格约为3000美元。其他SKU也有i5-12500H、i9-12900HK、GeForce RTX 3050 Ti、1200p显示屏，或仅集成显卡。
XPS 17 9720的竞争者包括17.3英寸的多媒体或专业消费者笔记本电脑，如 技嘉Aero 17, Razer Blade 17, HP Envy 17, 或 联想Legion 5 17.
更多戴尔评论。
Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 (XPS 17 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-12700H 14 x 1.7 - 4.7 GHz, 155 W PL2 / Short Burst, 55 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU - 6 GB VRAM, Core: 1282 MHz, RAM: 1500 MHz, 65 W TDP, GDDR6, 512.95, Optimus
Memory
32 GB
, DDR5-4800, SK Hynix, 30-29-29-57, Dual-Channel
Display
17.00 inch 16:10, 3840 x 2400 pixel 266 PPI, 10-point capacitive, Sharp LQ170R1, IPS, SHP1517, Dell P/N: T3MW9, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, 1024 GB
Weight
2.512 kg, Power Supply: 508 g
Price
3000 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 88.8 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2022 | Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 19.5 mm | 17.00" | 3840x2400 | |
| 82.4 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | HP Envy 17-cg i5-1135G7, GeForce MX450 | 2.7 kg | 19.3 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 87.9 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 19.5 mm | 17.00" | 3840x2400 | |
| 87.9 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2020 | Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q | 2.5 kg | 19.5 mm | 17.00" | 3840x2400 | |
| 85.2 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2022 | Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 3.1 kg | 24.3 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 76.5 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 2.2 kg | 21.4 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 90.1 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 19.9 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 |
SD卡阅读器
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| HP Envy 17-cg (AV Pro microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| HP Envy 17-cg (AV Pro microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
通讯 - 无Wi-Fi 6E
戴尔将WLAN从XPS 17 9710的英特尔AX1650升级到了XPS 17 9720的英特尔AX1675（或AX211）。较新的芯片支持Wi-Fi 6E，但该功能在XPS 17 9720上被禁用，就像我们在XPS 15 9520上发现的那样。 我们在XPS 15 9520上发现的情况.因此，用户将只能连接到2.4GHz或5GHz网络，而不是6GHz网络。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| HP Envy 17-cg | |
| Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| HP Envy 17-cg | |
| Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 | |
Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1384 (1326-1431)
Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1291 (990-1399)
网络摄像头
相机仍然只是720p，没有隐私快门。较低的原生分辨率与高分辨率的显示屏搭配得很差，画面难免有些混浊。戴尔说，现在红外和RGB传感器是分开的，性能更好，但像素密度仍然很低。相比之下，Razer Blade 17配备了一个更高分辨率的1080p网络摄像头。
仍然支持Windows Hello。
1.9 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
8 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
0 ∆E
维护
配件和保修
XPS 17 9720配备了与XPS 15 9520、XPS 17 9710和XPS 17 9700相同的130瓦交流适配器和USB-C转HDMI和USB-A适配器。如果在美国购买，则适用基本的一年有限制造商保修。
显示器 - 16:10 60 Hz IPS
有两个显示选项可供选择（1200p和2400p），而XPS 15 9520上有三个。我们设备上的面板与XPS 17 9710或9700上的夏普LQ170R1 IPS面板相同，这意味着自最初的2020型号以来，观看体验没有改变。这是一个优秀的显示器，现在仍然是，特别是在相对于其他IPS面板的对比度方面，但我们希望在未来看到90赫兹刷新率或更快的选项，类似于在最新的 IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro或即将推出的 Zenbook Pro 14 Duo.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sharp LQ170R1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 512.7 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 462.8 cd/m² Minimum: 26.58 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 512.7 cd/m²
Contrast: 1602:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.98 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.83
ΔE Greyscale 7.2 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
85.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.54
| Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 Sharp LQ170R1, IPS, 3840x2400, 17" | Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q Sharp LQ170R1, IPS, 3840x2400, 17" | Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H SHP14D7, IPS, 1920x1200, 17.3" | HP Envy 17-cg AU Optronics AUO439D, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE LEN173FHD, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W BOE NV173FHM-N49, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) BOE CQ NE173QHM-NZ1 (BOE09F9), IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 5% | -9% | -17% | -18% | -50% | 2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 92.9 | 90.5 -3% | 77.4 -17% | 68 -27% | 64.8 -30% | 39.53 -57% | 97.9 5% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 95 -5% | 97.2 -3% | 58.85 -41% | 99.9 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 85.3 | 99.8 17% | 76.6 -10% | 69 -19% | 66.7 -22% | 40.84 -52% | 85.5 0% |
| Response Times | 5% | -13% | 19% | 73% | 57% | 69% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 51.2 ? | 51.2 ? -0% | 60.4 ? -18% | 40 ? 22% | 15 ? 71% | 22 ? 57% | 15.2 ? 70% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 35.2 ? | 32 ? 9% | 37.6 ? -7% | 30 ? 15% | 9 ? 74% | 15 ? 57% | 11.2 ? 68% |
| PWM Frequency | 2500 ? | ||||||
| Screen | 20% | 33% | 6% | 16% | -16% | -9% | |
| Brightness middle | 512.7 | 539.4 5% | 636 24% | 347 -32% | 323 -37% | 269 -48% | 341 -33% |
| Brightness | 463 | 494 7% | 580 25% | 329 -29% | 305 -34% | 263 -43% | 308 -33% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 84 -1% | 86 1% | 89 5% | 89 5% | 88 4% | 82 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.32 -0% | 0.34 -6% | 0.27 16% | 0.25 22% | 0.3 6% | 0.45 -41% |
| Contrast | 1602 | 1686 5% | 1871 17% | 1285 -20% | 1292 -19% | 897 -44% | 758 -53% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.98 | 4.12 31% | 2.4 60% | 3.75 37% | 1.87 69% | 5.8 3% | 4.16 30% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12.09 | 7.65 37% | 3.5 71% | 7.53 38% | 4.84 60% | 18.46 -53% | 8.14 33% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.2 | 1.5 79% | 2 72% | 4.88 32% | 2.57 64% | 3.64 49% | 5.09 29% |
| Gamma | 2.54 87% | 2.15 102% | 2.08 106% | 2.53 87% | 2.42 91% | 2.35 94% | 2.48 89% |
| CCT | 6914 94% | 6438 101% | 6704 97% | 6624 98% | 7012 93% | 6995 93% | 6884 94% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.91 | 1.5 | 0.92 | 3 | |||
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 90.4 | 67.5 | |||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 100 | |||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 10% /
14% | 4% /
16% | 3% /
3% | 24% /
17% | -3% /
-12% | 21% /
5% |
* ... smaller is better
通过Dell PremierColor软件设置为DCI-P3色彩标准时，色温比预期的要高。与许多专业笔记本电脑不同，如戴尔Precision 、技嘉Aero或惠普ZBook系列，XPS系列在出厂时没有经过X-Rite校准。为了更好地利用面板的宽色域，有必要进行终端用户校准。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 51.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 25.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8354 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
业绩 - 阿尔德湖-H公司提高警惕
测试条件
在运行以下任何基准测试之前，我们的设备通过 "我的戴尔 "软件被设置为超性能模式，以获得尽可能高的分数。我们建议用户熟悉我的戴尔、戴尔更新和PremierColor软件，因为系统的关键功能是通过这些应用程序切换的。
Optimus 1.0是集成GPU和独立的GeForce RTX 3060之间自动图形切换的标准配置。由于XPS 17不是一台游戏机，所以不支持内部自适应同步和MUX。
处理器
CineBench xT基准测试和某些AIDA64分测试比配备上一代的XPS 15 9710快50%。 酷睿i7-11800H以代表处理器性能的显著同比改善。然而，在其他测试中，包括Blender和HWBOT x265，收益要小得多，但平均收益仍然大于我们在XPS 17 9700和XPS 17 9710之间观察到的情况。
奇怪的是， 酷睿i7-12700H在一些AIDA64基准测试中落后于第十代酷睿i7-10875H，如下图所示。
一些采用相同的酷睿i7-12800H CPU的较厚的笔记本电脑能够以更高的时钟频率运行该处理器，速度最高可达20%，如在 惠普Omen 16.
循环运行CineBench R15 xT显示，在长期承受极端处理负荷时，没有出现重大的性能节流问题。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2093 (2075.98-2171.32)
Dell XPS 15 9520 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1997 (1913.33-2170.14)
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2557 (2455.34-2812.94)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H; Ultra Performance: Ø1663 (1589.38-2024.19)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1625 (1566.05-2009.95)
Eurocom RX315 NH57AF1 Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1697 (1672.94-1779.91)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1576 - 7407, n=63) | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
| Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
| Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
| MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
| Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (300 - 704, n=63) | |
| Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 | |
| MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
| Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
| Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (4032 - 19330, n=63) | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
| Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
| MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
| Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
| Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
| Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (778 - 1826, n=62) | |
| MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
| Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
| Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ | |
| Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1379 - 2916, n=69) | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
| Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 | |
| Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
| MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
| Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
| Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
| Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (113 - 263, n=64) | |
| MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
| Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
| Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
| Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060 | |
| MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
| Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (168 - 732, n=62) | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
| Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
| Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (22844 - 73067, n=62) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
| Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
| MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
| Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (2743 - 5972, n=62) | |
| MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
| Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
| Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
| Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
| Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (5144 - 13745, n=63) | |
| MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (803 - 1851, n=63) | |
| Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 | |
| MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (4.67 - 21.8, n=63) | |
| Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 | |
| MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
| Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
| Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ | |
| MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
| Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (34.2 - 95.3, n=62) | |
| Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) | |
| Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
| Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060 | |
| MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
| Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (0.4441 - 1.052, n=62) | |
| Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
| Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Eurocom RX315 NH57AF1 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (2585 - 17957, n=62) | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Eurocom RX315 NH57AF1 | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (3249 - 9939, n=62) | |
| Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Eurocom RX315 NH57AF1 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1437 - 9692, n=62) | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
| Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (12863 - 52207, n=62) | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
| Eurocom RX315 NH57AF1 | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
系统性能
PCMark 10的结果一直高于我们在XPS 17 9710上记录的结果，如果只是勉强的话。我们的XPS 17 9720的成绩仍然是多媒体类别中最快的一些。
我们在设备上遇到了一个错误，在睡眠模式下，功耗会奇怪地稳定在40W，而不是通常的<2W，导致表面温度非常高，浪费了能源。通过 "我的戴尔 "切换电源配置文件似乎可以暂时解决这个问题。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (5986 - 8156, n=12) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4325 - 8670, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
| HP Envy 17-cg | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (9289 - 12144, n=12) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8025 - 12420, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
| HP Envy 17-cg | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (6161 - 10362, n=12) | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6763 - 10615, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060 | |
| HP Envy 17-cg | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (8950 - 12554, n=12) | |
| Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 15187, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
| HP Envy 17-cg | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1649 - 2017, n=11) | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (866 - 2255, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1536 - 1958, n=11) | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2050, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (907 - 2795, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1816 - 2084, n=11) | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1210 - 2207, n=11) | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (605 - 2094, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 7296 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (25615 - 80511, n=62) | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (25586 - 79442, n=62) | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (23679 - 88660, n=62) | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示，在我们的主页上打开多个浏览器标签时，存在轻微的DPC问题，就像我们在XPS 17 9710和9700上观察到的那样。在60FPS下的4K视频播放是完全流畅的，没有掉帧，这是任何由Core H驱动的多媒体笔记本电脑所期望的。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| HP Envy 17-cg | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
| Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060 | |
| Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
XPS 17 9710发货时，PCIe4 x4 NVMe固态硬盘还没有广泛使用，因此SKU只能用PCIe3 x4选项代替。值得庆幸的是，如今PCIe4驱动器更加普遍，很高兴看到XPS 17 9720采用了快速的三星PM9A1解决方案。我们的压力测试显示，在我们的设备中的驱动器将没有问题，保持其最大的连续读取速率超过7000 MB / s的长时间，而不需要节流，虽然整体性能仍然比我们记录在Razer Blade 17配备相同的1TB三星硬盘。
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
6941 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
5100 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
605.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
536.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
3787 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
3036 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
81.97 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
179.9 MB/s
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060: Ø6855 (5936.41-6948.02)
GPU性能
戴尔已经将GeForce RTX 3060 TGP从XPS 17 9710的70W降至XPS 17 9720的65W。虽然戴尔宣传9720的GPU为60瓦，但我们可以确认，Nvidia的控制面板显示为65瓦，这与我们在测试中的独立结果更接近。根据3DMark基准测试和测试的GPU游戏，其效果是原始图形性能下降10%，如 Witcher 3最终幻想15》或《奇异旅团》。
当与具有相同GeForce RTX 3060 GPU的平均笔记本电脑相比，XPS 17 9720中的GPU慢了大约20%。值得注意的是，其他大多数配备RTX 3060的笔记本电脑通常以80W或更高的TGP上限为目标。至少，这里的GPU仍然比原来XPS 17 9700中的RTX 2060 Max-Q ，好了大约15%。同时，降级到RTX 3050 Ti SKU将导致25%至30%的性能下降。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 21962 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 43738 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 15062 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 6473 points | |
Help | ||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | The Witcher 3 | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11 | Strange Brigade | Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | GTA V
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU: Ø61 (57-66)
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 186.6 | 179 | 152.8 | 83.8 | 63.4 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 347.7 | 214.6 | 133.9 | 67.8 | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 185.7 | 169.9 | 163 | 133.5 | 84.6 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 137.9 | 90.5 | 69.3 | 49.1 | 28.3 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 133.3 | 111.6 | 93.8 | 92.3 | ||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 352 | 162.6 | 130.6 | 113.4 | 82.3 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 95.4 | 78.1 | 60 | 48.9 | 29 | 11.6 |
排放物--游戏笔记本的噪音和温度
系统噪音
自最初的XPS 17 9700以来，风扇的噪音和行为没有改变，这意味着在游戏或运行其他高负载时，风扇的最高噪音仍将达到近50分贝（A）。在这种紧张的条件下，其噪音与许多游戏笔记本电脑相当。
当引入中高负荷时，风扇会很快从静音脉冲到噪音，因此，如果不需要额外的马力，我们建议使用静音电源配置文件来限制风扇脉冲。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 24.1 / 24.1 / 24.1 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 43.2 / 48 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.8 dB(A) | ||
| Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | HP Envy 17-cg GeForce MX450, i5-1135G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB | Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060 GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV | Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Micron 2200S 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TCK | Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU | Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB | Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -9% | -5% | -10% | -6% | -14% | 4% | |
| off / environment * | 23.8 | 26 -9% | 25.5 -7% | 28 -18% | 25 -5% | 29.6 -24% | 23 3% |
| Idle Minimum * | 24.1 | 26 -8% | 25.2 -5% | 28 -16% | 25 -4% | 31.4 -30% | 23 5% |
| Idle Average * | 24.1 | 31.7 -32% | 25.2 -5% | 28 -16% | 25 -4% | 31.4 -30% | 23 5% |
| Idle Maximum * | 24.1 | 25.2 -5% | 28 -16% | 30.5 -27% | 31.4 -30% | 23 5% | |
| Load Average * | 43.2 | 43.2 -0% | 45.9 -6% | 43.2 -0% | 37.5 13% | 36.1 16% | 36.92 15% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 48 | 49 -2% | 49 -2% | 50 -4% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 48 | 46.6 3% | 50.4 -5% | 50.5 -5% | 51 -6% | 40.1 16% | 50 -4% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
当长时间运行压力负荷时，顶部和底部的热点可以分别达到52℃和44℃以上。这些区域战略性地朝向机箱后部，远离掌托和大多数按键。然而，底面仍然会感到非常温暖，因为底板是一整块的金属。
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51.8 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.2 °C / 91.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-4.4 °C / -8 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51.8 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.2 °C / 91.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-4.4 °C / -8 F).
| Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | HP Envy 17-cg Intel Core i5-1135G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q | Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 14% | 1% | -1% | 2% | 12% | 6% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 51.8 | 45.9 11% | 50.2 3% | 53 -2% | 42.2 19% | 40.2 22% | 43 17% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 44.2 | 49.7 -12% | 38.4 13% | 39.2 11% | 50.9 -15% | 47.9 -8% | 44 -0% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 34.8 | 24.2 30% | 37.6 -8% | 37 -6% | 34.3 1% | 27.3 22% | 32 8% |
| Idle Bottom * | 33.2 | 24.8 25% | 34.2 -3% | 35.8 -8% | 32 4% | 28.9 13% | 34 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
与Core i7-11800H XPS 17 9710相比，我们的9720设备可以达到更高的初始功耗（115W对87W），同时稳定在更低的核心温度（75C对82C）和相同的功耗（55W）。因此，XPS系统只能在热限制开始之前短时间内利用桤木湖平台更高的TDP范围或时钟速率。
运行时的GPU时钟速率、温度和板卡功耗 Witcher 3将分别稳定在1312MHz、66C和65W，而XPS 17 9710的时钟频率为1530MHz、67C和69W。整体上同比图形性能较慢反映了我们上面记录的3DMark结果较差。
在超性能模式下运行与优化模式相比，GPU的性能提升似乎可以忽略不计。
用电池运行限制了CPU和GPU的性能。在电池供电的情况下，Fire Strike ，物理和图形得分分别为14770和24927分，而在主电源供电的情况下，得分分别为16354和23563分。
| CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | GPU平均温度(℃) | |
| 系统空闲 | -- | -- | 44 | 44 |
| Prime95压力 | 2.5 | -- | 75 | 59 |
| Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | ||||
| Witcher 3 压力（优化模式） | ~0.7 | 1290 | 66 | 67 |
| Witcher 3 压力（超性能模式） | ~0.8 | 1312 | 67 | 66 |
发言人
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
能源管理--更高的涡轮增压功率消耗
消耗功率
XPS 17 9700 出现了充电问题该系统无法从130瓦的交流适配器中获取超过100瓦的电量。值得庆幸的是，戴尔在后续的XPS 17 9710上解决了这个问题，9720也不例外。当运行 Witcher 3时，我们的9720设备会消耗115W，几乎与我们在旧版9710上记录的相同。XPS 15系列和XPS 17系列仍然是市场上唯一配备130 W USB-C适配器的机型。
值得注意的是，在测试开始时，运行Prime95时的功耗比9710略高，然后稳定在每台94W左右。因此，第12代CPU的较高功耗是短暂的，然后才变得与采用第11代处理器的9710机型相似。
在游戏或运行高负荷时，充电速度明显减慢。当运行 Witcher 3例如，当以13%的电池容量和交流电运行时，电池在一小时内只会再增加12%。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.155 / 1.2 Watt |
| Idle | 5.9 / 15.8 / 26.7 Watt |
| Load |
117.4 / 136.6 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 3840x2400, 17" | HP Envy 17-cg i5-1135G7, GeForce MX450, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV, IPS, 3840x2400, 17" | Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, Micron 2200S 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TCK, IPS, 3840x2400, 17" | Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 46% | 3% | 7% | -40% | 61% | -54% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5.9 | 3.8 36% | 7.5 -27% | 5.8 2% | 15.6 -164% | 4.2 29% | 14.4 -144% |
| Idle Average * | 15.8 | 9.4 41% | 15.7 1% | 20.6 -30% | 20.7 -31% | 7.9 50% | 20 -27% |
| Idle Maximum * | 26.7 | 10.1 62% | 23.1 13% | 21 21% | 22.9 14% | 8.8 67% | 21.5 19% |
| Load Average * | 117.4 | 64.4 45% | 87.2 26% | 104.7 11% | 134 -14% | 29.7 75% | 119 -1% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 114.8 | 64.4 44% | 116 -1% | 99.2 14% | 135 -18% | 28.8 75% | 218 -90% |
| Load Maximum * | 136.6 | 68 50% | 131.6 4% | 107.6 21% | 170 -24% | 44 68% | 248 -82% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø114.8 (110.3-124.2)
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø115.8 (114-122)
Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø127.7 (91.9-136.6)
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø123.4 (109-132)
Power Consumption external Monitor
Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø84.1 (56-136.5)
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø101 (91.4-132)
Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø111.8 (51.5-136.5)
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø124.4 (116-131)
Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø94.1 (89.2-116.6)
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø106.8 (101-112)
Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø107.5 (106.2-112.4)
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø111.2 (110-113)
电池寿命
运行时间与上一代9710或9700机型相比没有明显变化。在集成GPU处于激活状态的情况下，使用平衡或优化电源配置文件时，预计实际的WLAN使用时间略低于9小时。假设你没有运行上面提到的任何苛刻的应用程序，从空电到满电只需2个多小时。
| Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 97 Wh | HP Envy 17-cg i5-1135G7, GeForce MX450, 55.67 Wh | Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 97 Wh | Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, 97 Wh | Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | Asus VivoBook 17 F712JA-AU708W i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 32 Wh | Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 82 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 47% | 79% | 59% | 21% | 11% | 27% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 524 | 472 -10% | 453 -14% | 580 11% | 263 -50% | 262 -50% | 353 -33% |
| Load | 58 | 118 103% | 157 171% | 120 107% | 111 91% | 100 72% | 108 86% |
| Reader / Idle | 1063 | 1060 | 1425 | 331 | |||
| H.264 | 212 | 295 |
Pros
+ 多线程CPU性能显著提高
+ 可升级2xPCIe4 x4存储和内存
+ 没有xps 17 9700的充电问题
+ 纤薄而坚固的机身设计
Cons
- 运行高要求负载时，充电速度非常慢
- 较慢的GeForce RTX 3060性能
- 内部显示限制为60赫兹
- 不支持Wi-Fi 6E
结论--关于CPU的一切
对更新的CPU没有什么可抱怨的。虽然Alder Lake平台确实可能非常耗电，但性能提升至少是可敬的。知道自己可以利用额外性能的强大用户肯定会欣赏这方面的权衡。
戴尔XPS 17 9720引入了一个全新的处理器，与旧的第10代和第11代产品相比，性能有明显的提升。然而，在CPU之外，XPS 17 9710或9700的相同缺点仍然存在。
不幸的是，在这个设计的两年里，有一些小的缺点还没有得到解决。网络摄像头的视频质量仍然很差，在运行高要求的负载时，充电速度明显变慢，盖子的握力很差，很难打开，而且仍然没有网络摄像头隐私快门或Wi-Fi 6E支持。GPU似乎突然受到了打击，这对XPS的爱好者来说可能是一颗难以吞咽的药丸。与具有更多功能的替代品相比，XPS 17 9720的最大优势是，如 技嘉Aero 17的最大优势仍然是其更紧凑的机箱尺寸和16:10的长宽比。
价格和可用性
Dell XPS 17 9720 RTX 3060
- 05/31/2022 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Multimedia - Weighted Average
Price comparison
