Notebookcheck

惠普Envy 17 cg1356ng评论。一台大型多媒体笔记本电脑

17英寸的MX450。 惠普Envy 17拥有17英寸显示屏,非常适合消费媒体内容,也适合简单的游戏和办公任务。英特尔酷睿i5-1135G7和Nvidia的GeForce MX450应该可以为此提供足够的性能。我们的审查显示了这一点的效果。
Mike Wobker, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Windows Tiger Lake Laptop / Notebook Geforce
HP Envy 17 cg1356ng

大约一年前,我们已经看到了型号为Envy 17的产品。 cg0710ng在我们的一次测试中。虽然我们的总体印象相当好,但在我们看来,只有价格似乎太高。现在,惠普Envy 17-cg1356ng的售价约为1000欧元(约合1171美元),少了500欧元(约合586美元)。它配备了一个英特尔酷睿i5-1135G7,一个NvidiaGeForce MX450,16GB内存,和一个1TB的SSD。

有了这些硬件,这台17英寸的笔记本电脑可以与下面列出的竞争对手的笔记本电脑竞争。你还可以从我们的数据库中添加更多的设备,在每个部分下面。

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng (Envy 17-cg Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-1135G7 4 x 2.4 - 4.2 GHz, 46 W PL2 / Short Burst, 25.5 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake UP3
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 - 2048 MB, Core: 1575 MHz, Memory: 1751 MHz, NVIDIA 462.80, Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EUs
Memory
16384 MB 
, dual-channel
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, AU Optronics AUO439D, IPS, glossy: yes
Mainboard
Intel Tiger Lake-UP3 PCH-LP
Storage
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB, 1024 GB 
, 890 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Tiger Lake-U/Y PCH-LP - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port, Card Reader: SD, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 19.3 x 399 x 259
Battery
55.67 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 0.9 MP, 16:9 (1280x720)
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, McAfee Personal Security, HP software, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.73 kg, Power Supply: 300 g
Price
1000 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
82 %
08/2021
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng
i5-1135G7, GeForce MX450
2.7 kg19.3 mm17.30"1920x1080
80 %
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE
i3-1005G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
2.2 kg19.9 mm17.30"1920x1080
83 %
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350
2.2 kg19.9 mm17.30"1920x1080
86 %
08/2020
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H
i5-10300H, UHD Graphics 630
2.3 kg19.5 mm17.30"1920x1200

外壳 - 来自惠普的坚固的笔记本电脑

惠普公司用铝制造了Envy 17 cg1356ng的外壳,这确保了该笔记本电脑非常坚固,抗扭曲。它也不容易出现指纹。然而,显示屏就不一样了,因为它是由玻璃覆盖的。此外,打开角度相当小,只有大约120度。要打开盖子,你还需要两只手,因为铰链相当难移动,否则基本单元也会被抬起来。

HP Envy 17 cg1356ng
HP Envy 17 cg1356ng
HP Envy 17 cg1356ng

惠普笔记本电脑的重量略高于2.7公斤(约6磅),是一个相对较重的设备。由于采用了大型的17英寸显示屏,笔记本电脑的尺寸也变大了一些。

Size Comparison

403.5 mm 263.7 mm 19.9 mm 2.2 kg402 mm 281.3 mm 19.9 mm 2.2 kg399 mm 259 mm 19.3 mm 2.7 kg375 mm 248 mm 19.5 mm 2.3 kg

设备 - 快速的WLAN和困难的维护

虽然惠普在Envy 17中放弃了Thunderbolt连接,但可用的Type-C端口支持通过DisplayPort输出图像。其余的连接都是标准的。没有以太网连接。

左侧:1个USB-A 3.1 Gen1,HDMI,音频组合端口,1个USB-C(包括显示端口)。
左侧:1个USB-A 3.1 Gen1,HDMI,音频组合端口,1个USB-C(包括显示端口)。
右侧。SD读卡器,2个USB-A 3.1 Gen1,电源
右侧。SD读卡器,2个USB-A 3.1 Gen1,电源

SD卡阅读器

使用我们的AV Pro microSD 128 GB V60参考存储卡,Envy 17 cg1356ng的读卡器在复制和读取数据时的速度达到了74 MB/s,83.9 MB/s。这些都是良好的平均结果。

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
197 MB/s ∼100% +166%
Average of class Multimedia
  (18.1 - 224, n=62, last 2 years)
78.5 MB/s ∼40% +6%
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng
  (AV Pro microSD 128 GB V60)
74 MB/s ∼38%
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE
 
20.8 MB/s ∼11% -72%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
204.3 MB/s ∼100% +144%
Average of class Multimedia
  (23.2 - 217, n=62, last 2 years)
88.7 MB/s ∼43% +6%
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng
  (AV Pro microSD 128 GB V60)
83.9 MB/s ∼41%
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE
 
31.2 MB/s ∼15% -63%

沟通

惠普Envy 17 cg1356ng能够通过蓝牙5和WiFi 6进行无线连接。通过我们的Netgear Nighthawk AX12参考路由器,它在传输数据时达到了1418 Mbit/s的平均速度,在接收时达到了1548 Mbit/s。这些都是非常好的结果,足以在我们的测试领域中名列前茅。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1419 (698min - 1497max) MBit/s ∼100% 0%
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1418 (731min - 1508max) MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1415 (1340min - 1589max) MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=257)
1156 MBit/s ∼81% -18%
Average of class Multimedia
  (52 - 1563, n=79, last 2 years)
981 MBit/s ∼69% -31%
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
844 (423min - 919max) MBit/s ∼59% -40%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1548 (1357min - 1709max) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1453 (1291min - 1633max) MBit/s ∼94% -6%
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1252 (1156min - 1322max) MBit/s ∼81% -19%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (136 - 1743, n=257)
1246 MBit/s ∼80% -20%
Average of class Multimedia
  (119 - 1548, n=79, last 2 years)
1055 MBit/s ∼68% -32%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
825 (551min - 1155max) MBit/s ∼53% -47%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001368136213751357137816581517151514331496162514671595165916971685165217091681168116301693151215461412136415891613158115761543156214581396149513451609151514891291157715771549153216191633130014171392137213611329148514051382136413891294151313831368136213751357137816581517151514331496162514671595165916971685165217091681168116301693151215461412136415891613158115761543156214581396149513451609151514891291157715771549153216191633130014171392137213611329148514051382136413891294151313837311496146715081473100914841494145914591453141213411478137013541423146713881397142413591256144414801351142914751465147669814241350141313971421143314441436141413081451141614581383149714391427140913471364149413591456142314581450142614141450Tooltip
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1548 (1357-1709)
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1453 (1291-1633)
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1394 (731-1508)
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1395 (698-1497)

网络摄像头

与其他大多数制造商一样,惠普也只在其笔记本电脑中使用了一个0.9MP的低分辨率网络摄像头。图像质量也相应地很平庸,即使在光线良好的条件下,显示的物体也很模糊,而且显示的颜色太淡。

ColorChecker
14.8 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
6 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
13 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
ColorChecker HP Envy 17-cg1356ng: 13.23 ∆E min: 2.47 - max: 21.41 ∆E

安全问题

惠普Envy 17 cg1356ng可以使用指纹传感器解锁,该传感器位于右侧Alt键旁边。在我们的测试中,该传感器对存储的指纹反应良好,可靠地解锁了笔记本电脑。

辅料

惠普笔记本电脑的盒子里只包含笔记本电脑本身和相应的电源。你可以从制造商的网站上订购额外的通用配件。

维护

惠普Envy 17 cg1356ng应该可以提供一些很好的维护方案,只要它不会那么难打开。为了从底部卸下所有的螺丝,你首先要卸下两个粘在上面的橡皮筋。螺丝卸下后,箱子的底部被一些夹子夹得非常紧。

然而,在你最终能够松开夹子之后,你就可以接触到固态硬盘、两个内存插槽、WLAN模块、一个2.5英寸驱动器的插槽,以及拧在一起的电池。

HP Envy 17 cg1356ng - 维护选项
HP Envy 17 cg1356ng - 维护选项
HP Envy 17 cg1356ng - 可用的2.5英寸插槽,SSD,WLAN模块
HP Envy 17 cg1356ng - 可用的2.5英寸插槽,SSD,WLAN模块
HP Envy 17 cg1356ng - 工作内存
HP Envy 17 cg1356ng - 工作内存

担保

惠普为Envy 17 cg1356ng提供了24个月的保修期。这可以以额外的费用进行扩展,例如,3年的提货和退货服务,大约96欧元(约112美元)。

输入设备 - 带有数字键盘的笔记本电脑

键盘

Envy 17的按键为指尖提供了良好的购买力,并在打字时提供了清晰的反馈。然而,压力点是相当软的。由于采用了大尺寸的键盘,大多数按键都被安排在一个空间内,只有向上和向下的方向键略微显得太小。

触摸板

作为鼠标的替代品,惠普使用了ClickPad,它很适合于导航鼠标指针。它的表面对指尖只有很小的阻力,可以轻松地实现拖放动作,没有任何问题。鼠标点击可以通过点击垫子或触摸它来可靠地触发。

HP Envy 17 cg1356ng - 输入设备
HP Envy 17 cg1356ng - 输入设备
HP Envy 17 cg1356ng - ClickPad和指纹传感器
HP Envy 17 cg1356ng - ClickPad和指纹传感器
HP Envy 17 cg1356ng - 照明
HP Envy 17 cg1356ng - 照明

显示 - 强烈的反射

子像素网格
子像素网格
屏幕出血
屏幕出血

Envy 17 cg1356ng的显示屏由一块17.3英寸的大型IPS面板组成,分辨率为1920 x 1080像素。亮度为349cd/m²,相对较高,在我们的测试领域中,只有戴尔XPS 17 9700的亮度超过了它。 戴尔XPS 17 9700.亮度分布为89%,也很好。

惠普并没有使用 PWM进行亮度控制,这对眼睛敏感的人来说应该是有帮助的。没有提供其他显示器型号。

330
cd/m²
349
cd/m²
330
cd/m²
313
cd/m²
347
cd/m²
323
cd/m²
311
cd/m²
330
cd/m²
327
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AU Optronics AUO439D
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 349 cd/m² Average: 328.9 cd/m² Minimum: 13.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 295 cd/m²
Contrast: 1285:1 (Black: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.75 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 4.88 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
69% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.53
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng
AU Optronics AUO439D, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE
AU Optronics B173HAN04.3, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
BOE084E, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H
SHP14D7, IPS, 1920x1200, 17.30
Display
2%
-40%
10%
Display P3 Coverage
68
68.5
1%
39.98
-41%
77.44
14%
sRGB Coverage
95
97.08
2%
59.25
-38%
100
5%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
69
70.07
2%
41.3
-40%
76.56
11%
Response Times
5%
69%
-38%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
40 (19, 21)
39 (19, 20)
2%
14 (2, 12)
65%
60.4 (30.8, 29.6)
-51%
Response Time Black / White *
30 (17, 13)
28 (15, 13)
7%
8 (2, 6)
73%
37.6 (20, 17.6)
-25%
PWM Frequency
2500 (30)
Screen
2%
-6%
41%
Brightness middle
347
330
-5%
321
-7%
636
83%
Brightness
329
309
-6%
282
-14%
580
76%
Brightness Distribution
89
88
-1%
81
-9%
86
-3%
Black Level *
0.27
0.33
-22%
0.36
-33%
0.34
-26%
Contrast
1285
1000
-22%
892
-31%
1871
46%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.75
2.82
25%
4.3
-15%
2.4
36%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.53
6.27
17%
7.1
6%
3.5
54%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.88
3.58
27%
2.26
54%
2
59%
Gamma
2.53 87%
2.42 91%
2.36 93%
2.08 106%
CCT
6624 98%
6994 93%
6650 98%
6704 97%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
63
38
67.5
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
97
59
100
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.5
Total Average (Program / Settings)
3% / 2%
8% / -2%
4% / 21%

* ... smaller is better

虽然惠普Envy 17 cg1356ng以其1285:1的良好对比度在我们的测试领域中排名第二,但0.27cd/m²的非常好的黑色值足以在我们选定的比较设备中排名第一。

CalMAN分析还表明,在交付状态下,色彩的再现已经相当平衡。然而,由于DeltaE值为4.88,色彩偏差仍然略有上升。

CalMAN--颜色精度
CalMAN--颜色精度
CalMAN - 灰度
CalMAN - 灰度
卡尔曼--饱和度
卡尔曼--饱和度

由于其光亮的表面,Envy 17的显示屏非常容易反光。尽管亮度值确实相当不错,但图像内容在户外很难阅读。即使在阴暗的地方,也会有一些环境的反射。

在户外使用惠普Envy 17 cg1356ng(从笔记本后面晒太阳
在户外使用惠普Envy 17 cg1356ng(从笔记本后面晒太阳
在户外使用惠普Envy 17 cg1356ng(从笔记本后面晒太阳
在户外使用惠普Envy 17 cg1356ng(从笔记本后面晒太阳

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (37.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 15356 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

惠普在这里使用的IPS面板的视角非常稳定。图像内容也可以从非常陡峭的角度观看,不会出现扭曲或扭曲的颜色。

视角稳定
视角稳定

性能 - 适用于许多不同的任务

惠普的目标是Envy 17不仅用于多媒体应用,而且还将其作为办公笔记本电脑提供。相应地,也有配备更强大的CPU或没有专用显卡的型号,我们的测试设备就内置了这种显卡。工作内存和存储解决方案的设备也各不相同。价格在850-1600欧元(约996-1874美元)之间,我们的测试装置属于更实惠的设备型号,价格在1000欧元左右(约1171美元)。

HP Envy 17 cg1356ng - CPUz
HP Envy 17 cg1356ng - CPUz
HP Envy 17 cg1356ng - CPUz
HP Envy 17 cg1356ng - CPUz
HP Envy 17 cg1356ng - GPUz
HP Envy 17 cg1356ng - GPUz
HP Envy 17 cg1356ng - HWInfo
 

处理器

英特尔酷睿i5-1135G7这里使用的是一个四核处理器,属于英特尔的Tiger Lake 代。时钟速度在2.4和4.2GHz之间,这些速度能维持多久取决于冷却系统和配置的TDP。长期PL1 von 25.5瓦,短期PL2为46瓦,TDP在可能的配置选项中属于中间范围。

在我们的Cinebench R15恒定负载测试中,其性能开始与真正更强大的英特尔酷睿i7-1165G7Acer Aspire 5 A517但随后下降得相当快,在一个低约10%的数值上趋于平稳。这一结果在单项测试中也得到了证实,这意味着Envy 17 cg1356ng能够在我们的测试领域总体上处于中间位置。

你可以在我们的 "CPU基准测试列表 "中了解其他笔记本电脑的预期性能对比。 CPU基准测试列表.

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

04590135180225270315360405450495540585630675720765810855848.45754.08797.19763.87795.69724.72724.55721.67720.66719.5687.65708.68722.09721.87686.81709.08760.46681.16711.93752.26684.32713.62715.6686.08694.84399.03403.87404.97405.38406.77405.74403.09403.88401403.03402.53401.74402.78403.37403.74402.81401.78403.36404.42404.47405.34403.74404.37404.29403.05389.86404.02403403.79404.65406.96404.64404.9405.31404.99405.7404.53405.99405.09402.94831.69791.78785.79800.48798.8797.07799.9790.84796.43797.83797.51797.73796795.02798.18798.31798.91796.26798.58797.72796.53797.97799.6799.95795.01895.96843.7843.13815.74818.08812.27814.96814.7807.51813.4810.57812.89812.12816.78815.99813.92813.92815.99819.66819.13825.73827.34818.35817.83830.01Tooltip
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng Intel Core i5-1135G7: Ø728 (681.16-848.45)
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE Intel Core i3-1005G1: Ø404 (389.86-406.96)
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø798 (785.79-831.69)
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H Intel Core i5-10300H: Ø822 (807.51-895.96)
Cinebench R23: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Single Core)
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1504 Points ∼100% +13%
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1333 Points ∼89%
Average of class Multimedia
  (980 - 1534, n=44, last 2 years)
1330 Points ∼88% 0%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (1172 - 1372, n=26)
1325 Points ∼88% -1%
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE
Intel Core i3-1005G1
1061 Points ∼71% -20%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Multimedia
  (3121 - 13205, n=50, last 2 years)
6746 Points ∼100% +28%
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
5255 Points ∼78%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5216 Points ∼77% -1%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (2786 - 6136, n=27)
4448 Points ∼66% -15%
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE
Intel Core i3-1005G1
2636 Points ∼39% -50%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
573 Points ∼100% +12%
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
510 Points ∼89%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (442 - 527, n=33)
506 Points ∼88% -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (311 - 595, n=89, last 2 years)
483 Points ∼84% -5%
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H
Intel Core i5-10300H
460 Points ∼80% -10%
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE
Intel Core i3-1005G1
407 Points ∼71% -20%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Multimedia
  (727 - 5128, n=90, last 2 years)
2298 Points ∼100% +16%
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H
Intel Core i5-10300H
2110 Points ∼92% +6%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1994 Points ∼87% +1%
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1984 Points ∼86%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (979 - 2382, n=33)
1747 Points ∼76% -12%
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE
Intel Core i3-1005G1
1015 Points ∼44% -49%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
222 Points ∼100% +12%
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
199 Points ∼90%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (86.2 - 205, n=36)
193 Points ∼87% -3%
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H
Intel Core i5-10300H
189 Points ∼85% -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (126 - 240, n=90, last 2 years)
189 Points ∼85% -5%
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE
Intel Core i3-1005G1
148 Points ∼67% -26%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia
  (334 - 2154, n=104, last 2 years)
1001 Points ∼100% +18%
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H
Intel Core i5-10300H
896 (807.51min - 895.96max) Points ∼90% +6%
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
848 (681.16min - 848.45max) Points ∼85%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
832 (785.79min - 831.69max) Points ∼83% -2%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (431 - 925, n=37)
772 Points ∼77% -9%
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE
Intel Core i3-1005G1
407 Points ∼41% -52%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE
Intel Core i3-1005G1
1129 Seconds * ∼100% -92%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (499 - 1044, n=31)
687 Seconds * ∼61% -17%
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
588 Seconds * ∼52%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
581 Seconds * ∼51% +1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (233 - 1439, n=77, last 2 years)
548 Seconds * ∼49% +7%
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H
Intel Core i5-10300H
545 Seconds * ∼48% +7%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5380 MIPS ∼100% +13%
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H
Intel Core i5-10300H
4938 MIPS ∼92% +3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3406 - 5777, n=76, last 2 years)
4922 MIPS ∼91% +3%
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
4778 MIPS ∼89%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (3924 - 4867, n=33)
4647 MIPS ∼86% -3%
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE
Intel Core i3-1005G1
3989 MIPS ∼74% -17%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Multimedia
  (8984 - 59653, n=76, last 2 years)
28603 MIPS ∼100% +44%
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H
Intel Core i5-10300H
24259 MIPS ∼85% +22%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
23768 MIPS ∼83% +20%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (14745 - 24873, n=33)
20967 MIPS ∼73% +5%
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
19886 MIPS ∼70%
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE
Intel Core i3-1005G1
10896 MIPS ∼38% -45%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1569 Points ∼100% +13%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (1304 - 1428, n=30)
1394 Points ∼89% 0%
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1391 Points ∼89%
Average of class Multimedia
  (813 - 1645, n=72, last 2 years)
1308 Points ∼83% -6%
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H
Intel Core i5-10300H
1225 Points ∼78% -12%
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE
Intel Core i3-1005G1
1141 Points ∼73% -18%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Multimedia
  (1604 - 9050, n=72, last 2 years)
5293 Points ∼100% +14%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5056 Points ∼96% +9%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (3475 - 5472, n=30)
4793 Points ∼91% +3%
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
4648 Points ∼88%
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H
Intel Core i5-10300H
4378 Points ∼83% -6%
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE
Intel Core i3-1005G1
2417 Points ∼46% -48%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Multimedia
  (1.39 - 15.9, n=74, last 2 years)
7.64 fps ∼100% +41%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
6.38 fps ∼84% +17%
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H
Intel Core i5-10300H
6.37 fps ∼83% +17%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (3.57 - 7.6, n=30)
5.76 fps ∼75% +6%
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
5.43 fps ∼71%
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE
Intel Core i3-1005G1
3.53 fps ∼46% -35%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE
Intel Core i3-1005G1
63.6 s * ∼100% -18%
Average of class Multimedia
  (16.5 - 99.2, n=75, last 2 years)
54.7 s * ∼86% -1%
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
54.1 s * ∼85%
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H
Intel Core i5-10300H
53.3 s * ∼84% +1%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (45.9 - 58.8, n=32)
52.4 s * ∼82% +3%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
51.7 s * ∼81% +4%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE
Intel Core i3-1005G1
0.747 sec * ∼100% -3%
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
0.727 sec * ∼97%
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H
Intel Core i5-10300H
0.679 sec * ∼91% +7%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (0.619 - 0.727, n=31)
0.643 sec * ∼86% +12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.4998 - 1.002, n=75, last 2 years)
0.63 sec * ∼84% +13%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.566 sec * ∼76% +22%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
848 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
120 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
199 Points
Help

系统性能

在评估系统性能的PCMark 10测试中,HP Envy 17 cg1356ng在我们的测试领域取得了第二名。在单一学科中,特别是 "数字内容创作 "的结果非常突出,惠普笔记本电脑在所有其他选定的对比设备中处于领先地位。在日常操作中,笔记本电脑总是平稳地运行,没有显示任何微小的停顿。启动应用程序和访问数据都很顺利和迅速。

PCMark 10 / Score
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
5278 Points ∼100% +2%
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng
GeForce MX450, i5-1135G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
5196 Points ∼98%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
 
5196 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3028 - 6725, n=83, last 2 years)
4857 Points ∼92% -7%
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H
UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
4162 Points ∼79% -20%
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1, Samsung PM991 MZALQ256HAJD
3422 Points ∼65% -34%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H
UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
9368 Points ∼100% +4%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
9160 Points ∼98% +2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6441 - 10539, n=82, last 2 years)
8999 Points ∼96% 0%
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng
GeForce MX450, i5-1135G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
8985 Points ∼96%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
 
8985 Points ∼96% 0%
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1, Samsung PM991 MZALQ256HAJD
7954 Points ∼85% -11%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
9071 Points ∼100% +9%
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng
GeForce MX450, i5-1135G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
8303 Points ∼92%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
 
8303 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5448 - 9662, n=82, last 2 years)
7313 Points ∼81% -12%
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H
UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
7138 Points ∼79% -14%
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1, Samsung PM991 MZALQ256HAJD
5252 Points ∼58% -37%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng
GeForce MX450, i5-1135G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
5103 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
 
5103 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2148 - 9415, n=82, last 2 years)
4843 Points ∼95% -5%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
4804 Points ∼94% -6%
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H
UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
2928 Points ∼57% -43%
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1, Samsung PM991 MZALQ256HAJD
2606 Points ∼51% -49%
PCMark 10 Score
5196 points
Help

DPC延迟

在用LatencyMon进行的测试中,我们的惠普笔记本电脑的测试配置显示延迟增加,这使得它不适合于实时应用。

LatencyMon - 统计数据
LatencyMon - 统计数据
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H
UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
9205.1 μs * ∼100% -327%
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng
GeForce MX450, i5-1135G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
2154.6 μs * ∼23%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
1526.2 μs * ∼17% +29%
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1, Samsung PM991 MZALQ256HAJD
938.3 μs * ∼10% +56%

* ... smaller is better

存储解决方案

惠普为Envy 17配备了三星PM991固态硬盘,在存储基准测试中取得了非常好的读写率。凭借这一点,它达到了同类存储解决方案的水平,在我们的测试领域排名第三,仅次于联想V17-IIL.

你可以在我们的 "HDD/SSD基准列表 "中找到其他存储解决方案的性能预期。硬盘/SSD基准测试列表.

HP Envy 17-cg1356ng
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE
Samsung PM991 MZALQ256HAJD
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
2%
44%
-1%
6%
Write 4K
137.5
170.5
24%
242.2
76%
106.94
-22%
137 (98.9 - 168, n=4)
0%
Read 4K
38.26
56.45
48%
51.58
35%
41.49
8%
42.1 (32.4 - 55, n=4)
10%
Write Seq
1283
846.9
-34%
1970
54%
1025.39
-20%
1401 (1283 - 1582, n=3)
9%
Read Seq
1349
1168
-13%
2010
49%
1429.13
6%
1465 (1349 - 1575, n=3)
9%
Write 4K Q32T1
381.3
449.8
18%
578.5
52%
342.77
-10%
408 (375 - 476, n=4)
7%
Read 4K Q32T1
398
489.3
23%
673
69%
364.16
-9%
462 (398 - 506, n=4)
16%
Write Seq Q32T1
1654
1034
-37%
1976
19%
1714.4
4%
1592 (1492 - 1654, n=4)
-4%
Read Seq Q32T1
2386
2123
-11%
2420
1%
3205
34%
2365 (2329 - 2388, n=4)
-1%
AS SSD
-22%
12%
-7%
-7%
Seq Read
1961.19
1734.12
-12%
2216.62
13%
2424
24%
2006 (1960 - 2071, n=4)
2%
Seq Write
953.97
911.24
-4%
1919.57
101%
1159
21%
1242 (954 - 1547, n=4)
30%
4K Read
48.32
50.71
5%
31.52
-35%
34.68
-28%
44.1 (31.6 - 49.8, n=4)
-9%
4K Write
131.44
134.52
2%
215.26
64%
101.7
-23%
138 (117 - 164, n=4)
5%
4K-64 Read
1021.43
467.49
-54%
301.35
-70%
984.61
-4%
861 (455 - 1098, n=4)
-16%
4K-64 Write
882.77
706.25
-20%
1395.23
58%
955.71
8%
691 (262 - 891, n=4)
-22%
Access Time Read *
0.072
0.117
-63%
0.052
28%
0.116
-61%
0.0647 (0.053 - 0.072, n=3)
10%
Access Time Write *
0.029
0.028
3%
0.035
-21%
0.036
-24%
0.0383 (0.028 - 0.062, n=4)
-32%
Score Read
1266
692
-45%
555
-56%
1262
0%
1106 (682 - 1348, n=4)
-13%
Score Write
1110
932
-16%
1802
62%
1173
6%
954 (533 - 1155, n=4)
-14%
Score Total
2982
1954
-34%
2635
-12%
3020
1%
2596 (1552 - 3149, n=4)
-13%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-10% / -12%
28% / 26%
-4% / -5%
-1% / -1%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2386 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1654 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 398 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 381.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1349 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1283 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 38.26 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 137.5 MB/s

Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

0120240360480600720840960108012001320144015601680180019202040216022802199.282338.892347.472348.522348.62348.62349.352349.442349.562349.982350.072350.072350.192350.192350.192350.42350.612350.612350.612350.72350.822351.032351.032351.032351.032351.242351.242351.662351.662351.872352.052352.082352.282352.492352.492352.492352.72352.792353.12353.12353.122353.542353.732353.942353.942353.962354.362354.362354.992355.62Tooltip
: Ø2348 (2199.28-2355.62)

图形卡

为了显示对图形要求更高的图像内容,Envy 17 cg1356ng配备了一台NvidiaGeForce MX450.这适用于对图形性能有中等要求的3D应用,使其能够在一定程度上执行例如视频和图像处理。

在3DMark基准测试中,与我们测试领域的内部图形单元相比,Envy 17中的MX450表现出明显的优势,而且它还能够超越 NvidiaGeForce MX350前代型号。然而,与其他MX450单元相比,该GPU的性能低于平均水平。这是由于MX450有四个版本,都提供不同的性能水平,这里使用的是第二弱的版本。

你可以在我们的《GPU基准列表》中了解其他显卡提供的性能。 GPU基准测试列表.

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Multimedia
  (1365 - 31866, n=81, last 2 years)
9488 Points ∼100% +21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (6341 - 9580, n=13)
8076 Points ∼85% +3%
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-1135G7
7847 Points ∼83%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
NVIDIA GeForce MX350, Intel Core i7-1165G7
6166 Points ∼65% -21%
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), Intel Core i3-1005G1
1955 Points ∼21% -75%
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H
Intel UHD Graphics 630, Intel Core i5-10300H
1717 Points ∼18% -78%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (6498 - 87836, n=66, last 2 years)
33480 Points ∼100% +23%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (25467 - 33806, n=10)
28203 Points ∼84% +4%
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-1135G7
27235 Points ∼81%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
NVIDIA GeForce MX350, Intel Core i7-1165G7
26239 Points ∼78% -4%
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), Intel Core i3-1005G1
9889 Points ∼30% -64%
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H
Intel UHD Graphics 630, Intel Core i5-10300H
9507 Points ∼28% -65%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (920 - 23674, n=89, last 2 years)
6773 Points ∼100% +44%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (4336 - 5573, n=13)
4722 Points ∼70% +1%
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-1135G7
4689 Points ∼69%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
NVIDIA GeForce MX350, Intel Core i7-1165G7
4536 Points ∼67% -3%
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), Intel Core i3-1005G1
1347 Points ∼20% -71%
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H
Intel UHD Graphics 630, Intel Core i5-10300H
1158 Points ∼17% -75%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (300 - 9323, n=76, last 2 years)
2439 Points ∼100% +125%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (1086 - 2300, n=12)
1715 Points ∼70% +58%
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-1135G7
1086 Points ∼45%
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), Intel Core i3-1005G1
396 Points ∼16% -64%
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H
Intel UHD Graphics 630, Intel Core i5-10300H
373 Points ∼15% -66%
3DMark 11 Performance
7542 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
14229 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
4254 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
1204 points
Help

游戏性能

Nvidia的GeForce MX450相当适合游戏,只要你满足于中低的图形设置,就能够确保流畅的帧率。在我们测试的游戏中,用它在全高清分辨率下也仍能实现流畅的游戏。然而,目前的游戏,如"赛博朋克2077",需要大幅降低图形设置和分辨率,以保持30帧以上的帧率。

您可以在我们的 "GPU游戏列表 "中了解其他游戏的预期性能。 GPU游戏列表.

The Witcher 3 - 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Multimedia
  (10.5 - 243, n=62, last 2 years)
83.7 fps ∼100% +34%
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
62.4 fps ∼75%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (34 - 81.4, n=13)
60.4 fps ∼72% -3%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
42.27 (23min - 54max) fps ∼51% -32%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
84 (72.8min) fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (42.7 - 97.4, n=16)
80.2 fps ∼95% -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (13.4 - 144, n=81, last 2 years)
78.7 fps ∼94% -6%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
65.8 (55.7min) fps ∼78% -22%
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE
Intel Core i3-1005G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
20.4 (17.4min) fps ∼24% -76%
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H
Intel Core i5-10300H, Intel UHD Graphics 630
17.5 (16.4min) fps ∼21% -79%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 Standard Quality
Average of class Multimedia
  (9 - 112, n=31, last 2 years)
42.6 fps ∼100% +55%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (25 - 34.5, n=10)
27.9 fps ∼65% +1%
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
27.5 fps ∼65%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (35.4 - 66, n=16)
54.2 fps ∼100% +12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8.55 - 87.6, n=72, last 2 years)
52 fps ∼96% +7%
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
48.5 fps ∼89%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
30.2 fps ∼56% -38%
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE
Intel Core i3-1005G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
10.7 fps ∼20% -78%
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H
Intel Core i5-10300H, Intel UHD Graphics 630
10.3 fps ∼19% -79%
Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T
Average of class Multimedia
  (19 - 109, n=16, last 2 years)
52.4 fps ∼100% +64%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (24 - 41, n=5)
32.8 fps ∼63% +3%
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
32 fps ∼61%
Cyberpunk 2077 - 1280x720 Low Preset
Average of class Multimedia
  (19 - 117, n=11, last 2 years)
48.9 fps ∼100% +43%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (33.9 - 39.5, n=4)
35.8 fps ∼73% +5%
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
34.2 fps ∼70%
low med. high ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 107 62.4 33 19.9 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 123 103 92 84 fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 58.8 27.5 18 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 62.8 54.6 48.5 fps
Far Cry 5 (2018) 63 32 27 26 fps
Cyberpunk 2077 (2020) 34.2 13.6 9.4 fps

排放 - 仅在非常重的负载下节流

噪声排放

噪声特性
噪声特性

由于噪音水平高达46.6 dB(A),Envy 17的风扇会变得相当响。但这种情况很少发生,惠普笔记本电脑可以被认为是一台安静的笔记本电脑。在使用办公程序或在互联网上冲浪时,风扇大多保持关闭状态,因此,这款笔记本电脑也适合对噪音敏感的环境。

我们无法注意到任何其他噪音,如线圈酒。

Noise Level

Idle
26 / 31.7 / dB(A)
HDD
0 dB(A)
Load
43.2 / 46.6 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 26 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2021.522.121.220.530.521.52524.726.923.921.431.724.73122.825.534.320.53222.84024.119.326.817.730.724.15029.728.928.118.629.929.76317.617.421.716.120.317.68016.618.921.115.516.916.610016.617.818.314.716.716.612516.518.320.815.217.816.516016.320.819.515.516.716.320016.119.519.214.614.716.125014.219.718.413.81414.231514.82421.113.21414.840015.82421.91212.115.850014.42422.111.412.214.463020.326.124.811.311.920.380017.62826.711.511.517.6100020.332.229.711.611.820.3125023.535.232.91211.823.5160022.134.231.711.712.322.1200023.136.934.512.412.423.1250021.234.73212.712.321.2315018.834.131.714.81318.8400016.540.134.513.813.316.5500015.436.430.313.813.315.4630014.729.526.314.113.514.7800014.631.728.514.613.914.6100001631.830.418.115.5161250015.127.72718.715.315.11600012.81819.114.812.812.8SPL31.746.743.225.725.131.7N1.45.140.70.61.4median 16.3median 28median 26.7median 13.8median 13.3median 16.3Delta2.26.25.21.31.62.230.823.72425.630.83230.335.227.53230.226.328.92930.225.12226.223.225.130.121.224.924.130.123.722.726.720.423.720.221.219.617.220.22315.716.8192317.116.817.115.717.115.416.417.213.615.415.916.81713.115.915.116.917.212.415.114.820.520.61214.815.424.724.612.115.413.42322.512.113.41627.82911.61616.928.428.31216.917.230.13111.817.220.434.935.512.320.416.732.833.311.816.715.434.334.811.915.414.635.335.912.314.614.834.13513.114.814.732.533.213.214.714.132.132.913.414.113.729.730.113.413.713.625.826.713.613.613.520.421.31413.513.41818.416.313.412.81715.313.712.827.944.144.824.927.90.94.24.40.60.9median 15.1median 25.8median 26.7median 13.1median 15.11.27.57.30.91.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP Envy 17-cg1356ngAcer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5

温度

压力测试
压力测试

根据我们的测量,在我们的压力测试场景中,Envy 17的表面温度最高可达49.7°C(约121°F),最热的地方是底部中央向后的位置。在最高27°C(81°F)的情况下,掌托始终保持在一个适度的温度范围内。然而,压力测试代表了一种极端的情况,在日常操作中,这些数值应该会大大降低,这样你就可以一直在你的腿上使用笔记本电脑而不会有任何问题。

在我们的持续压力测试中,惠普笔记本电脑内部的温度短暂地上升到93℃(199°F)。这时,时钟速度下降到约400兆赫。直到测试结束,冷却系统才得以将其稳定在1.5 GHz的平均值。尽管这低于2.4GHz的基本时钟速度,但在这段时间内,系统仍然可以顺利运行。由于像我们的压力测试中那样的负载在实践中不太可能发生,所以你不必期望由于温度过高而产生任何限制。

Max. Load
 34.2 °C44 °C45.9 °C 
 34 °C37.9 °C32.9 °C 
 27.1 °C25.4 °C27 °C 
Maximum: 45.9 °C
Average: 34.3 °C
44.5 °C49.7 °C33.8 °C
30 °C40 °C31.5 °C
24.9 °C26.2 °C27 °C
Maximum: 49.7 °C
Average: 34.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  54.3 °C | Room Temperature 22.2 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 31 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.9 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.7 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 39 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.2 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 31 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.1 °C / 80.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+1.8 °C / 3.2 F).
热图--空闲运行(顶部
热图--空闲运行(顶部
热图--空闲运行(底部
热图--空闲运行(底部
热图 - 负载下(顶部
热图 - 负载下(顶部
热图 - 负载下(底部
热图 - 负载下(底部

发言人

扬声器特点
扬声器特点

惠普Envy 17 cg1356ng的扬声器能够产生相对较大的音量,提供强调高频率的声谱。这使得它们适合于再现语音内容,例如,但对于聆听媒体内容或音乐,建议使用外部扬声器或耳机。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs202630.5262530.331.730.33123.23223.24028.930.728.9503629.9366321.920.321.98017.416.917.410018.916.718.912527.517.827.516037.316.737.320040.314.740.325052.71452.731559.31459.340066.712.166.750065.112.265.163065.611.965.680066.711.566.7100066.211.866.2125074.311.874.316007212.372200074.112.474.1250068.512.368.5315073.21373.240007313.373500075.213.375.2630077.513.577.5800079.813.979.81000083.715.583.71250080.315.380.31600070.612.870.6SPL87.425.187.4N67.70.667.7median 68.5median 13.3median 68.5Delta10.11.610.122.322.822.32935.92929.630.629.623.225.623.230.824.730.823.522.123.520.621.120.621.822.321.818.917.218.924.515.424.531.113.531.146.415.546.457.114.757.16219.46256.713.356.761.512.961.568.212.268.26912.96966.513.166.568.412.468.469.91369.966.913.266.963.213.163.26213.26263.413.563.464.913.664.965.413.565.462.513.662.557.513.457.556.612.656.678.125.678.141.30.741.3median 62median 13.4median 629.40.99.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Envy 17-cg1356ngLenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69.03 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电源管理--WLAN中良好的电池寿命

消耗功率

根据我们的测量,Envy 17的最大功耗为68瓦。闲置状态下的平均功率为9.4瓦,负载下为64.4瓦,是我们测试领域中效率较低的设备之一。

附带的电源的额定功率为65瓦,所以它略微太小。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.35 / 0.8 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3.8 / 9.4 / 10.1 Watt
Load midlight 64.4 / 68 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng
i5-1135G7, GeForce MX450, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE
i3-1005G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), Samsung PM991 MZALQ256HAJD, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H
i5-10300H, UHD Graphics 630, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 17.30
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
 
Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
12%
8%
-5%
2%
-30%
Idle Minimum *
3.8
4.4
-16%
4.1
-8%
3.7
3%
4.15 (3 - 6, n=12)
-9%
6.07 (2.4 - 28.6, n=80, last 2 years)
-60%
Idle Average *
9.4
10
-6%
7.8
17%
8.3
12%
7.63 (4.9 - 9.4, n=12)
19%
10.5 (3 - 26.5, n=80, last 2 years)
-12%
Idle Maximum *
10.1
11.7
-16%
10
1%
11.3
-12%
10.8 (5.7 - 14.2, n=12)
-7%
13.8 (4.6 - 42, n=80, last 2 years)
-37%
Load Average *
64.4
47
27%
44
32%
56 (25 - 74, n=12)
13%
66.4 (24.8 - 150, n=80, last 2 years)
-3%
Witcher 3 ultra *
64.4
26.8
58%
Load Maximum *
68
42
38%
64.7
5%
109
-60%
71.4 (50.4 - 99, n=12)
-5%
94.6 (28.8 - 235, n=80, last 2 years)
-39%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stress Test

051015202530354045505560656363.162.76363.463.663.663.46363.463.764.864.763.763.96464.56463.864.364.663.964.164.263.96464.36464.264.764.163.964.264.164.464.164.164.7646464.264.663.964.264.56464.264.364.164.964.264.964.664.264.264.264.264.564.364.564.26464.763.864.465.264.764.164.464.365.364.364.164.264.164.364.464.36464.66464.364.964.664.164.564.163.963.764.764.164.56463.964.463.964.264.264.264.164.564.164.464.564.464.764.364.564.264.764.264.564.665.364.664.664.164.364.664.864.764.664.364.764.664.564.665.164.164.564.764.764.964.364.464.564.864.664.264.664.565.164.364.564.664.564.664.865.464.264.664.864.464.764.164.164.664.46564.164.664.764.964.564.664.764.864.964.764.364.764.964.664.664.664.764.464.764.864.364.464.764.364.464.764.464.664.664.764.864.364.764.564.764.764.664.564.564.764.764.564.564.364.564.964.564.764.464.964.664.464.864.464.464.664.764.464.764.76363.162.76363.463.663.663.46363.463.764.864.763.763.96464.56463.864.364.663.964.164.263.96464.36464.264.764.163.964.264.164.464.164.164.7646464.264.663.964.264.56464.264.364.164.964.264.964.664.264.264.264.264.564.364.564.26464.763.864.465.264.764.164.464.365.364.364.164.264.164.364.464.36464.66464.364.964.664.164.564.163.963.764.764.164.56463.964.463.964.264.264.264.164.564.164.464.564.464.764.364.564.264.764.264.564.665.364.664.664.164.364.664.864.764.664.364.764.664.564.665.164.164.564.764.764.964.364.464.564.864.664.264.664.565.164.364.564.664.564.664.865.464.264.664.864.464.764.164.164.664.46564.164.664.764.964.564.664.764.864.964.764.364.764.964.664.664.664.764.464.764.864.364.464.764.364.464.764.464.664.664.764.864.364.764.564.764.764.664.564.564.764.764.564.564.364.564.964.564.764.464.964.664.464.864.464.464.664.764.464.764.768.668.468.468.368.268.468.468.468.468.368.468.368.368.368.868.468.368.368.368.368.368.36868.368.368.468.368.368.368.568.468.668.468.468.168.168.268686868.168.1686868.368.26868.268.168.168.168.268.16868.1686868.168.168.168.16868.168.267.568.168.16867.96868.168.16868.168.267.968.868.168.168.16868.168.168.268.168.268.168.268.168.168.268.268.168.168.26868.168.168.16868.168.168.268.268.268.168.26868.168.168.168.268.268.268.268.168.168.16868.168.16868.168.168.168.16868.268.168.168.168.168.168.168.168.168.16868.168.268.168.168.168.268.168.268.168.168.168.168.268.168.168.268.168.268.268.168.168.268.168.168.168.168.268.268.268.268.16868.16867.96868.168.168.168.168.16868.268.168.168.168.168.268.168.168.168.1Tooltip
; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø64.4 (62.7-65.4)
; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø68.2 (67.5-68.8)

电池寿命

在我们现实的WLAN测试中,惠普笔记本电脑的电池寿命达到了近8小时。在我们的测试领域,只有 戴尔XPS 17 9700取得了更好的成绩,但它也配备了一个更大的电池。

由于支持快速充电,55.67瓦时的电池在大约1.5小时后就完全充满了。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
17h 43min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
7h 52min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 58min
HP Envy 17-cg1356ng
i5-1135G7, GeForce MX450, 55.67 Wh
Lenovo V17-IIL 82GX008TGE
i3-1005G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), 42 Wh
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350, 50.2 Wh
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H
i5-10300H, UHD Graphics 630, 97 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Battery Runtime
-22%
-5%
48%
3%
Reader / Idle
1063
827
-22%
1157 (274 - 2407, n=47, last 2 years)
9%
WiFi v1.3
472
369
-22%
441.4
-6%
912
93%
514 (198 - 912, n=82, last 2 years)
9%
Load
118
133
13%
121
3%
106 (41 - 265, n=64, last 2 years)
-10%
Witcher 3 ultra
77
82 (54 - 110, n=2, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 坚固的外壳
+ 良好的输入设备
+ 日常操作中的良好性能
+ 良好的电池寿命

Cons

- 反射率很高的显示屏
- 在非常大的负荷下节流
- 里面的部件难以接近
- 电源的尺寸略微过紧

结论 - 只能在室内使用

测试HP Envy 17 cg1356ng。测试装置由德国惠普公司提供。
测试HP Envy 17 cg1356ng。测试装置由德国惠普公司提供。

在我们的测试中,惠普Envy 17 cg1356ng显示自己是一台性能良好的笔记本电脑,不仅能够毫无问题地处理大量的办公任务,而且其显卡也使它适合于对图形性能要求稍高的应用。有了它,你可以舒适地执行一些图像和视频处理任务,游戏也可以在降低的图形设置下流畅地玩。良好的输入设备也有助于到目前为止的印象是好的。

性能良好的惠普Envy 17 cg1356ng的基本良好印象被高反射率的显示屏所破坏。

凭借其17.3英寸的屏幕,惠普笔记本电脑的显示屏足够大,可以再现各种媒体内容,易于阅读。如果不是因为反射式显示屏,亮度也会足够高。这不仅使其在户外难以识别图像内容,而且在室内的一些人造光源也会阻碍显示屏的视野,例如。

因此,那些正在寻找具有类似设备但采用哑光显示屏的笔记本电脑的人,也许会更好地使用 Acer Aspire 5 A517.

HP Envy 17-cg1356ng - 08/14/2021 v7
Mike Wobker

Chassis
85 / 98 → 87%
Keyboard
84%
Pointing Device
86%
Connectivity
63 / 80 → 79%
Weight
58 / 20-72 → 74%
Battery
79 / 95 → 83%
Display
80%
Games Performance
70 / 90 → 78%
Application Performance
87 / 90 → 97%
Temperature
91%
Noise
79 / 95 → 83%
Audio
75%
Camera
31 / 85 → 37%
Average
75%
82%
Multimedia - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Mark Riege
Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 237 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018
Stefan Hinum
Translator: Stefan Hinum - Founder, CEO, CFO - 18063 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2006
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 惠普Envy 17 cg1356ng评论。一台大型多媒体笔记本电脑
Mike Wobker, 2021-08-22 (Update: 2021-08-22)