Core Ultra 7 165U 性能首次亮相:戴尔Latitude 9450 2 合 1 评测
2024Latitude 9450 2 合 1 直接继承了去年的 Latitude 9440 二合一.新款机型引入了英特尔流星湖-U 处理器选项,以取代旧款的猛禽湖-U 系列。除此之外,这两款Latitude 在外观上完全相同,因为今年该系列没有重大变化。
我们的测试机是最高端的配置,配备酷睿 Ultra 7 165U CPU、32 GB LPDDR5x-7467 内存和 512 GB M.2 2230 固态硬盘,售价约为 3000 美元。较低配置的机型采用 Core Ultra 5 125U,内存和存储空间减半,价格便宜几百美元,但所有选项都固定采用 2560 x 1600 IPS 触摸屏。
Latitude 9450 2 合 1 的替代产品包括其他商务可转换产品,如 华硕专家本 B5 Flip, 联想 ThinkPad X13 Yoga G4或 HP EliteBook x360 830 G10.
更多戴尔评测:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.3 % | 04/2024 | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core | 1.6 kg | 16.28 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
87.9 % | 06/2023 | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.6 kg | 16.28 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.4 % | 09/2023 | HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.3 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
89.3 % | 03/2024 | Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 19.3 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
90.5 % | 04/2024 | Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | 1.3 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
86.1 % | 07/2022 | MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.6 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例 - 历时一年的设计仍让人耳目一新
去年的Latitude 9440 2 合 1 是对旧版本 9430 2 合 1 的彻底重新设计。 Latitude 9430 二合一.因此,今年的Latitude 9450 2-in-1 只做了很小的改动也就不足为奇了。我们对Latitude 9440 2 合 1 机箱和物理特性的现有评论仍然适用于Latitude 9450 2-in-1。
区分Latitude 9450 2 合 1 与 9440 2 合 1 的简单方法是查看取代 Ctrl 键的新 Microsoft Co-Pilot 键。联想等其他制造商的笔记本电脑也开始采用 Co-Pilot 键。
交流
Wi-Fi 7 是标准配置,而去年的机型 "仅 "支持 Wi-Fi 6E。不过,绝大多数用户仍无法充分利用 Wi-Fi 7 的优势,因此在撰写本文时,升级几乎没有任何区别。
网络摄像头
网络摄像头的质量仍为 2 MP,而 HP EliteBook 1040 G10 或 联想 ThinkPad X13 Yoga G4等机型则配备了 500 万像素传感器,可获得更清晰的图像。
维护
显示屏 - 仅 IPS
触摸屏没有变化,因此用户仍然可以获得与 2023 型号相同的友达光电 B140QAN IPS 面板。这种面板因其缓慢的黑白和灰白响应时间而臭名昭著,会导致非常明显的重影。不过,对于大多数办公任务来说,重影应该不是大问题。
遗憾的是,目前还没有其他显示屏可供选择,这意味着 OLED 和更高的刷新率是不可能的。
|
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 501.4 cd/m²
Contrast: 1567:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.52 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.45
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
80.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
80.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 AU Optronics B140QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.00 | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 AU Optronics B140QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.00 | HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA CMN1435, IPS, 1920x1200, 14.00 | Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P N140HCE-EN2, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT AU Optronics B140QAN04.R, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -2% | -14% | -17% | 15% | 9% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 80.6 | 77.2 -4% | 67.7 -16% | 62 -23% | 99.8 24% | 97.8 21% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.6 0% | 88.1 -12% | 92.5 -7% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 80.1 | 77.4 -3% | 69.8 -13% | 64 -20% | 97.3 21% | 85.9 7% |
Response Times | 9% | 15% | 38% | 98% | 65% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 59.6 ? | 53.5 ? 10% | 54.8 ? 8% | 31 ? 48% | 0.8 ? 99% | 16.9 ? 72% |
Response Time Black / White * | 35.6 ? | 33 ? 7% | 28.3 ? 21% | 26 ? 27% | 1 ? 97% | 15.4 ? 57% |
PWM Frequency | 240.5 ? | |||||
Screen | -16% | -24% | -8% | -62% | -45% | |
Brightness middle | 501.4 | 532.4 6% | 343 -32% | 373 -26% | 371.6 -26% | 496.7 -1% |
Brightness | 491 | 502 2% | 330 -33% | 342 -30% | 373 -24% | 468 -5% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 91 3% | 92 5% | 85 -3% | 99 13% | 87 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.48 -50% | 0.19 41% | 0.2876 10% | 0.3 6% | |
Contrast | 1567 | 1109 -29% | 1805 15% | 1297 -17% | 1656 6% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.52 | 2.33 8% | 3 -19% | 1.7 33% | 4.91 -95% | 3.93 -56% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.87 | 5.99 -23% | 7 -44% | 3.55 27% | 8.33 -71% | 7.9 -62% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.45 | 0.92 -104% | 0.7 -56% | 0.71 -58% | 1.59 -253% | 1.27 -182% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 1.6 43% | 5.4 -93% | 2.93 -5% | 2.2 21% | 5.9 -111% |
Gamma | 2.17 101% | 2.17 101% | 2.14 103% | 2.119 104% | 2.25 98% | 2.04 108% |
CCT | 6270 104% | 6314 103% | 7079 92% | 6765 96% | 6120 106% | 7618 85% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -3% /
-10% | -8% /
-16% | 4% /
-3% | 17% /
-16% | 10% /
-18% |
* ... smaller is better
显示屏默认设置为 P3,尽管面板只覆盖了标准的 81%。用户可能希望将屏幕设置为 sRGB,因为面板的额定值为 100% sRGB。您可以在上面免费下载我们经过校准的 ICM 配置文件。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
35.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise | |
↘ 18.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
59.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27.8 ms rise | |
↘ 31.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17844 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
性能 - 流星湖-U 对 流星湖-H
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将戴尔优化大师设置为超性能模式。
处理器
Core Ultra 7 165U 是 Core Ultra 7 155U 的 vPro 版本。两者的高速缓存大小和目标时钟频率基本相同,只是 Core Ultra 7 165U 的目标最高频率高出 100 MHz。但实际上,Core Ultra 7 165H 本身并不比 Core Ultra 7 155U 快。
遗憾的是,戴尔 Core Ultra 165U 的表现有些令人失望,其性能与较早的 Ryzen 7 7730U 不相上下。它仍然比去年Latitude 9440 2 合 1 中的酷睿 i7-1365U 快约 10%至 15%,但总体性能提升相对较小。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21HF0017GE | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 -1! | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 -4! | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 -3! | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 -2! | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE -2! | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA | |
HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q -2! | |
Asus F415EA-EK115W -2! |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21HF0017GE | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U () | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA | |
Asus F415EA-EK115W | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21HF0017GE | |
Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U () | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
Asus F415EA-EK115W | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q |
Geekbench 6.2 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21HF0017GE | |
Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U () | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
HP ProBook 445 G10 |
Geekbench 6.2 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21HF0017GE | |
Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U () | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
HP ProBook 445 G10 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21HF0017GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U () | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA | |
Asus F415EA-EK115W |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U | |
Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U () | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U () | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U () | |
Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U () |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U () | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U () | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U () | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U () | |
Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U () | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U () | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA |
压力测试
CPU Turbo Boost 可持续性有限,这与上文提到的 CineBench 不尽如人意的结果不谋而合。例如,在运行 Prime95 时,时钟频率和主板功耗分别高达 3.4 GHz 和 44 W,几分钟后才缓慢但稳定地降至 2.2 GHz 和 21 W,以控制温度。下面的截图显示,当 Turbo Boost 不受限制时,核心温度高达 102 C。
CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 44 |
Prime95 压力 | 2.3 | -- | 76 |
Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 1.8 | 1150 | 77 |
Witcher 3 压力 | ~2.1 | ~1600 - 2000 | 78 |
系统性能
PCMark 结果仅略微领先于旧版本Latitude 9440 2 合 1。改进是有的,但可能不如许多用户希望的那么明显。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) () | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) () | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) () | |
Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) () | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) () | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) () | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) () | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) () | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) () | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) () | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) () | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6156 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U () | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U () | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U () | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA | |
Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U () | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
LatencyMon 显示,在打开主页的多个浏览器标签时,会出现轻微的 DPC 问题,就像去年的机型一样。60 FPS 的 4K 视频播放也非常完美,在 60 秒后截屏时仅记录到一个丢帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的测试设备配备了 美光 2550取代了去年Latitude 9440 2 合 1 上的三星 PM9B1。从下面的 DiskSpd 读取循环测试结果来看,新的美光硬盘不易出现性能节流现象。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
Core Ultra 7 165U 配备了集成的 Arc 4 GPU,而 Core Ultra 7 155H 配备了集成的 Arc 8。这一微小的标称差异却带来了显著的性能差异,这并不利于我们的戴尔系统。例如,3DMark 结果显示,我们的 Arc 4 比 Arc 8 慢 30% 到 50%。图形性能仍然快于去年的 Iris Xe 96 EU,但优势较小,仅为 20% 至 25%。除非使用尽可能低的设置,否则要求较高的游戏仍然无法运行。有些游戏,如《小小蒂娜的仙境》,如果设置较高,甚至会崩溃。
性能参数 | 图形分数 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
性能模式 | 5468 | 20467 | 2059 |
均衡模式 | 5503 (-0%) | 20310 (-0%) | 2041 (-0%) |
电池电量 | 5255 (-4%) | 13578 (-34%) | 1614 (-22%) |
如Fire Strike 上表所示,在平衡模式而非性能模式下运行不会影响系统性能。不过,使用电池供电会降低 CPU 性能。
3DMark 11 Performance | 7588 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 23325 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5179 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 2315 points | |
Help |
Blender | |
v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD | |
HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21HF0017GE | |
v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21HF0017GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21HF0017GE | |
v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Asus F415EA-EK115W | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P | |
HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (592 - 649, n=3) | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21HF0017GE | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 |
* ... smaller is better
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P | |
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty | |
1280x720 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (31.7 - 32.8, n=3) | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (20.3 - 21.6, n=3) | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (16.7 - 17.6, n=3) | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (14.3 - 14.9, n=3) | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (12.5 - 13, n=3) |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands - 1280x720 Lowest Preset (DX12) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (54.8 - 61.8, n=3) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 92.1 | 57 | 32.4 | 17.9 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 91.4 | 69 | 61 | 57.3 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 48.2 | 25.9 | 18.2 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 37.6 | 30.1 | 25.3 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 48 | 24 | 23 | 21 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 121.1 | 52.1 | 41.9 | 33.3 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | ||||
F1 22 (2022) | 46.3 | 42 | 29.5 | 7.62 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 15 | 12.3 | 11 | 10.6 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 20.3 | 16.7 | 14.4 | 12.7 |
排放量
系统噪音
尽管两款机型在性能上存在差异,但风扇噪音和表现与我们在Latitude 9440 2-in-1 上观察到的基本相同。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.9 / 23.9 / 23.9 dB(A) |
Load |
| 36.4 / 44.7 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.9 dB(A) |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 165U | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZAL41T0HBLB | HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV | Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Arc 8-Cores, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB | MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -1% | 6% | -3% | 2% | 6% | |
off / environment * | 23.9 | 24.1 -1% | 23.1 3% | 24.78 -4% | 23.2 3% | 23.3 3% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.9 | 24.3 -2% | 23.1 3% | 24.78 -4% | 23.6 1% | 23.3 3% |
Idle Average * | 23.9 | 24.3 -2% | 23.1 3% | 24.78 -4% | 23.6 1% | 23.3 3% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.9 | 24.3 -2% | 23.1 3% | 24.78 -4% | 25 -5% | 23.3 3% |
Load Average * | 36.4 | 36.3 -0% | 35.3 3% | 37 -2% | 34.8 4% | 24 34% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 44.7 | 44.5 -0% | 37.3 17% | 37.7 16% | 35.6 20% | |
Load Maximum * | 44.7 | 44.5 -0% | 41.1 8% | 45 -1% | 46.2 -3% | 55.8 -25% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
靠近底座中心的热点可达到 36 摄氏度和 38 摄氏度,具体取决于侧面。相比之下,惠普 EliteBook 1040 G10 或微星 Summit E14 Flip Evo 的热区温度可达 45 摄氏度以上,而惠普 EliteBook 1040 G10 或微星 Summit E14 Flip Evo 的温度则低得多。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28 °C / 82.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+0.1 °C / 0.2 F).
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU | MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -12% | -6% | -8% | -18% | 1% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 35.4 | 40.8 -15% | 40.5 -14% | 42 -19% | 40 -13% | 44.2 -25% |
Maximum Bottom * | 37.8 | 40 -6% | 45.8 -21% | 40 -6% | 43 -14% | 45.8 -21% |
Idle Upper Side * | 27.2 | 30.4 -12% | 25.5 6% | 25.8 5% | 32 -18% | 19.6 28% |
Idle Bottom * | 28.2 | 32.8 -16% | 26.1 7% | 32 -13% | 35.2 -25% | 22 22% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
运行Witcher 3 时的平均功耗仅为 36 瓦,而使用旧版 Iris Xe 96 EUs 显卡的Latitude 9440 2 合 1 机型则为 52 瓦。因此,我们的新型号不仅速度稍快,而且功耗更低,每瓦性能更高。这一关键优势可能是电池续航时间更长的原因,下文将对此进行说明。
Latitude 9450 2 合 1 和Latitude 9440 2 合 1 配备了相同的 65 W USB-C 交流适配器。
(编者注:本月晚些时候,我们的 Metrahit Energy 万用表维修完成后,本节内容将进行更新。不便之处,敬请原谅。)
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core, , IPS, 2560x1600, 14.00 | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZAL41T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.00 | HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV, IPS, 1920x1200, 14.00 | Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | ||||||
Idle Minimum * | 4.2 | 2.8 | 9.6 | 4.2 | 5.4 | |
Idle Average * | 6.9 | 6.1 | 10.3 | 7.1 | 9.5 | |
Idle Maximum * | 7.8 | 6.3 | 8.6 | 12.9 | 12.4 | |
Load Average * | 46 | 48.9 | 58.028 | 58.9 | 54.7 | |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 51.9 | 38.2 | 39.6 | 49.5 | 52 | |
Load Maximum * | 68.2 | 65.9 | 65.28 | 66.7 | 63.4 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
电池续航时间有了较大幅度的提高,这似乎是流星湖笔记本电脑的一个主题。WLAN 运行时间约为 13.5 小时,比我们在旧版Latitude 9440 2 合 1 上记录的时间长 4 个多小时。
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core, 60 Wh | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh | HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 51 Wh | Asus Expertbook B5 Flip B5402F, i7-1360P i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 63 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores, 75 Wh | MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 72 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -24% | -19% | 16% | -32% | -19% | |
Reader / Idle | 1300 | 1423 9% | 855 -34% | 1324 2% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 815 | 555 -32% | 587 -28% | 641 -21% | 600 -26% | 494 -39% |
Load | 143 | 73 -49% | 130 -9% | 218 52% | 93 -35% | 114 -20% |
H.264 | 764 |
Pros
Cons
结论--只是小更新,一切从实际出发
2024Latitude 9450 2 合 1 与 2023 相比优势不大 Latitude 9440 二合一.最重要的变化是CPU和GPU的速度略有加快,电池续航时间更长,这可能会让某些电力用户或旅行者感到满意。除此之外,没有任何令人兴奋的东西能鼓励用户购买它而不是 2023 版。例如,如果能在升级 CPU 的同时提供新的显示屏选项就更好了。
Latitude 9450 2 合 1 与Latitude 9440 2 合 1 的用户体验基本相同。如果你的日常工作无法从本地 AI 加速中获益,那就省点钱,直接购买Latitude 9440 2 合 1 即可。
当然,如今说到笔记本电脑就不能不提到人工智能。Latitude 9450 2 合 1 确实集成了 NPU,以更好地区别于上一代机型。不过,截至本文撰写之时,绝大多数程序尚未使用 NPU。今天购买Latitude 9450 2-in-1 将意味着对 NPU 及其未来在 Windows 中的应用进行投资。如果本地 AI 加速和 Microsoft Co-Pilot 无法满足您的需求,那么Latitude 9440 2 合 1 基本上可以以更低的价格提供相同的体验。
价格和供应情况
戴尔公司目前正在出货 Latitude 9450 2 合 1,基本配置为 Core Ultra 5 125U 的起价为 2320 美元,配置为 Core Ultra 7 165H 的起价略高于 3000 美元。
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1
-
04/16/2024 v7
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.