Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar联想 IdeaPad Slim 5 14 笔记本电脑评测：配备 OLED 显示屏的成功全能型产品
IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 是一款多功能、超薄、轻便且功能强大的笔记本电脑。这款 14 英寸设备的售价约为 1,000 美元，配备了 Core Ultra 5 125H、16 GB LPDDR5x-7467 内存（不可扩展）和 512GB NVMe 固态硬盘。在屏幕方面，这款笔记本电脑采用反射式 60-Hz 16:10 OLED 显示屏（1920 x 1200 像素），全面覆盖 DCI-P3。Windows 11 家庭版操作系统使整套配置更加完善。
IdeaPad Slim 5 的竞争对手包括其他采用流星湖处理器的 14 英寸笔记本电脑，如 华硕 ZenBook 14和 惠普 Spectre x360或 Yoga Pro 7我们已经测试过同一制造商的 AMD 变体.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86.6 % | 03/2024 | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Cores | 1.4 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 88.5 % | 03/2024 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | 1.6 kg | 16.6 mm | 14.50" | 3072x1920 | |
| 88.6 % | 01/2024 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | 1.5 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.50" | 2560x1600 | |
| 86.7 % | 02/2024 | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | 1.2 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 91.4 % | 02/2024 | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | 1.5 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
案例
这款笔记本电脑的外壳看起来相当不错。首先，它设计时尚，体积小巧--尽管竞争对手在这些方面提供了类似的价值。1.4 千克的适中重量也让你没有理由抱怨，这意味着你仍然可以舒适地随身携带这款 14 英寸的设备。除了一些小细节外，它的稳定性和制造质量也很不错。
它的铰链既不会太松也不会太硬；单手就可以打开设备，不过在打开过程中底座有时会有些摆动。由于颜色较浅，几乎看不到指纹痕迹。其最大开启角度为 160°。
连接性
端口
该设备的端口仍有改进的余地。虽然这款 14 英寸笔记本电脑总共有 4 个 USB 端口，但即使是两个 Type-C 端口也只符合 3.2 Gen 1 标准，不过它们支持 DisplayPort 1.4 和 Power Delivery 3.0。此外，还有一个音频插孔、一个过时的 HDMI 1.4b 端口和一个 microSD 读卡器。由于端口位于两个侧板的后半部，因此使用外接鼠标不会有（空间）困难。
SD 读卡器
在我们的测试中，上述读卡器的连续读取速度达到了略低于 90 MB/s 的稳定性能。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (18.9 - 193.9, n=17, last 2 years) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (23.6 - 239, n=17, last 2 years) | |
交流
在无线局域网性能方面，这款笔记本电脑也没有让人感到意外。在距离我们的参考路由器一米远的地方，安装的英特尔模块（Wi-Fi 6E AX211）提供了相当不错的性能，有时甚至与竞争对手的性能相当。
网络摄像头
它的网络摄像头质量略高于笔记本电脑的标准，但令人遗憾的是，它的质量很差。2 百万像素的摄像头看起来比许多竞争产品更清晰，不过它还是没能像往常一样提供良好的色彩准确度。
配件
联想在提供笔记本电脑的同时，还提供了一些信息手册和一个小巧的 65 瓦电源（USB C）。
维护
其维护选项与 Yoga Pro 7 非常相似。这意味着它的底板由 6 个 Torx 螺钉和几个支架固定。与它的 14 英寸兄弟产品相比，联想没有采用双风扇散热装置，而是依靠一个相对较大的风扇。WLAN 模块和固态硬盘被一层薄膜覆盖。遗憾的是，内存是焊接上去的。
保修
笔记本电脑享有 12 个月的标准保修服务。
输入设备
键盘
与 Yoga Pro 7 一样，IdeaPad Slim 5 的输入设备也值得称赞。它的键盘布局合理（除了中间的方向键较小外），按键大小适中。与大多数其他厂商的键盘相比，IdeaPad Slim 5 的键入手感更好，不过对于一款经典的橡胶圆顶键盘来说，按键噪音还是比较大的。由于安装了白色背光，夜间书写也不成问题。
触摸板
它的触摸板也很不错--如果你忽略了听起来略显粗糙的点击区域的话。对于一款 14 英寸设备来说，12 x 7.5 厘米的尺寸是值得尊敬的。在我们的测试中，它在精度或手势支持方面从未出现过任何问题。它的表面相当光滑，这意味着手指可以很好地在上面滑动。
显示屏
说到 OLED 显示屏，人们的品味各不相同。如果你想长时间在明亮的室内或室外使用笔记本电脑，那么你最好选择哑光表面的设备。我们测试配置的眩光表面经常会造成非常强烈和令人不快的反光。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 392 cd/m²
Contrast: 19600:1 (Black: 0.02 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.75 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.59
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
96.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.249
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 LENOVO LEN140WUXGA (LEN88AC), OLED, 1920x1200, 14.00 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Lenovo LEN145-3K (LEN8AAF), IPS, 3072x1920, 14.50 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 LEN145WQXGA, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.50 | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA ATNA40CU06-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng SDC4197, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -4% | -17% | 0% | -3% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 98.4 -2% | 72.3 -28% | 99.8 0% | 99.8 0% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 99.7 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 96.7 | 86.9 -10% | 73.4 -24% | 97.6 1% | 89.3 -8% |
| Response Times | -1812% | -2752% | 63% | 59% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 1.3 ? | 34.1 ? -2523% | 43.6 ? -3254% | 0.69 ? 47% | 0.77 ? 41% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 1.2 ? | 14.4 ? -1100% | 28.2 ? -2250% | 0.71 ? 41% | 0.75 ? 37% |
| PWM Frequency | 240 | 480 ? 100% | 480 100% | ||
| Screen | -174% | -127% | 14% | 12% | |
| Brightness middle | 392 | 464 18% | 357 -9% | 391 0% | 378 -4% |
| Brightness | 388 | 456 18% | 348 -10% | 392 1% | 384 -1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 97 | 90 -7% | 88 -9% | 98 1% | 97 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.02 | 0.36 -1700% | 0.22 -1000% | 0.02 -0% | |
| Contrast | 19600 | 1289 -93% | 1623 -92% | 19550 0% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.75 | 0.9 49% | 2 -14% | 1.1 37% | 1.4 20% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.46 | 2.32 48% | 3.8 15% | 2.4 46% | 2.2 51% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.59 | 0.35 78% | 1.2 25% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 1.4 22% | 2.7 -50% | 1.3 28% | 1.7 6% |
| Gamma | 2.249 98% | 2.218 99% | 2.15 102% | 2.17 101% | 2.17 101% |
| CCT | 6574 99% | 6669 97% | 6929 94% | 6336 103% | 6256 104% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -663% /
-372% | -965% /
-479% | 26% /
22% | 23% /
20% |
* ... smaller is better
除此之外，OLED 屏幕在很大程度上是成功的。Slim 5 的黑度值低得惊人（几乎为 0 cd/m²），因此能呈现出传统 IPS 面板梦寐以求的惊人对比度。它的可视角度也令人印象深刻。
其响应时间也是如此，即使要求苛刻的用户也会感到满意。其他亮点还包括其丰富的色彩空间覆盖范围（约 100% 的 DCI-P3 和 AdobeRGB）以及开箱即用的高色彩准确度。
眼睛有问题的人可能需要做出一些牺牲。与 OLED 的典型特点一样，屏幕闪烁的频率相对较低。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
IdeaPad Slim 5 是一款中档笔记本电脑。用户应事先慎重考虑 16GB 内存从长远来看是否够用，因为正如之前所批评的那样，它不能更换。它的 M.2 固态硬盘（也只有 2242 型号）在技术上可以换成更大的 2280 型号。
测试条件
联想 Vantage 软件中隐藏了三种能源和性能模式，从节省电池模式到最高性能模式。我们的测量都是在智能冷却模式下进行的。
| Witcher 3 (FHD/Ultra) 省电 | 模式 | 智能冷却 | 最高性能 |
| 噪音 | 33 dB(A) 40 dB(A) 42 dB(A) | ||
| 性能 | 14-24 帧/秒 26 帧/秒 26 帧/秒 |
处理器
Core Ultra 5 125H 是 Core Ultra 7 155H 的廉价兄弟。 酷睿至尊 7 155H它可以处理 18 个并行线程，而不是 22 个。它的时钟频率和缓存（18 MB 对 24 MB）也略低。即便如此，在我们的基准测试中，Ultra 5 125H 的表现还是相当不错的。虽然这还不足以让它达到 Yoga Pro 7 的水平，但其他基于 155H 的笔记本电脑，如 ZenBook 14 或 Spectre x360，在 Cinebench 循环测试中也无法超越它。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (343 - 25961, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (8546 - 10722, n=2) | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11867 - 111109, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (43652 - 56389, n=2) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (2070 - 2747, n=2) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (453 - 4646, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15447 - 115300, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (77892 - 78188, n=2) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1223 - 14944, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (6855 - 7470, n=2) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6379 - 59053, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (21250 - 27588, n=2) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (45524 - 58228, n=2) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (594 - 824, n=2) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (270 - 1123, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (204 - 14018, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (4345 - 5630, n=2) | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (45724 - 49844, n=2) | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (7622 - 53954, n=57, last 2 years) | |
系统性能
它的系统性能也不差。在 PCMark 10 中获得了 6359 分的好成绩，尽管这款笔记本电脑的竞争对手一般都差不了多少。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU (6330 - 6359, n=2) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4384 - 7428, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU (10152 - 10584, n=2) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (8890 - 11168, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU (7798 - 7933, n=2) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6213 - 10279, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU (8198 - 8814, n=2) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4093 - 9749, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU () | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (718 - 1876, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU () | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (685 - 1829, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU () | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (776 - 2210, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU () | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (652 - 1899, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (119.2 - 448, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU (245 - 263, n=2) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (67.2 - 325, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU () | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (363 - 1913, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU (575 - 588, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 6359 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (86739 - 87131, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (22781 - 95353, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (75519 - 75830, n=2) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (23831 - 86433, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (63162 - 72329, n=2) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (23474 - 93382, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (129 - 158.1, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (18.8 - 172, n=52, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
LatencyMon 工具没有发现 Slim 5 在实时音频和视频处理方面有任何潜在问题。这在其他设备上并不常见。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
笔记本电脑的存储设备没有完全达到最佳工作状态。根据我们的 Loop 测试，长时间负载会导致速度暂时下降。总的来说，SK Hynix 制造的 M.2 硬盘性能相当不错，对大多数用户来说已经足够。
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
酷睿至尊 5 125H 集成的 iGPU 被称为 Arc 7与 弧 8相比，Arc 7 的 Xe 向量引擎数量从 128 个减少到 112 个，光线追踪单元/采样器数量从 8 个减少到 7 个，但减少的幅度并不大。不出所料，IdeadPad Slim 5 能够很好地跟上基于 Ultra 7 155H 的设备，（至少在合成图形基准测试中）它仅领先于 Radeon 780M仅次于 Yoga Pro 7 的 Radeon 780M。如果你想偶尔玩玩游戏，那么使用 Arc 8 可能会更好，因为我们测试的几款游戏（在驱动程序相同的情况下）比其他游戏更容易崩溃--至少在使用更高的设置时是这样，但即便如此，这些游戏还是无法玩下去。
| 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 -1! | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA -1! | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng -1! | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 42252 points | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 41299 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 12140 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 154153 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 30553 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7929 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3658 points | |
Help | ||
游戏性能
只要不过分追求分辨率（最高全高清），并满足中低设置，Arc 7 也适用于某些现代游戏。当尝试运行要求极高和/或中等优化的游戏时，情况就会变得紧张，如Alan Wake 2,Starfield,Lords of The Fallen,Avatar Frontiers of Pandora 和 Enshrouded 。在这种情况下，您将不可避免地不得不使用高清范围内的较低分辨率或英特尔 XeSS 形式的升频（如果游戏支持）。如果将其游戏性能与 Yoga Pro 7 进行比较，Radeon 780M 平均快 10%左右，而 Arc 8 则快近 20%。
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU (18.3 - 26, n=2) | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (8 - 44.2, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5.01 - 67.5, n=47, last 2 years) | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU (13.7 - 13.7, n=2) | |
| Palworld | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset AA:TSR | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (34.8 - 40.6, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU () | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:TSR | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (32.6 - 37.1, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU () | |
| Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:TSR | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (25.2 - 29.5, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU () | |
| Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 | |
| Helldivers 2 | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (32.1 - 39.2, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU () | |
| Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (25 - 30, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU () | |
| Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (22.7 - 27.5, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU () | |
| Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 | |
| Enshrouded | |
| 1920x1080 Performance | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (21.5 - 27, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU () | |
| Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 | |
| 1920x1080 Balanced AA:FX | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (18 - 22, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU () | |
| Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 | |
| 1920x1080 Quality AA:FX | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Prince of Persia The Lost Crown | |
| 1920x1080 Normal Preset | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU () | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (208 - 215, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (127 - 142.8, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU () | |
| Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 | |
| Last Epoch | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (53.8 - 73.9, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU () | |
| Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (38.7 - 52.4, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU () | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (33 - 46.4, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU () | |
积极的一面在长期测试中，我们使用 的Witcher 3(约 1 小时@全高清/超高清）进行的长期测试中，其帧速率保持良好稳定。而华硕 ZenBook 14 和惠普 Spectre x360 则出现了巨大的波动。
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
| GTA V (2015) | 153 | 151.6 | 34.1 | 13.7 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 138 | 88 | 52 | 26 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 93.5 | 70.5 | 75.8 | 73 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 64.8 | 35.8 | 25.3 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 47.1 | 38.3 | 31.3 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 74 | 41 | 37 | 35 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 149 | 69.5 | 57.7 | 47.3 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 31.6 | 27 | 22.6 | 21.6 |
| Hogwarts Legacy (2023) | 31 | 26.5 | 17.3 | 13.2 |
| Returnal (2023) | 30 | 29 | 27 | 23 |
| Atomic Heart (2023) | 40.7 | 31.9 | 22.8 | 16.4 |
| Company of Heroes 3 (2023) | 51.5 | 45.4 | 33.9 | 33.3 |
| Sons of the Forest (2023) | 24.9 | 17.3 | 15.5 | 15.2 |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake (2023) | 36.1 | 25.1 | 23.6 | 0 () |
| F1 23 (2023) | 68 | 60 | 40 | 0 () |
| Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart (2023) | 0 game wont start (crash) | 0 game wont start (crash) | 0 game wont start (crash) | 0 game wont start (crash) |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 30.2 | 26.4 | 22.8 | 21.8 |
| Atlas Fallen (2023) | 40.5 | 40.3 | 36.6 | 26.4 |
| Armored Core 6 (2023) | 39.7 | 32.6 | 28.5 | 23.5 |
| Starfield (2023) | 19.1 | 16.5 | 13.2 | 10.7 |
| The Crew Motorfest (2023) | 26 | 24 | 20 | 17 |
| Lies of P (2023) | 46 | 33.8 | 32.6 | 27.1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 (2023) | 90.2 | 57.9 | 37.6 | 24.7 |
| Assassin's Creed Mirage (2023) | 33 | 31 | 27 | 0 () |
| Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 95.5 | 56.8 | 35.6 | 28.1 |
| Lords of the Fallen (2023) | 17.1 | 11.7 | 11.4 | 10.8 |
| Alan Wake 2 (2023) | 15.8 | 0 () | 0 () | |
| EA Sports WRC (2023) | 28.6 | 21 | 19.2 | 17.9 |
| Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023) | 15 | 14 | 12 | 9 |
| The Finals (2023) | 70 | 47.7 | 39.7 | 34.6 |
| Ready or Not (2023) | 62.7 | 48.3 | 44.5 | 34.5 |
| Prince of Persia The Lost Crown (2024) | 215 | 127 | 120 | |
| Palworld (2024) | 34.8 | 32.6 | 25.2 | 23.4 |
| Enshrouded (2024) | 21.5 | 18 | 0 () | 0 () |
| Helldivers 2 (2024) | 32.1 | 25 | 22.7 | 21.7 |
| Skull & Bones (2024) | 33 | 31 | 24 | 18 |
| Last Epoch (2024) | 53.8 | 38.7 | 33 | 25.3 |
排放量
噪音排放
这款笔记本电脑的噪音表现尚可，但并不出众。在空闲模式下，以及在完成办公、播放视频和上网等简单任务时，其噪音排放在 30 分贝（A）左右，表现尚可。不过，在负载情况下，这款 14 英寸设备的噪音比竞争对手 Arc 8 要大，尽管性能较弱，但 40-45 dB（A）的噪音还是可以接受的。如果你想要更安静的声音，那么你可能需要使用省电模式，不过这样一来，笔记本电脑的性能就会受到严重限制。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 25 / 26 / 31 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 43 / 45 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Cores | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 5% | 4% | 10% | 18% | |
| off / environment * | 24 | 24 -0% | 24.3 -1% | 23.4 2% | 23.4 2% |
| Idle Minimum * | 25 | 25 -0% | 24.3 3% | 23.4 6% | 23.4 6% |
| Idle Average * | 26 | 27 -4% | 24.3 7% | 23.4 10% | 23.4 10% |
| Idle Maximum * | 31 | 30 3% | 27.9 10% | 24.5 21% | 25.6 17% |
| Load Average * | 43 | 36 16% | 36.7 15% | 39.3 9% | 25.6 40% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 40 | 38 5% | 44.2 -11% | 35.9 10% | 30.9 23% |
| Load Maximum * | 45 | 38 16% | 44.2 2% | 39.3 13% | 32.6 28% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
其机箱温度与竞争对手的机箱温度相似。在空闲模式下，它的机箱温度很低（顶部 25 °C，底部 26 °C），但在负载情况下，我们测得的峰值高达 43 °C（顶部）和 48 °C（底部），这还是可以接受的。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-2.7 °C / -4.9 F).
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Cores | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 5% | -1% | 6% | 9% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 43 | 43 -0% | 42.1 2% | 40.9 5% | 39.3 9% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 48 | 42 12% | 49.7 -4% | 46.8 2% | 45 6% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 26 | 25 4% | 25.7 1% | 24.1 7% | 23.8 8% |
| Idle Bottom * | 27 | 26 4% | 27.3 -1% | 24.6 9% | 24 11% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
使用 Furmark 和 Prime95 工具进行的压力测试没有发现任何令人不安的意外。虽然酷睿至尊 5 125H 一开始就达到了 100 °C，但很快就平衡到了 80 °C。我们使用Witcher 3 进行的游戏测试也得出了类似的数值（见截图）。
发言人
与扬声器相当出色的 Yoga Pro 7 相比，IdeaPad Slim 5 的音质明显较差。根据我们的音频分析，它的低音特别弱，所以你应该连接耳机或外置音响系统，才能充分享受媒体。
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理
耗电量
联想还可以在功耗方面稍作改进。在空闲模式下，这款 14 英寸设备的耗电量比大多数 Arc 8 笔记本电脑都要高，即 5-16 瓦。在负载情况下，其耗电量达到 48-70 瓦，与华硕 ZenBook 14 相近。
| Off / Standby | 0.3 / Watt |
| Idle | 5 / 8 / 16 Watt |
| Load |
53 / 70 Watt |
   
| |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Cores | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -1% | -14% | 1% | 33% | 10% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5 | 4 20% | 5.6 -12% | 6.1 -22% | 3.2 36% | 4.88 ? 2% |
| Idle Average * | 8 | 5.5 31% | 8.8 -10% | 10 -25% | 4.2 47% | 8.32 ? -4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 16 | 11.8 26% | 9 44% | 10.3 36% | 4.9 69% | 10.5 ? 34% |
| Load Average * | 53 | 66 -25% | 58.5 -10% | 53.3 -1% | 40.5 24% | 46 ? 13% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 47.7 | 55 -15% | 71 -49% | 42 12% | 37.9 21% | |
| Load Maximum * | 70 | 100 -43% | 100.6 -44% | 67 4% | 68.6 2% | 66 ? 6% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
竞争对手的电池容量为 68-75 瓦时，而 IdeaPad Slim 5 仅为 57 瓦时，运行时间不足。虽然电池容量一般，而且耗电量也不理想（插电状态下），但在亮度降低到 150 cd/m² 的情况下，仅用不到 9 小时的时间上网冲浪还是值得尊敬的。
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Cores, 57 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores, 73 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M, 73 Wh | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores, 75 Wh | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores, 68 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 25% | 14% | 30% | 2% | 16% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 544 | 680 25% | 618 14% | 707 30% | 555 2% | 629 ? 16% |
| H.264 | 737 | 1010 | 999 | 794 ? | ||
| Load | 86 | 134 | 129 | 115.4 ? |
Pros
Cons
判决
如果你能接受反光显示屏，那么 IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 几乎在所有方面都是一款成功的全能/多媒体笔记本电脑。酷睿 酷睿5 125H的首次亮相在很大程度上是成功的。得益于其 弧形 iGPU英特尔终于赶上了 Radeon 680M和 780M在落后多年之后，英特尔终于赶上了 Radeon 680M 和 780M--尽管如果 AMD 没有安于现状，它可能已经再次领先。
尽管如此，联想的 IdeaPad Slim 5 14 还是做了很多正确的事情。
它的外壳给人留下了高品质的印象，与同价位产品相比，它提供了更好的键盘。它的重量、电池续航时间和排放也几乎没有让你抱怨的理由。另一方面，许多潜在买家可能会因为它的内存是焊接上去的，无法扩展而望而却步。此外，你还得忍受平庸的音效和略显过时的端口选择（没有 Thunderbolt 4，只有 HDMI 1.4b）。
总而言之，这款 14 英寸设备与 "非常好 "的评级擦肩而过，就像 惠普 Spectre x360 14或英特尔/AMD 版的 Yoga Pro 7 14可管理。它的总体评分与 ZenBook 14华硕的 ZenBook 14 更为相似，后者（也）更贵。
价格和供应情况
在撰写本文时，搭载 Core Ultra 5 125H 的联想 IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 尚未在美国上市。它的零售价可能在 1,000 美元左右。
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9
-
03/13/2024 v7
Florian Glaser
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.
Pricecompare
