Gigabyte A5 K1评测。老式的游戏笔记本

Name: Gigabyte A5 K1
Brand: Gigabyte

反对瘦身的趋势。 技嘉A5 K1是一款经典的游戏笔记本电脑，它并不强调薄而轻的外壳。重点是良好的性价比，因为你得到一个来自AMD的六核CPU和一个GeForce RTX 3060的高TGP，价格低于1000欧元（约993美元）。

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 09/07/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Geforce Laptop / Notebook Ryzen (Zen)

在我们已经测试了不到1800欧元（约1788美元）的A5 X1与 Ryzen 9 5900HX和 GeForce RTX 3070现在，技嘉给我们送来了便宜得多的A5 K1，它也有16GB DDR4内存（2x 8GB双通道）和512GB基于NVM的固态硬盘，但不得不用较少的CPU和GPU功率来做。然而，一个Ryzen 5 5600H和一个 GeForce RTX 3060在900欧元左右（约894美元）是非常可敬的。在这个价格范围内，你通常只能得到一个 GeForce RTX 3050或 3050 Ti.技嘉（或裸机制造商Clevo）使用1920 x 1080像素的哑光144赫兹面板作为显示器。请注意。这台电脑实际上只配备了FreeDOS。不过，技嘉很好地提前为我们安装了Windows 11 Pro。

Test device courtesy of Gigabyte DE

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Gigabyte A5 K1 (A5 Series)

Processor

AMD Ryzen 5 5600H 6 x 3.3 - 4.2 GHz, Cezanne-H (Zen 3)

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU - 6 GB VRAM, Core: 1702 MHz, Memory: 1750 MHz, 130 W TDP, GDDR6, ForceWare 516.94, Optimus

Memory

16 GB

, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-3200, Dual Channel, two slots (both in use), max. 64 GB

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, BOEhydis NV156FHM-N4K (BOE08B3), IPS, Full-HD, glossy: no, 144 Hz

Mainboard

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Storage

ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4, 512 GB

, NVMe-SSD, two M.2-PCIe-slots (one in use), one 2.5-inch-slot

Soundcard

Realtek ALC293 @ AMD K19.5 - Audio Processor - High Definition Audio Controller

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 1 Headset, 1 Mic

Networking

Realtek Gaming 2.5GbE Family Controller (10MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 34 x 361 x 258

Battery

48.96 Wh Lithium-Ion, removeable

Camera

Webcam: HD

Additional features

Speakers: 2.0, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 230 W Power Supply, Gaming Center, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.174 kg, Power Supply: 684 g

Price

899 EUR

Links

Gigabyte homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

A5 K1的竞争对手包括其他15英寸的游戏机，GeForce RTX 3060或同等型号的产品 Radeon RX 6600M像华硕TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM，以及联想Legion 5 15ACH6A和 MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK除了Legion ，它们都要贵得多。后者的笔记本作为对比设备出现在表中。

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
82.3 %	09/2022	Gigabyte A5 K1 R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	2.2 kg	34 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
87.2 %	03/2022	Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	24.95 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
82.6 %	05/2022	Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE R5 5600H, Radeon RX 6600M	2.5 kg	25.75 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
82.6 %	01/2022	MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 R7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M	2.4 kg	23.95 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
84.1 %	01/2022	Gigabyte A5 X1 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	2.2 kg	25.3 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

由于机箱在结构上与A5 X1相同，除了最小的变化（侧面现在有纹理/结构的地方），我们将不在本文中重新评估机箱、端口和输入设备。你可以在下面的测试报告中找到相应的信息链接的测试报告.

尺寸比较

Gigabyte A5 K1 Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM DIN A4 ❌

沟通

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Gigabyte A5 K1 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1629 (1540^min - 1665^max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1793, n=153, last 2 years)	1272 MBit/s -22%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (694 - 1629, n=17)	1257 MBit/s -23%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Gigabyte A5 K1 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1717 (1689^min - 1734^max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming (685 - 1890, n=159, last 2 years)	1403 MBit/s -18%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (832 - 1722, n=17)	1383 MBit/s -19%

Gigabyte A5 K1 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1717 (1689-1734)

Gigabyte A5 K1 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1629 (1540-1665)

网络摄像头

ColorChecker Gigabyte A5 K1: 9.9 ∆E min: 4.09 - max: 16.61 ∆E

显示

与A5 X1相比，屏幕的得分稍弱，但总体上仍处于相当好的水平。


271 cd/m²	287 cd/m²	293 cd/m²
289 cd/m²	295 cd/m²	304 cd/m²
279 cd/m²	262 cd/m²	253 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BOEhydis NV156FHM-N4K (BOE08B3) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 304 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 281.4 cd/m² Minimum: 13 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 295 cd/m²
Contrast: 1017:1 (Black: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.36 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.2
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
66.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.106

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Gigabyte A5 K1 BOEhydis NV156FHM-N4K (BOE08B3), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM TL156VDXP0101, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE LGD06A5, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AU Optronics B156HAN08.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Gigabyte A5 X1 AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display		4%	9%	1%	7%
Display P3 Coverage	64.4	66.4 3%	71.1 10%	65.9 2%	69.6 8%
sRGB Coverage	92.5	97 5%	99.1 7%	91.6 -1%	98.6 7%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	66.1	68.5 4%	72.3 9%	67 1%	70.8 7%
Response Times		13%	17%	44%	25%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	14.5 ?(6.8, 7.7)	5.6 ?(3.2, 2.4) 61%	15 ?(7, 8) -3%	5.06 ?(2.5, 2.56) 65%	4.8 ?(1.4, 3.4) 67%
Response Time Black / White *	9.5 ?(5.5, 4)	12.8 ?(6.8, 6) -35%	6 ?(2, 4) 37%	7.44 ?(3.76, 3.68) 22%	11.2 ?(5.2, 6) -18%
PWM Frequency
Screen		27%	7%	-10%	3%
Brightness middle	295	353.7 20%	371 26%	311 5%	335 14%
Brightness	281	340 21%	328 17%	325 16%	325 16%
Brightness Distribution	83	89 7%	85 2%	84 1%	90 8%
Black Level *	0.29	0.34 -17%	0.32 -10%	0.22 24%	0.4 -38%
Contrast	1017	1040 2%	1159 14%	1414 39%	838 -18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.36	1.74 60%	3.25 25%	5.06 -16%	2.63 40%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.92	3.63 48%	6.33 9%	8.37 -21%	7.71 -11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.2	0.5 58%	1.11 7%	2.62 -118%	0.97 19%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.9	2.1 46%	4.94 -27%	4.8 -23%	4 -3%
Gamma	2.106 ^104%	2.3 ^96%	2.45 ^90%	2.12 ^104%	2.129 ^103%
CCT	7300 ^89%	6257 ^104%	6064 ^107%	8002 ^81%	7434 ^87%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		15% / 20%	11% / 9%	12% / -0%	12% / 7%

* ... smaller is better

我们的A5 K1的测试配置没有采用友达光电的面板，而是采用了京东方的面板。除了照明问题（显示器在可见的屏幕出血方面很挣扎），亮度也可以更好。平均281cd/m²的亮度对于大多数室内环境来说可能是足够的，但在冬季花园、阳台或露台等较亮的地方，你会很快希望有更高的亮度。更昂贵的兄弟在这里仍然达到325cd/m²。

A5 K1的优点是黑值略低（0.29 vs 0.4 cd/m²），这导致纸张上的对比度明显提高（1107:1 vs 838:1）。然而，由于A5 X1提供了更大的色彩空间，因此在实践中的差异是有限的。

后者在色彩准确性方面也略微领先。两台设备的可视角度和响应时间都令人满意。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
9.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.5 ms rise
9.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6.8 ms rise
14.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 7.7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

权力

凭借六核CPU和6GB GPU，A5 K1使自己在中端和高端之间游刃有余。16GB的内存对于广告中的价格来说也不错。

测试条件

在其他方面，电源模式可以在预装的游戏中心中改变，这在视觉上与其他Clevo裸机很熟悉。除了在娱乐模式下进行的电池测试外，我们的测量是在电源配置文件（包括自动风扇速度设置）下进行的。为了获得更长的电池寿命和更低的运行噪音，我们建议使用省电模式和静音模式，这并不完全符合其名称。

处理器

Ryzen 5 5600H是GeForce RTX 3060的一个理想伴侣。这款来自AMD塞尚一代的六核型号提供16MB L3缓存，并可通过SMT并行处理多达12个线程。这款7纳米芯片的TDP为45瓦。尽管Ryzen 5 5600H不出所料地不能与更强大的AMD兄弟竞争 Ryzen 7 5800H和Ryzen 9 5900HX，但该处理器提供了良好的性能。在Cinebench R15的循环测试中，结果仍然非常稳定，与同样配备5600H的联想Legion 5持平。

Cinebench R15 Multi Endurance test

Gigabyte A5 K1 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H: Ø1670 (1660.65-1681.66)

Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2656 (2614.89-2735.42)

Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H: Ø1622 (1447.86-1653.64)

MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø1973 (1963.86-1985.21)

Gigabyte A5 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø2143 (2094.46-2151.12)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming	85.4 pt
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	79.8 pt
Gigabyte A5 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	63.9 pt
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	62 pt
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	55.1 pt
Gigabyte A5 K1 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	53.8 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	52.8 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34613, n=232, last 2 years)	19581 Points +92%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	17713 (16651.9^min - 17712.9^max) Points +74%
Gigabyte A5 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	13500 Points +32%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	12083 Points +18%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	10416 Points +2%
Gigabyte A5 K1 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	10209 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (7945 - 10416, n=13)	9466 Points -7%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2235, n=230, last 2 years)	1816 Points +32%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	1771 Points +29%
Gigabyte A5 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	1493 Points +9%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1415 Points +3%
Gigabyte A5 K1 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	1373 Points
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	1366 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (1316 - 1381, n=13)	1363 Points -1%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=230, last 2 years)	7442 Points +87%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	6754 Points +70%
Gigabyte A5 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	5180 Points +30%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	4663 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	4059 Points +2%
Gigabyte A5 K1 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	3980 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (3074 - 4059, n=16)	3678 Points -8%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (169 - 855, n=230, last 2 years)	699 Points +30%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	680 Points +27%
Gigabyte A5 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	580 Points +8%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	554 Points +3%
Gigabyte A5 K1 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	536 Points
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	535 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (527 - 538, n=15)	533 Points -1%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=235, last 2 years)	3101 Points +84%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	2735 (2614.89^min - 2735.42^max) Points +63%
Gigabyte A5 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	2151 Points +28%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1985 (1963.86^min - 1985.21^max) Points +18%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	1723 Points +2%
Gigabyte A5 K1 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	1682 (1660.65^min - 1681.66^max) Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (1319 - 1723, n=16)	1562 Points -7%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 318, n=234, last 2 years)	268 Points +20%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	253 Points +13%
Gigabyte A5 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	237 Points +6%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	229 Points +2%
Gigabyte A5 K1 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	224 Points
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	223 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (218 - 225, n=14)	222 Points -1%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (300 - 384, n=14)	326 Seconds * -8%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	305.2 Seconds * -1%
Gigabyte A5 K1 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	302 Seconds *
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	257 Seconds * +15%
Gigabyte A5 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	231 Seconds * +24%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=228, last 2 years)	198.9 Seconds * +34%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	182 Seconds * +40%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=229, last 2 years)	77274 MIPS +66%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	67160 MIPS +44%
Gigabyte A5 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	60371 MIPS +30%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	56348 MIPS +21%
Gigabyte A5 K1 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	46482 MIPS
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	44503 MIPS -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (36315 - 46562, n=14)	43438 MIPS -7%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=229, last 2 years)	6133 MIPS +14%
Gigabyte A5 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	5720 MIPS +6%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	5508 MIPS +2%
Gigabyte A5 K1 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	5391 MIPS
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	5381 MIPS 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (5213 - 5446, n=14)	5350 MIPS -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	5330 MIPS -1%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=234, last 2 years)	13627 Points +90%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	12358 Points +72%
Gigabyte A5 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	8616 Points +20%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	8266 Points +15%
Gigabyte A5 K1 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	7186 Points
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	6567 Points -9%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (4990 - 7253, n=14)	6521 Points -9%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2210, n=234, last 2 years)	1811 Points +26%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	1751 Points +22%
Gigabyte A5 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	1525 Points +6%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1492 Points +4%
Gigabyte A5 K1 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	1434 Points
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	1414 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (1365 - 1445, n=14)	1412 Points -2%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=232, last 2 years)	21.3 fps +60%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	20.5 fps +54%
Gigabyte A5 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	16.6 fps +25%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	15.2 fps +14%
Gigabyte A5 K1 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	13.3 fps
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	12.8 fps -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (9.92 - 13.3, n=14)	12 fps -10%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Gigabyte A5 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	85.6 s * -5%
Gigabyte A5 K1 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	81.5 s *
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (52.2 - 81.5, n=14)	58.7 s * +28%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	55.9 s * +31%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	55.1 s * +32%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	49.9 s * +39%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=226, last 2 years)	49.1 s * +40%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (0.526 - 0.596, n=14)	0.541 sec * -2%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	0.537 sec * -2%
Gigabyte A5 K1 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	0.529 sec *
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	0.52 sec * +2%
Gigabyte A5 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	0.501 sec * +5%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 4.47, n=229, last 2 years)	0.4687 sec * +11%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4655 sec * +12%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1682 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

134.9 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

224 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming	96.2 pt
Gigabyte A5 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	86.4 pt
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M	79.6 pt
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	67.8 pt
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Radeon RX 6600M	65.4 pt
Gigabyte A5 K1 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	62 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H	60.5 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (3069 - 60169, n=225, last 2 years)	18634 KRay/s +52%
Gigabyte A5 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	15973 KRay/s +30%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M	14273 KRay/s +16%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Radeon RX 6600M	12360 KRay/s +1%
Gigabyte A5 K1 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	12287 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (9181 - 12636, n=14)	11351 KRay/s -8%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	9486 KRay/s -23%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Gigabyte A5 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	98866 Points +31%
Average of class Gaming (18567 - 252486, n=225, last 2 years)	93571 Points +24%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M	89725 Points +19%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Radeon RX 6600M	76011 Points +1%
Gigabyte A5 K1 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	75433 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (51994 - 78250, n=14)	69168 Points -8%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	41434 Points -45%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=225, last 2 years)	4332 MB/s +73%
Gigabyte A5 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	3395 MB/s +36%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	3288 MB/s +31%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M	3049 MB/s +22%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Radeon RX 6600M	2607 MB/s +4%
Gigabyte A5 K1 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	2502 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (1587 - 2675, n=14)	2332 MB/s -7%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=225, last 2 years)	109573 Points +42%
Gigabyte A5 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	102967 Points +33%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	99267 Points +29%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M	96014 Points +24%
Gigabyte A5 K1 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	77213 Points
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Radeon RX 6600M	76998 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (66699 - 77213, n=14)	74600 Points -3%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Gigabyte A5 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	12585 Points +39%
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=225, last 2 years)	12203 Points +35%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M	11629 Points +28%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	9852 Points +9%
Gigabyte A5 K1 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	9054 Points
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Radeon RX 6600M	8894 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (8340 - 9159, n=14)	8787 Points -3%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Gigabyte A5 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	54353 Points +31%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M	49254 Points +19%
Average of class Gaming (10291 - 134044, n=225, last 2 years)	47882 Points +16%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Radeon RX 6600M	41691 Points +1%
Gigabyte A5 K1 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	41456 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (28268 - 43274, n=14)	38073 Points -8%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	26379 Points -36%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Gigabyte A5 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	131100 MB/s +229%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M	121180 MB/s +204%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=225, last 2 years)	107712 MB/s +170%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Radeon RX 6600M	96790 MB/s +143%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (39852 - 98939, n=14)	75379 MB/s +89%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	66712 MB/s +67%
Gigabyte A5 K1 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	39852 MB/s

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2409, n=225, last 2 years)	1213 MB/s +95%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	1164 MB/s +87%
Gigabyte A5 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	833 MB/s +34%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M	789 MB/s +27%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Radeon RX 6600M	632 MB/s +2%
Gigabyte A5 K1 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	621 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (507 - 649, n=14)	601 MB/s -3%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (1518 - 31796, n=225, last 2 years)	10089 KRay/s +53%
Gigabyte A5 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	8496 KRay/s +29%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M	7526 KRay/s +14%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Radeon RX 6600M	6652 KRay/s +1%
Gigabyte A5 K1 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	6584 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (4811 - 6652, n=14)	5982 KRay/s -9%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	5486 KRay/s -17%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=226, last 2 years)	36818 MPixel/s +85%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	33509 MPixel/s +68%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M	20495 MPixel/s +3%
Gigabyte A5 K1 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	19920 MPixel/s
Gigabyte A5 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	19628 MPixel/s -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (7419 - 24746, n=14)	17081 MPixel/s -14%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Radeon RX 6600M	15135 MPixel/s -24%

系统性能

虽然它在PCMark 10的测试领域得分垫底，但A5 K1的系统性能大多令人信服。 6.考虑到该笔记本的价格，341分绝对是值得尊敬的。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=200, last 2 years)	7592 Points +20%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	7426 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE Radeon RX 6600M, R5 5600H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	7091 Points +12%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD	6875 Points +8%
Gigabyte A5 X1 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)	6875 Points +8%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (6341 - 6615, n=2)	6478 Points +2%
Gigabyte A5 K1 GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4	6341 Points

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average of class Gaming (8300 - 12334, n=199, last 2 years)	10731 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE Radeon RX 6600M, R5 5600H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	10506 Points +4%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	10499 Points +4%
Gigabyte A5 K1 GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4	10127 Points
Gigabyte A5 X1 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)	10105 Points 0%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD	9907 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (9639 - 10127, n=2)	9883 Points -2%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 11833, n=199, last 2 years)	9725 Points +10%
Gigabyte A5 X1 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)	9301 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE Radeon RX 6600M, R5 5600H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	9299 Points +5%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	9070 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (8829 - 9027, n=2)	8928 Points +1%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD	8922 Points +1%
Gigabyte A5 K1 GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4	8829 Points

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	11672 Points +51%
Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=199, last 2 years)	11476 Points +48%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD	9977 Points +29%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE Radeon RX 6600M, R5 5600H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	9907 Points +28%
Gigabyte A5 X1 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)	9383 Points +21%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (7740 - 9026, n=2)	8383 Points +8%
Gigabyte A5 K1 GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4	7740 Points

CrossMark / Overall
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2334, n=170, last 2 years)	1881 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU ()	1337 Points
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD	1309 Points

CrossMark / Productivity
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=170, last 2 years)	1791 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU ()	1370 Points
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD	1285 Points

CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2514, n=170, last 2 years)	2046 Points
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD	1401 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU ()	1372 Points

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=170, last 2 years)	1704 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU ()	1148 Points
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD	1129 Points

PCMark 10 Score		6341 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 92565, n=225, last 2 years)	59453 MB/s +42%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	53661 MB/s +28%
Gigabyte A5 K1 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	41892 MB/s
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M	41740 MB/s 0%
Gigabyte A5 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	41194 MB/s -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (20549 - 42141, n=14)	37145 MB/s -11%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Radeon RX 6600M	37007 MB/s -12%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Gaming (24879 - 90647, n=225, last 2 years)	63375 MB/s +33%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	59205 MB/s +24%
Gigabyte A5 K1 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	47595 MB/s
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M	47139 MB/s -1%
Gigabyte A5 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	46526 MB/s -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (22917 - 47595, n=14)	42445 MB/s -11%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Radeon RX 6600M	42375 MB/s -11%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Gaming (21619 - 103259, n=225, last 2 years)	61670 MB/s +38%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	58758 MB/s +32%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M	45343 MB/s +2%
Gigabyte A5 K1 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	44556 MB/s
Gigabyte A5 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	43231 MB/s -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (20226 - 44872, n=14)	36396 MB/s -18%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Radeon RX 6600M	30785 MB/s -31%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Radeon RX 6600M	87.9 ns * -15%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 152.5, n=222, last 2 years)	87.3 ns * -15%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M	79.9 ns * -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (75 - 89.1, n=14)	79 ns * -4%
Gigabyte A5 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	76.8 ns * -1%
Gigabyte A5 K1 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	76.2 ns *
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	0 ns * +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

笔记本电脑在延迟方面做得不太理想。根据LatencyMon工具，那些想实时编辑音频或视频的人应该宁可寻找替代方案（或手动操作），许多笔记本在这里暴露出弱点。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Gigabyte A5 K1 GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4	1011.8 μs *
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD	1010 μs * -0%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE Radeon RX 6600M, R5 5600H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	833 μs * +18%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	719 μs * +29%
Gigabyte A5 X1 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)	371.9 μs * +63%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储

安装的512GB固态硬盘对于NVMe硬盘来说，既不是特别快，也不是特别慢，但表现在比较设备的中场。我们必须特别批评其长期性能。在用DiskSpd进行的长期测试中，速度在几次运行后大幅下降，然后稳定在一个中等水平。积极的一面是，该机箱最多可以容纳两个M.2驱动器（PCIe 2280）和一个2.5英寸驱动器。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3480 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2265 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 530.7 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 594.7 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2296 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2241 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 45.83 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 128.5 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	93.4 pt
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	77.9 pt
Average ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4	63.1 pt
Gigabyte A5 K1 ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4	54.3 pt
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD	48.8 pt
Gigabyte A5 X1 ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)	47 pt
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	44.4 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=199, last 2 years)	3539 MB/s +58%
Average ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4 (2246 - 2913, n=2)	2580 MB/s +15%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2383 (2361.29^min - 2382.94^max) MB/s +6%
Gigabyte A5 K1 ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4	2246 (2220.01^min - 2246.17^max) MB/s
Gigabyte A5 X1 ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)	1953 (1947.63^min - 1952.74^max) MB/s -13%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	1935 (1931.9^min - 1934.83^max) MB/s -14%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD	1049 (1034.13^min - 1049^max) MB/s -53%
seq write
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=199, last 2 years)	3829 MB/s +78%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2894 (2651.7^min - 2893.78^max) MB/s +34%
Average ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4 (2153 - 2534, n=2)	2344 MB/s +9%
Gigabyte A5 K1 ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4	2153 (2086.9^min - 2153.03^max) MB/s
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD	1891 (1871.11^min - 1890.99^max) MB/s -12%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	1146 (903.24^min - 1146.3^max) MB/s -47%
Gigabyte A5 X1 ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)	1088 (531.01^min - 1088.42^max) MB/s -49%
seq q8 t1 read
Average of class Gaming (2268 - 16089, n=199, last 2 years)	6390 MB/s +84%
Average ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4 (3471 - 5005, n=2)	4238 MB/s +22%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	3554 (3284.35^min - 3554.02^max) MB/s +2%
Gigabyte A5 K1 ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4	3471 (3197.63^min - 3470.77^max) MB/s
Gigabyte A5 X1 ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)	2674 (2488.96^min - 2674.08^max) MB/s -23%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	2213 (2018.77^min - 2212.5^max) MB/s -36%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD	1665 (1590.44^min - 1664.72^max) MB/s -52%
seq q8 t1 write
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=199, last 2 years)	4818 MB/s +113%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2869 (2667.88^min - 2869.19^max) MB/s +27%
Average ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4 (2260 - 2543, n=2)	2402 MB/s +6%
Gigabyte A5 K1 ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4	2260 (2237.17^min - 2259.57^max) MB/s
Gigabyte A5 X1 ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)	2090 (864.03^min - 2090.02^max) MB/s -8%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD	1960 (1947.92^min - 1959.85^max) MB/s -13%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	1145 (65.64^min - 1144.64^max) MB/s -49%
4k q1 t1 read
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	69.4 (68.09^min - 69.4^max) MB/s +61%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=199, last 2 years)	67.9 MB/s +58%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD	60.7 (60.5^min - 60.73^max) MB/s +41%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	60.5 (60.38^min - 60.5^max) MB/s +41%
Gigabyte A5 X1 ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)	57.5 (57.41^min - 57.47^max) MB/s +34%
Average ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4 (43 - 62, n=2)	52.5 MB/s +22%
Gigabyte A5 K1 ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4	43 (42.51^min - 43.01^max) MB/s
4k q1 t1 write
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 421, n=199, last 2 years)	224 MB/s +71%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	211 (210.13^min - 210.73^max) MB/s +61%
Average ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4 (131.3 - 274, n=2)	203 MB/s +55%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	153 (151.1^min - 152.72^max) MB/s +17%
Gigabyte A5 X1 ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)	149 (147.55^min - 148.51^max) MB/s +13%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD	145 (143.98^min - 144.95^max) MB/s +10%
Gigabyte A5 K1 ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4	131.3 (127.87^min - 131.25^max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 read
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=199, last 2 years)	2590 MB/s +212%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2217 (2210.73^min - 2217.07^max) MB/s +167%
Average ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4 (829 - 1727, n=2)	1278 MB/s +54%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD	961 (959.57^min - 961.1^max) MB/s +16%
Gigabyte A5 K1 ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4	829 (783.23^min - 828.86^max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	646 (644.91^min - 645.74^max) MB/s -22%
Gigabyte A5 X1 ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)	375 (157.15^min - 374.73^max) MB/s -55%
4k q32 t16 write
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2314 (2299.73^min - 2313.93^max) MB/s +524%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=199, last 2 years)	2152 MB/s +480%
Average ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4 (371 - 2539, n=2)	1455 MB/s +292%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD	1289 (1244.18^min - 1288.59^max) MB/s +247%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	1061 (62.92^min - 1061.17^max) MB/s +186%
Gigabyte A5 X1 ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)	1043 (533.25^min - 1043.45^max) MB/s +181%
Gigabyte A5 K1 ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4	371 (358.18^min - 371.19^max) MB/s

AS SSD
Score Total
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=186, last 2 years)	6843 Points +57%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	6117 Points +40%
Gigabyte A5 K1 ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4	4356 Points
Average ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4 (3660 - 4356, n=2)	4008 Points -8%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD	3300 Points -24%
Gigabyte A5 X1 ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)	2793 Points -36%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	2499 Points -43%
Score Read
Average of class Gaming (760 - 4721, n=186, last 2 years)	2508 Points +80%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2291 Points +64%
Average ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4 (1394 - 1675, n=2)	1535 Points +10%
Gigabyte A5 K1 ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4	1394 Points
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD	1157 Points -17%
Gigabyte A5 X1 ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)	1057 Points -24%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	841 Points -40%
Score Write
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=186, last 2 years)	3120 Points +35%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2660 Points +15%
Gigabyte A5 K1 ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4	2305 Points
Average ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4 (1195 - 2305, n=2)	1750 Points -24%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD	1546 Points -33%
Gigabyte A5 X1 ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)	1274 Points -45%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	1251 Points -46%
Seq Read
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=186, last 2 years)	4963 MB/s +70%
Average ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4 (2926 - 4145, n=2)	3536 MB/s +21%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	3013 MB/s +3%
Gigabyte A5 K1 ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4	2926.3 MB/s
Gigabyte A5 X1 ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)	2873 MB/s -2%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD	2016 MB/s -31%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	1948 MB/s -33%
Seq Write
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=186, last 2 years)	3673 MB/s +114%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2768 MB/s +61%
Average ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4 (1720 - 2397, n=2)	2059 MB/s +20%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD	1830 MB/s +6%
Gigabyte A5 K1 ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4	1720.18 MB/s
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	1094 MB/s -36%
Gigabyte A5 X1 ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)	1017 MB/s -41%
4K Read
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	66.9 MB/s +62%
Average of class Gaming (30.4 - 112.1, n=186, last 2 years)	66.9 MB/s +62%
Average ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4 (41.3 - 80.8, n=2)	61 MB/s +48%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	60.58 MB/s +47%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD	55.2 MB/s +34%
Gigabyte A5 X1 ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)	53.9 MB/s +31%
Gigabyte A5 K1 ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4	41.27 MB/s
4K Write
Average of class Gaming (96.3 - 512, n=186, last 2 years)	211 MB/s +59%
Average ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4 (132.8 - 256, n=2)	194.4 MB/s +46%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	184.8 MB/s +39%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	145.7 MB/s +10%
Gigabyte A5 X1 ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)	140.2 MB/s +6%
Gigabyte A5 K1 ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4	132.8 MB/s
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD	127.7 MB/s -4%
4K-64 Read
Average of class Gaming (442 - 3475, n=186, last 2 years)	1939 MB/s +83%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	1923 MB/s +81%
Average ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4 (1060 - 1179, n=2)	1119 MB/s +6%
Gigabyte A5 K1 ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4	1059.75 MB/s
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD	901 MB/s -15%
Gigabyte A5 X1 ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)	716 MB/s -32%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	585.23 MB/s -45%
4K-64 Write
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=186, last 2 years)	2544 MB/s +27%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2198 MB/s +10%
Gigabyte A5 K1 ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4	2000.37 MB/s
Average ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4 (700 - 2000, n=2)	1350 MB/s -33%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD	1235 MB/s -38%
Gigabyte A5 X1 ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)	1032 MB/s -48%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	995.52 MB/s -50%
Access Time Read
Average ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4 (0.072 - 0.109, n=2)	0.0905 ms * -26%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD	0.087 ms * -21%
Gigabyte A5 X1 ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)	0.077 ms * -7%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	0.077 ms * -7%
Gigabyte A5 K1 ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4	0.072 ms *
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=184, last 2 years)	0.05343 ms * +26%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	0.03 ms * +58%
Access Time Write
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	0.081 ms * -189%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=186, last 2 years)	0.04639 ms * -66%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	0.039 ms * -39%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD	0.032 ms * -14%
Gigabyte A5 K1 ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4	0.028 ms *
Gigabyte A5 X1 ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)	0.027 ms * +4%
Average ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4 (0.015 - 0.028, n=2)	0.0215 ms * +23%

* ... smaller is better

Read continuous power: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Gigabyte A5 K1: Ø2870 (226.84-3474.56)

图形卡

GeForce RTX 3060是一个基于Nvidia安培架构的光线追踪GPU。DirectX 12模型有3840个着色器单元，尽管性能在很大程度上取决于TGP设置。技嘉为RTX 3060选择了一个非常高的数值，最大功率为130瓦，这在基准测试结果中也可以看到。这些结果比之前确定的3060的平均值几乎好10%。另一方面，RTX 3070在GPU部分的速度约为20%。内存配置已经不太符合要求了。6GB的VRAM在要求高的游戏中已经达到了极限--至少在更高的分辨率和设置下是这样。热情的游戏玩家至少应该使用8GB的GPU。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	100 pt
Gigabyte A5 X1 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	89.1 pt
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE ^-1! AMD Radeon RX 6600M	76.9 pt
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	74.8 pt
Gigabyte A5 K1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	70.3 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	66.1 pt
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Radeon RX 6600M	61 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72070, n=232, last 2 years)	40487 Points +43%
Gigabyte A5 X1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	35787 Points +27%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE AMD Radeon RX 6600M	31702 Points +12%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	30772 Points +9%
Gigabyte A5 K1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	28278 Points
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Radeon RX 6600M	27030 Points -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (13799 - 30772, n=43)	26816 Points -5%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=236, last 2 years)	29457 Points +38%
Gigabyte A5 X1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	26713 Points +25%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE AMD Radeon RX 6600M	24788 Points +16%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	22915 Points +7%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Radeon RX 6600M	21876 Points +3%
Gigabyte A5 K1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	21341 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (16354 - 23109, n=49)	20436 Points -4%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22547, n=234, last 2 years)	12066 Points +38%
Gigabyte A5 X1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	10648 Points +21%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	9174 Points +5%
Gigabyte A5 K1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	8766 Points
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE AMD Radeon RX 6600M	8234 Points -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (6285 - 9235, n=49)	8057 Points -8%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Radeon RX 6600M	7200 Points -18%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming (280 - 14457, n=155, last 2 years)	7720 Points +51%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	5350 Points +5%
Gigabyte A5 K1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	5118 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (3724 - 5399, n=25)	4791 Points -6%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Radeon RX 6600M	3349 Points -35%

3DMark 11 Performance		22909 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		44621 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		19308 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		8551 points
Help

... in comparison

游戏性能

在1,920 x 1,080的原生分辨率下，A5 K1可以非常流畅地运行几乎所有当前的游戏，并具有高到最大的细节。超过60FPS不是例外，而是规则，这对144Hz的屏幕有利。

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming (17.5 - 449, n=166, last 2 years)	220 fps +44%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H	186.8 (175^min) fps +22%
Gigabyte A5 X1 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX	171 (44.9^min, 70.4^P0.1, 112^P1) fps +12%
Gigabyte A5 K1 GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H	153 (127^min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (81 - 186.8, n=41)	144.8 fps -5%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE Radeon RX 6600M, R5 5600H	141 (8.84^min, 64.6^P0.1, 114^P1) fps -8%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H	133 (114^min, 114^P1) fps -13%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=226, last 2 years)	117.1 fps +49%
Gigabyte A5 X1 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX	101 (44^min, 47.1^P0.1, 70.8^P1) fps +28%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H	91.5 (87^min) fps +16%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE Radeon RX 6600M, R5 5600H	81.3 (9.27^min, 52.3^P0.1, 66.2^P1) fps +3%
Gigabyte A5 K1 GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H	78.8 (68^min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (58.2 - 91.5, n=48)	76.9 fps -2%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H	75.4 (64^min, 64.6^P1) fps -4%

与CPU循环类似，在长期测试中（60分钟），显卡也出现了一些问题。的Witcher 3)并没有显示出任何异常。GeForce RTX 3060以稳定的帧率运行。

Witcher 3 FPS-Diagram

Gigabyte A5 K1 R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU: Ø77.6 (67-81)

Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU: Ø84.6 (73-90)

Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE R5 5600H, Radeon RX 6600M: Ø85.3 (70.433-114.9)

MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 R7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M: Ø74.6 (40-80)

Gigabyte A5 X1 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU: Ø95.5 (89-99)

	low	med.	high	ultra
GTA V (2015)			154.2	91.4
The Witcher 3 (2015)			153	78.8
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	143.1	129.6	123.1	115.4
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)			84.8
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	99.1	84.1	69.6
Strange Brigade (2018)			172.9	149.1
God of War (2022)			74	52.8
Rainbow Six Extraction (2022)			155	125
Dying Light 2 (2022)			64.4
Elden Ring (2022)			60	60
Elex 2 (2022)			73	68.9
Ghostwire Tokyo (2022)			126	124
Vampire Bloodhunt (2022)			157	152
F1 22 (2022)			135	53
The Quarry (2022)			82.7	66.4

排放

噪声排放

正如预期的那样，RTX 3060的高TGP是以噪音发展为代价的。当使用性能模式时，这台15英寸的机器在负载下达到了非常高的56至58 dB(A)。这是一个令人讨厌的响亮水平，迫使人们使用耳机，尽管一些竞争对手也会有类似的响亮--尽管这些对手提供更薄的机箱。Clevo裸机在闲置模式和简单的任务（如办公、视频和网络）中通常要接受很多批评。然而，A5 K1在这里给人以积极的惊喜，因为风扇部分不活动，而且启动阶段的频率和强度按Clevo的标准是有限的。然而，潜在的噪音是该设备的弱点之一。

Noise Level

Idle		26 / 29 / 32 dB(A)
Load		57 / 58 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 26 dB(A)

	Gigabyte A5 K1 R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE R5 5600H, Radeon RX 6600M	MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 R7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M	Gigabyte A5 X1 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Noise		14%	6%	1%	0%
off / environment *	26	23.2 11%	25 4%	25.49 2%	25 4%
Idle Minimum *	26	23.6 9%	25 4%	29.57 -14%	27 -4%
Idle Average *	29	23.6 19%	25 14%	29.57 -2%	29 -0%
Idle Maximum *	32	25.4 21%	34.5 -8%	29.57 8%	32 -0%
Load Average *	57	38 33%	51.1 10%	48.61 15%	57 -0%
Witcher 3 ultra *	56	54.1 3%		59 -5%	56 -0%
Load Maximum *	58	57.2 1%	51.3 12%	57.66 1%	58 -0%

* ... smaller is better

温度

A5 K1的温度发展也并不出色--尽管它的高度很慷慨。满载60分钟后，上侧最高温度为50℃（122°F），下侧最高温度为51℃（123.8°F），比许多具有类似设备的更薄的笔记本电脑还要高。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


45 °C	46 °C	50 °C
45 °C	46 °C	43 °C
41 °C	44 °C	38 °C

Maximum: 50 °C
Average: 44.2 °C


50 °C	41 °C	51 °C
44 °C	37 °C	48 °C
33 °C	36 °C	41 °C

Maximum: 51 °C
Average: 42.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 56 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


27 °C	28 °C	28 °C
28 °C	28 °C	27 °C
30 °C	29 °C	26 °C

Maximum: 30 °C
Average: 27.9 °C


28 °C	28 °C	29 °C
29 °C	28 °C	30 °C
29 °C	30 °C	33 °C

Maximum: 33 °C
Average: 29.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 33 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


43 °C	43 °C	49 °C
44 °C	47 °C	42 °C
39 °C	44 °C	33 °C

Maximum: 49 °C
Average: 42.7 °C


51 °C	40 °C	45 °C
44 °C	36 °C	46 °C
34 °C	36 °C	39 °C

Maximum: 51 °C
Average: 41.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 57 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 44 °C / 111.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-15.1 °C / -27.2 F).

	Gigabyte A5 K1 R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE R5 5600H, Radeon RX 6600M	MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 R7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M	Gigabyte A5 X1 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Heat		-8%	6%	4%	6%
Maximum Upper Side *	50	44.4 11%	39.9 20%	44.4 11%	47 6%
Maximum Bottom *	51	48.8 4%	43.8 14%	48.6 5%	51 -0%
Idle Upper Side *	30	37.8 -26%	34.1 -14%	31.2 -4%	27 10%
Idle Bottom *	33	39.6 -20%	31.7 4%	32.2 2%	30 9%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

机箱内的情况不一定更好。尽管在用FurMark和Prime95工具进行压力测试时，CPU和GPU没有节流，这不是一个问题，但Ryzen 5 5600H的最高温度为98℃（208.4°F），GeForce RTX 3060的最高温度为88℃（190.4°F）（数据来自HWMonitor工具），这是一个边界线。

演讲者

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Gigabyte A5 K1 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理

能源消耗

由于图形切换（Nvidia 优化)，这款笔记本电脑在空闲模式下相当节俭，只有10到17瓦的功率。在负载情况下，我们可以从这台15英寸的笔记本电脑中哄骗出113到245瓦，这对于所安装的硬件和提供的性能来说是一个典型的消耗。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.5 / 1.2 Watt
Idle	10 / 12 / 17 Watt
Load	113 / 245 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Gigabyte A5 K1 R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE R5 5600H, Radeon RX 6600M	MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 R7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M	Gigabyte A5 X1 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		1%	-6%	18%	-5%	-31%
Idle Minimum *	10	6.3 37%	10 -0%	9.1 9%	10 -0%	13.8 ?(2 - 64, n=179, last 2 years) -38%
Idle Average *	12	9.8 18%	13.2 -10%	14.61 -22%	12 -0%	19.2 ?(8 - 67, n=179, last 2 years) -60%
Idle Maximum *	17	26.5 -56%	15.6 8%	15.05 11%	16 6%	27 ?(9 - 101.1, n=179, last 2 years) -59%
Load Average *	113	103.8 8%	178 -58%	77.8 31%	124 -10%	111.3 ?(32.1 - 202, n=178, last 2 years) 2%
Witcher 3 ultra *	181.4	189 -4%	181 -0%	131 28%	204 -12%
Load Maximum *	245	241.9 1%	180 27%	114.42 53%	272 -11%	251 ?(64.5 - 418, n=177, last 2 years) -2%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption - The Witcher 3 / Stresstest

Gigabyte A5 K1; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø181.4 (175-195.7)

Gigabyte A5 K1; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø217 (205-229)

Power consumption with external monitor

Gigabyte A5 K1; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø104.2 (100-108)

Gigabyte A5 K1; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø106.2 (92.7-126.3)

Gigabyte A5 K1; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø165.5 (159.8-188.5)

Gigabyte A5 K1; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø171.7 (168.7-182.5)

电池寿命

电池寿命与更昂贵的兄弟相差无几。通过WLAN上网的时间不到7小时（显示亮度降低到150cd/m²），只被一些竞争对手打败。然而，这些产品还提供更大的电池（80多瓦特，而不是49瓦特）。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing

6h 54min

	Gigabyte A5 K1 R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 48.96 Wh	Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH6A-82NW0010GE R5 5600H, Radeon RX 6600M, 80 Wh	MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 R7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, 90 Wh	Gigabyte A5 X1 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 48.96 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-31%	33%	27%	-8%	-11%
WiFi v1.3	414	285 -31%	552 33%	524 27%	381 -8%	368 ?(57 - 745, n=181, last 2 years) -11%
Reader / Idle		947	770	740	604	544 ?(57 - 1290, n=83, last 2 years)
Load		66	118	90	77	84.2 ?(36 - 173, n=143, last 2 years)
H.264				587	435	399 ?(56 - 747, n=92, last 2 years)
Witcher 3 ultra				115		80.6 ?(47 - 155, n=23, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 良好的价格-性能比

+ 多达三个大容量存储设备

+ 可从外部接触电池

+ 144赫兹面板

+ 快速的WLAN

Cons

- 表面相当摇晃，看起来很便宜

- 负载下的高排放（性能模式）。

- 相对于机箱的厚度来说，冷却效果不佳

- 扬声器可以做得更好

- 没有读卡器

判决书

如果忽略价格，技嘉A5 K1在与同样快速的15英寸竞争产品的竞争中很难胜出。除了3D模式（性能模式）下的巨大噪音外，组件的高温发展也应该在缺点上提及。尽管外壳相对较厚，但笔记本电脑在负载下变得非常温暖和响亮，这并不能完全说明冷却系统的作用。

说到机箱。机箱在质量方面并没有特别好的表现。塑料表面看起来相当便宜，而且还容易发出响声。在大多数其他方面--无论是输入设备、屏幕、连接性还是电池运行时间--技嘉笔记本电脑都相当不出众，无论是正面还是负面，都没有在人群中脱颖而出。

然而，那些主要关注性价比的人将通过A5 K1获得一个相当不错的报价。

大多数低于1000欧元（约993美元）的游戏笔记本要么速度较慢，要么不得不使用较差的显示屏（关键词：色彩空间）。

价格和可用性

评论的技嘉A5 K1配备Ryzen 5 5600H，GeForce RTX 3060，16GB内存和512GB固态硬盘，在各种网上商店（例如Notebooksbilliger）的售价约为900欧元（约894美元）。).

Gigabyte A5 K1 - 2022-09-01 09/01/2022 v7
Florian Glaser

Chassis

74 / 98 → 76%

Keyboard

79%

Pointing Device

78%

Connectivity

60 / 80 → 75%

Weight

62 / 10-66 → 93%

Battery

74 / 95 → 77%

Display

84%

Games Performance

96%

Application Performance

94%

Temperature

80 / 95 → 84%

Noise

59 / 90 → 66%

Audio

72%

Camera

38 / 85 → 45%

Average

73%

82%

Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 389263 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Gigabyte A5 K1评测。老式的游戏笔记本

Florian Glaser, 2022-09- 7 (Update: 2022-09- 7)

Gigabyte A5 K1评测。老式的游戏笔记本

潜在的竞争对手比较

尺寸比较

沟通

网络摄像头

显示

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

权力

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi Endurance test

系统性能

DPC延迟

大容量存储

Read continuous power: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

游戏性能

Witcher 3 FPS-Diagram

排放

噪声排放

温度

压力测试

演讲者

Gigabyte A5 K1 audio analysis

Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM audio analysis

电源管理

能源消耗

Power consumption - The Witcher 3 / Stresstest

Power consumption with external monitor

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

判决书

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare