Notebookcheck Logo

LG Gram 14 (2022)笔记本电脑回顾。时尚、轻巧、经济

羽量级。 LG Gram 14是一款令人印象深刻的笔记本电脑,有力地代表了低于1公斤(约2.2磅)的级别。2022年,这款紧凑的14英寸笔记本电脑获得了对酷睿i5-1240P的升级,并(最终)获得了哑光显示屏,我们将对这两者进行详细审查。
Alder Lake Intel Evo Laptop / Notebook

去年的 2021年模型基于 酷睿i7-1165G7在我们的审查中获得了88%的优秀分数。现在,LG已经发布了它有希望的继任者。主要的区别和改进是哑光显示屏,仍然使用16:10的长宽比,分辨率为1920 x 1200像素(仍然只有60赫兹)。至少在纸面上,CPU的升级看起来也是巨大的。2022年的机型没有使用四核英特尔Tiger Lake 芯片,而是使用12核英特尔Alder Lake 酷睿i5-1240P.Gram 14Z90Q的其余规格则不那么有趣。16GB内存和512GB NVMe固态硬盘在1000美元的价位上同样是标准配置(该设备起价约1080美元)。最后,Windows 11 Home是首选的操作系统。

LG Gram 14Z90Q (Gram Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-1240P 12 x 1.2 - 4.4 GHz, 43 W PL2 / Short Burst, 24 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-P
Graphics adapter
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Core: 1300 MHz, Memory: 2600 MHz, LPDDR5, 30.0.101.1369
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5-5200, dual channel, soldered (no expansion)
Display
14.00 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 162 PPI, LG LP140WU1-SPF1, IPS, glossy: no, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, 512 GB 
, M.2 NVMe SSD
Soundcard
Intel Alder Point-M/P PCH - HD Audio
Connections
2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 1x combined (headset/mic), Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 16.8 x 312 x 214
Battery
72 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: Full HD
Additional features
Speakers: 2.0, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 65-W power supply, Smart Assistant, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
980 g, Power Supply: 233 g
Price
1100 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Gram 14的竞争者包括其他重量低于1.5公斤(约3.3磅)的14英寸笔记本电脑,如 戴尔Latitude 7420或联想 Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IdeaPad 5 Pro 14.我们还包括去年的型号,以便进行比较。

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86.6 %
10/2022
LG Gram 14Z90Q
i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
980 g16.8 mm14.00"1920x1200
87.6 %
06/2022
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
1.3 kg14.6 mm14.00"2880x1800
90.1 %
04/2022
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
i5-1145G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
1.3 kg17.3 mm14.00"1920x1080
83.8 %
08/2022
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
1.4 kg16 mm14.00"2880x1800
88.3 %
06/2021
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
967 g16.8 mm14.00"1920x1200

案例

从外观上看,外壳没有什么变化。然而,LG现在使用更精致的字体来显示按键图例,并在机箱背面使用橡胶条而不是圆形橡胶脚,以提高稳定性。新机箱的制造质量很好。虽然根据制造商的说法,其表面由镁合金组成,感觉更像是塑料而不是金属,但Gram 14看起来相当高档。

也就是说,用户不应期望在刚性方面有太多的表现。在适度的压力下,键盘中心和触摸板区域都会有明显的弯曲。同样,盖子对来自角落的扭曲尝试的抵抗力也不是很强。不管怎么说,大多数用户还是应该认为对于这么薄的笔记本电脑来说,其刚性还是可以接受的。Gram 14的设计不值得批评。薄的外观(高度只有16.8毫米或约0.62英寸)、小边框、果断的设计语言和白色的配色方案使这款14英寸的设备非常有吸引力。

LG Gram 14
LG Gram 14
LG Gram 14

低重量是LG Gram的最大优势。980克(约2.16磅)使得设备非常轻便,这使得其竞争对手在1.3-1.4公斤(约2.87-3.09磅)时显得过时和沉重。几乎没有任何笔记本电脑能像Gram 14那样便携。

尺寸比较

321 mm 209 mm 17.3 mm 1.3 kg313.4 mm 215.2 mm 16.8 mm 967 g312 mm 214 mm 16.8 mm 980 g312 mm 221 mm 16 mm 1.4 kg312.4 mm 221.4 mm 14.6 mm 1.3 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性

端口

端口的选择与前一型号的类似。虽然一个音频插孔、一个HDMI输出(未指定版本)和两个带Power Delivery和DisplayPort或Thunderbolt 4的USB 4 type-C端口占据了左侧,但一个microSD读卡器、两个传统USB 3.2 type-A端口和一个Kensington锁位于右侧。由于两侧的端口都靠近背部,在使用外部鼠标时应该不会有干扰性电缆。

左边:HDMI,2个USB-C 4 gen 3x2(Power Delivery,DisplayPort,Thunderbolt 4),3.5mm
左边:HDMI,2个USB-C 4 gen 3x2(Power Delivery,DisplayPort,Thunderbolt 4),3.5mm
右边:microSD,2x USB-A 3.2 gen 2x1,Kensington锁
右边:microSD,2x USB-A 3.2 gen 2x1,Kensington锁

SD卡阅读器

读卡器的性能相当平均。在传输照片时,几乎是70MB/s,人们可能会将我们的测试设备与联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 14混淆。只有戴尔Latitude 7420能够明显超过其同行(近200MB/s)。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Intel Core i5-1145G7 (AV Pro V60)
196.8 MB/s +185%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
78 MB/s +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Intel Core i5-1135G7 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
72 MB/s +4%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
69 MB/s
Average of class Office
  (8 - 196.8, n=49, last 2 years)
55.8 MB/s -19%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Intel Core i5-1145G7 (AV Pro V60)
173.2 MB/s +95%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
90 MB/s +1%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
89 MB/s
Average of class Office
  (25 - 173.2, n=43, last 2 years)
65.6 MB/s -26%

沟通

一个英特尔模块处理无线网络。结合我们新的华硕参考路由器(我们没有竞争对手的结果),Wi-Fi 6E AX211达到了一个很好的范围。从1米(约3.28英尺)的距离接收数据时,1700Mb/s的传输率不值得批评。

Networking - iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1692 (860min - 1729max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (883 - 1857, n=166)
1492 MBit/s -12%
Average of class Office
  (609 - 1782, n=50, last 2 years)
1475 MBit/s -13%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
LG Gram 14Z90Q Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1663 (860-1729)

网络摄像头

不幸的是,该网络摄像头并不像全高清分辨率所显示的那样好。虽然较高的分辨率导致与许多竞争对手相比清晰度稍好,但就图像质量而言,它总体上是不够的(例如,由于色彩准确性差)。

ColorChecker
5.6 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
ColorChecker LG Gram 14Z90Q: 7.27 ∆E min: 1.91 - max: 12.26 ∆E

辅料

除了一些文件之外,笔记本电脑还配备了一个65瓦的充电器,它不仅非常紧凑(~9.5 x 6 x 2.5厘米/~3.74 x 2.36 x 0.98英寸),重量轻(~230克/~0.51磅),而且圆润漂亮,与白色机箱相匹配。

维护

由于底板上的螺丝隐藏在(胶合)橡胶部件下面,我们决定不打开设备(设备由商店提供)。YouTube上有拆解视频,其中显示了Gram 14的内部结构。

输入设备

键盘

鉴于其薄的结构,键盘的感觉出奇地好。与其他14英寸笔记本电脑相比,反馈和启动点分别清晰明了,而按键的响声可能相对较大。在正常的打字过程中,键盘几乎不产生变化。不一定要在图书馆等安静环境中打字的人,应该会对Gram 14感到满意。然而,在布局方面还有改进的余地。即使在ISO地区的机型上也有ANSI布局的回车键,而ISO地区的机型也有一个分体式的左移键。此外,将插入/删除和电源键合并在一起作为主键行的一部分是不太理想的。同时,狭窄的方向键不幸出现在许多其他笔记本电脑上。

当然,Gram 14的键盘还包括一个有两个亮度级别的背光。根据一天中的时间、观察角度和环境光线条件,白色按键和白色背光的组合会使按键的图例更难看。在这里,黑键或不同的背光颜色可能会更好。

LG Gram 14
LG Gram 14

触摸板

谈到触摸板,没有真正的惊喜--这是件好事。约11 x 7厘米(约4.33 x 2.76英寸),对于14英寸笔记本电脑来说,它足够大了。由于表面光滑,它提供了良好的滑行性能,同时使用起来也很舒适。键盘下半部分的集成按钮提供了适度的触觉反馈。与键盘类似,按键的咔哒声绝对是明显的。此外,点击板在四角附近可以更硬一些,在那里它可以被相对地推入机箱。支持的多点触摸手势在大多数时候都能可靠地工作。我们也没有发现输入的精确性问题。

显示

在显示屏方面,LG再次使用了自己的一个型号。无论是专业用户还是户外爱好者,都应该对LG用哑光版取代老款机型的光面面板的决定感到满意。

309
cd/m²
300
cd/m²
300
cd/m²
304
cd/m²
341
cd/m²
303
cd/m²
295
cd/m²
297
cd/m²
300
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LG LP140WU1-SPF1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 341 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 305.4 cd/m² Minimum: 23 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 341 cd/m²
Contrast: 1312:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.11 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.83
ΔE Greyscale 5.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
85.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.037
LG Gram 14Z90Q
LG LP140WU1-SPF1, IPS, 1920x1200, 14.00
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
LEN140WQ+, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Chi Mei CMN1416 CHF07 140HCG, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
LG Display LP140WU1-SPA1, IPS, 1920x1200, 14.00
Display
-10%
-17%
-13%
-1%
Display P3 Coverage
98.4
77.7
-21%
68
-31%
74
-25%
97.6
-1%
sRGB Coverage
99.9
100
0%
99
-1%
99.4
-1%
99.9
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
85.9
78.4
-9%
70
-19%
75
-13%
85.3
-1%
Response Times
27%
-11%
43%
6%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
47.5 ?(21.3, 26.2)
35.2 ?(16.8, 18.4)
26%
55 ?(24, 31)
-16%
29.4 ?(13.6, 15.8)
38%
45 ?(20, 25)
5%
Response Time Black / White *
24.5 ?(10.3, 14.2)
17.6 ?(6, 11.6)
28%
26 ?(11, 15)
-6%
13.1 ?(4.5, 8.6)
47%
23 ?(9, 14)
6%
PWM Frequency
Screen
6%
28%
0%
-17%
Brightness middle
341
469
38%
408
20%
403
18%
352
3%
Brightness
305
445
46%
378
24%
372
22%
332
9%
Brightness Distribution
87
90
3%
86
-1%
84
-3%
91
5%
Black Level *
0.26
0.22
15%
0.3
-15%
0.22
15%
Contrast
1312
1855
41%
1343
2%
1600
22%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.11
3.5
-13%
1.54
50%
2.74
12%
2.89
7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.29
5.3
36%
2.72
67%
4.49
46%
4.66
44%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.83
1.7
-105%
1.08
-30%
1.77
-113%
2.7
-225%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.3
3.3
38%
1.95
63%
3.6
32%
6.9
-30%
Gamma
2.037 108%
1.97 112%
2.33 94%
2.199 100%
2.34 94%
CCT
7571 86%
6512 100%
6806 96%
6547 99%
7904 82%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
76
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
Total Average (Program / Settings)
8% / 6%
0% / 13%
10% / 3%
-4% / -10%

* ... smaller is better

虽然305尼特的平均亮度与前代产品(332尼特)相比略低,但在许多情况下,屏幕内容明显更容易辨别,眼睛疲劳也减少了。同样,稍低的对比度(1312:1对1600:1)和稍差的黑值(0.26对0.22尼特)可能会被大多数用户看作是对非光面的值得的权衡。

卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:饱和度
卡尔曼:饱和度
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN:灰度(校准的)。
CalMAN:灰度(校准的)。
CalMAN: 饱和度(已校准)
CalMAN: 饱和度(已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)

在其他方面,这两块面板的表现相当相似,考虑到它们相似的ID(LP140WU1),这可能不是一个巧合。100%的DCI-P3色彩空间覆盖率和色彩准确度在出厂时都非常好,只有微弱的蓝色调(我们校准的ICC文件可在照度图的右边下载)。

LG Gram 14与sRGB对比
LG Gram 14与sRGB对比
LG Gram 14 VS AdobeRGB
LG Gram 14 VS AdobeRGB
LG Gram 14 vs P3
LG Gram 14 vs P3

该显示器的响应时间不太令人印象深刻。差不多25到48毫秒代表了一个相对较差的数值,对于游戏来说并不理想。在这里,一些竞争性的14英寸笔记本电脑(如联想的设备)表现更好。我们还希望下一代的显示屏能有略高的最大亮度,达到400尼特或更高,因为一些竞争对手已经能够达到这个数值。由于采用了底层IPS技术,LG Gram 14的可视角度很好。我们没有发现PWM闪烁或类似问题。

对话
对话
子像素阵列
子像素阵列
视角
视角

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.3 ms rise
↘ 14.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 52 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
47.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.3 ms rise
↘ 26.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

业绩

就性能而言,LG Gram 14是一款中档设备。制造商使用了均衡的组件组合,这--在游戏和其他3D应用之外--使超极本相当灵活。

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO

测试条件

预装的、组织良好的智能助手包含各种系统设置。大多数重要的设置都可以直接在第一个菜单中找到。散热曲线在很大程度上影响了性能和噪音特性。除非另有说明,我们使用默认设置正常进行了以下所有的基准测试。

LG Gram 14Z90Q
LG Gram 14Z90Q
LG Gram 14Z90Q
LG Gram 14Z90Q
LG Gram 14Z90Q
LG Gram 14Z90Q
散热情况 静音 正常
CPU PL1 (HWiNFO) 8瓦 12瓦 24瓦 28瓦
CPU PL2 (HWiNFO) 43 watts 43 watts 43 watts 43 watts

处理器

在使用正常模式时,CPU的性能令人失望。即使酷睿i5-1240P在名义上比老款的酷睿i5-1165G7快得多,其基准测试结果也只是略高。这非常令人惊讶,因为Alder Lake模型将第11代CPU的8个线程增加了一倍(4个性能核心支持超线程)。

为了获得明显更好的结果,必须将Gram 14设置为热配置文件 "高",这将极大地提高性能。在Cinebench R15多线程中,1500分而不是950分代表了几乎60%的改进。然而,这仍然使Gram 14落后于配备相同CPU的联想Yoga Slim 7i Pro。看来Gram 14的冷却解决方案在Core i5-1240P上已经达到极限。

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
LG Gram 14Z90Q Intel Core i5-1240P: Ø761 (596.7-950.07)
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 Intel Core i5-1240P: Ø1675 (1651.8-1830.66)
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH Intel Core i5-1145G7: Ø663 (583.12-791.56)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 Intel Core i5-1135G7: Ø800 (749.43-941.13)
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø602 (507.87-688.11)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Intel Core i5-1240P
85 pt
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
 
66.5 pt
Average of class Office
 
66.5 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Intel Core i5-1135G7
54.1 pt
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P
53.2 pt
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Intel Core i5-1145G7
51.4 pt
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7
50.9 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Intel Core i5-1240P
11266 Points +281%
Average of class Office
  (1056 - 15743, n=121, last 2 years)
8030 Points +172%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (277 - 11556, n=20)
7949 Points +169%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Intel Core i5-1135G7
5647 Points +91%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Intel Core i5-1145G7
4769 Points +61%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7
4170 (4112.7min - 4169.54max) Points +41%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P
2957 Points
Single Core
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Intel Core i5-1240P
1663 Points +108%
Average of class Office
  (529 - 1995, n=120, last 2 years)
1451 Points +82%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (640 - 1689, n=18)
1436 Points +80%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Intel Core i5-1145G7
1388 Points +74%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1360 Points +70%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1306 Points +64%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P
798 Points
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Intel Core i5-1240P
4208 Points +265%
Average of class Office
  (356 - 5904, n=119, last 2 years)
3085 Points +168%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (763 - 4456, n=16)
3077 Points +167%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Intel Core i5-1135G7
2173 Points +89%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Intel Core i5-1145G7
1693 Points +47%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1663 Points +44%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P
1152 Points
CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Intel Core i5-1240P
633 Points +52%
Average of class Office
  (181.3 - 764, n=119, last 2 years)
558 Points +34%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (251 - 653, n=16)
549 Points +32%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Intel Core i5-1145G7
531 Points +28%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Intel Core i5-1135G7
520 Points +25%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7
505 Points +21%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P
416 Points
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Intel Core i5-1240P
1831 (1651.8min - 1830.66max) Points +93%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (407 - 2007, n=19)
1487 Points +57%
Average of class Office
  (160.8 - 2642, n=119, last 2 years)
1392 Points +47%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P
950 (596.7min - 950.07max) Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Intel Core i5-1135G7
941 (749.43min - 941.13max) Points -1%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Intel Core i5-1145G7
792 (583.12min - 791.56max) Points -17%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7
688 (507.87min - 688.11max) Points -28%
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Intel Core i5-1240P
236 Points +16%
Average of class Office
  (82.6 - 284, n=117, last 2 years)
216 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (91.8 - 243, n=18)
205 Points +1%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7
203 Points 0%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Intel Core i5-1145G7
203 Points 0%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P
203 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Intel Core i5-1135G7
198.3 Points -2%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7
713 Seconds * -37%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Intel Core i5-1145G7
681 Seconds * -31%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Intel Core i5-1135G7
577 Seconds * -11%
Average of class Office
  (214 - 2844, n=119, last 2 years)
535 Seconds * -3%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P
519 Seconds *
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (285 - 1926, n=16)
503 Seconds * +3%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Intel Core i5-1240P
289 Seconds * +44%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Intel Core i5-1240P
47002 MIPS +69%
Average of class Office
  (4226 - 62349, n=120, last 2 years)
34626 MIPS +24%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (7254 - 47002, n=16)
33739 MIPS +21%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P
27875 MIPS
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Intel Core i5-1135G7
23957 MIPS -14%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7
20624 MIPS -26%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Intel Core i5-1145G7
20565 MIPS -26%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Office
  (2233 - 6687, n=120, last 2 years)
5007 MIPS +10%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Intel Core i5-1240P
4949 MIPS +9%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7
4883 MIPS +7%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Intel Core i5-1145G7
4751 MIPS +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Intel Core i5-1135G7
4716 MIPS +3%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P
4560 MIPS
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (2197 - 5320, n=16)
4528 MIPS -1%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Intel Core i5-1240P
9639 Points +23%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P
7848 Points
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (1763 - 10112, n=15)
7594 Points -3%
Average of class Office
  (1018 - 11980, n=121, last 2 years)
6590 Points -16%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Intel Core i5-1145G7
5055 Points -36%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5040 Points -36%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Intel Core i5-1135G7
4657 Points -41%
Single-Core
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P
1619 Points
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Intel Core i5-1240P
1581 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (672 - 1658, n=15)
1523 Points -6%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1518 Points -6%
Average of class Office
  (510 - 1974, n=121, last 2 years)
1468 Points -9%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Intel Core i5-1145G7
1430 Points -12%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1376 Points -15%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Intel Core i5-1240P
12.7 fps +75%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (1.99 - 12.9, n=16)
9.26 fps +28%
Average of class Office
  (1.55 - 17.4, n=119, last 2 years)
9.18 fps +27%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P
7.24 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Intel Core i5-1135G7
6.51 fps -10%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5.5 fps -24%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Intel Core i5-1145G7
5.46 fps -25%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (46.4 - 120.5, n=16)
58.7 s * -11%
Average of class Office
  (31.3 - 117.5, n=119, last 2 years)
56.7 s * -7%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Intel Core i5-1135G7
56.4 s * -6%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Intel Core i5-1145G7
53.4 s * -1%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P
53 s *
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Intel Core i5-1240P
51.7 s * +2%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7
45.3 s * +15%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.655 sec * -16%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Intel Core i5-1135G7
0.629 sec * -12%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Intel Core i5-1145G7
0.627 sec * -11%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (0.4987 - 1.236, n=16)
0.6 sec * -6%
Average of class Office
  (0.4244 - 1.397, n=118, last 2 years)
0.588 sec * -4%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P
0.564 sec *
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Intel Core i5-1240P
0.513 sec * +9%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
950 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
77.5 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
203 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Average of class Office
 
87.1 pt
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
82.6 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
76 pt
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Intel Core i5-1145G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
74.4 pt
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
 
72.6 pt
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
65.2 pt
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
57.2 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Office
  (763 - 24250, n=119, last 2 years)
8353 KRay/s +43%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
7952 KRay/s +36%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Intel Core i5-1145G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
6854 KRay/s +17%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (2405 - 9694, n=16)
6144 KRay/s +5%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
6118 KRay/s +5%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
5852 KRay/s
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
5427 KRay/s -7%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Office
  (4027 - 102228, n=119, last 2 years)
44699 Points +107%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
32283 Points +50%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (7407 - 49934, n=16)
30385 Points +41%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
28585 Points +33%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Intel Core i5-1145G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
28393 Points +32%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
22797 Points +6%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
21570 Points
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
2171 MB/s +110%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
2039 MB/s +97%
Average of class Office
  (279 - 4442, n=118, last 2 years)
1940 MB/s +87%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Intel Core i5-1145G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
1931 MB/s +86%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (415 - 2462, n=16)
1672 MB/s +61%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1530 MB/s +48%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
1036 MB/s
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
74173 Points +2%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
72893 Points
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (29405 - 76736, n=16)
67563 Points -7%
Average of class Office
  (8031 - 113016, n=119, last 2 years)
67458 Points -7%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
49653 Points -32%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Intel Core i5-1145G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
48647 Points -33%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
46549 Points -36%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Office
  (404 - 14288, n=119, last 2 years)
6752 Points +62%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
6520 Points +57%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (2135 - 6540, n=16)
5093 Points +23%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Intel Core i5-1145G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
4648 Points +12%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
4441 Points +7%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
4156 Points
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
4030 Points -3%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average of class Office
  (2054 - 54365, n=119, last 2 years)
23572 Points +95%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
19635 Points +63%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Intel Core i5-1145G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
17210 Points +43%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
16602 Points +38%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (5113 - 23992, n=16)
15922 Points +32%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
13870 Points +15%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
12059 Points
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
67919 MB/s +200%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Intel Core i5-1145G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
63071 MB/s +179%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
56451 MB/s +149%
Average of class Office
  (5226 - 147611, n=119, last 2 years)
47448 MB/s +110%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
44814 MB/s +98%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (8849 - 90370, n=16)
40001 MB/s +77%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
22645 MB/s
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
807 MB/s +161%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (101.6 - 812, n=16)
558 MB/s +81%
Average of class Office
  (67.6 - 1018, n=119, last 2 years)
533 MB/s +72%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
367 MB/s +19%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Intel Core i5-1145G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
366 MB/s +18%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
309 MB/s
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
281 MB/s -9%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Office
  (432 - 12755, n=119, last 2 years)
4455 KRay/s +43%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
4291 KRay/s +38%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Intel Core i5-1145G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
3694 KRay/s +18%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
3499 KRay/s +12%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (1154 - 5258, n=16)
3360 KRay/s +8%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
3118 KRay/s
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2763 KRay/s -11%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
44325 MPixel/s +88%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
37132 MPixel/s +57%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Intel Core i5-1145G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
35895 MPixel/s +52%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (11873 - 43661, n=16)
31199 MPixel/s +32%
Average of class Office
  (4814 - 48177, n=119, last 2 years)
24080 MPixel/s +2%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
23597 MPixel/s
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
17059 MPixel/s -28%

系统性能

从系统性能结果来看,CPU性能不佳并不明显。在PCMark 10中获得5049分,我们的测试设备排在Yoga Slim之后,排名第二。请注意,存储速度对这个基准的影响很大。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Office
  (2325 - 7157, n=104, last 2 years)
5340 Points +6%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5206 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (4881 - 5345, n=11)
5098 Points +1%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5049 Points
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1145G7, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
4959 Points -2%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
4877 Points -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
4705 Points -7%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
10170 Points +7%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
9877 Points +4%
Average of class Office
  (5095 - 20841, n=104, last 2 years)
9828 Points +3%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1145G7, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
9789 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (8890 - 10652, n=11)
9745 Points +2%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
9541 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
8877 Points -7%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average of class Office
  (3041 - 10198, n=104, last 2 years)
7453 Points +17%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
6834 Points +7%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1145G7, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
6585 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (6118 - 7058, n=11)
6511 Points +2%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6372 Points
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6344 Points 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
6248 Points -2%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6112 Points +6%
Average of class Office
  (1912 - 9056, n=104, last 2 years)
5782 Points +1%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5746 Points
Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (5169 - 6213, n=11)
5678 Points -1%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1145G7, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
5135 Points -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
5098 Points -11%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
4529 Points -21%
CrossMark / Overall
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1502 Points
Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (1392 - 1553, n=7)
1485 Points
Average of class Office
  (348 - 1891, n=104, last 2 years)
1313 Points
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1145G7, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
1290 Points
CrossMark / Productivity
Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (1393 - 1524, n=7)
1448 Points
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1440 Points
Average of class Office
  (393 - 1870, n=104, last 2 years)
1330 Points
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1145G7, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
1316 Points
CrossMark / Creativity
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1639 Points
Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (1426 - 1647, n=7)
1567 Points
Average of class Office
  (340 - 1982, n=104, last 2 years)
1348 Points
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1145G7, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
1292 Points
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (1267 - 1545, n=7)
1370 Points
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1316 Points
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1145G7, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
1209 Points
Average of class Office
  (258 - 2017, n=104, last 2 years)
1184 Points
PCMark 10 Score
5049 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
64363 MB/s +23%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
60605 MB/s +16%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Intel Core i5-1145G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
56359 MB/s +8%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (23312 - 70537, n=16)
52845 MB/s +1%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
52165 MB/s
Average of class Office
  (7158 - 84290, n=120, last 2 years)
42295 MB/s -19%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
34427 MB/s -34%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
70553 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
63937 MB/s -9%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
63778 MB/s -10%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (18989 - 70553, n=16)
55934 MB/s -21%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Intel Core i5-1145G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
55797 MB/s -21%
Average of class Office
  (7325 - 75550, n=120, last 2 years)
42852 MB/s -39%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
40911 MB/s -42%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
66352 MB/s +8%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
61603 MB/s
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Intel Core i5-1145G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
57438 MB/s -7%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
56155 MB/s -9%
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (23454 - 62496, n=16)
52794 MB/s -14%
Average of class Office
  (7579 - 94965, n=120, last 2 years)
46139 MB/s -25%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
42480 MB/s -31%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
116.1 ns *
Average Intel Core i5-1240P
  (85.1 - 188.3, n=11)
113.4 ns * +2%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Intel Core i5-1145G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
97.6 ns * +16%
Average of class Office
  (44.3 - 188.3, n=121, last 2 years)
96.5 ns * +17%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
89.9 ns * +23%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
84.5 ns * +27%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

竞争对手和LG Gram 14都存在不理想的延迟。根据LatencyMon,该系统似乎不大适合实时音频和视频编辑。

延迟监测
延迟监测
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
1338.4 μs * -27%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
1159 μs * -10%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1051.7 μs *
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1145G7, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
1045 μs * +1%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
962.2 μs * +9%

* ... smaller is better

存储解决方案

只要固态硬盘不持续受压(在长时间的测试中出现了较大的波动),安装的512-GB三星硬盘表现良好。在这个类别中,根据我们的性能评级,LG Gram 14是我们比较中最快的设备。在DiskSpd基准测试中,去年型号的SK海力士SSD明显落后。

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6771 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3973 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 348.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 277.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 3487 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2801 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 81.46 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 132.4 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
 
86.3 pt
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
82.9 pt
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
70.7 pt
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
67.1 pt
Average of class Office
 
58.1 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
54.4 pt
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
52.9 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3966 (3953.76min - 3966.17max) MB/s
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3768 (3710.83min - 3767.76max) MB/s -5%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (1472 - 4572, n=39)
3501 MB/s -12%
Average of class Office
  (482 - 4315, n=104, last 2 years)
2440 MB/s -38%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
2253 (2249.1min - 2253.29max) MB/s -43%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
2220 (2145.39min - 2220.25max) MB/s -44%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
1750 (1744.62min - 1750.49max) MB/s -56%
seq write
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3797 (3779.06min - 3796.85max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (1148 - 4434, n=39)
3289 MB/s -13%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2781 (2714.16min - 2781.13max) MB/s -27%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
2509 (2423.65min - 2509.03max) MB/s -34%
Average of class Office
  (333 - 5842, n=104, last 2 years)
2344 MB/s -38%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
2214 (2166.78min - 2213.54max) MB/s -42%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
1791 (1770.42min - 1790.56max) MB/s -53%
seq q8 t1 read
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6746 (6416.62min - 6746.33max) MB/s
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6661 (5743.73min - 6661.18max) MB/s -1%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (3387 - 6793, n=39)
6077 MB/s -10%
Average of class Office
  (535 - 7120, n=104, last 2 years)
3971 MB/s -41%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
3547 (3319.03min - 3546.53max) MB/s -47%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
3447 (3095.92min - 3447.32max) MB/s -49%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
3415 (3087.54min - 3415.21max) MB/s -49%
seq q8 t1 write
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4883 (4828.47min - 4882.8max) MB/s
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4864 (4851.08min - 4863.92max) MB/s 0%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (1146 - 5091, n=39)
4428 MB/s -9%
Average of class Office
  (276 - 6791, n=104, last 2 years)
2976 MB/s -39%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
2708 (2655.41min - 2707.84max) MB/s -45%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
2519 (2396.21min - 2519.09max) MB/s -48%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
2484 (2203.9min - 2484.29max) MB/s -49%
4k q1 t1 read
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
86.4 (86.03min - 86.38max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (37.6 - 92.9, n=39)
71.9 MB/s -17%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
69.5 (68.59min - 69.54max) MB/s -20%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
64 (63.55min - 63.98max) MB/s -26%
Average of class Office
  (17.7 - 89.9, n=104, last 2 years)
57.6 MB/s -33%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
52.5 (51.57min - 52.48max) MB/s -39%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
49.8 (49.46min - 49.8max) MB/s -42%
4k q1 t1 write
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
209 (205.73min - 209.33max) MB/s
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
192 (187.4min - 191.8max) MB/s -8%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (125.7 - 241, n=39)
180.3 MB/s -14%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
162 (155.31min - 161.61max) MB/s -22%
Average of class Office
  (32 - 429, n=104, last 2 years)
161 MB/s -23%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
144.4 (143.76min - 144.36max) MB/s -31%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
138.6 (137.42min - 138.64max) MB/s -34%
4k q32 t16 read
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3394 (2656.47min - 3393.51max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (477 - 3426, n=39)
2058 MB/s -39%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
1950 (1633.62min - 1949.6max) MB/s -43%
Average of class Office
  (184.2 - 4425, n=104, last 2 years)
1243 MB/s -63%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
1115 (1014.13min - 1115.15max) MB/s -67%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
691 (681.8min - 690.6max) MB/s -80%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
648 (644.66min - 648.41max) MB/s -81%
4k q32 t16 write
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2078 (1577.94min - 2078.28max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (253 - 3567, n=39)
1535 MB/s -26%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
1508 (1337.98min - 1507.57max) MB/s -27%
Average of class Office
  (192.2 - 3254, n=104, last 2 years)
920 MB/s -56%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
448 (415.71min - 447.54max) MB/s -78%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
425 (413.55min - 425.3max) MB/s -80%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
301 (294.12min - 300.61max) MB/s -86%
AS SSD
Score Total
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (3573 - 8620, n=38)
5933 Points +59%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
4579 Points +23%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4305 Points +16%
Average of class Office
  (704 - 9204, n=101, last 2 years)
3939 Points +6%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
3804 Points +2%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3721 Points
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
2980 Points -20%
Score Read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (1079 - 3224, n=38)
2099 Points +95%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
1886 Points +75%
Average of class Office
  (252 - 3364, n=101, last 2 years)
1419 Points +32%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
1400 Points +30%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
1260 Points +17%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1214 Points +13%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1079 Points
Score Write
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (1258 - 4036, n=38)
2819 Points +29%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2586 Points +19%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2177 Points
Average of class Office
  (320 - 4111, n=101, last 2 years)
1837 Points -16%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
1811 Points -17%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
1741 Points -20%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
1124 Points -48%
Seq Read
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4783.77 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (2629 - 5546, n=38)
4658 MB/s -3%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4353.7 MB/s -9%
Average of class Office
  (508 - 5796, n=101, last 2 years)
3148 MB/s -34%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
2975 MB/s -38%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
2729.13 MB/s -43%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
2674 MB/s -44%
Seq Write
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (1108 - 3925, n=38)
2766 MB/s +6%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2602.13 MB/s
Average of class Office
  (304 - 5880, n=101, last 2 years)
2054 MB/s -21%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1626.07 MB/s -38%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
1498.34 MB/s -42%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
1311 MB/s -50%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
1261 MB/s -52%
4K Read
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
68.4 MB/s 0%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
68.29 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (39.2 - 85.1, n=38)
67.8 MB/s -1%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
67.66 MB/s -1%
Average of class Office
  (18.7 - 91.1, n=101, last 2 years)
56.3 MB/s -18%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
49.97 MB/s -27%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
47.21 MB/s -31%
4K Write
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
183.7 MB/s +24%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (105.4 - 216, n=38)
174.9 MB/s +18%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
168.4 MB/s +14%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
162.16 MB/s +10%
Average of class Office
  (35.4 - 350, n=101, last 2 years)
158.3 MB/s +7%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
147.74 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
137.18 MB/s -7%
4K-64 Read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (533 - 2783, n=38)
1566 MB/s +194%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
1539 MB/s +189%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
1080.27 MB/s +103%
Average of class Office
  (182.3 - 2713, n=101, last 2 years)
1047 MB/s +97%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
924 MB/s +73%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
710.74 MB/s +33%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
532.76 MB/s
4K-64 Write
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (1010 - 3480, n=38)
2393 MB/s +35%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2261.7 MB/s +28%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1768.8 MB/s
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
1517 MB/s -14%
Average of class Office
  (132.3 - 3394, n=101, last 2 years)
1474 MB/s -17%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
1454.31 MB/s -18%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
809 MB/s -54%
Access Time Read
Average of class Office
  (0.022 - 0.295, n=101, last 2 years)
0.08048 ms * -92%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
0.08 ms * -90%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
0.075 ms * -79%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.052 ms * -24%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (0.023 - 0.089, n=37)
0.048 ms * -14%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.042 ms *
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
0.036 ms * +14%
Access Time Write
Average of class Office
  (0.017 - 0.619, n=101, last 2 years)
0.0646 ms * -115%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (0.02 - 0.076, n=38)
0.03368 ms * -12%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
0.031 ms * -3%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.03 ms *
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
0.029 ms * +3%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
0.026 ms * +13%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.025 ms * +17%

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

034068010201360170020402380272030603400374040804420476051005440578061206460Tooltip
LG Gram 14Z90Q: Ø5624 (3286.38-6736.26)

GPU性能

这款14英寸的笔记本电脑必须在没有dGPU的情况下进行。由于 Iris Xe Graphics G7的Iris Xe Graphics G7只有80个EUs,而老款的Core i5-1165G7则没有。 Iris Xe的96个EUs,因此GPU基准测试得分略低。在3DMark基准测试中,前者的GPU性能平均快40%左右。尽管被限制在相同的EU数,联想Yoga Slim 7i Pro也更快(约15%),这反映出Gram 14的冷却解决方案和性能管理不佳。

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
100 pt
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
84.1 pt
Average of class Office
 
81.1 pt
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
80.7 pt
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
74.2 pt
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
 
72.1 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
66.3 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
6718 Points +49%
Average of class Office
  (1474 - 12230, n=113, last 2 years)
5932 Points +32%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
5737 Points +27%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
5644 Points +25%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (2246 - 6477, n=105)
5167 Points +15%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
5069 Points +13%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
4501 Points
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
30164 Points +21%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
25745 Points +3%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
24879 Points
Average of class Office
  (5681 - 58068, n=96, last 2 years)
24181 Points -3%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
23003 Points -8%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (6361 - 30894, n=92)
21769 Points -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
18932 Points -24%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
5694 Points +63%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
4584 Points +31%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
4458 Points +27%
Average of class Office
  (712 - 8815, n=115, last 2 years)
4125 Points +18%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (1560 - 5305, n=107)
3782 Points +8%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
3499 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
3260 Points -7%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
1604 Points +16%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
1378 Points
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
1367 Points -1%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
1350 Points -2%
Average of class Office
  (242 - 3186, n=111, last 2 years)
1341 Points -3%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (561 - 1511, n=104)
1170 Points -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
1120 Points -19%
3DMark 11 Performance
4423 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
85803 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
17819 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
3338 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
1542 points
Help

游戏性能

游戏基准测试描绘了类似的画面。我们的14英寸笔记本电脑不仅与它的前辈和联想设备相比有差距,3D性能也有波动,因为我们的我们的Witcher 3循环测试显示(见图)。总的来说,80-EU版本的Iris Xe Graphics G7只适合在较低的设置和分辨率下用于旧的和/或要求不高的游戏。即使在最低或中等细节下,现代游戏也很少能在1920 x 1200的原始分辨率下播放。

The Witcher 3
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7
56.1 fps +85%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P
52.1 fps +71%
Average of class Office
  (7.82 - 89, n=96, last 2 years)
44.9 fps +48%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (21.8 - 56.9, n=100)
41.8 fps +38%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7
37.6 (27min) fps +24%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1145G7
37.5 fps +23%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P
30.4 (24min) fps
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7
29.3 fps +24%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P
27.4 fps +16%
Average of class Office
  (3.49 - 59.1, n=102, last 2 years)
24.6 fps +4%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P
23.6 (19min) fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (9.3 - 33.5, n=98)
21.5 fps -9%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7
17.6 (12min) fps -25%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1145G7
16.5 fps -30%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7
15.8 fps +27%
Average of class Office
  (2.66 - 34, n=109, last 2 years)
13.4 fps +8%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P
13.2 (12min, 12P1) fps +6%
LG Gram 14Z90Q
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P
12.4 (10min) fps
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1145G7
11.2 fps -10%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (6.26 - 15.7, n=88)
11.1 fps -10%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7
10.4 (7min) fps -16%

Witcher 3 FPS Graph

01234567891011121314Tooltip
LG Gram 14Z90Q i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs: Ø11.4 (7-14)
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs: Ø13.2 (12-14)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs: Ø11 (9-12)
low med. high ultra
GTA V (2015) 66.6 57.9 14.5
The Witcher 3 (2015) 46.8 30.4 23.6 12.4
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 104 67.6 33.3 30.7
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 31.9 16.6 16.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 38.4 25.2 24.5
Far Cry 5 (2018) 24 18 14
Strange Brigade (2018) 68.6 23.3 20.4
F1 22 (2022) 21 20 17

排放

系统噪音

系统噪音的结果是好坏参半。尽管Gram 14在使用 "低 "散热模式时保持相当安静,但在使用 "正常 "模式时,即使在简单的任务中,如视频流或网络浏览,风扇偶尔也会变得很明显(以下数值是在这种模式下测量的)。在35至36 dB(A)的情况下,风扇在负载下明显引人注目(尤其是风扇的噪音相当高),并超过了前代产品的31 dB(A)峰值。

对于对噪音敏感的用户来说,静音模式是最理想的,因为其描述非常准确。不幸的是,性能上的缺陷是如此之大(处理器在一段时间后会节流到400MHz),以至于系统每次都会挂掉几秒钟,视频也会出现卡顿或冻结。在这里,LG仍有一些工作要做。无法使用的静音模式是我们对该设备的最大问题之一。如果没有这个问题,Gram 14本可以成为静音系统爱好者的一个好选择。

Noise Level

Idle
26 / 27 / 28 dB(A)
Load
35 / 36 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.53835.438.539.22535.73535.336.437.13146.445.142.844.347.84032.229.229.628.631.95038.926.739.838.839.5633024.931.425.827.78029.717.919.218.929.110020.617.818.217.221.212527.318.916.716.22716025.917.920.41827.520024.422.122.820.928.525023.620.918.917.925.331523.415.616.414.624.340022.214.514.711.922.150024.416.114.31224.76302414.914.511.92480024.214.413.610.924.110002315.113.411.622.9125024.517.315.711.625160024.515.414.811.524.7200025.914.413.211.926.7250026.414.213.51226.8315023.113.51413.423.5400022.213.213.512.922.2500022.613.614.413.622.5630019.114.114.513.819.3800016.213.914.413.716.11000015.813.514.614.114.41250014.81314.913.613.21600013.112.713.411.812.3SPL35.62726.725.136N2.30.90.80.62.4median 23.4median 14.5median 14.5median 13.4median 24Delta2.51.51.42.23hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseLG Gram 14Z90Q
LG Gram 14Z90Q
i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
i5-1145G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
Noise
1%
-6%
-5%
6%
off / environment *
25
23.7
5%
25.3
-1%
25
-0%
26
-4%
Idle Minimum *
26
23.7
9%
25.3
3%
25
4%
26
-0%
Idle Average *
27
25.1
7%
25.3
6%
27
-0%
26
4%
Idle Maximum *
28
25.1
10%
25.3
10%
29
-4%
26
7%
Load Average *
35
38.4
-10%
44.9
-28%
39
-11%
30.5
13%
Witcher 3 ultra *
36
38.4
-7%
38
-6%
Load Maximum *
36
39.4
-9%
44.9
-25%
42
-17%
30.5
15%

* ... smaller is better

温度

温度的发展可以说是温和的。在空转时,整个机箱保持在30-°C(86°F)的标志以下,因此相对凉爽。在3D使用过程中,热点温度略高于40°C,也仍然可以接受。

Max. Load
 42 °C43 °C43 °C 
 42 °C42 °C34 °C 
 29 °C27 °C27 °C 
Maximum: 43 °C
Average: 36.8 °C
45 °C44 °C36 °C
39 °C39 °C35 °C
29 °C32 °C29 °C
Maximum: 45 °C
Average: 36.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  37 °C | Room Temperature 19 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29 °C / 84.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-1.3 °C / -2.3 F).
LG Gram 14Z90Q
i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
i5-1145G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
Heat
-5%
7%
-8%
5%
Maximum Upper Side *
43
42.3
2%
37.1
14%
42
2%
47.2
-10%
Maximum Bottom *
45
52.8
-17%
38.7
14%
45
-0%
45.8
-2%
Idle Upper Side *
27
27.1
-0%
27.3
-1%
34
-26%
23.8
12%
Idle Bottom *
28
29.1
-4%
28.1
-0%
30
-7%
22.9
18%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

虽然在我们用FurMark和Prime95进行的60分钟压力测试中,CPU和iGPU都不得不大幅降低其时钟速度,但Core i5-1240P在70°C(158°F)左右时并没有变得非常热。

压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3

发言人

2.0设置听起来很好,甚至比其他大多数笔记本电脑更好--不管是什么类别和外形因素。像往常一样,在涉及到低音的时候,也有弱点。这台14英寸笔记本电脑的最大音量为85 dB(A),很扎实。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.537.32536.436.93144.347.94028.631.95038.839.66325.830.58018.923.410017.228.712516.238.71601846.120020.953.325017.962.231514.662.640011.967.65001273.163011.97580010.975.8100011.673125011.672.5160011.573.3200011.970.825001266.7315013.463.1400012.962500013.675.3630013.878800013.775.11000014.174.51250013.671.51600011.873.8SPL25.185.2N0.664.8median 13.4median 71.5Delta2.26.325.625.830.126.325.923.12729.122.526.920.723.719.721.918.728.916.733.515.837.215.844.51550.51453.813.456.812.260.711.763.511.668.511.368.410.764.810.26210.665.711.162.311.359.911.762.311.756.912.256.91260.51264.711.962.711.46223.775.60.536.3median 11.9median 60.71.86.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLG Gram 14Z90QLenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
LG Gram 14Z90Q audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理

能源消耗

Gram 14非常经济。闲置期间只有6瓦,它做得非常好,比Yoga Slim 7i Pro更好,后者在负载下也会消耗更多的电力(以换取更好的性能)。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.4 /  Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3 / 6 / 12 Watt
Load midlight 40 / 63 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
LG Gram 14Z90Q
i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
i5-1145G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
Average of class Office
 
Power Consumption
-26%
10%
-19%
23%
-7%
Idle Minimum *
3
5.6
-87%
2.7
10%
5
-67%
2.5
17%
4.28 ?(2.2 - 9.6, n=106, last 2 years)
-43%
Idle Average *
6
9.3
-55%
6
-0%
7
-17%
5.3
12%
7.34 ?(3.8 - 20.6, n=106, last 2 years)
-22%
Idle Maximum *
12
9.6
20%
7.6
37%
13
-8%
9.5
21%
9.11 ?(4.8 - 23.9, n=106, last 2 years)
24%
Load Average *
40
49
-23%
37
7%
41
-3%
26.2
34%
40.8 ?(8.7 - 75.2, n=105, last 2 years)
-2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
36.5
38.2
-5%
33.2
9%
40.1
-10%
Load Maximum *
63
65.2
-3%
65
-3%
68
-8%
42.8
32%
57.8 ?(11.1 - 101.4, n=106, last 2 years)
8%

* ... smaller is better

Energy Consumption Witcher 3 / Stress Test

0510152025303540455055Tooltip
LG Gram 14Z90Q; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø36.5 (28.1-56.4)
LG Gram 14Z90Q; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø28.4 (20.8-36.6)

Energy Consumption external Monitor

051015202530354045Tooltip
LG Gram 14Z90Q; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø27.7 (18-33.7)
LG Gram 14Z90Q; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø34.2 (30.2-48.8)
LG Gram 14Z90Q; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø29.6 (23.4-34.6)
LG Gram 14Z90Q; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø20.3 (18.4-26.1)

电池寿命

除了重量低之外,长的电池寿命是Gram的最大优势之一。尽管最新的Gram 14不能像其前辈那样持续很长时间,但在理想条件下(最低亮度,禁用Wi-Fi,空闲)长达29小时仍是一个出色的结果。即使在中等亮度下浏览网页,这款14英寸超极本也能持续12个小时,非常值得称赞。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
28h 56min
WiFi Websurfing
11h 52min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 49min
LG Gram 14Z90Q
i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 72 Wh
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 61 Wh
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
i5-1145G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 63 Wh
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 56.5 Wh
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 72 Wh
Average of class Office
 
Battery Runtime
-46%
-3%
-38%
39%
-21%
Reader / Idle
1736
1411
-19%
2925
68%
1435 ?(527 - 2359, n=22, last 2 years)
-17%
WiFi v1.3
712
517
-27%
848
19%
442
-38%
854
20%
594 ?(300 - 1137, n=106, last 2 years)
-17%
Load
169
61
-64%
155
-8%
219
30%
119.4 ?(56 - 218, n=65, last 2 years)
-29%
H.264
643
1149
699 ?(348 - 1112, n=39, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 哑光16:10显示屏
+ 良好的电池寿命
+ 良好的输入设备
+ 令人难以置信的轻巧
+ 紧凑的机箱
+ 圆滑的设计
+ 雷电4
+ 优秀的扬声器

Cons

- i5-1240P的性能不理想
- 负载下的噪音明显高于前代产品
- 难以维护
- 焊接的内存(不可扩展)
- 无法使用的静音模式

判决书

LG Gram 14Z90Q回顾
LG Gram 14Z90Q回顾

Gram 14的2022年型号再次成为一款伟大的14英寸笔记本电脑。

这款轻巧的设备在大多数类别中都取得了良好到优秀的成绩,如外壳、输入设备、声音或排放。特别是哑光显示屏是一个改进,尽管其特性在其他方面与去年的型号的面板相似。

相比之下,GPU性能和噪音排放则是一种退步。尽管Gram 14几乎没有任何速度,有时甚至比它的前辈更慢(因为 酷睿i5-1240P的性能潜力是有限的),风扇噪音在较新的模型上更明显。不幸的是,由于极度的性能缺陷,静音模式无法使用。

虽然这听起来像是很多批评,但与竞争对手相比,Gram 14的表现非常好。几乎没有任何设备能够将这么长的电池寿命与高度便携的机箱结合起来。

这款笔记本电脑适合重视体力而非性能的用户。

瑜伽瘦身7i Pro 14是一个潜在的替代品。

价格和可用性

LG Gram 14Z90Q在各种在线商店有售。商店,起价约为1080美元。

LG Gram 14Z90Q - 12/24/2022 v7
Florian Glaser

Chassis
81 / 98 → 82%
Keyboard
83%
Pointing Device
86%
Connectivity
68 / 80 → 85%
Weight
75 / 20-75 → 100%
Battery
89%
Display
86%
Games Performance
58 / 78 → 75%
Application Performance
94 / 95 → 98%
Temperature
89%
Noise
90%
Audio
77%
Camera
45 / 85 → 53%
Average
78%
87%
Office - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > LG Gram 14 (2022)笔记本电脑回顾。时尚、轻巧、经济
Florian Glaser, 2022-10- 8 (Update: 2022-10- 8)